Behavioral and Morphological Development of Immature Hawaiian Freshwater Fishes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Behavioral and Morphological Development of Immature Hawaiian Freshwater Fishes Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1995 Behavioral and Morphological Development of Immature Hawaiian Freshwater Fishes. David Chestine Tate Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Tate, David Chestine, "Behavioral and Morphological Development of Immature Hawaiian Freshwater Fishes." (1995). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 5987. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/5987 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced frommicrofilm the master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, prim bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 NorthZeeb Road. Ann Arbor.Ml 48106*1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 BEHAVIORAL AND MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT OF IMMATURE HAWAIIAN FRESHWATER FISHES A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Zoology and Physiology by David Chestine Tate B.S., Middle Tennessee State University, 1967 M.S., Middle Tennessee State University, 1974 May 1995 OHI Number: 9538767 UMI Microform 9538767 Copyright 1995, by DMI Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. UMI 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, MI 48103 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am grateful for the support of my wife, Anne Moore Tate, whose help and encouragement have been invaluable in completing this project. I thank Dr. J. M. Fitzsimons for his expert guidance in directing my studies and for teaching me the skills of a field biologist. I value his friendship. I am grateful to Dr. Fred Bryan for sparking my interest in larval fishes and freshwater biology, and for many hours of stimulating conversation. For their guidance and encouragement I thank the other members of my advisory committee, Dr. Earl Wiedner, Dr. Douglas Rossman, and Dr. Mark Hafner. My work in Hawai'i could not have been completed without the advice, direction, and hospitality of Dr. R. T. Nishimoto. Thanks to Darrell Kuamo'o for sharing his ideas, his samples, his pictures, and especially his stories during those 24-hour collecting sessions. Wade Ishikawa and Skippy Hau provided essential instruction about Hawaiian stream biology and ecology that contributed to the completion of my research. Thanks to William Devick whose diligence in conserving Hawai'i's streams has been inspirational. Dr. William Font’s lessons on stream fish parasites are greatly appreciated. I could not have survived the early years without Brooksie Aucoin's typing. I am grateful to Fr. Robert Nielsen and the Board of Trustees at the Episcopal School of Acadiana for granting me a sabbatical leave to begin my doctoral program, and to Hiram Goza and Lynn Blevins for their continuing support of ii my studies. Finally, for her unflagging support in over four decades of schooling, I thank Mrs. Ann Ruth Marlow Tate. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ....................................... ii LIST OF TABLES ........................................ v LIST OF FIGURES ....................................... vii ABSTRACT ............................................. ix INTRODUCTION .......................................... 1 STUDY SITES ........................................... 6 METHODS ..... 24 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ................................ 29 Species Descriptions ............................. 29 Myomeres ......................................... 39 Recruitment Into Fresh Water ..................... 40 Schooling ........................................ 53 Predation ........................................ 58 Upstream Movement ................................ 63 APPLICATION OF RESEARCH ............................... 75 HURRICANE INIKI ....................................... 76 Introduction ..................................... 76 Materials and Methods ............................ 