DOCSLIB.ORG

Global Innovation Sweepstakes a QUEST to WIN the FUTURE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Global Innovation Sweepstakes a QUEST to WIN the FUTURE The Global Innovation Sweepstakes A QUEST TO WIN THE FUTURE BY Robert A. Manning and Peter Engelke CONTRIBUTING AUTHOR Samuel Klein The Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security works to develop sustainable, nonpartisan strategies to address the most important security challenges facing the United States and the world. The Center honors General Brent Scowcroft’s legacy of service and embodies his ethos of nonpartisan commitment to the cause of security, support for US leadership in cooperation with allies and partners, and dedication to the mentorship of the next generation of leaders. This report is written and published in accordance with the Atlantic Council Policy on Intellectual Independence. The authors are solely responsible for its analysis and recommendations. The Atlantic Council, its partners, and funders do not determine, nor do they necessarily endorse or advocate for, any of this report’s particular conclusions. © 2018 The Atlantic Council of the United States. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the Atlantic Council, except in the case of brief quotations in news articles, critical articles, or reviews. Please direct inquiries to: Atlantic Council 1030 15th Street NW, 12th Floor Washington, DC 20005 ISBN-13: 978-1-61977-550-3 June 2018 The Global Innovation Sweepstakes A QUEST TO WIN THE FUTURE BY Robert A. Manning and Peter Engelke CONTRIBUTING AUTHOR Samuel Klein Contents 1 Foreword 79 Mexico: Hopeful Challenger, BY KATHERINE PEREIRA 2 Executive Summary 81 South Korea: From Chaebol to 3 Recommendations Gangnam Style 4 China and the United States 83 Sweden: Innovation Society 5 Other Top-Tier Contenders 7 The Struggling Second and Third 85 Authors’ Bios Tiers 8 Lessons for Innovators 86 Acknowledgments 89 Glossary 9 Introduction: The Global Innovation Sweepstakes 90 Endnotes 12 Method: A World Tour 13 The Sweepstakes 15 Mapping Global Innovation SIDEBARS 17 China and the United States 25 Asia’s Other Giants 23 Assessing Top-Down Innovation 30 Europe: Rising to the Challenge in China 36 Small States, Big Impact by Dr. Yang Gao 41 The Rest: A Global Sample 32 Europe’s Competitive Advantages 46 The Policy Environment in the Entrepreneurial Age 47 Technology Outpacing Governance by Nicolas Colin 51 Intellectual Property 37 Universities in Sweden’s 58 Conclusion: Five Big Questions Innovation Ecosystem for the Future (and Some by Lisa Ericsson and Donnie SC Recommendations) Lygonis 69 SPECIAL SECTION 54 Innovation and Intellectual Global Innovation Profiles Property in Emerging Countries 70 China: Up Close and Personal, by Jennifer Brant BY SAMUEL KLEIN 74 France: Confounding Stereotypes 77 Israel: Place and Flow IV THE GLOBAL INNOVATION SWEEPSTAKES: A QUEST TO WIN THE FUTURE Foreword BY FREDERICK KEMPE eotechnology today is what geopolitics were to the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. A cluster of new technologies—namely artificial intel- ligence, robotics, green energy, and biotechnology, among others—will do more than just transform science. They will determine how we all live and function. Geotech—the race for technological leadership among the world’s powers—will remake the global order. GToday, the world has many innovative places—coun- diverse backgrounds and it is their thinking that drove the tries and cities—that are in a fierce competition for global findings of this report—the second in a two-part series. leadership in tech-based innovation. While the innovation The Council’s Scowcroft Center develops sustainable, non- ecosystem that the United States built after 1945 remains partisan strategies to address the most important security intact, it is at significant risk of erosion as China and other challenges facing the United States and the world. These countries aim for “first mover” advantage in the next round strategies are informed by strategic foresight and forward- of technological breakthroughs. Increasingly, countries looking analysis of global trends—many of which can be around the world recognize that they must lead in tech- found in this report. based innovation if they are to be prosperous and secure in The world is on the cusp of a technological wave that will the future. shape the future of human civilization. Those countries that It is with this realization that twelve months ago the can create cutting-edge technologies—and adapt to those Atlantic Council’s Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security, technologies at the same time—will realize enormous eco- in partnership with Qualcomm, embarked on a global tour nomic and geostrategic benefits in the decades to come. In of technology hubs to find out which ones are at the cutting that regard, this report comes at a very important time. We edges of tech-based innovation and which are at risk of fall- must realize that while the United States will remain innova- ing behind. tive, the country cannot be placed on auto-pilot if it hopes to Although we could not travel everywhere, our research stay at the top. took us to China, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Mexico, I hope you will find this report as thought-provoking as I the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Sweden, and