DOCSLIB.ORG

Baltimore Harbor Watershed Nutrient TMDL Restoration Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Baltimore Harbor Watershed Nutrient TMDL Restoration Plan Baltimore Harbor Watershed Nutrient TMDL Restoration Plan Anne Arundel County, Maryland November 2016 - Final Baltimore Harbor Watershed Nutrient TMDL Restoration Plan November 2016 - Final Prepared for: Anne Arundel County Department of Public Works Watershed Protection and Restoration Program 2662 Riva Road Annapolis, Maryland 21401 Prepared by: KCI Technologies, Inc. 936 Ridgebrook Road Sparks, Maryland 21152 Baltimore Harbor Watershed Nutrient TMDL Restoration Plan 2016 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background and Purpose .............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 TMDL Allocated and Planned Loads Summary ............................................................................. 3 1.2.1 Reduction Target Derivation ................................................................................................. 6 1.3 Restoration Plan Elements and Structure ..................................................................................... 9 2 Watershed Characteristics ............................................................................................. 11 2.1 Watershed Delineation ............................................................................................................... 11 2.2 Baltimore Harbor Watershed...................................................................................................... 11 2.3 Land Use/Land Cover .................................................................................................................. 14 2.3.1 Existing Land Use/Land Cover ............................................................................................. 14 2.3.2 Impervious Surfaces ............................................................................................................ 15 2.4 Water Quality .............................................................................................................................. 19 2.4.1 Use Designations ................................................................................................................. 19 2.4.2 TMDLs and 303(d) Impairments ......................................................................................... 19 2.4.3 NPDES .................................................................................................................................. 21 3 Causes and Sources of Impairment (a) ........................................................................... 23 3.1 Impairments ................................................................................................................................ 23 3.2 Sources ........................................................................................................................................ 23 3.2.1 Urban Stormwater Runoff .................................................................................................. 23 3.2.2 In‐stream Sources ............................................................................................................... 24 3.3 Anticipated Growth ..................................................................................................................... 29 3.3.1 Offsetting Loads from Future Growth ................................................................................ 30 3.3.2 Estimates of Future Growth ................................................................................................ 30 4 Management Measures (c) ............................................................................................ 35 4.1 Modeling Approach..................................................................................................................... 35 4.2 Best Management Practices ....................................................................................................... 35 5 Expected Load Reductions (b) ........................................................................................ 38 5.1 2015 Progress – Actual Implementation ..................................................................................... 38 5.2 Planned Implementation ............................................................................................................ 43 6 Technical and Financial Assistance Needs (d) ................................................................. 46 6.1 Funding Sources .......................................................................................................................... 48 7 Public Participation / Education (e) ................................................................................ 49 7.1 County Outreach Efforts ............................................................................................................. 49 7.2 Public Comment Period .............................................................................................................. 51 8 Implementation Schedule and Milestones (f & g) .......................................................... 51 8.1 Implementation Milestones ........................................................................................................ 