Proxy Voting Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Proxy Voting Review West Yorkshire Pension Fund West Yorkshire Pension Fund PROXY VOTING REVIEW PERIOD 1st July 2020 to 30th September 2020 01-07-2020 to 30-09-2020 1 of 241 West Yorkshire Pension Fund Contents 1 Resolution Analysis 3 1.1 Number of meetings voted by geographical location . 3 1.2 Number of Resolutions by Vote Categories . 4 1.3 List of meetings not voted and reasons why . 5 1.4 List of meetings with rejected votes and reasons why . 6 1.5 Number of Votes by Region . 7 1.6 Votes Made in the Portfolio Per Resolution Category . 8 1.7 Votes Made in the UK Per Resolution Category . 9 1.8 Votes Made in the US Per Resolution Category . 10 1.9 Shareholder Votes Made in the US Per Resolution Category . 11 1.10 Votes Made in the EU Per Resolution Category . 12 1.11 Votes Made in the GL Per Resolution Category . 13 1.12 Geographic Breakdown of Meetings All Supported . 14 1.13 List of all meetings voted . 15 2 Notable Oppose Vote Results With Analysis 24 3 Oppose/Abstain Votes With Analysis 47 4 Appendix 239 01-07-2020 to 30-09-2020 2 of 241 West Yorkshire Pension Fund 1 Resolution Analysis • Number of resolutions voted: 2637 (note that it MAY include non-voting items). • Number of resolutions supported by client: 1671 • Number of resolutions opposed by client: 656 • Number of resolutions abstained by client: 246 • Number of resolutions Non-voting: 54 • Number of resolutions Withheld by client: 9 • Number of resolutions Not Supported by client: 1 1.1 Number of meetings voted by geographical location Location Number of Meetings Voted UK & BRITISH OVERSEAS 107 EUROPE & GLOBAL EU 47 USA & CANADA 7 ASIA 35 JAPAN 1 AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND 1 SOUTH AMERICA 28 TOTAL 226 01-07-2020 to 30-09-2020 3 of 241 West Yorkshire Pension Fund 1.2 Number of Resolutions by Vote Categories Vote Categories Number of Resolutions For 1671 Abstain 246 Oppose 656 Non-Voting 54 Not Supported 1 Withhold 9 US Frequency Vote on Pay 0 Withdrawn 0 TOTAL 2637 01-07-2020 to 30-09-2020 4 of 241 West Yorkshire Pension Fund 1.3 List of meetings not voted and reasons why Company Meeting Date Type Comment DAIMLER AG 08-07-2020 AGM Meeting postponed/cancelled HON HAI PRECISION IND CO LTD 10-07-2020 EGM No ballot received PETROBRAS-PETROLEO BRASILEIRO 22-07-2020 EGM No ballot received ALMIRALL SA 24-07-2020 AGM Meeting postponed/cancelled BOLSAS Y MERCADOS ESPANOLES 30-07-2020 EGM No ballot received EASTERN WATER RESOURCES DEV & MGMT 04-08-2020 AGM Meeting postponed/cancelled TIM PARTICIPACOES SA 31-08-2020 EGM No ballot received COSAN LIMITED 01-09-2020 AGM No ballot received ELETROBRAS 02-09-2020 EGM No ballot received FOLLIE FOLLIE GROUP 10-09-2020 AGM No ballot received OI S.A. 17-09-2020 EGM No ballot received DAVIDE CAMPARI MILANO NV 18-09-2020 EGM No ballot received VOLKSWAGEN AG 30-09-2020 AGM Information only meeting 01-07-2020 to 30-09-2020 5 of 241 West Yorkshire Pension Fund 1.4 List of meetings with rejected votes and reasons why Company Meeting Date Type Comment EMPRESAS ICA SAB DE CV 24-07-2020 AGM Incorrect/No Power of Attorney ALFA SAB DE CV 17-08-2020 EGM Incorrect/No Power of Attorney 01-07-2020 to 30-09-2020 6 of 241 West Yorkshire Pension Fund 1.5 Number of Votes by Region Not US Frequency For Abstain Oppose Non-Voting Supported Withhold Withdrawn Vote on Pay Total UK & BRITISH OVERSEAS 1012 121 316 0 0 0 0 0 1449 EUROPE & GLOBAL EU 368 48 204 54 0 0 0 0 674 USA & CANADA 44 13 14 0 0 9 0 0 80 ASIA 136 28 83 0 0 0 0 0 247 JAPAN 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 