77 Results and Discussion ........................... 82 SUMMARY ................................................ 89 LITERATURE CITED ...................................... 92 APPENDIX A: LETTER OF PERMISSION ...................... 96 APPENDIX B: HAWAIIAN FISH NAMES ....................... 97 VITA ................................................... 98 LIST OF TABLES 1. Streams on the Hawaiian high islands in which freshwater fishes were studied .............. 19 2. Myomere counts for postlarval Hawaiian freshwater fish recruits ...................................... 40 3. Numbers of each species of gobioid postlarvae trapped at the stream-ocean interface during their recruitment into fresh water. L* concolor (LC), S. stimpsoni (SS), A. ouamengis (AG), S. hawaiiensis (SH), E. sandwicensis (ES) ....'42 4. Frequency of migration routes taken by Hawaiian freshwater fish recruits swimming into streams from the ocean. L. concolor (LC), S. stimpsoni (SS), A. au amen sis (AG) ............... 46 5. Frequency of diurnal periods and mode of onshore transport employed by Hawaiian freshwater fish recruits: L. concolor (LC), S. stimpsoni (SS), A. quamensis (AG), S. hawaiiensis (SH), E. sandwicensis (ES) ......... 47 6. Species composition of postlarval freshwater fish shoals observed in Hawaiian stream estuaries. L. concolor (LC), s. stimpsoni (SS), A. quamensis (AG), S. hawaiiensis (SH) ...... 55 7. Densities of the benthic freshwater predator, E. sandwicensis. in 2-m x 6-m plots in Honoli'i and Hakalau streams ....................... 60 8. Predation frequency on postlarval freshwater fishes by 1. sandwicensis and K. sandvicensis determined by gut examination ...................... 61 9. Size of feeding areas defended by size classes of juvenile A. quamensis and S. stimpsoni....................................... 65 10. Aggressive encounters (contests) of two S. stimpsoni juvenile morphological types with each other and with adults in Hakalau Stream ..................................... 67 11. Agonistic responses of three size classes of L. concolor to encounters with conspecifics and other gobioid species in Hakalau Stream (14 hours of observation) .......................... 70 v 12. Mean rainfall in inches from stations on Kaua'i's Na Pali Coast (Kilauea, Koloko [sic], Mohihi, Wainiha Intake) and Hawai'i's Hamakua Coast (Hakalau, Honohina, Kuka'iau, 'O'okala) (Owenby and Ezell 1992; Record of River and Climatological Observation, National Weather Service, February, 1993- June, 1994) ......................................... 87 vi LIST OF FIGURES 1. Hawaiian Islands in the mid-Pacific Ocean ....... 2 2. Southeast to northwest orientation of the Hawaiian Archipelago ...... 3 3. Kalalau Stream mouth, Kaua’i ............... 7 4. Terminal waterfall of Umauma Stream, Hawai'i .... 8 5. Hanakapi'ai Stream mouth, Kaua’i ................ 9 6. Waimea River estuary, Kaua'i ..................... 10 7. Hakalau Stream valley, Hawai'i .................. 12 8. Upper Wainiha River, Kaua'i ...................... 13 9. Midreaches of the Hanapepe River, Kaua'i ........ 14 10. Location of stream study sites on Hawai'i ........ 15 11. Location of stream study sites on Kaua’i ......... 16 12. Location of stream study sites on Maui ........... 17 13. Location of stream study site on O'ahu ........... 18 14. Estuary at Hakalau S t r e a m ........................ 22 15. Low-water bridge at the head of the estuary at Hakalau S t r e a m ................................. 23 16. Ventral view of melanophore distribution in Hawaiian freshwater fish postlarvae (drawings by Darrell Kuamo'o) ............................ 30 17. Composite graph of seasonality in postlarvae recruitment into fresh water by all five species of Hawaiian freshwater fishes ......... 43 18. Seasonal recruitment rates into fresh water by native Hawaiian stream fishes .............. 44 19. Diel periodicity of recruitment into
Recommended publications
  • Recognizing the Rights of the Hanalei River in Kaua'i, Hawai'i Earth Law
