DOCSLIB.ORG

Navigating Identity in Contemporary Noahidism Patrick J

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 3-21-2017 From the Fall to the Flood and Beyond: Navigating Identity in Contemporary Noahidism Patrick J. Villalonga Florida International University, [email protected] DOI: 10.25148/etd.FIDC001820 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Comparative Methodologies and Theories Commons, Ethics in Religion Commons, Jewish Studies Commons, New Religious Movements Commons, Other Religion Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Villalonga, Patrick J., "From the Fall to the Flood and Beyond: Navigating Identity in Contemporary Noahidism" (2017). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 3127. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/3127 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida FROM THE FALL TO THE FLOOD AND BEYOND: NAVIGATING IDENTITY IN CONTEMPORARY NOAHIDISM A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in RELIGIOUS STUDIES by Patrick Joaquin Villalonga 2017 To: Dean John F. Stack Steven J. Green School of International and Public Affairs This thesis, written by Patrick Joaquin Villalonga, and entitled From the Fall to the Flood and Beyond: Navigating Identity in Contemporary Noahidism, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment. We have read this thesis and recommend that it be approved. _____________________________________________ Oren Stier _____________________________________________ Erik Larson _____________________________________________ Tudor Parfitt, Major Professor Date of Defense: March 21, 2017 The thesis of Patrick Joaquin Villalonga is approved. _____________________________________________ Dean John F. Stack _____________________________________________ Andrés G. Gil Vice President for Research and Economic Development and Dean of the University Graduate School Florida International University, 2017 !ii © Copyright 2017 Patrick Joaquin Villalonga All rights reserved. !iii DEDICATION To my parents, Mayra and Eduardo Villalonga, for your tender love, your tough love, your undying support, and for helping to guide me along my way. To my friends, Michael Matos, Ralf Noya, and Solsiree Skarlinsky, for your affection, your insight, and for trusting in my madness. To those who have unknowingly kept me smiling throughout graduate school: Robin Pecknold, Ben Bridwell, Ram Dass, and Katt Williams. To my sisters, Nina and Sofia. Your love and example have been bottomless sources of inspiration; I’ve picked up the Phone. !iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This thesis is an attempt to sketch the contemporary Noahide movement, although not in a comprehensive manner. This is a first attempt at a rigorous and systematic study of this blossoming phenomenon, from the vantage point of English-speaking academia. Limited resources and time have narrowed the scope of my work, which may jeopardize the accuracy of my analysis to some degree. Nevertheless, I remain convinced I have produced an honest analysis of contemporary Noahidism, conducted with the utmost academic integrity. For this, I have to thank various individuals. Rabbi Michael Shelomo Bar-Ron, for his insight and hospitality during a shabbat in Fort Lauderdale. Rabbi Yakov Dovid Cohen, for his hospitality in guiding me around Crown Heights. Mr. Michael Dallen for his insight. Dr. Michael Schulman, for his hospitality on my visit to Pittsburgh and his insight into the blossoming of the online Noahide movement. Mr. Alan Cecil, for sharing his ideas and outlook regarding the Noahide laws. Dr. David Novak, whose research and dialogue helped me understand the theoretical background of Noahidism. Rabbi Levi Friedman of ChabadFIU, whose humor and insight helped me get my work off the ground. Dr. Erik Larson, whose example and knowledge have inspired me to dig deeper into this subject. Dr. Oren Stier, whose wit and encouragement have been ever so helpful during those times when I wasn't quite sure what I was doing. Dr. Tudor Parfitt, whose support and passion have helped offset pangs of procrastination and self-doubt. But, most importantly, I thank him for his example and encouragement which have helped me step !v out of my comfort zone and study something as complex and alive as Noahide identity. It would also be remiss of me not to acknowledge his financial support and the support of the FIU Jonathan Symons Fellowship Program. The Program, its lecture series, and Dr. Parfitt’s seminars have exposed me to a wealth of Jewish culture and history, without which I would have much less of an understanding of Judaism. Lastly, I must thank those who completed the Noahide Individuals Survey. The survey has yielded a great amount of information. In addition, I have to thank those who emailed me during the course of my research to share their encouragement and excitement about my work. I would like to add a quick autobiographical note