DOCSLIB.ORG

Broadway Triangle Redevelopment Project Williamsburg, Brooklyn, New York

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Broadway Triangle Redevelopment Project Williamsburg, Brooklyn, New York BROADWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT WILLIAMSBURG, BROOKLYN, NEW YORK PHASE IA CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT Prepared For: New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development New York, New York Prepared By: The Louis Berger Group, Inc. New York, New York February 2009 BROADWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT, WILLIAMSBURG, BROOKLYN, NEW YORK PHASE IA CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT Prepared For: New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development New York, New York Prepared By: Tina Fortugno, RPA Zachary J. Davis, RPA Deborah Van Steen The Louis Berger Group, Inc. New York, New York February 2009 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD) is seeking discretionary actions in order to facilitate the redevelopment of a nine-block area known as Broadway Triangle, located in Williamsburg, Brooklyn. The Proposed Action includes zoning map amendments to generally rezone the existing M1-2 Manufacturing District to Residential and Commercial Districts; zoning text amendments to establish Inclusionary Housing in the proposed R6A and R7A zoning districts; the disposition of City-owned properties; Urban Development Action Area Projects designation; the modification of an Urban Renewal Plan; and City Acquisition through eminent domain. The Project Area encompasses approximately 31 acres and is generally bounded by Flushing Avenue to the south, Throop Avenue to the east, Lynch Street to the north, and Union Avenue, Walton Street, and Harrison Avenue to the west. As part of this action, the HPD is undertaking an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the proposed Broadway Triangle Redevelopment Project. Consideration for cultural resources, including both archaeological and historic architectural resources, must be undertaken as part of the City Environmental Quality Review (CEQR) process. In addition, the HPD anticipates the use of federal funding from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to facilitate the construction of affordable housing. Given this anticipated use of federal funds, the EIS has been designed to include an Environmental Assessment (EA) in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). As such, the following Phase IA Cultural Resource Assessment establishes Areas of Potential Effect (APEs) for the project, those areas within which the proposed actions may affect potential archaeological and/or historic architectural resources, identifies designated and potential cultural resources that may be affected by the proposed project, and assesses the proposed action’s potential effects on those resources. This Phase IA Cultural Resource Assessment will be submitted to the New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission (LPC) and the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (NYSOPRHP). Within the Project Area, HPD has delineated projected and potential development sites. The proposed rezoning project consists of 35 projected development sites and two potential development sites. These development sites are located throughout the 31-acre rezoning area and encompass a total of 114 individual tax lots. LPC determined that none of the projected or potential development sites are sensitive for archaeological resources. As such, they concluded that there are no further archaeological concerns with respect to the 114 lots. Given that the Proposed Action must be reviewed by the NYSOPRHP, in addition to LPC, Areas of Potential Effect (APEs) for archaeological and historic architectural resources were defined despite the non-sensitivity determination of LPC. The archaeological APE for the Proposed Action was determined to be the area within which direct impacts would most likely occur as a result of the proposed project. Therefore, the archaeological APE was defined as the entire redevelopment area, encompassing all of the projected and potential development sites along with the blocks within which the development sites are located. As for the historic architectural survey, the historic architectural APE was determined using the CEQR guidelines that recommend a 400-foot (121.92 meters) radius from the borders of the project site as the limits of the study area for architectural resources (CEQR Technical Manual 312). Consultation with NYSOPRHP was also initiated so as to obtain a preliminary determination of the archaeological and historic architectural sensitivity of the project area. With respect to archaeological resources, NYSOPRHP found in concurrence with the LPC that there are no concerns with respect to the redevelopment project. Regarding historic architectural resources, the NYSOPRHP requested additional information, in the form of photographs of the area surrounding the project site, before issuing a sensitivity determination. The documentary study, including a review of historical accounts, cartographic resources, and previously conducted archaeological studies and previously identified archaeological sites, concluded that the archaeological APE was not sensitive for prehistoric or historic archaeological deposits. Therefore, no additional archaeological investigations were recommended with respect to the proposed redevelopment project. The comprehensive support for the