MASTER of SCIENCE in ARCHITECTURE

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MASTER of SCIENCE in ARCHITECTURE Four Eighteenth and Nineteenth Century Thinkers on the Truthfulness of Architecture A Thesis submitted to the Division of Research and Advanced Studies of the University of Cincinnati In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER of SCIENCE in ARCHITECTURE In the School of Architecture and Interior Design of the College of Design, Architecture, Art, and Planning 2012 by Florentina C. Popescu BA, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, 1998 BA, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania, 2002 MA, University of Pittsburg, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, 2004 Committee Members: John E. Hancock (Chair) Patrick Snadon 1 Abstract In modern architectural discourse, true architecture has been associated with the removal of ornament, simplicity, or transparency. While the importance of truth in modern architectural theory has been extensively documented, this study disentangles the internal complexity of the notion of architectural truth. It does so by examining those architectural practices that were rejected in the name of truth, and the terminology that designates their characteristic untruthfulness, in order to trace contrasting notions of truth in the history of architectural theory. It looks at four architectural theorists of eighteenth and nineteenth century Europe: Marc Antoine Laugier, Carlo Lodoli, Augustus Welby Northmore Pugin, and John Ruskin. There were two distinct notions of truth that coexisted in these authors and in eighteenth and nineteenth century architectural literature. The first relates truth to necessity, and requires the exclusion of those elements that were redundant relative to the structural or material logic of the building. The second refers to the ways to ascertain the truth of the architectural display, and requires the exclusion of those elements that interfered with the understanding of the building. The first is opposed to fault, imperfection or abuse, and is associated with functionality, while the second is the antonym of deception, and concerns intelligibility. This study concludes that the distinction between truth as function and truth as intelligibility can elucidate a number of ambiguities in the history of architectural theory. It explains the difference between Laugier and Lodoli, both of whom adhered to some version of functionalism, but diverged over certainty/intelligibility. It explains the position of Ruskin, who 2 was not a functionalist, yet was engaged with truth in architecture; the distinction between functionalism and intelligibility explains his stance better than other readings. Finally, the idea of intelligibility emerges as the main contribution of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries to the genealogy of modernist architecture, with a continuity that functionalism cannot provide. Keywords Truth, certainty, intelligibility, deception, rationalism, architecture, functionalism 3 This page intentionally left blank 4 Dedication To my family 5 Acknowledgement I thank John E. Hancock and Patrick Snadon, my advisors and most inspiring professors. Their grace, patience and support have made this thesis possible. Special thanks are due to Augustin Ioan for providing crucial comments on my work. I thank my sister, Viorica Popescu, for stirring my interest in architecture in the first place. I thank past and current faculty of the School of Architecture and Interior Design: James Bradford, Aarati Kanekar, Nnamdi Elleh, and David Saile. I thank the staff of the School of Architecture and Interior Design, particularly Ellen Guerrettaz Buelow, who provided invaluable administrative assistance over the years. I am greatly indebted to all those who helped me, in countless ways, complete this work. Final thanks are due to the University of Cincinnati for financial support and an amazing library. 6 Table of Contents Abstract ___________________________________________________________________________ 2 Keywords _________________________________________________________________________ 3 Dedication ________________________________________________________________________ 5 Acknowledgement _________________________________________________________________ 6 Table of Contents __________________________________________________________________ 7 Table of Figures ____________________________________________________________________ 9 Preface ___________________________________________________________________________ 13 I Introduction __________________________________________________________________ 14 I.1 Background ______________________________________________________________ 15 I.2 Literature review __________________________________________________________ 23 I.2.1 