2

chiral magnet is helical states in the region (I) the south pole in the region (II) and the north pole in the region (III), respectively (See Fig.1). At the tri-critical point B = 0, µ = κ2, all the helical states with |A| ≤ 1 become the ground states with the same energy. The topology of the order parameter manifold (OPM) is different in various regions as summrized in TableI: S2 at the tri- critical point, two discrete points (the north and south poles) along the line (a), S1 in the region (I), a point (north pole) in the region (II) including the line (b), and a point (south pole) in the region (III) including the line (c). It is interesting to observe that the DM interaction tends to favor easy-plane configuration, so that helical ground states can be ground states even in the presence of the easy-axis potential with µ > 0. The order of phase transition for the critical lines are Fig. 1. Phase diagram of the O(3) nonlinear sigma model as follows: The first-order phase transition occurs on the with the DM interaction in the meand-field level. line (a), since the global minimum of the energy jumps from one local minimum to the other across (a). The OPM G/H π0 π1 π2 π3 1 second-order phase transition occurs on the lines (b) and (I) S 0 Z 0 0 (c), where the second derivative of the ground state en- (a) Z2 Z2 0 0 0 2 Tri-critical pt. O(3)/O(2) ' S 0 0 ZZ ergy density with respect to B is discontinuous. It is (II) (III) (b)(c) 1pt 0 0 0 0 also notable that the tri-critical point, which is a switch- ing point of the first- and second-order transitions, has a TABLE I. The OPMs and associated homotopy groups. larger symmetry as we will discuss in details later. In order to explore instanton solutions for the anti- ferromagnetic material1, we introduce the imaginary For µ > 0, the potential favors for na to point to the time τ and consider the following Euclidean 2D La- north (n3 = 1) or the south (n3 = −1) pole (easy-axis). grangian (i = 0, 1) For µ < 0, it favors the equator (n3 = 0) (easy-plane). The term Bn3 is a staggered magnetic field, but, for sim- 1 L = (∂ na)2 + κ(n1∂ n2 − n2∂ n1) plicity, we call B as a magnetic field. 2 i x x µ (5) Since the DM interaction can be regarded as a back- + [1 − (n3)2] + Bn3. ground gauge field [25], the energy can be rewritten by 2 a a 3ab b defining a covariant derivative Dxn ≡ ∂xn −κ n as Note that this Euclidean 2D model should also be useful to describe the energy density of a 2+1D magnetic ma- Z (D na)2 1 − (n3)2  E[n] = dx x + (µ − κ2) + Bn3 .(2) terial (both ferromagnetic and anti-ferromagnetic) which 2 2 has an anisotropic uniaxial DM interaction only in one Since the first nonnegative term must vanish for a ground spatial direction x rather than two spatial directions. It is state, we obtain also convenient to use the stereographic projection of the target space na ∈ S2 to a complex plane v ∈ C through D na = 0 (a = 1, 2, 3), (3) x n1 + in2 1 − |v|2 v = , n3 = . (6) which has the helical-state solution given by 1 + n3 1 + |v|2 n1 + in2 = Ae−iκx, n3 = ±p1 − |A|2 (4) The O(3) sigma model with the DM interaction becomes ↔ 2{|∂ v|2 + iκv ∂ v¯ + µ|v|2} 1 − |v|2 with A ∈ C satisfying |A| ≤ 1. This is the spatially L = i + B (7) modulated state, where na rotates at a constant latitude (1 + |v|2)2 1 + |v|2 2 of the S target space with the wave number κ along ↔ the spatial direction x. The actual minimum of E[n] with v ∂ v¯ = v∂xv¯ − v∂¯ xv. The instanton number density depends on the value of the easy-axis potential µ and ρQ is defined by the magnetic field B. By examining the minimum of the 1 1 ∂ v∂ v¯ − ∂ v∂ v¯ ρ =  na∂ nb∂ nc = z z¯ z¯ z , (8) potential as a function of n3, we find three critical lines Q 4π abc x τ π (1 + |v|2)2 emanating from the tri-critical point at µ = κ2,B = 0 as illustrated in Fig.1: the line (a) along B = 0, µ > κ2, the line (b) along κ2 − µ = B > 0, and the line 1 Effective theory of ferromagnetic material involves the first order (c) along κ2 − µ = −B > 0. The ground state of the term in time derivative, instead of the second order. 