DOCSLIB.ORG

Lord Lexden.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lord Lexden.Pdf FEATURE their affairs, which had been wrested from them decades earlier. Their opponents believed that no change was needed. The Government’s proposals to give back control had failed to secure Parliamentary Class of their own approval more than once. Extensive talks had taken place between the political parties, Summer 1914 and summer 2019 share one both informally and around the conference table, but no agreement had been reached. characteristic above all. They are the only two The Government’s freedom of manoeuvre occasions on which our political system has been was severely limited since it depended on the votes of MPs from across the Irish Sea. reduced to total deadlock, writes Lord Lexden The Opposition insisted that a general election must be held before anything was finally decided. The Government he Prime Minister struck a was adamant that a solution must be note of deep gloom, declaring found in the current Parliament. that “the idea of a compromise In the Commons insults flew. The was regarded with growing upper house was no less restive. Much disfavour and suspicion”. The the same speeches were made over and TGovernment had pledged to end a severe, over again. Throughout the UK, divisions long-standing sense of grievance by enabling intensified. Those on opposing sides those affected by it to take back control of ceased to meet socially. An alarming Former Liberal Party Prime Minister H. H. Asquith WWW.POLITICSHOME.COM 3 JUNE 2019 | THE HOUSE MAGAZINE | 27 FEATURE number of people in the north of Ireland me that the conference will take place in made clear that they were prepared to my house, where I shall gladly welcome go to any lengths to get their way. its members.” Who could imagine today’s This was Britain in July 1914, on the constitutional monarch doing such thing? eve of the First World War. Its resemblance Could this conference, which was to Britain in May 2019 is obvious. Events chaired by the Speaker, find a way of just over a hundred years ago provide reconciling a devolved parliament in the closest parallel with those today Dublin with the insistence of Ulster’s that modern political history affords. Unionists, backed by the Tories, that they There have, of course, been other must be kept outside it? The partition of very serious crises. Severe violence flared Ireland was agreed in principle, but not up in parts of the country as politicians the extent of the area that would remain argued over the first Reform Bill in 1831- under Westminster’s direct rule. 2. The Tory party broke in two as a result Civil war loomed across the Irish Sea of Robert Peel’s courageous decision to where a paramilitary Ulster Unionist establish free trade in agricultural products volunteer force, some 100,000 strong, in 1846. Forty years later Gladstone broke “There are some was matched by a growing force of Irish the Liberals over Irish Home Rule. Nationalist volunteers. Bonar Law had These events feature prominently in striking contrasts, earlier given a firm pledge: “I can imagine everyone’s lists of great political misfortunes. no length of resistance to which Ulster will But the crises of 1914 and 2019 are in a as well as marked go, which I shall not be ready to support.” class of their own. Both were the product The Cabinet met to review the situation of rancorous disputes that had dominated similarities, after the breakdown of the conference parliamentary life for several years. at Buckingham Palace. An even graver Brexit has poisoned politics since 2016. between these crisis was now to release them from what Irish Home Rule, brought back into the had seemed perpetual political deadlock. forefront of parliamentary politics by two episodes of Churchill wrote later: “The discussion Asquith in 1912, continued with ever- had reached its inconclusive end, and the increasing bitterness the feuding between the unequalled strife” Cabinet was about to separate when the political parties that went back to the crisis quiet grave tones of Sir Edward Grey’s voice over the role of the House of Lords, which were heard reading a document which had had begun with Lloyd George’s People’s step if deadlock is to be broken. In 1914, just been brought to him from the Foreign Budget in 1909. Mutual recrimination no one called for Asquith’s resignation, Office. It was the Austrian note to Serbia. had become a long-established habit. though he was criticised for putting off The parishes of Fermanagh and Tyrone July 1914 and May 2019 share one important decisions (“wait and see” faded into the mists and squalls of Ireland.” characteristic above all. They are the were his watchwords). The Tory leader, A border was finally drawn in Ireland only two occasions on which our political Andrew Bonar Law, enjoyed the complete a few years later after Tories and Liberals system has been reduced to total deadlock. confidence of Tories, denouncing the had come together in Lloyd George’s No one in July 1914 could find a way out Government with a fervour that would coalition government. It represented of it. Nor can anyone in May 2019. have won the ERG’s admiration. the destruction of the hopes of Liberals There are some striking contrasts, as well In 1914, there was no question