DOCSLIB.ORG

Nwchem User Documentation Release

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nwchem User Documentation Release NWChem User Documentation Release 5.0 Molecular Sciences Software Group W.R. Wiley Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory Pacific Northwest National Laboratory P.O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352 September 2006 2 DISCLAIMER This material was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor the United States Department of Energy, nor Battelle, nor any of their employees, MAKES ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, OR ASSUMES ANY LEGAL LIABILITY OR RESPON- SIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS, OR USEFULNESS OF ANY INFORMATION, APPARA- TUS, PRODUCT, SOFTWARE, OR PROCESS DISCLOSED, OR REPRESENTS THAT ITS USE WOULD NOT INFRINGE PRIVATELY OWNED RIGHTS. LIMITED USE This software (including any documentation) is being made available to you for your internal use only, solely for use in performance of work directly for the U.S. Federal Government or work under contracts with the U.S. Department of Energy or other U.S. Federal Government agencies. This software is a version which has not yet been evaluated and cleared for commercialization. Adherence to this notice may be necessary for the author, Battelle Memorial Institute, to successfully assert copyright in and commercialize this software. This software is not intended for duplication or distribution to third parties without the permission of the Manager of Software Products at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, 99352. ACKNOWLEDGMENT This software and its documentation were produced with Government support under Contract Number DE-AC05- 76RL01830 awarded by the United States Department of Energy. The Government retains a paid-up non-exclusive, irrevocable worldwide license to reproduce, prepare derivative works, perform publicly and display publicly by or for the Government, including the right to distribute to other Government contractors. 3 4 AUTHOR DISCLAIMER This software contains proprietary information of the authors, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), and the US Department of Energy (USDOE). The information herein shall not be disclosed to others, and shall not be reproduced whole or in part, without written permission from PNNL or USDOE. The information contained in this document is provided “AS IS” without guarantee of accuracy. Use of this software is prohibited without written per- mission from PNNL or USDOE. The authors, PNNL, and USDOE make no representations or warranties whatsoever with respect to this software, including the implied warranty of merchant-ability or fitness for a particular purpose. The user assumes all risks, including consequential loss or damage, in respect to the use of the software. In addition, PNNL and the authors shall not be obligated to correct or maintain the program, or notify the user community of modifications or updates that will be made over the course of time. Contents 1 Introduction 19 1.1 Citation . 19 1.2 User Feedback . 20 2 Getting Started 23 2.1 Input File Structure . 23 2.2 Simple Input File — SCF geometry optimization . 24 2.3 Water Molecule Sample Input File . 25 2.4 Input Format and Syntax for Directives . 27 2.4.1 Input Format . 27 2.4.2 Format and syntax of directives . 28 3 NWChem Architecture 31 3.1 Database Structure . 31 3.2 Persistence of data and restart . 33 4 Functionality 35 4.1 Molecular electronic structure . 35 4.2 Relativistic effects . 37 4.3 Pseudopotential plane-wave electronic structure . 37 4.4 Molecular dynamics . 38 4.5 Python . 38 4.6 Parallel tools and libraries (ParSoft) . 39 5 Top-level directives 41 5.1 START and RESTART — Start-up mode . 41 5.2 SCRATCH_DIR and PERMANENT_DIR — File directories . 43 5 6 CONTENTS 5.3 MEMORY — Control of memory limits . 44 5.4 ECHO — Print input file . 45 5.5 TITLE — Specify job title . 46 5.6 PRINT and NOPRINT — Print control . 46 5.7 SET — Enter data in the RTDB . 47 5.8 UNSET — Delete data in the RTDB . 49 5.9 STOP — Terminate processing . 49 5.10 TASK — Perform a task . 49 5.10.1 TASK Directive for Electronic Structure Calculations . 50 5.10.2 TASK Directive for Special Operations . 51 5.10.3 TASK Directive for the Bourne Shell . 52 5.10.4 TASK Directive for QM/MM simulations . 