DOCSLIB.ORG

A Severn Barrage?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Severn Barrage? House of Commons Energy and Climate Change Committee A Severn Barrage? Second Report of Session 2013–14 Volume II Additional written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be published 4, 11 and 18 December 2012, 10, 16, 23 and 30 January and 26 March 2013 Published on 10 June 2013 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited The Energy and Climate Change Committee The Energy and Climate Change Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department of Energy and Climate Change and associated public bodies. Current membership Mr Tim Yeo MP (Conservative, South Suffolk) (Chair) Dan Byles MP (Conservative, North Warwickshire) Barry Gardiner MP (Labour, Brent North) Ian Lavery MP (Labour, Wansbeck) Dr Phillip Lee MP (Conservative, Bracknell) Rt Hon Peter Lilley MP (Conservative, Hitchin & Harpenden) Albert Owen MP (Labour, Ynys Môn) Christopher Pincher MP (Conservative, Tamworth) John Robertson MP (Labour, Glasgow North West) Sir Robert Smith MP (Liberal Democrat, West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine) Dr Alan Whitehead MP (Labour, Southampton Test) The following members were also members of the committee during the parliament: Gemma Doyle MP (Labour/Co-operative, West Dunbartonshire) Tom Greatrex MP (Labour, Rutherglen and Hamilton West) Laura Sandys MP (Conservative, South Thanet) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the internet at www.parliament.uk/ecc. The Reports of the Committee, the formal minutes relating to that report, oral evidence taken and written evidence from witnesses are available in a printed volume. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Sarah Hartwell-Naguib (Clerk), Liz Bolton (Second Clerk), Jenny Bird (Senior Committee Specialist), Tom Leveridge (Committee Specialist), Luanne Middleton (Inquiry Manager), Shane Pathmanathan (Senior Committee Assistant), Jonathan Olivier Wright (Committee Assistant), Joe Strawson (Committee Support Assistant), and Nick Davies (Media Officer). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Energy and Climate Change Committee, House of Commons, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 2569; the Committee’s email address is [email protected] List of additional written evidence 1 Richard Phillips Ev w1 2 Stroud Green Party Ev w1 3 Brian Webber Ev w2 4 Derek G Birkett Ev w2 5 Rail Freight Group Ev w4 6 Parsons Brinckerhoff Ev w5 7 Freight on Rail Ev w12 8 Archie D. Speirs Ev w13 9 VerdErg Renewable Energy Ltd Ev w14 10 British Marine Aggregate Producers Association Ev w17 11 The TaxPayers’ Alliance Ev w20 12 Unite the Union SW/8071 BRANCH Ev w21 13 Gloucestershire County Council Ev w22 14 North Somerset Flood Risk Action Group Ev w24 15 Kingston Seymour Parish Council Ev w25 16 Andrew Short Ev w26 17 Gloucestershire NFU Severn Estuary Stakeholders Ev w26 18 Vale of Glamorgan Council Ev w27 19 HR Wallingford Ev w32 20 Tata Steel Ev w35 21 Prys Davies, Welsh Government Ev w36 22 WWF Ev w37 23 Friends of the Earth Ev w41 24 Severn Voice Severn Estuary Flood Risk Management Strategy Task Group Ev w42 25 Rose Hewlett Ev w42 26 PRH Clifford Ev w43 27 National Farmers’ Union Ev w43 28 Mary Page Ev w45 29 Paul Crossley Ev w47 30 The Wildlife Trusts Ev w48 31 University of Bath Ev w50 32 CH2M HILL Ev w61 33 Natural England Ev w64 34 RWE Npower Renewables Ltd Ev w66 35 The Crown Estate Ev w68 36 Countryside Council for Wales Ev w70 37 Devon and Severn Inshore Fisheries and Conservation Authority Ev w74 38 South West TUC Ev w75 39 Black and Veatch Ltd Ev w78 40 Gloucester Harbour Trustees Ev w78 41 Owain Jones Ev w80 42 Canal & River Trust Ev w84 43 Energy Technologies Institute Ev w85 44 Rt Hon Dawn Primarolo MP Ev w87 45 Salmon & Trout Association Ev w87 46 Wales Green Party Ev w89 47 Children’s Scrapstore Ev w92 48 Jonathan White Ev w92 49 Don Metcalfe, Bristol Channel Federation of Sea Anglers Ev w99 50 Avonmouth Community Centre Association Ev w100 51 Severn Rivers Trust Ev w100 52 Dr Richard Brunning, Severn Estuary Levels Research Committee Ev w103 53 Natural Environment Research Council Ev w103 54 Severn Tidal Power Group Ev w109 55 Mark Barry Ev