before my introduction. From 2011-2013, I seriously considered conversion to Orthodox Judaism, but ultimately turned to Noahidism. I began this project in 2014 as a self-proclaimed Noahide, but I have now recanted my association with Noahidism and see myself as an agnostic who, at most, hopes for the truth of deism and advocates religious pluralism as a practice. This shift occurred in part due to personal factors I need not mention, but also because of the research I conducted and the conclusions I have reached about Noahidism. I do feel it is important to be candid about my religious background and my current affiliations because some readers are bound to wonder for whatever reason—be it sheer curiosity, a commitment to post-modern analysis, etc. If there are mistakes in my analysis (and there are bound to be), I offer my sincere apologies and I would be very happy to make corrections. !vi In this thesis I occasionally flesh out inconsistencies or dilemmas I have found lurking in Noahidism. My contentions with various aspects of contemporary Noahide ideology and practice are not indictments of Noahidism as a conceptual system or way of life, that is, my critique does not aim to invalidate or condemn Noahidism. I place no moral or ethical judgments on Noahide concepts or behaviors. Instead, I aspire to provide some insights into the true nature of the contemporary movement as a living, breathing phenomenon, part of which includes confronting the issues inherent in the movement. I hope the Noahide, Orthodox Jewish, and academic communities accept my work as a humble offering. !vii ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS FROM THE FALL TO THE FLOOD AND BEYOND: NAVIGATING IDENTITY IN CONTEMPORARY NOAHIDISM by Patrick Joaquin Villalonga Florida International University, 2017 Miami, Florida Professor Tudor Parfitt, Major Professor This thesis investigates artifacts and concepts present in the Noahide world and how they affect Noahide identity. Five factors are analyzed, namely Noahide law, religious pluralism, ritual, sectarianism, and conversion. I consult the Hebrew Scriptures as well as early, medieval, and modern rabbinic sources to set the conceptual background of the Noahide movement before moving into the primary, contemporary sources written by Orthodox Jews, Orthodox rabbis, and Noahides. To supplement my literary analysis, I have conducted a survey of self-identifying Noahide practitioners. This survey collects data concerning religious background, religious behavior, demographics, and free responses. I aim to show first and foremost that Noahidism is a new, exclusive religious tradition which comprises the lay order of Orthodox Judaism. This is born out of a theology which requires belief in the Jewish God and Jewish revelation, a strict ritual system based on Orthodox Jewish prescriptions, and a sectarian typology which mirrors !viii Orthodox Jewish sectarianism. Additionally, my analysis of conversion shows Noahidism is not a gateway to Orthodox conversion, but an end in itself. !ix TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 What is Noahidism? 2 Objectives 5 Methodology 10 Other 11 CHAPTER 1. LITERATURE REVIEW 13 What are the Noahide Laws? 13 Applications of Noahide Law 20 Understanding the Living Noahide Movement 25 CHAPTER 2. IDENTITY AND THE LAWS OF NOAH 28 The Code as a Body of Negative Law 28 Legislative and Judicial Power 32 Rationality and the Noahide Laws 38 Punishment and the Noahide Laws 50 CHAPTER 3. IDENTITY AND RELIGIOUS PLURALISM 54 The Noahide Laws as a Medium for Pluralism 56 Is Noahidism a Religion? 59 Salvation 71 Noahidism as an Exclusive Religion 73 The Noahide in Jewish Eschatology 84 The Potential for Pluralism in Noahide Rhetoric 85 Noahidism as a Lay Tradition 93 CHAPTER 4. IDENTITY AND NOAHIDE RITUAL 99 The Halakhah on Ritual 100 Ethical Precepts as Ritual 106 Torah and Contemplation 108 Prayer as Ritual 112 Other Philosophical Innovations 113 Kabbalah and Ritual 117 CHAPTER 5. IDENTITY AND CONVERSION 125 Identifying as a Noahide 128 Identity and Conversion to Orthodox Judaism 134 !x CHAPTER 6. IDENTITY AND SECTARIANISM 138 CONCLUSION 152 REFERENCES 157 APPENDICES 163 !xi INTRODUCTION I believe it was Woody Allen who once told a good joke about a Russian Jew—a joke which reminds me of the way in which Jews often approach dilemmas. Yaakov was a Jew in a small Russian town not long after the founding of the Soviet Union. One of the town’s policemen, Captain Petrov, had seen Yaakov acting suspiciously for a few days now. One afternoon, the officer seized Yaakov, sat him down, and confronted him with the issue. “Comrade Yaakov, what is all this suspicious behavior I see? Are you up to some mischief?!” “Well, yes, Captain Petrov,” Yaakov replied bashfully. “In all honesty, I am trying to flee the Soviet Union.” “What?! Why would you try doing such a thing?!” Comrade Petrov was incensed.
Recommended publications
  • Marketing Jewish Life Contact

