DOCSLIB.ORG

The True Value of Solar

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The True Value of Solar The True Value of Solar Measuring the Benefits of Rooftop Solar Power The True Value of Solar Measuring the Benefits of Rooftop Solar Power Written by: Gideon Weissman Frontier Group Emma Searson and Rob Sargent Environment America Research and Policy Center July 2019 Acknowledgments Environment Maine Research & Policy Center sincerely thanks Karl R. Rábago of the Pace Energy and Climate Center, John Farrell of the Institute for Local Self-Reliance, Kevin Lucas and Rachel Goldstein of the Solar Energy Industries Association and Nathan Phelps of Vote Solar for their review of this document. Thanks also to Tony Dutzik, Susan Rakov and Jonathan Sundby of Frontier Group for editorial support. The authors bear responsibility for any factual errors. The recommendations are those of Environment Maine Re- search & Policy Center. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views those who provided review. 2019 Environment Maine Research & Policy Center Environment Maine Research & Policy Center is a 501(c)(3) organization. We are dedicated to protecting Maine’s air, water and open spaces. We investigate problems, craft solutions, educate the public and decision makers, and help Mainers make their voices heard in local, state and national debates over the quality of our environment and our lives. For more information about Environment Maine Research & Policy Center or for additional copies of this report, please visit www.environmentmainecenter.org. Frontier Group provides information and ideas to help citizens build a cleaner, healthier, fairer and more democratic America. We address issues that will define our nation’s course in the 21st century – from fracking to solar energy, global warming to transportation, clean water to clean elections. Our experts and writers deliver timely research and analysis that is accessible to the public, applying insights gleaned from a variety of disciplines to arrive at new ideas for solving pressing problems. For more information about Frontier Group, please visit www.frontiergroup.org. Layout: Alec Meltzer/meltzerdesign.net Cover photo: National Renewable Energy Laboratory Table of Contents Executive Summary..................................................................1 Introduction...........................................................................3 The Value of Solar Power Has Important Implications for Renewable Energy Adoption ...................................................4 Solar Power Delivers Important Environmental and Public Health Benefits...............................................................5 Grid Benefits . .6 Societal Benefits . .7 Value-of-Solar Studies Should Account for All of Solar Energy’s Societal Benefits....................................................9 Conclusion and Recommendations ..............................................12 Notes ...................................................................................13 Executive Summary istributed solar energy is on the rise, gen- To help develop smart public policy around solar erating enough electricity to power more energy, many public utilities commissions, utilities than 6 million homes each year, and result- and other organizations have conducted or spon- Ding in annual carbon dioxide emission reductions sored “value-of-solar” studies that attempt to quan- equivalent to taking 4.4 million passenger vehicles tify the monetary value of the benefits delivered, and off the road.1 Public policy has been a key factor in costs imposed, by the addition of solar energy to the driving the growth of solar energy – recognizing the electric grid. Studies that include a full range of solar enormous benefits that solar power can provide both energy’s benefits – including benefits to the environ- today and in the future. ment and society – reliably conclude that the value of Figure ES-1. The Benefits of Rooftop Solar Energy2 Benefit Category Benefit Avoided electricity generation Energy Reduced line losses Market price response Avoided capacity investment Grid Capacity and Grid Investments Avoided transmission and distribution investment Reduced need for grid support services Reduced exposure to price volatility Risk and Reliability Benefits Improved grid resiliency and reliability Compliance Reduced environmental compliance costs Avoided greenhouse gas emissions Avoided air pollution Environment Societal Health benefits Avoided fossil fuel lifecycle costs Economy Local jobs and businesses Executive Summary 1 those benefits approximates or exceeds the compen- exceeds the retail rate of electricity. Recent studies sation solar panel owners receive through policies from states including Maine, Pennsylvania and such as net metering. Arkansas have found that solar energy brings substantial environmental benefits, and that Many value-of-solar studies, however – especially rooftop solar owners would provide a net benefit those conducted by electric utilities – have left out key to society even with net metering compensation.3 benefits of solar energy. Policymakers and members of the public who consult these studies may be left with • Studies commissioned by electric utilities gener- a false impression of solar energy’s value to the grid ally fail to account for benefits beyond the grid, and society, with