DOCSLIB.ORG

Infrastructure Delivery Plan (2021) Main Report Issue | 1 June 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Infrastructure Delivery Plan (2021) Main Report Issue | 1 June 2021 Local Plan Review: Infrastructure Delivery Plan (2021) Main Report Issue | 1 June 2021 | Local Plan Review: Infrastructure Delivery Plan (2021) Contents Sector-specific Funding 44 Conclusions 44 1 Introduction 5 Purpose of the Infrastructure Delivery Plan 5 6 Infrastructure Assessment: Education 45 Structure of this Report 5 Responsibility for delivery 45 Overview of progress since the 2016 IDP 45 2 Policy Context 7 Assessment of Current Infrastructure Provision 47 National Planning Policy 7 Planned Provision and Scheme Identification based on revised Housing and Local Planning Policy Context 7 Employment Needs 51 Sector-specific Funding 62 3 Approach and Methodology 11 Conclusions 62 Approach 11 Methodology 11 7 Infrastructure Assessment: Health and Social Care 63 Responsibility for delivery 63 4 Infrastructure Assessment: Transport and Highways 13 Overview of progress since the 2014 IDP 63 Responsibility for delivery 13 Assessment of Current Infrastructure Provision 66 Overview of progress since the 2016 IDP 13 Planned Provision and Scheme Identification based on revised Housing and Assessment of Current Infrastructure Provision 18 Employment Needs 72 Planned Provision and Scheme Identification based on revised Housing and Sector-specific Funding 79 Employment Needs 22 Conclusions 80 Sector-specific Funding 30 Conclusions 31 8 Infrastructure Assessment: Open Space, Green Infrastructure and Biodiversity 81 5 Infrastructure Assessment: Flood Risk Management 32 Responsibility for delivery 81 Responsibility for delivery 32 Overview of progress since the 2014 IDP 81 Overview of progress since the 2014 IDP 33 Assessment of Current Infrastructure Provision 83 Assessment of Current Infrastructure Provision 36 Planned Provision and Scheme Identification based on revised Housing and Planned Provision and Scheme Identification based on revised Housing and Employment Needs 87 Employment Needs 38 Sector-specific Funding 96 Arup | Main Report | 1 June 2021 3 \\GLOBAL\EUROPE\BRISTOL\JOBS\273XXX\273776-00\4.50_REPORTS\08. 2021 UPDATE\SDC IDP - MAIN REPORT MAY 2021 CLEAN.DOCX | Local Plan Review: Infrastructure Delivery Plan (2021) Conclusions 97 Assessment of Current Infrastructure Provision 144 Planned Provision and Scheme Identification based on revised Housing and 9 Infrastructure Assessment: Sport and Recreation 98 Employment Needs 147 Responsibility for delivery 98 Sector-specific Funding 159 Overview of progress since the 2016 IDP 98 Conclusions 160 Assessment of Current Infrastructure Provision 102 13 Infrastructure Assessment: Information and Communications Technology 162 Planned Provision and Scheme Identification based on revised Housing and Employment Needs 108 Responsibility for delivery 162 Sector-specific Funding 117 Overview of progress since the 2016 IDP 162 Conclusions 117 Assessment of Current Infrastructure Provision 166 Planned Provision and Scheme Identification based on revised Housing and 10 Infrastructure Assessment: Community Facilities 118 Employment Needs 168 Responsibility for delivery 118 Sector-specific Funding 170 Overview of progress since the 2016 IDP 118 Conclusions 170 Assessment of Current Infrastructure Provision 120 14 Infrastructure Assessment: Waste 171 Planned Provision and Scheme Identification based on revised Housing and Employment Needs 124 Responsibility for delivery 171 Sector-specific Funding 130 Overview of progress since the 2016 IDP 171 Conclusions 130 Assessment of Current Infrastructure Provision 173 Planned Provision and Scheme Identification based on revised Housing and 11 Infrastructure Assessment: Emergency Services 132 Employment Needs 173 Responsibility for delivery 132 Sector-specific Funding 173 Overview of progress since the 2016 IDP 132 Conclusions 174 Assessment of Current Infrastructure Provision 136 15 Delivery Strategy 175 Planned Provision and Scheme Identification based on revised Housing and Employment Needs 137 Sector-specific Funding 141 Conclusions 142 12 Infrastructure Assessment: Utilities 143 Responsibility for delivery 143 Overview of progress since the 2014 IDP 143 4 Arup | Main Report | 1 June 2021 \\GLOBAL\EUROPE\BRISTOL\JOBS\273XXX\273776-00\4.50_REPORTS\08. 