of the like Asquith who had written: “nothing as marked similarities, between these two monarch keeping out of politics. King must be done to erect a permanent or episodes of unequalled strife. During the George V was in close touch with all insuperable bar to Irish unity.” first, it was the Tory-dominated Lords, not sides as tension mounted. At one point Northern Ireland was brought into the Commons, that kept throwing out the he told Asquith that he might not give existence. It would become the central government’s measure to enable Ireland to his assent to the Home Rule legislation feature of political deadlock in 2019 when take back control of its affairs. But the lower while the deadlock persisted. Asquith Mrs May foolishly agreed to the EU’s house witnessed some of the worst scenes of replied: “Such a thing had not been terms for an Irish backstop, for which disorder in its history: Asquith was howled done since the reign of Queen Anne and many Tories will never forgive her. down, and sittings had to be suspended on a would inevitably prove disastrous to the number of occasions by a Speaker, who never monarchy. His Majesty could, however, forfeited the respect of any part of the House if he chose dismiss his ministers.” during times of extraordinary difficulty. Instead of doing that, the king Alistair Lexden is a Conservative Today, it is widely believed, especially summoned all the political leaders to a peer and historian. His among Tories, that the departure of the conference at Buckingham Palace on 21 publications include Ulster: The prime minister is the indispensable first July 1914. “It is”, he wrote, “a pleasure to Origins of the Problem. 28 | THE HOUSE MAGAZINE | 3 JUNE 2019 WWW.POLITICSHOME.COM .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gladstone and the Bank of England: a Study in Mid-Victorian Finance, 1833-1866
    GLADSTONE AND THE BANK OF ENGLAND: A STUDY IN MID-VICTORIAN FINANCE, 1833-1866 Patricia Caernarv en-Smith, B.A. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2007 APPROVED: Denis Paz, Major Professor Adrian Lewis, Committee Member and Chair of the Department of History Laura Stern, Committee Member Sandra L. Terrell, Dean of the Robert B. Toulouse School of Graduate Studies Caernarven-Smith, Patricia. Gladstone and the Bank of England: A Study in Mid- Victorian Finance, 1833-1866. Master of Arts (History), May 2007, 378 pp., 11 tables, bibliography, 275 titles. The topic of this thesis is the confrontations between William Gladstone and the Bank of England. These confrontations have remained a mystery to authors who noted them, but have generally been ignored by others. This thesis demonstrates that Gladstone’s measures taken against the Bank were reasonable, intelligent, and important for the development of nineteenth-century British government finance. To accomplish this task, this thesis refutes the opinions of three twentieth-century authors who have claimed that many of Gladstone’s measures, as well as his reading, were irrational, ridiculous, and impolitic. My primary sources include the Gladstone Diaries, with special attention to a little-used source, Volume 14, the indexes to the Diaries. The day-to-day Diaries and the indexes show how much Gladstone read about financial matters, and suggest that his actions were based to a large extent upon his reading. In addition, I have used Hansard’s Parliamentary Debates and nineteenth-century periodicals and books on banking and finance to understand the political and economic debates of the time.
    [Show full text]
  • Disraeli and Gladstone: Opposing Forces by Robert Blake
    Disraeli and Gladstone: Opposing Forces By Robert Blake Disraeli and Gladstone were both politicians of extraordinary ability - but their personalities clashed and they heartily loathed each other. Robert Blake, the British constitutional historian, compares their political careers, and charts their stormy relationship. Mutual dislike In the general election of 1 April 1880, the Conservative party under Benjamin Disraeli was crushingly defeated by the Liberals (known as Whigs) - under William Gladstone. Lord Granville, a moderate Whig, wrote to Queen Victoria who would, he knew, be bitterly disappointed by the decision of the electorate: 'Lord Beaconsfield [Disraeli] and Mr Gladstone are men of extraordinary ability; they dislike each other more than is usual among public men. Of no other politician Lord Beaconsfield would have said in public that his conduct was worse than those who had committed the Bulgarian atrocities. He has the power of saying in two words that which drives a person of Mr Gladstone's peculiar temperament into a state of great excitement.' There is no doubt that the two statesmen hated each other. There is no doubt that the two statesmen hated each other. Disraeli referred to his rival in a letter to Lord Derby as '...that unprincipled maniac Gladstone - extraordinary mixture of envy, vindictiveness, hypocrisy and superstition'. And Gladstone more moderately said of his old enemy, 'the Tory party had principles by which it would and did stand for bad and for good. All this Dizzy destroyed'. When Lord Granville wrote to Queen Victoria, Disraeli, born in 1804, had one more year to live; Gladstone, who was born in 1810, had another eighteen.
