Living at Knole – a Social and Functional History of the House

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Living at Knole – a Social and Functional History of the House A University of Sussex DPhil thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details KNOLE: AN ARCHITECTURAL AND SOCIAL HISTORY OF THE ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY‘S HOUSE, 1456-1538 ALDEN GREGORY VOLUME 1 A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Art History UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX October 2010 i DECLARATION I hereby declare that this thesis has not been and will not be submitted in whole or in part to any other University for the award of any other degree Alden Gregory ii UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX Alden Gregory The degree of DPhil, October 2010 Knole: An Architectural and Social History of the Archbishop of Canterbury’s House, 1456-1538 ABSTRACT This thesis analyses new evidence for both the architectural and social histories of the late-medieval Archbishops of Canterburys‘ house at Knole in Sevenoaks, Kent. Built and occupied by a succession of archbishops between 1456 and 1538, Knole is today regarded as one of the most significant medieval houses in Great Britain. Using newly discovered summary building accounts the thesis suggests a new interpretation of the building phases of the house. This has reattributed most of the major phases to Archbishop Bourchier (c.1411 – 1486) and suggests that by the time of his death much of the extant fabric had been completed. Significantly it also suggests, for the first time, that Bourchier may have been responsible for building the ranges surrounding Green Court; a part of the house that has previously been attributed to later owners of Knole. The thesis also suggests that of Bourchier‘s successors at Knole only Archbishop Warham (c.1450 – 1532) made any significant alterations to the building and attributes to him the timber-framed ranges around Pheasant Court and the east front, including the Brown Gallery. In addition to its architecture, the thesis also considers how a house like Knole was used by the archbishops and discusses the evidence for its differing functions. It compares Knole to other late-medieval houses and palaces, most significantly to the nearby house at Otford; another property built by the Archbishops of Canterbury. The thesis concludes that, alongside some ritual and business functions, Knole‘s primary role was as a country retreat away from the demands of Court and politics. iii CONTENTS Acknowledgements ...........................................................................................................vi List of Abbreviations.......................................................................................................viii INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................1 1) Background ...................................................................................................................1 2) The Architectural Historiography .................................................................................3 3) Architectural Phasing ....................................................................................................7 PART ONE: BUILDING KNOLE .................................................................................9 Phase 1 A – Knole Before 1445 ........................................................................................9 1) Knole‘s Early History ...................................................................................................9 2) The Early Owners of Knole ........................................................................................11 3) The Birdhouse Site ......................................................................................................13 Phase 1 B – Sir James Fiennes, 1445-1456 .....................................................................16 1) Sir James Fiennes ........................................................................................................16 2) Sir James Fiennes and the Evidence for Building Work at Knole ..............................18 Phase 2 A.1 – Archbishop Bourchier: Early Building Works and the Consolidation and Completion of Phase 1 B, 1456-1459 .......................................................................22 1) Archbishop Thomas Bourchier ...................................................................................22 2) Bourchier‘s Purchase of Knole ...................................................................................23 3) Archbishop Bourchier‘s Building Works ....................................................................25 4) Knole House in 1456 ...................................................................................................29 5) Summary .....................................................................................................................38 Phase 2 A.2 – Archbishop Bourchier: Extending and Rebuilding Knole, 1460-1468 ....40 1) Bourchier‘s Political Resurgence ................................................................................40 2) Knole and its Builders 1460-68 ...................................................................................40 2a) The Auditor: George Honton ................................................................................41 2b) The Masons: Thomas Jurdan, Walter Kyng and Thomas Danyell .......................42 2c) Local Labour at Knole ..........................................................................................45 2d) The Glazier: John Fort ..........................................................................................47 3) The Building Works 1460-68: Dating Evidence .........................................................49 4) The 1460s House .........................................................................................................51 4a) Stone Court North Range ......................................................................................52 4b) Stone Court South Range .....................................................................................53 4c) The