3 where we used the complex coordinates z = x + iτ, z¯ = x−iτ. The intergration of this quantity in the Euclidean 2D space yields the instanton number charactrizing the second homotopy group π2. Below, we show that in- stanton solutions exist in all the phases, sometimes as composite objects even when the OPS does not have a nontrivial π2. Domain walls on the line (a).— In this case the OPM consists of two points, suggesting that there exists a do- main wall solution connecting these two discrete ground Fig. 2. (a) A temporal domain wall configuration of n inter- states. For instance, we can impose a boundary condition polating two degenerate ground states, as an instanton solu- tion. (b) Domain wall-antidomain wall pair (bion). n3(τ, x = ±∞) = ±1 at the left and right spatial infini- ties. For a τ-independent configuration, we can make a Bogomol’nyi completion [26, 27] of the energy to find Bions in the phases (II) and (III).— If the magnetic Z Z  2 p 2  |(∂x + η)v| µ − κ field is turned on (B 6= 0) in the region (II) or (III), dx L = 2 dx + ∂ (9) 3 (1 + |v|2)2 x 1 + |v|2 we find that the linear term in n allows non-BPS wall- antiwall solutions, so-called bion solutions [37, 38]. For p with η = µ − κ2 + iκ. Since the first term is positive example, the simplest solution with a single wall-antiwall semi-definite, the surface term provides the lower bound pair is given by of the energy: √ x=∞ B Z   −iκ(x−x0) p 2 1 v = e sinh ω(τ − τ0), (15) dx L ≥ 2 µ − κ 2 . (10) ω 1 + |v| x=−∞ p 2 The equality holds when the BPS equation where ω = µ − κ + B and τ0 and x0 are the posi- tion moduli parameters. These solutions play a vital role p 2 (∂x + iκ)v + µ − κ v = 0 (11) in nonperturbative effects and resurgence theory [37–44] is satisfied. This equation gives the following domain wall recently being extensively considered in field theory. solution with a complex integration constant C Fractional instantons in helical state (I).— In this case, √ the OPM is S1 at latitude p(κ2 − µ + B)/(κ2 − µ − B). −iκx− µ−κ2x v = Ce ,C ∈ C. (12) Therefore, we expect to find a vortex characterized by a 1 This is the lowest energy configuration satisfying the non-trivial winding number around S . It carries a frac- boundary condition. This does not carry an instanton tional instanton number [45] as is known for skyrmions number in contrast to the temporal case discussed be- with easy-plane potential [46, 47], and is sometimes called low. a meron. A single-winding configuration takes the form Similarly we can construct a domain wall solution in z v = e−iκx f(|z|), (16) the temporal direction, regarded as an instanton, for the |z| boundary condition n3(τ = ±∞, x) = ±1. The Bogo- mol’nyi bound for the action per unit x is obtained by where z = x + iτ, z¯ = x − iτ are the complex coordi- replacing x → τ in Eq. (10). This bound is saturated if nates and f(|z|) is a profile function satisfying f(0) = 0 p 2 2 the BPS equations and f(∞) = (κ − µ + B)/(κ − µ − B). Numerically solving field equations we find a fractional instanton. p 2 (∂x + iκ)v = 0, ∂τ v + µ − κ v = 0 (13) Fig.3 (a) shows the profile of a fractional instanton, are satisfied. The domain wall solution is which also exhibits a dislocation of the phase (or a phase √ −iκx− µ−κ2τ slip) as shown in Fig.3 (b). v = Ce ,C ∈ C (14) Instantons in the tri-critical point.— The richest array with unit instanton number and action 2pµ − κ2 per of instantons is obtained at the tri-critical point µ = length ∆x = 2π/κ. It is interesting to note that as shown κ2,B = 0, where the Euclidean 2D action is bounded by R 2 in Fig.2 (a), helical states show up only in the vicinity the instanton number Q = d x ρQ as 2 of the wall even though it is hidden in the ground states Z Z 3 2 2 3 (n = ±1). d x Lcr ≥ ±(4πQ + d x κ∂τ n ). (17)

