Finding the Good Life As a Swaleader
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Coaches Handbook
City of Buckeye COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT -Recreation Division- COACHES HANDBOOK Important dates Opening day: Saturday, June 16th Picture day: Tuesday, June 19th and Thursday, June 21st Last day: Saturday, July 28th Peter Piper pizza party nights: TBD Community Services Department’s Vision and Mission Statement Our Vision “Buckeye Is An Active, Engaged and Vibrant Community.” Our Mission We are dedicated to enriching quality of life, managing natural resources and creating memorable experiences for all generations. .We do this by: Developing quality parks, diverse programs and sustainable practices. Promoting volunteerism and lifelong learning. Cultivating community events, tourism and economic development. Preserving cultural, natural and historic resources. Offering programs that inspire personal growth, healthy lifestyles and sense of community. Dear Coach: Thank you for volunteering to coach with the City of Buckeye Youth Sports Program. The role of a youth sports coach can be very rewarding, but can be challenging at times as well. We have included helpful information in this handbook to assist in making this an enjoyable season for you and your team. Our youth sports philosophy is to provide our youth with a positive athletic experience in a safe environment where fun, skill development, teamwork, and sportsmanship lay its foundation. In addition, our youth sports programs is designed to encourage maximum participation by all team members; their development is far more important than the outcome of the game. Please be sure to remember you are dealing with children, in a child’s game, where the best motivation of all is enthusiasm, positive reinforcement and team success. If the experience is fun for you, it will also be fun for the kids on your team as well as their parents. -
The Evolution of Basketball Statistics Is Finally Here
ows ind Sta W tis l t Ready for a ic n i S g i o r f t O w a e r h e TURBOSTATS SOFTWARE T The Evolution of Basketball Statistics is Finally Here All New Advanced Metrics, Efficiencies and Four Factors Outstanding Live Scoring BoxScore & Play-by-Play Easy to Learn Automatically Tags Video Fast Substitutions The Worlds Most Color-Coded Shot Advanced Live Game Charts Display... Scoring Software Uncontested Shots Shots off Turnovers View Career Shooting% Second Chance Shots After Each Shot Shots in Transition Includes the Advanced Zones vs Man to Man Statistics Used by Top Last Second Shots Pro & College Teams Blocked Shots New NET Rating System Score Live or by Video Highlights the Most Sort Video Clips Efficient Players Create Highlight Films Includes the eBook Theory of Evolution Creates CyberLink Explaining How the New PowerDirector video Formulas Help You Win project files for DVDs* The Only Software that PowerDirector 12/2010 Tracks Actual Rebound % Optional Player Photos Statistics for Individual Customizable Display Plays and Options Shows Four Factors, Event List, Player Team Stats by Point Guard Simulated image on the Statistics or Scouting Samsung ATIV SmartPC. Actual Screen Size is 11.5 Per Minute Statistics for Visit Samsung.com for tablet All Categories pricing and availability Imports Game Data from * PowerDirector sold separately NCAA BoxScores (Websites HTML or PDF) Runs Standalone on all Windows Laptops, Tablets and UltraBooks. Also tracks ... XP, Vista, 7 plus Windows 8 Pro Effective Field Goal%, True Shooting%, Turnover%, Offensive Rebound%, Individual Possessions, Broadcasts data to iPads and Offensive Efficiency, Time in Game Phones with a low cost app +/- Five Player Combos, Score on the Only Tablets Designed for Data Entry Defensive Points Given Up and more.. -
Difference-Based Analysis of the Impact of Observed Game Parameters on the Final Score at the FIBA Eurobasket Women 2019
Original Article Difference-based analysis of the impact of observed game parameters on the final score at the FIBA Eurobasket Women 2019 SLOBODAN SIMOVIĆ1 , JASMIN KOMIĆ2, BOJAN GUZINA1, ZORAN PAJIĆ3, TAMARA KARALIĆ1, GORAN PAŠIĆ1 1Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, University of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina 2Faculty of Economy, University of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina 3Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, University of Belgrade, Serbia ABSTRACT Evaluation in women's basketball is keeping up with developments in evaluation in men’s basketball, and although the number of studies in women's basketball has seen a positive trend in the past decade, it is still at a low level. This paper observed 38 games and sixteen variables of standard efficiency during the FIBA EuroBasket Women 2019. Two regression models were obtained, a set of relative percentage and relative rating variables, which are used in the NBA league, where the dependent variable was the number of points scored. The obtained results show that in the first model, the difference between winning and losing teams was made by three variables: true shooting percentage, turnover percentage of inefficiency and efficiency percentage of defensive rebounds, which explain 97.3%, while for the second model, the distinguishing variables was offensive efficiency, explaining for 96.1% of the observed phenomenon. There is a continuity of the obtained results with the previous championship, played in 2017. Of all the technical elements of basketball, it is still the shots made, assists and defensive rebounds that have the most significant impact on the final score in European women’s basketball. -