did and that it will help you understand and lead the way in France. We met with roughly two hundred individuals from today’s global innovation landscape. Frederick Kempe President and CEO Atlantic Council THE GLOBAL INNOVATION SWEEPSTAKES: A QUEST TO WIN THE FUTURE 1 Executive Summary BY MATHEW J. BURROWS Director of the Foresight, Strategy, and Risks Initiative, Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security, Atlantic Council he world is on the cusp of an unprecedented technological revolution, one that will have far-reaching social, economic, and geostrategic consequences. This tech revolution will change the way we live, work, manufacture goods, fight wars, and communicate. What is unfolding is a convergence of tech- nologies, the melding of the digital with the real economy, in a synergy of artificial intelligence (AI), big data (the cloud), robotics, biotech, advanced manufacturing, the Internet of Things (IoT), nano-engineering and -manufacturing, and Tover the horizon, quantum computing. How the United States and other major actors posi- This report seeks to answer the fundamental questions tion themselves as innovators and adaptors of emerging raised by the unfolding technological revolution. It fol- technologies will determine their economic fate and geo- lows an earlier one focused solely on US innovation that strategic standing. And while the United States remains at was also produced by the Foresight, Strategy, and Risks the top of the global tech-innovation hierarchy, its position (FSR) Initiative of the Atlantic Council’s Scowcroft Center is in real jeopardy. Several nations are fast approaching. for Strategy and Security in partnership with Qualcomm. In this century, the world’s most advanced countries will The first report saw a United States that was losing its be those best positioned to create and adapt to new and edge and recommended actions to help to shore up US disruptive technologies. Whoever ends up on top will reap leadership. tremendous gains. Those who do not will fall behind. The This report, which moves onto the global level, is by the authors of this report believe that countries fall into one same authors of the previous one—FSR’s Robert Manning of three general categories: those countries on the cutting and Peter Engelke—with Samuel Klein. The research was edge of tech-based innovation, those that easily adapt to conducted using a similar methodology of visiting inno- and absorb new technologies, and those that are lagging. vation hubs and speaking with people on the ground. These categories are not mutually exclusive—some coun- For this second report, the authors visited ten countries tries straddle categories—but the gaps between leaders and conducted telephone interviews with scientists and and those on the bottom rungs will grow larger. technologists in other nations. They read hundreds of sec- The key recommendations in this report deal not just with ondary publications and consulted numerous data sources. the potential problems between states, but also address The country visits allowed the authors to meet with a some of the inequities that are growing within societies diverse range of people across multiple points on the inno- due in part to emerging technologies. The entire world has vation ecosystem compass: entrepreneurs; government become more prosperous than ever before; the digital revo- officials (at local and national levels); venture capitalists; lution has played a key part in this development, accelerating owners of incubators, accelerators, and co-working spaces; the rise of China and other emerging markets. However, academics and university administrators; and local tech- technology has increased income inequalities. Women and innovation “thought leaders.” Altogether, the authors spoke minorities are grossly underrepresented in tech firms and with roughly two hundred people around the world, usually jobs. Will emerging technologies, such as AI, be different? off-the-record to get the most uncompromised views. The Will inequalities widen further? How will the geopolitical interviewees’ insights drive this report’s findings, and a few landscape, indeed the global order writ large, change if China of the interviewees contributed essays that are featured in replaces the United States as the world’s innovation leader? this report. 2 THE GLOBAL INNOVATION SWEEPSTAKES: A QUEST TO WIN THE FUTURE Eighth-grade students explore DNA extraction with US Army scientists. Recommendations Inclusion: Governments should encourage participation Restarting negotiations for a US-EU Transatlantic Trade and in the technology sector by women and girls, ethnic and Investment Partnership (TTIP) accord that adopted similar religious minorities, and lower-income groups, providing digital commerce provisions would be a big step toward incentives to firms to recruit more people from these groups setting global rules.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geoengineering in the Anthropocene Through Regenerative Urbanism
