DOCSLIB.ORG

A Critical Review of All Spider Species Cited from Greece with Their Localities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Critical Review of All Spider Species Cited from Greece with Their Localities Belgian Arachnological Society ARABEL A catalogue of the spiders of Greece A critical review of all spider species cited from Greece with their localities by Robert BOSMANS and Maria CHATZAKI Arachnological Contributions Newsletter Belg. Arachn. Soc., volume 20 (2, suppl.). 2005. ISSN 0774-7225 A catalogue of the spiders of Greece. A critical review of all spider species cited from Greece with their localities. by Robert Bosmans(*) and Maria Chatzaki(**) (*)Terrestrial Ecology Unit, Ledeganckstraat 35, B-9000 Gent, Belgium. (**) Department of Biology, University of Crete, 71100, Irakleio, Crete, Greece Arachnological Contributions. Newsletter of the Belgian Arachnological Society 20 (2, suppl.). 2005 ARABEL v.z.w. / a.s.b.l. Bestuur/Bureau VOORZITTER/PRÉSIDENT: Léon Baert Koninklijk Belgisch Instituut voor Natuurwetenschappen Vautierstraat 29 1000 Brussel ONDERVOORZITTER/VICE-PRÉSIDENT: Mark Alderweireldt Begoniastraat 5 9090 Melle SECRETARIS/SÉCRÉTAIRE: Koen Van Keer Oude Beurs 60 2000 Antwerpen PENNINGMEESTER/TRÉSORIER: Lynda Beladjal Universiteit Gent, TEREC K. L. Ledeganckstraat 35 9000 Gent BIBLIOTHECARIS/BIBLIOTHÉCAIRE: Domir De Bakker Koninklijk Museum voor Midden Afrika Leuvensteenweg 13 3080 Tervuren OVERIGE BESTUURSLEDEN: Dries Bonte (redactie) Frederik Hendrickx (coördinatie databank) Universiteit Gent, TEREC K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35 9000 Gent LIDGELD/CÔTITION: 15 Euro REKENING/COMPTE: 001-1662395-85 “Lidgeld/côtisation ARABEL” The spiders of Greece 2 Table of Contents I. Introduction.......................................................................................................................................................... 5 II. History of research on Greek spiders.................................................................................................................. 5 III. Method .............................................................................................................................................................. 6 IV. Number of species............................................................................................................................................. 8 V. Endemic species ................................................................................................................................................. 9 VI. Deleted species................................................................................................................................................ 15 VII. Doubtful species............................................................................................................................................. 16 VIII. List of species of Greece............................................................................................................................... 19 2. FAMILY ATYPIDAE ...................................................................................................................................................................................19 5. FAMILY HEXATHELIDAE ..........................................................................................................................................................................19 7. FAMILY CYRTAUCHENIIDAE.....................................................................................................................................................................19 8. FAMILY CTENIZIDAE ................................................................................................................................................................................19 12. FAMILY NEMESIIDAE .............................................................................................................................................................................20 20. FAMILY FILISTATIDAE............................................................................................................................................................................20 21. FAMILY SICARIIDAE ...............................................................................................................................................................................21 22. FAMILY SCYTODIDAE.............................................................................................................................................................................21 25. FAMILY LEPTONETIDAE .........................................................................................................................................................................22 28. FAMILY PHOLCIDAE ...............................................................................................................................................................................22 33. FAMILY SEGESTRIIDAE...........................................................................................................................................................................24 34. FAMILY DYSDERIDAE.............................................................................................................................................................................25 35. FAMILY OONOPIDAE ..............................................................................................................................................................................31 44. FAMILY PALPIMANIDAE .........................................................................................................................................................................31 46. FAMILY MIMETIDAE ..............................................................................................................................................................................32 47. FAMILY ERESIDAE..................................................................................................................................................................................32 48. FAMILY OECOBIIDAE .............................................................................................................................................................................33 51. FAMILY ULOBORIDAE ............................................................................................................................................................................34 54. FAMILY NESTICIDAE ..............................................................................................................................................................................35 55. FAMILY THERIDIIDAE.............................................................................................................................................................................35 56. FAMILY THERIDIOSOMATIDAE ...............................................................................................................................................................43 58. FAMILY ANAPIDAE.................................................................................................................................................................................43 62. FAMILY LINYPHIIDAE.............................................................................................................................................................................43 63. FAMILY TETRAGNATHIDAE ....................................................................................................................................................................48 64. FAMILY ARANEIDAE ..............................................................................................................................................................................50 65. FAMILY LYCOSIDAE ...............................................................................................................................................................................55 67. FAMILY PISAURIDAE ..............................................................................................................................................................................63 68. FAMILY OXYOPIDAE ..............................................................................................................................................................................63 74. FAMILY ZOROPSIDAE .............................................................................................................................................................................64 75. FAMILY ZORIDAE ...................................................................................................................................................................................64 77. FAMILY AGELENIDAE.............................................................................................................................................................................65 78. FAMILY CYBAEIDAE ..............................................................................................................................................................................69 83. FAMILY HAHNIIDAE ...............................................................................................................................................................................69 84. FAMILY DICTYNIDAE .............................................................................................................................................................................69 85. FAMILY AMAUROBIIDAE ........................................................................................................................................................................70
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arachnida: Araneae) from Dobruja (Romania and Bulgaria) Liviu Aurel Moscaliuc
    Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle © 31 août «Grigore Antipa» Vol. LV (1) pp. 9–15 2012 DOI: 10.2478/v10191-012-0001-2 NEW FAUNISTIC RECORDS OF SPIDERS (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE) FROM DOBRUJA (ROMANIA AND BULGARIA) LIVIU AUREL MOSCALIUC Abstract. A number of spider species were collected in 2011 and 2012 in various microhabitats in and around the village Letea (the Danube Delta, Romania) and on the Bulgarian Dobruja Black Sea coast. The results are the start of a proposed longer survey of the spider fauna in the area. The genus Spermophora Hentz, 1841 (with the species senoculata), Xysticus laetus Thorell, 1875 and Trochosa hispanica Simon, 1870 are mentioned in the Romanian fauna for the first time. Floronia bucculenta (Clerck, 1757) is at the first record for the Bulgarian fauna. Diagnostic drawings and photographs are presented. Résumé. En 2011 et 2012, on recueille des espèces d’araignées dans des microhabitats différents autour du village de Letea (le delta du Danube) et le long de la côte de la Mer Noire dans la Dobroudja bulgare. Les résultats sont le début d’une enquête proposée de la faune d’araignée dans la région. Le genre Spermophora Hentz, 1841 (avec l’espèce senoculata), Xysticus laetus Thorell, 1875 et Trochosa hispanica Simon, 1870 sont mentionnés pour la première fois dans la faune de Roumanie. Floronia bucculenta (Clerck, 1757) est au premier enregistrement pour la faune bulgare. Aussi on présente les dessins de diagnose et des photographies. Key words: Spermophora senoculata, Xysticus laetus, Trochosa hispanica, Floronia bucculenta, first record, spiders, fauna, Romania, Bulgaria. INTRODUCTION The results of this paper come from the author’s regular field work.
