New York's First Subway

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

New York's First Subway www.PDHcenter.com www.PDHonline.org Table of Contents Slide/s Part Description 1N/ATitle 2 N/A Table of Contents 3~91 1 Battery to Harlem in 15 Minutes 92~169 2 The Elm Street Route 170~254 3 A Gigantic Task 255~339 4 Plant & Equipment 340~375 5 The People Ride in a Hole in the Ground New York’s First Subway1 2 Part 1 Setting Precede nts Battery to Harlem in 15 Minutes 3 4 “Just what are the rights of the owners of property abutting upon a street or avenue, the fee in and to the soil underneath the surface of which has been acquired by the city of New York, so far as the same is not required The completion of the Interborough Rapid Transit (IRT) railroad in the New York City (NYC) for the ordinary city uses of gas or water pipes, or others of a like boroughs of Manhattan,theBronx and Brooklyn (commonly referred to as the “Subway”) demonstrated that underground railroads could be built beneath the congested streets of character, has never been finally determined…” the city and made possible a comprehensive system of subsurface transportation extending New YkYork Sta tte Supreme CtCourt throughout the territory of Greater NYC. In March 1900, when NYC’s Mayor Robert Van Wyck RE: owing to the magnitude of the work, delay might easily result in failure. An ceremoniously broke ground at Borough Hall Manhattan for the new subterranean railroad, underground railroad was something very new in NYC. No one could say for there were many well-informed people, including prominent financiers and experienced certain that the abutting property owners might not make damage claims engineers, who predicted failure for the enterprise. The railway was to be owned by the city, substantial enough to entitle them to their day in court, a day which might stretch built and operated under legislation unique in the history of municipal governments. into many months or several years. Provisions for the occupation of city streets, payments by the city and city supervision over construction and operation were scrupulously outlined. The experience of the elevated railroad companies in building their lines had demonstrated the uncertainty of depending upon legal precedents. It was not believed, at that time, that the abutting property owners would have any legal ground for complaint against the elevated structures, but the courts found new laws for new conditions and spelled out new property rights of light, air and access which were made the basis for an unprecedented volume of litigation. 5 6 © J.M. Syken 1 www.PDHcenter.com www.PDHonline.org “…a condition absolutely impossible of fulfillment…How is the city to prevent interference with the work by injunction? That question lies with the courts; and not with the courts of this State alone, for there are cases without doubt in which the courts of the United States would have jurisdiction to act, and when schsuch ju risdiction eistsexists thethey hav e not hitherto shown much reluctance in acting…That legal proceedings will be undertaken which will, to some extent at least, “…to secure to the contractor the right to construct and interfere with the progress of this work seems to be operate, free from all rights, claims, or other interference, inevitable....” whether by injunction, suit for damages, or otherwise on the New York State Supreme Court part of any abutting owner or other person.” RE: clause in the NYC contract for constructing the IRT Subway Above: caption: “View of Fourth Avenue at 32nd Street during construction of the IRT Subway, August 1902” 7 8 Another difficulty was the fact that the Constitution of the State of New The engineering difficulties were also intimidating. Subsidence of tall York limited the debt-incurring power of the city. The capacity of the city buildings along the streets had to be to undertake the work had been discussed at length in the courts and the considered and the streets NYS Supreme Court had mitigated this aspect by suggesting that it did themselves were already occupied not make much difference to the municipality whether or not the debt limit with a complicated network of subsurface structures such as permitted a contract for the work, because if the limit should be sewers, water and gas mains, exceeded; “no liability could possibly be imposed upon the city,” aview electric cable conduits, electric which might comfort the nervous taxpayers but hardly inspired the surface railway conduits, telegraph confidence of the financiers who undertook the contracts. Various and power conduits and many vaults extending out under the streets corporations, organized during the thirty-odd years of unsuccessful occupied by the abutting property attempts by the city to secure underground rapid transit, claimed that owners. On the surface there were their franchises gave them vested