53 5.11 CHARGE — Total system charge . 53 5.12 ECCE_PRINT — Print information for Ecce . 54 6 Geometries 57 6.1 Keywords on the GEOMETRY directive . 58 6.2 SYMMETRY — Symmetry Group Input . 60 6.3 Cartesian coordinate input . 61 6.4 ZMATRIX — Z-matrix input . 62 6.5 ZCOORD — Forcing internal coordinates . 68 6.6 Applying constraints in geometry optimizations . 69 6.7 SYSTEM — Lattice parameters for periodic systems . 69 7 Basis sets 71 7.1 Basis set library . 73 7.2 Explicit basis set definition . 74 7.3 Combinations of library and explicit basis set input . 75 8 Effective Core Potentials 77 8.1 Scalar ECPs . 78 8.2 Spin-orbit ECPs . 80 9 Relativistic All-electron Approximations 83 9.1 Douglas-Kroll approximation . 84 9.2 Dyall’s Modified Dirac Hamitonian approximation . 85 CONTENTS 7 10 Hartree-Fock or Self-consistent Field 89 10.1 Wavefunction type . 89 10.2 SYM — use of symmetry . 90 10.3 ADAPT – symmetry adaptation of MOs . 90 10.4 TOL2E — integral screening threshold . 91 10.5 VECTORS — input/output of MO vectors . 91 10.5.1 Superposition of fragment molecular orbitals . 94 10.5.2 Atomic guess orbitals with charged atoms . 99 10.6 Accuracy of initial guess . 100 10.7 THRESH — convergence threshold . 100 10.8 MAXITER — iteration limit . 100 10.9 PROFILE — performance profile . 101 10.10DIIS — DIIS convergence . 101 10.11DIRECT and SEMIDIRECT — recomputation of integrals . 101 10.11.1 Integral File Size and Format for the SCF Module . 103 10.12SCF Convergence Control Options . 104 10.13NR — controlling the Newton-Raphson . 105 10.14LEVEL — level-shifting the orbital Hessian . 105 10.15Orbital Localization . 106 10.16Printing Information from the SCF Module . 108 10.17Hartree-Fock or SCF, MCSCF and MP2 Gradients . 109 11 DFT for Molecules (DFT) 111 11.1 Specification of Basis Sets for the DFT Module . 113 11.2 VECTORS and MAX_OVL — KS-MO Vectors . 114 11.3 XC and DECOMP — Exchange-Correlation Potentials . 114 11.3.1 Exchange-Correlation Functionals . 115 11.3.2 Combined Exchange and Correlation Functionals . 116 11.3.3 Meta-GGA Functionals . 116 11.4 LB94 and CS00 — Asymptotic correction . 117 11.5 Sample input file . 117 11.6 ITERATIONS — Number of SCF iterations . ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Integrated Tools for Computational Chemical Dynamics
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Integrated Tools for Computational Chemical Dynamics • Developpp powerful simulation methods and incorporate them into a user- friendly high-throughput integrated software su ite for c hem ica l d ynami cs New Models (Methods) → Modules → Integrated Tools UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Development of new methods for the calculation of potential energy surface UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Development of new simulation methods UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Applications and Validations UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Electronic Software structu re Dynamics ANT QMMM GCMC MN-GFM POLYRATE GAMESSPLUS MN-NWCHEMFM MN-QCHEMFM HONDOPLUS MN-GSM Interfaces GaussRate JaguarRate NWChemRate UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Electronic Structure Software QMMM 1.3: QMMM is a computer program for combining quantum mechanics (QM) and molecular mechanics (MM). MN-GFM 3.0: MN-GFM is a module incorporating Minnesota DFT functionals into GAUSSIAN 03. MN-GSM 626.2:MN: MN-GSM is a module incorporating the SMx solvation models and other enhancements into GAUSSIAN 03. MN-NWCHEMFM 2.0:MN-NWCHEMFM is a module incorporating Minnesota DFT functionals into NWChem 505.0. MN-QCHEMFM 1.0: MN-QCHEMFM is a module incorporating Minnesota DFT functionals into Q-CHEM. GAMESSPLUS 4.8: GAMESSPLUS is a module incorporating the SMx solvation models and other enhancements into GAMESS. HONDOPLUS 5.1: HONDOPLUS is a computer program incorporating the SMx solvation models and other photochemical diabatic states into HONDO. UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DiSftDynamics Software ANT 07: ANT is a molecular dynamics program for performing classical and semiclassical trajjyectory simulations for adiabatic and nonadiabatic processes. GCMC: GCMC is a Grand Canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) module for the simulation of adsorption isotherms in heterogeneous catalysts.
