DOCSLIB.ORG

North Africa Programme North Africa Programme 2017-2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2017-2020 North Africa Programme North Africa Programme 2017-2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 4 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ............................................................................. 5 2. IUCN IN NORTH AFRICA .................................................................................................... 7 2.1 IUCN Members and partners in North Africa ..................................................................... 7 2.2 Results from previous programmes .................................................................................. 10 3. REGIONAL SITUATION ANALYSIS ................................................................................. 12 3.1 Overview of key biodiversity challenges and main actions implemented in North African countries ................................................................................................. 12 Overall situation: biodiversity status and trends in North Africa ...................................... 12 Protected areas ............................................................................................................... 13 Species assessments, protection and recovery .............................................................. 18 Conservation and recovery of ecosystems ...................................................................... 20 Addressing climate change and desertification .............................................................. 25 Assessing and preserving ecosystems services ............................................................. 29 3.2 Main needs and challenges to address in the North-Africa programme 2017-2010 ........ 30 4. THE NORTH AFRICA PROGRAMME 2017-2020: CORE AREAS, RESULTS AND APPROACHES .................................................................. 34 4.1 Core programme areas .................................................................................................... 34 4.2 Overview of the programme ............................................................................................. 35 PROGRAMME AREA 1: Valuing and conserving nature ................................................. 36 PROGRAMME AREA 2: Promoting and Supporting Effective and Equitable Governance of Natural Resources .................................................................. 39 PROGRAMME AREA 3: Deploying nature-based solutions to address societal challenges ................................. 41 4.3. Description of the programme: results and approaches .................................................. 43 PROGRAMME AREA 1: Valuing and conserving nature ............................................... 43 PROGRAMME AREA 2: Promoting and Supporting Effective and Equitable Governance of Natural Resources ................................................................................... 51 PROGRAMME AREA 3: Deploying Nature-based solutions to address societal challenges ................................ 56 5. MODALITIES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAMME ............................ 61 Working together .............................................................................................................. 61 Efficient implementation and mobilisation of resources .................................................. 62 Programme monitoring and reporting .............................................................................. 64 6. HUMAN RESOURCES NEEDED TO IMPLEMENT THE PROGRAMME ......................... 65 ACRONYMS ........................................................................................................................... 66 Visitors at the Ichkeul National Park © IUCN/Irene Morell EXECUTIVE SUMMARY There is little doubt that 2015 will be looked back upon as pivotal year in the North Morocco coast © Miguel CC BY 3.0 relationship between people and planet. It will be seen as the year when the world finally agreed on a common vision for the future and demonstrated that the collective will to make it happen is there. But cautious optimism is warrant- ed. While the adoption of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the historic agreement in Paris to tackle climate change represent the end of an arduous journey, a new one every bit as challenging is barely beginning. In many ways, the IUCN Programme 2017-2020 in North Africa represents a blueprint for realising many of the ambitions of the post-2015 agenda. The Pro- gramme embraces and assimilates the new momentum generated by the 2015 agreements and captures them in a programme of work that exploits IUCN’s strengths, taking advantage of the Union’s knowledge and reach to move agreements into concrete action. Moreover, the Programme breaks away from the once-widespread misconception that global challenges must each be ad- dressed separately, and instead recognises that environmental, economic and even political concerns often share direct and indirect drivers, and can similar- ly benefit from common solutions. The Programme also reflects IUCN’s conviction that a steady increase in global wellbeing can only be achieved through an enhanced understanding of the planet’s complex life-support systems and the predominant global and regional trends currently acting upon them – urbanisation, economic growth, burgeoning consumption, disappearing biodiversity, wealth inequality, climate change, population growth and many others. The IUCN Programme 2017-2020 in North Africa represents a blueprint for realising many of the ambitions of the post-2015 agenda IUCN · NORTH AFRICA PROGRAMME 2017-2020 4 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND The UICN North Africa Programme 2017-2020 has been elaborated in con- sultation and with the participation of all IUCN Members and Partners in North Flamingos in Tunisia © Mikhail Yablokov African countries. The Programme takes into account the aims of the Global IUCN Programme for the same period, the specific needs of North Africa as identified in the situation analysis and the results and recommendations of the IUCN Regional Conservation Forum for North Africa that was held in El Cairo, Egypt, in October 2015. The Programme involves 5 countries (Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco and Tu- nisia) and will be implemented in close cooperation with all UICN Members, national authorities and national and regional partners’ organisations. The in- volvement of all IUCN Members and partners is crucial to achieve the expected results of the programme. They will also contribute with their own activities to the achievement of the main targets set in the programme. IUCN-Med and its partners will undertake concerted action to further strengthen and amplify their efforts in developing effective solutions for nature conservation in North Africa. The current Programme builds on the work achieved in the previous pro- grammes (2008-2012, 2013-2016) and aims to contribute to implementing key international processes such as the Strategic Plan 2010-2020 for Biodiversity adopted by the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), and the post-2015 development agenda to reach, by 2030, the Sustainable Devel- opment Goals (SDGs). 5 NORTH AFRICA PROGRAMME 2017-2020 · IUCN The Programme involves 5 countries (Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco and Tu nisia) and will be implemented in close cooperation with all UICN Members, national authorities and national and regional partners’ organisations. The programme has been prepared also taking into account the IUCN Mediter- ranean programme and the most relevant initiatives and strategies in the Med- iterranean region, in particular the UNEP/MAP Mid-Term Strategy 2016-2021 (MTS) and the Mediterranean Strategy for Sustainable Development 2016-2025 (MSSD). The MTS is meant to guide the path for the protection of the marine and coastal environment of the Mediterranean region to achieve Good Envi- ronmental Status, and the MSSD aims to harmonise the interactions between socio-economic and environmental goals, for securing a sustainable future for the Mediterranean region consistent with the Sustainable Development Goals. Furthermore, a number of cooperation agreements have been signed between IUCN-Med and some national and international organisations for the imple- mentation of relevant actions in the Mediterranean region and in North Afri- can countries, which have been taken into account for the preparation of this programme. In particular, IUCN-Med implements a joint programme with the MAVA Foundation that aims to develop strategic actions to address key biodi- versity conservation challenges over the period 2015‐2019. IUCN-Med has also signed agreements and Memorandums of Understanding (MoU) with international and regional organisations, as the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM-FAO), the Mediterranean Action Plan (UNEP-MAP) Secretariat, the Union for the Maghreb Arab, as well with na- tional authorities (HCEFLCD of Morocco, DGF Algeria, Ministry of Environment Italy, etc.), which identify common areas of interest and specific activities to be jointly implemented. IUCN · NORTH AFRICA PROGRAMME 2017-2020 6 2. IUCN IN NORTH AFRICA 2.1 IUCN MEMBERS AND PARTNERS IN NORTH AFRICA The long-term goal of IUCN in North Africa is to preserve biodiversity compo- nents and restore degraded ecosystems. The development of knowledge and skills to achieve this goal is one of the constants and strengths of IUCN. Following a recommendation from its Members in North Africa,
Recommended publications
  • Regional Perspectives Report on North Africa and the Sahel Strategic Foresight Analysis

