DOCSLIB.ORG

Vihiga County

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vihiga County VIHIGA COUNTY COUNTY INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2018-2022 COUNTY VISION AND MISSION Vision: To be a model, prosperous and globally competitive county. Mission: To transform Vihiga into a prosperous County and offer quality life to its citizens through formulating and implementing efficient governance systems for sustainable development. ii Table Of Contents County Vision and Mission ........................................................................................................................... II Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................................... III List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................... IV List of Maps................................................................................................................................................. IV Abbreviations and Acronyms ......................................................................................................................... V Foreword .................................................................................................................................................... VII Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................... VIII CHAPTER ONE: COUNTY BACKGROUND INFORMATION ........................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Position and size of Vihiga County .................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Physiographic and Natural Conditions ............................................................................................. 1 1.4 Administrative and Political Units ................................................................................................... 2 1.5 Demographic Features ..................................................................................................................... 3 1.6 Human Development Indicators(HDI) ............................................................................................. 5 1.7 Infrastructure and Access ................................................................................................................. 6 1.8 Land and Land Use .......................................................................................................................... 7 1.9 Community Organizations and Non State Actors ............................................................................ 7 1.10 Crop, Livestock and Fish Production .......................................................................................... 8 1.11 Forestry and Agro Forestry ......................................................................................................... 8 1.12 Environment and Climate Change ............................................................................................... 9 1.13 Mining ....................................................................................................................................... 10 1.14 Tourism ..................................................................................................................................... 10 1.15 Industry...................................................................................................................................... 10 1.16 Employment .............................................................................................................................. 11 1.17 Water and Sanitation ................................................................................................................. 11 1.18 Health Access and Nutriton ....................................................................................................... 12 1.19 Education and Literacy .............................................................................................................. 13 CHAPTER TWO: LINKAGE WITH OTHER PLANS ......................................................................... 14 2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 14 2.2 Linkages with the Vision 2030 and the Third Medium Term Plan ................................................ 14 2.3 The Kenya Constitution ................................................................................................................. 14 2.4 Legislation on Integrated planning in Kenya ................................................................................. 14 2.5 Linkages with the Sustainable Development Goals(SDGs) ........................................................... 15 2.6 Mainstreaming SDGs in the County .............................................................................................. 15 CHAPTER THREE: REVIEW OF THE PREVIOUS CIDP AND SYNTHESIS OF KEY ISSUES . 19 3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 19 3.2 Implementation of 2013-2017 CIDP .............................................................................................. 19 3.3 County Sectro Perfomance Review ................................................................................................ 