damaging results for public policy. resulting in far lower values of solar. A 2016 report published by Environment America Research and To make decisions that serve the public interest, Policy Center and Frontier Group reviewed value- policymakers should account for the full value of of-solar studies and found that, of 16 studies solar energy, including societal benefits to the reviewed, only eight accounted for avoided green- environment and public health. house gas emissions, and no studies commis- Rooftop solar energy brings a wide variety of sioned by utilities accounted for the value of solar benefits to the grid and to society. energy beyond the grid. The studies that left out societal benefits valued solar, on average, at 14.3 • Rooftop solar power generally adds value to the cents per kilowatt-hour, compared to 22.9 cents electric grid. It not only reduces the need for gener- for those studies that at least accounted for green- ation from and investment in central power plants, house gas emissions. but over the long lifetime of solar energy systems it also can increase price stability and grid reliability, Value-of-solar studies should account for all of and reduce environmental compliance costs. solar energy’s benefits to the grid and society. • As a clean, emission-free energy source often • Policymakers must account for the societal value located on private property and built with of reduced power plant emissions, in particular considerable private, non-ratepayer investment, the value of avoided greenhouse gas emissions rooftop solar brings valuable societal benefits. and pollutants that contribute to the formation of Solar energy reduces global warming pollution, smog and soot. and also reduces emissions of dangerous air • Policymakers should also seek to account for pollutants such as nitrogen oxides, mercury and broader societal impacts of solar energy, including particulate matter. “upstream” impacts of fossil fuel production and Value-of-solar studies inconsistently account for use, such as methane emissions from fracking, and solar energy’s benefits, especially beyond the local economic development impacts. electric grid, resulting in dramatically different Public policy that fails to account for the full range of conclusions. benefits may deter the addition of solar power to the • Studies that include the benefits of solar energy grid, with ramifications for the environment, public beyond the grid generally find that its value health, and the operation of the electric grid. 2 The True Value of Solar Introduction he electricity system that powers our homes, tion and minimize harm to our health and environ- businesses and factories imposes heavy costs ment. But while many states aspire to least-cost utility on our environment and our health. These planning, and some even incorporate the social cost Tcosts accrue in a variety of ways. Particulate mat- of carbon into certain planning decisions, no state ter from burning coal harms our bodies, increases fully accounts for the external costs of electricity in mortality rates and strains the health care system.4 pricing or investment decisions.9 Fracking and coal mining degrade the environment, In the 20th century, the vast majority of electricity threaten water quality, and require expensive envi- was generated from fossil fuels at large, centralized ronmental rehabilitation.5 Each new ton of global power plants. Today, the availability of clean, afford- warming pollution – whether carbon dioxide from able renewable energy, coupled with the potential to power plants, or methane leaked from natural gas generate power close to where it is used, forces a re- wells – adds to the burden we and future genera- thinking of traditional ways of setting utility rates and tions will face from extreme weather, rising seas, and comparing the value of various options for generat- economic and societal disruption.6 ing electricity. The ways in which we choose to assign Most of these costs are quantifiable, and all are vast. value to various options for generating electricity will For instance, one U.S. Environmental Protection help to shape the electricity system of the future. It is Agency study found that
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2011 Indiana Renewable Energy Resources Study
    September 2011 2011 Indiana Renewable Energy Resources Study Prepared for: Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission and Regulatory Flexibility Committee of the Indiana General Assembly Indianapolis, Indiana State Utility Forecasting Group | Energy Center at Discovery Park | Purdue University | West Lafayette, Indiana 2011 INDIANA RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES STUDY State Utility Forecasting Group Energy Center Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana David Nderitu Tianyun Ji Benjamin Allen Douglas Gotham Paul Preckel Darla Mize Forrest Holland Marco Velastegui Tim Phillips September 2011 2011 Indiana Renewable Energy Resources Study - State Utility Forecasting Group 2011 Indiana Renewable Energy Resources Study - State Utility Forecasting Group Table of Contents List of Figures .................................................................................................................... iii List of Tables ...................................................................................................................... v Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................ vi Foreword ............................................................................................................................ ix 1. Overview ............................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Trends in renewable energy consumption in the United States ................ 1 1.2 Trends in renewable energy consumption in Indiana