The bound is saturated if and only if the BPS equation 2 Since in 2+1D, a domain wall carrying a skyrmion number b c (equivalent to the instanton number for Euclidean 2D) density ∂τ na ∓ abcn Dxn = 0 or ∂z¯v = −iκv/2 (18) induced by a modulating U(1) phase on the wall is called a do- main wall skyrmion [35, 36], we may call this solution a domain is satisfied. Let us consider solutions with a nonnegative wall instanton. instanton number Q (by taking the upper sign of the 4

inspired by the helical ground states (4), we define new variables3 nˆa as n1 + in2 = (ˆn1 + iˆn2)e−iκx, n3 =n ˆ3. (22) In terms of the new variables, the O(3) sigma model with the DM interaction can be rewritten into that without the DM interaction LwoDM(ˆn) = L(n): 1 µ − κ2 L (ˆn) = (∂ nˆa)2 + [1 − (ˆn3)2] + Bnˆ3. (23) woDM 2 µ 2 Fig. 3. (a) Fractional instanton (meron) (µ = 3, κ = 2,B = Note that the strength of the easy-axis potential is re- −1/2). (b) Fractional instanton as a dislocation or phase slip. Solid lines indicate the contours with arg v = −π/2 and duced from the original one. From this equivalence the- arrows denote (n1, n2). orem, we find that all instanton solutions in the O(3) sigma model with the DM interaction has one-to-one cor- respondence with those of the O(3) sigma model with- bound). Hence all the BPS solutions are obtained as out the DM interaction. This indicates that the original model (5) possesses a kind of hidden symmetry (known v(z, z¯) = e−iκxw(z), (19) as modified symmetry [51, 52]), which enables us to com- with an arbitrary holomorphic function w(z). pactly summarize our finding on the ground states and The BPS equation has the general l-instanton BPS so- instanton solutions (See TableI). Nevertheless, it should lution given by a rational function of degree l be emphasized that the physical variable na must be used to find the real magnetic texture of chiral magnets. p(z) v = e−iκx , (20) Summary and Discussion.— We have clarified pos- q(z) sible instanton solutions for the one-dimensional anti- where p(z), q(z) are mutually coprime polynomials of ferromagnetic spin chain in the presence of the DM inter- degree m, n with l = max(m, n) [Fig.4 (a)]. We can action. Depending on the phases, we have exhausted all also construct general l-caloron (periodic instantons)- possible instanton solutions including temporal domain solutions in the periodicity interval x ∼ x + L as walls with the instanton number density distributed in the temporal direction, vortices (dislocations or phase i 2πz p(e L ) slips) as fractional instantons and BPS instantons and v = e−iκx (21) i 2πz q(e L ) caloron at the critical coupling. We have also shown that the model with the DM interaction is equivalent to the with a rational map of degree l [Fig.4 (b)]. Let us note model without the DM interaction. that all these caloron solutions satisfy a twisted bound- Our results have ienergy. mplications both for theoreti- −iκL ary condition v(x + L, τ) = e v(x, τ). By changing a cal and experimental researches. The instanton solutions moduli parameter, this caloron can be split into a pair of in chiral magnets, which were not discussed before, give a a temporal domain wall and antidomain wall with frac- novel theoretical insight into the anti-ferromagnetic spin tional instanton numbers, separated at arbitrary distance chains and our methodology to obtain them based on with the same energy [48–50]. the equivalence theorem can be applied broadly in the Equivalence theorem.