DOCSLIB.ORG

Index of Passerines

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Index of passerines V. 8, p. 53 p. 8, V. PASSERIFORMES EURYLAIMIDAE PHILEPITTIDAE PITTIDAE FURNARIIDAE DENDROCOLAPTIDAE THAMNOPHILIDAE FORMICARIIDAE CONOPOPHAGIDAE RHYNOCRIPTIDAE COTINGIDAE PIPRIDAE Broadbills Asities Pittas Ovenbirds Woodcreepers Typical Antbirds Ground-antbirds Gnateaters Tapaculos Cotingas Manakins V. 8, p. 54 V. 8, p. 94 V. 8, p. 106 V. 8, p. 162 V. 8, p. 358 V. 8, p. 448 V. 8, p. 682 V. 8, p. 732 V. 8, p. 748 V. 9, p. 32 V. 9, p. 110 TYRANNIDAE ACANTHISITTIDAE ATRICHORNITHIDAE MENURIDAE ALAUDIDAE HIRUNDINIDAE MOTACILLIDAE CAMPEPHAGIDAE PYCNONOTIDAE CHLOROPSEIDAE IRENIDAE Tyrant-fl ycatchers New Zealand Wrens Scrub-birds Lyrebirds Larks Swallows and Martins Pipits and Wagtails Cuckoo-shrikes Bulbuls Leafbirds Fairy-bluebirds V. 9, p. 170 V. 9, p. 464 V. 9, p. 474 V. 9, p. 484 V. 9, p. 496 V. 9, p. 602 V. 9, p. 686 V. 10, p. 40 V. 10, p. 124 V. 10, p. 252 V. 10, p. 268 AEGITHINIDAE PTILOGONATIDAE BOMBYCILLIDAE HYPOCOLIIDAE DULIDAE CINCLIDAE TROGLODYTIDAE MIMIDAE PRUNELLIDAE TURDIDAE MUSCICAPIDAE Ioras Silky-fl ycatchers Waxwings Hypocolius Palmchat Dippers Wrens Mockingbirds and Thrashers Accentors Thrushes Old World Flycatchers V. 10, p. 278 V. 10, p. 292 V. 10, p. 304 V. 10, p. 320 V. 10, p. 326 V. 10, p. 332 V. 10, p. 356 V. 10, p. 448 V. 10, p. 496 V. 10, p. 514 V. 11, p. 56 PLATYSTEIRIDAE RHIPIDURIDAE MONARCHIDAE REGULIDAE POLIOPTILIDAE CISTICOLIDAE SYLVIIDAE PICATHARTIDAE TIMALIIDAE PARADOXORNITHIDAE POMATOSTOMIDAE Batises and Wattle-eyes Fantails Monarch-fl ycatchers Kinglets and Firecrests Gnatcatchers Cisticolas and Allies Old World Warblers Picathartes Babblers Parrotbills Australasian Babblers V. 11, p. 164 V. 11, p. 200 V. 11, p. 244 V. 11, p. 330 V. 11, p. 350 V. 11, p. 378 V. 11, p. 492 V. 12, p. 60 V. 12, p. 70 V. 12, p. 292 V. 12, p. 322 ORTHONYCHIDAE EUPETIDAE PACHYCEPHALIDAE PETROICIDAE MALURIDAE DASYORNITHIDAE ACANTHIZIDAE EPTHIANURIDAE NEOSITTIDAE CLIMACTERIDAE PARIDAE Logrunners Jewel-babblers and Allies Whistlers Australasian Robins Fairy-wrens Bristlebirds Thornbills Australian Chats Sittellas Australasian Treecreepers Tits and Chickadees V. 12, p. 338 V. 12, p. 348 V. 12, p. 374 V. 12, p. 438 V. 12, p. 490 V. 12, p. 532 V. 12, p. 544 V. 12, p. 612 V. 12, p. 628 V. 12, p. 642 V. 12, p. 662 REMIZIDAE AEGITHALIDAE SITTIDAE TICHODROMIDAE CERTHIIDAE RHABDORNITHIDAE NECTARINIIDAE MELANOCHARITIDAE PARAMYTHIIDAE DICAEIDAE PARDALOTIDAE Penduline-tits Long-tailed Tits Nuthatches Wallcreeper Treecreepers Rhabdornis Sunbirds Berrypeckers and Longbills Painted Berrypeckers Flowerpeckers Pardalotes V. 13, p. 52 V. 13, p. 76 V. 13, p. 102 V. 13, p. 146 V. 13, p. 166 V. 13, p. 188 V. 13, p. 196 V. 13, p. 322 V. 13, p. 340 V. 13, p. 350 V. 13, p. 390 