DOCSLIB.ORG

Author Index

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Author Index Page numbers in italics refer to the references Abbott LK, Robson AD 332, Ahmadjian V, Heikkilii H Albuzio A, see Passera C 78, 363 424, 458 132 Abd-el-Malek Y 359, 363 Ahmadjian V, Jacobs JB 424, Alexander GV, see Wallace A Abdulkadir S, see Akkermans 435,458 523, 535 ADL 338,363 Ahrland S, Chatt J, Davies Alexander M 168,171,189 Abe M, see Higashi S 312, NR 246,289 Alexander M, see Chao W-L 375 Aitken DM, Brown AD 142, 328,368 Abede B, see Bezdicek DF 143, 152, 153, 154, 159 Alexander M, see Labeda DP 307, 331, 361, 366 Aitken DM, Wicken AJ, 194 Abel K, see Olafson RW 282, Brown AD 151, 153, 159 Alexander M, see Lennox LB 296 Akagi H, see Kudo A 287, 331, 378 Abrahamson WG, see Hart­ 294 Alexander M, see Pena-Ca­ nett DC 662, 675 Akitt JW, Greenwood NN, briales JJ 328, 382 Ackerman M, see Neumann D Khandelwal BL, Lester GD Alexander M, see Ramirez C von 343,380 256,289 328,383 Adams DO, Yang SF 273, Akkermans ADL 336, 342, Alexander V 344, 353, 363 289 363 Alexander V, Billington M, Adams DO, see You YB 568, Akkermans ADL, Abdulkadir Schell DM 344, 345, 346, 622 S, Trinick MJ 338, 363 348, 353, 363 Adams F, Wear JI 262,289 Akkermans ADL, Houwers Alexander V, Kallio P 346, Adams MS 444, 449, 458 A 333,363 363 Adams MS, see Eickmeier Akkermans ADL, Roelofsen Alexander V, Schell DM 347, WC 447,460 W, Blom J 335, 336, 363 353,364 Adams MS, see Lechowicz Akkermans ADL, see Roelof­ Alexander V, see Schell DM MJ 442,444,450, 451, 464 sen W 335, 384 344, 348, 385 Adams MS, see Peet MM Akman Y, see Brooks RR Alfonsus EC 588, 611 447, 449, 465 270,290 Alimagno BV, Yoshida T Adams RM, see Dodson CH Aktas M, see Egmond F van 353,364 579, 591, 613 230,237 Alimagno BV, see Watanabe Adamson RS, see Tansley Alberda TH 669, 673 I 353, 389 AG 670,677 Albers F, see Dorr I 528, 532 Allen EK, see Allen ON 308, Addicott FT 569,611 Albert R, Kinzel H 45, 54, 309,364 Addy ND, see Mattson WJ 223, 236 Allen LD, see Dunigan EP 668,676 Albert R, Konigshofer H, Kin­ 332, 371 Adeoye KB, see Odu CTI zel H 224, 236 Allen MD, see Jeffree EP 171, 196 Albert R, Popp M 45, 54, 97, 562,616 Agarwala SC, Bisht SS, 125 Allen ON, Allen EK 308, Sharma C 264, 289 Albert R, see Konigshofer H 309,364 Agricola G 248, 289 224,240 Allen WR, Sheppard PM Ahmad I, see Stewart GR 49, Albert WB 667,673 251, 252, 255,281, 289 50, 58, 69, 134 Albrecht SL, Maier RJ, Hanus Allison FE 166, 189, 322, 364 Ahmad N, see Leigh RA 47, FJ, Russel SA, Emerich Allred AL 247, 289 49, 56 DW, Evans HJ 315,363 Alpert PH, see Schmid R Ahmad N, see Wyn Jones Albrecht SL, Okon Y, Lonn- 571, 619 RG 47,49,58 quist J, Burris RH 351, 363 Amagase S 508, 513 Ahmadjian V 424, 425, 435, Albrecht SL, see Okon Y Amagase S, Mori M, Na­ 444,458 349, 381 kayama S 508, 512,513 712 Author Index Amagase S, Nakayama S, Tsu­ Andrew CS, Hogarty MP Arditti J, Hogan NM, Chad­ gita A 508, 513 263,290 wick AV 568, 612 Amagase S, see Nakayama S Andrew CS, Johnson AD, Arditti JP 562,611 508,516 Sandland RL 213, 236 Arias JR, see Prance GT 566, Amar L, Reinhold L 8, 28 Andrew WD, see Greenway 584,619 Ambler JE, Brown JC, Gauch H 324,374 Arisz WH 17,28 HG 264,289 Andrews RE, Newman EI Ariyaratne