    Regional Perspectives Report on North Africa and the Sahel Strategic Foresight Analysis

    REGIONAL PERSPECTIVES REPORT ON NORTH AFRICA AND THE SAHEL STRATEGIC FORESIGHT ANALYSIS NATO UNCLASSIFIED - PUBLICLY DISCLOSED from the SFA 2017 apply to the region, the most significant trends in North Africa and the Sahel are expected population growth, climate change, and challenges in politics and governance. The confluence of these trends may significantly challenge governments, economies, societies, and food and water resources, contributing to instability and uncertainty in some countries in the region. Because of these trends, North Africa and the Sahel will require continuing focus and attention from Europe and NATO for the foreseeable future. Nations and institutions such as NATO and the EU may benefit from the information provided in this document to help develop coordinated strategies to respond to potential FOREWORD risks and take advantage of opportunities that The Strategic Foresight Analysis (SFA) arise from this neighbouring region. Innovation Regional Perspectives Report on North Africa and rapid technological advances may also offer and the Sahel aims to support NATO leadership’s opportunities to address these challenges. This visualisation of the future security environment report does not seek to predict the future, but and development of the next version of the instead provides potential trajectories for several SFA report and its companion follow-on report, trends and highlights their implications for the the Framework for Future Alliance Operations Alliance. Although some trends were not met with (FFAO). Together, the SFA and FFAO provide consensus, this report offers alternative views North Africa military advice and inform the NATO Defence where available to maintain objectivity. “ Planning Process (NDPP), as well as other The rapidly changing, complex security and the NATO and national processes that require an environment will continue to be the main driver understanding of the long-term future.
  • Reconnaissance Visit to Alatash – Dinder Lion Conservation Unit