    [Show full text]
  • NISSOS SOFIA for Sale
    Nissos Sofia For Sale Greece, Ionian Islands, The Echinades POA € QUICK SPEC Year of Construction Bedrooms Half Bathrooms Full Bathrooms Interior Surface approx TBA m2 - TBA Sq.Ft Exterior Surface approx 176,000 m2 - 1, 894,448 Sq.Ft Parking Cars Property Type Private Island TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS This unique property comprises a private island in the centre of the ionian Sea. Named Nissos Sofia and part of the Echinades complex, the small island is a green paradise of protected natural environment. With a long sea front, gentle sloping terrain and proximity to the west coast of mainland Greece, The island has a surface of c. 176, 000 sqm; it is flat, with ample vegetation and all along its West coast it is covered by perennial cedars. The landscape is breath-taking, the sea shallow and as clean as it could ever be. The region has been designated as a RAMSAR site - a fact that ensures a high level of privacy and tranquility to its residents. There are valid certificates regarding the designation of shoreline, the forest/ non-forest areas, and the absence of areas of archeological interest. The island has obtained a number of certificates and has progressed planning status.. Large part of the island has been characterised as private forest land by the Forestry which offers immense privatcy and a serene natural environment. According to the building regulations, 6 houses of 130 sqm each can be built under its full development capacity. PROPERTY FEATURES BEDROOMS • Master Bedrooms - • Total Bedrooms - • Suite - BATHROOMS • Full Bathrooms - • Total Bathrooms - • Half Bathrooms - ISLAND FEATURES • Nissos Sofia and part of the Echinades,Situated between the islands of Ithaka (only 4 miles away) and Lafkada.
    [Show full text]
  • DESERTMED a Project About the Deserted Islands of the Mediterranean
    DESERTMED A project about the deserted islands of the Mediterranean The islands, and all the more so the deserted island, is an extremely poor or weak notion from the point of view of geography. This is to it’s credit. The range of islands has no objective unity, and deserted islands have even less. The deserted island may indeed have extremely poor soil. Deserted, the is- land may be a desert, but not necessarily. The real desert is uninhabited only insofar as it presents no conditions that by rights would make life possible, weather vegetable, animal, or human. On the contrary, the lack of inhabitants on the deserted island is a pure fact due to the circumstance, in other words, the island’s surroundings. The island is what the sea surrounds. What is de- serted is the ocean around it. It is by virtue of circumstance, for other reasons that the principle on which the island depends, that the ships pass in the distance and never come ashore.“ (from: Gilles Deleuze, Desert Island and Other Texts, Semiotext(e),Los Angeles, 2004) DESERTMED A project about the deserted islands of the Mediterranean Desertmed is an ongoing interdisciplina- land use, according to which the islands ry research project. The “blind spots” on can be divided into various groups or the European map serve as its subject typologies —although the distinctions are matter: approximately 300 uninhabited is- fluid. lands in the Mediterranean Sea. A group of artists, architects, writers and theoreti- cians traveled to forty of these often hard to reach islands in search of clues, impar- tially cataloguing information that can be interpreted in multiple ways.
    [Show full text]
  • North American Spiders of the Genera Cybaeus and Cybaeina
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The University of Utah: J. Willard Marriott Digital... BULLETIN OF THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH Volume 23 December, 1932 No. 2 North American Spiders of the Genera Cybaeus and Cybaeina BY RALPH V. CHAMBERLIN and WILTON IVIE BIOLOGICAL SERIES, Vol. II, No. / - PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SALT LAKE CITY THE UNIVERSITY PRESS UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SALT LAKE CITY A Review of the North American Spider of the Genera Cybaeus and Cybaeina By R a l p h V. C h a m b e r l i n a n d W i l t o n I v i e The frequency with which members of the Agelenid genus Cybaeus appeared in collections made by the authors in the mountainous and timbered sections of the Pacific coast region and the representations therein of various apparently undescribed species led to the preparation of this review of the known North American forms. One species hereto­ fore placed in Cybaeus is made the type of a new genus Cybaeina. Most of our species occur in the western states; and it is probable that fur­ ther collecting in this region will bring to light a considerable number of additional forms. The drawings accompanying the paper were made from specimens direct excepting in a few cases where material was not available. In these cases the drawings were copied from the figures published by the authors of the species concerned, as indicated hereafter in each such case, but these drawings were somewhat revised to conform with the general scheme of the other figures in order to facilitate comparison.