w110 56 Renewable Energy Association, Ocean Energy Group Ev w111 57 Natasha Barker Bradshaw and Professor Graham Daborn Ev w114 58 South and West Transport Action Group Ev w124 59 North Somerset Council Ev w131 60 Sedgemoor District Council Ev w132 61 Robbee Smole Ev w133 62 Bristol Council and the West of England Local Enterprise Partnership Ev w134 63 Wye and Usk Foundation & River Wye Preservation Trust Ev w139 64 E.ON Ev w140 65 British Association for Shooting and Conservation Ev w141 66 Ravensrodd Consultants Ltd Ev w143 67 The Severn Lake Co Ev w145 68 Tidal Lagoon Swansea Bay Ev w147 69 Brian Catt Ev w149 70 Coalition of NGOs Ev w151 71 Marine Conservation Society Ev w153 72 Supervawt Ltd Ev w156 73 Cardiff Council Ev w156 74 Blue Marble Sustainable Solutions Ltd Ev w158 75 Karsten Evans Ev w172 76 Dr Edward Grist Ev w173 cobber Pack: U PL: CWE1 [SO] Processed: [10-06-2013 13:46] Job: 025815 Unit: PG01 Energy and Climate Change Committee: Evidence Ev w1 Written evidence Written evidence submitted by Richard Phillips (SEV02) The concept of a tidal barrage running across the Severn Estuary from Cardiff-to Weston has a long history. The last proposition was put forward in the first decade of the 21st century, but was put to one side. At that time a 70 page document was produced, purporting to examine all aspects of the project. I searched the whole of this work, seeking the results of any technical assessment of the impact of sedimentation, induced by flow restrictions, inevitable in such an undertaking. I found none. As a scientist, this aspect of the physics of the undertaking was of primary importance, since silting, on the scale which I would consider inevitable would rapidly take place. A reference on the Web states that “However, the barrage has caused progressive silting of the Rance ecosystem”. Though operating under a different regime, the Aswan Dam suffers immense silting problems, both in loading the dam itself to the point where flow into the turbines is in danger of being affected, and of denying the rich silt to Egyptian agriculture. The physics of sedimentation is well known. Whenever a solids laden fluid stream with a stable suspended burden of solids suffers a reduction in its velocity, the solid particles fall under gravity. This is absolutely inevitable. Inhibition of the flow of the Severn Estuary will inevitably take place, in total disregard of the manner in which the generation pattern is operated. The experience of the construction of a “causeway”, essentially a dam-like structure, on the Petitcodiac River in Canada, illustrates the havoc that the impedance of a muddy river create. Another matter to be addressed is the pattern of generation. Tidal cycles are completed in approximately one terrestrial day; but not quite. The cycle is in time with the lunar day, and thus tidal movements occur at different times every day, at precisely known times. Generation is in time with this shifting pattern. The average output from the turbine installation is not the headline turbine output, but approximately 50% of this value. This is due to the ever-changing driving force on the turbine, a reflection of ever-changing water level differences. I am a retired research scientist, having spent the last 35 years of my professional career at the Atomic Energy Research Establishment at Harwell in Oxfordshire. Since retirement I have continued to take a keen interest in all energy matters, and have a wide circle of very experienced contacts in all aspects of the industry. I have thus acquired a wide knowledge of the spectrum of energy matters from nuclear generation to renewables. I became, by examination, an Associate of the Royal Institute of Chemistry in 1954, and was elected a Fellow in 1971. October 2012 Written evidence submitted by the Stroud Green Party (SEV 03) The issue of obtaining renewable energy from the tide in the Severn has been discussed at various levels in the Green Party, including Stroud, the South West, Wales and at the National policy making conference. This has resulted in the following adopted policy: “The Green Party believe it is appropriate to use the tidal energy potential from estuaries such as the Severn estuary, subject to satisfactory sustainability