WA, see Waidy­ Ambler JE, see Brown JC, 181, 189, 689, 690, 703, 706 anatha UPS 332, 389, 406, 421 272, 290 Andrews RE, see Newman EI Armbruster WS, Webster GL Amelunxen F, Arbeiter H 690,708 591, 592, 612 579,611 Aneshansley D, see Thompson Armiger WH, see Foy CD Ammer D, Budry R, Lerch K WR 577,621 253, 260, 292 282,289 Angle JS, Pugashetti BK, Wa­ Armiger WH, see Reid DA Anders F 661, 673 gner GH 330, 364 253,297 Anderson AJ, Meyer DR, Angulo AF, Dijk C van, Qui­ Armstrong CE 150,159 Mayer FK 269, 289 spel A 333, 364 Armstrong MJ, see Kirkby Anderson AJ, see Possingham Anon 352, 364 EA 185,193 JV 317,383 Ansari AQ, Bowling DJF Armstrong RA 443, 454, 455, Anderson DJ 693, 705 179,189 456,458 Anderson DJ, see Osmond Ansari AQ, see Bowling DJF Armstrong W 263, 290 CB, 104, 119, 120, 132 107,126 Arnold CG 567,612 Anderson GJ 572, 596, Ansiaux JR 522,531 Arnold DJ, see Mosse B 396, 611 Antoniw JF, Ritter CE, Pier­ 418 Anderson IC, see Damirgi point WS, Loon LC van Arnold F 451,459 SM 330,369 540,555 Arp DJ, see Benson DR 335, Anderson IC, see Ham GE Antoniw LD, Sprent JI 319, 365 330,374 364 Arya LM, Blake GR, Farrell Anderson IC, see Tanner JW Antonovics J, see Wu L 300 DA 692,706 325,387 Antonovics JA, Bradshaw AD, Ashby WC, Beadle NCW 98, Anderson JW 316,364 Turner RG 249, 253, 264, 125 Anderson JW, see Chandler 288,290 Ashley CC, see Williamson GE 493, 495, 496, 508, 512, Antoun H, Bordeleau LM, RE 225,244 513,514 Gagnon C, Lachance RA Ashton FM 519, 531 Anderson MC 686, 705 328,364 Ashton PJ 341, 342, 364 Anderson OE, Boswell FC Aparicio-Tejo PM, Sanchez­ Ashton PJ, Walmsley RD 189 Diaz MF, Pena JI 320, 341,364 Anderson OE, Boswell FC, 364 Atabekov JG 539, 555 Harrison RM 174,189 Apelt G 474, 485 Atamian S, see Freund H Anderson RD, Weser U 283, Aplin PS, Hill DJ 455, 456, 268,292 289 458 Athar M, Mahmood A 338, Anderson RM, May RM 539, Applebaum SW 649, 653 364 555 . Applebaum SW, Guez M Atkins CA, Rainbird R, Pate Anderson RM, see May RM 648,653 JS 314,364 539,557 Applebaum SW, Tadmor U, Atkins CA, see Herridge DF Anderson WP 21,28 Podoler H 648, 653 314,375 Anderson WP, Hendrix DL, Appleby CA, see Bergersen Atkins CA, see Pate JS 315, Higinbotham N 11,28 FJ 304, 313, 365 382 Anderson WP, House CR Appleby CA, see Coventry Atkinson AW, John PCL, 107, 125 DR 305,369 Gunning BES 65,66,125 Anderson WP, Willcocks DA, Applewhite TH, see Ordin L Atkinson MR, Findlay GP, Wright BJ 11, 28 42,57 Hope AB, Pitman MG, Anderson WP, see Kramer D Apte SK, see David KAV Saddler HDW, West KR 10, 30, 109, 130 349,370 110, 111, 125 Anderson WW, see Levin DA Arbeiter H, see Amelunxen F Atsatt PR 521, 523, 528, 530, 697,708 579,611 531 Andrejeff VN 599, 611 Arditti J, Flick BH 567, 568, Atsatt PR, Guldberg LD 529, Andrew CS 323, 364 612 531 Author Index 713 Atsatt PR, Hansen 1M 528, Bagyaraj DJ, Menge JA 406, Baltruschat H, Sikora RA, 531 410,411 Schiinbeck F 407,411 Atsatt PR, Hearn TF, Nelson Bailey WJ, see Dixon KW Banfield J, see Leigh RA 47, RL, Heineman RT 528, 496, 510, 514 56 531 Baker AJM 267,290 Bangham AD, Papahadjopou­ Atsatt PR, O'Dowd DJ 672, Baker D, Kidd OH, Torrey los D 80,125 673 10 334, 335, 365 Bannikova VA, see Ponomarev Atsatt PR, Strong DR 523, Baker D, Torrey JO 334, AN 