DOCSLIB.ORG

Examining Youtube's Rabbit Hole of Radicalization

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Examining Youtube's Rabbit Hole of Radicalization Algorithmic Extremism: Examining YouTube’s Rabbit Hole of Radicalization Mark Ledwich Anna Zaitsev Brisbane, Australia The School of Information [email protected] University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, United States [email protected] Abstract—The role that YouTube and its behind-the-scenes broadcasting a large and widely diverse set of ideas to millions recommendation algorithm plays in encouraging online radical- of people worldwide. Included among general content creators ization has been suggested by both journalists and academics are those who specifically target users with polarizing and alike. This study directly quantifies these claims by examining the role that YouTubes algorithm plays in suggesting radicalized radicalizing political content. While YouTube and other social content. After categorizing nearly 800 political channels, we were media platforms have generally taken a strict stance against able to differentiate between political schemas in order to analyze most inflammatory material on their platform, extremist groups the algorithm traffic flows out and between each group. After from jihadi terrorist organizations [18][19], various political conducting a detailed analysis of recommendations received by positions [20], and conspiracy theorists have nonetheless been each channel type, we refute the popular radicalization claims. To the contrary, these data suggest that YouTubes recommendation able to permeate the content barrier [21]. algorithm actively discourages viewers from visiting radicalizing Extreme content exists on a spectrum. YouTube and other or extremist content. Instead, the algorithm is shown to favor social media platforms have generally taken a strict stance mainstream media and cable news content over independent against the most inflammatory materials or materials that YouTube channels with slant towards left-leaning or politi- are outright illegal. No social media platform tolerates ISIS cally neutral channels. Our study thus suggests that YouTubes recommendation algorithm fails to promote inflammatory or beheading videos, child porn, or videos depicting cruelty radicalized content, as previously claimed by several outlets. towards animals. There seems to a consensus amongst all Index Terms—YouTube, recommendation algorithm, radical- social media platforms that human moderators or moderation ization algorithms will remove this type of content [22]. YouTube’s automatic removal of the most extreme content, I. INTRODUCTION such as explicitly violent acts, child pornography, and animal The internet can both be a powerful force for good, prosocial cruelty, has created a new era of algorithmic data mining behaviors by providing means for civic participation and com- [23][24][13]. These methods range from metadata scans munity organization [1], as well as an attractor for antisocial [25] to sentiment analysis [26]. Nevertheless, content within behaviors that create polarizing extremism [2]. This dual an ideological grey area or that can nonetheless be perceived nature of the internet has been evident since the early days as ”radicalizing” exists on YouTube [27]. Definitions of free of online communication, where ”flame-wars” and ”trolling” speech differ from country to country. However, YouTube have been present in online communities for over two decades operates on a global scale within the cultural background of the [3][4][5]. While such behaviors were previously confined United States with robust legislation that protects speech [7]. to Usenet message boards and limited IRC channels, with Even if there are limitations to what YouTube will broadcast, the expansion of social media, blogs, and microblogging the platform does allow a fair bit of content that could be arXiv:1912.11211v1 [cs.SI] 24 Dec 2019 following the rapid growth of internet participation rates, these deemed as radicalizing, either by accident or by lack of inflammatory behaviors are no longer confined and have left monitoring resources. their early back-channels into public consciousness [6]. Means such as demonetization, flagging, or comment lim- The explosion of platforms, as well as ebbs and flows in the iting is several tools available to content moderators on political climate, has exacerbated the prevalence of antisocial YouTube [28]. Nevertheless, removing or demonetizing videos messaging [7]. Research focusing on uninhibited or antisocial or channels that present inflammatory content has not curtailed communication, as well as extremist messaging online has scrutiny of YouTube by popular media [29]. Recently, the New previously been conducted on platforms including Facebook York Times published a series of articles, notably critiquing [8], Twitter [9], Reddit [10], 4chan and 8chan [11][12], YouTube’s recommendation algorithm, which suggests related Tumblr [13] and even knitting forums such as Ravelry [14]. videos for users based on their prior preferences and users In addition to these prior studies on other platforms, at- with similar preferences [30][15]. The argument put forward tention has recently been paid to the role that YouTube by the NYT is that users would not otherwise have stumbled may play as a platform for radicalization [15][16][17]. upon extremist content if they were not actively searching for As a content host, YouTube provides a great opportunity for it since the role of recommendation algorithms for content on other websites is less prevalent. As such, YouTube’s algorithm more mainstream right-wing content. They have chosen a may have a role