Archbishop‘s Staterooms ...............................................................................56 4d) The Staircase.........................................................................................................62 4e) The Gatehouse ......................................................................................................64 4f) Adapting the 1456 House ......................................................................................66 4g) The Chapel ............................................................................................................67 4h) The Solar and the Tower ......................................................................................69 iv Phase 2 A.3 – Archbishop Bourchier: Green Court and Stable Court, 1472-1474 .........72 1) Political Turbulence and the Cessation of Works 1469-1471 .....................................72 2) Resumption of Work 1472-73 .....................................................................................75 2a) Brick Building at Knole ........................................................................................75 2b) Green Court and Stable Court ..............................................................................76 3) A Moat at Knole ..........................................................................................................83 4) Archbishop Bourchier‘s Death ....................................................................................84 Phase 2 B.1 – Archbishops Morton and Deane: Upkeep and Repair, 1486-1503 ...........85 1) Archbishop John Morton .............................................................................................85 2) Archbishop Henry Deane ............................................................................................92 Phase 2 B.2 – Archbishop Warham: Extending the House, 1504-1532 ..........................96 1) William Warham in Knole‘s Phasing ..........................................................................96 2) Warham the Builder ....................................................................................................97 3) Warham‘s Building Works at Knole ...........................................................................98 3a) 1504-1507: Upkeep and Repairs...........................................................................98 3b) 1508-1525: Evidence of New Building at Knole .................................................99 3c) The Brown Gallery, Chapel Corridor, Pheasant Court, the Leicester Gallery and the East Range .............................................................................................103 3d) Remodelling the Kitchen ....................................................................................110 4) William Warham and Otford Palace .........................................................................111 Phase 2 B.3 – Archbishop Cranmer: Upkeep
Recommended publications
  • Exhibition Leaflet
    THE REMARKABLE Do You Know…? The Sevenoaks Society Exhibition Dates In the exhibition, you will find answers to these The Society exists to: and Venue TREES OF questions and more: • Help protect the town’s heritage and character 15 September – 12 October SEVENOAKS • Which are the oldest trees in Sevenoaks? • Stimulate responsible and responsive town • And the biggest? planning 2014, The National Trust’s CELEBRATING AND • Where were the original oaks of Sevenoaks? • Keep a watchful eye on developments to ensure Orangery, Knole, Sevenoaks • When did Sevenoaks become One Oak – and they are appropriate and worthy of the town PROTECTING OUR TREES then Eight Oaks? • Provide impartial & authoritative comment to Entrance to the Orangery and Exhibition is free. planning bodies on specific planning proposals. See the Knole National Trust web-site for opening • Why are Wellingtonias so called and what is their times: www.nationaltrust.org.uk/knole connection with Sevenoaks? • What is the story behind the planting of the limes To find out more about the Society, visit our website in Wildernesse Avenue? at www.sevenoakssociety.org.uk, email us at [email protected], or ring David Gamble • Whose ghost strolls sadly down The Duchess on 01732 458898. Walk in Knole on windy, moonless nights? To join, send in the enclosed application form. For more information about the project and exhibition ring Keith Wade on 01732 451223. The Conservation Contact The Sevenoaks Society if you wish to use or Volunteers’ Kent Heritage display any of the material for educational or related Trees Project purposes. Riverhill Himalayan Gardens is open to the public The Conservation Volunteers (TCV) have been on certain days: visit www.riverhillgardens.co.uk helping communities and schools to improve green for details.
    [Show full text]
  • Knole Park Houses on the Left)
    INTRODUCTION TO KNOLE HOUSE TRAIL INSTRUCTIONS Kent Heritage Trees Project Photo: Diliff/Wikimedia Commons Diliff/Wikimedia Photo: Tree 1 to 2 Keeping the house on your right. Walk up the path running parallel to Knole House. Tree 2 is right on the top of the hill. Tree 2 to 3 Follow this path for 500m. At the crossroads, take the central path (leaving the golf park on the right and passing several Knole Park houses on the left). Continue along this path for another 500m and find the next tree on your left. Tree 3 to 4 Take the right pathway (just off main path) towards back Tree Trail towards Knole House. After 200m take the first path on your left (with the wall on your far right) down the hill. Turn left just before the end of for family walks the path and walk up the hill towards the next tree. Tree 4 to 5 Walk back down to the path (can you spot the “elephant tree” in front of you?). Turn right at the end of the path and take the first large pathway on the right. Walk uphill towards Knole House. You will find the next tree halfway up the hill, on your right. Tree 5 to 6 Walk straight back up the hill towards Knole House. Return to your starting point…. Knole is one of England’s most important historic Tree 6 to 7 Walk parallel to the road, past the pond on the right, houses in the heart of Kent’s medieval deer park. It is continue until you reach the path.
