Computer Simulation of Solar Combisystem Based on the Second Law Analysis
Xiao-Nan Wen
A Thesis
in
The Department
of
Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering
Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
for the Degree of Master of Applied Science (Building Engineering) at
Concordia University
Montréal, Québec, Canada
December 2013
© Xiao-Nan Wen, 2013
CONCORDIA UNIVERSTIY
School of Graduate Studies
This is to certify that the thesis prepared
By: Xiao-Nan Wen
Entitled: Computer Simulation of Solar Combisystem Based on the Second Law Analysis and submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of
Master of Applied Science (Building Engineering) complies with the regulations of the University and meets the accepted standards with respect to originality and quality.
Signed by the final examining committee:
Chair Dr. Fariborz Haghighat
Examiner Dr. Marius Paraschivoiu
Examiner Dr. Fariborz Haghighat
Examiner Dr. S. Samuel Li
Supervisor Dr. Radu G. Zmeureanu
Approved by Dr. Tarek Zayed, GPD Department of Building, Civil and Environment Engineering
Dr. Christopher W. Trueman, Interim Dean Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science
Date
Abstract
ComputerSimulationofSolarCombisystemBasedontheSecondLawAnalysis XiaoͲNanWen ThisthesispresentsthedevelopmentofaSecondLawmodelofasolar combisystemforresidentialapplications.Theworkpresentedinthethesisincludes:1)A methodologyforthedevelopmentofacombisystemcomputermodel;2)The mathematicalmodelsofasolarcombisystemcomponents;3)ThefeaturesofanEESͲ basedcomputermodelofasolarcombisystembeingdeveloped;4)Thesimulated
operationofasolarcombisystem;and5)Theanalysisoftheperformanceofasimulated solarcombisystembasedontheSecondLawofthermodynamics.
ThesolarcombisystemhadanannualsystemCoefficientofPerformance(COP) of3.98,anannualsystemexergeticCOPof0.17,anannualsystemenergyefficiencyof
42.0%,anannualsystemexergyefficiencyof40.7%,anannualoverallsolarenergy contributionof89.5%,anannualoverallsolarexergycontributionof88.8%,anannual inputsolarenergycontributionof82.7%,andanannualinputsolarexergycontribution of26.5%.Comparedtoanelectricheatingsystem,thesolarcombisystemhadanannual solarenergyfractionof1.3andanannualsolarexergyfractionof0.1.
iii
Acknowledgements
Iamgratefultomanypeoplewhoencouragedandinspiredmeduringthegraduatestudy.
Firstofall,Ithankmyteachers:Dr.AndreasK.Athienitis,Dr.TheodoreStathopoulos,Dr. RamaniRamakrishnan(RyersonUniversity,Toronto),Dr.HashemAkbari,Dr.RaduG. Zmeureanu,Dr.PaulP.Fazio,Dr.FariborzHaghighat,andDr.MohammedZaheeruddin.Their courselectureswereenlightening.
Ibenefitedgreatlyfrompeerdiscussionwithmyfellowgraduatestudentsontechnicaltopics. Theirvariousstrengthsdirectlyorindirectlycontributedtomystudy.Thanksto:Justin Tamasauskasonicestorage;Dr.AhmedElShenawyonresearchmethodology;JunLiuonsystem control;LaurentMagnierontransportphenomena;VéroniqueTremblayonuncertainty;Eric McDonaldonsubstanceproperty;NicholasZibinoncalibration;LiyaLuoonverification.
Thecompletionofmythesisprojectwouldnotbepossiblewithouttheresourcesprovidedby ourgroup.Thanksto:JasonNgChengHinforextractingdatafromTRNSYSandmodelsby MitchellLecknerandAlexandreHugo;JustinTamasauskasforsharingdata,andDr.Danielle MonfetforEnergyPlusreferences.IalsothankthesupportandfriendshipofMarieͲClaude Hamelin,AndreeaMihai,andMathieuLeCam.
IoweveryspecialthankstomythesissupervisorDr.RaduG.Zmeureanuforlayingthe foundationandtakingmeonthisjourneyofresearch.Ihavebeenfortunatetositinhisclass andjoininhisresearchstudentgroup.Duringthisthesisproject,hisconstantchallenges motivatedmetodeepenmyunderstandingofthestudiedtopic.Hetaughtmefocusand determination.Iamtrulygratefulforhisguidance.
IwouldalsoliketothankMs.JennyDrapeaumyGraduateProgramsAdvisorandMs.Olga SoaresmyDepartmentAdministratorfortheirsupport.
TheresearchwasfundedbythefinancialsupportoftheNaturalSciencesandEngineering ResearchCouncilofCanadaandtheFacultyofEngineeringandComputerScienceofConcordia University.
Atlast,Ithankmyparentswhohavebeensupportivewithopenminds,andmysisterandher husbandwhohavebeenwithmeeverystepoftheway.
iv
IN MEMORY OF
MY GRANDMOTHER, SHU-KUI WANG
v
TableofContents
1. Introduction...... 1
1.1. Background...... 1
1.2. Researchobjectives...... 4
2. Literaturereview...... 5
2.1. ComputermodelingofHVACsystems...... 5
2.2. Solarcombisystem...... 6
2.3. Stratifiedwaterstoragetank...... 10
2.4. Secondlawanalysis...... 15
2.5. Conclusions...... 19
3. Methodology...... 21
3.1. QuasiͲequilibriumprocess...... 21
3.2. Inputandoutput...... 22
3.3. Controlscheme...... 24
3.4. Mathematicalmodel...... 24
3.5. Computermodel...... 25
3.6. Testingandmodifications...... 25
3.7. Simulationandresultsanalysis...... 26
vi
4. Developmentofmathematicalmodel...... 28
4.1. Solarcombisystemconfiguration...... 28
4.2. Mathematicalmodelofsolarthermalcollector...... 30
4.2.1. Solarheatabsorptionandloss...... 31
4.2.2. Enteringtemperatureofheattransferfluid...... 33
4.2.3. Leavingtemperatureofheattransferfluid...... 33
4.2.4. Exergyanalysisofsolarthermalcollector...... 34
4.3. MathematicalmodelofwaterͲtoͲwaterheatpump...... 37
4.3.1. Electricpowerandheatingcapacity...... 37
4.3.2. Flowratesandenteringtemperaturesofheattransferfluids...... 40
4.3.3. Energybalanceandleavingtemperaturesofheattransferfluids...... 42
4.3.4. Icemassfractionatevaporatoroutlet...... 44
4.3.5. Isentropicefficiencyofcompressor...... 45
4.3.6. Heatoutput...... 47
4.3.7. Exergyanalysisofheatpump...... 48
4.4. Mathematicalmodeloficestoragetank...... 50
4.4.1. EnergybalanceoficeͲlayerandwaterͲlayer...... 51
4.4.2. Masscontentinicestoragetank...... 53
4.4.3. Heattransferbetweenlayers...... 54
vii
4.4.4. Heattransferwithsurroundings...... 55
4.4.5. Passingflow...... 58
4.4.6. Temperaturesinicestoragetank...... 58
4.4.7. InterchangeofenergyinsolidͲliquidequilibrium...... 59
4.4.8. Enteringconditionsofheattransferfluid...... 62
4.4.9. Exergyanalysisoficestoragetank...... 63
4.5. Mathematicalmodelofwaterstoragetank...... 66
4.5.1. TheenergybalanceofwaterͲnodes...... 68
4.5.2. Heattransferofimmersionheatexchangers...... 70
4.5.3. Heattransferbetweennodes...... 78
4.5.4. Heattransferwithsurroundings...... 79
4.5.5. Domestichotwatermakeup...... 81
4.5.6. Temperaturesinwaterstoragetank...... 82
4.5.7. Electricpowerofheater...... 83
4.5.8. Heattransferwithheatsourceandheatsink...... 83
4.5.9. Heatingloadofwaterstoragetank...... 84
4.5.10. Exergyanalysisofwaterstoragetank...... 85
4.6. Mathematicalmodelofradiantfloor...... 88
4.6.1. Heattransferflow...... 89
viii
4.6.2. Supplyconditions...... 89
4.6.3. Exergyanalysisofradiantfloor...... 90
4.7. Mathematicalmodelofcirculatingpump...... 91
4.7.1. Electricpower...... 92
4.7.2. Flowrates...... 94
4.7.3. Exergyanalysisofcirculatingpump...... 94
4.8. Mathematicalmodelofsystem...... 95
4.8.1. Heatingload...... 95
4.8.2. Energysupplyandloss...... 95
4.8.3. Heattransferwithenvironment...... 96
4.8.4. Heatstorage...... 96
4.8.5. Systemperformance...... 97
4.9. Mathematicalmodelofcontrolsystem...... 98
4.9.1. Controlledvariables...... 99
4.9.2. Setpoints...... 102
4.9.3. Controllogic...... 105
4.10. Integrationofmathematicalmodelsincompletecomputermodel...... 110
4.11. Modelvalidationandverification...... 115
5. Resultsanddiscussions...... 117
ix
5.1. Energyperformanceofsolarcombisystem...... 118
5.1.1. Overviewofannualenergyflow...... 118
5.1.2. Combisystemenergyperformance...... 120
5.1.3. ElectricityconsumptionandcombisystemCOP...... 123
5.1.4. Majorflowsofenergy...... 124
5.2. CombisystemoperationinnonͲheatingseason...... 127
5.3. Combisystemoperationinheatingseason...... 132
5.4. Responseforspaceheating...... 143
5.5. Operationofheatpumpwithicestoragetank...... 144
5.6. Operationofsolarcollectorwiththermalstorage...... 147
5.7. Operationofwaterstoragetank...... 150
5.8. Heattransitviathermalstorage...... 152
5.9. Exergyperformanceofsolarcombisystem...... 154
6. Conclusions...... 157
6.1. Futurework...... 161
References...... 163
Appendices...... 177
x
ListofFigures
Fig.1.1EnergyefficiencyeffectonenergyendͲuseinresidentialsectorofCanada...... 2
Fig.4.1Schematicofsolarcombisystemconfiguration...... 29
Fig.4.2Schematicofsolarthermalcollectormodel...... 31
Fig.4.3Schematicofheatpumpmodel...... 37
Fig.4.4TͲSdiagramofsingleͲstagevapourcompressionrefrigerationcycle...... 47
Fig.4.5Schematicoficestoragetankmodel...... 50
Fig.4.6Schematicofwaterstoragetankmodel...... 67
Fig.4.7Schematicofradiantfloormodel...... 89
Fig.4.8Schematicofcirculatingpumpmodel...... 91
Fig.4.9Performancecurveofcasepump...... 93
Fig.4.10Thermodynamicsystemboundaryofsolarcombisystem...... 95
Fig.4.11FlowchartofoperationcontrolalgorithmfornonͲheatingseason...... 107
Fig.4.12Flowchartofoperationcontrolalgorithmforheatingseason...... 108
Fig.4.13Simplifiedversionofthemodelingprocess(Sargent2011)...... 115
Fig.5.1Flowchartofenergyflowsofsolarcombisystemannualoperation...... 119
Fig.5.2Energysupplyandheatingloadofsolarcombisystem...... 125
Fig.5.3Heattransferbetweenstoragetanksandindoorsurroundings...... 126
Fig.5.4Heatstorageofsolarcombisystem...... 127
Fig.5.5HeatingloadofsolarcombisystemfromJuly20toJuly22...... 128
xi
Fig.5.6SolarheatcollectionchargingwaterstoragetankfromJuly20toJuly22...... 128
Fig.5.7SolarheatcollectionandstoragefromJuly20toJuly22...... 129
Fig.5.8HeatstorageofwaterstoragetankfromJuly20toJuly22...... 130
Fig.5.9NodetemperatureofwaterstoragetankfromJuly20toJuly22...... 131
Fig.5.10ElectricityconsumptionofsolarcombisystemfromJuly20toJuly22...... 132
Fig.5.11Flowchartofenergyflowsofsolarcombisystematspaceheatingpeak...... 133
Fig.5.12HeatingloadofsolarcombisystemfromJan.11toJan.13...... 135
Fig.5.13HeatoutputofheatpumpfromJan.11toJan.13...... 136
Fig.5.14SolarincidenceandsolarheatcollectionfromJan.11toJan.13...... 137
Fig.5.15HeatinputtowaterstoragetankfromJan.11toJan.13...... 138
Fig.5.16HeatstorageofwaterstoragetankfromJan.11toJan.13...... 138
Fig.5.17HeatinputandheatoutputoficestoragetankfromJan.11toJan.13...... 139
Fig.5.18HeatstorageoficestoragetankfromJan.11toJan.13...... 140
Fig.5.19NodetemperatureofwaterstoragetankfromJan.11toJan.13...... 141
Fig.5.20WaterͲlayertemperatureoficestoragetankfromJan.11toJan.13...... 142
Fig.5.21IcemassfractionoficestoragetankfromJan.11toJan.13...... 142
Fig.5.22ElectricityconsumptionofsolarcombisystemfromJan.11toJan.13...... 143
Fig.5.23HeatpumpCOPinheatingseason,dailymean...... 145
Fig.5.24Temperatureofwaterenteringheatpumpevaporator,dailymean...... 146
Fig.5.25Temperatureofwaterenteringheatpumpcondenser,dailymean...... 146
Fig.5.26Icemassfractionoficestoragetankinheatingseason,dailymean...... 147
Fig.5.27NodetemperatureofWaterstoragetank,monthlymean...... 151
xii
Fig.5.28Heattransitviawaterstoragetank,byweek...... 153
Fig.5.29Heattransitviaicestoragetank,byweek...... 153
Fig.1Solutionstoquadraticinapplicationsofsolarthermalefficiency...... 179
Fig.2Upperandlowerboundsofoutdoortemperatureofcasesolarthermalefficiency
...... 180
xiii
ListofTables
Table4.1Coefficientsandbaselineconditionofcaseheatpump...... 39
Table4.2Operatingparametersofcaseheatpump(GeoSmart2012)...... 47
Table4.3NodeexchangecontributionsofimmersionheatexchangerHX1inheat chargingmode...... 74
Table4.4NodeexchangecontributionsofimmersionheatexchangerHX2inheat chargingmode...... 75
Table4.5NodeexchangercontributionsofimmersionheatexchangerHX1inheat
dischargingmode...... 76
Table4.6Coefficientsofcitymaintemperatureofcasestudy...... 82
Table4.7Controlledvariablesofdevices...... 99
Table4.8Settingsofsolarcombisystemcomponentmodels...... 103
Table4.9Controlledvariablesofsolarcombisystemcomponent...... 105
Table4.10VariablesinparametrictablesofEESͲbasedsolarcombisystemmodel.....113
Table5.1Capacitiesandcontrolsettingsofsolarcombisystemsimulatedcase...... 118
Table5.2Referencesystemenergyusevs.solarenergycollectionofsolarcombisystem
...... 121
Table5.3ResultsofelectricityconsumptionandsystemCOPofsolarcombisystem annualoperation...... 123
Table5.4Resultsofenergyflowsofsolarcombisystemannualoperation...... 124
xiv
Table5.5Resultsofspaceheatingdemandandheatsupplytoradiantfloor...... 144
Table5.6Monthlyresultsofheatpumpoperation...... 145
Table5.7Monthlyresultsofsolarcollectoroperation...... 148
Table5.8Monthlyresultsofthermalefficiencyofsolarthermalcollector...... 149
Table5.9Monthlyresultsofwaterstoragetanknodetemperatures...... 150
Table5.10Monthlyresultsofheatflowsofwaterstoragetank...... 152
Table5.11Referencesystemexergyusevs.combisystemsolarexergycollectionofsolar combisystem...... 154
Table5.12Monthlyresultsofexergydestroyedbysolarcombisystemoperation...... 156
Table5.13Annualresultsofexergeticefficiencyofsolarcombisystemoperation...... 156
xv
Nomenclature
Symbols Descriptions Units ܣ Area m2 ܽ Coefficient,asinߟ solarcollectorthermalefficiency dimensionless 2 ܽଵ Coefficient,asinߟ solarcollectorthermalefficiency W/(m ͼԨ) 2 2 ܽଶ Coefficient,asinߟ solarcollectorthermalefficiency W/(m ͼԨ ) ሶ ு ܾǡܾଵǡǥܾସ Coefficients,asinܹ heatpumpelectricpowerinput dimensionless ሶ ௨ ܿǡܿଵǡǥ଼ܿ Coefficients,asinܹ circulatingpumppowerinput dimensionless ܿ Constantpressurespecificheat J/(kgͼԨ) ܦ Diameter m ሶ ௗ ݀ǡ݀ଵǡǥ݀ସ Coefficients,asinܳ heatpumpheatingcapacity dimensionless ܧ Energy J ܧሶ Energychangerate W ெ ݁ Coefficient,asinܶ௪ citymainwatertemperature Ԩ ܨ Flowfractionofcirculatingpump dimensionless ெ ݂ଵǡ ݂ଶǡǥ݂ଵ Coefficients,asinܶ௪ citymainwatertemperature Ԩ ܩ Insolation J ܩሶ Insolationrateontiltedsurface W ܩݎ Grashofnumber dimensionless ݃ Gravityacceleration m/s2 ெ ݃ଵǡ݃ଶǡǥ݃ଵ Coefficients,asinܶ௪ citymainwatertemperature Ԩ ܪ Height m ݄ Specificenthalpy J/kg ݇ Thermalconductivity W/(mͼԨ) ܮ Length;latentheatoffusion m;J/kg Mass kg ݉ሶ Massflowrate kg/s ܰ Dayoftheyear dimensionless ݊ Numbers dimensionless ݑ Nusseltnumber dimensionlessܰ ܲ Pressure Pa ܲݎ Prandtlnumber dimensionless ܳ Heat J ܳሶ Heattransferrate W ܴ Surfacefilmresistanceofheattransfer (m2ͼԨ)/W ܴܽ Rayleighnumber dimensionless ݑ݊ Numberofsimulationruns dimensionlessܴ ݏ Specificentropy J/(kgͼԨ)
xvi
ܶ Temperature Ԩ ܶܭ Thermodynamictemperature K ݐ Time s ܶ݅݉݁ Simulationtime s ܷ Thermaltransmittance W/(m2ͼԨ) ݑ Specificinternalenergy J/kg ܸሶ Volumeflowrate m3/s ܹ Work J ܹሶ Electricalpowerinputrate W ܺ Exergy J ܺሶ Exergytransferrate W
GreekLetters Descriptions Units ߙ Nodeexchangecontribution dimensionless ߚ Volumeexpansioncoefficient 1/Ԩ ߛ Massfractionoficeinstoragetank dimensionless ο DifferenceͲ οݐ Timestep s ߝ CoolingeffectoficeͲlayerinstoragetank dimensionless ߟ Energeticefficiency dimensionless
ߟூூ Exergeticefficiency dimensionless ߠ Open/closesignalofflowcontrolvalve dimensionless ߤ Viscosity kg/(mͼs) ߥ Specificvolume m3/kg ߦ Massfractionoficeatevaporatoroutlet dimensionless ߩ Density kg/m3 ߪ Energy/exergyratio dimensionless ߬ Exergeticqualityfactor dimensionless ߮ specificnonͲflowexergy J/kg ߯ Qualityofsaturatedrefrigerant dimensionless ߰ specificflowexergy J/kg ெ ߱ Coefficients,asinܶ௪ citymainwatertemperature dimensionless
xvii
Superscripts Descriptions ݑݔ Auxiliaryheaterܣ ܥ݈݈ Solarcollector ܥ݈݈Ͷܫܶ Circulationloopconnectingsolarcollectortoicestoragetank ܥ݈݈Ͷܹܶ Circulationloopconnectingsolarcollectortowaterstoragetank ܥ݈݈ܲ Circulatingpumpofcollectorloop ܥ݉ Compressor ܥ݊݀ Condenser ܥ݊݀ܲ Circulatingpumpofcondenserloop ܦܪܹ Domestichotwater ݒܽ Evaporatorܧ ݒܽܲ Circulatingpumpofevaporatorloopܧ ܪܲ Heatpump ܪܲͶܴܨ Circulationloopconnectingheatpumptoradiantfloor ܪܲͶܹܶ Circulationloopconnectingheatpumptowaterstoragetank ܫ IceͲlayerinicestoragetank ܫʹܹ FromiceͲlayertowaterͲlayerinicestoragetank ܫܶ Icestoragetank ܫܶܮ Icestoragetankheatingload ܫܶܵ Icestoragetankheatingsource ܯܽ݅݊ Citymain ܰ WaterͲnodeinwaterstoragetank ܰ݅ WaterͲnode݅ ݑ݉ Circulationpumpܲ ܴܨ Radiantfloor ܴܨܮ Radiantfloorheatingload ܴܨܵ Radiantfloorheatingsource ܵܪ Spaceheating ݑ݊ Sunܵ System ݏݕܵ ݒ Expansionvalve݈ܸܽ ܹ WaterͲlayerinicestoragetank ܹʹܫ FromwaterͲlayertoiceͲlayerinicestoragetank ܹܶ Waterstoragetank ܹܶܮ Waterstoragetankheatingload ܹܶܵ Waterstoragetankheatingsource ܹܶͶܴܨ Circulationloopconnectingwaterstoragetanktoradiantfloor ഥ (overbar) Quantitymean ሶ (overdot) Quantityperunittime
xviii
Subscripts Descriptions ܽ݅ݎ Air ݒ݃ Averageܽ ܿ Condensation ܾ Base ܾܽݏ݁ Baselinecondition ݐ Contact݊ܿ ܿ݉ Thermalcomfort ݀݁݉݀ Demands ݐ Destructionݏ݁݀ ݓ݊ Downward݀ ܧ Energetic ݁ Vaporization ݈݁݁ Electricity ݐ݉ Estimatedvalueݏ݁ ݔݐ Externalsurface݁ ݂ Flowinstoragetanks ݄ݏ Horizontalsurface ܪ HighͲtemperaturereservoir ܪܺ Heatexchanger ݅ܽ Indoorair ݅ܿ݁ Ice ݅݊ Inlet ݑ Thermalinsulationݏ݊݅ ݐ Internalsurface݊݅ ݅ݏ݁݊ Isentropic ܮ LowͲtemperaturereservoir ݈ܽ݀ Heatingload ݈ݏݏ loss ݔ Maximumܽ݉ ݉݁ܽ݊ Mean ݉݅݊ Minimum ܽ Outdoorair ݑݐ Outlet Overall ݈݈ܽݎݒ݁ ݈ܽ݊݁ Solarcollectorpanel ݎ Refrigerant ݎ݂݁ Referencesystem ݐ Setpoint݁ݏ ݏ݄݈݈݁ Tankshell ݕ Iceslurryݎݎݑ݈ݏ
xix
ݏ݈ Solar ݐ Storageݏ ݑ Supplyݏ Superheating ݄ݎݑݏ ݑ݊݅ݐ Unitarea ݑ Upward Variation ݎݒܽ Verticalsurface ݏݒ ݓ Water ݓ݂ Liquidwater (ݓ݅ Solidwater(ice ܺ Exergetic Ͳ Referencestate ͳǡ ʹǡ ǥ ͺ Stateofrefrigerant
Abbreviation Descriptions ASHRAE AmericanSocietyofHeating,RefrigeratingandAirͲConditioningEngineers BLAST BuildingLoadsAnalysisandSystem COP CoefficientofPerformance EBC,ECBCS EnergyConservationinBuildingsandCommunitySystems EES EngineeringEquationSolver HVAC Heating,Ventilating,andAirͲConditioning HVACSIM+ HVACSimulationPlus IEA InternationalEnergyAgency MATLAB MaTrixLaBoratory NIST NationalInstituteofStandardsandTechnology REFPROP ReferenceFluidThermodynamicandTransportPropertiesDatabase SC Solarcontribution SF Solarfraction SPARK SimulationProblemAnalysisResearchKernel TRNSYS TransientSystemSimulationTool VAV VariableAirVolume
xx
1. Introduction
1.1. Background Computersimulationistheprominentpracticetoaidlookingintosomephysical process.Throughmodelingphysicalprocessofamechanicaldevice,wecanbetter understandthedevicebehavior.Mankind’sdeepdependencyofmechanicaldevice arousestheeternalpursueforeffectivenessimprovementofenergyuse.Strengthening energysecurity,nowadays,isnotthematterofonenation,butworldwide.Thepressing
challengesonexpandingenergyneedsandnonͲstoppingemissionsofgreenhousegas
urgeactions.ThelatestreportissuedbytheU.N.climatepanelassessedthatatleast95%
oftheclimatechangearehumanͲcaused(IPCCWGI2013).Promotingtheeffectiveness
ofenergyuseisonesolutiontoreducethenegativeimpactontheglobe.Fig.1.1plots theenergyefficiencyeffectofCanadianresidentialenergyendͲuseoverthepasttwo decadesupto2009.Withouttheenergyefficiencyeffect,theenergyendͲusewouldrise dramaticallyfromthepastlevelof1990.Themostineffectivenessofenergyuse occurredinthethermodynamicprocessescanbeidentifiedwiththeSecondLawof thermodynamics.Throughexploringthequalityofenergy,themethodofSecondLaw analysisfacilitatestheleverageofpotentialmeasuresforenergyconservationand efficiencyimprovement.
1
ZLWKRXWHQHUJ\HIILFLHQF\HIIHFW ZLWKHQHUJ\HIILFLHQF\HIIHFW
(QHUJ\3-
Fig.1.1EnergyefficiencyeffectonenergyendͲuseinresidentialsectorofCanada Datasource:NRCanͲOEE(2012) Weembracedthetechnologythatusesenergyefficiently.Wealsoembracedthe
technology(suchassolartechnology)thatpromotestheenvironmentalsustainability
becauseweagreeontakingtherenewableenergiesintoourenergyschemeforgood.
Metz(1977)reviewedtheearlierstudiesandreportedthemosteconomichighͲ temperaturesolarsystemsservesseveralpurposesinacomplementaryfashion.The
authoralsoforecastedthatthemediumͲtemperaturesolarsystemswillhaveagreat
potentialby2000.Comingtopresentdays,solarsystemshavebeenseenappliedwidely.
Particularly,theapplicationsofsolartechnologydopresentthecomplementaryfashion
ofservingmultiplepurposes.AndthelowͲtemperaturesolarthermalsystemshave
takenoverthemajorityofsolarthermalcollectorsproducedintothiscentury.
SolarcombisystemisoneclassoflowͲtemperaturesolarthermalsystemthat
usessolarthermalenergy,togetherwithelectricity,toworkonthedualheating missionsinaresidentialhouse:toheatthedomesticwaterandtoheattheindoorspace.
2 Theextensivepracticesandtheactivesignsinthemarket,especiallyinEurope
(Ellehauge2003,Papillonetal.2010),haveconfirmedthevitalityofsolarcombisystem.
Invariousconfigurations,solarcombisystemsshareatypicalfeaturecomponent,the waterstoragetank.Becausetheavailabilityofsolarenergyvarieswithtime(Laughlin
2011),thestorageschemeprovidesthesolarenergysomedegreeofcontinuity.
Theheatpumpisoneoftheenergyconservativesolutionsthatuseslessofthe primaryenergythantheconventionalheatingsystems(IEAHPC2012).Harris(1957) countedthecombinationadvantageof"solarheater"with"thermalpump".Anon(1977)
reportedtherevivalofheatpumpswhiletheenergycostwassoaring;inparticular,the
heatpumpswerecoupledwiththe"heatͲreclaim"andsolarsystems.Steppingintothe
currentdecade,thecombinationofsolartechnologieswithheatpumphasredrawn
researchattention(IEAͲSHCT44/A382011).UpgradedfromtheAmericanSocietyof
Heating,RefrigeratingandAirͲConditioningEngineers(ASHRAE)TechnicalGroup1
Exergyinsummerof2012,theASHRAETechnicalCommittee7.4ExergyAnalysisfor
SustainableBuildingsaddressedthattheapplicationofsolarcollectorandheatpumpis preferredandmoresustainable,versusfossilfuel(ASHRAETC7.42013).
Whattheoperatingconditionswouldbewiththesolarcollectorandheatpump combinedinacombisystem?Howistheoperationperformance?Insightsfromthe pointofviewoftheSecondLawofthermodynamicsareworthforaninvestigation.
3 1.2. Researchobjectives Thisresearchaimstousecomputersimulationtechniquetoexaminetheenergy useofasolarcombisystemcoupledwithstoragetanksandaheatpump.Ourresearch grouphasaccumulatedsubstantialexperienceinaspecializedareadocumentedbyWu
(2004),Zheng(2006),Wei(2006),Zmeureanu&Wu(2007),Zmeureanu&Zheng(2008),
Leckner(2008),Hugo(2008),Wei&Zmeureanu(2009),Hugoetal.(2010),Leckner&
Zmeureanu(2011),NgChengHin(2013),andNgChengHinetal.(2013).Thisresearchis
proposedasacontributiontotheemploymentoftheSecondLawanalysisforthe
investigationofHVACsystemsbymeansofcomputermodeling.
Theresearchobjectivesare:
Formulatemathematicalmodelsofasolarcombisystemcomponents;
DevelopasolarcombisystemmathematicalmodelbasedontheSecondLawof
thermodynamics;
Implementthesolarcombisystemcomputermodel;
Analyzetheperformanceofasimulatedsolarcombisystem.
4
2. Literaturereview
2.1. ComputermodelingofHVACsystems ThecomputerͲbasedsimulationofHeating,Ventilating,andAirͲConditioning
(HVAC)systemsisperformedonHVACsystemcomputermodels,whicharecomposed ofmodularelementsrepresentingtheHVACcomponentequipmentandthecontrol system(ASHRAE2009a).SuchmodulartypeofHVACmodelshavebeenincludedin simulationpackagesandsoftware,suchas,ASHRAEHVAC1Toolkit(ASHRAE1994),
ASHRAEHVAC2Toolkit(Brandemeuhl1993,Brandemuehl&Gabel1994),TRNSYS(Klein
2006),EnergyPlus(BuildingTechnologiesOffice2013,Crawleyetal.2001),etc.
ComputermodelingstrategiesofHVACandbuildingsystemshaveemergedwiththree typicalschemes(ASHRAE2009a):systemͲbased,componentͲbased,andequationͲbased.
InasystemͲbasedscheme,calculationsareperformedforthebuildingzone loads,secondaryHVACsystems,andcentralplanttogetherateachtimestep,e.g. eQuest(JJH/LBNL2013),orcalculationsareprocessedinsequence,fromthebuilding zoneloadstothesecondaryHVACsystems,thenfromthecentralplanttotheeconomic
aspect,e.g.EnergyPlus(BuildingTechnologiesOffice2013).
InacomponentͲbasedscheme,calculationsareperformedatthecomponent level,andacompletesystemisaflexibleintegrationofthecomponents.Simulation programswithacomponentͲbasedschemeare,forexample,HVACSimulationPlus
5 (HVACSIM+)(Parketal.1985)andTransientSystemSimulationTool(TRNSYS)(Klein
2006).
TheequationͲbasedschemeenablesausertowritethemathematical formulationsofeverysinglecomponentandspecifytheinputsandoutputs.The equationͲbasedschemehasbeenusedby,forinstance,theSimulationProblemAnalysis
ResearchKernel(SPARK)(Buhletal.1993,Sowell&Moshier1995)andtheEngineering
EquationSolver(EES)(FͲChartSoftware,1989ascitedinPanek&Johnson1994,Klein andAlvarado,1991ascitedinMyers1992,Staus1997).
2.2. Solarcombisystem Solarcombisystems,beingmostlyusedinresidentialapplications,canbe classifiedto:solarcombisystem,solarcombiͲplussystem,andhighsolarcombiͲplus system(Balarasetal.2010).
Atypicalinstallationofasolarcombisystemcombinestheproductionof domestichotwaterandthespaceheating(Papillonetal.2010).Theinitiallydeveloped solarcombisystemwasstudiedbytheInternationalEnergyAgency(IEA)underthetask
26SolarCombisystems(SHCT262012).Thetaskgaveoneoftheconclusionsthatthe
solarcombisystemhasamaindrawbackofoversizing.Sizedbasedonthehigher
thermaldemandsinwinter,thesolarcombisystemis,therefore,oversizedforthelower
6 thermaldemandsinsummer.Thetaskreportconcludedthatthecaseswithlong heatingseasonsaremorepromising.
Duetothedrawbackofoversizing,thedevelopmentofsolarcombiͲplussystem wasmotivatedtoconnectthesolarthermalcollectorwiththethermaldrivencooling device(IEESolarCombi+2010).Combingsolarspaceheatingandcoolingwiththe domestichotwaterproduction,asolarcombiͲplussystemmayavoidthedrawbackof oversizing.
TheoperationofahighsolarcombiͲplussystemissameasofasolarcombiͲplus system,however,thesolarfractionishigher(EUHighCombi2011).Forinstance,the improvementmaylieinanintegrationofsolarheatstorage.Thesystemperformance wasexpectedtoimproveduringthespringandtheautumnwhentheheatingloadsare moderate.
TheIEAprojectSolarCombisystems,inactivefrom1998through2002,assessed twentyͲoneconfigurationsofsolarcombisystems.ForoneͲfamilyhouseapplication,the
solarcombisystemshadsolarthermalcollectorsof10to30m2andawaterstoragetank
of0.3to3m3.Lund(2005)analyzedthesizingofsolarcombisystems,intermsofthe areaofsolarthermalcollectorandthevolumeofshortͲtermheatstorage.Theuseof heatoutputoflargerareaofsolarthermalcollectorwasbetterinthecaseofsupplying bothdomestichotwaterandspaceheatingthaninthecaseonlyproducingdomestic hotwater.Enlargingtheareaofsolarthermalcollectorincreasedthesolarfractionofa completesystem,butreducedtheheatoutputofcollectorwithinunitareaofcollector
7 panel.Thestudyconcludedthattherewereonlymarginaleffectsontotheheatoutput ofcollectorfromtheincreaseofthesizeofheatstorage.Furbo,Vejen,etal.(2005) reportedalargescaleinstallationofasolarcombisysteminDenmark.Withthesolar thermalcollectorof336m2andhotwaterstoragetankof10m3,thesystemsupplied
thedistrictheatingnetworkandthehotwateruse.Raffeneletal.(2009)studiedthe sizingofsolarcombisystems.Twoobjectivefunctions,theannualfractionalenergy savingsandthemeanannualefficiency,weredevelopedasfunctionoftheareaofsolar thermalcollectorandthevolumeofheatstorage.Thesizingdecisionwasmadeby tradingoffbetweenthetwofunctions.
Amongvariousconfigurationsofsolarcombisystem,thoseincludeaheatpump arealsobelongtoatypeofsolarandheatpumpsystem(SHCT44A382011).Intermsof couplingsolarthermalcollectorswithheatpump,thecombinationcanbegenerally
classifiedasparallelsystem,seriessystem,orhybridsystem.Inaseriessystem,solar heatistransferredtoaheatpump(throughathermalstoragetank)forheating
(Freemanetal.1979).Chandrashekaretal.(1982)estimatedtheconditionsofCanada bysimulation.Theyconcludedthathigherenergysavingscouldbeobtainedbythe combination,comparedtoaresistanceheatingsystemandaconventionalairͲtoͲair heatpumpsystem.Thestudyalsoexaminedthe20Ͳyearlifecyclecost.Buttheresults differedamongthesingle,multiplexdwellingsatdifferentlocations.
Theoperationcontrolofasolarheatpumpcombinationiscomplex.The operationcontrolshouldtrytomaximizethedeliveryofthenonͲpurchasedsolarenergy.
8 Fromthisperspective,givingprioritytousethesolarsourceseemseasiertoberealized inaparalleledsystem.However,Day&Karayiannis(1994)concludedthatperformance improvementofparallelsystemwasnotasexpected.Inthereviewconductedby
Freemanetal.(1979),aparallelsystemwasthemostpracticalconfiguration.Theseries
systemiscomplexinthecontrolofbypassingaheatpumpanddirectlyusingthestorage tanktosupply,whenthesolesolaroperationissufficient.Bong(1983)pointedout, bypasstemperaturesarenotsubjecttoaunifieddecision,butdependontheprevailing buildingload.Theoperationofaheatpumpissubjectetothecapacityofsolarheat collection,ortheareaofsolarcollectorhadtobelargeenoughtakingintoaccountthe heatneedsofoperatingaheatpump.
Theoperationofasolarheatpumpsysteminvolvesthebalanceofusingthe
solarsourceand/ortheheatpump.Kush(1980)indicatedthatthethermalefficiencyof
solarthermalcollectorismoreimportantthantheCOPofheatpump.Karagiorgasetal.
(2010)useda“changeͲovercurve”,asafunctionoftheoutdoortemperatureandthe
solarradiationoncollectors,todecidetheoperationswitchbetweenadirectmodeand anindirectmode.Inthedirectmode,distributedairwasheatedusingsolarair collectors;intheindirectmode,aheatpumpwasusedtoreheattheairbeforebeing distributed.Theswitchofoperationreflectedtheneedsforoperatingaheatpump
whentheheatcollectionofsolarthermalcollectorisinsufficient.
Theoperationperformanceofsolarheatpumpsysteminstallationswas reported.Kugleetal.(1984)reportedthesolarheatpumpoperationforasingleͲfamily
9 housecouldbefreefromusingelectricalheatingelements.Asolaronlymodehadthe systemCOPupto35.Stojanoviđ&Akander(2010)testedtheperformanceofafullͲscale solarͲassistedheatpumpsystemfortheresidentialheatinginSweden.Intheheating season,agroundͲcoupledheatpumpusedsolarheatbeingstoredduringthemonthsof
latespring,summerandearlyautumn.TheheatpumphadaseasonalCOPof2.85,and thesystemhadaseasonalCOPof2.09.Bakirci&Yuksel(2011)monitoredasolarsource heatpumpsysteminstalledinabuildinginTurkey.ThesystemconsistedofflatͲplate solarcollectorsandaheatpumpusingasensiblestoragetankastheheatsource.The averageCOPwas3.8fortheheatpumpand2.9forthesystem.MorenoͲRodríguezetal.
(2012)studiedadirectͲexpansionsolarassistedheatpumpandfoundthestrong
dependenceoftheheatpumpCOPwiththeoutdoorconditions,especiallythesolar radiation.ThesimulatedCOPrangedfrom1.85to3.1,whereasthecalculatedusing experimentresultsrangedfrom1.7to2.9.
2.3. Stratifiedwaterstoragetank Waterstoragetankisamostcommontypeofsensiblethermalenergystorage
(ASHRAE2009b).Variousaspectsofthermalenergystoragesystemswereaddressedin
(Dincer&Rosen2011).Thermalenergystorageimprovetheintegrationofsystem
(Baker2008)andcreatethepotentialofeconomicsaving(Ehyaeietal.2010).Thermal stratificationisaphenomenonfeaturedbyapositivetemperaturegradientalongthe verticaldirectioninfluids(Turner1973).Themaintenanceofstratificationinathermal
10 storagetankenhancestheoperationperformanceofasystem(Nelsonetal.1998,
Duffie&Beckman2006).Attentionswerepaidtostratifiedstoragetanksinstudies.
Variousindicatorsregardingstratificationhaveappearedtoaddresstheperformanceof thermalstoragetank(Panthalookaranetal.2007):thestabilityindexandtheentropy generationnumberfromthe70’s;thestratificationcoefficient,stratificationfactor,
stratificationparameters,figureofmerit,andtheoverallsecondlawefficiencyfromthe
80’s;theMIXnumberandtheequivalenttemperaturefromthe90’s.Theemergeof newindicatorscontinued,suchas,theequivalentlosttankheightbyBahnfleth&Song
(2005),theenergyresponsefactorandtheentropygenerationratiobyPanthalookaran etal.(2007).Somestudiestracedthevariationofthermoclinetocomprehendthe thermalstateinstoragetanks(Behschnitt1996,Nelsonetal.1998,Hasnain1998,Rosen etal.2004,Shinetal.2004).
Thermalstratificationcanbedamagedinvariousways,includingtheturbulence ofjetflow,buoyancyeffect,andtheheatconductionalongthewallsofstoragetank.
Thejetflowisreferredtotheflowchanneledbytankportsfromtheinletstotheoutlets.
Thejetflowdisturbswaterbodyinthestoragetankcausingmixing.Theturbulenceof
jetflow,i.e.jetmixing,wasdescribedinthestudiesofVisser&VanDijk(1991),Halleret
al.(2008),andHalleretal.(2009).Turner(1973)gaveanaccountofflowmotionsdriven orinfluencedbythebuoyancyforceinastratifiedfluid:Alongtheverticaldirectionin fluids,theexistenceofnegativetemperaturegradientorpositivedensitygradient wouldoverturnthelocalstabilitybymovingthermals,intendingtouniformthelocal densityandsmooththetemperaturegradient.Fan&Furbo(2012a)andFan&Furbo
11 (2012b)showedthemagnitudeofvelocityofadownwardflowinawaterstoragetank underastandbyoperation.Theflowwascausedbythelossofheatfromthestorage tanktothesurroundings,whichledthedownwardflowalongthetanksidewallsand theupwardflowaroundtheverticalaxialofstoragetank.Theheatretainedwithin storagetankwallswouldconductdownward(Oppeletal.1986)causingthe degradationofthermalstratification(Nelsonetal.1999a).Cruickshank&Harrison(2010) reportedamodelingstudywiththeheatconductiontakingplacenotonlyacrossthe commonboundaryofstratifiednodesbutalsothroughthetankwalls.
Reversestratificationexistsinoperatedwaterstoragetank.Rheeetal.(2010) conductedanexperimentalstudyonahotwaterstoragetankwithadoublechimney device.Thedevicehastwonozzlestubstoroutethebuoyancydrivenflowthrough.The
experimentshowedthereversestratificationtakingplaceduringtheheatingperiodof thestoragetank.Thissuggestedthatrelativelystablestratificationneedstimetobe developedinanoperatedstoragetank.Cruickshank&Harrison(2011)reportedthermal responsetothechargeofheatinthestudiedmultiͲtanks.StratificationinaseriesͲ connectedthermalstoragedisappearedwhiletheflowrateinaheatchargeͲloop increased.