and environmental impact assessments. In particular we support the development of tidal lagoons and tidal stream turbines as a means of generating clean renewable energy, but reject any proposal for a single continuous barrage across the Severn estuary.” With the recent renewed proposals for a Severn Barrage this was discussed again by the Green Party in Stroud in November 2012. It was agreed again that the Severn is a unique and important ecosystem with significant biodiversity value. A barrage would have significant adverse impacts and is not supported. However other less damaging and newer technologies should be investigated to make use of the renewable energy potential of the Severn tides such as lagoons and tidal stream turbines. Furthermore we would like complain that the time given for this consultation is insufficient and means many groups have been unable to respond.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gloucestershire Economic Needs Assessment
    GL5078P Gloucestershire ENA For and on behalf of Cheltenham Borough Council Cotswold District Council Forest of Dean District Council Gloucester City Council Stroud District Council Tewkesbury Borough Council Gloucestershire Economic Needs Assessment Prepared by Strategic Planning Research Unit DLP Planning Ltd August 2020 1 08.19.GL5078PS.Gloucestershire ENA Final GL5078P Gloucestershire ENA Prepared by: Checked by: Approved by: Date: July 2020 Office: Bristol & Sheffield Strategic Planning Research Unit V1 Velocity Building Broad Quay House (6th Floor) 4 Abbey Court Ground Floor Prince Street Fraser Road Tenter Street Bristol Priory Business Park Sheffield BS1 4DJ Bedford S1 4BY MK44 3WH Tel: 01142 289190 Tel: 01179 058850 Tel: 01234 832740 DLP Consulting Group disclaims any responsibility to the client and others in respect of matters outside the scope of this report. This report has been prepared with reasonable skill, care and diligence. This report is confidential to the client and DLP Planning Ltd accepts no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report or any part thereof is made known. Any such party relies upon the report at their own risk. 2 08.19.GL5078PS.Gloucestershire ENA Final GL5078P Gloucestershire ENA CONTENTS PAGE 0.0 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... 6 1.0 Introduction...................................................................................................................... 19 a) National
    [Show full text]
  • Tees Valley Climate Change Strategy 2010 - 2020 1 2 Tees Valley Climate Change Strategy 2010 - 2020 Foreword
    Contents Pages Foreword 3 Statements of Support 4 - 5 Background 6 - 8 The Tees Valley Climate Change Partnership 9 - 10 Climate Change in the Tees Valley 11 - 15 The Tees Valley Emissions Baseline 16 - 19 Opportunities 20 - 21 Business 22 - 28 Housing 29 - 36 Transport 37 - 44 Our Local Environment 45 - 56 Communication and Behaviour Change 57 - 64 Endnotes 65 - 68 Glossary 69 - 70 Useful Information 71 - 72 Tees Valley Climate Change Partnership Contacts 73 - 75 Notes Page 76 Tees Valley Climate Change Strategy 2010 - 2020 1 2 Tees Valley Climate Change Strategy 2010 - 2020 Foreword "I am delighted to present the Tees Valley Climate Change Strategy. The Coalition Government has made it very clear that it believes climate change is one of the gravest threats we face, and that urgent action to reduce carbon emissions is needed. The Tees Valley Local Authorities and partners have long since recognised this threat and continue to implement a series of measures to address it. Tees Valley represents a unique blend of industrial, urban and rural areas and climate change represents a real threat, especially to our carbon emitting industries, however the assets, skills and experience we have also mean that we are well placed to maximise the opportunities presented by the transition to a Low Carbon economy. This transition will safeguard the industries and jobs we have, attract new inward investment and support the creation of new green jobs and technologies leading to a stronger and more diverse economy. This strategy represents the "coming together" of the five Tees Valley local authorities and their partners with a single aim and vision.
