DOCSLIB.ORG

Facies Analysis and Diagenetic Evolution of the Dinantian Carbonates

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Facies Analysis and Diagenetic Evolution of the Dinantian Carbonates Facies analysis and diagenetic evolution of the Dinantian carbonates in the Dutch subsurface Report by SCAN September 2019 1 This page intentionally left blank Facies analysis and diagenetic evolution of the Dinantian carbonates in the Dutch subsurface Written by: Mahtab Mozafari1, Peter Gutteridge2, Alberto Riva3, Kees Geel4, Joanna Garland2 and Julie Dewit2 September 2019 1- Energie Beheer Nederland (EBN), Daalsesingel 1, 3511 SV Utrecht, the Netherlands 2- Cambridge Carbonates Ltd, No. 4 The Courtyard, 707 Warwick Road, Solihull, B91 3DA, UK 3- G.E.Plan Consulting srl, Via L. Ariosto 58, 44121 Ferrara, Italy 4- Geological Survey of the Netherlands (TNO), Princetonlaan 6, 3584 CB Utrecht, the Netherlands Dit rapport is een product van het SCAN-programma en wordt mogelijk gemaakt door het Ministerie van Economische Zaken en Klimaat This page intentionally left blank Acknowledgements We gratefully acknowledge John Reijmer (KFUPM, Saudi Arabia), Marten ter Borgh (EBN), Henk van Lochem (Argo Geological Consultants BV, the Netherlands), and Rudy Swennen (KU Leuven, Belgium) for their helpful suggestions and constructive reviews that allowed us to improve this report. We would like to thank our collaborators from TNO (the Netherlands): Renaud Bouroullec, Susan Nelskamp, Johan ten Veen, Rader Abdul Fattah and Dries Hegen for their scientific inputs and helpful discussions throughout the project. This page intentionally left blank Table of contents List of figures and tables ......................................................................................................................................... iv 1. Samenvatting/Executive summary .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Doelstellingen van het onderzoek ............................................................................................................................1 1.2 Conclusies ...............................................................................................................................................................1 1.3 Aanbevelingen .........................................................................................................................................................4 Excecutive summary ................................................................................................................................................ 6 1.4 Aims of study ..........................................................................................................................................................6 1.5 Conclusions .............................................................................................................................................................6 1.6 Recommendations ...................................................................................................................................................8 2. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 10 3. Databases, literature and information available ............................................................................................ 11 3.1 The Netherlands wells ...........................................................................................................................................11 3.2 Belgium, UK and Germany wells ..........................................................................................................................13 4. Geological Setting ......................................................................................................................................... 15 4.1 Structural Evolution ..............................................................................................................................................15 4.1.1 Devonian to Early Carboniferous Crustal Extension ........................................................................... 17 4.1.2 Variscan Compression.......................................................................................................................... 18 4.1.3 The Permian Uplift ............................................................................................................................... 19 4.1.4 Triassic-Jurassic Extension .................................................................................................................. 20 4.1.5 Cretaceous-Tertiary Inversion .............................................................................................................. 21 4.2 General Dinantian Carbonate Models and Analogues ...........................................................................................21 4.2.1 Dinantian carbonate buildups ............................................................................................................... 21 4.2.2 Tournaisian to mid Visean carbonate ramp systems along the southern Laurussian margin ............... 24 4.2.3 Tournaisian to mid Visean carbonate ramp systems north of the London-Brabant Massif .................. 28 4.2.4 Late Visean carbonate shelf and shelf margin depositional systems .................................................... 31 4.2.5 Carbonate slope and basinal depositional systems ............................................................................... 33 4.2.6 Late Warnantian (Brigantian) depositional systems ............................................................................. 