Factors Influencing Maize Yield Gaps on Smallholder Farms in Vihiga and Kakamega Counties of Western Kenya

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Factors Influencing Maize Yield Gaps on Smallholder Farms in Vihiga and Kakamega Counties of Western Kenya FACTORS INFLUENCING MAIZE YIELD GAPS ON SMALLHOLDER FARMS IN VIHIGA AND KAKAMEGA COUNTIES OF WESTERN KENYA MUNIALO SUSSY A80/51206/2016 RESEARCH THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN AGRICULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SCIENCE AND CROP PROTECTION FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE, UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI JULY 2020 DECLARATION This thesis is my original work and has not been presented for a degree in any other University Signature …………………………………….Date…………August 3rd 2020…………… Munialo Sussy APPROVAL: This thesis has been submitted for examination with approval as University supervisors Prof. Cecilia Moraa Onyango, Department of Plant Science and Crop Protection, University of Nairobi. Signature ……… ………….Date……August 6th 2020…… Prof. Willis Oluoch Kosura, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Nairobi. Signature … …Date……August 5, 2020………………………………… Prof. Ingrid Öborn, Department of Crop Production Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Signature Date……4 August 2020 Prof Sigrun Dahlin, Department of Soil and Environment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Signature Date…...4 August 2020 ii DEDICATION I dedicate this work to my mother and my siblings for their ever continuous support through prayer and encouragement throughout the journey. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisors; Prof. Cecilia Moraa Onyango, Prof. Willis Oluoch Kosura, Prof. Ingrid Öborn and Prof Sigrun Dahlin for their tireless efforts and immense assistance throughout the research period. Despite their busy schedules, they were available for consultations physically, through emails and through telephone communication. My appreciation to the Swedish Research Councils Formas (220-2014-646) and VR for financial support. Special appreciation to smallholder farms in Mukuyu and Shikomoli who willingly donated portions of their farms for field activities. I wish to thank extension officers and field guides in Mukuyu and Shikomoli for their guidance during the field activities. Appreciation to the Crop and Nutrition Services Laboratory in Nairobi for soil analysis, the Research methods and Geoscience Laboratory staff at ICRAF for providing guidance in data collection and analysis. Many thanks to University of Nairobi research assistants; Shadrack Nyawade, Rodgers Rogito and Getrude Kabochi for their assistance in soil sampling and field work activities. I am also grateful to the Yield gap project team members: Prof. Hakan Marstop from Swedish University of Agricultural Science; Dr. Ola Hall, Prof Goran Djurfeldt, and Prof. Magnus Jirstrom from Lund University; Dr. Fred Dzanku University of Ghana, Prof. Stephen Wambugu of Chuka University and Dr. Robert Wayumba of Technical University of Kenya for their invaluable advice and support. I would like to thank World Agroforestry (ICRAF) for providing a PhD Fellowship to support my study. I also appreciate ICRAF Systems theme, Anne Omollo and Mary-Jude Kariuki, the Capacity Development Unit, Imelda Igumba, as well as the Finance, CT and Knowledge Management units for their administrative and logistical support. I wish to also thank Ibrahim Wahab; Lund University whom we jointly collaborated in overseeing the research activities. I can’t forget my colleagues; Penina Mueni, Raphael Ibanda, Tarirai Muoni, Mercy Mbugua, Samuel Omondi, Muhati, friends; Mercy Onyango, Dorcas Jalang’o, Dennis Olumeh, Joseph Nzioki and iv my family members for their support and motivation. Above all, I am so grateful to the Almighty God for inner strength, patience and health throughout the study period. v Table of contents DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY ............................................................................................ i DECLARATION ............................................................................................................................ ii DEDICATION ............................................................................................................................... iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ............................................................................................................. iv Table of contents ............................................................................................................................ vi List of tables .................................................................................................................................... x Table of figures ............................................................................................................................. xii List of appendices ........................................................................................................................ xiv GENERAL ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................. xvi CHAPTER ONE ............................................................