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Construction of Quantum–Classical Hybrid Models Arxiv:2102.09355V1 [Physics.Chem-Ph] 18 Feb 2021
    Automated construction of quantum{classical hybrid models Christoph Brunken and Markus Reiher∗ ETH Z¨urich, Laboratorium f¨urPhysikalische Chemie, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 2, 8093 Z¨urich, Switzerland February 18, 2021 Abstract We present a protocol for the fully automated construction of quantum mechanical-(QM){ classical hybrid models by extending our previously reported approach on self-parametri- zing system-focused atomistic models (SFAM) [J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2020, 16 (3), 1646{1665]. In this QM/SFAM approach, the size and composition of the QM region is evaluated in an automated manner based on first principles so that the hybrid model describes the atomic forces in the center of the QM region accurately. This entails the au- tomated construction and evaluation of differently sized QM regions with a bearable com- putational overhead that needs to be paid for automated validation procedures. Applying SFAM for the classical part of the model eliminates any dependence on pre-existing pa- rameters due to its system-focused quantum mechanically derived parametrization. Hence, QM/SFAM is capable of delivering a high fidelity and complete automation. Furthermore, since SFAM parameters are generated for the whole system, our ansatz allows for a con- venient re-definition of the QM region during a molecular exploration. For this purpose, a local re-parametrization scheme is introduced, which efficiently generates additional clas- sical parameters on the fly when new covalent bonds are formed (or broken) and moved to the classical region. arXiv:2102.09355v1 [physics.chem-ph] 18 Feb 2021 ∗Corresponding author; e-mail: [email protected] 1 1 Introduction In contrast to most protocols of computational quantum chemistry that consider isolated molecules, chemical processes can take place in a vast variety of complex environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1809.04476V2 [Physics.Chem-Ph] 18 Oct 2018 (Sub)States
    Quantum System Partitioning at the Single-Particle Level Quantum System Partitioning at the Single-Particle Level Adrian H. M¨uhlbach and Markus Reihera) ETH Z¨urich, Laboratorium f¨ur Physikalische Chemie, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 2, CH-8093 Z¨urich,Switzerland (Dated: 17 October 2018) We discuss the partitioning of a quantum system by subsystem separation through unitary block- diagonalization (SSUB) applied to a Fock operator. For a one-particle Hilbert space, this separation can be formulated in a very general way. Therefore, it can be applied to very different partitionings ranging from those driven by features in the molecular structure (such as a solute surrounded by solvent molecules or an active site in an enzyme) to those that aim at an orbital separation (such as core-valence separation). Our framework embraces recent developments of Manby and Miller as well as older ones of Huzinaga and Cantu. Projector-based embedding is simplified and accelerated by SSUB. Moreover, it directly relates to decoupling approaches for relativistic four-component many-electron theory. For a Fock operator based on the Dirac one-electron Hamiltonian, one would like to separate the so-called positronic (negative-energy) states from the electronic bound and continuum states. The exact two-component (X2C) approach developed for this purpose becomes a special case of the general SSUB framework and may therefore be viewed as a system- environment decoupling approach. Moreover, for SSUB there exists no restriction with respect to the number of subsystems that are generated | in the limit, decoupling of all single-particle states is recovered, which represents exact diagonalization of the problem.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Scalable Parallel Algorithm for Fock Matrix Construction