The Fundamentals of Shooting the Basketball
The Fundamentals of Shooting the Basketball The objective of the offense in Basketball is accuracy of each attempted shot. Most players recognize this; but, only the better shooters learn how to practice correctly and work at improvement year round. Since most of this practice sessions are alone, every player must be his own critic. This means he\she must understand the proper mechanics that affect the success, or failure, of every shot. Every player must know his range and know what is a good shot. Therefore, before examining the techniques associated with the various shots, a good basketball player is expected to have in his arsenal, here are the principles at work in every scoring shot from anywhere on a basketball court. These are divided into two parts, the mental aspect and the physical aspect: 1. Mental. At no time is psychological conditioning more critical than when shooting the basketball in a game. Knowing when to shoot and being able to do it effectively under pressure distinguishes the great shooter from the ordinary. Regardless of how much he practices, or how well he conditions himself, only a modest amount of improvement is possible in speed, reflexes, or strength. History gives many examples of players able to achieve greatness despite mediocre physical talent. Usually, however, such successes are due to determination. a. Concentration: is the fixing of attention on the job at hand and is characteristic of every great athlete. Through continuous practice, good shooters develop their concentration to the extent that they are oblivious to every distraction. Ability to relax: is closely related to concentration. -
Analysis of Different Types of Turnovers Between Winning and Losing Performances in Men’S NCAA Basketball
한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지 Journal of The Korea Society of Computer and Information Vol. 25 No. 7, pp. 135-142, July 2020 JKSCI https://doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2020.25.07.135 Analysis of different types of turnovers between winning and losing performances in men’s NCAA basketball 1)Doryung Han*, Mark Hawkins**, HyongJun Choi*** *Honorary principal professor, Major of Security secretary Studies Continuing Education Center, Kyonggi University, Seoul, Korea **Head coach, Performance Analysis of Sport, University of Wales, UK ***Associate Professor, Dept. of Physical Education (Performance Analysis in Sport), Dankook University, Yongin, Korea [Abstract] Basketball is a highly complex sport, analyses offensive and defensive rebounds, free throw percentages, minutes played and an efficiency rating. These statistics can have a large bearing and provide a lot of pressure on players as their every move can be analysed. Performance analysis in sport is a vital way of being able to track a team or individuals performance and more commonly used resource for player and team development. Discovering information such as this proves the importance of these types of analysis as with post competition video analysis a coach can reach a far more accurate analysis of the game leading to the ability to coach and correct the exact requirements of the team instead of their perceptions. A significant difference was found between winning and losing performances for different types of turnovers supporting current research that states that turnovers are not a valid predictor of match outcomes and that there is no specific type of turnover which can predict the outcome of a match as briefly mentioned in Curz and Tavares (1998). -
Competition Wrongs Abstract
NICOLAS CORNELL Competition Wrongs abstract. In both philosophical and legal circles, it is typically assumed that wrongs depend upon having one’s rights violated. But within any market-based economy, market participants may be wronged by the conduct of other actors in the marketplace. Due to my illicit business tactics, you may lose profits, customers, employees, reputation, access to capital, or any number of other sources of value. This Article argues that such competition wrongs are an example of wrongs that arise without an underlying right, contrary to the typical philosophical and legal assumption. The Article thus draws upon various forms of business law to illustrate what is a conceptual point: that we can and do wrong one another in ways that do not involve violating our private entitlements but rather violating only public norms. author. Assistant Professor, University of Michigan Law School. This Article has benefitted from comments and suggestions from many others. Specifically, I would like to thank Mitch Ber- man, Dan Crane, Ryan Doerfler, Chris Essert, Rich Friedman, John Goldberg, Don Herzog, Wa- heed Hussain, Julian Jonker, Greg Keating, Greg Klass, George Letsas, Gabe Mendlow, Sanjukta Paul, Tony Reeves, Arthur Ripstein, Amy Sepinwall, Henry Smith, Sabine Tsuruda, David Wad- dilove, and Gary Watson. I am also grateful to audiences at Binghamton, Bowdoin, Harvard, IN- SEED, Michigan, Oxford, Penn, and Virginia, as well as the Bechtel Workshop in Moral and Po- litical Philosophy, the Legal Philosophy Workshop, and the North American Workshop on Private Law Theory. 2030 thecompetition claims of wrongs official reason article contents introduction 2032 i. -
