DOCSLIB.ORG

(Branodunum), Norfolk Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Results

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(Branodunum), Norfolk Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Results making sense of heritage Brancaster Roman Fort, (Branodunum), Norfolk Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Results Ref: 85209.01 September 2014 BRANCASTER ROMAN FORT (BRANODUNUM), NORFOLK Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Results Prepared for: Videotext Communications Ltd 11 St Andrews Crescent CARDIFF CF10 3DB by Wessex Archaeology Portway House Old Sarum Park SALISBURY Wiltshire SP4 6EB Report reference: 82509.01 Scheduled Ancient Monument number (old county style) NF 208 (The National Heritage List for England entry 1003983) September 2014 © Wessex Archaeology Limited 2014 all rights reserved Registered Charity in England and Wales, No. 287786. In Scotland, Scottish Charity No. SC042630 Brancaster Roman Fort, Norfolk Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Results DISCLAIMER THE MATERIAL CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT WAS DESIGNED AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF A REPORT TO AN INDIVIDUAL CLIENT AND WAS PREPARED SOLELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THAT CLIENT. THE MATERIAL CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT DOES NOT NECESSARILY STAND ON ITS OWN AND IS NOT INTENDED TO NOR SHOULD IT BE RELIED UPON BY ANY THIRD PARTY. TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW WESSEX ARCHAEOLOGY WILL NOT BE LIABLE BY REASON OF BREACH OF CONTRACT NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE (WHETHER DIRECT INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL) OCCASIONED TO ANY PERSON ACTING OR OMITTING TO ACT OR REFRAINING FROM ACTING IN RELIANCE UPON THE MATERIAL CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT ARISING FROM OR CONNECTED WITH ANY ERROR OR OMISSION IN THE MATERIAL CONTAINED IN THE REPORT. LOSS OR DAMAGE AS REFERRED TO ABOVE SHALL BE DEEMED TO INCLUDE, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, ANY LOSS OF PROFITS OR ANTICIPATED PROFITS DAMAGE TO REPUTATION OR GOODWILL LOSS OF BUSINESS OR ANTICIPATED BUSINESS DAMAGES COSTS EXPENSES INCURRED OR PAYABLE TO ANY THIRD PARTY (IN ALL CASES WHETHER DIRECT INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL) OR ANY OTHER DIRECT INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL LOSS OR DAMAGE QUALITY ASSURANCE SITE CODE 85209 ACCESSION CODE 2012.240 CLIENT CODE PLANNING APPLICATION REF. - NGR 578209, 344020 VERSION STATUS* PREPARED APPROVED APPROVER’S DATE FILE BY BY SIGNATURE 1 I NB LNM 02/09/14 X:\PROJECTS\85209\POST EX\REPORT\85209_BRANCASTER ROMAN FORT_REPORT V1.DOC * I= Internal Draft E= External Draft F= Final WA Project No. 85209 ii Brancaster Roman Fort, Norfolk Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Results BRANCASTER ROMAN FORT (BRANODUNUM), NORFOLK Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Results Contents Summary ............................................................................................................ vi Acknowledgements ............................................................................................ vii 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................1 1.1 Project Background .....................................................................................1 1.2 The Site, location and geology ....................................................................1 1.3 Archaeological Background and Previous Archaeological Work ................. 2 2 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES ...................................................................................3 3 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................3 3.1 Geophysical Survey.....................................................................................3 3.2 Evaluation Trenches ....................................................................................4 3.3 Copyright .....................................................................................................4 4 RESULTS ............................................................................................................5 4.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................5 4.2 Geophysical Results ....................................................................................5 4.3 Conclusions .................................................................................................8 4.4 Evaluation Trenches ....................................................................................8 5 FINDS ................................................................................................................14 5.1 Introduction ................................................................................................14 5.2 Pottery .......................................................................................................15 5.3 Ceramic Building Material ..........................................................................20 5.4 Mortar, opus signinum and wall plaster .....................................................21 5.5 Stone and Worked Flint .............................................................................22 5.6 Glass .........................................................................................................22 5.7 Metalworking debris ...................................................................................22 5.8 Coins .........................................................................................................22 5.9 Metalwork ..................................................................................................24 5.10 Worked Bone .............................................................................................26 5.11 Human Bone..............................................................................................26 5.12 Animal Bone ..............................................................................................27 5.13 Marine Shell...............................................................................................29 6 PALAEO-ENVIRONMENTAL SUMMARY ........................................................30 6.1 Introduction ................................................................................................30 6.2 Charred and mineralised plant remains .....................................................31 6.3 Wood Charcoal ..........................................................................................32 6.4 Land and aquatic molluscs and marine shells ...........................................32 6.5 Small animal and fish bones......................................................................33 6.6 Foraminifera ..............................................................................................33 7 DISCUSSION.....................................................................................................33 7.1 Introduction ................................................................................................33 7.2 Evidence for an earlier fort (Trench 5 and Trench 3) .................................34 7.3 The eastern vicus (Trench 3) .....................................................................34 7.4 The main fort .............................................................................................35 WA Project No. 85209 iii Brancaster Roman Fort, Norfolk Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Results 8 POTENTIAL AND FURTHER RECOMMENDATIONS .....................................37 8.1 Potential.....................................................................................................37 8.2 Proposals...................................................................................................39 9 ARCHIVE ...........................................................................................................39 10 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................41 10.1 Bibliography ...............................................................................................41 10.2 Online resources .......................................................................................46 APPENDIX 1: TRENCH SUMMARIES .......................................................................47 APPENDIX 2: SUPPLEMENTARY FINDS INFORMATION ......................................54 Table 1: Finds totals by material type and by trench (number / weight in grammes) ..................................................................................................54 Table 2: Pottery assemblage by trench .............................................................55 Table 3: Pottery quantification by fabric type .....................................................56 Table 4: Pottery fabric concordance for greywares ...........................................56 Table 5: Pottery vessel forms by fabric ..............................................................58 Table 6: Trench 1 pottery fabrics .......................................................................59 Table 7: Trench 1 pottery forms by fabric ..........................................................60 Table 8: Trench 2 pottery fabrics .......................................................................61 Table 9: Trench 2 pottery forms by fabric ..........................................................61 Table 10: Trench 3 pottery fabrics .....................................................................62 Table 11: Trench 3 pottery forms by fabric ........................................................62 Table 12: Trench 4 pottery fabrics .....................................................................63 Table 12: Trench 4 pottery forms by fabric ........................................................63
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Research Framework Revised.Vp