51 8.2 Loading Allocations and Milestone Targets ................................................................................ 52 8.3 Implementation Priorities ........................................................................................................... 53 8.3.1 Stream Reach Restoration .................................................................................................. 53 8.3.2 Subwatershed Restoration ................................................................................................. 57 8.3.3 Prioritization of Strategy Implementation .......................................................................... 59 i Anne Arundel County DPW Baltimore Harbor Watershed Nutrient TMDL Restoration Plan 2016 9 Load Reduction Evaluation Criteria (h) ........................................................................... 59 9.1 Tracking Implementation of Management Measures ................................................................ 59 9.2 Estimating Load Reductions ........................................................................................................ 62 9.3 Tracking Overall Program Success through Monitoring ............................................................. 62 9.4 Best Management Practices Inspection and Maintenance ........................................................ 62 10 Monitoring (i) ................................................................................................................ 63 11 References ..................................................................................................................... 66 List of Tables Table 1: Baltimore Harbor Watershed Local TMDL Allocated and Planned Annual Average Loads ............ 6 Table 2: Disaggregated and Calibrated Baltimore Harbor Watershed Local TMDL SW‐WLAs and Load Reductions .................................................................................................................................................... 8 Table 3: Baltimore Harbor Watershed Drainage Area and Stream Miles ................................................... 12 Table 4: 2014 Land Use / Land Cover .......................................................................................................... 14 Table 5: Baltimore Harbor Watershed Percent Impervious Cover ............................................................. 15 Table 6: Use Designations of the Baltimore Harbor Watershed ................................................................ 19 Table 7: Category 4a and 5 Listings for Anne Arundel County's Portion of the Baltimore Harbor Watershed ................................................................................................................................................... 20 Table 8: Erosion Inventory and Severity per Subwatershed (Anne Arundel County, 2011 and 2012b) ..... 27 Table 9: Linear Feet of Erosion per Subwatershed (Anne Arundel County, 2011 and 2012b) ................... 28 Table 10: Increases in Land Use and Pollutant Loads from 2010 through 2015 ........................................ 31 Table 11: Estimated Future Increases in Pollutant Loads ........................................................................... 32 Table 12: Typical Nutrient Reduction from Stormwater BMPs .................................................................. 37 Table 13: Nutrient Loads Required for the Baltimore Harbor Watershed Local TMDL – Disaggregated to Anne Arundel County Phase I MS4 Source and Calibrated to BayFAST ...................................................... 38 Table 14: Current BMP Implementation through FY2015 for Baltimore Harbor Watershed ..................... 39 Table 15 – List of streets swept in Baltimore Harbor watershed ............................................................... 39 Table 16: FY2015 Progress Reductions Achieved ....................................................................................... 43 Table 17: BMP Implementation ‐ Current FY2015, Planned FY2030, and Total Restoration Levels for the Baltimore Harbor Watershed ..................................................................................................................... 44 Table 18: FY2030 Planned Reductions
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mile Creek Area Limited Amendment Clarksburg Master Plan and Hyattstown Special Study Area
    Approved and Adopted July 2014 10Mile Creek Area Limited Amendment Clarksburg Master Plan and Hyattstown Special Study Area Montgomery County Planning Department M-NCPPC MongomeryPlanning.org APPROVED and ADOPTED 10 Mile Creek Area Limited Amendment Clarksburg Master Plan ans Hyattstown Special Study Area Abstract This document is a Limited Amendment to the 1994 Clarksburg Master Plan and Hyattstown Special Study Area for the Ten Mile Creek Watershed. It retains the 1994 Master Plan vision, but refines 1994 Plan recommendations to better achieve two important objectives: the creation of a well-defined corridor town that provides jobs, homes, and commercial activities; and the preservation of natural resources critical to the County’s well-being. The Amendment contains land use, zoning, transportation, parks, and