INVESTIGATION and PROSECUTION of KILLINGS This

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

INVESTIGATION and PROSECUTION of KILLINGS This INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION OF KILLINGS This chapter of the Handbook collects the observations and recommendations of the UN Special Rapporteur with respect to States’ investigation and prosecution of killings. A State’s obligation to ensure the right to life includes a duty to promptly and effectively investigate alleged violations of that right, whether by the State itself or by non-state actors. The material in this chapter addresses the various governmental institutions necessary to carry out this obligation, including police, prosecutors and the judiciary. Accountability for violations of the right to life requires the consistent functioning and cooperation of all of these institutions. This chapter also collects the Special Rapporteur’s observations regarding the efficacy of mechanisms for investigating alleged violations of the right to life in special contexts, such as in armed conflict and societies in transition. Finally, the Special Rapporteur discusses how international assistance can complement domestic efforts to investigate and prosecute killings. A. OBLIGATION TO INVESTIGATE, PROSECUTE AND PUNISH EXTRAJUDICIAL EXECUTIONS .............................................................................................................................. 3 B. THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM ................................................................................ 12 C. POLICE INVESTIGATIONS .............................................................................................. 29 D. PROSECUTIONS .................................................................................................................. 38 E. THE JUDICIARY .................................................................................................................. 42 F. COMMISSIONS OF INQUIRY ........................................................................................... 50 G. WITNESS PROTECTION PROGRAMS ........................................................................... 67 H. POLICE INTERNAL AFFAIRS .......................................................................................... 85 I. OMBUDSMEN ........................................................................................................................ 89 J. NATIONAL POLICE COMMISSIONS .............................................................................. 92 K. POLICE OVERSIGHT BOARDS ....................................................................................... 96 L. CORONERS ........................................................................................................................... 97 M. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN POLICE AND PROSECUTORS .................................... 98 N. CORRUPTION AND IMPUNITY ..................................................................................... 103 O. POOR FORENSICS AND IMPUNITY ............................................................................. 110 P. TRANSPARENCY AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEMS .......................................... 112 Q. CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM AND THE PROSECUTION OF MILITARY OFFICIALS ............................................................................................................................... 114 R. INVESTIGATIONS AND PROSECUTION ISSUES ARISING IN ARMED CONFLICT ............................................................................................................................... 122 Military justice systems ........................................................................................................ 122 Accountability for civilian deaths ........................................................................................ 135 Command responsibility ...................................................................................................... 139 Transparency in armed conflict .......................................................................................... 142 Armed opposition groups and their “justice” systems ...................................................... 149 Prosecutions of private contractors and civilian government employees ........................ 153 S. TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE AND EXTRAJUDICIAL EXECUTIONS ........................ 157 Amnesties and extrajudicial executions .............................................................................. 157 Obligation to preserve evidence ........................................................................................... 157 T. INDEPENDENT OR EXTERNAL AND INTERNATIONAL INVESTIGATIONS AND MONITORING ......................................................................................................................... 158 Role of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights ..................................... 158 National commissions on human rights .............................................................................. 160 Non-governmental organisations ......................................................................................... 165 The International Criminal Court ...................................................................................... 166 Ceasefire monitoring ............................................................................................................ 