    Frontispiece: the Norfolk Rapid Coastal Zone Assessment Survey team recording timbers and ballast from the wreck of The Sheraton on Hunstanton beach, with Hunstanton cliffs and lighthouse in the background. Photo: David Robertson, copyright NAU Archaeology Research and Archaeology Revisited: a revised framework for the East of England edited by Maria Medlycott East Anglian Archaeology Occasional Paper No.24, 2011 ALGAO East of England EAST ANGLIAN ARCHAEOLOGY OCCASIONAL PAPER NO.24 Published by Association of Local Government Archaeological Officers East of England http://www.algao.org.uk/cttees/Regions Editor: David Gurney EAA Managing Editor: Jenny Glazebrook Editorial Board: Brian Ayers, Director, The Butrint Foundation Owen Bedwin, Head of Historic Environment, Essex County Council Stewart Bryant, Head of Historic Environment, Hertfordshire County Council Will Fletcher, English Heritage Kasia Gdaniec, Historic Environment, Cambridgeshire County Council David Gurney, Historic Environment Manager, Norfolk County Council Debbie Priddy, English Heritage Adrian Tindall, Archaeological Consultant Keith Wade, Archaeological Service Manager, Suffolk County Council Set in Times Roman by Jenny Glazebrook using Corel Ventura™ Printed by Henry Ling Limited, The Dorset Press © ALGAO East of England ISBN 978 0 9510695 6 1 This Research Framework was published with the aid of funding from English Heritage East Anglian Archaeology was established in 1975 by the Scole Committee for Archaeology in East Anglia. The scope of the series expanded to include all six eastern counties and responsi- bility for publication passed in 2002 to the Association of Local Government Archaeological Officers, East of England (ALGAO East). Cover illustration: The excavation of prehistoric burial monuments at Hanson’s Needingworth Quarry at Over, Cambridgeshire, by Cambridge Archaeological Unit in 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Nfl Releases Tight Ends and Offensive Linemen to Be Named Finalists for the ‘Nfl 100 All-Time Team’
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Alex Riethmiller – 310.840.4635 NFL – 12/9/19 [email protected] NFL RELEASES TIGHT ENDS AND OFFENSIVE LINEMEN TO BE NAMED FINALISTS FOR THE ‘NFL 100 ALL-TIME TEAM’ 18 Offensive Linemen and 5 Tight Ends to be Named to All-Time Team Episode 4 of ‘NFL 100 All-Time Team’ Airs on Friday, December 13 at 8:00 PM ET on NFL Network Following the reveal of the defensive back and specialist All-Time Team class last week, the NFL is proud to announce the 40 offensive linemen (16 offensive tackles; 15 guards; 9 centers) and 12 tight ends that are finalists for the NFL 100 All-Time Team. 39 of the 40 offensive linemen finalists have been enshrined in the Pro Football Hall of Fame. The 12 finalists at tight end include eight Pro Football Hall of Famers and combine for 711 career receiving touchdowns. Episode three will also reveal four head coaches to make the NFL 100 All-Time Team. The NFL100 All-Time Team airs every Friday at 8:00 PM ET through Week 17 of the regular season. Rich Eisen, Cris Collinsworth and Bill Belichick reveal selections by position each week, followed by a live reaction show hosted by Chris Rose immediately afterward, exclusively on NFL Network. From this group of finalists, the 26-person blue-ribbon voting panel ultimately selected seven offensive tackles, seven guards, four centers and five tight ends to the All-Time Team. The NFL 100 All-Time Team finalists at the offensive tackle position are: Player Years Played Team(s) Bob “The Boomer” Brown 1964-1968; 1969-1970; 1971- Philadelphia Eagles; Los Angeles 1973 Rams; Oakland Raiders Roosevelt Brown 1953-1965 New York Giants Lou Creekmur 1950-1959 Detroit Lions Dan Dierdorf 1971-1983 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating the Origins of Great Easton, Leicestershire: Commumity Archaeology Meets the ‘Big Dig’
    INVESTIGATING THE ORIGINS OF GREAT EASTON, LEICESTERSHIRE: COMMUMITY ARCHAEOLOGY MEETS THE ‘BIG DIG’. Nicholas J. Cooper and Vicki Score On Sunday June 22nd 2003, the inhabitants of Great Easton in the Welland Valley, in southeast Leicestershire, together with professional archaeologists from the University of Leicester and Channel 4’s Time Team, undertook a one-day field work investigation to try to establish the origins of their village and to chart its subsequent development. In conjunction with geophysical survey, a total of 41 metre-square test pits and two machine-excavated trenches were opened up across the village and dug to a maximum depth of 0.6m or until archaeology or natural was encountered (Fig. 1). Pits 14, 23, 35 & 44 were not excavated. Although most of the archaeological features recorded were modern (with the notable exceptions of a late Roman or Early Anglo-Saxon cobbled surface from Test Pit 3 and medieval plot boundaries in Trench 40) the artefactual material from the investigation has added considerably to the existing body of knowledge gathered by the Great Easton Fieldwork Group (Burningham and Wallis 2004, Fig. 1) over the last 20 years. This, along with more recent developer-funded opportunities, allows us to trace this focus of settlement back to the Roman period or later Iron Age (Fig. 2). Analysis of the pottery assemblage and its distribution has confirmed and complemented the findings of earlier work, which suggested the existence of a Roman period settlement (probably with an Iron Age antecedent), in the north- eastern part of the village, on higher ground around the church and immediately to the north in Lount’s Crescent.