    [Show full text]
  • The Corn Laws
    The Corn Laws After the end of the Napoleonic Wars it was feared that cheap foreign grain would flood the British market and that domestic producers would suffer financially. The first of the Corn Laws was introduced by the British Government in 1815 to protect domestic landowners and farmers from this threat. The high tariffs imposed made it too expensive to import grain, even when domestic supplies were in short supply. The price of bread increased and rioting was not uncommon. Eventually, despite strong opposition from his own party, Conservative Prime Minister Sir Robert Peel successfully repealed the law in 1846. On display here is a selection of documents relating to the Corn Laws, including a political cartoon and election broadsheets (the topic featured prominently in election campaigns). The Anti-Corn Law League, a political movement set up in 1836, fought to abolish the Corn Laws and produced the innovative free-trade sticker seen here on an envelope dating from 1842. All the documents presented here are held by the University of Nottingham at Manuscripts and Special Collections. The University collects archival material relating to the history of the University itself and its predecessor bodies, including the Midland Agricultural and Dairy College, the history of the East Midlands, and the research interests of the University. Over three million items are stored at Kings Meadow Campus. For more information on any of the items in the display or to arrange a visit to the Reading Room at Kings Meadow Campus visit www.nottingham.ac.uk/mss or email [email protected] Cartoon entitled 'Political Balance', December 1816 The Fagan Collection of Political Prints and Caricatures, Pol P 25 This political cartoon depicts the 'Constitution' as an ill-balanced set of scales with the prices of basic foodstuffs rising on one side (well out of reach of the starving working man) and the 'coffin' bearing 'Old England' (weighed down by the Corn Bills) disappearing into the 'abyss of corruption' on the other.
    [Show full text]
  • Views of Peel of One of Britain’S Most Eminent Nineteenth-Century Politicians, It Is Richard A
    REviEWS Liberal Unionist Party were more that individuals made to their party Richard A. Gaunt’s interest- involved in running government no matter how irrational their aspi- ing new work Sir Robert Peel: The than developing their party after rations had become. Life and Legacy is not such a book. 1895. Chamberlain’s explosive radi- The legacy of Liberal Union- Gaunt discusses the various facets cal ideas could hurt his friends as ism was not limited to the subtle of Peel’s political career and tries much as his enemies, as he dem- changes in Conservatism manifest to address the question of Peel’s onstrated between 1903 and 1906. right up till the Second World War, principles and convictions. How- The party had failed to establish if not beyond, but was also evident ever, he finally shrinks from being itself outside its original enclaves in the pioneering campaigning explicit about them. He finds virtue and, once it had rejected the idea of methods the new party employed in in the different interpretations and reunion with the Gladstonians, it its struggle to survive. Dr Cawood does not let the reader know where became progressively more prob- hints at the scope for more work he stands personally. In fact, his lematic to envisage escaping the that can, and I hope, will be done to book is neither an extended biog- not always friendly Tory embrace. explore this. His book is much to be raphy nor at least an exploration of Cawood suggests that the pro- welcomed and from now on those Peel’s political thought, but, rather, longed engagement from the for- interested in the period will need to an informative account of the mul- mation of the 1895 government to engage with his findings.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Report