6 SOUTH AMERICA 95 36 36 0 1 0 0 0 168 TOTAL 1671 246 656 54 1 9 0 0 2637 01-07-2020 to 30-09-2020 7 of 241 West Yorkshire Pension Fund 1.6 Votes Made in the Portfolio Per Resolution Category Portfolio For Abstain Oppose Non-Voting Not Supported Withheld Withdrawn All Employee Schemes 14 0 3 0 0 0 0 Annual Reports 174 80 85 0 0 0 0 Articles of Association 98 4 16 0 0 0 0 Auditors 131 35 59 0 0 0 0 Corporate Actions 17 8 0 0 0 0 0 Corporate Donations 26 2 1 0 0 0 0 Debt & Loans 9 0 6 0 0 0 0 Directors 758 75 227 0 1 9 0 Dividend 97 7 2 0 0 0 0 Executive Pay Schemes 12 0 29 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 101 11 12 0 0 0 0 NED Fees 15 11 13 0 0 0 0 Non-Voting 0 1 0 54 0 0 0 Say on Pay 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 Share Capital Restructuring 13 0 3 0 0 0 0 Share Issue/Re-purchase 197 6 187 0 0 0 0 Shareholder Resolution 9 5 7 0 0 0 0 01-07-2020 to 30-09-2020 8 of 241 West Yorkshire Pension Fund 1.7 Votes Made in the UK Per Resolution Category UK For Abstain Oppose Non-Voting Not Supported Withheld Withdrawn Annual Reports 52 26 7 0 0 0 0 Remuneration Reports 34 23 20 0 0 0 0 Remuneration Policy 10 8 23 0 0 0 0 Dividend 44 0 1 0 0 0 0 Directors 461 27 66 0 0 0 0 Approve Auditors 36 26 24 0 0 0 0 Share Issues 152 3 20 0 0 0 0 Share Repurchases 3 0 72 0 0 0 0 Executive Pay Schemes 9 0 19 0 0 0 0 All-Employee Schemes 13 0 1 0 0 0 0 Political Donations 26 2 1 0 0 0 0 Articles of Association 21 3 4 0 0 0 0 Mergers/Corporate Actions 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 Meeting Notification related 49 0 1 0 0 0 0 All Other Resolutions 100 0 50 0 0 0 0 Shareholder Resolution 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 01-07-2020 to 30-09-2020 9 of 241 West Yorkshire Pension Fund 1.8 Votes Made in the US Per Resolution Category US/Global US & Canada For Abstain Oppose Non-Voting Not Supported Withheld Withdrawn All Employee Schemes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Reports 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Articles of Association 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 Auditors 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 Corporate Actions 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Corporate Donations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Debt & Loans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Directors 32 10 3 0 0 9 0 Dividend 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Executive Pay Schemes 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 NED Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non-Voting 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Say on Pay 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 Share Capital Restructuring 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Share Issue/Re-purchase 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01-07-2020 to 30-09-2020 10 of 241 West Yorkshire Pension Fund 1.9 Shareholder Votes Made in the US Per Resolution Category US/Global US and Canada For Abstain Oppose Non-Voting Not Withheld Withdrawn Supported Social Policy Political Spending/Lobbying 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Employment Rights 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Lobbying 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Executive Compensation Performance Metrics Requirement 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Corporate Governance Diversity of the Board/Director Qualification 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Written Consent 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 