    [Show full text]
  • Community Solar Power
    Community Solar Power Obstacles and Opportunities JOHN FARRELL [email protected] Revised November 2010 A publication of New Rules Project 612-379-3815 1313 5th St. SE, Suite 303 www.newrules.org Minneapolis, MN 55414 New Rules Project www.newrules.org i Comment on Revisions The original edition of Community Solar Power received a lot of attention, for which we at the Institute for Local Self-Reliance are very grateful. The grading system we used for community solar projects was of particular interest, especially our offer of higher scores for projects placed on rooftops rather than on the ground. In particular, the excellent folks at the Clean Energy Collective (whose project is featured in this report) engaged us on the criteria we used for rooftop and ground-mounted solar power. After several in-depth conversations, we offer this revision to Community Solar Power and to the grades we provided for solar project location. We think that our revised grading system better reflects the advantages of distributed renewable energy as well as the best efforts of community solar projects to provide their participants with the best value. See the table below for the revised grades (an updated scorecard is in the report). For a more thorough discussion of the location conversation, see this post to our distributed energy web resource, Energy Self-Reliant States: Community Solar: Better on the Roof? Sincerely, -John Farrell Community Sol Simple University Green- Solar Sun- Solar CEC Partners Solar Park house Pioneer Smart Ellensburg Sakai Scorecard:
    [Show full text]
  • Home Power #103.Pdf
    Say Hello To Your New Business Partner. We’d like to go into business with you. The SMA Solar Pro Club is simple to join, with no dues, no fees, and plenty of support. Just We’re SMA America, a solar technology company become an SMA trained Solar Pro, and you’ll based in Grass Valley, California. Our parent receive: company was founded in Germany in 1981. We • Lead referrals manufacture Sunny Boy solar inverters, from 700 • Co-op advertising support to 2500 watts; a 125,000 watt central inverter for • Technical support priority large commercial solar plants; and a new battery • Ongoing training opportunities inverter for the off-grid and backup power markets, • Early access to new products along with all the accessories. Our German engineering and American know-how mean we Customers considering Sunny Boy solar produce the most efficient, longest-lasting, most powered systems and seeking the best in the trouble-free system on the market today. business should ask for an SMA Solar Pro. And when they do, we want that to be you. Your dealer/installer business is a big part of our success. Now it’s our turn to help you. So join the club: Call 530.273.4895x100, and become an SMA Solar Pro... today. Solar Today... Energy TomorrowTM. SMA America, Inc. 12438 Loma Rica Drive • Grass Valley, CA 95945 Telephone: 1.530.273.4895 • Fax: 1.530.274.7271 Email: [email protected] • Web: www.sma-america.com �������������������������������������������� � � � �� �� �� ��� � www.usbattery.com RECYCLED PPOWER At U.S. Battery, we’re committed to doing our part in keeping the environment clean and green for future generations, as well as providing you with premium deep cycle products guaranteed to deliver your power requirements when you need them.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Report Prepared by Arizona State University NINETY-NINTH ARIZONA TOWN HALL
    Arizona’s Energy Future 99th Arizona Town Hall November 6 - 9, 2011 Background Report Prepared by Arizona State University NINETY-NINTH ARIZONA TOWN HALL PREMIER PARTNER CONTRIBUTING PARTNER COLLABORATING PARTNERS SUPPORTING PARTNERS CIVIC PARTNERS CORE Construction Kennedy Partners Ryley, Carlock & Applewhite Sundt Construction One East Camelback, Suite 530, Phoenix, Arizona 85012 Phone: 602.252.9600 Fax: 602.252.6189 Website: www.aztownhall.org Email: [email protected] ARIZONA’S ENERGY FUTURE September 2011 We thank you for making the commitment to participate in the 99th Arizona Town Hall to be held at the Grand Canyon on November 6-9, 2011. You will be discussing and developing consensus with fellow Arizonans on the future of energy in Arizona. An essential element to the success of these consensus-driven discussions is this background report that is provided to all participants before the Town Hall convenes. As they have so often done for past Arizona Town Halls, Arizona State University has prepared a detailed and informative report that will provide a unique and unparalleled resource for your Town Hall panel sessions. Special thanks go to editors Clark Miller and Sharlissa Moore of the Consortium for Science, Policy, and Outcomes at ASU for spearheading this effort and marshaling many talented professionals to write individual chapters. For sharing their wealth of knowledge and professional talents, our thanks go to the many authors who contributed to the report. Our deepest gratitude also goes to University Vice President and Dean of the College of Public Programs for ASU, Debra Friedman, and Director of the School of Public Affairs for ASU, Jonathan Koppell, who made great efforts to ensure that ASU could provide this type of resource to Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • Emerging Trends in the U.S. Solar Market a White Paper from Enterprise Florida and Gtm Research | Shayle Kann Gtm Research
