DOCSLIB.ORG

Cadastral Data Content Standard for the National Spatial Data Infrastructure

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cadastral Data Content Standard for the National Spatial Data Infrastructure Cadastral Data Content Standard for the National Spatial Data Infrastructure Cadastral Subcommittee Federal Geographic Data Committee December 1996 Federal Geographic Data Committee Department of Agriculture • Department of Commerce • Department of Defense • Department of Energy Department of Housing and Urban Development • Department of the Interior • Department of State Department of Transportation • Environmental Protection Agency Federal Emergency Management Agency • Library of Congress National Aeronautics and Space Administration • National Archives and Records Administration Tennessee Valley Authority Federal Geographic Data Committee Established by Office of Management and Budget Circular A-16, the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) promotes the coordinated development, use, sharing, and dissemination of geographic data. The FGDC is composed of representatives from the Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Energy, Housing and Urban Development, the Interior, State, and Transportation; the Environmental Protection Agency; the Federal Emergency Management Agency; the Library of Congress; the National Aeronautics and Space Administration; the National Archives and Records Administration; and the Tennessee Valley Authority. Additional Federal agencies participate on FGDC subcommittees and working groups. The Department of the Interior chairs the committee. FGDC subcommittees work on issues related to data categories coordinated under the circular. Subcommittees establish and implement standards for data content, quality, and transfer; encourage the exchange of information and the transfer of data; and organize the collection of geographic data to reduce duplication of effort. Working groups are established for issues that transcend data categories. For more information about the committee, or to be added to the committee's newsletter mailing list, please contact: Federal Geographic Data Committee Secretariat c/o U.S. Geological Survey 590 National Center Reston, Virginia 22092 Telephone: (703) 648-5514 Facsimile: (703) 648-5755 Internet (electronic mail): [email protected] Anonymous FTP: ftp://www.fgdc.gov/pub/gdc/ World Wide Web: http://www.fgdc.gov/fgdc.html ii Preface This document was prepared using WordPerfect 6.0. If you obtained this copy digitally and are working under a different wordprocessor or a different version of WordPerfect, you may experience format differences or page numbering differences. Some printers may also create differences in microspacing, which can lead to formatting and page break discrepancies. The Subcommittee on Cadastral Data thanks the agencies and individuals that contributed to the content of this standard. iii Cadastral Data Content Standard for the National Spatial Data Infrastructure - December 1996 Table of Contents Table of Contents Preface Introduction 1. Introduction .........................................................1 1.1 Mission and Goals of Cadastral Data Content Standard ........................ 2 1.2 Relationship to Existing Standards ........................................3 1.3 Description of Standard ................................................3 1.4 Applicability and Intended Uses of Standard .................................4 1.5 Standard Development Procedures ........................................5 1.5.1 Participants ....................................................5 1.5.2 Comments and Reviews ...........................................6 1.6 Maintenance of Standard ................................................6 Diagram Conventions 2. Introduction ..........................................................8 2.1 Reading the Diagrams ..................................................8 2.1.1 Entities .........................................................8 2.1.2 Associations .....................................................8 2.1.3 Cardinality .....................................................10 2.2 Attributes ..........................................................12 Entities and Attributes 3. Introduction ........................................................14 3.1 Entity Relationship Diagram ............................................15 3.2 Entity and Attribute Definitions ..........................................16 AGENT ...........................................................17 AGENT ADDRESS ..................................................18 CIRCULAR CURVE .................................................19 CORNER ..........................................................21 CORNER POINT ....................................................22 CORNER POINT MEASURED COORDINATE ............................24 INDIVIDUAL ......................................................25 LEGAL AREA CORNER ..............................................26 LEGAL AREA DESCRIPTION .........................................27 LEGAL AREA RECORD BOUNDARY ..................................28 ORGANIZATION ...................................................29 OTHER CURVE ....................................................30 OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF BLOCK ................................31 OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF BLOCK PARCEL ........................32 OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF DESCRIPTION ..........................33 PARCEL ..........................................................35 iv Cadastral Data Content Standard for the National Spatial Data Infrastructure - December 1996 Table of Contents PARCEL ADDRESS .................................................36 PARCEL AREA .....................................................37 PARCEL RECORD BOUNDARY .......................................38 PARCEL LEGAL AREA ..............................................39 PARCEL TRANSACTION ............................................40 PUBLIC AGENCY ..................................................42 PUBLIC LAND SURVEY SYSTEM DESCRIPTION ........................43 PUBLIC LAND SURVEY SYSTEM TOWNSHIP ..........................45 