Site Report: Brick Company, Hunting Terrace

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Site Report: Brick Company, Hunting Terrace FINAL REPORT JANUARY 25, 2018 ARCHEOLOGICAL MONITORING AND DOCUMENTATION OF SITE 44AX0233 (ALEXANDRIA BRICK COMPANY) AT THE THORNTON, 1199 S. WASHINGTON STREET, ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA PREPARED FOR: FOULGER-PRATT DEVELOPMENT, LLC. 12435 PARK POTOMAC AVENUE, SUITE 200 POTOMAC, MD 20854 R. CHRISTOPHER GOODWIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. 241 EAST FOURTH STREET, SUITE 100 . FREDERICK, MD 21701 Archeological Monitoring and Documentation of Site 44AX0233 (Alexandria Brick Company) at The Thornton, 1199 S. Washington St., Alexandria, Virginia Final Report ___________________________________ Kathleen M. Child, M.A. Principal Investigator by Kathleen M. Child, M.A. and Martha R. Williams, M.A., M.Ed. R. Christopher Goodwin & Associates, Inc. 241 E. Fourth Street, Suite 100 Frederick, Maryland 21701 January 2018 for Foulger-Pratt Development, LLC. 12435 Park Potomac Avenue, Suite 200 Potomac, MD 20854 Abstract onstruction of The Thornton, a planned Archeological features associated with the residential apartment building located at Alexandria Brick Company were exposed in the C1199 S. Washington Street in Alexandria, southwestern quadrant of the Hunting Terrace Virginia, exposed portions of three early twen- redevelopment area. Redevelopment efforts for tieth century kiln structures associated with the the parcel included the removal of all existing former Alexandria Brick Company (44AX0233). buildings and infrastructure, and construction Archeological documentation of the exposed of a new multi-story residential complex with structures was undertaken between July 27, 2016 below-grade parking facilities. A previous Phase and September 22, 2016 by R. Christopher Good- IA background study and archeological assess- win and Associates, Inc., on behalf of Foulger- ment indicated a high potential for intact archeo- Pratt Development, LLC. The archeological work logical deposits or features associated with the for- included documentation of exposed cultural fea- mer brick-manufacturing company (Williams and tures and archeological monitoring of mechani- Sanders 2013). The brick-making business had cally-excavated exploratory trenches placed near been established on the property by 1884 and con- the exposed kiln structures; monitoring work was tinued to operate under various names until 1919, performed on an on-call basis during the above- when fire destroyed the engine house and drying cited dates. sheds. The property lay unused until 1943, when All archeological investigations were con- the Hunting Terrace Apartments was built. ducted in consultation with the Office of Historic The Alexandria Brick Company produced Alexandria/Alexandria Archaeology (Alexandria machine and hand-made bricks until 1919, when Archaeology) and Foulger-Pratt Development, the facility was again destroyed by fire. The aban- LLC, and followed updates to the Scope of Work doned kiln complex appears to have been partial- for a Documentary Study and Archaelogical Test- ly dismantled when the Hunting Terrace Apart- ing (dated December 16, 2008) prepared by Al- ments was built. The complex originally consist- exandria Archaeology for the project. All aspects ed of five pairs of freestanding, coal-fired, updraft of the investigation complied with applicable fed- kilns; one of which were examined in detail for eral, state, and local standards. Research methods this project. Archeological monitoring during employed during archeological monitoring work redevelopment, combined with documentation were approved by Alexandria Archeology and of previously exposed kiln structures, provided followed guidelines for archeological investiga- information on the layout of brick kilns used by tions put forth in the City of Alexandria’s Archae- the Alexandria Brick Company during the late ological Standards (Alexandria Archaeology nineteenth and early twentieth century. Project 1996) and the Secretary of Interior’s Standards engineers were able to alter their plans in order to and Guidelines for Archaeology and Historic avoid impacting portions of the brick kiln com- Preservation (USDI NPS 1983). plex which now are preserved in place. ii R. Christopher Goodwin & Associates, Inc. Contains Privileged Information -- Do Not Release Table of Contents Abstract . ii List of Figures . v List of Tables . xv I. Introduction . 1 Project Location and Description ...................................................1 Research Objectives .............................................................4 Project Personnel (RCGA Staff) ....................................................4 Organization of the Report . .4 II. Natural and Cultural Setting . 