    Marketing Jewish Life Contact

    CONTACT WINTER 2004/SHEVAT 5764 VOLUME 6 NUMBER 2 THE JOURNAL OF JEWISH LIFE NETWORK/STEINHARDT FOUNDATION Marketing Jewish Life contact WINTER 2004/SHEVAT 5764 VOLUME 6 NUMBER 2 Marketing Jewish Life Eli Valley Editor or the past dozen years, many American Jewish institutions have tai- Erica Coleman Copy Editor lored programming towards that elusive yet abundant breed: the unaf- Janet Mann filiated Jew. Millions have been spent on new programs that promise to Administration F reach Jews who lie outside the community’s orbit. Unfortunately, we Yakov Wisniewski have often neglected perhaps the most crucial area of focus: innovative mar- Design Director keting of programs and offerings. Instead, many of us have relied on perfunc- tory marketing plans that place the message of outreach and engagement in JEWISH LIFE NETWORK STEINHARDT FOUNDATION the media of the already-affiliated. Michael H. Steinhardt Chairman Such logic is counter-intuitive. If our target is the unengaged, then by defini- Rabbi Irving Greenberg tion they exist outside the range of Jewish media. The competition for their President attention is fierce. Like everyone else, Jews in the open society are subject to Rabbi David Gedzelman seemingly limitless avenues of identity exploration and a whirlwind of infor- Executive Director mation. The deluge of messages and options is equivalent to spam – unless it Jonathan J. Greenberg z”l Founding Director is found to be immediately compelling, it will be deleted. In such an atmos- phere, strategic message creation and placement is crucial for the success and CONTACT is produced and distributed by Jewish Life Network/ vitality of Jewish programs.
  • Philosophic Homilies of Nissim of Girona - 14704

    Philosophic Homilies of Nissim of Girona - 14704

    Syllabus PHILOSOPHIC HOMILIES OF NISSIM OF GIRONA - 14704 Last update 12-09-2021 HU Credits: 2 Degree/Cycle: 2nd degree (Master) Responsible Department: Jewish Thought Academic year: 0 Semester: 1st Semester Teaching Languages: Hebrew Campus: Mt. Scopus Course/Module Coordinator: Prof. Zeev Harvey Coordinator Email: [email protected] Coordinator Office Hours: Tu 11:30-12:30 Teaching Staff: Prof Zeev Harvey page 1 / 4 Course/Module description: One of the great medieval authorities on Jewish law, Rabbi Nissim ben Reuben of Girona ( Ha-Ran, c. 1310-1376) is known for his Commentary on BT Nedarim, his Commentaries on Rabbi Isaac Alfasi's Halakhot, and his Novellae on various Talmudic tractates. However, he was also a profound and original philosophic homilist. His book of philosophic homilies, known as "Derashot Ha-Ran," had a significant influence on medieval Jewish philosophy both directly and also indirectly, through his student Rabbi Hasdai Crescas and his student's student Rabbi Joseph Albo. Course/Module aims: We shall read together one homily from Derashot Ha-Ran. In the last month of the semester, we shall discuss the papers of participants. Learning outcomes - On successful completion of this module, students should be able to: ability to analyze a medieval philosophic sermon Attendance requirements(%): 100% Teaching arrangement and method of instruction: Reading and discussion Course/Module Content: A seminar paper (about 20-25 pp.) or a short paper (about 7-10 pp.). The paper is to be submitted by the final class (11.1.22). It may be on any subject connected with Derashot Ha-Ran, and may be written in accordance with various approaches, e.g., historical, analytic, or philological.
  • We All Know, the Emancipation Was a Great Turning Point in the History Of

