Open-Source EHR Systems for Ambulatory Care: a Market Assessment | 3 Software Architectures

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Open-Source EHR Systems for Ambulatory Care: a Market Assessment | 3 Software Architectures C A LIFORNIA Open-Source EHR Systems for HEALTHCARE Ambulatory Care: A Market Assessment FOUNDATION Introduction followed structured interview guides to cover This report provides a market assessment of a consistent set of relevant topics. Many of the ambulatory electronic health record (EHR) interviews also included online demonstrations systems that are available under open-source of the EHR applications. Following initial data licensing. A number of open-source EHRs, collection, the authors categorized the projects into commonly referred to as free and open-source three groups: those appropriate for subsequent software (FOSS), have emerged over the past five detailed reviews, those meriting less-detailed to ten years. The goal of this evaluation was to overviews, and those requiring no further determine whether available FOSS systems are evaluation. For more information about the suitable for widespread adoption and effective use methodology and the specific areas of inquiry, see as ambulatory EHRs. To this end, the authors Appendix A. UMMARY investigated a number of existing FOSS EHR projects to evaluate their organizational structures, Based on the data collected, the authors drafted development communities, functional capabilities, written assessments of each FOSS EHR project. S and available implementation and support The principals of each project reviewed these services. The evaluation also analyzed the potential assessments for accuracy prior to publication. E advantages of FOSS EHR systems for physician practices, as well as the limitations and general Although pricing information was collected for challenges of this alternative approach to acquiring each of the projects reviewed, the number of data clinical information technology. points was deemed insufficient to include pricing in this report as a basis for comparing open-source This document provides a summary of the EHR systems. Pricing data are reported only in findings. The detailed assessments of each EHR aggregate, to comment on the general costs of system, as well as additional relevant background FOSS EHR systems relative to commercial EHR information and resources, appear in Appendices A systems. See Appendix E. through F, published separately on the California CUTIV HealthCare Foundation’s Web site at The FOSS EHR Market Landscape E www.chcf.org/topics/view.cfm?itemID=133551. Free and open-source software (FOSS) emerged as a model for EHR systems between 2000 and X Methodology 2002. This trend was prompted by the success The authors gathered data for this report from the of the open-source Linux operating systems and projects’ Web sites, existing product reviews, and the growing recognition that proprietary clinical E extensive telephone interviews with FOSS EHR information systems were prohibitively expensive project leaders, third-party support firms, and to purchase and difficult to customize for many JANUARY installed practice sites. The telephone interviews health care organizations. 2008 A number of FOSS EHR projects emerged and This report focuses most attention on projects that met all disappeared during this early period. Many of the early of the following further criteria: projects were initiated and sustained largely by individual K Most or all of the software is available under an hobbyists with an interest in the medical field and open-source license; open-source development. These projects were academic in nature — tests to see whether medical software could K The application currently demonstrates clinical be developed under the open-source model. Robust data-management capabilities; development communities, stable revenue streams, and K The application is designed for the ambulatory commercial sustainability were not among their goals. care setting in the United States; As a