DOCSLIB.ORG

Alabama Forestry Invitational State Manual & Study Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Alabama Forestry Invitational State Manual & Study Guide Alabama Forestry Invitational State Manual & Study Guide The Alabama Cooperative Extension System (Alabama A&M University and Auburn University) is an equal opportunity educator and employer. Everyone is welcome! Please let us know if you have accessibility needs. © 2020 by the Alabama Cooperative Extension System. All rights reserved. www.aces.edu 4HYD-2426 Alabama Cooperative Extension System Mission Statement The Alabama Cooperative Extension System, the primary outreach organization for the land grant mission of Alabama A&M University and Auburn University, delivers research-based educational programs that enable people to improve their quality of life and economic well-being. ALABAMA 4-H VISION Alabama 4-H is an innovative, responsive leader in developing youth to be productive citizens and leaders in a complex and dynamic society. Our vision is supported through the collaborative, committed efforts of Extension professionals, youth, and volunteers. ALABAMA 4-H MISSION 4-H is the youth development component of the Alabama Cooperative Extension System. 4-H helps young people from rural and urban areas explore their interests and expand their awareness of our world while providing opportunities to develop a greater sense of who they are and who they can become–as contributing citizens of our communities, our state, our nation, and our world. This mission is achieved through research-based educational programs of Alabama A&M and Auburn Universities and an ongoing tradition of applied, hands-on/minds-on experiences, which develop the heads, hearts, hands, and health of Alabama youth. 4-H is a community of young people across Alabama who are learning leadership, citizenship, and life skills. Disclaimer: Contents of this guide are intended for internal audiences and are subject to change. ii Table of Contents Introduction ............................................. 4 Insect and Disease Identification .......... 23 Objectives ............................................................. 4 Introduction ...................................................... 23 Knowledge and Skills ........................................... 4 Contest Rules ..................................................... 23 Code of Conduct ................................................... 4 Official Insect Species List ................................. 23 Contest ................................................................. 4 Practice Insect and Disease Identification Additional Resources ........................................... 4 Scoresheet ......................................................... 25 References ......................................................... 26 Alabama Forestry Invitational Additional Resources ........................................ 26 Competition .............................................. 5 Contest Rotations ................................................ 5 Topographic Maps................................. 26 Example Event Schedule ...................................... 5 Objectives .......................................................... 26 Contest Rules ..................................................... 26 General Rules and Regulations .............. 5 Change in Elevation ........................................... 27 I.Participants and Eligibility ................................. 5 Measuring Distance ........................................... 27 II.General Contest Rules ...................................... 6 Line of Travel...................................................... 27 Alabama Forestry Facts .......................... 7 Map Symbols...................................................... 28 Practice Topographic Maps Forestry's Effects on the Alabama Economy ....... 7 Scoresheet.......................................................... 30 Forestry Presence in Alabama ............................. 7 Forests and the Environment .............................. 8 Other Forestry Facts ............................................ 9 Forest Evaluation .................................... 31 References .......................................................... 10 Objectives .......................................................... 31 Contest Rules ..................................................... 31 Tree Identification ................................. 11 I. Site Evaluation ........................................ 31 Objectives: .......................................................... 11 II. Stand Evaluation .................................... 33 Contest Rules ..................................................... 11 III. Recommended Practices ........................ 34 Official Tree Identification Species List ............. 12 IV. Forest Inventory ..................................... 34 Practice Tree Identification Scoresheet ............ 13 Practice Forest Evaluation Scoresheet ............. 35 References .......................................................... 14 Forestry Quiz ......................................... 37 Additional Resources ......................................... 14 Objectives .......................................................... 37 Contest Rules ..................................................... 37 Tree Measurement ................................. 14 Objectives ........................................................... 14 Forestry Knowledge Bowl ..................... 37 Contest Rules ..................................................... 