Differentapproacheswereemployedinthecomputermodelingofstratified storagetankforthepurposeofeliminatingthereversestratification.Forinstance,a reversioneliminationalgorithmwasimplementedinthemodel4PORTbyVisser&Van
Dijk(1991).Themodelforcesstratifiednodeinhighertemperaturetostayathigher
12 positionineachtimestep.Withinatimestep,wheneveramaximumtemperaturedoes notbelongtoatopnode,averagedtemperaturewouldbereassignedtothenodes, fromthebottomonetotheonewiththemaximumtemperature.Theaverage calculationandthereassignmentoftemperaturewouldrepeattillthedistributionof
thetemperaturesdemonstratingthermalstratification,thesimulationofnexttimestep
thenstarts.Withthisalgorithm,astablystratifiedstoreisachievedalways.Allardetal.
(2011)comparedfiveelectricalwaterheatersmodelsimplementedintheTRNSYS software.ThestudyconcludedthatthemodelTYPE534representedthebesttradeͲoff becausetheusercanhavecoldwaterenteringdifferentnodes(underafractionalinlet mode)and/oruseseveralheatingelements(underavirtualheatingmode).
Boththebuoyancyeffectandtheturbulenceofjetflowcausewatermixingina storagetank.Thisshouldbereflectedincertainwaysinthemodelingofstratified storagetank.Whenstablystratifiednaturalbodiesoffluidaredisturbedinanyway,
internalwavesaregenerated(Turner1973).Visser&VanDijk(1991)realizedthattaking
intoaccountonlytheinterͲnodalheatconductionresultedunreasonabletemperature
distribution;theychosetoemployareversioneliminationalgorithmtopresent stratification.Ismailetal.(1997)studiedastratifiedhotthermalstorageinan
experimentalsetup.Theyconcludedthattheuseofsoleconductioninmodelingwas
unsatisfying.ModelingthemixingwasincludedinLoehrkeetal.(1978),Oppeletal.
(1986),AlͲNajem&ElͲRefaee(1997),andNelsonetal.(1999b),howeverthesestudies didnotreachanagreedsolutionyet.
13 Kleinbachetal.(1993)validatedaoneͲdimensionalmultiͲnodemodel.
Cruickshank&Harrison(2010)reportedaoneͲdimensionalstratifiedwaterstoragetank modelwasacceptableforacoldͲdowntest.Kleinbach(1990)concludedhismodel predictionsdifferedmoreamongthemodelswithsmall(ч4)numberofnodesthan
amongthemodelswithlarge(ш8)numberofnodes.Visser&VanDijk(1991)suggested
usealargenumberofnodes,like100orevenlarger,like500,torepresentthe contributionofactualturbulentmixingproperly.Duffie&Beckman(2006)suggested thattheuseofthreeorfournodesmaybesuitable.Thepositionandthedesignoftank portsaffecttheoperationofstratifiedwaterstoragetank(Jordan&Furbo2005,Duffie
&Beckman2006).Theenergyperformanceofstoragetankbenefitsfromacoldwater portatthetankbottomandahotwaterportatthetanktop(Spuretal.2006,Ievers&
Lin2009).Keepingadistancebetweentheinletandoutletportsavoidstheoverlapping ofmixingzones(Palaciosetal.2012).Furbo,Andersen,etal.(2005)reportedthe thermalperformanceofstoragetankbenefitsfromthemultiͲdischargingofheat.The studyconcludedthatincreasingthefrequencyofheatchargingͲdischargingwasworth todoformakingmoreuseofthethermalstorageandavoidingthermalstagnation.
Glembin&Rockendorf(2012)reportedastratifiedchargingdeviceledhigherutilization ofsolarenergyinathermalstorageofasinglefamilyhouse.
14 2.4. Secondlawanalysis Fromthethermodynamicprinciple,theexergyindicatestheextentoftheenergy partingfromthetheoreticalmaximum(Moran&Shapiro1999),andtheSecondLawof thermodynamicsneedstobeconsidered(Rosen&Dincer2001,Dincer&Rosen2005,
Dewulfetal.2008,Rosenetal.2008,andAoetal.2008).Theexergyanalysishasbeen
fallenfarbehindtheenergyanalysisinthestudiesregardingbuildingenergysystems.
Toríoetal.(2009)gaveacriticalreviewofexergyanalysisstudiesconductedforsystems thatusetherenewableenergy.TheprogrammeEnergyConservationinBuildingsand
CommunitySystems(EBC,formerlyECBCS)carriedouttheresearchprojectAnnex37
LowExergySystemsforHeatingandCooling,from1999to2003,topromotetheuseof lowvaluedandenvironmentallysustainableenergysources(ECBCSA372003).The
ECBCScarriedoutanotherresearchprojectfrom2006to2010,theAnnex49Low
ExergySystemsforHighPerformanceBuildingsandCommunities,topromotetheuseof
exergyanalysismethodasthebasispracticefordesignersanddecisionmakerstotake energy/exergyandcostefficientmeasures(ECBCSA492010).
ThestateͲofͲartbuildingenergyanalysisprogramsuseonlytheenergybalance toestimatetheenergyuseinbuildings(Rosenetal.2001,Zmeureanu&Wu2007).Itard
(2005)implementedexergycalculationsintheH.e.n.k.program(Itard2003)foranearly designtocounttheflowsofexergywithinabuilding.Basedonthespreadsheet applications,e.g.MicrosoftExcel(Microsoft2013)andOpenOfficeCalc(Apache
Openoffice2013),afewofexergyanalysistoolsforbuildingsandcommunitieswere developed.Forinstance,thePreͲDesignTool(Schmidt2004,Torío2010)forbuildings,
15 theCascadia(Church2008)forneighborhooddesign,andtheSoftwareforExergy
Performance(SEPE)(Molinari2011)forexergydemandsofcoolingandheatingin buildings.Thesetoolsweredevelopedfordesign,preͲdesign,orgeneralassessment, performingthesteadystateexergyanalysis.AquasiͲsteadystateexergyanalysisstudy
wasreportedbyWu(2004)andZmeureanu&Wu(2007).TheEESprogram
demonstratedtobeanidealenvironmentintheexergyanalysisstudyofresidential
heatingsystems.Wei(2006)usedtheEESprogramtosimulatetheVariableAirVolume
(VAV)systemsofanofficebuilding.Gaggioli(2010)recommendedtheadoptionofthe
EESoracounterpartforthermodynamicproblems.TheroutinesoftheMaTrix
LaBoratory(MATLAB)program(Mathworks2011)alreadycandirectlyusetheNIST
ReferenceFluidThermodynamicandTransportPropertiesDatabase(REFPROP)
(Lemmonetal.2013).Thisprovidedanalternativeprogrammingenvironmentto performmoredetailedexergyanalysis.
TheexergyanalysiswasemployedinHVACsystemstudiesbyRosenetal.(1999),
Badescu(2002),Rosen(2001a),Dincer(2002),Shah&Furbo(2003),Rosenetal.(2004),
Singhetal.(2012),andSoni&Gupta(2012).Exergyanalysisstudyofpowerplantswere documentedbyDurmayaz&Yavuz(2001),Rosen(2001b),Verkhivker&Kosoy(2001),
andAljundi(2009).Resultsofenergeticperformanceandexergeticperformancearenot unanimous,withgreatdiscrepancyundermostofthecases.Forinstance,Bjurstrom&
CarlssonB.(1985)yieldeddifferentresultsregardingthetransitiontemperatureinthe latentheatstorageoperationfromtheenergyandexergyanalyses.Petela(2005)found theexergyefficiencyofasolarcylindricalͲparaboliccookerwasaround1%,about10
16 timessmallerthantherespectiveenergyefficiency.Zmeureanu&Wu(2007)reported
theheatrecoveryequipmentincreasedtheenergyefficiencybutdecreasedtheexergy efficiencyofthesystem.
Theexergyanalysisisappreciatedforbringingextraperspectivetotheviewof energyanalysis.Altaetal.(2010)foundthattheincreaseofairflowrateofasolar heaterimprovedtheenergyefficiencybutreducedtheexergyefficiency.Ezanetal.
(2011)analyzedaniceͲonͲcoilthermalenergystorage.Usingtheenergyanalysis method,thestoragecapacityandthesystemefficiencyincreasedwithdecreasedinlet temperatureofheattransferfluidandincreasedlengthoftube.Usingtheexergy analysismethod,theexergyefficiencywasincreasedwithincreasinginlettemperature
ofheattransferfluidandincreasinglengthoftube.Koroneos&Tsarouhis(2012)studied
asolarsystemappliedtoaresidenceinNorthernGreece.Comparingasolarheating,a
solarcooling,andasolardomesticwaterheatingsystems,theoverallsystemexergy efficiencywasthehighestinthesolarcoolingsystem,thelowestinthesolarheating system.
Theindustryofsolarthermalcollectoremploysenergyperformancetoassess collectorproducts(FSEC2010andSRCC2013).Intheresearcharea,variousindicators,
fromtheenergeticaspect,exergeticaspect,oreconomicaspect,wereemployedto
evaluatetheperformanceofvarioustypesofsolarcollector.Chow(2010)reviewedthe
indicatorsfortheperformanceofphotovoltaic/thermalhybridsolartechnology, includingthethermalefficiency,electricalefficiency,totalefficiency,energysaving
17 efficiency,exergeticefficiency,costpaybacktime,energypaybacktime,andthe greenhousegaspaybacktime.Intermsofcalculatingtheavailablesolarexergy,the
Carnotefficiencyandtheexergy/energyratioofradiationwereoftenbeingused,for example,byAltaetal.(2010),Akpinar&KoçyiŒit(2010),andAkyuzetal.(2012).
Studiesfocusingontheexergeticperformanceofsolarcollectorwere documentedsincethelate80’s.Bejanetal.(1981)analyzedtheirreversibility associatedwiththecollectionͲdeliveryprocessofsolarcollector.Suzuki(1988) presentedtheexpressionofexergybalanceofsolarthermalcollector.Thecapacityof
exergygainofevacuatedtubularcollectorwasnearlyequaltothatofflatplatecollector.
Thestudyalsoconcludedthatthelossduringtheabsorptionofsolarheattookthe largestproportionamongtheoverallexergyloss,whichincludedtheopticalloss, leakageloss,andtheheatconductionlossaswell.Petela(2005)concludedthatthe escapingofinsolationandtheheatlosstotheenvironmentdecreasedtheefficiencyof solarcollectiondevicefromtheexergeticviewpoint.InAkyuzetal.(2012),theexergy efficiencyofsolarphotovoltaicpanelwascalculatedwiththeexergylossduetowind speedbeingtakenintoaccount.
Themaximumexergyembodiedintheradiativeenergy,especiallythesolar
radiation,wasconcernedinstudies,sincethe60’stothe80’s.Petela(1964)derivedthe exergy/energyratioofradiationfortheestimationofthetheoreticalmaximumexergy embodiedintheradiativeheat.Parrott(1978)addressedthetheoreticalmaximum
exergyinsolarradiation.Edgerton(1980)questionedtheconvertibilityofsolarradiation
18 tothermodynamicwork.Jeter(1981)theoreticallyinvestigatedthemaximum conversionefficiencyofdirectsolarenergyutilization,whichwasastheCarnot efficiency.Petela(2010)andAgudelo&Cortés(2010)werethelatesttoreviewand summarizethestudiesregardingtheexergyanalysisofthermalradiationprocess.
2.5. Conclusions Basedontheliteraturereviewconductedforthisresearch,fourmainissuesgot theattention:(i)ThecomputermodelingofHVACsystemsarepopularamongthe applicationsinasystemͲbasedschemeortheapplicationsinacomponentͲbased scheme.AnequationͲbasedmodelingschemeissuperioratallowingspecificationsof
inputsandoutputs.(ii)Solarcombisystemshaveproofedthevitality,however,exergy analysisstudiesonsolarcombisystemsarerare;(iii)Themodelingofwaterstoragetank
isanindispensableaspectinthemodelingofasolarcombisystem.Researchinthe modelingofstratifiedstoragetankshouldbeconducted;and(iv)Includingaheatpump asacomponentofasolarcombisystemmakesachallengingsystemconfigurationfor investigation.
Toaddresstheseissues,amodeldevelopmentstudyshouldbedone,tousethe
EESprogramasthemodelingplatformdevelopingaSecondͲLawmodelofasolar combisystempresentingthesolarheatpumpcombination.Usingthecomponent
approach,thesolarcombisystemmodelbeingdevelopedisobtainedbyintegratingthe
modelcomponents,whicharetobedevelopedatfirst.Withthedevelopedsolar
19 combisystemcomputermodel,thesystemoperationcanbesimulatedandperformed withtheSecondͲLawanalyses.
20
3. Methodology Thischapterpresentsthemethodologyoftheresearchpresentedinthisthesis.
Thisresearchinvestigatedasolarcombisysteminaspecifiedconfigurationusing computersimulation.Thestepsfollowedare:
Choosingthemodelingapproach;
Determiningmodelinputsandoutputsandperformingcasedatacollection;
Establishingthecontrolschemeanddefiningthecontrolledvariables;
Developingthesolarcombisystemmathematicalmodel;
ImplementingthesolarcombisystemcomputermodelintheEESprogram;
Assigningthecasestudydataandcontrolsettings;
Modelvalidationandverification;
Simulatingthesolarcombisystemmodelandperformingresultsanalysis;
Drawingtheconclusionsbasedonthesimulatedsolarcombisystemoperation
andperformanceanalysis.
Regardingthestepslistedabove,thefollowedsectionswillprovidemoredetails.
3.1. QuasiͲequilibriumprocess ManyactualprocessesareapproximatedbythequasiͲequilibriumprocesses
withnegligibleerror(Cengel&Boles2002).InsuchaquasiͲsteadyapproach,the
21 combisystemmathematicalmodelwasformulated.Thethermodynamicbalancewas
writtenforrateofenergyinW.Thetimeincrementof15minuteswasused,whichis alsousedbyothermodelingprograms,forinstance,thesimulationprogramEnergyPlus
(BuildingTechnologiesOffice2013)usesasdefaultofsimulationtimestep.Inthe
developmentofIBLAST,aresearchversionofsimulationprogramBuildingLoads
AnalysisandSystem(BLAST),thevaluehasbeenidentifiedgivingstableresultswithout
largelyincreaseincomputationtime(BLASTSupportOffice1991).
Themodelingofthesolarcombisystemisinadynamicmodelingbecauseofthe
thermalenergystoragetanksbeingthecombisystemcomponentsinconnectionwith
othercomponentequipment.Themodelingofthermalenergystoragetankfollowsa
dynamicapproach,wherethecomputationresultsoftimeͲlaggedvariablesfromthe
previoustimeareprocessedastheinitialvaluesforcalculatingthetimeͲlaggedvariables
atthecurrenttime.
3.2. Inputandoutput Theinputandoutputofthesolarcombisystemcomputermodelwereidentified atthebeginningstage,beforestartingthemathematicalmodeldevelopment.Data collectionispartoftheinputsidentificationbecauseacomputermodelingofHVAC systemonlyrepresentsthesystemoperationscenariobycases,whichisthesametrue forthedevelopmentofacomputermodel.Thecollecteddatawillbeinputtothemodel duringthedevelopmentfortrialrun.
22 Thesolarcombisystemoutputswereidentifiedforthepurposeofoperation investigation,includingthetemperatureofworkingfluid,heattransferratebetween components,auxiliaryenergyuse,andperformanceindices.Themodelinputsidentified canbegroupedtoinputparametersandinputvariables.Theinputparametersare constantsincludingtheequipmentdimensionsandtheoperationconstraints.The operationconstraintsare,suchas,theoperationtemperaturelimits.Theinputvariables havevaluesvaryingtime,includingtheheatingrequirementsandtheboundary conditions.Theheatingrequirementsarethespaceheatingdemandandthedomestic hotwaterconsumption.Theboundaryconditionsarereferredtotheconditionsofthe environmentofthermodynamicsystem,includingtheinsolation,outdoortemperature, indoortemperature,andcitymaintemperature.
Theinputequipmentdimensionscanbefromthedocumentspublishedbythe manufacturers,whichcouldbetheinstallation,operationandmaintenancemanuals, specificationcatalogues,ratingcertifications,etc.However,tofixcertainparameters onemightneedtospecifytheexactproductmodeltosetthecapacity.Theinput variablescanbefromotherstudiesorapplications.Forinstance,thestudiedcaseused datafromotherstudiesfortheheatingdemands,indoortemperature,andcitymain temperature;usedweatherdatafromTRNSYSsimulationprogramfortheclimate
conditions.
23 3.3. Controlscheme Thecontrolschemepresentsthegeneralthoughtsabouthowtooperatethe controldevices(e.g.,valves,thermostats,etc.)toactuatethecomponentinorderto manipulatethesolarcombisystemoperation.Bearingacontrolschemeinmindwasone ofthepremisestoformulatethemathematicalmodel.
3.4. Mathematicalmodel Themathematicalmodelofsolarcombisystemwasdevelopedusingthe componentapproach.Inthisapproach,thewholecombisystemmodeliscomposedof componentmodels,includingthesolarthermalcollectormodel,heatpumpmodel,ice storagetankmodel,waterstoragetankmodel,circulatingpumpmodel,systemmodel
(todescribetheoperatingconditionsandtoevaluatetheoperationperformanceatthe
systemlevel),andcontrolsystemmodel.Bydevelopingrelationsamongthecomponent models,thewholecombisystemmodelwasformed.Thecomponentmathematical modelswereformulatedmainlyinequations,someinconditions.Theequationswereto describethethermodynamicprocessthateachofthecomponentsundergoes.The conditionswereforthedecisionalgorithmsofthecontrolsystemmodel.
Thepresentedmodelsinthisthesis,somepartsofcertaincomponentmodels arenewapproachesornewalgorithmsbeingdevelopedduringthisresearch.Theother partswereadoptedfromexistingmodelsdocumentedbyotherresearchers,withor
withoutmodification.
24
3.5. Computermodel Thesolarcombisystemcomputermodelwasobtainedbyimplementingthe
developedcomponentmathematicalmodelsintheEESprogram.Essentially,the programcansolvecouplednonͲlinearalgebraicanddifferentialequations.Theprogram hasthebuiltͲinfunctionscalculatingthethermodynamicandtransportpropertiesof substances.Theprogramcancheckunitconsistency,whichmayappeartobeaminor feature,butisespeciallyusefulforcomplexmodels;thesolarcombisystembeing
studiedinthisresearchisoneofthose.
Atthisstep,theinterfaceformodelinputswascreatedintheEESprogram.The equationsandconditionswereimplementedasprocedures.Mainprocedurewassetup
tocompilethecomputationdirectives,functions,andproceduressofortheexecutionin sequence.Duringimplementingtheprocedures,effortsweremadetopreparethe componentmodelsreadyforfuturereuseindifferentsystemconfigurations.
3.6. Testingandmodifications Thecomputermodelneededtestsandverificationbeforerunningthesimulation forfinalresults.Thetestingwasperformedbyrunningthemodelandobservingthe modelrespondsandmodeloutputstoensureiftheobservedareasbeingexpected
(Kennedy&O’Hagan2001).Thetestswereperformedforvarioussimulationtimespans,
25 forday,andforseason(i.e.,heatingseasonandnonͲheatingseason),beforeperforming onacompletesimulationyear.
Detailedoutputsfromthetestsimulationswereexamined.Theerrordetection atthisstepwastimeconsuming.Themodelwasexaminedwithenergybalance,aswell aswithcertainvariables,suchastemperatures,efficiencies,exergydestructions.For
instance,theefficiency,exergydestruction,anddimensionlessvariablestypicallyhave
valueswithincertainrange.Theiroutputscanexposeproblemsorerrorshidinginthe model.
3.7. Simulationandresultsanalysis Thedevelopedcomputermodelwasruntosimulatethesolarcombisystem annualoperation.Toeliminatetheimpactmadebytheinitialvalues,thesimulationof threecontinuousyearswasperformed,andonlytheresultsforthethirdyearwereused fortheanalysis.Theexportedsimulationresultswerevastsetsofdatarequiringdata treatment.TheprogramMATLABwasusedinthisstudyasapostͲprocessorforthis purpose.
Atthestepofdatatreatment,animportantaspectistodistinguishtheon/off statusofsolarthermalcollector,heatpump,andradiantfloor,becauseavariablethat belongstothemodelofeitheroneofthemisastepfunction.Whentheoperationisin
offstatus,thevariabledoesnothaveavalue.However,adummyvalueof0was
26 assignedoutofthecomputationneeds.Whenanalyzingthedataexported,thedummy valuemustbefilteredoutfirstduetothevaluedoesnotrepresentanyphysical meaning.Avariablethatbelongstothewaterstoragetankmodelortheicestorage tankmodelisnotastepfunction.Thecontrolledvariables(Section4.9.1)andthe variablesregardingtheheatingdemandswereusedinfilteringthedummyvalues.Any ofthemservedasaclassifyingindextorecognizedummyvaluesforcertainstep function.
27
4. Developmentofmathematicalmodel
4.1. Solarcombisystemconfiguration Thesolarcombisystemconsistsofsolarthermalcollector,awaterstoragetank, aradiantfloor,aheatpump,anicestoragetank,andthreecirculatingpumps.Thesolar combisystemconfigurationisillustratedinFig.4.1.Threecirculationloops(ܮͳǡ ܮʹǡ ܮ͵) makeconnectionsamongthesolarthermalcollector,waterstoragetank,icestorage
tank,heatpump,andradiantfloor.Thecirculatingpumpsdrivewater,theheattransfer
fluid,circulatingalongtheloopstotransferheatamongtheconnectedequipment.The solarthermalcollectortrapssolarheatinputtothecombisystem,andtheheatisstored inthewaterstoragetankandicestoragetank.Byusingsolarthermalenergyand
electricity,thecombisystemcoverstheneedsfordomestichotwaterandresidential spaceheating.Coldwaterfromthecitymainisheatedinthewaterstoragetank.While preparingdomestichotwater,thewaterstoragetankalsosuppliesheatbeingusedfor spaceheating.Thespaceheatingisprovidedbytheradiantfloorusingheatsupplied fromthewaterstoragetank,orbytheheatpump.Theheatpumpextractsheatfrom theicestoragetanktosupply,inagivensequence,theradiantfloor,andthewater storagetankaswell.
28
Fig.4.1Schematicofsolarcombisystemconfiguration Themodelingisbasedonthecombisystemcharacteristicsandresidentialdesign requirements.Thecombisystemcharacteristicsincludetheinsolationdensity,outdoor airdrybulbtemperature,andmainwatertemperature.Theresidentialdesign requirementsincludethesensibleheatingload,designindoortemperature,and domestichotwaterconsumption.Assumptionsbeingmadeforthemodelinginclude,
Thepressureofwaterisassumedtobeconstantatthestandardatmosphere
pressure;
Heattransfertotheheattransferwaterduetoelectricalpowerinputto
circulatingpumpsisneglected;
Heattransferthroughthecirculationlooppipesisneglected;
29 Heatstorageinpipewalls,deviceshellandattachedinsulations,floormaterial
andsurfaceattachmentisneglected;
Tankshellisassumedtobeuniformlyinsulated;neglectingpipeentranceon
tankshellaswellasjunctionsofthermalorcontrolinstruments;
Themagnitudeofimmersionheatexchangers,mountedinthewaterstorage
tank,isneglected.Thus,thevolumeofimmersionheatexchangerdoesnot
reducetheinsidevolumeofwaterstoragetank;
Theturbulenceofjetflow(duetowaterdrawnͲoff)inthewaterstoragetankis
neglected;
Thermaltransmittanceofthepipewalls,deviceshell,andinsulationmaterialis
constant.Filmresistanceontheexteriorsurfaceofstoragetanksisconstant.
Thischapterpresentsthemathematicalmodelsofthesolarcombisystem components,andtheintegrationofallmodelstocomprisethecombisystemcomputer model.
4.2. Mathematicalmodelofsolarthermalcollector Thesolarthermalcollector(Fig.4.2)absorbssolarradiationthatistransferredto
theheatsinkthroughthecirculationloopusingwaterastheworkingfluid.The mathematicalmodelcalculatestheheattransferredbytheworkingfluidandthefluid leavingtemperature.
30
Fig.4.2Schematicofsolarthermalcollectormodel
4.2.1. Solarheatabsorptionandloss
Theincidentsolarradiationonthesolarthermalcollectoriscalculatedas:
ሶ ሶ ܳ௦ ൌܩܣ݊ ǡ (4.1)
ሶ where,ܳ௦ istheinsolationrateupontiltedsolarthermalcollectorwhenthesolar
thermalcollectorisoperated;ܩሶisthepowerdensityofinsolationupontiltedcollector
panelsurface;ܣisthegrossareaofsinglesolarthermalcollectorpanel;݊ isthe
numberofsolarthermalcollectorpanel.
Theabsorbedsolarenergyiscalculatedasfunctionofthethermalefficiencyof
solarthermalcollector,ߟ,andtheincidentinsolationas:
ሶ ሶ ܳ ൌߟ ܳ௦ ǡ (4.2)
where,
ଶ ܶ െܶ ൫ܶ െܶ൯ ߟ ൌܽ ܽ ǡ௪ ܽ ǡ௪ ǡ (4.3) ଵ ܩሶ ଶ ܩሶ
31 ܳሶ isthesolarheatabsorptionrateofsolarthermalcollector;ܽ ǥܽଶarethe
coefficientsofsolarcollectorthermalefficiency;ܶǡ௪ isthetemperatureofwater
enteringthesolarthermalcollector;ܶistheoutdoorairtemperature.Forthe
calculationsofsolarcollectorthermalefficiency,twosituationsareexcluded:(1)ߟ<
0,and(2)ߟ>1.ConstraintsrequiredtoapplyEqn.(4.3)arepresentedinAppendixA.
ሶ Thesolarenergylossrateatthesolarthermalcollector,ܧ௦௦ ,iscalculatedas:
ሶ ሶ ܧ௦௦ ൌ൫ͳെߟ ൯ܳ௦ Ǥ (4.4)
Thesurfaceareaܣ,thenumber݊ ,andthecoefficientsܽǡܽଵǡܽଶ,are
inputparameters.TheCertificationandRatingsheetofselectedsolarthermalcollector
productprovidessuchinformation.Forinstance,thestudiedcasesimulatedtheEmpire
ECͲ24glazedflatplatesolarcollector(SunEarth2012)of14panelsinparallel.Each
2 2 panelhastheareaof2.298m .Thecoefficientsareܽ=0.728,ܽଵ=Ͳ2.98830W/(m ͼԨ),
2 2 ܽଶ=Ͳ0.01930W/(m ͼԨ ).Thecoefficientܽhaspositivevalue;thecoefficientsܽଵǡܽଶ
havenegativevaluestotakeintoaccountthedecreaseofefficiencyduetoheatloss.
Theinsolationܩሶandthetemperatureܶareinputvariables.Forinstance,the
casestudywasperformedforMontreal.Theinsolationdensityonthetiltedsurfaceof
60°duesouth,andthelocaloutdoordrybulbtemperaturewereused.Theseweather
informationwereextractedfromtheweatherdatafileTMY2ofTRNSYS16simulation
environment(Klein2006)at15minutestimestep.
32 4.2.2. Enteringtemperatureofheattransferfluid
Theenteringtemperatureofheattransferfluidisdeterminedbytheoperation
ofotherdeviceconnectedtothesolarthermalcollector.Theenteringtemperatureis
theinputofthesolarthermalcollectormodel.
Thewaterstoragetankandicestoragetankaretheheatsinksofsolarthermal
collectorinthesolarcombisystem.Operatingthesolarthermalcollectoragainstoneof
thestoragetanksatatime,thetemperatureofwaterinthestoragetankistakenasthe
temperatureofwaterenteringthesolarthermalcollector,
ேଵ ݐܽ݊݇ ݁݃ܽݎݐݏ ݎݐ ݓܽݐ݁ݏ݊݅ܽ݃ܽ ܶ௪ ǡ ܶǡ௪ ൌ൜ ௐ ǡ (4.5) ݐܽ݊݇ ݁݃ܽݎݐݏ ݁ܿ݅ ݐݏ݊݅ܽ݃ܽ ௪ ǡܶ
ேଵ where,ܶ௪ isthetemperatureofthewaterͲnodeܰͳinthewaterstoragetank(Section
ௐ 4.5.1);ܶ௪ isthetemperatureofthewaterͲlayerintheicestoragetank(Section4.4.1).
Theheattransferrateofsolarthermalcollectorܳሶ isnotedasܳሶ ସௐ்for
thetransfertothewaterstoragetankandܳሶ ସூ்forthetransfertotheicestorage
tank.
4.2.3. Leavingtemperatureofheattransferfluid
Thetemperatureofwaterleavingthesolarthermalcollector,ܶ௨௧ǡ௪,is
calculatedas:
ሶ ܳ ܶ௨௧ǡ௪ ൌܶ ǡ (4.6) ǡ௪ ݉ሶ ܥ ௪ ௪
33 and
݉ሶ ௪ ൌߩ௪ ܸ௪ሶ ǡ (4.7)
ሶ ሶ ܸ௪ ൌܸ௨௧ ܣ݊ Ǥ (4.8)
ሶ ሶ where,݉ሶ ௪ isthemassflowrateofwater;ܸ௪ isthevolumeflowrateofwater,ܸ௨௧
isthevolumeflowrateperunitcollectorarea.Thewaterproperties,constantpressure
specificheatܥ anddensityߩ,areestimatedattheaveragetemperatureof ௪ ௪
waterthroughthesolarthermalcollector,ܶ௩ǡ௪,as:
൫ܶ ܶ௨௧ǡ௪൯ ܶ ൌ ǡ௪ Ǥ (4.9) ௩ǡ௪ ʹ ሶ ሶ Ͳ6 Thevolumeflowrateܸ௨௧ istheinputparameter.Forinstanceܸ௨௧ =20.1×10
m3/(sͼm2)wasusedinthiscasestudyreferringtoCertificationandRatingsheetof
EmpireECͲ24(SunEarth2012).
4.2.4. Exergyanalysisofsolarthermalcollector
Thissectionpresentstheexergyanalysisofthesolarthermalcollectoroperation
byregardingthesolarthermalcollectorasthethermodynamicopensystem.Theexergy
balanceequationisestablishedconsideringtheabsorptionofsolarradiation,theflowof
water,andtheexergydestroyedduringtheoperation.
34 Specificexergyoffluids
Thevelocityofsubstanceandtheelevationofsubstanceareneglectedto calculatethespecificexergyofthefluid.Thespecificexergyoftheflowmass߰,e.g. liquidwater,iscalculatedas:
߰ൌ݄െܶܭݏǡ (4.10)
andthespecificexergyofthenonͲflowmass߮,e.g.solidwater(ice),iscalculatedas:
(ǡ (4.11ݏܭ߮ൌݑܲݒെܶ
isthespecificentropy;ݑisthespecificinternalݏ;where,݄isthespecificenthalpy
Ͳistheܭܶ;energy;ݒisthespecificvolume;ܲͲisthepressureatthereferencestate
absolutetemperatureatthereferencestate.Eqn.(4.10)and(4.11)arereferredto
Cengel&Boles(2002).
Solarexergyabsorption
ሶ Thesolarexergyinputrate,ܺ௦,duetotheabsorbedsolarenengyiscalculated as:
ሶ ሶ ܺ௦ ൌܳ หߪ௦หǡ (4.12)
where,ߪ௦istheexergy/energyratioofradiationwithrespecttotheSun’s temperature(Petela1964),
ସ Ͷ ܶܭ ͳ ܶܭ ߪ௦ ൌͳെ ቆ ቇ ǡ (4.13) ͵ ܶܭ௦௨ ͵ ܶܭ௦௨
ܶܭ௦௨istheabsolutetemperatureoftheSun,5700K(Petela2010).
35 Thesolarexergyabsorptioniscalculatedwiththeassociatedsolarenergy
absorption.Thesolarenergyabsorptionisthenetoftheincidentsolarenergyonthe
solarthermalcollectorpanelsurfaceandthelossoftheincidentoccurredatthesame
timeinvariousways.
Exergyofwaterflowthroughsolarthermalcollector
Theexergytransferratebywaterflowthroughthesolarthermalcollector,ܺሶ ,
iscalculatedas:
ሶ ܺ ൌ݉ሶ ௪ ൫߰௨௧ǡ௪ െ߰ǡ௪൯ǡ (4.14)
where,߰௨௧ǡ௪isthespecificexergyofwaterleavingthesolarthermalcollector;߰ǡ௪is
thespecificexergyofwaterenteringthesolarthermalcollector.
Theexergytransferrateofsolarthermalcollectorܺሶ isnotedasܺሶ ସௐ்for
thetransfertothewaterstoragetank,andܺሶ ସூ்forthetransfertotheicestorage
tank.
Exergydestructionandexergeticefficiency
ሶ Theexergydestructionratebythesolarthermalcollectoroperation,ܺௗ௦௧,is
obtainedfromtheexergybalanceequation:
ሶ ሶ ሶ ܺௗ௦௧ ൌܺ௦ െܺ ǡ (4.15)
Theexergeticefficiencyofthesolarthermalcollectoroperation,ߟூூ ,iscalculatedas:
ܺሶ ߟ ൌͳെ ௗ௦௧Ǥ (4.16) ூூ ሶ ܺ௦
36
4.3. MathematicalmodelofwaterͲtoͲwaterheatpump Theheatpump(Fig.4.3)isoperatedunderthevaporcompressionrefrigeration cycleoftherefrigerant.Theheatpumpevaporatorisconnectedtotheheatsourceby onecirculationloop.Theheatpumpcondenserisconnectedtotheheatsinkbyanother circulationloop.Byoperatingtheheatpump,heatistransferredfromtheheatsource totheheatsink.Themathematicalmodelcalculatestheelectricpowerinputtothe waterͲtoͲwaterheatpump,theheattransferredbyheattransferfluids,andthefluid
leavingtemperatures.
Fig.4.3Schematicofheatpumpmodel
4.3.1. Electricpowerandheatingcapacity
Theelectricpower,ܹሶ ு,andtheheatoutputrateatthecondenser,ܳሶ ௗ,are
estimatedforgiveninlettemperatureandvolumeflowrateatbothofcondenserand evaporatorusingaregressionmodeldevelopedbyTang(2005):
37
ௗ ா௩ ௗ ா௩ ܶܭ ܶܭ ܸ௪ሶ ܸሶ ܹሶ ு ൌ൭ܾ ܾ ǡ௪ ܾ ǡ௪ ܾ ܾ ௪ ൱ܹሶ ு ǡ ଵ ʹͺ͵Ǥͳͷ ଶ ʹͺ͵Ǥͳͷ ଷ ܸሶ ௗ ସ ሶ ா௩ ௦ ௦ ܸ௦ (4.17)
ௗ ா௩ ௗ ா௩ ܶܭ ܶܭ ܸ௪ሶ ܸሶ ܳሶ ௗ ൌ൭݀ ݀ ǡ௪ ݀ ǡ௪ ݀ ݀ ௪ ൱ܳሶ ௗǡ ଵ ʹͺ͵Ǥͳͷ ଶ ʹͺ͵Ǥͳͷ ଷ ܸሶ ௗ ସ ሶ ா௩ ௦ ௦ ܸ௦ (4.18)
ௗ ா௩ where,ܶܭǡ௪ istheabsolutetemperatureofwaterenteringthecondenser;ܶܭǡ௪ is
ௗ theabsolutetemperatureofwaterenteringtheevaporator;ܸ௪ሶ isthevolumeflow
ሶ ா௩ rateofwaterthroughthecondenser;ܸ௪ isthevolumeflowrateofwaterthrough theevaporator.Thesubscript ௦denotesthephysicalquantityatthebaseline condition.ThesoͲcalledreferenceconditioninTang(2005)iscalledbaselineconditionin thisthesistoavoidtheconfusionwiththereferencestateofthethermodynamic analysis.
ሶ ு ሶ ௗ Thecoefficientsܾǡܾଵǡǥܾସand݀ǡ݀ଵǡǥ݀ସ,andthequantitiesܹ௦ǡܳ௦ ǡ
ሶ ௗ ሶ ா௩ ܸ௦ andܸ௦ arespecificvaluesassignedbytheuserforaspecifiedheatpump.The tencoefficientsandfourquantitiesareidentifiedasconstantsusingregression
ௗ ா௩ technique.Theabsolutetemperaturesܶܭǡ௪ andܶܭǡ௪ ,andthevolumeflowrates
ሶ ௗ ሶ ா௩ ܸ௪ andܸ௪ aredependentvariables.Table4.1showsthecoefficientsandthe
baselineconditionofthecaseheatpumpusedinthisstudypreparedforaheatpump
GeoSmartHS050(GeoSmart2012)usingStatGraphicssoftware(StatPoint2012).
38 Table4.1Coefficientsandbaselineconditionofcaseheatpump
Coefficientsof ܾ ܾଵ ܾଶ ܾଷ ܾସ electricpowerinput, dimensionless Ͳ6.32321 0.498219 6.52788 0.0211943Ͳ0.115108
Coefficientsof ݀ ݀ଵ ݀ଶ ݀ଷ ݀ସ heatoutputrate, dimensionless Ͳ2.36262 4.11641Ͳ0.949693 0.0853777Ͳ0.0135187 ா௩ ܹሶ ு ܳሶ ௗ ܸሶ ௗ ܸሶ Baselinecondition ௦ ௦ ௦ ௦ 3390W 21072W 9.46×10Ͳ3m3/s 9.46×10Ͳ3m3/s Eqns.(4.19)and(4.20)areusedtocalculatethepowerܹሶ ுandheatoutput rateܳሶ ௗofthemodeledcaseheatpump.
ா௩ ܶܭௗ ܶܭ ܹሶ ு ൌ ൭െǤ͵ʹ͵ʹͳ ͲǤͶͻͺʹͳͻ ǡ௪ Ǥͷʹͺͺ ǡ௪ ʹͺ͵Ǥͳͷ ʹͺ͵Ǥͳͷ (4.19) ௗ ா௩ ܸ௪ሶ ܸሶ ͲǤͲʹͳͳͻͶ͵ െ ͲǤͳͳͷͳͲͺ ௪ ൱ ൈ ͵͵ͻͲǡ ͲǤͲͲͲͻͶ͵ͷ͵ ͲǤͲͲͲͻͶ͵ͷ͵
ா௩ ܶܭௗ ܶܭ ܳሶ ௗ ൌ ൭െʹǤ͵ʹʹ ͶǤͳͳͶͳ ǡ௪ െ ͲǤͻͶͻͻ͵ ǡ௪ ʹͺ͵Ǥͳͷ ʹͺ͵Ǥͳͷ
ܸሶ ௗ ܸሶ ா௩ (4.20) ͲǤͲͺͷ͵ ௪ െ ͲǤͲͳ͵ͷͳͺ ௪ ൱ ͲǤͲͲͲͻͶ͵ͷ͵ ͲǤͲͲͲͻͶ͵ͷ͵
ൈ ʹͳͲʹǤ
Inthisstudy,theheatpumphasequalflowratesatthecondensersideandthe evaporatorside.Thebaselineconditionwaschosenwithequalflowratesaswell(Table
4.1).TheCoefficientofPerformance(COP)wascalculatedfromEqns.(4.19)and(4.20) andcomparedwiththecaseheatpumpperformancedata.Thecomparisonisfairly good(seeresults).However,whentheflowratesareunequal,theresultsarenotin agreementwiththemanufacturer’sdata.
39 Shenoy(2004)indicatedtheuseofcomputermodelofthemanufacturerto generatethetechnicaldatatablewithafewmeasuredpointsobtainedfromthetesting process.Inpreparingthecaseheatpumpmodel,samplepointswerecarefullychosen byexaminingthereversiblecycleCOP(Cengel&Boles2002):
ܶܭு ܥܱܲ௩ ൌ ǡ (4.21) ܶܭு െܶܭ
where,ܥܱܲ௩isthereversiblecycleCOP;ܶܭுistheabsolutetemperatureofthehighͲ temperaturereservoir;ܶܭistheabsolutetemperatureofthelowͲtemperature reservoir.Thehightemperaturecorrespondstotheenteringtemperatureatthe condenser,thelowtemperaturetotheenteringtemperatureattheevaporator.Among theperformancedataofthecaseheatpump,thepointscorrespondingtoܥܱܲ௩in
negativeoratunreasonablehighvalues(uptohundredseventhousands)wererejected.
Withtheelectricpowerinputandheatoutputrate,theCOPofheatpump,
ܥܱܲு,iscalculatedas:
ܳሶ ௗ ܥܱܲு ൌ Ǥ (4.22) ܹሶ ு
4.3.2. Flowratesandenteringtemperaturesofheattransferfluids
ሶ ௗ ሶ ா௩ Theflowratesܸ௪ andܸ௪ areinputparametersoftheheatpumpmodel.
ሶ ௗ ሶ ா௩ Ͳ3 3 Inthisstudy,ܸ௪ =ܸ௪ =9.46×10 m /s,referredtothecaseheatpump performancedata.
40 Theenteringtemperaturesofheattransferfluidsaredeterminedbythe operationofotherdevicesconnectedtotheheatpump.Theenteringtemperaturesare theinputsoftheheatpumpmodel.Attheheatpumpevaporatorside,theentering
ௐ temperatureistakenthetemperatureofthewaterͲlayerܶ௪ intheicestoragetank
(Section4.4.1)as:
ா௩ ௐ ܶܭǡ௪ ൌ ʹ͵Ǥͳͷ ܶ௪ Ǥ (4.23)
Atthecondenserside,thewaterstoragetankandtheradiantflooraretheheatsinks.
