DOCSLIB.ORG

Fact Sheet: Overview

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fact Sheet: Overview metro.net/wsab Next stop: new rail to Southeast LA County. Fact Sheet fall 2019 Overview Metro is evaluating a new light rail transit (LRT) line that > Northern Alignment Options Screening Report (2017) – will connect southeast LA County to downtown Los Angeles, Metro analyzed six northern alignment options. Upon review, serving the cities and communities of downtown Los Angeles, the Metro Board of Directors approved carrying forward four unincorporated Florence-Graham community of LA County, of the northern alignment options identified in the TRS for Vernon, Huntington Park, Bell, Cudahy, South Gate, Downey, environmental study and initiated the scoping process for Paramount, Bellflower, Cerritos and Artesia. The West Santa this project. Ana Branch Transit Corridor (WSAB) Project is a 19-mile > In May 2018, the Metro Board selected two Northern corridor undergoing an Environmental Impact Statement Alignment Alternatives – Alternative E: Alameda (EIS)/Environmental Impact Report (EIR) process to prepare Underground and Alternative G: Downtown Transit Core the corridor for LRT. Underground – to proceed into the Draft EIS/EIR. The project area is home to 1.2 million residents and is a In December 2018, the Metro Board updated the project job center to approximately 584,000 employees. Projections definition after receiving feedback through scoping and show the resident population increasing to 1.5 million other ongoing outreach efforts. Key updates to the project and jobs increasing to 670,000 by 2040. Population and definition include: aerial structure over the I-10 (Santa employment densities are five times higher than the LA County Monica) Freeway; five new aerial grade separations; three average. This rail corridor is anticipated to serve commuters proposed stations removed from further study (Washington, in a high travel demand corridor by providing relief to the Vernon, 183rd/Gridley); removal of the optional Bloomfield limited transportation systems currently available to these extension and station; and elimination of Alternative G2 communities. In addition, the project is expected to provide a (Pershing Square design option). direct connection to Metro’s Green and Blue lines. Goals Initial Operating Segments (IOS) Metro is evaluating the following two Initial Operating The main goals of the WSAB Project are to: Segments (IOS) options as part of the EIS/EIR to accelerate 1. Provide mobility improvements delivery of the project faster than assumed in the Measure M 2. Support local and regional land-use plans and policies Expenditure Plan: > 3. Minimize environmental impacts IOS 1 – I-105 (Century Freeway)/Green Line Station to Pioneer Station 4. Ensure cost effectiveness and financial feasibility > IOS 2 – Slauson Station to Pioneer Station 5. Promote equity These IOS options were developed based on physical infrastructure limits and barriers, major origins/destinations, Background market trends and high activity areas. Proposed stations Previous studies analyzed opportunities for transit connections serving major activity areas and operational feasibility were also in southeast LA County, including: considered. These options were identified for further evaluation based on how they met the project’s five goals. > Alternatives Analysis (AA) (2013) – Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) assessed alternatives The EIS/EIR will study the entire project and the two IOS to add a new connection along a 34-mile corridor from options. If an IOS option is implemented, connectivity to Union Station in LA County to the City of Santa Ana in downtown LA could be accomplished via a transfer to existing Orange County, and recommended the LRT alignment as the Metro lines. preferred transit mode and northern alignment alternatives for further consideration. Public-Private Partnerships (P3) > Technical Refinement Study (TRS) (2015) – Metro built Metro is evaluating the feasibility and potential benefits on the recommendations in the SCAG AA with a focus on of delivering the WSAB Project through a Public-Private the LA County segment of the Pacific Electric Right-of-Way Partnership (P3) program. P3s do not provide additional (ROW)/WSAB project corridor. This study identified four funding but may enhance financial capacity to advance new northern alignment options, updated capital cost construction in certain cases, along with other potential and ridership forecasts, and analyzed specific challenges benefits to the project. Metro is engaging with the P3 industry identified in the SCAG AA within the LA County segment. to explore options to enhance financial capacity in order to advance construction of the full corridor. West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor Project Overview Northern Alignment Alternatives Corridor Overview Alternatives E and G are the two northern alignments currently > 19 miles being studied as part of the Draft EIS/EIR with the following > 12 new stations station