    [Show full text]
  • Tonbridge Castle and Its Lords
    Archaeologia Cantiana Vol. 16 1886 TONBRIDGE OASTLE AND ITS LORDS. BY J. F. WADMORE, A.R.I.B.A. ALTHOUGH we may gain much, useful information from Lambard, Hasted, Furley, and others, who have written on this subject, yet I venture to think that there are historical points and features in connection with this building, and the remarkable mound within it, which will be found fresh and interesting. I propose therefore to give an account of the mound and castle, as far as may be from pre-historic times, in connection with the Lords of the Castle and its successive owners. THE MOUND. Some years since, Dr. Fleming, who then resided at the castle, discovered on the mound a coin of Con- stantine, minted at Treves. Few will be disposed to dispute the inference, that the mound existed pre- viously to the coins resting upon it. We must not, however, hastily assume that the mound is of Roman origin, either as regards date or construction. The numerous earthworks and camps which are even now to be found scattered over the British islands are mainly of pre-historic date, although some mounds may be considered Saxon, and others Danish. Many are even now familiarly spoken of as Caesar's or Vespa- sian's camps, like those at East Hampstead (Berks), Folkestone, Amesbury, and Bensbury at Wimbledon. Yet these are in no case to be confounded with Roman TONBEIDGHE CASTLE AND ITS LORDS. 13 camps, which in the times of the Consulate were always square, although under the Emperors both square and oblong shapes were used.* These British camps or burys are of all shapes and sizes, taking their form and configuration from the hill-tops on which they were generally placed.
    [Show full text]
  • Lambeth Palace Library Research Guide Biographical Sources for Archbishops of Canterbury from 1052 to the Present Day
    Lambeth Palace Library Research Guide Biographical Sources for Archbishops of Canterbury from 1052 to the Present Day 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 3 2 Abbreviations Used ....................................................................................................... 4 3 Archbishops of Canterbury 1052- .................................................................................. 5 Stigand (1052-70) .............................................................................................................. 5 Lanfranc (1070-89) ............................................................................................................ 5 Anselm (1093-1109) .......................................................................................................... 5 Ralph d’Escures (1114-22) ................................................................................................ 5 William de Corbeil (1123-36) ............................................................................................. 5 Theobold of Bec (1139-61) ................................................................................................ 5 Thomas Becket (1162-70) ................................................................................................. 6 Richard of Dover (1174-84) ............................................................................................... 6 Baldwin (1184-90) ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • How Did One Approach Otford Palace?