01-07-2020 to 30-09-2020 11 of 241 West Yorkshire Pension Fund 1.10 Votes Made in the EU Per Resolution Category EU & Global EU For Abstain Oppose Non-Voting Not Supported Withheld Withdrawn All Employee Schemes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 Annual Reports 37 15 26 0 0 0 0 Articles of Association 53 0 5 0 0 0 0 Auditors 13 6 16 0 0 0 0 Corporate Actions 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Corporate Donations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Debt & Loans 6 0 4 0 0 0 0 Directors 162 16 106 0 0 0 0 Dividend 28 1 1 0 0 0 0 Executive Pay Schemes 3 0 7 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 23 1 3 0 0 0 0 NED Fees 8 3 1 0 0 0 0 Non-Voting 0 1 0 54 0 0 0 Say on Pay 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Share Capital Restructuring 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 Share Issue/Re-purchase 27 0 33 0 0 0 0 Shareholder Resolution 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 01-07-2020 to 30-09-2020 12 of 241 West Yorkshire Pension Fund 1.11 Votes Made in the GL Per Resolution Category Global For Abstain Oppose Non-Voting Not Supported Withheld Withdrawn All Employee Schemes 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Annual Reports 40 8 9 0 0 0 0 Articles of Association 20 1 7 0 0 0 0 Auditors 5 2 14 0 0 0 0 Corporate Actions 12 5 0 0 0 0 0 Corporate Donations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Debt & Loans 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 Directors 100 22 52 0 1 0 0 Dividend 25 6 0 0 0 0 0 Executive Pay Schemes 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous 22 9 7 0 0 0 0 NED Fees 7 8 9 0 0 0 0 Non-Voting 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Say on Pay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Share Capital Restructuring 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 Share Issue/Re-purchase 10 3 17 0 0 0 0 Shareholder Resolution 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01-07-2020 to 30-09-2020 13 of 241 West Yorkshire Pension Fund 1.12 Geographic Breakdown of Meetings All Supported SZ Meetings All For AGM EGM 1 0 0 0 AS Meetings All For AGM EGM 35 7 0 7 UK Meetings All For AGM EGM 107 12 0 12 EU Meetings All For AGM EGM 47 4 0 4 SA Meetings All For AGM EGM 28 7 0 7 GL Meetings All For AGM EGM 0 0 0 0 JP Meetings All For AGM EGM 1 1 0 1 US Meetings All For AGM EGM 7 0 0 0 TOTAL Meetings All For AGM EGM 226 31 0 31 01-07-2020 to 30-09-2020 14 of 241 West Yorkshire Pension Fund 1.13 List of all meetings voted Company Meeting Date Type Resolutions For Abstain Oppose GRUPO AEROPORTUARIO DEL PACIFICO 01-07-2020 EGM 2 2 0 0 GRUPO AEROPORTUARIO DEL PACIFICO 01-07-2020 AGM 14 7 2 5 SAINSBURY (J) PLC 02-07-2020 AGM 22 16 2 4 PROMOTORA Y OPERADORA DE INFRAESTRUCTURA 03-07-2020 AGM 11 0 11 0 MARKS & SPENCER GROUP PLC 03-07-2020 AGM 23 13 2 8 GEORGIA CAPITAL PLC 06-07-2020 EGM 2 2 0 0 BLUEFIELD SOLAR INCOME FUND LIMITED 06-07-2020 EGM 2 1 0 1 WAREHOUSE REIT PLC 06-07-2020 EGM 7 5 0 2 BANCA POPOLARE EMILIA ROMAGNA 06-07-2020 EGM 2 2 0 0 GRUPO AEROPORTUARIO DEL CENTRO NORTE 07-07-2020 AGM 9 7 0 2 GCP ASSET BACKED INCOME FUND LIMITED 07-07-2020 AGM 13 10 1 2 GCP ASSET BACKED INCOME FUND LIMITED 07-07-2020 EGM 1 0 0 1 TAKKT AG 07-07-2020 AGM 8 6 0 1 WHITBREAD PLC 07-07-2020 AGM 21 16 2 3 ASSURA PLC 07-07-2020 AGM 16 12 2 2 MASMOVIL IBERCOM SA 08-07-2020 AGM 21 14 0 7 DAIMLER AG 08-07-2020 AGM 16 10 0 5 ALSTOM SA 08-07-2020 AGM 27 14 2 11 SIEMENS AG 09-07-2020 EGM 1 1 0 0 3I INFRASTRUCTURE PLC 09-07-2020 AGM 16 15 0 1 TEMPLETON EMERGING MARKETS I.T.