termini options: > Five new Park & Ride facilities Alternative E: Alameda Underground > Los Angeles Union Station (LAUS) Forecourt > Study area: 98 square miles > LAUS east of the Metropolitan Water District (MWD) > Population and employment densities are five times Alternative G: Downtown Transit Core Underground higher than LA County > At 8th St/Flower, with a pedestrian connection to 7th St/Metro Center Environmental Planning Process The WSAB Project's environmental process is well defined by $4 billion (B) (2015$) allocation of funding (comprised federal requirements stipulated in the National Environmental of Measure M and other local, state and federal sources). Policy Act (NEPA) and state environmental requirements Measure M funding becomes available in two cycles: stipulated in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). > FY 2028 - $1B The flow chart below highlights the major milestones in the environmental study phase. > FY 2041 - $3B The current project cost is estimated to be $6.5-$6.6B (in Project Delivery and Coordination 2018$), contingent upon further project design, coordination The project is on schedule for environmental clearance and the with freight railroad and the Ports on ROW, and development of Draft EIS/EIR is expected to be released in December 2020. First/Last Mile plans and costs. The Metro Board is anticipated to select a Locally Preferred Measure M indicates that an early project delivery may be made Alternative in April 2021. possible with a P3 delivery method. A P3 with a comprehensive delivery approach is being pursued as part of a strategy for The WSAB Project involves a shared corridor of approximately accelerating a significantly increased project scope by 2028. ten miles of freight-owned Right-of-Way (ROW) that runs along board authorized study of additional northern alignments & the Wilmington and Lacommunity Habra Branches meetings (owned by Union Project Involvement Pacific Railroad, UPRR) andmarch the 2018San Pedro Subdivision (owned by the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach). Staff is actively Metro is committed to a comprehensive outreach program coordinating with UPRR and the Ports to obtain agreement on that provides project stakeholders with the necessary tools and design and ROW, which is needed to advance the project. resources to be educated and informed, and provide valuable input at key milestones. The Draft EIS/EIR is anticipated to be Funding circulated in December 2020 and will include public hearings in early 2021 and an official public comment period. Per Measure M and Metro’s Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) financial forecast, as amended, the project has a Phases of Project Development contact us Meghna Khanna, Project Manager Metro One Gateway Plaza, MS 99-22-7 Los Angeles, CA 90012 213.922.6262 [email protected] metro.net/wsab @metrowsab metrowsab 20-0611 ©2019 lacmta.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gateway District SPECIFIC PLAN
    CITY OF SOUTH GATE Gateway District FACT SHEET SPECIFIC PLAN Upcoming Opportunities for Community CITY OF SOUTH GATE Participation South Gate’s collaboration with business and residential communities is of paramount importance to the development of the Specific Plan. The City will host three community meetings between January and Fall 2016. 1 Community Meeting 1: Project Initiation Meeting Wednesday, January 27, 2016 Gateway The focus of the initial meeting is to increase project awareness, provide interested residents and business groups information about the Specific Plan’s purpose, study goals and timeline, and to gather feedback on the TOD vision for South Gate. 2 Community Workshop 2: Project Specific Workshop Spring/Summer 2016 The second meeting will be a workshop where the information gathered from the first meeting, as well District as technical work, will be shared. Participants will provide feedback and input on preliminary land use and design scenarios, including public access and open space. Information gathered from the SPECIFIC PLAN workshop will help define the Specific Plan’s goals and policies, and will be used to develop the Public Review Draft Specific Plan. Community Meeting 3: Public Review Draft Specific Plan 3 Summer/Fall 2016 The third meeting will provide the community an opportunity to review and comment on the Public Review Draft Specific Plan. Participants will have the chance to review key components of the Specific Plan, such as site design concepts, proposed land uses, pedestrian- and transit-oriented concepts, and strategies for public access and open space. Comments will be documented and be responded to in the Final Gateway Specific Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • City Council Agenda Report
    CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: 4/12/2021 ITEM NO: 15 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council SUBJECT: Approval of a Letter to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority in Support of Federal Funding for the West Santa Ana Branch Light Rail Project FROM: Karen Lee, Management Analyst REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Melissa Burke, Administrative Manager HongDao Nguyen, City Attorney William Rawlings, City Manager RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the Mayor to sign, and direct staff to submit, the attached letter to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. BACKGROUND: The West Santa Ana Branch (WSAB) light rail line is a substantial public works and transportation project that will have a permanent impact on the region. This project will have tremendous impact on the City as the City’s planned station location in the Downtown will be the line’s terminus. The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) is overseeing this project. During the January 12, 2021 meeting of the WSAB City Manager Technical Advisory Committee, and the board meeting of the Orangeline Development Authority/Eco-Rapid Transit on January 13, 2021, Metro staff reported that it intends to lobby for federal funding for the WSAB project to help pay the estimated cost of $6.3 to $6.5 billion in 2018 dollars based on 5% design level plus the addition of project revisions. The project costs will be updated this month based on the 15% design level. 1 ANALYSIS: Metro has requested that cities along the WSAB corridor provide letters in support of the WSAB project and Metro’s efforts to pursue federal funding for this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Oei Office of Extraordinary Innovation
    Tab 9 INNOVATION Defining the Problem Problem: Mobility in Los Angeles County is not working Thesis: We need to do things very differently to reduce Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) use Proposed solutions: Set a course, accelerate projects, and try new stuff 2 “We have to have stretch goals that area realistic” 3 ROLE OF METRO STRATEGIC PLAN • Foundation that aligns all plans, programs, and services to achieve a common vision • Establishes mission, vision, and goals to be adopted by other plans (e.g. Long Range Transportation Plan, NextGen Bus Study, etc.) • Sets principles for making decisions and conducting business 4 STRATEGIC MOBILITY: SUPPLY • Increase capacity for non-SOV modes • Improve quality of existing transit system Common Interest 5 STRATEGIC MOBILITY: DEMAND • Manage demand • Pricing beyond transit fares • CongestionCommon pricingInterest • Regulate TNCs 6 “This is a really innovative idea but we can’t do it. It’s never been done before” 7 MicroTransit Pilot Can Metro increase customer satisfaction & attract new riders? > A cross between a pooled ride and a shuttle bus > Meets increasing expectation for convenience > Expands FMLM solutions > Flexible and seamless o Integrated with transit system o Serves non-linear travel On Demand | Dynamically Routed Data Driven | Corner to Corner 8 “If we improve our service more people will use it and we can’t afford that.” 9 Mobility on Demand Partner with a transportation network company to provide better and more equitable access to 3 pilot transit stations “We could have thought of that on our own.” 11 Unsolicited Proposals: Background In February 2016, Metro opened its doors to the private sector, at an Industry> Pledged our Forumcommitment.
    [Show full text]
  • City Council Agenda Report
    CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: 11/9/2020 ITEM NO: 7 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council SUBJECT: Informational Report Regarding the 3% Local Contribution Required Under Measure M to Fund the West Santa Ana Branch Light Rail Line FROM: Karen Lee, Management Analyst REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: Melissa Burke, Administrative Manager Christi Hogin, City Attorney William Rawlings, City Manager RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the report. BACKGROUND: Los Angeles County voters approved Measure M on November 8, 2016, which implemented a permanent county-wide sales tax increase to fund projects to greatly expand the County’s public transit system, including new rail lines, roads, and related infrastructure. The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) administers Measure M funds. Funding for the West Santa Ana Branch (WSAB) line is provided by Measure M. One of Measure M’s requirements is a local contribution by jurisdictions for constructing a rail project with a new station within their boundaries. The rationale for the contribution is that local jurisdictions receive a direct benefit due to the increased access to transit service that is above and beyond the project’s benefit to the County as a whole. The contribution amount is 3% of the project’s total costs at the 30% level of its final design. It is capped at this amount for local contribution purposes, even if the total project cost increases. This amount is then divided by the number of new rail stations constructed on the line. Jurisdictions located within a one-half mile area of the new station will proportionally share the costs based on each jurisdiction’s share of the area.
