UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
MINIATURIZED TECHNIQUES for Imvic TESTS1 DANIEL Y
328 ]. Milk Food Technol., Vol. 35, No. 6 (1972) MINIATURIZED TECHNIQUES FOR IMViC TESTS1 DANIEL Y. c. FuNG AND RICHARD D. MILLER Department of Microbiology The Pennsylvania State University University Park 16802 ( Received for publication January 24, 1972) ABsTRACT Indole test Sterile tryptone broth ( Difco) was introduced into the A miniaturized method for performing IMViC tests is pro wells ( 0.2 ml per well) of a series of Microtiter plates; the Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/jfp/article-pdf/35/6/328/2399137/0022-2747-35_6_328.pdf by guest on 27 September 2021 posed. Twenty-four gram-negative bacterial species and plates were then inoculated, covered, and incubated at 37 C. strains were tested by use of miniaturized and conventional At intervals of 8, 12, and 24 hr, Microtiter plates were re methods; the results were comparable. The miniaturized moved from the incubator for testing. To detect indole pro method effects savingG of time, space, materials, and effort. duction, 2 drops of Kovac reagent were transferred by a The advantages and applications of microbiological Pasteur pipette to each well of the Microtiter plate. A red layer formed on top of the broth in the well indicated a posi~ tests using small volumes of media have been dis tive reaction. Parallel conventional tests for indole produc cussed in detail by Hartman (6). The combination tion, as well as other IMViC tests, were performed according of small volumes of media in Microtiter plates and to the Difm Manual (3), in each species and strain in four multiple inoculation techniques has been used by replicates. -
Prevalence of Urinary Tract Infection and Antibiotic Resistance Pattern in Pregnant Women, Najran Region, Saudi Arabia
Vol. 13(26), pp. 407-413, August, 2019 DOI: 10.5897/AJMR2019.9084 Article Number: E3F64FA61643 ISSN: 1996-0808 Copyright ©2019 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article African Journal of Microbiology Research http://www.academicjournals.org/AJMR Full Length Research Paper Prevalence of urinary tract infection and antibiotic resistance pattern in pregnant women, Najran region, Saudi Arabia Ali Mohamed Alshabi1*, Majed Saeed Alshahrani2, Saad Ahmed Alkahtani1 and Mohammad Shabib Akhtar1 1Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia. 2Department of Obstetics and Gyneocology, Faculty of Medicine, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia. Received 25 February, 2019; Accepted August 5, 2019 Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) is one of the commonest infectious disease in pregnancy, and in pregnancy we have very limited number of antibiotics to treat the UTI. This study was conducted on 151 patients who attended the gynecology clinic during the study period. Nineteen UTI proven cases of UTI were studied for prevalence of microorganism and sensitivity pattern against different antibiotics. Among the bacteria isolated, Escherichia coli (73.68%) and Staphylococcus aureus (10.52%) were the most prevalent Gram negative and Gram positive bacteria respectively. To know the resistance pattern of microorganism we used commercially available discs of different antibiotics. Gram negative bacteria showed more resistance as compared to Gram positive one. It is observed that the most effective antibiotic for Gram negative isolates is Ceftriaxone (87.5%), followed by Amoxicillin + Clavulanic acid (81.25%), Amikacin (75%), Cefuroxime (75%), Cefixime (68.75%) and Mezlocillin (62.5%). For the Gram positive bacteria, Ceftriaxone, Amikacin and Amoxicillin + Clavulanic acid were the most effective antimicrobials (100%). -
Catalase Test: Lab-3380
Standard Operating Procedure Subject Catalase Test Index Number Lab-3380 Section Laboratory Subsection Microbiology Category Departmental Contact Sarah Stoner Last Revised 9/18/2019 References Required document for Laboratory Accreditation by the College of American Pathologists (CAP), Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and/or COLA. Applicable To Employees of Gundersen Health System Laboratory, Gundersen Tri-County, Gundersen St. Joseph, Gundersen Boscobel Hospital, and Gundersen Palmer Lutheran Hospital Laboratories. Detail PRINCIPLE: The breakdown of hydrogen peroxide into oxygen and water is mediated by the enzyme catalase. When a small amount of an organism that produces catalase is introduced into hydrogen peroxide, rapid elaboration of bubbles of oxygen, the gaseous product of the enzyme’s activity, is produced. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This test is used as an aid in distinguishing between Staphylococci and Streptococci. All members of the genus Staphylococcus are catalase (+), where as members of the genus Streptococcus are catalase (-). Listeria monocytogenes {catalase (+)} can be distinguished from beta-hemolytic streptococcus {catalase (-)}. Most Neisseria sp. are catalase (+). Catalase can also help distinguish Bacillus sp. {catalase (+)} from Clostridum sp. {mostly catalase (-)}. SPECIMEN: Isolates preferably grown on non-blood containing media not older than 24 hours old. REAGENTS AND MATERIALS: 1. 3% hydrogen peroxide (from stock bottle). Store 2o – 25o C. Do not freeze or overheat. Light sensitive, store in brown bottle. 2. Clean microscope slide or glass test tube 3. Wooden applicator stick EQUIPMENT/INSTRUMENTATION: N/A QUALITY CONTROL: Each new lot and shipment or once a month, perform QC on reagent with stock organisms of S aureus (positive) and Beta strep group A (negative). -
Mass Spectrometry-Based Microbiological Testing for Blood
Nomura et al. Clin Proteom (2020) 17:14 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12014-020-09278-7 Clinical Proteomics REVIEW Open Access Mass spectrometry-based microbiological testing for blood stream infection Fumio Nomura1* , Sachio Tsuchida1, Syota Murata2, Mamoru Satoh1 and Kazuyuki Matsushita2 Abstract Background: The most successful application of mass spectrometry (MS) in laboratory medicine is identifcation (ID) of microorganisms using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of fight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) in blood stream infection. We describe MALDI-TOF MS-based bacterial ID with particular emphasis on the methods so far developed to directly identify microorganisms from positive blood culture bottles with MALDI-TOF MS including our own protocols. We touch upon the increasing roles of Liquid chromatography (LC) coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) as well. Main body: Because blood culture bottles contain a variety of nonbacterial proteins that may interfere with analysis and interpretation, appropriate pretreatments are prerequisites for successful ID. Pretreatments include purifcation of bacterial pellets and short-term subcultures to form microcolonies prior to MALDI-TOF MS analysis. Three commercial protocols are currently available: the Sepsityper® kit (Bruker Daltonics), the Vitek MS blood culture kit (bioMerieux, Inc.), and the rapid BACpro® II kit (Nittobo Medical Co., Tokyo). Because these commercially available kits are costly and bacterial ID rates using these kits are not satisfactory, particularly for Gram-positive bacteria, various home-brew protocols have been developed: 1. Stepwise diferential sedimentation of blood cells and microorganisms, 2. Combi- nation of centrifugation and lysis procedures, 3. Lysis-vacuum fltration, and 4. Centrifugation and membrane fltra- tion technique (CMFT). -
New Methods for Pathogens : a Revlew Daniel Y
234 NEW METHODS FOR PATHOGENS : A REVLEW DANIEL Y. C. FUNG The Pennsylvania State University Intr ductioii Interests in new methods for identification of bacterial pathogens have increased greatly in recent years due to the awareness of, the need for, and the potential of rapid methods and automation in Micro- biology. In 1971 a report by the U .So National Institute of General Medical Sciences presented the status of mechanization and automation in the clinical laboratory; autcnnation in microbiology was one of the topics reviewed (Kinney, 19-71). Richardson (1972) summttrized the developments of automation in the dairy Laboratories. These topics have been discussed in detail in the International Symposium on Rapid Methods and Automation in Microbiology first held L~IStockholm, Sweden, 1973, and again in Cambridge University, England, 1976. Another symposium was held in Kiel, Germny, 1974 with the title Automation of Microbio1ogr;ical Food Analysis. TheIn proceedings of the First International Symposium were published in two volumes : Automation in Microbiology and Innrmnolom (Heden and Illeni, 1975a) and New Approaches to the Identification of Microorganisms (Heden and Illeni, 1975b). The purpose of this article is to summarize the highlights of some automated microbiological tests and rapid methods relevant to the food industry. Hopefully some of these methods could be adapted and used routinely by the food industry. New Approaches and Automation in Microbioloa Generally the approach to developing new nethods for pathogens involved either a search for new ideas and related instrument develop- ment or improvement of existing bacteriological methods. The impetus for the development of new ideas and instruments mbly comes from clinical needs for rapid detection of organisms and antibiotic sensitivity testing. -
What Is a Microorganism?