14 Objectives .......................................................... 37 Measurement of Standing Trees ....................... 15 Equipment ......................................................... 37 Using a Volume Table ........................................ 16 Official ............................................................... 37 Practice Scoresheet (Senior) .............................. 18 Procedure of Play .............................................. 38 Practice Scoresheet (Junior) .............................. 19 Suggested Bowl Setup ....................................... 40 Additional Resources ......................................... 20 Forestry Bowl Bracket Diagram ........................ 41 Compass Traverse ................................. 20 Glossary .................................................. 42 Introduction ...................................................... 20 Contest Rules ..................................................... 20 Federal Laws Affecting Forestry .......... 45 Practice Compass Traverse Scoresheet ............ 22 3 Welcome Knowledge and Skills Forest habitat management and conservation The Alabama Cooperative Extension System 4-H Identification of tree species Program invites you to join the team by becoming a Tree measurement Forestry Invitational participant. Identification of forest insects and diseases By working as a team, we can provide more Compass and pacing opportunities for youth and adults to learn about Forest stand evaluation forestry and natural resource management. Critical thinking, decision making, Together we can increase awareness of Alabama’s communication, and team building skills resources and ensure quality forest habitat for future generations. Code of Conduct All participants are required to follow the 4-H Code The purpose of this guide is to provide you with of Conduct. information and tools necessary for developing practical forestry skills and preparing youth ages 9 Contest to 18 to become successful Forestry Invitational Seniors will compete in all seven contest rotations, participants. and the winning team will have the opportunity to represent Alabama at the National 4-H Forestry The provided activities and teaching methods can Invitational held annually at the Jackson’s Mill 4-H be tailored according to age, number of students in Center in Weston, West Virginia. Juniors will the class, and the physical learning environment. compete in all contest rotations with the exception Pertinent information and resources to make of Insects and Diseases, though they will participate teaching your participants as easy as possible are for practice. You are encouraged to enlist the help included, as well as tips for working with a team. of local foresters and other subject matter experts to assist with training teams. 4-H Forestry offers Junior and Senior level opportunities. Participants will learn how to Additional Resources manage and conserve a variety of forest habitats by Instructional Videos: acquiring skills in tree species identification, timber Compass and Pacing measurement, insect and disease identification, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C- compass and pacing, and evaluating forest growth. oJVuIp1ek&list=PLB662BB96927FA87A Insect and Disease Pests http://www.forestry.state.al.us/ResourceSheets.aspx?bv Introduction =5&s=0 Objectives Publications: Develop awareness and appreciation of the A Key to Common Trees of Alabama need and importance of conserving natural http://www.aces.edu/pubs/docs/A/ANR-0509/ANR- resources 0509.pdf Forest Ecology Acquire information and understanding of http://www.aces.edu/pubs/docs/Y/YANR-0196/YANR- practical forestry skills 0196.pdf Develop citizenship and leadership knowledge National 4-H Forestry Invitational: and skills Forestry Manuals and Contest Lists Demonstrate knowledge and skills by http://4hforestryinvitational.org/training/forestry- participating in state-level forestry judging manuals activities Receive recognition for accomplishments 4 Day Two Alabama Forestry 8:30 to 10:00 a.m. Senior
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 4 Reproductive Biology of Cerambycids
    4 Reproductive Biology of Cerambycids Lawrence M. Hanks University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana, Illinois Qiao Wang Massey University Palmerston North, New Zealand CONTENTS 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 133 4.2 Phenology of Adults ..................................................................................................................... 134 4.3 Diet of Adults ............................................................................................................................... 138 4.4 Location of Host Plants and Mates .............................................................................................. 138 4.5 Recognition of Mates ................................................................................................................... 140 4.6 Copulation .................................................................................................................................... 141 4.7 Larval Host Plants, Oviposition Behavior, and Larval Development .......................................... 142 4.8 Mating Strategy ............................................................................................................................ 144 4.9 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................... 148 Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Contact Pheromones As Mate Recognition Cues of Four Species of Longhorned Beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)