ZOSTEROPIDAE PROMEROPIDAE MELIPHAGIDAE ORIOLIDAE LANIIDAE MALACONOTIDAE PRIONOPIDAE VANGIDAE DICRURIDAE CALLAEIDAE NOTIOMYSTIDAE White-eyes Sugarbirds Honeyeaters Orioles Shrikes Bush-shrikes Helmet-shrikes Vangas Drongos New Zealand Wattlebirds Stitchbird V. 13, p. 402 V. 13, p. 486 V. 13, p. 498 V. 13, p. 692 V. 13, p. 732 V. 14, p. 50 V. 14, p. 124 V. 14, p. 142 V. 14, p. 172 V. 14, p. 228 V. 14, p. 242 GRALLINIDAE STRUTHIDEIDAE ARTAMIDAE CRACTICIDAE PITYRIASEIDAE PTILONORHYNCHIDAE PARADISAEIDAE CORVIDAE BUPHAGIDAE STURNIDAE PASSERIDAE Mudlarks Australian Mudnesters Woodswallows Butcherbirds Bristlehead Bowerbirds Birds-of-paradise Crows Oxpeckers Starlings Old World Sparrows V. 14, p. 258 V. 14, p. 272 V. 14, p. 286 V. 14, p. 308 V. 14, p. 344 V. 14, p. 350 V. 14, p. 404 V. 14, p. 494 V. 14, p. 642 V. 14, p. 654 V. 14, p. 760 PLOCEIDAE VIDUIDAE ESTRILDIDAE VIREONIDAE FRINGILLIDAE DREPANIDIDAE PEUCEDRAMIDAE PARULIDAE THRAUPIDAE CARDINALIDAE EMBERIZIDAE ICTERIDAE Weavers Whydahs and Indigobirds Waxbills Vireos Finches Hawaiian Honeycreepers Olive Warbler New World Warblers Tanagers Cardinals Buntings and New World Sparrows New World Blackbirds V. 15, p. 74 V. 15, p. 198 V. 15, p. 234 V. 15, p. 378 V. 15, p. 440 V. 15, p. 618 V. 15, p. 660 V. 15, p. 666 V. 16, p. 46 V. 16, p. 330 V. 16, p. 428 V. 16, p. 684 Passerines (alphabetical) A Bush-tyrant V. 9, p. 170, 389 Finchbill V. 10, p. 124, 168 Jungle-fl ycatcher V. 11, p. 56, 111 Oriole V. 16, p. 648, 758 Rockrunner V. 12, p. 70, 290 Tit V. 12, p. 662, 711; V. 13, p. 52, ACANTHISITTIDAE V. 9, p. 464 Bush-warbler V. 11, p. 492, 591 Firecrest V. 11, p. 330, 347 ORIOLIDAE V. 13, p. 692 Rock-sparrow V. 14, p. 760, 809 74; p. 76, 95 ACANTHIZIDAE V. 12, p. 544 Butcherbird V. 14, p. 308, 337 Fire-eye V. 8, p. 448, 636 K Oropendola V. 16, p. 684, 750 Rock-thrush V. 10, p. 514, 717 Tit-babbler V. 12, p. 70, 181 Accentor V. 10, p. 496, 508 Firefi nch V. 15, p. 234, 336 Kakamega V. 12, p. 70, 289 ORTHONYCHIDAE V. 12, p. 338 Rockwarbler V. 12, p. 544, 579 Tit-fl ycatcher V. 11, p. 56, 125 AEGITHALIDAE V. 13, p. 76 C Firetail V. 15, p. 234, 351 Kamao V. 10, p. 514, 627 Ou V. 15, p. 618, 651 Rook V. 14, p. 494, 625 Tit-hylia V. 13, p. 52, 75 AEGITHINIDAE V. 10, p. 278 Cachalote V. 8, p. 162, 323 Firethroat V. 10, p. 514, 747 Kingbird V. 9, p. 170, 419 Ovenbird V. 8, p. 162, 241 Rosefi nch V. 15, p. 440, 580 Titmouse V. 12, p. 662, 729 Akalat V. 10, p. 514, 731 Cacique V. 16, p. 684, 747 Firewood-gatherer V. 8, p. 162, 315 Kinglet V. 11, p. 330, 346 Ovenbird V. 15, p. 666, 766 Rosy-fi nch V. 15, p. 440, 572 Tit-spinetail V. 8, p. 162, 265 Akekee V. 15, p. 618, 653 Cactus-fi nch V. 16, p. 428, 681 Fiscal V. 13, p. 732, 788 Kiskadee V. 9, p. 170, 408 Oxpecker V. 14, p. 642, 652 Rubythroat V. 10, p. 514, 750 Tit-tyrant V. 9, p. 