PUBLIC LAND SURVEY SYSTEM TOWNSHIP FIRST DIVISION ............47 PUBLIC LAND SURVEY SYSTEM TOWNSHIP SECOND DIVISION .........48 PUBLIC LAND SURVEY SYSTEM TOWNSHIP THIRD DIVISION ...........49 RECORD BOUNDARY ...............................................50 RECORD BOUNDARY CORNER POINT ................................52 RECORD BOUNDARY REFERENCE ...................................53 RESTRICTION .....................................................54 STRAIGHT LINE ...................................................55 SURVEY SYSTEM DESCRIPTION .....................................56 SURVEY SYSTEM FIRST DIVISION ...................................57 SURVEY SYSTEM SECOND DIVISION .................................58 SURVEY SYSTEM THIRD DIVISION ..................................59 TRANSACTION AGENT .............................................60 TRANSFERRED RIGHT ..............................................61 3.3 Bibliography and References ...........................................62 3.4 Explanatory Notes ...................................................65 3.5 Index to Definitions ...................................................65 Link Attributes 4. Introduction ........................................................70 4.1 Cultural and Demographic Link ..........................................70 4.2 Source Link ........................................................71 4.3 Units of Measure Link .................................................71 Informative Annex - Federal Domain of Values 5. Introduction ........................................................73 5.1 Parcel Type .........................................................74 5.2 Parcel Area Type .....................................................94 5.3 Restriction Type .....................................................96 v Cadastral Data Content Standard for the National Spatial Data Infrastructure - December 1996 Table of Contents Appendices Appendix 1: Informative Appendix, Corner Classification Domain .....................99 Appendix 2: Informative Appendix, Ownership Type Domain ........................104 Appendix 3: Informative Appendix, Survey System Domain .........................107 Appendix 4: Informative Appendix, Source Type Domain ...........................112 vi Cadastral Data Content Standard for the National Spatial Data Infrastructure - December 1996 Introduction 1. Introduction The Federal Geographic Data Committee was established by Office of Management and Budget Circular A-16 to promote the coordinated development, use, sharing, and dissemination of geographic data. The Federal Geographic Data Committee is composed of representatives from the Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Energy, Housing and Urban Development, the Interior, State, and Transportation; the Environmental Protection Agency; the Federal Emergency Management Agency; the Library of Congress; the National Aeronautics and Space Administration; the National Archives and Records Administration; and the Tennessee Valley Authority. Additional Federal agencies participate on Federal Geographic Data Committee subcommittees and working groups. The Department of the Interior chairs the Subcommittee on Cadastral Data. Federal Geographic Data Committee subcommittees work on issues related to data categories coordinated under the circular. Subcommittees establish and implement standards for data content, quality, and transfer; encourage the exchange of information and the transfer of data; and organize the collection of geographic data to reduce duplication of effort. Working
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Michigan Land Contract Guide Important Disclaimer: The
    Michigan Land Contract Guide Important Disclaimer: The information in this guide is meant to be educational and general in nature. It does not replace the advice of an attorney. Why a Land Contract Guide Now? One of the impacts of the foreclosure crisis has been the increase in the use of land contracts as a way to buy or sell a home. A land contract can provide a way for a homebuyer who cannot qualify for conventional financing to purchase a home. It can also provide a way for seller to be more likely to sell a home and sell it at a price closer to its perceived value than an appraisal would reflect. While a land contract can be a viable and valuable alternative to traditional financing, it can also cause significant problems for both buyers and sellers who do not understand the basics and who enter into a poorly crafted contract. The purpose of this guide is to provide those basics and a check list of those considerations and provisions that make for a well-crafted Land Contract in the state of Michigan. It does not replace the advice of an attorney. What is a Land Contract? A land contract is an agreement between a buyer and a seller that states the buyer is purchasing property but will not receive the legal title until the debt has been satisfied. Land contracts are a form of seller financing and are typically used in real estate transactions, usually residential, when a buyer cannot secure traditional means of financing . Unlike a mortgage, a land contract stipulates that if a buyer does not fulfill his financial obligations in the agreed upon terms of the contract, then the seller regains possession of the property and keeps whatever money the buyer has remitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Installment Land Contracts: Developing Law in Virginia