    We All Know, the Emancipation Was a Great Turning Point in the History Of

    PROGRESSIVE LITURGIES OF GERMANY AND AMERICA 585 p- John D. Rayner Introduction As we all know, the Emancipation was a great turning point in the history of Judaism, although ‘point' is hardly the right word, since it was a long-drawn- out process extending from the eighteenth century into the twentieth. Nevertheless the initial impact of it was often felt by a single generation, and in Germany by the generation of those born during the Napoleonic era. As we all know; too, the initial impact was for many of the newly emancipated German Jews a negative one so far as their Jewish religious life was concerned because the revolutionary educational, linguistic, cultural and social changes they experienced caused them to feel uncomfortable in the old- style synagogues. And as we all know as well, it is to this problem, of the alienation of emancipated Jewry from the traditional synagogue that the Reformers first and foremost addressed themselves. They believed that if only the synagogue services could be made more attractive, that would halt and perhaps reverse w the drift. 0 . _ {:1 j N In retrospect we can see that they were only partly right. There are other 8E}; factors besides the nature of synagogue worship which determine or influence the extent to which individuals will affirm their Jewish identity \ :8 " and adhere to their Jewish faith, and subsequent generations of Reformers 13E came to recognise that and to address themselves to these other issues also. (3 ‘1‘: Nevertheless the nature of synagogue worship is clearly a factor, and a big one.
  • Ideal" and "Real" in Classical Jewish Political Theory

    Ideal" and "Real" in Classical Jewish Political Theory

    IDEAL" AND "REAL" IN CLASSICAL JEWISH POLITICAL THEORY Gerald J.Blidstein This essay considers the degree to which Jewish political and legal ? ? theory allows and, indeed, mandates the recognition that the Torah legislates an ideal law which is not appropriate for situations of social and political stress, and the degree to which such situations are really the historical norm rather than the exception. The Talmud, it is shown, adum brates this concept, but in a fairly marginal form.Maimonides places it at center stage of societal governance, apparently expecting that a Jewish so ciety will of necessity be thrown back upon this option; but he also sug gests guidelines for its regulation. R. Nissim of Barcelona (fourteenth century) both expands the concept and also relaxes the Maimonidean re strictions on its use. This final form of the doctrine receives a thorough critique at the hands of Isaac Abrabanel; but it also serves as the linchpin for much contemporary argument for the legitimacy of Israeli legislation from a classical Jewish perspective. The relationship of law and political theory to reality, that is, to the actual doings of people in society and to the concrete problems faced by societies, is undoubtedly complex. Are law and political theory to are shape reality? Or is the reverse true, and both law and theory to take their cue from society? This, of course, is a very abstract formula tion of the issue. It is also an overly extreme and polarized formulation, for it is likely that the relationship of law and political theory to re ality is dynamic and indeed dialectical.
  • Jewish Law and Current Legal Problems