597, 600, 619 531 364 Bannister P, Norton WM Atsatt PR, see Heineman R T Baker D, Torrey JO, Kidd 401,411 523,532 OH 334,365 Bar Shalom (Bogoslavsky) D, Attoe OJ, see Oraven EH Baker DA, Hall JL, Thorpe see Oalil J 567, 569, 615 213,238 JR 594,612 Baranowska H, Ejchart A, Pu­ Aufsess A von 581, 582, 612 Baker DA, Malek F, Didhevar trament A 262, 290 Auger S, Verma DPS 311, F 19,28 Baranowska H, see Putrament 364 Baker DA, see Minchin FR A 262,297 Aulitzky H 410, 411 227,241 Barber DA, see Benians OJ Auquier P, see Lambinon J Baker HO 585, 600, 601, 602, 397,412 281,294 603,604,612 Barber DA, see Russell R Austenfeld FA 183,189 Baker HO, Baker I 595,597, 109,133 Ausubel FM, see Ruvkun OB 602, 603, 604, 612, 623 Barber J, see Shieh YJ 68, 133 311,385 Baker HO, Cruden W, Baker Barber JT 490,514 A vron M, see Ben-Amotz A I 565, 594, 612 Barber LE 327, 365 74, 126 Baker HO, Opler PA, Baker Barber LE, Russell SA, Evans Awonaike KO, Lea PJ, Day I 624 HJ 351,365 JM, Roughley RJ, Millin Baker HO, see Baker I 602, Barber SA, see Raper CD BJ 326,364 612 694,709 Awramik SM 657,673 Baker I, Baker HO 602,612 Barea JM, Azcon R, Hayman Ayanaba A, Omayuli APO Baker I, see Baker HO 565, DS 406,411 171, 189 594, 595, 597, 602, 603, 604, Barea JM, Brown ME 351, Ayanaba A, see Islam R 332, 612,623,624 365 376 Baker PF 543, 555 Barea JM, see Azcon-Aguilar Azcon R, see Barea JM 406, Bakshi BK, see Oerdemann C 332,364 411 JW 408,414 Barham RO, Marx DH, Azcon-Aguilar C, Barea JM Bal AK, see Verma DPS 313, Ruehle JL 404,407,411 332,364 388 Barker AV, see Maynard DN Balch WE, see Fox OE 149, 188,195 160 Barker H, Harrison BD 541, Baalen C van, see Batterton Bald JO, Samuel 0 543, 555 555 JC 62, 67, 84, 125 Bald JO, Tinsley TW 539, Barker KR, Husingh D, John­ Baalen C van, Hoare DS, 555 ston SA 331, 365 Brandt E 354, 364 Baldini VLD, Diibereiner J Barkley WK, see Ounning Baas-Becking LOM 353, 364 350,365 BES 669,675 Bache BW, Sharp OS 256, Baldwin IL, see Fred EB 309, Barlow BA, Wiens D 529, 257,290 372 531 Bachmann E 443, 459 Baldwin JP 684, 702, 706 Barlow EWR, Baeroma L, Bacon JSD, see Palmer MJ Ball E, see Liittge U 23,31, Young JL 45, 55 232,242 44,57 Barlow EWR, see Munns R Baddeley MS, Ferry BW, Fi­ Ball NO 566, 612 47,57 negan EJ 452, 453, 459 Balotin NM, DiPalma JR Barnes DJ, see Crossland CJ Baeroma L, see Barlow EWR 498,513 347,369 45,55 BaItensperger AA, Schank SC, Barnes DK, see Peterson MA Baglioni C, see Weber LA 49, Smith RL, Littell RC, Bou­ 310,382 58 ton JH, Dudeck AE 351, Barnes DK, see Viands DR Bagnall OJ, Wolfe JA 7,28 365 310,388 Bagyaraj DJ, Manjunath A, Baltruschat H, Schiinbeck F Barnes RL, Naylor A W 400, Patil RB 332, 364 405,411 411 714 Author Index Barnet Y 328, 365 Beattie DJ, see Marx DH Bentrup FW 498, 500, 502, Barnet YM, see Evans J 328, 403,416 514 372 Beck JV, see Bryner LC 281, Bentrup FW, see Felle H 19, Barnett NM, see Casterline 291 29 JL 274, 282, 291 Becker VE, Reeder J, Stetler Bequaert J 671,673 Bar-Nun N, Poljakoff-Mayber R 457,459 Berezovskii KK, see Klima­ A 65,125 Becking JH 333, 334, 338, shevskii EL 261, 294 Barrett JA 542, 555 343, 359, 360, 365 Berg EHR van den 310,365 Barrios S, see Torrey JG 304, Becquerel P 571,
Recommended publications
  • Seed Ecology Iii

