Alabama Forestry Invitational State Manual & Study Guide
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
4 Reproductive Biology of Cerambycids
4 Reproductive Biology of Cerambycids Lawrence M. Hanks University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana, Illinois Qiao Wang Massey University Palmerston North, New Zealand CONTENTS 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 133 4.2 Phenology of Adults ..................................................................................................................... 134 4.3 Diet of Adults ............................................................................................................................... 138 4.4 Location of Host Plants and Mates .............................................................................................. 138 4.5 Recognition of Mates ................................................................................................................... 140 4.6 Copulation .................................................................................................................................... 141 4.7 Larval Host Plants, Oviposition Behavior, and Larval Development .......................................... 142 4.8 Mating Strategy ............................................................................................................................ 144 4.9 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................... 148 Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................................. -
Contact Pheromones As Mate Recognition Cues of Four Species of Longhorned Beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)
Jotirnal of Insect Behavior, Vol. 16, No. 2, March 2003 (@ 2003) Contact Pheromones as Mate Recognition Cues of Four Species of Longhorned Beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) Matthew D. Ginzell and Lawrence M. ~anksl~~ Accepted December 4,2002 We tested the hypothesis that contact phermones mediate mate recognition for four species of longhorned beetles, Neoclytus mucronatus mucronatus (E),Megacyllene caryae (Gahan), Megacyllene robiniae (Forster), and Plec- trodera scalator (E).All tested males of all four species attempted to mate with females only after contacting them with their antennae. From 66.7 to 80% of tested males attempted to mate with hexane-extracted dead females treated with 0.1-1.0 female eq~livalentsof conspecific female extracts, confirming that nonpolar compounds on the cuticle of females are essential for mate recogni- tion in all four species. These findings are further evidence of the critical role of contact pheromones in mating systems of longhorned beetles. KEY WORDS: mate recognition; contact pheromones; mating behavior; Megacyllene; Neoclyttis; Plectrodem. INTRODUCTION The insect cuticle is rendered waterproof by a lipid layer that is a complex mixture of long-chain fatty acids, alcohols, esters, aldehydes, ketones, and hy- drocarbons (Gibbs, 1998). Some hydrocarbon constituents serve as contact pheromones in many types of insects (Blomquist et al., 1996). Such con- tact pheromones have been isolated in a few species of longhorned beetles IDepartment of Entomology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois. 2To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: 217-244-3499. E-mail: hanks0life. uiuc.edu. 181 0892-7553/03/0300-018110O 2003 Plenum Publishing Corporation 182 Ginzel and Hanks (Kim et al., 1993; Wang, 1998) and identified for a few others (Fukaya et al., 1996, 1997, 2000; Ginzel et al., 2003). -
MF2735 Borers
Home and Horticultural Borers Common Kansas Species The term “borers” applies to a wide range of insects as they feed on inner bark and sapwood tissues. Destruction whose immature stages generally develop within host plants. of these tissues hinders formation of new wood and essen- Although insects feeding on foliage pose a minimal threat tially girdles branches and trunks, resulting in dead branches to health and vigor of woody plants (because auxiliary buds and trunks beyond zones of destruction. The most prevalent can produce new foliage), borers feed unseen beneath bark, flatheaded borers in Kansas are thebronze birch borer (Fig. 3) destroying