    [Show full text]
  • Turning the Tide, Tidal Power in the UK
    Turning the tide The Sustainable Development Commission is the Government’s independent watchdog on sustainable in the UK Tidal Power development, reporting to the Prime Minister, the First Ministers of Scotland and Wales and the First Minister and Deputy First Minister of Northern Ireland. Through advocacy, advice and appraisal, we help put sustainable development at the heart of Government policy. www.sd-commission.org.uk England (Main office) 55 Whitehall London SW1A 2HH 020 7270 8498 [email protected] Scotland 3rd Floor, Osborne House 1-5 Osborne Terrace, Haymarket, Edinburgh EH12 5HG 0131 625 1880 [email protected] www.sd-commission.org.uk/scotland Wales c/o Welsh Assembly Government, Cathays Park, Cardiff CF10 3NQ Turning 029 2082 6382 Commission Development Sustainable [email protected] www.sd-commission.org.uk/wales Northern Ireland Room E5 11, OFMDFM the Tide Castle Buildings, Stormont Estate, Belfast BT4 3SR 028 9052 0196 Tidal Power in the UK [email protected] www.sd-commission.org.uk/northern_ireland Turning the Tide Tidal Power in the UK Contents Executive Summary 5 1 Introduction 15 1.1 Background to this project 16 1.2 Our approach 17 1.3 UK tidal resource 19 1.3.1 Two types of tidal resource 19 1.3.2 Electricity generating potential 22 1.3.3 Resource uncertainties 22 1.3.4 Timing of output from tidal sites 23 1.3.5 Transmission system constraints 25 1.4 Energy policy context 28 1.4.1 Current Government policy 28 1.4.2 The SDC’s advice 28 1.5 Public and stakeholder engagement
    [Show full text]
  • Welsh Government the Impact of the Severn Tolls on the Welsh Economy Final Report
    Welsh Government The Impact of the Severn Tolls on the Welsh Economy Final Report 216322 Issue | 30 May 2012 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Job number 216322 ISBN 978 0 7504 8034 5 Ove Arup & Partners Ltd 4 Pierhead Street Capital Waterside Cardiff CF10 4QP United Kingdom www.arup.com Welsh Government The Impact of the Severn Tolls on the Welsh Economy Final Report Contents Page Executive Summary i 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 The Severn Crossings and the Welsh Economy 1 1.3 Study Objectives 3 2 Study Approach 5 2.1 Introduction 5 2.2 Literature review 5 2.3 Traffic and transport modelling 5 2.4 Impacts of toll on businesses and consumers 6 2.5 Econometric modelling 6 3 Traffic and Travel Patterns 7 3.1 Introduction 7 3.2 Traffic Volumes and Travel Patterns 7 3.3 Travel Patterns 10 3.4 Journey Times 11 3.5 Severn Crossing Toll Rates and Revenue 12 3.6 Tolls and Total Journey Costs 13 3.7 Trends in Transport Costs 15 3.8 Commuting Patterns and the Severn Crossings 17 4 Evidence from Toll Roads Elsewhere 20 4.1 Introduction 20 4.2 Effects on Traffic and Transport – The Toll Price Elasticity of Demand 20 4.3 Economic Effects of Tolled Infrastructure 24 5 Impacts on Traffic and Transport 26 5.1 Introduction 26 5.2 Behavioural Responses to Toll Penalties 26 5.3 Determinants of Toll Responses 26 5.4 Modelling Framework 28 5.5 Impacts of Traffic Flows
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Society of Chemistry Input to the Ad Hoc Nuclear
    ROYAL SOCIETY OF CHEMISTRY INPUT TO THE AD HOC NUCLEAR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD The Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) was pleased to hear of the instigation of the Ad Hoc Nuclear Research and Development Advisory Board (the Board) following the findings of the House of Lords Science and Technology Committee Inquiry ‘Nuclear Research and Development Capabilities’.1,2 The RSC is the largest organisation in Europe for advancing the chemical sciences. Supported by a network of 47,000 members worldwide and an internationally acclaimed publishing business, its activities span education and training, conferences and science policy, and the promotion of the chemical sciences to the public. This document represents the views of the RSC. The RSC has a duty under its Royal Charter "to serve the public interest" by acting in an independent advisory capacity, and it is in this spirit that this submission