result, these early efforts were highly susceptible K The application is fully compliant with HIPAA to project fatigue and abandonment. For example, security provisions; and the TORCH project, which developed a promising K The project has been implemented in at least open-source EMR application, quickly dissolved after ten physician practice sites. its lead developer left the project. The surviving FOSS EHR projects managed to develop larger and more stable These criteria narrowed the field to five projects: organizational structures. ClearHealth, FreeMED, OpenEMR (Commercial Model), OpenEMR (Community Model), and Preliminary research identified 13 active FOSS EHR WorldVistA EHR. This study conducted detailed projects, as defined by (1) providing software that assessments of these projects, which are summarized manages patient-specific clinical information and below and presented in detail later in this report. Note (2) providing at least some of this software under an that the authors previously evaluated a beta-test version open-source license. These projects are listed in Table 1. of WorldVistA EHR (then known as VistA-Office EHR) Table 1. Active FOSS EHR Projects in 2006. Hence, that system was not assessed anew for PROJECT URL this study, although certain enhancements had been ClearHealth www.clear-health.com made since 2006. The report of the previous evaluation is IndivoHealth www.indivohealth.org available at www.sujansky.com/vista.php. FreeMED www.freemedsoftware.org Table 2. FOSS EHR Projects Included in Detailed Review GNUmed www.gnumed.org ClearHealth Medsphere OpenVista www.medsphere.org FreeMED OpenEMR www.openemr.net (Managed Model) OpenEMR (Commercial Model) OpenEMR sourceforge.net/projects/openemr OpenEMR (Community Model) (Community Model) WorldVistA EHR OSCAR www.oscarcanada.org PrimaCare pcdom.org.my Briefer overviews of four additional projects were also Res Medicinae resmedicinae.sourceforge.net conducted. Although these projects did not meet all Tolven Healthcare www.tolven.org of the criteria above, they were of interest because they Innovations represent interesting approaches or promising future Ultimate EMR www.uemr.com directions in open-source health care information WorldVistA EHR www.worldvista.org/World_VistA_EHR technology. The four projects that this study briefly 2 | CALIFORNIA HEALT H CARE FOUNDATION overviewed are listed in Table 3, along with the reason(s) license determine the rights and obligations of anyone they did not qualify for a detailed assessment. possessing software published thereunder. Of the many licenses that exist, only three are relevant to the FOSS Table 3. FOSS EHR Projects That Underwent a EHR systems that this study reviewed in detail: Less-detailed Overview PROJECT FINDINGS K The GNU General Public License (GPL) stipulates IndivoHealth Intended primarily as a personal health that anyone in possession of the software may use, record; implemented at only two sites modify, and redistribute it without restriction as Medsphere OpenVista Primarily designed for and marketed to hospitals; some of the core software long as the source code is made available with any is not available under an open-source license distributions and the recipients of any distributions also use, modify, and redistribute the software under Tolven Healthcare Intended primarily as a personal health Innovations record; implemented at only two sites the terms of the GPL. Ultimate EMR Implemented at only two sites K The GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) is similar to the GPL, but, unlike the GPL, it allows Lastly, four of the FOSS projects this study identified LGPL software libraries to be linked to proprietary provide ambulatory EHR systems for use primarily software systems without the latter becoming outside of the United States. Certain of these projects, derivative works (and thereby no longer proprietary). such as the Canadian system OSCAR, have a robust set K The Mozilla Public License (MPL) allows source of features, a sizable following, an active development