169 2 A. OBLIGATION TO INVESTIGATE, PROSECUTE AND PUNISH EXTRAJUDICIAL EXECUTIONS Report of the Special Rapporteur to the Human Rights Council (A/HRC/14/24, 20 May 2010, ¶¶ 53-55): 53. Impunity is often a central cause of continued killings. In many of the countries visited, impunity is maintained through problems at every level of the criminal justice system. Thus, police may be unwilling or unable to carry out an independent investigation of the killing. The State may lack forensic capacity to conduct investigations. Crimes scenes may not be secured. The police may fail to refer cases to the prosecution service. Prosecutors may be corrupt or poorly trained. Witnesses may justifiably be unwilling to testify because of inadequate witness protection programmes. Judges’ dockets may be so overcrowded that cases are delayed for years, or judges may also take bribes to delay cases or absolve perpetrators. If perpetrators are convicted, prison systems may be insecure or susceptible to corruption, resulting in prisoners escaping or bribing their way out of detention. 54. In response to these challenges, specific studies have addressed: (a) The need for external oversight of the police, including a study of the various forms of oversight, and the applicable law and principles (A/HR/14/24/Add.8); (b) The obstacles to effective national commissions of inquiry, and the requirements for the creation and implementation of effective commissions;22 (c) Best practices in witness protections programmes (A/63/313); (d) How States can make their military justice systems compatible with human rights standards (A/63/313). 55. Mission reports have also addressed the important role of international and nongovernmental actors, including NGOs, national human rights institutions, OHCHR, and the International Criminal Court, in promoting accountability. Report of the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions (E/CN.4/2006/53, 8 March 2006, ¶¶ 33-43): 33. It is of continuing concern that States often fail to comply with their obligation to effectively investigate, prosecute, and punish violations of the right to life in situations of armed conflict and occupation. This failure has taken a number of forms. Policies on investigating deaths have permitted unjustifiable exceptions and have often failed to provide for impartiality and independence. During armed conflicts, even grave crimes such as murder are often leniently punished when committed by members of the armed forces. Trends in the investigation, prosecution, and punishment of commanding officers have been even less encouraging. Impunity for individuals has not been the only failure. In some cases, a strategic reluctance to engage in “body counts” may have impeded full consideration of how the impact of armed conflict on civilian populations can be minimized. Efforts at monitoring the consequences of choices of 3 weapons and tactics on the incidental loss of civilian life generally remain ad hoc, leaving compliance with requirements of proportionality and precautionary measures under-examined.1 34. These practices threaten to roll back 50 years of progress in subjecting armed conflict to the rule of law. The Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 first established the legal obligation of States to investigate alleged unlawful killings and to prosecute their perpetrators. Elaborating the general obligation to “respect and to ensure respect” for humanitarian law,2 the Geneva Conventions mandated the penal repression of violations. In particular, when a State receives allegations that someone has committed or ordered a grave breach - such as the “wilful killing” of a protected civilian3 - the State is then legally obligated to search for him and either try him before its own courts or extradite him to another State that has made out a prima facie case.4 Should he be found guilty, the State must impose an “effective penal sanction[]”.5 However, gaps remained in this accountability regime. In international armed conflicts, some individuals were excluded from protection by their nationality.6 In non-international armed conflicts, no mechanism for penal repression was provided.7 The scope of legal protection has, however, steadily improved. Since the Geneva
Recommended publications
  • War on the Mexican Drug Cartels
    THE WAR ON MEXICAN CARTELS OPTIONS FOR U.S. AND MEXICAN POLICY-MAKERS POLICY PROGRAM CHAIRS Ken Liu Chris Taylor GROUP CHAIR Jean-Philippe Gauthier AUTHORS William Dean Laura Derouin Mikhaila Fogel Elsa Kania Tyler Keefe James McCune Valentina Perez Anthony Ramicone Robin Reyes Andrew Seo Minh Trinh Alex Velez-Green Colby Wilkason RESEARCH COORDINATORS Tia Ray Kathryn Walsh September 2012 Final Report of the Institute of Politics National Security Student Policy Group THE WAR ON MEXICAN CARTELS OPTIONS FOR U.S. AND MEXICAN POLICY-MAKERS POLICY PROGRAM CHAIRS Ken Liu Chris Taylor GROUP CHAIR Jean-Philippe Gauthier AUTHORS William Dean Laura Derouin Mikhaila Fogel Elsa Kania Tyler Keefe James McCune Valentina Perez Anthony Ramicone Robin Reyes Andrew Seo Minh Trinh Alex Velez-Green Colby Wilkason RESEARCH COORDINATORS Tia Ray Kathryn Walsh September 2012 Final Report of the Institute of Politics 2 National Security Student Policy Group Institute of Politics ABOUT THE INSTITUTE OF POLITICS NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY GROUP The Institute of Politics is a non-profit organization located in the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University. It is a living memorial to President John F. Kennedy, and its mission is to unite and engage students, particularly undergraduates, with academics, politicians, activists, and policymakers on a non-partisan basis and to stimulate and nurture their interest in public service and leadership. The Institute strives to promote greater understanding and cooperation between the academic world and the world of politics and public affairs. Led by a Director, Senior Advisory Board, Student Advisory Committee, and staff, the Institute provides wide-ranging opportunities for both Harvard students and the general public.