19 3.4 Cross-Cutting Issues ....................................................................................................................... 34 CHAPTER FOUR: DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES, ........................................................................... 39 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 39 4.2 Agriculture, Rural and Urban Development Sector ....................................................................... 39 4.3 Energy, Infrastructure and ICT ...................................................................................................... 51 4.4 General Economic and Commercial Affairs(GECA) ..................................................................... 56 4.5 Environmental Protection, Water and Natural Resources .............................................................. 60 FEASIBILITY STUDIES AND DESIGNS, IMPLEMENTATION............................................................................ 65 4.6 Education ....................................................................................................................................... 66 4.7 Health ............................................................................................................................................. 70 4.8 Governance, Justice, Law and Order .............................................................................................. 76 4.9 Public Administration and International Relations ........................................................................ 79 4.10 Social Protection, Culture and Recreation ...................................................................................... 82 CHAPTER FIVE: IMPLEMENTATION FRAMEWORK ................................................................... 86 5.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 86 5.2 County Citizen’s Forum ................................................................................................................. 87 5.3 County Budget and Economic Forum ............................................................................................ 87 5.4 County Assembly ........................................................................................................................... 87 5.5 County Executive ........................................................................................................................... 87 5.6 CIDP Secretariat............................................................................................................................. 87 5.7 County CIDP Implementing Unit................................................................................................... 88 iii 5.8 State and Non State Actors............................................................................................................. 88 5.9 Monitoring and Evaluation Unit .................................................................................................... 88 5.10 Community ..................................................................................................................................... 88 CHAPTER SIX: RESOURCE MOBILIZATION FRAMEWORK ...................................................... 89 6.2 Capital Expenditure Funding ......................................................................................................... 89 6.3 County Revenue Projections 2018/19-2022/23 .............................................................................. 92 6.4 Assets and Financial Management ................................................................................................. 93 CHAPTER SEVEN: IMPLEMENTATION, MONITORING AND EVALUATION FRAMEWORK .....................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • County Urban Governance Tools
    County Urban Governance Tools This map shows various governance and management approaches counties are using in urban areas Mandera P Turkana Marsabit P West Pokot Wajir ish Elgeyo Samburu Marakwet Busia Trans Nzoia P P Isiolo P tax Bungoma LUFs P Busia Kakamega Baringo Kakamega Uasin P Gishu LUFs Nandi Laikipia Siaya tax P P P Vihiga Meru P Kisumu ga P Nakuru P LUFs LUFs Nyandarua Tharaka Garissa Kericho LUFs Nithi LUFs Nyeri Kirinyaga LUFs Homa Bay Nyamira P Kisii P Muranga Bomet Embu Migori LUFs P Kiambu Nairobi P Narok LUFs P LUFs Kitui Machakos Kisii Tana River Nyamira Makueni Lamu Nairobi P LUFs tax P Kajiado KEY County Budget and Economic Forums (CBEFs) They are meant to serve as the primary institution for ensuring public participation in public finances in order to im- Mom- prove accountability and public participation at the county level. basa Baringo County, Bomet County, Bungoma County, Busia County,Embu County, Elgeyo/ Marakwet County, Homabay County, Kajiado County, Kakamega County, Kericho Count, Kiambu County, Kilifi County, Kirin- yaga County, Kisii County, Kisumu County, Kitui County, Kwale County, Laikipia County, Machakos Coun- LUFs ty, Makueni County, Meru County, Mombasa County, Murang’a County, Nairobi County, Nakuru County, Kilifi Nandi County, Nyandarua County, Nyeri County, Samburu County, Siaya County, TaitaTaveta County, Taita Taveta TharakaNithi County, Trans Nzoia County, Uasin Gishu County Youth Empowerment Programs in urban areas In collaboration with the national government, county governments unveiled