code and derivative works covered under its terms community, and a good number of implementations. to be directly integrated into proprietary software However, this study conducted neither a detailed review systems (not just linked to such systems), although nor a brief overview of these projects because they may the license also requires that any modifications made not meet the functional requirements of EHR systems to MPL software libraries be distributed with source in the U.S., particularly requirements related to HIPAA code. compliance and billing practices. Organizational structures. The open-source projects These projects and their base countries are: GNUmed that this study reviewed each fall into one of three general (Germany); OSCAR (Canada); PrimaCare (Malaysia); organizational patterns: (1) community organizations — and Res Medicinae (Germany). loose affiliations of individual software contributors with minimal centralized management or financial General Concepts resources; (2) commercial organizations — for-profit A number of concepts apply across all of the FOSS business entities that directly fund, staff, and centrally EHR systems that this study reviewed. These concepts manage the development of open-source EHR systems; are summarized below and described in greater detail in and (3) nonprofit organizations — like commercial Appendix B. entities, nonprofits also provide centralized management for open-source systems, but rely more on external Licensing models. Dozens of open-source licensing benefactors for funding and software-development models exist, from the benchmark General Public License resources. These organizational models differ in their (GPL)
Recommended publications
  • Management of Large Sets of Image Data Capture, Databases, Image Processing, Storage, Visualization Karol Kozak
    Management of large sets of image data Capture, Databases, Image Processing, Storage, Visualization Karol Kozak Download free books at Karol Kozak Management of large sets of image data Capture, Databases, Image Processing, Storage, Visualization Download free eBooks at bookboon.com 2 Management of large sets of image data: Capture, Databases, Image Processing, Storage, Visualization 1st edition © 2014 Karol Kozak & bookboon.com ISBN 978-87-403-0726-9 Download free eBooks at bookboon.com 3 Management of large sets of image data Contents Contents 1 Digital image 6 2 History of digital imaging 10 3 Amount of produced images – is it danger? 18 4 Digital image and privacy 20 5 Digital cameras 27 5.1 Methods of image capture 31 6 Image formats 33 7 Image Metadata – data about data 39 8 Interactive visualization (IV) 44 9 Basic of image processing 49 Download free eBooks at bookboon.com 4 Click on the ad to read more Management of large sets of image data Contents 10 Image Processing software 62 11 Image management and image databases 79 12 Operating system (os) and images 97 13 Graphics processing unit (GPU) 100 14 Storage and archive 101 15 Images in different disciplines 109 15.1 Microscopy 109 360° 15.2 Medical imaging 114 15.3 Astronomical images 117 15.4 Industrial imaging 360° 118 thinking. 16 Selection of best digital images 120 References: thinking. 124 360° thinking . 360° thinking. Discover the truth at www.deloitte.ca/careers Discover the truth at www.deloitte.ca/careers © Deloitte & Touche LLP and affiliated entities. Discover the truth at www.deloitte.ca/careers © Deloitte & Touche LLP and affiliated entities.
    [Show full text]
  • Examples of the Electronic Health Record (EHR)