    Washington and Lee Law Review Volume 37 | Issue 4 Article 8 Fall 9-1-1980 Installment Land Contracts: Developing Law in Virginia Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr Part of the Property Law and Real Estate Commons, and the Secured Transactions Commons Recommended Citation Installment Land Contracts: Developing Law in Virginia, 37 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1161 (1980), https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol37/iss4/8 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington and Lee Law Review at Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington and Lee Law Review by an authorized editor of Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Notes INSTALLMENT LAND CONTRACTS: DEVELOPING LAW IN VIRGINIA An installment land sale contract1 is a method of seller financing for land sales. The land contract, sometimes referred to as a "contract for deed" or "longterm contract," functions as a substitute for a mortgage or deed of trust.2 Generally, in a mortgage, the seller conveys title to the property, and the buyer obtains financing by pledging the property as security for the purchase price of the land.3 The mortgagee has a lien on the buyer's title.4 In a deed of trust transaction, the buyer conveys title to the property to a third party to hold as trustee during the period of in- debtedness. 5 In a land contract, the seller finances the land sale retaining legal title to the property until the buyer makes the final installment payment.e Land contracts are used most often in states in which- mortgage law heavily favors the mortgagor.7 Pro-mortgagor law restricts the mortga- gee's right to enforce the lien on the property by prescribing lengthy pro- cedures for mortgage foreclosure.8 Sellers often prefer land contracts be- ' G.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Contracts Presentation FINAL
    Annette Higby, Emma Hempstead, Thomas Bell Other names: Installment Land Contract, Contract for Deed, etc. Buyer Regular Principal and Interest Payments § Usually annual § To the Seller Takes possession of property at outset of contract Seller Retains title until all payments made May retain possessory interest in some of the property Buyer Able to possess land without access to commercial credit No significant down payment Seller Simple means of transferring farmland Ease tax consequences into installments Greater pool of potential buyers Can retain a life estate in the homestead Buyer Forfeiting possession in default Forfeiting payments made in default Seller Buyer default Decline in land values Waste Bankruptcy of Buyer High risk of default, Buyer often ineligible for commercial or FSA lending Nearly all land contracts protect the Seller with a forfeiture clause If Buyer defaults on a payment they forfeit possession of property, and all payments made to date Sometimes considered a form of liquidated damages can become unreasonable, especially when buyer has: made most of the contract payments, or made significant improvements to the farm prior to default Varies greatly by jurisdiction Enforce forfeiture clause but require Seller provide brief right to cure and a right of redemption upon full payment of the contract (Maine) Restitution theory requiring Seller to return any payments beyond Seller’s actual damages Rental theory of damages Fair market value of land at time of default in relation to contract price (New Hampshire) Restatement of Property §3.4(a) regards the land contract as a mortgage, and Seller’s remedy is foreclosure. Foreclosure sale price determines duties, if in excess of the contract Buyer receives payment, if less than contract price, Seller has a right to the deficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Tenancies and Creative Financing—The Land Contract
    University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review Volume 5 Issue 4 Article 1 1982 Joint Tenancies and Creative Financing—The Land Contract Robert Kratovil Follow this and additional works at: https://lawrepository.ualr.edu/lawreview Part of the Contracts Commons, and the Property Law and Real Estate Commons Recommended Citation Robert Kratovil, Joint Tenancies and Creative Financing—The Land Contract, 5 U. ARK. LITTLE ROCK L. REV. 475 (1982). Available at: https://lawrepository.ualr.edu/lawreview/vol5/iss4/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Bowen Law Repository: Scholarship & Archives. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review by an authorized editor of Bowen Law Repository: Scholarship & Archives. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT LITTLE ROCK LAW JOURNAL VOLUME 5 1982 NUMBER 4 JOINT TENANCIES AND "CREATIVE FINANCING"- THE LAND CONTRACT Robert Kratovil* The drying up of institutional mortgage money in recent years has resulted in a burgeoning of "creative financing" of home sales. Newspaper advertisements often seek to attract buyers by stating that "owner financing is available" or that the "mortgage is assuma- ble."' Another form of "creative financing" is the installment con- tract, which is commonplace in jurisdictions in which the simplified forfeiture process offers a quick and inexpensive means of extin- guishing the rights of a defaulting purchaser.2 Many of the homes financed by this method are owned by a husband and wife in joint tenancy.3 A question that will therefore recur is what effect the exe- cution of an installment contract by the joint tenants will have on an existing joint tenancy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Basics of Land Contracts
    The Basics of Land Contracts What is a Land Contract? A land contract is a written legal contract or agreement that is used to purchase real estate, such as vacant land, a house, an apartment building, a commercial building, or other real property. A land contract is a form of seller financing that is similar to a mortgage. But, rather than borrowing money from a lender or bank to buy real estate, the buyer makes payments to the real estate owner, or seller, until the purchase price is paid in full. A buyer and a seller both sign the land contract covering the agreed upon terms and conditions of the sale. Upon satisfaction of all contract terms and conditions, including payment of the purchase price over a specified time period, the legal title of the property transfers from the seller to the buyer by way of a warranty deed or other deed used to convey title. Why Are Land Contracts Used? As with other types of seller financing, a land contract may be beneficial for both the buyer and the seller. Benefits to buyers. There may be a buyer interested in the real estate for sale but, because of their credit history or other reasons, they cannot obtain approval for the mortgage they need. The parties can enter into a sale by land contract so that the buyer makes monthly payments directly to the seller. Benefits to sellers. The seller does not receive the full purchase price up front, like the seller would if the buyer used a mortgage or paid all cash, but the seller may have more options for potential buyers.