5 Natural Setting .................................................................5 Geology and Soils ........................................................5 Previous Investigations...........................................................6 Historic Context ................................................................8 Site-Specific Property History ...............................................8 Antebellum Period .................................................8 The Civil War Period .............................................11 Post Bellum Period to Present ......................................11 Brick Manufacturing Technology ...........................................19 The Brickmaking Industry in Alexandria .....................................27 III. Research Methods . 35 Research Objectives ............................................................35 Archival Research Methods ......................................................36 Archeological Field Methods . .36 Laboratory Analysis and Curation .................................................37 Historic Artifact Analysis .................................................37 Records and Curation ....................................................37 IV. Results of Archeological Investigations . 39 The Thornton Foundation Wall (Trenches 1, 2.1 and 2.2) ...............................42 Trench 1 ...............................................................42 Trench 2 ...............................................................59 Trench 2.1 (Trench 2 Section 1) . .63 Trench 2.2 (Trench 2 Section 2) ......................................82 Exploratory Trenches (Trenches 3-10) ..............................................82 Trench 3 ...............................................................88 Trench 4 ...............................................................88 Trenches 5 and 5A .......................................................91 iii R. Christopher Goodwin & Associates, Inc. Contains Privileged Information -- Do Not Release Table of Contents Trench 6 ..............................................................100 Trenches 7-10..........................................................102 Elevator Shaft ................................................................118 V. Summary . 129 Summary....................................................................129 Preservation .................................................................131 References Cited . 133 Relevant Project Correspondence including the Project-Specific Scope of Work (dated December 16, 2008) . .Appendix I Resumes of Key Project Personnel . Appendix II iv R. Christopher Goodwin & Associates, Inc. Contains Privileged Information -- Do Not Release List of Figures Figure 1.1 Detail from the Alexandria, Virginia, USGS 7.5’ Quadrangle (1983 pho- torevised), showing the approximate location of The Thornton development area ......2 Figure 1.2 Aerial photograph showing the location of The Thornton development area ...........3 Figure 2.1 Plate 3 of G. M. Hopkins’ 1877 Atlas of Alexandria, showing property owners and proposed street extensions/alignments along Great Hunting Creek. (Image: Goodwin & Associates, Inc. 2013:Figure 2) .......................9 Figure 2.2 Detail from C. W. Bache’s 1863 map of the topography on the north side of Great Hunting Creek, showing the locations of significant landscape features and the smallpox hospital. (Digital image from American Mem- ory, Library of Congress). .................................................10 Figure 2.3 Advertisement for the Alexandria Brick Company from Richmond’s 1900 City Directory ......................................................14 Figure 2.4 Newspaper article for the 1891 Alexandria Brick Company fire (Alexan- dria Gazette, May 7, 1891) ................................................14 Figure 2.5 Detail from newspaper article for the Alexandria Brick Company depict- ing the brick-making facility (image: Alexandria Gazette, September 16, 1893).......15 Figure 2.6 Advertisement for the Bromilaw Brick Company (Alexandria Gazette, August 28, 1909) ........................................................16 Figure 2.7 Detail from Sanborn’s Fire Insurance Map of Alexandria (1907), show- ing topography and configuration of the Alexandria Brick Company’s works on Hunting Creek (Digital image from Geography and Map Divi- sion, Library of Congress). ................................................17 Figure 2.8 Promotional page from Wedderburn’s 1907 Historic Alexandria, VA, Past and Present (Tercentennial Souvenir, 1607-1907), extolling the virtues of Alexandria’s brickmaking industry, and highlighting Harlow and Agnew’s Alexandria Brick Company. (Image: https://ia600504. us.archive.org/16/items/souvenirvirginia01wedd/). .18 Figure 2.9 Detail from Sanborn’s 1921 Fire Insurance map of Alexandria, showing the “dilapidated kilns” of the abandoned Alexandria
Recommended publications
  • Native Vascular Flora of the City of Alexandria, Virginia