    Jotirnal of Insect Behavior, Vol. 16, No. 2, March 2003 (@ 2003) Contact Pheromones as Mate Recognition Cues of Four Species of Longhorned Beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) Matthew D. Ginzell and Lawrence M. ~anksl~~ Accepted December 4,2002 We tested the hypothesis that contact phermones mediate mate recognition for four species of longhorned beetles, Neoclytus mucronatus mucronatus (E),Megacyllene caryae (Gahan), Megacyllene robiniae (Forster), and Plec- trodera scalator (E).All tested males of all four species attempted to mate with females only after contacting them with their antennae. From 66.7 to 80% of tested males attempted to mate with hexane-extracted dead females treated with 0.1-1.0 female eq~livalentsof conspecific female extracts, confirming that nonpolar compounds on the cuticle of females are essential for mate recogni- tion in all four species. These findings are further evidence of the critical role of contact pheromones in mating systems of longhorned beetles. KEY WORDS: mate recognition; contact pheromones; mating behavior; Megacyllene; Neoclyttis; Plectrodem. INTRODUCTION The insect cuticle is rendered waterproof by a lipid layer that is a complex mixture of long-chain fatty acids, alcohols, esters, aldehydes, ketones, and hy- drocarbons (Gibbs, 1998). Some hydrocarbon constituents serve as contact pheromones in many types of insects (Blomquist et al., 1996). Such con- tact pheromones have been isolated in a few species of longhorned beetles IDepartment of Entomology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois. 2To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: 217-244-3499. E-mail: hanks0life. uiuc.edu. 181 0892-7553/03/0300-018110O 2003 Plenum Publishing Corporation 182 Ginzel and Hanks (Kim et al., 1993; Wang, 1998) and identified for a few others (Fukaya et al., 1996, 1997, 2000; Ginzel et al., 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • MF2735 Borers
    Home and Horticultural Borers Common Kansas Species The term “borers” applies to a wide range of insects as they feed on inner bark and sapwood tissues. Destruction whose immature stages generally develop within host plants. of these tissues hinders formation of new wood and essen- Although insects feeding on foliage pose a minimal threat tially girdles branches and trunks, resulting in dead branches to health and vigor of woody plants (because auxiliary buds and trunks beyond zones of destruction. The most prevalent can produce new foliage), borers feed unseen beneath bark, flatheaded borers in Kansas are thebronze birch borer (Fig. 3) destroying irreplaceable cambial and wood tissues. Insect and the flatheaded appletree borer (Fig. 4) borers are commonly classified according to taxonomic families within larger orders. Orders with the most borer Roundheaded Borers (Family: Cerambycidae) species are Coleoptera (beetles) and Lepidoptera (moths). Cerambycids are a large group of wood-boring beetles. Hymenoptera (bees and wasps) and Diptera (flies) each have Longhorned beetles vary greatly in size, shape and coloration. borer species, but they are few and rarely cause major damage. Roundheaded borers may initially feed on outer tissues When the term “trees” is used in this publication, it should but eventually burrow deeper into wood, where feeding or be understood to include woody shrubs. tunneling activities structurally weaken trees and shrubs. Examining break points in downed limbs often provides Coleopterans (Beetles) evidence of roundheaded borer feeding damage. The two most recognized families of borer beetles are Many common Kansas wood borers are roundheaded Buprestidae and Cerambycidae, commonly referred to as borers.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Forest Experiment Station Notes on the Life
    w ~ r--.~·-OCCASIONAL PAPER NO. 45 APRIL 2, 1935 ~ (Reissue, Feb. 19, 1941) ~ I SOUTHERN FOREST EXPERIMENT STATION ~ ~ E. L. Demmon, Director l\c,, New Orleans, La. NOTES ON THE LIFE CYCLE OF THE NANTUCKET TIP MO'l'H RHYAOIONIA FRUSTRANA COMST. IN SOUTHEASTERN LOUISlANA By Philip C. Wakeley, Associate Silviculturist Southern Forest Experiment Station ...• I The Occasional Papers of the Southern Forest Experiment Station present information on current southern forestry prob­ lems under investigation at the station. In some cases, these •contributions were first presented as addresses to a limited i group of people, and as "occasional papers 11 they can reach a " much wider audience, In other cases, they are summaries of investigations prepared especially t o give a report of the progress made in a particular field of research. In any case, the statements herein contained should be considered subject to correction or modification as f urther data are obtained. Note: Assistance in the duplication of this paper was furnished by the personnel of Work Projects Administration official project 165-2-64-102. NOTES ON THE LIFE CYCLE OF THE NANTUCKET TIP MOTH RHYACIONIA FRUSTRANA COMST. IN SOUTHEASTERN LOUISIANAY By Philip C. Wakeley, Associate Silviculturist Southern Forest Experiment Station The Nantucket tip moth (RhYacionia frustrana Comst.) is a small tor­ tricid moth occurring generally throughout the pine forests of North America. The larvae are responsible for an immense amount of dam~ge to small pines, both in natural reproduction and in planted stands OJ .9 In 1915, W.R. Mattoon, of the United States Forest Service, described the conspicuous damage of the Nantucket tip moth on shortleaf pine (Pinus e'china.ta) in the South (2), but somewhat underrated the potentialities of the insect for mischief.