    Examples of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) What is Biomedical & Health Informatics? William Hersh Copyright 2020 Oregon Health & Science University Examples of the EHR • Using the Veterans Health Information Systems and Technology Architecture (VistA) • Why VistA? – State-of-the-art EHR that has transformed healthcare in the Veteran’s Health Administration (VHA) (Perlin, 2006; Byrne, 2010) – Not that pretty, but has all of the modern features of the EHR, e.g., clinical decision support (CDS), computerized provider order entry (CPOE), etc. – Distributed under open-source model, unlike most other vendors who do not even allow screen shots to be shown outside their customers’ institutions • Fascinating story (Allen, 2017), but VistA now being phased out in favor of Cerner EHR adopted by Department of Defense (VA, 2017) – https://www.ehrm.va.gov/ WhatIs5 2 1 Some details about VistA • Server written in M (formerly called MUMPS), accessed via command-line interface – Runs in commercial Intersystems Cache (on many platforms) or open-source GT.M (Linux only) • Client (called CPRS) written in Delphi and providers graphical user interface – Only runs on Windows (just about all versions) WhatIs5 3 Logging on to CPRS, the front end to VistA WhatIs5 4 2 Choosing a patient WhatIs5 5 Cover sheet – overview WhatIs5 6 3 Drilling down to details of a problem WhatIs5 7 Details of an allergy WhatIs5 8 4 Viewing vital signs over time WhatIs5 9 More details on problems WhatIs5 10 5 List of active orders WhatIs5 11 Viewing the patient’s notes WhatIs5 12
    [Show full text]
  • Free and Open Source Software for Electronic Health Information
    Washington University Journal of Law & Policy Volume 30 Open Source and Proprietary Models of Innovation 2009 Slouching Toward Open Innovation: Free and Open Source Software for Electronic Health Information Greg R. Vetter University of Houston Law Center Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_journal_law_policy Part of the Computer Law Commons, and the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Greg R. Vetter, Slouching Toward Open Innovation: Free and Open Source Software for Electronic Health Information, 30 WASH. U. J. L. & POL’Y 179 (2009), https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_journal_law_policy/vol30/iss1/8 This Essay is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Journal of Law & Policy by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Slouching Toward Open Innovation: Free and Open Source Software for Electronic Health Information Greg R. Vetter INTRODUCTION Gartner, one of the most respected market research firms for information technology, recently called open source software the ―biggest disruptor the software industry has ever seen and postulated it will eventually result in cheaper software and new business models.‖1 The degree to which this prediction materializes depends on many influences, one of which is the subject of this Article. I argue that some software markets are more favorable for open source approaches than others. Using a case study of one particular software market, this Article develops a tentative framework of factors characterizing markets likely to disfavor contemporary approaches in free and open source software (―FOSS‖).2 Associate Professor of Law, University of Houston Law Center; Co-Director, Institute for Intellectual Property and Information Law; biography available at: http://www.law.uh.edu/ faculty/gvetter (last visited Mar.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cloud Based Patient-Centered Ehealth Record
    International Journal on Advances in Life Sciences, vol 7 no 1 & 2, year 2015, http://www.iariajournals.org/life_sciences/ 30 A Cloud Based Patient-Centered eHealth Record Konstantinos Koumaditis, Leonidas Katelaris, and Marinos Themistocleous Department of Digital Systems University of Piraeus Piraeus, Greece e-mail: (konkoum,lkatelaris,mthemist)@unipi.gr Abstract - This research focuses on the Patient-Centered integrated view of citizens health status. The latter is reflected e-Health (PCEH) concept by introducing its importance in EHRs and Personal Health Records (PHRs), which are and demonstrating a multidisciplinary project that being enriched and exploited by different actors and combines advanced technologies. The project links stakeholders (i.e., health and care professionals, citizens, several aspects of PCEH functionality, such as: (a) nutrition experts, hospitals, etc.) in the health ecosystem. homecare telemedicine