    [Show full text]
  • Vigilantism V. the State: a Case Study of the Rise and Fall of Pagad, 1996–2000
    Vigilantism v. the State: A case study of the rise and fall of Pagad, 1996–2000 Keith Gottschalk ISS Paper 99 • February 2005 Price: R10.00 INTRODUCTION South African Local and Long-Distance Taxi Associa- Non-governmental armed organisations tion (SALDTA) and the Letlhabile Taxi Organisation admitted that they are among the rivals who hire hit To contextualise Pagad, it is essential to reflect on the squads to kill commuters and their competitors’ taxi scale of other quasi-military clashes between armed bosses on such a scale that they need to negotiate groups and examine other contemporary vigilante amnesty for their hit squads before they can renounce organisations in South Africa. These phenomena such illegal activities.6 peaked during the1990s as the authority of white su- 7 premacy collapsed, while state transfor- Petrol-bombing minibuses and shooting 8 mation and the construction of new drivers were routine. In Cape Town, kill- democratic authorities and institutions Quasi-military ings started in 1993 when seven drivers 9 took a good decade to be consolidated. were shot. There, the rival taxi associa- clashes tions (Cape Amalgamated Taxi Associa- The first category of such armed group- between tion, Cata, and the Cape Organisation of ings is feuding between clans (‘faction Democratic Taxi Associations, Codeta), fighting’ in settler jargon). This results in armed groups both appointed a ‘top ten’ to negotiate escalating death tolls once the rural com- peaked in the with the bus company, and a ‘bottom ten’ batants illegally buy firearms. For de- as a hit squad. The police were able to cades, feuding in Msinga1 has resulted in 1990s as the secure triple life sentences plus 70 years thousands of displaced persons.
    [Show full text]
  • New Study Indicates Growing Support for Vigilante Justice in Latin America | Security Assistance Monitor
    4/7/2015 New Study Indicates Growing Support for Vigilante Justice in Latin America | Security Assistance Monitor enter search words here View Site by Region Global English Countries Programs Data Resources Regions Our Work Blog About New Study Indicates Growing Support for Vigilante Justice SHARE THIS in Latin America 04/03/15 Gabrielle Acierno Latin America and the Caribbean U.S. Aid, Justice System SHARE THIS / Like Across Latin America and the Caribbean, the number of people supporting the use of vigilantism, an indicator of distrust in law enforcement and judicial institutions, is significantly increasing according to a recent study by Vanderbilt University’s Latin American Public Opinion Project. Although the study, which is based on surveys from 2004 and 2014, shows that most people throughout the Americas do not support vigilantism, the findings highlight challenges in U.S. security assistance to many countries in Latin American and the Caribbean. Citizen self­defense or vigilante groups have sprung up throughout Latin America and the Caribbean, taking arms to fight organized crime where many believe governments and institutions have failed. The results have typically bred more instability. A recent InSight Crime article indicates Latin America’s history boasts ample examples of how vigilantism often leads to more violence, from Colombia’s paramilitary groups, to Venezuela’s urban militias, to Mexico’s ‘autodefensa’ phenomena, to police militias in Brazil and police death squads in El Salvador and Honduras. In turbulent states like Michoacán, Mexico, organized citizen defense groups (“autodefensas”) rose up in 2013, frustrated with the government’s ineptitude at reining in violence and cartel influence.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Political Participation and Representation in Asia
    iwanaga The ability of a small elite of highly educated, upper-class Asian women’s political women to obtain the highest political positions in their country is unmatched elsewhere in the world and deserves study. But, for participation and those interested in a more detailed understanding of how women representation strive and sometimes succeed as political actors in Asia, there is a women’s marked lack of relevant research as well as of comprehensive and in asia user-friendly texts. Aiming to fill the gap is this timely and important study of the various obstacles and opportunities for women’s political Obstacles and Challenges participation and representation in Asia. Even though it brings political together a diverse array of prominent European and Asian academicians and researchers working in this field, it is nonetheless a singularly coherent, comprehensive and accessible volume. Edited by Kazuki Iwanaga The book covers a wide range of Asian countries, offers original data from various