    Seed Ecology Iii

    SEED ECOLOGY III The Third International Society for Seed Science Meeting on Seeds and the Environment “Seeds and Change” Conference Proceedings June 20 to June 24, 2010 Salt Lake City, Utah, USA Editors: R. Pendleton, S. Meyer, B. Schultz Proceedings of the Seed Ecology III Conference Preface Extended abstracts included in this proceedings will be made available online. Enquiries and requests for hardcopies of this volume should be sent to: Dr. Rosemary Pendleton USFS Rocky Mountain Research Station Albuquerque Forestry Sciences Laboratory 333 Broadway SE Suite 115 Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA 87102-3497 The extended abstracts in this proceedings were edited for clarity. Seed Ecology III logo designed by Bitsy Schultz. i June 2010, Salt Lake City, Utah Proceedings of the Seed Ecology III Conference Table of Contents Germination Ecology of Dry Sandy Grassland Species along a pH-Gradient Simulated by Different Aluminium Concentrations.....................................................................................................................1 M Abedi, M Bartelheimer, Ralph Krall and Peter Poschlod Induction and Release of Secondary Dormancy under Field Conditions in Bromus tectorum.......................2 PS Allen, SE Meyer, and K Foote Seedling Production for Purposes of Biodiversity Restoration in the Brazilian Cerrado Region Can Be Greatly Enhanced by Seed Pretreatments Derived from Seed Technology......................................................4 S Anese, GCM Soares, ACB Matos, DAB Pinto, EAA da Silva, and HWM Hilhorst
  • Specialist Foragers in Forest Bee Communities Are Small, Social Or Emerge Early

    Specialist Foragers in Forest Bee Communities Are Small, Social Or Emerge Early

    Received: 5 November 2018 | Accepted: 2 April 2019 DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.13003 RESEARCH ARTICLE Specialist foragers in forest bee communities are small, social or emerge early Colleen Smith1,2 | Lucia Weinman1,2 | Jason Gibbs3 | Rachael Winfree2 1GraDuate Program in Ecology & Evolution, Rutgers University, New Abstract Brunswick, New Jersey 1. InDiviDual pollinators that specialize on one plant species within a foraging bout 2 Department of Ecology, Evolution, and transfer more conspecific and less heterospecific pollen, positively affecting plant Natural Resources, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey reproDuction. However, we know much less about pollinator specialization at the 3Department of Entomology, University of scale of a foraging bout compared to specialization by pollinator species. Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, CanaDa 2. In this stuDy, we measured the Diversity of pollen carried by inDiviDual bees forag- Correspondence ing in forest plant communities in the miD-Atlantic United States. Colleen Smith Email: [email protected] 3. We found that inDiviDuals frequently carried low-Diversity pollen loaDs, suggest- ing that specialization at the scale of the foraging bout is common. InDiviDuals of Funding information Xerces Society for Invertebrate solitary bee species carried higher Diversity pollen loaDs than Did inDiviDuals of Conservation; Natural Resources social bee species; the latter have been better stuDied with respect to foraging Conservation Service; GarDen Club of America bout specialization, but account for a small minority of the worlD’s bee species. Bee boDy size was positively correlated with pollen load Diversity, and inDiviDuals HanDling EDitor: Julian Resasco of polylectic (but not oligolectic) species carried increasingly Diverse pollen loaDs as the season progresseD, likely reflecting an increase in the Diversity of flowers in bloom.
  • Guidelines for Determining Significance and Report Format and Content Requirements