33 4.3 Dinantian lithostratigraphy in the Netherlands ......................................................................................................34 4.3.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 34 4.3.2 Bosscheveld Formation (OBBS; early Tournaisian/Hastarian) ............................................................ 34 4.3.3 Pont d’Arcole Formation (PDA; early Tournaisian/Hastarian) ............................................................ 34 4.3.4 Zeeland Formation (CLZL; Tournaisian to Visean / Hastarian – Warnantian) .................................... 35 5. Methodologies and workflows applied in the project ................................................................................... 43 5.1 Sequence stratigraphy ............................................................................................................................................43 5.2 Core logging ..........................................................................................................................................................47 i 5.3 Petrography ...........................................................................................................................................................48 5.4 Thin section scans .................................................................................................................................................49 5.5 Cold Cathodoluminescence (CL) ..........................................................................................................................49 5.6 Sulfur Isotopes .......................................................................................................................................................49 5.7 C and O stable isotopes .........................................................................................................................................50 5.8 Fluid inclusion analysis/ Microthermometry .........................................................................................................50 5.9 X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements ................................................................................................................51 5.10 Vitrinite reflectance ...............................................................................................................................................51 5.11 Biostratigraphy ......................................................................................................................................................51 5.12 Map building .........................................................................................................................................................52 5.13 1D Basin Modeling ...............................................................................................................................................53 6. Synthesis / Results ........................................................................................................................................ 55 6.1 Sequence stratigraphy ............................................................................................................................................55 6.1.1 High resolution sequence stratigraphic sub-division of wells WSK-01 and KSL-02 .......................... 61 6.1.2 High resolution sequence stratigraphic correlation with the north Netherlands ................................... 63 6.2 Sedimentology .......................................................................................................................................................65 6.2.1 Depositional facies recognised in cores ............................................................................................... 65 6.3 Carbonate Platform Evolution ...............................................................................................................................66
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Late Paleozoic Sea Levels and Depositional Sequences Charles A
    Western Washington University Western CEDAR Geology Faculty Publications Geology 1987 Late Paleozoic Sea Levels and Depositional Sequences Charles A. Ross Western Washington University, [email protected] June R. P. Ross Western Washington University Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/geology_facpubs Part of the Geology Commons, and the Paleontology Commons Recommended Citation Ross, Charles A. and Ross, June R. P., "Late Paleozoic Sea Levels and Depositional Sequences" (1987). Geology Faculty Publications. 61. https://cedar.wwu.edu/geology_facpubs/61 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Geology at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in Geology Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Special Publication 24, 1987. LATE PALEOZOIC SEA LEVELS AND DEPOSITIONAL SEQUENCES CHARLES A. ROSSI AND JUNE R. P. ROSS2 1 Chevron U.S.A., Inc.,P. O. BOX 1635, Houston, TX 77251 2 Department of Biology, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225 ABSTRACT studies on these changes in sea level and their paleogeographic distribution (Ross, 1979; Ross Cyclic sea level charts for the Lower and Ross, 1979, 1981a, 1981b, 1985a, 1985b) are Carboniferous (Mississippian), Middle and Upper elaborated on in this paper with charts in a Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian), and Permian show similar format to that used for Mesozoic and considerable variability in the duration and Cenozoic sea-level cyclic fluctuations by Haq, magnitude of third-order depositional sequences, Hardenbol, and Vail (1987 and this volume). and also in the position of general sea level as represented by second-order sea level.