Thetemperatureofwaterenteringthecondensereitheristhetemperatureofwater
ோி ேଵ leavingtheradiantfloorܶ௨௧ǡ௪(Section4.6.1),orthewaterͲnodetemperatureܶ௪ in
thewaterstoragetank(Section4.5.1),orthemassͲweightedaveragetemperatureof thosetwoas:
ௗ ܶܭǡ௪
ோி ݎݐ݂݈݊ܽ݅݀ܽݎݐݏ݊݅ܽ݃ܽ ͵Ǥͳͷ ܶ௨௧ǡ௪ǡʹ ۓ ேଵ ۖ ݐܽ݊݇݁݃ܽݎݐݏݎݐݓܽݐ݁ݏ݊݅ܽ݃ܽ ͵Ǥͳͷ ܶ௪ ǡʹ ൌ ோி ோி ௗ ோி ேଵ ǡ ሶ ௪ ܶ௨௧ǡ௪ ሺ݉ሶ ௪ െ݉ሶ ௪ ሻܶ௪݉ ۔ ݐܽ݊݇ ݁݃ܽݎݐݏݎݓܽݐ݁݀݊ܽݎݐ ݂݈݊ܽ݅݀ܽݎ ݐ ܾݐ݄ݏ݊݅ܽ݃ܽ ͵Ǥͳͷ ௗ ǡʹۖ ሶ ௪݉ ە
(4.24)
where,
ௗ ௗ ௗ ݉ሶ ௪ ൌߩǡ௪ܸ௪ሶ ǡ (4.25)
ோி ேଵ ܶ௨௧ǡ௪isthetemperatureofwaterleavingtheradiantfloor;ܶ௪ isthetemperatureof
ோி thewaterͲnodeܰͳofthewaterstoragetank;݉ሶ ௪ isthemassflowrateofwater
ௗ throughtheradiantfloor;݉ሶ ௪ isthemassflowrateofwaterthroughtheheatpump
ௗ condenser;ߩǡ௪isthemeandensityofwaterthroughthecondenser.
41 ௗ Thedensityߩǡ௪iscalculatedatthemeanwatertemperatureoverthe
certainperiodoftimeݐ(݇=1…݇),asof
σ ܶௗ ୀଵ ௩ǡ௪௧ ܶௗ ൌ ೖǡ (4.26) ǡ௪ ݇
where,
ௗ ௗ ܶ ܶ௨௧ǡ௪ ܶௗ ൌ ǡ௪ Ǥ (4.27) ௩ǡ௪ ʹ
Thetimeintervalݐ(݇=1…݇)denotesthetimeintervalwhentheheatpumpisin
ௗ operation;thetemperatureܶ௩ǡ௪istheaveragetemperatureofwaterthroughthe condenser.
ௗ Theaveragetemperatureܶ௩ǡ௪ isstepfunction.Themeantemperature ௧ೖ
ௗ ܶǡ௪thereforeonlycorrespondstothetimespanswhentheheatpumpisturnedon.
Inthemodel,themeanistheinputparameteroftheheatpumpmodel.Theinputtothe
ௗ modeledcasewasbasedontheEqns.(4.26)and(4.27).Thestudiedcaseusedܶǡ௪=
44.1Ԩ,whichisthemeanvalueduringtheheatingseasonwhentheheatpumpison operation.
4.3.3. Energybalanceandleavingtemperaturesofheattransferfluids
Theheatinputrateattheevaporator,ܳሶ ா௩,isderivedfromtheheatpump energybalanceequationas:
ܳሶ ா௩ ൌܳሶ ௗ െܹሶ ுǤ (4.28)
42 ௗ Thetemperatureofwaterleavingthecondenser,ܶ௨௧ǡ௪,iscalculatedas:
ሶ ௗ ௗ ௗ ܳ ܶ௨௧ǡ௪ ൌܶ ǡ (4.29) ǡ௪ ݉ሶ ௗܥ ௗ ௪ ǡ௪
ௗ where,݉ሶ ௪ isthemassflowrateofwaterthroughthecondenser;theconstant pressurespecificheatܥ ௗ iscalculatedatthetemperatureܶௗ . ǡ௪ ǡ௪
ா௩ Thetemperatureofwaterleavingtheevaporator,ܶ௨௧ǡ௪,iscalculatedas:
ሶ ா௩ ா௩ ா௩ ܳ ܶ ൌܶ െ ǡ (4.30) ௨௧ǡ௪ ǡ௪ ݉ሶ ா௩ܥ ா௩ ௪ ǡ௪
where,
ா௩ ா௩ ሶ ா௩ ݉ሶ ௪ ൌߩǡ௪ܸ௪ ǡ (4.31)
݉ሶ ா௩isthemassflowrateofwaterthroughtheevaporator;ܥ ா௩ isthemean ௪ ǡ௪
ா௩ constantpressurespecificheatofwaterthroughtheevaporator;ߩǡ௪isthemean
densityofwaterthroughtheevaporator.
ா௩ Thewaterproperties,thedensityߩǡ௪andconstantpressurespecificheat
ܥ ா௩ ,arecalculatedasatthemeanwatertemperatureoverthecertainperiodof ǡ௪
timeݐ(݇=1…݇),asof
σ ܶா௩ ୀଵ ௩ǡ௪௧ ܶா௩ ൌ ೖǡ (4.32) ǡ௪ ݇
where,theaveragetemperatureofwaterthroughtheevaporator
43 ா௩ ா௩ ܶ ܶ௨௧ǡ௪ ܶா௩ ൌ ǡ௪ Ǥ (4.33) ௩ǡ௪ ʹ
ா௩ Themeantemperatureܶǡ௪istheinputparameteroftheheatpumpmodel.The
ா௩ studiedcaseusedܶǡ௪=3.9Ԩ,whichisthemeanvalueduringtheheatseason
whentheheatpumpisturnedon.
4.3.4. Icemassfractionatevaporatoroutlet
Icemassfraction,ߦ,isthefractionalmassflowrateofsolidwater(ice)inthe waterthroughtheevaporator.Themassflowrateofsolidwater,liquidwater,andthe overallwithoutdistinguishingphasesaresubjecttothefollowingrelations:
ா௩ ா௩ ݉ሶ ௪ ൌߦ݉ሶ ௪ ǡ (4.34)
ா௩ ா௩ ݉ሶ ௪ ൌ ሺͳെߦሻ݉ሶ ௪ ǡ (4.35)
ா௩ ா௩ where,݉ሶ ௪ isthemassflowrateofsolidwater(ice)leavingtheevaporator;݉ሶ ௪ is
themassflowrateofliquidwaterleavingtheevaporator.
Theheattransferrateattheevaporatorcanbeformulatedas:
ܳሶ ா௩ ൌ݉ሶ ா௩ܮ ݉ሶ ா௩ܥ ா௩ ൫ܶா௩ െܶா௩ ൯ǡ ௪ ௪ ௪ ௩ǡ௪ ǡ௪ ௨௧ǡ௪ (4.36)
where,ܮ௪isthespecificenthalpyoffusionofwater,333606J/kg.Theconstant pressurespecificheatܥ ா௩ iscalculatedattheaveragetemperatureofwateratthe ௩ǡ௪ evaporator,
44 ா௩ ா௩ ܶǡ௪ ܶ௨௧ǡ௪ ܶா௩ ൌ ǡ (4.37) ௩ǡ௪ ʹ
ா௩ where,ܶ௨௧ǡ௪isthetemperatureofliquidwaterleavingtheevaporator.When
ா௩ solidificationoccurs,theliquidwatertemperatureisnotedbyܶ௨௧ǡ௪,whilethesolid
ா௩ watertemperatureisnotedbyܶ௨௧ǡ௪.Theliquidwatertemperatureisestimatedas
0.01Ԩ.Thesolidwatertemperatureisestimatedas0ԨregardlessofsubͲcooling
(Tamasauskasetal.2012).
BysubstitutingEqns.(4.34)and(4.35)ontoEqn.(4.36),themassfractionis
derivedas:
ா௩ ܳሶ ா௩ ா௩ ா௩ െܥ ൫ܶ െܶ ൯ ݉ሶ ா௩ ௩ǡ௪ ǡ௪ ௨௧ǡ௪ ߦൌ ௪ Ǥ (4.38) ܮ െܥ ா௩ ቀܶா௩ െܶா௩ ቁ ௪ ௩ǡ௪ ǡ௪ ௨௧ǡ௪
4.3.5. Isentropicefficiencyofcompressor
Theisentropicefficiencyofcompressorisameasureofthedeviationofthe
compressoroperationfromthecorrespondingidealprocess.Thecompressorisentropic
efficiency,ߟ௦ ,iscalculatedas:
ܹሶ ு ߟ ൌ ௦ǡ (4.39) ௦ ܹሶ ு
ሶ ு where,ܹ௦istheisentropiccompressionpower.
ሶ ு Theisentropicpowerܹ௦isobtainedbymodelingthevaporcompression
refrigerationcycle.Fig.4.4illustratesthesingleͲstagevaporcompressionrefrigeration
45 cycleintemperatureͲentropy(TͲS)diagram.Thepoints1,2,4…8arethekeystatesof therefrigerantundertheoperationofheatpump.IncounterͲclockwisetheactual processisrepresentedby1ї2forthecompressioninthecompressor,2ї4ї5ї6for
thedeͲsuperheating,condensation,andsubͲcoolinginthecondenser,6ї7forinthe expansionvalve,7ї8ї1forthevaporizationandsuperheatingintheevaporator.The pressuresofvaporizationandcondensationareindicatedbyܲandܲ,alongwithܶ andܶasofthecorrespondingtemperatures.Theprocessofisentropiccompressionis representedbythetransformation1ї3.Theisentropicpoweriscalculatedin
ሶ ܹ௦ ൌ݉ሶ ൫݄ǡଷ െ݄ǡଵ൯ǡ (4.40)
where,
ܹሶ ு ݉ሶ ൌ ǡ (4.41) ሺܲ െܲሻݒǡଵ
݉ሶ isthemassflowrateofrefrigerant;݄ǡଷisthespecificenthalpyofrefrigerantatthe
state3;݄ǡଵisthespecificenthalpyofrefrigerantatthestate1;ݒǡଵisthespecific
volumeofrefrigerantatthestate1.Eqn.(4.39)to(4.41)arereferredtoCengel&Boles
(2002).
Byconsultingthetechnicalinformationofthecaseheatpump(GeoSmart2012), therefrigerantR410Awasusedinthisstudy,alongwiththeoperatingparameters presentedinTable4.2.Wherethecondition,thetemperatureofwaterenteringthe condenserat21.1Ԩǡwasdeterminedreferringtotheleavingtemperatureofwaterat theradiantfloor(SectionͶǤǤͳ).
46
Fig.4.4TͲSdiagramofsingleͲstagevapourcompressionrefrigerationcycle
Table4.2Operatingparametersofcaseheatpump(GeoSmart2012) Temperatureofwaterenteringcondenserat21.1Ԩ Temperatureofwaterenteringevaporator,Ԩ tч10 10<tч21.11 t>21.11 Suctionpressure,kPa 468.84 520.55 572.27 Dischargepressure,kPa 1727.14 1825.39 1923.64 Superheattemperature difference,Ԩ 4.72 5.97 7.22
4.3.6. Heatoutput
Theheatoutputfromtheheatpumpistransferredtothewaterstoragetank and/ortheradiantfloor.Whenonlythewaterstoragetankneedsheatfromtheheat pump,thefollowingconditionapplies:
ܳሶ ுସோி ൌͲǡ (4.42)
ܳሶ ுସௐ் ൌܳሶ ௗǤ (4.43)
Whenboththewaterstoragetankandtheradiantfloorneedheat,theneedof theradiantfloorissatisfiedfirstwhilethewaterstoragetankissuppliedwiththe excessiveheat.Theheattransferratefromthecondenserܳሶ ௗisnotedasܳሶ ுସௐ்for
47 thetransfertothewaterstoragetank,andܳሶ ுସோிforthetransfertotheradiantfloor.
Theheatdistributioniscomputedusingthefollowingrelations:
ܳሶ ுସோி ൌܳሶ ோி ቊ ௗௗ ǡ ݂݅ ܳሶ ோி ൏ܳሶ ௗ ሶ ுସௐ் ሶ ௗ ሶ ோி ௗௗ ܳ ൌܳ െܳௗௗ (4.44) ܳሶ ுସோி ൌܳሶ ௗ ቊ ǡ ݂݅ ܳሶ ோி ܳሶ ௗ ܳሶ ுସௐ் ൌͲ ௗௗ
ሶ ோி where,ܳௗௗisthedemandedheattransferrateoftheradiantfloor.
4.3.7. Exergyanalysisofheatpump
Thissectionpresentstheexergyanalysisoftheheatpumpoperationby regardingtheheatpumpasathermodynamicopensystem.Theexergybalance equationisestablishedconsideringtheuseofelectricity,theflowsofwater,andthe exergydestroyedduringtheoperation.
Exergyofwaterflowsthroughevaporatorandcondenser
Thenetexergytransferratebywaterflowthroughtheevaporator,ܺሶ ா௩,is
estimatedas
ሶ ா௩ ா௩ ா௩ ா௩ ா௩ ா௩ ா௩ ܺ ൌ݉ሶ ௪ ߰ǡ௪ െ൫݉ሶ ௪ ߰௨௧ǡ௪ ݉ሶ ௪ ߮௨௧ǡ௪൯ǡ (4.45)
ா௩ ா௩ where,߰ǡ௪ isthespecificexergyofwaterenteringtheevaporator;߰௨௧ǡ௪isthe
ா௩ specificexergyofliquidwaterleavingtheevaporator;߮௨௧ǡ௪isthespecificexergyof
thesolidwaterleavingtheevaporator.
48 Thenetexergytransferratebywaterflowthroughthecondenser,ܺሶ ௗ,is
estimatedas
ሶ ௗ ௗ ௗ ௗ ܺ ൌ݉ሶ ௪ ൫߰௨௧ǡ௪ െ߰ǡ௪ ൯ǡ (4.46)
ௗ ௗ where,߰௨௧ǡ௪isthespecificexergyofwaterleavingthecondenser;߰ǡ௪ isthespecific
exergyofwaterenteringthecondenser.
Theexergyistransferredthroughthecirculationloopܮ͵fromtheheatpump condensertotheradiantfloorand/orthewaterstoragetank.Theexergytransferrate totheradiantfloorisnotedasܺሶ ுସோி,andthattothewaterstoragetankasܺሶ ுସௐ்.
Therefore,
ܺሶ ௗ ൌܺሶ ுସோி ܺሶ ுସௐ்Ǥ (4.47)
Exergydestructionandexergeticefficiency
ሶ ு Theexergydestructionratebytheheatpumpoperation,ܺௗ௦௧,isobtainedfrom
theexergybalanceequation:
ሶ ு ሶ ு ሶ ா௩ ሶ ௗ ܺௗ௦௧ ൌܹ ܺ െܺ ǡ (4.48)
ு Theexergeticefficiencyoftheheatpumpoperation,ߟூூ ,iscalculatedas:
ሶ ு ு ܺௗ௦௧ ߟூூ ൌͳെ Ǥ (4.49) ܹሶ ு ܺሶ ா௩
49 4.4. Mathematicalmodeloficestoragetank Thestoragetank(Fig.4.5)containswaterasthestoragemedia,allowingthe coexistenceofliquidwaterandsolidwater.Thestoragetankisoperatedbetweena heatsourceandaheatsink.Themathematicalmodelsimulatestheicestoragetank operationtocalculatethetemperatureofwaterandthemassoficeinthestoragetank.
Fig.4.5Schematicoficestoragetankmodel Inthecaseofonlyliquidphase,thestoragemediaisonehomogeneouswaterͲ layer.Inthegeneralcaseoftwophases,thereisonehomogeneouswaterͲlayerbelow onehomogeneousiceͲlayer.Whentheicestoragetankisundertheheattransferwith theheatsourceand/ortheheatsink,thereisflowofwaterthroughthestoragemedia fromtoptobottom.Inthegeneralcase,thewaterflowcontainssolidwater(ice)and liquidwater.Theliquidwateriscalledpassingflowinhere,whichacrosstheiceͲlayer flowintothewaterͲlayer,whiletheiceaccumulatestheiceͲlayer.Theheattransferof
theicestoragetanktakesplace:(i)acrossthecontactsurfacebetweentheiceͲlayerand
waterͲlayer;(ii)throughthestoragetanksurfacewiththesurroundingenvironment;(iii)
50 bythepassingflowwiththeheatsourceandheatsink.Thissectionpresentstheice storagetankmodelbyTamasauskasetal.(2012)withmodifications.
4.4.1. EnergybalanceoficeͲlayerandwaterͲlayer
TheenergybalanceequationoftheiceͲlayerisasfollows:
ሶ ூ ሶ ூ ሶ ூ ሶ ூ ூ் ܳ௦௧ ൌܳ௧ ܳ௫௧ ܳ െܮ௪݉ሶ ௪ ǡ (4.50)
ሶ ூ ሶ ூ where,ܳ௦௧istheenergychangerateoftheiceͲlayer;ܳ௧istheheattransferrateof
ூ theiceͲlayerwiththewaterͲlayeracrossthecontactsurfaceinbetween;ܳሶ௫௧isthe
ሶ ூ heattransferoftheiceͲlayerwiththesurroundingsacrossthetanksurface;ܳisthe
heattransferoftheiceͲlayerwiththepassingflow;ܮ௪isthelatentheatoffusionof
ூ் water;݉ሶ ௪ isthemassflowrateofsolidwater(ice)fromtheheatsink.
TermsinEqn.(4.50)havefollowingformulations,
݀݉ூ ܳሶ ூ ൌെ ܮ ǡ (4.51) ௦௧ ݀ݐ ௪
ሶ ூ ூ் ௐ ூ ܳ௧ ൌ݄௦௨௬ܣ௧൫ܶ௪ െܶ൯ǡ (4.52)
ሶ ூ ூ் ூ ூ ூ் ூ ܳ௫௧ ൌ൫ܷ௩௦ ܣ௩௦ ܷ௦ܣ௧൯൫ܶ െܶ൯ǡ (4.53)
ܳሶ ூ ൌ݉ሶ ூ்ܿ ூ் ܶூ் ݉ሶ ூ்ௌܿ ூ்ௌ ܶூ்ௌ െ൫݉ሶ ூ் ݉ሶ ூ்ௌ൯ܿ ூ் ܶூ் Ǥ ௪ ǡ௪ ǡ௪ ௪ ǡ௪ ǡ௪ ௪ ௪ ǡ௪ ǡ௪ (4.54)
ூ ூ் where,ݐisthetime;݉isthemassoftheiceͲlayer;݉ሶ ௪ isthemassflowrateof
ூ்ௌ liquidwaterfromtheicestoragetankheatsink;݉ሶ ௪ isthemassflowrateofwater
ூ ௐ fromtheicestoragetankheatsource;ܶisthetemperatureoftheiceͲlayer;ܶ௪ isthe
ூ் temperatureofthewaterͲlayer;ܶ istheairtemperatureofthesurroundings;ܶǡ௪is
51
thetemperatureofthepassingflow;݄௦௨௬istheheattransfercoefficientbetweenthe
ூ் slurryiceandliquidwater;ܷ௩௦ isthethermaltransmittanceofverticalsurfaceoftheice
ூ storagetank;ܷ௦isthethermaltransmittanceofthehorizontalsurfaceoftheiceͲlayer;
ூ் ூ ܣ௧isthecontactsurfaceareabetweentheiceͲlayerandthewaterͲlayer;ܣ௩௦isthe verticalsurfaceareaoftheiceͲlayer.
TheenergybalanceequationofthewaterͲlayerisasfollows:
ሶ ௐ ሶ ௐ ሶ ௐ ሶ ௐ ܳ௦௧ ൌܳ௧ ܳ௫௧ ܳ ǡ (4.55)
ሶ ௐ ሶ ௐ where,ܳ௦௧istheenergychangerateofthewaterͲlayer;ܳ௧istheheattransferofthe
ௐ waterͲlayerwithiceͲlayeracrossthecontactsurfaceinbetween;ܳሶ௫௧istheheat
ሶ ௐ transferofthewaterͲlayerwiththesurroundingsacrossthetanksurface;ܳ istheheat
transferofthewaterͲlayerwiththepassingflow.
TermsinEqn.(4.55)havefollowingformulations,
ௐ ௐ ௐ ݀ ቀ݉௪ ܿ ܶ௪ ቁ ܳሶ ௐ ൌൌ ௪ ǡ (4.56) ௦௧ ݀ݐ
ሶ ௐ ூ் ூ ௐ ܳ௧ ൌ݄௦௨௬ܣ௧൫ܶ െܶ௪ ൯ǡ (4.57)
ሶ ௐ ூ் ௐ ௐ ூ் ௐ ܳ௫௧ ൌ൫ܷ௩௦ ܣ௩௦ ܷ௦ܣ ൯൫ܶ െܶ௪ ൯ǡ (4.58)
ܳሶ ௐ ൌ൫݉ሶ ூ் ݉ሶ ூ்ௌ൯ܿ ூ் ܶூ் െ ሺ݉ሶ ூ் ݉ሶ ூ்ௌሻܿ ௐܶௐǤ ௪ ௪ ǡ௪ ǡ௪ ௪ ௪ ௪ ௪ (4.59)
ௐ ௐ where,݉௪ isthemassofthewaterͲlayer;ܷ௦isthethermaltransmittanceofthe
ௐ horizontalsurfaceofthewaterͲlayer;ܣ௩௦istheverticalsurfaceareaofthewaterͲlayer;
ூ் ܣ isthebaseareaoftheicestoragetank.
52 4.4.2. Masscontentinicestoragetank
ூ் Thetotalwatermassinsidetheicestoragetank,݉௪ ,consistsofthemassofthe twolayers,
ூ் ூ ௐ ݉௪ ൌ݉ ݉௪ Ǥ (4.60)
Themassfractionoficeintheicestoragetank,ߛ,istheratioasof
݉ூ (4.61) ߛൌ ூ் ǡ ݉௪
where,
ௐ ூ் ߩ௪ ߩ ூ் ݉௪ ൌ ௐ ܸ ǡ (4.62) ߛ௫ߩ௪ ሺͳെߛ௫ሻߩ
andfortherectangulartank,
ܸூ் ൌܪூ்ܹூ்ܮூ்ǡ (4.63)
ௐ ߩ௪ isthedensityofthewaterͲlayer,estimatedwiththemaximumtemperatureofthe
ௐ waterͲlayer,denotedasܶ௫;ߩisthedensityoftheiceͲlayer,estimatedas916.2
3 kg/m foriceat0°C;ߛ௫isthemaximummassfractionoficeintheicestoragetank;
ܸூ்isthevolumeoftheicestoragetank;ܪூ்istheheightoftherectangulartank;ܹூ்
isthewidthoftherectangulartank;ܮூ்isthelengthoftherectangulartank.
Themaximummassfractionoficeߛ௫,themaximumtemperatureofwaterͲ
ௐ ூ் ூ் ூ் layerܶ௫,andthethreedimensionsoftankܪ ǡܹ ,andܮ ,aretheinput parameters.Forinstance,inthecasestudy,ܪூ்=2m,ܹூ்=2m,andܮூ்=3.5m.The maximummassfractionoficeߛ௫issetfortheoperationalrequirement,sincecertain amountofliquidwatershouldbesecuredforthecirculationswiththeheatsourceand
53 ௐ heatsink.ReferringtoSunwell(2012),ߛ௫=0.7.Themaximumtemperatureܶ௫is
setfromtheeconomicconsiderations.Highwatertemperaturedamagesthe possibilitiesofwaterundergoingphasechange,whichdecreasesthethermalstorage
capacity.Besides,theheatpumpactsastheheatsinkoftheicestoragetank.Heat
pumpsusuallygetanoperationrange,intermsoftheenteringtemperatureatthe
ௐ evaporator.BasedontheheatpumpperformancedatafromGeoSmart(2012),ܶ௫=
37.7°C.
4.4.3. Heattransferbetweenlayers
TheheattransferbetweentheiceͲlayerandthewaterͲlayeristreatedasnatural
convectionofwarmwaterunderneathacoldplate(Kreith&Bohn2001),duetothe smallmagnitudeofthepassingflow.Theintensityofheattransferbetweeniceand watervaries(Maciejewski1996).Theheattransfercoefficientbetweeniceandwateris
calculatedas(Kreith&Bohn2001),
ௐ തܰݑതതത௦୳௬݇௪ ݄ ൌ ǡ (4.64) ௦௨௬ ܮூ
ௐ where,ܰݑ௦௨௬istheNusseltnumberoficeslurry;݇௪ istheconductivityofthewaterͲ layer;ܮூisthecharacteristiclength,takenasthewetperimeteroftheiceͲlayer,
ܹூ்ܮூ் ܮூ ൌ Ǥ (4.65) ʹሺܹூ் ܮூ்ሻ
TheNusseltnumberpiecewisedependsontheRayleighnumber(Kreith&Bohn2001),
54 Ͳǡ ܴܽ ͳͲହ ௦௨௬ ۓ ଵ ൗସ ହ (ݑ௦௨௬ ൌ ͲǤͷͶܴܽ௦௨௬ ǡͳͲ൏ܴܽ௦௨௬ ͳͲ ǡ (4.66ܰ ଵ ۔ ൗଷ ͲǤͳͷܴܽ௦௨௬ ǡܴܽ௦௨௬ ͳͲە
where,ܴܽ௦௨௬istheRayleighnumberforiceslurry,
ூ ௐ ܴܽ௦௨௬ ൌܩݎܲݎ௪ ǡ (4.67)
and
ௐ ௐ ௐ ூ ூଷ ݃ߚ௪ ߩ௪ ൫ܶ௪ െܶ ൯ܮ ܩݎூ ൌ Ǥ (4.68) ௐଶ ߤ௪
ூ ௐ ܩݎ istheGrashofnumberoftheiceͲlayer;ܲݎ௪ isthePrandtlnumberofthewaterͲ
ௐ layer;݃isthegravityacceleration;ߩ௪isthedensityofthewaterͲlayer;ܶ௪ isthe
ௐ temperatureofthewaterͲlayer;ߤ௪ istheviscosityofthewaterͲlayer.
TheareaofcontactsurfacebetweentheiceͲlayerandthewaterͲlayeris calculatedas:
ூ் Ͳǡ ݂݅ ߛ൏Ͳ ܣ௧ ൌ൜ ூ் ǡ (4.69) ܣ ǡ ݂݅ ߛͲ
where,
ூ் ூ் ூ் ܣ ൌܹ ܮ ǡ (4.70)
forarectangularstoragetank.
4.4.4. Heattransferwithsurroundings
Theheattransferbetweentheicestoragetankanditssurroundingenvironment
takesplacearoundthestoragetanksurface.Neglectingthethermaltransmittanceof
55 thetankshell,thethermaltransmittanceofverticalsurfaceoftheicestoragetankis
calculatedwith:
ூ் ͳ ܷ௩௦ ൌ ǡ ͳ (4.71) ூ் ܴ௩௦ ܷ௦௨
ூ் where,ܷ௦௨isthethermaltransmittanceofinsulationattachedtotheicestoragetank;
2 ܴ௩௦ isthesurfacefilmresistanceofstillairunderhorizontalheatflow,0.12m ͼԨ/W
(ASHRAE2009c).
ThethermaltransmittanceofthehorizontalsurfaceoficeͲlayerisapiecewise
functionasfollows:
ூ் ூ ܷ௦ǡௗ௪ǡܶ ൏ܶ ூ ூ ܷ௦ ൌ ൞ Ͳǡ ܶ ൌܶ ǡ (4.72) ூ் ூ ܷ௦ǡ௨ǡܶ ܶ
where,
ூ் ͳ ܷ௦ǡௗ௪ ൌ ǡ ͳ (4.73) ூ் ܴ௦ǡௗ௪ ܷ௦௨
ூ் ͳ ܷ௦ǡ௨ ൌ ǡ ͳ (4.74) ூ் ܴ௦ǡ௨ ܷ௦௨
ூ் ܷ௦ǡௗ௪isthethermaltransmittanceoficestoragetankhorizontalsurfaceunderheat
ூ் flowdownward;ܷ௦ǡ௨isthethermaltransmittanceoficestoragetankhorizontal
surfaceunderheatflowupward;ܴ௦ǡௗ௪isthefilmresistanceofstillairunder
2 horizontalsurfaceunderheatflowdownward,0.16m ͼԨ/W(ASHRAE2009c);ܴ௦ǡ௨is
56 thefilmresistanceofstillairunderhorizontalsurfaceunderheatflowupward,0.11 m2ͼԨ/W(ASHRAE2009c).
RespectingtherelationbetweenthewaterͲlayertemperatureandtheindoorair
temperature,thepiecewisefunctionofthethermaltransmittanceofhorizontalsurface ofthewaterͲlayerisas
ூ் ூ் ௐ ܷ௦ǡ௨ ܷ௦ǡௗ௪ሺͳെݏ݃݊ሺߛሻሻǡܶ௪ ൏ܶ ௐ ௐ ܷ௦ ൌ ൞ Ͳǡ ܶ௪ ൌܶ ǡ (4.75) ூ் ூ் ௐ ܷ௦ǡௗ௪ ܷ௦ǡ௨ሺͳെݏ݃݊ሺߛሻሻǡܶ௪ ܶ
where,thesignfunctionݏ݃݊ሺߛሻreturns1forߛ>0,returns0forߛ=0.
TheverticalsurfaceareaoftheiceͲlayerisestimatedas
ூ ூ் ܣ௩௦ ൌߛ௩௦ǡ (4.76)
andtheverticalsurfaceareaofthewaterͲlayer
ௐ ூ் ܣ௩௦ ൌ ሺͳെߛሻܣ௩௦ǡ (4.77)
where,theverticalsurfaceareaoftheiceͲstoragetankwallsis
ூ் ூ் ூ் ூ் ܣ௩௦ ൌʹሺܹ ܮ ሻܪ Ǥ (4.78)
ூ் Thethermaltransmittanceܷ௦௨andthetemperatureܶ aretheinput
ூ் 2 parameters.Thecasestudyusedܷ௦௨=0.253W/(m ͼԨ)fortheicestoragetank thermaltransmittance;theresidentialenvironmenttemperatureof18Ԩ(Leckner&
Zmeureanu2011)astheindoorairtemperature.
57 4.4.5. Passingflow
Thepassingflowtemperatureislowerthantheenteringliquidwater temperature,becausetheiceͲlayercoolsthepassingflow.Thetemperatureofthe passingflowiscalculatedasBehschnitt(1996):
݉ሶ ூ்ܶூ் ݉ሶ ூ்ௌܶூ்ௌ െߝൣ݉ሶ ூ்൫ܶூ் െܶூ ൯݉ሶ ூ்ௌ൫ܶூ்ௌ െܶூ ൯൧ ூ் ௪ ǡ௪ ௪ ǡ௪ ௪ ǡ௪ ௪ ǡ௪ ܶǡ௪ ൌ ூ்ௌ ூ் ǡ ݉ሶ ௪ ݉ሶ ௪
(4.79)
where,ߝisthecoolingeffectivenessoftheiceͲlayer,calculatedasTamasauskasetal.
(2012):
ͶʹǤ͵ͷߛǡ Ͳ ߛ ൏ ͲǤͲʹ ߝൌቐͳʹͳǤͷߛହ െ ͳͷǤͻߛସ ͺͺǤߛଷ ʹ͵Ǥ͵ͳߛଶ ͵Ǥͳʹߛ ͲǤͻʹͺǡ ͲǤͲʹ ߛ ͲǤͶͶǤ ͳǡ ͲǤͶͶ ൏ ߛ ͳ
(4.80)
4.4.6. Temperaturesinicestoragetank
ThetemperatureoftheiceͲlayerisestimatedatconstanttemperatureof0Ԩ
ሺTamasauskasetal.2012).ThewaterͲlayertemperatureiscalculatedbysolvingthe energybalanceEqns(4.50)and(4.55).ByemployingbackwardEulermethodto discretizetheordinarydifferentialequations,weobtain:
ூ ூ ݉௧ െ݉௧ ܳሶ ூ ൌെ ೕ ೕషభ ܮ ǡ (4.81) ௦௧ οݐ ௪
ቀ݉ௐܿ ௐቁ ቀܶௐ െܶௐ ቁ ௪ ௪ ௪ ௧ೕ ௪ ௧ೕషభ ௧ೕషభ (4.82) ܳሶ ௐ ൌ ǡ ௦௧ οݐ
where,
58
(οݐ ൌ ݐ െݐିଵǤ (4.83
.οݐisthetimestep;ݐisthecurrenttime;ݐିଵistheprevioustime.RearrangingEqns
(4.81)and(4.82)wehave:
ሶ ூ οݐܳ ூ ூ ௦௧ (4.84) ݉௧ ൌ݉௧ െ ǡ ೕ ೕషభ ܮ௪
ሶ ௐ οݐܳ ܶௐ ൌܶௐ ௦௧ Ǥ ௪ ௧ೕ ௪ ௧ೕషభ (4.85) ቀ݉ௐܿ ௐቁ ௪ ௪ ௧ೕషభ
ThetemperatureofthewaterͲlayeriscalculatedbysimultaneouslysolvingabovetwo
ௐ ூ் ூ equationswith݉௪ =݉ Ͳ݉substituted.
.Thetimestepοݐistheinputparameter,thecasestudyusedοݐ=900s
4.4.7. InterchangeofenergyinsolidͲliquidequilibrium
InterchangeofenergyforsolidͲliquidequilibriumisaproceduretoamendthe discretizedsolutionsfortheoccasionsinvolvingthephasechanging.Phasechange occursduringtheheatcharginganddischargingoftheicestoragetank.Inthenumerical solutionofthediscretizedenergybalanceequationsoftheicestoragetank,thefinal momentsofphasechangemaytakeplaceduringoneofthecalculationtimeperiod.In
thefinalmomentstheicecouldcompletelydisappeared,orthewatereventually
reachedthesolidificationtemperatureof0Ԩ.Thecalculationtimeperiodreferstothe timestepusedtodiscretizetheordinarydifferentialequationsoftheenergybalances.
Thediscretizedsolutioncannottellthefinalmoments,butonlygivenforthefixedtime
step,e.g.ݐandݐିଵ.Ifthemomentstakeplacebetweenݐandݐିଵ,thecalculations
59 ூ ௐ shouldabletohandle,orthenumericalsolutionsas݉ <0orܶ௪ <0arepossibleto ௧ೕ ௧ೕ
present.Smallertimestepsmitigatebutdonoteliminatethepotentialproblem.
Withtheprocedureemployedinthisthesis,thelimitstatesofheatchargingand
dischargingarecounted.Reachingthelimitstates,theamountofheatthatisunableto
bechargedontotheiceͲlayerischargedontothewaterͲlayerinstead;andtheamount
ofheatthatisunabletobedischargedfromthewaterͲlayerisdischargedfromtheiceͲ
layer.Twonewvariablesareintroducedforcountingthedispatch:(i)Theheattransfer rate,denotedbyܳሶ ூଶௐ,istheinterchangeofenergyfromtheiceͲlayertothewaterͲ layer;(ii)Theheattransferrate,denotedbyܳሶ ௐଶூ,istheinterchangeofenergyfromthe
waterͲlayertotheiceͲlayer.
I. TheiceͲlayer
TheprocedurestartswiththepreͲestimationoftheenergychangerateofthe
ሶ ூ iceͲlayer,ܳ௦௧,with:
ሶ ூ ሶ ூ ሶ ூ ሶ ூ ூ் ܳ௦௧ ൌܳ୬௧ ܳ௫௧ ܳ െܮ௪݉ሶ ௪ Ǥ (4.86)
Becauseofnotknowingifexistsenoughicetofulfilltheheatcharging,thecalculation byEqn.(4.50)isdistinguishedbythepreͲestimatedquantity.
ூ ThepreͲestimationofthemassoftheiceͲlayer,݉,attimeݐiscalculated with:
ூ ሶ௦௧ οݐܳ ூ ூ (4.87) ݉ ൌ݉௧ െ Ǥ ௧ೕ ೕషభ ܮ௪
60 ூ ூ ூ IfthepreͲestimatedmass݉ш0,thenatthetimeݐ,݉௧ ൌ݉ ;if ௧ೕ
݉ூ <0,݉ூ issetequaltozero. ௧ೕ
TheheatstoragecapacityoftheiceͲlayeriscalculatedwithEqn.(4.81).Theheat
transferrateܳሶ ூଶௐiscalculatedasthedifferencebetweenthepreͲestimateddemand forheatstorageandthecapacityoftheiceͲlayeras:
ሶ ூଶௐ ሶ ூ ሶ ூ ܳ ൌܳ௦௧ െܳ௦௧Ǥ (4.88)
II. ThewaterͲlayer
Theheattransferrateܳሶ ூଶௐisaddedtoEqn.(4.55):
ሶ ௐ ሶ ௐ ሶ ௐ ሶ ௐ ሶ ூଶௐ ܳ௦௧ ൌ൫ܳ௧ ܳ௫௧ ܳ ൯ܳ Ǥ (4.89)
ௐ ThepreͲcalculationofthetemperatureofthewaterͲlayerattimeݐ,ܶ௪ ,ispreͲ
calculatedas:
ௐ ሶ௦௧ οݐܳ ௐ ௐ ܶ௪ ൌܶ௪ ௧ Ǥ (4.90) ௧ೕ ೕషభ ቀ݉ௐܿ ቁ ௪ ௪ ௧ೕషభ
ௐ ௐ ௐ ௐ Ifܶ௪ ш0,congelationdoesnotcommence,andhenceܶ௪ ௧ =ܶ௪ ;ifܶ௪ <0, ௧ೕ ೕ ௧ೕ
ܶௐ issetequaltozero.Withthetemperatureܶௐ ,theheatstoragecapacityofthe ௪ ௧ೕ ௪ ௧ೕ
waterͲlayeriscalculatedwithEqn.(4.82).Theheattransferrateܳሶ ௐଶூiscalculatedas:
ሶ ௐଶூ ሶ ௐ ሶ ௐ ܳ ൌܳ௦௧ െܳ௦௧ǡ (4.91)
61 whichcorrespondstotheamountoficefrozenfromwaterinextra.ThemassoficeͲ layer,therefore,shouldbe:
݉ூ ൌ݉ூ ݉ூ ǡ ௧ೕ ௫௧ (4.92)
ூ where,݉௫௧istheextramassofice,
ሶ ௐଶூοݐܳ ூ (4.93) ݉௫௧ ൌ Ǥ ܮ௪
4.4.8. Enteringconditionsofheattransferfluid
Theenteringconditionsofheattransferfluidaredeterminedbytheoperationof otherdevicesconnectedtotheicestoragetank.Theenteringconditionsaretheice storagetankmodelinputs,relatedtothestoragetankheatsourceandheatsink.
Thesolarthermalcollectoristheheatsourceoficestoragetankinthesolar
combisystem.Theleavingconditionsoftheheattransferwaterfromthesolarthermal
collectoraretheenteringconditionstotheicestoragetank:
ூ்ௌ ݉ሶ ௪ ൌ݉ሶ ௪ ǡ (4.94)
ூ்ௌ ܶǡ௪ ൌܶ௨௧ǡ௪ǡ (4.95)
ܿ ூ்ௌ ൌܿ Ǥ ǡ௪ ௨௧ǡ௪ (4.96)
Theheatpumpistheheatsinkoficestoragetankinthesolarcombisystem.The leavingconditionsoftheheattransferwaterfromtheheatpumpevaporatorarethe enteringconditionstotheicestoragetank:
62
ூ் ா௩ ݉ሶ ௪ ൌ݉ሶ ௪ ǡ (4.97)
ூ் ா௩ ݉ሶ ௪ ൌ݉ሶ ௪ ǡ (4.98)
ூ் ா௩ ܶǡ௪ ൌܶ௨௧ǡ௪ǡ (4.99)
ܿ ூ் ൌܿ ா௩ Ǥ ǡ௪ ௨௧ǡ௪ (4.100)
4.4.9. Exergyanalysisoficestoragetank
Thissectionpresentstheexergyanalysisoftheicestoragetankoperationby
regardingtheicestoragetankasathermodynamicopensystem.Theexergybalance equationisestablishedconsideringtheflowofwater,theheattransferbetweenthe storagetankandsurroundings,theinterͲlayerheattransferbetweenthetwocontrol
volumes,andtheexergydestroyedduringtheoperation.
Exergytransferwithheatsourceandheatsink
Whenthesolarthermalcollectorisoperatedagainsttheicestoragetank,the netexergytransferratefromtheheatsource,ܺሶ ூ்ௌ,is:
ܺሶ ூ்ௌ ൌܺሶ ସூ்Ǥ (4.101)
Whentheheatpumpisturnedon,thenetexergytransferratetotheheatsink,ܺሶ ூ்,is:
ܺሶ ூ் ൌܺሶ ா௩Ǥ (4.102)
Exergytransferwithsurroundings
ூ் Theexergytransferbetweentheicestoragetankandthesurroundings,ܺሶ௫௧,is
calculatedwith:
63 ூ் ூ ௐ ܺሶ௫௧ ൌܺሶ௫௧ ܺሶ௫௧ǡ (4.103)
where,
ூ ூ ܺሶ௫௧ ൌܳሶ௫௧ȁ߬ȁǡ (4.104)
ௐ ௐ ܺሶ௫௧ ൌܳሶ௫௧ȁ߬ȁǡ (4.105)
ூ ௐ ܺሶ௫௧istheexergytransferrateoftheiceͲlayerwiththeindoorsurroundings;ܺሶ௫௧isthe
exergytransferrateofthewaterͲlayerwiththeindoorsurroundings;߬isthequality factorofconductionͲconvectionwithrespecttotheindoorairtemperatureܶܭ,
ܶܭͲ ߬݅ܽ ൌͳെ Ǥ (4.106) ܶܭ݅ܽ
் ForthequalityfactorofconductionͲconvection,generallyexpressedas߬=1Ͳ బ, ்
whenܶܭ>ܶܭ,thequalityfactorispositive,indicatingtheconductionͲconvection embodieswarmexergywithrespecttothereferencestate.Whenܶܭ<ܶܭ,thequality
factorisnegative,indicatingcoldexergyembodied.Whenܶܭ=ܶܭ,thequalityfactoris
zero,indicatingnoexergyistransferredduetotheconductionͲconvection.Bytakingthe qualityfactorinabsolutevalue,thesignconventionofthequalityfactoriswithdrawn, sothatnoconflictionwouldbecausedagainstthesignconventionofenergytransfer process.