    Recognizing the Rights of the Hanalei River in Kaua’i, Hawai'i Earth Law Center and the Hanalei River Heritage Foundation1 ​ 1 Report prepared by Addison Luck, Earth Law Manager at the Earth Law Center. 1 Giving Rights to the Hanalei River TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 2 ​ I. RIGHTS FOR THE NATURAL WORLD 4 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ A. OLD IS NEW AGAIN 4 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ B. A RADICAL IDEA 6 ​ ​ ​ C. RIVER RIGHTS 8 ​ ​ ​ II. HANALEI RIVER WATERSHED 11 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ A. ECOLOGY 13 ​ B. THREATS 20 ​ III. NATIVE HAWAIIAN ENVIRONMENTAL PRACTICES 21 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ A. VALUES 21 ​ B. STEWARDSHIP 23 ​ IV. HAWAIIAN WATER LAW 27 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ V. RIGHTS FOR THE HANALEI RIVER 28 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 2 Giving Rights to the Hanalei River Introduction The Hanalei River, located on the oldest of the Hawaiian Islands (Map 1), is the largest ​ ​ river by discharge on Kaua’i and provides critical habitat to at least 48 endangered species.2 The ​ Hanalei River flows sixteen miles from the summit of Mt. Wai`ale`ale, one of the wettest spots on terrestrial Earth3 and often considered the most rained-on location in the world,4 to the ​ ​ Hanalei Bay and the Pacific Ocean. Translating to “lei making” or “crescent bay” in Hawaiian, the Hanalei River journeys through pristine jungle wilderness, taro fields, pastureland, and the towns of Hanalei and Princeville before entering Hanalei Bay, a white sand river mouth home to super corals,5 legendary surfing and snorkeling,6 and a variety of marine life. Foundational to all ​ ​ life on Kaua’i, the Hanalei River is particularly important to
    [Show full text]
  • The Native Stream Fishes of Hawaii
    Summer 2014 American Currents 2 THE NATIVE STREAM FISHES OF HAWAII Konrad Schmidt St. Paul, MN [email protected] Several years ago at the University of Minnesota a poster The “uniqueness” of these species is due not only to the about Hawaii’s native freshwater fishes caught my eye. I high degree of endemism, but also includes their habitat, life was astonished to learn that for a tropical zone the indige- cycle, and evolutionary adaptations. Hawaii’s watersheds nous freshwater ichthyofauna (traditionally and collectively are typically short and small. The healthiest fish populations known as ‘o’opu) is incredibly rich in uniqueness, but very generally inhabit perennial streams located on the windward poor in species diversity, comprising only four gobies and (northeast) side of islands which are drenched with 100-300 one sleeper. Four of the five are endemic to Hawaii. How- inches of rainfall annually. Frequent and turbid flash floods, ever, recent research suggests the ‘o’opu nākea of Hawaii is called freshets, occur on a regular basis; between events, a distinct species from the Pacific River Goby, and is, there- however, stream visibility can exceed 30 feet. On the lee- fore, also endemic. In addition to these fishes, there are only ward, drier sides, populations do persist in some intermit- two native euryhaline species that venture from the ocean tent streams at higher elevations even though lower reaches into the lower and slower reaches of streams not far above may be dry for months or years. These dynamic streams are their mouths: Hawaiian Flagtail (Kuhlia sandvicensis) and continually and naturally in a state of recovery.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasites of Hawaiian Stream Fishes: Sources and Impacts