    Reconnaissance Visit to Alatash – Dinder Lion Conservation Unit

    Reconnaissance visit to Alatash – Dinder Lion Conservation Unit, Ethiopia – Sudan border. Hans Bauer and Gebeyehu Rskay Mission Report 22-29 November 2015, Alatash National Park, Ethiopia Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, University of Oxford (WildCRU) Ethiopian Wolf Conservation Programme (EWCP) Ethiopian Wildlife Conservation Authority (EWCA) Funded by Born Free USA 1 Contents Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Team ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 4 Methods .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Area description ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Results ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 Discussion................................................................................................................................................ 7 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................
  • Enclosure Size in Captive Wild Mammals. a Comparison Between UK Zoological Collections

    Enclosure Size in Captive Wild Mammals. a Comparison Between UK Zoological Collections

    1 ENCLOSURE SIZE IN CAPTIVE WILD MAMMALS: A comparison between UK zoological collections and the wild. JORDI CASAMITJANA1 Abstract A comparison was made between the average enclosure size of a random sample of mammals kept during the years 2000- 2001 in a random sample of UK zoological collections and the minimum home range of these taxa in the wild. Allometric laws were used to estimate the home range area, while direct observation from videotaped visits to the collections was used to estimate enclosure size area. The results showed that, as an average, the average enclosure size had an area 100 times smaller than the minimum home range. Key words: mammal, zoo, enclosure size, allometric, megafauna, captivity, home range Introduction The zoo debate Nowadays, many people choose not to go to zoos because they consider that either it is wrong to keep wild animals in captivity as a matter of principle, or the conditions the animals are kept in zoos are unacceptable. The zoo community, and its supporters, think otherwise, and this difference of opinion is what constitute the so called ‘zoo debate’. It is not unusual that people engaged in such debate try to prove their points either by quoting ‘expert’ opinion or by referring to facts, evidence and reports about zoo’s activities. However, many of these ‘facts’ are missing because no objective research has ever been developed to find them. One of the most common arguments used in the zoo debate refers to the space available to captive animals kept in zoos. The anti-zoo side of the debate often criticises enclosures for being too small, while zoo advocates tend to respond that they are big enough, or that size ‘does not matter’.
  • Mammals of Jordan

    Mammals of Jordan

    © Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Mammals of Jordan Z. AMR, M. ABU BAKER & L. RIFAI Abstract: A total of 78 species of mammals belonging to seven orders (Insectivora, Chiroptera, Carni- vora, Hyracoidea, Artiodactyla, Lagomorpha and Rodentia) have been recorded from Jordan. Bats and rodents represent the highest diversity of recorded species. Notes on systematics and ecology for the re- corded species were given. Key words: Mammals, Jordan, ecology, systematics, zoogeography, arid environment. Introduction In this account we list the surviving mammals of Jordan, including some reintro- The mammalian diversity of Jordan is duced species. remarkable considering its location at the meeting point of three different faunal ele- Table 1: Summary to the mammalian taxa occurring ments; the African, Oriental and Palaearc- in Jordan tic. This diversity is a combination of these Order No. of Families No. of Species elements in addition to the occurrence of Insectivora 2 5 few endemic forms. Jordan's location result- Chiroptera 8 24 ed in a huge faunal diversity compared to Carnivora 5 16 the surrounding countries. It shelters a huge Hyracoidea >1 1 assembly of mammals of different zoogeo- Artiodactyla 2 5 graphical affinities. Most remarkably, Jordan Lagomorpha 1 1 represents biogeographic boundaries for the Rodentia 7 26 extreme distribution limit of several African Total 26 78 (e.g. Procavia capensis and Rousettus aegypti- acus) and Palaearctic mammals (e. g. Eri- Order Insectivora naceus concolor, Sciurus anomalus, Apodemus Order Insectivora contains the most mystacinus, Lutra lutra and Meles meles). primitive placental mammals. A pointed snout and a small brain case characterises Our knowledge on the diversity and members of this order.
  • Ostrich Production Systems Part I: a Review