    [Show full text]
  • The Kenya Gazette
    THE KENYA GAZETTE Published by Authority of the Republic of Kenya (Registered as a Newspaperat the G.P.O.) Vol. CXX—No. 64 NAIROBI, 31st May, 2018 Price Sh. 60 CONTENTS GAZETTE NOTICES GAZETTE NOTICES—{Contd.} PAGE PAGE Establishment of Taskforce on Building Bridges to The Environmental Managementand Co-ordination Act— Unity AdViSOTY 0... ecscsssesccssssessessecssssseecsesseeeesnnseseenes 1658 Environmental Impact Assessment Study Report........... 1693-1695 of County Government Notices ......scssscsssssssseccnsereeceneeeneniees 1658, 1679-1692 The Labour Relations Act— Application for Registration 1695 ae .. Trade Union The Land Registration Act—Issue of Provisional Certificates, etc....... 1658-1672 The Records Disposal (Courts) Rules—Intended . Destruction of Court Records «0.0... ssssssecsesssesseeresssaseeees 1695-1696 The Land Act—Intention to Acquire Land, etc............0000 1673-1676 . oo, . Disposal of Uncollected Goods ......cccsecsecsetsesnsessneessienssees 1696 The Geologists Registration Act—Registered Geologists ... 1676-1679 1696-1702 . LossofPolicies. The Physical Planning Act—Completion of Part 1702-1703 Development Plains........csssccssecseessersteesneeneeesecennesssensaenane 1693 Change of Names .......ssccccsceeesesseeeeetenererensseseseansesseceeess [1657 1658 THE KENYA GAZETTE 31st May, 2C 1% CORRIGENDA (e) shall outline the policy, administrative reform proposals, and IN Gazette Notice No. 2874 of 2018, amend the Cause No.printed implementation modalities for each identified challenge area; as “55 of 2017”to read “55 of 2018”. (f) shall consider and propose appropriate mechanisms ; for coordination, collaboration and cooperation amonginstitutions to bring about the sought changes; IN Gazette Notice No. 4246 of 2018, Cause No. 72 of 2018, amend the deceased's name printed as “Teresia Wairimu” to read “Teresia (g) shall pay special attention to making practical interventions Wairimu Njai”. that will entrench honourable behaviour, integrity and inclusivity in leading social sectors; IN Gazette Notice No.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Potential of Fish Farming to Improve the Livelihoods of Farmers in the Lake Victoria Region, Kenya: Assessing Impacts of Governmental Support
    Examining the Potential of Fish Farming to Improve the Livelihoods of Farmers in the Lake Victoria Region, Kenya: assessing Impacts of Governmental Support. Item Type Thesis/Dissertation Authors Jacobi, Nora Publisher University of Akureyri Download date 23/09/2021 10:05:06 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/6854 Master‘s Thesis Examining the Potential of Fish Farming to Improve the Livelihoods of Farmers in the Lake Victoria Region, Kenya Assessing Impacts of Governmental Support Athugun á möguleikum fiskeldis til að bæta lífskjör kenískra bænda við Viktoríuvatn - mat á áhrifum opinbers stuðnings Nora Jacobi Advisor: Benedict J. Colombi, PhD University of Akureyri Faculty of Business and Science University Centre of the Westfjords Master of Resource Management: Coastal and Marine Management Ísafjörður, May 2013 Supervisory Committee Advisor: Benedict J. Colombi, Assistant Professor at the School of Natural Resources and the Environment, The University of Arizona Reader: Rodrigo Menafra, MMM Program Director: Dagný Arnarsdóttir, MSc Nora Jacobi Examining the Potential of Fish Farming to Improve the Livelihoods of Farmers in the Lake Victoria Region, Kenya – Assessing the Impacts of Governmental Support Athugun á möguleikum fiskeldis til að bæta lífskjör kenískra bænda við Viktoríuvatn -mat á áhrifum opinbers stuðnings 45 ECTS thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of a Master of Resource Management degree in Coastal and Marine Management at the University Centre of the Westfjords, Suðurgata 12, 400 Ísafjörður, Iceland Degree accredited by the University of Akureyri, Faculty of Business and Science, Borgir, 600 Akureyri, Iceland Copyright © 2013Nora Jacobi All rights reserved Printing: Háskólaprent, May2013 Declaration I hereby confirm that I am the sole author of this thesis and it is a product of my own academic research.
    [Show full text]
  • KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS Kenya Population Situation Analysis