irreplaceable cambial and wood tissues. Insect and the flatheaded appletree borer (Fig. 4) borers are commonly classified according to taxonomic families within larger orders. Orders with the most borer Roundheaded Borers (Family: Cerambycidae) species are Coleoptera (beetles) and Lepidoptera (moths). Cerambycids are a large group of wood-boring beetles. Hymenoptera (bees and wasps) and Diptera (flies) each have Longhorned beetles vary greatly in size, shape and coloration. borer species, but they are few and rarely cause major damage. Roundheaded borers may initially feed on outer tissues When the term “trees” is used in this publication, it should but eventually burrow deeper into wood, where feeding or be understood to include woody shrubs. tunneling activities structurally weaken trees and shrubs. Examining break points in downed limbs often provides Coleopterans (Beetles) evidence of roundheaded borer feeding damage. The two most recognized families of borer beetles are Many common Kansas wood borers are roundheaded Buprestidae and Cerambycidae, commonly referred to as borers. -
Southern Forest Experiment Station Notes on the Life
w ~ r--.~·-OCCASIONAL PAPER NO. 45 APRIL 2, 1935 ~ (Reissue, Feb. 19, 1941) ~ I SOUTHERN FOREST EXPERIMENT STATION ~ ~ E. L. Demmon, Director l\c,, New Orleans, La. NOTES ON THE LIFE CYCLE OF THE NANTUCKET TIP MO'l'H RHYAOIONIA FRUSTRANA COMST. IN SOUTHEASTERN LOUISlANA By Philip C. Wakeley, Associate Silviculturist Southern Forest Experiment Station ...• I The Occasional Papers of the Southern Forest Experiment Station present information on current southern forestry prob lems under investigation at the station. In some cases, these •contributions were first presented as addresses to a limited i group of people, and as "occasional papers 11 they can reach a " much wider audience, In other cases, they are summaries of investigations prepared especially t o give a report of the progress made in a particular field of research. In any case, the statements herein contained should be considered subject to correction or modification as f urther data are obtained. Note: Assistance in the duplication of this paper was furnished by the personnel of Work Projects Administration official project 165-2-64-102. NOTES ON THE LIFE CYCLE OF THE NANTUCKET TIP MOTH RHYACIONIA FRUSTRANA COMST. IN SOUTHEASTERN LOUISIANAY By Philip C. Wakeley, Associate Silviculturist Southern Forest Experiment Station The Nantucket tip moth (RhYacionia frustrana Comst.) is a small tor tricid moth occurring generally throughout the pine forests of North America. The larvae are responsible for an immense amount of dam~ge to small pines, both in natural reproduction and in planted stands OJ .9 In 1915, W.R. Mattoon, of the United States Forest Service, described the conspicuous damage of the Nantucket tip moth on shortleaf pine (Pinus e'china.ta) in the South (2), but somewhat underrated the potentialities of the insect for mischief. -
Pheromone-Based Disruption of Eucosma Sonomana and Rhyacionia Zozana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) Using Aerially Applied Microencapsulated Pheromone1
361 Pheromone-based disruption of Eucosma sonomana and Rhyacionia zozana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) using aerially applied microencapsulated pheromone1 Nancy E. Gillette, John D. Stein, Donald R. Owen, Jeffrey N. Webster, and Sylvia R. Mori Abstract: Two aerial applications of microencapsulated pheromone were conducted on five 20.2 ha plots to disrupt western pine shoot borer (Eucosma sonomana Kearfott) and ponderosa pine tip moth (Rhyacionia zozana (Kearfott); Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) orientation to pheromones and oviposition in ponderosa pine plantations in 2002 and 2004. The first application was made at 29.6 g active ingredient (AI)/ha, and the second at 59.3 g AI/ha. Baited sentinel traps were used to assess disruption of orientation by both moth species toward pheromones, and E. sonomana infes- tation levels were tallied from 2001 to 2004. Treatments disrupted orientation by both species for several weeks, with the first lasting 35 days and the second for 75 days. Both applications reduced infestation by E. sonomana,but the lower application rate