technologies, (b) e-prescribing, e- Three general PHR models have been proposed [7]: a) the referral, e-learning and (c) state-of-the-art technologies stand-alone model, b) Electronic Health Record (EHR) like cloud computing and Service Oriented Architecture system, and c) the integrated one, which is an interoperable (SOA), will lead to an innovative integrated e-health system providing linkage with a variety of patient platform that delivers many benefits to the society, the information sources, such as EHRs, home diagnostics, economy, the industry and the research community. This insurance claims etc. The main types of health information paper provides insights of the PCEH concept and the supported by PHRs are problem lists, procedures, major current stages of the project. In doing so, we aim to illnesses, provider lists, allergy data, home-monitored data, increase the awareness of this significant work and family history, social history and lifestyle, immunizations, disseminate the knowledge gained so far through our medications and laboratory tests [8, 9].
    [Show full text]
  • Debian Med Integrated Software Environment for All Medical Applications
    Debian Med Integrated software environment for all medical applications Andreas Tille 27. February 2013 When people hear for the first time the term ‘Debian Med’ there are usually two kinds of misconceptions. Let us dispel these in advance, so as to clarify subsequent discussion of the project. People familiar with Debian as a large distribution of Free Software usually imag- ine Debian Med to be some kind of customised derivative of Debian tailored for use in a medical environment. Astonishingly, the idea that such customisation can be done entirely within Debian itself is not well known and the technical term Debian Pure Blend seems to be sufficiently unknown outside of the Debian milieu that many people fail to appreciate the concept correctly. There are no separate repositories like Personal Package Archives (PPA) as introduced by Ubuntu for additional software not belong- ing to the official distribution or something like that – a Debian Pure Blend (as the term ’pure’ implies) is Debian itself and if you have received Debian you have full De- bian Med at your disposal. There are other Blends inside Debian like Debian Science, Debian Edu, Debian GIS and others. People working in the health care professions sometimes acquire another miscon- ception about Debian Med, namely that Debian Med is some kind of software primarily dedicated to managing a doctor’s practice. Sometimes people even assume that people assume the Debian Med team actually develops this software. However, the truth about the Debian Med team is that we are a group of Debian developers hard at work incor- porating existing medical software right into the Debian distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Linux: Come E Perchх
    ÄÒÙÜ Ô ©2007 mcz 12 luglio 2008 ½º I 1. Indice II ½º Á ¾º ¿º ÈÖÞÓÒ ½ º È ÄÒÙÜ ¿ º ÔÔÖÓÓÒÑÒØÓ º ÖÒÞ ×Ó×ØÒÞÐ ÏÒÓÛ× ¾½ º ÄÒÙÜ ÕÙÐ ×ØÖÙÞÓÒ ¾ º ÄÒÙÜ ÀÖÛÖ ×ÙÔÔ ÓÖØØÓ ¾ º È Ð ÖÒÞ ØÖ ÖÓ ÓØ Ù×Ö ¿½ ½¼º ÄÒÙÜ × Ò×ØÐÐ ¿¿ ½½º ÓÑ × Ò×ØÐÐÒÓ ÔÖÓÖÑÑ ¿ ½¾º ÒÓÒ ØÖÓÚÓ ÒÐ ×ØÓ ÐÐ ×ØÖÙÞÓÒ ¿ ½¿º Ó׳ ÙÒÓ ¿ ½º ÓÑ × Ð ××ØÑ ½º ÓÑ Ð ½º Ð× Ñ ½º Ð Ñ ØÐ ¿ ½º ÐÓ ½º ÓÑ × Ò×ØÐÐ Ð ×ØÑÔÒØ ¾¼º ÓÑ ÐØØÖ¸ Ø×Ø ÐÖ III Indice ¾½º ÓÑ ÚÖ Ð ØÐÚ×ÓÒ ¿ 21.1. Televisioneanalogica . 63 21.2. Televisione digitale (terrestre o satellitare) . ....... 64 ¾¾º ÐÑØ ¾¿º Ä 23.1. Fotoritocco ............................. 67 23.2. Grafica3D.............................. 67 23.3. Disegnovettoriale-CAD . 69 23.4.Filtricoloreecalibrazionecolori . .. 69 ¾º ×ÖÚ Ð ½ 24.1.Vari.................................. 72 24.2. Navigazionedirectoriesefiles . 73 24.3. CopiaCD .............................. 74 24.4. Editaretesto............................. 74 24.5.RPM ................................. 75 ¾º ×ÑÔ Ô ´ËÐе 25.1.Montareundiscoounapenna . 77 25.2. Trovareunfilenelsistema . 79 25.3.Vedereilcontenutodiunfile . 79 25.4.Alias ................................. 80 ¾º × ÚÓÐ×× ÔÖÓÖÑÑÖ ½ ¾º ÖÓÛ×Ö¸ ÑÐ ººº ¿ ¾º ÖÛÐРгÒØÚÖÙ× Ð ÑØØÑÓ ¾º ÄÒÙÜ ½ ¿¼º ÓÑ ØÖÓÚÖ ÙØÓ ÖÖÑÒØ ¿ ¿½º Ð Ø×ØÙÐ Ô Ö Ð ×ØÓÔ ÄÒÙÜ ¿¾º ´ÃµÍÙÒØÙ¸ ÙÒ ×ØÖÙÞÓÒ ÑÓÐØÓ ÑØ ¿¿º ËÙÜ ÙÒ³ÓØØÑ ×ØÖÙÞÓÒ ÄÒÙÜ ½¼½ ¿º Á Ó Ò ÄÒÙÜ ½¼ ¿º ÃÓÒÕÙÖÓÖ¸ ÕÙ×ØÓ ½¼ ¿º ÃÓÒÕÙÖÓÖ¸ Ñ ØÒØÓ Ô Ö ½½¿ 36.1.Unaprimaocchiata . .114 36.2.ImenudiKonqueror . .115 36.3.Configurazione . .116 IV Indice 36.4.Alcuniesempidiviste . 116 36.5.Iservizidimenu(ServiceMenu) . 119 ¿º ÃÓÒÕÙÖÓÖ Ø ½¾¿ ¿º à ÙÒ ÖÖÒØ ½¾ ¿º à ÙÒ ÐÙ×ÓÒ ½¿½ ¼º ÓÒÖÓÒØÓ Ò×ØÐÐÞÓÒ ÏÒÓÛ×È ÃÍÙÒØÙ º½¼ ½¿¿ 40.1.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF File, 212 KB