    Biology of Hawaiian Streams and Estuaries. Edited by N.L. Evenhuis 157 & J.M. Fitzsimons. Bishop Museum Bulletin in Cultural and Environmental Studies 3: 157–169 (2007). Parasites of Hawaiian Stream Fishes: Sources and Impacts WILLIAM F. FONT Department of Biological Sciences, Southeastern Louisiana University, Hammond, Louisiana 70402, USA; email: [email protected] Abstract Introduced freshwater fishes impact native Hawaiian stream fishes in two important ways. In addition to direct negative effects associated factors such as predation, competition, and interference, indirect effects may occur when exotic fishes transfer their parasites to native hosts. Six species of helminths that have been introduced with alien live-bearing fishes, including guppies, green swordtails, shortfin mollies, and mosquitofish which now parasitize the five species of gobioids that occur naturally in Hawaiian streams. Some of these exotic parasites form large populations and produce heavy infec- tions in native fishes that can result in disease. Sources, host specificity, distribution, and life cycles of these parasites were studied to assess their potential for pathogenicity and to aid in the formulation of comprehensive conservation and management plans for native stream species in Hawai‘i. Introduction Vitousek et al. (1997) regarded introduced species to be second only to habitat destruction as a threat to biodiversity. Although he was referring to the global distribution of alien species, his experience with the negative impacts of introductions was gained through his extensive research in Hawai‘i. Much research has been conducted on species introduced either accidentally or deliberately into ter- restrial ecosystems within the archipelago by humans. Maciolek (1984) and Devick (1991) ad- dressed the problem of introduced species in Hawaiian streams.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-JMIH-Program-Book-MASTER
    W:\CNCP\People\Richardson\FY19\JMIH - Rochester NY\Program\2018 JMIH Program Book.pub 2 Organizing Societies American Elasmobranch Society 34th Annual Meeting President: Dave Ebert Treasurer: Christine Bedore Secretary: Tonya Wiley Editor and Webmaster: Chuck Bangley Immediate Past President: Dean Grubbs American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists 98th Annual Meeting President: Kathleen Cole President Elect: Chris Beachy Past President: Brian Crother Prior Past President: Carole Baldwin Treasurer: Katherine Maslenikov Secretary: Prosanta Chakrabarty Editor: W. Leo Smith Herpetologists’ League 76th Annual Meeting President: Willem Roosenburg Vice-President: Susan Walls Immediate Past President: David Sever (deceased) Secretary: Renata Platenburg Treasurer: Laurie Mauger Communications Secretary: Max Lambert Herpetologica Editor: Stephen Mullin Herpetological Monographs Editor: Michael Harvey Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles 61th Annual Meeting President: Marty Crump President-Elect: Kirsten Nicholson Immediate Past-President: Richard Shine Secretary: Marion R. Preest Treasurer: Ann V. Paterson Publications Secretary: Cari-Ann Hickerson 3 Thanks to our Sponsors! PARTNER SPONSOR SUPPORTER SPONSOR 4 We would like to thank the following: Local Hosts Alan Savitzky, Utah State University, LHC Co-Chair Catherine Malone, Utah State University, LHC Co-Chair Diana Marques, Local Host Logo Artist Marty Crump, Utah State University Volunteers We wish to thank the following volunteers who have helped make the Joint Meeting
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL REPORT Development and Use of Genetic Methods for Assessing Aquatic Environmental Condition and Recruitment Dynamics of Native Stream Fishes on Pacific Islands
    FINAL REPORT Development and Use of Genetic Methods for Assessing Aquatic Environmental Condition and Recruitment Dynamics of Native Stream Fishes on Pacific Islands SERDP Project RC-1646 APRIL 2014 Michael J. Blum Tulane University James F. Gilliam North Carolina State University Peter B. McIntyre University of Wisconsin Distribution Statement A Table of Contents List of Tables ii List of Figures iii List of Acronyms v Keywords ix Acknowledgments x 1 Abstract 1 2 Objectives 3 3 Background 5 3.0 Oceanic Island Watersheds and Stream Ecosystems 5 3.1 Genetic Assessment of Aquatic Environmental Condition 8 3.2 Historical Colonization and Contemporary Connectivity 9 3.2.1 Genetic Analysis of Historical Colonization and Contemporary Connectivity 11 3.2.2 Use of Otolith Microchemistry for Estimating Contemporary Connectivity 12 3.2.3 Use of Oxygen Isotopes in Otoliths for Reconstructing Life History 14 3.2.4 Coupled Biophysical Modeling of Larval Dispersal 16 3.3 Genetic and Integrative Assessment of Pacific Island Watersheds 18 3.3.1 Among-Watershed Assessment of Environmental Condition 18 3.3.2 Within-Watershed Assessment of Environmental Condition 19 3.3.3 Mark-recapture Calibration of Snorkel Surveys 22 4 Materials and Methods 26 4.0 Historical Colonization and Contemporary Connectivity 26 4.0.1 Genetic Analysis of Historical Colonization and Contemporary Connectivity 26 4.0.2 Otolith Microchemistry Analysis of Contemporary Connectivity 32 4.0.3 Use of Oxygen Isotopes in Otoliths for Reconstructing Life History 38 4.0.4 Coupled Biophysical