provided greater absolute reduction, perhaps because prior infestation levels were higher in 2002 than in 2004. Infestations in treated plots were reduced by two-thirds in both years, suggesting that while increas- ing the application rate may prolong disruption, it may not provide greater proportional efficacy in terms of tree pro- tection. The incidence of infestations even in plots with complete disruption suggests that treatments missed some early emerging females or that mated females immigrated into treated plots; thus operational testing should be timed earlier in the season and should comprise much larger plots. In both years, moths emerged earlier than reported pre- viously, indicating that disruption programs should account for warmer climates in timing of applications. -
Merrimac Farm WMA Insect List As of September 2014 Order Family
Merrimac Farm WMA Insect List as of September 2014 Order Family Common Name Scientific Name Acari Ixodidae American Dog Tick Dermacentor variabilis Araneae Anyphaenidae Ghost Spider Hibana sp. Araneae Araneidae Larinia directa Larinia directa Araneae Araneidae Star-bellied Orbweaver Acanthepeira stellata Araneae Araneidae White Micrathena Micrathena mitrata Araneae Araneidae Spined Micrathena Micrathena gracilis Araneae Lycosidae Wolf Spider Hogna sp. Araneae Lycosidae Thin-legged Wolf Spider Pardosa sp. Araneae Lycosidae Rabid Wolf Spider Rabidosa rabida Araneae Oxyopidae Lynx Spider Oxyopes aglossus Araneae Salticidae Jumping Spider Pelegrina proterva? Araneae Salticidae Jumping Spider Phidippus princeps Araneae Salticidae Jumping Spider Tutellina elegans Araneae Salticidae Peppered Jumper Pelegrina galathea Araneae Thomisidae Northern Crab Spider Mecaphesa asperata Araneae Thomisidae Swift Crab Spider Mecaphesa celer Araneae Thomisidae White-banded Crab Spider Misumenoides formosipes Blattodea Cryptocercidae Brown-hooded Cockroach Cryptocercus punctulatus Coleoptera Cantharidae Margined Leatherwing Chauliognathus marginatus Coleoptera Cantharidae Soldier Beetle Podabrus rugosulus Coleoptera Carabidae Vivid Metallic Ground Beetle Chlaenius sp. Coleoptera Carabidae Vivid Metallic Ground Beetle Chlaenius emarginatus Coleoptera Carabidae Six-spotted Tiger Beetle Cicindela sexguttata Coleoptera Cerambycidae Flower Longhorn Beetle Strangalia luteicornis Coleoptera Cerambycidae Locust Borer Megacyllene robiniae Coleoptera Cerambycidae Red -
Nantucket Pine Tip Moth, Rhyacionia Frustrana, Lures and Traps: What Is the Optimum Combination?
NANTUCKET PINE TIP MOTH, RHYACIONIA FRUSTRANA, LURES AND TRAPS: WHAT IS THE OPTIMUM COMBINATION? Gary L. DeBarr, J. Wayne Brewer, R. Scott Cameron and C. Wayne Berisford' Abstract--Pheromone traps are used to monitor flight activity of male Nantucket pine tip moths, Rhyacionia frustrana (Comstock), to initialize spray timing models, determine activity periods, or detect population trends. However, a standard- ized trapping procedure has not been developed. The relative efficacies of six types of lures and eight commercial phero- mone traps were compared in field tests in Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, and Virginia. Additional factors, including trap color, lure longevity and loading rates and ratios were also tested. These tests demonstrate that lures and1 or traps have a pronounced effect on male moth catches. The Pherocon 1Cwing trap was the most effective. White traps were slightly better than colored traps. Pherocon 1C@wing traps baited with commercial Scent@, EcogenQor Tr6ckQ lures caught the greatest numbers of moths. INTRODUCTION also lower during later tip moth generations even though populations are high (Asaro and Berisford 2001 a). Female NPTM Sex Pheromones and Male Response The Pheromones Larvae of the Nantucket pine tip moth (NPTM), Rhyacionia NPTM females produce a two-component sex pheromone frustrana (Comstock), bore into and kill the shoots of loblolly (Berisford and Brady 1973) and their pheromone glands pine, Pinus taeda L.(Yates 1960). NPTM mate shortly after contain only about 20 nanograms (ng) of attractive they emerge from infested shoots. Female moths produce components. Hill and others (1981) identified a straight- small quantities of sex pheromones that attract conspecific chain 12 carbon monoene acetate, (E)- 9-dodecen-I-yl males for mating (Manley and Farrier 1969). -
