List of UNESCO Kalinga Prize Laureates

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Odisha Review January - 2012 List of UNESCO Kalinga Prize Laureates Year Name of Prize Laureates Nobel Prize Countries 1950¶s 1952 Louis de Broglie Nobel 1929 France 1953 Julian Huxley United Kingdom 1954 Waldemar Kaempffert USA 1955 Augusto Pi Suner Venezuela 1956 George Gamow USA 1957 Bertrand Russell Nobel 1950 United Kingdom 1958 Karl von Frisch Nobel 1973 F.R. Germany 1959 Jean Rostand France 1960's 1960 Ritchie Calder United Kingdom 1961 Arthur C. Clarke United Kingdom 1962 Gerald Piel USA 1963 Jagjit Singh India 1964 Warren Weaver USA 1965 Eugene Rabinovitch USA 1966 Paul Couderc France 1967 Fred Hoyle United Kingdom 1968 Gavin de Beer United Kingdom 1969 Konrad Lorenz Nobel 1973 Austria 18 UNESCO Kalinga Prize Spl. January - 2012 Odisha Review 1970's 1970 Margaret Mead USA 1971 Pierre Augier France 1972 Philip H. Abelson USA Nigel Calder United Kingdom 1973 Not awarded 1974 José Reis Brazil Luis Estrada Mexico 1975 Not awarded 1976 George Porter Nobel 1967 United Kingdom Alexander Oparin USSR 1977 Fernand Seguin Canada 1978 Hoimar von Ditfurth F.R. Germany 1979 Sergei Kapitza USSR 1980's 1980 Arístides Bastidas Venezuela 1981 David F. Attenborough United Kingdom Dennis Flanagan USA 1982 Oswaldo Frota-Pessoa Brazil 1983 Abdullah Al Muti Sharafuddin Bangladesh 1984 Yves Coppens France Igor Petryanov USSR 1985 Sir Peter Medawar Nobel 1960 United Kingdom 1986 Nicolai G. Basov Nobel 1964 USSR David Suzuki Canada 1987 Marcel Roche Venezuela 1988 Björn Kurtén Finland 1989 Saad Ahmed Shabaan A.R. of Egypt 1990's 1990 Misbah-Ud-Din Shami Pakistan 1991 Radu Iftimovici Romania Narender K. Sehgal India UNESCO Kalinga Prize Spl. 19 Odisha Review January - 2012 1992 Jorge Flores Valdés Mexico Peter Okebukola Nigeria 1993 Piero Angela Italy 1994 Nikolai N. Drozdov Russia 1995 Julieta Fierro Gossman Mexico 1996 Jirí Grygar Czech Republic Jayant V. Narlikar India 1997 Dorairajan Balasubramanian India 1998 Regina Paz Lopez Philippines Ennio Candotti Brazil 1999 Marian Addy Ghana Emil Gabrielian Armenia 2000's 2000 Ernst W. Hamburger Brazil 2001 Stefano Fantoni Italy 2002 Marisela Salvatierra Venezuela 2003 Pervez Hoodbhoy Pakistan 2004 Jean Audouze France 2005 Jeter Bertoletti Brazil 2006-2008 No awards due to change of UNESCO rules 2009 Yash Pal India Trinh Xuan Thuan Vietnam 2011 Dr. Rene Raul Drucker Colin Mexico Since 2009 the Kalinga Prize was renamed as "UNESCO - Kalinga Prize" and has become biennial. Source : http://en.wikipedia.org 20 UNESCO Kalinga Prize Spl..

Copy Link

Recommended publications

February 29, 1964 NATURE PHYSIOLOGY of COLOUR
No. 4922 February 29, 1964 NATURE 859 leads inevitably to cancer. The present state of knowledge fibres" are present. Again (p. 118), von Gelei's evidence of morphology in 'pre-cancerous' lesions does not permit for "m elanin-dispersing fibres" in Phoxinus is inadequat,e an accura te prediction of the direction along which t he and open to ot.her interpretations. There may be a lesion will proceed. This book should undoubtedly be double innervation, but the evidence in favour of it is available in all medical libraries and institutions associ- not n early so good as the present review suggests. ated with cancer research. H. JACKSON Recent work on the p art. played by pituitary hormones in vertebrate colour changes is well discussed. In this connexion, H. R. H ewer should be given the cred it for PHYSIOLOGY OF COLOUR CHANGE first observing the paling of minnows after they have been injected with minnow pituit ary extract. The t'ecent The Control of Chromatophores work of A. K. Kent unfortunately a.ppeared too late to (International Series of Monographs on Pure and Applied be included. Biology: Zoology, No. 14.) By M. Fingerman. Pp. A small blemish in the writing is the use of "feeling". ix+ 184. (Oxford, London, New York and P aris : To say that after experiments an author "felt" that the Pergamon Press, 1963.) 50s. interpretation must be so-and-so is an unhappy ex HE physiology of colour change is a big subject and pression. Hunches (good and bad) are common enough T includes a study of receptor, integrative and effector when we embark on experiments, but " feelings" regarding mechanisms.