    REPUBLIC OF KENYA KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS Kenya Population Situation Analysis Published by the Government of Kenya supported by United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) Kenya Country Oce National Council for Population and Development (NCPD) P.O. Box 48994 – 00100, Nairobi, Kenya Tel: +254-20-271-1600/01 Fax: +254-20-271-6058 Email: [email protected] Website: www.ncpd-ke.org United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) Kenya Country Oce P.O. Box 30218 – 00100, Nairobi, Kenya Tel: +254-20-76244023/01/04 Fax: +254-20-7624422 Website: http://kenya.unfpa.org © NCPD July 2013 The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the contributors. Any part of this document may be freely reviewed, quoted, reproduced or translated in full or in part, provided the source is acknowledged. It may not be sold or used inconjunction with commercial purposes or for prot. KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS JULY 2013 KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS i ii KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................iv FOREWORD ..........................................................................................................................................ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ..........................................................................................................................x EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................xi
    [Show full text]
  • African Journal of Co-Operative Development and Technology ASSESSMENT of ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION and WATER QUALITY in SOUTHERN
    African Journal of Co-operative Development and Technology ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION AND WATER QUALITY IN SOUTHERN VIHIGA HILLS OBOKA A. Wycliffe1 & OTHOO O. Calvince2 1The Co-operative University of Kenya, School of Cooperatives and Community Development, P.O. Box 24814- 00502 Karen – Nairobi, Kenya, Email: [email protected], or 2The Co-operative University of Kenya, School of Cooperatives and Community Development, P.O. Box 24814- 00502 Karen – Nairobi, Kenya, Email: [email protected] Abstract Southern Vihiga hills present a case of an intriguing history of land degradation in Kenya that has over the years defied all efforts to address. In 1957, as a measure to curb environmental degradation in southern Vihiga, the colonial government through the legal notice number 266 of the Kenya gazette supplement number 28 established Maragoli Hills Forest without the acceptance by the local communities. The forest was over time degraded, and completely destroyed in 1990s. Efforts to rehabilitate the forest have continually been frustrated by the local community. The study set out to determine the extent of environmental degradation; and establish water quality in streams originating southern Vihiga hills. Data for the study was collected using GPS surveys; photography; high temporal resolution satellite imagery; and interviews. Data on environmental degradation was analyzed through ArcGIS 10.3.1. Analysis of biological and physiochemical parameters of water was undertaken at the government chemist in Kisumu. The study found total loss of forest cover on Edibwongo Hill (Maragoli forest), with extensive areas of bare surfaces, and gulleys. The study also found very high population of Coliform and E.Coli in water in all the three streams sampled in both dry and wet seasons; and very high turbidity; water color; and iron (Fe) concentrations in water from the sampled streams.
    [Show full text]
  • Devolution in Kenya: an Opportunity for Increased Public Participation, Reduced Corruption, and Improved Service Delivery
    DEVOLUTION IN KENYA: AN OPPORTUNITY FOR INCREASED PUBLIC PARTICIPATION, REDUCED CORRUPTION, AND IMPROVED SERVICE DELIVERY by HAYLEY ELSZASZ Ngonidzashe Munemo, Advisor A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts with Honors in Political Science WILLIAMS COLLEGE Williamstown, Massachusetts MAY 11, 2016 Table of Contents Introduction…………………………………………………………………………..1 Chapter I: History of Local Government in Kenya………………………………..32 Independence and the Kenyatta Presidency The Moi Era Period of Democratization Constitutional Reforms Chapter II: Participation and Corruption in Post-Devolution Kenya……..……...61 Participation in Kenya’s Local Governments Disengagement Corruption Post-2010 Actions to Counter Corruption Perceptions of Corruption Chapter III: Healthcare Delivery in Post-Devolution Kenya……………………..94 Constitutional Framework Financing Local Healthcare Healthcare in Counties Healthcare System Post-Devolution Health Sector Explanations and Predictions Conclusion………………………………………………………………………….120 Bibliography………………………………………………………………………..137 ii Figures and Tables Figure 2.1 Voter Turnout 1992-2013 69 Table 0.1: Vote Margins in County Elections 24 Table 0.2: Party in Power: County Government 25 Table 0.3: Presidential Outcomes 2013 27 Table 0.4: Centrality of Counties 29 Table 1.1: The Provincial Administration: Kenyatta 36 Table 1.2: The Provincial Administration: Moi 46 Table 1.3: Devolved Local Government 57 Table 2.1: Voter Turnout 1992-2013 by Province 70 Table 2.2: Members of County Assemblies 77 Table 2.3: Qualities of the Most Corrupt Counties 83 Table 2.4: Bribes in Exchange for Services 91 Table 3.1: Tiers of Health Services 95 Table 3.2 Local Revenue & Central Government Grants 100 Table 3.3 Central Government Grants to the Counties 102 Table 3.4: Vaccination Rates by Province 113 Table 3.5: Births Delivered in a Health Facility by Province 114 Table 3.6: Infant Mortality by Province 115 Table 3.7: Antenatal Care by Province 116 Note on currency usage: All figures are given in Kenyan Shillings (KSh).