The Parasites of the V Nantucket Pine Tip Moth
I I '/' ,. l TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1017 ;\ ~· ., f ,,.-;...__.,I • I V I J r·1,- •..-! . /1 I • • .f '' t : ..... I THE PARASITES OF THE V ;'.,.~ /~ ', ' ( NANTUCKET PINE TIP MOTH J • IN SOUTH CAROLINA ,//1 f~ ) ' R. D. EIKENBARY and RICHARD C. FOX SOUTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION ' CLEMSON UNIVERSITY CLEMSON, SOUTH CAROLINA W. H. WILEY 0, B. GARRISON Dean of Agriculture and Director of Agric ultural Experiment Station Biologi ca l Sciences and Agricultural Research TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1017 JULY 1965 THE PARASITES OF THE NANTUCKET PINE TIP MOTH IN SOUTH CAROLINA R. D. EIKENBARY and RICHARD C. FOX SOUTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION CLEMSON UNIVERSITY CLEMSON, SOUTH CAROLINA W. H. WILEY 0. B. GARRISON Dean of Agriculture and Director of Agricultural Experiment Station Biological Sciences and Agricultural Research SUMMARY A statewide survey of the parasites of the Nantucket pine tip moth, Rhyacionia frustrana ( Comstock), was made by collecting infested pine tips from 23 locations in South Carolina over a 2-year period. Parasites were allowed to emerge in specially designed cages, were identified, and recorded. A total of 37 species of para sites was recovered, all hymenopterous except one dipterous species. Of these, the iclmeumonid, Campoplex frustranac Cushman, was the most abundant with the tachinid, Lixophaga mcdiocris Aldrich, following closely in numbers. Parasitism by locations was shown and comparative parasitism by the two main parasites was listed. It was shown that Campoplex frustrmwc was the most abundant parasite in the Piedmont region and that Lixophaga mcdiocris was the most prevalent in the Coastal Plain region. No definite pattern of dominance could be shown in the Sandhills. -
Genetic Diversity in Longleaf Pine (Pinus Palustris): Influence of Historical and Prehistorical Events
1135 Genetic diversity in longleaf pine (Pinus palustris): influence of historical and prehistorical events R.C. Schmidtling and V. Hipkins Abstract: Genetic diversity of allozymes at 24 loci was studied in 23 populations of longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.), including three seed orchard populations and an old-growth stand. Overall, the mean number of alleles per polymorphic locus was 2.9, the percentage of polymorphic loci was 92%, and the mean expected heterozygosity was 0.105. These values are comparable with diversity measures found in a similar loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) study. Diversity measures of the seed orchard sources and the old-growth stand were similar to those in the other natural seed sources. F statistics indicate very little inbreeding overall (FIS = –0.002) and low differentiation among populations (FST = 0.041). All measures of genetic diversity were significantly related to longitude; western sources tended to have more allozyme diversity. Since growth or survival are not related to longitude, and no important climatic variables are related to longitude within the natural range of longleaf, it is proposed that the east–west variation in longleaf pine is a result of migration from a single refugium in the west (south Texas or northeastern Mexico) after the Pleistocene. Résumé : Les auteurs ont étudié la diversité génétique d’alloenzymes observée pour 24 loci chez 23 populations de pin à longues feuilles (Pinus palustris Mill.), dont trois populations de verger à graines et une vieille forêt. Pour l’ensemble de l’étude, le nombre moyen d’allèles par locus polymorphe, le pourcentage de loci polymorphes et l’hétérozygotie moyenne espérée affichaient des valeurs respectives de 2,9, 92% et 0,105. -
C:\Myfiles\Dept Newsletter\Nov-2003.Wpd