    [Show full text]
  • Arachnids from the Greenhouses of the Botanical Garden of the PJ Šafárik University in Košice, Slovakia (Arachnida: Araneae, Opiliones, Palpigradi, Pseudoscorpiones)
    © Arachnologische Gesellschaft e.V. Frankfurt/Main; http://arages.de/ Arachnologische Mitteilungen / Arachnology Letters 53: 19-28 Karlsruhe, April 2017 Arachnids from the greenhouses of the Botanical Garden of the PJ Šafárik University in Košice, Slovakia (Arachnida: Araneae, Opiliones, Palpigradi, Pseudoscorpiones) Anna Šestáková, Martin Suvák, Katarína Krajčovičová, Andrea Kaňuchová & Jana Christophoryová doi: 10.5431/aramit5304 Abstract. This is the first detailed contribution on the arachnid fauna from heated greenhouses in the Botanical Garden of the P.J. Šafárik University in Košice (Slovakia). Over ten years 62 spider taxa in 21 families were found. Two spiders, Mermessus trilobatus (Emerton, 1882) and Hasarius adansoni (Audouin, 1826), were recorded in Slovakia for the first time. Another interesting record was the cellar spider Hoplopholcus sp. and a new locality for the exotic spiders Coleosoma floridanum Banks, 1900 and Triaeris stenaspis Simon, 1891 was discovered. Additionally, a short survey of other arachnids (except Acari) was done. A single specimen of a provisionally identifiable palpigrade species (cf. Eukoenenia florenciae), one harvestmen species, Opilio canestrinii (Thorell, 1876), and four pseudoscorpion species were recorded. The rare pseudoscorpion species Chthonius ressli Beier, 1956 was collected for the second time in Slovakia. Keywords: alien species, artificial ecosystems, faunistics, introduced species, new record Zusammenfassung. Spinnentiere aus Warmhäusern des Botanischen Gartens der PJ Šafárik Universität in Košice, Slowakei (Arachnida: Araneae, Opiliones, Palpigradi, Pseudoscorpiones). Hiermit wird der erste umfangreiche Beitrag zur Spinnentierfauna des Botanischen Gartens der P.J. Šafárik Universität in Košice (Slowakei) präsentiert. Während zehn Jahren wurden 62 Spinnentaxa aus 21 Familien nachgewiesen. Zwei Spinnenarten, Mermessus trilobatus (Emerton, 1882) und Hasarius adansoni (Audouin, 1826), werden erst- mals für die Slowakei gemeldet.
    [Show full text]
  • David Penney
    ARTÍCULO: NEW EXTANT AND FOSSIL DOMINICAN REPUBLIC SPIDER RECORDS, WITH TWO NEW SYNONYMIES AND COMMENTS ON TAPHONOMIC BIAS OF AMBER PRESERVATION David Penney Abstract: A collection of 23 identifiable extant spider species from the Dominican Republic revealed eight (= 35%) new species records for the country and five (= 22%) for the island of Hispaniola. The collection includes the first record of the family Prodidomidae from Hispaniola. Phantyna guanica (Gertsch, 1946) is identified as a junior synonym of Emblyna altamira (Gertsch & Davis, 1942) (Dictynidae) and Ceraticelus solitarius Bryant, 1948 is identified as a junior synonym of C. paludigenus Crosby & Bishop, 1925 (Linyphiidae). Such a large proportion of new records in such a small sample demonstrates that the extant spider fauna of the Dominican Republic is poorly known ARTÍCULO: and is worthy of further investigation, particularly in light of its potential for quantifying New extant and fossil Dominican bias associated with the amber-preserved fauna. New records of fossil spider species Republic spider records, with two preserved in Miocene amber are provided. The taphonomic bias towards a significantly new synonymies and comments higher number of male compared to female spiders as inclusions in Dominican Republic on taphonomic bias of amber amber is a genuine phenomenon. preservation Key words: Arachnida, Araneae, Dictynidae, Linyphiidae, Miocene, palaeontology, taphonomy, taxonomy, Hispaniola. David Penney Taxonomy: Department of Earth Sciences Emblyna altamira (Gertsch & Davis,