    Guidelines for Determining Significance and Report Format and Content Requirements

    COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING SIGNIFICANCE AND REPORT FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENT GROUP Department of Planning and Land Use Department of Public Works Fourth Revision September 15, 2010 APPROVAL I hereby certify that these Guidelines for Determining Significance for Biological Resources, Report Format and Content Requirements for Biological Resources, and Report Format and Content Requirements for Resource Management Plans are a part of the County of San Diego, Land Use and Environment Group's Guidelines for Determining Significance and Technical Report Format and Content Requirements and were considered by the Director of Planning and Land Use, in coordination with the Director of Public Works on September 15, 2O1O. ERIC GIBSON Director of Planning and Land Use SNYDER I hereby certify that these Guidelines for Determining Significance for Biological Resources, Report Format and Content Requirements for Biological Resources, and Report Format and Content Requirements for Resource Management Plans are a part of the County of San Diego, Land Use and Environment Group's Guidelines for Determining Significance and Technical Report Format and Content Requirements and have hereby been approved by the Deputy Chief Administrative Officer (DCAO) of the Land Use and Environment Group on the fifteenth day of September, 2010. The Director of Planning and Land Use is authorized to approve revisions to these Guidelines for Determining Significance for Biological Resources and Report Format and Content Requirements for Biological Resources and Resource Management Plans except any revisions to the Guidelines for Determining Significance presented in Section 4.0 must be approved by the Deputy CAO.
  • The Potential Conservation Value of Unmowed Powerline Strips for Native Bees

    The Potential Conservation Value of Unmowed Powerline Strips for Native Bees

    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION Biological Conservation 124 (2005) 133–148 www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon The potential conservation value of unmowed powerline strips for native bees K.N. Russell a,*, H. Ikerd b, S. Droege c a Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West, 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, USA b Bee Biology and Systematics Laboratory, Utah State University, 5310 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322-5310, USA c USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, 12100 Beech Forest, Laurel, MD 20708-4083, USA Received 17 February 2004 Abstract The land area covered by powerline easements in the United States exceeds the area of almost all national parks, including Yel- lowstone. In parts of Europe and the US, electric companies have altered their land management practices from periodic mowing to extraction of tall vegetation combined with the use of selective herbicides. To investigate whether this alternate management practice might produce higher quality habitat for native bees, we compared the bee fauna collected in unmowed powerline corridors and in nearby mowed grassy fields at the Patuxent Wildlife Research Center (MD). Powerline sites had more spatially and numerically rare species and a richer bee community than the grassy fields, although the difference was less pronounced than we expected. Powerline sites also had more parasitic species and more cavity-nesting bees. Bee communities changed progressively through the season, but differences between the site types were persistent. The surrounding, non-grassland landscape likely has a strong influence on the bee species collected at the grassland sites, as some bees may be foraging in the grasslands but nesting elsewhere.
  • Wild Bee Declines and Changes in Plant-Pollinator Networks Over 125 Years Revealed Through Museum Collections

    Wild Bee Declines and Changes in Plant-Pollinator Networks Over 125 Years Revealed Through Museum Collections

