Next-Generation Sequencing Reveals Novel Rare Fusion Events with Functional Implication in Prostate Cancer

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Next-Generation Sequencing Reveals Novel Rare Fusion Events with Functional Implication in Prostate Cancer Oncogene (2015) 34, 568–577 & 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0950-9232/15 www.nature.com/onc ORIGINAL ARTICLE Next-generation sequencing reveals novel rare fusion events with functional implication in prostate cancer I Teles Alves1, T Hartjes2, E McClellan3,4, S Hiltemann2,RBo¨ ttcher2, N Dits2, MR Temanni5, B Janssen6, W van Workum6, P van der Spek3, A Stubbs3, A de Klein7, B Eussen7, J Trapman8 and G Jenster2 Gene fusions, mainly between TMPRSS2 and ERG, are frequent early genomic rearrangements in prostate cancer (PCa). In order to discover novel genomic fusion events, we applied whole-genome paired-end sequencing to identify structural alterations present in a primary PCa patient (G089) and in a PCa cell line (PC346C). Overall, we identified over 3800 genomic rearrangements in each of the two samples as compared with the reference genome. Correcting these structural variations for polymorphisms using whole-genome sequences of 46 normal samples, the numbers of cancer-related rearrangements were 674 and 387 for G089 and PC346C, respectively. From these, 192 in G089 and 106 in PC346C affected gene structures. Exclusion of small intronic deletions left 33 intergenic breaks in G089 and 14 in PC346C. Out of these, 12 and 9 reassembled genes with the same orientation, capable of generating a feasible fusion transcript. Using PCR we validated all the reliable predicted gene fusions. Two gene fusions were in-frame: MPP5–FAM71D in PC346C and ARHGEF3–C8ORF38 in G089. Downregulation of FAM71D and MPP5–FAM71D transcripts in PC346C cells decreased proliferation; however, no effect was observed in the RWPE-1-immortalized normal prostate epithelial cells. Together, our data showed that gene rearrangements frequently occur in PCa genomes but result in a limited number of fusion transcripts. Most of these fusion transcripts do not encode in-frame fusion proteins. The unique in-frame MPP5–FAM71D fusion product is important for proliferation of PC346C cells. Oncogene (2015) 34, 568–577; doi:10.1038/onc.2013.591; published online 3 February 2014 Keywords: FAM71D; gene fusions; next-generation sequencing; prostate cancer; MPP5 INTRODUCTION approach uses only 1–2% of the genomic sequences as a Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most frequently diagnosed template through capture and enrichment before the sequencing cancers and a major cause of death in men in countries with a process.15,16 This allows for higher sequence coverage at the western lifestyle.1 Throughout the past two decades, several expense of a few disadvantages such as the uneven capture genetic events have been revealed that are important in efficiency and the absence of unknown or yet to be annotated development and progression of PCa.2 The predominant genetic exons.17 Instead of a focused exome-sequencing approach, more abnormalities identified so far include the forming of ETS-fusion challenging whole-genome sequencing provides the most genes,3 loss of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) tumor complete view of genomic changes.18 A range of sequencing suppressor gene,4 amplification of AR and amplification of the technologies is now available and more are becoming available MYC oncogene.5 Most of these studies used comparative genomic soon that provide different approaches for library construction, hybridization/SNP (single nucleotide length polymorphism) arrays clone separation and amplification, and nucleotide detection.19–22 and performed genome-wide copy number variation analysis The technology utilized in this study from Complete Genomics Inc. as a start to identify specific genetic alterations.6,7 The use of (Mountain View, CA, USA) makes use of array technology to gene expression arrays was important in the detection of genes separate amplified DNA template organized into single-strand with aberrant expression patterns.8 The integration of these two coils, known as DNA nanoballs. Nucleotide read-out is based on a different sets of data, copy number variation and gene expression ligation protocol.23 reinforced and expanded this panel of genetic alterations.9,10 In PCa genomics the use of NGS has allowed significant Next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques emerging over progress in cataloging systematically all the DNA changes present the last few years proved to be a major breakthrough in in cancer.24 The use of RNA-seq has produced major insight documenting novel genetic changes resulting in a better under- into the identification and expression