    [Show full text]
  • Surface-Active Spiders (Araneae) in Ley and Field Margins
    Norw. J. Entomol. 51, 57–66. 2004 Surface-active spiders (Araneae) in ley and field margins Reidun Pommeresche Pommeresche, R. 2004. Surface-active spiders (Araneae) in ley and field margins. Norw. J. Entomol. 51, 57-66. Surface-active spiders were sampled from a ley and two adjacent field margins on a dairy farm in western Norway, using pitfall traps from April to June 2001. Altogether, 1153 specimens, represent- ing 33 species, were found. In total, 10 species were found in the ley, 16 species in the edge of the ley, 22 species in the field margin “ley/forest” and 16 species in the field margin “ley/stream”. Erigone atra, Bathyphantes gracilis, Savignia frontata and Collinsia inerrans were the most abun- dant species in the ley. C. inerrans was not found in the field margins. This species is previously recorded only a few times in Norway. Diplocephalus latifrons, Tapinocyba insecta, Dicymbium tibiale, Bathyphantes nigrinus and Diplostyla concolor were most abundant in the field margin “ley/ forest”. D. latifrons, D. tibiale and Pardosa amentata were most abundant in the field margin “ley/ stream”, followed by E. atra and B. gracilis. The present results were compared to results from ley and pasture on another farm in the region, recorded in 2000. A Detrended Correspondence Analyses (DCA) of the data sets showed that the spider fauna from the leys were more similar, independent of location, than the fauna in ley and field margins on the same locality. The interactions between cultivated fields and field margins according to spider species composition, dominance pattern and habitat preferences are discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Project Completion Report
    CEPF SMALL GRANT FINAL PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT Organization Legal Name: - Tarantula (Araneae: Theraphosidae) spider diversity, distribution and habitat-use: A study on Protected Area adequacy and Project Title: conservation planning at a landscape level in the Western Ghats of Uttara Kannada district, Karnataka Date of Report: 18 August 2011 Dr. Manju Siliwal Wildlife Information Liaison Development Society Report Author and Contact 9-A, Lal Bahadur Colony, Near Bharathi Colony Information Peelamedu Coimbatore 641004 Tamil Nadu, India CEPF Region: The Western Ghats Region (Sahyadri-Konkan and Malnad-Kodugu Corridors). 2. Strategic Direction: To improve the conservation of globally threatened species of the Western Ghats through systematic conservation planning and action. The present project aimed to improve the conservation status of two globally threatened (Molur et al. 2008b, Siliwal et al., 2008b) ground dwelling theraphosid species, Thrigmopoeus insignis and T. truculentus endemic to the Western Ghats through systematic conservation planning and action. Investment Priority 2.1 Monitor and assess the conservation status of globally threatened species with an emphasis on lesser-known organisms such as reptiles and fish. The present project was focused on an ignored or lesser-known group of spiders called Tarantulas/ Theraphosid spiders and provided valuable information on population status and potential conservation sites in Uttara Kannada district, which will help in future monitoring and assessment of conservation status of the two globally threatened theraphosid species T. insignis and Near Threatened T. truculentus. Investment Priority 2.3. Evaluate the existing protected area network for adequate globally threatened species representation and assess effectiveness of protected area types in biodiversity conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Spider Biodiversity Patterns and Their Conservation in the Azorean