conclusions regarding the sensitivity of the archaeological APE is included in the following report. Page i The Louis Berger Group, Inc. Phase IA Cultural Resource Assessment Broadway Triangle Redevelopment Project TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................................................................................................i TABLE of CONTENTS .........................................................................................................................................ii LIST OF FIGURES...............................................................................................................................................iii LIST OF PHOTOS................................................................................................................................................iii LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................................. v 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................ 1 1.1 Project Description............................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Areas of Potential Effect....................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Scope of Work and Project Personnel ................................................................................................... 5 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING............................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Project Area and Current Land Use....................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Geology and Geography....................................................................................................................... 9 3.0 BACKGROUND.................................................................................................................................... 13 3.1 Prehistoric Overview.......................................................................................................................... 13 3.1.1 Prehistoric Archaeological Site Potential........................................................................................ 14 3.1.2 Previous Cultural Resource Surveys............................................................................................... 15 3.2 Historic Background .......................................................................................................................... 19 4.0 ARCHAEOLOGICAL POTENTIAL...................................................................................................... 41 4.1 Prehistoric Archaeological Site Potential ............................................................................................ 41 4.2 Historic Archaeological Site Potential................................................................................................. 42 5.0 HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL SURVEY............................................................................................. 44 5.1 Methodology...................................................................................................................................... 44 5.2 Identification and Evaluation of Historic Properties within the Architectural APE............................... 45 5.2.1 Previously Listed or Eligible Historic Properties within the Architectural APE ............................... 45 5.2.2 Previously Undocumented Historic Properties within the Architectural APE................................... 51 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.................................................................................... 79 6.1 Archaeology....................................................................................................................................... 79 6.2 Historic Architecture.......................................................................................................................... 79 7.0 REFERENCES CITED..........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fwd Brooklyn Brewery Food & Arts Festival Comes to Nashville, April 8
    Contact: Dan D’Ippolito, [email protected], 718-233-6634 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE BROOKLYN BREWERY ANNOUNCES “THE BROOKLYN BREWERY MASH: ADVENTURES IN FOOD, FILM, MUSIC, BOOKS & BEER” Comes to Nashville: April 8 – 14 MARCH 18, 2013, BROOKLYN, NY – Brooklyn Brewery is taking its neighborhood on the road. Collaborating with friends old and new, the Brewery has bundled up some of its favorite events into The Brooklyn Brewery Mash as a benefit for Slow Food USA. Including Nashville from April 8–14, The Mash will drop in 11 cities during 2013 and roll out a roster of parties, comedy, concerts, pop-up supperclubs and readings, all featuring humanity’s favorite beverage.vc Watch the trailer here. “The Mash is an expression of Brooklyn art, music, food and the cultural links we see with many cities around the world,” says Brooklyn Brewery President & Co-founder Steve Hindy. “There is a revolution happening in the world of food and the world of beer, and we are happy to celebrate this revolution with our friends around the US.” NYC food and art organizations have been closely linked to Brooklyn Brewery from the beginning. Be it a beer dinner, cook-off, concert or film festival, the ethos of these happenings has consistently mirrored the consideration and creativity behind the making of The Brewery’s beer. Paired with the flavor and flair of Brooklyn, classic nightlife is re- imagined as a more interactive experience. During The Mash, participants will enjoy an array of perennial and rare Brooklyn beers. Helping color in The Mash, NBNY, the organizers of Brooklyn’s Bring to Light festival, will create their immersive installations of light and projection art throughout the tour.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Park' to House 1,200 Condos