Recommended publications
  • Copyright Notice
    COPYRIGHT NOTICE Please note: The material contained in this document can be used ONLY forpersonal study/research and therefore can be copied but only forpersonal use. Any form of copying for distribution purposes requires copyright permission from author/university. UNIVERSITY OF NATAL AN EXPLORATORY STUDY TO DETERMINE IF THE VENTURE CAPITAL SCHEMES FRAMEWORK CAN BE INTRODUCED TO SOUTH AFRICA RAJENDRAN GOVENDER University of Natal Graduate School of Business Master of Business Administration Supervisor Pro£ Abhijit Bhattacharya Topic An exploratory study to determine if the Venture Capital Schemes Framework can be introduced to South Africa Student Rajendran Govender Student No. 201 506209 Date 15 September 2003 DECLARAnON "1, Rajendran Govender, hereby declare that: • the work in this report is my own original work, • all sources used or referred to have been documented and recognised, • this report has not been previously submitted in full or partial fulfilment of the requirements for an equivalent, or higher qualification at any other educational institution. " . ... -----------------------------~ ~ . 096662 Rajendran Govender September 2003 • f..:.; ' II ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my supervisor, Professor Abhijit Bhattacharya for his assistance, time and guidance in completing this dissertation. I would also like to thank Mr. Raj Sewnarain and Mr. Jay Soma of Business Partners Limited (East Fund - Durban), for taking time out oftheir busy schedules and assisting with the discussion / interview component of the research design. ill ABSTRACT The South African government has indicated that the National Small Business Act of 1996 had failed to get the small business sector working successfully as engine for growth. Thus, government policy measures, using an institutional network alone, to create a thriving SME economy, has not succeeded.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Turning up the Heat: How Venture Capital Can Help Fuel The
    1 Turning up the Heat: How Venture Capital Can Help Fuel the Economic Transformation of the Great Lakes Region Appendices 2 Appendix A Key Venture Capital Words, Phrases and Concepts1 Venture capital refers to cash invested by professional investors in new companies with prospects for rapid growth, substantial size, and attractive profitability. The definitions of pre-seed, seed, and early stage venture investing refer to the earliest stages of professional investing, often when the company does not yet have all of the components of a fully functioning enterprise, namely: management, developed products, and sales. Pre-seed investments usually take place before a company is formed and finance the early stages of technology development and company formation. These stages are succeeded by seed and early stage investing, when some elements of company operations are in place, but where management teams, products, and markets are not fully tested against the competition. Generally speaking, all three investment phases occur pre-revenue or before meaningful revenue is earned. Investors in start-up companies include the business founders, their friends and families, angels, and professional venture capitalists. Investing in these businesses generally starts with the founders and proceeds through friends and family members who personally know the founders; investors may also include angel investors who may not have personal acquaintance with the founders, and/or professional venture capitalists who are investing in the business without any necessary prior involvement with any of the company’s other investors. Historically, angel investors were high net-worth individuals who provided investment cash without becoming involved in management of the enterprise.