    [Show full text]
  • How Important Was Basing House?
    How important was Basing House? A short introductory activity exploring the events and people of Basing House, Basingstoke, from its Tudor heyday in 1601 to its destruction in the Civil War in 1645. Duration: 30 minutes National Curriculum links KS2 History A local history study o A study over time tracing how several aspects of national history are reflected in the locality (this can go beyond 1066) o A study of an aspect of history or a site dating from a period beyond 1066 that is significant in the locality A study of an aspect or theme in British history that extends pupils’ chronological knowledge beyond 1066 o The changing power of monarchs o A significant turning point in British history Cross-curricular links KS2 English o Spoken language o Reading KS2 Geography o Locational knowledge o Human and physical geography Learning context Prior learning: none required. Learning objectives To learn what the local site of Basing House was like in its Tudor heyday (1601) To learn how the inhabitants of Basing House lived in 1601, and what happened to them in 1645. Learning outcomes All: will be able to investigate a primary and a secondary source to understand that Basing House is a local site at which there was a large, wealthy palace which is now in ruins. Most: will be able to construct a simple chronology of Basing House, drawing contrasts between its Tudor heyday and later destruction; understand that Basing House was an important and wealthy household. Some: will be able to critically interrogate and connect all sources to evaluate the importance of Basing House at two different time periods.
    [Show full text]
  • Mick Aston Archaeology Fund Supported by Historic England and Cadw
    Mick Aston Archaeology Fund Supported by Historic England and Cadw Mick Aston’s passion for involving people in archaeology is reflected in the Mick Aston Archaeology Fund. His determination to make archaeology publicly accessible was realised through his teaching, work on Time Team, and advocating community projects. The Mick Aston Archaeology Fund is therefore intended to encourage voluntary effort in making original contributions to the study and care of the historic environment. Please note that the Mick Aston Archaeology Fund is currently open to applicants carrying out work in England and Wales only. Historic Scotland run a similar scheme for projects in Scotland and details can be found at: http://www.historic-scotland.gov.uk/index/heritage/grants/grants-voluntary-sector- funding.htm. How does the Mick Aston Archaeology Fund work? Voluntary groups and societies, but also individuals, are challenged to put forward proposals for innovative projects that will say something new about the history and archaeology of local surroundings, and thus inform their future care. Proposals will be judged by a panel on their intrinsic quality, and evidence of capacity to see them through successfully. What is the Mick Aston Archaeology Fund panel looking for? First and foremost, the panel is looking for original research. Awards can be to support new work, or to support the completion of research already in progress, for example by paying for a specific piece of analysis or equipment. Projects which work with young people or encourage their participation are especially encouraged. What can funding be used for? In principle, almost anything that is directly related to the actual undertaking of a project.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern 50 Results 2020 50 Miles Position Time Team Number Team Name Team Location District County 1 13:34 6 Ten Gallon Dixie D