in guiding content, and to some extent, prefer- conspiracy theorist Alex Jones’ InfoWars (nowadays removed ences towards more extremist predispositions. Critical to this from YouTube) as their seed channel, and their list of right- critique is that while previous comments on the role that social wing channels reflects this particular niche. InfoWars and media websites play in spreading radicalization have focused other conspiracy channels represent only a small segment on user contributions, the implications of the recommendation of right-wing channels. Besides, the study applies a topic algorithm strictly implicate YouTube’s programming as an analysis method derived from the Implicit Association Test offender. (IAT) [34]. However, the validity of IAT has been contested The critique of the recommendation algorithm is another [35]. In conclusion, we consider the seed channel selection as difference that sets YouTube apart from other platforms. In problematic and the range of the comparison channels as too most cases, researchers are looking at how the users apply vaguely explained [36]. social media tools as ways to spread jihadism [18], alt-right In addition to content analysis of YouTube’s videos, Riberio messages of white supremacy [12]. Studies are also focusing et al. (2019) took a novel approach by analyzing the content on the methods the content creators might use to recruit more of video comment sections, explaining which types of videos participants in various movements; for example, radical left- individual users were likely to comment on overtime. Catego- wing Antifa protests [31]. Nevertheless, the premise is that rizing videos in four categories, including alt-right, alt-light, users of Facebook, Tumblr, or Twitter would not stumble upon the intellectual dark web (IDW), and a final control group, extremists if they are not actively searching for it since the the authors found inconclusive evidence of migration between role of recommendation algorithms is less prevalent. There groups of videos. 1 are always some edge cases where innocuous Twitter hashtags The analysis shows that a portion of commenters does can be co-opted for malicious purposes by extremists or migrate from IDW videos to the alt-light videos. There is also trolls [19], but in general, users get what they specifically a tiny portion of commenter migration from the centrist IDW seek. However, the case for YouTube is different: the rec- to the potentially radicalizing alt-right videos. However, we ommendation algorithm is seen as a major factor in how believe that one cannot conclude that YouTube is a radicalizing users engage with YouTube content. Thus, the claims about force based on commenter traffic only. There are several YouTube’s role in radicalization are twofold. First, there are flaws in the setting of the study. Even though the study content creators that publish content that has the potential is commendable, it is also omitting the migration from the to radicalize [15]. Second, YouTube is being scrutinized for center to the left-of-center altogether, presenting a somewhat how and where the recommendation algorithm directs the skewed view of the commenter traffic. In addition, only a user traffic [17][15]. Nevertheless, empirical evidence of tiny fraction of YouTube viewers engage in commenting. For YouTube’s role in radicalization is insufficient [32]. There are example, the most popular video by Jordan Peterson, a central anecdotes of a radicalization pipeline and hate group rabbit character of the IDW, has 4.7 million views but only ten hole, but academic literature on the topic is scant, as we thousand comments. Besides, commenting on a video does discuss in the next section. not necessarily mean agreement with the content. A person leaving a comment on a controversial topic might stem from II. PRIOR ACADEMIC STUDIES ON YOUTUBE a desire to get a reaction (trolling or flaming) from either RADICALIZATION the content creator or other viewers [37][5]. We are hesitant Data-drive
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Scout Maceachron '12 and Michaela Hearst '
    ALUMNI PROFILE ‘I couldn’t have done this without the writing I did at LC.’ Alumnae Scout MacEachron ’12 and Michaela Hearst ’14 put the skills they gained at LC to work for them. By Mark DiPietro ong before Landmark College had Michaela had a similar trajectory, writing poetry and fiction since elementary school but hitting a dead stop with essay La communication degree, students writing as she progressed through upper grades. Michaela like Scout MacEachron ’12 and Michaela was diagnosed with non-verbal learning disorder (NVLD) 1 and learning disorder not otherwise specified (LD-NOS) Hearst ’14 were rediscovering their love when she was 14. of writing and journalism thanks to “My relationship with writing turned rocky before I came to faculty members like Mac Gander and Landmark,” she says. Glennon’s class taught her to “just Sara Glennon. get something on paper,” and Gander “helped tap into this story-writing side of me, which I hadn’t explored.” “I’ll always remember Mac The two women have taken as this figure in my life who different career paths, but inspired this love that is now both involve effective writing my career,” says Scout, who is and communication. After a producer for NowThis News graduating from LC with in Los Angeles. “I can’t thank an associate degree, Scout him enough.” went on to earn a bachelor’s Scout arrived at LC in 2010, degree in American Studies after attending schools in from Barnard College. She Connecticut, San Francisco, cut her teeth with internships and New Delhi, India, and at Rolling Stone, Good spending two years at Vassar Housekeeping, NBC News, College.