Topp _________________________________________________________________ 23 I.2.2 Forty _________________________________________________________________ 25 I.2.3 Rizzuto _______________________________________________________________ 27 I.2.4 Ameri ________________________________________________________________ 29 I.3 Structure of the argument __________________________________________________ 32 II Eighteenth century ____________________________________________________________ 35 II.1 Marc Antoine Laugier _____________________________________________________ 35 II.1.1 Essay ________________________________________________________________ 36 II.1.2 Avertissment __________________________________________________________ 49 Summary _____________________________________________________________________ 53 II.2 Carlo Lodoli ______________________________________________________________ 54 II.2.1 Two interpretations ____________________________________________________ 54 II.2.1 Principles _____________________________________________________________ 55 II.2.2 Practical reasoning _____________________________________________________ 57 Summary _____________________________________________________________________ 59 III Nineteenth century ____________________________________________________________ 60 III.1 A.W.N. Pugin ___________________________________________________________ 61 III.1.1 Principles - Decorating utility ___________________________________________ 63 7 III.1.2 Construction and convenience ___________________________________________ 63 III.1.3 Purpose ______________________________________________________________ 67 Summary _____________________________________________________________________ 69 III.2 John Ruskin ____________________________________________________________ 69 III.2.1 The Seven Lamps of Architecture _______________________________________ 70 III.2.2 The Stones of Venice __________________________________________________ 77 Summary _____________________________________________________________________ 88 IV Conclusion ___________________________________________________________________ 89 V Bibliography _________________________________________________________________ 93 8 Table of Figures Figure 1. Parthenon, Athens - Greek Doric corner (left), Vitruvian Doric corner (right). In: (left) ARTstor [database online]. [cited 03 March 2011]. Available from ARTstor, Inc., New York, New York. (right) Ware, William R. The American Vignola: A Guide to the Making of Classical Architecture. Mineola: Dover Publishing, 1994. _______________________ 16 Figure 2. Southern homes pediments. In: Southern House Plans, http://www.southern-house- plans.com/southerncharm/pediments.html, 05 July 2012 (accessed 05 July 2012). __ 17 Figure 3. Louvre east side, architect Claude Perrault 1680. In: ARTstor [database online]. [cited 03 March 2011]. Available from ARTstor, Inc., New York, New York. ____________ 18 Figure 4. Façade of the Church of St. Gervais, architect Salomon de Brosse. In: ARTstor [database online]. [cited 03 March 2011]. Available from ARTstor, Inc., New York, New York. _______________________________________________________________ 20 Figure 5. Santa Constanza, Rome. In: ARTstor [database online]. [cited 09 July 2011]. Available from ARTstor, Inc., New York, New York. ___________________________________ 21 Figure 6. Secession building, architect Joseph Maria Olbrich. In: ARTstor [database online]. [cited 03 March 2011]. Available from ARTstor, Inc., New York, New York. _______ 25 Figure 7. Postal Savings Bank, Vienna, Austria, 1904-1906 (image between 1945 and 1959), architect Otto Wagner. In: ARTstor [database online]. [cited 03 March 2011]. Available from ARTstor, Inc., New York, New York. __________________________ 25 9 Figure 8. Michaelerplatz Building, House for the gentlemen’s outfitter Goldmann and Salatsch Vienna, Austria, 1910-1912, architect Adolf Loos. In: ARTstor [database online]. [cited 03 March 2011]. Available from ARTstor, Inc., New York, New York. ____________ 25 Figure 9. Purkersdorf Sanatorium, Purkersdorf, Austria, 1904-1905, architect Josef Hoffmann. In: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanatorium_Purkersdorf, 07April 2007 (accessed 07 August 2009). ____________________________________________________________ 25 Figure 10. Maison Carrée at Nimes. In: ARTstor [database online]. [cited 03 March 2011]. Available from ARTstor, Inc., New York, New York. __________________________ 41 Figure 11. Louvre, Court Carrée. In: Flickr, http://www.flickr.com/photos/wenzday01/5916798811 (accessed 07 July 2012). ____ 42 Figure 12. Hotel Soubise, Paris, France. In: ARTstor [database online]. [cited 03 March 2011]. Available from ARTstor, Inc., New York, New York. __________________________ 43 Figure 13. St. Sulpice façade, architect Giovanni Niccolò Servandoni.