    Ratner gets 45 days to up ante MTA talks exclusively with Bruce despite his low offer By Jess Wisloski ner’s company, with the hopes of upping its the July 27 meeting that neither bid came commitment of her company to the proj- The Brooklyn Papers bid by the board’s Sept. 29 meeting. close enough to the state authority’s $214 ect, and reiterated Extell’s plans to develop Ratner’s bid offers $50 million up front. million appraised value for the rail yards to 1,940 units of new housing, with 573 As it once was, so it shall be again, It also includes $29 million in renovations justify the board’s interest. mixed-income units. the Metropolitan Transportation of the rail yards (to help pay for the reloca- Compared to Ratner’s bid — which was She said the costs of infrastructure and Authority board decided this week, tion of them required by Ratner’s plan), two years in the making and included any required platform would be paid for when it cast aside the high bidder — $20 million in environmental remediation dozens of support letters from elected offi- by Extell, and again raised an offer pre- / Jori Klein who offered $150 million to develop of the land (which needs to be done in or- cials, a myriad of minority contracting or- sented by Extell on Monday to work with the Long Island Rail Road storage der to develop the site for housing), $182 ganizations and numerous labor unions, Forest City Ratner to add an arena that / Jori Klein yards at Atlantic Avenue — and million to build a platform (to build the the Extell bid — hastily prepared to meet would be developed on private property.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} Field Guide to the Water Life
    Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} Field Guide To The Water Life Of Britain by Reader's Digest Association Britain's Butterflies A Field Guide to the Butterflies of Great Britain and Ireland. Britain’s Butterflies is a comprehensive and beautifully designed photographic field guide to the butterflies of Britain and Ireland. Containing hundreds of stunning colour photographs, the fourth edition has been extensively revised and updated, and provides the latest information on every species ever recorded. It covers in detail the identification of all 59 butterfly species that breed regularly, as well as four former breeders, 10 rare migrants and one species of unknown status. The easy-to-use format will enable butterfly watchers – beginners or experts – to identify any species they encounter. Produced in association with Butterfly Conservation, the fourth edition features new introductory sections on the identification of more difficult groups; revised maps that show the latest distributions recorded by the UK Butterfly Monitoring Scheme; expanded sections on food plants and on recording and monitoring; a new section on climate change; and a revised species order reflecting the latest taxonomy. Customer Reviews. Biography. David Newland has been a butterfly enthusiast since boyhood. He is the author of Discover Butterflies in Britain and the coauthor of Britain's Day- flying Moths (both WILDGuides). Robert Still , the cofounder of WILDGuides, is an ecologist and graphic artist, and has designed more than thirty of its titles. Andy Swash , the managing director of WILDGuides, is an ecologist and wildlife photographer. Swash and Still are the coauthors of a number of books, including Britain's Habitats , Britain's Dragonflies , Britain's Day-flying Moths and Britain's Sea Mammals (all WILDGuides).
    [Show full text]
  • Brooklyn Brewery Clone Recipes
    the best of ® 6 Classic Brooklyn Brewery Clone Recipes Please note all file contents are Copyright © 2017 Battenkill Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This file is for the buyer’s personal use only. It’s unlawful to share or distribute this file to others in any way including e-mailing it, posting it online, or sharing printed copies with others. BROOKLYN BREWERY’S BROOKLYN BREWERY’S BROOKLYN LAGER CLONE BROOKLYN LAGER CLONE (ALL-GRAIN) (EXTRACT WITH GRAINS) (5 gallons/19 L, all-grain) (5 gallons/19 L, extract with grains) OG = 1.052 FG = 1.012 OG = 1.052 FG = 1.012 IBU = 30 SRM = 13 ABV= 5.2% IBU = 30 SRM = 13 ABV= 5.2% Brooklyn Lager is Brooklyn Brewery’s flagship beer. It is loosely Ingredients based on the old Vienna lager style, derivations of which were 2 lbs. (0.91 kg) light dried malt extract popular in parts of the United States in the late 1800s. Bitterness 4 lbs. (1.8 kg) light liquid malt extract is snappy, with a firm malt core and the beer is dry-hopped. 7 oz. (0.20 kg) American 2-row malt 14 oz. (0.40 kg) Munich malt (10 °L) Ingredients 11 oz. (0.31 kg) Caramel malt (60 °L) 9 lbs. 6 oz. (4.25 kg) American 2-row malt 4.6 AAU Willamette hops (75 min.) 14 oz. (0.4 kg) Munich malt (10 °L) (1 oz./28 g of 4.6% alpha acids) 11 oz. (0.31 kg) Caramel malt (60 °L) 2.5 AAU Cascade hops (35 min.) 4.6 AAU Willamette hops (75 min.) (0.33 oz./9.3 g of 7.5% alpha acids) (1 oz./28 g of 4.6% alpha acids) 2.5 AAU Vanguard hops (35 min.) 2.5 AAU Cascade hops (35 min.) (0.45 oz./13 g of 5.6% alpha acids) (0.33 oz./9.3 g of 7.5% alpha acids) 0.5 oz.