perspectives and engages the latest research on participation women in politics in Asia. It also aims to put the Asian situation in a global context by making a comparison with the situation in Europe. This is a volume that will be invaluable in women’s studies internationally and especially in Asia. a nd representation representation i n asia www.niaspress.dk Iwanaga-2_cover.indd 1 4/2/08 14:23:36 WOMEN’S POLITICAL PARTICIPATION AND REPRESENTATION IN ASIA Kazuki_prels.indd 1 12/20/07 3:27:44 PM WOMEN AND POLITICS IN ASIA Series Editors: Kazuki Iwanaga (Halmstad University) and Qi Wang (Oslo University) Women and Politics in Thailand Continuity and Change Edited by Kazuki Iwanaga Women’s Political Participation and Representation in Asia Obstacles and Challenges Edited by Kazuki Iwanaga Kazuki_prels.indd 2 12/20/07 3:27:44 PM Women’s Political Participation and Representation in Asia Obstacles and Challenges Edited by Kazuki Iwanaga Kazuki_prels.indd 3 12/20/07 3:27:44 PM Women and Politics in Asia series, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Vigilantism 1 POLICE LEGITIMACY and SUPPORT for VIGILANTE VIOLENCE in PAKISTAN JUSTICE TANKEBE Institute of Criminology Univ
    Vigilantism 1 POLICE LEGITIMACY AND SUPPORT FOR VIGILANTE VIOLENCE IN PAKISTAN JUSTICE TANKEBE Institute of Criminology University of Cambridge MUHAMMAD ASIF Allama Iqbal Medical College Lahore, Pakistan * Direct correspondence to Justice Tankebe, Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge, Sidgwick Avenue, Cambridge CB3 9DA, U.K. (email: [email protected]). Vigilantism 2 POLICE LEGITIMACY AND SUPPORT FOR VIGILANTE VIOLENCE IN PAKISTAN Abstract Bottoms and Tankebe (2012) recently analyzed the multidimensional nature of police legitimacy and made an argument for its relevance to social order. A few studies have tested the predictive value of their model in explaining everyday legal compliance and support for the police. Using survey data from three communities of varying socio-economic conditions in Pakistan, this paper examines the links between the multiple dimensions of police legitimacy and support for vigilante violence. The findings show overall high levels of support for vigilantism. Regression analysis shows that experiences of police illegality consistently predict support for vigilantism across the three communities. Aspects of procedural justice – specifically, perceived quality of police decisionmaking – predict support for vigilantism in some conditions but not others. Contrary to expectations, quality of interpersonal treatment by police and police effectiveness do not explain support for vigilantism. We also found no evidence to show that feelings of obligation to obey the police mediates the influence of police legitimacy on vigilante support. The implications of these findings are discussed. Key words: legitimacy, vigilantism, lawfulness, procedural justice, corruption, dialogic legitimacy Vigilantism 3 In November 2008, residents in a neighbourhood in Karachi apprehended three men suspected of robbery, beat them up, doused them with petrol and burned them.
    [Show full text]
  • Asamblea General Distr
    NACIONES UNIDAS A Asamblea General Distr. GENERAL A/HRC/8/3/Add.2 16 de abril de 2008 ESPAÑOL Original: INGLÉS CONSEJO DE DERECHOS HUMANOS Octavo período de sesiones Tema 3 de la agenda PROMOCIÓN Y PROTECCIÓN DE TODOS LOS DERECHOS HUMANOS, CIVILES, POLÍTICOS, ECONÓMICOS, SOCIALES Y CULTURALES, INCLUIDO EL DERECHO AL DESARROLLO Informe del Relator Especial sobre las ejecuciones extrajudiciales, sumarias o arbitrarias, Philip Alston Adición* MISIÓN A FILIPINAS * Sólo el resumen del presente informe se somete a los servicios de edición y se distribuye en todos los idiomas oficiales. El informe propiamente dicho, que figura en el anexo al resumen, y los apéndices se distribuyen tal como se recibieron. GE. 08-13004 (S) 300408 050508 A/HRC/8/3/Add.2 página 2 Resumen En los últimos seis años se han producido numerosas ejecuciones extrajudiciales de activistas de izquierda en Filipinas. Con esas muertes se ha eliminado a dirigentes de la sociedad civil, incluidos defensores de los derechos humanos, sindicalistas y partidarios de la reforma agraria, se ha intimidado a un gran número de agentes de la sociedad civil y se ha restringido el discurso político en el país. Dependiendo de quién cuenta y cómo lo hace, el número total de ejecuciones se sitúa entre 100 y más de 800. La estrategia de contrainsurgencia y los recientes cambios en las prioridades del sistema de justicia penal revisten especial importancia para entender por qué se siguen produciendo esas muertes. En el Gobierno, muchos han llegado a la conclusión de que varias organizaciones de la sociedad civil son "frentes" del Partido Comunista de Filipinas y su grupo armado, el Nuevo Ejército del Pueblo.