    [Show full text]
  • Restructuring of the Rembrandt Group Circular to Shareholders and Notices of Annual General Meetings 30 August 2000
    Rembrandt Group Limited Rembrandt Controlling Investments Limited Technical Investment Corporation Limited Technical and Industrial Investments Limited Restructuring of the Rembrandt Group Circular to shareholders and notices of annual general meetings 30 August 2000 Attorneys Joint sponsoring brokers Deutsche Bank Securities Deutsche Bank Securities (SA) (Pty) Ltd Hofmeyr Herbstein & Gihwala Inc. (Registration number 1995/011798/07) Reporting accountants PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. Chartered Accountants (SA) Registered Accountants and Auditors (Registration no 1998/012055/21) Indien u ’n Afrikaanse vertaling van hierdie dokument wil hê, skakel asseblief 0800 996 164 If you have any questions regarding the restructuring of the Rembrandt Group, call the Information Agents on 0800 996 164 (or + 44 20 7335 7278 if you are phoning from outside South Africa) are acting as Information Agents to answer your questions about the restructuring. Corporate information Directors of Rembrandt Group Limited (Registration number 1948/031037/06) Johann Rupert (Chairman) P J Erasmus* E de la H Hertzog (Co-Deputy Chairman) D M Falck M H Visser (Co-Deputy Chairman and Managing Director) J Malherbe P E Beyers E Molobi* W E Bührmann J A Preller G D de Jager* P G Steyn* J W Dreyer T van Wyk * non-executive Directors of Rembrandt Controlling Investments Limited (Registration number 1952/000002/06) Johann Rupert (Chairman) D M Falck E de la H Hertzog (Co-Deputy Chairman) J Malherbe M H Visser (Co-Deputy Chairman and Managing Director) E Molobi* P E Beyers J A
    [Show full text]
  • 3I Infrastructure Plc Completes the Sale of Its Stake in Cross London Trains and the Acquisition of Tampnet
    3i Infrastructure plc completes the sale of its stake in Cross London Trains and the acquisition of Tampnet 14 MARCH 2019 3i Infrastructure plc (“3i Infrastructure”) yesterday completed the sale of its 33.3% stake in Cross London Trains (“XLT”) following the satisfaction of certain conditions. The sale, to a consortium of Dalmore and Equitix funds, was announced on 5 February 2019 with proceeds to 3i Infrastructure of £333 million. XLT was established to procure and lease the rolling stock for use on the Thameslink passenger rail franchise. 3i Infrastructure today completed the acquisition of Tampnet following the receipt of regulatory approvals in Europe and the USA. 3i Infrastructure has invested €226 million alongside Danish pension fund ATP, with each party acquiring 50%. 3i Infrastructure’s investment manager, 3i Investments plc, will manage the investment on behalf of the consortium. Tampnet is the leading offshore telecoms network operator in the North Sea and the Gulf of Mexico. The transaction was announced on 27 July 2018. -Ends- For further information, contact: Thomas Fodor Investor enquiries +44 20 7975 3469 Kathryn van der Kroft Media enquiries +44 20 7975 3021 Notes to editors: About 3i Infrastructure plc 3i Infrastructure plc is a Jersey-incorporated, closed-ended investment company, an approved UK Investment Trust (with effect from 15 October 2018), listed on the London Stock Exchange and regulated by the Jersey Financial Services Commission. It is a long- term investor in infrastructure businesses and assets. Its market focus is on economic infrastructure and greenfield projects in developed economies, principally in Europe, investing in operating businesses and projects which generate long-term yield and capital growth.