[Show full text]
Yasha Gall, Julian Sorell Huxley, 1887-1975
Julian Sorell Huxley, 1887-1975 Yasha Gall Published by Nauka, St. Petersburg, Russia, 2004 Reproduced as an e-book with kind permission of Nauka Science editor: Academician AL Takhtajan Preface by the Science Editor The 20th century was the epoch of discovery in evolutionary biology, marked by many fundamental investigations. Of special significance were the works of AN Severtsov, SS Chetverikov, S Wright, JBS Haldane, G De Beer JS Huxley and R Goldschmidt. Among the general works on evolutionary theory, the one of greatest breadth was Julian Huxley’s book Evolution: The Modern Synthesis (1942). Huxley was one of the first to analyze the mechanisms of macro-evolutionary processes and discuss the evolutionary role of neoteny in terms of developmental genetics (the speed of gene action). Neoteny—the most important mechanism of heritable variation of ontogenesis—has great macro-evolutionary consequences. A Russian translation of Huxley’s book on evolution was prepared for publication by Professor VV Alpatov. The manuscript of the translation had already been sent to production when the August session of the VASKNIL in 1948 burst forth—a destructive moment in the history of biology in our country. The publication was halted, and the manuscript disappeared. I remember well a meeting with Huxley in 1945 in Moscow and Leningrad during the celebratory jubilee at the Academy of Sciences. He was deeply disturbed by the “blossoming” of Lysenkoist obscurantism in biology. It is also important to note that in the 1950s Huxley developed original concepts for controlling the birth rate of the Earth’s population. He openly declared the necessity of forming an international institute at the United Nations, since the global ecosystem already could not sustain the pressure of human “activity” and, together with humanity, might itself die.
[Show full text]
From Logos to Bios: Hellenic Philosophy and Evolutionary Biology
From Logos to Bios: Hellenic Philosophy and Evolutionary Biology by Wynand Albertus de Beer submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of D Litt et Phil in the subject Religious Studies at the University of South Africa Supervisor: Prof Danie Goosen February 2015 Dedicated with grateful acknowledgements to my supervisor, Professor Danie Goosen, for his wise and patient guidance and encouragement throughout my doctoral research, and to the examiners of my thesis for their helpful comments and suggestions. From Logos to Bios: Hellenic Philosophy and Evolutionary Biology by W.A. de Beer Degree: D Litt et Phil Subject: Religious Studies Supervisor: Prof Danie Goosen Summary: This thesis deals with the relation of Hellenic philosophy to evolutionary biology. The first part entails an explication of Hellenic cosmology and metaphysics in its traditional understanding, as the Western component of classical Indo-European philosophy. It includes an overview of the relevant contributions by the Presocratics, Plato, Aristotle, and the Neoplatonists, focussing on the structure and origin of both the intelligible and sensible worlds. Salient aspects thereof are the movement from the transcendent Principle into the realm of Manifestation by means of the interaction between Essence and Substance; the role of the Logos, being the equivalent of Plato’s Demiurge and Aristotle’s Prime Mover, in the cosmogonic process; the interaction between Intellect and Necessity in the formation of the cosmos; the various kinds of causality contributing to the establishment of physical reality; and the priority of being over becoming, which in the case of living organisms entails the primacy of soul over body.