    [Show full text]
  • Act 236 of 1961 CHAPTER 31 FORECLOSURE of MORTGAGES
    REVISED JUDICATURE ACT OF 1961 (EXCERPT) Act 236 of 1961 CHAPTER 31 FORECLOSURE OF MORTGAGES AND LAND CONTRACTS 600.3101 Jurisdiction of circuit court to foreclose mortgages of real estate and land contracts; exception. Sec. 3101. The circuit court has jurisdiction to foreclose mortgages of real estate and land contracts. However, the procedures set forth in this chapter shall not apply to mortgages of real estate and land contracts held by the Michigan state housing development authority. History: 1961, Act 236, Eff. Jan. 1, 1963;Am. 1981, Act 172, Imd. Eff. Dec. 10, 1981. 600.3105 Mortgage; land contract; foreclosure proceeding; unsatisfied execution on judgment at law; separate proceeding; consolidation. Sec. 3105. (1) If a judgment has been obtained in any other civil action for the money, or part thereof, demanded in the complaint in an action to foreclose a mortgage on real estate or a land contract, no proceeding shall be had in the action to foreclose unless the sheriff or other proper officer has returned an execution as unsatisfied, in whole or in part, and certified that he can find no property of the defendant out of which to satisfy the execution except the mortgaged premises. (2) After a complaint has been filed to foreclose a mortgage on real estate or land contract, while it is pending, and after a judgment has been rendered upon it, no separate proceeding shall be had for the recovery of the debt secured by the mortgage, or any part of it, unless authorized by the court. (3) When a complaint is filed to foreclose a trust mortgage or deed of trust given to secure notes, bonds, or other evidences of indebtedness, the court may at any time before final judgment require all cases begun subsequent to the filing of the foreclosure complaint, by plaintiffs holding notes, bonds, or other evidences of indebtedness secured by the mortgage, to be consolidated with the action to foreclose, and the court may adjudicate the rights of the individual security holders.
    [Show full text]
  • Manual of Surveying Instructions for the Survey of the Public Lands of The
    C^ ^y^^A^ '<L- ^7. /- yf/^. <x^ & :; USo^ TaI : 51 A N U A L OF SURVEYING INSTRUCTIONS FOll THE SUinEY OE THE PUi^LIC LANDS OF THE U:^riTED STATES A^D P^HIA^^TE LA^jSTD CLiS.I]MS. Prepared in conformity witli law nniler the direc'ion of THE COMMISSIONER OP TnE/oEXEKAL LAND OFFICE. JUNE 30, 1S94. WASHINGTON C OTLililN'r-IENT PRINTING 0FFIC3. 1 8 9 i. Department of the Interior, General Land Office, Washington, D. C, June 30, 1894. Gentlemen : The followiug instructions, including full and minute directions for the execution of surveys in the field, are issued under the authority given me by sections 453, 456, and 23!)S, United States Kevised Stat- utes, and must be strictly complied with by yourselves, your office assistants, aud deputy surveyors. All directions in conflict with these instructions are hereby abrogated. In all official communications, this edition will be known and referred to as the Manual of 1S94. Very respectfully, S. W. Lamoreux, Commissioner. To Surveyors General, of the United States. ; MANUAL or SURVEYmG I:N^STRUCT10NS. HISTORY OF LEGISLATION FOR SURVEYS. Tlic present system of survey of the public lands was inau<^urated by a committee appointed by the Continental Congress, consisting of the following delegates: Hon. Thos. Jefferson, Chairman Virginia. Hon. Hugh Williamson ]Srorth Carolina. Hon. David Howell IMiode Island. Hon. Elbridge Gerry Massachusetts. Hon. Jacob Read South Carolina. On the 7th of May, 1784, this committee lepoitcd "An ordinance for ascertaining the mode of locating and (lisi)osiiig of lands in the western territory, and lor other purposes therein mentioned." This ordinance required the public lands to be divided into " hundreds " often geograph- ical miles square, and those again to be subdivided into lots of one mile square each, to be numbered from 1 to 100, commencing in the nortli- tcestern corner, and continuing from west to east and from east to west consecutively.
