Jpos Programmer's Guide
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
OASIS Response to NSTC Request for Feedback on Standard Practices
OASIS RESPONSE TO NSTC REQUEST FOR FEEDBACK ON STANDARDS PRACTICES OASIS (Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards) is pleased to respond to the request from the National Science and Technology Council's Sub-Committee on Standards published at 75 FR 76397 (2010), and extended by 76 FR 3877 (2011), for feedback and observations regarding the effectiveness of Federal agencies' participation in the development and implementation of standards and conformity assessment activities and programs. We have advised our own members about the Federal Register inquiry, in case they wish to respond. Of course, their opinions are their own, and this response does not represent the views of any members, but only the observations of OASIS professional staff. I. RESPONDENT'S BACKGROUND OASIS is one of the largest and oldest global open data standards consortia, founded in 1993 as SGML Open. OASIS has over 5000 active participants representing about 600 member organizations and individual members in over 80 countries. We host widely-used standards in multiple fields including • cybersecurity & access control (such as WS-Security, SAML, XACML, KMIP, DSS & XSPA) [/1], • office documents and smart semantic documents (such as OpenDocument, DITA, DocBook & CMIS) [/2], and • electronic commerce (including SOA and web services, such as BPEL, ebXML, WS-ReliableMessaging & the WS-Transaction standards) [/3] among other areas. Various specific vertical industries also fulfill their open standards requirements by initiating OASIS projects, resulting in mission-specific standards such as • UBL and Business Document Exchange (for e-procurement) [/4], • CAP and EDML (for emergency first-responder notifications) [/5], and • LegalXML (for electronic court filing data)[/6]. -
Automated Software System for Checking the Structure and Format of Acm Sig Documents
AUTOMATED SOFTWARE SYSTEM FOR CHECKING THE STRUCTURE AND FORMAT OF ACM SIG DOCUMENTS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF APPLIED SCIENCES OF NEAR EAST UNIVERSITY By ARSALAN RAHMAN MIRZA In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Master of Science in Software Engineering NICOSIA, 2015 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would not have been possible without the help, support and patience of my principal supervisor, my deepest gratitude goes to Assist. Prof. Dr. Melike Şah Direkoglu, for her constant encouragement and guidance. She has walked me through all the stages of my research and writing thesis. Without her consistent and illuminating instruction, this thesis could not have reached its present from. Above all, my unlimited thanks and heartfelt love would be dedicated to my dearest family for their loyalty and their great confidence in me. I would like to thank my parents for giving me a support, encouragement and constant love have sustained me throughout my life. I would also like to thank the lecturers in software/computer engineering department for giving me the opportunity to be a member in such university and such department. Their help and supervision concerning taking courses were unlimited. Eventually, I would like to thank a man who showed me a document with wrong format, and told me “it will be very good if we have a program for checking the documents”, however I don’t know his name, but he hired me to start my thesis based on this idea. ii To Alan Kurdi To my Nephews Sina & Nima iii ABSTRACT Microsoft office (MS) word is one of the most commonly used software tools for creating documents. -
POS Interface Specifications ISO 8583 (1987 Version)
POS Interface Specifications ISO 8583 (1987 version) Prepared by: Nigeria Inter – Bank Settlement System (NIBSS) Version: 1.16 August 07, 2018 Page 1 of 64 POS ISO 8583 Interface Specification TABLE OF CONTENTS POS INTERFACE SPECIFICATIONS .................................................................................... 1 ISO 8583 (1987 VERSION) ............................................................................................... 1 DOCUMENT CONTROL .................................................................................................... 3 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 4 2. EXTERNAL MESSAGE TYPES ........................................................................................ 5 2.1 PROTOCOL ............................................................................................................ 5 2.2 BITMAP .................................................................................................................... 5 2. 3 SUPPORTED MESSAGE TYPE ......................................................................................... 5 3. EXTERNAL MESSAGE TYPE LAYOUTS ........................................................................... 6 3.1 AUTHORIZATION REQUEST/REPEAT (0100) ..................................................................... 6 3.2 AUTHORIZATION REQUEST RESPONSE (0110) .................................................................. 7 3.3 FINANCIAL REQUEST/REPEAT (0200) .......................................................................... -