    [Show full text]
  • Sicilian Eatery
    SICILIAN EATERY Concrete is a casual dining experience located on the border of Brooklyn neighborhoods Bedford Stuyvesant + Bushwick. 917-886-9660 The 3,000 sq ft space has a capacity of 75, featuring an open kitchen, dining area, full bar with seating, and performance stage. 906 Broadway, Concrete’s menu includes a variety of plates from both Italian and American cuisines, Brooklyn NY 11206 in addition to a selection of Sicilian street food favorites. 906broadway The bar offers a selection of top shelf liquors, Sicilian wines, and local beers. @gmail.com The list of specialty cocktails are curated exclusively for Concrete, with all cocktail syrups made fresh + in house by our bartending staff. @concretebrooklyn Open June 2018, the space features artwork from both local and international artists, www. including a custom mural from artist Mike Lee on the building’s Stockton St side. concrete-brooklyn The live event calendar is set to premiere in Fall 2018. .com Currently serving dinner from 5p - 11p, with brunch available on weekends. Located at 906 Broadway, Brooklyn NY 11206, accessible by the J/M/Z trains at Myrtle-Broadway + the B46 bus. THE NEAREST TRAINS ARE THE M/J/Z LINES AT MYRTLE - BROADWAY, OR FLUSHING AVE. WE ARE A 14 MINUTE WALK FROM THE HALSEY L TRAIN STATION IN BUSHWICK. THE B46, B47, B54, M1, M119 (AT MYRTLE AVE), AND B15 (AT LEWIS AVE) HAVE ROUTES TO MYRTLE / BROADWAY JUNCTION, AND ARE WITHIN A 3-10 MINUTE WALK FROM CONCRETE’S LOCATION. High resolution images can be downloaded here: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/1upry4klu8zc8ll/AADVl9DsBLjDfT5-E4H1iezNa?dl=0 Interior and Exterior Space Photography: Leonardo Mascaro http://www.leonardomascaro.com Food + Drink Photography: Paul Quitoriano http://www.paulcrispin.com DOP GRADE PRODUCTS Dnominazione di Origine Protetta certification ensures that products are locally grown and packaged.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Manhattan
    WASHINGTON STREET IS 131/ CANAL STREETCanal Street M1 bus Chinatown M103 bus M YMCA M NQRW (weekday extension) HESTER STREET M20 bus Canal St Canal to W 147 St via to E 125 St via 103 20 Post Office 3 & Lexington Avs VESTRY STREET to W 63 St/Bway via Street 5 & Madison Avs 7 & 8 Avs VARICK STREET B= YORK ST AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS 6 only6 Canal Street Firehouse ACE LISPENARD STREET Canal Street D= LAIGHT STREET HOLLAND AT&T Building Chinatown JMZ CANAL STREET TUNNEL Most Precious EXIT Health Clinic Blood Church COLLISTER STREET CANAL STREET WEST STREET Beach NY Chinese B BEACH STStreet Baptist Church 51 Park WALKER STREET St Barbara Eldridge St Manhattan Express Bus Service Chinese Greek Orthodox Synagogue HUDSON STREET ®0= Merchants’ Fifth Police Church Precinct FORSYTH STREET 94 Association MOTT STREET First N œ0= to Lower Manhattan ERICSSON PolicePL Chinese BOWERY Confucius M Precinct ∑0= 140 Community Plaza Center 22 WHITE ST M HUBERT STREET M9 bus to M PIKE STREET X Grand Central Terminal to Chinatown84 Eastern States CHURCH STREET Buddhist Temple Union Square 9 15 BEACH STREET Franklin Civic of America 25 Furnace Center NY Chinatown M15 bus NORTH MOORE STREET WEST BROADWAY World Financial Center Synagogue BAXTER STREET Transfiguration Franklin Archive BROADWAY NY City Senior Center Kindergarten to E 126 St FINN Civil & BAYARD STREET Asian Arts School FRANKLIN PL Municipal via 1 & 2 Avs SQUARE STREET CENTRE Center X Street Courthouse Upper East Side to FRANKLIN STREET CORTLANDT ALLEY 1 Buddhist Temple PS 124 90 Criminal Kuan Yin World
    [Show full text]
  • AUGUST 2002 Winner for PARENTS, EDUCATORS & STUDENTS U.S
    Award www.EDUCATIONUPDATE.com Volume VII, No. 12 • New York City • AUGUST 2002 Winner FOR PARENTS, EDUCATORS & STUDENTS U.S. POSTAGE PAID U.S. POSTAGE VOORHEES, NJ Permit No.500 PRSRT STD. Learning at Crotched Mountain School. Photo Credit: Ed Judice INSIDE: Homeschooling Special Education: Leave No Child Behind 2 Award EDUCATION UPDATE ■ FOR PARENTS, EDUCATORS & STUDENTS ■ AUGUST 2002 Winner GUEST EDITORIAL EDUCATION UPDATE School Failure and School Responsibility Mailing Address: By STUART DUNN nals, it is time the school system accepted the team from MS 309 addressed their comprehen- 276 5th Avenue, Suite 1005 In a recent article on The New York Times fact that the responsibility for educating the sive approach and its effects. This school suf- New York, NY 10001 Education page entitled, “Defining Failed children is that of the schools and the educa- fers from all of the contributing factors apolo- email: [email protected] Schools Is Harder Than It Sounds,” Richard tors, not society at large, not the parents and gists like to call on – health/poverty, language, www.educationupdate.com Rothstein, the author states, “But nobody real- certainly not the other school children. This parent/child, and community issues. Despite Tel: 212-481-5519 ly knows how to identify failing schools…typ- responsibility is not abrogated by the existence these external factors, fundamental to the MS Fax: 212-481-3919 ically, a failing school is deemed one with low of societal factors that make the job more dif- 309 program is acceptance of ownership of the scores. But, while low scores can result from ficult.