    [Show full text]
  • Busia County
    Sanitation Profile for 2017 Busia County Population of Busia County. Estimated percentage 953,337 21.2% of Busia population 9.6% Estimated percentage of Busia that is under 5 Years. population that is urban. Grand Score Rank Rank County (Out of 110 2 Population density 2017 2014 439/km of Busia County. points) Estimated percentage of Busia Kitui 89 1 9 91.4% population that is rural. Siaya 86 2 13 Nakuru 80 3 2 Source: 2009 Census Projections by the Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (2016). Kiambu 79 4 4 Busia 7474 5 3 Kisii 73 6 19 Machakos 71 7 5 Busia is ranked number 5 out of 47 in the county sanitation Isiolo 68 8 20 Nyeri 68 8 1 benchmarking according to the following key indicators: Homa Bay 67 10 17 Kisumu 67 10 10 E/Marakwet 66 12 10 Embu 64 13 40 Tharaka Nithi 63 14 21 Bungoma 62 15 33 Kirinyaga 61 16 5 Latrine Latrine Latrine Murang’a 61 16 8 Pupil: Pupil: Laikipia 60 18 25 Kilifi 59 19 33 Migori 58 20 14 RANK out of 47 Reporting Timely for Budget Score Sanitation /5 for Number of Score ODF Claim /10 for Cost per ODF Score Village /10 for Economic Costs of Score Poor Sanitation /10 for Score Girls /10 Coverage for Score /10 Boys Coverage for Household Improved Score Rate /15 Latrine Coverage for Number of Score facilities per Handwashing /10 school for Number of ODF Score villages (DPHO Certified /10 Targets of ODF Percent /10 Achieved Villages /10 of ODF Percent GRAND TOTAL Nyandarua 58 20 18 2014 3 5 10 10 3 5 5 15 0 10 10 8 81 Uasin Gishu 58 20 38 Kakamega 56 23 5 2017 5 0 10 10 0 8 8 5 0 10 10 10 74 Trans Nzoia 55 24
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Influencing Maize Yield Gaps on Smallholder Farms in Vihiga and Kakamega Counties of Western Kenya
    FACTORS INFLUENCING MAIZE YIELD GAPS ON SMALLHOLDER FARMS IN VIHIGA AND KAKAMEGA COUNTIES OF WESTERN KENYA MUNIALO SUSSY A80/51206/2016 RESEARCH THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN AGRICULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SCIENCE AND CROP PROTECTION FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE, UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI JULY 2020 DECLARATION This thesis is my original work and has not been presented for a degree in any other University Signature …………………………………….Date…………August 3rd 2020…………… Munialo Sussy APPROVAL: This thesis has been submitted for examination with approval as University supervisors Prof. Cecilia Moraa Onyango, Department of Plant Science and Crop Protection, University of Nairobi. Signature ……… ………….Date……August 6th 2020…… Prof. Willis Oluoch Kosura, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Nairobi. Signature … …Date……August 5, 2020………………………………… Prof. Ingrid Öborn, Department of Crop Production Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Signature Date……4 August 2020 Prof Sigrun Dahlin, Department of Soil and Environment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Signature Date…...4 August 2020 ii DEDICATION I dedicate this work to my mother and my siblings for their ever continuous support through prayer and encouragement throughout the journey. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisors; Prof. Cecilia Moraa Onyango, Prof. Willis Oluoch Kosura, Prof. Ingrid Öborn and Prof Sigrun Dahlin for their tireless efforts and immense assistance throughout the research period. Despite their busy schedules, they were available for consultations physically, through emails and through telephone communication. My appreciation to the Swedish Research Councils Formas (220-2014-646) and VR for financial support.