    How did one approach Otford Palace? Charles Shee How did one approach the Otford Palace? Charles Shee This article, based on the archives of the Otford and District Historical Society, was first published in the Otford History and Heritage Newsletter, Autumn 2019, no 19. It is included in the Otford Palace archive by kind permission of Charles Shee and Alan Williams, editor of the Newsletter. Walking from the Otford pond to the Palace it is easy to assume that the slightly elevated lane that passes Chantry Cottage was the access route to the 16C Archbishop ’s Palace. However, a moment’s reflection suggests that this is unlikely. The present narrow road (Palace Approach) leads towards the remaining north-western Tower, but the original main entrance, the Great Gatehouse, was actually significantly further to the east (Fig 1). The western half of the Great Gatehouse still exists, and is joined to the remaining tower by a row of cottages (Fig 1). Some readers will know the western Gatehouse as the building where the Guides used to meet. The eastern part of the Gatehouse and the long range running east towards the station, along with most of the rest of the Palace, were demolished and cleared away many years ago. Surely the original approach to the grand northern entrance of this magnificent palace must have been further to the east than the existing lane? None of the known accounts of the Palace tell us how the Great Gatehouse was approached from the north, nor are there any contemporary illustrations. The reconstruction model of the Palace by Rod Shelton (a “must see” in the Heritage Centre) and the guides to the Palace by local historians Cliff Ward and Rod Shelton leave it to the imagination how this approach way might have connected to the vicinity of the Otford pond or High Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysing Property Rents in Medieval Gloucester
    Location, location, location? Analysing property rents in medieval Gloucester Article Accepted Version Casson, C. and Casson, M. (2016) Location, location, location? Analysing property rents in medieval Gloucester. The Economic History Review, 69 (2). pp. 575-599. ISSN 1468-0289 doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.12117 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/49601/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . To link to this article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ehr.12117 Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online Location, Location, Location? Analysing Property Rents in Medieval Gloucester Catherine Casson and Mark Casson Abstract Although medieval rentals have been extensively studied, few scholars have used them to analyse variations in the rents paid on individual properties within a town. It has been claimed that medieval rents did not reflect economic values or market forces, but were set according to social and political rather than economic criteria, and remained ossified at customary levels. This paper uses hedonic regression methods to test whether property rents in medieval Gloucester were influenced by classic economic factors such as the location and use of a property. It investigates both rents and local rates (landgavel), and explores the relationship between the two.
    [Show full text]
  • Item C1 TM/10/2029 – PROPOSED WESTERLY EXTENSION to HERMITAGE QUARRY, HERMITAGE LANE, AYLESFORD, KENT
    SECTION C MINERALS AND WASTE DISPOSAL Background Documents - the deposited documents, views and representations received as referred to in the reports and included in the development proposals dossier for each case and also as might be additionally indicated. Item C1 TM/10/2029 – PROPOSED WESTERLY EXTENSION TO HERMITAGE QUARRY, HERMITAGE LANE, AYLESFORD, KENT A report by Head of Planning Applications Group to Planning Applications Committee on 10 May 2011. Planning application TM/10/2029 Proposed westerly extension to Hermitage Quarry, Hermitage Lane, Aylesford, Kent (MR. 717 556) Recommendation: Permission be granted subject to conditions. Local and adjoining Member(s): Mrs T Dean, Mrs P Stockell, Mr P Homewood, Mr D Daley, Mr M Robertson, Mrs V Dagger, Mrs S Hohler and Mr R Long, Classification: Unrestricted Background 1. The existing Hermitage Quarry lies within the strategic gap between Allington, to the east, the village of Aylesford, to the north and Barming Heath to the south. It forms part of 230ha of the Hermitage Farm Estate which comprises agricultural land and woodland as well as the quarry itself. The existing quarry has a purpose built access onto Hermitage Lane (B2246), leading to the A20 and M20 at junction 5. 2. Operational since 1990, the quarry is currently operating within an eastern extension area permitted under planning permission reference TM/05/2784. As part of the overall working plan, the consented phased working and restoration scheme requires the operator to work the site in an east to south direction, with final permitted reserves being worked in the permitted western extension (reference TM/02/2782) before infilling and restoration of the final phase which is currently occupied by the plant site area.