2021 UPDATE\SDC IDP - MAIN REPORT MAY 2021 CLEAN.DOCX | Local Plan Review: Infrastructure Delivery Plan (2021) 1 Introduction policy to set out an overall strategy for the pattern, scale and quality of development to make sufficient provision infrastructure types. Purpose of the Infrastructure Delivery Plan Structure of this Report Following the publication of the Stroud District Local Plan Review Draft for This IDP is a ‘refresh’ and uses the existing IDPs (Arup, 20132 and 20143) as a Consultation in November 2019, this Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) forms baseline. A summary of the infrastructure position for each sector as recorded in part of the evidence base to support the Publication version1 of the emerging the 2014 IDP will be outlined within each chapter, as well as the following: Stroud District Local Plan Review. Reporting of policy changes and strategy updates at national and local This IDP draws together baseline information from stakeholders for transport, levels; utilities, community and green infrastructure and services to understand the current the quality, capacity and any gaps or shortfalls of existing infrastructure Updates on the infrastructure projects delivered or progressed since the last provision within Stroud District. IDP in 2014 (where available); The IDP then utilises the views of expert stakeholders, existing evidence and a An assessment of current infrastructure; and range of benchmarks and standards to provide an assessment of the Consideration of the levels of growth proposed in the Development Plan infrastructure that will be required to support the housing and employment Review and the future infrastructure requirements associated with this. growth set out in the emerging Local Plan Review. It will also seek to identify where new or improved infrastructure could help to unlock development sites. The report is structured as follows: The benchmarks and costs, derived from national, county and local levels, will Section 2 sets out the national and local policy context for the Infrastructure be used to estimate the costs of infrastructure providing infrastructure to meet Strategy; demands associated with housing and employment growth and the IDP will seek Section 3 sets out the approach and methodology for the study; to identify potential funding solutions and calculate any shortfalls in funding. Sections 4 to 14 provide a sector by sector summary of the infrastructure It is recommended that the information within this IDP should inform any baseline and requirements to support development proposed by the review of planning obligations and used to support specific negotiations in Development Plan review. Each section provides an overview of the relation to s.106 and s.278 agreements. organisation responsible for planning and service delivery; and assessment The IDP aims to inform any cross-boundary strategic policies as set out within of infrastructure needs and costs; and key infrastructure project. Paragraph 20 of the National Planning Policy Framework, which requires such 1 Under reg. 19 of The Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012. 3 Arup (2014) Stroud Infrastructure Delivery Plan, Refresh Version. Available: 2 Arup (2013) Stroud Infrastructure Delivery Plan, Consultation Draft. Available: https://www.stroud.gov.uk/media/2312/ps_e23.pdf https://www.stroud.gov.uk/media/2311/stroud_idp.pdf Arup | Main Report | 1 June 2021 5 \\GLOBAL\EUROPE\BRISTOL\JOBS\273XXX\273776-00\4.50_REPORTS\08. 2021 UPDATE\SDC IDP - MAIN REPORT MAY 2021 CLEAN.DOCX | Local Plan Review: Infrastructure Delivery Plan (2021) Section 15 outlines the infrastructure delivery strategy to support the sustainable growth set out in the Local Plan Review. Within each sector, the infrastructure baseline and assessment against planned provision are reported on the basis of “Parish Clusters”. Further detail about parish clusters is included within the Policy Context section of this report. 6 Arup | Main Report | 1 June 2021 \\GLOBAL\EUROPE\BRISTOL\JOBS\273XXX\273776-00\4.50_REPORTS\08. 2021 UPDATE\SDC IDP - MAIN REPORT MAY 2021 CLEAN.DOCX | Local Plan Review: Infrastructure Delivery Plan (2021) 2 Policy Context Local Planning Policy Context Stroud District Local Plan (Adopted 2015) National Planning Policy The Stroud District Local Plan sets out the development strategy and delivery National Planning Policy Framework policies to support the sustainable growth of Stroud District up to 2031. The development strategy establishes broad principles about acceptable levels of Paragraph 20 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) requires that development in the district’s towns and the countryside, whilst the policies seek development plans should “contain strategic policies that set out an overall to support the development strategy by managing and directing development, as strategy for the pattern, scale and quality of development, and make sufficient well as specific site allocations, area designations, protections and planning provision for: controls. Housing (including affordable housing), employment, retail, leisure and The 2015 Local Plan supports the provision of the following, up to 2031: other commercial development; between 6,800 and 12,500 net jobs within new employment land Infrastructure for transport, telecommunications, security, waste allocations;
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Environment Agency Midlands Region Wetland Sites Of