— Let us now show that there related studies. The phase diagram in Fig.1 with the exists a one-to-one mapping between the above model variety of instantons can help us to understand physics (5) and the usual O(3) sigma model. For that purpose, which would be observed in future experiments on chi- ral magnets with controllable DM interaction [53–56] or easy-axis potential. There are several interesting avenues related to this work. While we have considered one-dimensional chi- ral magnets in this letter, we can generalize our ap- proach to higher-dimensional systems [22–25]. In par- ticular, the 2D model allows a topologically conserved skyrmion current and Hopf terms, thus involves rich the- oretical structures. Although we have only focused on

Fig. 4. Configurations of n for (a) single BPS instanton solution: p(z)/q(z) = (z − z0)/(z + z0), and (b) single BPS 3 2π(z−z ) When our system is put in the finite interval 0 ≤ x ≤ L, we also i 2πz i 2πz i 0 caloron solution: p(e L )/q(e L ) = λ(e L − 1). need to take account of the change of the boundary condition. 5 the ground state at the mean field level and instanton [10] B. Binz, A. Vishwanath, and V. Aji, “Theory of the solutions interpolating them, it is also interesting to con- helical spin crystal: A candidate for the partially ordered sider generic quantum aspects of the systems; e. g. a state of mnsi,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 207202 (2006). generalization of the Haldane conjecture [57, 58] in chi- [11] I. Dzyaloshinsky, “A thermodynamic theory of weak fer- romagnetism of antiferromagnetics,” Journal of Physics ral anti-ferromagnetic chains, and deconfined quantum and Chemistry of Solids 4, 241 – 255 (1958). criticality in 2+1-dimensional systems [59–61]. The pos- [12] Toru Moriya, “Anisotropic Superexchange Interaction sible ’t Hooft anomaly — field theoretical manifestation and Weak Ferromagnetism,” Phys. Rev. 120, 91–98 of the Lieb-Schultz-Mattis theorem [62, 63] — together (1960). with semi-classics analyses including resurgence theory in [13] Y. Togawa, T. Koyama, K. Takayanagi, S. Mori, the sigma models [37–44] will shed light on the detailed Y. Kousaka, J. Akimitsu, S. Nishihara, K. Inoue, A. S. quantum aspects of chiral magnets. Ovchinnikov, and J. Kishine, “Chiral magnetic soliton lattice on a chiral helimagnet,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, This work is supported by MEXT-Supported Program 107202 (2012). for the Strategic Research Foundation at Private Univer- [14] Jun-ichiro Kishine and AS Ovchinnikov, “Theory of sities “Topological Science” (Grant No. S1511006) and monoaxial chiral helimagnet,” in Solid State Physics, by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Vol. 66 (Elsevier, 2015) pp. 1–130. Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI) Grant [15] Yoshihiko Togawa, Yusuke Kousaka, Katsuya Inoue, and Jun-ichiro Kishine, “Symmetry, structure, and dynamics Number 18H01217. The authors are also supported in of monoaxial chiral magnets,” Journal of the Physical part by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 18K03627 (T. Society of Japan 85, 112001 (2016). F.), 19K03817 (T. M.), and 16H03984 (M. N.). M.H. [16] S. M¨uhlbauer, B. Binz, F. Jonietz, C. Pfleiderer, is also partially supported by RIKEN iTHEMS Program A. Rosch, A. Neubauer, R. Georgii, and P. B¨oni, (in