    Jewish Law and Current Legal Problems

    JEWISH LAW AND CURRENT LEGAL PROBLEMS JEWISH LAW AND CURRENT LEGAL PROBLEMS EDITED BY NAHUM RAKOVER The Library of Jewish Law The Library of Jewish Law Ministry of Justice The Jewish Legal Heritage Society Foundation for the Advancement of Jewish Law PROCEEDINGS of the First International Seminar on The Sources Of Contemporary Law: The Bible and Talmud and Their Contribution to Modern Legal Systems Jerusalem. August 1983 © The Library of Jewish Law The Jewish Lcg<1l Heritage Society P.O.Box 7483 Jerusalem 91074 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE 9 GREETINGS OF THE MINISTER OF JUSTICE, Moshe Nissim II LEGAL THEORY Haim H. Cohn THE LESSON OF JEWISH LAW FOR 15 LEGAL CHANGE Meyer S. Feldblum THE EMERGENCE OF THE HALAKHIC 29 LEGAL SYSTEM Classical and Modern Perceptions Norman Solomon EXTENSIVE AND RESTRICTIVE 37 INTERPRETATION LAW IN CHANGING SOCIETIES Yedidya Cohen THE KIBBUTZ AS A LEGAL ENTITY 55 Reuben Ahroni THE LEVIRATE AND HUMAN RIGHTS 67 JUDICIAL PROCESS Haim Shine COMPROMISE 77 5 POLITICAL THEORY Emanuel Rackman THE CHURCH FATHERS AND HEBREW 85 POLITICAL THOUGHT LAW AND RELIGION John Wade THE INFLUENCE OF RELIGION UPON LAW 97 Bernard J. Meis/in THE TEN COMMANDMENTS IN AMERICAN 109 LAW PENAL LAW Ya'akov Bazak MAIMONIDES' VIEWS ON CRIME AND 121 PUNISHMENT Yehuda Gershuni EXTRADITION 127 Nahum Rakover COERCION IN CONJUGAL RELATIONS 137 SELF-INCRIMINATION Isaac Braz THE PRIVILEGE AGAINST SELF­ 161 INCRIMINATION IN ANGLO-AMERICAN LAW The Influence of Jewish Law Arnold Enker SELF-INCRIMINATION 169 Malvina Halberstam THE RATIONALE FOR EXCLUDING 177 INCRIMINATING STATEMENTS U.S. Law Compared to Ancient Jewish Law Stanley Levin DUE PROCESS IN RABBINICAL AND 191 ISRAELI LAW Abuse and Subversion 6 MEDICAL ETHICS David A.
  • Wellsprings Unleashed

    Wellsprings Unleashed

    לכשיפוצו מעיינותיך חוצה Wellsprings Unleashed THE REBBE’S REVOLUTION "חדש OF PRINTING THE WHOLE השביעי OF CHASSIDUS שהוא המושבע והמשביע ברוב טוב לכל ישראל על כל !Didan Notzach השנה” YOMAN - TEVES 5747 A Staunch Soldier RABBI YAAKOV YEHUDA HECHT $5.95 TEVES 5778 ISSUE 64 (141) Wellsprings Unleashed THE REBBE’S REVOLUTION: PRINTING THE WHOLE OF CHASSIDUS1 We were greatly assisted in the preparation of this article by Rabbi Chaim Shaul Brook, director of Vaad Hanachos B’Lahak; Rabbi Eliyahu Matusof, senior editor at Otzar HaChassidim; Rabbi Dovid Olidort, senior editor at Kehot Publication Society; and Rabbi Gavriel Shapiro, senior editor .זכות הרבים תלוי‘ בהם .at Otzar HaChassidim We also drew many resources from the book “Kehos” by Rabbi Zushe Wolf. TEVES 5778 A CHASSIDISHER DERHER 15 KEHOS PUBLISHERS AT WORK AT THE PRINTING PRESS. LEVI FREIDIN VIA JEM 198876 LEVI FREIDIN VIA JEM 193308 LEVI FREIDIN VIA JEM 193293 With every successive generation, Chassidus has been spread in an increasingly growing manner. One of the most important approaches to making Chassidus accessible for every person—to the chutza—was to write it down, thus making it available far beyond those who heard the maamar. The Torah of the Rabbeim was either written by them or transcribed by others and publicized far and wide in the form of haatakos—hand-made copies. Taking these fundamentally un-revealable treasures and spreading them to the masses comes with tremendous danger, and the Rabbeim risked their lives in doing so. When a page of Chassidus was seen floating in the streets, the Maggid nearly passed away from the Heavenly kitrug that ensued; the Alter Rebbe would have been nistalek if not for the sacrifice of his daughter, who gave her life in his stead; and the list goes on.
  • Noahidism Or B'nai Noah—Sons of Noah—Refers To, Arguably, a Family