STATE of MICHIGAN CENTRAL PROCUREMENT SERVICES Department of Technology, Management, and Budget 525 W
STATE OF MICHIGAN CENTRAL PROCUREMENT SERVICES Department of Technology, Management, and Budget 525 W. ALLEGAN ST., LANSING, MICHIGAN 48913 P.O. BOX 30026 LANSING, MICHIGAN 48909 CONTRACT CHANGE NOTICE Change Notice Number 1 to Contract Number 200000002198 Program Fidelity Information Services, LCC Manager Various MDHHS CONTRACTOR 601 Riverside Avenue STATE Jacksonville, FL 32204 Administrator Kim Bynan Contract Joy Nakfoor DTMB 414-577-9861 (517) 249-0481 [email protected] [email protected] VC0006630 CONTRACT SUMMARY ELECTRONIC BENEFITS TRANSFER (EBT) FOR SNAP AND WIC PROGRAMS INITIAL EFFECTIVE DATE INITIAL EXPIRATION DATE INITIAL AVAILABLE OPTIONS EXPIRATION DATE BEFORE November 1, 2020 September 14, 2027 1 - 3 Year September 14, 2027 PAYMENT TERMS DELIVERY TIMEFRAME N/A ALTERNATE PAYMENT OPTIONS EXTENDED PURCHASING ☐ P-Card ☐ PRC ☐ Other ☐ Yes ☒ No MINIMUM DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS N/A DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE NOTICE OPTION LENGTH OF OPTION EXTENSION LENGTH OF EXTENSION REVISED EXP. DATE ☐ ☐ September 14, 2027 CURRENT VALUE VALUE OF CHANGE NOTICE ESTIMATED AGGREGATE CONTRACT VALUE $22,655,691.55 $0.00 $22,655,691.55 DESCRIPTION Effective August 24, 2021, the new Go Live date is August 29, 2021. As of the Go Live, pricing is updated to: - SNAP CSR Cost per Minute is $0.699 (per the attached Schedule B – MDHHS SNAP Pricing, II. Call Center/Telecommunication). - WIC Cost per Case Month is $0.414 (per the attached Schedule B – MDHHS WIC Pricing, A. Cost Per Case Month). All other terms, conditions, specifications and pricing remain the same. Per contractor and agency agreement, and DTMB Central Procurement approval. CHANGE NOTICE NO. 1 TO CONTRACT NO. -
JSON Application Programming Interface for Discrete Event Simulation Data Exchange
JSON Application Programming Interface for Discrete Event Simulation data exchange Ioannis Papagiannopoulos Enterprise Research Centre Faculty of Science and Engineering Design and Manufacturing Technology University of Limerick Submitted to the University of Limerick for the degree of Master of Engineering 2015 1. Supervisor: Prof. Cathal Heavey Enterprise Research Centre University of Limerick Ireland ii Abstract This research is conducted as part of a project that has the overall aim to develop an open source discrete event simulation (DES) platform that is expandable, and modular aiming to support the use of DES at multi-levels of manufacturing com- panies. The current work focuses on DES data exchange within this platform. The goal of this thesis is to develop a DES exchange interface between three different modules: (i) ManPy an open source discrete event simulation engine developed in Python on the SimPy library; (ii) A Knowledge Extraction (KE) tool used to populate the ManPy simulation engine from shop-floor data stored within an Enterprise Requirements Planning (ERP) or a Manufacturing Execution System (MES) to allow the potential for real-time simulation. The development of the tool is based on R scripting language, and different Python libraries; (iii) A Graphical User Interface (GUI) developed in JavaScript used to provide an interface in a similar manner to Commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) DES tools. In the literature review the main standards that could be used are reviewed. Based on this review and the requirements above, the data exchange format standard JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) was selected. The proposed solution accom- plishes interoperability between different modules using an open source, expand- able, and easy to adopt and maintain, in an all inclusive JSON file. -
Release Notes for the Docbook XSL Stylesheets I
Release Notes for the DocBook XSL Stylesheets i Release Notes for the DocBook XSL Stylesheets Release Notes for the DocBook XSL Stylesheets ii Contents 1 Release Notes: snapshot 1 2 Release Notes: 1.79.2 1 3 Release Notes: 1.79.1 1 3.1 Gentext . .1 3.2 Common . .2 3.3 FO...........................................................4 3.4 HTML.........................................................9 3.5 Manpages . 13 3.6 Epub.......................................................... 14 3.7 HTMLHelp . 16 3.8 Eclipse . 16 3.9 JavaHelp . 16 3.10 Slides . 17 3.11 Website . 17 3.12 Webhelp . 18 3.13 Params . 18 3.14 Profiling . 20 3.15Lib........................................................... 20 3.16 Tools . 20 3.17 Template . 21 3.18 Extensions . 21 4 Release Notes: 1.79.0 21 4.1 Gentext . 22 4.2 Common . 23 4.3 FO........................................................... 24 4.4 HTML......................................................... 29 4.5 Manpages . 34 4.6 Epub.......................................................... 35 4.7 HTMLHelp . 36 4.8 Eclipse . 36 4.9 JavaHelp . 37 4.10 Slides . 37 4.11 Website . 38 4.12 Webhelp . 38 4.13 Params . 39 Release Notes for the DocBook XSL Stylesheets iii 4.14 Profiling . 40 4.15Lib........................................................... 40 4.16 Tools . 40 4.17 Template . 41 4.18 Extensions . 42 5 Release Notes: 1.78.1 42 5.1 Common . 42 5.2 FO........................................................... 43 5.3 HTML......................................................... 43 5.4 Manpages . 44 5.5 Webhelp . 44 5.6 Params . 44 5.7 Highlighting . 44 6 Release Notes: 1.78.0 44 6.1 Gentext . 45 6.2 Common . 45 6.3 FO........................................................... 46 6.4 HTML......................................................... 47 6.5 Manpages . -