    [Show full text]
  • Von Influencer*Innen Lernen Youtube & Co
    STUDIEN MARIUS LIEDTKE UND DANIEL MARWECKI VON INFLUENCER*INNEN LERNEN YOUTUBE & CO. ALS SPIELFELDER LINKER POLITIK UND BILDUNGSARBEIT MARIUS LIEDTKE UND DANIEL MARWECKI VON INFLUENCER*INNEN LERNEN YOUTUBE & CO. ALS SPIELFELDER LINKER POLITIK UND BILDUNGSARBEIT Studie im Auftrag der Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung MARIUS LIEDTKE arbeitet in Berlin als freier Medienschaffender und Redakteur. Außerdem beendet er aktuell sein Master-Studium der Soziokulturellen Studien an der Europa-Universität Viadrina in Frankfurt (Oder). In seiner Abschlussarbeit setzt er die Forschung zu linken politischen Influencer*innen auf YouTube fort. DANIEL MARWECKI ist Dozent für Internationale Politik und Geschichte an der University of Leeds. Dazu nimmt er Lehraufträge an der SOAS University of London wahr, wo er auch 2018 promovierte. Er mag keinen akademi- schen Jargon, sondern progressives Wissen für alle. IMPRESSUM STUDIEN 7/2019, 1. Auflage wird herausgegeben von der Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung V. i. S. d. P.: Henning Heine Franz-Mehring-Platz 1 · 10243 Berlin · www.rosalux.de ISSN 2194-2242 · Redaktionsschluss: November 2019 Illustration Titelseite: Frank Ramspott/iStockphoto Lektorat: TEXT-ARBEIT, Berlin Layout/Herstellung: MediaService GmbH Druck und Kommunikation Gedruckt auf Circleoffset Premium White, 100 % Recycling Inhalt INHALT Vorwort. 4 Zusammenfassung. 5 Einleitung ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 6 Teil 1 Das Potenzial von YouTube
    [Show full text]
  • Heberlein, Thomas A. 2017. Sweden
    Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, March 5, 2017 Sweden is safe Since President Donald Trump called attention to violence in Sweden, we have had American journalists show up here. One, Tim Pool — funded in part by right-wing editor Paul Joseph Watson who tweeted “Any journalist claiming Sweden is safe; I will pay for travel costs & accommodation for you to stay in crime ridden migrant suburbs of Malmo” — visited Rosengård, Malmö’s toughest immigrant area. He was followed by Swedish reporters and found what was no surprise to me, an American living in Sweden: “If this is the worst Malmö can offer never come to Chicago.” Pool claimed Chicago had about 750 murders last year. All of Sweden, which has three times the population of Chicago, had 112 murders in 2015 (the last year for which statistics are available). Malmö, with a population of 330,000, had 12 murders in 2016. Madison, with a population of 243,000 had nine. So per capita, you are about as safe in Malmö as in Madison. Pool also said after a few hours in Rosengård: “For anyone worried about violence in Malmö and worried that he will be robbed or attacked in Rosengård is ‘löliga’ (ridiculous).” On TV news, he was shown walking in the community and reported it was boring and the only danger he felt was from the ice on the sidewalks. Sweden, I admit, is not a perfect society: It does have problems keeping ice off the sidewalks, and thousands are injured in falls every year. Tom Heberlein emeritus professor University of Wisconsin-Madison Stockholm, Sweden http://www.jsonline.com/story/opinion/readers/2017/03/04/letters-march-walkers-prison-priorities- wrong/98723360/ .