ExergydestroyedbyinterͲlayerheattransfer
TheheattransferbetweentheiceͲlayerandwaterͲlayerduetothetemperature
differencedegradesthequalityoftheheat.TheinterͲlayerexergydestructionrate,
ሶ ூ் ܺ௧ǡௗ௦௧,iscalculatedas:
64 ሶ ூ் ሶ ூ ሶ ௐ ܺ௧ǡௗ௦௧ ൌܺ௧ െܺ௧ǡ (4.107)
ሶ ூ ሶ ௐ where,ܺ௧istheexergytransferrateoftheiceͲlayerwiththewaterͲlayer;ܺ௧isthe
exergytransferrateofthewaterͲlayerwiththeiceͲlayer.Furthertransforming,
ሶ ூ் ሶ ூ ௐ ூ ܺ௧ǡௗ௦௧ ൌܳ௧൫ห߬ หെห߬ ห൯ǡ (4.108)
where,߬ௐisthequalityfactorofthetransferredheatwithrespecttothewaterͲlayer
ௐ temperature,ܶܭ௪ ,as:
ܶܭ ௐ (4.109) ߬ ൌͳെ ௐ Ǣ ܶܭ௪
߬ூ isthequalityfactorofthetransferredheatwithrespecttotheiceͲlayertemperature,
ூ ܶܭ,as:
ூ ܶܭ ߬ ൌͳെ ூ Ǥ (4.110) ܶܭ
Changeofexergyduringheatstorageprocessinicestoragetank
Theexergyvariationratewithintheicestoragetank,οܺሶ ூ்,iscalculatedasthe
sumofthatofthetwolayers,
οܺሶ ூ் ൌοܺሶ ூ οܺሶ ௐǡ (4.111)
where,οܺሶ ூistheexergyvariationrateoftheiceͲlayer,
ூ ூ ூ ቀ݉ െ݉ ቁ ߮ ௧ೕ ௧ೕషభ (4.112) οܺሶ ூ ൌ Ǣ ߂ݐ
οܺሶ ௐistheexergyvariationrateofthewaterͲlayer,
65 ௐ ௐ ௐ ௐ ݉௪ ௧ ߰௪ ௧ െ݉௪ ௧ ߰௪ ௧ οܺሶ ௐ ൌ ೕ ೕ ೕషభ ೕషభ Ǣ (4.113) ߂ݐ
ூ ௐ ߮isthespecificexergyoficeintheiceͲlayer;߰௪ isthespecificexergyofwaterinthe
waterͲlayer.
Exergydestructionandexergeticefficiency
ሶ ூ் Theexergydestructionratebytheicestoragetankoperation,ܺௗ௦௧,isobtained fromtheestablishedexergybalance:
ሶ ூ் ሶ ூ்ௌ ሶ ூ் ሶ ூ் ሶ ூ் ሶ ூ் ܺௗ௦௧ ൌܺ െܺ ܺ௫௧ ܺ௧ǡௗ௦௧ െ߂ܺ Ǥ (4.114)
ூ் Theexergeticefficiencyoftheicestoragetankoperation,ߟூூ ,iscalculatedas:
௧ೕ ூ் σ ܺௗ௦௧ ߟூ் ൌͳെ Ǥ (4.115) ூூ ௧ೕ ூ்ௌ σ ܺ
௧ೕ ூ் σ ܺௗ௦௧isthesumofexergydestructionoftheicestoragetanksincethestarttimeof
operation,where,
ூ் ሶ ூ் (ௗ௦௧ ൌܺௗ௦௧߂ݐǡ (4.116ܺ
௧ೕ ூ்ௌ σ ܺ isthesumofexergytransferfromtheheatsourceoficestoragetanksincethe starttimeofoperation,where,
(ூ்ௌ ൌܺሶ ூ்ௌ߂ݐǤ (4.117ܺ
4.5. Mathematicalmodelofwaterstoragetank Thewaterstoragetank(Fig.4.6)containswaterasthethermalstoragemedia.
Twoimmersionheatexchangersaremountedinsidethestoragetank,aspartoftwo
66 circulationloopsconnectingthestoragetanktotheheatsourcesandheatsinks.Inside thecirculationloops,wateristheheattransferfluid.Heattransfersbetweentheheat transferfluidandthestoragemediabytheimmersionheatexchangers.Coldwaterfrom thecitymainflowsintothestoragetanktocompensatethehotwaterdrawnoff.
WheneverthedrawͲofftemperaturebelowthesettemperature,aninlineheateronthe drawͲoffpipelinestartsuptoreheatthehotwaterusingelectricity.Themathematical modelsimulatesthewaterstoragetankoperationtocalculatethetemperatureofwater inthestoragetankandtheelectricpowerinputtotheinlineheater.
Fig.4.6Schematicofwaterstoragetankmodel ThemodelingofwaterstoragetankisbasedonDuffie&Beckman(2006)and
Cruickshank&Harrison(2010).Thestoragemediaisregardedasfivedistinct
homogeneouslayersinequalmass.EachlayerisidentifiedasonewaterͲnode,denoted
asܰ݅,݅=1,2…5insequencefromthebottomtotop.Oneimmersionheatexchanger
67 ܪܺͳlocatesatthewaterͲnodeܰͳ,theotherimmersionheatexchangerܪܺʹlocatesat thewaterͲnodeܰ͵.TheheattransferofwaterͲnodestakesplaceacrossthecontact surfacebetweenadjacentwaterͲnodes,tanksurface,andimmersionheatexchanger surfaces.ThecoldwaterportlocatesatthewaterͲnodeܰͳ,thehotwaterportlocates atthewaterͲnodeܰͷ.Thewaterflowcreatedbytheleavinghotwaterandentering coldwateriscalledjetflowinhere,whichisinvolvedwiththetransferofheatwiththe waterͲnodesaswell.Themodelingassumesthatthejetflowtakesplaceaswater movingfromthelowernodetotherightabovehighernode,whichisapatternofrelay inthebottomͲupdirection.Apremiseimpliedisthattheamountofjetflowatonetime stepdoesnotexceedthemassoftheonewaterͲnode.
4.5.1. TheenergybalanceofwaterͲnodes
EnergybalanceisestablishedforthewaterͲnodeܰ݅as:
ሶ ே ሶ ே ሶ ே ሶ ே ሶ ே ܳ௦௧ ൌܳு ܳ௧ ܳ௫௧ ܳ (4.118)
ሶ ே ሶ ே where,ܳ௦௧istheenergychangerateofthewaterͲnodeܰ݅;ܳுistheheattransfer
ሶ ே rateoftheimmersionheatexchanger;ܳ௧istheheattransferrateofthewaterͲnode
ே ܰ݅withtheadjacentnodesacrossthecontactsurfaceinbetween;ܳሶ௫௧istheheat
ሶ ே transferrateofthewaterͲnodeܰ݅withthesurroundingsacrossthetanksurface;ܳ is
theheattransferrateofthewaterͲnodeܰ݅withthejetflow.
TermsinEqn.(4.118)havefollowingformulations,
68
ே ே ே ݀ ቀ݉௪ܿ ܶ௪ ቁ ܳሶ ே ൌ ௪ ǡ (4.119) ௦௧ ݀ݐ
ሶ ே ሶ ே ሶ ே ሶ ே ܳு ൌܳௐ்ௌଵ ܳௐ்ௌଶ ܳௐ்ଵǡ (4.120)
݇ௐ்ାଵ ௐ் ௐ் ேାଵ ே ۓ ൫ܣ ܣ௦ǡ௦൯൫ܶ௪ െܶ௪ ൯ǡ ݅ ൌ ͳ ௐ்ାଵܮ ۖ ௐ் ۖ ௐ் ௐ் ேିଵ ே ݇ ۖ ௦ǡ௦൯൫ܶ௪ െܶ௪ ൯ ܣ ܣ൫ ۖ ܮௐ் ሶ ே ܳ௧ ൌ ௐ்ାଵ ǡ (4.121) ௐ் ௐ் ேାଵ ே ݇ ۔ ௦ǡ௦൯൫ܶ௪ െܶ௪ ൯ǡ ݅ ൌ ʹǡ ͵ǡ Ͷܣ ܣௐ்ାଵ ൫ ۖ ܮ ۖ ௐ்݇ ۖ ௐ் ௐ் ேିଵ ே ۖ ൫ܣ ܣ௦ǡ௦൯൫ܶ௪ െܶ௪ ൯ǡ ݅ ൌ ͷ ௐ்ܮ ە
ௐ் ே ௐ் ௐ் ே ൫ܷ௩௦ ܣ௩௦ ܷ ܣ ൯൫ܶ െܶ௪ ൯ǡ ݅ ൌ ͳǡ ͷ ܳሶ ே ൌቊ ௦ ǡ (4.122) ௫௧ ௐ் ே ே ܷ௩௦ ܣ௩௦ ൫ܶ െܶ௪ ൯ǡ ݅ ൌ ʹǡ ͵ǡ Ͷ
ுௐ ெ௦ ெ ே ே ݉ሶ ௪ ቀܿ ܶ௪ െܿ ܶ௪ ቁ ǡ݅ൌͳ ሶ ே ௪ ௪ ܳ ൌ ቐ Ǥ (4.123) ݉ሶ ுௐ ቀܿ ேିଵܶேିଵ െܿ ேܶேቁ ǡ ݅ ൌʹǡ͵ǡͶǡͷ ௪ ௪ ௪ ௪ ௪
ሶ ே where,ܳௐ்ௌଵistheheattransferratefromtheheatsourcethroughtheheatexchanger
ሶ ே ܪܺͳtothewaterͲnodeܰ݅;ܳௐ்ௌଶistheheattransferratefromtheheatsource
ሶ ே throughtheheatexchangerܪܺʹtothewaterͲnodeܰ݅;ܳௐ்ଵistheheattransferrate
ே fromthewaterͲnodeܰ݅totheheatsinkthroughtheheatexchangerܪܺͳ;݉௪isthe
ுௐ ே massofthewaterͲnode;݉ሶ ௪ isthemassflowrateofdomestichotwaterdrawn;ܶ௪
ேାଵ isthetemperatureofthewaterͲnodeܰ݅;ܶ௪ isthetemperatureoftheofthewaterͲ
ேିଵ ெ nodeܰ݅+1;ܶ௪ isthetemperatureoftheofthewaterͲnodeܰ݅Ͳ1;ܶ௪ isthe temperatureofwaterfromthecitymain;݇ௐ்isthethermalconductivityofwater
ௐ்ାଵ ௐ் givenbyEqn.(4.140)(similarto݇ );ܷ௩௦ isthethermaltransmittanceofvertical
ௐ் surfaceofthewaterstoragetank;ܷ௦ isthethermaltransmittanceofthehorizontal surfaceofthewaterstoragetank;ܮௐ்isthelengthgivenbyEqn.(4.144)(similarto
69 ௐ்ାଵ ௐ் ௐ் ܮ ሻ;ܣ isthebaseareaofthewaterstoragetank;ܣ௦ǡ௦isthecrossͲsectional
ே areaofthewaterstoragetankshell;ܣ௩௦ istheverticalsurfaceareaofthewaterͲnode
ܰ݅.
4.5.2. Heattransferofimmersionheatexchangers
Theheattransferbyconductiontakesplaceinthewaterstoragetankbetween theadjacentnodes,infunctionalofthetemperaturegradientandthermalconductivity.
Thedependentquantitiesgenerallyareavailableforthemodeling.Incontrast,theheat transferbyconvectionismorecomplex,andthemodelingdoesnothaveanapproach
widelybeingacceptedforallsituations.However,theconvectioncannotbeabandon.
Withoutemployingcertaincomputationalapproach,largetemperaturedifference
presentamongtheexchangernode(thenodewiththeheatexchanger)andnonͲ
exchangernode(thenodewithouttheheatexchanger).
Becausetheconvectioncausedbythefluidmechanismofbuoyancyeffectis
unknown,anewconceptofsoͲcalledcontinuousnodeisconceivedformodeling stratifiedthermalstoragetank.Theconceptispresentedinthissection,withaseriesof
definitionincludingnodeexchangeheat,nodeexchangecontribution,andnode exchangemassforexplicatethecontinuousnodecomponents.Theapplication
approachisgivenbycaseofthisstudy.
70 Theheattransferofimmersionheatexchangerܪܺwiththenodeܰ݅isdefined
ሶ ே asnodeexchangeheat.Denotingthenodeexchangeheatratebyܳு,theoverallheat
transferrateofimmersionheatexchangerܪܺbyܳሶ ு,herehas
ே ு ܳሶு ൌܳሶ ǡ ሺ݅ൌ ͳǥ݊ሻǡ (4.124) ୀଵ
where,݊isthenumberofnodesinthestratifiedthermalstoragetank.Theratioofthe
nodeexchangeheatratetotheoverallheattransferrateofimmersionheatexchanger
ܪܺisdefinedasnodeexchangecontribution,denotingbyߙே,
ܳሶ ே ߙே ൌ ு Ǥሺ݅ൌͳǥ݊ሻ (4.125) ܳሶ ு
Forasingleheatexchangerܪܺ,thesummationofallnodeexchangecontributions
equalsto1,
ߙே ൌͳ ൫Ͳߙே ͳ൯ǡ (4.126) ୀଵ
where,ߙே=0indicatesthatthenodeܰ݅isnotinfluencedbytheheattransferof
immersionheatexchangerܪܺ;ߙே>0indicatesthatthenodeܰ݅isinfluencedbythe
heattransferofimmersionheatexchangerܪܺ;ifߙே=1,thenodeܰ݅istheonlyone
nodethatundergoestheheattransferwiththeimmersionheatexchangerܪܺ.
Thecontinuousnodeisalumpednodeaggregatedwiththenodesthat
undergoingthetransferofheatwiththeimmersionheatexchanger.Byassigningthe
indicesǥݍtothecomponentnodes,thecontinuousnodeiscomposedofthenodeܰ݅
(݅=ǥݍ),andthecomponentnodeexchangercontributionissubjectto:
71 ߙே ͲǤ ሺ݅ൌ ǥݍሻ (4.127)
Becausethecomponentnodesaggregateintoonecontinuousbody,eachhasanequal nodeexchangecontribution.Themagnitudeofthenodeexchangecontributionis, therefore,thereciprocalofthecomponentnumber,
ͳ ߙே ൌ Ǥሺ݅ൌǥݍሻ (4.128) ݍെͳ
Thecontinuousnodeincludestheexchangernode,and,maybe,nonͲexchangernode.
Beingwiththeimmersionheatexchanger,anexchangernodeisalwaysunderthe influenceoftheheattransferand,therefore,Eqn.(4.127)isappliedandanexchanger nodeisalwaysthecontinuousnodecomponent.AsforthenonͲexchangernode,it couldbeornotbeinvolvedintheheattransferofimmersionheatexchanger.The situationforanonͲexchangernodeinvolvedthetransferofheatandbecomesthe continuousnodecomponentis:(i)itsadjacenthighertemperaturenodeinpositiveߙே
underaheatchargingprocess,or(ii)itsadjacentlowertemperaturenodeinpositive
ߙேunderaheatdischargingprocess.
Duringaheatchargingprocess,thenodeexchangeheatrateiscalculatedas:
ே ே ு ܳሶு ൌߙ ܳሶ Ǥሺ݅ൌͳǥ݊ሻ (4.129)
Bothofthequantitiesattherightsideareknown.Duringaheatdischargingprocess,the
nodeexchangemassisdefinedasthepartialmassofnodeܰ݅thatisuponthe
ே discharge,denotedby݉ு.Themagnitudeofthenodeexchangemassisbetween0 andthemassofthenode,inclusive.Thenodethatdoesnotbelongtothecontinuous
72 nodehasthenodeexchangemassofzero.Thecomponentnodesofcontinuousnode
ே haveequalnodeexchangemassforeach,denotedby݉ு,
ሶ ு ே ܳ οݐ ݉ு ൌ ǡሺ݅ൌͳǥ݊ሻ (4.130) σ ቂݏ݃݊൫ߙே൯ ቀܥ ேܶே െܥ ுܶுቁቃ ୀଵ
ே ு whereܶ isthetemperatureofthenodeܰ݅;ܶ isthetemperatureoftheheat transferfluidenteringtheimmersionheatexchangerܪܺ.Andthedischarging temperatureoftheimmersionheatexchangeroperationisthearithmeticmean temperatureofthecomponentnodes,calculatedas:
ே ே σୀ ݏ݃݊൫ߙ ൯ܶ ܶு ൌ Ǥሺ݅ൌǥݍሻ (4.131) ௨௧ ݍെͳ
Thenodeexchangemassfeaturestheheatdischargingprocess,usedtocalculatethe nodeexchangemassofnodeܰ݅,
ே ே ே ݉ு ൌݏ݃݊൫ߙ ൯݉ுǤሺ݅ൌͳǥ݊ሻ (4.132)
Whereupon,thenodeexchangeheatiscalculatedas:
ே ே ே ு ு ݉ு ቀܥ ܶ െܥ ܶ ቁ ܳሶ ே ൌ Ǥሺ݅ൌͳǥ݊ሻ (4.133) ு οݐ
Abriefsummaryisgivenfortheaboveconceptdevelopment:Thesimplest
situationforacontinuousnodebeingformediswithoneexchangernode;theutmostis withallnodesinastoragetank.Withinacontinuousnode,thetemperatureofan exchangernodeisthehighestduringtheheatcharging,thelowestduringtheheat discharging.IfanonͲexchangernodejoinsacontinuousnodedependson:(i)the
73 temperaturedifferencewiththeadjacentnodes;and(ii)theoperationstatusofan
immersionheatexchanger,inheatchargingorheatdischarging.Eachnodeinastorage
tankisappointedanodeexchangecontribution.Theheatcharging/dischargingimpacts
madebyanimmersionheatexchangeroneachofthenodesarecalculated.
Thefollowingsubsectionsarepresentedhowtheconceptisapplied.Thewater storagetankhastwoimmersionheatexchangers,ܪܺͳandܪܺʹ,operatedinthree ways:theimmersionheatexchangerܪܺͳinheatchargingmode;theimmersionheat exchangerܪܺʹinheatchargingmode;theimmersionheatexchangerܪܺͳinheat
dischargingmode.
I. Theimmersionheatexchangerࡴࢄintheheatchargingmode
ሶ ே Theheattransferrateܳௐ்ௌଵiscalculatedas:
ሶ ே ே ሶ ௐ்ௌଵ ܳௐ்ௌଵ ൌߙௐ்ௌଵܳ ǡ (4.134)
ሶ ௐ்ௌଵ ே where,ܳ istheheatchargingrateoftheimmersionheatexchangerܪܺͳǢߙௐ்ௌଵis
thenodeܰ݅exchangecontributionwithrespecttotheheattransferrateܳሶ ௐ்ௌଵ.
ே Thenodeexchangecontributionߙௐ்ௌଵisdeterminedwiththewaterͲnode temperaturesintheheatchargingmode,showninTable4.3.
Table4.3NodeexchangecontributionsofimmersionheatexchangerHX1inheatchargingmode Conditions Decisions ேଵ ேଶ ேଵ ே ܶ௪ ൏ܶ௪ ߙௐ்ௌଵ=1andߙௐ்ௌଵ=0( ݅=2,3…5) ேଵ ேଶ ேଷ ே ே ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ൏ܶ௪ ߙௐ்ௌଵ=1/2( ݅=1,2)andߙௐ்ௌଵ=0(݅=3,4,5) ேଵ ேଶ ேଷ ேସ ே ே ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ൏ܶ௪ ߙௐ்ௌଵ=1/3( ݅=1,2,3)andߙௐ்ௌଵ=0(݅=4,5) ேଵ ேଶ ேଷ ேସ ேହ ே ேହ ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ൏ܶ௪ ߙௐ்ௌଵ=1/4( ݅=1,2…4)andߙௐ்ௌଵ=0 ேଵ ேଶ ேଷ ேସ ேହ ே ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ߙௐ்ௌଵ=1/5( ݅=1,2…5)
74 II. Theimmersionheatexchangerࡴࢄintheheatchargingmode
ሶ ே Theheattransferrateܳௐ்ௌଶiscalculatedas:
ሶ ே ே ሶ ௐ்ௌଶ ܳௐ்ௌଶ ൌߙௐ்ௌଶܳ ǡ (4.135)
ሶ ௐ்ௌଶ ே where,ܳ istheheatchargingrateoftheimmersionheatexchangerܪܺʹ;ߙௐ்ௌଶis
thenodeܰ݅exchangecontributionwithrespecttotheheatchargingrateܳሶ ௐ்ௌଶ.
ே Thenodeexchangecontributionߙௐ்ௌଶisdeterminedwiththewaterͲnode temperaturesintheheatchargingmode,showninTable4.4.
Table4.4NodeexchangecontributionsofimmersionheatexchangerHX2inheatchargingmode Conditions Decisions ேଶ ேଷ ேସ ேଷ ே ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ൏ܶ௪ ߙௐ்ௌଶ=1andߙௐ்ௌଶ=0( ݅=1,2,4,5) ேଵ ேଶ ேଷ ேସ ே ே ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ൏ܶ௪ ߙௐ்ௌଶ=1/2( ݅=2,3)andߙௐ்ௌଶ=0(݅=1,4,5) ேଵ ேଶ ேଷ ேସ ே ே ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ൏ܶ௪ ߙௐ்ௌଶ=1/3( ݅=1,2,3)andߙௐ்ௌଶ=0(݅=4,5) ேଶ ேଷ ேସ ேହ ேଷ ே ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ൏ܶ௪ ߙௐ்ௌଶ=1/2( ݅=3,4)andߙௐ்ௌଶ=0(݅=1,2,5) ேଵ ேଶ ேଷ ேସ ேହ ே ே ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ߙௐ்ௌଶ=1/3( ݅=3,4,5)andߙௐ்ௌଶ=0(݅=1,2) ேଵ ேଶ ேଷ ேସ ேହ ே ேହ ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ߙௐ்ௌଶ=1/4( ݅=1,2…4)andߙௐ்ௌଶ=0 ேଶ ேଷ ேସ ேହ ே ே ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ߙௐ்ௌଶ=1/3( ݅=3,4,5)and ߙௐ்ௌଶ=0(݅=1,2) ேଵ ேଶ ேଷ ேସ ேହ ே ேଵ ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ߙௐ்ௌଶ=1/4( ݅=2,3…5)andߙௐ்ௌଶ=0 ேଵ ேଶ ேଷ ேସ ேହ ே ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ߙௐ்ௌଶ=1/5( ݅=1,2…5) III. Theimmersionheatexchangerࡴࢄintheheatdischargingmode
Theheattransferrateܳሶ ௐ்ଵiscalculatedas:
ே ே ே ௐ்ଵ ௐ்ଵ ݉ௐ்ଵ ቆܥ ܶ௪ െܥ ܶǡ௪ ቇ ௧ೕ ௪ ௧ ௧ೕషభ ǡ௪ ௧ೕ (4.136) ே ೕషభ ௧ೕ ܳሶௐ்ଵ ൌ ǡ ௧ೕ οݐ where,
75
݉ே ൌݏ݃݊ቀߙே ቁ ݉ே ǡ (4.137) ௐ்ଵ௧ೕ ௐ்ଵ௧ೕ ௐ்ଵ௧ೕ
and
ሶ ௐ்ଵ οݐܳ ே ௧ೕ ݉ௐ்ଵ ൌ ǡ ௧ೕ (4.138) ே ே ே ௐ்ଵ ௐ்ଵ σ ቈݏ݃݊ ቀߙ ቁ ቆܥ ܶ௪ െܥ ܶ ቇ ௐ்ଵ௧ೕ ௪ ௧ೕషభ ǡ௪ ǡ௪ ௧ ௧ೕషభ ௧ೕ ೕ
ሶ ௐ்ଵ ௐ்ଵ ܳ istheheatdischargingrateoftheimmersionheatexchangerܪܺͳ;ܶǡ௪ isthe
ே temperatureofwaterenteringtheimmersionheatexchangerܪܺͳ;݉ௐ்ଵisthenode
ሶ ௐ்ଵ ே ܰ݅exchangemasswithrespecttotheheatdischargingrateܳ ;ߙௐ்ଵisthenode
ሶ ௐ்ଵ ே ܰ݅exchangecontributionrespectingtheheatdischargingrateܳ ;݉ௐ்ଵisthe nodeexchangemassrespectingtheheatdischargingrateܳሶ ௐ்ଵ.
ே Thenodeexchangecontributionߙௐ்ଵwasdeterminedwiththewaterͲnode temperaturesfortheheatdischargingmode,showninTable4.5.
Table4.5NodeexchangercontributionsofimmersionheatexchangerHX1inheatdischargingmode Conditions Decisions ேଵ ேଶ ேଵ ே ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ߙௐ்ଵ=1andߙௐ்ଵ=0( ݅=2,3…5) ேଵ ேଶ ேଷ ே ே ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ߙௐ்ଵ=1/2( ݅=1,2)andߙௐ்ଵ=0(݅=3,4,5) ேଵ ேଶ ேଷ ேସ ே ே ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ߙௐ்ଵ=1/3( ݅=1,2,3)andߙௐ்ଵ=0(݅=4,5) ேଵ ேଶ ேଷ ேସ ேହ ே ேହ ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ߙௐ்ଵ=1/4( ݅=1,2…4)andߙௐ்ଵ=0 ேଵ ேଶ ேଷ ேସ ேହ ே ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ܶ௪ ߙௐ்ଵ=1/5( ݅=1,2…5) Asforthedischargingtemperatureoftheimmersionheatexchangerܪܺͳ,the calculationisas:
ே ே σୀ ݏ݃݊ ቀߙௐ்ଵ ቁ ܶ௪ ௐ்ଵ ௧ೕ ௧ೕషభ (4.139) ܶ௨௧ǡ௪ ൌ ǡ ௧ೕ ݍെͳ
ௐ்ଵ where,ܶ௨௧ǡ௪ isthetemperatureofwaterleavingtheimmersionheatexchangerܪܺͳ.
76 SubstitutingEqns.(4.134),(4.135),and(4.136)toEqn.(4.120),thedetermined
ே ே ே nodeexchangecontributionsߙௐ்ௌଵ,ߙௐ்ௌଶ,andߙௐ்ଵ,basedonthenode temperaturesofprevioustimeܶே ,willbeusedtocalculateܳሶ ே ,theheattransfer ௪ ௧ೕషభ ு
rateoftheimmersionheatexchangerofnodeܰ݅.Thenodetemperaturesatthecurrent time,ܶே ,iscalculatedbysolvingtheenergybalanceequationsofthefivenodesof ௪ ௧ೕ thewaterstoragetank.
Theapproachpresentedabovewasusedtoestimatetheimmersionheat exchangeroperationontothestratifiednodes.Theconceptofcontinuousnodewas developedbyacknowledgingthatthefluidmotionofconvectiontakesplaceinthe presenceoftemperaturedifference.Theexistenceofflowmotioncanberecognizedby thetemperaturedifferencesamongthenodes:Fromthepointofviewoffluid mechanics,thetemperaturedifferenceindicatesthediffusionandcollisionsinthefluid, especiallywhenlargetemperaturedifferenceinplace,thebuoyancyisbustlingaboutto
homogenizethedensityoffluid(Turner1973).Withtheconceptofcontinuousnode,to
modeltheflowmotionisavoided.Instead,bydesignatingthermodynamicsystemina
flexibleway,theapproachreplacestheneedformodelingtheconvection.Fromthe
thermodynamicpointofview,howthecontinuousnodeconceptworkscanbe explicatedthisway:Theestablishmentofenergybalanceequation(4.118)upon controlledmassimpliesthat,onenodeisonethermodynamicsystem,andthestorage tankoperationisrepresentedbyseveralthermodynamicsystems.Whenthecontinuous nodehasmorethanonecomponentnodes,themultiplethermodynamicsystemsofthe
77 componentnodes(eachinoneͲnodeͲmagnitude)areregardedasonethermodynamics system(inmultipleͲnodesͲmagnitude)undergoingtheheatchargingordischarging process.Inthisperspective,thenodeexchangecontributionisassigned.Afterwards,the multiplethermodynamicsystemsareresumed,theenergybalanceequation(4.118)is validandtheunknowntemperatureofeachnodecanbesolved.
4.5.3. Heattransferbetweennodes
TheinterͲnodalheattransfertakesplaceunderthetemperaturedifference
betweenadjacentwaterͲnodesintheverticaldirectionbyconduction.Inaddition,the
heatconductionthroughthetankshelliscalculated.Itwasassumedthattheinner verticalsurfaceoftankshellhasthetemperatureequaltothetemperatureofthe waterͲnodeatthesameheight.
Thethermalconductivity݇ௐ்isanareaͲweightedpropertyas
ௐ் ௐ் ௐ் ௐ் ௐ் ݇௦ܣ௦ǡ௦ ݇௩ǡ௪ܣୠ ݇ ൌ ௐ் ௐ் ǡ݅ൌʹǡ͵ǥͷǡ (4.140) ܣ௦ǡ௦ ܣ
ௐ் ௐ் where,݇௦isthethermalconductivityofthewaterstoragetankshell;݇௩ǡ௪isthe thermalconductivityofwaterwithrespecttothetemperature,
ܶெ௦ ܶே ௪ ௪ ǡ݅ൌͳ ۓ ௐ் ʹ ܶ௩ǡ௪ ൌ Ǥ (4.141) ேିଵ ܶேܶ۔ ௪ ௪ ǡ݅ൌʹǡ͵ǥͷ ʹ ە
ௐ் ௐ் Foraverticalcylindertank,theareasܣ௦ǡ௦ǡܣ arecalculatedas:
78 ௐ் ௐ் ௐ் ܣ௦ǡ௦ ൌߨܦ ߜ௦ǡ (4.142)
ߨ ଶ ܣௐ் ൌ ܦௐ் ǡ (4.143) Ͷ
ௐ் ௐ் where,ܦ isthediameterofthecylinderwaterstoragetank;ߜ௦isthethicknessof
thewaterstoragetankshell.
ThedistancethatcorrespondstotheinterͲnodalheatconductioniscalculatedin
ܮௐ் ܮௐ் ܮௐ் ൌ ேିଵ ே ǡ݅ൌʹǡ͵ǥͷǡ (4.144) ʹ
where,
ே ௐ் ݉௪ ܮே ൌ ே ௐ்ǡ (4.145) ߩ௪ ܣ
ௐ் ܮே isthethicknessofthewaterͲnodeܰ݅.ForafiveͲnodeswaterstoragetankmodel,
ͳ ݉ே ൌ ൫ߩௐ்ܣௐ்ܪௐ்൯ǡ (4.146) ௪ ͷ ௪
ௐ் ௐ் where,ߩ௪ isthedensityofwaterinthewaterstoragetank,estimatedat99Ԩ;ܪ is
theheightofthewaterstoragetank.
ௐ் ௐ் ௐ் ௐ் Thethermalconductivity݇௦andtankdimensionsߜ௦ǡܦ ǡܪ arethe
ௐ் inputparameters.Forinstance,inthecasestudy:݇௦=13.64W/(mͼԨ)forstainless
ௐ் ௐ் ௐ் steelat40Ԩ,andߜ௦=0.002m,ܦ =1.3m,ܪ =1.657m(Consolar2012).
4.5.4. Heattransferwithsurroundings
Theheattransferbetweenthewaterstoragetankandthesurrounding environmenttakesplacethroughthestoragetankwalls.Thethermaltransmittanceis
79 calculatedwiththethermaltransmittanceofthestoragetankinsulationandthesurface filmresistanceofstillair.
Thethermaltransmittanceofwaterstoragetankhorizontalsurfaceunderheat
ௐ் flowupwardisdenotedbyܷ௦ǡ௨;thethermaltransmittanceofwaterstoragetank
ௐ் horizontalsurfaceunderheatflowdownwardisdenotedbyܷ௦ǡௗ௪.Thecalculations
ௐ் ௐ் ௐ் forܷ௦ǡ௨andܷ௦ǡௗ௪,andܷ௩௦ aswell,aresimilartoEqns.(4.71),(4.74),and(4.73),
ௐ் respectively(Section4.4.4),exceptusingܷ௦௨(thethermaltransmittanceofinsulation
ூ் attachedtothewaterstoragetank)insteadofusingܷ௦௨.Thethermaltransmittanceof
horizontalsurfaceofthewaterstoragetankiscalculatedinapiecewisefunctionwith
respecttotherelationbetweenthebottomandtopnodestemperaturesandtheindoor airtemperatureas:
ௐ் ேଵ ேହ ܷ௦ǡ௨ǡܶ௪ ൏ܶ ݎ ܶ௪ ܶ ௐ் ேଵ ேହ ܷ௦ ൌ ൞ Ͳǡ ܶ௪ ൌܶ ݎ ܶ௪ ൌܶ Ǥ (4.147) ௐ் ேଵ ேହ ܷ௦ǡௗ௪ǡܶ௪ ܶ ݎ ܶ௪ ൏ܶ
Foracylinderstoragetank,theverticalsurfaceareaofthewaterͲnodeܰ݅is calculatedas:
ே ் ௐ் ܣ௩௦ ൌߨܦ ܮே Ǥ (4.148)
ௐ் Thethermaltransmittanceܷ௦௨istheinputparameter.Inthecasestudy,
ௐ் 2 ܷ௦௨=0.286W/(m ͼԨ).
80 4.5.5. Domestichotwatermakeup
Duetothedischargeofhotwater,heatoutputratefromthewaterstoragetank iscalculatedas:
ܳሶ ௐ்ଶ ൌ݉ሶ ுௐ ቀܿ ேହܶேହ െܿ ெ௦ܶெ௦ቁǡ (4.149) ௪ ௪ ௪ ௪ ௪
where,
ுௐ ெ ுௐ ݉ሶ ௪ ൌߩ௪ ܸ௪ሶ Ǥ (4.150)
ܳሶ ௐ்ଶistheheatoutputrateofthewaterstoragetankontoheatingwaterforthe
ுௐ domesticdrawͲoff;ܸ௪ሶ isthevolumeflowrateofthedomestichotwaterdrawͲoff.
ெ Thetemperatureܶ௪ istheinputvariable.Forinstance,thecasestudyused thecorrelateddatabyHugo(2008)basedonthemeasuredtemperatureofthecity mainofMontrealbyDumas&Marcoux(2004),
ெ ڮ ሺʹ߱ܰሻ ݃ଶ ሺʹ߱ܰሻ ሺ߱ܰሻ ݃ଵ ሺ߱ܰሻ ݂ଶ ௪ ൌ݂݁ଵܶ (4.151) ݂ଵ ሺͳ߱ܰሻ ݃ଵ ሺͳ߱ܰሻǡ
where,߱ǡ ݁ǡ ݂ǡ݃(݅=1,2…7)arethecoefficientscitedinTable4.6.
ுௐ Theflowrateܸ௪ሶ istheinputvariable.ThecasestudyuseddatabyUlrike
Jordan&Vajen(2001)withaveragedailydomestichotwaterconsumptionof266L
(Aguilaretal.2005);ThepublishedconsumptionrateinoneͲminutetimescalewas transformedto15mintimescale.
81 Eqn.(4.123)calculatestheheattransferrateduetothehotwaterdrawͲoff.The formulationimpliesapremisethatthemassofthejetflowisnotgreaterthanthemass ofthewaterͲnode.Thestudiedcasesatisfiedthepremise,thatis,
ுௐ ே (ሶ ௪ οݐ ݉௪ǡ (4.152݉
.where,οݐisthetimestep,οݐ=900s
Table4.6Coefficientsofcitymaintemperatureofcasestudy Units Units ߱ 0.0086904 dimensionless ݁ 11.490452 Ԩ
݂ଵ 0.1839946 Ԩ ݃ଵ 0.0905672 Ԩ
݂ଶ Ͳ6.7763674 Ԩ ݃ଶ Ͳ7.3992997 Ԩ
݂ଷ Ͳ0.0965715 Ԩ ݃ଷ Ͳ0.2033946 Ԩ
݂ସ 0.0843686 Ԩ ݃ସ 0.8829336 Ԩ
݂ହ Ͳ0.0031887 Ԩ ݃ହ Ͳ0.0370572 Ԩ
݂ Ͳ0.0969744 Ԩ ݃ 0.1161188 Ԩ
݂ 0.0140706 Ԩ ݃ Ͳ0.0229117 Ԩ
଼݂ Ͳ0.3362503 Ԩ ଼݃ Ͳ0.0142773 Ԩ
݂ଽ Ͳ0.0277629 Ԩ ݃ଽ Ͳ0.0179754 Ԩ
݂ଵ Ͳ0.0362475 Ԩ ݃ଵ Ͳ0.1390454 Ԩ
݂ଵଵ Ͳ0.0136723 Ԩ ݃ଵଵ Ͳ0.0541225 Ԩ
݂ଵଶ Ͳ0.0187207 Ԩ ݃ଵଶ 0.1353561 Ԩ
݂ଵଷ Ͳ0.0066015 Ԩ ݃ଵଷ Ͳ0.0206411 Ԩ
݂ଵସ Ͳ0.0893228 Ԩ ݃ଵସ 0.0843321 Ԩ
݂ଵହ Ͳ0.0449833 Ԩ ݃ଵହ Ͳ0.0122686 Ԩ
݂ଵ 0.1727085 Ԩ ݃ଵ 0.0686489 Ԩ
݂ଵ 0.0242816 Ԩ ݃ଵ 0.0008067 Ԩ
4.5.6. Temperaturesinwaterstoragetank
ThewaterͲnodetemperatureiscalculatedbysolvingtheenergybalance formulatedforthewaterstoragetank.EmployingbackwardEulermethodtodiscretize theEqn.(4.119),weobtain:
82
ቀ݉ே ܿ ேቁ ቀܶே െܶே ቁ ௪ ௪ ௪ ௧ೕ ௪ ௧ೕషభ ௧ೕషభ (4.153) ܳሶ ே ൌ Ǥ ௦௧ οݐ
Byrearrangingwehave:
ሶ ே οݐܳ ܶே ൌܶே ௦௧ Ǥ ௪ ௧ೕ ௪ ௧ೕషభ (4.154) ቀ݉ே ܿ ேቁ ௪ ௪ ௧ೕషభ
4.5.7. Electricpowerofheater
Theelectricpoweroftheheateriscalculatedas:
ܹሶ ௨௫ ൌ݉ሶ ுௐ ቀܥ ௨௫ ܶ௨௫ െܥ ேହܶேହቁǡ (4.155) ௪ ௪ǡ௦௧ ௪ǡ௦௧ ௪ ௪
௨௫ ௨௫ where,ܹሶ istheelectricpoweroftheauxiliaryheater;ܶ௪ǡ௦௧isthesetpoint temperatureofdomestichotwater.
௨௫ Thesettemperatureܶ௦௧ istheinputparameter.Forinstance,thestudiedcase
௨௫ setܶ௦௧ =40.5Ԩ(CaliforniaEnergyCommission2005).
4.5.8. Heattransferwithheatsourceandheatsink
Theheattransferratesofthewaterstoragetankwiththeheatsourcesandheat sinkaretheinputofthewaterstoragetankmodel.Determinedbytheoperating conditionsofthedevicesconnectedtotheimmersionheatexchangers,theheat transferratesareasbelow.
Fortheimmersionheatexchangerܪܺͳ,theheattransferrateintheheat
chargingmodeiscorrespondedtotheheattransferfromtheheatpumpas:
83 ܳሶ ௐ்ௌଵ ൌܳሶ ுସௐ்Ǥ (4.156)
Intheheatdischargingmode,theenteringconditionoftheheattransferwateristaken astheleavingconditionfromtheradiantfloor,
ௐ்ଵ ோி ܶǡ௪ ൌܶ௨௧ǡ௪ǡ (4.157)
ோி where,ܶ௨௧ǡ௪isthetemperatureofwaterleavingtheradiantfloor.Theheatdischarging rateiscorrespondedtotheheattransfertotheradiantflooras:
ܳሶ ௐ்ଵ ൌܳሶ ௐ்ସோிǡ (4.158)
where,
ሶ ௐ்ସோி ሶ ோி ܳ ൌܳௗௗǤ (4.159)
ሶ ௐ்ସோி ሶ ோி ܳ istheheattransferratefromthewaterstoragetanktotheradiantfloor;ܳௗௗ istheheattransferratedemandedbytheindoorspaceontotheradiantfloor.
Fortheimmersionheatexchangerܪܺʹ,theheatchargingrateiscorresponded totheheattransferfromthesolarthermalcollectoras:
ܳሶ ௐ்ௌଶ ൌܳሶ ைସௐ்Ǥ (4.160)
4.5.9. Heatingloadofwaterstoragetank
Theheatingloadofwaterstoragetankhastwocomponents:theheat dischargingofheatexchangerܪܺͳandthedomestichotwatermakeup.Therefore,the heatoutputrateofwaterstoragetank,ܳሶ ௐ்,iscalculatedas:
ܳሶ ௐ் ൌܳሶ ௐ்ଵ ܳሶ ௐ்ଶǤ (4.161)
84
4.5.10. Exergyanalysisofwaterstoragetank
Thissectionpresentstheexergyanalysisofthewaterstoragetankoperationby regardingthewaterstoragetankasathermodynamicopensystem.Theexergybalance equationisestablishedconsideringtheflowofwater,theheattransferbetweenthe storagetankandsurroundings,theinterͲnodalheattransferbetweenadjacentwaterͲ nodes,andtheexergydestroyedduringtheoperation.