    Noahidism Or B'nai Noah—Sons of Noah—Refers To, Arguably, a Family

    Noahidism or B’nai Noah—sons of Noah—refers to, arguably, a family of watered–down versions of Orthodox Judaism. A majority of Orthodox Jews, and most members of the broad spectrum of Jewish movements overall, do not proselytize or, borrowing Christian terminology, “evangelize” or “witness.” In the U.S., an even larger number of Jews, as with this writer’s own family of orientation or origin, never affiliated with any Jewish movement. Noahidism may have given some groups of Orthodox Jews a method, arguably an excuse, to bypass the custom of nonconversion. Those Orthodox Jews are, in any event, simply breaking with convention, not with a scriptural ordinance. Although Noahidism is based ,MP3], Tạləmūḏ]תַּלְמּוד ,upon the Talmud (Hebrew “instruction”), not the Bible, the text itself does not explicitly call for a Noahidism per se. Numerous commandments supposedly mandated for the sons of Noah or heathen are considered within the context of a rabbinical conversation. Two only partially overlapping enumerations of seven “precepts” are provided. Furthermore, additional precepts, not incorporated into either list, are mentioned. The frequently referenced “seven laws of the sons of Noah” are, therefore, misleading and, indeed, arithmetically incorrect. By my count, precisely a dozen are specified. Although I, honestly, fail to understand why individuals would self–identify with a faith which labels them as “heathen,” that is their business, not mine. The translations will follow a series of quotations pertinent to this monotheistic and ,MP3], tạləmūḏiy]תַּלְמּודִ י ,talmudic (Hebrew “instructive”) new religious movement (NRM). Indeed, the first passage quoted below was excerpted from the translated source text for Noahidism: Our Rabbis taught: [Any man that curseth his God, shall bear his sin.
  • Farbrengen Has Different Types of Nisyonos, to in Connection with Gimmel Tammuz, We a Certain Extent

    Farbrengen Has Different Types of Nisyonos, to in Connection with Gimmel Tammuz, We a Certain Extent

    Today’s generation Farbrengen has different types of nisyonos, to In connection with Gimmel Tammuz, we a certain extent. What we once called “the street” asked Rabbi Abrahams to share a few words of has managed to infiltrate our pockets and homes. inspiration for the benefit of our readers. The However, none of it is inherently new. The goal of following is a short synopsis of Rabbi Abrahams’s a Chossid is to immerse himself totally in avodas farbrengen. Hashem, in learning and davening, hafatza and so A connection to the Rebbe can be divided into on. It isn’t beyond your reach; you just need the two categories: chitzonius and pnimius. Sometimes resolve to immerse yourself within it. people, especially bochurim, ask, “How can we Being a mekushar means choosing to dedicate have a connection to the Rebbe?” oneself to the Rebbe. That is then spelled out This question is based on an assumption that in every facet of your life; you learn Chassidus by simply being in the Rebbe’s presence, one had and nigleh, engage in avodas hatefillah, learn the a real connection with him, but today, when we Rebbe’s sichos and maamarim, and involve yourself don’t see the Rebbe physically, we can’t be properly in the Rebbe’s activities. That is how you create a connected. true hiskashrus within yourself. That assumption is inherently wrong. Ultimately, this genuine hiskashrus also brings A physical relationship with the Rebbe is also with it the chitzoniusdiker trappings of a Chossid. very important, but that is totally unrelated to I often see the bochurim arriving at 770 or coming whether a person can be called a mekushar, and— to the Ohel with the same chayus and excitement more specifically—whether he fulfills his purpose that we had, when we were able to see the Rebbe; in the world.
  • Indische Religionen Als Gegenstand Religionsphilosophischer Entwürfe