    [Show full text]
  • LADM-Based Model for Natural Resource Administration in China
    International Journal of Geo-Information Article LADM-Based Model for Natural Resource Administration in China Zhongguo Xu 1,2, Yuefei Zhuo 1,2 , Rong Liao 1,3, Cifang Wu 1,2, Yuzhe Wu 1,2 and Guan Li 2,4,* 1 Department of Land Administration, School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, 866 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou 310058, China; [email protected] (Z.X.); [email protected] (Y.Z.); [email protected] (R.L.); [email protected] (C.W.); [email protected] (Y.W.) 2 Land Academy for National Development, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310029, China 3 Department of Foreign Affairs, China Land Surveying and Planning Institute, No.37 West Guanyingyuan District, Beijing 100035, China 4 Law School, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 23 August 2019; Accepted: 10 October 2019; Published: 14 October 2019 Abstract: China’s rapid urbanization and industrialization have continually placed massive pressure on the country’s natural resources. The fragmented departmental administration of natural resources also intensifies the problem of sustainable use. Accordingly, China’s central government has launched natural resource administration reform from decentralization to unification. This study systematically analyzes the reform requirements from legal, organizational, and technical aspects. The right structure of China’s natural resource assets for fulfilling such requirements is examined in this work through a review of relevant legal text, and such a right structure is converted into a draft national technical standard of China’s natural resource administration on the basis of the land administration domain model (LADM). Results show that China’s natural resource administration covers lands, buildings, structures, forests, grasslands, waters, beaches, sea areas, minerals, and other fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Contracts for Deed in Oklahoma: Obsolete but Not Forgotten
    University of Arkansas ∙ System Division of Agriculture [email protected] ∙ (479) 575-7646 An Agricultural Law Research Article Contracts for Deed in Oklahoma: Obsolete but not Forgotten by Drew L. Kershen Originally published in OKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 15 OK. CITY UNIV. L. REV. 716 (1990) www.NationalAgLawCenter.org CONTRACTS FOR DEED IN OKLAHOMA: OBSOLETE, BUT NOT FORGOTTEN DREW L. KERSHEN* I. INTRODUCTION Historically, the contract for deed has been a distinct le­ gal device by which land is bought and sold. Indeed, contracts for deed have likely been the most common substitute to a mortgage or deed of trust for financing the sale of land. Con­ tracts for deed differed from mortgages or deeds of trust, how­ ever, in several important ways.l • Title to the land did not pass in any way or for any pur­ pose to the contract-for-deed purchaser until the final pay­ ment was made under the contract. • The contract-for-deed purchaser only had contract rights in the land and contract claims against the contract-for-deed seller during the term of the contract. • The contract-for-deed purchaser could not affect the title to the land; the contract-for-deed purchaser did not have an interest in the land which could be recorded; the contract­ for-deed purchaser did not have an interest in the land which could be mortgaged; the contract-for-deed purchaser • Professor of Law, University of Oklahoma. B.A. Notre Dame University, J.D. University of Texas, LL.M. Harvard. I especially thank the members of the Oklahoma City Title Attorneys Association and the Oklahoma County Bar Associa· tion.