    [Show full text]
  • 1981 Caltrans Inventory of Pacific Electric Routes
    1981 Inventory of PACIFIC ELECTRIC ROUTES I J..,. I ~ " HE 5428 . red by I58 ANGELES - DISTRICT 7 - PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION BRANCH rI P37 c.2 " ' archive 1981 INVENTORY OF PACIFIC ELECTRIC ROUTES • PREPARED BY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) DISTRICT 07 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION BRANCH FEBRUARY 1982 • TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Pacific Electric Railway Company Map 3a Inventory Map 3b II. NQR'I'HIRN AND EASTERN DISTRICTS 4 A. San Bernardino Line 6 B. Monrovia-Glendora Line 14 C. Alhambra-San Gabriel Line 19 D. Pasadena Short Line 21 E. Pasadena Oak Knoll Line 23 F. Sierra Madre Line 25 G. South Pasadena Line 27 H. North Lake Avenue Line 30 10 North Fair Oaks Avenue Line 31 J. East Colorado Street Line 32 K. Pomona-Upland Line 34 L. San Bernardino-Riverside Line 36 M. Riverside-Corona Line 41 III. WESTERN DISTRICT 45 A. Glendale-Burbank Line 47 B. Hollywood Line Segment via Hill Street 52 C. South Hollywood-Sherman Line 55 D. Subway Hollywood Line 58 i TABLE OF CONTENTS (Contd. ) -PAGE III. WESTERN DISTRICT (Conta. ) E. San Fernando valley Line 61 F. Hollywood-Venice Line 68 o. Venice Short Line 71 H. Santa Monica via Sawtelle Line 76 I. westgate Line 80 J. Santa Monica Air Line 84 K. Soldier's Home Branch Line 93 L. Redondo Beach-Del Rey Line 96 M. Inglewood Line 102 IV. SOUTHIRN DISTRICT 106 A. Long Beach Line 108 B. American Avenue-North Long Beach Line 116 c. Newport-Balboa Line 118 D. E1 Segundo Line 123 E. San Pedro via Dominguez Line 129 F.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Set to Begin Environmental Clearance Process for West Santa Ana Branch Rail Line Connecting Southeast L.A
    Latest Measure R Transit Project Moving Forward Metro Set to Begin Environmental Clearance Process for West Santa Ana Branch Rail Line Connecting southeast L.A. County to the regional transit system moved one step closer to reality today when the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) Board approved contracts to proceed with environmental work and community outreach for the West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor project to connect L.A. Union Station and Artesia via a new rail line. The Board approved contracts with Parsons Brinkerhoff, Inc. to complete the environmental clearance for the project and a contract with Arrellano Associates, LLC for community outreach. The Board also approved a funding agreement with the Gateway Cities Council of Governments to help the 13 cities along the project corridor participate in the study. The effort will be led by the Eco-Rapid Transit Joint Powers Authority, which was created to study rail transit in the corridor. The West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor travels through the cities of Artesia, Bell, Bellflower, Bell Gardens, Cudahy, Cerritos, Downey, Huntington Park, Lynwood, Los Angeles, Maywood, Paramount, South Gate and Vernon. During the environmental clearance phase, various rail alignments will be studied between Los Angeles Union Station and a southern terminus in Artesia. The preferred route will ultimately be approved by the Metro Board. “Connecting southeast L.A. County to the regional transit system is an important part of Metro’s broad vision for better regional mobility,” said John Fasana, Metro Board Chair and Duarte City Council Member. “But this milestone is particularly good news for the Gateway Cities communities.
    [Show full text]
  • ATN]Tha Lll]L]L
    RECEIVED Item No. 2 i\W 7 Z018 of CITYOFSOUTH GATE City South Gate WFICEOFTHECITYMANAGER3bpm CITY COUNCIL ATN]ThA Lll]L]L For the Regular Meeting of August 14, 2018 Orj4ating Deartment: ftZ4’ i7’frC1t Manager Department Director Joe Perez! SUBJECT: COMMENT LETTER FOR THE WEST SANTA ANA BRANCH TRANSIT CORRIDOR PROJECT PURPOSE: To submit comments and concerns to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) regarding potential impacts related to the West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor Project. Metro is receiving public input until August 24, 2018, which marks the end of their formal public comment period for a revised Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)/Environmental Impact Report (EIR). RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorize the Mayor to execute the comment letter regarding potential impacts related to the West Santa Branch Transit Corridor Project to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority prior to August 24, 2018. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ANALYSIS: Metro is evaluating a new light rail transit line that would connect downtown Los Angeles to southeast LA County, serving the cities and communities of downtown Los Angeles, unincorporated Florence-Graham community of LA County, Vernon, Huntington Park, Bell, Cudahy, South Gate, Downey, Paramount, Bellflower and Artesia. The West Santa Ana Branch (WSAB) Transit Corridor Project is a 20-mile corridor that is undergoing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)/Environmental Impact Report (EIR) process to prepare the corridor for light rail use. The project’s name originates from the southern portion of the route south of the Metro Green Line that follows the old Pacific Electric streetcar alignment known as the West Santa Ana Branch Corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor Study
    What is the GATEWAY DISTRICT? The Gateway District encompasses approximately 59 acres located at the north-east corner of Firestone Blvd and Atlantic Ave. It is: • The future site of the planned South Gate Transit Station along the West Santa Ana Branch Corridor Transit Line. • Identified to become a dense“transit village” designed to support a high-level of pedestrian activity. • Envisioned as a visual and functional transit gateway feature for the City of South Gate. • The optimal location for future transit- oriented development (TOD) to support the future transit station. CITY OF SOUTH GATE • Currently characterized by existing light- to heavy-industrialGatewa usesy and emerging retail uses.District Conceptual Sketch of the Gateway District SPECIFIC PLAN Fostoria Street Salt Lake Avenue South Gate City Limit Fostoria Street Wilcox Avenue Los Angeles River Angeles Los Patata Street River Angeles Los South Gate City Limit Patata Street Project Area Reisner Way Reisner Way Rayo Avenue Avenue Rayo Rayo Mason Street Patata Street Rayo Avenue Wilcox Avenue Wilcox Wilcox Avenue Atlantic AvenueWilcox Firestone Place Los Angeles River y t N a PLA Firestone Boulevard May Court Firestone Place Burke Avenue Burke Avenue E Dudlext Avenue Dudlext Avenue T Vossler Avenue w Vossler Avenue GA H T e SPECIFIC Map of the Gateway District Rayo Avenue Rayo Firestone Boulevard Avenue Rayo SOU t West Santa Ana Branch OF Patata Street Y Transit Corridor a Distric Rayo Avenue CIT G Southern Avenue Project Area Potential Station Location Mason Street Salt Lake
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles Equity Maps Large.Ai
    S and Can yo ! Newhall n Placerita Canyon Sand C any on Ventura County ra Los Angeles County er Si Th e Ol d Measure R Expansion l el rn Bradl ey Exi Ya d t 3 xfor Ro S lk an Fe Po d Big rnan T ujung do Hubbar n a Cany yo on sn SylmarSan Fernando on Se a ga Can Moorpark un ay Canyon mp ! cl uj ch T ! Ta Ma le Gl Litt Lopez Ran enoak er xton on Pa ce s er e Port Pi Rinaldi l Cany rn age bo HWY 118 and ys K Os San Fernando Mission Br ! an Nu V Simi Valley x on Chatsworth Fo Chatsworth Wentworth eas Ar le ta Devonshire Ar Mount Gl le ! boa ta Chatsworth and e ah Bal da rn unl Ma lz rilla oodley bo S INTERSTATE W Ze per la Os el Rese 5 Plummer B Sant Plummer a Plummer Ves rra a e Manor ed Te Carlotta Lak lv Nordhoff Ar Laur l Nordhoff epu heldon ! le S on Orange S ny ta el una Ca Fo C La T INTERSTATE othill Lowel o an ! d 210 a e Orange Line Extension ot anford yo or cl n xf ose Northridge Br ani Tu Honolul enr v De S P yl ey Cir u ll Roscoe Roscoe a W Rosc ! ! oe enns ka Va ebb ent P et Gl sc rch Sun Valley enoak Fo Van Nuys re othi Ma Winn ll im a s Los Angeles County Canoga San Fernando BRT Corridors S an ! La C sh oodlake Saticoy ed i nd cle Fe lv er W ir la rnando C ne epu Naom Lank ys ey Sherman Way Sherman S Vi Verdugo ll ! Sherman Glendora Ridge Va t Sc Fo rs k ot an Nu n ott hi V k Ramp ll oo yo an Alta a Burbank/ Bob Hope Airport den Oa Vanowen enhu San Ber a t De Soto ks Canoga ! e hi yv ! Empi Can re re mp it at Fallbr ! Gl Victory Woodley el Fe Pl Ha Ta ctory enoaks ! Vi Woodm d r K Wh ! ! Victory nan enne oo Reseda Laur do d
    [Show full text]
  • Gateway Cities COG Agenda