    geosciences Review Geoengineering in the Anthropocene through Regenerative Urbanism Giles Thomson * and Peter Newman Curtin University Sustainability Policy Institute, Curtin University, Perth 6102, WA, Australia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-8-9266-9030 Academic Editors: Carlos Alves and Jesus Martinez-Frias Received: 26 June 2016; Accepted: 13 October 2016; Published: 25 October 2016 Abstract: Human consumption patterns exceed planetary boundaries and stress on the biosphere can be expected to worsen. The recent “Paris Agreement” (COP21) represents a major international attempt to address risk associated with climate change through rapid decarbonisation. The mechanisms for implementation are yet to be determined and, while various large-scale geoengineering projects have been proposed, we argue a better solution may lie in cities. Large-scale green urbanism in cities and their bioregions would offer benefits commensurate to alternative geoengineering proposals, but this integrated approach carries less risk and has additional, multiple, social and economic benefits in addition to a reduction of urban ecological footprint. However, the key to success will require policy writers and city makers to deliver at scale and to high urban sustainability performance benchmarks. To better define urban sustainability performance, we describe three horizons of green urbanism: green design, that seeks to improve upon conventional development; sustainable development, that is the first step toward a net zero impact; and the emerging concept of regenerative urbanism, that enables biosphere repair. Examples of green urbanism exist that utilize technology and design to optimize urban metabolism and deliver net positive sustainability performance. If mainstreamed, regenerative approaches can make urban development a major urban geoengineering force, while simultaneously introducing life-affirming co-benefits to burgeoning cities.
    [Show full text]
  • New Media & Society
    New Media & Society http://nms.sagepub.com Information and communication technology innovations: radical and disruptive? Michael Latzer New Media Society 2009; 11; 599 DOI: 10.1177/1461444809102964 The online version of this article can be found at: http://nms.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/11/4/599 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com Additional services and information for New Media & Society can be found at: Email Alerts: http://nms.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://nms.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav Citations http://nms.sagepub.com/cgi/content/refs/11/4/599 Downloaded from http://nms.sagepub.com at University of Zurich on November 16, 2009 new media & society Copyright © 2009 SAGE Publications Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore and Washington DC Vol 11(4): 599–619 [DOI: 10.1177/1461444809102964] ARTICLE Information and communication technology innovations: radical and disruptive? MICHAEL LATZER University of Zurich, Switzerland Abstract Information and communication technology innovations (ICT) are considered to be of central importance to social and economic developments. Various innovation theories offer classifications to predict and assess their impact. This article reviews the usefulness of selected approaches and their application in the convergent communications sector. It focuses on the notion of disruption, the comparatively new distinction between disruptive and sustaining innovations, and examines how it is related to other innovation-theoretical typologies. According to the literature, there is a high frequency of disruptive changes in the field of internet protocol-based innovations in combination with wireless technology. A closer analysis reveals that these classifications and assessments not only differ in detail but are even contradictory.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Money: an Analysis of the Capital Landscape for Early-Stage, For-Profit, Social Enterprises in the United States
    Mapping the Money: An Analysis of the Capital Landscape for Early-Stage, For-Profit, Social Enterprises in the United States May Samali June 2016 M-RCBG Associate Working Paper Series | No. 59 The views expressed in the M-RCBG Associate Working Paper Series are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business & Government or of Harvard University. The papers in this series have not undergone formal review and approval; they are presented to elicit feedback and to encourage debate on important public policy challenges. Copyright belongs to the author(s). Papers may be downloaded for personal use only. Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business & Government Weil Hall | Harvard Kennedy School | www.hks.harvard.edu/mrcbg MAPPING THE MONEY: An Analysis of the Capital Landscape for Early-Stage, For-Profit, Social Enterprises in the United States Author: MAY SAMALI Master in Public Policy Candidate 2016 Kennedy School of Government Harvard University Client: TUMML 501(c)3 accelerator in San Francisco, CA Faculty Advisor: Carl Byers Seminar Leader: Executive Dean John Haigh Publication Date: March 29, 2016 This Working Paper reflects the views of the author and should not be viewed as representing the views of the external client, nor those of Harvard University or any of its faculty. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I want to acknowledge the many people who generously shared their time, resources, and expertise with me throughout the research and writing process. First, thank you to Executive Dean John Haigh and Carl Byers—my advisors at the Harvard Kennedy School—for sharing excellent insights and keeping me on track.