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes Collected During the 2017 Marinegeo Assessment of Kāne
    Journal of the Marine Fishes collected during the 2017 MarineGEO Biological Association of the ā ‘ ‘ ‘ United Kingdom assessment of K ne ohe Bay, O ahu, Hawai i 1 1 1,2 cambridge.org/mbi Lynne R. Parenti , Diane E. Pitassy , Zeehan Jaafar , Kirill Vinnikov3,4,5 , Niamh E. Redmond6 and Kathleen S. Cole1,3 1Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, MRC 159, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA; 2Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Original Article Singapore 117543, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore; 3School of Life Sciences, University of Hawai‘iatMānoa, 2538 McCarthy Mall, Edmondson Hall 216, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA; 4Laboratory of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology of Cite this article: Parenti LR, Pitassy DE, Jaafar Aquatic Organisms, Far Eastern Federal University, 8 Sukhanova St., Vladivostok 690091, Russia; 5Laboratory of Z, Vinnikov K, Redmond NE, Cole KS (2020). 6 Fishes collected during the 2017 MarineGEO Genetics, National Scientific Center of Marine Biology, Vladivostok 690041, Russia and National Museum of assessment of Kāne‘ohe Bay, O‘ahu, Hawai‘i. Natural History, Smithsonian Institution DNA Barcode Network, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, MRC 183, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA the United Kingdom 100,607–637. https:// doi.org/10.1017/S0025315420000417 Abstract Received: 6 January 2020 We report the results of a survey of the fishes of Kāne‘ohe Bay, O‘ahu, conducted in 2017 as Revised: 23 March 2020 part of the Smithsonian Institution MarineGEO Hawaii bioassessment. We recorded 109 spe- Accepted: 30 April 2020 cies in 43 families.
    [Show full text]
  • Nekton Communities in Hawaiian Coastal Wetlands: the Distribution and Abundance of Introduced Fish Species
    Estuaries and Coasts (2012) 35:212–226 DOI 10.1007/s12237-011-9427-1 Nekton Communities in Hawaiian Coastal Wetlands: The Distribution and Abundance of Introduced Fish Species Richard Ames MacKenzie & Gregory L. Bruland Received: 1 December 2010 /Revised: 27 April 2011 /Accepted: 27 June 2011 /Published online: 19 July 2011 # Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation (outside the USA) 2011 Abstract Nekton communities were sampled from 38 Keywords Gambusia affinis . Hawaii . Invasive fish . Hawaiian coastal wetlands from 2007 to 2009 using lift Poeciliidae . Tilapia . Tropical coastal wetlands nets, seines, and throw nets in an attempt to increase our understanding of the nekton assemblages that utilize these poorly studied ecosystems. Nekton were dominated by Introduction exotic species, primarily poeciliids (Gambusia affinis, Poecilia spp.) and tilapia. These fish were present in 50– Coastal wetlands on Pacific Islands provide valuable habitat 85% of wetlands sampled; densities were up to 15 times for endemic fauna and flora (Erickson and Puttock 2006) greater than native species. High densities of exotic fish that are utilized by Pacific Islanders for fiber, fuel, food, or were generally found in isolated wetlands with no connec- medicine (Naylor and Drew 1998; Drew et al. 2005; Balick tion to the ocean, were often the only nekton present, were 2009). Unfortunately, these ecosystems and the ecological positively correlated with surface water total dissolved services they provide are being lost at an alarming rate nitrogen, and were negatively correlated with native species (Dahl 1990; Kosaka 1990), and the remaining wetland richness. Native species were present in wetlands with habitat continues to be threatened by increased develop- complete or partial connection to the ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • Migratory Flexibility in Native Hawai'ian Amphidromous Fishes