    A New Scalable Parallel Algorithm for Fock Matrix Construction Xing Liu Aftab Patel Edmond Chow School of Computational Science and Engineering College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, Georgia, 30332, USA [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract—Hartree-Fock (HF) or self-consistent field (SCF) ber of independent tasks and using a centralized dynamic calculations are widely used in quantum chemistry, and are scheduler for scheduling them on the available processes. the starting point for accurate electronic correlation methods. Communication costs are reduced by defining tasks that Existing algorithms and software, however, may fail to scale for large numbers of cores of a distributed machine, particularly in increase data reuse, which reduces communication volume, the simulation of moderately-sized molecules. In existing codes, and consequently communication cost. This approach suffers HF calculations are divided into tasks. Fine-grained tasks are from a few problems. First, because scheduling is completely better for load balance, but coarse-grained tasks require less dynamic, the mapping of tasks to processes is not known communication. In this paper, we present a new parallelization in advance, and data reuse suffers. Second, the centralized of HF calculations that addresses this trade-off: we use fine- grained tasks to balance the computation among large numbers dynamic scheduler itself could become a bottleneck when of cores, but we also use a scheme to assign tasks to processes to scaling up to a large system [14]. Third, coarse tasks reduce communication. We specifically focus on the distributed which reduce communication volume may lead to poor load construction of the Fock matrix arising in the HF algorithm, balance when the ratio of tasks to processes is close to one.
    [Show full text]
  • An Efficient Hardware-Software Approach to Network Fault Tolerance with Infiniband
    An Efficient Hardware-Software Approach to Network Fault Tolerance with InfiniBand Abhinav Vishnu1 Manoj Krishnan1 and Dhableswar K. Panda2 Pacific Northwest National Lab1 The Ohio State University2 Outline Introduction Background and Motivation InfiniBand Network Fault Tolerance Primitives Hybrid-IBNFT Design Hardware-IBNFT and Software-IBNFT Performance Evaluation of Hybrid-IBNFT Micro-benchmarks and NWChem Conclusions and Future Work Introduction Clusters are observing a tremendous increase in popularity Excellent price to performance ratio 82% supercomputers are clusters in June 2009 TOP500 rankings Multiple commodity Interconnects have emerged during this trend InfiniBand, Myrinet, 10GigE …. InfiniBand has become popular Open standard and high performance Various topologies have emerged for interconnecting InfiniBand Fat tree is the predominant topology TACC Ranger, PNNL Chinook 3 Typical InfiniBand Fat Tree Configurations 144-Port Switch Block Diagram Multiple leaf and spine blocks 12 Spine Available in 144, 288 and 3456 port Blocks combinations 12 Leaf Blocks Multiple paths are available between nodes present on different switch blocks Oversubscribed configurations are becoming popular 144-Port Switch Block Diagram Better cost to performance ratio 12 Spine Blocks 12 Spine 12 Spine Blocks Blocks 12 Leaf 12 Leaf Blocks Blocks 4 144-Port Switch Block Diagram 144-Port Switch Block Diagram Network Faults Links/Switches/Adapters may fail with reduced MTBF (Mean time between failures) Fortunately, InfiniBand provides mechanisms to handle