    [Show full text]
  • Academic Freedom 258–260, 281 See Also Libertas Inquirendi
    INDEX Academic Freedom 258–260, 281 See also Giles of Rome, Geoff rey See also Libertas inquirendi Hardeby, John Kedington, Philip Albert the Great 27 Repyndon, John Shipton Alneto, William of 102 Avignon 5, 76–78, 85–90, 104, 123, Alnwick, William of 65, 71, 75 137 n. 26, 206, 257, 275, 296 Alyngton, Robert 179–180, 182, 209, 250 Bacher, John Rea 69 Andreas Capellanus 29 Baconthorpe, John of 263–264 Andrew, William, bishop of Meath 211, Baketon, Th omas 168, 170 215, 219–220, 277, 299 Baldock, Robert 238 Annals of Dunstable 58–59 Ball, John 148, 179, 195 Annals of Oseney 48–51, 57–58 Baltinglass Abbey, Ireland 153 Anne of Bohemia 164, 184 Balton, John 190 Antimendicant poetry 97–98 Bangor, bishop of 213 Apostolic Poverty See Poverty Bartholemew the Cistercian 72 Controversy Barton, William 129–130, 141, 148, Appeals 17, 20–21, 60, 62, 66, 77–78, 80, 150–152, 154–155, 157–163, 168, 171, 82, 93–94, 99–107, 124, 129, 139, 141, 174, 177, 203, 241, 245, 247, 276, 280, 149–150, 153, 163, 178, 192, 194, 198, 282, 288–289, 297–298 201–203, 206, 222, 226–229, 234, Condemnation of John Wyclif’s 236–238, 244, 247, 275, 279, 281, 296, propositions 129, 148–164, 171, 298–300 177, 241 Appelby, John 170 Sententia 152, 156–159, 161–162, 288 Aquinas, Th omas 1, 17, 27, 29–30, 42, Beaufon, Walter 85 46–47, 49 n. 34, 64, 260–261, 276, 280 Bedeman, Laurence (see Laurence Arundel, Th omas, archbishop of Stephen) Canterbury 223–226, 228–230, Belluno-Feltre, Gregory of 90 250–251, 253, 261, 270–271, 286 Benedict XI 94 Th e Constitutiones 223–226, 229–231, Benedict XII 98 n.
    [Show full text]
  • Lucy Worsley Summer Is Here!
    Summer 2019 History festival UK:DRIC launch What’s on guide CityLife Kings Jam music festival Television presenter and historian Lucy Worsley Summer is here! If you want to know more about the fantastic festivals coming to Gloucester this summer then look no further – as this issue of City Life includes previews of the History Festival, Gloucester Goes Retro family festival and Kings Jam Music Festival as well as our usual What’s On round-up. We also report on why Gloucester is leading the way with digital innovation, how you can help tackle climate change by recycling food waste, and much more. We are always looking for feedback! Let us know what you think of City Life by emailing [email protected] Thanks for reading and enjoy the summer! The City Life team Contents 2 Welcome 3 Gloucester Goes Retro 4 Recycling food waste 5 Call for a wilder Gloucestershire 6 Gloucestershire Poet Laureate 7 Westgate Gardening Group 8 Reception move 10 Bruton Way demolition 12 History Festival 16 What’s On 18 UK: DRIC launch 20 Kings Jam music festival 22 Kings Quarter artists Windrush generationhonoured Discover DeCrypt What’s on guide Spring 2019 Life Moon landing in Glos Cover photo: City Lucy Worsley Subscribe © Historic Royal Palaces, Bloomsbury, Ben Turner. to future issues of City Life Never miss an issue with a free subscription to your resident’s magazine. You will receive an email letting you know when a new issue is online. Published by To sign up email Gloucester City Council 2019 City_1286) [email protected] 2 CityLife Summer 2019 Go Retro in Gloucester Now in its fifth year, the award winning Gloucester Goes Retro returns to Gloucester this summer.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonsuch Palace
    MARTIN BIDDLE who excavated Nonsuch ONSUCH, ‘this which no equal has and its Banqueting House while still an N in Art or Fame’, was built by Henry undergraduate at Pembroke College, * Palace Nonsuch * VIII to celebrate the birth in 1537 of Cambridge, is now Emeritus Professor of Prince Edward, the longed-for heir to the Medieval Archaeology at Oxford and an English throne. Nine hundred feet of the Emeritus Fellow of Hertford College. His external walls of the palace were excavations and other investigations, all NONSUCH PALACE decorated in stucco with scenes from with his wife, the Danish archaeologist classical mythology and history, the Birthe Kjølbye-Biddle, include Winchester Gods and Goddesses, the Labours of (1961–71), the Anglo-Saxon church and Hercules, the Arts and Virtues, the Viking winter camp at Repton in The Material Culture heads of many of the Roman emperors, Derbyshire (1974–93), St Albans Abbey and Henry VIII himself looking on with and Cathedral Church (1978, 1982–4, the young Edward by his side. The 1991, 1994–5), the Tomb of Christ in of a Noble Restoration Household largest scheme of political propaganda the Church of the Holy Sepulchre (since ever created for the English crown, the 1989), and the Church on the Point at stuccoes were a mirror to show Edward Qasr Ibrim in Nubia (1989 and later). He the virtues and duties of a prince. is a Fellow of the British Academy. Edward visited Nonsuch only once as king and Mary sold it to the Earl of Martin Biddle Arundel. Nonsuch returned to the crown in 1592 and remained a royal house until 1670 when Charles II gave the palace and its park to his former mistress, Barbara Palmer, Duchess of Cleveland.