rights in the streets to the exclusion of street railway lines carrying a very the new enterprise and they were prepared to assert their rights in the heavy traffic load night and day and all the thoroughfares in the lower courts. In fact, the Underground Railroad Company of the City of New part of the city were congested with York sought to enjoin the building of the subterranean railroad and vehicular traffic. The city was carried their contest to the Supreme Court of the United States, which did unwilling to take any risk and not finally decide the questions raised until March 1904, when the Subway demanded millions of dollars of security to insure the completion of was practically complete. Problematic also were NYC’s biennial elections the Subway precisely according to and the fact that the railroad could not be completed in just two years. contract, the terms of which were The attitude and policies of one administration toward the project might exacting down to the smallest detail. 9 Left: underground work at Broad- 10 be very different from that of its successors. way & 96th Street The builders of the IRT did not underestimate the magnitude of the task before them and retained experienced experts for every part of the work. The subway was built near the surface and was easily accessible, well-lit, dry, clean and well ventilated. The stations and approaches were generous in their proportions and the stations themselves were furnished with many conveniences previously unknown. There was a separate express service with its own tracks and the stations were so arranged that passengers could pass from local to express trains and vice-versa without delay and/or payment of an additional fare. Special precautions were taken and devices adopted to prevent a failure of electric power and the delays which would ensue. An electro-pneumatic block signal system was devised excelling any system previously used. The third rail for conveying the electric current was covered so as to prevent injury from contact. Special emergency and fire alarm signal systems were installed throughout the length of the railroad. At a few stations, where the IRT was not near the surface, improved escalators and elevators were provided. The cars were designed to Above Top: 81st Street Sewer prevent danger from fire and improved types of motors were adopted, capable of supplying Above Bottom: 45th Street and high-speed combined with complete control. Strength, utility, beauty, efficiency and Broadway convenience were considered for all parts of the IRT’s structures and equipment, stations, Left: view looking north on Broadway Power House and electrical sub-stations. 11 Left: caption: “A typical station of the new subway, showing proposed arrangement and architectural details” 12 from Post Office Building Right: caption: “A view of the interior of the new subway in New York, showing the general arrangement of tracks and stations “ © J.M. Syken 2 www.PDHcenter.com www.PDHonline.org “The railway and its equipment as contemplated by the contract constitute a great public work. All parts of the Top Left: exterior of IRT sub-station structure where exposed to public sight shall therefore be Top Right:interiorof23rd Street IRT designed, constructed, and maintained with a view to the station beauty of their appearance, as well as to their efficiency.” Left: Fulton Street IRT entrance RE: excerpt from clause in the IRT construction contract 13 14 Above: IRT Subway kiosk “In the new subway in New York crowding will be eliminated by the simple device of providing one stairway for entrance and one for exit, and by making the platforms large enough to accommodate several hundred persons at once. There will be broad staircases, of easy grade, ticket booths designed with reference to appearances as well its use, and the stations will have lofty vaulted ceilings well lighted by day through bulls- eye glass and at night by electric lamps. The decorations will be of tiles, faience, and glazed terra-cotta, with the name of the station plainly marked in panels. All the ornamentation has been designed to help the passenger recognize his station without the necessity of listening for the announcement of the guard or reading the signs. Express stations at the City Hall, Fourteenth Street, Forty-second Seventy-second, and Ninety- sixth streets naturally divide the local stations into groups. For each group a general scheme of decoration has been devised, and no two stations in a group are decorated in the same colors…” Harper’s Weekly, January 31st 1903 15 16 “…Repeated experiments have convinced the architects and engineers that the moisture and drip familiar to explorers of caves and tunnels can be avoided in the Subway stations by building air-chambers behind walls and ceilings. Accordingly, this method of construction has been adopted, and the underground will be damp-proof.