    Ostrich Production Systems Part I: a Review

    11111111111,- 1SSN 0254-6019 Ostrich production systems Food and Agriculture Organization of 111160mmi the United Natiorp str. ro ucti s ct1rns Part A review by Dr M.M. ,,hanawany International Consultant Part II Case studies by Dr John Dingle FAO Visiting Scientist Food and , Agriculture Organization of the ' United , Nations Ot,i1 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. M-21 ISBN 92-5-104300-0 Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without any prior written permission from the copyright holders provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the copyright holders. Applications for such permission, with a statement of the purpose and extent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Director, Information Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Viale dells Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy. C) FAO 1999 Contents PART I - PRODUCTION SYSTEMS INTRODUCTION Chapter 1 ORIGIN AND EVOLUTION OF THE OSTRICH 5 Classification of the ostrich in the animal kingdom 5 Geographical distribution of ratites 8 Ostrich subspecies 10 The North
  • Crossing the North African and South African Ostrich

    Crossing the North African and South African Ostrich

    CROSSING THE NORTH AFRICAN AND SOUTH AFRICAN OSTRICH. Bu J. E. DUERDEN, M.Sc., PH.D., Professor of Zoology, Rhodes University College, Grahamstown ; O~cer- in-Charge, Ostrich Investigations, Grootfontein School of Agriculture, Middelburg, C. P., South Africa. (With Plate VII, and Two Text-figures.) CONTENTS. PAGE Introduction 156 North African Os~,rlch . 157 South African Ostrich . 157 Nature of the Material 159 Dimensions 162 Colour 163 Northern Ostrich 165 Southern Ostrich 166 Cross-bred Ostriches 166 Bald Head-Patch . 168 The Egg 170 Egg of North African Ostrich 170 Egg of South African Ostrich 171 Eggs from Cross.matings 172 Eggs from Cross-bred Hens 175 The Wing Quills 174 North African Ostriches . 175 South African Ostriches . 176 Ci'oss-bred Ostriches 177 Survival of 42-plumed Ostriches 178 Scutellation of Middle Toe 181 Claw on Fourth Toe 185 Discusslon 186 Factorial Constitution 186 Adaptive Value of Changes 190 Establishment of Characters . !93 Specific distinctness of Northern and Southern Ostrich 196 Journ. of Gem WlI 11 156 Crossing the North and South African Ostrich ~[NTRODUCTION. TIIE continent of Africa, with the adjoining parts of Arabia, Palestine and Asia Minor, is the natural home of the ostrich genus Struthio. Beyond the confines of Aft'its however the wild bh'd is now extremely rare, if it exists a~ all i while in Africa it is slowly passing away as the continent becomes occupied by the white settler. The domesticated bird on the other hand has greatly increased in number during the fifty years of ostrich farming, amounting to near one million in 1913, though since considerably reduced owing to the less demand for plumage as a result of the prolonged war.
  • The Middle East and North Africa (MENA)

    The Middle East and North Africa (MENA)