    [Show full text]
  • The Backbone of the Metropolis How the Development of Rapid Transit Determined the Becoming of the New York City Metropolis
    The Backbone of the Metropolis How the development of rapid transit determined the becoming of the New York City Metropolis. History Thesis By: Pieter Schreurs Student number: 1090526 Email: [email protected] Telephone: 31(0)6-21256096 Tutor: Prof.Dr. Franziska Bollerey Date: July 2008 Cover image: “The Subway”, by George Tooker 1950, Egg tempera on composition board, Collection of Whitney Museum of American Art Source: “Subway City; Riding the trains, reading New York”; Brooks, 1997 The Backbone of the Metropolis How the development of rapid transit determined the becoming of the New York City Metropolis. History Thesis By: Pieter Schreurs Student number: 1090526 Email: [email protected] Telephone: 31(0)6-21256096 Tutor: Prof.Dr. Franziska Bollerey Date: July 2008 Image 1: The Network of Parkways. In the 1920s and 30s Robert Moses developed and intricate network of park ways around New York City. These were designed for the Joy of driving. Source: “The Power Broker”; Caro, 1975 4 Introduction Grade separated urban rapid transit and the metropolis: knowledge of what is in between this location and the previous one. users underground and re-emerge them to completely different parts of the city, without According to James Crawford, “…Transport technology has always affected both the growth and form of cities, and each new transport mode has left its stamp on urban form. When a New York, New York: new model is adopted, existing urban areas are forced into new uses and ever new forms and new development is arranged in accordance with the demands and capabilities of the In researching the development of rapid transit systems in relation to the development new mode...“ (Crawford, 2000, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Tenure, Attachment, and Changing Perceptions in Gentrifying Williamsburg, Brooklyn
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 5-2018 There’s Nothing Here: Tenure, Attachment, and Changing Perceptions in Gentrifying Williamsburg, Brooklyn Sara Martucci The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/2642 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] THERE’S NOTHING HERE: TENURE, ATTACHMENT, AND CHANGING PERCEPTIONS OF GENTRIFYING WILLIAMSBURG, BROOKLYN by SARA MARTUCCI A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Sociology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2018 © 2018 SARA MARTUCCI All Rights Reserved ii There’s Nothing Here: Tenure, Attachment, and Changing Perceptions in Gentrifying Williamsburg, Brooklyn by Sara Martucci This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Sociology in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Date Professor Philip Kasinitz Chair of Examining Committee Date Professor Lynn Chancer Executive Officer Supervisory Committee: Professor John Mollenkopf Professor Jason Patch Professor Sharon Zukin THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii Abstract There’s Nothing Here: Tenure, Attachment, and Changing Perceptions in Gentrifying Williamsburg, Brooklyn by Sara Martucci Depending on the audience, the term “gentrification” conjures images of pristine condos, fancy restaurants, dive bars full of hipsters, or eviction notices.