is made. To provide input to the Board the RSC has performed a wide consultation with the chemical science community, including members of both our Radiochemistry and Energy Sector Interest Groups and also our Environment Sustainability and Energy Division. September 2012 The Role of Chemistry in a Civil Nuclear Strategy 1 Introduction Chemistry and chemical knowledge is essential in nuclear power generation and nuclear waste management. It is essential that a UK civil nuclear strategy recognises the crucial role that chemistry plays, both in research and innovation and in the development of a strong skills pipeline. As the RSC previously articulated in our response to the House of Lords Inquiry, 3 nuclear power is an important component of our current energy mix.
    [Show full text]
  • STROUD and ELECTRICITY by Roger Hennessey
    Supplement to the Histelec News No. S67b December 2017 With the successful Weekend in the Cotswold organised by David Peacock, member Roger Hennessey sent his interesting electricity research of the area, for the benefit of members who joined the weekend away. It has been decided to give it further coverage. STROUD AND ELECTRICITY by Roger Hennessey The relationship between the Stroud area and electricity is a long one, summarised perhaps in the short phrase, 'From rear-guard to vanguard'. Although early developments seemed promising, Stroud took a long time to receive public supplies of electric power, even by the UK's notorious standards in the field. For example, the first English scientist to verify Benjamin Franklin's theory that lightning and electricity were the same was the Stroud-born John Canton, FRS (1718-72). In Victorian times one of the earliest enthusiasts for public electricity was a local textile magnate, Alfred Apperly, who installed electricity in his mansion (Rodborough Court) in the late 1880s. The story of electric power for the people of Stroud was, however, very different. Some of the district's many textile mills generated their own power, but repeated attempts to set up an undertaking for public supply ran into difficulties. As early as 1888 'A Ratepayer' was reported in the press suggesting the establishment of electricity undertaking for the town; soon afterwards the House-to-House Electric Supply Co supported the idea and applied for a Provisional Order [PO], but the initiative fizzled out. Another proposal in 1900 was opposed by the local Urban District Council which claimed that it was considering a PO itself.
    [Show full text]
  • LOW CARBON ENERGY OBSERVATORY ©European Union, 2019 OCEAN ENERGY Technology Market Report
    LOW CARBON ENERGY OBSERVATORY ©European Union, 2019 OCEAN ENERGY Technology market report Joint EUR 29924 EN Research Centre This publication is a Technical report by the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission’s science and knowledge service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policymaking process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of this publication. Contact information Name: Davide MAGAGNA Address: European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Petten, The Netherlands E-mail: [email protected] Name: Matthijs SOEDE Address: European Commission DG Research and Innovation, Brussels, Belgium Email: [email protected] EU Science Hub https://ec.europa.eu/jrc JRC118311 EUR 29924 EN ISSN 2600-0466 PDF ISBN 978-92-76-12573-0 ISSN 1831-9424 (online collection) doi:10.2760/019719 ISSN 2600-0458 Print ISBN 978-92-76-12574-7 doi:10.2760/852200 ISSN 1018-5593 (print collection) Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2019 © European Union, 2019 The reuse policy of the European Commission is implemented by Commission Decision 2011/833/EU of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). Reuse is authorised, provided the source of the document is acknowledged and its original meaning or message is not distorted. The European Commission shall not be liable for any consequence stemming from the reuse. For any use or reproduction of photos or other material that is not owned by the EU, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders.