    [Show full text]
  • Standardized PLSS Data Set (PLSS Cadnsdi) Users Reference Materials
    Standardized PLSS Data Set (PLSS CadNSDI) Users Reference Materials October 2015 (reviewed October 2016) Handbook for PLSS Standardized Data If you have comments, suggestions, corrections or additions for the material in this document please send them to [email protected] Comments will be accumulated, reviewed and incorporated into the next version of this material. Please see the information listed with the PLSS Work Group on the FGDC Cadastral Subcommittee publication site (http://nationalcad.org/PLSSWorkgroup/PLSSWorkgroup.html) for additional information on the Standardized PLSS CadNSDI Data Sets. Handbook for Standardized PLSS CadNSDI Data Table of Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 Frequently Asked Questions ............................................................................................. 2 General Questions ........................................................................................................... 2 Conflicted Areas - How should a GISer work around conflicted areas? ........................ 6 Survey System and Parcel Feature Classes - The feature classes "Survey System" and “Parcel” do not have any data in them, why is this? ...................................................... 6 PLSS Township ................................................................................................................ 7 Metadata at a Glance .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Standard Abbreviations (Sorted by Abbreviation) This Index Is Color Coded to Indicate Source of Information
    Index of Standard Abbreviations (Sorted by Abbreviation) This Index is color coded to indicate source of information. H-1275-1 - Manual Land Status Records (Revised Proposed 2001 Edition from Rick Dickman) Oregon/Washington Proposed Abbreviations (Robert DeViney - retired 2006) Oregon/Washington Proposed Abbreviations (Land Records Team - Post Robert DeViney) 1st Prin Mer First Principal Meridian 2nd Prin Mer Second Principal Meridian 3rd Prin Mer Third Principal Meridian 4th Prin Mer Fourth Principal Meridian 5th Prin Mer Fifth Principal Meridian 6th Prin Mer Sixth Principal Meridian 1/2 Half 1/4 Quarter A A A Acre(s) A&M Col Agriculture and Mechanical College A/G Anchors & guys A/Rd Access road ACEC Area of Critical Environmental Concern Acpt Accept/Accepted Acq Acquired Act of Cong Act of Congress ADHE Adjusted homestead entry Adm S Administrative site Admin Administration, administered AEC Atomic Energy Commission AF Air Force Agri Agriculture, Agricultural Agri Exp Sta Agriculture Experiment Station AHA Alaska Housing Authority AHE Additional homestead entry All Min All minerals Allot Allotment Als PS Alaska public sale Amdt Amendment, Amended, Amends Anc Fas Ancillary facilities ANS Air Navigation Site AO Area Office Apln Application Apln Ext Application for extension Aplnt Applicant App Appendix Approp Appropriation, Appropriate, Appropriated Page 1 of 13 Index of Standard Abbreviations (Sorted by Abbreviation) Appvd Approved Area Adm O Area Administrator Order(s) Arpt Airport ARRCS Alaska Rural Rehabilitation Corp. sale Asgn Assignment
    [Show full text]
  • The Ohio Surveys
    Report on Ohio Survey Investigation -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A Report on the Investigation of the FGDC Cadastral Data Content Standard and its Applicability in Support of the Ohio Survey Systems Nancy von Meyer Fairview Industries, Inc For The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) National Integrated Land System (NILS) Project Office January 2005 i Report on Ohio Survey Investigation -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preface Ohio was the testing and proving grounds of the Public Land Survey System (PLSS). As a result Ohio contains many varied land descriptions and survey systems. Further complicating the Ohio land description scene are large federal tracts reserved for military use and lands held by other states prior to Ohio statehood. This document is not a history of the land system development for Ohio. The history of Ohio surveys can be found in other materials including the following: Downs, Randolf C., 1927, Evolution of Ohio County Boundaries”, Ohio Archeological and Historical Publications Number XXXVI, Columbus, Ohio. Reprinted in 1970. Gates, Paul W., 1968. “History of Public Land Law Development”, Public Land Law Review Commission, Washington DC. Knepper, George, 2002, “The Official Ohio Lands Book” Auditor of State, Columbus Ohio. http://www.auditor.state.oh.us/StudentResources/OhioLands/ohio_lands.pdf Last Accessed November 2, 2004 Petro, Jim, 1997, “Ohio Lands A Short History”, Auditor of State, Columbus Ohio. Sherman, C.E., 1925, “Original Ohio Land Subdivisions” Volume III of the Final Report to the Ohio Cooperative Topographic Survey. Reprinted in 1991. White, Albert C., “A History of the Public Land Survey System”, US Government Printing Office, Stock Number 024-011-00150-6, Washington D.C.
    [Show full text]