    [Show full text]
  • PIC INSURES the 3I GROUP PENSION PLAN
    PIC INSURES THE 3i GROUP PENSION PLAN London, 26 May 2017 – Pension Insurance Corporation plc (“PIC”), a specialist insurer of defined benefit pension funds, has concluded a pension insurance buy-in with the Trustees of the 3i Group Pension Plan (“the Plan”), for a premium of approximately £200 million. The buy-in covers around 40% of the Plan’s liabilities for pensions in payment. The Trustees were advised by LCP and Linklaters. 3i is a leading international investment manager focused on mid-market Private Equity and Infrastructure. Their core investment markets are northern Europe and North America. Carol Woodley, Chairman of Trustees, said: “The Plan has been de-risking for a number of years, primarily by moving our asset mix to favour index-linked gilts. We are very pleased to have been able to complete this logical next step in our long-term de-risking programme. PIC demonstrated significant expertise while helping us to manage a complex project and ultimately deliver the transaction we required.” Uzma Nazir, Head of Origination Structuring at PIC, said: “The Plan’s Trustees and the company have a well-developed de-risking strategy in place. As part of this strategy, the Trustees have been increasing the proportion of the Plan’s assets invested in bonds over time. This strategy has proved to be the right one and the Trustees have now been able to de-risk a significant proportion of the liabilities. We are delighted to have been able to help them achieve this goal.” Michelle Wright, Partner at LCP and lead adviser on the transaction, said “The buy-in is an important step in the Plan’s de-risking journey, reducing the Plan’s exposure to longevity risk and providing perfect hedging of the Plan’s complex pension increases for around 40% of the Plan’s liabilities for pensions in payment.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Institutional Investors the Answer for Long-Term Development Financing?
    Development Co-operation Report 2014 Mobilising Resources for Sustainable Development © OECD 2014 PART I Chapter 6 Are institutional investors the answer for long-term development financing? by Raffaele Della Croce, Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs,1 OECD Developing countries need long-term investors to help finance activities that support sustainable growth such as infrastructure, including low-carbon infrastructure. With USD 83.2 trillion in assets in 2012 in OECD countries alone, institutional investors – pension funds, insurers and sovereign wealth funds – represent a potentially major source of long-term financing for developing countries. Despite the recent financial crisis, the prospect for future growth for institutional investors is unabated, especially in developing countries. But although interest is growing, the overall level of institutional investment in infrastructure remains modest and major barriers to investment still exist. Greater growth will depend on policy and structural reforms to create a more favourable investment climate, build private sector confidence and ensure that global savings are channelled into productive and sustainable investments. This chapter also includes an opinion piece on long-term investment by Sony Kapoor, Managing Director of Re-Define, on promoting long-term investment in developing country infrastructure. 79 I.6. ARE INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS THE ANSWER FOR LONG-TERM DEVELOPMENT FINANCING? Long-term finance plays a pivotal role in fulfilling physical investment needs across all sectors of the economy (OECD, 2013c). It is also essential for the development of small and medium-sized enterprises, especially young, innovative, high-growth firms. Addressing the challenge of climate change and other pressures on the environment will require long-term investments in renewable energy and low-carbon technologies (G20/OECD, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Sovereign Wealth Funds As Sustainability Instruments? Disclosure of Sustainability Criteria in Worldwide Comparison
    sustainability Article Sovereign Wealth Funds as Sustainability Instruments? Disclosure of Sustainability Criteria in Worldwide Comparison Stefan Wurster * and Steffen Johannes Schlosser TUM School of Governance, Technical University Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) are state-owned investment vehicles intended to pursue national objectives. Their nature as long-term investors combined with their political mandate could make SWFs an instrument suited to promote sustainability. As an essential precondition, it is important for SWFs to commit to sustainability criteria as part of an overarching strategy. In the article, we present the sustainability disclosure index (SDI), an original new dataset for a selection of over 50 SWFs to investigate whether SWFs disclose sustainability criteria covering environmental, social, economic, and governance aspects into their mandate. In addition to an empirical measurement of the disclosure rate, we conduct multiple regressions to analyze what factors help to explain the variance between SWFs. We see that a majority of SWFs disclose at least some of the sustainability criteria. However, until today, only a small minority address a broad selection as a possible basis for a comprehensive sustainability strategy. While a high-state capacity and a young population in a country as well as a commitment to the international Santiago Principles are positively associated with a higher disclosure rate, we find no evidence for strong effects of the economic development level, the resource abundance, and the degree of democratization of a country or of the specific size and structure of a fund. Identifying favorable conditions for a higher commitment of SWFs could Citation: Wurster, S.; Schlosser, S.J.