170, 280 Akepa V. 15, p. 618, 652 CALLAEIDAE V. 14, p. 228 Flamecrest V. 11, p. 330, 348 Kokako V. 14, p. 228, 240 Oxylabes V. 11, p. 492, 644 Rufous-warbler V. 11, p. 378, 466 Tit-warbler V. 13, p. 76, 100 Akiapolaau V. 15, p. 618, 657 Calyptura V. 9, p. 32, 87 Flatbill V. 9, p. 170, 337 Rushbird V. 8, p. 162, 261 Tityra V. 9, p. 170, 449 Akikiki V. 15, p. 618, 651 Camaroptera V. 11, p. 378, 481 Flowerpecker V. 13, p. 350, 369 L P Rush-tyrant V. 9, p. 170, 315 Tody-fl ycatcher V. 9, p. 170, 330 Akohekohe V. 15, p. 618, 658 CAMPEPHAGIDAE V. 10, p. 40 Flowerpiercer V. 16, p. 46, 268 LANIIDAE V. 13, p. 732 PACHYCEPHALIDAE V. 12, p. 374 Rush-warbler V. 11, p. 492, 599 Tody-tyrant V. 9, p. 170, 321 Alauahio V. 15, p. 618, 649 Canary V. 15, p. 440, 518 Flycatcher V. 9, p. 170, 276; V. 11, Lark V. 9, p. 496, 543 Painted Berrypecker V. 13, p. 340, Tomtit V. 12, p. 438, 484 ALAUDIDAE V. 9, p. 496 Canary-fl ycatcher V. 11, p. 56, 162 p. 56, 103; p. 244, 316 Laughingthrush V. 12, p. 70, 231 348 S Torrent-lark V. 14, p. 258, 271 Alethe V. 10, p. 514, 707 Canastero V. 8, p. 162, 302 Flycatcher-babbler V. 12, p. 70, 282 Leafbird V. 10, p. 252, 263 Palila V. 15, p. 618, 650 Saddleback V. 14, p. 228, 241 Towhee V. 16, p. 428, 595 Amakihi V. 15, p. 618, 655 Capuchinbird V. 9, p. 32, 103 Flycatcher-chat V. 10, p. 514, 730 Leaf-love V. 10, p. 124, 211 Palmchat V. 10, p. 326, 331 Saltator V. 16, p. 330, 414 Treecreeper V. 12, p. 642, 657; V. 13, Anianiau V. 15, p. 618, 652 Cardinal V. 16, p. 330, 408; p. 428, Flycatcher-shrike V. 10, p. 40, 121 Leaftosser V. 8, p. 162, 351 Palmcreeper V. 8, p. 162, 328 Sapayoa V. 9, p. 110, 167 p. 166, 181 Antbird V. 8, p. 448, 598 641 Flycatcher-thrush V. 10, p. 514, 620 Leaf-warbler V. 11, p. 492, 652 Palm-tanager V. 16, p. 46, 325 Saw-wing V. 9, p. 602, 643 Tree-fi nch V. 16, p. 428, 679 Anteater-chat V. 10, p. 514, 725 CARDINALIDAE V. 16, p. 330 Flyrobin V. 12, p. 438, 486 Leiothrix V. 12, p. 70, 270 Palm-thrush V. 10, p. 514, 709 Scimitar-babbler V. 12, p. 70, 165 Treehunter V. 8, p. 162, 340 Antpecker V. 15, p. 234, 305 Casiornis V. 9, p. 170, 428 Fody V. 15, p. 74, 155 Linnet V. 15, p. 440, 569 Pampa-fi nch V. 16, p. 428, 639 Scrub-bird V. 9, p. 474, 482 Treepie V. 14, p. 494, 601 Antpipit V. 9, p. 170, 293 Catbird V. 10, p. 448, 479; V. 14, Foliage-gleaner V. 8, p. 162, 328 Liocichla V. 12, p. 70, 264 Paradigalla V. 14, p. 404, 464 Scrub-fl ycatcher V. 9, p. 170, 310 Treerunner V. 8, p. 162, 321 Antpitta V. 8, p. 682, 709 p. 350, 393 Forest-fl ycatcher V. 11, p. 56, 108 Logrunner V. 12, p. 338, 346 PARADISAEIDAE V. 14, p. 404 Scrub-jay V. 14, p. 494, 571 Trembler V. 10, p. 448, 480 Antshrike V. 8, p. 448, 533 Cave-chat V. 10, p. 514, 741 Forest-warbler V. 11, p. 492, 602 Longbill V.
Recommended publications
  • ISSAP Madagascar Pond Heron