November 2003 Faculty News Room Version of Musical Chairs Dr. Heather McAuslane reports that we Dr. Virendra Gupta, now retired, is moving have 29 applicants for the Insect Toxicology out of his labs and office (3209), but has position. The search committee hopes to temporary use of 3006 for his office. At the report by late December on who will be same time, Dr. Faith Oi will move from invited for interviews. 3206 to Gupta’s old office in 3209. Dr. Tom Sanford (retired) used to be in 3006, but he Post-Doc News now uses 3207 when he is not starring in a local drama production. The new insect Dr. Anand B. Persad, a postdoctoral physiology position, which is currently being scientist in Dr. Marjorie Hoy's laboratory advertised, is assigned 3206 as office space. since August 2001, left for a permanent position with Davey Tree Company in Kent, Ph.D. student Rebecca Baldwin, who Ohio. Dr. Persad has been ordering long teaches ENY 3005 Principles of Entomology, underwear for his sojourn in the frozen north. is moving from 3215 to 3212 and will share After growing up in Trinidad and spending that office with Ph.D. student Pete Coon, over two years in Florida, he and his wife who teaches ENY 3007C Life Science. must now adjust to a temperate climate. The non-tenured toxicologist position, for Dr. Yoshi Hashimoto joined Dr. Pauline which the committee is now reviewing Lawrence’s lab to work on characterization applications, is currently assigned office and expression of genes from the space in 3213. -
Cerambycidae of Tennessee
Cerambycidae of Tennessee! Disteniinae: Disteniini! Parandrinae: Parandriini! Closed circles represent previously published county records, museum specimen records, and specimens examined. Open circles are county records reported in Jamerson (1973) for which a specimen could not be located. Future collections are needed to substantiate these accounts. Fig. 2. Elytrimitatrix (Elytrimitatrix) undata (F.)! Fig. 3. Neandra brunnea (F.)! Prioninae: Macrotomini! Prioninae: Meroscheliscini! Fig. 4. Archodontes melanoplus melanoplus (L.)! Fig. 5. Mallodon dasystomus dasystomus Say! Fig. 6. Tragosoma harrisii (LeConte)! Prioninae: Prionini! Fig. 7. Derobrachus brevicollis Audinet-Serville! Fig. 8. Orthosoma brunneum (Forster)! Fig. 9. Prionus (Neopolyarthron) imbricornis (L.)! Prioninae! : Solenopterini! Fig. 10. Prionus (Prionus) laticollis (Drury) ! Fig. 11. Prionus (Prionus) pocularis Dalman ! Fig. 12. Sphenosethus taslei (Buquet) ! Necydalinae: Necydalini! Spondylidinae: Asemini! Fig. 13. Necydalis melitta (Say)! Fig. 14. Arhopalus foveicollis (Haldeman)! Fig. 15. Arhopalus rusticus obsoletus (Randall)! ! ! Suppl. Figs. 2-15. Tennessee county collection localities for longhorned beetle (Cerambycidae) species: Disteniinae, Parandrinae, Prioninae, Necydalinae, Spondylinae: Asemini (in part). ! Spondylidinae: Asemini (ctd.)! Fig. 16. Asemum striatum (L.)! Fig. 17. Tetropium schwarzianum Casey! Fig. 18. Atimia confusa confusa (Say)! ! Spondylidinae: Saphanini! Lepturinae: Desmocerini! Lepturinae: Encyclopini! Fig. 19. Michthisoma heterodoxum LeConte -
5 Chemical Ecology of Cerambycids
5 Chemical Ecology of Cerambycids Jocelyn G. Millar University of California Riverside, California Lawrence M. Hanks University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana, Illinois CONTENTS 5.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 161 5.2 Use of Pheromones in Cerambycid Reproduction ....................................................................... 162 5.3 Volatile Pheromones from the Various Subfamilies .................................................................... 173 5.3.1 Subfamily Cerambycinae ................................................................................................ 173 5.3.2 Subfamily Lamiinae ........................................................................................................ 176 5.3.3 Subfamily Spondylidinae ................................................................................................ 178 5.3.4 Subfamily Prioninae ........................................................................................................ 178 5.3.5 Subfamily Lepturinae ...................................................................................................... 179 5.4 Contact Pheromones ..................................................................................................................... 179 5.5 Trail Pheromones ......................................................................................................................... 182 5.6 Mechanisms for