    [Show full text]
  • 15 National and Sub-National Policies and Institutions
    National and Sub-national 15 Policies and Institutions Coordinating Lead Authors: Eswaran Somanathan (India), Thomas Sterner (Sweden), Taishi Sugiyama (Japan) Lead Authors: Donald Chimanikire (Zimbabwe), Navroz K. Dubash (India), Joseph Kow Essandoh-Yeddu (Ghana), Solomone Fifita (Tonga / Fiji), Lawrence Goulder (USA), Adam Jaffe (USA / New Zealand), Xavier Labandeira (Spain), Shunsuke Managi (Japan), Catherine Mitchell (UK), Juan Pablo Montero (Chile), Fei Teng (China), Tomasz Zylicz (Poland) Contributing Authors: Arild Angelsen (Norway), Kazumasu Aoki (Japan), Kenji Asano (Japan), Michele Betsill (USA), Rishikesh Ram Bhandary (Nepal / USA), Nils-Axel Braathen (France / Norway), Harriet Bulkeley (UK), Dallas Burtraw (USA), Ann Carlson (USA), Luis Gomez-Echeverri (Austria / Colombia), Erik Haites (Canada), Frank Jotzo (Germany / Australia), Milind Kandlikar (India / Canada), Osamu Kimura (Japan), Gunnar Kohlin (Sweden), Hidenori Komatsu (Japan), Andrew Marquard (South Africa), Michael Mehling (Germany / USA), Duane Muller (USA), Luis Mundaca (Chile / Sweden), Michael Pahle (Germany), Matthew Paterson (Canada), Charles Roger (UK / Canada), Kristin Seyboth (USA), Elisheba Spiller (USA), Christoph von Stechow (Germany), Paul Watkiss (UK), Harald Winkler (South Africa), Bridget Woodman (UK) Review Editors: Martin Jänicke (Germany), Ronaldo Seroa da Motta (Brazil), Nadir Mohamed Awad Suliman (Sudan) Chapter Science Assistant: Rishikesh Ram Bhandary (Nepal / USA) 1141 National and Sub-national Policies and Institutions Chapter 15 This chapter should be cited as: Somanathan E., T. Sterner, T. Sugiyama, D. Chimanikire, N. K. Dubash, J. Essandoh-Yeddu, S. Fifita, L. Goulder, A. Jaffe, X. Labandeira, S. Managi, C. Mitchell, J. P. Montero, F. Teng, and T. Zylicz, 2014: National and Sub-national Policies and Institu- tions. In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Edenhofer, O., R.