    [Show full text]
  • 1199SEIU Health Care Employees Pension Fund
    1199SEIU Health Care Employees Pension Fund SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION OF YOUR PENSION BENEFITS HOME | TABLE OF CONTENTS | HOME | TABLE OF CONTENTS | July 2016 Dear Pension Fund Participants and Retirees: This updated booklet contains a Summary Plan Description (“SPD”) of your Pension Plan as well as a copy of the Plan Document for the 1199SEIU Health Care Employees Pension Fund (the “Plan” or “Pension Fund”). It can help you plan and prepare for Retirement. If you have any questions about the Pension Plan and how it affects you, feel free to make an appointment with a Pension Fund Counselor. When you do, it’s important to make your appointment at least three to six months before you plan to Retire. Your Pension Fund Counselor will explain your pension benefits and options, and help you through the application process. This SPD is a non-technical explanation of your pension benefits. It is written to make it easier for you to understand your rights and responsibilities under the Plan Document and related Trust Agreement. However, it may not provide you with all of the details of the Plan’s rules and regulations, nor does it modify, change or otherwise interpret the terms of the Plan Document. Any words that have an initial capital letter are defined terms and appear in Section XII under the heading “Key Terms and Definitions.” Telephone conversations and other oral statements can easily be misunderstood. Therefore, you should rely on the information provided in the SPD and Plan Document rather than any oral explanation of the Plan’s provisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Contribution of Pension Funds to the Capital Markets of the EEC
    COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Report on the contribution of pension funds to the capital markets of the EEC ECONOMIE AND FINANCIAL AFFAIRS SERIES - 1968 - 7 I Report on the Contribution of Pension Funds to the Capital Markets of the EEC STUDIES ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL AFFAIRS SERIES No. 1 BRUSSELS 1969 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 7 CHAPTER I Some conceptual considerations 9 1. Current transfers 9 2. Funding (capitalization) 10 3. Effects on capital markets 11 CHAPTER II Pension funds and their assets - The present status 15 1. United Kingdom 15 2. United States 16 3. Holland 17 4. Germany 18 5. Italy 20 6. Belgium 21 7. France 22 CHAPTER III Scope for growth of pension funds 24 1. Statistics and estimates 24 2. Scope of analysis 24 3. Basic assumptions 24 4. Conceptual framework 25 5. Projections of membership 26 6. Projections of benefits 27 7. Projections of fund assets 27 8. Main conclusions and implications 32 CHAPTER IV Possible reforms to foster the security and growth of pension funds and their contribution to capital markets 37 1. On pension funds in the form of balance-sheet provisions (Germany and Italy) 37 2. On the legal form of pension funds 39 3 Page 3. On countries with a repartition system in force 39 4. On the tax position of pension funds 40 5. On the regulation of pension funds 42 APPENDICES TO CHAPTER III 45 List of tables in the text Table 1 - Trends in private non-agricultural employment 28 Table 2 - Projections of membership penetration 28 Table 3 - Covered workers by country and main type of fund
    [Show full text]
  • Pension Fund Investment in Infrastructure: a Resource Paper
    - Occasional Paper Series - No.3 December, 2008 Pension Fund Investment in Infrastructure: A Resource Paper By Larry W. Beeferman Pensions and Capital Stewardship Project Labor and Worklife Program Harvard Law School Contents Abstract............................................................................ 1 Introduction...................................................................... 2 Section 1: Risk, Reward, and Other Financial Considerations A. Infrastructure: defi nitions………….…………….…... 5 B. Why infrastructure investments may be attractive to pension funds.................................... 7 C. The fi nancial rewards and risks of investments in individual infrastructure facilities…………….. 8 D. Where infrastructure investments fi t in the fund portfolio…................................................. 