    Multimedia Appendix 2. List of OS Projects Contacted for Survey Project Name Web Page 3D Slicer http://www.slicer.org/ Apollo http://www.fruitfly.org/annot/apollo/ Biobuilder http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/5/43 Bioconductor http://www.bioconductor.org Biojava http://www.biojava.org/ Biomail Scientific References Automation http://biomail.sourceforge.net/biomail/index.html Bioperl http://bioperl.org/ Biophp http://biophp.org Biopython http://www.biopython.org/ Bioquery http://www.bioquery.org/ Biowarehouse http://bioinformatics.ai.sri.com/biowarehouse/ Cd-Hit Sequence Clustering Software http://bioinformatics.org/cd-hit/ Chemistry Development Kit http://almost.cubic.uni-koeln.de/cdk/ Coasim http://www.daimi.au.dk/~mailund/CoaSim/ Cytoscape http://www.cytoscape.org Das http://biodas.org/ E-Cell System http://sourceforge.net/projects/ecell/ Emboss http://emboss.sourceforge.net/ http://www.ensembl.org/info/software/versions.htm Ensemble l Eviewbox Dicom Java Project http://sourceforge.net/projects/eviewbox/ Freemed Project http://bioinformatics.org/project/?group_id=298 Ghemical http://www.bioinformatics.org/ghemical/ Gnumed http://www.gnumed.org Medical Dataserver http://www.mii.ucla.edu/dataserver Medical Image Analysis http://sourceforge.net/projects/mia Moby http://biomoby.open-bio.org/ Olduvai http://sourceforge.net/projects/olduvai/ Openclinica http://www.openclinica.org Openemed http://openemed.org/ Openemr http://www.oemr.org/ Oscarmcmaster http://sourceforge.net/projects/oscarmcmaster/ Probemaker http://probemaker.sourceforge.net/
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Open-Source Electronic Health Record Systems Based on Functional and User Performance Criteria
    Original Article Healthc Inform Res. 2019 April;25(2):89-98. https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2019.25.2.89 pISSN 2093-3681 • eISSN 2093-369X Comparison of Open-Source Electronic Health Record Systems Based on Functional and User Performance Criteria Saptarshi Purkayastha1, Roshini Allam1, Pallavi Maity1, Judy W. Gichoya2 1Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA 2Dotter Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA Objectives: Open-source Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems have gained importance. The main aim of our research is to guide organizational choice by comparing the features, functionality, and user-facing system performance of the five most popular open-source EHR systems. Methods: We performed qualitative content analysis with a directed approach on recently published literature (2012–2017) to develop an integrated set of criteria to compare the EHR systems. The functional criteria are an integration of the literature, meaningful use criteria, and the Institute of Medicine’s functional requirements of EHR, whereas the user-facing system performance is based on the time required to perform basic tasks within the EHR system. Results: Based on the Alexa web ranking and Google Trends, the five most popular EHR systems at the time of our study were OSHERA VistA, GNU Health, the Open Medical Record System (OpenMRS), Open Electronic Medical Record (OpenEMR), and OpenEHR. We also found the trends in popularity of the EHR systems and the locations where they were more popular than others. OpenEMR met all the 32 functional criteria, OSHERA VistA met 28, OpenMRS met 12 fully and 11 partially, OpenEHR-based EHR met 10 fully and 3 partially, and GNU Health met the least with only 10 criteria fully and 2 partially.