Recommended publications
  • Laugier Vs Durand: Revisiting Primitive Hut in the Classical Architectural Discourse
    YEDİ: SANAT, TASARIM VE BİLİM DERGİSİ KIŞ 2016, SAYI 15: 111-120 WINTER 2016, ISSUE 15: 111-120 YEDİ: SANAT, TASARIM VE BİLİM DERGİSİ Laugier vs Durand: Revisiting Primitive Hut in the Classical Architectural Discourse Ece KÜRELİ * ........................................................................................................... Abstract Finding an origin of architecture describes a process of inquiry which embodies itself in the term of ‘primitive hut’. This inquiry starts with Marcus Pollio Vitruvius from the antiquity and evolves into skepticism and rationalism of the Enlightenment Age. Quatrémere de Quincy, Viollet-le-Duc, William Chambers, Jacques-François Blondel and Claude Nicolas Ledoux, who were the important figures of the era, discussed the question of architectural origin differently. However, Marc-Antoine Laugier and Jean-Nicolas-Louis Durand, another two important figures of the Enlightenment, developed different aspects to the question with regard to their arguments on developmental process of the primitive hut. Their different viewpoints require a further investigation since these two 18th century French architectural theoreticians have fictionalize their objectives of ‘ideal architecture’ and ‘true beauty’ from the metaphor of the primitive hut. Keywords: Origin of Architecture, Primitive Hut, The Enlightenment, Laugier, Durand. Laugier Durand’a Karşı: Klasik Mimari Söylemde İlkel Kulübeyi Yeniden Ziyaret Özet Mimarlığın kökenini bulmak, antik dönemde Marcus Pollio Vitruvius ile başlayan ve kendini ‘ilkel kulübe’
    [Show full text]
  • The Five Orders of Architecture
    BY GìAGOMO F5ARe)ZZji OF 2o ^0 THE FIVE ORDERS OF AECHITECTURE BY GIACOMO BAROZZI OF TIGNOLA TRANSLATED BY TOMMASO JUGLARIS and WARREN LOCKE CorYRIGHT, 1889 GEHY CENTER UK^^i Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2013 http://archive.org/details/fiveordersofarchOOvign A SKETCH OF THE LIFE OF GIACOMO BAEOZZI OF TIGNOLA. Giacomo Barozzi was born on the 1st of October, 1507, in Vignola, near Modena, Italy. He was orphaned at an early age. His mother's family, seeing his talents, sent him to an art school in Bologna, where he distinguished himself in drawing and by the invention of a method of perspective. To perfect himself in his art he went to Eome, studying and measuring all the ancient monuments there. For this achievement he received the honors of the Academy of Architecture in Eome, then under the direction of Marcello Cervini, afterward Pope. In 1537 he went to France with Abbé Primaticcio, who was in the service of Francis I. Barozzi was presented to this magnificent monarch and received a commission to build a palace, which, however, on account of war, was not built. At this time he de- signed the plan and perspective of Fontainebleau castle, a room of which was decorated by Primaticcio. He also reproduced in metal, with his own hands, several antique statues. Called back to Bologna by Count Pepoli, president of St. Petronio, he was given charge of the construction of that cathedral until 1550. During this time he designed many GIACOMO BAROZZr OF VIGNOLA. 3 other buildings, among which we name the palace of Count Isolani in Minerbio, the porch and front of the custom house, and the completion of the locks of the canal to Bologna.