Recommended publications
  • Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} Field Guide to the Water Life
    Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} Field Guide To The Water Life Of Britain by Reader's Digest Association Britain's Butterflies A Field Guide to the Butterflies of Great Britain and Ireland. Britain’s Butterflies is a comprehensive and beautifully designed photographic field guide to the butterflies of Britain and Ireland. Containing hundreds of stunning colour photographs, the fourth edition has been extensively revised and updated, and provides the latest information on every species ever recorded. It covers in detail the identification of all 59 butterfly species that breed regularly, as well as four former breeders, 10 rare migrants and one species of unknown status. The easy-to-use format will enable butterfly watchers – beginners or experts – to identify any species they encounter. Produced in association with Butterfly Conservation, the fourth edition features new introductory sections on the identification of more difficult groups; revised maps that show the latest distributions recorded by the UK Butterfly Monitoring Scheme; expanded sections on food plants and on recording and monitoring; a new section on climate change; and a revised species order reflecting the latest taxonomy. Customer Reviews. Biography. David Newland has been a butterfly enthusiast since boyhood. He is the author of Discover Butterflies in Britain and the coauthor of Britain's Day- flying Moths (both WILDGuides). Robert Still , the cofounder of WILDGuides, is an ecologist and graphic artist, and has designed more than thirty of its titles. Andy Swash , the managing director of WILDGuides, is an ecologist and wildlife photographer. Swash and Still are the coauthors of a number of books, including Britain's Habitats , Britain's Dragonflies , Britain's Day-flying Moths and Britain's Sea Mammals (all WILDGuides).
    [Show full text]
  • Broadway Triangle Redevelopment Project Williamsburg, Brooklyn, New York
    BROADWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT WILLIAMSBURG, BROOKLYN, NEW YORK PHASE IA CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT Prepared For: New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development New York, New York Prepared By: The Louis Berger Group, Inc. New York, New York February 2009 BROADWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT, WILLIAMSBURG, BROOKLYN, NEW YORK PHASE IA CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT Prepared For: New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development New York, New York Prepared By: Tina Fortugno, RPA Zachary J. Davis, RPA Deborah Van Steen The Louis Berger Group, Inc. New York, New York February 2009 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD) is seeking discretionary actions in order to facilitate the redevelopment of a nine-block area known as Broadway Triangle, located in Williamsburg, Brooklyn. The Proposed Action includes zoning map amendments to generally rezone the existing M1-2 Manufacturing District to Residential and Commercial Districts; zoning text amendments to establish Inclusionary Housing in the proposed R6A and R7A zoning districts; the disposition of City-owned properties; Urban Development Action Area Projects designation; the modification of an Urban Renewal Plan; and City Acquisition through eminent domain. The Project Area encompasses approximately 31 acres and is generally bounded by Flushing Avenue to the south, Throop Avenue to the east, Lynch Street to the north, and Union Avenue, Walton Street, and Harrison Avenue to the west. As part of this action, the HPD is undertaking an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the proposed Broadway Triangle Redevelopment Project. Consideration for cultural resources, including both archaeological and historic architectural resources, must be undertaken as part of the City Environmental Quality Review (CEQR) process.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 of 1 Forecast of Contracts to Be Advertised and Proposals to Be Solicited
    Welcome to the latest MTA "Eye on the Future," in which we present currently funded capital projects that are planned to be advertised from September 2017 through August 2018. The "Eye" is hosted along with other information and resources about the MTA Capital Program in one convenient location. It is part of our commitment to improve business practices and we hope that it is useful to you. The MTA Capital Program is very important for the safety and reliability of the MTA transportation system and is vital for the regional economy. As described in this issue of the "Eye," the MTA is preparing to undertake 145 projects valued at approximately $4.71 billion in capital work. This work spans many areas, including civil, structural, and electrical, as well as new technologies. These projects are crucial for the reliability, growth and resiliency of the system and contribute to the regional economy. This amount of investment is projected to generate approximately $8.29 billion in economic activity for the New York region. We want to make sure you’re aware of our recently-launched web-portal: MyMTA.info. This portal enables suppliers and bidders to the MTA to search procurement opportunities and information across all MTA agencies, respond to sourcing events online, select categories for the goods and services your sell and more. Contractors and suppliers have a critical stake in the success of the Capital Program. We appreciate your interest in and support of the projects included in this issue of the "Eye," and we look forward to your participation.