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Statement of the problem ...................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Justification for the study ...................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Objectives of the Study ......................................................................................................... 4 CHAPTER TWO ............................................................................................................................ 6 LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................................................... 6 2.1 The yield gap concept ........................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Relevance of yield gaps analysis ........................................................................................... 7 2.3 Methods for analyzing yield gaps analysis ........................................................................... 8 2.3.1 Comparison of statistical analysis methods used in yield gap studies ......................... 11 2.4 Multi-disciplinary assessment of factors influencing yield gaps ........................................ 13 2.5 Assessing yield gaps at a local level ................................................................................... 16 CHAPTER THREE ...................................................................................................................... 17 SOIL AND MANAGEMENT-RELATED FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO MAIZE YIELD GAPS IN WESTERN KENYA .................................................................................................... 17 Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... 17 3.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 19 3.2 Materials and method .......................................................................................................... 23 3.2.1 Description of the study sites........................................................................................ 23 vi 3.2.2 Identifying and geo-referencing of maize plots ............................................................ 25 3.2.3 Measuring crop performance and weed pressure ......................................................... 26 3.2.4 Soil measurements, sampling, and analysis.................................................................. 27 3.2.5 Quantifying maize yield gaps ....................................................................................... 29 3.2.6 Data analysis ................................................................................................................. 30 3.3 Results ................................................................................................................................. 31 3.3.1 Crop performance and weed pressure at key maize development stages ..................... 31 3.3.2 Characterization of soil physical and chemical properties ........................................... 32 3.3.3 Maize yields and yield gaps in Mukuyu and Shikomoli .............................................. 34 3.3.4 Soil and Management-related Factors contributing to yield gaps in Mukuyu ............. 36 3.3.5 Factors contributing to maize yield gaps in Shikomoli ................................................ 39 3.4 Discussion ........................................................................................................................... 43 3.4.1 Consistent factors influencing maize yield gaps regardless of agroecology ................ 43 3.4.2 Agroecology-specific factors influencing maize yield gaps ......................................... 46 3.4.3 Methodological applicability and relevance in yield gap studies ................................. 48 3.5 Conclusion and Recommendation ....................................................................................... 49 CHAPTER FOUR ........................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • County Urban Governance Tools