    [Show full text]
  • Episode 2: Getting Funding for Your Startup
    Episode 2: Getting funding for your startup This is the transcript for Episode 2 of the Smart Startup English Podcast. You can listen to the audio for Episode 2 on the episode page. ​ ​ To get our episodes for free, you can also subscribe to the Smart Startup English podcast on iTunes, Soundcloud and Spotify. ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Welcome to the Smart Startup English Podcast, episode 2. I’m Mickey, I’m your host, and in this episode we’re talking about money. About how and where to get it from as a startup. But first, let me ask you a question: If you’re a startup founder, how did you get your first dollar? Is there any way to get money before your business starts making enough money? They say that money makes the world go round. But when you’re a startup founder, getting money doesn’t always come easy. When your startup is brand new, you might need to do a bit of bootstrapping. What does bootstrapping mean? It means that you’re using your own money or your own resources to start your business. When you’re bootstrapping, you’re not taking money from anyone else. Maybe you’re using your personal savings, or you have a day job, or you’re using your own home as an office. Maybe you’re even bringing in a bit of revenue with your product. Maybe you’re even bringing in a bit of revenue with your product. But your focus is still on keeping your expenses low. A lot of today’s successful tech companies - such as Basecamp, Mailchimp and Skyscanner - started as bootstrapped businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • A Look at How Five of the Biggest Tech Companies Probe New Terrain
    THEMIDDLEMARKET.COM MARCH 2020 A look at how fi ve of the biggest tech companies probe new terrain through early-stage investments CV1_MAJ0320.indd 1 2/24/20 4:16 PM Gain way. We designed our M&A Escrow experience to be a straight line from start to finish. With our comprehensive Deal Dashboard, streamlined KYC and account opening, and high-touch service through a single point of contact, try a better way on your next deal. Learn more at srsacquiom.com 0C2_MAJ0320 2 2/24/2020 11:54:58 AM Contents March 2020 | VOL. 55 | NO. 3 Cover Story 16 Fresh Terrain A look at how five of the biggest tech companies explore new territory through early-stage investments. Features 24 Viral impact How the coronavirus is affecting M&A and private equity. 27 Top investment banks Houlihan Lokey leads list based on volume of PE-backed U.S. deals 30 Top private equity firms Audax ranks first in U.S. deals. Private Equity Perspective 14 Record year for fundraising Blackstone’s $26 billion fund marked the largest buyout fund ever raised. The Buyside 15 Taking a new path XPO Logistics is selling assets and has Watercooler hired a new CFO to lead the process. 6 10 Guest article Climate change draws PE Future of auto 33 KKR raises first global impact fund to BorgWarner acquires Delphi to Women on board target clean water. position for auto industry shift. Gender diversity on corporate boards is good for performance and for 8 12 shareholders. Protecting businesses Why investors like steaks Advent and Crosspoint buy Smith & Wollensky owner purchases cybersecurity firm Forescout.
    [Show full text]
  • A Systematic Review of Methods for Health Care Technology Horizon Scanning
    AHRQ Health Care Horizon Scanning System A Systematic Review of Methods for Health Care Technology Horizon Scanning Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 540 Gaither Road Rockville, MD 20850 Contract No. 290-2010-00006-C Prepared by: Fang Sun, M.D., Ph.D. Karen Schoelles, M.D., S.M., F.A.C.P ECRI Institute 5200 Butler Pike Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462 AHRQ Publication No. 13-EHC104-EF August 2013 This report incorporates data collected during implementation of the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Health Care Horizon Scanning System by ECRI Institute under contract to AHRQ, Rockville, MD (Contract No. 290-2010-00006-C). The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the authors, who are responsible for its content, and do not necessarily represent the views of AHRQ. No statement in this report should be construed as an official position of AHRQ or of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The information in this report is intended to identify resources and methods for improving the AHRQ Health Care Horizon Scanning System in the future. The purpose of the AHRQ Health Care Horizon Scanning System is to assist funders of research in making well-informed decisions in designing and funding comparative-effectiveness research. This report may periodically be assessed for the urgency to update. If an assessment is done, the resulting surveillance report describing the methodology and findings will be found on the Effective Health Care Program website at: www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov.