15 E. Types of investment vehicles……………….............. 18 F. Financial performance…………………………………. 23 G. Fees and other charges………………………………. 29 Section 2: Labor Implications and Responses A. Potential impacts………..……………………………... 32 B. Contractual and legislative responses…………….. 35 C. Pension fund responses.…..……………………….... 40 Conclusions…………………………………….................. 50 Endnotes…..…………………………………….................. 56 Occasional Papers | December 2008 Pension Fund Investment in Infrastructure: A Resource Paper By Larry W. Beeferman* Abstract What is termed “infrastructure” appears to offer pension funds opportunities for investment that might yield substantial and predictable returns matching their long-term liabilities. But there
    [Show full text]
  • SAVCA KPMG Private Equity Survey 2004
    SAVCA Southern African Venture Capital and KPMG AND SAVCA Private Equity and Venture Capital Survey – 2003 KPMG CORPORATE FINANCE The GIBS & SAVCA Foundation Programme for Venture Capital and Private Equity. Consider it your first major investment. The Gordon Institute of Business Science, together with the Southern African Venture Capital and Private Equity Association, have partnered to create The Foundation Programme, a three day course from 1-3 June 2004. This programme will provide a strategic overview of the Venture Capital and Private Equity industry and processes, as well as a working knowledge of key analytical tools used by practitioners and insights into practical challenges and strategic opportunities in the industry. The 3-year partnership between GIBS and SAVCA will include the hosting of: G An annual 3-day Foundation Programme G An annual 1-day Advanced Programme G A number of GIBS Forum events highlighting topical industry issues which have an impact on practitioners. For more information on these programmes visit www.gibs.co.za/savca or to reserve your seat contact Maritsa Botha on 011 771 4317, or email at [email protected]. But don’t wait too long. An investment this profitable doesn’t come around every day SAVCA sponsors KPMG and SAVCA Private Equity and Venture Capital Survey – 2003 KPMG and SAVCA 1 Contents Highlights 3 Glossary 4 Foreword 5 Sources Of Information 6 Introduction to Private Equity 7 Funds Under Management 9 Fund Raising Activity 13 Investment Activity 16 Exits 21 Performance 23 Black Economic Empowerment
    [Show full text]
  • K P M G a N D S a V C a Private Equity and Venture Capital Survey – 2002
    KPMG AND SAVCA Private Equity and Venture Capital Survey – 2002 KPMG CORPORATE FINANCE SAVCA – WBS Foundation Programme for Practitioners In Venture Capital and Private Equity VCPE 7-9 May 2003 University of the Witwatersrand 2 St David’s Place, PARKTOWN, Johannesburg 2193 Programme Booking and Administration: Anne Badcock Tel: (011) 717-3573 Fax (011) 643-2336 e-mail: [email protected] WBS Website: www.wits.ac.za/wbs KPMG and SAVCA Private Equity and Venture Capital Survey – 2002 Highlights I South Africa’s private equity industry boasts R40,6 billion in funds under management I R8,7 billion in undrawn commitments available for future investments I Investment spending by private equity firms up 63% from 2001 to R3,9 billion in 2002 I Fourth consecutive year of decreased fund raising with R800 million in new commitments raised during 2002 Private Equity and Venture Capital Survey – 2002 3 Contents Glossary 4 Foreword 5 Sources of information 6 Introduction to private equity 7 Funds under management and commitments 9 Investments 17 Exits 21 Performance 22 Black Economic Empowerment 24 References and footnotes 26 Glossary IRR – Internal Rate of Return. BEE – Black Economic Empowerment. BVCA – British Venture Capital Association. EVCA – European Private Equity & Venture Capital Association. Follow on investments – Investments into companies where first round funding has already been made. Gross IRR – IRR before the deduction of management fees and carried interest. Gross realised IRR – Gross IRR on the total realised portfolio of investments. Draw down – A draw down or capital call occurs when third party investors (called limited partners in the US) provide cash to a private equity fund for investment into a portfolio company.
    [Show full text]