    [Show full text]
  • 116Th Street (Cb10)
    116TH STREET (CB10) Corridor Safety Improvements December 2016 PROJECT LOCATION . Part of safety improvements proposed on 116th St between Lenox Ave and Madison Ave . Busy corridor with residential and commercial land uses and several schools, children’s programs, senior centers, religious institutions nearby . 2/3 subway stop at Lenox Ave and nearby 6 subway stop at Lexington Ave . Many buses use 116th St: . Local buses: M116, M7, M102, M1 . Express buses: BxM6, BxM7, BxM8, BxM9, BxM10, BxM11 2 3 CB10 CB11 6 nyc.gov/dot 2 VISION ZERO PRIORITY W 116TH ST & Manhattan Priority Geographies LENOX AVE is a Vision Vision Zero Zero Priority • Multi-agency effort to reduce Intersection traffic fatalities in NYC • Borough Action Plans released in 2015 • Priority Intersections, Corridors, and Areas identified for each borough • On 116th St: • Intersections with Lenox Ave and Madison Ave identified as a Priority Intersections nyc.gov/dot 3 SAFETY DATA: PROJECT NEED W 116th St (Lenox Ave to 5th Ave): • 8 people severely injured (e.g., traumatic injuries typically requiring ambulance response) • 21 pedestrians injured at Lenox • 87 total injuries Total Injuries 2010-2014 42 3 Total KSI 35 KSI = persons 2010-2014 killed or severely 5 injured nyc.gov/dot 4 W 116TH ST & LENOX AVE: EXISTING CONDITIONS Long crossing distances for pedestrians, especially for seniors and children Lenox Ave is 80 feet wide Lenox Ave at W 116th St, looking south nyc.gov/dot 5 W 116TH ST & LENOX AVE: EXISTING CONDITIONS Pedestrians get stuck in the middle with no safe space
    [Show full text]
  • D. Rail Transit
    Chapter 9: Transportation (Rail Transit) D. RAIL TRANSIT EXISTING CONDITIONS The subway lines in the study area are shown in Figures 9D-1 through 9D-5. As shown, most of the lines either serve only portions of the study area in the north-south direction or serve the study area in an east-west direction. Only one line, the Lexington Avenue line, serves the entire study area in the north-south direction. More importantly, subway service on the East Side of Manhattan is concentrated on Lexington Avenue and west of Allen Street, while most of the population on the East Side is concentrated east of Third Avenue. As a result, a large portion of the study area population is underserved by the current subway service. The following sections describe the study area's primary, secondary, and other subway service. SERVICE PROVIDED Primary Subway Service The Lexington Avenue line (Nos. 4, 5, and 6 routes) is the only rapid transit service that traverses the entire length of the East Side of Manhattan in the north-south direction. Within Manhattan, southbound service on the Nos. 4, 5 and 6 routes begins at 125th Street (fed from points in the Bronx). Local service on the southbound No. 6 route ends at the Brooklyn Bridge station and the last express stop within Manhattan on the Nos. 4 and 5 routes is at the Bowling Green station (service continues into Brooklyn). Nine of the 23 stations on the Lexington Avenue line within Manhattan are express stops. Five of these express stations also provide transfer opportunities to the other subway lines within the study area.