Exergytransferwithheatsourceandheatsink
Thenetexergytransferratefromthewaterstoragetankheatsources,ܺሶ ௐ்ௌ,is
calculatedas:
ܺሶ ௐ்ௌ ൌܺሶ ௐ்ௌଵ ܺሶ ௐ்ௌଶ (4.162)
where,ܺሶ ௐ்ௌଵisthenetexergytransferrateoftheimmersionheatexchangerܪܺͳ;
ܺሶ ௐ்ௌଶisthenetexergyinputrateoftheimmersionheatexchangerܪܺʹ;botharethe inputofthewaterstoragetankmodel.Whenthewaterstoragetankreceivesexergy fromtheheatpump,
ܺሶ ௐ்ௌଵ ൌܺሶ ுସௐ்Ǣ (4.163)
Whenwaterstoragetankreceivesexergyfromthesolarthermalcollector,
ܺሶ ௐ்ௌଶ ൌܺሶ ସௐ்Ǥ (4.164)
Theexergytransferrateܺሶ ுସௐ்iscalculatedwith:
ܺሶ ுସௐ் ൌܺሶ ௗ െܺሶ ுସோிǤ (4.165)
85 Thenetexergytransferratetothewaterstoragetankheatsink,ܺሶ ௐ்ଵ,isthe
inputofthewaterstoragetankmodel.Whenthewaterstoragetankoutputexergyto
theradiantfloor,
ܺሶ ௐ்ଵ ൌܺሶ ௐ்ସோிǤ (4.166)
where,ܺሶ ௐ்ସோிistheexergytransferratefromthewaterstoragetanktotheradiant floor.
Exergytransferwithsurroundings
ௐ் Theexergytransferbetweenthewaterstoragetankandthesurroundings,ܺሶ௫௧ , iscalculatedas:
ହ ௐ் ே ܺሶ௫௧ ൌܺሶ௫௧ǡ (4.167) ୀଵ
where,
ሶ ே ሶ ே ܺ௫௧ ൌܳ௫௧ห߬หǡ (4.168)
ே ܺሶ௫௧istheexergytransferrateofthewaterͲnodeܰ݅withtheindoorsurroundings.
ExergydestroyedbyinterͲnodalheattransfer
Duetothetemperaturedifferenceamongtheadjacentnodes,theinterͲnodal
ሶ ௐ் exergydestructionrateofthewaterstoragetank,ܺ௧ǡௗ௦௧,iscalculatedas:
ସ ሶ ௐ் ሶ ே ே ேାଵ ܺ௧ǡௗ௦௧ ൌหܳ௧ǡேାଵ൫ห߬ หെห߬ ห൯ห (4.169) ୀଵ
where,
86 ݇ௐ்ାଵ ܳሶ ே ൌ ൫ܣௐ் ܣௐ் ൯൫ܶேାଵ െܶே൯ǡ (4.170) ௧ǡேାଵ ܮௐ்ାଵ ௦ǡ௦ ௪ ௪
ܶܭ ே (4.171) ߬ ൌͳെ ேǡ ܶܭ௪
ܶܭ ேାଵ (4.172) ߬ ൌͳെ ேାଵǡ ܶܭ௪
ሶ ே ே ܳ௧ǡேାଵistheheattransferrateofthewaterͲnodeܰ݅withthenodeܰ݅+1,߬ isthe
qualityfactorofconductionͲconvectionwithrespecttothewaterͲnodeܰ݅absolute
ே temperatureܶܭ௪ .
Changeofexergyduringheatstorageprocessinwaterstoragetank
Theexergyvariationratewithintheicestoragetank,οܺሶ ௐ்,iscalculatedasthe
sumofthatofthewaterͲnodes,
ହ ே ே ே ݉௪ ቀ߰௪ ௧ െ߰௪ ௧ ቁ ߂ܺሶ ௐ் ൌ ೕ ೕషభ ǡ (4.173) ߂ݐ ୀଵ
where,߰ே isthespecificexergyofwaterinthewaterͲnodeܰ݅. ௪ ௧ೕ
Exergydestructionandexergeticefficiency
ሶ ௐ் Theexergydestructionratebythewaterstoragetankoperation,ܺௗ௦௧,is obtainedfromtheestablishedexergybalance:
ሶ ௐ் ሶ ௐ்ௌ ሶ ௐ் ሶ ௐ் ሶ ௐ் ሶ ௐ் ܺௗ௦௧ ൌܺ െܺ ܺ௫௧ ܺ௧ǡௗ௦௧ െ߂ܺ Ǥ (4.174)
ௐ் Theexergeticefficiencyoftheicestoragetankoperation,ߟூூ ,iscalculatedas:
௧ೕ ௐ் σ ܺௗ௦௧ ߟௐ் ൌͳെ ǡ (4.175) ூூ ௧ೕ ௐ்ௌ σ ܺ
87
௧ೕ ௐ் ௧ೕ ௐ்ௌ Thecalculationsforσ ܺௗ௦௧,andσ ܺ aresimilartotheEqns.(4.116)and(4.117), respectively.
Exergyoutputforheating
Theexergyoutputrateofthewaterstoragetankontoheating,ܺሶ ௐ்,is
calculatedas:
ܺሶ ௐ் ൌܺሶ ௐ்ଵ ܺሶ ௐ்ଶǡ (4.176)
where,
ௐ்ଶ ுௐ ுௐ ெ௦ ܺሶ ൌ݉ሶ ௪ ൫߰௪ െ߰௪ ൯ǡ (4.177)
ܺሶ ௐ்ଵistheexergyoutputrateoftheimmersionheatexchangerܪܺͳ;ܺሶ ௐ்ଶisthe
ுௐ exergyoutputratefordomestichotwatermakeup;߰௪ isthespecificexergyofwater
ெ௦ withrespecttothetemperatureofthedomestichotwaterdrawnͲoff;߰௪ isthe
specificexergyofwaterwithrespecttothetemperatureofthecitymain.
4.6. Mathematicalmodelofradiantfloor Theradiantfloor(Fig.4.7)takesheatfromtheheatsourcetoemittothe residentialspace,whichistheheatsinkoftheradiantfloor.Themathematicalmodel simulatestheradiantflooroperationtocalculatetheradiantfloorheatsupplytothe residentialspace.
88
Fig.4.7Schematicofradiantfloormodel
4.6.1. Heattransferflow
ோி Themassflowrateofwaterthroughtheradiantfloor,݉ሶ ௪ ,iscalculatedas:
ܳሶ ோி ݉ሶ ோி ൌ ǡ (4.178) ௪ ܥ ோி ܶோி െܥ ோி ܶோி ǡ௪ ǡ௪ ௨௧ǡ௪ ௨௧ǡ௪
ሶ ோி ோி where,ܳ istheheatinputratetotheradiantfloor;ܶǡ௪isthetemperatureofwater
ோி enteringtheradiantfloor;ܶ௨௧ǡ௪isthetemperatureofwaterleavingtheradiantfloor.
AccordingtoASHRAE(2004),theminimumfloorsurfacetemperatureis19Ԩ.
Thetemperatureofwaterleavingtheradiantfloorissetat20Ԩ.
4.6.2. Supplyconditions
Thesupplyconditionsaretheinputsoftheradiantfloormodel,determinedby theleavingconditionsofthedevicesconnected.Theheattransferratefromtheradiant floorheatsourceisas:
89 ݏݑ݈݅݁ݏ ݐܽ݊݇ ݁݃ܽݎݐݏ ݎሶ ௐ்ସோிǡ ݓ݄݁݊ ݓܽݐ݁ܳ ܳሶ ோி ൌቊ Ǥ (4.179) ݏݑ݈݅݁ݏ ሶ ுସோிǡ ݓ݄݁݊ ݄݁ܽݐ ݑ݉ܳ
Thetemperatureofwaterenteringtheradiantfloorisas:
ௐ்ଵ ݏݑ݈݅݁ݏ ݐܽ݊݇ ݁݃ܽݎݐݏ ݎோி ܶ௨௧ǡ௪ ǡ ݓ݄݁݊ ݓܽݐ݁ ܶǡ௪ ൌቊ ௗ Ǥ (4.180) ݏݑ݈݅݁ݏ ௨௧ǡ௪ǡ ݓ݄݁݊ ݄݁ܽݐ ݑ݉ܶ
4.6.3. Exergyanalysisofradiantfloor
Thissectionpresentstheexergyanalysisoftheradiantflooroperationby regardingtheradiantfloorasathermodynamicopensystem.Theexergybalance equationisestablishedconsideringtheflowofwater,theheattransferbetweenthe radiantfloorandindoorspace,andtheexergydestroyedduringtheoperation.
Exergyofwaterflowthroughradiantfloor
Theexergytransferratebywaterflowthroughtheradiantfloor,ܺሶ ோிௌ,is
calculatedas:
ሶ ோிௌ ோி ோி ோி ܺ ൌ݉ሶ ௪ ൫߰ǡ௪ െ߰௨௧ǡ௪൯ǡ (4.181)
ோி ோி where,߰ǡ௪isthespecificexergyofwaterenteringtheradiantfloor;߰௨௧ǡ௪isthe
specificexergyofwaterleavingtheradiantfloor.
Theexergytransferrateܺሶ ோிௌisnotedasܺሶ ுସோிfortheheatpumpastheheat source,andܺሶ ௐ்ସோிforthewaterstoragetanksupplyingtheradiantfloor.
Exergyflowintoindoorspace
Theexergyoutputrateoftheradiantfloor,ܺሶ ோி,iscalculatedas:
90 ሶ ோி ሶ ோி ܺ ൌܳ ห߬หǤ (4.182)
Destroyedexergyandexergeticefficiency
ሶ ோி Theexergydestructionratebytheradiantflooroperation,ܺௗ௦௧,isobtained fromtheexergybalanceequation:
ሶ ோி ሶ ோிௌ ሶ ோி ܺௗ௦௧ ൌܺ െܺ ǡ (4.183)
ோி Theexergeticefficiencyoftheradiantflooroperation,ߟூூ ,iscalculatedas:
ܺሶ ோி ߟோி ൌͳെ ௗ௦௧Ǥ (4.184) ூூ ܺሶ ோிௌ
4.7. Mathematicalmodelofcirculatingpump Thecirculatingpump(Fig.4.8)driveswaterflowalongthecirculationloop.The mathematicalmodelsimulatesthecirculatingpumpoperationtocalculatetheelectric powerinput.
Fig.4.8Schematicofcirculatingpumpmodel
91 4.7.1. Electricpower
Thepumpperformanceiscalculatedusingpolynomialmodel(ASHRAE2009a).
Electricpowerinputiscalculatedusingaregressionmodelwiththefollowing formulation:
ଶ ଷ ସ ହ ሶ ௨ ሶ ௨ ሶ ௨ ሶ ௨ ሶ ௨ ሶ ௨ ܹ ൌ ൬ܿ ܿଵܸ௪ ܿଶܸ௪ ܿଷܸ௪ ܿସܸ௪ ܿହܸ௪ (4.185) ሶ ௨ ሶ ௨ ሶ ௨଼ ௨ ܸܿ௪ ܸܿ௪ ଼ܸܿ௪ ൰ ܨ ǡ
௨ where,ܹሶ istheelectricpowerinputtothecirculatingpump;ܿ ǥ଼ܿarethe
ሶ ௨ coefficients;ܸ௪ isthevolumeflowrateofwaterthroughthecirculatingpump;
ܨ௨istheflowfraction,
ܸሶ ௨ ܨ௨ ൌ ௪ ǡ (4.186) ሶ ௨ ܸ௫
ሶ ௨ andܸ௫ isthemaximumvolumeflowrateofwaterthroughthecirculatingpump.
ሶ ௨ Thecoefficientsܿ ǥ଼ܿandthequantityܸ௫ aregivenforaspecificpumpby
theuserextractedfromthemanufacturecatalogue.Fig.4.9showsthecoefficientsand theperformancecurveofthepump,WiloͲStar16F(Wilo2012),usedinthecasestudy.
Eqn.(4.187)isthespecificformulationpreparedtomodelthecasepump,usedontoall
pumpsofthesolarcombisystem.Regardingtheflowfraction,aminimumisrequiredfor
thesakeofavoidinglowflowdamage,suchas,temperaturerise,radialbearingloads,
axialthrust,etc.Recommendedminimumflowraterangesfrom10%to80%oftheflow atbestefficiencypoint;however,thesametypeofpumpmayhavethe
92 recommendationinarangeforagivenapplication(Volk2005).Thecasestudysetthe
௨ minimumasܨ =0.1.
3RZHU :
í )ORZ P V [ ܿ, ܿଵ, ܿଶ, ܿଷ, ܿସ, ܿହ, ܿ, ܿ, ଼ܿ, 3 2 6 3 9 4 12 5 15 6 18 7 21 8 24 W Wͼs/m Wͼs /m Wͼs /m Wͼs /m Wͼs /m Wͼs /m Wͼs /m Wͼs /m 14.918 Ͳ0.55325 Ͳ5.423 1.9018 Ͳ0.76084 Ͳ0.76548 0.74376 0.1408 Ͳ0.15351 Fig.4.9Performancecurveofcasepump ଶ ଷ ሶ ௨ ሶ ௨ ሶ ௨ ሶ ௨ ܹ ൌ ൬ͳͶǤͻͳͺ െ ͲǤͷͷ͵ʹͷ ܸ௪ െ ͷǤͶʹ͵ ܸ௪ ͳǤͻͲͳͺܸ௪
ሶ ௨ସ ሶ ௨ହ ሶ ௨ െ ͲǤͲͺͶܸ௪ െ ͲǤͷͶͺܸ௪ ͲǤͶ͵ܸ௪ (4.187)
௨ ଼ ܸሶ ͲǤͳͶͲͺܸሶ ௨ ͲǤͳͷ͵ͷͳ ܸሶ ௨ ൰ ௪ Ǥ ௪ ௪ ͲǤͲͲͳͲͶͳ
ሶ ௨ ሶ ௨ଵ ሶ ௨ଶ ሶ ௨ଷ Theflowrateܸ௪ isnotedbyܸ௪ ǡܸ௪ andܸ௪ forthepumpܲͳ,
ܲʹ,andܲ͵connectedtothecirculationloopܮͳ,ܮʹ,andܮ͵,respectively.Also,the
ሶ ௨ ሶ ௨ଵ ሶ ௨ଶ ሶ ௨ଷ powerinputܹ isnotedbyܹ௪ ǡܹ௪ andܹ௪ .Forthesolar
combisystem,theoverallelectricpowerinputofthecirculatingpumpsiscalculatedas:
ሶ ௨ ሶ ௨ଵ ሶ ௨ଶ ሶ ௨ଷ ܹ௦௨ ൌܹ ܹ ܹ Ǥ (4.188)
93 4.7.2. Flowrates
Thevolumeflowrateistheinputofthecirculatingpumpmodel,determinedby theoperationofthecirculationloopconnected.Onthecirculationloopܮͳ,theflow
rateisthatthroughthesolarthermalcollector,
ሶ ௨ଵ ሶ ܸ௪ ൌܸ௪ Ǥ (4.189)
Onthecirculationloopܮʹ,theflowrateisthatthroughtheheatpumpevaporator,
ሶ ௨ଶ ሶ ா௩ ܸ௪ ൌܸ௪ Ǥ (4.190)
Onthecirculationloopܮʹ,theflowrateisthatthroughtheheatpumpcondenser,
ሶ ௨ଷ ሶ ௗ ܸ௪ ൌܸ௪ Ǥ (4.191)
4.7.3. Exergyanalysisofcirculatingpump
Fortheoperationofcirculatingpumpܲͳ,ܲʹ,andܲ͵,theexergydestruction
ሶ ௨ଵ ሶ ௨ଶ ሶ ௨ଷ rate,denotedbyܺௗ௦௧ ,ܺௗ௦௧ ,andܺௗ௦௧ ,arecalculatedasthefollowing:
ሶ ௨ଵ ሶ ௨ଵ ܺௗ௦௧ ൌܹ Ǥ (4.192)
ሶ ௨ଶ ሶ ௨ଶ ܺௗ௦௧ ൌܹ Ǥ (4.193)
ሶ ௨ଷ ሶ ௨ ܺௗ௦௧ ൌܹ Ǥ (4.194)
Forthesolarcombisystem,theoverallexergydestructionofcirculatingpump
ሶ ௨ operations,ܹௗ௦௧ ,iscalculatedas:
ሶ ௨ ሶ ௨ ܹௗ௦௧ ൌܹ௦௨ Ǥ (4.195)
94 4.8. Mathematicalmodelofsystem Themathematicalmodelofsystemisdevelopedbycouplingallthe mathematicalmodelsofthecomponentdevices.Forthewholecombisystem,the thermodynamicsystemboundarywasdrawnaroundthecombisystemphysicalparts(II inFig.4.10)toisolatethecombisystemfromtheouterandindoorenvironment,which arethethermodynamicsystemsurroundings.
Fig.4.10Thermodynamicsystemboundaryofsolarcombisystem
4.8.1. Heatingload
ሶ ௌ௬௦ Thecombisystemheatoutputrateforheating,ܳௗ,includesthatforthe
preparationofdomestichotwaterandthatforspaceheating,
ሶ ௌ௬௦ ሶ ௐ்ଶ ሶ ோி ܳௗ ൌܳ ܳ Ǥ (4.196)
4.8.2. Energysupplyandloss
ሶ ௌ௬௦ Theenergysupplyrateofthecombisystem,ܧ௦௨,iscalculatedas:
95 ሶ ௌ௬௦ ሶ ௌ௬௦ ሶ ௌ௬௦ ܧ௦௨ ൌܧ௦ ܹ ǡ (4.197)
ሶ ௌ௬௦ where,ܧ௦ isthesolarenergysupplyratetothecombisystem,
ሶ ௌ௬௦ ሶ ܧ௦ ൌܳ௦ Ǣ (4.198)
ሶ ௌ௬௦ ܹ istheelectricpowerinputratetothecombisystem,
ሶ ௌ௬௦ ሶ ௨௫ ሶ ு ሶ ௨ ܹ ൌܹ ܹ ܹ௦௨ Ǥ (4.199)
ሶ ௌ௬௦ Theenergylossrateofthecombisystem,ܧ௦௦,istheenergylossrateatthe solarthermalcollector,
ሶ ௌ௬௦ ሶ ܧ௦௦ ൌܧ௦௦ Ǥ (4.200)
4.8.3. Heattransferwithenvironment
ሶ ௌ௬௦ Theheattransferrateofthecombisystemwiththeenvironment,ܳ௫௧ ,includes
thatoftheicestoragetankandthatofthewaterstoragetank,
ሶ ௌ௬௦ ሶ ூ் ሶ ௐ் ܳ௫௧ ൌܳ௫௧ ܳ௫௧ Ǥ (4.201)
4.8.4. Heatstorage
ሶ ௌ௬௦ Theenergychangerateofthecombisystem,ܳ௦௧ ,includesthatintheice
storagetankandthatinthewaterstoragetank,
ሶ ௌ௬௦ ሶ ூ் ሶ ௐ் ܳ௦௧ ൌܳ௦௧ ܳ௦௧ Ǥ (4.202)
96 4.8.5. Systemperformance
Theperformanceofthesolarcombisystemisexaminedoverthewhole simulationperiodusingindicators:(i)theCoefficientofPerformance,(ii)thesolar energycontribution,and(iii)thesolarenergyfraction.
SystemCOP
ThecombisystemCOPiscalculatedastheoverallcombisystemheatingload,
௧ ௌ௬௦ ௧ ௌ௬௦ σ௧ୀ ܳௗ,dividedbytheoverallcombisystemelectricityconsumption,σ௧ୀ ܹ ,as:
σ௧ ܳௌ௬௦ ܥܱܲ ൌ ௧ୀ ௗǤ (4.203) ௧ ௌ௬௦ σ௧ୀ ܹ
where,
ௌ௬௦ ሶ ௌ௬௦ (ௗ ൌܳௗοݐǡ (4.204ܳ
ௌ௬௦ ሶ ௌ௬௦ ( ൌܹ οݐǤ (4.205ܹ
Solarenergycontribution
Thesolarenergycontributionofthecombisystem,ܵܥா ,iscalculatedasthe
௧ ௌ௬௦ overallsolarenergysuppliedtothecombisystem,σ௧ୀ ܧ௦ ,dividedbytheoverall
௧ ௌ௬௦ energysuppliedtothecombisystem,σ௧ୀ ܧ௦௨,as:
σ௧ ܧௌ௬௦ ܵܥ ൌ ௧ୀ ௦ ǡ (4.206) ா ௧ ௌ௬௦ σ௧ୀ ܧ௦௨
where,
ௌ௬௦ ሶ ௌ௬௦ (௦ οݐǡ (4.207ܧ௦ ൌܧ
97 ௌ௬௦ ሶ ௌ௬௦ (௦௨οݐǤ (4.208ܧ௦௨ ൌܧ
Solarenergyfraction
Solarenergyfractionevaluatesthecontributionofsolardevicesofasolarsystem.
Theevaluationofthesolarenergyfractionrequiresthecomparisonwithareference systemthatdoesnotincludeanysolardevicebutmeetsthesameheatingneedsasthe solarsystemdoes.Inthisstudy,anallelectricalheatingsystemisusedasthereference system.
Thesolarenergyfractionofthecombisystem,ܵܨா,iscalculatedastheoverall
௧ solarenergysuppliedbythesolarthermalcollector,σ௧ୀ ܳ ,totheenergyusedby
௧ ௌ௬௦ thereferencesystem,σ௧ୀ ܧ௦௨ ,as:
݈݈ܥ ݐ ܳ σݐൌͲ ܵܨ ൌ ǡ (4.209) ݏݕ݂ܵ݁ݎ ݐ ܧ ݑݏܧ σݐൌͲ
where,
( ൌܳሶ οݐǡ (4.210ܳ
ௌ௬௦ ሶ ௌ௬௦ (௦௨ οݐǤ (4.211ܧ௦௨ ൌܧ
4.9. Mathematicalmodelofcontrolsystem Themathematicalmodelsimulatestheoperationcontrolsofthevalves, circulatingpumps,andauxiliaryheater.Thecontrolsystemsimulationisaccomplished bycustomizingthecontrolledvariables,setpoints,andorganizingthecontrollogic.
98
4.9.1. Controlledvariables
Thecontrolsystemsendsoutoperationinstructionsbycontrolsignals.Inthe
controlsystemmodeling,thecontrolsignalsaresimulatedusingcontrolledvariables.
Controlledvariablesarecustomizedforthecombisystemtocontroltheflowsofheat transferfluids,tooperatetheauxiliaryheater.Thedevelopedmathematicalmodelsof
combisystemdevicesareintegratedwiththecontrolledvariables,particularlyintothose modelsectionsthatarerelatedtotheheattransferfluidflowsandtheelectricpowerof theauxiliaryheater.Table4.7showsthecontrolledvariableswithrespecttothedevices beingcontrolled(seeFig.4.1).
Table4.7Controlledvariablesofdevices Devices Controlledvariables Circulatingpumpܲͳ ߠ Circulatingpumpܲʹ ߠு Circulatingpumpܲ͵ ߠுǡߠௐ்ସோி ThreeͲwayvalveܸͳ,LͲtype ߠସௐ்ǡߠସூ் ThreeͲwayvalveܸʹ,TͲtype ߠுସௐ்ǡߠுସோிǡߠௐ்ସோி Bypassvalveܸ͵ ߠுǡߠௐ்ସோி Auxiliaryheater ߠ௨௫ I. Thecirculationloopࡸ
Thesolarthermalcollectorandthetwostoragetanksarelinkedbythe circulationloopܮͳ,whichhasthecirculatingpumpܲͳandthevalveܸͳ.Whenthe circulationloopisonoperation,heatistransferredfromthesolarthermalcollectorto thestoragetanks.ThevalveܸͳissimulatedasathreeͲwayvalveofLͲtype,sothatone
99 ofthestoragetanks,eitherthewaterstoragetankortheicestoragetank,canreceive
theheattransferred.
Thecontrolledvariableࣂisdefinedforthecontrolofcirculatingpumpܲͳ:
ߠ=1forturningonthepump,ߠ=0forturningoff.Thecontrolled variableࣂࢃࢀisdefinedforthecontrolofvalveܸͳtoconnectthesolarthermal collectorwiththewaterstoragetank,ߠସௐ்=1foropenedconnection,ߠସௐ்=0
forclosed.Thecontrolledvariableࣂࡵࢀisdefinedforthecontrolofvalveܸͳto connectthesolarthermalcollectorwiththeicestoragetank:ߠସூ்=1foropened
connection,ߠସூ்=0forclosed.
Withthecontrolledvariablesdefined,Eqn.(4.5)ismodifiedas:
ேଵ ସௐ் ܶ௪ ǡߠ ൌͳ ܶ ൌቊ ௧ିο௧ Ǥ (4.212) ǡ௪ ௧ ௐ ସூ் ܶ௪ ௧ିο௧ǡߠ ൌͳ
II. Thecirculationloopsࡸandࡸ
Theoperationofthecirculationloopܮʹisrelatedtotheoperationofthe circulationloopܮ͵,duetobothareconnectedtotheheatpump.Thecontrolled variableࣂࡴࡼisdefinedforthecontrolofheatpump:ߠு=1forturningup,ߠு=0for
shuttingdown.Thecirculatingpumpsܲʹandܲ͵areoperatedtogetherwiththeheat pump,andthereforebotharecontrolledbythecontrolledvariableߠு.
Theheatpump,thewaterstoragetank,andtheradiantfloorarelinkedupby thecirculationloopܮ͵,whichhasthecirculatingpumpܲ͵,andthevalveܸʹ.Thevalve
100 ܸʹissimulatedasathreeͲwayvalveofTͲtype.Thecirculationloopܮ͵hasonebypass
fortheswitchofheatsources.Bycontrollingthebypassvalveܸ͵,eithertheheatpump orthewaterstoragetankisswitchedtobetheheatsourceofthecirculationloopܮ͵.
Theoperationisasolesourcesituation:Whenthecirculationloopܮ͵isonoperation withtheheatpumpastheheatsource,heatistransferredfromtheheatpumptoeither thewaterstoragetank,ortheradiantfloor,orboth.Whenthecirculationloopison
operationwiththewaterstoragetankastheheatsource,heatistransferredfromthe waterstoragetanktotheradiantfloor.Theoperationofcirculationloopܮ͵ synchronizedtheoperationofthecirculatingpumpܲ͵.
Thecontrolledvariablesࣂࡴࡼࢃࢀ,ࣂࡴࡼࡾࡲ,andࣂࢃࢀࡾࡲaredefinedforthe specifieddeviceconnectionsalongthecirculationloopܮ͵,eitheroneofcontrolled variablesinfluencestheoperationsofvalveܸʹandvalveܸ͵atthesametime.The controlledvariableࣂࡴࡼࢃࢀisdefinedfortheconnectionbetweentheheatpumpand thewaterstoragetank:ߠுସௐ்=1foropenedconnection,ߠுସௐ்=0forclosed.The controlledvariableࣂࡴࡼࡾࡲisdefinedfortheconnectionbetweentheheatpumpand radiantfloor:ߠுସோி=1foropenedconnection,ߠுସோி=0forclosed.Thecontrolled
variableࣂࢃࢀࡾࡲisdefinedfortheconnectionbetweenthewaterstoragetankand radiantfloor,ߠௐ்ସோி=1foropenedconnection,ߠௐ்ସோி=0forclosed.
Thecontrolledvariablesߠுandߠௐ்ସோிneverbothequalto1atthesametime,
becausetheheatpumpdoesnotworksimultaneouslywiththehotwaterstoragetank
101 toheattheradiantfloor.Forthecontrolledvariablesߠுସோிandߠுସௐ்,ifoneorboth
equalto1,thenߠு=1.
Withthecontrolledvariablesdefined,Eqns.(4.23)and(4.24)ismodifiedas:
ா௩ ௐ ܶܭ ൌ ʹ͵Ǥͳͷ ܶ௪ ǡ (4.213) ǡ௪ ௧ ௧ିο௧
and
ܶܭௗ ǡ௪ ௧
ʹ͵Ǥͳͷ ܶோி ǡߠுସௐ் ൌͲܽ݊݀ߠுସோி ൌͳ ௨௧ǡ௪ ۓ ͵Ǥͳͷ ܶேଵ ǡߠுସௐ் ൌͳܽ݊݀ߠுସோி ൌͲʹ ۖ ൌ ௪ ௧ିο௧ Ǥ ோி ோி ௗ ோி ேଵ ሶ ௪ ܶ௨௧ǡ௪ ൫݉ሶ ௪ െ݉ሶ ௪ ൯ܶ௪ ௧ିο௧ ுସௐ் ுସோி݉ ۔ ͵Ǥͳͷ ௗ ǡߠ ൌͳܽ݊݀ߠ ൌͳʹۖ ሶ ௪݉ ە
(4.214)
III. Theheater
Thecontrolledvariableࣂ࢛࢞isdefinedforthecontroloftheauxiliaryheater:
ߠ௨௫=1forturningon,ߠ௨௫=0forturningoff.
4.9.2. Setpoints
Thesetpointistheconstantassignedtoasettingvariableforspecifingthe designed/expectedoperationstaterepresentedbythevariable.Anydepartureofthe currentoperationstatefromtheexpectedstatewouldmakethecontrolsystemtosend newcontrolinstructionforadjustment.ThecontrolsettingsarepresentedinTable4.8,
where,thesetpointsaregivenbyquantitiessofortheusertoassignvalues.
102 Table4.8Settingsofsolarcombisystemcomponentmodels Devices Settingvariables Setpoints ோி ோி Radiantfloor ܶǡ௪ ܶ ௐ ௐ Icestoragetank ߛǡ ܶ௪ ߛ௫ǡܶ௫ ேଵ ேଷ ேହ ௐ் ௐ் ௐ் Waterstoragetank ܶ௪ ǡܶ௪ ǡܶ௪ ܶ௦௧ ǡܶ௩ ǡܶ௫ I. Theradiantfloor
Thesupplytemperaturetotheradiantfloorislimitedtoalowerbound.The settingis
ோி ோி ܶǡ௪ ܶǡ (4.215)
ோி where,ܶisthecomforttemperatureofradiantfloor.Inthestudy,thevaluewas
ோி ܶ=25Ԩ.Thesettingwasreferredtotheoptimaltemperatureforsedentaryinterms ofthermalcomfortbyOlesen(1977).
II. Theicestoragetank
Themassfractionoficeintheicestoragetankislimitedtoanupperlimit.The settingis
ߛߛ௫ǡ (4.216)
where,ߛ௫isthemaximummassfractionoficeintheicestoragetank.Inthecase study,ߛ௫=0.7±0.01,asthemaximumvalueof0.7,allowingthevariationof0.01in
thesimulation.
Thetemperatureofliquidwaterintheicestoragetankislimitedtoanupper limit.Thesettingis
103 ௐ ௐ ܶ௪ ܶ௫ǡ (4.217)
ௐ where,ܶ௫isthemaximumtemperatureofthewaterͲlayerintheicestoragetank.In
ௐ thecasestudy,ܶ௫=37.8±1Ԩ,asthemaximumtemperatureof37.8Ԩ,allowingthe
variationof1Ԩinthesimulation.Thesettingcompliedwiththeheatpumpcatalogue intermsoftheoperationtemperaturesoftheheatsource(GeoSmart2012).Tolimit withamaximumwasalsoregardedinfavorofmakinguseofthermalcapacityofwater underphasechanging,sincethestoragetankisoperatedasacoldenergystore.
III. Thewaterstoragetank
Temperaturesinthewaterstoragetankaresubjecttoamaximum,denotedby
ௐ் ܶ௫.Thebasicsettingsarethewatertemperatureofthreenodesinthewaterstorage tankasfollows.
ேଵ ௐ் ௐ் ܶ௪ ܶ௦௧ െܶ௩ ǡ (4.218)
ேଷ ௐ் ܶ௪ ܶ௦௧ ǡ (4.219)
ௐ் ேହ ௐ் ௐ் ܶ௦௧ ܶ௪ ܶ௦௧ ܶ௩ ǡ (4.220)
ௐ் ௐ் where,ܶ௦௧ isthetemperaturesetforthewaterstoragetank;ܶ௩ isthevariation
allowedwithrespecttothewaterstoragetanksettingtemperature.
ௐ் ௐ் ௐ் Inthecasestudy,ܶ௫=60Ԩ,ܶ௦௧ =40Ԩ,andܶ௩ =5Ԩ.Withthemaximum limit,theoperationrangeforthebottom,middle,andtopsectiontemperaturesare35Ԩ
ேଵ ேଷ ேହ чܶ௪ ч60Ԩ,40Ԩчܶ௪ ч60Ԩ,and40Ԩчܶ௪ ч45Ԩ,respectively.Forthetop waterͲnodeܰͷ,theupperboundistomeetthetemperaturerequirementofdomestic hotwateruse,thesafetyrequirementofnotexceed50Ԩfromscald,aswellas
104 avoidingtheLegionellapneumophilatobe“inthe60Ԩrange”(ASHRAE2007).Forthe
bottomwaterͲnodeܰͳ,thesettingwasreferredtothesupplytemperature requirementoftheradiantfloor.Theimpactmadebythelowtemperatureoftheheat sourceofheatpumpwasalsotakenintoaccount.ForthemiddlewaterͲnodeܰ͵,the settingwasinbetweenofthetopandthebottom,thelowerboundwassetthesameas ofthetopnode.
4.9.3. Controllogic
Thecontrollogicismodelingthedecisionmakingatthecontrolhubof mechanicalsystembasedonsettingvaluesandthedeviationsofcorresponding measurestakenbysensors,beforecontrolactuatorssettingoutcontroldirectivesto regulatethebehaviorofsystemdevices(ASHRAE2011).Table4.9sortedthecontrolled
variablesforthecombisystemcomponentdevices.Eachofthedevicesisunderthe
operationcontroldirectivesdeliveredbythelistedcontrolledvariables.
Table4.9Controlledvariablesofsolarcombisystemcomponent Devices Controlledvariables Solarthermalcollector ߠ(ߠସௐ்ǡߠସூ்) Heatpump ߠு(ߠுସௐ்ǡߠுସோி) Icestoragetank ߠସூ்ǡߠு Waterstoragetank ߠସௐ்ǡߠுସௐ்ǡߠௐ்ସோி Radiantfloor ߠுସோிǡߠௐ்ସோி Fig.4.11illustratesthecontrollogicofthenonͲheatingseasonoperationofthe combisystem.Fig.4.12illustratesthecontrollogicoftheheatingseasonoperationof thecombisystem.Thecontrollogicdirecttheintegralresponseofthesolar
105 combisystemoperationbasedontheconditionsof:(i)therelationsofthecurrentvalues ofsettingvariablesandthesetpoints,(ii)theavailabilityofinsolation,and(iii)the
residentialheatingdemands.Theconditionsarerepresentedbydiamondconditional
boxesonthefigures.Tohavethegraphicpresentationsinconcise,acoupleofpremises
arenotdetailed:(i)ܩሶ Ͳforߠ=1,alsoߠସௐ்=1orߠସூ்=1,thatis,onlywhen
insolationisavailable,thesolarthermalcollectormightstartontocollectsolarheat.(ii)
ௐ ௐ ସூ் ܶ௪ ൏ܶ௫forߠ =1,thatis,onlywhentheicestoragetankwaterͲlayer temperaturebelowitssetpoint,theheatispossiblyallowedtotransferfromthesolar thermalcollectortotheicestoragetank.
Controldirectivesarefirmedbyassigningvaluestothecontrolledvariables, whichareenclosedintherectangularboxesandtrapezoidalboxesonthefigures.The controldirectivesaredecisionsmadefortheconditionsbasedonTrueorFalse,denoted byTandFonthefigures.Thesecontroldirectiveswouldcontroltheauxiliaryheater
(circledbythelineinovalonthefigures),manipulatetheoperationsofcirculationloop
ܮͳ,ܮʹ,andܮ͵bycontroltheoperationsofcirculatingpumpsandvalves.Control directivesenclosedinthetrapezoidalboxesareflexiblesituationswithonedecisionin higherpriorityovertheother.Flexibilityisgrantedregardingtheheattransferfromthe solarthermalcollectortooneofthetwostoragetanks,whenneitherofthestorage tanksinurgeofheatcharging.
106 Thecontrollogicisnotexclusivetoobtainthesameseriescontroldirectives.
However,anychangeisbelievedverylikelytoyielddifferentresults.Thepresented controllogicisusedinthisstudy.
ܰͳ ܹܶ ܹܶ ݐ െܾܶܽ݊݀ T݁ݏݓ ܶܶ ܰ͵ ܹܶ ݐ݁ݏݓ ܶܶ ܰͷ ܹܶ ܹܶ ݐ ܾܶܽ݊݀݁ݏݓ ܶܶ
ܦܪܹ T ܸݓሶ Ͳ ܰͷ ܹܶ ݐ F݁ݏݓ ܶܶ
ݑݔ ൌͲ ܰ͵ ܹܶ Tܣߠ ݐ݁ݏF ܶݓ ܶ ܰͷ ܹܶ ݓ ܶܶ ݐ݁ݏ ݑݔ ൌͳܣߠ F ߠܥ݈݈Ͷܫܶ ൌͲ
T ܥ݈݈ Ͷܹܶ ߛ൏ߛ݉ܽݔ ߠ ൌͳ
F ߠܪܲͶܹܶ ൌͳ
ߠܥ݈݈Ͷܫܶ ൌͳ ߠܥ݈݈ Ͷܹܶ ൌͲ
ߠܪܲͶܹܶ ൌͲ
Fig.4.11FlowchartofoperationcontrolalgorithmfornonͲheatingseason
107
T ܦܪܹ I ߛ൏ߛ݉ܽݔ T ܸݓሶ Ͳ ܰͷ ܹܶ ݐ݁ݏݓ ܶܶ F ݑݔ ൌͲ Fܣߠ ߠܪܲͶܴܨ ൌͲ ݑݔ ൌͳܣߠ ߠܥ݈݈Ͷܫܶ ൌͳ ߠܪܲͶܹܶ ൌͲ
ߠܥ݈݈ Ͷܹܶ ൌͲ II ܹܶܮͳ ܴܨ T T ܶݑݐ ǡݓ ܶܿ݉ ሶ ܴܨ ܰ͵ ܹܶ ܰͳ ܹܶ ܹܶ ݐ െܾܶܽ݊݀ T݁ݏݐ ܶݓ ܶ݁ݏͲ ܶݓ ܶ ݀݉݁݀ܳ ܰͷ ܹܶ ܰ͵ ܹܶ ݐ݁ݏݐ ܶݓ ܶ݁ݏݓ ܶܶ F ܶܰͷ ܹܶܶ ܹܶܶ ܾ݀݊ܽ ݐ݁ݏ ൌͳ ݓ ܨߠܹܶͶܴ
ߠܹܶͶܴܨ ൌͲ F III
ܹܶܮͳ ܴܨ ݓ ܶܿ݉ Tܶ T T ܴܨ ܰͳ ܹܶ ܹܶ ሶ Ͳ ܶݓ ܶ െܶܳ ܹܶ ͵ܰ ܾ݀݊ܽ ݐ݁ݏ ݀݉݁݀ ݐ݁ݏݓ ܶܶ ܰͷ ܹܶ ݐ݁ݏݓ ܶܶ F IV F F ߠܥ݈݈ Ͷܹܶ ൌͳ prior over ߠܥ݈݈Ͷܹܶ ൌͲ ܥ݈݈Ͷܫܶ ߠ ൌͳ ߠܥ݈݈Ͷܫܶ ൌͳ ܥ݈݈Ͷܫܶ prior over ߠ ൌͳ ߠܥ݈݈ Ͷܹܶ ൌͳ
ߠܪܲͶܹܶ ൌͲ
ߠܪܲͶܹܶ ൌͳ
T ሶ ܴܨ ܪܲͶܴܨ ܳ݀݁݉݀ Ͳ ߠ ൌͳ ܥ݊݀ ܴܨ ݑݐ ǡݓ ܶܿ݉ܶ
F ߠܪܲͶܴܨ ൌͳ
T ܹܶͶܴܨ ሶ ܴܨ ߠ ൌͳ ܳ݀݁݉݀ Ͳ
F ߠܹܶͶܴܨ ൌͲ Fig.4.12Flowchartofoperationcontrolalgorithmforheatingseason
108 ThecontrolforthenonͲheatingseasonoperation(Fig.4.11)isrelativesimple.
Duringthen,thewaterstoragetanktakesontheheatdistributioncenterofthe
combisystem.Incontrast,thecontrolfortheheatingseasonoperation(Fig.4.12)is
relativecomplex.Toensuretheresidentialheatingdemandsbeingmet,thethermal storagecapacityoftheicestoragetankiscrucial.OnFig.4.12,thetopleftpartiscircled bydashedoutlinenotedwiththecalloutI,whichcorrespondsthesituationofice storagetanklackedofheatstoragecapacity,featuredbyߛшߛ௫.Thispartofcontrol flowsindicate:Iftheicestoragetankiscrippled,soistheheatpump,andthewater storagetankbecomesthesoledevicethatcanrespondtotheheatingdemands.Insuch situation,thecombisystemiscompletelyclimateͲdependent.Withonlywaterstorage tankandsolarthermalcollectorbefunctional,thecombisystemsuppliesheatfarfrom enoughasbeingdemanded.
Iftheicestoragetankhasthecapacitytostoreheat,thecontrollogicwouldflow tothesituationthathasthewaterstoragetankstatusbeingfocused,notedbythe calloutII,III,andIVonFig.4.12.FortheconditionincalloutII,thewaterstoragetankis sufficientwithheatinstorage,andwouldsupplyheatifneededbutnottakeinany.The conditionincalloutIIIrepresentsthebottomlineofwaterstoragetankinheat reservation,forspaceheating.Reachingthisbottomline,theheatpumpistobe employedforheatinputtothewaterstoragetank.TheconditionincalloutIV representsthatthewaterstoragetankcanbeusedtoheattheradiantfloor.Andatthis situation,thesolarthermalcollectorisemployedastheheatsourceofwaterstorage
tank.Thecontrolstrategysuggestedinhereisthat,usingthewaterstoragetankto
109 respondtheheatingdemandsofradiantflooratthehigherprioritythanusingtheheat pump.Thereasonisthatunlikethewaterstoragetank,theheatpumpoutputislackof flexibility.