    [Show full text]
  • A Forgotten Landscape
    Crossing the Severn A Forgotten Landscape School Learning Resources Crossing the Severn Objectives :- To describe how people and animals have crossed the river Severn in the past and present. To create, design and build an innovative way of crossing the Severn. School Learning Resources Under and Over Under and Over - Tiny water voles burrow under the reens that drain the forgotten landscape and the two Severn crossings carry thousands of people over the Severn every day. Starlings and sparrowhawks get a birds’ eye view of the estuary while fossils lie just underneath its surface. School Learning Resources Make your Severn crossing You are going to design and make a new innovative way to cross the river Severn. You need to use the materials provided to create a model of your design. Your model must be able to support the lego man across the river. When you have you model come back and test it. School Learning Resources Your design Look at the following slides and take inspiration from designs from the past, present and future. Think about whether you will go under or over the river, whether you will use the water or try to keep dry. School Learning Resources Over - Second Severn Crossing Over - Severn Bridge Under - The Severn Railway Tunnel School Learning Resources Severn Bridge The Severn Bridge is a suspension bridge, carrying the M48 across the river Severn and river Wye. It leaves Aust and arrives in Chepstow, via support in Beachley on a peninsula. The bridge replaced the Aust ferry in 1966, and was granted Grade 1 listed status in 1999.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Power
    No.59 z iii "Ill ~ 2 er0 Ill Ill 0 Nuclear Family Pia nning p3 Chernobyl Broadsheet ·, _ I. _ . ~~~~ George Pritchar d speaks CONTENTS COMMENT The important nuclear development since the Nuclear Family Planning 3 last SCRAM Journal was the Government's The CEGB's plans, and the growing opposition, after Sizewell B by go ahead for Sizewell B: the world's first HUGH RICHARDS. reactor order since Chernobyl, and Britain's News 4-6 first since the go ahead was given to Torness Accidents Will Happen 1 and Heysham 2 in 1978. Of great concern is Hinkley Seismic Shocker 8-9 the CEGB's announced intention to build "a A major article on seismic safety of nuclear plants in which JAMES small fanilty• of PWRs, starting with Hinkley GARRETT reveals that Hinkley Point C. At the time of the campaign In the Point sits on a geological fault. south west to close the Hinkley A Magnox Trouble at Trawsfynydd 10-11 station, and .a concerted push in Scotland to A summary of FoE's recent report on increasing radiation levels from prevent the opening of Torness, another Trawsfynydd's by PATRICK GREEN. nuclear announcement is designed to divide Pandora's POX 12 and demoralise the opposition. But, it should The debate over plutonium transport make us more determined. The article on the to and from Dounreay continues by facing page gives us hope: the local PETE MUTTON. authorities on Severnside are joining forces CHERNOBYL BROADSHEET to oppose Hinkley C, and hopefully they will Cock-ups and Cover-ups work closely with local authorities in other "Sacrificed to • • • Nuclear Power" threatened areas - Lothian Region, The Soviet Experience Northumberland, the County Council Coalition "An Agonising Decision• 13 against waste dumping and the Nuclear Free GEORGE PRITCHARD explains why Zones - to formulate a national anti-nuclear he left Greenpeoce and took a job strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Shaping Subtransmission South West 2018
    Strategic Investment Options Shaping Subtransmission South West – July 2018 Strategic Investment Options: Shaping Subtransmission Version Control Issue Date 1 26/07/2016 2 18/07/2018 Contact Details Email [email protected] Postal Network Strategy Team Western Power Distribution Feeder Road Bristol BS2 0TB Disclaimer Neither WPD, nor any person acting on its behalf, makes any warranty, express or implied, with respect to the use of any information, method or process disclosed in this document or that such use may not infringe the rights of any third party or assumes any liabilities with respect to the use of, or for damage resulting in any way from the use of, any information, apparatus, method or process disclosed in the document. © Western Power Distribution 2018 Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2018 No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the written permission of the Network Strategy and Innovation Manager, who can be contacted at the addresses given above. 2 South West – July 2018 Contents 1 – Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 4 2 – Objective of this Report ................................................................................................................ 7 3 – Background ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environment Agency Midlands Region Wetland Sites Of
    LA - M icllanAs <? X En v ir o n m e n t A g e n c y ENVIRONMENT AGENCY MIDLANDS REGION WETLAND SITES OF SPECIAL SCIENTIFIC INTEREST REGIONAL MONITORING STRATEGY John Davys Groundwater Resources Olton Court July 1999 E n v i r o n m e n t A g e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE ANGLIAN REGION Kingfisher House. Goldhay Way. Orton Goldhay, Peterborough PE2 5ZR 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................... 3 1.) The Agency's Role in Wetland Conservation and Management....................................................3 1.2 Wetland SSSIs in the Midlands Region............................................................................................ 4 1.3 The Threat to Wetlands....................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Monitoring & Management of Wetlands...........................................................................................4 1.5 Scope of the Report..............................................................................................................................4 1.6 Structure of the Report.......................................................................................................................5 2 SELECTION OF SITES....................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Definition of a Wetland Site................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]