    [Show full text]
  • Pfizer / Broadway Triangle Redevelopment Plan Brooklyn, NY
    Pfizer / Broadway Triangle Redevelopment Plan Brooklyn, NY (July 2007) Prepared for: Prepared by: Pfizer, Inc Michael Kwartler and Associates New York, NY Architecture Planning Urban Design TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 1.1 Location 1.2 Transportation and Access 1.3 Land Use 1.4 Urban Design 2.0 LAND USE REGULATIONS AND PLANS 2.1 Zoning 2.2 PPS: Redevelopment Plan for the Broadway Triangle 2.3 Urban Renewal Area 3.0 THE PFIZER PROPERTIES REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Goals and Objectives 3.3 Overview 3.4 Land-Use and Urban Design 3.4.1 Land-Use 3.4.2.Urban Design 3.5 Regulatory Amendments 3.5.1 Zoning 3.5.2 Urban Renewal Area Plan 4.0 APPENDIX 4.1 Pfizer/Broadway Triangle Redevelopment Plan (Fig. 12-A, 12-B, 12-C, 12-D, 12-E) 4.2 Urban Renewal Plan (1989) Michael Kwartler & Associates Executive Summary Pfizer, Inc. has been an integral part of the Broadway Triangle community for over 150 years, setting the pattern for the Triangle’s development into a vibrant mixed-use district. The Pfizer/Broadway Triangle Redevelopment Plan builds on that tradition, proposing to use its sites and buildings as a catalyst for change, transforming the Triangle into a equally vibrant 21st Century mixed-use district providing a range of employment and entrepreneurial opportunities; housing choices; and shopping, recreation and community facilities for its residents and workers, that will be both attractive and sustainable. The goals of the Pfizer/Broadway Triangle Redevelopment compliment and give concrete form to Mayor Bloomberg’s strategic plan for the city: PlaNYC: A Greener Greater New York.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Response Incidents
    Emergency Response Incidents Incident Type Location Borough Utility-Water Main 136-17 72 Avenue Queens Structural-Sidewalk Collapse 927 Broadway Manhattan Utility-Other Manhattan Administration-Other Seagirt Blvd & Beach 9 Street Queens Law Enforcement-Other Brooklyn Utility-Water Main 2-17 54 Avenue Queens Fire-2nd Alarm 238 East 24 Street Manhattan Utility-Water Main 7th Avenue & West 27 Street Manhattan Fire-10-76 (Commercial High Rise Fire) 130 East 57 Street Manhattan Structural-Crane Brooklyn Fire-2nd Alarm 24 Charles Street Manhattan Fire-3rd Alarm 581 3 ave new york Structural-Collapse 55 Thompson St Manhattan Utility-Other Hylan Blvd & Arbutus Avenue Staten Island Fire-2nd Alarm 53-09 Beach Channel Drive Far Rockaway Fire-1st Alarm 151 West 100 Street Manhattan Fire-2nd Alarm 1747 West 6 Street Brooklyn Structural-Crane Brooklyn Structural-Crane 225 Park Avenue South Manhattan Utility-Gas Low Pressure Noble Avenue & Watson Avenue Bronx Page 1 of 478 09/30/2021 Emergency Response Incidents Creation Date Closed Date Latitude Longitude 01/16/2017 01:13:38 PM 40.71400364095638 -73.82998933154158 10/29/2016 12:13:31 PM 40.71442154062271 -74.00607638041981 11/22/2016 08:53:17 AM 11/14/2016 03:53:54 PM 40.71400364095638 -73.82998933154158 10/29/2016 05:35:28 PM 12/02/2016 04:40:13 PM 40.71400364095638 -73.82998933154158 11/25/2016 04:06:09 AM 40.71442154062271 -74.00607638041981 12/03/2016 04:17:30 AM 40.71442154062271 -74.00607638041981 11/26/2016 05:45:43 AM 11/18/2016 01:12:51 PM 12/14/2016 10:26:17 PM 40.71442154062271 -74.00607638041981
    [Show full text]
  • Mccarren Park Uart­ View All Monuments in NYC Parks, As Well As Temporary Public Art Installations on Our NYC Public Art Map and Guide I Map)
    BOARD MEETING AFFIRMATION OF NEW MEMBERS Chairperson Ms. Fuller requested the new members to come forward to be affirmed. Mr. Solomon Green, Ms. Dana Rachlin, Mr. Michael Gary Schlesinger ROLL CALL Chairperson Ms. Fuller requested District Manager Mr. Esposito to call the roll. He informed the Chairperson that there were 39 members present, a sufficient quorum to call the meeting to order. MOMENT OF SILENCE Chairperson Ms. Fuller called for a moment of silence dedicated to Mr. Weidberg and his family, for the passing of Mr. Weidberg’s brother. ELECTIONS At 8:00 PM, Chairperson Ms. Fuller announced that it was time for elections. She requested the Elections Committee members [Ms. Barros; Ms. Foster; Mr. Torres] to come forward. Ballots were distributed and collected. The meeting continued while the Elections Committee convened in the other room to count the ballots. The committee reported the following regarding the elections: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE POSITION CANDIDATE TALLY OF VOTES Chairperson Dealice Fuller 38 votes __________________________________________________________________________________ First Vice Chairperson Simon Weiser 23 votes. Karen Nieves 14 votes. __________________________________________________________________________________ Second Vice Chairperson Del Teague 38 votes. __________________________________________________________________________________ Third Vice Chairperson Stephen J. Weidberg 38 votes. __________________________________________________________________________________ Financial Secretary Maria Viera
    [Show full text]