    ISSAP Madagascar Pond Heron

    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals Secretariat provided by the United Nations Environment Programme 15 th MEETING OF THE CMS SCIENTIFIC COUNCIL Rome, Italy, 27-28 November 2008 UNEP/CMS/ScC15/Doc.6 DRAFT INTERNATIONAL SINGLE SPECIES ACTION PLAN FOR THE CONSERVATION OF THE MADAGASCAR POND HERON ARDEOLA IDAE (Introductory note prepared by the Secretariat) 1. The Single Species Action Plan for the Conservation of the Madagascar Pond Heron Ardeola idae was initiated jointly by CMS and AEWA in 2007 upon a recommendation of the 14 th Meeting of the CMS Scientific Council. 2. The plan covers the entire range of this intra-African migrant. The drafting of the Plan was commissioned to the BirdLife International Africa Partnership Secretariat with financial support provided by the Ministry of Environment of Italy and was compiled by a team under the management of Paul Kariuki Ndang’ang’a. Earlier drafts of the Plan have been consulted extensively with experts and governmental officials at the Range States. 3. The Plan has already been adopted by the 4 th Meeting of the Parties to AEWA (Antananarivo, Madagascar, 15-19 September 2008). Action requested: The Scientific Council is requested to: a. review and endorse the Plan; and b. transmit the Plan to the Conference of the Parties for adoption. For reasons of economy, documents are printed in a limited number, and will not be distributed at the meeting. Delegates are kindly requested to bring their copy to the meeting and not to request additional copies. DISCLAIMER The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP/CMS concerning the legal status of any State, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of their frontiers and boundaries.
  • Territory Size and Stability in a Sedentary Neotropical Passerine: Is Resource Partitioning a Necessary Condition?

    Territory Size and Stability in a Sedentary Neotropical Passerine: Is Resource Partitioning a Necessary Condition?

    J. Field Ornithol. 76(4):395±401, 2005 Territory size and stability in a sedentary neotropical passerine: is resource partitioning a necessary condition? Janet V. Gorrell,1 Gary Ritchison,1,3 and Eugene S. Morton2 1 Department of Biological Sciences, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, Kentucky 40475 USA 2 Hemlock Hill Field Station, 22318 Teepleville Flats Road, Cambridge Springs, Pennsylvania 16403 USA Received 9 April 2004; accepted 11 April 2005 ABSTRACT. Long-term pair bonds and defense of territories year-round are common among tropical passer- ines. The boundaries of these territories tend to be stable, perhaps re¯ecting the need to defend an area that, regardless of conditions, provides suf®cient food resources. If, however, these stable territories are not, even tem- porarily, suf®ciently large, then intra-pair competition for available food may result, particularly in species with no sexual size dimorphism. With such competition, sex-speci®c differences in foraging behavior may result. Male and female Dusky Antbirds (Cercomacra tyrannina) are not size dimorphic, and pairs jointly defend territories throughout the year. Our objective was to determine if paired Dusky Antbirds exhibited sex-speci®c differences in foraging behavior. Foraging antbirds were observed in central Panama from February±July 2002 to determine if pairs par- titioned food resources. Males and females exhibited no differences in foraging behavior, with individuals of both sexes foraging at similar heights and using the same foraging maneuvers (glean, probe, and sally) and substrates (leaves, rolled leaves, and woody surfaces). These results suggest that Dusky Antbirds do not partition resources and that territory switching, rather than resource partitioning, may be the means by which they gain access to additional food resources.
  • An Inventory of Avian Species in Aldesa Valley, Saudi Arabia