Pre-Solicitation Instructions
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TECHNOLOGY PRE-SOLICITATION INSTRUCTIONS TO: All Interested Bidders RE: Pre-Solicitation Feedback DATE: November 9, 2016 The California Department of Technology (CDT) requests feedback and/or questions on the following Pre- Solicitation documents. FOR: ELECTRONIC WOMEN, INFANT AND CHILDREN MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS (eWIC MIS) PRE-SOLICITATION REVIEW 1. eWIC MIS Project Request for Proposal (RFP) in its entirety a. Part 1 – Bidders Instructions b. Part 2 – Bidders Response 2. Exhibit 22 – Cost Workbook Please note these documents are drafts and are subject to change. GENERAL QUESTIONS If the answer is yes to any of the questions below, please explain. 1. Are there any requirements for which assumptions are required to be made to provide a response? 2. Are there areas in the Statement of Work (SOW) that you believe are not clear? 3. Are there any Sections which are inconsistent and/or contradictory? 4. Is any additional information needed to prepare a response? REQUIREMENTS 1. Are there any requirements too onerous or which may result in unnecessary costs or risks to the State? If so, please indicate which ones and explain why. 2. Are there any requirements which may prevent you from submitting a response? If so, what are they, and why would they prevent you from responding? 3. Are there any requirements which may make it difficult to implement the solution by April 1, 2020? If yes, why? OTHER 1. Please provide a Rough Order of Magnitude (budgetary estimate) of the total costs for the solution required by this RFP. 2. Please review Section 5, Cost (Part 2) and Exhibit 22, Cost Worksheet, of the RFP and provide input on whether the Section and worksheet(s) are clear, concise, complete, and easy to use. -
Docbook to XHTML I
DocBook to XHTML i DocBook to XHTML DocBook to XHTML ii COLLABORATORS TITLE : DocBook to XHTML ACTION NAME DATE SIGNATURE WRITTEN BY Jordi Fita February 6, 2018 REVISION HISTORY NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION NAME 29081e152caf 2011-05-31 Added the ’notranslate’ class to the code’s div jfita output in db2html. 34b7522b4f97 2011-03-28 atangle is now using a new style for directives jfita which don’t collide with XML tags. I had to update all games and programs as well in order to use the new directive syntax. 6cc909c0b61d 2011-03-07 Added the comments section. jfita a43774cb5c70 2011-01-25 db2html now takes into account XML jfita idiosyncrasies. 3afa2eb8824f 2010-11-12 Fixed missing tokens from lexer in db2html. jfita 2d89308d5f16 2010-11-10 Fixed a problem with double end of line values in jfita db2html’s literate programming filter. d1e8f7703f36 2010-11-10 Corrected the literate programming directive’s jfita regexp to include the dot character. 8c7d8f36c874 2010-10-30 Fixed a typo. jfita a643bad18ca3 2010-10-28 Fixed a typo in db2html. jfita ec13c85db550 2010-10-27 Added a missing source style to db2html.txt jfita DocBook to XHTML iii REVISION HISTORY NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION NAME 30b4b6244050 2010-10-27 Added the filter for atangle’s directive to db2html. jfita e3241d8e1dc9 2010-10-25 Added the AsciiDoc’s homepage’s link to jfita db2html. 05a1b32f8b4a 2010-10-22 The appendix sections now aren’t actual jfita appendix when making a book. 0ab76df46149 2010-10-20 Added the download links. jfita 9efbebdaa6ab 2010-10-19 Fixed an unused ’tmp’ variable in db2html’s jfita print_error function. -
Markup Languages and TEI XML Encoding
Methods and tools for Digital Philology: markup languages and TEI XML encoding Digital Tools for Humanists Summer School 2019 Pisa, 10-14 June 2019 Roberto Rosselli Del Turco Dipartimento di Studi Umanistici Università di Torino [email protected] XML encoding Markup languages there are many markup languages, which differ greatly fundamental distinction: procedural markup vs. descriptive markup procedural markup is typical of word processors: instructions for specifying where the characters should appear on the page, their appearance, etc. WYSIWYG approach, but also see LaTeX the user doesn’t see or modify the markup directly (but again see LaTeX) descriptive markup describes text this distinction isn’t as neat as one would love to think, see for instance the structural aspect of text 2 XML encoding Descriptive markup allows the scholar to do a semantic annotation of text the current standard is the XML language (← SGML) in spite of the multiple hierarchies problem XML has been used to produce many different encoding schemas: TEI schemas for all types of texts TEI-derived schemas: EpiDoc, MEI, CEI, etc. other schemas: DOCBOOK, MML – Music Markup Language, MathML, SVG, etc. it is also possible to create a personal encoding schema, but you would need a very good reason not to use TEI XML 3 Il linguaggio XML Markup languages: XML SGML is the “father” of XML (eXtensible Markup Language) XML was created to replace both SGML, offering similar characteristics but a much lower complexity, and also HTML, going beyond the intrinsic -