    [Show full text]
  • Vihiga County Assembly Kenya
    VIHIGA COUNTY ASSEMBLY KENYA ‘Unemployment is the major challenge and reason why the majority of the residents of Vihiga County are living in poverty. I will ensure that we have job centres where our people will be able to access jobs. This will ensure that our people are recruited in their fields of specialisation.’ Governor Moses Akaranga Vihiga County is a county in the Geographically, a larger part of the former Western Province of Kenya. Its County is hilly terrain. It also has a good capital and largest town is Vihiga. The amount of forest cover such as the County borders Kakamega County to Kibiri Forest, which is an extension of VIHIGA Governor Moses Akaranga has an the north, Nandi County to the east, Kakamega Forest. open-door policy and has invited young Kisumu County to the south and Siaya people with problems to visit him in his County to the west. Economy office so that ‘they can find a solution to Agriculture is the main economic activity. issues facing them instead of engaging in The County has a population of crime’ 554,622 (2009 census) and covers an Crops planted include maize, millet, area of 563 km². bananas, avocados, sweet potatoes and cassava. Main economic activities include There are four major townships: tea farming, eucalyptus tree farming, Luanda, Majengo, Chavakali and Mbale sand and stone quarrying, dairy farming Town which serves as the administrative and horticulture. Apart from those in headquarters. The County has four formal employment most residents districts headed by district engage in informal trade, with Luanda commissioners and three sub-counties market being the largest in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Insect Growth Regulator Pyriproxyfen on Dragonfly Nymphs As Predators of Anopheles Mosquitoes at Mahanga, Vihiga County, Kenya
    1 EFFECTS OF INSECT GROWTH REGULATOR PYRIPROXYFEN ON DRAGONFLY NYMPHS AS PREDATORS OF ANOPHELES MOSQUITOES AT MAHANGA, VIHIGA COUNTY, KENYA AMEKA, CALEB MIKHALI (BSC) I56/CE/15393/2008 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Award of the Degree of Master of Science (Agricultural Entomology) in the School of Pure and Applied Sciences of Kenyatta University November 2015 ii DECLARATION This thesis is my original work and has not been presented for a degree in any other university or for any other award. Ameka Caleb Mikhali (I56/CE/15393/2008) Department of Zoological sciences SUPERVISORS We confirm that the work reported in this thesis was carried out by the candidate under our supervision as the university supervisors. Signature Prof. Elizabeth Kokwaro Department of Zoological Sciences Kenyatta University Signature Dr. Bryson Ndenga Centre for Global Health Research KEMRI, Kisumu iii DEDICATION This work is dedicated to my wife, Pamela and children, Elsey, Alvin, Fortune and Quintone for their endurance, prayers and moral support during the time of this study. Special dedication to my late father Clement Ameka who was my source of inspiration during childhood. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to extend my sincere gratitude to several people for the role they played to enable me undertake and accomplish this study. I extend my deepest appreciation to my university supervisor Prof. Elizabeth Kokwaro for her unwavering support, constructive criticisms, guidance, patience and availability. Special thanks to Dr. Bryson Ndenga of Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) who introduced me to the world of mosquitoes and Medical Entomology. His technical, scientific input and guidance throughout the course of research, data analysis and thesis writing was of great help.