    GTM RESEARCH NOVEMBER 2009 EMERGING TRENDS IN THE U.S. SOLAR MARKET A WHITE PAPER FROM ENTERPRISE FLORIDA AND GTM RESEARCH | SHAYLE KANN GTM RESEARCH Photo courtesy Florida Power and Light COPYRIGHT 2009, GREENTECH MEDIA INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED GTM RESEARCH NOVEMBER 2009 1 INTRODUCTION The United States is rapidly emerging as one of the world’s leading markets for solar power. Installed costs for PV systems have fallen on average 3.6 percent per year for the past decade, making solar more affordable by the day. Simultaneously, electricity prices have been rising and acknowledgement of the external costs of fossil fuel-based generation have been growing. As a result, the U.S. PV market has grown at an average rate of 71 percent per annum since 2000, signifi cantly outpacing global PV demand growth of 51 percent per annum. FIGURE 1: ANNUAL PV DEMAND IN THE UNITED STATES, 2000-2008 Source: IREC This rapid growth has placed the U.S. as the third-largest global demand center for PV, trailing only Germany and Spain. However, while demand is beginning to stabilize in the historical demand centers, the U.S. market is only beginning to ramp up. With high insolation, the largest electricity demand in the world, and ample available land for solar development, the U.S. presents an attractive long-term growth opportunity for developers, installers, fi nanciers, and other solar service providers. The solar market is evolving as rapidly as it is growing. Local and state governments throughout the U.S. are increasingly considering new policies and incentives to support solar deployment, utilities are beginning to consider solar a valuable component of their portfolios, and technological innovations are increasing the effectiveness and value of solar power.
    [Show full text]
  • Q4 2018 / Q1 2019 Solar Industry Update
    Q4 2018/Q1 2019 Solar Industry Update David Feldman Robert Margolis May 2019 NREL/PR-6A20-73992 Executive Summary • At the end of 2018, global PV installations reached 509 GW-DC, • The United States installed 10.7 GW-DC of PV in 2018 (8.3 GW- an annual increase of 102 GW-DC from 2017. AC), with 4.2 GW-DC coming in Q4—cumulative capacity reached 62.5 GW-DC (49.7 GW-AC). – In 2018, the leading markets in terms of annual deployment were China (44 GW-DC), the United States (11 GW-DC), and – Analysts also expect U.S. PV capacity to double by 2022. India (8 GW-DC). • In 2018, global PV shipments were approximately 89 GW—a Analysts expect cumulative PV capacity to double by 2022. – decrease of 5% from 2017. More than 96% of those PV shipments used c-Si technology and were shipped from Asian • At the end of 2018, cumulative global CSP installations reached countries. 6.2 GW, up 710 MW from 2017. • In 2018, the United States produced approximately 1 GW of c-Si • Solar installations represented 22% of all new U.S. electric modules and 0.4 GW of thin film. generation capacity in 2018—second to natural gas (58%). – The United States expanded its PV manufacturing capacity • In 2018, solar represented 4.6% of net summer capacity and to 6 GW in Q1 2019 (up from 2.5 GW in 2017), and it is 2.3% of annual net generation. expected to add another 3 GW in the near future.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Energy Markets Solar Energy Markets an Analysis of the Global Solar Industry
    Solar Energy Markets Solar Energy Markets An Analysis of the Global Solar Industry Philip G. Jordan The Economic Advancement Research Institute Wrentham, MA, USA and BW Research Partnership, Inc. Wrentham, MA, USA AMSTERDAM • BOSTON • HEIDELBERG • LONDON • NEW YORK • OXFORD PARIS • SAN DIEGO • SAN FRANCISCO • SINGAPORE • SYDNEY • TOKYO Elsevier 32 Jamestown Road, London NW1 7BY, UK 225 Wyman Street, Waltham, MA 02451, USA Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Details on how to seek permission, further information about the Publisher’s permissions policies and our arrangement with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance Center and the Copyright Licensing Agency, can be found at our website: www.elsevier.com/permissions This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the Publisher (other than as may be noted herein). Notice Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience broaden our understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical treatment may become necessary. Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating and using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. In using such information or methods they should be mindful of their own safety and the safety of others, including parties for whom they have a professional responsibility. To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or editors, assume any liability for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions, or ideas contained in the material herein.