historic resources recommendations for the portions of the Planning Area in the Ten Mile Creek Watershed. Source of Copies The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission 8787 Georgia Avenue Silver Spring, MD 20910 Online: www.MontgomeryPlanning.org/community/plan_areas/I270_corridor/clarksburg/ clarksburg_lim_amendment.shtm Notice to Readers An area master plan, after approval by the District Council and adoption by the Maryland- National Capital Park and Planning Commission, constitutes an amendment to The General Pl (On Wedges and Corridors) for Montgomery County. Each area master plan reflects a vision of future development that responds to the unique character of the local community within the context of a Countywide perspective. Area master plans are intended to convey land use policy for defined geographic areas and should be interpreted together with relevant Countywide functional master plans. Master plans generally look ahead about 20 years from the date of adoption.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources
    Gaithersburg A Character Counts! City City of Gaithersburg WATER RESOURCES A Master Plan Element February 17, 2010 2009 MASTER PLAN CITY OF GAITHERSBURG 2009 MASTER PLAN WATER RESOURCES ELEMENT Planning Commission Approval: January 20, 2010, Resolution PCR-2-10 Mayor and City Council Adoption: February 16, 2010, Resolution R-10-10 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Mayor Sidney A. Katz Council Vice President Cathy C. Drzyzgula Jud Ashman Henry F. Marraffa, Jr. Michael A. Sesma Ryan Spiegel PLANNING COMMISSION Chair John Bauer Vice-Chair Matthew Hopkins Commissioner Lloyd S. Kaufman Commissioner Leonard J. Levy Commissioner Danielle L. Winborne Alternate Commissioner Geraldine Lanier CITY MANAGER Angel L. Jones ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Erica Shingara, former Environmental Services Director Gary Dyson, Environmental Specialist Christine Gallagher, former Environmental Assistant Meredith Strider, Environmental Assistant PLANNING AND CODE ADMINISTRATION Greg Ossont, Director, Planning & Code Administration Lauren Pruss, Planning Director Kirk Eby, GIS Planner Raymond Robinson III, Planner CIT Y CITY OF GAITHERSBURG OF GAITHERSBURG 2009 MASTER PLAN CHAPTER 2 WATER RESOURCES TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Purpose and Intent................................................................................................................ 1 2. Background.......................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • From My Backyard to Our Bay an Anne Arundel County Resident’S Guide to Improving Our Environment and Protecting Our Natural Resources
    From My Backyard to Our Bay An Anne Arundel County Resident’s Guide to Improving our Environment and Protecting our Natural Resources From My Backyard to Our Bay The Chesapeake Bay is in Peril. What’s threatening the Bay? Nitrogen. Phosphorus. Sediment. These are the major pollutants responsible for the decline of water quality in the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries. Nitrogen and phosphorus are nutrients that are essential food in the right quantities, but too much can be lethal to the Bay. Too much nutrients spawn the growth of algae which turns the water green and can be toxic to marine life, pets, and humans. When those algae die, they rob the water of oxygen and create ―dead zones‖ where fish, oysters, clams, and crabs can’t survive. Sediment is soil that washes into the Bay when it rains. It clouds the water and prevents underwater grasses from growing. These grasses produce oxygen and provide a place for young fish and crabs to develop and thrive. So who’s responsible? Every one of us. Every drop of water that falls on Anne Arundel County will make its way to the Bay. Along the way it will pick up and carry with it the things that we put on the ground. What can I do? From My Backyard to Our Bay offers tips for living in harmony with the Bay. It highlights how you can contribute to the health of your local watershed, maintain an environmentally friendly lawn, and manage stormwater runoff, wells, and septic systems in ways that will reduce the flow of pollutants and sediment into the Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland's 2015-2019 Nonpoint Source Management Plan
    Maryland’s 2015-2019 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Department of the Environment 1800 Washington Boulevard, Suite 540 Baltimore MD 21230-1718 December 15, 2014 Updated August 4, 2016 Published and distributed by the Section §319(h) Nonpoint Source Program Maryland Department of the Environment 1800 Washington Boulevard, Suite 540 Baltimore MD 21230 Phone: 410-537-3906 Fax: 410-537-3873 Lee Currey, Director Science Services Administration Jim George, Manager Water Quality Protection and Restoration Program Ken Shanks, Chief TMDL Implementation Division Maryland’s Nonpoint Source Program is funded in part by a Section §319(h) Clean Water Act Grant from the U.S. EPA. Although this program is funded partly by U.S. EPA, the contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the opinion or position of EPA. Maryland’s 2015-2019 NPS Management Plan page ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ------ see first page(s) of each chapter for subheadings - Executive Summary - Chapter 1 – Introduction - Chapter 2 – Objectives and Milestones - Chapter 3 – Resource Assessment and Monitoring Programs - Chapter 4 – Maryland NPS Programs and Initiatives - Chapter 5 – Watershed Management to Achieve NPS Goals - Chapter 6 – Public Education, Outreach and Financial Assistance APPENDICES - Abbreviations - Maryland’s Chesapeake Bay Two-Year Milestones - Components of Maryland’s 2015-2019 Nonpoint Source Management Plan o (Documents designated as integral parts of Maryland’s NPS management plan) - Internet Sources - Milestones for Tracking Progress 2016 UPDATE LISTING - Cover