    Received: 29 August 2019 Accepted: 5 December 2019 DOI: 10.1111/jfb.14224 REGULAR PAPER FISH Migratory flexibility in native Hawai'ian amphidromous fishes Heidi Heim-Ballew1 | Kristine N. Moody2 | Michael J. Blum2 | Peter B. McIntyre3,4 | James D. Hogan1 1Department of Life Sciences, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, Abstract Texas, USA We assessed the prevalence of life history variation across four of the five native 2 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary amphidromous Hawai'ian gobioids to determine whether some or all exhibit evidence Biology, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA of partial migration. Analysis of otolith Sr.: Ca concentrations affirmed that all are 3Center for Limnology, University of amphidromous and revealed evidence of partial migration in three of the four spe- Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA cies. We found that 25% of Lentipes concolor (n= 8), 40% of Eleotris sandwicensis 4Department of Natural Resources, (n=20) and 29% of Stenogobius hawaiiensis (n=24) did not exhibit a migratory life- Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, history. In contrast, all individuals of Sicyopterus stimpsoni (n= 55) included in the USA study went to sea as larvae. Lentipes concolor exhibited the shortest mean larval dura- Correspondence tion (LD) at 87 days, successively followed by E. sandwicensis (mean LD = 102 days), Heidi Heim-Ballew, Department of Life Sciences, Texas A&M University-Corpus S. hawaiiensis (mean LD = 114 days) and S. stimpsoni (mean LD = 120 days). These Christi, 6300 Ocean Drive, Unit 5800, Corpus findings offer a fresh perspective on migratory life histories that can help improve Christi TX, 78412, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Seriola Lalandi Dorsalis), Technological Advances Towards the Development of the Aquaculture Sector
    Quantifying Digestion in California Yellowtail (Seriola lalandi dorsalis), Technological Advances Towards the Development of the Aquaculture Sector The Graduate Division The University of Hawai‘i at Hilo In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science: Tropical Conservation Biology and Environmental Science Hilo, Hawai’i December 2016 By: George Rod Parish IV Thesis Committee: Armando Garciaa Charles Farwellbc Luke Gardnerbd Kevin Hopkinsa Barbara Blockbd a Pacific Aquaculture & Coastal Resources Center, College of Agriculture, Forestry and Natural Resource Management, University of Hawaii at Hilo, 1079 Kalanianaole Ave., Hilo, HI 96720, United States b Tuna Research and Conservation Center, 886 Cannery Row, Monterey, CA 93940, USA c Monterey Bay Aquarium, 886 Cannery Row, Monterey, CA 93940, USA d Biology Department, Hopkins Marine Station, Stanford University, 120 Ocean View Blvd, Pacific Grove, CA 93950, USA Table of Contents Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... iv List Of Figures .................................................................................................................................. vi List Of Tables .................................................................................................................................. vii Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 I. Yellowtail
    [Show full text]
  • Growth Patterns, Diet Composition and Sex Ratios in Giant African Threadfin, Polydactylus Quadrifilis from Ologe Lagoon, Lagos, Nigeria