    [Show full text]
  • Pheromone-Based Disruption of Eucosma Sonomana and Rhyacionia Zozana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) Using Aerially Applied Microencapsulated Pheromone1
    361 Pheromone-based disruption of Eucosma sonomana and Rhyacionia zozana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) using aerially applied microencapsulated pheromone1 Nancy E. Gillette, John D. Stein, Donald R. Owen, Jeffrey N. Webster, and Sylvia R. Mori Abstract: Two aerial applications of microencapsulated pheromone were conducted on five 20.2 ha plots to disrupt western pine shoot borer (Eucosma sonomana Kearfott) and ponderosa pine tip moth (Rhyacionia zozana (Kearfott); Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) orientation to pheromones and oviposition in ponderosa pine plantations in 2002 and 2004. The first application was made at 29.6 g active ingredient (AI)/ha, and the second at 59.3 g AI/ha. Baited sentinel traps were used to assess disruption of orientation by both moth species toward pheromones, and E. sonomana infes- tation levels were tallied from 2001 to 2004. Treatments disrupted orientation by both species for several weeks, with the first lasting 35 days and the second for 75 days. Both applications reduced infestation by E. sonomana,but the lower application rate provided greater absolute reduction, perhaps because prior infestation levels were higher in 2002 than in 2004. Infestations in treated plots were reduced by two-thirds in both years, suggesting that while increas- ing the application rate may prolong disruption, it may not provide greater proportional efficacy in terms of tree pro- tection. The incidence of infestations even in plots with complete disruption suggests that treatments missed some early emerging females or that mated females immigrated into treated plots; thus operational testing should be timed earlier in the season and should comprise much larger plots. In both years, moths emerged earlier than reported pre- viously, indicating that disruption programs should account for warmer climates in timing of applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Merrimac Farm WMA Insect List As of September 2014 Order Family
    Merrimac Farm WMA Insect List as of September 2014 Order Family Common Name Scientific Name Acari Ixodidae American Dog Tick Dermacentor variabilis Araneae Anyphaenidae Ghost Spider Hibana sp. Araneae Araneidae Larinia directa Larinia directa Araneae Araneidae Star-bellied Orbweaver Acanthepeira stellata Araneae Araneidae White Micrathena Micrathena mitrata Araneae Araneidae Spined Micrathena Micrathena gracilis Araneae Lycosidae Wolf Spider Hogna sp. Araneae Lycosidae Thin-legged Wolf Spider Pardosa sp. Araneae Lycosidae Rabid Wolf Spider Rabidosa rabida Araneae Oxyopidae Lynx Spider Oxyopes aglossus Araneae Salticidae Jumping Spider Pelegrina proterva? Araneae Salticidae Jumping Spider Phidippus princeps Araneae Salticidae Jumping Spider Tutellina elegans Araneae Salticidae Peppered Jumper Pelegrina galathea Araneae Thomisidae Northern Crab Spider Mecaphesa asperata Araneae Thomisidae Swift Crab Spider Mecaphesa celer Araneae Thomisidae White-banded Crab Spider Misumenoides formosipes Blattodea Cryptocercidae Brown-hooded Cockroach Cryptocercus punctulatus Coleoptera Cantharidae Margined Leatherwing Chauliognathus marginatus Coleoptera Cantharidae Soldier Beetle Podabrus rugosulus Coleoptera Carabidae Vivid Metallic Ground Beetle Chlaenius sp. Coleoptera Carabidae Vivid Metallic Ground Beetle Chlaenius emarginatus Coleoptera Carabidae Six-spotted Tiger Beetle Cicindela sexguttata Coleoptera Cerambycidae Flower Longhorn Beetle Strangalia luteicornis Coleoptera Cerambycidae Locust Borer Megacyllene robiniae Coleoptera Cerambycidae Red
    [Show full text]
  • Nantucket Pine Tip Moth, Rhyacionia Frustrana, Lures and Traps: What Is the Optimum Combination?
    NANTUCKET PINE TIP MOTH, RHYACIONIA FRUSTRANA, LURES AND TRAPS: WHAT IS THE OPTIMUM COMBINATION? Gary L. DeBarr, J. Wayne Brewer, R. Scott Cameron and C. Wayne Berisford' Abstract--Pheromone traps are used to monitor flight activity of male Nantucket pine tip moths, Rhyacionia frustrana (Comstock), to initialize spray timing models, determine activity periods, or detect population trends. However, a standard- ized trapping procedure has not been developed. The relative efficacies of six types of lures and eight commercial phero- mone traps were compared in field tests in Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, and Virginia. Additional factors, including trap color, lure longevity and loading rates and ratios were also tested. These tests demonstrate that lures and1 or traps have a pronounced effect on male moth catches. The Pherocon 1Cwing trap was the most effective. White traps were slightly better than colored traps. Pherocon 1C@wing traps baited with commercial Scent@, EcogenQor Tr6ckQ lures caught the greatest numbers of moths. INTRODUCTION also lower during later tip moth generations even though populations are high (Asaro and Berisford 2001 a). Female NPTM Sex Pheromones and Male Response The Pheromones Larvae of the Nantucket pine tip moth (NPTM), Rhyacionia NPTM females produce a two-component sex pheromone frustrana (Comstock), bore into and kill the shoots of loblolly (Berisford and Brady 1973) and their pheromone glands pine, Pinus taeda L.(Yates 1960). NPTM mate shortly after contain only about 20 nanograms (ng) of attractive they emerge from infested shoots. Female moths produce components. Hill and others (1981) identified a straight- small quantities of sex pheromones that attract conspecific chain 12 carbon monoene acetate, (E)- 9-dodecen-I-yl males for mating (Manley and Farrier 1969).