    [Show full text]
  • Horizon Scanning for New and Emerging Technologies in Healthtech What Do the Present and Future Hold? Foreword
    www.pwc.com/sg Horizon Scanning for New and Emerging Technologies in HealthTech What do the present and future hold? Foreword A collaborative, data-driven and evidence based study The last few years have seen an explosion of technology along with an increasing convergence of the Healthcare, Medical Devices, HealthTech, Pharma and Digital realms. It is imperative that in the midst of this, we keep the patients and their problems at the heart of it all. To effectively do so, understanding continuously evolving patient needs will be critical. And by doing so, we can better solve the real challenges they face and provide solutions to complement current clinical practices and technologies to improve what we at PwC call the 3 As in healthcare: Affordable, Accessible and A+ quality care. However, with the rapid and exponential pace of technological advancement, how do we keep track of the game-changing and clinically impactful developments? What are the present trends driving these developments, and what are likely future trends? Is there a fit-for- purpose framework that can be applied to assist in the assessment of these technologies? What will be the implications to regulators, health technology assessments (HTA), policy makers, payers, healthcare professionals and any and all other stakeholders? Horizon Scanning for New and Emerging Technologies in HealthTech aims to answer these questions. For the purposes of this paper, MedTech refers to the traditional innovation-led, fully integrated medical device industry. HealthTech on the other hand, refers to information technology (IT)-led solutions which are more patient-focused and comprise start-ups and non-traditional players who are causing an industry paradigm shift.
    [Show full text]
  • Science & Technology Trends 2020-2040
    Science & Technology Trends 2020-2040 Exploring the S&T Edge NATO Science & Technology Organization DISCLAIMER The research and analysis underlying this report and its conclusions were conducted by the NATO S&T Organization (STO) drawing upon the support of the Alliance’s defence S&T community, NATO Allied Command Transformation (ACT) and the NATO Communications and Information Agency (NCIA). This report does not represent the official opinion or position of NATO or individual governments, but provides considered advice to NATO and Nations’ leadership on significant S&T issues. D.F. Reding J. Eaton NATO Science & Technology Organization Office of the Chief Scientist NATO Headquarters B-1110 Brussels Belgium http:\www.sto.nato.int Distributed free of charge for informational purposes; hard copies may be obtained on request, subject to availability from the NATO Office of the Chief Scientist. The sale and reproduction of this report for commercial purposes is prohibited. Extracts may be used for bona fide educational and informational purposes subject to attribution to the NATO S&T Organization. Unless otherwise credited all non-original graphics are used under Creative Commons licensing (for original sources see https://commons.wikimedia.org and https://www.pxfuel.com/). All icon-based graphics are derived from Microsoft® Office and are used royalty-free. Copyright © NATO Science & Technology Organization, 2020 First published, March 2020 Foreword As the world Science & Tech- changes, so does nology Trends: our Alliance. 2020-2040 pro- NATO adapts. vides an assess- We continue to ment of the im- work together as pact of S&T ad- a community of vances over the like-minded na- next 20 years tions, seeking to on the Alliance.
    [Show full text]
  • The View Beyond Venture Capital
    BUILDING A BUSINESS The view beyond venture capital Dennis Ford & Barbara Nelsen Fundraising is an integral part of almost every young biotech’s business strategy, yet many entrepreneurs do not have a systematic approach for identifying and prioritizing potential investors—many of whom work outside of traditional venture capital. re you a researcher looking to start a Why and how did the funding landscape During the downturns, it quickly became Anew venture around a discovery made change? apparent that entrusting capital to third-party in your laboratory? Perhaps you have already The big changes in the life science investor alternative fund managers was no longer an raised some seed money from your friends landscape start with the venture capitalist effective strategy, and investors began to with- and family and are now seeking funds to sus- (VC). In the past, venture capital funds were draw capital. The main reason for the with- tain and expand your startup. In the past, the typically capitalized by large institutional drawal (especially from VCs in the early-stage next step on your road to commercialization investors that consisted of pensions, endow- life science space) was generally meager returns would doubtless have been to seek funding ments, foundations and large family offices across the asset class; despite the high risk and from angels and venture capital funds; today, with $100 million to $1 billion in capital long lockup periods that investors accepted in however, the environment for financing an under management. Traditionally, the major- return for a promise of premium performance, early-stage life science venture looks strik- ity of these institutions maintained a low-risk, VCs were often not returning any more capital ingly different from that familiar landscape low-return portfolio of stocks and bonds that than investors would have earned by making of past decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Signals of Success in Reward-Based Crowdfunding: Does Experience Matter?