    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Master's Theses and Capstones Student Scholarship Spring 2018 WILD BEE DECLINES AND CHANGES IN PLANT-POLLINATOR NETWORKS OVER 125 YEARS REVEALED THROUGH MUSEUM COLLECTIONS Minna Mathiasson University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis Recommended Citation Mathiasson, Minna, "WILD BEE DECLINES AND CHANGES IN PLANT-POLLINATOR NETWORKS OVER 125 YEARS REVEALED THROUGH MUSEUM COLLECTIONS" (2018). Master's Theses and Capstones. 1192. https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis/1192 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses and Capstones by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WILD BEE DECLINES AND CHANGES IN PLANT-POLLINATOR NETWORKS OVER 125 YEARS REVEALED THROUGH MUSEUM COLLECTIONS BY MINNA ELIZABETH MATHIASSON BS Botany, University of Maine, 2013 THESIS Submitted to the University of New Hampshire in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Biological Sciences: Integrative and Organismal Biology May, 2018 This thesis has been examined and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biological Sciences: Integrative and Organismal Biology by: Dr. Sandra M. Rehan, Assistant Professor of Biology Dr. Carrie Hall, Assistant Professor of Biology Dr. Janet Sullivan, Adjunct Associate Professor of Biology On April 18, 2018 Original approval signatures are on file with the University of New Hampshire Graduate School.
  • Zootaxa, Halictophagus, Insecta, Strepsiptera, Halictophagidae

    Zootaxa, Halictophagus, Insecta, Strepsiptera, Halictophagidae

    Zootaxa 1056: 1–18 (2005) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA 1056 Copyright © 2005 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) A new species of Halictophagus (Insecta: Strepsiptera: Halicto- phagidae) from Texas, and a checklist of Strepsiptera from the United States and Canada JEYARANEY KATHIRITHAMBY1 & STEVEN J. TAYLOR2 1Department of Zoology, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, U.K. [email protected] 2Center for Biodiversity, Illinois Natural History Survey, 607 East Peabody Drive (MC-652), Champaign IL 61820-6970 U.S.A. [email protected] Correspondence: Jeyaraney Kathirithamby Department of Zoology, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, U.K.; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract A new species of Halictophagidae (Insecta: Strepsiptera), Halictophagus forthoodiensis Kathirith- amby & Taylor, is described from Texas, USA. We also present a key to 5 families, and a check-list of 11 genera and 84 species of Strepsiptera known from USA and Canada. Key words: Strepsiptera, Halictophagus, Texas, USA, Canada Introduction Five families and eighty three species of Strepsiptera have been recorded so far from USA and Canada of which thirteen are Halictophagus. Key to the families of adult male Strepsiptera found in USA and Canada 1. Mandibles absent..................................................................................... Corioxenidae – Mandibles present ........................................................................................................ 2 2. Legs with
  • Carnivorous Plant Newsletter V44 N4 December 2015

    Carnivorous Plant Newsletter V44 N4 December 2015

    Technical Refereed Contribution Soil pH values at sites of terrestrial carnivorous plants in south-west Europe Lubomír Adamec • Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences • Dukelská 135 • CZ-379 82 Trˇebonˇ • Czech Republic • [email protected] Keywords: Soil water pH, neutral soils, Pinguicula spp., Drosera intermedia, Drosophyllum lusitanicum. Abstract: Although the majority of terrestrial carnivorous plants grow in acidic soils at a pH of 3.5-5.5, there are many dozens of carnivorous species, mostly mountainous or rocky Pinguicula species, which grow preferen- tially or strictly in neutral or slightly alkaline soils at pHs between 7-8. Knowledge of an optimum soil pH value and an amplitude of this factor may be important not only for understanding the ecology of various species and their conservation, but also for successfully growing them. I report soil pH values at microsites of 15 terrestrial carnivorous plant species or subspecies in SW Europe. Introduction The majority of terrestrial carnivorous plants grow in wetlands such as peat bogs, fens, wet meadows, or wet clayish sands. The soils have usually low available mineral nutrient content (N, P, K, Ca, Mg), are hypoxic or anoxic and usually acidic (Juniper et al. 1989; Adamec 1997; Rice 2006). Unlike mineral nutritional character- istics of these soils, which have commonly been studied and related to carnivorous plant growth in the field or greenhouse experiments and which have also been published (for the review see Adamec 1997), relatively very little is known about the relationship between soil pH and growth of terrestrial carnivorous plants. Although some limited knowledge of soil pH at habitats of carnivorous plants or in typical substrates exist among botanists and growers (e.g., Roberts & Oosting 1958; Aldenius et al.
  • Unique Bee Communities Within Vacant Lots and Urban Farms Result from Variation in Surrounding Urbanization Intensity