Using XML for Long-Term Preservation Subtitle: Experiences from the Diva Project
Title: Using XML for Long-term Preservation Subtitle: Experiences from the DiVA Project Authors: Müller, Eva; Klosa, Uwe; Hansson, Peter; Andersson, Stefan; Siira, Erik Organization: Uppsala University Library, Electronic Publishing Centre Email: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Address: Box 510, 75 120 Uppsala, Sweden Url: http://publications.uu.se Keyword: long-term preservation, XML, XML Schema, DiVA, DiVA Document Format, DiVA Archive, URN, URN:NBN Abstract One of the objectives of the DiVA project is to explore the possibility of using XML as a format for long-term preservation. For this reason, the practical use of XML in different parts of the system was evaluated before deciding on the design. The DiVA Document Format - defined by an XML schema - has been developed to describe the inter-relationships amongst the various data elements and processes, and to support long-term preservation of the actual documents. XML Schema provides a means for defining the structure, content and semantics of XML documents. It is an XML based alternative to the XML Document Type Definition (DTD). Because one of the primary reasons for using XML was to support long-term preservation, the most popular DTDs for documents: DocBook and TEI were evaluated. Limitations regarding metadata descriptions were found in both of these DTDs, so the decision to develop a new structure for DiVA, using XML schema, was made. This schema combines the DocBook Schema (derived from the DocBook DTD) for the textual parts of the document with the internal schema for all metadata (bibliographic and administrative data). -
Technical Standards Catalogue VERSION 6.2
e-Government Technical Standards Catalogue VERSION 6.2 FINAL September 2005 Technical Standards Catalogue / version 6.2 final / September 2005 1 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................3 2 CHANGES FROM PREVIOUS VERSION..................................................................................4 3 ISSUES UNDER CONSIDERATION............................................................................................5 4 INTERCONNECTION ...................................................................................................................7 TABLE 1 SPECIFICATIONS FOR INTERCONNECTIVITY.......................................................................7 TABLE 2 SPECIFICATIONS FOR WEB SERVICES ..............................................................................10 5 DATA INTEGRATION ................................................................................................................16 TABLE 3 SPECIFICATIONS FOR DATA INTEGRATION ...........................................................................16 6 CONTENT MANAGEMENT METADATA ...............................................................................19 TABLE 4 SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTENT MANAGEMENT METADATA .................................................19 TABLE 5 SPECIFICATIONS FOR IDENTIFIERS .......................................................................................20 7 E-SERVICES ACCESS.................................................................................................................23 -
Why Is There a Need for GSMA Mobile Money API Specification? a Comparison with Other Industry Standards
Why is there a need for GSMA Mobile Money API Specification? A comparison with other industry standards July 2020 Copyright © 2020 GSM Association GSMA Mobile Money The GSMA represents the interests of mobile operators The GSMA’s Mobile Money programme works to accelerate worldwide, uniting more than 750 operators with almost the development of the mobile money ecosystem for the 400 companies in the broader mobile ecosystem, including underserved. handset and device makers, software companies, equipment providers and internet companies, as well as organizations For more information, please contact us: in adjacent industry sectors. Web: www.gsma.com/mobilemoney Twitter: @gsmamobilemoney The GSMA also produces the industry-leading MWC events Email: [email protected] held annually in Barcelona, Los Angeles and Shanghai, as well as the Mobile 360 Series of regional conferences. Inclusive Tech Lab: www.gsma.com/lab For more information, please visit the GSMA corporate website at www.gsma.com. Follow the GSMA on Twitter: @GSMA Authors: Viji Pathy, API Architect, Inclusive Tech Lab Bart-Jan Pors, Director, Inclusive Tech Lab, Mobile Money Gareth Pateman, Founding Partner, MFX THE GSMA MOBILE MONEY PROGRAMME IS SUPPORTED BY THE BILL AND MELINDA GATES FOUNDATION Why is there a need for GSMA Mobile Money API Specification? A comparison with other industry standards Contents Executive summary ................................................................................................. 5 01 Introduction ................................................................................................