    LA - M icllanAs <? X En v ir o n m e n t A g e n c y ENVIRONMENT AGENCY MIDLANDS REGION WETLAND SITES OF SPECIAL SCIENTIFIC INTEREST REGIONAL MONITORING STRATEGY John Davys Groundwater Resources Olton Court July 1999 E n v i r o n m e n t A g e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE ANGLIAN REGION Kingfisher House. Goldhay Way. Orton Goldhay, Peterborough PE2 5ZR 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................... 3 1.) The Agency's Role in Wetland Conservation and Management....................................................3 1.2 Wetland SSSIs in the Midlands Region............................................................................................ 4 1.3 The Threat to Wetlands....................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Monitoring & Management of Wetlands...........................................................................................4 1.5 Scope of the Report..............................................................................................................................4 1.6 Structure of the Report.......................................................................................................................5 2 SELECTION OF SITES....................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Definition of a Wetland Site................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • JNCC Coastal Directories Project Team
    Coasts and seas of the United Kingdom Region 11 The Western Approaches: Falmouth Bay to Kenfig edited by J.H. Barne, C.F. Robson, S.S. Kaznowska, J.P. Doody, N.C. Davidson & A.L. Buck Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House, City Road Peterborough PE1 1JY UK ©JNCC 1996 This volume has been produced by the Coastal Directories Project of the JNCC on behalf of the project Steering Group and supported by WWF-UK. JNCC Coastal Directories Project Team Project directors Dr J.P. Doody, Dr N.C. Davidson Project management and co-ordination J.H. Barne, C.F. Robson Editing and publication S.S. Kaznowska, J.C. Brooksbank, A.L. Buck Administration & editorial assistance C.A. Smith, R. Keddie, J. Plaza, S. Palasiuk, N.M. Stevenson The project receives guidance from a Steering Group which has more than 200 members. More detailed information and advice came from the members of the Core Steering Group, which is composed as follows: Dr J.M. Baxter Scottish Natural Heritage R.J. Bleakley Department of the Environment, Northern Ireland R. Bradley The Association of Sea Fisheries Committees of England and Wales Dr J.P. Doody Joint Nature Conservation Committee B. Empson Environment Agency Dr K. Hiscock Joint Nature Conservation Committee C. Gilbert Kent County Council & National Coasts and Estuaries Advisory Group Prof. S.J. Lockwood MAFF Directorate of Fisheries Research C.R. Macduff-Duncan Esso UK (on behalf of the UK Offshore Operators Association) Dr D.J. Murison Scottish Office Agriculture, Environment & Fisheries Department Dr H.J. Prosser Welsh Office Dr J.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Ornithological Interest of Sssis in England
    Natural England Research Report NERR015 A review of the ornithological interest of SSSIs in England www.naturalengland.org.uk Natural England Research Report NERR015 A review of the ornithological interest of SSSIs in England Allan Drewitt, Tristan Evans and Phil Grice Natural England Published on 31 July 2008 The views in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Natural England. You may reproduce as many individual copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with Natural England, 1 East Parade, Sheffield, S1 2ET ISSN 1754-1956 © Copyright Natural England 2008 Project details This report results from research commissioned by Natural England. A summary of the findings covered by this report, as well as Natural England's views on this research, can be found within Natural England Research Information Note RIN015 – A review of bird SSSIs in England. Project manager Allan Drewitt - Ornithological Specialist Natural England Northminster House Peterborough PE1 1UA [email protected] Contractor Natural England 1 East Parade Sheffield S1 2ET Tel: 0114 241 8920 Fax: 0114 241 8921 Acknowledgments This report could not have been produced without the data collected by the many thousands of dedicated volunteer ornithologists who contribute information annually to schemes such as the Wetland Bird Survey and to their county bird recorders. We are extremely grateful to these volunteers and to the organisations responsible for collating and reporting bird population data, including the British Trust for Ornithology, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, the Joint Nature Conservancy Council seabird team, the Rare Breeding Birds Panel and the Game and Wildlife Conservancy Trust.