[Show full text]
The Evolutionary Embryologist Gavin Rylands De Beer (1899–1972)
Homology and Heterochrony: The Evolutionary Embryologist Gavin Rylands de Beer (1899–1972) Ingo Brigandt Department of History and Philosophy of Science University of Pittsburgh 1017 Cathedral of Learning Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA E-mail: [email protected] Preprint of an article published in 2006 in the Journal of Experimental Zoology (Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution) 306B: 317–328 www.interscience.Wiley.com GAVIN RYLANDS DE BEER (1899–1972) 2 Abstract The evolutionary embryologist Gavin Rylands de Beer can be viewed as one of the forerunners of modern evolutionary developmental biology in that he posed crucial questions and proposed relevant answers about the causal relationship between ontogeny and phylogeny. In his developmental approach to the phylogenetic phenomenon of homology, he emphasized that homology of morphological structures is to be identified neither with the sameness of the underlying developmental processes nor with the homology of the genes that are in involved in the development of the structures. De Beer’s work on developmental evolution focused on the notion of heterochrony, arguing that paedomorphosis increases morphological evolvability and is thereby an important mode of evolution that accounts for the origin of many taxa, including higher taxa. GAVIN RYLANDS DE BEER (1899–1972) 3 Gavin Rylands de Beer (Fig. 1) was born in England in 1899, but spent the first 13 years of his life in France, where his father worked as a correspondent of a telegraph company. After returning to England, he went to Harrow School, where he became interested in zoology. In 1917 he entered Magdalen College at Oxford, graduating in 1922 after a leave for serving in the British Army during World War I.
[Show full text]
Inside Vl:Lnprasalailall UII) > Kalinga Prize -1998 WH.COME to Moo
1<.eglsterea WIth the l<eglsrrar or l'\lewspapers or mUla: lU'I..IU"::O"1 "0 Monthly Newsletter of Vigyan Prasar April 15, 1999 Vol, 1 No.7 VP rtC2\NS Inside Vl:lNPRASAlAIlAll_UII) > Kalinga Prize -1998 WH.COME TO moo "~.I( UNCE All)1ECIIIlOGY rmIYm A 12-03-1999 > Science Section > Richard P. Feynman > List of our Distributors Station Director of AIR Chennai initiating the meet. Vigyan Prasar - All India Radio Chennai Joint Serial on Popular Science in Tarn'l An interactive workshop was organised by Vigyan Prasar (VP) and All India Radio (AIR) Chennai in the studios of AIR, Chennai, on 12th March, 1999 to plan for a joint popular science serial in Tamil language. The workshop was attended by a host of distinguished scientists, experts, media personnel and journalists from all over Tamil Nadu. In a bid to involve all AIR stations of the state for simultaneous broadcast of the proposed serial, the organisers had invited officials from all these stations. As a result the Station Directors and Science Cell Staff of Tiruchirapally, Karaikkal, Madurai, Pondicherry, Coimbatore, Tirunelveli, Tirunallar, Nagereoil, Ooty and Udhagamandalam were present during this one day event to guide the proceedings. Most of the speakers A section of distinguished participants. suggested an interactive type of programme aimed at children and youth of Tamil Nadu. Those who put forward their valuable suggestions included Dr. R.M. Vasagam, Vice Chancellor, Anna University; Dr. V.C. Kulandaiswamy, Former Vice Chancellor of IGNOU; Prof. P.T. Manoharan, Former Vice Chancellor, Madras University; Dr. R. Natarajan, Director, liT Madras; Dr.
[Show full text]
Gavin Rylands De Beer (1899-1972) [1]
Published on The Embryo Project Encyclopedia (https://embryo.asu.edu) Gavin Rylands de Beer (1899-1972) [1] By: Kearl, Megan Keywords: Biography [2] Evolution [3] Zoology [4] Gavin de Beer was an English zoologist known for his contributions toe volution [5] and embryology [6], in particular for showing the inadequacy of the germ layer theory as it was then proposed. He was born in London, England, on 1 November 1899, but was raised for his first thirteen years in France where his father worked for a telegraph company. He entered Magdalen College, Oxford, in 1917 but his studies were soon interrupted by World War I [7]. After serving in the military, he returned to Oxford where he studied under Edwin Goodrich [8]. He graduated in 1922 but stayed on as a fellow of Merton College and to teach in the Zoology Department. He was the Jenkinson Memorial Lecturer between 1926 and 1938. During his time at Oxford, de Beer authored his first major work,A n Introduction to Experimental Embryology [9], which was published in 1926. The book contained de Beer’s observations that certain cartilage and bone cells are derived from an area of the ectoderm [10], now known as the neural crest [11], instead of the mesoderm [12], as germ layer theory then asserted. After the publication of this book, he began favoring comparative and descriptive methods over experimentation in his research. In 1930 he released another book, Embryology and Evolution, later retitled Embryos and Ancestors. This book contained de Beer’s ideas about his developmental theory of evolution [5], which combined Mendelian genetics with Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection [13].