    Indische Religionen Als Gegenstand Religionsphilosophischer Entwürfe

    Indische Religionen als Gegenstand religionsphilosophischer Entwürfe. Salomon Formstecher und Samuel Hirsch über indisches „Heidentum“ von Hans-Michael Haußig Abstract During the 19th century, for the first time Jewish thinkers, influenced by philosophi- cal currents of their time, tried to give a new interpretation of Judaism by contextual- izing it in general history. Especially two representatives of Reform Judaism, Salomon Formstecher (1808–1889) and Samuel Hirsch (1815–1889) presented two works pursuing this direction. Both authors aimed for a scientific approach of Judaism and agreed that there exist only two religions in the world: Judaism and Heathenism. Both religions are in fundamental opposition to each other. Within their works, Formstecher and Hirsch dealt in a different manner with Indian religions. The paper will investigate the presenta- tion of Indian religions in both works in the frame of their conceptions on Heathenism. Zusammenfassung Im 19. Jahrhundert erschienen erstmalig grundlegende theologische bzw. religionsphi- losophische Entwürfe, die sich darum bemühten, unter dem Einfluss der maßgeblichen philosophischen Systeme ihrer Zeit das Judentum neu zu deuten und in den Rahmen der allgemeinen Menschheitsgeschichte einzuordnen. Es waren insbesondere zwei Ver- treter des Reformjudentums, Salomon Formstecher (1808–1889) und Samuel Hirsch (1815–1889), die im Abstand von nur einem Jahr (1841 bzw. 1842) zwei dementsprechen- de Entwürfe vorlegten. Beide Autoren streben eine wissenschaftliche Sichtweise auf das Judentum an und weisen darin eine Gemeinsamkeit auf, dass es ihrer Ansicht nach neben diesem als einzige Religion praktisch nur das Heidentum gibt. Judentum und Heidentum stehen in einem grundlegenden Gegensatz zueinander. Im Rahmen der Ausführung ihrer These gehen sowohl Formstecher als auch Hirsch in unterschiedlichem Maße auf die indischen Religionen ein.
  • UNVERISTY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Spiritual Narrative In

    UNVERISTY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Spiritual Narrative In

    UNVERISTY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Spiritual Narrative in Sound and Structure of Chabad Nigunim A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Music by Zachary Alexander Klein 2019 © Copyright by Zachary Alexander Klein 2019 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Spiritual Narrative in Sound and Structure of Chabad Nigunim by Zachary Alexander Klein Doctor of Philosophy in Music University of California, Los Angeles, 2019 Professor Richard Dane Danielpour , Co-Chair Professor David Samuel Lefkowitz, Co-Chair In the Chabad-Lubavitch chasidic community, the singing of religious folksongs called nigunim holds a fundamental place in communal and individual life. There is a well-known saying in Chabad circles that while words are the pen of the heart, music is the pen of the soul. The implication of this statement is that music is able to express thoughts and emotions in a deeper way than words could on their own could. In chasidic thought, there are various spiritual narratives that may be expressed through nigunim. These narratives are fundamental in understanding what is being experienced and performed through singing nigunim. At times, the narrative has already been established in Chabad chasidic literature and knowing the particular aspects of this narrative is indispensible in understanding how the nigun unfolds in musical time. ii In other cases, the particular details of this narrative are unknown. In such a case, understanding how melodic construction, mode, ornamentation, and form function to create a musical syntax can inform our understanding of how a nigun can reflect a particular spiritual narrative. This dissertation examines the ways in which musical syntax and spiritual parameters work together to express these various spiritual narratives in sound and structure of nigunim.
  • Partner with Us in Building Our Community Center !!!