    Systematics and Biodiversity 6 (2): 249–282 Issued 6 June 2008 doi:10.1017/S1477200008002648 Printed in the United Kingdom C The Natural History Museum ∗ Paulo A.V. Borges1 & Joerg Wunderlich2 Spider biodiversity patterns and their 1Azorean Biodiversity Group, Departamento de Ciˆencias conservation in the Azorean archipelago, Agr´arias, CITA-A, Universidade dos Ac¸ores. Campus de Angra, with descriptions of new species Terra-Ch˜a; Angra do Hero´ısmo – 9700-851 – Terceira (Ac¸ores); Portugal. Email: [email protected] 2Oberer H¨auselbergweg 24, Abstract In this contribution, we report on patterns of spider species diversity of 69493 Hirschberg, Germany. the Azores, based on recently standardised sampling protocols in different hab- Email: joergwunderlich@ t-online.de itats of this geologically young and isolated volcanic archipelago. A total of 122 species is investigated, including eight new species, eight new records for the submitted December 2005 Azorean islands and 61 previously known species, with 131 new records for indi- accepted November 2006 vidual islands. Biodiversity patterns are investigated, namely patterns of range size distribution for endemics and non-endemics, habitat distribution patterns, island similarity in species composition and the estimation of species richness for the Azores. Newly described species are: Oonopidae – Orchestina furcillata Wunderlich; Linyphiidae: Linyphiinae – Porrhomma borgesi Wunderlich; Turinyphia cavernicola Wunderlich; Linyphiidae: Micronetinae – Agyneta depigmentata Wunderlich; Linyph- iidae:
    [Show full text]
  • Araneae, Theridiidae)
    Phelsuma 14; 49-89 Theridiid or cobweb spiders of the granitic Seychelles islands (Araneae, Theridiidae) MICHAEL I. SAARISTO Zoological Museum, Centre for Biodiversity University of Turku,FIN-20014 Turku FINLAND [micsaa@utu.fi ] Abstract. - This paper describes 8 new genera, namely Argyrodella (type species Argyrodes pusillus Saaristo, 1978), Bardala (type species Achearanea labarda Roberts, 1982), Nanume (type species Theridion naneum Roberts, 1983), Robertia (type species Theridion braueri (Simon, 1898), Selimus (type species Theridion placens Blackwall, 1877), Sesato (type species Sesato setosa n. sp.), Spinembolia (type species Theridion clabnum Roberts, 1978), and Stoda (type species Theridion libudum Roberts, 1978) and one new species (Sesato setosa n. sp.). The following new combinations are also presented: Phycosoma spundana (Roberts, 1978) n. comb., Argyrodella pusillus (Saaristo, 1978) n. comb., Rhomphaea recurvatus (Saaristo, 1978) n. comb., Rhomphaea barycephalus (Roberts, 1983) n. comb., Bardala labarda (Roberts, 1982) n. comb., Moneta coercervus (Roberts, 1978) n. comb., Nanume naneum (Roberts, 1983) n. comb., Parasteatoda mundula (L. Koch, 1872) n. comb., Robertia braueri (Simon, 1898). n. comb., Selimus placens (Blackwall, 1877) n. comb., Sesato setosa n. gen, n. sp., Spinembolia clabnum (Roberts, 1978) n. comb., and Stoda libudum (Roberts, 1978) n. comb.. Also the opposite sex of four species are described for the fi rst time, namely females of Phycosoma spundana (Roberts, 1978) and P. menustya (Roberts, 1983) and males of Spinembolia clabnum (Roberts, 1978) and Stoda libudum (Roberts, 1978). Finally the morphology and terminology of the male and female secondary genital organs are discussed. Key words. - copulatory organs, morphology, Seychelles, spiders, Theridiidae. INTRODUCTION Theridiids or comb-footed spiders are very variable in general apperance often with considerable sexual dimorphism.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article ISSN 2336-9744 (Online) | ISSN 2337-0173 (Print) the Journal Is Available on Line At