    Native Vascular Flora City of Alexandria, Virginia Photo by Gary P. Fleming December 2015 Native Vascular Flora of the City of Alexandria, Virginia December 2015 By Roderick H. Simmons City of Alexandria Department of Recreation, Parks, and Cultural Activities, Natural Resources Division 2900-A Business Center Drive Alexandria, Virginia 22314 [email protected] Suggested citation: Simmons, R.H. 2015. Native vascular flora of the City of Alexandria, Virginia. City of Alexandria Department of Recreation, Parks, and Cultural Activities, Alexandria, Virginia. 104 pp. Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................................ 2 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Climate ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Geology and Soils .................................................................................................................... 3 History of Botanical Studies in Alexandria .............................................................................. 5 Methods ............................................................................................................................................ 7 Results and Discussion ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy
    Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy Introduction Brook Trout symbolize healthy waters because they rely on clean, cold stream habitat and are sensitive to rising stream temperatures, thereby serving as an aquatic version of a “canary in a coal mine”. Brook Trout are also highly prized by recreational anglers and have been designated as the state fish in many eastern states. They are an essential part of the headwater stream ecosystem, an important part of the upper watershed’s natural heritage and a valuable recreational resource. Land trusts in West Virginia, New York and Virginia have found that the possibility of restoring Brook Trout to local streams can act as a motivator for private landowners to take conservation actions, whether it is installing a fence that will exclude livestock from a waterway or putting their land under a conservation easement. The decline of Brook Trout serves as a warning about the health of local waterways and the lands draining to them. More than a century of declining Brook Trout populations has led to lost economic revenue and recreational fishing opportunities in the Bay’s headwaters. Chesapeake Bay Management Strategy: Brook Trout March 16, 2015 - DRAFT I. Goal, Outcome and Baseline This management strategy identifies approaches for achieving the following goal and outcome: Vital Habitats Goal: Restore, enhance and protect a network of land and water habitats to support fish and wildlife, and to afford other public benefits, including water quality, recreational uses and scenic value across the watershed. Brook Trout Outcome: Restore and sustain naturally reproducing Brook Trout populations in Chesapeake Bay headwater streams, with an eight percent increase in occupied habitat by 2025.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NOV 0 ·~ 2013 National Register of Historic Places NAT. Re018TiR OF HISTORIC PlACES Registration Form NATIONAL PARK SERVICE This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional certification comments, entries, and narrative items on continuation sheets if needed (NPS Form 10-900a). 1. Name of Property historic name George Washington Birthplace National Monument other names/site number Wakefield. Popes Creek Plantation , VDHR File #096-0026 2. Location 1732 Popes Creek Road not for publication street & number L-----' city or town Colonial Beach ~ vicinity state Vir inia code VA county Westmoreland code _ _;_:19'--=-3- zip code -"'2=2:....;.4"""43.;;...._ ___ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this _!__nomination_ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property .K._ meets __ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: x_ b state ' Ide "x n J.VIA.rVI In my opinion, the property .x..._ meets_ does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Trout Program Maps
    SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2018 FOUR DOLLARS Inside: 2019 Trout Program Maps SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2018 Contents 5 How Sweet Sweet Sweet It Is! By Mike Roberts With support from the Ward Burton Wildlife Foundation, volunteers, and business partners, a citizen science project aims to help a magnificent songbird in the Roanoke River basin. 10 Hunting: A Foundation For Life By Curtis J. Badger A childhood spent afield gives the author reason to reflect upon a simpler time, one that deeply shaped his values. 14 Women Afield: Finally By John Shtogren There are many reasons to cheer the trend of women’s interest in hunting and fishing, and the outdoors industry takes note. 20 What’s Up With Cobia? By Ken Perrotte Virginia is taking a lead in sound management of this gamefish through multi-state coordination, tagging efforts, and citation data. 24 For The Love Of Snakes By David Hart Snakes are given a bad rap, but a little knowledge and the right support group can help you overcome your fears. 28 The Evolution Of Cute By Jason Davis Nature has endowed young wildlife with a number of strategies for survival, cuteness being one of them. 32 2019 Trout Program Maps By Jay Kapalczynski Fisheries biologists share the latest trout stocking locations. 38 AFIELD AND AFLOAT 41 A Walk in the Woods • 42 Off the Leash 43 Photo Tips • 45 On the Water • 46 Dining In Cover: A female prothonotary warbler brings caterpillars to her young. See page 5. ©Mike Roberts Left: A handsome white-tailed buck pauses while feeding along a fence line.