    Southern 50 Results 2020 50 miles Position Time Team Team Name Team Location District County Number 1 13:34 6 Ten Gallon Dixie Didcot ESU Thames Ridge Oxfordshire 2 13:57 7 Phoenix Flyers 201st Islington North London GLN 3 19:46 12 Pan Galactic Gargle Blasters Hitchhikers ESU Cambridge Cambridgeshire 4 21:45 1 Put Them On The Pile Hatters ESU Southgate GLN Not classified 2 SSESU St Saviour’s ESU Wimbledon & Wandle GLSW Not classified 3 WWKD WWKD Royal Kingston GLSW Not classified 5 Tigger Roo and Eeyore Hatters ESU Southgate GLN Not classified 8 Better Late Than Never Various Fleet, Odiham, Abingdon Hampshire/Oxfordshire Ten Gallon Dixie: 50 Miles Challenge Shield (presented to the fastest team and overall winners) Ten Gallon Dixie: Sharon Blower Trophy (Presented to the fastest mixed team) Phoenix Flyers: Robert Walters Trophy (Presented to the overall runners up) Put Them On The Pile: Grove Trophy (Presented to the fastest team whose average age is 33 years (whole years) per walker) 50 kms 1 07:14 57 22nd Southgate 22nd Southgate Southgate GLN 2 08:50 44 Hobgoblin Hobgoblin Network Basildon Essex 3 09:08 29 10 Litre Dixie Hornchurch Network Hornchurch GLNE 4 09:18 58 Phoenix Flyers Too 201st Islington North London GLN 5 09:33 30 Henlow Striders Henlow Clifton Biggleswade & District Bedfordshire 6 09:41 55 Team Hellfire 1st Salter Street West Warwickshire Warwickshire 7 09:53 56 Tesco Antibacterial Handwash Thames Ridge Network Thames Ridge Oxfordshire 8 10:13 48 Yeah Nah Yeah Nah Hatters ESU Southgate GLN 9 10:22 53 1st Runwell Overtakers
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Protocol for Homeless Young People (16-17 Years Old) Flow Chart
    Joint protocol for Homeless Young People (16-17 years old) Flow chart Young person or agency contacts Children and Families Young person contacts LHA (If out of hours, EDT will support and refer to day time team for next working (LHA to explore prevention options) day action) LHA confirm Initial assessment/enquiries made. If leaving care criteria applies decision in writing Are they homeless? No to C&F No Initial assessment/enquiries made. Yes Early Help Are they homeless? Complete MARF and send to Arrange joint assessment for 16 & 17 [email protected] year olds within 10 days of initial and request joint Yes referral or sooner assessment Information Are they a CIN? Complete a referral C&F referral if advice and S20 form and send to LHA necessary for joint assessment guidance Joint assessment LHA to provide No Yes interview temporary accommodation pending joint assessment C&F to provide temporary C&F to secure housing Yes No LHA duty to investigate and accommodation if and support. Placement S20 duty? continue to explore prevention necessary pending joint and care plan to be options assessment completed S17 duty? Is a full housing duty owed? A&LCT provides or funds accommodation or placement to 18. Placement Yes No No Yes and care plan to be completed Consider Early Help C&F to provide Offer of supported accommodation and other universal Information advice appropriate support or settled accommodation with information, advice and guidance and advise LHA floating support and guidance Primary responsibility rests with A&LCT. A&LCT Pathway plan prior to 18th birthday may seek advice from to consider whether joint LHA if no suitable assessment required accommodation available Responsibility Key C&F A&LCT = Asylum and Leaving Care Team LHA = Local Housing Authority LHA C&F = Children and Families EDT = Emergency Duty Team Joint.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridgeshire Archaeology JIGSAW “Piecing Together Cambridgeshire’S Past
    Cambridgeshire County Council JIGSAW Project Final report 2007 Cambridgeshire Archaeology JIGSAW “piecing together Cambridgeshire’s Past Final Report April 2007 Prepared By The Market Research Group (MRG), Bournemouth University, On Behalf Of Cambridgeshire County Council www.themarketresearchgroup.co.uk Page a Cambridgeshire County Council JIGSAW Project Final report 2007 Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................ 1 1.0: Background .............................................................................. 3 1.1: The Market Research Group (MRG)........................................ 3 1.2: Cambridgeshire County Council .............................................. 4 2.0: Research Aims & Objectives................................................... 6 3.0: Outline Methodology................................................................ 8 3.1: Audience Research - Existing Users ....................................... 8 3.2: Audience Research - Potential Users ...................................... 9 3.3: Audience Research – JIGSAW Focus Groups ...................... 11 4.0: Findings –Cambridgeshire Archaeology users results...... 12 5.0: Findings – Potential users or non user survey ................... 39 6.0: Findings – Castle celebration event (non users) ................ 79 7.0: Findings - Schools – qualitative results............................. 101 8.0: Findings – Focus group results.......................................... 116 8.1: Users and non users focus groups