    [Show full text]
  • 1993 112 Kentish Rag and Other Kent Building Stones Worssam.Pdf
    http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society KENTISH RAG AND OTHER KENT BUILDING STONES BERNARD C. WORSSAM and TIM TATTON-BROWN The name Kentish Rag, or Ragstone, suggests a building stone suitable only for rough walling purposes, a view expressed, for example, by Howe (1910, 264), who wrote of Kentish Rag: 'It has been extensively used in churches in the Home Counties in the form of random and coursed work; it cannot be dressed . .' From earlier periods than Howe's time of writing there are, however, many examples of dressed stonework as well as of ashlar and window tracery in Kentish Rag. It is one purpose of this paper to draw attention to the varied ways in which the stone has been used from time to time. Kentish Rag varies in lithology along its outcrop, such that it is possible in the case of many buildings to deduce the location from which their stone has been derived. Certain Middlesex churches (Robinson and Worssam 1990) provide instances. The paper, therefore, starts with an account of the geology of Kentish Rag. Descriptions are also included of three types of stone with some resemblance to Kentish Rag: the well-known Reigate stone, from Surrey; Folkestone stone, which is rarely recognised as a building stone; and Thanet Beds sandstone from east Kent, so little regarded that it has no familiar local name. THE GEOLOGY OF KENTISH BUILDING STONES Kentish Rag occurs in the Hythe Beds formation, which is part of the Lower Greensand, a group of formations of Lower Cretaceous age (see Table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Fifteenth Century Literary Culture with Particular
    FIFTEENTH CENTURY LITERARY CULTURE WITH PARTICULAR* REFERENCE TO THE PATTERNS OF PATRONAGE, **FOCUSSING ON THE PATRONAGE OF THE STAFFORD FAMILY DURING THE FIFTEENTH CENTURY Elizabeth Ann Urquhart Submitted for the Degree of Ph.!)., September, 1985. Department of English Language, University of Sheffield. .1 ''CONTENTS page SUMMARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ill INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1 The Stafford Family 1066-1521 12 CHAPTER 2 How the Staffords could Afford Patronage 34 CHAPTER 3 The PrIce of Patronage 46 CHAPTER 4 The Staffords 1 Ownership of Books: (a) The Nature of the Evidence 56 (b) The Scope of the Survey 64 (c) Survey of the Staffords' Book Ownership, c. 1372-1521 66 (d) Survey of the Bourgchiers' Book Ownership, c. 1420-1523 209 CHAPTER 5 Considerations Arising from the Study of Stafford and Bourgchier Books 235 CHAPTER 6 A Brief Discussion of Book Ownership and Patronage Patterns amongst some of the Staffords' and Bourgchiers' Contemporaries 252 CONCLUSION A Piece in the Jigsaw 293 APPENDIX Duke Edward's Purchases of Printed Books and Manuscripts: Books Mentioned in some Surviving Accounts. 302 NOTES 306 TABLES 367 BIBLIOGRAPHY 379 FIFTEENTR CENTURY LITERARY CULTURE WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE PATTERNS OF PATRONAGE, FOCUSSING ON THE PATRONAGE OF THE STAFFORD FAMILY DURING THE FIFTEENTH CENTURY. Elizabeth Ann Urquhart. Submitted for the Degree of Ph.D., September, 1985. Department of English Language, University of Sheffield. SUMMARY The aim of this study is to investigate the nature of the r61e played by literary patronage in fostering fifteenth century English literature. The topic is approached by means of a detailed exam- ination of the books and patronage of the Stafford family.
    [Show full text]