[Show full text]
Mendel's Opposition to Evolution and to Darwin
Mendel's Opposition to Evolution and to Darwin B. E. Bishop Although the past decade or so has seen a resurgence of interest in Mendel's role in the origin of genetic theory, only one writer, L. A. Callender (1988), has concluded that Mendel was opposed to evolution. Yet careful scrutiny of Mendel's Pisum pa- per, published in 1866, and of the time and circumstances in which it appeared suggests not only that It Is antievolutlonary In content, but also that it was specif- ically written in contradiction of Darwin's book The Origin of Species, published in 1859, and that Mendel's and Darwin's theories, the two theories which were united in the 1940s to form the modern synthesis, are completely antithetical. Mendel does not mention Darwin in his Pi- [Mendel] in so far as they bore on his anal- sum paper (although he does in his letters ysis of the evolutionary role of hybrids." to Nlgeli, the famous Swiss botanist with Olby's (1979) article, entitled "Mendel whom he initiated a correspondence, and No Mendelian?," led to a number of revi- in his Hieracium paper, published In 1870), sionist views of Mendel's work and his in- but he states unambiguously in his intro- tentions, although no agreement has been duction that his objective is to contribute reached. For instance, some writers, un- to the evolution controversy raging at the like de Beer, Olby, and Callender, overlook time: "It requires a good deal of courage or minimize the evolutionary significance indeed to undertake such a far-reaching of Mendel's paper, while others maintain task; however, this seems to be the one that Mendel had little or no interest in he- correct way of finally reaching the solu- redity, an interpretation that has been op- tion to a question whose significance for posed by Hartl and Orel (1992): "We con- the evolutionary history of organic forms clude that Mendel understood very clearly must not be underestimated" (Mendel what his experiments meant for heredity." 1866).
[Show full text]
Biological and Physical Constraints on the Evolution of Form in Plants and Animals
24th ALTENBERG WORKSHOP IN THEORETICAL BIOLOGY Biological and Physical Constraints on the Evolution of Form in Plants and Animals organized by Jeffrey H. Schwartz and Bruno Maresca September 23-26, 2010 Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research Altenberg, Austria 24th Altenberg Workshop in Theoretical Biology Topic and aims Although the comparative study of morphology has for centuries been a viable intel- lectual pursuit, inquiry into the emergence of the form or shape of structures under scrutiny still often remains a disconnected endeavor. For example, during the 1970s and especially 1980s the guiding principle was Lewis Wolpert’s “pattern formation” model, in which the focus was on positional information and variation in what William Bateson referred to as “repeated parts.” For developmental biology, the notion of naïve cells being imbued with the potential to generate structure and form from an extrinsic mor-phogenetic source was challenged by the perspective that the emergence of structure and form was at least as much due to properties intrinsic to cells and between cells in time and space. Later in the 1980s and into the 1990s, the discovery in animals and then plants of homeobox genes and their roles in both generating positional information and affecting the development of repeated parts seemingly opened up new vistas for understanding morphology and its use in systematics and phylogenetic reconstruction. For example, with the identification of the gene Antennapedia in insects (Drosophila) and its orthologue, the HOX-gene family, in vertebrates, comparative morphologists and developmental geneticists rushed to generate diagrams of nested sets of clades on which ancestors with hypothesized regulatory gene activity producing different types of appendages could be represented.