    CRITICAL SIGNALS OF SUCCESS IN REWARD-BASED CROWDFUNDING: DOES EXPERIENCE MATTER? A THESIS Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Economics and Business The Colorado College In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Bachelor of Arts By Nicolas Ahrens February 2015 CRITICAL SIGNALS OF SUCCESS IN REWARD-BASED CROWDFUNDING: DOES EXPERIENCE MATTER? Nicolas Ahrens February 2015 Economics Abstract Crowdfunding is a novel and promising method of raising early-seed capital for entrepreneurs. By leveraging the Internet, crowdfunding opens up a relatively large number of investors to entrepreneurial ventures. Academic research remains scarce on the subject, particularly in factors that predict fundraising success. Drawing from entrepreneurial selection theory and previous crowdfunding research, this paper accounts for the role of previous founder experience in current crowdfunding video game projects. Using Probit regression analysis, this paper finds that previous crowdfunding experience by a founder is the most influential signal in predicting fundraising success—more so than factors found in previous studies. Furthermore, founders who demonstrate support for other crowdfunding projects increase their probability of success for their own project. This finding raises a case that external motivations for investing exist within the crowdfunding realm. The conclusions in this paper can be of use to crowdfunding investors and platforms, as well as future academic research. KEYWORDS: crowdfunding, Kickstarter, entrepreneur, regression analysis, video games JEL CLASSIFICATION: L26, G24, C10 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my advisor, Rich Fullerton, for his tremendous amount of support and guidance throughout this process. I would also like to thank Phoenix Van Wagoner for his technical ability and calm demeanor in what at times could be a stressful environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Financing Cycle: Source: by Kmuehmel
    Financing Cycle: Source: By Kmuehmel - Own work by uploader, derived from Startup_financing_cycle.JPG by Kompere, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=6206260 (This financing diagram illustrates how start-up companies are typically financed. First, the new firm seeks out "seed capital" and funding from "angel investors" and accelerators. Then, if the firm can survive through the "valley of death"–the period where the firm is trying to develop on a "shoestring" budget–the firm can seek venture capital financing.) Financing needs of any business depend on the stage through which the business is undergoing. Stage 1. Seed Funding/capital stage-(First Stage /Startup stage / Stage of financing during valley of Death) Seed money, sometimes known as seed funding or seed capital, is a form of securities offering in which an investor invests capital in a start-up company in exchange for an equity stake or convertible note stake in the company. The term seed suggests that this is a very early investment, meant to support the business until it can generate cash of its own, or until it is ready for further investments. Seed money options include : • friends and family funding, • angel funding, • Government Schemes/Grants • bootstrapping and • crowdfunding. (*Explanations in the next lecture.) Seed funding can be raised online using equity crowdfunding platforms such as SeedInvest, Seedrs and Angels Den. Investors make their decision whether to fund a project based on the perceived strength of the idea and the capabilities,
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 01 2017
    ISSUE 01 2017 SLUSH Partially melted snow or ice: ‘the snow on the ground was turning into brown slush’ An energetic gathering of world-conquering founders: ‘Despite the crazy weather, I made it to Slush and met my future Co-founder.’ PHOTO BY KAI KUUSISTO KAI BY PHOTO NOBODY IN THEIR RIGHT MIND WOULD COME TO HELSINKI IN NOVEMBER That’s where it all started. Slush grew from the and Shanghai join this movement with the same idea of cultural change: creating a grassroots mindset: for startup community by the community. movement to serve the next generation of founders Not all Slushes are alike though. And now I’m not and an environment that strongly supports talking about the weather. Each city and each entrepreneurship. We wanted to create something community adds its own local flavor to the global authentic and frantic. So Slush was born, amidst network. Be it the cherry blossoms of Japan or the the dark and slushy Nordics. rhythms of Jamaica, we always like to throw some Over the past seven years, Slush has grown spices into the mix of entrepreneurs and tech. from a 300-person gathering to become a global This magazine was created to fulfill the times of community organizing more than 40 events with anticipation as we are waiting for the next Slush +30,000 attendees all around the world from to fall. I hope you enjoy it as much as we enjoyed Singapore to South Africa. It’s truly humbling writing it. to see the next generation in cities like Tokyo Marianne CEO, Slush — 4 — — 5 — TABLE OF CONTENTS PHOTO BY JUSSI RATILAINEN JUSSI BY PHOTO 08Slush Globally 2016 Startups32 & Investors The46 Next Track in Music Hustling Near and Far Touring in Europe Behind the Energy of Slush The Founder Blossom in Japan WINDOW TO THE FUTURE.
    [Show full text]