OnFig.4.12,theconditionregardingheatsupplytotheradiantfloor,as formulatedbyEqn.(4.215),isdistinguishedintoconditionsoftwoforms:
ௐ்ଵ ோி ܶ௨௧ǡ௪ ܶǡ (4.221)
forthewaterstoragetankonthesupply,and
ௗ ோி ܶ௨௧ǡ௪ ܶǡ (4.222)
fortheheatpumpcondenseronthesupply.
4.10. Integrationofmathematicalmodelsincompletecomputermodel Thesolarcombisystemmathematicalmodelisbuiltfromintegratedcomponent models,includingthecontrolsystemmodel,thesystemmodel,andthecomponent equipmentmodels.Thecomponentequipmentmodels,includingthesolarthermal collectormodel,heatpumpmodel,icestoragetankmodel,waterstoragetankmodel, radiantfloormodel,andcirculatingpumpmodel,arecouplingonewiththeother
throughtherelationsthatrepresenttheheattransferwaterbehaviorswithinthe circulationloops.Theintegrationofcontrolsystemmodelwiththecoupledcomponent equipmentmodelsispracticedbynotonlyincludingthecontrolalgorithm,butalsoby
110 modifyingthoserelationsregardingcirculationloopswithappropriatecontrolled variablestorepresentthecontrolledheattransferthroughthecirculationloops.
Thesolarcombisystemcomputermodelisachievedbyimplementingthesolar combisystemmathematicalmodelontoacomputerprogram.Where,interfacewas createdforinputs.Thesolarcombisystemoperationcanbemodeledbyrunning
computersimulationwiththecomputermodel.ThisresearchusedtheEESprogram
(Klein2012)fortheimplementation.EESisageneralpurposeequationͲsolvingprogram handlingcouplednonͲlinearalgebraicanddifferentialequations.TheprogramhasbuiltͲ infunctionscalculatingthethermodynamicandtransportpropertiesofsubstances.
Suchfeaturesmaketheprogramsuitableforthisstudytouse.
ReadingpreviousvaluesinquasiͲstaticapproach
ThecombisystemthermodynamicmodelisdevelopedinquasiͲstaticapproach.
Thisimpliesthethermodynamicprocessofthecombisystemisregardedassteadystate
overeachofthetimeintervalοݐ.Becauseofthermalstorageprocessinvolved,asgiven byEqns.(4.87),(4.90),and(4.154),thestateofonetimeintervalisrelatedtothestate oftheprevioustimeinterval.Thisrequiresthecomputermodelshouldbeabletocarry
thepreviousstateovertothecurrenttimeforthethermalstorageprocesstobe
computed.
Twovariablesareintroducedforthepurposeofcontinuouscomputation:ܴݑ݊
asthesequencingnumberofsimulationruns,whichstartsfrom1attheinitiation;ܶ݅݉݁
111 forthecombisystemoperationtimesimulated,whichistheinputstartingfrom0sat theinitiation.Thefollowingrelationissubjected:
ܶ݅݉݁ (ݑ݊ ൌ ͳǤ (4.223ܴ οݐ
,Forexample,thecasestudyhasοݐ=900s,withܶ݅݉݁=0,900,1800…input,ܴݑ݊=1,2
3…areobtained.
Certaintypesofvariables
Afewvariablesarefunctionalforthecomputermodeltocompute,presentedin
Table4.10.Thesevariablesaregroupedintothreetypesbytheirfunctions.Thetime variablesaretheinputvariablesofthecombisystemmodel,varyingateachtimestep.
Thedifferentialvariablesarethevariablesfromthedifferentialequationsofstorage
tankmodels.Thistypeofvariablesneedstheinitialvalueinput,thecasestudyused:
ூ ௐ ே ݉=0,ܶ௪ =18Ԩ,andܶ௪ =18Ԩ.Thetracingvariablesarethevariablesbeingtraced
forthepreviousvalues.Thosedifferentialvariablesarebelongingtothistypetoo.
MultiplesoͲcalledParametricTablesarecreatedforthesevariables.Thenumber ofparametrictablesdependsonthenumberofsimulationruns.Becauseeachtable, named,canholdalimitednumberofrows,onerowcorrespondingtoonesimulation run.TheparametrictablesarejointlyusedwiththebuildͲinTableValueFUNCTION,
(ሻǡ (4.224݈ܾ݁ܽ݅ݎݓǡ ݒܽݎ ሺݐܾ݈ܽ݁ǡ ൌ ݈ܾ݁ܽ݅ݎݒܽ
ݓdenotesthenumberofݎ;where,ݐܾ݈ܽ݁denotesthenameoftheparametrictable
isthenameofthevariableincludedinthe݈ܾ݁ܽ݅ݎtherowintheparametrictable;ݒܽ
,ݓasݎparametrictable.Byassigningtheargument
112 (ݓ ൌ ܴݑ݊ െ ͳǡ (4.225ݎ thefunctionreadsandassignsthepreviousvalueofthegivenvariablefromthe specifiedparametrictable.
Table4.10VariablesinparametrictablesofEESͲbasedsolarcombisystemmodel Symbols Descriptions Type ܩሶ Insolationontiltedpanel
ܶ Outdoorairtemperature ܶெ Citymainwatertemperature ௪ Timevariable ுௐ ܸ௪ሶ Domestichotwatervolumeflowrate ሶ ோி ܳௗௗ Spaceheatingdemand ܶ݅݉݁ Simulationtime ݉ூ IceͲlayermass Differentialvariable ܶௐ WaterͲlayertemperature ௪ Tracingvariable ே ܶ௪ WaterͲnodetemperature ߛ Icemassfraction ௐ ݉௪ WaterͲlayermass ோி ݉ሶ ௪ Watermassflowrateofradiantfloor Tracingvariable ߠுସௐ் Controlledvariableofheatpumpchargingwaterstoragetank ߠுସோி Controlledvariableofheatpumpchargingradiantfloor
Modelparameters
ThesoͲcalledLookupTablesarecreatedtostorethemodelparametersinputby theuser.Onetableisusedforonecomponentequipment,plusacommononeforthe
simulationoperation(includingparameterssuchasthetimestepοݐ).ThebuiltͲin
LookupFUNCTIONisusedfortheprogramtoreadandassigntheparametervalues,
(ሻǡ (4.226ݎݐ݁݁݉ܽݎݓǡ ܽݎ ሺݐܾ݈ܽ݁ǡ ൌ ݎݐ݁݁݉ܽݎܽ
ݓdenotesthenumberoftheݎ;where,ݐܾ݈ܽ݁denotesthenameofthelookuptable
.istheparametertobelookedupforvaluesݎݐ݁݁݉ܽݎtablerow;ܽ
113 Programming
Atthisstage,eachofthecomponentmodelsneedstobebrokendowntoparts foreachparttobewrittenasaprocedure.Theprocedures,alongwithsomeuserͲ writtenfunctions,becomethesubroutinesofthecombisystemcomputermodel.The subroutines,eithersavedasstandͲaloneEESlibraryfilesunderparticulardirectoryor
arrangedwithinasoͲcalledEquationWindow,aretobeusedbythemainroutineofthe combisystemcomputermodel.Themainroutineiswrittenintheequationwindow, withfunctionsanddirectivescompiledinsequence.Arrangingthesequenceis necessaryforsolvingtheunknownwiththeknowninready(appearedearlier).The programmedmodelcanpreͲcalculate,suchastheimminentcapacitiesofcomponent equipment.Thiswasusedbythecontrolalgorithmforadjustingthedeviceoperation.
Valueswerereadfromthelookuptablesandparametrictablesusingthespecific functions,thedirectivescallproceduresandexportresults.
Solving
RunningsimulationisexecutedupontheparametrictablesusingthesoͲcalled
SolveTableCOMMAND.Whilethesolvingisprocessedrowbyrowontheparametric tables,thecombisystemoperationissimulatedfromonetimesteptothenext.During eachrunofsimulation,thevariablesintheparametrictables(excepttheinputtime
variables)arewrittenwithresultsthatarejustsolvedbygoingthroughthemainroutine tocomputeforalltheunknowns.Thesolvingoperationemploysiterativecomputation technique,startingfromaguessvalueforanunknown,andterminatingtillthestop criteriabeingreached.Thecasestudyappliedthedefaultsettingofcriteriatolerances
114 ofEES:numberofiterations>100,relativeresiduals<10Ͳ6,changeinvariables<10Ͳ9,
elapsedtime>3600s.
4.11. Modelvalidationandverification Aftercompletingthemodelimplementation,modelvalidationandverification wereconductedfollowingtwoofthefourprocessespresentedbySargent(2011)(Fig.
4.13):theconceptualmodelvalidationandthecomputerizedmodelverification.The formerverifiesthesolarcombisystemmathematicalmodel’srepresentationisforthe intendedpurposeofthemodelingofthesystemoperation.Thelatterverifiesthe
programmingandimplementationintheEESprogramwascorrect.
Fig.4.13Simplifiedversionofthemodelingprocess(Sargent2011) Themathematicalandlogicalrelationshipsofthecombisystemcomponent modelsandtheoverallcombisystemmodelwereexaminedforvalidation.The
115 componentenergymodels,eitherfrompreviousstudies,currentindustrypracticeor newdevelopmentsunderwentthecheckupoftheSecondLawofthermodynamics.
WheneverthemodelsfailedtocomplywithboththeFirstLawofthermodynamicand theSecondLawofthermodynamic,themodelsweremodified.
Forcomputermodelverification,structuredwalkthroughsandcorrectness
proofswereperformed,asofthestatictestingapproach.Dynamictestingwasexecuted undersimulationtestswithvarioussimulationtimespans,forday,forseason(i.e., heatingseasonandnonͲheatingseason),andforacompletesimulationyear.Detailed outputfromthetestsimulationsweretracedforinvestigatingtheinputͲoutputrelations,
themodelinternalconsistency,etc.Energybalancewascheckedforeachcomponent equipmentmodels,aswellasforthecompletecombisystemmodel.Effortsweremade tolookforthehiddenerrors,forinstancecheckingdimensionlessnumbers,suchas thermalefficiency,whichbearsvaluesinarangebetween0and1.Thefeatureof checkingunitconsistencyintheEESprogramwasusedtoreduceerrorsforthiscomplex combisystemmodel.
116
5. Resultsanddiscussions ThecasestudyhouseisinMontreal,Canada.TheheatingseasonisfromOctober
17toApril30,followedbythenonͲheatingseasonfromMay1toOctober16.The designindoortemperatureofthehouseis18Ԩ.Thebuildinggeometryandphysical characteristicscanbefoundinLeckner&Zmeureanu(2011).Thesolarcombisystem computermodelwassimulatedtomeetthecasehouseresidentialheating requirementsduringayear.Theinputspaceheatingdemandwasfromthestudyby
Leckner&Zmeureanu(2011)withaseasonaloverallof8,323kWhandapeakof12.992 kWinJanuary.TheinputdomestichotwaterconsumptionwasfromthestudybyUlrike
Jordan&Vajen(2001)withadailyaverageof266L(Aguilaretal.2005).Theinputcold watertemperaturewasfromthestudybyHugo(2008),whocorrelatedthetemperature ofthecitymainofMontrealmeasuredbyDumas&Marcoux(2004).
Table5.1presentsthecapacityandcontrolsettingsofthesolarcombisystem
equipmentinthesimulatedcase.Thewaterstoragetank(Consolar2012),heatpump
(GeoSmart2012),andsolarthermalcollector(SunEarth2012)areproductsavailablefor
purchase;thesizeoficestoragetankwasstudiedascustomized.Theircapacitiesand thenodesettingtemperatureswerefinalizedafteranalysesperformedusingthe
developedcomputermodel.Thedecisionwasmadebasedon:tomeetthecaseheating
requirementsusingequipmentinthelowestcapacities.
117 Table5.1Capacitiesandcontrolsettingsofsolarcombisystemsimulatedcase Componentequipment Capacity Settings Minimumsupplytemperature25Ԩ(Olesen1977) RadiantfloorloopͲ Returntemperature20Ԩ(ASHRAE(2004) Nodessettingtemperature40±5Ԩ Maximumallowabletemperature60Ԩ(ASHRAE2007) Waterstoragetank 2.2m3 AuxiliaryheaterstartͲuptemperature40.5Ԩ (CaliforniaEnergyCommission2005) Maximumicefraction70%(Sunwell2012) Icestoragetank 14m3 Maximumwatertemperature37.8Ԩ(GeoSmart2012) 12.95kW Heatpump Ͳ COP3.1 Tiltangle60°(Hugo2008) Solarthermalcollectors 27.58m2 OrientationdueSouth Theinitialconditionsofthesimulationwerethetemperaturesinthestorage tanks,whichweretakenastheindoorairtemperature18Ԩ.Theimpactoftheinitial valueswaseliminatedbysimulatingthecombisystemoperationforasimulationtimeof threecontinuousyears.Resultsofthethirdyearwereusedfortheanalysis.
5.1. Energyperformanceofsolarcombisystem
5.1.1. Overviewofannualenergyflow
Thesolarcombisystemusedsolarheatandelectricitytomeettheresidential heatingneeds.Theannualenergyflowsamongthesystemcomponentsareplottedin
Fig.5.1.Therectangularboxesbycontinuouslinerepresentthesystemcomponents.
Therectangularboxesbydottedlinerepresentthesupplyofenergy(atthetop)andthe heatingloads(atthebottom).Theboxesinirregularshaperepresenttheoutdoor environmentandtheindoorsurroundings.Thearrowsconnectingtheboxesshowthe directionoftheflowpaths.
118
Fig.5.1Flowchartofenergyflowsofsolarcombisystemannualoperation SystemCOP:3.98.Solarenergycontribution:89.5%.Solarenergyfraction(reference):1.3. TheannualenergyusewasquantifiedinkWh.Theamountofchangeofenergy wasindicatedforthestoragetanks,positiveforenergystoredandnegativeforenergy extracted.Similarconventionwasusedfortheindoorsurroundings.Theoperation temperatureswerelabeled.Forinstance,inthecaseofsolarcollectors,ܶത௨௧Τܶതisthe
119 meanoutlettemperaturefollowedbythemeaninlettemperature.Inthecaseof outdoorenvironment,ܶ௫Τܶistheupperlimitandthelowerlimitofoutdoor temperature.Somecaseswerelabelledwithonetemperature:meantemperatureof theicestoragetankwaterͲlayer,meantemperatureofthewaterstoragetanknodes,or supplytemperaturealongtheflowpath.
5.1.2. Combisystemenergyperformance
CombisystemCOP
ThesystemCOPwascalculatedastheratioofthesystemheatingloadtothe systemelectricityconsumption.Annualoperationofthecombisystemused2,956kWh ofelectricitymeetingtheheatingneedsof11,763kWh.Thecombisystemhadanannual systemCOPof3.98.
ݐ݁݉ ݄݁ܽݐ݅݊݃ ݈ܽ݀ݏݕݏ ൌ ܱܲܥݐ݁݉ݏݕܵ ݑ݉ݐ݅݊ݏݐݕ ܿ݊݅ܿ݅ݎݐ݁݉ ݈݁݁ܿݐݏݕݏ (5.1) ͳͳǡ͵ ൌ ൌ͵Ǥͻͺ ʹǡͻͷ
Solarenergyfractioncomparedtoreferencesystem
AcomparednonͲsolarsystemissupposedtosatisfythesameheatingneedsas
ofasolarsystem(Hastings&Wall2007).Thereferencesystemcomparedwasconsisted ofelectricwaterheaterandelectricbaseboardheater(Table5.2).
120 Bycomparingthetwosystems,thesolarenergyfractionofasolarsystemis calculatedasaratioofthesolarenergycollectionofasolarsystemtotheenergyused bythereferencesystem,
ݐ݁݉ݏݕݏݎ݈ܽݏ ݕ ݈݈ܿ݁ܿݐ݅݊ ݂݃ݎ݁݊݁ ݎ݈ܽݏ ሻ ൌ ܨݐ݅݊ሺܵܿܽݎݕ݂݃ݎ݁݊݁ݎ݈ܽܵ ݐ݁݉ݏݕݏ ݁ܿ݊݁ݎ݂݁݁ݎ ݕܾ ݀݁ݏݕ ݑ݃ݎ݁݊݁ ா (5.2) ͳͶǡͳʹͳ ൌ ൌͳǤ͵ ͳͲǡͺͷͲ
Thesolarcombisystemhadanannualsolarenergyfractionof1.3.Aprilhadthe solarenergyfractionpeakof5.39,andtheminimumappearedinDecemberasof0.52.
Table5.2Referencesystemenergyusevs.solarenergycollectionofsolarcombisystem Reference system Solarcombisystem Electricity Electricity consumption consumption ofbaseboard ofwater Totalenergy Collectedsolar Solarenergy heater, heater, use, radiation, fraction, kWh kWh kWh kWh dimensionless January 2,331.04 277.51 2,608.55 1,707.84 0.65 February 1,721.11 262.53 1,983.64 2,222.92 1.12 March 949.38 306.54 1,255.92 2,807.75 2.24 April 182.27 283.44 465.72 2,511.75 5.39 May 0.00 213.88 213.88 433.03 2.02 June 0.00 156.79 156.79 342.73 2.19 July 0.00 117.67 117.67 298.52 2.54 August 0.00 100.80 100.80 274.45 2.72 September 0.00 145.52 145.52 350.41 2.41 October 171.68 171.73 343.41 1,018.88 2.97 November 976.15 218.15 1,194.30 974.43 0.82 December 1,991.79 271.83 2,263.62 1,178.00 0.52 Year 8,323 2,526 10,850 14,121 1.30
Solarenergycontribution
Among28,023kWhofenergy,asumoftheannualincidentsolarenergy(25,067 kWh)andtheannualelectricityconsumption,theannualincidentsolarenergy contributionwas89.5%.
121 ݕ݃ݎ݁݊݁ ݎ݈ܽݏ ݐ݊݁݀݅ܿ݊݅ ሻ ൌ ൈ ͳͲͲ ܥݑݐ݊ ሺܾܵ݅ݎݕܿ݊ݐ݃ݎ݁݊݁ݎ݈ܽݏݐ݊݁݀݅ܿ݊ܫ ݕ ݅݊ݑݐ݃ݎ݁݊݁ ݐ݁݉ݏݕݏ ா (5.3) ʹͷǡͲ ൌ ൈ ͳͲͲΨ ൌ ͺͻǤͷΨ ʹͺǡͲʹ͵
Among17,077kWhofenergy,asumoftheannualsolarenergycollection
(14,121kWh)andtheannualelectricityconsumption,theannualcollectedsolarenergy contributionwas82.7%.
ݕ ݈݈ܿ݁ܿݐ݅݊݃ݎ݁݊݁ ݎ݈ܽݏ ሻ ൌ ൈ ͳͲͲ ܥݑݐ݊ ሺܾܵ݅ݎݕܿ݊ݐ݃ݎ݁݊݁ݎ݈ܽݏ݈݈݁ܿݐ݁݀ܥ ݕ ݅݊ݑݐ݃ݎ݁݊݁ ݐ݁݉ݏݕݏ ா (5.4) ͳͶǡͳʹͳ ൌ ൈ ͳͲͲΨ ൌ ͺʹǤΨ ͳǡͲ
Energyefficiency
Thesystemoperationused28,023kWhofenergytomeettheheatingneedsof
11,763kWhoveroneyear.Theannualsystemenergyefficiencyof42.0%wascalculated astheratiooftheannualheatingloadtotheannualenergyinput:
ݐ݁݉ ݄݁ܽݐ݅݊݃ ݈ܽ݀ݏݕݏ ݕ݂݂݁݅ܿ݅݁݊ܿݕ ൌ ൈ ͳͲͲ݃ݎݐ݁݉݁݊݁ݏݕܵ ݕ ݅݊ݑݐ݃ݎ݁݊݁ ݐ݁݉ݏݕݏ (5.5) ͳͳǡ͵ ൌ ൈ ͳͲͲΨ ൌ ͶʹǤͲΨ ʹͺǡͲʹ͵
Ifcountingtheenergyusesincetheheatinputbythesolarthermalcollector,to supplytheheatingloadledtheenergyefficiencyof68.9%(among17,077kWh).
122 5.1.3. ElectricityconsumptionandcombisystemCOP
Table5.3presentstheelectricityconsumptionofheatpumpandcirculating pumps,alongwiththesystemCOPcalculatedastheaverageofthesystemCOPsover thecorrespondingtimeperiod.
Table5.3ResultsofelectricityconsumptionandsystemCOPofsolarcombisystemannualoperation Heatpump, Circulatingpumps,kWh SystemCOP, kWh P1 P2 P3 Overall dimensionless January 854.89 1.58 1.54 1.73 4.85 3.07 February 564.02 1.84 1.03 1.18 4.04 3.55 March 264.50 2.21 0.48 0.59 3.29 4.84 April 99.43 2.36 0.19 0.23 2.78 4.94 MayͲ0.78 ͲͲ0.78 449.77 JuneͲ0.67 ͲͲ0.67 420.69 JulyͲ0.47 ͲͲ0.47 491.50 AugustͲ0.55 ͲͲ0.55 380.45 SeptemberͲ0.51 ͲͲ0.51 553.23 October 64.64 1.16 0.12 0.17 1.44 6.54 November 367.64 1.27 0.65 0.83 2.75 3.31 December 714.98 1.30 1.29 1.49 4.08 3.19 Year 2,930 15 5 6 26 3.98 Theheatpumpused2930kWhofelectricityintheyear,withthehighest
consumptioninJanuaryfollowedbyDecember.Thecirculationpumpsܲʹ&ܲ͵were
operatedduringJanuarytoAprilandOctobertoDecemberintheheatingseason.The
circulationpumpܲͳhasbeenoperatedthroughouttheyear.Theauxiliaryheater,not
shown,wasneverusedwithoutanyconsumption.Intheheatingseason,themonthly averagedsystemCOPwasover3fromJanuarytoAprilandfromOctobertoDecember.
FromMaytoDecembermonthlyaveragedsystemCOPrepresentedlargevalues,dueto smallamountofelectricitywasconsumedonoperatingthecirculatingpumpܲͳ.The
monthlyaveragedsystemCOPinOctoberwaslargerthanintherestheatingseason
months,becausehalfofthemonthwasinnonͲheatingseason.
123
5.1.4. Majorflowsofenergy
TheenergyflowsofsolarcombisystemannualoperationshowninFig.5.1are detailedbymonthinthefollowedTable5.4.
Table5.4Resultsofenergyflowsofsolarcombisystemannualoperation
Energyinput,kWh Heat transferred Heatlostto Incident Heating withindoor outdoor Heat solar load, surroundings, environment, storage, heat Electricity Overall kWh kWh kWh kWh January 2,823.18 859.75 3,682.93 2,640.14 66.91 1,115.34Ͳ10.49 February 3,680.97 568.06 4,249.02 2,014.13 25.57 1,458.05 798.38 March 4,714.15 267.79 4,981.94 1,295.93 Ͳ51.51 1,906.41 1,724.80 April 4,015.50 102.22 4,117.72 504.91 Ͳ59.81 1,503.75 2,046.47 May 1,200.62 0.78 1,201.40 351.81 Ͳ65.85 767.59 15.36 June 948.72 0.67 949.39 279.79 Ͳ64.76 605.99Ͳ1.82 July 725.36 0.47 725.83 233.21 Ͳ68.20 426.83Ͳ2.88 August 758.99 0.55 759.53 208.46 Ͳ68.79 484.53Ͳ2.80 September 875.64 0.51 876.16 284.46 Ͳ62.49 525.23 3.46 October 1,783.80 66.08 1,849.88 431.87 Ͳ53.31 764.91 598.34 November 1,530.94 370.39 1,901.33 1,224.29 17.47 556.51 135.25 December 2,008.93 719.06 2,728.00 2,294.88 41.29 830.94Ͳ360.62 Year 25,067 2,956 28,023 11,764 Ͳ343 10,946 4,943
Heatingloadandenergyuse
Thecombisystemsupplied11,764kWhofheatingloadforthespaceheating
(8,323kWh)andthepreparationofdomestichotwater(3,440kWh)duringanannual operation.Fig.5.2presentsthemonthlyprofileofspaceheatingloadandwaterheating load.Thesimulatedspaceheatingloadmatchedtheinputheatingdemandappeared fromOctobertoApril,correspondingtheheatingseasonstartedfromOctober17to
April30.Thewaterheatingloadcontinuedthroughoutthe12months.
124 VRODUKHDW HOHFWULFLW\ ZDWHUKHDWLQJ VSDFHKHDWLQJ
(QHUJ\N:K
-DQ )HE 0DU $SU 0D\ -XQH -XO\ $XJ 6HS 2FW 1RY 'HF Fig.5.2Energysupplyandheatingloadofsolarcombisystem Thetotal28,023kWhofenergyinputtothesystemincluded2,956kWhof
electricityand25,067kWhofincidentsolarheatduringtheoperationperiods.The
profileofmonthlyenergyusefromthetwosourcesisalsopresentedinFig.5.2.
Heattransferbetweencombisystemandindoorenvironment
Thecombisystemlost343kWhofheattotheindoorenvironmentthroughoutan entireyear.Thelosswastheresultsoftransferofheatbetweenthewaterstoragetank andthesurroundings,andbetweentheicestoragetankandthesurroundings.Fig.5.3 showsthemonthlyprofileoftheheattransfer,wherethepositivesrepresenttheheat
transferredfromtheindoorenvironmenttothestoragetanks,thenegativesrepresent theheattransferredfromthestoragetankstotheindoorenvironment.
125
LFHVWRUDJHWDQN ZDWHUVWRUDJHWDQN RYHUDOO
+HDWN:K
í
í -DQ )HE 0DU $SU 0D\ -XQH -XO\ $XJ 6HS 2FW 1RY 'HF Fig.5.3Heattransferbetweenstoragetanksandindoorsurroundings (positivevaluesrepresenttanksinheatgain;negativevaluesrepresenttanksinheatloss)
Heatlosstooutdoorenvironment
Thecombisystemlost10,946kWhofheattotheoutdoorenvironmentduring theannualoperation.Thelosswasaccountedfortheamountofsolarheatfailedtobe absorbedbythesolarthermalcollectors.
Heatstorage
Thecombisystemusingthewaterstoragetankandtheicestoragetankstored
4,943kWhofheatthroughoutanentireyear.Fig.5.4presentsthestorageofheatby month,wherethepositivesrepresenttheheatstoredinthestoragetanks,the negativesrepresenttheheatreleasedfromthestoragetanks.Themonthlyprofile
showstheicestoragetankinactiveofstoringandreleasingheatfromJanuarytoMay andfromSeptembertillDecemberduringtheheatingseason.Themostamountofheat storedappearsattheicestoragetankinApril,themostamountofheatreleasedatthe
126 icestoragetankinDecember.Theresultsshowedsmallermagnitudeofstorageofheat
tookplaceinthewaterstoragetank,incontrasttotheicestoragetank.
LFHVWRUDJHWDQN ZDWHUVWRUDJHWDQN
+HDWN:K
í -DQ )HE 0DU $SU 0D\ -XQH -XO\ $XJ 6HS 2FW 1RY 'HF Fig.5.4Heatstorageofsolarcombisystem (positivevaluesrepresentheatstored;negativevaluesrepresentheatreleased)
5.2. CombisystemoperationinnonͲheatingseason ThecombisystemhadnonͲheatingseasonoperationof169days,fromMay1to
October16,producingthedomestichotwater.ThenonͲheatingseasonoperationis discussedwiththehourlyresultsofthreecontinuouscalendardaysfromJuly20toJuly
22.
Heatingloadanduseofheat
Fig.5.5presentstheheatingloadofthesolarcombisystemfordomestichot waterproduction.Thewaterstoragetank,wheretopreparethedomestichotwater,
127 hadtwoheatsources:theheatpumpandthesolarthermalcollectors.Buttheresults showedthattheidlestatusofheatpumpduringthenonͲheatingseason.Thisindicated theuseofsolarthermalcollectorsinnonͲheatingseasonwassufficient.Theheatcharge fromthesolarthermalcollectorstothewaterstoragetankispresentedinFig.5.6.
+HDWN:K
-XO\-XO\-XO\ Fig.5.5HeatingloadofsolarcombisystemfromJuly20toJuly22
+HDWN:K
-XO\-XO\-XO\ Fig.5.6SolarheatcollectionchargingwaterstoragetankfromJuly20toJuly22
128 Fig.5.7presentsthesolarradiationandtheheatflowsatthesolarthermal collectors.Theavailablesolarincidentisreferredtotheincidentsolarenergyonthe surfacesofsolarthermalcollectorsregardlessthecollectoroperation.Theutilizedsolar incidentisreferredtotheincidentsolarenergyonthesurfacesofsolarthermal collectorsduringtheonoperationofsolarthermalcollectors.Whenthesolarthermal collectorswereon,solarheatwascollectedchargingtothestoragetanks.Theresults showtheheatchargingonlytookplacefromthesolarthermalcollectorstothewater storagetank,nothingfortheicestoragetank.
SRWHQWLDOVRODUUDGLDWLRQ LQFLGHQWVRODUUDGLDWLRQ FKDUJLQJLFHVWRUDJHWDQN FKDUJLQJZDWHUVWRUDJHWDQN
+HDWN:K
-XO\-XO\-XO\ Fig.5.7SolarheatcollectionandstoragefromJuly20toJuly22 ThesolarthermalcollectorshavebeenoperatedwithintwohoursonJuly20and within3hoursonJuly22,nooperationonJuly21.Thissuggestedthatthedomestichot waterproductiononJuly21usedtheheatstoredinthewaterstoragetank.Afterthe releaseofheatfromstorage,thesolarthermalcollectorscollectedheatonJuly22for
129 thewaterstoragetank,morethanonJuly20.Thisshowedhowthesolarthermal collectoroperationservingtheshortperiodheatstorageoperationofwaterstorage tank.
Heatstorage
Fig.5.8presentsthechangeofheatinthewaterstoragetank.Thepositive valuesindicatethewaterstoragetankwasundertheheatcharging,thenegativevalues indicatethewaterstoragetankwasundertheheatdischarging.
+HDWN:K
í
-XO\-XO\-XO\ Fig.5.8HeatstorageofwaterstoragetankfromJuly20toJuly22
Storagetemperature
Fig.5.9presentsthetemperaturevariationoffivewaterͲnodes(ܰͳtoܰͷ)inthe
waterstoragetank.AfterthedomestichotwaterproductiononJuly21,the
temperatureofnodeܰͳdroppeddownto35.5Ԩ,nearthesetpointof35Ԩ.Thisled thesolarthermalcollectorstostartoperationonthenextdayJuly22assoonassolar
heatwasavailable.Thecombisystemcontrolsystemallowedthechargeofheattothe
130 waterstoragetankwhenthetemperatureinwaterstoragetankisbelow60Ԩ.Forthis
reason,asthetemperaturereached62ԨatthenodeܰͶand61Ԩatthenodeܰͷ,the solarthermalcollectorsstoppedtheonoperation(Fig.5.7)thoughsolarheatwasstill
available.Thetemperatureprofileindicatedthermalstratificationinthewaterstorage
tank.
& °
7HPSHUDWXUH QRGH1 QRGH1 QRGH1 QRGH1 QRGH1 -XO\-XO\-XO\ Fig.5.9NodetemperatureofwaterstoragetankfromJuly20toJuly22
Electricityuse
Fig.5.10presentstheelectricityusedbythecombisystemoperation.The electricityconsumptionwassolelyduetotheoperationofpumpܲͳtocirculatewater alongtheloopܮͳforthetransferofheatfromthesolarthermalcollectorstothewater storagetank.
131
(OHFWULFLW\:K
-XO\-XO\-XO\ Fig.5.10ElectricityconsumptionofsolarcombisystemfromJuly20toJuly22
5.3. Combisystemoperationinheatingseason Thecombisystemhadtheheatingseasonoperationof196daysfromOctober17
toApril30.Thecombisystemcoveredtheheatingneedsforthedomestichotwaterand thespaceheating.Theoperationatthepeakspaceheatingistobeoverviewedinthis section,followedbytheheatingseasonoperatingconditiondiscussedwiththehourly
resultsofthreecontinuouscalendardaysfromJanuary11toJanuary13.
Peakspaceheating
Theresidentialspaceheatingdemandreachedthepeakof12,992Wat7:15a.m. onJanuary12,andtherewasalsodomestichotwateruseatthismoment(Fig.5.11).
132
Fig.5.11Flowchartofenergyflowsofsolarcombisystematspaceheatingpeak Aboveflowchartpresentstheoperationtemperaturesalongwiththeenergy flowratesinW.Atthispeaktime,theoutdoortemperaturewasͲ26.4Ԩ,citywater temperaturewas3.5Ԩ,andtheindoortemperaturewas18Ԩ.Thecombisystemused
133 electricity(0.56W)torunacirculationpumpforthespaceheating,whichwassupplied bytheradiantfloorusingtheheatfromwaterstoragetank(12,992W).Thewater storagetankalsocoveredtheheatmeetingthedomestichotwaterneeds(609W).The
supplytemperaturewas47.7Ԩfortheradiantfloorand44.4Ԩforthedomestichot
water.Thetotalheattransferratefromthewaterstoragetankfortheheatingwas
13,601W.
Terrell(1979)hasreportedthepossibilityofasolarheatingsystemsatisfyingthe heatingdemandduringthecoldestmonthswithoutdirectlyusingsolarenergy.Instead,
thesolarenergystoredfromtheprevioustimewasreleasedtomeettheheatingneeds, andthestoretemperaturewasreducedbysuchoperation.Thereportedresultswere confirmedbytheresultsshowninthissimulatedcase:Thecombisystemsatisfiedthe heatingdemandattheresidentialpeakspaceheatingtimeusingtheheatstoredfrom theprevioustime.
Thesurroundingsofthecombisystemunderwenttheheattransferwiththe storagetanks.Thewaterstoragetanklostheat(71W)tothesurroundings,whereasthe icestoragetankgainedheat(159W)fromthesurroundings.Thewaterstoragetank
operationatthispeakdecreasedtheheatstoredattherateof13,672W.Atthispeak,
thesolarthermalcollectors,heatpump,andtheauxiliaryheaterwereidle.
Heatingload
Fig.5.12presentsthecombisystemheatingloadforthespaceheatingandthe domestichotwater.Thespaceheatingwassuppliedbytheradiantfloorusingtheheat
134 fromheatpumpandwaterstoragetank.Thedomestichotwaterwaspreparedinthe waterstoragetank.Thespaceheatingloadexhibitedsimilarpatternsofvariation throughthehoursofeachday.Theheatprovidedbywaterstoragetankforthespace heatingwasnolessthantheheatprovidedbyheatpump,whenthespaceheatingload wererelativelow.Whenthespaceheatingloadwashigh,theheatpumpprovidedmost amountofheatforthespaceheating.Thisindicatedtheoperationdifferencebetween theheatpumpandthewaterstoragetank,intermsofmatchingthespaceheating demandrespectingitsowncapability.
ZDWHUKHDWLQJ VSDFHKHDWLQJXVLQJZDWHUVWRUDJHWDQN VSDFHKHDWLQJXVLQJKHDWSXPS
+HDWN:K
-DQ-DQ-DQ Fig.5.12HeatingloadofsolarcombisystemfromJan.11toJan.13
Heatpumpoutput
Fig.5.13presentstheuseoftheheatoutputfromheatpump.Theheatoutput wastransferredtothewaterstoragetankandtheradiantfloor.Withinthehourswith higheroutput,theheatpumpprovidedtheradiantfloormoreheatthandoesthewater
135 storagetank.Onthecontrary,thewaterstoragetankreceivedheatfromtheheatpump morethantheradiantfloordidwithinthehoursthattheheatpumpmadeoutputs.
ZDWHUVWRUDJHWDQN UDGLDQWIORRU
+HDWN:K
-DQ-DQ-DQ Fig.5.13HeatoutputofheatpumpfromJan.11toJan.13
Solarheatcollection
Solarheatwasthesolesourceprovidingthecombisystemwithheat.Fig.5.14 presentsthesolarradiationandtheheatflowsatthesolarthermalcollectors.
Solarheatwasavailablearoundthemiddlehouseeachday,andthesolarthermal collectorswereonoperationduringthen.Thecollectedheatwasinputtotheice
storagetankandthewaterstoragetankforstorage.Theresultsshowthattheice storagetankreceivedmoreheatthanthewaterstoragetankduringthesedays.The
seasonalpeakspaceheatingtookplaceonJanuary12.Theresultsshowthatthesolar thermalcollectorshadonoperationduringmostofthetimewhensolarheatwas available.
136
SRWHQWLDOVRODUUDGLDWLRQ LQFLGHQWVRODUUDGLDWLRQ FKDUJLQJLFHVWRUDJHWDQN FKDUJLQJZDWHUVWRUDJHWDQN
+HDWN:K
-DQ-DQ-DQ Fig.5.14SolarincidenceandsolarheatcollectionfromJan.11toJan.13
Heatstorage
I. Waterstoragetank
Fig.5.15presentstheheatchargingtothewaterstoragetank,bytheheatpump andthesolarthermalcollectors.Thewaterstoragetankstartedtotakeinheatatevery earlymorningfromtheheatpump.Aroundthemiddlehoursofeachday,therewas heattransferredfromthesolarthermalcollectors.
Fig.5.16presentsthechangeofheatinthewaterstoragetank,exhibitedthe shorttermheatstorage.Thepositivevalueswerecorrespondedtotheheatgains,the negativevalueswerecorrespondedtotheheatlosses.Thegreatestmagnitudeofheat gainwasonJanuary12,whichoccurredhoursafterthepeakspaceheatingload.
137
KHDWSXPS VRODUFROOHFWRU
+HDWN:K
-DQ-DQ-DQ Fig.5.15HeatinputtowaterstoragetankfromJan.11toJan.13
+HDWN:K
í
-DQ-DQ-DQ Fig.5.16HeatstorageofwaterstoragetankfromJan.11toJan.13 II. Icestoragetank
Theicestoragetankisthethermalenergystorageoperatedbetweenthesolar thermalcollectorsandtheheatpump.Fig.5.17presentstheinputandoutputofheatof
138 icestoragetank.Theresultsshowedtheicestoragetankoutputheatmorefrequently thaninput.
KHDWLQSXW KHDWRXWSXW
+HDWN:K
-DQ-DQ-DQ Fig.5.17HeatinputandheatoutputoficestoragetankfromJan.11toJan.13 Fig.5.18presentsthechangeofheatintheicestoragetank.Comparedtothe waterstoragetank,theicestoragetankhadlargermagnitudeofchangeofduringthe day.Thissuggestedtheicestoragetankwasoperatedwithlargerstoragecapacitythan thewaterstoragetank.
139
+HDWN:K
í
í -DQ-DQ-DQ Fig.5.18HeatstorageoficestoragetankfromJan.11toJan.13
Storagetemperature
I. Waterstoragetank
Fig.5.19presentsthetemperatureofnodes(ܰͳ ǥ ܰͷ)inthewaterstoragetank.
Mostofthetemperaturesfellinbetween42.9Ԩand49.3Ԩ.Thelargesttemperature dropoccurredinJanuary12downto36.7Ԩ.Thehourlyresultsshowedthenodeܰͷ hadthesteadiesttemperaturesamongallthenodes.Thenodeܰͳhadthemost
dynamicchangeoftemperature,whichwasduetothecharginganddischarging
operationoftheimmersionheatexchangerܪܺͳ.Thetemperaturevariationofeach
nodeduringthisperiodwas:nodeܰͷin2Ԩ,nodeܰͶin3Ԩ,nodeܰ͵in4.2Ԩ,node
ܰʹin4.4Ԩ,andnodeܰͳin12.6Ԩ.Thermalstratificationexistedlocallyatsometime, forinstance,amongthenodesܰʹ,ܰ͵,ܰͶ,andܰͷfrom18:00onJanuary12to6:00on
January13.
140
QRGH1 QRGH1 QRGH1 QRGH1 QRGH1 & °
7HPSHUDWXUH
-DQ-DQ-DQ Fig.5.19NodetemperatureofwaterstoragetankfromJan.11toJan.13 II. Icestoragetank
Fig.5.20presentsthetemperatureofthewaterͲlayeroficestoragetank.The watertemperatureremainedalmostconstantat0.1ԨǤRelatedtothewaterͲlay temperature,themassfractionoficeintheicestoragetankispresentedonFig.5.21.
Themassfractionoficewas0.45atthebeginningofJanuary11,reached0.53atthe endofJanuary13.Theresultsshowedthecoexistenceoftwophasesofwaterintheice storagetankduringthisperiod.Theicestoragetankhadthemaximumicemassfraction of0.7inthissimulatedcase.AttheendofJanuary13,theicestoragecapacityofice storagetankwasusedupto75.7%.
141
&
°
7HPSHUDWXUH
-DQ-DQ-DQ Fig.5.20WaterͲlayertemperatureoficestoragetankfromJan.11toJan.13
0DVVIUDFWLRQGLPHQVLRQOHVV
-DQ-DQ-DQ Fig.5.21IcemassfractionoficestoragetankfromJan.11toJan.13
Electricityuse
Fig.5.22presentsthetotalelectricityconsumptionofthecombisystemduring thethreedayinheatingseason.Theelectricitywasusedtooperatingtheheatpump,
142 andthecirculatingpumpsܲͳ,ܲʹ,andܲ͵.Theheatpumpused121kWhofelectricity, thelargestamountintheoverall.Thecirculatingpumpsܲͳ,ܲʹ,andܲ͵usedelectricity of0.15kWh,0.218kWh,and0.237kWh,respectively.