    [Show full text]
  • Bucks Local History Network
    BUCKS LOCAL HISTORY NETWORK ANNUAL CONFERENCE AND FAIR 2016 – 1 Oct Saturday AYLESBURY - DISTRICT COUNCIL OFFICES 6 lectures and displays by local groups first lecture 10.0 finish 4.30 BUCKINGHAMSHIRE’S TIME TEAM -Recent strides in the County’s Archaeology HUMAN ACTIVITY IN THE BUCKS MIDDLE THAMES FROM 10,000BC TO ROMAN TIMES. THE EVIDENCE OF KINGSMEAD QUARRY HORTON Alistair Barclay Wessex Archaeology THE EVOLUTION OF THE LANDSCAPE IN N. BUCKS: THE EVIDENCE FROM BROUGHTON Rob Atkins, Museum of London formerly of Oxford Archaeology RESEARCHING THE IRON AGE AND ROMAN LANDSCAPES AROUND AYLESBURY Sandy Kidd, Principal Archaeology Adviser - Greater London and Eliza Alquassar, County Archaeology Officer and Assistant Inspector of Ancient Monuments, Historic England. SETTLEMENT IN BUCKINGHAMSHIRE IN THE SAXON PERIOD Mike Farley, Former County Archaeologist THE SAXON AND MEDIEVAL HISTORY OF WYCOMBE HEATH, PENN, COMMON AND KINGS WOODS Miles Green, Historian of Penn THE CONTEXT OF THE LENBOROUGH HOARD Susan Fern Hon Curator of the Old Gaol Museum, formerly numismatist at National Museum of Wales BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO THE THEMES OF THE DAY FIRST THREE TALKS IN THE MORNING & SECOND THREE IN THE AFTERNOON At Horton, in the south, excavations have yielded a stone axe head, used by Neanderthal man, dating from approximately 300, 000 years ago. They have also found some of two of the five nationally known houses of early Neolithic man. At Broughton in the north, as at Horton, the changing use of the area has been revealed in extensive excavations. Here 19 middle iron age round houses have been discovered. Cremation remains of a late iron age date show that the north of the county was then ‘politically’ linked to the Chilterns.
    [Show full text]
  • The Early Medieval Period, Its Main Conclusion Is They Were Compiled at Malmesbury
    Early Medieval 10 Early Medieval Edited by Chris Webster from contributions by Mick Aston, Bruce Eagles, David Evans, Keith Gardner, Moira and Brian Gittos, Teresa Hall, Bill Horner, Susan Pearce, Sam Turner, Howard Williams and Barbara Yorke 10.1 Introduction raphy, as two entities: one “British” (covering most 10.1.1 Early Medieval Studies of the region in the 5th century, and only Cornwall by the end of the period), and one “Anglo-Saxon” The South West of England, and in particular the three (focusing on the Old Sarum/Salisbury area from the western counties of Cornwall, Devon and Somerset, later 5th century and covering much of the region has a long history of study of the Early Medieval by the 7th and 8th centuries). This is important, not period. This has concentrated on the perceived “gap” only because it has influenced past research questions, between the end of the Roman period and the influ- but also because this ethnic division does describe (if ence of Anglo-Saxon culture; a gap of several hundred not explain) a genuine distinction in the archaeological years in the west of the region. There has been less evidence in the earlier part of the period. Conse- emphasis on the eastern parts of the region, perhaps quently, research questions have to deal less with as they are seen as peripheral to Anglo-Saxon studies a period, than with a highly complex sequence of focused on the east of England. The region identi- different types of Early Medieval archaeology, shifting fied as the kingdom of Dumnonia has received detailed both chronologically and geographically in which issues treatment in most recent work on the subject, for of continuity and change from the Roman period, and example Pearce (1978; 2004), KR Dark (1994) and the evolution of medieval society and landscape, frame Somerset has been covered by Costen (1992) with an internally dynamic period.