    [Show full text]
  • View / Download 11.3 Mb
    THE PORTRAYAL OF MARIJUANA ON VICE.COM DOCUMENTARIES The Graduate School of Economics and Social Sciences of İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University by GÖKÇE ÖZSU In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATION AND DESIGN İHSAN DOĞRAMACI BİLKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA August 2017 Scanned by CamScanner ABSTRACT THE PORTRAYAL OF MARIJUANA ON VICE.COM DOCUMENTARIES Özsu, Gökçe MA, The Department of Communication and Design Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Bülent Çaplı August 2017 This thesis aims to examine the representational attitude of vice.com (or VICE) documentaries covering marijuana, in the context of normalization. In this respect, this thesis mainly descriptively analyses three VICE documentaries covering marijuana in the setting of recreation, medicine and industry. VICE is a United States based media outlet which uses hybrid form of journalism combining conventional form of media operations and new media techniques. Normalization is a sociological concept for describing the the scale of social acceptance as a norm which was disseminated from the iii margins of the society towards mainstream scale. To implement descriptive analysis on vice.com documentaries, normalization and drug representation in the United States media has been evaluated in the socio-historical setting, and examined. As a major finding, even though vice.com documentaries represent marijuana as normal, the normative references of normalization of marijuana is not clear. In this respect, in the conclusion, the determiners and normative background of normalization of marijuana are tried to be discussed. Keywords: Documentary, Marijuana, Normalization, Stigmatization, VICE iv ÖZET VICE.COM BELGESELLERİNDE MARİJUANANIN TASVİRİ Özsu, Gökçe Yüksek Lisans, İletişim ve Tasarım Bölümü Danışman: Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Syllabus 2021
    History 201: The History of Now Professor Patrick Iber Spring 2021 / TuTh 9:30-10:45AM / online Office Hours: Wednesday 11am-1pm, online [email protected] (608) 298-8758 TA: Meghan O’Donnell, [email protected] Sections: W 2:25-3:15; W 3:30-4:20; W 4:35-5:25 This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA History is the study of change over time, and requires hindsight to generate insight. Most history courses stop short of the present, and historians are frequently wary of applying historical analysis to our own times, before we have access to private sources and before we have the critical distance that helps us see what matters and what is ephemeral. But recent years have given many people the sense of living through historic times, and clamoring for historical context that will help them to understand the momentous changes in politics, society and culture that they observe around them. This experimental course seeks to explore the last twenty years or so from a historical point of view, using the historian’s craft to gain perspective on the present. The course will consider major developments—primarily but not exclusively in U.S. history—of the last twenty years, including 9/11 and the War on Terror, the financial crisis of 2008 and its aftermath, social movements from the Tea Party to the Movement for Black Lives, and political, cultural, and the technological changes that have been created by and shaped by these events. This course is designed to be an introduction to historical reasoning, analysis, writing, and research.
    [Show full text]
  • Unlikely Identities
    Unlikely Identities: In May of 1911 an Ottoman deputy from Thessaloniki, Dimitar Vlahov, interjected Abu Ibrahim and the himself in a parliamentary debate about Zionism in Palestine with a question: “Are Politics of Possibility in 2 Arab peasants opposed to the Jews?” 1 Late Ottoman Palestine Answering himself, he declared that there was no enmity between Arab and Samuel Dolbee & Shay Hazkani Jewish peasants since, in his estimation, “They are brothers [onlar kardeştir], and like brothers they are trying to live.” Noting that in the past few weeks “anti- Semitism” had appeared on the pages of newspapers, he reiterated his message of familial bonds: “Whatever happens, the truth is in the open. Among Jewish, Arab, and Turkish peasants, there is nothing that will cause conflict. They are brothers.” Vlahov Efendi’s somewhat simplistic message of coexistence was not popular, appearing as it did in the midst of a charged debate about Zionist land acquisitions in Palestine.3 Other deputies in parliament pressed him about the source of his information on these apparent familial ties between peasants. He had mentioned “Arab newspapers,” but ʿAbd al-Mehdi Bey of Karbala wanted to know which ones he had consulted to support his claims. “In Jaffa there is a newspaper that appears named ‘Palestine,’” Vlahov replied. Commotion in the hall interrupted his speech at this point, but Vlahov continued, explaining how the paper suggested Hadera [Khdeira], south of Haifa, had been “nothing but wild animals” thirty years before but had recently become economically prosperous through Zionist settlement. Rishon LeZion, one of the first Zionist colonies, was another engine of development, as its tax revenue had increased a hundred- fold in the previous three decades, he claimed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Armenian Genocide