particular, iTHEMS STAMP working group). The “Skyrmion lattice in a chiral magnet,” Science 323, 915– work of M.N. is also supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid 919 (2009). for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas “Topological [17] XZ Yu, Yoshinori Onose, Naoya Kanazawa, JH Park, JH Han, Yoshio Matsui, Naoto Nagaosa, and Yoshinori Materials Science” (KAKENHI Grant No. 15H05855) Tokura, “Real-space observation of a two-dimensional from MEXT. skyrmion crystal,” Nature 465, 901 (2010). [18] Stefan Heinze, Kirsten Von Bergmann, Matthias Men- zel, Jens Brede, Andr´eKubetzka, Roland Wiesendan- ger, Gustav Bihlmayer, and Stefan Bl¨ugel,“Sponta- neous atomic-scale magnetic skyrmion lattice in two di- ∗ masaru.hongo(at)riken.jp mensions,” Nature Physics 7, 713 (2011). † toshiaki.fujimori018(at)gmail.com [19] Naoto Nagaosa and Yoshinori Tokura, “Topological prop- ‡ misumi(at)phys.akita-u.ac.jp erties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions,” Nature nan- § nitta(at)phys-h.keio.ac.jp otechnology 8, 899 (2013). ¶ norisuke.sakai(at)gmail.com [20] P. Milde, D. K¨ohler,J. Seidel, L. M. Eng, A. Bauer, [1] R. Rajaraman, Solitons and instantons. An introduction A. Chacon, J. Kindervater, S. M¨uhlbauer,C. Pfleiderer, to solitons and instantons in quantum field theory (Ams- S. Buhrandt, C. Sch¨utte, and A. Rosch, “Unwinding of terdam, Netherlands: North-holland (1982) 409p, 1982). a skyrmion lattice by magnetic monopoles,” Science 340, [2] Sidney Coleman, Aspects of symmetry: selected Erice lec- 1076–1080 (2013). tures (Cambridge University Press, 1988). [21] N. Kanazawa, Y. Nii, X. X. Zhang, A. S. Mishchenko, [3] N. S. Manton and P. Sutcliffe, Topological solitons (Cam- G. De Filippis, F. Kagawa, Y. Iwasa, N. Nagaosa, and bridge University Press, 2004). Y. Tokura, “Critical phenomena of emergent magnetic [4] A. Vilenkin and E. P. S. Shellard, Cosmic Strings and monopoles in a chiral magnet,” Nature Communications Other Topological Defects (Cambridge University Press, 7, 11622 (2016). 2000). [22] Bruno Barton-Singer, Calum Ross, and Bernd J. [5] Grigory E Volovik, The universe in a helium droplet, Vol. Schroers, “Magnetic Skyrmions at Critical Coupling,” 117 (Oxford University Press on Demand, 2003). (2018), arXiv:1812.07268 [cond-mat.str-el]. [6] D. R. Nelson, Defects and Geometry in Condensed Matter [23] C. Adam, Jose M. Queiruga, and A. Wereszczyn- Physics 1st Edition (Cambridge University Press, 2002) ski, “BPS soliton-impurity models and supersymmetry,” p. 392. (2019), arXiv:1901.04501 [hep-th]. [7] Alexei N Bogdanov and DA Yablonskii, “Thermodynami- [24] C. Adam, K. Oles, T. Romanczukiewicz, and cally stable vortices in magnetically ordered crystals. the A. Wereszczynski, “Domain walls that do not get stuck mixed state of magnets,” Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz 95, 178 on impurities,” (2019), arXiv:1902.07227 [cond-mat.mes- (1989). hall]. [8] A. Bogdanov and A. Hubert, “Thermodynamically sta- [25] Bernd J. Schroers, “Gauged Sigma Models and Magnetic ble magnetic vortex states in magnetic crystals,” Journal Skyrmions,” (2019), arXiv:1905.06285 [hep-th]. of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 138, 255 – 269 [26] E. B. Bogomolny, “Stability of Classical Solutions,” Sov. (1994). J. Nucl. Phys. 24, 449 (1976), [Yad. Fiz.24,861(1976)]. [9] UK R¨oßler,AN Bogdanov, and C Pfleiderer, “Sponta- [27] M. K. Prasad and Charles M. Sommerfield, “An Exact neous skyrmion ground states in magnetic metals,” Na- Classical Solution for the ’t Hooft Monopole and the ture 442, 797 (2006). Julia-Zee Dyon,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 760–762 (1975). 6