    [Show full text]
  • A Strategy for the Identification of Contaminated Land Within Its Area
    A Strategy for the Identification of Contaminated Land June 2001- Issue 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Under legislation introduced on 1st April, 2000, Stroud District Council was placed under a statutory duty to inspect its District to identify contaminated land. A formal strategy was to be published by July, 2001 which would detail how the Authority intended to undertake its inspection duties. This document is that strategy. The District Council is the lead Authority with regard to contaminated land but, wherever necessary, it undertakes to work in partnership with other organisations, particularly the Environment Agency. Detailed consultation regarding this strategy was undertaken with both statutory and non-statutory consultees up to April, 2001. Publication of this final version occurred on 30th June, 2001, in line with legislative requirements. The Council’s priorities in dealing with contaminated land will be: 1. To protect human health 2. To protect controlled waters 3. To protect specified ecosystems 4. To prevent damage to property In dealing with these priorities the Council also aims to prevent any further contamination of land, to encourage voluntary remediation of contaminated land and to encourage re-use of brownfield land. A five-year programme of inspection will be undertaken with a target date for completion of April, 2005. A prioritised inspection programme is proposed, with Priority Investigation Areas being inspected first, followed by other areas later in the programme. Among the Priority Investigation Areas identified are major population centres, the Five Valleys, controlled waters are land owned by the Council itself. It is recognised that the inspection programme will need to be extremely flexible as some sites may be identified that require urgent attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Design Statement
    Draft Design Statement Please note that this is a rough draft. This is the initial response from Frampton on Severn Parish Council. It will be subject to amendment from planners and County Highways and the completed version will probably not include all the recommendations that are made here. Recommendations under discussion are shown in darker green. We will also make amendments following responses from parishioners. The document will then be edited and typeset. The following still needs to be added: More photographs, particularly of brick types, boundary types and the different wards. Additional maps, including those of footpaths, the conservation area and the location of open spaces. References Acknowledgements Lists of organisations and businesses Appendices The format: Links to the Stroud District Local Plan (the document used by planners to make decisions) are in blue boxes. In the final printed version these are likely to be reduced to the Plan references only. At present the content is included so that parishioners can see the connection between the local and parish plans. Parish council recommendations are in light green boxes. Darker green indicates that they are under discussion with Stroud planners, need discussion with County Highways or need to be moved to a parish action plan and outside of the planning document. Please note that by hovering your cursor over the relevant chapter in the index and clicking, you can jump directly to the chapter. Below each section you will find the word ‘Index’ and if you hover over this and click you will jump back to the index. Index Draft Design Statement 0 Index 1 New National Planning Policy Framework, March 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Gloucestershire Waste Local Plan
    GLOUCESTERSHIRE WASTE LOCAL PLAN GLOUCESTERSHIRE WASTE LOCAL PLAN 2002 – 2012 Peter Bungard Executive Director: Environment Gloucestershire County Council Shire Hall Gloucester GL1 2TH October 2004 Printed on 100% Recycled Paper ISBN www.gloucestershire.gov.uk Cover Photo “Bottles” by kind permission of the Environment Agency TIMETABLE AND ADOPTION PROCESS FOR THE GLOUCESTERSHIRE WASTE LOCAL PLAN Town & Country Planning [Development Plan] Regulations 1999 Consultation Autumn 1999 Pre Deposit Consultation based on key Waste Local Plan Pre Deposit Consultation Draft issues approach. October 1999 Consultation Period 1st Nov 1999 - 17th Dec 1999 Deposit of Proposals Summer / Autumn 2000 The Deposit Draft Plan is placed 'on Waste Local Plan Deposit Draft August 2000 deposit' for a 6 week period during which Deposit Period 14th September 2000 - 26th October representations may be made to the 2000 plan. Deposit of Revised Proposals This version indicates the changes to the Deposit Draft. Also placed 'on deposit' for Early Spring 2001 a 6 week period, during which Waste Local Plan Revised Deposit Draft April 2001 representations may be made to the changes only. Pre Inquiry Meeting Summer 2001 Around 12 weeks before the start of the 6th August 2001 Public Local Inquiry Public Local Inquiry Autumn / Winter 2001 Inquiry sat between 6th November 2001 and 9th January 2002 Summer 2002 Inspector’s Report Received August 2002 Autumn 2003 First Proposed Modification of WPA Consideration of the Inspector’s Report and Proposals Proposed Modifications, October 2003 (in response to Inspector’s Report) Second Proposed Modification of Spring / Summer 2004 Proposals Further Proposed Modifications, July 2004 Adoption Autumn 2004 Adopted Gloucestershire Waste Local Plan Foreword FOREWORD There are over half a million waste managers in Gloucestershire.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 4: Landscape Assessment Criteria and Broad Area Proformas