    Partner with Us in Building Our Community Center !!!

    ה“ב :The Board Rabbi Chaim Greenberg, Board member Mr.Menashe Hochstead, Board member 777 Mrs.Alizah F.Hochstead, Board member 777 Partner with us in building our community center !!! To donate your US tax deductible contribution: Please make your check payable to PEF Israel Endowment Funds Inc. Please be sure to include "HaKehilot HaChadoshot 580625614" in the memo line And can be sent to: PEF Israel Endowment Funds Inc. 630 Third Avenue Suite 1501 New York, NY 10017 Or to: HaKehilot HaChadashot P.O.B. 50125 . Beitar Illit , Israel, 9056702 For NIS contributions in Israel: HaKehilot HaChadashot P.O.B 50125 Beitar Illit 9056702 For wire donations Mercantile Bank: #17, Branch: #734 Beitar Illit, account: #47779, HaKehilot HaChadashot We appreciate your generous support Sincerely yours Rabbi Chaim Greenberg Chabad Community Center, Beitar Illit,Israel P.O.B. 50125 . Beitar Illit , Israel, 9056702 Phone: 972-52-770-3760, Fax : 972-2 -652-7340, Email: [email protected] A map of Chabad Beitar Illit, Israel Institutions in Beitar A young and vibrant town, founded 20 years ago, and currently home to sense of responsibility to do all that it can to strengthen children's Kollelim 45,000 people—more than half of whom are children. attachment to the Rebbe. Chassidus Kollel, Hadas neighborhood. The Chabad community is one of the largest in Israel, numbering more 770 will house all educational institutions as well as the Rebbe's room Torat Menahem Chassidus Kollel, HaGeffen neighborhood. than 450 families with more than 2000 children, keinyirbu. where bar mitzvah boys will put on tefillin for the first time.
  • Apostates and More, Part 2,The History Behind the Ashkenazi

    Apostates and More, Part 2,The History Behind the Ashkenazi

    Apostates and More, Part 2 Apostates and More, Part 2 Marc B. Shapiro Continued from here 1. Another apostate was Rabbi Nehemiah ben Jacob ha-Kohen of Ferrara, who was an important supporter of R. Moses Hayyim Luzzatto during the controversy about him.[1]Here is the the final page of the haskamah he wrote in 1729 for R. Aviad Sar Shalom Basilea’s Emunat Hakhamim. R. Isaac Lampronte, in a halakhic discussion in hisPahad Yitzhak, refers to Nehemiah, but not by name.[2] He calls him .In R .אחד מן החכמים רך בשנים אשר אחרי כן הבאיש ריחו כנודע Hananel Nepi and R. Mordechai Samuel Ghirondi, Toldot Gedolei Yisrael (Trieste, 1853), p. 229, they write about Obviously, “Ishmaelite” is a .שאח”כ נעשה ישמעאלי :Nehemiah code word for Christian.[3] The story reported by Samuel David Luzzatto is that Nehemiah used to go to prostitutes, and when the rabbis found out about this they removed the rabbinate from him. Too embarrassed to remain in the Jewish community, Nehemiah apostatized.[4] Cecil Roth cites another Italian source that Nehemiah converted so he could marry a Christian woman. Unfortunately, his son and three daughters apostatized together with him (his wife had apparently already died).[5] Another apostate who should be mentioned is Michael Solomon Alexander (1799-1844), first Anglican bishop in Jerusalem. Before his apostasy, Alexander was a rabbi.[6] Rabbi Abraham Romano of Tunis also became an apostate. He converted at the end of the seventeenth century when R. Meir Lombrozo was appointed a dayan in his place. After Romano converted, he became well known as a Islamic preacher, and after his death his tomb was venerated by Muslims.