Excavations at 41-49 Walmgate, York, 2000
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Nfl Releases Tight Ends and Offensive Linemen to Be Named Finalists for the ‘Nfl 100 All-Time Team’
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Alex Riethmiller – 310.840.4635 NFL – 12/9/19 [email protected] NFL RELEASES TIGHT ENDS AND OFFENSIVE LINEMEN TO BE NAMED FINALISTS FOR THE ‘NFL 100 ALL-TIME TEAM’ 18 Offensive Linemen and 5 Tight Ends to be Named to All-Time Team Episode 4 of ‘NFL 100 All-Time Team’ Airs on Friday, December 13 at 8:00 PM ET on NFL Network Following the reveal of the defensive back and specialist All-Time Team class last week, the NFL is proud to announce the 40 offensive linemen (16 offensive tackles; 15 guards; 9 centers) and 12 tight ends that are finalists for the NFL 100 All-Time Team. 39 of the 40 offensive linemen finalists have been enshrined in the Pro Football Hall of Fame. The 12 finalists at tight end include eight Pro Football Hall of Famers and combine for 711 career receiving touchdowns. Episode three will also reveal four head coaches to make the NFL 100 All-Time Team. The NFL100 All-Time Team airs every Friday at 8:00 PM ET through Week 17 of the regular season. Rich Eisen, Cris Collinsworth and Bill Belichick reveal selections by position each week, followed by a live reaction show hosted by Chris Rose immediately afterward, exclusively on NFL Network. From this group of finalists, the 26-person blue-ribbon voting panel ultimately selected seven offensive tackles, seven guards, four centers and five tight ends to the All-Time Team. The NFL 100 All-Time Team finalists at the offensive tackle position are: Player Years Played Team(s) Bob “The Boomer” Brown 1964-1968; 1969-1970; 1971- Philadelphia Eagles; Los Angeles 1973 Rams; Oakland Raiders Roosevelt Brown 1953-1965 New York Giants Lou Creekmur 1950-1959 Detroit Lions Dan Dierdorf 1971-1983 St. -
How Important Was Basing House?
How important was Basing House? A short introductory activity exploring the events and people of Basing House, Basingstoke, from its Tudor heyday in 1601 to its destruction in the Civil War in 1645. Duration: 30 minutes National Curriculum links KS2 History A local history study o A study over time tracing how several aspects of national history are reflected in the locality (this can go beyond 1066) o A study of an aspect of history or a site dating from a period beyond 1066 that is significant in the locality A study of an aspect or theme in British history that extends pupils’ chronological knowledge beyond 1066 o The changing power of monarchs o A significant turning point in British history Cross-curricular links KS2 English o Spoken language o Reading KS2 Geography o Locational knowledge o Human and physical geography Learning context Prior learning: none required. Learning objectives To learn what the local site of Basing House was like in its Tudor heyday (1601) To learn how the inhabitants of Basing House lived in 1601, and what happened to them in 1645. Learning outcomes All: will be able to investigate a primary and a secondary source to understand that Basing House is a local site at which there was a large, wealthy palace which is now in ruins. Most: will be able to construct a simple chronology of Basing House, drawing contrasts between its Tudor heyday and later destruction; understand that Basing House was an important and wealthy household. Some: will be able to critically interrogate and connect all sources to evaluate the importance of Basing House at two different time periods. -
Cambridgeshire Archaeology JIGSAW “Piecing Together Cambridgeshire’S Past
Cambridgeshire County Council JIGSAW Project Final report 2007 Cambridgeshire Archaeology JIGSAW “piecing together Cambridgeshire’s Past Final Report April 2007 Prepared By The Market Research Group (MRG), Bournemouth University, On Behalf Of Cambridgeshire County Council www.themarketresearchgroup.co.uk Page a Cambridgeshire County Council JIGSAW Project Final report 2007 Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................ 1 1.0: Background .............................................................................. 3 1.1: The Market Research Group (MRG)........................................ 3 1.2: Cambridgeshire County Council .............................................. 4 2.0: Research Aims & Objectives................................................... 6 3.0: Outline Methodology................................................................ 8 3.1: Audience Research - Existing Users ....................................... 8 3.2: Audience Research - Potential Users ...................................... 9 3.3: Audience Research – JIGSAW Focus Groups ...................... 11 4.0: Findings –Cambridgeshire Archaeology users results...... 12 5.0: Findings – Potential users or non user survey ................... 39 6.0: Findings – Castle celebration event (non users) ................ 79 7.0: Findings - Schools – qualitative results............................. 101 8.0: Findings – Focus group results.......................................... 116 8.1: Users and non users focus groups -
The Early Medieval Period, Its Main Conclusion Is They Were Compiled at Malmesbury