    [Show full text]
  • Travel Directions to Columbia University
    Department of Applied Physics & Applied Mathematics, Columbia University Travel Directions to Columbia University Columbia University is located on the Upper West Side of Manhattan at West 116th Street between Broadway and Amsterdam Avenues. The Non-Neutral Plasma Workshop will meet in Davis Auditorium (4th floor/campus level) of the CEPSR/Schapiro Building at 530 W. 120th Street, between Broadway and Amsterdam Avenue. From the Airport http://www.panynj.gov/ Taxi The easiest way to reach Columbia University from the airport is by taxi. The average fare from LaGuardia Airport (718-533- 3400), the closest airport to the campus, is $25, plus bridge and tunnel tolls and tip. Taxis depart from stands located outside the exits of the major terminals. Hail only marked yellow cabs with fares posted on the driver's door. Car services are also available curbside at the major terminals, or they may be prearranged. Kennedy Airport has a flat fare of $45 to any single stop in Manhattan. This does not include tolls and tip which will add another $10. Taxi service from Newark Airport into Manhattan is around $65 including tolls and tip. Bus Service The city M60 bus provides inexpensive service ($2.00) from LaGuardia Airport to Columbia University (leaving LaGuardia every 30 minutes from 4:50 am–1:00 am). The ride may last 45-60 minutes, depending on traffic. Call 718-330-1234 for up-to-date schedule and service information. The Gray Line Air Shuttle (212-315-3006 or 800-451-0455) provides bus service from both LaGuardia and Kennedy Airports to Grand Central Station and the Port Authority Bus Terminal.
    [Show full text]
  • The New York City Subway
    John Stern, a consultant on the faculty of the not-for-profit Aesthetic Realism Foundation in New York City, and a graduate of Columbia University, has had a lifelong interest in architecture, history, geology, cities, and transportation. He was a senior planner for the Tri-State Regional Planning Commission in New York, and is an Honorary Director of the Shore Line Trolley Museum in Connecticut. His extensive photographs of streetcar systems in dozens of American and Canadian cities during the late 1940s, '50s, and '60s comprise a major portion of the Sprague Library's collection. Mr. Stern resides in New York City with his wife, Faith, who is also a consultant of Aesthetic Realism, the education founded by the American poet and critic Eli Siegel (1902-1978). His public talks include seminars on Fiorello LaGuardia and Robert Moses, and "The Brooklyn Bridge: A Study in Greatness," written with consultant and art historian Carrie Wilson, which was presented at the bridge's 120th anniversary celebration in 2003, and the 125th anniversary in 2008. The paper printed here was given at the Aesthetic Realism Foundation, 141 Greene Street in NYC on October 23rd and at the Queens Public Library in Flushing in 2006. The New York Subway: A Century By John Stern THURSDAY, OCTOBER 27, 1904 was a gala day in the City of New York. Six hundred guests assembled inside flag-bedecked City Hall listened to speeches extolling the brand-new subway, New York's first. After the last speech, Mayor George B. McClellan spoke, saying, "Now I, as Mayor, in the name of the people, declare the subway open."1 He and other dignitaries proceeded down into City Hall station for the inau- gural ride up the East Side to Grand Central Terminal, then across 42nd Street to Times Square, and up Broadway to West 145th Street: 9 miles in all (shown by the red lines on the map).