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia for Other Uses, See Architecture (Disambiguation)
    Architecture From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia For other uses, see Architecture (disambiguation).. Further information: Outline of architecture Section and elevation of f Brunelleschi''s dome of Florence Cathedral.. Architecture ((Latin architectura,, from the Greek ἀρχιτέκτων – – arkhitekton, from ἀρχι- "chief" and τέκτων "builder, carpenter, mason") is both the process and product of planning,, designing and construction.. Architectural works, in the material form of buildings,, are often perceived as cultural symbols and as works of art.. Historical civilizations are often identified with their surviving architectural achievements. "Architecture" can mean: A general term to describe buildings and other physical structures. The art and science of designing and erecting buildings and other physical structures. The style and method of design and construction of buildings and other physical structures. The practice of the architect,, where architecture means the offering or rendering of professional services in connection with the design and construction of buildings, or built environments..[1] The design activity of the architect, from the macro- level ((urban design,, landscape architecture)) to the micro-level (construction details and furniture). The term "architecture" has been adopted to describe the activity of designing any kind of system, and is commonly used in describing information technology.. In relation to buildings, architecture has to do with the planning, designing and constructing form, space and ambience that
    [Show full text]
  • Decoding the Pantheon Columns
    $UFKLWHFWXUDO Graßhoff, G and Berndt, C 2014 Decoding the Pantheon Columns. +LVWRULHV Architectural Histories, 2(1): 18, pp. 1-14, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ ah.bl RESEARCH ARTICLE Decoding the Pantheon Columns Gerd Graßhoff* and Christian Berndt* The goal of this study has been to reconstruct the design principles underlying the construction of the Pantheon’s portico columns as well as to demonstrate how digital investigation methods and models can be used to improve our understanding of ancient architectural knowledge. Thanks to the data of the Bern Digital Pantheon Model, a synthesis of all the scanned surface points obtained during a digitization cam- paign of the Karman Center for Advanced Studies in the Humanities of the University of Bern in 2005, we have been able to determine empirically the column profiles of the portico with unprecedented precision. A second stage of our investigation involved explaining the profile of the column shafts by a construction model that takes into account the parameters recommended by Vitruvius and design methods such as those that can be found in the construction drawings discovered at Didyma. Our analysis shows that the design principles of the portico’s columns can be successfully reconstructed, and has led to the surpris- ing result that at least two different variants of a simple circle construction were used. Finally, we have been able to deduce from the distribution of the different profile types among the columns that the final profiles were designed and executed in Rome. Introduction design could reach a considerable degree of complexity. The shafts of the Pantheon’s portico columns are com- For example, Stevens believed that the Pantheon’s por- posed of granite monoliths, forty Roman feet tall, which tico columns exhibit a profile that is based on two tan- were excavated from two Egyptian quarries.
    [Show full text]
  • Architectural Product Catalog
    TURNCRAFT ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCT CATALOG 2005 A History of Architectural Excellence So many architects and builders The making select Turncraft Architectural Columns of Turncraft because they feature thoughtful Architectural product design, fi ne workmanship, columns is an superior assembly, precision turning exacting process. and fl uting, and artful fi nishing. Finger-jointed Round columns may be ordered with or solid staves true architectural entasis in sizes are milled to consistent with the classic proportions the required of the Greek Doric, Tuscan, Roman dimensions, Doric, Ionic, and Corinthian Orders, assembled using or in custom shaft diameters up to the strongest Type-I waterproof glue, 36" and lengths to 30'. They can and then are metal-banded for curing. be smooth surfaced or given dramatic In the computer-controlled lathe, the deep fl uting (with increased stave assembled shaft is turned to the precise thickness) as desired. Greek Doric taper desired, complete with true Columns feature classic edge-to-edge architectural entasis. The top of each fl uting. Square columns and pilasters column is profi led according to the style may be ordered to match (available specifi ed, and the entire column is in tapered or non-tapered and in machine sanded to ensure a smooth various plan styles—see page 14). fi nish. Flutes are milled at precisely Non-tapered cylinders are available for determined intervals and depths, always INTRODUCTION use in casework, radius wall corners, ending in full half-rounds at the top and and contemporary applications. bottom (except on Greek Doric). Each column, regardless of size, is visually inspected, any defects are corrected, and then it is fi nish sanded.