[Show full text]
UNESCO KALINGA PRIZE List of Prize Winners
ORISSA REFERENCE ANNUAL - 2004 UNESCO KALINGA PRIZE List of Prize Winners YEAR NAME OF THE AWARDEE COUNTRY 1952 Louis de Broglie France 1953 Julian Huxley United Kingdom 1954 Waldemar Kaempffert USA 1955 Augusto Pi Suner Venezuela 1956 George Gamow USA 1957 Bertrand Russel United Kingdom 1958 Karl von Frisch F.R. Germany 1959 Jean Rostand France 1960 Ritchi Calder United Kingdom 1961 Arthur C. Clarke United Kingdom 1962 Gerald Piel USA 1963 Jagjit Singh India 1964 Warren Weave USA 1965 Eugene Rabinovitch USA 1966 Paul Coudero France 1967 Fred Hoyle United Kingdom 1968 Gavin de Beer United Kingdom 1969 Konrad Lorenz Austria 1970 Margaret Mead USA 1971 Pierre Augier France 1972 Philip H. Abelson USA Nigel Calder United Kingdom 1973 Nil - 1974 Jose Reis Brazil Louis Estrada Mexico 1975 Nil - 1976 George Porter United Kingdom Alexander Oparin Erstwhile USSR 1977 Fernand Seguin Canada 538 ORISSA REFERENCE ANNUAL - 2004 YEAR NAME OF THE AWARDEE COUNTRY 1978 Hoimar Von Ditfurth F.R.Germany 1979 Sergei Kapitza USSR 1980 Aristide Bastidas Venezuela 1981 David F. Attenborough United Kingdom Dennis Flanagan USA 1982 Oswaldo Prota-Pessoa Brazil 1983 Abdullah Ai Muti Sharafuddin Bangladesh 1984 Yves Coppens France Igor Petryanov USSR 1985 Sir Peter Medawar United Kingdom 1986 Nicolai G. Rasov USSR David Suzuki Canada 1987 Marcel Roche Venezuela 1988 Bjorn Kurten Finland 1989 Saad Ahmed Shabaan A.R.of Egypt 1990 Misbah-Ud-Din Shami Pakistan 1991 Radu Ittimovici Romania Narender K. Sehgal India 1992 Jorge Flores Valdes Mexico 1993 Piero Angela Italy 1994 Nikolai N.Drozdov Russia 1995 Julieta Fierro Gossman Mexico 1996 Jiri Grygar Czech Rep Jayant V.
[Show full text]
Ciencia, Filosofia E Politica.Indd 1 12/07/2013 11:03:16 UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DA BAHIA
CIÊNCIA, FILOSOFIA E POLÍTICA UMA HOMENAGEM A FERNANDO BUNCHAFT Ciencia, Filosofia e Politica.indd 1 12/07/2013 11:03:16 UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DA BAHIA REITORA Dora Leal Rosa VICEREITOR Luiz Rogério Bastos Leal EDITORA DA UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DA BAHIA DIRETORA Flávia Goulart Mota Garcia Rosa CONSELHO EDITORIAL Alberto Brum Novaes Angelo Szaniecki Perret Serpa Caiuby Alves da Costa Charbel Ninõ El-Hani Cleise Furtado Mendes Dante Eustachio Lucchesi Ramacciotti Evelina de Carvalho Sá Hoisel José Teixeira Cavalcante Filho Maria Vidal de Negreiros Camargo Ciencia, Filosofia e Politica.indd 2 12/07/2013 11:03:16 OLIVAL FREIRE JÚNIOR SAULO CARNEIRO (Orgs.) CIÊNCIA, FILOSOFIA E POLÍTICA UMA HOMENAGEM A FERNANDO BUNCHAFT Edua Salvador 2013 Ciencia, Filosofia e Politica.indd 3 12/07/2013 11:03:16 2013, autores. Direitos para esta edição cedidos à EDUFBA. Feito o depósito legal. Graa atualizada conforme o Acordo Ortográco da Língua Portuguesa de 1990, em vigor no Brasil desde 2009. REVISÃO Eduardo Ross NORMALIZAÇÃO Susane Barros CAPA, PROJETO GRÁFICO e EDITORAÇÃO Rodrigo Oyarzábal Schlabitz SIBI – Sistema de Bibliotecas da UFBA Ciência, losoa e política : uma homenagem a Fernando Buncha / Olival Freire Júnior, Saulo Carneiro (Org.). - Salvador : EDUFBA, 2013. 211 p. ISBN 978-85-232-1063-2 1. Buncha, Fernando, 1924-2001. 2. Mecânica. 3. Física. 4. Matemática. 5. Ciência. 6. Filosoa. 7. Política. I. Freire Júnior, Olival. II. Carneiro, Saulo. CDD - 531 Editora liada a EDUFBA Rua Barão de Jeremoabo, s/n, Campus de Ondina, 40170-115, Salvador-BA, Brasil