    Regional strategy for development cooperation with The Middle East and North Africa (MENA) 2006 – 2008 The Swedish Government resolved on 27 April 2006 that Swedish support for regional development cooperation in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA region) during the period 2006-2008 should be conducted in accordance with the enclosed regional strategy. The Government authorized the Swedish International Development Coope- ration Agency (Sida) to implement in accordance with the strategy and decided that the financial framework for the development cooperation programme should be SEK 400–500 million. Regional strategy for development cooperation with the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) 2006 – 2008 Contents 1. Summary ........................................................................................ 2 2. Conclusions of the regional assessment ........................................... 3 3. Assessment of observations: Conclusions ......................................... 6 4. Other policy areas .......................................................................... 8 5. Cooperation with other donors ........................................................ 10 6. The aims and focus of Swedish development cooperation ................ 11 7. Areas of cooperation with the MENA region ..................................... 12 7.1 Strategic considerations ............................................................. 12 7.2 Cooperation with the Swedish Institute in Alexandria and ............... 14 where relevant with the Section for
  • Site Report: Kafa Biosphere Reserve and Adjacent Protected Areas

    Site Report: Kafa Biosphere Reserve and Adjacent Protected Areas

    Site report: Kafa Biosphere Reserve and adjacent Protected Areas Part of the NABU / Zoo Leipzig Project ‘Field research and genetic mapping of large carnivores in Ethiopia’ Hans Bauer, Alemayehu Acha, Siraj Hussein and Claudio Sillero-Zubiri Addis Ababa, May 2016 Contents Implementing institutions and contact persons: .......................................................................................... 3 Preamble ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Objective ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 Description of the study site ......................................................................................................................... 5 Kafa Biosphere Reserve ............................................................................................................................ 5 Chebera Churchura NP .............................................................................................................................. 5 Omo NP and the adjacent Tama Reserve and Mago NP .......................................................................... 6 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................
  • Out of Europe: Investigating Hystrix Cristata (Rodentia: Hystricidae) Skull Morphometric Geographic Variability in Africa

    Out of Europe: Investigating Hystrix Cristata (Rodentia: Hystricidae) Skull Morphometric Geographic Variability in Africa

    Biogeographia – The Journal of Integrative Biogeography 36 (2021): a001 https://doi.org/10.21426/B636051379 Out of Europe: Investigating Hystrix cristata (Rodentia: Hystricidae) skull morphometric geographic variability in Africa FRANCESCO M. ANGELICI1*, PAOLO COLANGELO2, SPARTACO GIPPOLITI3 1 FIZV, Via Marco Aurelio 2, I-00184 Rome (Italy) 2 Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto di Ricerca sugli Ecosistemi Terrestri, CNR-IRET, Via Salaria km 29.300, I-00015 Montelibretti, Rome (Italy) 3 Società Italiana per la Storia della Fauna ‘Giuseppe Altobello’, Viale Liegi 48, I-00198 Rome (Italy) * corresponding author: [email protected] Keywords: Crested porcupine, geographic variability, Hystrix cristata senegalica, Hystrix cristata galeata, North-East Africa, taxonomy. SUMMARY The crested porcupine Hystrix cristata is one of the most well-known members of the Family Hystricidae, yet very little is known regarding its geographic variability in Africa. Two alternative hypotheses exist; pre-1940s classical taxonomy supported the existence of a distinct Eastern African species, Hystrix galeata, whereas recent molecular data seem to support only a North-South separation inside one single species, with the geographic-ecological barrier represented by the Sahara desert. Our morphometric data support the recognition of Hystrix cristata senegalica Cuvier, 1822 as the sub- Saharan representative of the species with a clear morphological difference between the North African and sub-Saharan crested porcupines, which seem re-conductible mostly to size difference. Within H. c. senegalica, our analysis seems to support a weak separation between the West African and the East African samples. Owing to considerable qualitative skull differences and overlooked molecular data, the taxonomic status of H. galeata remains uncertain as well as the status of porcupines of North-East Africa (Nubia).
  • Female Genital Mutilation