    [Show full text]
  • Me'morchilik Asoslari
    M.MUXAMEDOVA ME’MORCHILIK ASOSLARI TOSHKENT 0 ‘ZBEKIST0N RESPUBLIKASI OLIY VA 0 ‘RTA MAXSUS TA’LIM VAZIRLIGI M.MUXAMEDOVA ME’MORCHILIK ASOSLARI O ‘zbekiston Respublikctsi Oliy va о ‘rta maxsus ta ’lim vazirligi tomonidan о ‘quv qo ‘llanma sifatida tavsiya etilgan UO‘K: 72.01(075.8) K BK 85.il М 96 М 96 M.Muxamedova. Me’morchilik asoslari. -Т.: «Fan va texnologiya», 2018,296 Bet. ISBN 978-9943-11-927-7 Mazkur o‘quv qoilanma me’morchilikning estetik talaBlari, texnik mukam- malligi, Binolar klassifikatsiyasi, asosiy soha va turlari, Binolar konstruksiyasi, me’morchilikning rivojlanish an’analari, yangi tipdagi binolaming funksionalligi va konstruktiv mustahkamligi Bilimlarini o‘zlashtirishga yo'naltiriladi. “Me’morchilik asoslari” o‘quv qoilanmasi mazmuniga yetakchi xorijiy oliy o‘quv yurtlarida ishlaB chiqilgan ilmiy qoilanmalar asosida me’morchilikka oid ilmiy yangiliklar kiritilgan. UshBu o‘quv qo‘llanma doirasida Qadimgi Misr, Old Osiyo, Uzoq Sharq me’morchiligi, Qadimgi Gretsiya iBodatxonalarida qurilish konstruksiyalari va order sistemalari (doriy, ion, korinf), qadimgi Rim ustun-to‘sin sistemasiga yangi konstruksiyalar kiritilishi (kompozit va toskan orderlari) akveduk, amfiteatr, forum, insulalar qurilishi, Vizantiya va ilk xristianlar davri arxitekturasi, roman va gotika usluBi me’morchilik asoslari, Uyg‘onish va Barokko davri shaharsozligining rivojlanish an’analari, klassitsizm va ampir usluBi asoslari, eklektizm, modern, konstruktivizm, funksionalizm usluBlarining zamonaviy usluBiar rivojidagi o‘rni, yangi tipdagi Binolaming funksionalligi va konstruktiv mustahkamligini o‘rganish kaBi mavzular mujassamlashtirilgan. O'quv qo‘llanmaning asosiy dolzarBligi talaBalarga Sharq va G‘arB, umuman olganda jahon me’morchiligining tarixi va nazariyasini o‘rgatish, me’morchilik tarixining tadriji, rivojlanish qonuniyatlarini o‘zlashtirish, turli usluBlaming yuzaga kelishi va shu usluBlar ta’sirida Bunyod etilgan oBidalar me’morchiligini yoritiB Berishdir.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Publications in Society's Library
    OXFORD ARCHITECTURAL AND HISTORICAL SOCIETY LIBRARY RICHMOND ROOM, ASHMOLEAN MUSEUM Classified Shelf-List (Brought up-to-date by Tony Hawkins 1992-93) Note (2010): The collection is now stored in the Sackler Library CLASSIFICATION SCHEME A Architecture A1 General A2 Domestic A3 Military A4 Town Planning A5 Architects, biographies & memoirs A6 Periodicals B Gothic architecture B1 Theory B2 Handbooks B3 Renaissance architecture B4 Church restoration B5 Symbolism: crosses &c. C Continental and foreign architecture C1 General C2 France, Switzerland C3 Germany, Scandinavia C4 Italy, Greece C5 Asia D Church architecture: special features D1 General D2 Glass D3 Memorials, tombs D4 Brasses and incised slabs D5 Woodwork: roofs, screens &c. D6 Mural paintings D7 Miscellaneous fittings D8 Bells E Ecclesiology E1 Churches - England, by county E2 Churches - Scotland, Wales E3 Cathedrals, abbeys &c. F Oxford, county F1 Gazetteers, directories, maps &c. F2 Topography, general F3 Topography, special areas F4 Special subjects F5 Oxford diocese and churches, incl RC and non-conformist F6 Individual parishes, alphabetically G Oxford, city and university G1 Guidebooks G2 Oxford city, official publications, records G3 Industry, commerce G4 Education and social sciences G5 Town planning G6 Exhibitions, pageants &c H Oxford, history, descriptions & memoirs H1 Architecture, incl. church guides H2 General history and memoirs H3 Memoirs, academic J Oxford university J1 History J2 University departments & societies J3 Degree ceremonies J4 University institutions
    [Show full text]
  • Hellenistic Architecture in Syria