    Unique Bee Communities Within Vacant Lots and Urban Farms Result from Variation in Surrounding Urbanization Intensity

    sustainability Article Unique Bee Communities within Vacant Lots and Urban Farms Result from Variation in Surrounding Urbanization Intensity Frances S. Sivakoff ID , Scott P. Prajzner and Mary M. Gardiner * ID Department of Entomology, The Ohio State University, 2021 Coffey Road, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; [email protected] (F.S.S.); [email protected] (S.P.P.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-330-601-6628 Received: 1 May 2018; Accepted: 5 June 2018; Published: 8 June 2018 Abstract: We investigated the relative importance of vacant lot and urban farm habitat features and their surrounding landscape context on bee community richness, abundance, composition, and resource use patterns. Three years of pan trap collections from 16 sites yielded a rich assemblage of bees from vacant lots and urban farms, with 98 species documented. We collected a greater bee abundance from vacant lots, and the two forms of greenspace supported significantly different bee communities. Plant–pollinator networks constructed from floral visitation observations revealed that, while the average number of bees utilizing available resources, niche breadth, and niche overlap were similar, the composition of floral resources and common foragers varied by habitat type. Finally, we found that the proportion of impervious surface and number of greenspace patches in the surrounding landscape strongly influenced bee assemblages. At a local scale (100 m radius), patch isolation appeared to limit colonization of vacant lots and urban farms. However, at a larger landscape scale (1000 m radius), increasing urbanization resulted in a greater concentration of bees utilizing vacant lots and urban farms, illustrating that maintaining greenspaces provides important habitat, even within highly developed landscapes.
  • Diversified Floral Resource Plantings Support Bee Communities After

    Diversified Floral Resource Plantings Support Bee Communities After

    www.nature.com/scientificreports Corrected: Publisher Correction OPEN Diversifed Floral Resource Plantings Support Bee Communities after Apple Bloom in Commercial Orchards Sarah Heller1,2,5,6, Neelendra K. Joshi1,2,3,6*, Timothy Leslie4, Edwin G. Rajotte2 & David J. Biddinger1,2* Natural habitats, comprised of various fowering plant species, provide food and nesting resources for pollinator species and other benefcial arthropods. Loss of such habitats in agricultural regions and in other human-modifed landscapes could be a factor in recent bee declines. Artifcially established foral plantings may ofset these losses. A multi-year, season-long feld study was conducted to examine how wildfower plantings near commercial apple orchards infuenced bee communities. We examined bee abundance, species richness, diversity, and species assemblages in both the foral plantings and adjoining apple orchards. We also examined bee community subsets, such as known tree fruit pollinators, rare pollinator species, and bees collected during apple bloom. During this study, a total of 138 species of bees were collected, which included 100 species in the foral plantings and 116 species in the apple orchards. Abundance of rare bee species was not signifcantly diferent between apple orchards and the foral plantings. During apple bloom, the known tree fruit pollinators were more frequently captured in the orchards than the foral plantings. However, after apple bloom, the abundance of known tree fruit pollinating bees increased signifcantly in the foral plantings, indicating potential for foral plantings to provide additional food and nesting resources when apple fowers are not available. Insect pollinators are essential in nearly all terrestrial ecosystems, and the ecosystem services they provide are vital to both wild plant communities and agricultural crop production.
  • ALFABETISCHE TERMENLIJST Pagina 2 a a Z