    [Show full text]
  • The Philippines' War on Drugs (Read: the Poor)
    INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INTERNSHIP PROGRAM | WORKING PAPER SERIES VOL 8 | NO. 1 | FALL 2020 The Philippines’ War on Drugs (Read: The Poor): The Erosion of the Rule of Law and the Violation of Children’s Human Rights Kathleen Barera ABOUT CHRLP Established in September 2005, the Centre for Human Rights and Legal Pluralism (CHRLP) was formed to provide students, professors and the larger community with a locus of intellectual and physical resources for engaging critically with the ways in which law affects some of the most compelling social problems of our modern era, most notably human rights issues. Since then, the Centre has distinguished itself by its innovative legal and interdisciplinary approach, and its diverse and vibrant community of scholars, students and practitioners working at the intersection of human rights and legal pluralism. CHRLP is a focal point for innovative legal and interdisciplinary research, dialogue and outreach on issues of human rights and legal pluralism. The Centre’s mission is to provide students, professors and the wider community with a locus of intellectual and physical resources for engaging critically with how law impacts upon some of the compelling social problems of our modern era. A key objective of the Centre is to deepen transdisciplinary — 2 collaboration on the complex social, ethical, political and philosophical dimensions of human rights. The current Centre initiative builds upon the human rights legacy and enormous scholarly engagement found in the Universal Declartion of Human Rights. ABOUT THE SERIES The Centre for Human Rights and Legal Pluralism (CHRLP) Working Paper Series enables the dissemination of papers by students who have participated in the Centre’s International Human Rights Internship Program (IHRIP).
    [Show full text]
  • Killings by Non-State Actors and Affirmative State Obligations
    KILLINGS BY NON-STATE ACTORS AND AFFIRMATIVE STATE OBLIGATIONS This chapter of the Handbook addresses a wide variety of situations in which killings by non-state actors can nonetheless implicate the State to some degree, or invoke responsibilities on its part. The right to life includes not only a prohibition on illegal killings by State authorities, but also entails State obligation is to adequately protect this right and punish violations of it by non-state actors. In situations of widespread killings, or traditions which tend towards regular violence against a particular portion of the population, States can be held responsible for failure to adequately address systemic causes, for instance, through efforts to protect vulnerable populations, improve education, address impunity, or correct perceived inadequacies in law enforcement and the justice system which lead to vigilantism. A. LEGAL BASIS OF RESPONSIBILITY OF STATES FOR VIOLATIONS BY NON-STATE ACTORS ....................................................................................................................... 2 B. KILLINGS BY ARMED OPPOSITION GROUPS ......................................................... 10 C. MANDATE OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR AND ADDRESSING KILLINGS BY ARMED OPPOSITION GROUPS .............................................................. 22 D. DUE DILIGENCE AND INTER-COMMUNAL/ETHNIC VIOLENCE ............... 25 E. KILLINGS BY VIGILANTES AND MOB JUSTICE ................................................... 29 F. KILLINGS OF “WITCHES” ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Focus on the Philippines Yearbook 2010
    TRANSITIONS Focus on the Philippines Yearbook 2010 FOCUS ON THE GLOBAL SOUTH Published by the Focus on the Global South-Philippines #19 Maginhawa Street, UP Village, Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines Copyright@2011 By Focus on the Global South-Philippines All rights reserved. The contents of this publication may be reproduced, quoted or used as reference provided that Focus, as publisher, and the writers, will be duly recognized as the proper sources. Focus would appreciate receiving a copy of the text in which contents of this publication have been used or cited. Statistics and other data with acknowledged other sources are not properties of Focus Philippines, and thus permission for their use in other publication should be coordinated with the pertinent owners/offices. Editor Clarissa V. Militante Assistant Editor Carmen Flores-Obanil Lay-out and Design Amy T. Tejada Contributing Writers Walden Bello Jenina Joy Chavez Jerik Cruz Prospero de Vera Herbert Docena Aya Fabros Mary Ann Manahan Clarissa V. Militante Carmen Flores-Obanil Dean Rene Ofreneo Joseph Purruganan Filomeno Sta. Ana Researcher of Economic Data Cess Celestino Photo Contributions Jimmy Domingo Lina Sagaral Reyes Contents ABOUT THE WRITERS OVERVIEW 1 CHAPTER 1: ELECTIONS 15 Is Congress Worth Running for? By Representative Walden Bello 17 Prosecuting GMA as Platform By Jenina Joy Chavez 21 Rating the Candidates: Prosecution as Platform Jenina Joy Chavez 27 Mixed Messages By Aya Fabros 31 Manuel “Bamba” Villar: Advertising his Way to the Presidency By Carmina Flores-Obanil
    [Show full text]
  • Philippines 010705 View