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Maryland's Environment: a Holistic Solution Douglas F
    University of Baltimore Law Forum Volume 40 Article 3 Number 2 Spring 2010 2010 Protecting Maryland's Environment: A Holistic Solution Douglas F. Gansler Former Maryland Attorney General Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/lf Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Gansler, Douglas F. (2010) "Protecting Maryland's Environment: A Holistic Solution," University of Baltimore Law Forum: Vol. 40: No. 2, Article 3. Available at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/lf/vol40/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Baltimore Law Forum by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLE PROTECTING MARYLAND'S ENVIRONMENT: A HOLISTIC SOLUTION By: Douglas F. Gansler* I. AN ENVIRONMENTAL "AMERICA IN MINIATURE" aryland, like its nickname,l really is "America in Miniature." From M the mountainous west to the largest estuary in the United States, Maryland's variety of ecosystems provides a wealth of recreational and economic opportunities for its citizens and visitors. Whether hiking, boating, crabbing, or just enjoying the view, all Marylanders benefit from a healthy environment. However, Maryland's environment is increasingly vulnerable to damage from pollution. Many of Maryland's most threatened environments, including the Chesapeake Bay and its watersheds, are part of delicate ecosystems that are affected by pollution that does not respect political boundaries. The Bay's watersheds are endangered by upstream nutrients that eventually travel to Maryland, causing eutrophication and destruction of important marine habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles County Municipal Stormwater Restoration Plan
    CHARLES COUNTY MUNICIPAL STORMWATER RESTORATION PLAN PLAN TO ACHIEVE STORMWATER WASTE LOAD ALLOCATIONS AND IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RESTORATION CHARLES COUNTY, MARYLAND DECEMBER 2017 CHARLES COUNTY MUNICIPAL STORMWATER RESTORATION PLAN P L A N T O A C HI E V E S T O R M W AT E R W A ST E LO AD A LLOCATIONS AND IM P E R V IO U S S U R F AC E R ESTORATION Compliance document for Part IV.E.2.a. and b. of MS4 Discharge Permit #11-DP-3322. DECEMBER 2017 PREPARED FOR CHARLES COUNTY, MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT 200 BALTIMORE ST. LA PLATA, MD 20646 PREPARED BY KCI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 936 RIDGEBROOK ROAD SPARKS, MD 21152 Restoration Plan Acknowledgements This watershed restoration plan was completed as a collaborative effort between the following partners: Charles County Department of Planning and Growth Management KCI Technologies, Inc. The report was authored by the following individuals from KCI Technologies, Inc.: Susanna Brellis Mike Pieper Bill Frost, P.E. Megan Crunkleton County staff providing expertise, oversight, and review include: Karen Wiggen Charles Rice Erica Hahn Appropriate citation for the Restoration Plan is as follow: KCI Technologies, Inc. 2016. Charles County Municipal Stormwater Restoration Plan. Prepared by KCI Technologies, Inc., Sparks, Maryland for Charles County Department of Planning and Growth Management, La Plata, Maryland. Dated June 2016. For more information pertaining to the Restoration Plan, please contact: Karen Wiggen, Planner Charles County Government Department of Planning and Growth Management P.O. Box 2150 La Plata, MD 20646 301-645-0683 [email protected] And visit us on the web: www.charlescountymd.gov/watershed ii Charles County, Maryland Restoration Plan Table of Contents 1 Introduction and Background ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads.Asp (Accessed September 10, 2007)
    Appendix D References Acoustical Society of America. 1983. Guide to the Evaluation of Human Exposure to Vibration in Buildings. American National Standard ANSI S3.29. Acoustical Society of America. 2005. Part 4: Noise Assessment and Prediction of Long-Term Community Response. American National Standard Quantities and Procedures for Description and Measurement of Environmental Sound, ANSI S12.9-2005/Part 4. Action Langley Park. 2007. Langley Park. http://www.langleypark.org/langleypark.html (Accessed August 9, 2007). Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. 2002. Section 106 Regulations Summary. http://www.achp.gov/106summary.html (Accessed August 2007). Alexandria Drafting Company. 1999. Street Map Book, Washington, DC. American Monthly. 