Early Medieval 10 Early Medieval Edited by Chris Webster from contributions by Mick Aston, Bruce Eagles, David Evans, Keith Gardner, Moira and Brian Gittos, Teresa Hall, Bill Horner, Susan Pearce, Sam Turner, Howard Williams and Barbara Yorke 10.1 Introduction raphy, as two entities: one “British” (covering most 10.1.1 Early Medieval Studies of the region in the 5th century, and only Cornwall by the end of the period), and one “Anglo-Saxon” The South West of England, and in particular the three (focusing on the Old Sarum/Salisbury area from the western counties of Cornwall, Devon and Somerset, later 5th century and covering much of the region has a long history of study of the Early Medieval by the 7th and 8th centuries). This is important, not period. This has concentrated on the perceived “gap” only because it has influenced past research questions, between the end of the Roman period and the influ- but also because this ethnic division does describe (if ence of Anglo-Saxon culture; a gap of several hundred not explain) a genuine distinction in the archaeological years in the west of the region. There has been less evidence in the earlier part of the period. Conse- emphasis on the eastern parts of the region, perhaps quently, research questions have to deal less with as they are seen as peripheral to Anglo-Saxon studies a period, than with a highly complex sequence of focused on the east of England. The region identi- different types of Early Medieval archaeology, shifting fied as the kingdom of Dumnonia has received detailed both chronologically and geographically in which issues treatment in most recent work on the subject, for of continuity and change from the Roman period, and example Pearce (1978; 2004), KR Dark (1994) and the evolution of medieval society and landscape, frame Somerset has been covered by Costen (1992) with an internally dynamic period. -
Albion PD 2012-57 Vers
HUNTINGDON ROAD/NIAB CAMBRIDGE PROJECT DESIGN FOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION HUNTINGDON ROAD/NIAB CAMBRIDGE PROJECT DESIGN FOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION Project: NBC1942 CHER event no.: ECB3788 Planning application: 07/0003/OUT Document: 2012/70 Version: 1.3 Compiled by Checked by Approved by Mike Luke Drew Shotliff Hester Cooper-Reade 20th November 2013 Produced for: CgMs Consulting Ltd Copyright Albion Archaeology 2013, all rights reserved Albion Archaeology Contents Purpose of this document 4 Key terms 5 1. INTRODUCTION 6 1.1 Project background 6 1.2 Site location, topography and geology 6 2. ARCHAEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND 8 3. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES 9 3.1 Introduction 9 3.2 Relevant national, regional and county research frameworks 9 3.3 Specific objectives 10 4. METHODOLOGIES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIELDWORK 13 4.1 Introduction 13 4.2 Provisional project programme 13 4.3 Overview of the fieldwork methodology 13 4.4 Overview of finds processing 14 4.5 Overview of environmental studies 14 4.6 Constraints on archaeological investigation 15 4.7 Feedback into and adjustment of excavation strategies 16 4.8 Monitoring and area “sign offs” 16 4.9 Landowner issues 17 4.10 Preliminary dissemination of results 17 4.11 Record checking and archive consolidation 17 4.12 Assessment and Updated Project Design 18 4.13 Analysis, publication and archiving 19 5. PROJECT COMMUNICATION, DELIVERY AND QUALITY 21 5.1 Communication 21 5.2 Delivery 22 5.3 Quality 22 6. THE PROJECT TEAM 24 6.1 Introduction to Albion Archaeology 24 6.2 Project structure and responsibilities 24 6.3 Relevant experience 24 6.4 Members of the project team 25 7. -
IN TOUCH Issue 31 Oxford Archaeology Review 2013/14 Gill Hey Visiting OA’S Excavations on the Bexhill to Hastings Link Road MESSAGE from GILL
IN TOUCH Issue 31 Oxford Archaeology Review 2013/14 Gill Hey visiting OA’s excavations on the Bexhill to Hastings Link Road MESSAGE FROM GILL Oxford Archaeology in 2014 is an organisation looking forwards and outwards. We are delighted to be launching our new strategy to take us to 2020 (see opposite), with the ambition of being the leading heritage practice focused on delivering high-quality archaeological projects, providing good value for our clients, communicating exciting and up-to-date information to the public, and being a stimulating, safe and rewarding place to work. Our vision is to be at the forefront of advancing knowledge about the past and working in partnership with others for public benefit. A key element of the strategy is communication, both externally and internally. Since March 2007, we have produced 30 in-house magazines, one every quarter in printed and digital formats, and each packed with project news, in addition to providing information for staff on employment matters. Over time, they have become more glossy, but the challenge has been deciding what to exclude, not how to fill the space. They are We also have special features which showcase five particular a testament to the huge variety of work that has been under aspects of our work over the year: our HLF community projects; way, from strategic studies and research, through an immense National Heritage Protection Projects undertaken for English diversity of fieldwork, to news on our publications. We thought Heritage; Burials Archaeology; Industrial Archaeology; and a it was time to share this little gem with you. -