(OHFWULFLW\N:K
-DQ-DQ-DQ Fig.5.22ElectricityconsumptionofsolarcombisystemfromJan.11toJan.13
5.4. Responseforspaceheating Asspaceheatingdemandfortheindoorspace,theradiantfloorwasprovided heatfromtwoheatsources,theheatpumpandthewaterstoragetank.Thissection presentsthemanagementofthetwoheatsourcestorespondtheradiantfloorand meetthespaceheatingdemand,whichistheoperationofcirculationloopܮ͵.
Table5.5presentsthespaceheatingdemandandtheheatsupplytoradiant
floor.Theresultsshowedthespaceheatingdemandsweresatisfiedcompletely,among
theheatpumpsupplied30.4%andthewaterstoragetanksupplied69.6%.Theresults
143 wereduetotheuseofwaterstoragetankwascontrolledtorespondtheradiantfloor needsforheatatthehigherpriority(4.9.3).Theadvantageofthestrategywasthe spaceheatingdemandwasmatchedbyoperatingthecirculatingpumpܲ͵totransfer thedemandedamountofheattotheradiantfloor.Unlikely,theheatpump(with
constantwaterflowsattheevaporatorandcondenser)lackedofflexibility,intermsof heatoutputamount.Notusingthisstrategy,theoperationwouldtendtooverheatthe space,oroverheatthewaterstoragetankandfurthercausethecombisystemshut
down.
Table5.5Resultsofspaceheatingdemandandheatsupplytoradiantfloor Spaceheating Heatsupply,kWh demand, Byheat Fromwater kWh pump storagetank Overall October 171.68 23.05 148.63 171.68 November 976.15 220.76 755.39 976.15 December 1,991.79 653.39 1,338.39 1,991.79 January 2,331.04 875.18 1,455.86 2,331.04 February 1,721.11 539.30 1,181.82 1,721.11 March 949.38 187.15 762.24 949.38 April 182.27 29.18 153.09 182.27 Season 8,323 2,528 5,795 8,323 Ͳ30.4% 69.6% 100%
5.5. Operationofheatpumpwithicestoragetank
Heatpumpperformance
Table5.6presentstheheatpumpoperationresults,includingtheenergyflows andtheoperationCOPovertheheatingseason.Amongtheheatpumpoutputof9326 kWh,thewaterstoragetankreceived73%(6,799kWh),morethantheradiantfloor.
TheseasonalaverageCOPwas3.19.
144 Table5.6Monthlyresultsofheatpumpoperation Energyinput,kWh Heatoutputfromcondenser,kWh Heatat Toradiant Towater COP, Electricity evaporator floor storagetank Overall dimensionless October 64.64 187.65 23.05 229.24 252.29 3.93 November 367.64 801.98 220.76 948.86 1,169.62 3.19 December 714.98 1,455.79 653.39 1,517.37 2,170.77 3.04 January 854.89 1,611.14 875.18 1,590.85 2,466.04 2.89 February 564.02 1,201.15 539.30 1,225.87 1,765.17 3.13 March 264.50 804.02 187.15 881.38 1,068.52 4.06 April 99.43 334.77 29.18 405.02 434.20 4.41 Year 2,930 6,397 2,528 6,799 9,327 3.19 Fig.5.23presentsthedailymeanCOPofheatpumpthroughoutanentire heatingseason.Thedailymeantemperatureofwaterenteringtheevaporatoris presentedinFig.5.24,inFig.5.25presentsthedailymeantemperatureofwater enteringthecondenser.Resultsshownwiththethreefiguressuggestedtheimpact madeontheheatpumpCOPfromtheinlettemperatureattheevaporatorside.
&23GLPHQVLRQOHVV
1RY 'HF -DQ )HE 0DU $SU 0D\ Fig.5.23HeatpumpCOPinheatingseason,dailymean
145
& °
7HPSHUDWXUH
1RY 'HF -DQ )HE 0DU $SU 0D\ Fig.5.24Temperatureofwaterenteringheatpumpevaporator,dailymean
& °
7HPSHUDWXUH
1RY 'HF -DQ )HE 0DU $SU 0D\ Fig.5.25Temperatureofwaterenteringheatpumpcondenser,dailymean
Stateofwaterinicestoragetank
Fig.5.26presentsthemassfractionoficeintheicestoragetank.Theice appearedinNovember,presentingastableexistencesinceearlyDecember.Throughout onemonthofaccumulation,themassfractionoficeclimbeduptothepeakof0.69at
146 thelateJanuary.TheicemeltedawaybymidͲFebruary.Afterthenandtilltheendofthe
heatingseason,theicestoragetankcontainedonlyliquidwater.
,FHPDVVIUDFWLRQGLPHQVLRQOHVV
1RY 'HF -DQ )HE 0DU $SU 0D\ Fig.5.26Icemassfractionoficestoragetankinheatingseason,dailymean
5.6. Operationofsolarcollectorwiththermalstorage Solarheatwasanexclusiveheatsourcetothecombisystem.Table5.7presents
theenergyflowsregardingtheoperationofsolarthermalcollectors,aswellasthe
thermalefficiencyofsolarthermalcollectors.Duringthetimewhenthesolarthermal
collectorswereonoperation,theannualincidentsolarenergywas25,067kWh,the
annualsolarheatcollectionwas14,121kWh,while10,946kWhofsolarheatfailedto becollectedandlosttotheoutdoorenvironment.Theoperationofsolarthermal collectorshadanannualaveragethermalefficiencyof0.51.
147 Table5.7Monthlyresultsofsolarcollectoroperation Solarheatcollection,kWh Heatlossto Thermal Incidentsolar Inwater Inice outdoor efficiencyof radiation, storage storage environment, solarcollector, kWh tank tank Overall kWh dimensionless January 2,823.18 232.74 1,475.10 1,707.84 1,115.34 0.58 February 3,680.97 289.61 1,933.30 2,222.92 1,458.05 0.57 March 4,714.15 272.66 2,535.08 2,807.75 1,906.41 0.54 April 4,015.50 119.03 2,392.72 2,511.75 1,503.75 0.57 May 1,200.62 433.03 0.00 433.03 767.59 0.31 June 948.72 342.73 0.00 342.73 605.99 0.31 July 725.36 298.52 0.00 298.52 426.83 0.36 August 758.99 274.45 0.00 274.45 484.53 0.31 September 875.64 350.41 0.00 350.41 525.23 0.35 October 1,783.80 217.84 801.05 1,018.88 764.91 0.51 November 1,530.94 99.18 875.26 974.43 556.51 0.62 December 2,008.93 173.25 1,004.75 1,178.00 830.94 0.55 Year 25,067 3,103 11,017 14,121 10,946 0.51
Distributionofsolarheatcollection
Amongtheannualsolarheatcollection(14,121kWh),thewaterstoragetank received3,103kWhofheatthroughoutanentireyear,countedfor22%.Theicestorage tankreceived11,017kWhofheatduringtheheatingseason(fromMay1toOctober16), countedfor78%.Theoperationoficestoragetankhandledthemajorityofsolarheat storage.
Amongtheannualheatstoredinthewaterstoragetank(3,103kWh),thewater
storagetankstored1,870kWhofheatintheheatingseason.Inadditiontothe11,017 kWhofheatstoredintheicestoragetankintheheatingseason,theoverallsolarheat
storageduringtheheatingseasonwas12,887kWh,countedfor87%oftheannualsolar heatcollection.Therest23%ofsolarheatcollectionwasmadeduringthenonͲheating season,whichwasallchargedtothewaterstoragetank.
148 Thermalefficiencyofsolarcollectoroperation
Thetwostoragetanks,withdifferentlevelsofoperationtemperature,made differentimpactontheperformanceofsolarthermalcollector.Table5.8presentsthe thermalefficiencyofsolarthermalcollectorbystoragetanks,toshowtheimpactmade
bytheenteringtemperatureofcollectorworkingfluid.
Table5.8Monthlyresultsofthermalefficiencyofsolarthermalcollector Units:dimensionless Withwater Withice storagetank storagetank January 0.30 0.66 February 0.34 0.62 March 0.33 0.58 April 0.31 0.59 May 0.31 Ͳ June 0.31 Ͳ July 0.36 Ͳ August 0.31 Ͳ September 0.35 Ͳ October 0.32 0.59 November 0.26 0.69 December 0.28 0.63 Year 0.32 0.62 Operatedwiththewaterstoragetank,thesolarthermalcollectorhadtheannual meanthermalefficiencyof0.32.Operatedwiththeicestoragetank,thesolarcollector thermalefficiencyrangedfrom0.58inMarchto0.69inNovember,leadingtheannual meanthermalefficiencyof0.63.Thethermalefficiencyofsolarthermalcollectorrose
abouttwotimeswhenagainstacoldthermalstorage,comparedtowithawarm
thermalstorage.
149
5.7. Operationofwaterstoragetank
Temperature
Thewaterstoragetankwasmodeledasastratifiedthermalstoragetank.Table
5.9presentsthetemperaturesoffivenodes(ܰͳtoͷ)inthewaterstoragetank,along
withthehotwaterdrawͲofftemperature.ThetemperatureprofileispresentedonFig.
5.27.Theresultsshowedthatthenodesܰ͵,ܰͶ&ܰͷhavehighermonthlyaverage temperaturesfromMaytoNovemberthanothermonths.
Table5.9Monthlyresultsofwaterstoragetanknodetemperatures Hotwater Nodetemperature,Ԩ drawͲoff temperature, N1 N2 N3 N4 N5 Mean Ԩ January 45.3 44.9 45.3 45.1 44.7 45.1 44.8 February 45.2 44.8 45.4 45.3 45.0 45.1 45.1 March 43.8 44.8 46.1 45.9 45.4 45.2 45.5 April 41.7 44.1 45.8 45.9 45.4 44.6 45.5 May 31.3 46.0 57.6 59.7 59.5 50.9 59.6 June 34.5 47.9 58.7 60.3 59.9 52.3 60.0 July 37.8 49.7 59.1 60.6 60.2 53.5 60.2 August 39.7 51.1 59.7 60.7 60.0 54.3 60.2 September 35.9 48.1 58.0 60.2 60.0 52.4 60.0 October 39.0 45.6 51.9 53.5 53.4 48.7 53.3 November 46.3 45.1 45.2 45.0 44.6 45.2 44.6 December 45.6 44.7 44.9 44.8 44.5 44.9 44.5 Year 40.5 46.4 51.5 52.3 51.9 48.5 51.4
150
QRGH1 QRGH1 QRGH1 QRGH1 QRGH1
& °
7HPSHUDWXUH
-DQ )HE 0DU $SU 0D\ -XQH -XO\ $XJ 6HS 2FW 1RY 'HF Fig.5.27NodetemperatureofWaterstoragetank,monthlymean
Heatinputandoutput
Thetemperaturedistributioninthewaterstoragetankwastheoutcomeofthe heattransferthatthestoragetankunderwent.Table5.10presentstheheatflowsofthe waterstoragetankoperation.Theannualheatinputwas9,902kWh.Theannualheat outputwas9,236kWh.Duetothetemperaturedifferencewiththesurroundings,the
storagetanklost667kWhofheatthroughoutanentireyear.
151
Table5.10Monthlyresultsofheatflowsofwaterstoragetank Heatinput,kWh Heatoutput,kWh Heattransfer From with Heat solar Byheat To Forhot surroundings, storage, collector pump Overall space water Overall kWh kWh January 232.74 1,590.85 1,823.59 1,455.86 309.10 1,764.96 Ͳ51.21 7.43 February 289.61 1,225.87 1,515.49 1,181.82 293.02 1,474.84 Ͳ46.33 Ͳ5.68 March 272.66 881.38 1,154.04 762.24 346.55 1,108.79 Ͳ51.17 Ͳ5.91 April 119.03 405.02 524.05 153.09 322.63 475.73 Ͳ48.11 0.21 May 433.03 0.00 433.03 0.00 351.81 351.81 Ͳ59.46 21.76 June 342.73 0.00 342.73 0.00 279.79 279.79 Ͳ60.36 2.58 July 298.52 0.00 298.52 0.00 233.21 233.21 Ͳ64.96 0.35 August 274.45 0.00 274.45 0.00 208.46 208.46 Ͳ66.50 Ͳ0.51 September 350.41 0.00 350.41 0.00 284.46 284.46 Ͳ60.91 5.03 October 217.84 229.24 447.08 148.63 260.18 408.81 Ͳ56.82 Ͳ18.56 November 99.18 948.86 1,048.04 755.39 248.14 1,003.53 Ͳ49.98 Ͳ5.47 December 173.25 1,517.37 1,690.62 1,338.39 303.09 1,641.48 Ͳ50.88 Ͳ1.74 Year 3,103 6,799 9,902 5,795 3,440 9,236 Ͳ667 Ͳ0.51
5.8. Heattransitviathermalstorage Theheattransitisreferredtotheoveralltransferofheatthroughheatcharging andheatdischarging.Thetwothermalstoragetanksofcombisystembridgedthetime gapofheatbetweentheavailableandinneedy.Fig.5.28presentstheheatchargesand dischargesofthewaterstoragetankovertheyear.Theannualgrossofheattransitof thewaterstoragetankiscalculatedasasumoftheheatchargedtothewaterstorage
tankandtheheatdischargedfromthewaterstoragetank;theamountwas19,138kWh.
Fig.5.29presentstheheatchargesanddischargesoftheicestoragetankovertheyear.
Theannualgrossofheattransitoftheicestoragetankiscalculatedasasumoftheheat chargedtotheicestoragetankandtheheatdischargedfromtheicestoragetank;the amountwas17,414kWh.
152
KHDWFKDUJLQJ KHDWGLVFKDUJLQJ
+HDWN:K
-DQ )HE 0DU $SU 0D\ -XQH -XO\ $XJ 6HS 2FW 1RY 'HF Fig.5.28Heattransitviawaterstoragetank,byweek KHDWFKDUJLQJ KHDWGLVFKDUJLQJ
+HDWN:K
-DQ )HE 0DU $SU 0D\ -XQH -XO\ $XJ 6HS 2FW 1RY 'HF Fig.5.29Heattransitviaicestoragetank,byweek Theannualgrossofheattransitviatheicestoragetankwas1,724kWhlessthan
thewaterstoragetank.Countingthetwostoragetankstogether,theoverallheattransit was36,552kWh.Amongthisamount,thewaterstoragetankhasbeeninchargeof
153 52.4%,theicestoragetank47.6%.Theresultsshowedthesignificantperformanceof thewaterstoragetankinthesimulatedcombisystemannualoperation.
5.9. Exergyperformanceofsolarcombisystem
CombisystemexergeticCOP
TheexergeticCOPiscalculatedastheratiooftheexergyofheatingload(507 kWh)totheauxiliaryelectricityconsumption(2,956kWh).Thecombisystemhadan annualexergeticCOPof0.17.
Solarexergyfractioncomparedtoreferencesystem
Table5.11presentstheexergyusedbythespecifiedreferencesystem(i.e., electricheatingsystem),andtheexergycollectionofthecombisystemsolarthermal collectors.
Table5.11Referencesystemexergyusevs.combisystemsolarexergycollectionofsolarcombisystem Referencesystem Solarcombisystem Electrical exergyuseof Electrical baseboard exergyuseof Totalexergy Collected Solarexergy heater, waterheater, use, solarexergy, fraction, kWh kWh kWh kWh dimensionless January 2,331.04 277.51 2,608.55 49.85 0.02 February 1,721.11 262.53 1,983.64 95.67 0.05 March 949.38 306.54 1,255.92 226.53 0.18 April 182.27 283.44 465.72 209.86 0.45 May 0.00 213.88 213.88 76.27 0.36 June 0.00 156.79 156.79 61.23 0.39 July 0.00 117.67 117.67 53.70 0.46 August 0.00 100.80 100.80 49.49 0.49 September 0.00 145.52 145.52 62.63 0.43 October 171.68 171.73 343.41 91.19 0.27 November 976.15 218.15 1,194.30 41.64 0.03 December 1,991.79 271.83 2,263.62 49.53 0.02 Year 8,323 2,526 10,850 1,068 0.10
154 Overtheentireyear,thesolarcollectorscollected1,068kWhofthermalenergy.
Comparedto10,850kWhofexergyofheatingloadbythereferencesystem,the combisystemhadasolarexergyfractionof0.10.Themaximumsolarexergyfraction appearedinAugustasof0.49.Theminimumsolarexergyfractionof0.02appearedin
JanuaryandDecember.
Solarexergycontribution
Among26,421kWhofexergy,sumoftheannualincidentsolarexergy(23,465 kWh)andtheannualelectricalexergy,theannualincidentsolarexergycontributionwas
88.8%.
Among4,024kWhofexergy,sumoftheannualsolarexergycollection(1,068 kWh)andtheannualelectricityconsumption,theannualcollectedsolarexergy
contributionwas26.5%.
Exergyefficiency
Table5.12presentstheexergydestructionestimatedbymonthlyandannual operationofthecombisystem.Thecombisystemoperationovertheyeardestroyed
15,657kWhofexergyoutofthetotal26,421kWhofexergysupplyincludingthe incidentsolarexergyandelectricity.LessexergyweredestroyedduringMaythrough
Octoberthantheothermonths.Amongthecomponentequipment,themostamountof exergywasdestroyedbyoperatingthesolarthermalcollector,accountedfor77.6%.
Othercontributionswere:theheatpump11.2%,theradiantfloor4.3%,thewater
155 storagetank3.8%,theicestoragetank2.9%,andthecirculatingpumps0.2%.The estimatedexergeticefficiencyispresentedinTable5.13.
Table5.12Monthlyresultsofexergydestroyedbysolarcombisystemoperation Units:kWh Ice Water Solar Solar Heat Auxiliary storage storage Radiant combisystem collectors pump Pumps heater tank tank floor January 2,390.27 1,548.87 512.22 4.85 0 21.93 111.51 190.87 February 2,590.32 1,985.22 335.54 4.04 0 35.82 94.76 134.94 March 2,845.44 2,401.82 160.30 3.29 0 140.03 68.58 71.42 April 2,420.35 2,141.41 62.53 2.78 0 172.75 27.54 13.34 May 361.54 329.09 Ͳ 0.78 0 2.51EͲ02 31.65 Ͳ June 285.56 259.60 Ͳ 0.67 0 1.23EͲ02 25.28 Ͳ July 247.54 225.75 Ͳ 0.47 0 6.43EͲ03 21.31 Ͳ August 227.53 207.43 Ͳ 0.55 0 3.22EͲ03 19.55 Ͳ September 289.35 265.39 Ͳ 0.51 0 1.58EͲ03 23.44 Ͳ October 992.11 862.60 38.84 1.44 0 49.06 27.04 13.12 November 1,246.33 870.53 216.00 2.75 0 22.11 54.18 80.76 December 1,760.89 1,053.20 423.84 4.08 0 20.00 95.58 164.18 Year 15,657 12,151 1,749 26 0 462 600 669 100% 77.6% 11.2% 0.2% 0.0% 2.9% 3.8% 4.3%
Table5.13Annualresultsofexergeticefficiencyofsolarcombisystemoperation Solar Solarthermal Icestorage Waterstorage combisystem collectors Heatpump tank tank Radiantfloor 40.7% 9.3% 42.6% 19.0% 61.0% 17.8% Iftheexergydestroyedduringthesolarthermalcollectoroperationisexcluded fromtheanalysis,theexergydestroyedwassummedto3,506kWhandthe correspondingexergyefficiencywas12.9%(among4,024kWh).
156
6. Conclusions Thisthesishaspresentedthedevelopmentofasolarcombisystemcomputer model,implementedinEESprogram.Theworkpresentedinthethesisincludes:(i)A methodologyforthedevelopmentofasolarcombisystemcomputermodel;(ii)The mathematicalmodelsofthesolarcombisystemmodelcomponents;(iii)Thefeaturesof aEESͲbasedcomputermodelofasolarcombisystembeingdeveloped;(iv)Asimulated solarcombisystemoperationcaseresults;and(v)Theanalysisofthesimulatedsolar combisystemoperatingconditionsbasedontheSecondLawofthermodynamics.
ThemodeldevelopmentbasiswastheSecondLawofthermodynamics,which
waschosenfortheabilitytorepresenttheenergyandthequalityoftheenergy
relatedtothesolarcombisystemoperation.
Themathematicalmodelofthesolarcombisystemwasdevelopedincomponent
approachasofmodulartype,whichlefttheopportunityforthedeveloped
modulestobeintegratedformodelsofdiverseHVACsystems.
ThemathematicalmodelofsolarcombisystemwasimplementedintheEES
program,whichwaschosenforitsequationͲbasedscheme,aswellasthebuiltͲin
functionsforcalculatingthethermodynamicpropertiesofworkingfluids.
Thecompletecomputermodelofsolarcombisystemissuitableformodelingthe
selectedsolarcombisystemoperationasafunctionofthespaceheatingdemand,
domestichotwaterconsumption,outdoordryͲbulbairtemperature,andsolar
157 radiation,andsubjecttotheoperatingcontrolalongwiththesimulationtime
stepassignedbytheuser.
Operationfeatures
TheenergyͲconsumingequipmentofthesolarcombisystemincludesthesolar thermalcollector,circulatingpumps,heatpump,andauxiliaryheater.Thesolarthermal collectorandtheheatpumparetheprimaryenergyͲconsumingcomponents,their energyconsumptionsaredeterminednotonlybytheheatingrequirementsandclimate condition,butalsoaffectedbytheenteringstateofheattransferfluid.Thestatesatthe
equipmentinletsrelyontheoperationofthermalstoragetanksundertheoperating
controlperformedonthecompletesolarcombisystem.
Thesimulatedsolarcombisystemprovided3,440kWhofheatfortheannual
domestichotwateruseofatypicaloneͲstoreydetachedhouse,andmetthe
residentialspaceheatingdemandof8,323kWhthroughoutaheatingseasonof
196dayswiththeoutdoortemperaturethelowestatͲ28.1ԨinMontreal
Canada.
ThedrawͲofftemperatureofthedomestichotwaterwas51.4Ԩinannual
average.Thesupplytemperatureoftheradiantfloorwas37.7Ԩinseasonal
average,whilethereturntemperaturebeingcontrolledatconstant20Ԩ.
Satisfyingtheannualheatingneedsof11,764kWhintotal,thesolar
combisystemreceived14,121kWhofsolarheatfromthesolarthermal
collectors,consumed2,956kWhofelectricitytorunawaterͲtoͲwaterheat
158 pumpandthreecirculationpumpswhereaswithoutstartinguptheauxiliary
electricheater.
Thewaterstoragetank(warmthermalstorage)hadanannualaverage
temperatureof48.5Ԩ.
Theicestoragetank(coldthermalstorage)hadanannualaveragetemperature
of13.7Ԩ.
Energyperformance
Thesolarcombisystemoperationrepresents:
a. AnannualsystemCOPof3.98;
b. Anannualsolarenergyfractionof1.3comparedtoanelectricheating
system;
c. Anannualincidentsolarenergycontributionof89.5%andanannual
collectedsolarenergycontributionof82.7%;
d. Anannualsystemenergyefficiencyof42.0%regardingtheincidentsolar
heatduringthecollectorsonoperationasthethermalenergyinput,and
of68.9%regardingthesolarheatcollectionasthethermalenergyinput.
Thesolarthermalcollectoroperationrepresents:
a. Anannualaveragethermalefficiencyof0.51;
b. Anannualaveragethermalefficiencyof0.62operatedagainstthecold
thermalstorage;
c. Anannualaveragethermalefficiencyof0.32operatedagainstthewarm
thermalstorage.
159 TheheatpumphadaseasonalaverageCOPof3.19.
Exergyperformance
Thesolarcombisystemdestroyed15,657kWhofexergyovertheannual
operationandrepresents:
a. AnannualexergeticCOPof0.17;
b. Anannualsolarexergyfractionof0.10comparedtoanelectricheating
system;
c. Anannualincidentsolarexergycontributionof88.8%andanannual
collectedsolarexergycontributionof26.5%;
d. Anannualsystemexergyefficiencyof40.7%regardingtheincidentsolar
exergyduringthecollectorsonoperationasthethermalexergyinput,
andof12.9%regardingthesolarexergycollectionasthethermalexergy
input.
Theannualaverageexergyefficiencywas:
a. 61.0%forthewaterstoragetank;
b. 19.0%fortheicestoragetank;
c. 9.3%forthesolarthermalcollectors;
d. 42.55%fortheheatpump;
e. 17.82%fortheradiantfloor.
160
6.1. Futurework I. Modelvalidation
Toimprovethedevelopedsolarcombisystemmodel,validationofthe componentmodelsandthewholesolarcombisystemmodelcanbecarriedout,if installationorexperimentalsetupisavailable.
II. Analysisofsensitivity
Aninterestingissuefoundduringthemodelsimulationisthatthesolar combisystemcomponentcapacities,thesystemoperatingcontrol,andthecombisystem
heatingperformancearecloselyrelated.Toinvestigatethethreeaspectstheimpact
addedbyoneontotheotherwillprovidevaluableinformationforthesystem
application,andfavorthesolarcombisystemoperationtowardsbetterperformance.
III. SolarcombiͲplus,highsolarcombiͲplus,andoptimization
Theresultsshowedthedrawbackofoversizingofthesolarcombisystemforthe
simulatedcase,withoutcoolingloadinthenonͲheatingseason.Acasewithsolar coolingcanbesimulatedusingthedevelopedmodelwithcertainmodificationto investigateasolarcombiͲplussystemoperation,toseeifabletoachievethe performanceasahighsolarcombiͲplussystemdoes,andfurtherconductoptimization study.Thestudiedsolarcombisystemseemedhasthepotentialbecausethe
161 configurationhasbothsensiblethermalstorageandlatentthermalstorage,plusthe
configurationisnotonlycomplexbutalsoflexible.
IV. SecondLawmodelLibraryofHVACcomponents
SimilarmodeldevelopmentcanbedoneontootherHVACcomponentsfora
SecondLawmodellibraryofsimulationprograms.
162 References
Agudelo, A., & Cortés, C. (2010). Thermal Radiation and the Second Law. (QHUJ\, (2), 679–691.
Aguilar, C., White, D. J., & Ryan, D. L. (2005). CBEEDAC 2005-RP-02 Domestic Water Heating and Water Heater Energy Consumption in Canada. &%(('$&&DQDGLDQ %XLOGLQJ(QHUJ\(QG8VH'DWDDQG$QDO\VLV&HQWUH. Retrieved May 26, 2011, from http://sedc-coalition.eu/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/CREEDAC-Canadian- Residential-Hot-Water-Apr-2005.pdf
Akpinar, E. K., & Koçyi÷it, F. (2010). Energy and Exergy Analysis of a New Flat-Plate Solar Air Heater Having Different Obstacles on Absorber Plates. $SSOLHG(QHUJ\, (11), 3438–3450.
Akyuz, E., Coskun, C., Oktay, Z., & Dincer, I. (2012). A Novel Approach for Estimation of Photovoltaic Exergy Efficiency. (QHUJ\, (1), 1–8.
Aljundi, I. H. (2009). Energy and Exergy Analysis of a Steam Power Plant in Jordan. $SSOLHG7KHUPDO(QJLQHHULQJ, (2-3), 324–328.
Allard, Y., Kummert, M., Bernier, M., & Moreau, A. (2011). Intermodel Comparison and Experimental Validation of Electrical Water Heater Models in TRNSYS. In 3URFHHGLQJVRI%XLOGLQJ6LPXODWLRQ (pp. 688–695). Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, 14-16 November 2011, Sydney, Australia. IBPSA.
Al-Najem, N. M., & El-Refaee, M. M. (1997). A Numerical Study for the Prediction of Turbulent Mixing Factor in Thermal Storage Tanks. $SSOLHG7KHUPDO(QJLQHHULQJ, (12), 1173–1181.
Alta, D., Bilgili, E., Ertekin, C., & Yaldiz, O. (2010). Experimental Investigation of Three Different Solar Air Heaters: Energy and Exergy Analyses. $SSOLHG(QHUJ\, (10), 2953–2973.
Anon. (1977). Heat Pumps: Their Chances Today. 3RZHU, , 80–83.
Ao, Y., Gunnewiek, L., & Rosen, M. A. (2008). Critical Review of Exergy-Based Indicators for the Environmental Impact of Emissions. ,QWHUQDWLRQDO-RXUQDORI *UHHQ(QHUJ\, (1-2), 87–104.
Apache Openoffice. (2013). Apache OpenOffice Calc. The Apache Software Foundation.
163 ASHRAE. (1994). HVAC 1 Toolkit: A Toolkit for Primary HVAC System Energy Calculation. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.
ASHRAE. (2004). $6+5$(6WDQGDUG7KHUPDO(QYLURQPHQWDO&RQGLWLRQVIRU +XPDQ2FFXSDQF\. Atlanta, GA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.
ASHRAE. (2007). Service Water Heating. In $6+5$(+DQGERRN+9$&$SSOLFDWLRQV (pp. 49.1–29). Atlanta, Ga.: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air- Conditioning Engineers.
ASHRAE. (2009a). Energy Estimating and Modeling Methods. In $6+5($+DQGERRN )XQGDPHQWDOV (pp. 19.1–38). Atlanta, Ga.: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.
ASHRAE. (2009b). Thermal Storage. In $6+5($+DQGERRN)XQGDPHQWDOV (pp. 34.1– 33). Atlanta, Ga.: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.
ASHRAE. (2009c). Heat, Air, and Moisture Control in Building Assemblies— Material Properties. In $6+5($+DQGERRN)XQGDPHQWDOV (pp. 26.1–22). Atlanta, Ga.: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.
ASHRAE. (2011). )XQGDPHQWDOVRI+9$&&RQWURO6\VWHPV (p. 354). Atlanta, GA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.
ASHRAE TC7.4. (2013). ASHRAE TC7.4 Exergy Analysis For Sustainable Buildings. $6+5$(7HFKQLFDO&RPPLWWHH. Retrieved November 17, 2013, from http://tc74.ashraetcs.org/
Badescu, V. (2002). First and Second Law Analysis of a Solar Assisted Heat Pump Based Heating System. (QHUJ\&RQYHUVLRQDQG0DQDJHPHQW, (18), 2539–2552.
Bahnfleth, W. P., & Song, J. (2005). Constant Flow Rate Charging Characteristics of a Full-Scale Stratified Chilled Water Storage Tank with Double-Ring Slotted Pipe Diffusers. $SSOLHG7KHUPDO(QJLQHHULQJ, (17-18), 3067–3082.
Baker, J. (2008). New Technology and Possible Advances in Energy Storage. (QHUJ\ 3ROLF\, (12), 4368–4373.
Bakirci, K., & Yuksel, B. (2011). Experimental Thermal Performance of a Solar Source Heat-Pump System for Residential Heating in Cold Climate Region. $SSOLHG 7KHUPDO(QJLQHHULQJ, (8-9), 1508–1518.
164 Balaras, C. A., Dascalaki, E. G., Tsekouras, P., & Aidonis, A. (2010). High Solar Combi Systems in Europe. $6+5$(7UDQVDFWLRQV, , 408–415.
Behschnitt, S. A. (1996). $&RPSDULVRQRI:DWHU(WKDOQRO3XUH:DWHUDQG,FHDV 6WRUDJH0HGLDIRU%XLOGLQJ7KHUPDO6WRUDJH$SSOLFDWLRQV. Master Thesis. University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA.
Bejan, A., Kearney, D. W., & Kreith, F. (1981). Second Law Analysis and Synthesis of Solar Collector Systems. 6RODU(QHUJ\(QJLQHHULQJ, , 23–28.
Bjurstrom, H., & Carlsson, B. (1985). An Exergy Analysis of Sensible and Latent Heat Storage. +HDW5HFRYHU\6\VWHPV, (3), 233–250.
BLAST Support Office. (1991). %ODVW8VHU5HIHUHQFH. Urbana-Champaign, Illinois: BLAST Support Office, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois.
Bong, T. Y. (1983). Toward an Efficient Operation of a Series Solar Heat Pump System. $6+5$(7UDQVDFWLRQV, (2A), 617–627.
Brandemeuhl, M. (1993). HVAC 2 Toolkit: A Toolkit for Secondary HVAC System Energy Calculations. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air- Conditioning Engineers.
Brandemuehl, M. J., & Gabel, S. (1994). Development of a Toolkit for Secondary HVAC Sytem Energy Calculations. $6+5$(7UDQVDFWLRQV, (1), 21–32.
Buhl, W. F., Erdem, A. E., Winkelmann, F. C., & Sowell, E. F. (1993). Recent Improvements in SPARK: Strong Component Decomposition, Multivalued Objects, and Graphical Interface. In 3URFHHGLQJVRI%XLOGLQJ6LPXODWLRQ¶. Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, 16-18 August 1993, Adelaide, Australia. IBPSA.
Building Technologies Office. (2013). (QHUJ\3OXV(QJLQHHULQJ5HIHUHQFH (p. 1348). University of Illinois, Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
California Energy Commission. (2005). CEC-500-2005-161 Hot Water Distribution System Research – Phase I Final Report. &DOLIRUQLD(QHUJ\&RPPLVVLRQ3XEOLF ,QWHUHVW(QHUJ\5HVHDUFK 3,(5 3URJUDP. Retrieved December 05, 2012, from http://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ve d=0CCsQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cuwcc.org%2FWorkArea%2Fdownlo adasset.aspx%3Fid%3D2178&ei=xhqPUujnJcm0qgG- gYGgDQ&usg=AFQjCNG43xcoHfeQMujHzHAL3hnw4WuUBg&bvm=bv.569880 11,d.aWM
165 Cengel, Y. A., & Boles, M. A. (2002). 7KHUPRG\QDPLFV$Q(QJLQHHULQJ$SSURDFK (4th ed., p. 821). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Chandrashekar, M., Le, N. T., Sullivan, H. F., & Hollands, K. G. T. (1982). A Comparative Study of Solar Assisted Heat Pump Systems for Canadian Locations. 6RODU(QHUJ\, , 217–226.
Chow, T. T. (2010). A Review on Photovoltaic/Thermal Hybrid Solar Technology. $SSOLHG(QHUJ\, (2), 365–379.
Church, K. (2008). Cascadia: An Exergetic Approach to Neighbourhood Design. ECBCS Annex 49. Retrieved April 30, 2012, from http://www.annex49.com/tools/02_Cascadia.zip
Consolar. (2012). Solus II Highest Energy Savings on Hot Water and Heating. *UHHQVKRS*URXS. Retrieved June 15, 2011, from http://www.consolar.de/fileadmin/Consolar/user/downloads_EN/PI/PI_EN- SOLUS_II-WEB.pdf
Crawley, D. B., Lawrie, L. K., Winkelmann, F. C., Buhl, W. F., Huang, Y. J., Pedersen, C. O., … Glazer, J. (2001). EnergyPlus: Creating a New-Generation Building Energy Simulation Program. (QHUJ\DQG%XLOGLQJV, , 319–331.
Cruickshank, C. A., & Harrison, S. J. (2010). Heat Loss Characteristics for a Typical Solar Domestic Hot Water Storage. (QHUJ\DQG%XLOGLQJV, (10), 1703–1710.
Cruickshank, C. A., & Harrison, S. J. (2011). Thermal Response of a Series- and Parallel- Connected Solar Energy Storage to Multi-Day Charge Sequences. 6RODU(QHUJ\, (1), 180–187.
Day, A. R., & Karayiannis, T. G. (1994). Solar-Assisted Heat Pump Research and Development. %XLOGLQJ6HUYLFHV(QJLQHHULQJ5HVHDUFKDQG7HFKQRORJ\, (2), 71– 80.
Dewulf, J., Van Langenhove, H., Muys, B., Bruers, S., Bakshi, B. R., Grubb, G. F., … Sciubba, E. (2008). Critical Review Exergy: Its Potential and Limitations in Environmental Science and Technology. (QYLURQPHQWDO6FLHQFH 7HFKQRORJ\, (7), 2221–2232.
Dincer, I. (2002). On Thermal Energy Storage Systems and Applications in Buildings. (QHUJ\DQG%XLOGLQJV, , 377–388.
Dincer, I., & Rosen, M. A. (2005). Thermodynamic Aspects of Renewables and Sustainable Development. 5HQHZDEOHDQG6XVWDLQDEOH(QHUJ\5HYLHZV, (2), 169– 189.
166 Dincer, I., & Rosen, M. A. (2011). 7KHUPDO(QHUJ\6WRUDJH (2nd ed., p. 599). Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
Duffie, J. A., & Beckman, W. A. (2006). 6RODU(QJLQHHULQJRI7KHUPDO3URFHVVHV (3rd ed., p. 908). Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley.
Dumas, M., & Marcoux, C. (2004). Variation Annuelle de la Température de L’eau dans le Réseau d'aqueduc de Montréal. $6+5$(0RQWUpDO. Retrieved October 27, 2006, from http://www.ashrae-mtl.org/text/a_ashrae.html
Durmayaz, A., & Yavuz, H. (2001). Exergy Analysis of a Pressurized-Water Reactor. $SSOLHG(QHUJ\, , 39–57.
ECBCS A37. (2003). IEA ECBCS Annex 37 Low Exergy Systems for Heating and Cooling. ,($(QHUJ\LQ%XLOGLQJVDQG&RPPXQLWLHV3URJUDPPH. Retrieved March 03, 2012, from http://www.ecbcs.org/annexes/annex37.htm
ECBCS A49. (2010). IEA ECBCS Annex 49 Low Exergy Systems for High Performance Buildings and Communities. ,($(QHUJ\LQ%XLOGLQJVDQG&RPPXQLWLHV3URJUDPPH. Retrieved August 06, 2012, from http://www.ecbcs.org/annexes/annex49.htm
Edgerton, R. H. (1980). Second Law and Radiation. (QHUJ\, , 693–707.
Ehyaei, M. A., Mozafari, A., Ahmadi, A., Esmaili, P., Shayesteh, M., Sarkhosh, M., & Dincer, I. (2010). Potential Use of Cold Thermal Energy Storage Systems for Better Efficiency and Cost Effectiveness. (QHUJ\DQG%XLOGLQJV, (12), 2296–2303.
Ellehauge, K. (2003). Solar Combisystems Final Report: Key Issues in Solar Thermal (Solar Thermal Technology Promotion). (XURSHDQ$OWHQHU3URJUDPPH. Retrieved March 17, 2011, from http://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ve d=0CCsQFjAA&url=http://www.elle-kilde.dk/altener-combi/dwload/combisystems- final_2003-05- 20.pdf&ei=txyPUr_xMoWgqAGckIDQDQ&usg=AFQjCNHIl4WRxb2Dd1Ri40mw dLUkrYdSaQ&bvm=bv.56988011,d.aWM
EU HighCombi. (2011). High Combi Project. (XURSHDQ8QLRQ+,*+&20%,3URMHFW. Retrieved November 17, 2013, from http://www.highcombi.eu/
Ezan, M. A., Erek, A., & Dincer, I. (2011). Energy and Exergy Analyses of an Ice-on- Coil Thermal Energy Storage System. (QHUJ\, (11), 6375–6386.
Fan, J., & Furbo, S. (2012a). Thermal Stratification in a Hot Water Tank Established by Heat Loss from the Tank. 6RODU(QHUJ\, (11), 3460–3469.
167 Fan, J., & Furbo, S. (2012b). Buoyancy Driven Flow in a Hot Water Tank due to Standby Heat Loss. 6RODU(QHUJ\, (11), 3438–3449.
Freeman, T. L., Mitchell, J. W., & Audit, T. E. (1979). Performance of Combined Solar- Heat Pump Systems. 6RODU(QHUJ\, , 125–135.
FSEC. (2010). FSEC Standard 101-10 Operation of the Solar Thermal Collector Certification Program. )ORULGD6RODU(QHUJ\&HQWHU. Retrieved October 28, 2011, from http://www.fsec.ucf.edu/en/publications/pdf/standards/FSECstd_101-10.pdf
Furbo, S., Andersen, E., Thür, A., Shah, L. J., & Andersen, K. D. (2005). Performance Improvement by Discharge from Different Levels in Solar Storage Tanks. 6RODU (QHUJ\, (5), 431–439.
Furbo, S., Vejen, N. K., & Shah, L. J. (2005). Thermal Performance of a Large Low Flow Solar Heating System with a Highly Thermally Stratified Tank. -RXUQDORI6RODU (QHUJ\(QJLQHHULQJ, (1), 15.
Gaggioli, R. A. (2010). Teaching Elementary Thermodynamics and Energy Conversion: Opinions. (QHUJ\, (2), 1047–1056.
GeoSmart. (2012). Premium H. *HR6PDUW(QHUJ\. Retrieved March 05, 2013, from http://geosmartenergy.com/geothermal-energy/geothermal-products/hydronic- system.html
Glembin, J., & Rockendorf, G. (2012). Simulation and Evaluation of Stratified Discharging and Charging Devices in Combined Solar Thermal Systems. 6RODU (QHUJ\, (1), 407–420.
Haller, M. Y., Cruickshank, C. A., Streicher, W., Harrison, S. J., Andersen, E., & Furbo, S. (2009). Methods to Determine Stratification Efficiency of Thermal Energy Storage Processes– Review and Theoretical Comparison. 6RODU(QHUJ\, (10), 1847–1860.
Haller, M. Y., Streicher, W., Andersen, E., & Furbo, S. (2008). Comparative Analysis of Thermal Energy Storage Stratification Efficiency— a New Method Combines Advantages of Previous Approaches. In 3URFHHGLQJVRI(II6WRFN. 11th International Conference on Thermal Energy Storage for Efficiency and Sustainability, 14-17 June 2009, Stockholm, Sweden.
Harris, G. G. M. (1957). The Heat Pump, Its Relation to Solar Energy and Heat Storage. (OHFWULFDO1HZVDQG(QJLQHHULQJ, (1), 60–63.