Microbiology: What is it? ! Study of organisms who are too small to be seen without a microscope. ! Study of small organisms or microorganisms. NOT just Bacteria! ! Study of single celled organisms. The original cell biology! ! Categories & subjects based on the type of organisms: (1) Viruses – Virology (acellular) (2a) Bacteria – Bacteriology (e.g. Prokaryotes) (2b) Archea – Archeaology? (already taken) (3) Fungi – Mycology (4) Algae – Phycology (5) Protozoa – Protozoology WHAT IS A MICROORGANISM? “There is no simple answer to this question. The word ‘microorganism’ is not the name of a group of related organisms, as are the words ‘plants’ or ‘invertebrates’ or ‘fish’. The use of the word does, however, indicate that there is something special about small organisms; we use no special word to denote large organisms or medium-sized ones. - Sistrom (1969) 1 Reasons to study Microbiology: (1) Bacteria are part of us! E. coli lives in our gut and produces essential vitamins (e.g. K). (2) Infectivity & Pathogenicity; MO’s have the ability to cause disease in compromised &/or heathy hosts. (3) MO’s in the environment; Bioremediation or use of MO’s to breakdown waste compounds like oil, pesticides, etc. Mineral cycling of elements like N, S, Fe, etc. (4) Applied Microbiology or use in agriculture and industry. (5) Understand basic biological processes: Evolution, Ecology, Genetics, etc. WHY STUDY MICROBIOLOGY? “The role of the infinitely small is infinitely large.” - Louis Pasteur (1862) 2 WE ARE NOT ALONE! “We are outnumbered. The average human contains about 10 trillion cells. On that average human are about 10 times as many microorganisms, or 100 trillion cells...As long as they stay in balance and where they belong, [they] do us no harm…In fact, many of them provide some important services to us. -
Source : Microbiology by Pelczar, Prescott Et Al Microbiology, Microbiology of Water
Source : Microbiology by Pelczar, Prescott et al Microbiology, Microbiology of water Water - very essential factor needed by man (used for cooking, drinking, etc.). -open and widely accessible, making it susceptible to contamination by chemicals and bacterial pathogens. -once contaminated, it would be harmful for human consumption. Water Borne Diseases Water-borne diseases are any illness caused by drinking water contaminated by human or animal faeces, which contain pathogenic microorganisms. The germs in the faeces can cause the diseases by even slight contact and transfer. Waterborne microbial pathogens Microbes in water include: – Bacteria – Virus – Protozoa – Helmiths – Spirochete – Rickettsia – Algae A few microbes (pathogens) are capable of causing disease, and may be transmitted by water. Waterborne pathogens Salmonella typhi Escherichia coli Vibrio cholera Pseudomonas aeruginosa Shigella spp. Cryptosporidium Giardia lamblia Norwalkvirus Cryptosporidium parvum Bacterial diseases transmitted through drinking water Disease Causal bacterial agent Cholera Vibrio cholerae Gastroenteritis caused Vibrio parahaemolyticus by vibrios Typhoid fever and Salmonella typhi, Salmonella paratyphi, other serious Salmonella typhimurium salmonellosis Bacillary dysentery Shigella dysenteriae, Shigella flexneri or shigellosis Shigella boydii, Shigella sonnei Acute diarrheas and gastroenteritis Escherichia coli Viral Sources of Waterborne Disease Hepatitis A: inflammation and necrosis of liver Norwalk-type virus: acute gastroenteritis Rotaviruses: -
Helicobacter Pylori Infections: Culture from Stomach Biopsy, Rapid Urease Test (Cutest®), and Histologic Examination of Gastric Biopsy