    [Show full text]
  • Step-By-Step Install Guide OSCAR Mcmaster CMS on Linux Ubuntu 10.04 LTS (Lucid Lynx)
    Global Open Versity eHealth Labs Install Guide OSCAR McMaster CMS on Linux Ubuntu 10.04 LTS v1.5 Global Open Versity e-Health Management Systems Hands-on Labs Training Manual Step-by-Step Install Guide OSCAR McMaster CMS on Linux Ubuntu 10.04 LTS (Lucid Lynx) Kefa Rabah Global Open Versity, Vancouver Canada [email protected] www.globalopenversity.org Table of Contents Page No. STEP-BY-STEP INSTALL GUIDE OSCAR MCMASTER CMS ON LINUX UBUNTU 10.04 LTS 3 1.0 Introduction 3 Part 1: Install & Configure Linux Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Desktop 4 Step 1: Getting Started & Hardware Pre-requisites 4 Step 2: Install Linux Ubuntu 10.04 LTS 4 Step 3: Update Ubuntu 10.04 Operating Systems 4 Part 2: Installing OSCAR McMaster CMS on Linux Ubuntu 8.04 LTS Server 5 Step 1: Preamble 5 Part 3: Installing the Infrastructure Packages 6 Step 1: Install OpenSSH Package 6 Step 2: Install Sun-Java6-JDK Package 7 Step 3: Install Ant Package 8 Step 4: Install MySQL Database Server Package 8 Step 5: Install Apache Tomcat 6 Package 9 Step 6: Install Pretty Good Privacy (PGP) Package 9 Step 7: Install CVS 10 Step 8: Install PostgreSQL database server 10 Step 9: Install UNZIP Package 10 Step 10: Install Network Time Protocol (NTP) Service 11 Step 11: Reboot the server 11 Step 12: Configuring the Base Packages 11 Step 13: Configuring Tomcat6 12 Step 14: Secure Apache Tomcat6 using SSL 13 Part 5: Install OSCAR CMS Server 15 Step 1: Download & Install OSCAR 15 Step 2: Create OSCAR Database on MySQL 16 Part 6: Enabling New eCharts 18 Step 1: Enable eChart 18 Part 7: Drugref2/3
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in Information Technology 0.Pdf
    ADVANCES IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND COMMUNICATION IN HEALTH Studies in Health Technology and Informatics This book series was started in 1990 to promote research conducted under the auspices of the EC programmes’ Advanced Informatics in Medicine (AIM) and Biomedical and Health Research (BHR) bioengineering branch. A driving aspect of international health informatics is that telecommunication technology, rehabilitative technology, intelligent home technology and many other components are moving together and form one integrated world of information and communication media. The complete series has been accepted in Medline. Volumes from 2005 onwards are available online. Series Editors: Dr. O. Bodenreider, Dr. J.P. Christensen, Prof. G. de Moor, Prof. A. Famili, Dr. U. Fors, Prof. A. Hasman, Prof. E.J.S. Hovenga, Prof. L. Hunter, Dr. I. Iakovidis, Dr. Z. Kolitsi, Mr. O. Le Dour, Dr. A. Lymberis, Prof. J. Mantas, Prof. M.A. Musen, Prof. P.F. Niederer, Prof. A. Pedotti, Prof. O. Rienhoff, Prof. F.H. Roger France, Dr. N. Rossing, Prof. N. Saranummi, Dr. E.R. Siegel and Dr. P. Wilson Volume 143 Recently published in this series Vol. 142. J.D. Westwood, S.W. Westwood, R.S. Haluck, H.M. Hoffman, G.T. Mogel, R. Phillips, R.A. Robb and K.G. Vosburgh (Eds.), Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 17 – NextMed: Design for/the Well Being Vol. 141. E. De Clercq et al. (Eds.), Collaborative Patient Centred eHealth – Proceedings of the HIT@HealthCare 2008 joint event: 25th MIC Congress, 3rd International Congress Sixi, Special ISV-NVKVV Event, 8th Belgian eHealth Symposium Vol. 140. P.H. Dangerfield (Ed.), Research into Spinal Deformities 6 Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Source Et Gestion De L'information Médicale : Aperçu Des Projets Existants