1896. Historic Clean Drinking Manor. No. 3, Vol. VIII. Daughters of the American Revolution. Baltimore, MD. American Public Transit Association. January 1979. “Section 2-7, Noise and Vibration,” 1981 Guidelines for Design of Rail Transit Facilities. American Public Transportation Association. October 2009. Economic Impact of Public Transportation Investment. Glen Weisbrod and Arlee Reno. http://www.apta.com/resources/reportsandpublications/Documents/economic_impact_of_public_transport ation_investment.pdf (Accessed September 2011). American Society for Testing and Materials. 2005. Designation E 1527-05, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. West Conshohocken, PA. American Society of Civil Engineers. 2008. Predicting Train-Induced Vibrations in Multi-Story Buildings. M. Sanayei, C. R. Brett, J. A. Zapje, E. E. Unger, and E. M. Hines. American Trails. 2007. National Recreation Trails. http://americantrails.org/nationalrecreationtrails/about.htm (Accessed November 9, 2007). Anacostia Watershed Network. 2009. Anacostia Watershed Network. http://www.anacostia.net Anderson, J.R., E.E. Hardy, J.T.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Database Design and Data Dictionary
    Water Quality Database Database Design and Data Dictionary Prepared For: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III Chesapeake Bay Program Office January 2004 BACKGROUND...........................................................................................................................................4 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................6 WATER QUALITY DATA.............................................................................................................................6 THE RELATIONAL CONCEPT ..................................................................................................................6 THE RELATIONAL DATABASE STRUCTURE ...................................................................................7 WATER QUALITY DATABASE STRUCTURE..........................................................8 PRIMARY TABLES ..........................................................................................................................................8 WQ_CRUISES ..................................................................................................................................................8 WQ_EVENT.......................................................................................................................................................8 WQ_DATA..........................................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Calendar Year 2013
    Walter R. Boynton _____________________________________________________________________________________ CURRICULUM VITAE calendar year 2013 Walter R. Boynton Chesapeake Biological Laboratory University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science P. O. Box 38 Solomons, Maryland 20688 Phone: 410-326-7275 Fax: 410-326-7302 E-mail: [email protected] I. Education 1969 B. S. Springfield College (Biology) 1974 M. S. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (Marine Sciences) 1975 Ph.D. University of Florida (Environmental Engineering) II. Professional Background 1969 - 1970 Faculty Research Assistant, University of Maryland, Natural Resources Institute, Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, Solomons, MD. 1975 - 1977 Research Associate, University of Maryland, Center for Environmental and Estuarine Studies, Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, Solomons, MD. 1978 - 1983 Assistant Professor, University of Maryland, Center for Environmental and Estuarine Studies, Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, Solomons, MD. 1987 (Apr - Oct) Sabbatical at ASKO Laboratory, University of Stockholm 1983 - 1988 Associate Professor, University of Maryland, Center for Environmental and Estuarine Studies, Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, Solomons, MD. 1988-present Professor, University of Maryland, Center for Environmental Science, Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, Solomons, MD. 1992-present Graduate Faculty, University System of Maryland. 1998-present Graduate Faculty, University of Maryland System Inter-Institutional Graduate Council. Awards and Special Recognition 1982 Awarded certificate of appreciation by Tri-County Council of Southern Maryland (Presented by Maryland Governor Harry Hughes) 1990 Nominated for the PEW Scholars in Conservation and the Environment Fellowship. 1992 Nominated for Computerworld Smithsonian Awards. Environment, Energy and Agriculture. 1997 Nominated for the PEW Scholars in Conservation and the Environment Fellowship. 1999 The CES President’s Award for Excellence in Application of Science. 2003 Distinguished Service Award, Estuarine Research Federation.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Patuxent River Sediment TMDL Restoration Plan