    [Show full text]
  • CEEC 100% Renewable Energy White Paper
    CONCORD CITY COUNCIL CONCORD ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE ADVISORY REPORT IN SUPPORT OF THE GOAL OF 100% RENEWABLE ENERGY FOR CONCORD January 31, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................... iii PART 1 - INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1 PART 2 – CONCORD’S ENERGY PRESENT ................................................................................................... 2 A. Current Community-Wide Energy Consumption ............................................................................... 2 B. Current Municipal Government Energy Consumption ..................................................................... 2 C. Existing Non-Fossil Fueled Energy Generation in Concord ........................................................... 2 D. Concord's Recent Energy-Related Initiatives ....................................................................................... 3 PART 3 -- THE THREAT OF CLIMATE CHANGE AND THE RENEWABLE ENERGY SOLUTION ..................................................................................................................................................................... 4 A. Global and National Impacts ..................................................................................................................... 4 B. State and Local Impacts .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Electricity: Potential Economic Effects of Increased Commitments in Massachusetts
    United States International Trade Commission Renewable Electricity: Potential Economic Effects of Increased Commitments in Massachusetts January 2021 Publication Number: 5154 Investigation Number: 332-574 United States International Trade Commission Commissioners Jason E. Kearns, Chair Randolph J. Stayin, Vice Chair David S. Johanson Rhonda K. Schmidtlein Amy A. Karpel Catherine DeFilippo Director, Office of Operations Jonathan Coleman Director, Office of Industries Address all communications to Office of External Relations ([email protected]) United States International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 United States International Trade Commission Renewable Electricity: Potential Economic Effects of Increased Commitments in Massachusetts January 2021 Publication Number: 5154 Investigation Number: 332-574 This report was prepared principally by: Project Leader Diana Friedman Deputy Project Leader Tricia Mueller Office of Industries Brian Daigle, Andrew David, Jennifer Powell, Allison Utomi, Heather Wickramarachi Office of Economics David Riker, Samantha Schreiber Office of Analysis and Research Services Conor Hargrove, Maureen Letostak Content Reviewers Martha Lawless, Marinos Tsigas Statistical Reviewers Russell Duncan Editorial Reviewers Peg Hausman, Judy Edelhoff Production Support Byron Barlow, Gwenetta Duvall, Monica Sanders Under the direction of Robert Carr Natural Resources and Energy Division Office of Industries Table of Contents Table of Contents Glossary of Terms ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Standards and Requirements for Solar Equipment, Installation, and Licensing and Certification a Guide for States and Municipalities
    SUSTAINABLE SOLAR EDUCATION PROJECT Beren Argetsinger, Keyes&FoxLLP•BenjaminInskeep,EQResearchLLC Beren Argetsinger, A GuideforStatesandMunicipalities and LicensingCertification for SolarEquipment,Installation, Standards andRequirements FEBRU A RY 2017 RY © B igstock/ilfede SUSTAINABLE SOLAR EDUCATION PROJECT ABOUT THIS GUIDE AND THE SUSTAINABLE SOLAR EDUCATION PROJECT Standards and Requirements for Solar Equipment, Installation, and Licensing and Certification: A Guide for States and Municipalities is one of six program guides being produced by the Clean Energy States Alliance (CESA) as part of its Sustainable Solar Ed- ucation Project. The project aims to provide information and educational resources to help states and municipalities ensure that distributed solar electricity remains consumer friendly and its benefits are accessible to low- and moderate-income households. In ad- dition to publishing guides, the Sustainable Solar Education Project will produce webinars, an online course, a monthly newsletter, and in-person training on topics related to strengthening solar accessibility and affordability, improving consumer information, and implementing consumer protection measures regarding solar photovoltaic (PV) systems. More information about the project, including a link to sign up to receive notices about the project’s activities, can be found at www.cesa.org/projects/sustainable-solar. ABOUT THE U.S. DEpaRTMENT OF ENERGY SUNSHOT INITIATIVE The U.S. Department of Energy SunShot Initiative is a collaborative national effort that aggressively drives innovation to make solar energy fully cost-competitive with traditional energy sources before the end of the decade. Through SunShot, the Energy Department supports efforts by private companies, universities, and national laboratories to drive down the cost of solar electricity to $0.06 per kilowatt-hour.