    Hellenistic Architecture in Syria A D ISS ERTATIO N PRESENTED TO THE F ACULTY O F PRINCETON UNIVERSITY IN CANDIDACY F O R TH E DEGREE O F Docron O F PH ILOSOPHY BY R fiRRAY R. 5 . BUTLE , J PRINCETO N UNIVERSITY PRESS PRIN CETO N LON D ON : HUMPHRE Y MILF ORD OXF ORD U NIVE RS ITY PRES S 1917 1 09 09 05 PREF ACE The purpose o f this thesis is to show tha t the architecture of S en h D yria up to the d of t e third century A . was Hellenistic. n In general only dated monuments have bee considered, or e c those whose p riod an be determined with certainty. With these restrictions , all the monuments of Northern Central Syria and D ran a f m of the j ebel Hau , showing det ils o any i po rtance, en Baalbec a have be considered. , as being in process of public i ha s een e c a t on, b omitted exc pt for oc asion l reference . South of the Ha uran only the ruins a t Arak il - Emir ha ve been ih o D r or ren cluded, with those f je ash and Amma n f refe ce . men 1 m Monu ts published by Mr. H . C. Butler since April, 9 , c are not in luded . In the spelling of names the system has been followed that r n a a is employed by D . E no Littm nn in the public tions of the America n Archaeological Expedition to Syr ia in 1 899- 1 900 t n c e n wi hout the use of diacritical sig s .
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture
    Architecture For the professional, see Architect. For other uses, see civilizations are often identified with their surviving ar- Architecture (disambiguation). chitectural achievements. Architecture (Latin architectura, after the Greek “Architecture” can mean: • A general term to describe buildings and other phys- ical structures.[3] • The art and science of designing buildings and (some) nonbuilding structures.[3] • The style of design and method of construction of buildings and other physical structures.[3] • The knowledge of art, science & technology and humanity.[3] Brunelleschi, in the building of the dome of Florence Cathedral • The practice of the architect, where architecture in the early 15th-century, not only transformed the building and means offering or rendering professional services [1][2] the city, but also the role and status of the architect. in connection with the design and construction of buildings, or built environments.[4] • The design activity of the architect,[3] from the macro-level (urban design, landscape architecture) to the micro-level (construction details and furni- ture). Architecture has to do with planning, designing and con- structing form, space and ambience to reflect functional, technical, social, environmental and aesthetic considera- tions. It requires the creative manipulation and coordina- tion of materials and technology, and of light and shadow. Often, conflicting requirements must be resolved. The practise of Architecture also encompasses the pragmatic aspects of realizing buildings and structures, including scheduling, cost estimation and construction administra- tion. Documentation produced by architects, typically drawings, plans and technical specifications, defines the structure and/or behavior of a building or other kind of system that is to be or has been constructed.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Classical Architectural Vocabulary
    Classical Architectural Vocabulary The five classical orders The five orders pictured to the left follow a specific architectural hierarchy. The ascending orders, pictured left to right, are: Tuscan, Doric, Ionic, Corinthian, and Composite. The Greeks only used the Doric, Ionic, and Corinthian; the Romans added the ‘bookend’ orders of the Tuscan and Composite. In classical architecture the selected architectural order for a building defined not only the columns but also the overall proportions of a building in regards to height. Although most temples used only one order, it was not uncommon in Roman architecture to mix orders on a building. For example, the Colosseum has three stacked orders: Doric on the ground, Ionic on the second level and Corinthian on the upper level. column In classical architecture, a cylindrical support consisting of a base (except in Greek Doric), shaft, and capital. It is a post, pillar or strut that supports a load along its longitudinal axis. The Architecture of A. Palladio in Four Books, Leoni (London) 1742, Book 1, plate 8. Doric order Ionic order Corinthian order The oldest and simplest of the five The classical order originated by the The slenderest and most ornate of the classical orders, developed in Greece in Ionian Greeks, characterized by its capital three Greek orders, characterized by a bell- the 7th century B.C. and later imitated with large volutes (scrolls), a fascinated shaped capital with volutes and two rows by the Romans. The Roman Doric is entablature, continuous frieze, usually of acanthus leaves, and with an elaborate characterized by sturdy proportions, a dentils in the cornice, and by its elegant cornice.