[Show full text]
UNESCO KALINGA PRIZE List of Prize Winners
ODISHA REFERENCE ANNUAL - 2011 UNESCO KALINGA PRIZE List of Prize Winners YEAR NAME OF THE AWARDEE COUNTRY 1952 Louis de Broglie France 1953 Julian Huxley United Kingdom 1954 Waldemar Kaempffert USA 1955 Augusto Pi Suner Venezuela 1956 George Gamow USA 1957 Bertrand Russel United Kingdom 1958 Karl von Frisch F.R. Germany 1959 Jean Rostand France 1960 Ritchi Calder United Kingdom 1961 Arthur C. Clarke United Kingdom 1962 Gerald Piel USA 1963 Jagjit Singh India 1964 Warren Weave USA 1965 Eugene Rabinovitch USA 1966 Paul Coudero France 1967 Fred Hoyle United Kingdom 1968 Gavin de Beer United Kingdom 1969 Konrad Lorenz Austria 1970 Margaret Mead USA 1971 Pierre Augier France 1972 Philip H. Abelson USA Nigel Calder United Kingdom 1973 Nil - 1974 Jose Reis Brazil Louis Estrada Mexico 1975 Nil - 1976 George Porter United Kingdom Alexander Oparin Erstwhile USSR 1977 Fernand Seguin Canada 119 ODISHA REFERENCE ANNUAL - 2011 YEAR NAME OF THE AWARDEE COUNTRY 1978 Hoimar Von Ditfurth F.R.Germany 1979 Sergei Kapitza USSR 1980 Aristide Bastidas Venezuela 1981 David F. Attenborough United Kingdom Dennis Flanagan USA 1982 Oswaldo Prota-Pessoa Brazil 1983 Abdullah Ai Muti Sharafuddin Bangladesh 1984 Yves Coppens France Igor Petryanov USSR 1985 Sir Peter Medawar United Kingdom 1986 Nicolai G. Rasov USSR David Suzuki Canada 1987 Marcel Roche Venezuela 1988 Bjorn Kurten Finland 1989 Saad Ahmed Shabaan A.R.of Egypt 1990 Misbah-Ud-Din Shami Pakistan 1991 Radu Ittimovici Romania Narender K. Sehgal India 1992 Jorge Flores Valdes Mexico 1993 Piero Angela Italy 1994 Nikolai N.Drozdov Russia 1995 Julieta Fierro Gossman Mexico 1996 Jiri Grygar Czech Rep Jayant V.
[Show full text]
Unesco Kalinga Prize
ODISHA REFERENCE ANNUAL - 2014 UNESCO KALINGA PRIZE YEAR NAME OF THE AWARDEE COUNTRY 1952 Louis de Broglie France 1953 Julian Huxley United Kingdom 1954 Waldemar Kaempffert USA 1955 Augusto Pi Suner Venezuela 1956 George Gamow USA 1957 Bertrand Russel United Kingdom 1958 Karl von Frisch F.R. Germany 1959 Jean Rostand France 1960 Ritchi Calder United Kingdom 1961 Arthur C. Clarke United Kingdom 1962 Gerald Piel USA 1963 Jagjit Singh India 1964 Warren Weave USA 1965 Eugene Rabinovitch USA 1966 Paul Coudero France 1967 Fred Hoyle United Kingdom 1968 Gavin de Beer United Kingdom 1969 Konrad Lorenz Austria 1970 Margaret Mead USA 1971 Pierre Augier France 1972 Philip H. Abelson USA Nigel Calder United Kingdom 1973 Nil - 1974 Jose Reis Brazil Louis Estrada Mexico 1975 Nil - 1976 George Porter United Kingdom Alexander Oparin Erstwhile USSR 1977 Fernand Seguin Canada 123 ODISHA REFERENCE ANNUAL - 2014 YEAR NAME OF THE AWARDEE COUNTRY 1978 Hoimar Von Ditfurth F.R.Germany 1979 Sergei Kapitza USSR 1980 Aristide Bastidas Venezuela 1981 David F. Attenborough United Kingdom Dennis Flanagan USA 1982 Oswaldo Prota-Pessoa Brazil 1983 Abdullah Ai Muti Sharafuddin Bangladesh 1984 Yves Coppens France Igor Petryanov USSR 1985 Sir Peter Medawar United Kingdom 1986 Nicolai G. Rasov USSR David Suzuki Canada 1987 Marcel Roche Venezuela 1988 Bjorn Kurten Finland 1989 Saad Ahmed Shabaan A.R.of Egypt 1990 Misbah-Ud-Din Shami Pakistan 1991 Radu Ittimovici Romania Narender K. Sehgal India 1992 Jorge Flores Valdes Mexico 1993 Piero Angela Italy 1994 Nikolai N.Drozdov Russia 1995 Julieta Fierro Gossman Mexico 1996 Jiri Grygar Czech Rep Jayant V.
[Show full text]