    Upper Patuxent River Sediment TMDL Restoration Plan Anne Arundel County, Maryland November 2016 - Final Upper Patuxent River Sediment TMDL Restoration Plan November 2016 - Final Prepared for: Anne Arundel County Department of Public Works Watershed Protection and Restoration Program 2662 Riva Road, P.O. Box 6675 Annapolis, Maryland 21401 Prepared by: KCI Technologies, Inc. 936 Ridgebrook Road Sparks, Maryland 21152 Upper Patuxent River Sediment TMDL Restoration Plan 2016 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Background and Purpose .............................................................................................................. 4 1.2 TMDL Allocated and Planned Loads Summary ............................................................................. 5 1.3 Restoration Plan Elements and Structure ..................................................................................... 6 2 Watershed Characteristics ............................................................................................... 8 2.1 Watershed Delineation ................................................................................................................. 8 2.2 Upper Patuxent ............................................................................................................................. 8 2.3 Land Use/Land Cover .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Calendar Year 2016
    Walter R. Boynton _____________________________________________________________________________________ CURRICULUM VITAE calendar year 2016 Walter R. Boynton Chesapeake Biological Laboratory University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science P. O. Box 38 Solomons, Maryland 20688 Phone: 410-326-7275 Fax: 410-326-7302 E-mail: [email protected] I. Education 1969 B. S. Springfield College (Biology) 1974 M. S. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (Marine Sciences) 1975 Ph.D. University of Florida (Environmental Engineering) II. Professional Background 1969 - 1970 Faculty Research Assistant, University of Maryland, Natural Resources Institute, Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, Solomons, MD. 1975 - 1977 Research Associate, University of Maryland, Center for Environmental and Estuarine Studies, Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, Solomons, MD. 1978 - 1983 Assistant Professor, University of Maryland, Center for Environmental and Estuarine Studies, Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, Solomons, MD. 1987 (Apr - Oct) Sabbatical at ASKO Laboratory, University of Stockholm 1983 - 1988 Associate Professor, University of Maryland, Center for Environmental and Estuarine Studies, Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, Solomons, MD. 1988-present Professor, University of Maryland, Center for Environmental Science, Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, Solomons, MD. 1992-present Graduate Faculty, University System of Maryland. 1998-present Graduate Faculty, University of Maryland System Inter-Institutional Graduate Council. Awards and Special Recognition 1982 Awarded certificate of appreciation by Tri-County Council of Southern Maryland (Presented by Maryland Governor Harry Hughes) 1990 Nominated for the PEW Scholars in Conservation and the Environment Fellowship. 1992 Nominated for Computerworld Smithsonian Awards: Environment, Energy and Agriculture. 1997 Nominated for the PEW Scholars in Conservation and the Environment Fellowship. 1999 The UMCES President’s Award for Excellence in Application of Science. 2003 Distinguished Service Award, Estuarine Research Federation.
    [Show full text]
  • Potomac River Full Report
    Potomac River Water and Habitat Quality Assessment Maryland Department of Natural Resources Tidewater Ecosystem Assessment Tawes Building, D-2, 580 Taylor Avenue Annapolis, MD 21401 http://dnr.maryland.gov Toll Free in Maryland: 1-877-620-8DNR, ext: 8630 Out of state call: 410-260-8630 TTY users call via the MD Relay: 711 (within MD) Out of state call: 1-800-735-2258 Martin O’Malley, Governor Anthony G. Brown, Lt. Governor The facilities and services of the Maryland Department of Natural Resources are available to all without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, age, national origin or physical or mental disability. This document is available in alternative format upon request from a qualified individual with disability Primary Author: Renee Karrh [email protected] Contributors: Diana Domotor, Rebecca Golden, Lee Karrh, Brooke Landry, William Romano, Brian Smith, Ben Cole, Sherm Garrison, Thomas Parham, Mark Trice, Cathy Wazniak The electronic version of the report is available at http://mddnr.chesapeakebay.net/eyesonthebay/tribsums.cfm Acknowledgements: Information on the water and habitat quality of Maryland’s rivers and bays is available due to the hard work of many dedicated staff including: staff who are in the field collecting the samples year-round, sometimes under less than desirable weather conditions laboratory staff who perform the chemical tests to determine what exactly is in those water samples data management staff who collect the resulting information, confirm the accuracy and quality of the data, and organize and maintain the databases and analytical staff who interpret the data to answer the question ‘how is the river/Bay doing?’ There are too many individuals to directly name from more than 25 years of monitoring, so we simply wish to commend all of them for their commitment to collecting high quality information and making it available and useful to the citizens of Maryland.
    [Show full text]