    The Armenian Genocide During World War I, the Ottoman Empire carried out what most international experts and historians have concluded was one of the largest genocides in the world's history, slaughtering huge portions of its minority Armenian population. In all, over 1 million Armenians were put to death. To this day, Turkey denies the genocidal intent of these mass murders. My sense is that Armenians are suffering from what I would call incomplete mourning, and they can't complete that mourning process until their tragedy, their wounds are recognized by the descendants of the people who perpetrated it. People want to know what really happened. We are fed up with all these stories-- denial stories, and propaganda, and so on. Really the new generation want to know what happened 1915. How is it possible for a massacre of such epic proportions to take place? Why did it happen? And why has it remained one of the greatest untold stories of the 20th century? This film is made possible by contributions from John and Judy Bedrosian, the Avenessians Family Foundation, the Lincy Foundation, the Manoogian Simone Foundation, and the following. And others. A complete list is available from PBS. The Armenians. There are between six and seven million alive today, and less than half live in the Republic of Armenia, a small country south of Georgia and north of Iran. The rest live around the world in countries such as the US, Russia, France, Lebanon, and Syria. They're an ancient people who originally came from Anatolia some 2,500 years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing a Curriculum for TEFL 107: American Childhood Classics
    Minnesota State University Moorhead RED: a Repository of Digital Collections Dissertations, Theses, and Projects Graduate Studies Winter 12-19-2019 Developing a Curriculum for TEFL 107: American Childhood Classics Kendra Hansen [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://red.mnstate.edu/thesis Part of the American Studies Commons, Education Commons, and the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Hansen, Kendra, "Developing a Curriculum for TEFL 107: American Childhood Classics" (2019). Dissertations, Theses, and Projects. 239. https://red.mnstate.edu/thesis/239 This Project (696 or 796 registration) is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at RED: a Repository of Digital Collections. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Projects by an authorized administrator of RED: a Repository of Digital Collections. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Developing a Curriculum for TEFL 107: American Childhood Classics A Plan B Project Proposal Presented to The Graduate Faculty of Minnesota State University Moorhead By Kendra Rose Hansen In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Teaching English as a Second Language December, 2019 Moorhead, Minnesota Copyright 2019 Kendra Rose Hansen v Dedication I would like to dedicate this thesis to my family. To my husband, Brian Hansen, for supporting me and encouraging me to keep going and for taking on a greater weight of the parental duties throughout my journey. To my children, Aidan, Alexa, and Ainsley, for understanding when Mom needed to be away at class or needed quiet time to work at home.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprendre Le Désordre Informationnel Saisir Les
    GUIDE ESSENTIEL DE FIRST DRAFT POUR Comprendre le désordre informationnel Janvier 2020 TABLE DES MATIÈRES Introduction 5 CHAPITRE 1 Satire ou parodie 13 CHAPITRE 2 Fausse connexion 19 CHAPITRE 3 Contenu trompeur 23 CHAPITRE 4 Faux contexte 27 CHAPITRE 5 Contenu « imposteur » 33 CHAPITRE 6 Contenu manipulé 45 CHAPITRE 7 Contenu fabriqué 51 Conclusion 56 À PROPOS DE L'AUTEURE Claire Wardle pilote actuellement l'orientation stratégique et la recherche chez First Draft. En 2017, elle a co-écrit le rapport fondamental, Information Disorder: An interdisciplinary Framework for Research and Policy for the Council ofEurope (Désordre informationnel : Un cadre interdisciplinaire de recherche et de politique pour le Conseil de l'Europe1. Auparavant, elle a été doctorante au Shorenstein Center for Media, Politics and Public Policy de la Harvard Kennedy School, directrice de recherche au Tow Center for Digital Journalism de la Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism et responsable des réseaux sociaux à l'Agence des Nations Unies pour les réfugiés. Elle a également été chef de projet pour la BBC Academy en 2009, où elle a conçu un programme complet de formation à la vérification des médias pour BBC News qui a été déployé dans toute l'organisation. Elle est titulaire d'un doctorat en communication de l'Université de Pennsylvanie. 2e édition ; première publication en octobre 2019 Edition: Alastair Reid et Victoria Kwan Production : Tommy Shane Conception graphique: Imagist Cet ouvrage est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-
    [Show full text]
  • Pewdiepie, Popularity, and Profitability