    Appendix 4: Landscape Assessment Criteria and Broad Area Proformas The Assessment of Strategic Development Opportunities in Parts of Gloucestershire Landscape and Visual Sensitivity Assessment Criteria Physical character (including topography and scale) This considers the shape and scale of the landform, landscape pattern and landscape elements in relation to the scale of potential development. Smooth, gently undulating or flat landforms are likely to be less sensitive to development than a landscape with a more dramatic landform, distinct landform features or incised valleys with prominent slopes. This criterion considers how developments fit with the scale of the landform (understanding the scale of the development proposed is important when applying this criterion). Larger scale, simple landforms are likely to be less sensitive to larger scale developments than smaller scale, enclosed landforms (where large scale developments could appear out of scale with the underlying landform). Conversely, smaller developments may be able to be screened within enclosed landforms, therefore reducing landscape sensitivity. Existing small-scale features in the landscape in the form of existing buildings or trees will influence the scale of development that can be accommodated in the landscape. Low sensitivity Low-moderate Moderate sensitivity Moderate-high High sensitivity sensitivity sensitivity e.g. the landscape has e.g. the landscape has an e.g. the landscape has a smooth, gently undulating undulating landform and dramatic landform or or featureless landform some distinct landform distinct landform features with uniform large-scale features; it is overlain by that contribute positively landscape pattern and low a mixture of small-scale to landscape character; density of overlying and larger scale field the area has a high density landscape features.
    [Show full text]
  • Shropshire Council Water Cycle Study Addendum: Water Quality Impact Assessment
    Shropshire Council Water Cycle Study Addendum: Water Quality Impact Assessment Final Report March 2021 www.jbaconsulting.com 3. Shropshire Water Cycle Study Water Quality Addendum 2021 i This page is intentionally blank. 3. Shropshire Water Cycle Study Water Quality Addendum 2021 i JBA Project Manager Richard Pardoe Pipe House Lupton Road Wallingford OX10 9BS Revision History Revision Ref/Date Amendments Issued to S3-P01 Draft Report Joy Tetsill 24/02/2021 (Senior Planning Officer) A1-C02 Final Report Joy Tetsill 05/03/2021 Contract This report describes a water quality impact assessment conducted as an addendum to the Shropshire Council Water Cycle Study in 2020. Richard Pardoe of JBA Consulting carried out this work. Prepared by .................................. Richard Pardoe MSc MEng Analyst Reviewed by ................................. Paul Eccleston BA CertWEM CEnv MCIWEM C.WEM Technical Director Purpose This document has been prepared as a Final Report for Shropshire Council. JBA Consulting accepts no responsibility or liability for any use that is made of this document other than by Shropshire Council for the purposes for which it was originally commissioned and prepared. JBA Consulting has no liability regarding the use of this report except to Shropshire Council. Copyright © Jeremy Benn Associates Limited 2021. Carbon Footprint A printed copy of the main text in this document will result in a carbon footprint of 91g if 100% post-consumer recycled paper is used and 115g if primary-source paper is used. These figures assume the report is printed in black and white on A4 paper and in duplex. JBA is aiming to reduce its per capita carbon emissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Walmore Common), Mr Hyslop (West Gloucestershire IDB) and Larry Howells (South Gloucestershire IDB)
    Report Number 692 Re-creation options for River Severn/Avon floodplain wetlands English Nature Research Reports working today for nature tomorrow English Nature Research Reports Number 692 Re-creation options for River Severn/Avon floodplain wetlands Ecoscope Applied Ecologists and Silsoe College, Cranfield University with Aspinwall Clouston Ltd For: The Environment Agency (Midlands region, Lower Severn Area) English Nature (Three Counties Team) The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (Central England Region) January 1999 You may reproduce as many additional copies of this report as you like for non-commercial purposes, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with English Nature, Northminster House, Peterborough PE1 1UA. However, if you wish to use all or part of this report for commercial purposes, including publishing, you will need to apply for a licence by contacting the Enquiry Service at the above address. Please note this report may also contain third party copyright material. ISSN 0967-876X © Copyright English Nature 2006 Cover note Project officer Dr Peter Holmes based at English Nature’s Three Counties Team office, Bronsil House, Eastnor, Ledbury, Herefordshire HR8 1EP. tel 01531 638500 [email protected] Contractor(s) (where appropriate) Ecoscope Applied Ecologists 9 Bennell Court Comberton Cambridge CB3 7DS and Silsoe College, Cranfield University Silsoe Bedford MK45 4DT with Aspinwall Clouston Ltd Sanderson House Station Rd Horsforth Leeds LS18 5NT The views in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of English Nature This report should be cited as: ECOSCOPE APPLIED ECOLOGISTS, SILSOE COLLEGE, & ASPINWALL CLOUSTON LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • Frampton on Severn Community Design Statement