    [Show full text]
  • Domain Decomposition and Electronic Structure Computations: a Promising Approach
    Domain Decomposition and Electronic Structure Computations: A Promising Approach G. Bencteux1,4, M. Barrault1, E. Canc`es2,4, W. W. Hager3, and C. Le Bris2,4 1 EDF R&D, 1 avenue du G´en´eral de Gaulle, 92141 Clamart Cedex, France {guy.bencteux,maxime.barrault}@edf.fr 2 CERMICS, Ecole´ Nationale des Ponts et Chauss´ees, 6 & 8, avenue Blaise Pascal, Cit´eDescartes, 77455 Marne-La-Vall´ee Cedex 2, France, {cances,lebris}@cermics.enpc.fr 3 Department of Mathematics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-8105, USA, [email protected] 4 INRIA Rocquencourt, MICMAC project, Domaine de Voluceau, B.P. 105, 78153 Le Chesnay Cedex, FRANCE Summary. We describe a domain decomposition approach applied to the spe- cific context of electronic structure calculations. The approach has been introduced in [BCH06]. We survey here the computational context, and explain the peculiari- ties of the approach as compared to problems of seemingly the same type in other engineering sciences. Improvements of the original approach presented in [BCH06], including algorithmic refinements and effective parallel implementation, are included here. Test cases supporting the interest of the method are also reported. It is our pleasure and an honor to dedicate this contribution to Olivier Pironneau, on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday. With admiration, respect and friendship. 1 Introduction and Motivation 1.1 General Context Numerical simulation is nowadays an ubiquituous tool in materials science, chemistry and biology. Design of new materials, irradiation induced damage, drug design, protein folding are instances of applications of numerical sim- ulation. For convenience we now briefly present the context of the specific computational problem under consideration in the present article.
    [Show full text]
  • The Norbornene Mystery Revealed
    Supplementary Material (ESI) for Chemical Communications This journal is (c) The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010 Electronic Supporting Information The Norbornene Mystery Revealed Stephan N. Steinmann, Pierre Vogel, Yirong Mo, and Clémence Corminboeuf* To be published in Chemical Communication. The supplementary Data were prepared on June 22, 2010 and contains 14 pages. Contents: Method Section Figure S1: Molecules used for the comparisons between known experimental 1 Jcc-coupling constants (in Hertz) and the computed values. 1 Table S1 JCC-coupling comparison between experiment and computation. 1 Table S2: JCC-coupling constants for all compounds considered. Cartesian coordinates: B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) (BLW and canonical) optimized structures for all compounds considered in the article. Contents: Computational Details 1 Table S1: JCC-coupling constants for all compounds considered. 1 Figure S1: Molecules for JCC-coupling comparison between experiment and computation. 1 Table S2: JCC-coupling comparison between experiment and computation. B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) (BLW and canonical) optimized structures for all compounds considered in the article. Computational Details Standard geometries were optimized at the B3LYP1, 2/6-311+G** level using Gaussian 09.3 The BLW- constrained B3LYP/6-311+G** geometries (‘loc’) were optimized using a modified version of GAMESS-US (release 2008)4interfaced with the BLW-module.5, 6 Both the density and the J-coupling constants have been computed at the PBE7/IGLO-III level in Dalton 2.0.8 The BLW-eigenvalues and eigenvectors were optimized at the given DFT level with the SCF module of Dalton, SIRIUS, that has been interfaced with the BLW- module.