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE & BIOLOGY ISSN Print: 1560–8530; ISSN Online: 1814–9596 10–682/IAZ/2011/13–4–559–564 http://www.fspublishers.org Full Length Article Growth Patterns, Diet Composition and Sex Ratios in Giant African Threadfin, Polydactylus quadrifilis from Ologe Lagoon, Lagos, Nigeria EMMANUEL O. LAWSON1 AND ADEOLA U. OLAGUNDOYE Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Science, Lagos State University, Ojo. P.O. Box 0001, LASU Post Office, Lagos, Nigeria 1Corresponding author’s e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The growth patterns, diet composition, and sex ratio of Giant African threadfin, Polydactylus quadrifilis (Cuvier, 1829) was investigated in Ologe lagoon in Nigeria to provide necessary baseline data toward the development of fisheries in Lagos lagoon system. A total of 180 individuals were caught from Ologe lagoon with gill and cast nets between October 2007 and September 2008. The fish measured between 90 and 490 mm Total length and weighed 8.5-950 g Body weight, respectively. The length-weight relationships were Log W = -4.96 + 2.92 Log TL (n = 83, r = 0.96) for males and Log W = 3.44+2.27 Log TL (n = 41, r = 0.88) for females. The growth exponential was near isometric for males (b = 2.92) and allometric for females (b = 2.27). Condition factor (K) of the fish ranged from 5.2 × 10-4 to 1.3 × 10-³ g/mm3 for males and 4.24 × 10-4 to 1.3 × 10-³ g/mm3 for females. 53.33% of the stomachs had foods, while 46.67% were empty. The species has piscivorous habit and carnivorous in nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Structure and Habitat Preferences of Intertidal Fishes of the Eastern Canary Islands: Fuerteventura, Gran Canaria
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1996 Community Structure and Habitat Preferences of Intertidal Fishes of the Eastern Canary Islands: Fuerteventura, Gran Canaria, and Lanzarote, With a Behavioral Description of Mauligobius Maderensis (Osteichthyes: Gobiidae). Richard Patrick Cody Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Cody, Richard Patrick, "Community Structure and Habitat Preferences of Intertidal Fishes of the Eastern Canary Islands: Fuerteventura, Gran Canaria, and Lanzarote, With a Behavioral Description of Mauligobius Maderensis (Osteichthyes: Gobiidae)." (1996). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 6180. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/6180 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type o f computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
    [Show full text]
  • Kahana, Oÿahu
    Kahana, Oÿahu DAR Watershed Code: 31018 Kahana, Oÿahu WATERSHED FEATURES Kahana watershed occurs on the island of Oÿahu. The Hawaiian meaning of the name is “cutting”. The area of the watershed is 8.5 square mi (22.1 square km), with maximum elevation of 2641 ft (805 m). The watershed's DAR cluster code is 4, meaning that the watershed is medium size, steep in the upper watershed, and with embayment. The percent of the watershed in the different land use districts is as follows: 0.9% agricultural, 98.2% conservation, 0% rural, and 0.9% urban. Land Stewardship: Percentage of the land in the watershed managed or controlled by the corresponding agency or entity. Note that this is not necessarily ownership. Military Federal State OHA County Nature Conservancy Other Private 0.1 0.0 94.4 0.0 3.0 0.0 2.5 Atlas of Hawaiian Watersheds & Their Aquatic Resources 4/7/2008 109 Kahana, Oÿahu Land Management Status: Percentage of the watershed in the categories of biodiversity protection and management created by the Hawaii GAP program. Permanent Biodiversity Managed for Multiple Protected but Protection Uses Unmanaged Unprotected 0.0 0.0 97.5 2.5 Land Use: Areas of the various categories of land use. These data are based on NOAA C- CAP remote sensing project. Percent Square mi Square km High Intensity Developed 0.0 0.00 0.00 Low Intensity Developed 1.0 0.09 0.23 Cultivated 0.0 0.00 0.00 Grassland 0.7 0.06 0.14 Scrub/Shrub 40.3 3.44 8.91 Evergreen Forest 56.1 4.80 12.42 Palustrine Forested 0.0 0.00 0.00 Palustrine Scrub/Shrub 0.0 0.00 0.00 Palustrine Emergent 1.1 0.10 0.25 Estuarine Forested 0.0 0.00 0.00 Bare Land 0.1 0.01 0.03 Unconsolidated Shoreline 0.1 0.01 0.03 Water 0.5 0.04 0.10 Unclassified 0.0 0.00 0.00 STREAM FEATURES Kahana is a perennial stream.
    [Show full text]