[28] A. A. Belavin, Alexander M. Polyakov, A. S. Schwartz, [45] Muneto Nitta and Walter Vinci, “Decomposing Instan- and Yu. S. Tyupkin, “Pseudoparticle Solutions of the tons in Two Dimensions,” J. Phys. A45, 175401 (2012), Yang-Mills Equations,” Phys. Lett. B59, 85–87 (1975), arXiv:1108.5742 [hep-th]. [,350(1975)]. [46] Juha Jaykka and Martin Speight, “Easy plane [29] Alexander M. Polyakov and A. A. Belavin, “Metastable baby skyrmions,” Phys. Rev. D82, 125030 (2010), States of Two-Dimensional Isotropic Ferromagnets,” arXiv:1010.2217 [hep-th]. JETP Lett. 22, 245–248 (1975), [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. [47] Michikazu Kobayashi and Muneto Nitta, “Fractional vor- Fiz.22,503(1975)]. tex molecules and vortex polygons in a baby Skyrme [30] Gerard ’t Hooft, “Computation of the Quantum Effects model,” Phys. Rev. D87, 125013 (2013), arXiv:1307.0242 Due to a Four-Dimensional Pseudoparticle,” Phys. Rev. [hep-th]. D14, 3432–3450 (1976), [,70(1976)]. [48] Minoru Eto, Youichi Isozumi, Muneto Nitta, Keisuke [31] Gerard ’t Hooft, “Symmetry Breaking Through Bell- Ohashi, and Norisuke Sakai, “Instantons in the Higgs Jackiw Anomalies,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 8–11 (1976), phase,” Phys. Rev. D72, 025011 (2005), arXiv:hep- [,226(1976)]. th/0412048 [hep-th]. [32] R. Jackiw and C. Rebbi, “Vacuum Periodicity in a Yang- [49] Minoru Eto, Toshiaki Fujimori, Youichi Isozumi, Muneto Mills Quantum Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 172–175 Nitta, Keisuke Ohashi, Kazutoshi Ohta, and Norisuke (1976), [,353(1976)]. Sakai, “Non-Abelian vortices on cylinder: Duality be- [33] Curtis G. Callan, Jr., R. F. Dashen, and David J. Gross, tween vortices and walls,” Phys. Rev. D73, 085008 “The Structure of the Gauge Theory Vacuum,” Phys. (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0601181 [hep-th]. Lett. B63, 334–340 (1976), [,357(1976)]. [50] Minoru Eto, Youichi Isozumi, Muneto Nitta, Keisuke [34] Thomas Sch¨aferand Edward V. Shuryak, “Instantons in Ohashi, and Norisuke Sakai, “Solitons in the Higgs QCD,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 323–426 (1998), arXiv:hep- phase: The Moduli matrix approach,” J. Phys. A39, ph/9610451 [hep-ph]. R315–R392 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0602170 [hep-th]. [35] Muneto Nitta, “Josephson vortices and the Atiyah- [51] Keisuke Ohashi, Toshiaki Fujimori, and Muneto Nitta, Manton construction,” Phys. Rev. D86, 125004 (2012), “Conformal symmetry of trapped Bose-Einstein conden- arXiv:1207.6958 [hep-th]. sates and massive Nambu-Goldstone modes,” Phys. Rev. [36] Michikazu Kobayashi and Muneto Nitta, “Sine-Gordon A96, 051601 (2017), arXiv:1705.09118 [cond-mat.quant- kinks on a domain wall ring,” Phys. Rev. D87, 085003 gas]. (2013), arXiv:1302.0989 [hep-th]. [52] Daisuke A. Takahashi, Keisuke Ohashi, Toshiaki [37] Toshiaki Fujimori, Syo Kamata, Tatsuhiro Misumi, Fujimori, and Muneto Nitta, “Two-dimensional Muneto Nitta, and Norisuke Sakai, “Nonpertur- Schr¨odingersymmetry and three-dimensional breathers bative contributions from complexified solutions in and Kelvin-ripple complexes as quasi-massive-Nambu- N−1 CP models,” Phys. Rev. D94, 105002 (2016), Goldstone modes,” Phys. Rev. A96, 023626 (2017), arXiv:1607.04205 [hep-th]. arXiv:1706.09677 [cond-mat.quant-gas]. [38] Toshiaki Fujimori, Syo Kamata, Tatsuhiro Misumi, [53] S.