    [Show full text]
  • First Solar SUSTAINABILITY REPORT Table of Contents
    First Solar SUSTAINABILITY REPORT Table of Contents 1 Message from the CEO ............................................................................1 2 About First Solar .....................................................................................3 Our Operations ..................................................................................4 Awards and Recognitions 2014-2015 ..................................................5 Driving Down the Cost of Solar ...........................................................6 Economic Sustainability .....................................................................7 First Solar’s Sustainability Program .....................................................9 3 Responsible Life Cycle Management ..................................................... 13 Leading Eco-Efficient PV Technology ..................................................14 Continuous Improvement ..................................................................19 Industry-Leading Quality, Reliability And Safety .................................20 First Solar Recycling Program ...........................................................22 Raw Material Availability ...................................................................23 4 Supply Chain Sustainability ...................................................................25 Supplier Qualification and Assessment .............................................27 Human Rights Standards and Practices ...........................................27 Conflict Minerals ..............................................................................28
    [Show full text]
  • Economics: TENURE
    University of Maine System 2017 Tenure and Promotion UNIVERSITY OF MAINE SYSTEM Tenure and Promotion Application Form I. FACE DATA A. NAME: Sharon J.W. Klein B. PRESENT RANK: Assistant Professor C. COLLEGE/DEPARTMENT: College of Natural SCiences, Forestry and Agriculture; School of Economics D. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE YEAR(S) EMPLOYER(S) POSITION(S) 2011-present School of Economics, University of Maine Assistant Professor 2007-2011 Department of Engineering and Public Graduate Research Assistant Policy, Carnegie Mellon University 2005-2007 Colegio Americano de Quito, Ecuador International BaCCalaureate ScienCe TeaCher (8th, 11th, 12th grade) 2002-2005 King/Chavez Academy, San Diego, CA ScienCe TeaCher (7th & 8th grade) 2000-2002 Hargrave Environmental Consulting, San Environmental Technician Diego, CA 1999-2000 Americorps National Civilian Community Corps Member Corps, Southeast Region E. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND YEAR(S) INSTITUTION(S) FIELD DEGREE 2009-2011 Carnegie Mellon University Engineering and Ph.D. Public Policy 2007-2009 Carnegie Mellon University Engineering and M.S. Public Policy 2002-2004 National University SeCondary TeaChing Single Subject Certificate Education (Chemistry) 1996-1999 University of MassaChusetts, Environmental B.S. Amherst ScienCe Sharon J.W. Klein Page 1 University of Maine System 2017 Tenure and Promotion II. RECORD OF ACTIONS A. INITIAL PROBATIONARY APPOINTMENT 1. Effective Date: August 1, 2011 2. Length of Initial Tenure-Track Appointment: 1 year & 1 month 3. Prior Experience Credited toward Tenure: None 4. Rank: Assistant Professor B. REAPPOINTMENTS DATE(S) LENGTH Sept. 1, 2012 1 year Sept. 1, 2013* 1 year Sept. 1, 2014 1 year Sept. 1, 2015 1 year Sept. 1, 2016 1 year *I stopped the clock on August 16, 2013, for the 2013-2014 academic year, due to exceptional life circumstances associated with a difficult pregnancy and 2 miscarriages (see Appendix G).
    [Show full text]