    The Observatory for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders Philippine Alliance of Human Rights Advocates a joint programme (PAHRA) Open Letter to Mrs. Gloria Macapagal Arroyo, President of the Philippines, and to the non-State Armed Groups Killings of Political Activists and Human Rights Defenders in the Philippines Paris-Geneva-Quezon City, July 1, 2005 The International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) and the World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT), in the framework of their joint programme, the Observatory for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders, and the Philippine Alliance of Human Rights Advocates (PAHRA), express their deepest concern at the numerous attacks against human rights defenders and political activists in the Philippines since the beginning of the year. While the Government of the Republic of the Philippines has formally acceded to a number of international human rights and humanitarian instruments, non-State actors have openly bounded themselves to respect them, particularly Article 3 common to the four Geneva Conventions of 1949 for the protection of war victims and the 1977 second Additional Protocol relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts. However, both seem unable or unwilling to comply with those international obligations. We are alarmed by the increasing human rights violations in the Philippines. Since January 2005, 15 cases of extra- judicial killings or violent attacks against political activists and human rights defenders, allegedly by both State and non-State agents, have been perpetrated in the Philippines. We express serious concern on the following cases that are brought to your attention: • Fr. Allan Caparro, a human rights advocate, and his wife, Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Blood Feuds and Revenge in Canons and Medieval Statutes and Social Consequences
    E-ISSN 2281-4612 Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Vol 4 No 3 ISSN 2281-3993 MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy November 2015 Blood Feuds and Revenge in Canons and Medieval Statutes and Social Consequences Aferdita Tepshi Doctorate at the European University of Tirana Doi:10.5901/ajis.2015.v4n3p199 Abstract In this paper as object of this publication is the phenomenon of blood feud murders as a medieval phenomenon, which continues to accompany the life of the Albanian nation in modern times bringing loss of life and other negative consequences in the society. I purposefully chose this topic as a subject of study in this paper, by noticing the serious consequences that brings the blood feud, and I thought as valuable to investigate, draw conclusions, by stating the reasons and consequences of this medieval phenomenon and to submit my opinions related to this phenomenon. Through this study i want to point out the flow of this medieval phenomenon, reflecting its negative side as well as the consequences of this phenomenon, the tendency of this phenomenon nowdays, the work of the state authorities and non-governmental social organizations to mitigate this phenomenon, always in the service of life and freedom of the individual. Murders are the most serious crimes that affect the human right to live, as a fundamental human right protected by a number of international acts such as the Universal Declaration of the General Assembly of the UN (1948), the European Convention (1950), the Constitution of the Republic of Albania etc. Martin Luterking said (4th april 1968) “It may be true that the law cannot make a man love me, but it can keep him from lynching me, and I think that's pretty important” Albanian scholars in Albania starting from the basic thesis that blood feud murders are social historical phenomena that have appeared since ancient times, in pre-state formations and blood feud was the only way of protection of certain social groups, a phenomenon which over time is replaced by the State and its structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Extra Judicial Killings: a Reflection of Failing in Criminal Justice System
    South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, Vol. 12, Issue 4 (April) ISSN 2289-1560 2017 EXTRA JUDICIAL KILLINGS: A REFLECTION OF FAILING IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM. 1 NASIR, MARUF ADENIYI ABSTRACT The recent incidents of killings in many developing countries call for a serious appraisal of the administration of criminal justice with regards to the concepts of punishment. Besides killings that is politically motivated and the use of state apparatus to execute perceived enemies and alleged criminals, the public have equally been invested with self-help oriented killings. Lynching of alleged offenders has become the order of the day, people now careless about the judicial process; mob attacks and other form of lawlessness remain unabated as public brutality triumph against the due process of law. The trend now assumes a more dangerous dimension as it has graduated from a personal concept of an eye for an eye syndrome to a community organized event such as the recent killings or the lynching of the “UNIPORT” students which was regarded as a community event, also a young person was burnt to death by a mob attack in Orile-Iganmu area of Lagos State recently for allegedly stealing of a phone. These happenings are worrisome and it is indeed an indication of a systematic collapse or failings of the Criminal Justice System. How does the situation degenerate to this hopeless situation? What are those things that led to this great depravity in our justice system? Why are the citizens taking laws into their hands by lynching and engaging in other barbarities? These and other unresolved questions that make National Policy on Criminal Justice to remain incoherent are of particular scope of this paper.
    [Show full text]