    Female Genital Mutilation

    Female Genital Mutilation in the Middle East and North Africa Female genital mutilation in the global development agenda SDG 5 Female genital mutilation (FGM) is Achieve gender equality and a violation of human rights. Every empower all girl and woman has the right to be women and girls protected from this harmful practice, a manifestation of entrenched gender inequality with devastating TARGET 5.3 INDICATOR 5.3.2 Eliminate all harmful practices, Proportion of girls and women consequences. FGM is now firmly on such as child, early and forced aged 15 to 49 years who have the global development agenda, most marriage and female genital undergone female genital mutilation mutilation prominently through its inclusion in Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) target 5.3, which aims to eliminate the practice by 2030. 02 | Female Genital Mutilation in the Middle East and North Africa KEY FACTS about FGM Almost 50 million girls and women have undergone female genital mutilation in five practising countries in the Middle East The prevalence of FGM varies from and North Africa, accounting for one quarter of the global total 94 per cent in Djibouti to 7 per cent in Iraq Age at cutting varies across countries in the region; in FGM is highly medicalized in Egypt and Sudan Yemen it most often occurs Less than half where almost 8 in 10 girls are cut in the first week of life, of women support the by medical personnel, whereas traditional while in Egypt it is most likely to continuation of FGM in most practitioners are responsible for most cutting in occur
  • Male Circumcision: Global Trends and Determinants of Prevalence, Safety and Acceptability IWHO Library Cataloguing-In-Publication Data

    Male Circumcision: Global Trends and Determinants of Prevalence, Safety and Acceptability IWHO Library Cataloguing-In-Publication Data

    Male circumcision Global trends and determinants of prevalence, safety and acceptability UNAIDS Department of Reproductive health and Research 20 AVENUE APPIA World Health Organization CH-1211 GENEVA 27 20 AVENUE APPIA SWITZERLAND CH-1211 GENEVA 27 SWITZERLAND T (+41) 22 791 36 66 F (+41) 22 791 41 87 T (+41) 22 791 2111 F (+41) 22 791 41 71 www.unaids.org ISBN 978 92 4 159616 9 www.who.int/reproductive-health Male circumcision: global trends and determinants of prevalence, safety and acceptability IWHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Male circumcision: global trends and determinants of prevalence, safety and acceptability. « UNAIDS / 07.29E / JC1320E ». 1. Circumcision, Male - trends. 2.Circumcision, Male - methods. 3.HIV infections - prevention and control. I.World Health Organization. II.UNAIDS. ISBN 978 92 4 159616 9 (WHO) (NLM classification: WJ 790) ISBN 978 92 9 173633 1 (UNAIDS) © World Health Organization and Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS, 2007 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization can be obtained from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications – whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution – should be addressed to WHO Press, at the above address (fax: +41 22 791 4806; e-mail: [email protected]). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatso- ever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
  • Information Package on Male Circumcision and HIV Prevention Insert 2

    Information Package on Male Circumcision and HIV Prevention Insert 2

    InformatIon Package on male CircumcIsIon and HIV PreVentIon Insert 2 The Global Prevalence of Male Circumcision Global estimates in 2006 suggest that about 30% of males – representing a total of approximately 665 million men – are circumcised. Other common determinants of male circumcision are ethnic- ity, perceived health and sexual benefits, and the desire to conform to socio-cultural norms. Male circumcision is common in many African countries and is almost universal in North Africa and most of West Africa. In contrast it is less common in southern Africa; country to country and within country variation is greatest in this regioni. Self-reported prevalence in several countries is around 15% (Botswana, Namibia, Swaziland, Zambia, Zimbabwe); but substantially higher in oth- ers (Malawi 21%, South Africa 35%, Lesotho 48%, Mozambique 60%, and Angola and Madagascar more than 80%). Prevalence in central and eastern Africa varies from 15% in Burundi and Rwanda, to over 70% in Ethiopia, Kenya and the United Republic of Tanzania. In sub-Saharan Africa age at circumcision varies from infancy to the late teens or early twenties. Male circumcision in Africa is undertaken for mainly religious and cultural reasons. Male circumcision is almost universal in the Middle East and Central Asia and in Bangladesh, Indonesia and Pakistanii,iii. In addition there are an estimated 120 million circumcised men in Indiaiv. In all these countries, male circumcision is undertaken primarily for religious and cultural reasons. There is little non-religious circumcision in Asia, with the exception of the Republic of Korea and the Philippines where circumcision is routine and widespreadv.