    Open source et gestion de l'information médicale : aperçu des projets existants Ateliers CISP Club 2011 – Alexandre BRULET Open Source : bref historique... 1969 : UNIX (Bell Labs°) 1975 : distribué à des universités pour « fins éducatives » avec les codes sources... 1977 : projet BSD 1984 : projet GNU (R. Stallman) (sources partagées) 1985 : Free Software Fondation (cadre légal – licence GPL) 1989 : licence BSD modifiée (open source) 1991 : noyau GNU/Linux ? OS dérivés (NetBSD, FreeBSD, SunOS ...) 1993 : Slackware 1993 : Debian 1994 : Red Hat > 50 OS dérivés > 100 OS dérivés 1998 : MPL (ex : SUSE) > 50 OS dérivés (Knopix, Ubuntu...) (Mandriva, Fedora ...) 1999 : licence Apache UNESCO 2004 : logiciels libres patrimoine de l'humanité (…) > 35 licences libres recensées sur wikipédia (PHP, Cecil, MIT, CPL, W3C, etc.) Open source : un fonctionnement communautaire ● La « pyramide » Linux : développeurs / 'maintainers' / chefs de projet sys USB net (...) L. Torvalds / A. Morton ● Système de «patchs» : publics, signés, discutés, soumis, (approuvés) ● Versions stables régulières et archivées (mirroirs) ● Système de «paquets» permettant la cohérence des OS ● Mode de fonctionnement repris par la plupart des distributions basées sur Linux ainsi que leurs « filles » : Debian → Ubuntu, Slackware → Zenwalk, RedHat → Fedora, etc. ● Idem pour les logiciels (xfce/gnome/kde, OOo, Gimp, Firefox, etc.) Le monde open source : un immense agrégat de communautés... OS OS OS Projets GNU OS OS OS Noyau OS OS OS Noyau OS OS Projets BSD Programme open source Programme propriétaire Système OS d'exploitation Quid des logiciels médicaux ? Petit tour du monde de l'open source médical à partir d'une liste proposée par Wikipédia. 1. Logiciels médicaux francophones : MedinTux ● Petite communauté depuis 2005 (marseille), licence CeCiLL ● DMI cabinet / hôpital - objectif = ergonomie ● Programmes serveurs et clients, consultation web possible.
    [Show full text]
  • LIFE Packages
    LIFE packages Index Office automation Desktop Internet Server Web developpement Tele centers Emulation Health centers Graphics High Schools Utilities Teachers Multimedia Tertiary schools Programming Database Games Documentation Internet - Firefox - Browser - Epiphany - Nautilus - Ftp client - gFTP - Evolution - Mail client - Thunderbird - Internet messaging - Gaim - Gaim - IRC - XChat - Gaim - VoIP - Skype - Videomeeting - Gnome meeting - GnomeBittorent - P2P - aMule - Firefox - Download manager - d4x - Telnet - Telnet Web developpement - Quanta - Bluefish - HTML editor - Nvu - Any text editor - HTML galerie - Album - Web server - XAMPP - Collaborative publishing system - Spip Desktop - Gnome - Desktop - Kde - Xfce Graphics - Advanced image editor - The Gimp - KolourPaint - Simple image editor - gPaint - TuxPaint - CinePaint - Video editor - Kino - OpenOffice Draw - Vector vraphics editor - Inkscape - Dia - Diagram editor - Kivio - Electrical CAD - Electric - 3D modeller/render - Blender - CAD system - QCad Utilities - Calculator - gCalcTool - gEdit - gxEdit - Text editor - eMacs21 - Leafpad - Application finder - Xfce4-appfinder - Desktop search tool - Beagle - File explorer - Nautilus -Archive manager - File-Roller - Nautilus CD Burner - CD burner - K3B - GnomeBaker - Synaptic - System updates - apt-get - IPtables - Firewall - FireStarter - BackupPC - Backup - Amanda - gnome-terminal - Terminal - xTerm - xTerminal - Scanner - Xsane - Partition editor - gParted - Making image of disks - Partitimage - Mirroring over network - UDP Cast
    [Show full text]