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Response Incidents
    Emergency Response Incidents Incident Type Location Borough Utility-Water Main 136-17 72 Avenue Queens Structural-Sidewalk Collapse 927 Broadway Manhattan Utility-Other Manhattan Administration-Other Seagirt Blvd & Beach 9 Street Queens Law Enforcement-Other Brooklyn Utility-Water Main 2-17 54 Avenue Queens Fire-2nd Alarm 238 East 24 Street Manhattan Utility-Water Main 7th Avenue & West 27 Street Manhattan Fire-10-76 (Commercial High Rise Fire) 130 East 57 Street Manhattan Structural-Crane Brooklyn Fire-2nd Alarm 24 Charles Street Manhattan Fire-3rd Alarm 581 3 ave new york Structural-Collapse 55 Thompson St Manhattan Utility-Other Hylan Blvd & Arbutus Avenue Staten Island Fire-2nd Alarm 53-09 Beach Channel Drive Far Rockaway Fire-1st Alarm 151 West 100 Street Manhattan Fire-2nd Alarm 1747 West 6 Street Brooklyn Structural-Crane Brooklyn Structural-Crane 225 Park Avenue South Manhattan Utility-Gas Low Pressure Noble Avenue & Watson Avenue Bronx Page 1 of 478 09/30/2021 Emergency Response Incidents Creation Date Closed Date Latitude Longitude 01/16/2017 01:13:38 PM 40.71400364095638 -73.82998933154158 10/29/2016 12:13:31 PM 40.71442154062271 -74.00607638041981 11/22/2016 08:53:17 AM 11/14/2016 03:53:54 PM 40.71400364095638 -73.82998933154158 10/29/2016 05:35:28 PM 12/02/2016 04:40:13 PM 40.71400364095638 -73.82998933154158 11/25/2016 04:06:09 AM 40.71442154062271 -74.00607638041981 12/03/2016 04:17:30 AM 40.71442154062271 -74.00607638041981 11/26/2016 05:45:43 AM 11/18/2016 01:12:51 PM 12/14/2016 10:26:17 PM 40.71442154062271 -74.00607638041981
    [Show full text]
  • NYCT Bus & MTA Bus Employee On-Duty Lost-Time Accident Rate
    Bus Company Transit & Bus Committee Meeting June 2013 Committee Members M. Lebow, Chair F. Ferrer, Acting MTA Chairman J. Banks III, Vice Chair S. Metzger J. Sedore, Jr. M. Page J. Kay A. Albert C. Moerdler D. Paterson E. Watt A. Cappelli MEETING AGENDA NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT & BUS COMMITTEE June 3, 2013 - 10:30 AM 347 Madison Avenue Fifth Floor Board Room, New York, NY AGENDA ITEMS PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – APRIL 22, 2013 1.1 2. COMMITTEE WORK PLAN 2.1 3. OPERATIONS PERFORMANCE SUMMARY ¾ April Operations Report 3.1 ¾ March Operations Report 3.34 4. FINANCIAL REPORTS ¾ March NYCT Financial & Ridership Report 4.1 ¾ March SIR Financial & Ridership Report 4.23 ¾ March MTA Bus Financial & Ridership Report 4.34 ¾ April NYC Transit & MTA Bus Flash Reports (under separate cover) ¾ Capital Program Status Report 4.47 5. PROCUREMENTS 5.1 ¾ NYCT Non-Competitive 5.5 ¾ NYCT Competitive 5.6 ¾ MTACC Competitive 5.10 ¾ MTA Bus Competitive 5.11 ¾ NYCT Ratifications 5.12 ¾ MTACC Ratifications 5.13 6. SERVICE CHANGES ¾ NYCT Implement B67 Extension to Brooklyn Navy Yard (For Approval) 6.1 ¾ NYCT Implement New B32 Bus Service in Brooklyn and Queens (For Approval) 6.8 ¾ NYCT Reroute M100 Bus Service in East Harlem 6.15 ¾ NYCT Bus Schedule Changes, Effective September 2013 6.19 ¾ MTA Bus Implement New Q70 Limited Stop Service (For Approval) 6.24 ¾ MTA Bus Schedule Changes, Effective September 2013 6.35 7. SPECIAL REPORTS & PRESENTATIONS ¾ April MetroCard Report 7.1 ¾ March MetroCard Report 7.5 8. STANDARD FOLLOW-UP REPORTS ¾ Escalator & Elevator Service Report 8.1 ¾ Transit Adjudication Bureau Report 8.24 ¾ NYC Transit & MTA Bus EEO Report 8.26 9.