Yorkshire Archaeology Today Blocks Within Thedevelopment Excavation Areas Seto Theproject
Great Expectations for the Hungate Excavation The Hungate excavation: seven years in pre-production, five years in production and a Above: View of the further two years in post-production. The Hungate excavation has its own financiers, Hungate excavations its executives, its own director, its producers, its technical staff, its actors, a potential looking south-east from cast of 1000s and possibly even its own villains, here and there. Sounds more like a Stonebow Hollywood blockbuster than a large-scale urban excavation! So why the film analogy? Well, the Hungate being carried out as a scheme of archaeological excavations are the largest in York for 25 mitigation due to the below-ground years and during the intervening quarter of implications that the new development may a century the profile of archaeology has have on the archaeology of the area. As the changed considerably. The rise of popular development has six phases of construction, TV programmes such as Time Team, the five of which should be in place by 2012, the proliferation of archaeology/history Hungate excavations will take place over the documentaries and TV channels, the growth next five years, with the work in the Block H in archaeology magazines, the number of area to be completed by 2011. The Block H Peter Connelly archaeologists that pop up on the silver screen area will take up to five years to excavate as all and in computer games and, of course, instant of the archaeology has to be removed prior access to archaeological information through to the start of the building development, the internet have all fuelled the demand upwards of 2.5m deep in stratigraphy in for participation, access to and educational places, and it has to be completed by the end involvement in archaeology. -
SAA Archaeological Record Anna Marie Prentiss (ISSN 1532-7299) Is Published five Times a Year and Is Edited by Anna Marie Prentiss
Archaeological Practice on Reality Television SOCIETY FOR AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGY the SAAarchaeologicalrecord The Magazine of the Society for American Archaeology Volume 15, No. 2 March 2015 Editor’s Corner 2 Anna Marie Prentiss From the President 3 Jeffrey H. Altschul, RPA SAA and Open Access—The Financial Implications 4 Jim Bruseth Exploring Open Access for SAA Publications 5 Sarah Whitcher Kansa and Carrie Dennett Volunteer Profile : Kirk French 9 ARCHAEOLOGICAL PRACTICE ON REALITY TELEVISION Reality Television and the Portrayal of Archaeological 10 Sarah A. Herr Practice: Challenges and Opportunities Digging for Ratings Gold: American Digger and the 12 Eduardo Pagán Challenge of Sustainability for Cable TV Interview with John Francis on National Geographic 18 Sarah A. Herr and Archaeology Programming Time Team America: Archaeology as a Gateway 21 Meg Watters to Science : Engaging and Educating the Publi c Beyond “Nectar” and “Juice” : Creating a Preservation 26 Jeffery Hanson Ethic through Reality TV Reality Television and Metal Detecting : Let’s Be Part of 30 Giovanna M. Peebles the Solution and Not Add to the Problem Metal Detecting as a Preservation and Community 35 Matthew Reeves Building Tool : Montpelier’s Metal Detecting Programs Going Around (or Beyond) Major TV : Other Media 38 Richard Pettigrew Options to Reach the Public Erratum In the Acknowledgements section of “Ho’eexokre ‘Eyookuuka’ro ‘We’re Working with Each Other”: The Pimu Catalina Island Proj - ect” Vol. 15(1):28, an important supporter was left out and should be disclosed. On the cover: Time Team America camera - Acknowledgments. The 2012 Pimu Catalina Island Archaeology man filming excavations for the episode "The Field School was also supported by the Institute for Field Research Search for Josiah Henson." Image courtesy of (IFR). -
The Time Team Guide to the History of Britain Free Download
THE TIME TEAM GUIDE TO THE HISTORY OF BRITAIN FREE DOWNLOAD Tim Taylor | 320 pages | 05 Jul 2010 | Transworld Publishers Ltd | 9781905026708 | English | London, United Kingdom The Time Team Guide to the History of Britain Goodreads is the world's largest site for readers with over 50 million reviews. I feel really, really angry about it," he told British Archaeology magazine. This book will give you and your family a clear and concise view of what happened when, and why. Available in shop from just two hours, subject to availability. The English and their History. A further hundred activities relating to Roman history were carried out by schools and other institutions around the UK. More Details This item can be requested from the shops shown below. Of course, as a Time Team book, much is made of archaeological evidence and the Team digs feature in each era. Tracy Borman. Not you? BUT on the other side there is the awesome design and presentation of dozens of wide lens photographs of the archeological sites and a similar number of the awesomely detailed pictures Victor Ambrose the programs historical painter contributed to the format which make the book at least visually a proper feast for the eyes and kind of a nice coffee table book to thumb through for the vaguely historically interested person, even when the content of historical information or TV program trivia is a bit underwhelming. Which came first, the Bronze Age or the Stone Age? Alison Weir. Time Team usually does not carry out excavations for these programmes, but may contribute a reconstruction. -