    County Urban Governance Tools This map shows various governance and management approaches counties are using in urban areas Mandera P Turkana Marsabit P West Pokot Wajir ish Elgeyo Samburu Marakwet Busia Trans Nzoia P P Isiolo P tax Bungoma LUFs P Busia Kakamega Baringo Kakamega Uasin P Gishu LUFs Nandi Laikipia Siaya tax P P P Vihiga Meru P Kisumu ga P Nakuru P LUFs LUFs Nyandarua Tharaka Garissa Kericho LUFs Nithi LUFs Nyeri Kirinyaga LUFs Homa Bay Nyamira P Kisii P Muranga Bomet Embu Migori LUFs P Kiambu Nairobi P Narok LUFs P LUFs Kitui Machakos Kisii Tana River Nyamira Makueni Lamu Nairobi P LUFs tax P Kajiado KEY County Budget and Economic Forums (CBEFs) They are meant to serve as the primary institution for ensuring public participation in public finances in order to im- Mom- prove accountability and public participation at the county level. basa Baringo County, Bomet County, Bungoma County, Busia County,Embu County, Elgeyo/ Marakwet County, Homabay County, Kajiado County, Kakamega County, Kericho Count, Kiambu County, Kilifi County, Kirin- yaga County, Kisii County, Kisumu County, Kitui County, Kwale County, Laikipia County, Machakos Coun- LUFs ty, Makueni County, Meru County, Mombasa County, Murang’a County, Nairobi County, Nakuru County, Kilifi Nandi County, Nyandarua County, Nyeri County, Samburu County, Siaya County, TaitaTaveta County, Taita Taveta TharakaNithi County, Trans Nzoia County, Uasin Gishu County Youth Empowerment Programs in urban areas In collaboration with the national government, county governments unveiled
    [Show full text]
  • KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS Kenya Population Situation Analysis
    REPUBLIC OF KENYA KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS Kenya Population Situation Analysis Published by the Government of Kenya supported by United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) Kenya Country Oce National Council for Population and Development (NCPD) P.O. Box 48994 – 00100, Nairobi, Kenya Tel: +254-20-271-1600/01 Fax: +254-20-271-6058 Email: [email protected] Website: www.ncpd-ke.org United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) Kenya Country Oce P.O. Box 30218 – 00100, Nairobi, Kenya Tel: +254-20-76244023/01/04 Fax: +254-20-7624422 Website: http://kenya.unfpa.org © NCPD July 2013 The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the contributors. Any part of this document may be freely reviewed, quoted, reproduced or translated in full or in part, provided the source is acknowledged. It may not be sold or used inconjunction with commercial purposes or for prot. KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS JULY 2013 KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS i ii KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................iv FOREWORD ..........................................................................................................................................ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ..........................................................................................................................x EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................xi
    [Show full text]
  • Busia County
    Sanitation Profile for 2017 Busia County Population of Busia County. Estimated percentage 953,337 21.2% of Busia population 9.6% Estimated percentage of Busia that is under 5 Years. population that is urban. Grand Score Rank Rank County (Out of 110 2 Population density 2017 2014 439/km of Busia County. points) Estimated percentage of Busia Kitui 89 1 9 91.4% population that is rural. Siaya 86 2 13 Nakuru 80 3 2 Source: 2009 Census Projections by the Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (2016). Kiambu 79 4 4 Busia 7474 5 3 Kisii 73 6 19 Machakos 71 7 5 Busia is ranked number 5 out of 47 in the county sanitation Isiolo 68 8 20 Nyeri 68 8 1 benchmarking according to the following key indicators: Homa Bay 67 10 17 Kisumu 67 10 10 E/Marakwet 66 12 10 Embu 64 13 40 Tharaka Nithi 63 14 21 Bungoma 62 15 33 Kirinyaga 61 16 5 Latrine Latrine Latrine Murang’a 61 16 8 Pupil: Pupil: Laikipia 60 18 25 Kilifi 59 19 33 Migori 58 20 14 RANK out of 47 Reporting Timely for Budget Score Sanitation /5 for Number of Score ODF Claim /10 for Cost per ODF Score Village /10 for Economic Costs of Score Poor Sanitation /10 for Score Girls /10 Coverage for Score /10 Boys Coverage for Household Improved Score Rate /15 Latrine Coverage for Number of Score facilities per Handwashing /10 school for Number of ODF Score villages (DPHO Certified /10 Targets of ODF Percent /10 Achieved Villages /10 of ODF Percent GRAND TOTAL Nyandarua 58 20 18 2014 3 5 10 10 3 5 5 15 0 10 10 8 81 Uasin Gishu 58 20 38 Kakamega 56 23 5 2017 5 0 10 10 0 8 8 5 0 10 10 10 74 Trans Nzoia 55 24
    [Show full text]
  • Vihiga County Assembly Kenya
    VIHIGA COUNTY ASSEMBLY KENYA ‘Unemployment is the major challenge and reason why the majority of the residents of Vihiga County are living in poverty. I will ensure that we have job centres where our people will be able to access jobs. This will ensure that our people are recruited in their fields of specialisation.’ Governor Moses Akaranga Vihiga County is a county in the Geographically, a larger part of the former Western Province of Kenya. Its County is hilly terrain. It also has a good capital and largest town is Vihiga. The amount of forest cover such as the County borders Kakamega County to Kibiri Forest, which is an extension of VIHIGA Governor Moses Akaranga has an the north, Nandi County to the east, Kakamega Forest. open-door policy and has invited young Kisumu County to the south and Siaya people with problems to visit him in his County to the west. Economy office so that ‘they can find a solution to Agriculture is the main economic activity. issues facing them instead of engaging in The County has a population of crime’ 554,622 (2009 census) and covers an Crops planted include maize, millet, area of 563 km². bananas, avocados, sweet potatoes and cassava. Main economic activities include There are four major townships: tea farming, eucalyptus tree farming, Luanda, Majengo, Chavakali and Mbale sand and stone quarrying, dairy farming Town which serves as the administrative and horticulture. Apart from those in headquarters. The County has four formal employment most residents districts headed by district engage in informal trade, with Luanda commissioners and three sub-counties market being the largest in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • County Name County Code Location
    COUNTY NAME COUNTY CODE LOCATION MOMBASA COUNTY 001 BANDARI COLLEGE KWALE COUNTY 002 KENYA SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT MATUGA KILIFI COUNTY 003 PWANI UNIVERSITY TANA RIVER COUNTY 004 MAU MAU MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL LAMU COUNTY 005 LAMU FORT HALL TAITA TAVETA 006 TAITA ACADEMY GARISSA COUNTY 007 KENYA NATIONAL LIBRARY WAJIR COUNTY 008 RED CROSS HALL MANDERA COUNTY 009 MANDERA ARIDLANDS MARSABIT COUNTY 010 ST. STEPHENS TRAINING CENTRE ISIOLO COUNTY 011 CATHOLIC MISSION HALL, ISIOLO MERU COUNTY 012 MERU SCHOOL THARAKA-NITHI 013 CHIAKARIGA GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL EMBU COUNTY 014 KANGARU GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL KITUI COUNTY 015 MULTIPURPOSE HALL KITUI MACHAKOS COUNTY 016 MACHAKOS TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE MAKUENI COUNTY 017 WOTE TECHNICAL TRAINING INSTITUTE NYANDARUA COUNTY 018 ACK CHURCH HALL, OL KALAU TOWN NYERI COUNTY 019 NYERI PRIMARY SCHOOL KIRINYAGA COUNTY 020 ST.MICHAEL GIRLS BOARDING MURANGA COUNTY 021 MURANG'A UNIVERSITY COLLEGE KIAMBU COUNTY 022 KIAMBU INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY TURKANA COUNTY 023 LODWAR YOUTH POLYTECHNIC WEST POKOT COUNTY 024 MTELO HALL KAPENGURIA SAMBURU COUNTY 025 ALLAMANO HALL PASTORAL CENTRE, MARALAL TRANSZOIA COUNTY 026 KITALE MUSEUM UASIN GISHU 027 ELDORET POLYTECHNIC ELGEYO MARAKWET 028 IEBC CONSTITUENCY OFFICE - ITEN NANDI COUNTY 029 KAPSABET BOYS HIGH SCHOOL BARINGO COUNTY 030 KENYA SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT, KABARNET LAIKIPIA COUNTY 031 NANYUKI HIGH SCHOOL NAKURU COUNTY 032 NAKURU HIGH SCHOOL NAROK COUNTY 033 MAASAI MARA UNIVERSITY KAJIADO COUNTY 034 MASAI TECHNICAL TRAINING INSTITUTE KERICHO COUNTY 035 KERICHO TEA SEC. SCHOOL
    [Show full text]
  • Flamingo Beach Resort and Spa, Shanzu, Mombasa 12
    A REPORT OF THE 3RD ANNUAL EHRDs WORKSHOP ON STRENGTHENING THE WORK OF ENVIRONMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS (EHRDs) THROUGH THEIR ENGAGEMENT WITH THE COUNTY ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEES (CECs) AND ASSESSMENT OF EMERGENCY AND NON-EMERGENCY SUPPORT NEEDS FOR EHRDs FLAMINGO BEACH RESORT AND SPA, SHANZU, TH TH MOMBASA 12 - 14 JUNE, 2019 ACRONYMS EHRDs - Environmental Human Rights Defenders NEMA - National Environment Management Authority CECs - County Environmental Committees CJGEA - Center for Justice Governance and Environmental Action LED - Land and Environment Defenders UNEP - United Nations Environment Programme OHCHR - UN Office of High Commissioner on Human Rights ILC - International Land Commission CoG - Council of Governors HRDs - Human Rights Defenders EU - European Union PI - Protection International USA - United States of America US - United States UN - United Nations NCHRD-K - National Coalition for Human Rights Defenders CBO - Community Based Organization NGO - Non-Governmental Organization ii Abstract EHRDs globally have continued to face serious threats with regards to the type of work they do. More often than not they are subjected to numerous violations ranging from attacks, murders, harassments, and infringement of their fundamental rights among many others. Kenya is not left behind, it is one of the countries that has become extremely unbearable for the EHRDs to survive in. In this regard, CJGEA came up with an initiative to empower EHRDs countrywide to ensure they are protected and feel secure when handling their work. This was also to ensure environmental protection and conservation work continues smoothly. For the past three years, EHRDs drawn from all over the country under the banner of CJGEA have been meeting annually for a workshop to deliberate on the issues that affect them and the work they do so as to better their work in protecting the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Vihiga County Urban Integrated Development Strategy