    [Show full text]
  • Albion PD 2012-57 Vers
    HUNTINGDON ROAD/NIAB CAMBRIDGE PROJECT DESIGN FOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION HUNTINGDON ROAD/NIAB CAMBRIDGE PROJECT DESIGN FOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION Project: NBC1942 CHER event no.: ECB3788 Planning application: 07/0003/OUT Document: 2012/70 Version: 1.3 Compiled by Checked by Approved by Mike Luke Drew Shotliff Hester Cooper-Reade 20th November 2013 Produced for: CgMs Consulting Ltd Copyright Albion Archaeology 2013, all rights reserved Albion Archaeology Contents Purpose of this document 4 Key terms 5 1. INTRODUCTION 6 1.1 Project background 6 1.2 Site location, topography and geology 6 2. ARCHAEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND 8 3. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES 9 3.1 Introduction 9 3.2 Relevant national, regional and county research frameworks 9 3.3 Specific objectives 10 4. METHODOLOGIES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIELDWORK 13 4.1 Introduction 13 4.2 Provisional project programme 13 4.3 Overview of the fieldwork methodology 13 4.4 Overview of finds processing 14 4.5 Overview of environmental studies 14 4.6 Constraints on archaeological investigation 15 4.7 Feedback into and adjustment of excavation strategies 16 4.8 Monitoring and area “sign offs” 16 4.9 Landowner issues 17 4.10 Preliminary dissemination of results 17 4.11 Record checking and archive consolidation 17 4.12 Assessment and Updated Project Design 18 4.13 Analysis, publication and archiving 19 5. PROJECT COMMUNICATION, DELIVERY AND QUALITY 21 5.1 Communication 21 5.2 Delivery 22 5.3 Quality 22 6. THE PROJECT TEAM 24 6.1 Introduction to Albion Archaeology 24 6.2 Project structure and responsibilities 24 6.3 Relevant experience 24 6.4 Members of the project team 25 7.
    [Show full text]
  • The Time Team Guide to the History of Britain Free
    FREE THE TIME TEAM GUIDE TO THE HISTORY OF BRITAIN PDF Tim Taylor | 320 pages | 05 Jul 2010 | Transworld Publishers Ltd | 9781905026708 | English | London, United Kingdom The Time Team Guide to the History of Britain by Tim Taylor Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Want to Read saving…. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Other editions. Enlarge cover. Error rating book. Refresh and try again. Open Preview See a Problem? Details if other :. Thanks for telling us about the problem. Return to Book Page. We all know that the Battle of Hastings was fought inLondon's 'one big burning blaze' tore through the capital in and that Britain declared war on Nazi Germany inbut many of us remember the most important moments in our history by the folk stories which are attached to them. So we remember Henry VIII for his wives rather than the Reformation The Time Team Guide to the History of Britain Charles We all know that the Battle of Hastings was fought inLondon's 'one big burning blaze' tore through the capital in and that Britain declared war on Nazi Germany inbut many of us remember the most important moments in our history by the folk stories which are attached to them. But if we set aside these stories, do we really know what happened when, and why it's so important? Which came first, the Bronze Age or the Stone Age? Why did the Romans play such a significant role in our past? And how did a nation as small as Britain come to command such a vast empire? Here, Tim Taylor and the team of expert historians behind Channel 4's Time Team, answer these questions and many more, cataloguing British history in a way that is accessible to all.
    [Show full text]