    An Inventory of Avian Species in Aldesa Valley, Saudi Arabia

    14 5 LIST OF SPECIES Check List 14 (5): 743–750 https://doi.org/10.15560/14.5.743 An inventory of avian species in Aldesa Valley, Saudi Arabia Abdulaziz S. Alatawi1, Florent Bled1, Jerrold L. Belant2 1 Mississippi State University, Forest and Wildlife Research Center, Carnivore Ecology Laboratory, Box 9690, Mississippi State, MS, USA 39762. 2 State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, 1 Forestry Drive, Syracuse, NY, USA 13210. Corresponding author: Abdulaziz S. Alatawi, [email protected] Abstract Conducting species inventories is important to provide baseline information essential for management and conserva- tion. Aldesa Valley lies in the Tabuk Province of northwest Saudi Arabia and because of the presence of permanent water, is thought to contain high avian richness. We conducted an inventory of avian species in Aldesa Valley, using timed area-searches during May 10–August 10 in 2014 and 2015 to detect species occurrence. We detected 6860 birds belonging to 19 species. We also noted high human use of this area including agriculture and recreational activities. Maintaining species diversity is important in areas receiving anthropogenic pressures, and we encourage additional surveys to further identify species occurrence in Aldesa Valley. Key words Arabian Peninsula; bird inventory; desert fauna. Academic editor: Mansour Aliabadian | Received 21 April 2016 | Accepted 27 May 2018 | Published 14 September 2018 Citation: Alatawi AS, Bled F, Belant JL (2018) An inventory of avian species in Aldesa Valley, Saudi Arabia. Check List 14 (5): 743–750. https:// doi.org/10.15560/14.5.743 Introduction living therein (Balvanera et al.
  • Antbird Guilds in the Lowland Caribbean Rainforest of Southeast Nicaragua1

    Antbird Guilds in the Lowland Caribbean Rainforest of Southeast Nicaragua1

    The Condor 102:7X4-794 0 The Cooper Ornithological Society 2000 ANTBIRD GUILDS IN THE LOWLAND CARIBBEAN RAINFOREST OF SOUTHEAST NICARAGUA1 MARTIN L. CODY Department of OrganismicBiology, Ecology and Evolution, Universityof California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Some 20 speciesof antbirdsoccur in lowland Caribbeanrainforest in southeast Nicaragua where they form five distinct guilds on the basis of habitat preferences,foraging ecology, and foraging behavior. Three guilds are habitat-based,in Edge, Forest, and Gaps within forest; two are behaviorally distinct, with species of army ant followers and those foraging within mixed-species flocks. The guilds each contain 3-6 antbird species. Within guilds, species are segregatedby body size differences between member species, and in several guilds are evenly spaced on a logarithmic scale of body mass. Among guilds, the factors by which adjacent body sizes differ vary between 1.25 and 1.75. Body size differ- ences may be related to differences in preferred prey sizes, but are influenced also by the density of the vegetation in which each speciescustomarily forages. Resumen. Unas 20 especies de aves hormiguerasviven en el bosque tropical perenni- folio, surestede Nicaragua, donde se forman cinquo gremios distinctos estribando en pre- ferencias de habitat, ecologia y comportamiento de las costumbresde alimentacion. Las diferenciasentre las varias especiesson cuantificadaspor caractaristicasde1 ambiente vegetal y por la ecologia y comportamientode la alimentaci6n, y usadospara definir cinco grupos o gremios (“guilds”). Tres gremios se designanpor las relacionesde habitat: edge (margen), forest (selva), y gaps (aberturasadentro la selva); dos mas por comportamiento,partidarios de army ants (hormigasarmadas) y mixed-speciesflocks (forrejando en bandadasde especies mexcladas).
  • Fitness Costs and Benefits of Egg Ejection by Gray Catbirds