Physical and Physiological Profiles of Aerobic and Anaerobic Capacities
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article Physical and Physiological Profiles of Aerobic and Anaerobic Capacities in Young Basketball Players David Mancha-Triguero 1,*, Javier García-Rubio 1 , Antonio Antúnez 2 and Sergio J. Ibáñez 1 1 Grupo GOERD, Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte, Universidad de Extremadura, 10071 Cáceres, Spain; [email protected] (J.G.-R.); [email protected] (S.J.I.) 2 Grupo GOERD, Facultad de Educación, Universidad de Extremadura, 06071 Badajoz, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 16 January 2020; Accepted: 18 February 2020; Published: 21 February 2020 Abstract: Current trends in the analysis of the physical fitness of athletes are based on subjecting the athlete to requirements similar to those found in competition. Regarding physical fitness, a thorough study of the capacities that affect the development of team sports in different ages and gender is required since the demands are not equivalent. The objective of this paper was to characterize the physical-physiological demands of athletes in an aerobic and anaerobic test specific to basketball players, as well as the evolution of the variables according to age and gender. The research was carried out in 149 players from different training categories (n = 103 male; n = 46 female). The athletes performed two field tests that evaluated both aerobic capacity and lactic anaerobic capacity. Each athlete was equipped with an inertial device during the tests. Sixteen variables (equal in both tests) were analyzed. Three of them evaluated technical-tactical aspects, four variables of objective internal load, six kinematic variables of objective external load (two related to distance and four related to accelerometry) and three neuromuscular variables of objective external load. -
Song of the Year
General Field Page 1 of 15 Category 3 - Song Of The Year 015. AMAZING 031. AYO TECHNOLOGY Category 3 Seal, songwriter (Seal) N. Hills, Curtis Jackson, Timothy Song Of The Year 016. AMBITIONS Mosley & Justin Timberlake, A Songwriter(s) Award. A song is eligible if it was Rudy Roopchan, songwriter songwriters (50 Cent Featuring Justin first released or if it first achieved prominence (Sunchasers) Timberlake & Timbaland) during the Eligibility Year. (Artist names appear in parentheses.) Singles or Tracks only. 017. AMERICAN ANTHEM 032. BABY Angie Stone & Charles Tatum, 001. THE ACTRESS Gene Scheer, songwriter (Norah Jones) songwriters; Curtis Mayfield & K. Tiffany Petrossi, songwriter (Tiffany 018. AMNESIA Norton, songwriters (Angie Stone Petrossi) Brian Lapin, Mozella & Shelly Peiken, Featuring Betty Wright) 002. AFTER HOURS songwriters (Mozella) Dennis Bell, Julia Garrison, Kim 019. AND THE RAIN 033. BACK IN JUNE José Promis, songwriter (José Promis) Outerbridge & Victor Sanchez, Buck Aaron Thomas & Gary Wayne songwriters (Infinite Embrace Zaiontz, songwriters (Jokers Wild 034. BACK IN YOUR HEAD Featuring Casey Benjamin) Band) Sara Quin & Tegan Quin, songwriters (Tegan And Sara) 003. AFTER YOU 020. ANDUHYAUN Dick Wagner, songwriter (Wensday) Jimmy Lee Young, songwriter (Jimmy 035. BARTENDER Akon Thiam & T-Pain, songwriters 004. AGAIN & AGAIN Lee Young) (T-Pain Featuring Akon) Inara George & Greg Kurstin, 021. ANGEL songwriters (The Bird And The Bee) Chris Cartier, songwriter (Chris 036. BE GOOD OR BE GONE Fionn Regan, songwriter (Fionn 005. AIN'T NO TIME Cartier) Regan) Grace Potter, songwriter (Grace Potter 022. ANGEL & The Nocturnals) Chaka Khan & James Q. Wright, 037. BE GOOD TO ME Kara DioGuardi, Niclas Molinder & 006. -
2019 Host Operations Manual First and Second Rounds
2019 HOST OPERATIONS MANUAL FIRST AND SECOND ROUNDS TIP: To easily search for terms or words within this document, right click, select “Find”, type the word or words you want to search for and hit “Enter”. The Find function will take you to the first use of this term, hit “Enter” to move to the next. This manual outlines the responsibilities of an institution hosting the first- and second- rounds of the NCAA Division I Women’s Basketball Championship and should complement the information contained in the championship bid portal. Additional information will be made available to the host on Teamworks, a collaborative website and mobile app. It is essential that each host institution staff member familiarize themselves with the information and policies included in this manual and available on Teamworks (Refer to Section No. 23). The NCAA considers this hosting opportunity a partnership between the host institution, facility, committee and the NCAA. The primary objective of everyone involved in the administration of the championship shall be to provide a memorable championship experience for each participating student-athlete, coach, institutional staff member and tournament attendee. Comments and suggested additions to this manual are always welcome. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the NCAA staff. Table of Contents Section Page Mission and Role 1 Committee Listing 2 Contact Information 3 Resources 7 New for the 2019 Championship 8 Section 1. Bands 10 Section 2. Cheerleaders and Mascots 12 Section 3. Credentials 15 Section 4. Drug Testing 20 Section 5. Facility 23 Section 6. Financial Administration 36 Section 7. -