    [Show full text]
  • Shortlisted Chief Officers.Pdf
    VIHIGA COUNTY GOVERNMENT COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD P O BOX 344-50300 MARAGOLI Email:[email protected] SHORTLISTED CANDIDATES FOR THE POSITION OF CHIEF OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS 1. COUNTY CHIEF OFFICER TECHNICAL AND VOCATIONAL TRAINING S/NO NAME GENDER AGE SUB COUNTY WARD VILLAGE ID/P-PORT Contact 1 ISSA MOHAMMED WAFULA MALE 48 SIRISIA LWANDANYI MWALIE 10857478 720605962 2 LUKALO BEATRICE AFANDI FEMALE 57 SABATIA CHAVAKALI KISATIRU 0569767 720821273 3 KIPTOK GRACE CHERUTOH FEMALE 50 HAMISI BANJA KAPSOIYWO 10003909 727907477 4 AMBASA CONSTANCE ROSE FEMALE 54 EMUHAYA BUNYORE CENTRAL ESIRULO 8730845 722780307 5 IMBWANA ABISAI AMATALO MALE 45 LUANDA LUANDA TOWNSHIP EPANG'A 12439437 726750281 6 CHEGUGU RASTO NYABEN MALE 37 HAMISI JEPKOYAI KABONGO 24089951 705568925 7 AMBUTSI FRED LISALITSA MALE 46 NANDI SOUTH KEMELOI KAMIMEI 12469528 721528733 8 MUGUHELI GIDEON LUMADEDE MALE 56 SABATIA WEST SABATIA KEVEYE 6971519 726551998 9 MISOI ALPHONSE KIRWA MALE 60 ALDAI KOYO-NDURIO KOYO 0638467 721918751 10 NAMBALA LINNER MANGALA FEMALE 58 BUKHAYO WEST BUGENGI KHUNG'UNG'U 9956890 723068248 2. COUNTY CHIEF OFFICER CO-OPERATIVES S/NO NAME GENDER AGE SUB COUNTY WARD VILLAGE ID/P-PORT Contact 1 ARNOLDA CHAO M 42 VOI MBOLOLO KARIAKOR 14619074 722830990 2 KAGUNZA BENARD GRUTENBURG M 40 HAMISI BANJA MUTIVA 11041658 777248618 3 SHIVAIRO LYNDA KHAMISI F 44 HAMISI SHAMAKHOKHO SENENDE 13634108 723877315 4 MADAGA MICHAEL SULTAN M 29 HAMISI SHIRU MUKUCHI 28100305 720782381 5 KESENWA ALFRED M 57 SABATIA MUDETE VOHOLE 1948558 722856362 NORTH EAST 6 HEZRON JOSEPH LIBULI M 39 EMUHAYA BUNYORE ESIBUYE 22168321 723305836 7 ODENDO HUMPHREY OMEDI M 42 VIHIGA MUNGOMA LYANAGINGA 14679662 721546652 NORTH EAST 8 AKOLO TOM JOSHUA M 49 EMUHAYA BUNYORE EBUCHERO 10694933 722457704 9 HASSSAN MOHAMED ISSACK M 33 MANDERA EAST TOWNSHIP TOWNSHIP 25505171 725707707 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of East Bunyore Location, Emuhaya Division, Vihiga District, Kenya
    INSTITUTE OF AFRICAN STUDIES (I.A.S) UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI (U.O.N) RESEARCH PROBLCM THE INFLUENCE OF THE FAMILY ON SCHOOL DROP-OUT AMONG THE YOUTH: THE CASE OF EAST BUNYORE LOCATION, EMUHAYA DIVISION, VIHIGA DISTRICT, KENYA. A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF ARTS IN ANTHROPOLOGY. IN THE INSTITUTE OF AFRICAN STUDIES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI IN THE 1996/97 ACADEMIC YEAR. University of NAIROBI Library UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI INST. OF AFRICAN £TUDIE* I IRRAK-v BY: OKUSI KETRAY SUPERVISOR: DR. LEUNITA A. MURULI DECLARATION This is my original work and has not been presented by anybody anywhere for examination. SIGNATURE: OKUSI KETRAY (N06/1421/92) This dissertation has been submitted for examination with my approval as a University supervisor. SIGNATURE: a (c ) % 1 1 3 * Dr. Leunita A. Muruli University Supervisor I . A. S 1 DEDICATION This work is dedicated to my father, Mr. Jairus Okusi who injected in me a sense of hard work, honesty, obedience and above all discipline and respect for others. 11 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I acknowledge the unrelenting support and intellectual advice extended to me by my supervisor, Dr. Leunita A. Muruli. I thank Mr. Nyamongo and Dr. Nang'endo for their constructive criticism and suggestions during the course of my research. I also thank my fellow classmates for their encouragement. I am indebted to the Institute staff both academic and non-academic for the invaluable support. Special thanks go to the school drop-outs and key informants who without their co-operation this research would not have been a success.
    [Show full text]