    Pepperdine Journal of Communication Research Volume 8 Article 4 2020 The 3 P's: Pewdiepie, Popularity, and Profitability Lea Medina Pepperdine University, [email protected] Eric Reed Pepperdine University, [email protected] Cameron Davis Pepperdine University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/pjcr Part of the Communication Commons Recommended Citation Medina, Lea; Reed, Eric; and Davis, Cameron (2020) "The 3 P's: Pewdiepie, Popularity, and Profitability," Pepperdine Journal of Communication Research: Vol. 8 , Article 4. Available at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/pjcr/vol8/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Communication at Pepperdine Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pepperdine Journal of Communication Research by an authorized editor of Pepperdine Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. 21 The 3 P’s: Pewdiepie, Popularity, & Popularity Lea Medina Written for COM 300: Media Research (Dr. Klive Oh) Introduction Channel is an online prole created on the Felix Arvid Ul Kjellberg—more website YouTube where users can upload their aectionately referred to as Pewdiepie—is original video content to the site. e factors statistically the most successful YouTuber, o his channel that will be explored are his with a net worth o over $15 million and over relationships with the viewers, his personality, 100 million subscribers. With a channel that relationship with his wife, and behavioral has uploaded over 4,000 videos, it becomes patterns. natural to uestion how one person can gain Horton and Wohl’s Parasocial such popularity and prot just by sitting in Interaction eory states that interacting front o a camera.
    [Show full text]
  • From Ranking Algorithms to New Media Technologies 2018, Vol
    Article Convergence: The International Journal of Research into From ranking algorithms to New Media Technologies 2018, Vol. 24(1) 50–68 ª The Author(s) 2017 ‘ranking cultures’: Investigating Reprints and permission: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav the modulation of visibility DOI: 10.1177/1354856517736982 in YouTube search results journals.sagepub.com/home/con Bernhard Rieder University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands Ariadna Matamoros-Ferna´ndez Queensland University of Technology, Australia O` scar Coromina Universitat Auto`noma de Barcelona, Spain Abstract Algorithms, as constitutive elements of online platforms, are increasingly shaping everyday sociability. Developing suitable empirical approaches to render them accountable and to study their social power has become a prominent scholarly concern. This article proposes an approach to examine what an algorithm does, not only to move closer to understanding how it works, but also to investigate broader forms of agency involved. To do this, we examine YouTube’s search results ranking over time in the context of seven sociocultural issues. Through a combination of rank visualizations, computational change metrics and qualitative analysis, we study search ranking as the distributed accomplishment of ‘ranking cultures’. First, we identify three forms of ordering over time – stable, ‘newsy’ and mixed rank morphologies. Second, we observe that rankings cannot be easily linked back to popularity metrics, which highlights the role of platform features such as channel subscriptions in processes of visibility distribution. Third, we find that the contents appearing in the top 20 results are heavily influenced by both issue and platform vernaculars. YouTube-native content, which often thrives on controversy and dissent, systematically beats out mainstream actors in terms of exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Discourse Analysis
    How Facebook Comments Reflect Certain Characteristics Of Islamophobia: A Critical Discourse Analysis By Annabell Curci-Wallis UPPSALA UNIVERSITY Department of Theology Master Programme in Religion in Peace and Conflict Master thesis 30 credits Spring 2019 Supervisor: Mia Lövheim Facebook Comments and the Reflection of Characteristics of Islamophobia 2 Thank you: I am extremely grateful to my supervisor, Mia Lövheim, who was patient with me, advised me, and send insightful comments and suggestions even when she had the flu, so I could finish on time. I could not have done it without you. Thank you. I also like to say thank you to my husband, and my sweet daughter, who both supported me by giving me enough time and space, to finish my work. Abstract: This study is a contribution to the limited knowledge of how different types of media content (about Muslims and extremism) posted and shared on Facebook might influence corresponding user comments. Through analyzing the discourse of user comments this study aims to identify how comments might reflect certain characteristics of Islamophobia, and to which themes in Facebook posts commentators relate to the most. The linguistic analysis is guided by the use of critical discourse analysis. For the purpose of this study, three different ​ types of articles/video and the corresponding comments are analyzed. Two of the articles/video that I will analyze are from unreliable media sources, and one of the articles is from a credible ​ ​ media source. The linguistic analysis showed that the majority of commentators expressed that ​ they believe the claims made in the articles/video about Muslims and extremism are true.
    [Show full text]