    Frampton on Severn Community Design Statement A community’s description of Frampton on Severn parish and its guide for future development and conservation December 2018 Cover photgraph credits Front and back cover: Joshua Kattenhorn Inside front cover: Wayne Seeley (top), Tom Williams (bottom) Frampton on Severn Community Design Statement Autumn 2018 I welcome this document, which has been led by the local community. It offers residents a real opportunity to express their views on future changes to their local area by setting aspirations and providing a policy framework to consider proposals. It should encourage both locally distinctive and high quality design standards by identifying the local issues to be addressed. Such information can be used to celebrate our District’s special and diverse environmental qualities that I see every day. It should enhance all our understanding of the importance of local design in a collaborative and positive way. Doina Cornell Leader, Stroud District Council, 2018 Frampton on Severn Parish Council has been producing future plans for more than 40 years. These plans give groups and individuals the chance to influence Stroud District Council’s plans. The first version I came across was from 1976, produced after a consultation not dissimilar to the one we carried out during the summer of 2017. We had a 70% return from households, similar to 1976, but the big difference was technology - we could offer an on-line version of the survey and comprehensive analysis of results. Over the years, Frampton councillors have regularly consulted with parishioners to understand their needs and aspirations for our community and have worked hard to deliver on these.
    [Show full text]
  • A Severn Barrage?
    House of Commons Energy and Climate Change Committee A Severn Barrage? Second Report of Session 2013–14 Volume II Additional written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be published 4, 11 and 18 December 2012, 10, 16, 23 and 30 January and 26 March 2013 Published on 10 June 2013 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited The Energy and Climate Change Committee The Energy and Climate Change Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department of Energy and Climate Change and associated public bodies. Current membership Mr Tim Yeo MP (Conservative, South Suffolk) (Chair) Dan Byles MP (Conservative, North Warwickshire) Barry Gardiner MP (Labour, Brent North) Ian Lavery MP (Labour, Wansbeck) Dr Phillip Lee MP (Conservative, Bracknell) Rt Hon Peter Lilley MP (Conservative, Hitchin & Harpenden) Albert Owen MP (Labour, Ynys Môn) Christopher Pincher MP (Conservative, Tamworth) John Robertson MP (Labour, Glasgow North West) Sir Robert Smith MP (Liberal Democrat, West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine) Dr Alan Whitehead MP (Labour, Southampton Test) The following members were also members of the committee during the parliament: Gemma Doyle MP (Labour/Co-operative, West Dunbartonshire) Tom Greatrex MP (Labour, Rutherglen and Hamilton West) Laura Sandys MP (Conservative, South Thanet) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Display PDF in Separate
    £TA - iMiOL/^DS CJETVfS - S o * S' local environment agency plan SEVERN VALE ENVIRONMENTAL OVERVIEW AUGUST 1999 CHELTENHAM under-Edge AVONMOUTH ▼ T En v ir o n m e n t H A g e n c y T All enquiries relating to this document should be made to: The Environment Agency Lower Severn Area Office Riversmeet House North way Lane Newtown Industrial Estate Tewkesbury Gloucestershire GL20 8JG Tel: 01684 850951 Fax: 01684 293599 Sharpness Docks The Severn Vale Local Environment Agency Plan, public registers of environmental information, and a wide variety of publications on the work of the Environment Agency can be gained from our Lower Severn Area office, at the above address. You can also find us at www.environment- agency.gov. uk Severn Vale Environmental Overview August 1999 CONTENTS Maps ........................................................................................................................................iv Tables ............................................................. ...................................................................... ."...v Figures ........................................................................................................................................ vi 1.0 IN T R O D U C T IO N .........................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose and Scope of the Environmental Overview......................................................1 1.2 Structure of the Environmental Overview.....................................................................
    [Show full text]