    VIHIGA COUNTY URBAN INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY CUIDS. JUNE 2019 TABLE OF CONTENT Contents TABLE OF CONTENT ................................................................................................................. i CHAPTER ONE ......................................................................................................................... 1 URBANIZATION, URBAN MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE COUNTY ............. 1 SECTION 1: OVERVIEW OF URBANIZATION IN VIHIGA ....................................................... 1 MAJOR URBAN AREAS ........................................................................................................... 3 URBANIZATION AND COUNTY SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT .................................. 3 ROLE OF URBAN AREAS IN THE COUNTY ECONOMY ........................................................ 6 NATURE OF RURAL-URBAN LINKAGES IN THE COUNTY ................................................... 6 URBAN DEVELOPMENT CHALLENGES ................................................................................. 6 STATE OF HOUSING IN THE COUNTY ..................................................................................11 LEGAL AND REGULATORY SYSTEMS FOR URBAN MANAGEMENT IN THE COUNTY ....12 The Constitution of Kenya, 2010 ............................................................................................13 Urban Areas and Cities Act 2011 ...........................................................................................13 County Government Act, 2012 ..................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Booker Academy Shines Again
    Weekly Vol. 11 (20th —26th November, 2017) Weekly Bulletin Page 1 Booker Academy shines again THIS WEEK @ A GLANCE Booker Academy Shines again “Utamu Halisi wa Wakenya” back in the market Vihiga United car- ries the day Devotional Charge Teachers of Booker Academy celebrating 2017 KCPE results Booker Academy emerged the best school in Mumias Sub-County with a mean mark of 391.9 in the re- cently released KCPE re- sults by Education Cabinet Secretary, D. Fred Matiang’i. Booker Academy best girl and boy in 2017 KCPE 35 out of 83 candidates Kasana Valarie, the best can- ““Valarie was a disciplined, who sat for KCPE at Book- didate in Booker Academy polite and organized girl”, er Academy are set to join scored 445 while the last can- said Mr. Tom Omuhaka, National Schools. didate scored 314 out of 500 Booker Academy’s Head “Candidates with 400 marks. Valarie was ranked the Teacher. “The good results marks from both private 2nd in Kakamega County after were attributed by good and public centres will all Goldalyn Kakuya , the best teacher - pupil contact join national schools” said candidate nationally. time” added Mr. Omuhaka. Dr. Matiang’i. Channel any queries, information or feedback to Corporate Affairs & Strategy Office on Extension 4730/1/4/5/6/7 Weekly Vol. 11 (20th —26th November, 2017) Weekly Bulletin Page 2 “Utamu Halisi wa Wakenya” back in the market After missing for almost 7 Sugar imports in January - months in the market, September 2017 totaled Mumias sugar has landed 933,848 Mts compared to in the market again.
    [Show full text]
  • Feeding Infants and Young Children in Vihiga County, Kenya
    Audience This policy brief is for policy makers, program managers, researchers, and other professionals dealing with nutrition, health, community development, and social and behaviour change and those with an interest in maternal and child health and development in Vihiga County. Purpose There is increasing recognition of the need for implementation research that is designed to provide context-specific information and data to inform decisions for planning nutrition and public health interventions. This brief provides evidence for decisions to improve maternal and young child nutrition derived from a systematic landscape analysis in the county. 1. Introduction : This policy brief summarises key results from conducted using the GAIN-initiated a study designed to identify potential inter- Focused Ethnographic Study of ventions to improve nutrition in infants and Infant and Young Child Feeding young children in Vihiga County, Kenya. The Practices (Pelto and Armar-Klemesu study was commissioned to provide 2014). information necessary for the design of • A dietary assessment and an applica- appropriate high-impact nutrition tion of Optifood, a linear interventions in Vihiga to improve nutritional programming software tool. Gretel Pelto and Faith Thuita Faith and Pelto Gretel Kenya Brief Policy outcomes at the household level. The study was conducted in Vihiga County, An FES applies well-established ethnographic which is located on the fringes of the Rift methods to obtain data from caregivers on Valley in the Lake Victoria Basin at 1,300– determinants of dietary practices, including Infants and Young Children in Vihiga County inand Young Children Infants 1,500 metres above sea level. Despite a social, economic, cultural, technological, and favourable climate and soils, Vihiga County environmental factors (Pelto et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure1: the Map of Kenya Showing 47 Counties (Colored) and 295 Sub-Counties (Numbered)
    BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance Supplemental material placed on this supplemental material which has been supplied by the author(s) BMJ Global Health Additional file 1: The county and sub counties of Kenya Figure1: The map of Kenya showing 47 counties (colored) and 295 sub-counties (numbered). The extents of major lakes and the Indian Ocean are shown in light blue. The names of the counties and sub- counties corresponding to the shown numbers below the maps. List of Counties (bold) and their respective sub county (numbered) as presented in Figure 1 1. Baringo county: Baringo Central [1], Baringo North [2], Baringo South [3], Eldama Ravine [4], Mogotio [5], Tiaty [6] 2. Bomet county: Bomet Central [7], Bomet East [8], Chepalungu [9], Konoin [10], Sotik [11] 3. Bungoma county: Bumula [12], Kabuchai [13], Kanduyi [14], Kimilili [15], Mt Elgon [16], Sirisia [17], Tongaren [18], Webuye East [19], Webuye West [20] 4. Busia county: Budalangi [21], Butula [22], Funyula [23], Matayos [24], Nambale [25], Teso North [26], Teso South [27] 5. Elgeyo Marakwet county: Keiyo North [28], Keiyo South [29], Marakwet East [30], Marakwet West [31] 6. Embu county: Manyatta [32], Mbeere North [33], Mbeere South [34], Runyenjes [35] Macharia PM, et al. BMJ Global Health 2020; 5:e003014. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003014 BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance Supplemental material placed on this supplemental material which has been supplied by the author(s) BMJ Global Health 7. Garissa: Balambala [36], Dadaab [37], Dujis [38], Fafi [39], Ijara [40], Lagdera [41] 8.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Kenya Demographic and Health Survey (KDHS)
    2014 Kenya Demographic and Health Survey (KDHS) County-level KDHS Data: Outputs from a DHS Workshop Republic of Kenya 2014 Kenya Demographic and Health Survey (KDHS) County-level KDHS Data: Outputs from a DHS Workshop Kenya National Bureau of Statistics Nairobi, Kenya Ministry of Health Nairobi, Kenya National AIDS Control Council Nairobi, Kenya Kenya Medical Research Institute Nairobi, Kenya National Council for Population and Development Nairobi, Kenya The DHS Program, ICF Rockville, Maryland, USA December 2017 KENYANS AND AMERICANS WORLD BANK IN PARTNERSHIP TO FIGHT HIV/AIDS Cover photos (left to right): © 2009 Georgina Goodwin/Vestegaard Frandsen, Courtesy of Photoshare © 2011 Riders for Health/Tom Oldham , Courtesy of Photoshare © 2013 Molly Snell, Courtesy of Photoshare Recommended citation: Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, Ministry of Health [Kenya], National AIDS Control Council [Kenya], Kenya Medical Research Institute, National Council for Population and Development [Kenya], and ICF. 2017. 2014 Kenya Demographic and Health Survey (KDHS) County-level KDHS Data: Outputs from a DHS Workshop. Nairobi, Kenya: Ministry of Health Kenya. Contents County-level KDHS Data: Outputs from a DHS Workshop ............................................... v Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................ vii Acronym List ........................................................................................................................... ix Participants .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • In Busia County, Kenya
    Rehabilitation of Busia (Jn B1) A lupe (Jnc C43) By pass (5.0 km) in Busia County, Kenya ESIA Project Report (Final Copy) 23 September 2019 Project No.: 0410731 The business of sustainability Document title Rehabilitation of Busia (Jn B1) A lupe (Jnc C43) By pass (5.0 km) in Busia County, Kenya Document subtitle ESIA Project Report (Final Copy) Project No. 0410731 Date 23 September 2019 Version 2.0 Author As per document history below Client Name Mota – Engil Africa Document history ERM approval to issue Version Revision Author Reviewed by Name Date Comments 1.0: Draft 1 00 Barnabas Mike Everett Mike 23.09.2019 Draft 1 issued to Busheshe, Everett client for review Mercy Kuria, Gideon Owaga and Faith Angasa 2.0: Final 01 Barnabas Mike Everett Mike 23.09.2019 Final Copy of the Copy Busheshe, Everett ESIA Project Mercy Kuria, Report for Gideon Owaga Submission to and Faith NEMA Angasa www.erm.com Version: 2.0 Project No.: 0410731 Client: Mota – Engil Africa 23 September 2019 Signature Page 23 September 2019 Rehabilitation of Busia (Jn B1) A lupe (Jnc C43) By pass (5.0 km) in Busia County, Kenya ESIA Project Report (Final Copy) Mike Everett Partner ERM East Africa (Pty) Ltd Senteu Plaza, 1st Floor Cnr of Galana and Lenana Roads Kilimani P.O Box 29170-00100 Nairobi, Kenya T: +254 740 861 650/1 © Copyright 2019 by ERM Worldwide Group Ltd and / or its affiliates (“ERM”). All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form, or by any means, without the prior written permission of ERM.
    [Show full text]