    Research Article ISSN 2336-9744 (online) | ISSN 2337-0173 (print) The journal is available on line at www.biotaxa.org/em New faunistic data on the cave-dwelling spiders in the Balkan Peninsula (Araneae) MARIA V. NAUMOVA1, STOYAN P. LAZAROV2, BOYAN P. PETROV2, CHRISTO D. DELTSHEV2 1Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1, Tsar Osvoboditel Blvd., 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria, E-mail: [email protected] 2National Museum of Natural History, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1, Tsar Osvoboditel Blvd., 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria, E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Corresponding author: Christo Deltshev Received 15 October 2016 │ Accepted 7 November 2016 │ Published online 9 November 2016. Abstract The contribution summarizes previously unpublished data and adds records of newly collected cave-dwelling spiders from the Balkan Peninsula. New data on the distribution of 91 species from 16 families, found in 157 (27 newly established) underground sites (caves and artificial galleries) are reported due to 337 original records. Twelve species are new to the spider fauna of the caves of the Balkan Peninsula. The species Histopona palaeolithica (Brignoli, 1971) and Hoplopholcus longipes (Spassky, 1934) are reported for the first time for the territory of Balkan Peninsula, Centromerus cavernarum (L. Koch, 1872), Diplocephalus foraminifer (O.P.-Cambridge, 1875) and Lepthyphantes notabilis Kulczyński, 1887 are new for the fauna of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cataleptoneta detriticola Deltshev & Li, 2013 is new for the fauna of Greece, Asthenargus bracianus Miller, 1938 and Centromerus europaeus (Simon, 1911) are new for the fauna of Montenegro and Syedra gracilis (Menge, 1869) is new for the fauna of Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • 19 4 273 282 Tanasevitch2 for Inet.P65
    Arthropoda Selecta 19(4): 273282 © ARTHROPODA SELECTA, 2010 On synonymy of linyphiid spiders of the Russian fauna (Arachnida: Aranei: Linyphiidae). 1 Î ñèíîíèìèè ïàóêîâ-ëèíèôèèä ôàóíû Ðîññèè (Arachnida: Aranei: Linyphiidae). 1 Andrei V. Tanasevitch À.Â. Òàíàñåâè÷ Centre for Forest Ecology and Production, Russian Academy of Sciences, Profsoyuznaya Str. 84/32, Moscow 117997 Russia. E-mail: and- [email protected] Öåíòð ïî ïðîáëåìàì ýêîëîãèè è ïðîäóêòèâíîñòè ëåñîâ ÐÀÍ, Ïðîôñîþçíàÿ óë. 84/32, Ìîñêâà 117997 Ðîññèÿ. E-mail: and- [email protected] KEY WORDS: Spiders, Linyphiidae, new synonym, new combination, Russian fauna. ÊËÞ×ÅÂÛÅ ÑËÎÂÀ: Ïàóêè, Linyphiidae, íîâûé ñèíîíèì, íîâàÿ êîìáèíàöèÿ, ôàóíà Ðîññèè. ABSTRACT. Seven new synonyms are established Introduction for the Russian fauna: Agyneta yakutsaxatilis Marusik et Koponen, 2002, syn.n. = Agyneta amersaxatilis Hundreds of new taxa of the linyphiid spiders have Saaristo et Koponen, 1998; Bolyphantes palaeformis been described during the last three decades from the (Tanasevitch, 1989), syn.n. = Bolyphantes bipartitus territory of the former Soviet Union, mainly from the (Tanasevitch, 1989), both comb.n. (ex Lepthyphantes Caucasus, Siberia, the Far East and Central Asia. A Menge, 1866); Epigytholus tuvensis Tanasevitch, 1996, significant progress in the taxonomy of the family syn.n. = Epigytholus kaszabi (Wunderlich, 1995), Linyphiidae, as well as abundant material from various comb.n. (ex Lepthyphantes); Hybauchenidium holmi Palearctic regions which has been recently accumulated, Marusik, 1988, syn.n. = Hybauchenidium aquilonare allow one to not only critically consider some of the (L. Koch, 1879); Poeciloneta yanensis Marusik et Ko- earlier described species and genera but also, in some ponen, 2002, syn.n. = Poeciloneta variegata (Black- cases, to dispel any doubts in their invalidity.
    [Show full text]