Available online at www.annclinlabsci.org 148 Annals of Clinical & Laboratory Science, vol. 45, no. 2, 2015 An Efficiency Comparison between Three Invasive Methods for the Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infections: Culture from Stomach Biopsy, Rapid Urease Test (CUTest®), and Histologic Examination of Gastric Biopsy Avi Peretz1, Avi On 2, Anna Koifman1, Diana Brodsky1, Natlya Isakovich1, Tatyana Glyatman1, and Maya Paritsky3 1Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, 2Pediatric Gastrointestinal Unit, and 3Gastrointestinal Unit, Baruch Padeh Medical Center, Poria, affiliated to the Faculty of Medicine, Bar Ilan University, Galille, Israel Abstract. Background. Helicobacter pylori is one of the most prevalent pathogenic bacteria in the world, and humans are its principal reservoir. There are several available methods to diagnose H. pylori infection. Disagreement exists as to the best and most efficient method for diagnosis. Methods. In this paper, we report the results of a comparison between three invasive methods for H. pylori diagnosis among 193 pa- tients: culture, biopsy for histologic examination, and rapid urease test (CUTest®). Results. We found that all three methods have a high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of infections caused by H. pylori. However, the culture method, which is not used routinely, also showed high sensitivity, probably due to biopsies’ seeding within 30 minutes, using warm culture media, non-selective media, and longer incuba- tion. Conclusions. Although not a routine test, culture from biopsy can be meaningful in identification of antibiotic-resistant strains of H. pylori and should therefore be considered a useful diagnostic tool. Keywords: Helicobacter pylor, Culture, Urease test, Gastric biopsy. Introduction Helicobacter pylori is one of the most prevalent Recently, a close association was found between H. -
Gram Stain Workshop for the Laboratory Generalist
Gram Stain Workshop for the Laboratory Generalist Karen Stiles, SM(ASCP)CM State Training Coordinator Assistant Chemical Terrorism Coordinator Nebraska Public Health Laboratory 402-559-3590 [email protected] 1 GRAM STAIN OBJECTIVES: Upon completion, the participant will be able to: 1. Explain the principle of the Gram stain procedure, including what elements can affect staining results 2. Correlate the most common pathogens with positive Gram stains from blood cultures and direct specimen sterile body fluid smears 3. Perform and interpret Grams stains 2 Purpose of Gram Stain Classify bacteria based on form, size, cellular morphology, Gram reaction Assess quality of specimen Identify specific infectious agent from morphology and Gram reaction Correlation with culture growth Correlation with culture-independent methodologist Guide presumptive antibiotic therapy 3 Principle of Gram Stain Cell wall composition Gram positive – think peptidoglycan layer with teichoic acid Gram negative – high in lipid content Basic premise Crystal Violet – all cells take up primary stain Gram’s iodine – mordant to form complex Decolorizer – mixture of acetone and alcohol Dehydrate lipids in Gram negative cell walls, wash out complex Gram positive cells resistant, retain stain complex Safranin - counterstain 4 Gram negative cells take up counterstain Preparation of Samples Specimen Type Preparation CSF/sterile body fluids Cyto/Centrifuge Blood Culture Broth Drop to slide Tissue Touch prep Tissue homogenate Drop to slide Swabbed material Roll -
Medical Bacteriology
LECTURE NOTES Degree and Diploma Programs For Environmental Health Students Medical Bacteriology Abilo Tadesse, Meseret Alem University of Gondar In collaboration with the Ethiopia Public Health Training Initiative, The Carter Center, the Ethiopia Ministry of Health, and the Ethiopia Ministry of Education September 2006 Funded under USAID Cooperative Agreement No. 663-A-00-00-0358-00. Produced in collaboration with the Ethiopia Public Health Training Initiative, The Carter Center, the Ethiopia Ministry of Health, and the Ethiopia Ministry of Education. Important Guidelines for Printing and Photocopying Limited permission is granted free of charge to print or photocopy all pages of this publication for educational, not-for-profit use by health care workers, students or faculty. All copies must retain all author credits and copyright notices included in the original document. Under