    Fitness Costs and Benefits of Egg Ejection by Gray Catbirds

    FITNESS COSTS AND BENEFITS OF EGG EJECTION BY GRAY CATBIRDS BY JANICE C. LORENZANA Ajhesis presented to the University of Manitoba in fulfillment of the thesis requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Department of Zoology Winnipeg, Manitoba Janice C. Lorenzana (C) April 1999 National Library Bibfiot hèque nationale 1*1 of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395,rue Wellington Ottawa ON K 1A ON4 Onawa ON KIA ON4 Canada Canada Your ble Vorre derence Our fi& Narre fetefmce The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sel1 reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microforni. vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/film, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fi-orn it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or othenvise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. Canada THE UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA FACULTY OF GRADUATE STZTDIES ***** COPYRIGEIT PERMISSION PAGE Fitness Costs and Benefits of Egg Ejection by Gray Catbirds BY Janice C. Lorenzana A Thesis/Practicurn submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba in partial Mfiilment of the requirements of the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Permission has been granted to the Library of The University of Manitoba to lend QB sell copies of this thesis/practicum, to the National Library of Canada to microfilm this thesis and to lend or seli copies of the film, and to Dissertations Abstracts International to publish an abstract of this thesis/practicum.
  • Comments on the Ornithology of Nigeria, Including Amendments to the National List

    Comments on the Ornithology of Nigeria, Including Amendments to the National List

    Robert J. Dowsett 154 Bull. B.O.C. 2015 135(2) Comments on the ornithology of Nigeria, including amendments to the national list by Robert J. Dowsett Received 16 December 2014 Summary.—This paper reviews the distribution of birds in Nigeria that were not treated in detail in the most recent national avifauna (Elgood et al. 1994). It clarifies certain range limits, and recommends the addition to the Nigerian list of four species (African Piculet Verreauxia africana, White-tailed Lark Mirafra albicauda, Western Black-headed Batis Batis erlangeri and Velvet-mantled Drongo Dicrurus modestus) and the deletion (in the absence of satisfactory documentation) of six others (Olive Ibis Bostrychia olivacea, Lesser Short-toed Lark Calandrella rufescens, Richard’s Pipit Anthus richardi, Little Grey Flycatcher Muscicapa epulata, Ussher’s Flycatcher M. ussheri and Rufous-winged Illadopsis Illadopsis rufescens). Recent research in West Africa has demonstrated the need to clarify the distributions of several bird species in Nigeria. I have re-examined much of the literature relating to the country, analysed the (largely unpublished) collection made by Boyd Alexander there in 1904–05 (in the Natural History Museum, Tring; NHMUK), and have reviewed the data available in the light of our own field work in Ghana (Dowsett-Lemaire & Dowsett 2014), Togo (Dowsett-Lemaire & Dowsett 2011a) and neighbouring Benin (Dowsett & Dowsett- Lemaire 2011, Dowsett-Lemaire & Dowsett 2009, 2010, 2011b). The northern or southern localities of species with limited ranges in Nigeria were not always detailed by Elgood et al. (1994), although such information is essential for understanding distribution patterns and future changes. For many Guineo-Congolian forest species their northern limit in West Africa lies on the escarpment of the Jos Plateau, especially Nindam Forest Reserve, Kagoro.
  • MADAGASCAR: the Wonders of the “8Th Continent” a Tropical Birding Custom Trip