    [Show full text]
  • The Studies on Stratigraphy of the Carboniferous in Poland
    Numer 6 (362) CZERWIEC 1983 przegląd ROK XXX/ 6EOL06/CZNY ORGAN PAŃSTWOWEJ SŁłJŻB'ł' GEOLOGICZNE'1 X MIĘDZYNARODOWY KONGRES X INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS STRATYGRAFII I GEOLOGII KARBONU OF CARBONIFEROUS STRATIGRAPHY AND GEOLOGY Madryt 1983 r. Madrid, 1983 W dniach 12-17 września 1983 r. odbędzie się w Ma­ drycie Międzynarodowy Kongres Stratygrafii i Geologii In the days 12-17 September 1983, the International Karbonu. Będzie on dziesiątym kongresem począwszy od Congress of Carboniferous Stratigraphy and Geology will 1927 r. Dotychczas Polacy uczestniczyli w ośmiu kongre­ be held in Madrid. It will be the tenth congress since 1927. sach, które odbyły się w Holandii, Francji, W. ·Brytanii, Up to now, Poles participated in eight of them, i.e. in the RFN i ZSRR. W dziewiątym kongresie w USA, Polacy nie ones in the Netherlands, France, Great Britain, FRG and brali udziału, przesiano natomiast artykuł z zakresu petro­ USSR. Our representative.y did not participate in . the IX grafii węgla kamiennego opublikowany w materiałach kon­ Congress in the [/SA but one paper on petrography of coal gresowych. has been submitted and published in the congress materials. Polacy biorący czynny udział w ośmiu kongresach wy­ Poles who took part in eight congresses read 27 papers głosili 27 referatów o 'różnej tematyce karbońskiej. covering various problems of the Carboniferous. W niniejszym okolicznościowym numerze „Przeglądu In this special issue of "Przegląd Geologiczny" are Geologicznego" zamieszczono artykuły specjalnie przygo­ published papers prepared for the X Congress. They present towane na ten kongres. Treścią ich są niektóre wyniki prac some results obtained at the first stage of research works stanowiących realizację pierwszego etapu badań przewidzia­ carried out within the frame of the International Geological nych w projekcie „Korelacja formacji węglonośnych" (Pro­ Correlation Programme ( IGCP) Project no.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinantian Carbonate Development and Related Prospectivity of the Onshore Northern Netherlands
    Dinantian carbonate development and related prospectivity of the onshore Northern Netherlands Nynke Hoornveld, 2013 Author: Nynke Hoornveld Supervisors: Bastiaan Jaarsma, EBN Utrecht Prof. Dr. Jan de Jager, VU University Amsterdam Master Thesis: Solid Earth, (450199 and 450149) 39 ECTS. VU University Amsterdam 01-06-2013 Dinantian carbonate development and related prospectivity of the onshore Northern Netherlands Nynke Hoornveld, 2013 Contents Contents……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..2 Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………………..3 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………….……4 Geological History of the Netherlands relating to Dinantian development…………………………..……………..7 Tectonic history…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..9 Stratigraphy of the Carboniferous…………………………………………………………………………………………….16 Stratigraphic Nomenclature of the Netherlands……………………………………………………………….………23 Methods……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…..26 Seismic interpretation…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…27 Time-depth conversion…………………………………………………………………………………………………….……...35 Well correlation……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…38 Carbonate production, precipitation and geometries, with a focus on the Dinantian……….………40 Results………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………..57 Well information, evaluation and reservoir development………………………………………………………..58 Geometry of the Dinantian carbonate build-ups in the Dutch Northern onshore…………..……….75 The geological history
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Mitigation and Investability of a U-PHS Project in the Netherlands