    Breakthrough Britain A Force to be Reckoned With A Policy Report by the Policing Reform Working Group Chaired by Ray Mallon March 2009 About the Centre for Social Justice The Centre for Social Justice aims to put social justice at the heart of British politics. Our policy development is rooted in the wisdom of those working to tackle Britain’s deepest social problems and the experience of those whose lives have been affected by poverty. Our working groups are non-partisan, comprising prominent academics, practitioners and policy makers who have expertise in the relevant fields. We consult nationally and internationally, especially with charities and social enterprises, who are the the champions of the welfare society. In addition to policy development, the CSJ has built an alliance of poverty fighting organisations that reverse social breakdown and transform communities. We believe that the surest way the Government can reverse social breakdown and poverty is to enable such individuals, communities and voluntary groups to help themselves. The CSJ was founded by Iain Duncan Smith in 2004, as the fulfilment of a promise made to Janice Dobbie, whose son had recently died from a drug overdose just after he was released from prison. Chairman: Rt Hon Iain Duncan Smith MP Executive Director: Philippa Stroud Breakthrough Britain: A Force to be Reckoned With © The Centre for Social Justice, 2009 Published by the Centre for Social Justice, 9 Westminster Palace Gardens, Artillery Row, SW1P 1RL www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk ISBN: 978-0-9556999-9-3 Designed by SoapBox, www.soapboxcommunications.co.uk This report represents the views of the working group as a whole and does not reflect at every point the individual opinion of each and every working group member.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewel Theatre Audience Guide Addendum: Victorian Era Timeline
    Jewel Theatre Audience Guide Addendum: Victorian Era Timeline directed by Art Manke by Susan Myer Silton, Dramaturg © 2019 The timeline that begins on page two of this document, when combined with the biography of Queen Victoria, provides a general overview of the people and events that were shaping England and the world during the Victorian Era, the time of the play. VICTORIAN ERA OVERVIEW “Facts on Victorian England Culture” by Sabine McKellen (https://www.theclassroom.com/victorian-england-culture-22777.html) is reprinted below to give more information about the social, cultural, moral and ethical mores of the time, and as a segue to the chronology that follows: The Victorian era began with coronation of Queen Victoria in 1837 and lasted until her death in 1901. The Victorian period began as the Georgian era and the Industrial Revolution came to end. England saw many wars during the Georgian era, but the Victorian era offered important political, economic and cultural transformations to England. The period that saw the expanding of both the British Empire and the middle class responded to rapid cultural changes with rigid societal expectations. Expansion of British Influence The Victorian era is named in honor of Queen Victoria, who took the throne in 1837 and oversaw nearly 63 years of expansion of the British Empire. The United Kingdom physically extended its borders, at one point claiming nearly a quarter of the world through colonization and becoming a top political power. It also set the tone for fashion, social order and general culture throughout Europe and the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Stoneway Guest House Quiz 12 Please Do Not Use the Internet and Cheat
    Stoneway Guest House Quiz 12 Please do not use the internet and cheat. Section 1 Match the Prime Ministers to their date in office. CLEMENT ATLEE 1830-34 EARL GREY 1834-35 EDWARD HEATH 1852-55 HAROLD MCMILLAN 1937-40 HAROLD WILSON 1940-45 JAMES CALLAGHAN 1945-51 MARGARET THATCHER 1957-63 NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN 1963-64 SIR ALEX DOUGLAS HOME 1964-70 SIR ROBERT PEEL 1970-74 1976-79 1979-90 Section 2 Landmarks 1. The official name of the tower in which Big Ben is located was originally the Clock Tower, but what was it was renamed in 2012? 2. In a letter in 1754 by English antiquary William Stukeley, about which landmark did he write 'could be seen from the moon'? 3. Name the large unfinished Roman Catholic church in Barcelona, designed by architect Antoni Gaudí? 4. Which bronze statue by Edvard Eriksen, can be seen on a rock by the waterside at the Langelinie promenade in Copenhagen? 