    [Show full text]
  • The Parasites of the V Nantucket Pine Tip Moth
    I I '/' ,. l TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1017 ;\ ~· ., f ,,.-;...__.,I • I V I J r·1,- •..-! . /1 I • • .f '' t : ..... I THE PARASITES OF THE V ;'.,.~ /~ ', ' ( NANTUCKET PINE TIP MOTH J • IN SOUTH CAROLINA ,//1 f~ ) ' R. D. EIKENBARY and RICHARD C. FOX SOUTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION ' CLEMSON UNIVERSITY CLEMSON, SOUTH CAROLINA W. H. WILEY 0, B. GARRISON Dean of Agriculture and Director of Agric ultural Experiment Station Biologi ca l Sciences and Agricultural Research TECHNICAL BULLETIN 1017 JULY 1965 THE PARASITES OF THE NANTUCKET PINE TIP MOTH IN SOUTH CAROLINA R. D. EIKENBARY and RICHARD C. FOX SOUTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION CLEMSON UNIVERSITY CLEMSON, SOUTH CAROLINA W. H. WILEY 0. B. GARRISON Dean of Agriculture and Director of Agricultural Experiment Station Biological Sciences and Agricultural Research SUMMARY A statewide survey of the parasites of the Nantucket pine tip moth, Rhyacionia frustrana ( Comstock), was made by collecting infested pine tips from 23 locations in South Carolina over a 2-year period. Parasites were allowed to emerge in specially designed cages, were identified, and recorded. A total of 37 species of para­ sites was recovered, all hymenopterous except one dipterous species. Of these, the iclmeumonid, Campoplex frustranac Cushman, was the most abundant with the tachinid, Lixophaga mcdiocris Aldrich, following closely in numbers. Parasitism by locations was shown and comparative parasitism by the two main parasites was listed. It was shown that Campoplex frustrmwc was the most abundant parasite in the Piedmont region and that Lixophaga mcdiocris was the most prevalent in the Coastal Plain region. No definite pattern of dominance could be shown in the Sandhills.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Diversity in Longleaf Pine (Pinus Palustris): Influence of Historical and Prehistorical Events
    1135 Genetic diversity in longleaf pine (Pinus palustris): influence of historical and prehistorical events R.C. Schmidtling and V. Hipkins Abstract: Genetic diversity of allozymes at 24 loci was studied in 23 populations of longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.), including three seed orchard populations and an old-growth stand. Overall, the mean number of alleles per polymorphic locus was 2.9, the percentage of polymorphic loci was 92%, and the mean expected heterozygosity was 0.105. These values are comparable with diversity measures found in a similar loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) study. Diversity measures of the seed orchard sources and the old-growth stand were similar to those in the other natural seed sources. F statistics indicate very little inbreeding overall (FIS = –0.002) and low differentiation among populations (FST = 0.041). All measures of genetic diversity were significantly related to longitude; western sources tended to have more allozyme diversity. Since growth or survival are not related to longitude, and no important climatic variables are related to longitude within the natural range of longleaf, it is proposed that the east–west variation in longleaf pine is a result of migration from a single refugium in the west (south Texas or northeastern Mexico) after the Pleistocene. Résumé : Les auteurs ont étudié la diversité génétique d’alloenzymes observée pour 24 loci chez 23 populations de pin à longues feuilles (Pinus palustris Mill.), dont trois populations de verger à graines et une vieille forêt. Pour l’ensemble de l’étude, le nombre moyen d’allèles par locus polymorphe, le pourcentage de loci polymorphes et l’hétérozygotie moyenne espérée affichaient des valeurs respectives de 2,9, 92% et 0,105.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Myfiles\Dept Newsletter\Nov-2003.Wpd