    [Show full text]
  • Computational Chemistry for Chemistry Educators Shawn C
    Volume 1, Issue 1 Journal Of Computational Science Education Computational Chemistry for Chemistry Educators Shawn C. Sendlinger Clyde R. Metz North Carolina Central University College of Charleston Department of Chemistry Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry 1801 Fayetteville Street, 66 George Street, Durham, NC 27707 Charleston, SC 29424 919-530-6297 843-953-8097 [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION In this paper we describe an ongoing project where the goal is to The majority of today’s students are technologically savvy and are develop competence and confidence among chemistry faculty so often more comfortable using computers than the faculty who they are able to utilize computational chemistry as an effective teach them. In order to harness the student’s interest in teaching tool. Advances in hardware and software have made technology and begin to use it as an educational tool, most faculty research-grade tools readily available to the academic community. members require some level of instruction and training. Because Training is required so that faculty can take full advantage of this chemistry research increasingly utilizes computation as an technology, begin to transform the educational landscape, and important tool, our approach to chemistry education should reflect attract more students to the study of science. this. The ability of computer technology to visualize and manipulate objects on an atomic scale can be a powerful tool to increase both student interest in chemistry as well as their level of Categories and Subject Descriptors understanding. Computational Chemistry for Chemistry Educators (CCCE) is a project that seeks to provide faculty the J.2 [Physical Sciences and Engineering]: Chemistry necessary knowledge, experience, and technology access so that they can begin to design and incorporate computational approaches in the courses they teach.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Calculation of Molecular Properties of Heavy Element Systems with Ab Initio Approaches: from Gas-Phase to Complex Systems André Severo Pereira Gomes
    On the calculation of molecular properties of heavy element systems with ab initio approaches: from gas-phase to complex systems André Severo Pereira Gomes To cite this version: André Severo Pereira Gomes. On the calculation of molecular properties of heavy element systems with ab initio approaches: from gas-phase to complex systems. Theoretical and/or physical chemistry. Universite de Lille, 2016. tel-01960393 HAL Id: tel-01960393 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01960393 Submitted on 19 Dec 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. M´emoirepr´esent´epour obtenir le dipl^omed' Habilitation `adiriger des recherches { Sciences Physiques de l'Universit´ede Lille (Sciences et Technologies) ANDRE´ SEVERO PEREIRA GOMES Universit´ede Lille - CNRS Laboratoire PhLAM UMR 8523 On the calculation of molecular properties of heavy element systems with ab initio approaches: from gas-phase to complex systems M´emoirepr´esent´epour obtenir le dipl^omed' Habilitation `adiriger des recherches { Sciences Physiques de l'Universit´ede Lille (Sciences et
    [Show full text]
  • Starting SCF Calculations by Superposition of Atomic Densities
    Starting SCF Calculations by Superposition of Atomic Densities J. H. VAN LENTHE,1 R. ZWAANS,1 H. J. J. VAN DAM,2 M. F. GUEST2 1Theoretical Chemistry Group (Associated with the Department of Organic Chemistry and Catalysis), Debye Institute, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands 2CCLRC Daresbury Laboratory, Daresbury WA4 4AD, United Kingdom Received 5 July 2005; Accepted 20 December 2005 DOI 10.1002/jcc.20393 Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). Abstract: We describe the procedure to start an SCF calculation of the general type from a sum of atomic electron densities, as implemented in GAMESS-UK. Although the procedure is well known for closed-shell calculations and was already suggested when the Direct SCF procedure was proposed, the general procedure is less obvious. For instance, there is no need to converge the corresponding closed-shell Hartree–Fock calculation when dealing with an open-shell species. We describe the various choices and illustrate them with test calculations, showing that the procedure is easier, and on average better, than starting from a converged minimal basis calculation and much better than using a bare nucleus Hamiltonian. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 27: 926–932, 2006 Key words: SCF calculations; atomic densities Introduction hrstuhl fur Theoretische Chemie, University of Kahrlsruhe, Tur- bomole; http://www.chem-bio.uni-karlsruhe.de/TheoChem/turbo- Any quantum chemical calculation requires properly defined one- mole/),12 GAMESS(US) (Gordon Research Group, GAMESS, electron orbitals. These orbitals are in general determined through http://www.msg.ameslab.gov/GAMESS/GAMESS.html, 2005),13 an iterative Hartree–Fock (HF) or Density Functional (DFT) pro- Spartan (Wavefunction Inc., SPARTAN: http://www.wavefun.