    MADAGASCAR: the Wonders of the “8Th Continent” a Tropical Birding Custom Trip

    MADAGASCAR: The Wonders of the “8th Continent” A Tropical Birding Custom Trip October 20—November 6, 2016 Guide: Ken Behrens All photos taken during this trip by Ken Behrens Annotated bird list by Jerry Connolly TOUR SUMMARY Madagascar has long been a core destination for Tropical Birding, and with the opening of a satellite office in the country several years ago, we further solidified our expertise in the “Eighth Continent.” This custom trip followed an itinerary similar to that of our main set-departure tour. Although this trip had a definite bird bias, it was really a general natural history tour. We took our time in observing and photographing whatever we could find, from lemurs to chameleons to bizarre invertebrates. Madagascar is rich in wonderful birds, and we enjoyed these to the fullest. But its mammals, reptiles, amphibians, and insects are just as wondrous and accessible, and a trip that ignored them would be sorely missing out. We also took time to enjoy the cultural riches of Madagascar, the small villages full of smiling children, the zebu carts which seem straight out of the Middle Ages, and the ingeniously engineered rice paddies. If you want to come to Madagascar and see it all… come with Tropical Birding! Madagascar is well known to pose some logistical challenges, especially in the form of the national airline Air Madagascar, but we enjoyed perfectly smooth sailing on this tour. We stayed in the most comfortable hotels available at each stop on the itinerary, including some that have just recently opened, and savored some remarkably good food, which many people rank as the best Madagascar Custom Tour October 20-November 6, 2016 they have ever had on any birding tour.
  • Bird List Column A: 1 = 70-90% Chance Column B: 2 = 30-70% Chance Column C: 3 = 10-30% Chance

    Bird List Column A: 1 = 70-90% Chance Column B: 2 = 30-70% Chance Column C: 3 = 10-30% Chance

    Colombia: Chocó Prospective Bird List Column A: 1 = 70-90% chance Column B: 2 = 30-70% chance Column C: 3 = 10-30% chance A B C Tawny-breasted Tinamou 2 Nothocercus julius Highland Tinamou 3 Nothocercus bonapartei Great Tinamou 2 Tinamus major Berlepsch's Tinamou 3 Crypturellus berlepschi Little Tinamou 1 Crypturellus soui Choco Tinamou 3 Crypturellus kerriae Horned Screamer 2 Anhima cornuta Black-bellied Whistling-Duck 1 Dendrocygna autumnalis Fulvous Whistling-Duck 1 Dendrocygna bicolor Comb Duck 3 Sarkidiornis melanotos Muscovy Duck 3 Cairina moschata Torrent Duck 3 Merganetta armata Blue-winged Teal 3 Spatula discors Cinnamon Teal 2 Spatula cyanoptera Masked Duck 3 Nomonyx dominicus Gray-headed Chachalaca 1 Ortalis cinereiceps Colombian Chachalaca 1 Ortalis columbiana Baudo Guan 2 Penelope ortoni Crested Guan 3 Penelope purpurascens Cauca Guan 2 Penelope perspicax Wattled Guan 2 Aburria aburri Sickle-winged Guan 1 Chamaepetes goudotii Great Curassow 3 Crax rubra Tawny-faced Quail 3 Rhynchortyx cinctus Crested Bobwhite 2 Colinus cristatus Rufous-fronted Wood-Quail 2 Odontophorus erythrops Chestnut Wood-Quail 1 Odontophorus hyperythrus Least Grebe 2 Tachybaptus dominicus Pied-billed Grebe 1 Podilymbus podiceps Magnificent Frigatebird 1 Fregata magnificens Brown Booby 2 Sula leucogaster ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ WINGS ● 1643 N. Alvernon Way Ste. 109 ● Tucson ● AZ ● 85712 ● www.wingsbirds.com (866) 547 9868 Toll free US + Canada ● Tel (520) 320-9868 ● Fax (520)
  • Belize), and Distribution in Yucatan

    Belize), and Distribution in Yucatan

    University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland Institut of Zoology Ecology of the Black Catbird, Melanoptila glabrirostris, at Shipstern Nature Reserve (Belize), and distribution in Yucatan. J.Laesser Annick Morgenthaler May 2003 Master thesis supervised by Prof. Claude Mermod and Dr. Louis-Félix Bersier CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1. Aim and description of the study 2. Geographic setting 2.1. Yucatan peninsula 2.2. Belize 2.3. Shipstern Nature Reserve 2.3.1. History and previous studies 2.3.2. Climate 2.3.3. Geology and soils 2.3.4. Vegetation 2.3.5. Fauna 3. The Black Catbird 3.1. Taxonomy 3.2. Description 3.3. Breeding 3.4. Ecology and biology 3.5. Distribution and threats 3.6. Current protection measures FIRST PART: BIOLOGY, HABITAT AND DENSITY AT SHIPSTERN 4. Materials and methods 4.1. Census 4.1.1. Territory mapping 4.1.2. Transect point-count 4.2. Sizing and ringing 4.3. Nest survey (from hide) 5. Results 5.1. Biology 5.1.1. Morphometry 5.1.2. Nesting 5.1.3. Diet 5.1.4. Competition and predation 5.2. Habitat use and population density 5.2.1. Population density 5.2.2. Habitat use 5.2.3. Banded individuals monitoring 5.2.4. Distribution through the Reserve 6. Discussion 6.1. Biology 6.2. Habitat use and population density SECOND PART: DISTRIBUTION AND HABITATS THROUGHOUT THE RANGE 7. Materials and methods 7.1. Data collection 7.2. Visit to others sites 8. Results 8.1. Data compilation 8.2. Visited places 8.2.1. Corozalito (south of Shipstern lagoon) 8.2.2.
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii

    Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii

    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
  • Impact of Human Activity on Foraging Flocks and Populations of the Alpine Chough Pyrrhocorax Graculus

    Impact of Human Activity on Foraging Flocks and Populations of the Alpine Chough Pyrrhocorax Graculus

    Avocetta N°19: 189-193 (1995) Impact of human activity on foraging flocks and populations of the alpine chough Pyrrhocorax graculus ANNE DELESTRADE Centre de Biologie des Ecosystèmes d'Altitude, Université de Pau, 64000 Pau, France. Present address: Institut d'écologie, CNRS URA 258, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 7 qua i St Bernard, 75252 Paris, France. Abstract - The Alpine Chough Pyrrhocorax graculus is a social corvid which uses food provided by tourist activities in mountain regions (e.g. at ski stations, refuse dumps, picnic areas). In order to determine the impact ofthe human food supply on the Alpine Chough, foraging flock size and distribution were studied in a tourist region in the Northern French Alps between 1988 and 1992. Alpine Chough attendance at tourist sites was closely related to human activities. Activity rhytbrn was influenced by human presence on picnic area in summer. Relations to human activities held at a seasonal scale (such as opening of a ski station) but not at a daily time scale (such as weekend). Long term trends of Alpine Chough populations since intense tourist development at altitude are discussed with regard of flock size counts recorded at a same site before and after intense tourist development. Introduction a little studied species, and it is particularly uncertain whether Alpine Chough populations have increased Availability of food is a factor which influences the since the intense development of tourist activities in distribution and abundance of species at a range of mountains. spatial and temporal scales. Many bird species forage The aims of this study were (1) to determine whether in human related habitats (Murton and Wright 1968), the Alpine Chough adapted its foraging behaviour to and food supplied by man (e.g.
  • "Official Gazette of RM", No. 28/04 and 37/07), the Government of the Republic of Montenegro, at Its Meeting Held on ______2007, Enacted This

    "Official Gazette of RM", No. 28/04 and 37/07), the Government of the Republic of Montenegro, at Its Meeting Held on ______2007, Enacted This

    In accordance with Article 6 paragraph 3 of the FT Law ("Official Gazette of RM", No. 28/04 and 37/07), the Government of the Republic of Montenegro, at its meeting held on ____________ 2007, enacted this DECISION ON CONTROL LIST FOR EXPORT, IMPORT AND TRANSIT OF GOODS Article 1 The goods that are being exported, imported and goods in transit procedure, shall be classified into the forms of export, import and transit, specifically: free export, import and transit and export, import and transit based on a license. The goods referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article were identified in the Control List for Export, Import and Transit of Goods that has been printed together with this Decision and constitutes an integral part hereof (Exhibit 1). Article 2 In the Control List, the goods for which export, import and transit is based on a license, were designated by the abbreviation: “D”, and automatic license were designated by abbreviation “AD”. The goods for which export, import and transit is based on a license designated by the abbreviation “D” and specific number, license is issued by following state authorities: - D1: the goods for which export, import and transit is based on a license issued by the state authority competent for protection of human health - D2: the goods for which export, import and transit is based on a license issued by the state authority competent for animal and plant health protection, if goods are imported, exported or in transit for veterinary or phyto-sanitary purposes - D3: the goods for which export, import and transit is based on a license issued by the state authority competent for environment protection - D4: the goods for which export, import and transit is based on a license issued by the state authority competent for culture.