    November 2003 Faculty News Room Version of Musical Chairs Dr. Heather McAuslane reports that we Dr. Virendra Gupta, now retired, is moving have 29 applicants for the Insect Toxicology out of his labs and office (3209), but has position. The search committee hopes to temporary use of 3006 for his office. At the report by late December on who will be same time, Dr. Faith Oi will move from invited for interviews. 3206 to Gupta’s old office in 3209. Dr. Tom Sanford (retired) used to be in 3006, but he Post-Doc News now uses 3207 when he is not starring in a local drama production. The new insect Dr. Anand B. Persad, a postdoctoral physiology position, which is currently being scientist in Dr. Marjorie Hoy's laboratory advertised, is assigned 3206 as office space. since August 2001, left for a permanent position with Davey Tree Company in Kent, Ph.D. student Rebecca Baldwin, who Ohio. Dr. Persad has been ordering long teaches ENY 3005 Principles of Entomology, underwear for his sojourn in the frozen north. is moving from 3215 to 3212 and will share After growing up in Trinidad and spending that office with Ph.D. student Pete Coon, over two years in Florida, he and his wife who teaches ENY 3007C Life Science. must now adjust to a temperate climate. The non-tenured toxicologist position, for Dr. Yoshi Hashimoto joined Dr. Pauline which the committee is now reviewing Lawrence’s lab to work on characterization applications, is currently assigned office and expression of genes from the space in 3213.
    [Show full text]
  • Cerambycidae of Tennessee
    Cerambycidae of Tennessee! Disteniinae: Disteniini! Parandrinae: Parandriini! Closed circles represent previously published county records, museum specimen records, and specimens examined. Open circles are county records reported in Jamerson (1973) for which a specimen could not be located. Future collections are needed to substantiate these accounts. Fig. 2. Elytrimitatrix (Elytrimitatrix) undata (F.)! Fig. 3. Neandra brunnea (F.)! Prioninae: Macrotomini! Prioninae: Meroscheliscini! Fig. 4. Archodontes melanoplus melanoplus (L.)! Fig. 5. Mallodon dasystomus dasystomus Say! Fig. 6. Tragosoma harrisii (LeConte)! Prioninae: Prionini! Fig. 7. Derobrachus brevicollis Audinet-Serville! Fig. 8. Orthosoma brunneum (Forster)! Fig. 9. Prionus (Neopolyarthron) imbricornis (L.)! Prioninae! : Solenopterini! Fig. 10. Prionus (Prionus) laticollis (Drury) ! Fig. 11. Prionus (Prionus) pocularis Dalman ! Fig. 12. Sphenosethus taslei (Buquet) ! Necydalinae: Necydalini! Spondylidinae: Asemini! Fig. 13. Necydalis melitta (Say)! Fig. 14. Arhopalus foveicollis (Haldeman)! Fig. 15. Arhopalus rusticus obsoletus (Randall)! ! ! Suppl. Figs. 2-15. Tennessee county collection localities for longhorned beetle (Cerambycidae) species: Disteniinae, Parandrinae, Prioninae, Necydalinae, Spondylinae: Asemini (in part). ! Spondylidinae: Asemini (ctd.)! Fig. 16. Asemum striatum (L.)! Fig. 17. Tetropium schwarzianum Casey! Fig. 18. Atimia confusa confusa (Say)! ! Spondylidinae: Saphanini! Lepturinae: Desmocerini! Lepturinae: Encyclopini! Fig. 19. Michthisoma heterodoxum LeConte
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Chemical Ecology of Cerambycids
    5 Chemical Ecology of Cerambycids Jocelyn G. Millar University of California Riverside, California Lawrence M. Hanks University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana, Illinois CONTENTS 5.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 161 5.2 Use of Pheromones in Cerambycid Reproduction ....................................................................... 162 5.3 Volatile Pheromones from the Various Subfamilies .................................................................... 173 5.3.1 Subfamily Cerambycinae ................................................................................................ 173 5.3.2 Subfamily Lamiinae ........................................................................................................ 176 5.3.3 Subfamily Spondylidinae ................................................................................................ 178 5.3.4 Subfamily Prioninae ........................................................................................................ 178 5.3.5 Subfamily Lepturinae ...................................................................................................... 179 5.4 Contact Pheromones ..................................................................................................................... 179 5.5 Trail Pheromones ......................................................................................................................... 182 5.6 Mechanisms for
    [Show full text]