Hasnain, S. M. (1998). Review on Sustainable Thermal Energy Storage Technologies, Part II: Cool Thermal Storage. (QHUJ\&RQYHUVLRQDQG0DQDJHPHQW, (11), 1139– 1153.
168 Hastings, S. R., & Wall, M. (2007). 6XVWDLQDEOH6RODU+RXVLQJ. London; Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
Hugo, A. (2008). &RPSXWHU6LPXODWLRQDQG/LIH&\FOH$QDO\VLVRID6HDVRQDO7KHUPDO 6WRUDJH6\VWHPLQD5HVLGHQWLDO%XLOGLQJ. Master Thesis. Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.
Hugo, A., Zmeureanu, R., & Rivard, H. (2010). Solar Combisystem with Seasonal Thermal Storage. -RXUQDORI%XLOGLQJ3HUIRUPDQFH6LPXODWLRQ, (4), 255–268.
IEA HPC. (2012). Heat Pump Technology. ,($+HDW3XPS3URJUDPPH. Retrieved October 05, 2012, from http://www.heatpumpcentre.org/en/aboutheatpumps/heatpumptechnology/Sidor/defa ult.aspx
IEA-SHC T44/A38. (2011). Solar and Heat Pump Systems Industry Newsletter. ,($ 6+&7DVN$QQH[. Retrieved February 08, 2012, from http://www.heatpumpcentre.org/en/projects/ongoingprojects/annex38/Documents/20 11-01_Newsletter_Final (2).pdf
IEE SolarCombi+. (2010). Solar Combi+ Project. ,QWHOOLJHQW(QHUJ\(XURSH 6RODU&RPEL3URMHFW. Retrieved January 07, 2012, from http://www.solarcombiplus.eu/index_en.htm
Ievers, S., & Lin, W. (2009). Numerical Simulation of Three-Dimensional Flow Dynamics in a Hot Water Storage Tank. $SSOLHG(QHUJ\, (12), 2604–2614.
IPCC WGI. (2013). Working Group I Contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report, Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis Summary for Policymakers. ,3&&:RUNLQJ*URXS,. Retrieved September 27, 2013, from http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/uploads/WGIAR5- SPM_Approved27Sep2013.pdf
Ismail, K. A. R., Leal, J. F. B., & Zanardi, M. A. (1997). Models of Liquid Storage Tanks. (QHUJ\, (8), 805–815.
Itard, L. (2003). H.e.n.k., A Software Tool for the Integrated Design of Buildings and Installations in the Early Design Stage. In 3URFHHGLQJVRI%XLOGLQJ6LPXODWLRQ (pp. 555–562). 8th International IBPSA Conference, 11-14 August 2003, Eindhoven, Netherlands. IBPSA.
Itard, L. (2005). Implementation of Exergy— Calculations in an Existing Software State Tool for Exergy-Flow Calculations in the Early Design Stage. In 3URFHHGLQJVRI %XLOGLQJ6LPXODWLRQ (pp. 459–466). 9th International IBPSA Conference, 15- 18 August 2005, Montreal, Canada. IBPSA.
169 Jeter, S. M. (1981). Maximum Conversion Efficiency for the Utilization of Direct Solar Radiation. 6RODU(QHUJ\, , 231–236.
JJH/LBNL. (2013). DOE-2 Based Building Energy Use and Cost Analysis Software. (QHU/RJLFDQG-DPHV-+LUVFK $VVRFLDWHV. Retrieved November 25, 2013, from http://doe2.com/
Jordan, U., & Furbo, S. (2005). Thermal Stratification in Small Solar Domestic Storage Tanks Caused by Draw-offs. 6RODU(QHUJ\, (2), 291–300.
Jordan, U., & Vajen, K. (2001). 5HDOLVWLF'RPHVWLF+RW:DWHU3URILOHVLQ'LIIHUHQW7LPH 6FDOHV. IEA SHC Task 26: Solar Combisystems.
Karagiorgas, M., Galatis, K., Tsagouri, M., Tsoutsos, T., & Botzios-Valaskakis, A. (2010). Solar Assisted Heat Pump on Air Collectors: A Simulation Tool. 6RODU (QHUJ\, (1), 66–78.
Kennedy, M. C., & O’Hagan, A. (2001). Bayesian Calibration of Computer Models. -RXUQDORIWKH5R\DO6WDWLVWLFDO6RFLHW\6HULHV% 6WDWLVWLFDO0HWKRGRORJ\ , (3), 425–464.
Klein, S. A. (2006). TRNSYS: Transient Systems Simulation Program.
Klein, S. A. (2012). Engineering Equation Solver Academic Commercial v.9.215-3D. F- Chart Software.
Kleinbach, E. M. (1990). 3HUIRUPDQFH6WXG\RI2QH'LPHQVLRQDO0RGHOVIRU6WUDWLILHG 7KHUPDO6WRUDJH7DQN. Master Thesis. University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA.
Kleinbach, E. M., Beckman, W. A., & Klein, S. A. (1993). Performance Study of One- Dimensional Models for Stratified Thermal Storage Tanks. 6RODUHQHUJ\, , 155– 166.
Koroneos, C., & Tsarouhis, M. (2012). Exergy Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment of Solar Heating and Cooling Systems in the Building Environment. -RXUQDORI &OHDQHU3URGXFWLRQ, , 52–60.
Kreith, F., & Bohn, M. S. (2001). 3ULQFLSOHVRI+HDW7UDQVIHU (6th ed.). Australia: Brooks/Cole Pub.
Kugle, S., Green, S., Haji-Sheikh, A., & Lou, D. Y. S. (1984). Performance of Solar Assisted Heat Pump Sytems in Residential Applications. 6RODU(QHUJ\, (2), 169– 179.
170 Kush, E. A. (1980). Performance of Heat Pumps at Elevated Evaporating Temperatures with Application to Solar Input. -RXUQDORI6RODU(QHUJ\(QJLQHHULQJ, , 203–210.
Laughlin, R. B. (2011). 3RZHULQJWKH)XWXUH+RZ:H:LOO (YHQWXDOO\ 6ROYHWKH (QHUJ\&ULVLVDQG)XHOWKH&LYLOL]DWLRQRI7RPRUURZ (p. 224). New York: Basic Books.
Leckner, M. (2008). /LIH&\FOH(QHUJ\DQG&RVW$QDO\VLVRID1HW=HUR(QHUJ\+RXVH 1=(+ 8VLQJD6RODU&RPELV\VWHP. Master Thesis. Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.
Leckner, M., & Zmeureanu, R. (2011). Life Cycle Cost and Energy Analysis of a Net Zero Energy House with Solar Combisystem. $SSOLHG(QHUJ\, (1), 232–241.
Lemmon, E. W., Huber, M. L., & Mclinden, M. O. (2013). NIST Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties— REFPROP v.9.1 User’s Guide. 1DWLRQDO,QVWLWXWHRI6WDQGDUGVDQG7HFKQRORJ\.
Loehrke, R. I., Gari, H. N., Sharp, M. K., & Haberstroh, R. D. (1978). A Passive Technique for Enhancing Thermal Stratification in Liquid Storage Tanks. $60(, (78-HT-50).
Lund, P. D. (2005). Sizing and Applicability Considerations of Solar Combisystems. 6RODU(QHUJ\, (1), 59–71.
Maciejewski, P. K. (1996). Evidence of a Convective Instability Allowing Warm Water to Freeze in Less Time than Cold Water. -RXUQDORI+HDW7UDQVIHU, , 65–72.
Mathworks. (2011). MATLAB R2011b 7.13.0.564. The Mathworks.
Metz, W. D. (1977). Solar Thermal Energy: Bringing the Pieces Together. 6FLHQFH, (4304), 650–651.
Microsoft. (2013). Microsoft Excel. Microsoft Corporation.
Molinari, M. (2011). S.E.P.E.: An Exergy Analysis and Optimization Tool. (&%&6 $QQH[. Retrieved February 11, 2012, from http://www.annex49.com/tools/03_SEPE.zip
Moran, M. J., & Shapiro, H. N. (1999). )XQGDPHQWDOVRI(QJLQHHULQJ7KHUPRG\QDPLFV (4th ed., p. 918). New Yorkௗ: Wiley.
Moreno-Rodríguez, A., González-Gil, A., Izquierdo, M., & Garcia-Hernando, N. (2012). Theoretical Model and Experimental Validation of a Direct-Expansion Solar Assisted Heat Pump for Domestic Hot Water Applications. (QHUJ\, (1), 704–715.
171 Myers, G. E. (1992). Equilibrium via Element Potentials and Computers. Winter Annual Meeting of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 8-13 November 1992, Anaheim, USA. ASME.
Nelson, J. E. B., Balakrishnan, A. R., & Murthy, S. S. (1998). Transient Analysis of Energy Storage in a Thermally Stratified Water Tank. ,QWHUQDWLRQDO-RXUQDORI (QHUJ\5HVHDUFK, , 867–883.
Nelson, J. E. B., Balakrishnan, A. R., & Murthy, S. S. (1999a). Parametric Studies on Thermally Stratified Chilled Water Storage Systems. $SSOLHG7KHUPDO(QJLQHHULQJ, , 89–115.
Nelson, J. E. B., Balakrishnan, A. R., & Murthy, S. S. (1999b). Experiments on Stratified Chilled-Water Tanks. ,QWHUQDWLRQDO-RXUQDORI5HIULJHUDWLRQ, , 216–234.
Ng Cheng Hin, J. (2013). /LIH&\FOH2SWLPL]DWLRQRID5HVLGHQWLDO6RODU&RPELV\VWHPIRU 0LQLPXP&RVW(QHUJ\8VHDQG([HUJ\'HVWUR\HG. Master Thesis. Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.
Ng Cheng Hin, J., Zmeureanu, R., & Rosen, M. A. (2013). Exergy Analysis of a Residential Thermal Storage System. In 3URFHHGLQJVRI&&7&. 3rd Climate Change Technology Conference, 27-29 May 2013, Montreal, Canada. EIC.
NRCan-OEE. (2012). Total End-Use Sector— Energy Use Analysis. 1DWXUDO5HVRXUFHV &DQDGD2IILFHRI(QHUJ\(IILFLHQF\. Retrieved October 09, 2012, from http://oee.nrcan.gc.ca/corporate/statistics/neud/dpa/tablesanalysis2/aaa_ca_1_e_4.cf m?attr=0
Olesen, B. W. (1977). Thermal Comfort Requirements for Floors Occupied by People with Bare Feet. $6+5$(7UDQVDFWLRQV, , 41–57.
Oppel, F. J., Ghajar, A. J., & Moretti, P. M. (1986). Computer Simulation of Stratified Heat Storage. $SSOLHG(QHUJ\, , 205–224.
Palacios, E., Admiraal, D. M., Marcos, J. D., & Izquierdo, M. (2012). Experimental Analysis of Solar Thermal Storage in a Water Tank with Open Side Inlets. $SSOLHG (QHUJ\, (1), 401–412.
Panek, J., & Johnson, S. (1994). )(50,/$%70&U\RJHQLF3URFHVV6LPXODWLRQ. Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory. Retrieved from http://lss.fnal.gov/archive/test-tm/1000/fermilab-tm-1874.pdf
Panthalookaran, V., Heidemann, W., & Müller-Steinhagen, H. (2007). A New Method of Characterization for Stratified Thermal Energy Stores. 6RODU(QHUJ\, (8), 1043– 1054.
172 Papillon, P., Nielsen, J. E., Cholin, X., Letz, T., Thür, A., Kuhness, G., … Drueck, H. (2010). Solar Combisystems Promotion and Standardisation Final Report. ,QWHOOLJHQW (QHUJ\(XURSH&20%,62/3URMHFW. CombiSol. Retrieved October 10, 2012, from http://eaci- projects.eu/iee/fileshow.jsp?att_id=16647&place=pa&url=http://CombiSol Publishable Report[1].pdf&prid=1491
Park, C., Clark, D. R., & Kelly, G. E. (1985). An Overview of HVACSIM+, A Dynamic Building/HVAC/Control Systems Simulation Program. In 3URFHHGLQJVRIWKHVW $QQXDO%XLOGLQJ(QHUJ\6LPXODWLRQ&RQIHUHQFH. 21-22 August 1985, Seattle, WA.
Parrott, J. E. (1978). Theoretical Upper Limit to the Conversion Efficiency of Solar Energy. 6RODU(QHUJ\, (3), 227–229.
Petela, R. (1964). Exergy of Heat Radiation. -RXUQDORI+HDW7UDQVIHU, , 187–192.
Petela, R. (2005). Exergy Analysis of the Solar Cylindrical-Parabolic Cooker. 6RODU (QHUJ\, (3), 221–233.
Petela, R. (2010). (QJLQHHULQJ7KHUPRG\QDPLFVRI7KHUPDO5DGLDWLRQ)RU6RODU3RZHU 8WLOL]DWLRQ (p. 399). New York: McGraw Hill.
Raffenel, Y., Fabrizio, E., Virgone, J., Blanco, E., & Filippi, M. (2009). Integrated Solar Heating Systems: From Initial Sizing Procedure to Dynamic Simulation. 6RODU (QHUJ\, (5), 657–663.
Rhee, J., Campbell, A., Mariadass, A., & Morhous, B. (2010). Temperature Stratification from Thermal Diodes in Solar Hot Water Storage Tank. 6RODU(QHUJ\, (3), 507– 511.
Rosen, M. A. (2001a). The Exergy of Stratified Thermal Energy Storages. 6RODU(QHUJ\, (3), 173–185.
Rosen, M. A. (2001b). Energy- and Exergy-Based Comparison of Coal-Fired and Nuclear Steam Power Plants. ([HUJ\$Q,QWHUQDWLRQDO-RXUQDO, (3), 180–192.
Rosen, M. A., & Dincer, I. (2001). Exergy as the Confluence of Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development. ([HUJ\$Q,QWHUQDWLRQDO-RXUQDO, (1), 3–13.
Rosen, M. A., Dincer, I., & Kanoglu, M. (2008). Role of Exergy in Increasing Efficiency and Sustainability and Reducing Environmental Impact. (QHUJ\3ROLF\, (1), 128– 137.
Rosen, M. A., Leong, W. H., & Le, M. N. (2001). Modelling and Analysis of Building Systems that Integrate Cogeneration and District Heating and Cooling. In
173 3URFHHGLQJRIH6LP&RQIHUHQFH (pp. 187–194). 13-14 June 2001, Ottawa, Canada. IBPSA-Canada.
Rosen, M. A., Pedinelli, N., & Dincer, I. (1999). Energy and Exergy Analysis of Cold Thermal Storage Systems. ,QWHUQDWLRQDO-RXUQDORI(QHUJ\5HVHDUFK, (February), 1029–1038.
Rosen, M. A., Tang, R., & Dincer, I. (2004). Effect of Stratification on Energy and Exergy Capacities in Thermal Storage Systems. ,QWHUQDWLRQDO-RXUQDORI(QHUJ\ 5HVHDUFK, (2), 177–193.
Sargent, R. G. (2011). Verification and Validation of Simulation Models. In 3URFHHGLQJV RIWKH:LQWHU6LPXODWLRQ&RQIHUHQFH (pp. 183–198). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 11-14 December 2011, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Schmidt, D. (2004). Design of Low Exergy Buildings— Method and a Pre-Design Tool. ,QWHUQDWLRQDO-RXUQDORI/RZ(QHUJ\DQG6XVWDLQDEOH%XLOGLQJV, , 1–47.
Shah, L. J., & Furbo, S. (2003). Entrance Effects in Solar Storage Tanks. 6RODU(QHUJ\, (4), 337–348.
SHC T26. (2012). IEA SHC Task 26 Solar Combisystems. ,($6RODU+HDWLQJDQG &RROLQJ3URJUDPPH. Retrieved October 09, 2012, from http://www.iea- shc.org/task26/
SHC T44A38. (2011). IEA-SHC Task 44/ Annex 38 Solar and Heat Pump Systems Industry Newsletter First Issue. ,($6RODU+HDWLQJDQG&RROLQJ3URJUDPPH ,($ +HDW3XPS3URJUDPPH. Retrieved January 07, 2012, from http://www.heatpumpcentre.org/en/projects/ongoingprojects/annex38/Documents/20 11-01_Newsletter_Final (2).pdf
Shenoy, A. (2004). 6LPXODWLRQ0RGHOLQJDQG$QDO\VLVRID:DWHUWR$LU+HDW3XPS. Master Thesis. Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, USA.
Shin, M.-S., Kim, H.-S., Jang, D.-S., Lee, S.-N., Lee, Y.-S., & Yoon, H.-G. (2004). Numerical and Experimental Study on the Design of a Stratified Thermal Storage System. $SSOLHG7KHUPDO(QJLQHHULQJ, (1), 17–27.
Singh, S., Chander, S., & Saini, J. S. (2012). Exergy Based Analysis of Solar Air Heater Having Discrete V-Down Rib Roughness on Absorber Plate. (QHUJ\, (1), 749– 758.
Soni, J., & Gupta, R. C. (2012). Exergy Analysis of Vapour Compression Refrigeration System with Using R- 407C and R-410A. ,QWHUQDWLRQDO-RXUQDORI(QJLQHHULQJ 5HVHDUFK 7HFKQRORJ\, (7), 1–12.
174 Sowell, E. F., & Moshier, M. A. (1995). HVAC Component Model Libraries for Equation-Based Solvers. In 3URFHHGLQJVRI%XLOGLQJ6LPXODWLRQ¶ (pp. 189–196). 4th Conference of International Building Simulation Association, 1995, Madison, USA. IBPSA.
Spur, R., Fiala, D., Nevrala, D., & Probert, D. (2006). Performances of Modern Domestic Hot-Water Stores. $SSOLHG(QHUJ\, (8), 893–910.
SRCC. (2013). Certification Info— Solar Collector Certification Program. 6RODU5DWLQJ &HUWLILFDWLRQ&RUSRUDWLRQ. Retrieved March 10, 2012, from http://www.solar- rating.org/certification/collector.html
StatPoint. (2012). Statgraphics Centurion XVI.I. StatPoint Techonologies.
Staus, G. A. (1997). Solving Equations with EES. -RXUQDORI6FLHQFHDQG7HFKQRORJ\, (2), 4–6.
Stojanoviü, B., & Akander, J. (2010). Build-up and Long-Term Performance Test of a Full-Scale Solar-Assisted Heat Pump System for Residential Heating in Nordic Climatic Conditions. $SSOLHG7KHUPDO(QJLQHHULQJ, (2-3), 188–195.
SunEarth. (2012). EC-24 Solar Collector Certification and Rating. 6RODU5DWLQJ &HUWLILFDWLRQ&RUSRUDWLRQ. Retrieved July 21, 2012, from https://securedb.fsec.ucf.edu/srcc/coll_detail?srcc_id=2006024A
Sunwell. (2012). Deepchill Variable-State Ice Machines & Systems. 6XQZHOO 7HFKQRORJLHV Retrieved March 05, 2013, from http://www.sunwell.com/systems.htm
Suzuki, A. (1988). A Fundamental Equation for Exergy Balance on Solar Collectors. -RXUQDORI6RODU(QHUJ\(QJLQHHULQJ, (2), 102–106.
Tamasauskas, J., Poirier, M., Zmeureanu, R., & Sunyé, R. (2012). Modeling and Optimization of a Solar Assisted Heat Pump Using Ice Slurry as a Latent Storage Material. 6RODU(QHUJ\, (11), 3316–3325.
Tang, C. C. (2005). 0RGHOLQJ3DFNDJHG+HDW3XPSLQD4XDVL6WHDG\6WDWH(QHUJ\ 6LPXODWLRQ3URJUDP. Master Thesis. Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, USA.
Terrell, R. E. (1979). Performance and Analysis of a “Series” Heat Pump-Assisted Solar Heated Residence in Madison, Wisconsin. 6RODU(QHUJ\, (5), 451–453.
Torío, H. (2010). Pre-Design Tool: Tool for Buildings Exergy Analysis. (&%&6$QQH[ . Retrieved February 11, 2012, from http://www.annex49.com/tools/01_Annex_Pre_Design_Tool.zip
175 Torío, H., Angelotti, A., & Schmidt, D. (2009). Exergy Analysis of Renewable Energy- Based Climatisation Systems for Buildings: A Critical View. (QHUJ\DQG%XLOGLQJV, (3), 248–271. Retrieved from http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378778808002211
Turner, J. S. (1973). %XR\DQF\(IIHFWVLQ)OXLGV (p. 367). Cambridge [Eng.]: University Press.
Verkhivker, G. P., & Kosoy, B. V. (2001). On the Exergy Analysis of Power Plants. (QHUJ\&RQYHUVLRQDQG0DQDJHPHQW, (18), 2053–2059.
Visser, H., & Van Dijk, H. A. L. (1991). 7HVW3URFHGXUHVIRU6KRUW7HUP7KHUPDO6WRUHV. (H. Visser & H.A.L.Van Dijk, Eds.).OXZHU$FDGHPLF3XEOLVKHUV. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Volk, M. (2005). 3XPS&KDUDFWHULVWLFVDQG$SSOLFDWLRQV (2nd ed., p. 533). Boca Raton [Fla.]: Taylor & Francis.
Wei, Z. (2006). $QDO\VLVRI(QHUJ\([HUJ\DQG*UHHQKRXVH*DV(PLVVLRQVIRU9DULDEOH $LU9ROXPH6\VWHPVLQDQ2IILFH%XLOGLQJ. Master Thesis. Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.
Wei, Z., & Zmeureanu, R. (2009). Exergy Analysis of Variable Air Volume Systems for an Office Building. (QHUJ\&RQYHUVLRQDQG0DQDJHPHQW, (2), 387–392.
Wilo. (2012). Wilo Online Catalogue. :LOR&DQGD. Retrieved March 11, 2013, from http://productfinder.wilo.com/en/DE/productrange/0000000d0000476f00050023/fc_ range_description
Wu, X. (2004). 6HFRQG/DZ$QDO\VLVRI5HVLGHQWLDO+HDWLQJ6\VWHPV. Master Thesis. Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.
Zheng, X. (2006). ([HUJ\$QDO\VLVRI:DWHU/RRS+HDW3XPS6\VWHPLQDQ2IILFH %XLOGLQJ. Master Thesis. Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.
Zmeureanu, R., & Wu, X. (2007). Energy and Exergy Performance of Residential Heating Systems with Separate Mechanical Ventilation. (QHUJ\, (3), 187–195.
Zmeureanu, R., & Zheng, X. (2008). Second Law Analysis of the Water Loop Heat Pump System for Office Buildings. In 3URFHHGLQJVRI:RUOG5HQHZDEOH(QHUJ\&RQJUHVV ;. 19-25 July 2008, Glasgow, UK.
176 Appendices
AppendixA
ApplicationconstraintsofEq.(4.3)
Torevealthepotentialofthesituations(1)ߟ<0and(2)ߟ>1,atheoretical
approachoffindingsolutionstoquadraticispresentedbelow.Abnormalresultswould
occur,if
ଶ ܶǡ௪ െܶ ൫ܶǡ௪ െܶ൯ ܽ ܽଵ ܽଶ ൏Ͳ ሺ݅ሻ ܩ ܩ (1) ଶ ܶ െܶ ൫ܶ െܶ ൯ ܽ ܽ ǡ௪ ܽ ǡ௪ ͳ ሺ݅݅ሻ ଵ ܩ ଶ ܩ
whichcouldbefurthertransformedas(denotingܶtoܶ,ܶǡ௪ toܶ)
ܽଶ ଶ ʹܽଶ ܽଵ ܽଶ ଶ ܽଵ ܶ െ ቀ ܶ ቁ ܶ ቀ ܶ ܶ ܽቁ ൏ Ͳ ሺ݅ሻ ܩ ܩ ܩ ܩ ܩ (2) ܽ ʹܽ ܽ ܽ ܽ ଶ ܶ ଶ െ ቀ ଶ ܶ ଵቁ ܶ ቀ ଶ ܶ ଶ ଵ ܶ ܽ െͳቁ Ͳ ሺ݅݅ሻ ܩ ܩ ܩ ܩ ܩ
or
ܻ ൏Ͳ ሺ݅ሻ (3) ܻଵ Ͳ ሺ݅݅ሻ
where,
ܽଶ ଶ ʹܽଶ ܽଵ ܽଶ ଶ ܽଵ ܻ ൌ ܶ െ ቀ ܶ ቁ ܶ ቀ ܶ ܶ ܽቁ ሺ݅ሻ ܩ ܩ ܩ ܩ ܩ (4) ܽ ʹܽ ܽ ܽ ܽ ܻ ൌ ଶ ܶ ଶ െ ቀ ଶ ܶ ଵቁ ܶ ቀ ଶ ܶ ଶ ଵ ܶ ܽ െͳቁ ሺ݅݅ሻ ଵ ܩ ܩ ܩ ܩ ܩ
fitsinageneralquadraticformof
177 ଶ ܻ ൌ ܣܶ ܤܶ ܥ ሺ݅ሻ ଶ (5) ܻଵ ൌ ܣܶ ܤܶ ܥଵ ሺ݅݅ሻ
whichbearsthediscriminant
ଶ ܤ െͶܣܥ ሺ݅ሻ οൌ ቊ ଶ (6) ܤ െͶܣܥଵ ሺ݅݅ሻ
with
ܽଶ ܣ ൌ ǡ (7) ܩ
ʹܽଶ ܽଵ ܤൌെ൬ ܶ ൰ǡ (8) ܩ ܩ ܽ ܽ ܥ ൌ ଶ ܶ ଶ ଵ ܶ ܽ ሺ݅ሻ ܩ ܩ ܽ ܽ (9) ܥ ൌ ଶ ܶ ଶ ଵ ܶ ܽ െͳ ሺ݅݅ሻ ଵ ܩ ܩ
Whenοш0,quadraticfunctionܻandܻଵhastwodistinctroots
െܤ േ ξο ܶ ൌ Ǥ (10) ଵǡଶ ʹܣ
QuadraticfunctionsinEqn.(4)areillustratedinFig.1usingthecasesolar collectorcoefficients,whereܽଶ<0,ܣ<0and,therefore,thecurvesopenupward.If quadraticdiscriminantο>0,twodistinctrootsexistastheplottedsituation.Eqn.(3)ሺ݅ሻ istruewhenܶ<ܶଵ,orܶ>ܶଶ;Eqn.(3)ሺ݅݅ሻistruewhenܶଵ<ܶ<ܶଶ.Underthe
applicationofthesolarcollectoroperation,onlyܶଵismeaningful,sinceonecan
calculateܶଶatamuchvaluethanthatoftheoutdoorairmayreachinreality,suchas
200Ԩ.Theweightedcurvesthatoverlayinguponܻandܻଵhighlightwhereܻ ൏Ͳ
andܻଵ Ͳ,respectively.Similarsituationforο=0,buttwodistinctrootsbecomingone.
Ifο<0,therootsdonotexist,thequadraticcurvesfallbelowtheaxisܶ.Therefore,Eqn.
178 (3)ሺ݅ሻalwaysholdsbutnotሺ݅݅ሻ.Amongthesituationsexplicated,wheneverEqn.(3)
truejustifiestheinvalidapplicationofthermalefficiencyofsolarcollector,whichshould alwayslieinarangeof0чߟч1.
Fig.1Solutionstoquadraticinapplicationsofsolarthermalefficiency Theapplicationconstrainsofsolarthermalcollectorproductusedinthecase studywereexaminedinthequadraticapproach.Fig.2showstheupperandlower boundsoftheoutdoorairtemperaturewithrespecttothesolarinsolationfrom0W/m2
2 to1200W/m whilevariousenteringtemperatures,ܶ,between0.01Ԩto70Ԩ.For instance,thevalidapplicationofthermalefficiencyshouldbewiththeoutdoor temperatureranginginͲ20Ԩ<ܶ<40Ԩwhentheenteringtemperatureat20Ԩand
thesolarinsolationdensityat200W/m2.
Abidingbythelowerboundsensuresthermalefficiencyofsolarthermalcollector
ߟ>0,bytheupperboundsensuresߟ<1.Alongtheverticalaxisdownward,the boundsofoutdoortemperaturedropandlowerboundsgoalongwithlowerentering temperatures.Alongthehorizontalaxistotheleftside,theoutdoortemperatureis
179 constrainedtighterwithinnarrowrangesasthesolarinsolationdecreasing.But, constraintsarerelievedprovidingthesolarinsolationhigherthan425W/m2.
Fig.2Upperandlowerboundsofoutdoortemperatureofcasesolarthermalefficiency
180
AppendixB
Inputandoutputofthecomponentmodels
Thesolarthermalcollectormodel:
Symbols Descriptions Units
Inputs ܽ Coefficientofsolarcollectorthermalefficiency dimensionless 2 ܽଵ Coefficientofsolarcollectorthermalefficiency W/(m ͼԨ) 2 2 ܽଶ Coefficientofsolarcollectorthermalefficiency W/(m ͼԨ ) 2 ܣ Grossareaofsinglesolarthermalcollectorpanel m ݊ Numberofsolarthermalcollectorpanel dimensionless ሶ 3 2 ܸ௨௧ Volumeflowrateperunitcollectorarea m /(sͼm ) Powerdensityofinsolationupontiltedcollectorpanelsurface, ܩሶ W/m2 timevariable
ܶ Outdoorairtemperature,timevariable Ԩ Temperatureofwaterenteringsolarthermalcollector, ܶ Ԩ ǡ௪ associatedvariable Outputs ܶ௨௧ǡ௪ Temperatureofwaterleavingsolarthermalcollector Ԩ ݉ሶ ௪ Massflowrateofwaterthroughsolarthermalcollector kg/s 3 ܸ௪ሶ Volumeflowrateofwaterthroughsolarthermalcollector m /s ܳሶ Solarheatabsorptionrateofsolarthermalcollector W
181 Theheatpumpmodel:
Symbols Descriptions Units Volumeflowrateofwaterthroughevaporatorunderbaseline Inputs ܸሶ ா௩ m3/s ௦ condition,inputparameter Volumeflowrateofwaterthroughcondenserunderbaseline ܸሶ ௗ m3/s ௦ condition,inputparameter Electricpowerofheatpumpunderbaselinecondition,input ܹሶ ு W ௦ parameter Heatoutputrateatcondenserunderbaselinecondition,input ܳሶ ௗ W ௦ parameter
ܾǡܾଵǡǥܾସ Coefficientsofheatpupelectricpower,inputparameterͲ
݀ǡ݀ଵǡǥ݀ସ Coefficientsofheattransferrateatcondenser,inputparameterͲ ா௩ 3 ܸ௪ሶ Volumeflowrateofwaterthroughevaporator,inputparameter m /s ௗ 3 ܸ௪ሶ Volumeflowrateofwaterthroughcondenser,inputparameter m /s ா௩ ܶǡ௪ Temperatureofwaterenteringevaporator,associatedvariable Ԩ ௗ ܶǡ௪ Temperatureofwaterenteringcondenser,associatedvariable Ԩ ா௩ ܶǡ௪ Meantemperatureofwaterthroughevaporator,inputparameter Ԩ ௗ ܶǡ௪ Meantemperatureofwaterthroughcondenser,inputparameter Ԩ
οܶ௦௨ Superheattemperaturedifference,inputparameter Ԩ
ܲ Pressureofcondensation,inputparameter Pa
ܲ Pressureofvaporization,inputparameter Pa ሶ ோி ܳௗௗ Spaceheatingdemandontoradiantfloor,inputtimevariable W ா௩ Outputs ܶ௨௧ǡ௪ Temperatureofliquidwaterleavingevaporator Ԩ ௗ ܶ௨௧ǡ௪ Temperatureofwaterleavingcondenser Ԩ ா௩ ݉ሶ ௪ Massflowrateofwaterthroughevaporator kg/s ா௩ ݉ሶ ௪ Massflowrateofliquidwaterleavingevaporator kg/s ா௩ ݉ሶ ௪ Massflowrateofsolidwater(ice)leavingevaporator kg/s ௗ ݉ሶ ௪ Massflowrateofwaterthroughcondenser kg/s ா௩ 3 ܸ௪ሶ Volumeflowrateofwaterthroughevaporator m /s ௗ 3 ܸ௪ሶ Volumeflowrateofwaterthroughcondenser m /s ܹሶ ு Electricpowerofheatpump W ܳሶ ௗ Heatoutputrateatcondenser W ܳሶ ுସோி Heatoutputratefromheatpumptoradiantfloor W ܳሶ ுସௐ் Heatoutputratefromheatpumptowaterstoragetank W
182 Theicestoragetankmodel:
Symbols Descriptions Units Inputs ܮூ் Lengthofrectangularstoragetank m ܹூ் Widthofrectangularstoragetank m ܪூ் Heightofrectangularstoragetank m Thermaltransmittanceofinsulationattachedtoicestorage ܷூ் W/(m2ͼԨ) ௦௨ tank ௐ ܶ௫ MaximumtemperatureofwaterͲlayer Ԩ
ߛ௫ Maximumicemassfractioninicestoragetank dimensionless οݐ Timestep s
ܶ Indoorairtemperature Ԩ Massflowrateofwaterenteringfromicestoragetankheat ݉ሶ ூ்ௌ kg/s ௪ source,associatedvariable Massflowrateofsolidwaterfromicestoragetankheatsink, ݉ሶ ூ் kg/s ௪ associatedvariable Massflowrateofliquidwaterenteringfromicestoragetank ݉ሶ ூ் kg/s ௪ heatsink,associatedvariable Temperatureofwaterenteringfromicestoragetankheat ܶூ்ௌ Ԩ ǡ௪ source,associatedvariable Temperatureofwaterenteringfromicestoragetankheat ܶூ் Ԩ ǡ௪ sink,associatedvariable
ூ்ௌ Constantpressurespecificheatofwaterenteringfromice ܿ J/(kgͼԨ) ǡ௪ storagetankheatsource,associatedvariable
ூ் Constantpressurespecificheatofliquidwaterenteringfrom ܿ J/(kgͼԨ) ǡ௪ icestoragetankheatsink,associatedvariable ௐ Outputs ܶ௪ TemperatureofwaterͲlayer Ԩ
183 Thewaterstoragetankmodel:
Symbols Descriptions Units Inputs ܪௐ் Heightofwaterstoragetank m ܦௐ் Diameterofcylinderwaterstoragetank m ௐ் ߜ௦ Thicknessofwaterstoragetankshell m ௐ் ݇௦ Thermalconductivityofwaterstoragetankshell W/(mͼԨ) Thermaltransmittanceofinsulationattachedtowaterstorage ܷௐ் W/(m2ͼԨ) ௦௨ tank οݐ Timestep s
ܶ Indoorairtemperature Ԩ ுௐ 3 ܸ௪ሶ Volumeflowrateofdomestichotwaterdrawn,inputvariable m /s ெ ܶ௪ Temperatureofwaterfromcitymain,inputvariable Ԩ Heatchargingrateofimmersionheatexchangerܪܺͳ,associated ܳሶ ௐ்ௌଵ W variable Heatchargingrateofimmersionheatexchangerܪܺʹ,associated ܳሶ ௐ்ௌଶ W variable ሶ ோி ܳௗௗ Spaceheatingdemandontoradiantfloor,inputvariable W ே Outputs ܶ௪ TemperatureofwaterͲnodeܰ݅ Ԩ ௐ்ଵ ܶ௨௧ǡ௪ Temperatureofwaterleavingimmersionheatexchangerܪܺͳ Ԩ ܳሶ ௐ்ଵ Heatdischargingrateofimmersionheatexchangerܪܺͳ W ܳሶ ௐ்ଶ Heatoutputrateofwaterstoragetankfordomesticwaterheating W ܳሶ ௐ் Heatoutputrateofwaterstoragetankforheating W ܳሶ ௐ்ସோி Heattransferratefromwaterstoragetanktoradiantfloor W
Theradiantfloormode:
Symbols Descriptions Units Heattransferratefromwaterstoragetanktoradiantfloor, Inputs ܳሶ ௐ்ସோி W associatedvariable Heattransferratefromheatpumptoradiantfloor,associated ܳሶ ுସோி W variable Temperatureofwaterleavingimmersionheatexchangerܪܺͳ, ܶௐ்ଵ Ԩ ௨௧ǡ௪ associatedvariable Temperatureofwaterleavingheatpumpcondenser,associated ܶௗ Ԩ ௨௧ǡ௪ variable ோி Outputs ݉ሶ ௪ Massflowrateofwaterthroughradiantfloor kg/s ܳሶ ோி Heatinputratetoradiantfloor W
184 Thecirculatingpumpmodel:
Symbols Descriptions Units
Inputs ܿ Coefficientofelectricpowerinputtocirculatingpump W 3 ܿଵ Coefficientofelectricpowerinputtocirculatingpump Wͼs/m 2 6 ܿଶ Coefficientofelectricpowerinputtocirculatingpump Wͼs /m 3 9 ܿଷ Coefficientofelectricpowerinputtocirculatingpump Wͼs /m 4 12 ܿସ Coefficientofelectricpowerinputtocirculatingpump Wͼs /m 5 15 ܿହ Coefficientofelectricpowerinputtocirculatingpump Wͼs /m 6 18 ܿ Coefficientofelectricpowerinputtocirculatingpump Wͼs /m 7 21 ܿ Coefficientofelectricpowerinputtocirculatingpump Wͼs /m 8 24 ଼ܿ Coefficientofelectricpowerinputtocirculatingpump Wͼs /m ሶ ௨ 3 ܸ௫ Maximumvolumeflowrateofwaterthroughcirculatingpump m /s ௨ଵ 3 ܸ௪ሶ Volumeflowrateofcirculatingpumpܲͳ,associatedvariable m /s ௨ଶ 3 ܸ௪ሶ Volumeflowrateofcirculatingpumpܲʹ,associatedvariable m /s ௨ଷ 3 ܸ௪ሶ Volumeflowrateofcirculatingpumpܲ͵,associatedvariable m /s Outputs ܹሶ ௨ଵ Electricpowerinputtocirculatingpumpܲͳ W ܹሶ ௨ଶ Electricpowerinputtocirculatingpumpܲʹ W ܹሶ ௨ଷ Electricpowerinputtocirculatingpumpܲ͵ W ሶ ௨ ܹ௦௨ Overallpowerinputoncirculatingpumps W
185 Thecontrolsystemmodel:
Symbols Descriptions Units Powerdensityofinsolationupontiltedcollectorpanelsurface, Inputs ܩሶ W/m2 inputvariable ሶ ோி ܳௗௗ Spaceheatingdemandontoradiantfloor,inputvariable W ுௐ 3 ܸ௪ሶ Volumeflowrateofdomestichotwaterdrawn,timevariable m /s ߛ Icemassfractionoficestoragetank,associatedvariable dimensionless
ߛ௫ Maximumicemassfractioninicestoragetank,inputparameter dimensionless ௐ ܶ௪ IcestoragetankwaterͲlayertemperature,associatedvariable Ԩ ௐ் ܶ௦௧ Temperaturesetforwaterstoragetank,inputparameter Ԩ Variationallowedrespectingtosettingtemperatureofwater ܶௐ் Ԩ ௩ storagetank,inputparameter ேଵ ܶ௪ TemperatureofwaterͲnodeܰͳ,associatedvariable Ԩ ேଷ ܶ௪ TemperatureofwaterͲnodeܰ͵,associatedvariable Ԩ ேହ ܶ௪ TemperatureofwaterͲnodeܰͷ,associatedvariable Ԩ Temperatureofwaterleavingimmersionheatexchangerܪܺͳ, ܶௐ்ଵ Ԩ ௨௧ǡ௪ associatedvariable ௗ ܶ௨௧ǡ௪ Temperatureofwaterleavingcondenser Ԩ ோி ܶ Comforttemperatureofradiantfloor,inputparameter Ԩ Outputs ߠ Controlledvariableforoperatingcirculatingpumpܲͳ dimensionless ControlledvariableforthreeͲwayvalveܸͳ,respectingthe ߠସூ் dimensionless operationbetweensolarthermalcollectorandicestoragetank ControlledvariableforthreeͲwayvalveܸͳ,respectingthe ߠସௐ் operationbetweensolarthermalcollectorandwaterstorage dimensionless tank ߠு Controlledvariableforoperatingheatpump dimensionless ControlledvariableforthreeͲwayvalveܸʹ,respectingthe ߠுସௐ் dimensionless operationbetweenheatpumpandwaterstoragetank ControlledvariableforthreeͲwayvalveܸʹ,respectingthe ߠுସோி dimensionless operationbetweenheatpumpandradiantfloor Controlledvariableforbypassvalveܸ͵,respectingthe ߠௐ்ସோி dimensionless operationbetweenwaterstoragetankandradiantfloor ߠ௨௫ Controlledvariableforoperatingauxiliaryheater dimensionless
186
AppendixC
EmpireECͲ24SRCCOGͲ100certification
Source:SunEarth(2012)
187
AppendixD
RegardingcoefficientsidentificationwithStatGraphicsforGeoSmartHS050
ࢃሶ ࡴࡼ I. Theplotof forEqn.(4.19)regression ૢ
RͲSquared=99.7768percent
StandardErrorofEst.=0.0136088
TheRͲSquaredstatisticindicatesthatthemodelasfittedexplains99.7768%of
ௐሶ ಹು thevariabilityin .Thestandarderroroftheestimateshowsthestandarddeviation ଷଷଽ oftheresidualstobe0.0136088.
188
ࡽሶ ࢊ II. Theplotof forEqn.(4.20)regression ૠ
RͲSquared=98.6571percent
StandardErrorofEst.=0.0158837
TheRͲSquaredstatisticindicatesthatthemodelasfittedexplains98.6571%of
ொሶ thevariabilityin .Thestandarderroroftheestimateshowsthestandarddeviation ଶଵଶ oftheresidualstobe0.0158837.
189 III. GeoSmartHS050performancedata
Source:GeoSmart(2012)
190
AppendixE
WiloͲStar16Fperformancecurve
Source:Wilo(2012)
191