    West Santa Ana Branch City Manager Technical Advisory Committee Thursday, July 15, 2021, 2:00 PM – 3:30 PM TELECONFERENCE MEETING VIA ZOOM Register in advance for this webinar: https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_z7dIEX8pRvC-IzboBukZ0Q Phone: 669.900.6833 Meeting ID: 820 6603 0727 AGENDA 1. Welcome John Moreno, Chair 2. Approval of Minutes 15 min. 3. Update on Environmental Process Meghna Khanna Senior A. Document Release and Review Period Director, Mobility Corridor, B. Comment Submittal & Public Participation Countywide Planning 15 min. 4. Update on Federal Funding Efforts Raffi Hamparian, Senior A. Congressional Efforts Director for Federal Affairs, B. Metro Efforts Government Relations 20 min. 5. Update on First/Last Mile Guidelines Jacob Lieb, Senior Director, A. Adopt FLM Guidelines FLM Planning B. FLM Planning Process, Roles and Responsibilities Katie Lemmon, Senior C. 3% Local Contribution Guidance Manager, FLM Planning D. Metro Support for Implementation 10 min. 6. Update on WSAB Project Efforts John Moreno, Chair A. Metro Board Action on Subregional Funding B. Request for Economic Information C. City Manager TAC Public Involvement Schedule D. Master Cooperative Agreements 7. Other City Manager TAC Items and Discussion 8. Propose Next CM TAC Meeting – Thursday, August 12, 2021, Via ZOOM Focus: Environmental Document Review and Initial LPA Discussion 9. Adjournment 2. Approval of Minutes MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE GATEWAY CITIES COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS West Santa Ana Branch City Manager Technical Advisory Committee June
    [Show full text]
  • Passenger Rail
    TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PASSENGER RAIL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TECHNICAL REPORT DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION 2 REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE 2 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 3 ANALYTICAL APPROACH 5 EXISTING CONDITIONS 6 STRATEGIES 27 NEXT STEPS 44 CONCLUSION 45 TECHNICAL REPORT PASSENGER RAIL DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT connectsocal.org EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM This Connect SoCal Passenger Rail report lays out a vision of passenger rail services for the SCAG Region for the next three decades. It demonstrates Passenger Rail the progress that has been made over the last two decades in terms of growing ridership, new rail services, capital improvements and new funding opportunities. It demonstrates the regional importance and significance of passenger rail in the SCAG region, and why growing rail services by increasing frequencies in underserved corridors, as well as establishing service in unserved markets, is crucial to the future mobility and sustainability of our region. The report highlights recent success in establishing new funding opportunities for passenger rail, including the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) and Senate Bill (SB) 1. Amtrak’s Pacific Surfliner intercity rail service is benefiting from these new funding opportunities as well as recent institutional arrangements that establish local control for the service. The Southern California Regional Rail Authority’s (SCRRA) Southern California Optimized Rail Expansion (SCORE) program is an ambitious
    [Show full text]
  • 001 Monthly IG Reports[Icon]
    ATTACHMENT 1A MEMORANDUM To: North County Transit District Board of Directors Matthew O. Tucker, Executive Director Lori Winfree, General Counsel From: Townsend Public Affairs, Inc. Christopher Townsend, President Richard Harmon, Senior Director Date: March 10, 2020 Subject: Monthly Report—February 2020 SUMMARY This memorandum is an overview of activities undertaken by Townsend Public Affairs (TPA) over the last month, working on behalf of the North County Transit District, including the following subjects: Legislative Activity and Updates o State Update . Legislative Activity . LAO Report on Governor’s Homelessness Plan . Governor’s State of the State . Housing Update . State Surplus Property . LEAP Funding o Tracked Legislation Potential Funding Opportunities State Capitol Office ▪ 925 L Street • Suite 1404 • Sacramento, CA 95814 • Phone (916) 447-4086 • Fax (916) 444-0383 Federal Office ▪ 600 Pennsylvania SE • Suite 207 • Washington, DC 20003 • Phone (202) 546-8696 • Fax (202) 546-4555 Central California Office ▪ 744 P Street • Suite 308 • Fresno, CA 93721 • Phone (949) 399-9050 • Fax (949) 476-8215 Southern California Office ▪ 1401 Dove Street • Suite 330 • Newport Beach, CA 92660 • Phone (949) 399-9050 • Fax (949) 476-8215 Northern California Office ▪ 300 Frank Ogawa Plaza • Suite 204 • Oakland, CA 94612 • Phone (510) 835-9050 • Fax (510) 835-9030 LEGISLATIVE ACTIVITY AND UPDATES State Update Legislative Activity In February, State lawmakers were primarily focused on introducing legislation prior to the February 21 bill introduction deadline. Since the new year, 2,309 bills have been introduced. Additionally, there are 410 two-year bills that can be acted upon in 2020, bringing the total number of active bills in the Legislature to 2,719.
    [Show full text]