    [Show full text]
  • TMDL) Action Plan
    City of Alexandria, Virginia Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Action Plan For compliance with 9VAC25-890, “General VPDES Permit for Discharges of Stormwater from Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems, Permit No. VAR040057 June 17, 2015 Revised November 20, 2015 Revised June 30, 2016 Prepared by: City of Alexandria, Virginia Department of Transportation and Environmental Services Stormwater Management Division PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 2. Background ......................................................................................................................... 1 3. Legal Authorities to Reduce Pollutant of Concern ............................................................... 3 4. Planning Framework ........................................................................................................... 3 a. Principles ......................................................................................................................... 3 b. Action Goals .................................................................................................................... 4 5. TMDL Development and Load Determination ..................................................................... 4 a. Four Mile Run Non-Tidal ................................................................................................. 4 b. Four Mile Run Tidal ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment C Receiving Waters by Watershed
    ATTACHMENT C RECEIVING WATERS BY WATERSHED ACCOTINK CREEK ACCOTINK BAY ACCOTINK CREEK BEAR BRANCH CALAMO RUN COON BRANCH CROOK BRANCH DANIELS RUN FIELD LARK BRANCH FLAG RUN GUNSTON COVE HUNTERS BRANCH KERNAN RUN LAKE ACCOTINK LONG BRANCH MASON RUN POHICK BAY TURKEY RUN BELLE HAVEN CAMERON RUN HUNTING CREEK POTOMAC RIVER QUANDER BROOK BULL NECK RUN BLACK POND BULLNECK RUN POTOMAC RIVER BULL RUN BULL RUN CAMERON RUN BACKLICK RUN CAMERON RUN COW BRANCH FAIRVIEW LAKE HOLMES RUN INDIAN RUN LAKE BARCROFT PIKES BRANCH POPLAR RUN TRIPPS RUN TURKEYCOCK CREEK TURKEYCOCK RUN Page 1 of 12 CUB RUN BIG ROCKY RUN BULL RUN CAIN BRANCH CUB RUN DEAD RUN ELKLICK RUN FLATLICK BRANCH FROG BRANCH OXLICK BRANCH ROCKY RUN ROUND LICK ROUND RUN SAND BRANCH SCHNEIDER BRANCH UPPER OCCOQUAN SEWAGE AUTHORITY DEAD RUN DEAD RUN POTOMAC RIVER DIFFICULT RUN ANGELICO BRANCH BRIDGE BRANCH BROWNS BRANCH CAPTAIN HICKORY RUN COLVIN MILL RUN COLVIN RUN DIFFICULT RUN DOG RUN FOX LAKE HICKORY RUN LAKE ANNE LAKE AUDUBON LAKE FAIRFAX LAKE NEWPORT LAKE THOREAU LITTLE DIFFICULT RUN MOONAC CREEK OLD COURTHOUSE SPRING BRANCH PINEY BRANCH PINEY RUN POTOMAC RIVER ROCKY BRANCH ROCKY RUN SHARPERS RUN SNAKEDEN BRANCH SOUTH FORK RUN Page 2 of 12 THE GLADE TIMBER LAKE WOLFTRAP CREEK WOLFTRAP RUN WOODSIDE LAKE DOGUE CREEK ACCOTINK BAY BARNYARD RUN DOGUE CREEK DOGUE RUN GUNSTON COVE LAKE D'EVEREUX NORTH FORK DOGUE CREEK PINEY RUN POTOMAC RIVER FOUR MILE RUN CAMERON RUN FOUR MILE RUN HUNTING CREEK LONG BRANCH POTOMAC RIVER HIGH POINT BELMONT BAY GUNSTON COVE MASON NECK OCCOQUAN BAY POHICK BAY
    [Show full text]
  • An Ecological Study of Hunting Creek
    i An Ecological Study of Hunting Creek 2013 FINAL REPORT February 2014 by R. Christian Jones Professor, Department of Environmental Science and Policy Director, Potomac Environmental Research and Education Center George Mason University Project Director Kim de Mutsert Assistant Professor Department of Environmental Science and Policy George Mason University Co-Principal Investigator & Gregory D. Foster Professor, Department of Chemistry George Mason University Co-Principal Investigator to Alexandria Renew Enterprises Alexandria, VA ii Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................... ii Executive Summary ............................................................................................... iii List of Abbreviations ...............................................................................................x The Aquatic Monitoring Program for the Hunting Creek Area of the Tidal Freshwater Potomac River ....................................................................................................1 Acknowledgements ......................................................................................2 Introduction ..................................................................................................3 Methods........................................................................................................8 A. Profiles and Plankton: Sampling Day .........................................8 B. Profiles and Plankton: Followup