no circumstances is it permissible to sell or distribute on a commercial basis, or to claim authorship of, copies of material reproduced from this publication. ©2006 by Abilo Tadesse, Meseret Alem All rights reserved. Except as expressly provided above, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission of the author or authors. This material is intended for educational use only by practicing health care workers or students and faculty in a health care field. PREFACE Text book on Medical Bacteriology for Medical Laboratory Technology students are not available as need, so this lecture note will alleviate the acute shortage of text books and reference materials on medical bacteriology. -
Diagnostic Microbiology 170-1 Provides an Overview of the Most Commonly Used Stains
PART Infectious Diseases XVII Section cells is used to judge the suitability of a specimen for culture. For 1 example, the presence of more than 10 epithelial cells per low-power field in a sputum specimen is highly suggestive of a specimen contami- General Considerations nated with oral secretions. In addition, a preliminary assessment of the etiologic agent can be made based upon the morphology (e.g., cocci vs rods) and stain reaction (e.g., Gram-positive isolates are purple; Gram- negative are red) of the microorganisms. However, a negative Gram stain does not rule out infection as 104 to 105 microorganisms per mL Chapter 170 in the specimen are required for detection by this method. In addition to the Gram stain, many other stains are used in micro- biology, both to detect organisms and to help infer their identity. Table Diagnostic Microbiology 170-1 provides an overview of the most commonly used stains. Carey-Ann D. Burnham and Isolation and Identification Gregory A. Storch The approach to isolation of microorganisms in a clinical specimen will vary depending on the body site and pathogen suspected. For body sites that are usually sterile, such as cerebrospinal fluid, nutrient-rich media such as sheep blood agar and chocolate agar are used to aid in Laboratory evidence to support the diagnosis of an infectious disease the recovery of fastidious pathogens. In contrast, stool specimens may be based on 1 or more of the following: direct examination of contain abundant amounts of commensal bacteria and thus to isolate specimens using microscopic or antigen detection techniques, isola- pathogens, selective and differential media must be used. -
Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Anaerobic
antibiotics Review Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Anaerobic Bacteria: Rubik’s Cube of Clinical Microbiology? Márió Gajdács 1,*, Gabriella Spengler 1 and Edit Urbán 2 1 Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunobiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary; [email protected] 2 Institute of Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Szeged, 6725 Szeged, Hungary; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +36-62-342-843 Academic Editor: Leonard Amaral Received: 28 September 2017; Accepted: 3 November 2017; Published: 7 November 2017 Abstract: Anaerobic bacteria have pivotal roles in the microbiota of humans and they are significant infectious agents involved in many pathological processes, both in immunocompetent and immunocompromised individuals. Their isolation, cultivation and correct identification differs significantly from the workup of aerobic species, although the use of new technologies (e.g., matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, whole genome sequencing) changed anaerobic diagnostics dramatically. In the past, antimicrobial susceptibility of these microorganisms showed predictable patterns and empirical therapy could be safely administered but recently a steady and clear increase in the resistance for several important drugs (β-lactams, clindamycin) has been observed worldwide. For this reason, antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobic isolates for surveillance