Influence of Political Parties in Elections: Evidence from Nepal
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ISSN 1712-8358[Print] Cross-Cultural Communication ISSN 1923-6700[Online] Vol. 9, No. 5, 2013, pp. 105-111 www.cscanada.net DOI:10.3968/j.ccc.1923670020130905.8250 www.cscanada.org Influence of Political Parties in Elections: Evidence from Nepal Md. Nurul Momen[a],* [a]Assistant professor. PhD. Department of Public Administration, Again, the people’s movement in 2006 brought Rajshahi University, Rajshahi, Bangladesh. about changes in Nepal. An interim constitution was Research areas: Public policy and law; Governance; Administrative reform promulgated in 2007, with the King giving up power, and *Corresponding author. an interim House of Representatives was formed with Maoist members after the new government held peace Received 12 July 2013; accepted 15 October 2013 talks with the Maoist rebels. In 2007, the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) joined the interim government Abstract: of Nepal. On 10 December 2007, the interim parliament This article measures the influence of political party passed a bill that made Nepal a federal republic, and (with) variables on the electoral process in Nepal. In the findings, the Prime Minister becoming head of state. On 28 May in general, the research found that a free and fair election 2008, lawmakers in Nepal legally abolished the monarchy, in Nepal does not perform at par with their counterparts and declared the country a republic, ending 239 years of in the Western world. In Nepal, it is the confrontational royal rule in the Himalayan nation (International Crisis political culture among the political parties which is Group, 2008). challenging to ensure free and fair elections. In 2008 Nepal’s Constituent Assembly (CA) elections Free and fair elections; Nepal and marked a major step forward to a federal democratic Key words: th political parties republic. On 10 April, 2008, the first election for the constitution assembly took place in Nepal (International Md. Nurul Momen (2013). Influence of Political Parties in Crisis Group, 2008).The Communist Party of Nepal (CPN- Elections: Evidence from Nepal. Cross-Cultural Communication, Maoist) led the election results, but failed to gain a simple 9(5), 105-111 . Available from: http//www.cscanada.net/index. majority in the parliament. However, Nepal has been php/ccc/article/view/j.ccc.19236700201309 05.8250. following national election since 1960, except during the DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/j.ccc.1923670020130905.8250. civil war there was no election (excluding the municipal election). After a long gap, Nepal managed to hold the election of the Constituent Assembly on April 10, 2008. BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT The 2008 Constituent Assembly election transitioned Nepal from a monarchy to a parliamentary republic, and Nepal has seen rapid political changes during the last two gave an overwhelming victory to the Communist Party of decades. Until 1990, Nepal was a monarchy under the Nepal (Maoist) that ended the long civil war.2 executive control of the king. Faced with a movement against the absolute monarchy, King Birendra,1 in 1990, agreed to large-scale political reforms by creating a 1. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY parliamentary monarchy with the king as the head of Qualitative research helps to give a real meaning of the state and a prime minister as the head of the government. research as well as a comprehensive study to analyze the findings. This approach does not make analyses, and 1 Birendra Bir Bikram Shah Dev was a king of Nepal who succeeded in 1972. He reigned until his death in the 2001 Nepalese royal massacre. He is the most internationally well-known Nepalese king 2 Compiled from Comprehensive Peace Accord (2006) and Interim in the modern history. Constitution of Nepal (2007), and Election Legislation. 105 Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture Influence of Political Parties in Elections: Evidence from Nepal conclusions based on figures rather it is more explanatory aggregation and representation,” making them “the and exploratory. Therefore, I decided to employ institution which impact most directly on the extent qualitative approach in my research. to which social cleavages are translated into national Every research requires methodology to execute the politics” (Benjamin, 2008). However, political parties in study. In doing so, both historical and empirical data South Asia are often instead of acting as forces for good, was used. Historical data was mostly collected from intense conflicts between the parties. In South Asia, secondary sources, such as published books, reports, political parties look to each other parties with suspicion journals and articles. Empirical data was collected from and distrust. It has been observed in South Asia that the intensive fieldwork through interviews in Nepal from absence of consensus between the parties make hard to July 2011 to August 2011; however, many prominent reach a compromise on governance issues. personalities (11 respondents) from different categories It is cited that scholars found a strong relationship were invited for interview. Bureaucrats, social activists, between political parties and free and fair elections. For politicians, leaders of different social movement, example, political party determines which member of the professionals and other high ranking people of policy party will contest in the parliamentary elections. In the making level were the participants. I asked to different transitional democracies, the opposition parties can shift categories of respondents in Nepal about how political the politics from the Parliament to the street, and disrupt parties’ influence of institutionalizing free and fair public life and order. These practices can lead to political elections. instability, if it is forcefully handled instead of providing some avenues to ventilate their grievances. Furthermore, it is argued that if a political party commitment to 2. INTRODUCTION democratic ideals is not high, political parties can Norton (2000, p.8) argues out that political party is narrowly serve the interests of common people. crucial to political life and central to Westminster form Political parties seek to influence government of government, but excessive partisanship is harmful policies participating in the election. According to Law to limiting its capacity to call government into account (1997), political parties influence by attempting to elect (Rahman, 2005). The political confrontation among its candidate to the office. Furthermore, the party differs the parties tends to treat each other as enemies rather from other political parties in its mobilization capability than as opponents in Nepal. Furthermore, Nepal’s (Law, 1997). During a legislative election, the parties try political parties are still dominated by the upper castes to win support from their voters in order to legitimately and classes of society that have ruled the country for gain the power to influence the government decisions. centuries. Interestingly, in the outside, political parties/ There are some fundamental features of political parties politicians behave in a modern western way, but in their that vary from one polity to another. According to Lee minds, they are embedded in hierarchical thinking, and Shaw (1979, pp.392-393), these variations may be whose ideas are not equality and participation of all as to whether they are one, two or more than two major people (Kraemer, 1999). political parties. Whether the parties tend to be cohesive After the democratic era of 1990, mass people were or non-cohesive; and whether the leading parties are united to the call of political parties to fight against ideologically close or distant (Rahman, 2005). The the undemocratic practices that could not bring any presence, absence or blends of these characteristics qualitative political changes in the country. People help to determine the degree of party control over the expected that democracy would bring some changes in governance system in a country. society, but it noticeable that it did not work as people Political parties do not necessarily have to like each as hoped. It is noted that political parties are extremely other. But in the democratic system they must tolerate important for the consolidation of a free and fair to each other, and admit each other’s legitimacy. Unekis election. Therefore, this article tries to analyze about (1998, p.195) argues out that rival political parties face how political parties negatively influence the electoral each other from positions of strength (controlling either process in Nepal. in the Presidency or the Parliament) in a struggle for control over the development of public policy (Ibid). Although the basis of conflict between political parties 3. RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN is competition for office, the adversarial relationship POLITICAL PARTIES AND FREE AND between the parties is in their nature. The conflict between the political parties may occur at any time. FAIR ELECTIONS But it is especially occurring during the elections. Each Political party is the functioning of the state; therefore, party is not only trying to advance its political mandate free and fair elections depend on how political parties at the expense of the others, but in many cases, to operate in a country. Benjamin (2008) describes political prevent the opposing views from being given a voice parties as; “the key agents of political articulation, before the electorate. Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture 106 Md. Nurul Momen (2013). Cross-Cultural Communication, 9(5),