    [Show full text]
  • ALEXANDRIA and BELHAVEN a Case of Dual Identity by Diane Riker
    ALEXANDRIA and BELHAVEN A Case of Dual Identity by Diane Riker We returned down the river about 16 miles to or, William F. Carne, claimed that Belhaven had predat- Alexandria or Belhaven, a small trading place ed Alexandria by at least a decade. In his series of arti- in one of the finest situations imaginable. cles published in the Alexandria Gazette in the 1870s Archdeacon Burnaby, October 17591 and 1880s,2 Carne described a bustling little community of merchants and their families residing at the river end For the first dozen years of its history, Alexandria, of Oronoco Street as early as the 1730s. In an otherwise Virginia, was a town with two names. The majority of estimable work, this claim was questionable. those who lived, worked and visited here on the crescent Nevertheless, numerous historians adopted this view. bay by the Potomac knew it as Alexandria, while some Which came first: Alexandria or Belhaven? This of its most prominent citizens called it Belhaven. Others, paper will attempt to disentangle fact from fantasy. including mapmakers and the visiting archdeacon quot- ed above, accepted the difference and used both names. Earliest References to Alexandria More than a century after the initial sales of Among the George Washington papers in the Alexandria lots took place in mid-July 1749, the first Library of Congress is a half-page of smudgy and hur- comprehensive history of the town was written. Its auth- ried script, the output perhaps of someone taking notes The Courses of the Town of Alexandria __________________________ The Meanders of the River S 84 ½ E 3 Chain S 52 E 4 C 17 L S 24 E 5 C 9 L to the Point at sm Hickory stump above the Landing Place S 70 E 1 C 46 L S 45 E 3 C 18 L George Washington’s notes describing “The Courses of the Town of Alexandria.” The colonial survey- or used chains (C) and their links (L) to measure land.
    [Show full text]
  • Potomac River Basin
    POTOMAC RIVER BASIN WATERBODY AND AFFECTED AFFECTED LOCALITIES CONTAMINANT SPECIES ADVISORIES/RESTRICTIONS BOUNDARIES Potomac River Basin American Eel (the following tributaries between the VA/MD state line near Rt. 340 bridge (Loudoun County) to the I-395 bridge in Arlington County (above Loudoun Co., the Woodrow Wilson Bridge): Goose Creek up to Fairfax Co., PCBs No more than two meals/month the Dulles Greenway Road Bridge, Broad Run up Arlington Co. to Rt. 625 bridge, Difficult Run up to Rt. 7 bridge, and Pimmit Run up to Rt. 309 bridge. These tributaries comprise ~24 miles) Carp PCBs DO NOT EAT American Eel PCBs DO NOT EAT Channel Catfish ≥ 18 inches PCBs DO NOT EAT Channel Catfish < 18 inches PCBs Potomac River Basin Bullhead Catfish PCBs (the tidal portion of the following tributaries and embayments from I- Largemouth Bass 395 bridge (above the Woodrow Arlington Co, PCBs Wilson Bridge) to the Potomac River Alexandria City, Bridge at Rt. 301: Four Mile Run, Fairfax Co., Anadromous (coastal) Hunting Creek, Little Hunting Creek, Striped Bass Prince William Co., PCBs Pohick Creek, Accotink Creek, Stafford Co., Occoquan River, Neabsco Creek, King George Co. Sunfish Species Powell Creek, Quantico Creek, PCBs Chopawamsic Creek, Aquia Creek, No more than two meals/month and Potomac Creek. These tributaries Smallmouth Bass comprise ~126 miles) PCBs White Catfish PCBs White Perch PCBs Gizzard Shad PCBs Yellow Perch PCBs Gizzard Shad PCBs Potomac River Basin White Perch (the tidal portion of the following tributaries from the Potomac River King George Co., Bridge at Rt. 301 to mouth of river near Westmoreland Co., PCBs No more than two meals/month Smith Point: Upper Machodoc Creek, Northumberland Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2010 Hugh West and the West Family’S Momentous Role in Founding and Developing Alexandria and Fairfax and Loudoun Counties, Virginia by Jim Bish