5. The Taj Mahal is an ivory-white marble mausoleum on the Yamuna river, in the Indian city of Agra, what is the meaning of 'taj mahal' in English? 6. Which world famous landmark celebrated its 100th anniversary in 1989? 7. The Colosseum (or Colosseo) is an oval amphitheatre in the centre of the city of Rome; what alternative name is it often called? 8. Which iconic landmark was originally created in 1923 as an advertisement for a local real estate development? 9. In the 1985 comedy film National Lampoon's European Vacation, Clark Griswold backs his car into which iconic landmark? 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Queen Victoria Transcript
    Queen Victoria Transcript Date: Tuesday, 20 September 2016 - 6:00PM Location: Museum of London 20 September 2016 Queen Victoria Professor Vernon Bogdanor FBA CBE Ladies and gentlemen, this is the first of a series of six lectures on British sovereigns since Queen Victoria, and it will conclude next summer with a lecture on the Queen. My aim in these lectures is to try to answer two questions: the first is how our system of constitutional monarchy has evolved since the 19th Century; and the second is what is the role of constitutional monarchy in a modern democratic state. This first lecture is on Queen Victoria, but first, I have a confession to make because I fear I cannot possibly compete with the television series, which seems to have transfixed the nation, and soon we will know every detail of the Queen’s private life in the early years of her reign, but I cannot help feeling that the television series is not really about Victoria, Queen of England and Empress of India, but about an entirely different character – Victoria, the telly star – and indeed, I sometimes felt as if I had intruded upon an episode of Downton Abbey by mistake! I suspect that Queen Victoria would have responded to the series by using words often attributed to her, but which she never in fact used, the words being “We are not amused.” But whether that is right or not, I fear there will be nothing in this lecture on the Queen’s love life, about which I know nothing. Instead, I will concentrate on a theme which I am sure you will all find much more exciting, namely, the constitution! In June 1837, a young girl of 18 was woken at Kensington Palace and told by the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Lord Chamberlain that her uncle, William IV, was dead and that she was to be Queen of Britain, or England as the Victorians used to call it, ignoring the susceptibilities of the Scots, Welsh and Irish.
    [Show full text]
  • 1986 Spring – Donnelly
    History 837 Semester II, 1985-86 Mr. Donnelly Schedule of Discussions I. The Reform Act of 1832 and the Extent of Deference. Brock, Michael, The Great Reform Act. London, 1973. Crosby, T. L., English Farmers and the Politics of Protection, 1815- 1852. Hassocks, Sussex, 1977. Davis, R. W., Political Change and Continuity, 1760-1885: A Buckinghamshire Study. Hamden, Conn., 1972. Gash, Norman, Politics in the Age of Peel: A Study in the Technique of Parliamentary Representation, 1830-1850. London, 1953. Moore, D. C., The Politics of Deference: A Study of the Mid-Nine­ teenth Century English Political System. Hassocks, Sussex, 1976. II. The Tory Split of 1846 and the Peelites. Blake, Robert, Disraeli. London, 1966. See Chapters 10-18. Conacher, J. B., The Aberdeen Coalition, 1852-55: A Study in Mid­ Nineteenth Century Party Politics. Cambridge, 1968. Conacher, J. B., The Peelites and the Party System, 1846-52. Newton Abbot, 1972. Gash, Norman, Sir Robert Peel: The Life of Sir Robert Peel After 1830. London, 1972. See Chapters 15-17. Jones, W. D., and Erickson, A. B., The Peelites, 1846-1857. Columbus, Ohio, 1972. Stewart, Robert, The Politics of Protection: Lord Derby and the Protectionist Party, 1841-1852. New York, 1971. III. Extra-Parliamentary Pressure Groups. Hamer, D. A., The Politics of Electoral Pressure: A Study in the History of Victorian Reform Agitations. Atlantic Highlands, N. J., 1977. Harrison, Brian, Drink and the Victorians: The Temperance Ques­ tion in England, 1815-1872. London, 1971. See Chapters 9-13. McCord, Norman, The Anti-Corn Law League, 1838-1846. London, 1958. IV.