    energies Article Risk Mitigation and Investability of a U-PHS Project in The Netherlands Gert Jan Kramer 1,* , Twan Arts 2, Janos L. Urai 3,4 , Han Vrijling 5 and Jan M. H. Huynen 6 1 Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Princetonlaan 8a, 3584 CB Utrecht, The Netherlands 2 O-PAC Ontwikkelingsmij, Vrijthof 48, 6211 LE Maastricht, The Netherlands; [email protected] 3 Institute for Structural Geology, Tectonics and Geomechanics, RWTH Aachen University, Lochnerstrasse 4-20, D-52056 Aachen, Germany; [email protected] 4 Geostructures—Consultancy for Structural Geology and Geomechanics, Hunnenweg 9, 6224 JN Maastricht, The Netherlands 5 Department of Hydraulic Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, 2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands; [email protected] 6 Sogecom B.V., Vrijthof 48, 6211 LE Maastricht, The Netherlands; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +31-30-253-7948 Received: 13 July 2020; Accepted: 23 September 2020; Published: 28 September 2020 Abstract: We review the status of a 1.4 GW, 8 GWh underground pumped hydro storage (U-PHS) project in the southern Netherlands, which has been under development since the 1980s. Its history shows how the prospect of a large-scale U-PHS for The Netherlands (a country whose proverbial flatness prohibits PHS) has been attractive in every decade, based on proven technology in a subsurface location with validated properties, and solid analysis of its economics. Although the ongoing energy transition clearly requires massive electricity storage, (U-)PHS projects are challenging investment propositions, in The Netherlands, as elsewhere. This case study illustrates a point of general relevance, namely that although the project execution risk, related to uncertainty with respect to subsurface integrity, is very low, the transition risk, associated with the intrinsic uncertainties of an electricity system in transition, is significant.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Correlation of the Base of the Serpukhovian Stage
    Correlation of the base of the Serpukhovian Stage (Carboniferous; Mississippian) in northwest Europe GEORGE D. SEVASTOPULO* & MILO BARHAM✝ *Department of Geology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland ✝Milo Barham, Department of Applied Geology, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia Author for correspondence: [email protected] Running head: Correlation base Serpukhovian northwest Europe Abstract - The Task Group charged with proposing the GSSP for the base of the Serpukhovian Stage (Mississippian: Lower Carboniferous) is likely to use the global First Appearance Datum (FAD: evolutionary first appearance) of the conodont Lochriea ziegleri in the lineage Lochriea nodosa-L. ziegleri for the definition and correlation of the base of the stage. It is important to establish that the FOD (First Occurrence Datum) of L. ziegleri in different basins is essentially penecontemporaneous. Ammonoids provide high-resolution biostratigraphy in the late Mississippian but their use for international correlation is limited by provincialism. However, it is possible to assess the levels of diachronism of the FOD of L. ziegleri in sections in northwest Europe using ammonoid zones. Published compilations of conodont distribution in the Rhenish Slate Mountains of Germany show the FOD of L. ziegleri in the Emstites novalis Biozone (upper part of the P2c zone of the British/Irish ammonoid biozonation) but L. ziegleri has also been reported as occurring in the Neoglyphioceras spirale Biozone (P1d zone). In the Yoredale Group of northern England, the FOD of L. ziegleri is in either the P1c or P1d zone. In NW Ireland, the oldest records of both L. nodosa and L. ziegleri are from the Lusitanoceras granosum Biozone (P2a).
    [Show full text]
  • DXC Geological U.K. North Sea Carboniferous Chronostratigraphy
    DXC Geological Ltd. U.K. North Sea Carboniferous Chronostratigraphy Page: 1 DXC Geological Ltd. Contents 1.0 Basic Carboniferous Chronostratigraphy 4 1.1 Upper Palaeozoic, Carboniferous 4 1.1.1 Lithology 4 1.1.2 Fauna 4 Fig 1.1 Chronostratigraphical framework for the Carboniferous 6 2.0 General Geology and Structural Framework 7 2.1 Introduction 7 2.2 Hercynian Phase 7 2.3 Variscan Deformation 8 Fig 2.1 Basin Platform Topography Resulting from Early Carboniferous Rifting. 8 3.0 Southern North Sea Stratigraphy and Reservoir Geology 8 3.1 Carboniferous Reservoirs 8 Fig 3.1 Carboniferous Petroleum Systems around the Mid North Sea High. 9 3.2 Carboniferous Formation Identification 9 3.3 Stephanian / Westphalian 10 Fig 3.2 Westphalian Palaeogeography Schematic. 