    [Show full text]
  • A Chronology of 125Th Street
    125th Street Chronology • 16th Century Native Americans inhabit summer village at what is now East 125th Street and the Harlem River. • 1609 Henry Hudson trades with Native Americans off the Manhattanville shoreline. • 1658 Pieter Stuyvesant founds the village of Nieuw Haarlem, part of which occupies the land at what would later become East 125th Street between First and Second avenues. • 1776 George Washington defeats the British in the Battle of Harlem Heights, driving the enemy south across what was then called the Hollow Way, later known ofOicially as West 125th Street. • 1806 Village of Manhattanville founded at an inlet along the Hudson River at what will soon become West 125th Street. 1811 The Randel Plan proposes a grid of streets blanketing Manhattan, including an East-West thoroughfare along a geological fault line thereafter known as 125th Street. • 1813 125th Street opens as one of Manhattan’s 15 major cross-town streets • 1814 Regular ferry service begins along the Harlem River from East 125th Street to downtown. • 1850s The public school at East 125th Street and Second Avenue admits it Oirst African-American student. • 1863-1872 Artist Thomas Nast plots the downfall of the Tweed Ring from his backyard studio at Fifth Avenue and 125th Street. • 1869 A group of German Jews relocates from the Lower East Side to East 125th Street and Third Avenue, establishing the core of uptown’s Jewish community. • 1889 Oscar Hammerstein opens the Harlem Opera House at 211 West 125th Street, paving the way for 125th Street’s development as an entertainment district. • 1904 The Interborough Rapid Transit’s Broadway line opens in Upper Manhattan, spanning West 125th Street with a viaduct featuring a 168.5-foot parabolic arch.
    [Show full text]
  • F. Vehicular Traffic
    Chapter 9: Transportation (Vehicular Traffic) F. VEHICULAR TRAFFIC EXISTING CONDITIONS STREET AND ROADWAY NETWORK Traffic conditions in the study area vary in relation to a number of factors—the nature of the street and roadway network, surrounding land uses and the presence of major traffic generators, and the intensity of interaction between autos, taxis, trucks, buses, deliveries, and pedestrians. The study area contains five subareas, or zones—Lower Manhattan, the Lower East Side, East Midtown, the Upper East Side, and East Harlem—and each has different street and roadway characteristics along its length. East Midtown, the Upper East Side, and East Harlem are characterized by a regular street grid, with avenues running north-south and streets running east- west. Each of the major north-south avenues—First, Second, Third, Lexington, Park, Madison, and Fifth Avenues—are major traffic carriers. There is just one limited-access roadway, the FDR Drive, which extends around the eastern edge of the study area from its northern end to its southern end. A general overview of the character of the street and roadway network in each of the five zones is presented below. Lower Manhattan is characterized by an irregular grid pattern south of Canal Street. Except for a few major arterials, most streets within the area are narrow with usually just one "moving" lane. Travel is time-consuming and slow along them. Pedestrian traffic often overflows into the street space, further impeding vehicular traffic flow. Water Street and Broadway are the two key north-south streets in this area, and carry two or more effective travel lanes, yet are often difficult to negotiate due to frequent double-parked truck traffic.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridging the Gap: It May Be Further Than You Think!
    NYCTRC Bridging the Gap: It May Be Further than You Think! Ellyn Shannon and Bradley Brashears New York City Transit Riders Council 347 Madison Avenue NYCTRC Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................ 1 FINDINGS ................................................................................................................................... 3 A Division ............................................................................................................................... 4 B Division ............................................................................................................................... 6 RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................... 8 A and B Division Platform by Line Detail Guide ...................................................................... 12 A Division Platform Detail ................................................................................................... 16 B Division Platforms Detail .................................................................................................. 32 Appendix Appendix A: Raised Platforms and Boarding Area Description .............................................. 72 Appendix B: Description of Vertical and Horizontal Gaps, Code
    [Show full text]