    [Show full text]
  • W.E. Gladstone Exhibition Boards
    W.E. Gladstone The Grand Old Man in Nottinghamshire William Ewart Gladstone (1809-98) was probably the most famous political figure of the nineteenth century. Initially a Conservative, he became a committed Liberal and served as Prime Minister of Britain and Ireland four times between 1868 and 1894. He was popularly known as ‘The People’s Illustration of the ceremony, from Illustrated London News, William’, and, in later life, as the ‘Grand Old Man’, vol. 71, 6 October 1877. or more simply as ‘G.O.M.’ W.E. Gladstone from Thomas Archer, William Ewart Gladstone and his contemporaries (1898), vol. 1 (University Special Collection DA563.4.A7). Born in Liverpool of Scottish ancestry, Gladstone died at his wife’s family home in Hawarden, Wales, but Nottinghamshire was the location of his earliest political success and retained a special interest for him throughout his life. This exhibition commemorates the bicentenary of Gladstone’s birth on 29 December 1809. It demonstrates the diversity of Gladstone’s links with the county and the city of Nottingham, and uses local material to illustrate a few of the themes that engaged Gladstone in his political career. Description of the laying of the foundation stone of University College, from Illustrated London News, vol. 71, 6 October 1877. Ticket of admission to hear Gladstone speak at Alexandra Rink Extract from Gladstone’s speech, (University East Midlands Special from Nottingham Daily Journal, 28 Collection Not 3.F19 NOT O/S X). September 1877. A ceremony of special significance for Nottingham and the University took place in September 1877, when the foundation stone of University College, Nottingham was laid.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Economy and Peel's Repeal of the Corn Laws
    ECONOMICS AND POLITICS 0954-1985 Volume I Spring 1989 No. 1 POLITICAL ECONOMY AND PEEL’S REPEAL OF THE CORN LAWS DOUGLASA. IRWIN The repeal of the Corn Laws in Britain in 1846 has been much debated as to whether interest groups or ideology contributed most to this policy reform. This paper examines a conventional view that Sir Robert Peel, in proposing repeal, converted from protection to free trade under the influence of the ideas of political economy. It is shown that economic ideas had a crucial influence on Peel, but that he remained skeptical of political economy as a doctrine. I. INTRODUCTION THETHEORY of economic policy has undergone a significant transformation in recent decades. Whereas previous analysis examined the conditions determining the maximization of social welfare, political forces and economic interest groups are now explicitly incorporated into the analysis to explain the existence of policies inconsistent with those welfare-maximizing rules. ’ Yet economists are still divided as to whether such policies can be explained solely on the basis of the underlying interest groups or whether the political process retains some autonomy for the role of ideologies and political preferences.* The triumph of free trade in Britain with the repeal of the Corn Laws by parlia- ment in 1846 provides a rich example of the interaction between ideology and interests in determining economic policy. The Corn Laws were a long-standing piece of legislation that provided protection to British agriculture, primarily benefiting the landlords who dominated parliament. In the early nineteenth century the Corn Laws came under attack from manufacturing interests, as they grew in economic size and political influence, and from prominent economists, as theoretical developments indicated their harmful effect on the economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Prime Ministers & the Inns of Court
    prime ministers & the inns of court Sir Robert Walpole "Today often viewed as the first British Prime Minister, Sir Robert Walpole was described by contemporary opponents as the ‘Screen-Master General’, adept at pulling all the political strings." Legislation passed: Bribery Act 1729 Distress for Rent Act 1737 Gaming Act 1738 Papists Act 1722 Parliamentary Privilege Act 1737 b. 1676 d. 1745 Witchcraft Act 1735 In office 1721-1742 Political Party: Whig Source: GOV.UK Lincoln's Inn member https://history.blog.gov.uk/2014/11/20/ sir-robert-walpole-whig-1721-1742/ Spencer Compton, 1st earl of wilmington "Spencer Compton, Earl of Wilmington, was a successful Speaker of the House of Commons. His tenure as First Lord of the Treasury was short and he died in office. He came to prominence after Sir Robert Walpole’s lengthy administration and was only ever seen as a temporary replacement." b. 1673 d. 1743 In office 1742-1743 Political Party: Whig Middle Temple member Source: GOV.UK https://history.blog.gov.uk/2014/12/03/ spencer-compton-1st-earl-of-wilmington George Grenville "George Grenville came from a family of politicians. He became First Lord of the Treasury during a period of considerable political turbulence in the 1760s. His imposition of new duties on the American colonies helped provoke the outbreak of the American War of Independence." Legislation passed: Stamp Act 1765 b. 1712 d. 1770 In office 1763-1765 Political Party: Whig Source: GOV.UK Inner Temple member https://www.gov.uk/government/history/ past-prime-ministers/george-grenville William Pitt 'The Younger' "At just 24 years old, William Pitt The Younger, son of Pitt the Elder, was the youngest Prime Minister in history.
    [Show full text]