10 3.3.1 General Lithology 10 3.3.2 Barren Red Beds 10 3.3.3 Schooner and Ketch Fields (Blocks 44/26 & 44/28) 11 Fig 3.3 Ketch and Cleaver Formations. 11 3.4 Namurian 12 Fig 3.4 Early Namurian Palaeogeography Schematic. 12 3.4.1 General Lithology 13 3.4.2 Ravenspurn Field (Block 43/26) 13 Fig 3.5 Typical Namurian cyclothem sequence in the Ravenspurn Field. 13 3.5 Visean / Dinantian 13 3.5.1 Holkerian 13 3.5.2 Asbian 13 3.5.3 Brigantian 14 Fig 3.6 Dinantian Palaeogeography Schematic. 14 3.5.4 Breagh Field (Block 42/13) 14 Fig 3.7 Breagh Area (Block 42/13) Carboniferous Stratigraphy Summary. 15 3.6 Tournaisian 15 4.0 Northern North Sea Stratigraphy and Reservoir Geology 16 Page: 2 DXC Geological Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • New Data on the Serpukhovian (Carboniferous) Coral Assemblages from the Northwestern Part of the Moscow Basin (Russia)
    TO L O N O G E I L C A A P I ' T A A T L E I I A Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, 59 (3), 2020, 225-233. Modena C N O A S S. P. I. New data on the Serpukhovian (Carboniferous) coral assemblages from the northwestern part of the Moscow Basin (Russia) Ian D. Somerville, Olga L. Kossovaya, Sergio Rodríguez* & Pedro Cózar I.D. Somerville, UCD School of Earth Sciences, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland; [email protected] O.L. Kossovaya, All-Russian Geological Survey Institute VSEGEI, Srednyy Prospect 74, R-199026 St. Petersburg, Russia; Kremlyovskaya St. 18, Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, Russia, 420008; [email protected] S. Rodríguez, Departamento de Paleontología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, c/ José Antonio Nováis 12, Ciudad Universitaria, E-28040 Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Geociencias (CSIC-UCM), c/ Severo Ochoa 7, Ciudad Universitaria, E-28040 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] *corresponding author P. Cózar, Instituto de Geociencias (CSIC-UCM), c/ Severo Ochoa 7, Ciudad Universitaria, E-28040 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] KEY WORDS - Mississippian, Tabulata, Rugosa, Lonsdaleiinae, northwestern Russia. ABSTRACT - Research in two quarries of the Borovichi area near the Uglovka town (northwestern Moscow Basin) has provided several rugose and tabulate corals that improve the knowledge on the palaeontology of that area. The Zarech’e quarry yielded rare specimens of Syringopora reticulata and Dibunophyllum bipartitum, as well as common specimens of Actinocyathus floriformis, A. borealis and A. crassiconus. The Uglovka quarry provided also Syringopora reticulata, Dibunophyllum bipartitum but different species of colonial rugosans: Actinocyathus sp., Lonsdaleia multiseptata and Schoenophyllum sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Stratigraphy of Dinantian Carbonates in the Southern Netherlands and Northern Belgium
    Netherlands Journal of Geosciences — Geologie en Mijnbouw |96 – 4 | 353–379 | 2017 doi:10.1017/njg.2017.33 Seismic stratigraphy of Dinantian carbonates in the southern Netherlands and northern Belgium John J.G. Reijmer1,2,∗, Johan H. ten Veen3, Bastiaan Jaarsma4 & Roy Boots1 1 Sedimentology and Marine Geology group, Geology and Geochemistry cluster, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 2 Present address: College of Petroleum Engineering & Geosciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia 3 TNO – Geological Survey of the Netherlands, Princetonlaan 6, 3584 CB Utrecht, the Netherlands 4 EBN B.V., Daalsesingel 1, 3511 SV Utrecht, the Netherlands ∗ Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Manuscript received: 3 June 2017, accepted: 22 September 2017 Abstract Due to their potential as a petroleum or geothermal system, the Dinantian carbonates of the Netherlands have recently attracted renewed interest because of the identified presence of excellent reservoir properties. This notion contrasts with the general assumption that these carbonates are tight. Therefore, in order to give the current knowledge state, this paper re-examines the sparse publicly available well and seismic data and literature to assess the distribution and reservoir properties of the Dinantian carbonates. Dinantian carbonate deposition occurred throughout the study area (southern onshore and offshore of the Netherlands and northern Belgium), which is situated on the northern margin of the London–Brabant Massif, progressively onlapping the latter structure. This study confirms the presence of three carbonate facies types in the study area: a Tournaisian low-gradient carbonate ramp system, succeeded by a succession in which the carbonate ramp system evolved to a rimmed shelf setting.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Serve a Onegeology Level 1 Conformant WMS Using Mapserver
    Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Who should be using this cookbook? 2 1.3 What type of data should be served as a contribution to OneGeology Level 1? 3 2 SCANNING A PAPER MAP 6 2.1 Scanning 6 2.2 Geo-referencing a scanned map 8 2.3 Image formats and transparency 9 2.4 The Legend for the scanned map 9 3 SETTING UP A MAPSERVER WMS 11 3.1 Pre-requisites for setting up a WMS 11 3.2 Software installation 11 3.3 Configuring the WMS 14 4 REGISTERING YOUR WMS SERVICE WITH THE ONEGEOLOGY PORTAL REGISTRY 27 Appendix 1: Converting coordinate system in data files 35 Appendix 2: Creating MapServer CLASS definitions from ArcView legends 38 Appendix 3: Creating MapServer CLASS definitions from ARCGIS legends 45 Installation 45 Creating mapfiles 46 Appendix 4: BGS example service mapfile 49 Appendix 5: GetCapabilities response from BGS OneGeology service 134 - i - 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background The OneGeology project aims for a complete covering of the world with a target 1:1 000 000 Geological Map. Every country will display its own map series within the national or wider boundaries that it chooses. Further integration or international harmonisation of the content is not included in the project. The maps are displayed as Web Services, so the source keeper keeps full control of the national map, while it is still possible by calling all the web services to compose a full covering of the world. This document is one of a series of “cookbooks” written to assist organisations contributing to OneGeology.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Serpukhovian Conodonts from the Guadiato Area (Córdoba, Spain) Conodontos Del Serpujoviense Inferior Del Área Del Guadiato (Córdoba, España)
    Coloquios de Paleontología, 55 (2005) 21-50 ISSN: 1132-1660 Early Serpukhovian conodonts from the Guadiato Area (Córdoba, Spain) Conodontos del Serpujoviense inferior del Área del Guadiato (Córdoba, España) Paula Medina-Varea1, Graciela N. Sarmiento1, Sergio Rodríguez1 and Pedro Cózar2 MEDINA-VAREA, P., SARMIENTO, G.N., RODRÍGUEZ, S. and CÓZAR, P. 2005. Early Serpukhovian conodonts from the Guadiato Area (Córdoba, Spain). Coloquios de Paleontología, 55: 21-50. Abstract: The conodont assemblages of three stratigraphic sections from lower Serpukhovian rocks of the Guadiato Area (southwes- tern Spain) are composed of fifteen taxa, included in nine genera. Many of them are identified in open nomenclature due to the poor preservation of the specimens, of which most of them are fragmented, the presence of juvenile specimens, and the current controversy in the recognition of some multielement apparatuses. Generally, the faunas are not highly diversified and there is a low abundance of specimens in the horizons that yield conodonts. The assemblages include: Cavusgnathus navicula, Cavusgnathus cf. navicula, Gnathodus girtyi, of which two subspecies were identified, Gnathodus girtyi girtyi and Gnathodus girtyi meischneri, Hindeodontoides? sp., Hindeodus cristula, Idioprioniodus healdi, Idioprioniodus spp., Kladognathus macrodentata?, Kladognathus tenuis-complectens, Lochriea? sp., Mestognathus bipluti, Synclydognathus geminus, Synclydognathus spp. and many unidentifiable fragments. Key words: Taxonomy, Conodonts, Biostratigraphy, Serpukhovian, Sierra Morena, Spain. Resumen: Se describen las asociaciones de conodontos de tres secciones estratigráficas de materiales del Serpujoviense inferior en el Área del Guadiato (Suroeste de España). Se han identificado quince taxones pertenecientes a nueve géneros, muchos en nomen- clatura abierta debido a varios factores tales como, la preservación de los especímenes, de los cuales, la mayoría están fragmentados, la presencia de especímenes juveniles, y a la controversia existente en el reconocimiento de los aparatos multielementales.