-A. Siegfried, E. V. Altynbaev, N. M. Chubova, Muneto Nitta, and Norisuke Sakai, “Exact resurgent V. Dyadkin, D. Chernyshov, E. V. Moskvin, D. Men- trans-series and multibion contributions to all orders,” zel, A. Heinemann, A. Schreyer, and S. V. Grig- Phys. Rev. D95, 105001 (2017), arXiv:1702.00589 [hep- oriev, “Controlling the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interac- th]. tion to alter the chiral link between structure and mag- [39] Gerald V. Dunne and Mithat Unsal, “Continuity and netism for Fe1−xCoxSi,” Phys. Rev. B 91, 184406 (2015), Resurgence: towards a continuum definition of the arXiv:1503.07409 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]. CP(N-1) model,” Phys. Rev. D87, 025015 (2013), [54] T. Koretsune, N. Nagaosa, and R. Arita, “Control arXiv:1210.3646 [hep-th]. of Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in Mn1−xFexGe: a [40] Gerald V. Dunne and Mithat Unsal, “New Nonper- first-principles study,” Scientific Reports 5, 13302 (2015), turbative Methods in Quantum Field Theory: From arXiv:1503.03777 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]. Large-N Orbifold Equivalence to Bions and Resur- [55] A. Belabbes, G. Bihlmayer, S. Bl¨ugel, and A. Manchon, gence,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 66, 245–272 (2016), “Oxygen-enabled control of Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Inter- arXiv:1601.03414 [hep-th]. action in ultra-thin magnetic films,” Scientific Reports 6, [41] Tatsuhiro Misumi, Muneto Nitta, and Norisuke Sakai, 24634 (2016), arXiv:1511.01614 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]. N−1 “Neutral bions in the CP model,” JHEP 06, 164 [56] X. Ma, G. Yu, X. Li, T. Wang, D. Wu, K. S. Olsson, (2014), arXiv:1404.7225 [hep-th]. Z. Chu, K. An, J. Q. Xiao, K. L. Wang, and X. Li, “In- [42] Tatsuhiro Misumi, Muneto Nitta, and Norisuke Sakai, terfacial control of Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in “Classifying bions in Grassmann sigma models and heavy metal/ferromagnetic metal thin film heterostruc- non-Abelian gauge theories by D-branes,” PTEP 2015, tures,” Phys. Rev. B 94, 180408 (2016), arXiv:1611.01577 033B02 (2015), arXiv:1409.3444 [hep-th]. [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]. [43] Tatsuhiro Misumi, Muneto Nitta, and Norisuke Sakai, [57] F. D. M. Haldane, “Nonlinear field theory of large spin “Resurgence in sine-Gordon quantum mechanics: Exact Heisenberg antiferromagnets. Semiclassically quantized agreement between multi-instantons and uniform WKB,” solitons of the one-dimensional easy Axis Neel state,” JHEP 09, 157 (2015), arXiv:1507.00408 [hep-th]. Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1153–1156 (1983). [44] Toshiaki Fujimori, Syo Kamata, Tatsuhiro Misumi, [58] F. D. M. Haldane, “Continuum dynamics of the 1- Muneto Nitta, and Norisuke Sakai, “Resurgence Struc- D Heisenberg antiferromagnetic identification with the ture to All Orders of Multi-bions in Deformed SUSY O(3) nonlinear sigma model,” Phys. Lett. A93, 464–468 Quantum Mechanics,” PTEP 2017, 083B02 (2017), (1983). arXiv:1705.10483 [hep-th]. [59] F. D. M. Haldane, “O (3) Nonlinear sigma Model 7

and the Topological Distinction between Integer- and tum critical points,” Science 303, 1490–1494 (2004). Half-Integer-Spin Antiferromagnets in Two Dimensions,” [62] Elliott H. Lieb, Theodore Schultz, and Daniel Mattis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1029–1032 (1988). “Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain,” An- [60] N. Read and Subir Sachdev, “Valence-bond and spin- nals Phys. 16, 407–466 (1961). Peierls ground states of low-dimensional quantum anti- [63] Ian Affleck and Elliott H. Lieb, “A Proof of Part of Hal- ferromagnets,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1694–1697 (1989). dane’s Conjecture on Spin Chains,” Lett. Math. Phys. [61] T. Senthil, Ashvin Vishwanath, Leon Balents, Subir 12, 57 (1986). Sachdev, and Matthew P. A. Fisher, “Deconfined quan-