    Editor: Linda Greenberg Spring 2010 Hugh West and the West Family’s Momentous Role in Founding and Developing Alexandria and Fairfax and Loudoun Counties, Virginia by Jim Bish There has been much written about the founding Within a few years after Hugh’s birth, his grand- and development of the city of Alexandria and the Fairfax mother, Sarah (Pearson) West died.6 By 1710 Hugh’s County region. Most writers give credit to the Fairfaxes, grandfather, Major John West, married again, this time to Washingtons, Masons, Alexanders, and Carlyles. Elizabeth (Semmes) Turley.7 She was the widow of John However, I contend that, and, this paper explains why, the Turley and had young children. When Hugh was about most critical family in establishing Alexandria and devel- seven years of age, in 1712, his father John West died and oping the region’s commercial interests were members of his mother Ann (Harris) West married John Wheeler and the West family and the most important member of that possibly moved to land that Wheeler had received as a 1 family in establishing Alexandria was Hugh West. land grant farther north on Pohick Creek.8 Probably by 1712, Major John West had no surviv- EARLY YEARS: 1705 ing sons because both John West and his brother Pearson Hugh West was born March 18, 1705 in Stafford West had died. Not long after that, Major West -- Hugh’s County, Virginia (now Fairfax County, Virginia) to John grandfather -- and his new bride, Elizabeth, probably at and Ann (Harris) West.2 Hugh was born into a frontier least twenty years his junior, had a son also named John.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Glencarlyn Park and Long Branch Nature
    HISTORY OF GLENCARLYN PARK AND LONG BRANCH NATURE CENTER By Susan Gilpin With pleasure now the Poet Sings The beauty of the "Carlin Springs" -­ Nature there lends her fairest charms. There quiet reigns without alarms, The waters flow in limpid streams, The good there rest in peaceful dreams. Thither are bending a thriving throng -­ As birds flock singing joyous Song. There Home is truly a thing of joy There Sylvan pleasures never cloy. by]. W . Ray inscribed to Dr. Backus May 21, 1894 Carlin Springs, twin springs south of Four Mile Run in what is now Glencarlyn Park, have attracted nature lovers for over a century. After the Civil War outing parties came from Washingron, D.C., by train, and now bicyclists approach the springs along the old Washington & Old Dominion railroad right of way, now a Northern Virginia Regional Park. Admiring the beauty of the springs and the adjacent stream, however, has been easier than figuring out a way ro preserve them. Glencarlyn Park exists because of far-sighted individuals who persisted even when other concerns robbed some officials of the vision of the parkland. Citizen initiatives started the park, and citizen vigilance helps ro preserve it. Geology And Prehistory Geologically, Glencarlyn Park sits astride the fall line which divides the piedmont from the coastal plain. A waterfall known as Huffman's White Water on Four Mile Run at the south end of the park marks the end of the sedimented flatlands which stretch across the Chesapeake to the Atlantic. Four Mile Run was named in early colonial days -- the name first appears on a land grant map of 1694.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the Cameron Run Watershed
    Chapter 2 Overview of the Cameron Run Watershed 2.1 WHAT IS THE CAMERON RUN WATERSHED? The Cameron Run watershed drains a 44-square-mile section of Northern Virginia. Thirty-three square miles of this area lie within the jurisdiction of Fairfax County; the remaining area lies within the cities of Falls Church and Alexandria (Figure 2-1). The western part of the watershed is within the Piedmont physiographic province (i.e., just west of the fall line); the eastern part is in the Coastal Plain. The Piedmont is an area of very old crystalline rocks underlying rolling hills. The Coastal Plain is characterized by a recent series of unconsolidated sedimentary strata (sands) typified by flat lands. Holmes Run is the primary headwater stream of the Cameron Run watershed. The headwaters of Holmes Run lie near the junction of the Capital Beltway (I-495) and I-66, approximately 1.5 miles west of the city of Falls Church. Flowing south and east, Holmes Run drains a portion of the area between Tyson’s Corner and the cities of Vienna and Falls Church. The stream crosses beneath four major highways before flowing into Lake Barcroft. Lake Barcroft is located at the confluence of Holmes Run and Tripps Run. Tripps Run drains the southeastern half of the city of Falls Church. Other major tributaries of Cameron Run are Backlick Run, Indian Run, and Pike Branch. Lake Barcroft (137 acres), Fairview Lake (15 acres), and four regional ponds are major waterbodies within the watershed. Figure 2-1. Cameron Run watershed Final Cameron Run Watershed Plan 2-1 August 2007 Approximately four miles southeast of Lake Barcroft, Holmes Run meets Backlick Run.
    [Show full text]