    [Show full text]
  • Ichnotaxonomic Assessment of Mazon Creek Area Trace Fossils, Illinois, USA
    Ichnotaxonomic Assessment of Mazon Creek Area Trace Fossils, Illinois, USA by David J. LoBue B.S. Geology B.A. Religious Studies B.A. Political Science Arizona State University 2006 Submitted to the Department of Geology and the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science 2010 _________________________ Stephen T. Hasiotis, Chair _________________________ Paul Selden _________________________ Anthony Walton Date Defended: ____________ The Thesis Committee for David J. LoBue certifies that this is the approved version of the following thesis: Ichnotaxonomic Assessment of Mazon Creek Area Trace Fossils, Illinois, USA __________________________ Stephen T. Hasiotis, Chairperson Date Approved: _____________ ii ABSTRACT David J. LoBue, M.S. Department of Geology, July 2010 University of Kansas The Francis Creek Shale Member (FCSM) of the Mid-Pennsylvanian Carbondale Formation along Mazon Creek in northern Illinois is known for soft-bodied organisms preserved within siderite concretions. Trace fossils, though less well known, also occur in concretions. Several hundred trace-fossil-bearing concretions were examined from collections at The Field Museum, Chicago, and The University of Kansas Natural History Museum, Lawrence. Identification was based on accepted diagnostic criteria and comparison with like specimens. Described were 24 ichnogenera and 28 ichnospecies, including a new ichnospecies of Pennatulites and a new ichnogenera of coprolite— Funiculichnus spiralis, unnamed trace fossils including a bivalve-locomotion trail, spiral and amorphous coprolites, and two possible galls, and several deformation structures and body fossils misidentified as trace fossils. Trace-fossil assemblages indicate a Skolithos– Cruziana ichnofacies transition from shallow, high-energy to deeper, lower-energy nearshore marine environments, which is consistent with previous interpretations that the FCSM was deposited in a nearshore, deltaic environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Neandertal Studies in Belgium: 2000–2005
    PERIODICUM BIOLOGORUM UDC 57:61 VOL. 108, No 3, 373–387, 2006 CODEN PDBIAD ISSN 0031-5362 Original scientific paper Neandertal Studies in Belgium: 2000–2005 Abstract MICHEL TOUSSAINT1 STÉPHANE PIRSON2 On several occasions since 1830 Southern Belgium Meuse Basin caves yielded Neandertal remains, some of them having a major influence on the 1 M. Toussaint, Direction de l'Archéologie, development of palaeoanthropology as a distinct scientific discipline; in MRW, 1 rue des Brigades d'Irlande, 5100 particular, the discovery of human fossils in 1829–1830 at Engis, of a Namur, Belgium. mandible in 1866 at La Naulette and of skeletons in 1886 at Spy. Yet to this 2 S. Pirson, Institut royal des Sciences day the context of these old finds is not well known. But new finds, from the naturelles de Belgique, Département de last two decades, at Couvin, Scladina and Walou took place within modern paléontologie, 29 rue Vautier, 1000 Bruxelles, multidisciplinary field and laboratory studies, backed up by stratigraphic Belgium. positioning, different dating methods and palaeoenvironmental recordings. In parallel, most of the old and recent Neandertal fossils were the object of new anthropological laboratory studies using state-of-the-art technologies, Correspondence: notably 3D reconstruction from computer tomography scans. This article Michel Toussaint overviews all these contributions, focusing primarily on the work of the last Direction de l'Archéologie, MRW, 1 rue des Brigades d'Irlande, 5100 Namur, Belgium five years. E-mail: [email protected] 1. INTRODUCTION Key words: Neandertals, Belgium, palaeoanthropology, computer tomography, n eight occasions since 1830, several caves of the Mosan Basin of dating, stratigraphic positioning.
    [Show full text]