Journal of Sport and Kinetic Movement Vol
Journal of Sport and Kinetic Movement Vol. I, No. 31/2018 EFFICIENCY OF BASKETBALL POINT GUARD PLAYER IN GAMES Florentina POPESCU1, Maria-Cristiana PORFIREANU2, Cristian RISTEA1 1Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Spiru Haret 2Academy of Economic Studies [email protected] Abstract: Introduction Modern sports games training methodology has some important changes in the conception of content, structure and organization of the players’ training. Each sport game has a modeling method applicable, as well as in basketball training. In a basketball team, each player has a specific position on court, but the players are request to play more positions (roles) in a game. So, that means the players have to be able to change fast their role in order to win points. Material and methods Goal’s paper is to analyze the efficiency of the actions of the leading basketball player in 2017 National Championship in Romania. The hypothesis: if the individualized basketball training the coach’ aims are increasing the effectiveness of the attack actions, then on the official games, the leader will have high percentages in the playing model. The research methods used are: scientific documentation, case study, statistical-mathematical method, graphic method. The study was based on the record sheets of 35 official games from Women's Basketball National Championship in a competitive year, 2017. Results: We analyzed the point guard’ efficiency in the basketball team performance. We recorded the game model indicators for the female Romanian basketball team. Discussions and conclusions One of the most important role of the players is to be point guard. For this, the player has to be very good in handling the ball, for passing, dribbling, throwing, shooting. -
Partisan Gerrymandering and the Efficiency Gap Nicholas 0
+(,121/,1( Citation: 82 U. Chi. L. Rev. 831 2015 Provided by: The University of Chicago D'Angelo Law Library Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Tue Feb 2 13:11:38 2016 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: https://www.copyright.com/ccc/basicSearch.do? &operation=go&searchType=0 &lastSearch=simple&all=on&titleOrStdNo=0041-9494 Partisan Gerrymandering and the Efficiency Gap Nicholas 0. Stephanopoulost& Eric M McGheeft The usual legal story about partisangerrymandering is relentlesslypessimis- tic. The courts did not even recognize the cause of action until the 1980s; they have never struck down a district plan on this basis; and four sitting justices want to vacate the field altogether. The Supreme Court's most recent gerrymanderingdeci- sion, however, is the most encouraging development in this area in a generation. Several justices expressed interest in the concept of partisan symmetry-the idea that a plan should treat the majorparties symmetrically in terms of the conversion of votes to seats--and suggested that it could be shaped into a legal test. In this Article, we take the justices at their word. First, we introduce a new measure of partisan symmetry: the efficiency gap. It represents the difference be- tween the parties' respective wasted votes in an election, divided by the total num- ber of votes cast. -
Measuring Production and Predicting Outcomes in the National Basketball Association
Measuring Production and Predicting Outcomes in the National Basketball Association Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Michael Steven Milano, M.S. Graduate Program in Education The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Packianathan Chelladurai, Advisor Brian Turner Sarah Fields Stephen Cosslett Copyright by Michael Steven Milano 2011 Abstract Building on the research of Loeffelholz, Bednar and Bauer (2009), the current study analyzed the relationship between previously compiled team performance measures and the outcome of an “un-played” game. While past studies have relied solely on statistics traditionally found in a box score, this study included scheduling fatigue and team depth. Multiple models were constructed in which the performance statistics of the competing teams were operationalized in different ways. Absolute models consisted of performance measures as unmodified traditional box score statistics. Relative models defined performance measures as a series of ratios, which compared a team‟s statistics to its opponents‟ statistics. Possession models included possessions as an indicator of pace, and offensive rating and defensive rating as composite measures of efficiency. Play models were composed of offensive plays and defensive plays as measures of pace, and offensive points-per-play and defensive points-per-play as indicators of efficiency. Under each of the above general models, additional models were created to include streak variables, which averaged performance measures only over the previous five games, as well as logarithmic variables. Game outcomes were operationalized and analyzed in two distinct manners - score differential and game winner.