MINT YARD York Conservation Management Plan
MINT YARD York Conservation Management Plan FINAL DRAFT Simpson & Brown Architects With Addyman Archaeology August 2012 Contents Page 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 2.0 INTRODUCTION 11 2.1 Objectives of the Conservation Plan ...............................................................................11 2.2 Study Area ..........................................................................................................................11 2.3 Heritage Designations.......................................................................................................13 2.4 Structure of the Report......................................................................................................14 2.5 Adoption & Review...........................................................................................................15 2.6 Other Studies......................................................................................................................15 2.7 Limitations..........................................................................................................................15 2.8 Orientation..........................................................................................................................15 2.9 Project Team .......................................................................................................................15 2.10 Acknowledgements...........................................................................................................16 2.11 Abbreviations and Definitions.........................................................................................16 -
Groundwell Ridge Swindon Wiltshire
GROUNDWELL RIDGE SWINDON WILTSHIRE ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVALUATION CA PROJECT: 1566 CA REPORT: 03104 Author: Mark Brett Approved: Neil Holbrook Signed: ……………………………………………………………. Issue: 01 Date: 6th November 2003 This report is confidential to the client. Cotswold Archaeology accepts no responsibility or liability to any third party to whom this report, or any part of it, is made known. Any such party relies upon this report entirely at their own risk. No part of this report may be reproduced by any means without permission. © Cotswold Archaeology Headquarters Building, Kemble Business Park, Cirencester, Gloucestershire, GL7 6BQ Tel. 01285 771022 Fax. 01285 771033 E-mail: [email protected] Groundwell Ridge, Swindon, Wiltshire: Archaeological Evaluation ©Cotswold Archaeology SUMMARY........................................................................................................................3 1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 4 The site ................................................................................................................ 4 Archaeological background.................................................................................. 5 Archaeological objectives .................................................................................... 6 Methodology ........................................................................................................ 8 2. RESULTS.................................................................................................................. -
Reports from the Environmental Archaeology Unit, York 2000/04, 51 Pp
Reports from the Environmental Archaeology Unit, York 2000/04, 51 pp. Assessment of biological remains from 41-49 Walmgate York (site code 1999.941) by Cluny Johnstone, John Carrott, Allan Hall, Harry Kenward and Darren Worthy Summary Excavations carried out at 41-49 Walmgate, York, as part of the Time Team Live programme, yielded a total of 34 samples and a single box of bone and shell. Of the samples, 22 (SRS and BS samples) were processed on site and eight GBA samples were processed at the EAU. Analysis was limited to Anglo- Scandinavian and medieval deposits with secure dating evidence. Preservation of biological remains within these deposits was exceptional in a number of ways, particularly the presence of dried (and not rewetted) plant remains and charred insects in association with waterlogged material. The range of plant and insect species was very similar to that observed in Anglo-Scandinavian deposits in other areas of York. The species present were indicative of the interiors of buildings, including moist floor environments and possibly also thatch. Dyeplants and invertebrates associated with wool were present in several deposits, as in many Anglo-Scandinavian deposits from York, suggesting textile processing in the vicinity. The shell and vertebrate assemblages, whilst being well preserved, were too small to provide any useful insights into the economy of the site, other than that they mainly represent food waste. The exceptional preservation of all bioarchaeological remains from this site and the quantity of information gained from such a small scale intervention, has once again highlighted the potential of deposits in this area for yielding a wealth of information on the environment and economy of Anglo- Scandinavian York.