    [Show full text]
  • Dmol Guide to Select a Dmol3 Task 1
    DMOL3 GUIDE MATERIALS STUDIO 8.0 Copyright Notice ©2014 Dassault Systèmes. All rights reserved. 3DEXPERIENCE, the Compass icon and the 3DS logo, CATIA, SOLIDWORKS, ENOVIA, DELMIA, SIMULIA, GEOVIA, EXALEAD, 3D VIA, BIOVIA and NETVIBES are commercial trademarks or registered trademarks of Dassault Systèmes or its subsidiaries in the U.S. and/or other countries. All other trademarks are owned by their respective owners. Use of any Dassault Systèmes or its subsidiaries trademarks is subject to their express written approval. Acknowledgments and References To print photographs or files of computational results (figures and/or data) obtained using BIOVIA software, acknowledge the source in an appropriate format. For example: "Computational results obtained using software programs from Dassault Systèmes Biovia Corp.. The ab initio calculations were performed with the DMol3 program, and graphical displays generated with Materials Studio." BIOVIA may grant permission to republish or reprint its copyrighted materials. Requests should be submitted to BIOVIA Support, either through electronic mail to [email protected], or in writing to: BIOVIA Support 5005 Wateridge Vista Drive, San Diego, CA 92121 USA Contents DMol3 1 Setting up a molecular dynamics calculation20 Introduction 1 Choosing an ensemble 21 Further Information 1 Defining the time step 21 Tasks in DMol3 2 Defining the thermostat control 21 Energy 3 Constraints during dynamics 21 Setting up the calculation 3 Setting up a transition state calculation 22 Dynamics 4 Which method to use?
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Quantum Chemistry with [Open]Molcas
    Modern quantum chemistry with [Open]Molcas Cite as: J. Chem. Phys. 152, 214117 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0004835 Submitted: 17 February 2020 . Accepted: 11 May 2020 . Published Online: 05 June 2020 Francesco Aquilante , Jochen Autschbach , Alberto Baiardi , Stefano Battaglia , Veniamin A. Borin , Liviu F. Chibotaru , Irene Conti , Luca De Vico , Mickaël Delcey , Ignacio Fdez. Galván , Nicolas Ferré , Leon Freitag , Marco Garavelli , Xuejun Gong , Stefan Knecht , Ernst D. Larsson , Roland Lindh , Marcus Lundberg , Per Åke Malmqvist , Artur Nenov , Jesper Norell , Michael Odelius , Massimo Olivucci , Thomas B. Pedersen , Laura Pedraza-González , Quan M. Phung , Kristine Pierloot , Markus Reiher , Igor Schapiro , Javier Segarra-Martí , Francesco Segatta , Luis Seijo , Saumik Sen , Dumitru-Claudiu Sergentu , Christopher J. Stein , Liviu Ungur , Morgane Vacher , Alessio Valentini , and Valera Veryazov J. Chem. Phys. 152, 214117 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0004835 152, 214117 © 2020 Author(s). The Journal ARTICLE of Chemical Physics scitation.org/journal/jcp Modern quantum chemistry with [Open]Molcas Cite as: J. Chem. Phys. 152, 214117 (2020); doi: 10.1063/5.0004835 Submitted: 17 February 2020 • Accepted: 11 May 2020 • Published Online: 5 June 2020 Francesco Aquilante,1,a) Jochen Autschbach,2,b) Alberto Baiardi,3,c) Stefano Battaglia,4,d) Veniamin A. Borin,5,e) Liviu F. Chibotaru,6,f) Irene Conti,7,g) Luca De Vico,8,h) Mickaël Delcey,9,i) Ignacio Fdez. Galván,4,j) Nicolas Ferré,10,k) Leon Freitag,3,l) Marco Garavelli,7,m) Xuejun Gong,11,n) Stefan Knecht,3,o) Ernst D. Larsson,12,p) Roland Lindh,4,q) Marcus Lundberg,9,r) Per Åke Malmqvist,12,s) Artur Nenov,7,t) Jesper Norell,13,u) Michael Odelius,13,v) Massimo Olivucci,8,14,w) Thomas B.
    [Show full text]