    [Show full text]
  • Meraz Avila, Fidel Alejandro (2009) Architecture and Temporality In
    ARCHITECTURE AND TEMPORALITY IN CONSERVATION PHILOSOPHY: CESARE BRANDI Fidel Alejandro Meraz Avila, architect, MArch Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy November 2008 Abstract In conservation of culturally significant architecture (CSA), awareness about problems of temporality and their consideration has been frequently approached with different perspectives. However, these partial explanations have usually focused on accounts of temporality that mainly approach the past and the present, and more rarely the future, but do not consider the complete spectrum of human temporality, nor explicit ontological bases. In this thesis, architecture emerges as a manifold being in constant becoming that compels human being to exercise permanently memory and assimilation. The main contribution is the proposal of an existential approach towards conservation as an intentionality grounded on the more fundamental attitudes of cultivation and care. Through epistemological and phenomenological analysis of Brandi’s thought – focusing on his paradigmatic Theory of Restoration – his attitude comes forth as a particular form of conservation intentionality limited to architecture as a work of art. Following mainly Ingarden and Ricoeur, the results of ontological and phenomenological investigations about architecture and temporality demonstrate conservation in its modern form as a limited temporal intentionality. After these theoretical pre-conditions, the existential approach applied on the previously deduced dimensions of the space and time of Dasein – in Heidegger’s terms – proved the grounding of conservation on an existential interpretation of the more fundamental notions of cultivation and care. Making an analogy with Ingarden’s notion of the architectural work of art, CSA is ontologically analysed emerging to consciousness as a manifold 1 being that can be concretized in different ways according with the attitude of the receptor.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Questions in Architectural History 1 (Late 18Th – 19Th Century) Faculty: Christopher Cowell, Mary Mcleod, Reinhold Martin T
    Questions in Architectural History 1 (Late 18th – 19th Century) Faculty: Christopher Cowell, Mary McLeod, Reinhold Martin Teaching Fellows: Caitlin Blanchfield, Benedict Clouette, Samuel Stewart-Halevy, Robin Honggare, Alireza Karbasioun, Elliott Sturtevant, Ife Vanable. ARCH A4348 Wed 11am-1pm / Avery 115 (Cowell) Fall 2018 This two-semester introductory course is organized around selected questions and problems that have, over the course of the past two centuries, helped to define architecture’s modernity. The course treats the history of architectural modernity as a contested, geographically and culturally uncertain category, for which periodization is both necessary and contingent. The fall semester begins with the apotheosis of the European Enlightenment and the early phases of the industrial revolution in the late eighteenth century. From there, it proceeds in a rough chronology through the “long” nineteenth century. Developments in Europe and North America are situated in relation to worldwide processes including trade, imperialism, nationalism, and industrialization. Sequentially, the course considers specific questions and problems that form around differences that are also connections, antitheses that are also interdependencies, and conflicts that are also alliances. The resulting tensions animated architectural discourse and practice throughout the period, and continue to shape our present. Each week, objects, ideas, and events will move in and out of the European, North American, and colonial non-West frame, with a strong emphasis on relational thinking and contextualization. This includes a historical, relational understanding of architecture itself. Although the Western tradition had recognized diverse building practices as “architecture” for some time, an understanding of architecture as an academic discipline and as a profession, which still prevails today, was only institutionalized in the European nineteenth century.
    [Show full text]