    ALFABETISCHE TERMENLIJST Pagina 2 a a Z

    ALFABETISCHE TERMENLIJST Pagina 2 A a z. alpha. A = afk. adenine: toegepast in schematische weergave vd. bouw van DNA en RNA. a. = afk. Lat. anno: in het jaar. a-, an- = voorvoegsel met de betekenis: niet, zonder. Å = ångstrom: verouderde lengteeenheid; 1 millimeter is gelijk aan 10 miljoen ångstrom; v. nm, afk. van nanometer. Aalwijn, Aalwee N. ZAfr. = Aloe spp. (Asphodelaceae), ook enkele aloë-achtige verwante soorten. Aaron's Beard N. = Opuntia leucotricha (Cactaceae). Aaron's Rod N. = Koningskaars: Verbascum thapsus (Scrophulariaceae). ABA z. abscisic acid. abaxial ADJ. = aan de vd. as verwijderde zijde, aan de onderzijde (ve. blad); syn. dorsal; ant. adaxial, ventral. abbreviate ADJ. = afgekort. ABC Islands N. = Aruba, Bonaire & Curaçao: de voormalig Ned. eilanden die, tov. de andere Kleine Antillen ver naar het Westen, voor de kust van Venezulela liggen; v. Leeward Islands, Windward Islands. aberrant ADJ. = afwijkend, niet normaal, ongewoon, iets verschilled vh. type; syn. abnormal. abiogenesis N. = veronderstelde ontwikkeling van levende organismen uit dood anorganisch materiaal. abiotic ADJ. = abiotisch: btr. factoren uit de niet-levende omgeving die het leven van planten en dieren beïnvloeden; bv. beschikbaar water, pH vd. bodem, kooldioxidegehalte vd. lucht en licht; v. biotic. abnormal ADJ. = ongewoon, abnormaal, afwijkend; v. aberrant. aboriginal ADJ. = oorspronkelijk, inheems; btr. plant die van nature in een gebied thuis hoort; syn. native, indigeneous; ant. exotic. aborted ADJ. = defect, onvruchtbaar, onvolledig ontwikkeld. abortion N. = het feit dat een orgaan of deel vd. plant zich niet ontwikkelt of in de volwassen plant niet meer aanwezig is. abortive ADJ. = al in een vroeg stadium onvolledig ontwikkeld. Abrojo Sp. N. = 1) Opuntia tunicata (Cactaceae) 2) ook O.
  • Land Uses That Support Wild Bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophila) Communities Within an Agricultural Matrix

    Land Uses That Support Wild Bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophila) Communities Within an Agricultural Matrix

    Land uses that support wild bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophila) communities within an agricultural matrix A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Elaine Celeste Evans IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Dr. Marla Spivak December 2016 © Elaine Evans 2016 Acknowledgements Many people helped me successfully complete this project. Many years ago, my advisor, mentor, hero, and friend, Marla Spivak, saw potential in me and helped me to become an effective scientist and educator working to create a more bee-friendly world. I have benefitted immensely from her guidance and support. The Bee Lab team, both those that helped me directly in the field, and those that advised along the way through analysis and writing, have provided a dreamy workplace: Joel Gardner, Matt Smart, Renata Borba, Katie Lee, Gary Reuter, Becky Masterman, Judy Wu, Ian Lane, Morgan Carr- Markell. My committee helped guide me along the way and steer me in the right direction: Dan Cariveau (gold star for much advice on analysis), Diane Larson, Ralph Holzenthal, and Karen Oberauser. Cooperation with Chip Eullis and Jordan Neau at the USGS enabled detailed land use analysis. The bee taxonomists who helped me with bee identification were essential for the success of this project: Jason Gibbs, John Ascher, Sam Droege, Mike Arduser, and Karen Wright. My friends and family eased my burden with their enthusiasm for me to follow my passion and their understanding of my monomania. My husband Paul Metzger and my son August supported me in uncountable ways.
  • Hymenoptera: Apoidea) Habitat in Agroecosystems Morgan Mackert Iowa State University

    Hymenoptera: Apoidea) Habitat in Agroecosystems Morgan Mackert Iowa State University

    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2019 Strategies to improve native bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) habitat in agroecosystems Morgan Mackert Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Mackert, Morgan, "Strategies to improve native bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) habitat in agroecosystems" (2019). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 17255. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/17255 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Strategies to improve native bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) habitat in agroecosystems by Morgan Marie Mackert A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major: Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Program of Study Committee: Mary A. Harris, Co-major Professor John D. Nason, Co-major Professor Robert W. Klaver The student author, whose presentation of the scholarship herein was approved by the program of study committee, is solely responsible for the content of this thesis. The Graduate College will ensure this thesis is globally accessible and will not permit alterations after a degree is conferred. Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2019 Copyright © Morgan Marie Mackert, 2019. All rights reserved ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... iv ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................... vi CHAPTER 1.