of novel long noncoding standing of cancer cell biology.11,12 Both RNA and DNA can be RNAs and novel gene fusions in PCa.25,26 Exome sequencing of used as templates for NGS methods and it is possible to analyze PCa samples was utilized for the detection of novel small either paired-end, mate pair, as short or long sequence reads mutations.27–30 In the same way, a mutational landscape of depending on the platform applied.13,14 An exome-sequencing patients with castration-resistant PCa was described by Tomlins 1Department of Urology and Pathology, Josephine Nefkens Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; 2Department of Urology, Josephine Nefkens Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; 3Department of Bioinformatics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; 4Department of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Metropolitan State University of Denver, Colorado, USA; 5CMNS-Institute for Advanced Computer Studies, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA; 6ServiceXS B.V., Leiden, The Netherlands; 7Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands and 8Department of Pathology, Josephine Nefkens Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Correspondence: Dr G Jenster, Department of Urology, Josephine Nefkens Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Be 362a, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam 3000 CA, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected] Received 12 March 2013; revised 30 November 2013; accepted 18 December 2013; published online 3 February 2014 Novel rare fusion events with functional implication in prostate cancer I Teles Alves et al 569 et al.3 in 2012.31 In addition, deep RNA sequencing is also used to same orientation were identified (Table 2; Supplementary Tables identify transcription-induced chimeras associated with human S3–S5). prostate adenocarcinoma such as the novel TMEM79-SMG5.32,33 However, a full overview of all structural variations (SVs) and mutations can only be provided by whole-genome sequencing. Validation of fusion genes present in PC346C and G089 Many studies so far have applied NGS to obtain a more thorough For each possible gene fusion event in PC346C and G089, we perceptive of already known genetic alterations.34 The mechanism checked all the mapped reads, both the normal and the mispaired involving PTEN loss has been correlated with novel genetic reads (Supplementary Figure S3). We observed that a number of alterations in genes located in the vicinity of PTEN.24 Moreover, the fusion events were not supported by a convincing number of expression of constitutively active androgen receptor splice discordant mate pairs (Table 2). To evaluate whether the criterion variants in castration resistance PCa has been described.35 A few of three or more mispaired reads was justified, all 9 þ 11 fusion studies have been published making use of whole or focused events were validated using (RT)–PCR both at the DNA and RNA genome NGS technologies to discover and describe new genetic levels (Supplementary Figures S4 and S5, Supplementary Tables alterations in PCa. The study by Berger et al.24 in 2011 provided a S6–S9). Most of the fusion events with low mispaired read counts comprehensive approach towards both known and newly (o5) could not be confirmed, showing that the cutoff number of identified mutations and genomic rearrangements. Other studies three discordant mate pairs was set low. have focused on either a particular genomic region such as the For most gene fusions, the event was confirmed by sequencing 10q11.2 97-kb region comprising the MSMB gene or in the analysis on the RNA and/or DNA level. Out of these six PC346C fusion of all alterations present in a particular PCa sample.36,37 This was events, all were validated on the DNA level with only one that could the case for the new type of prostate adenocarcinoma identified not be verified at the transcript level (Supplementary Tables S10 that has a hybrid phenotype of both luminal and neuroendocrine and S11). The fusion in question, ITGA10–RBM8A, comprises the cells.37,38 downstream part of the 30-untranslated repeat sequence of RBM8A In this study, we applied whole-genome paired-end sequencing so it was not expected to be present within the fusion transcript. In in two PCa samples. Analysis of the PC346C PCa cell line and the G089, out of the nine reliable fusion events eight were validated at G089 primary PCa patient sample, which were selected based on the DNA level and five at the RNA level. The four fusions that were the absence of ETS-fusion genes,39 generated a wide panel of validated only at the DNA level were assessed for the expression new SV events. We focused on the detection of SVs to unravel levels of the involving genes using Affymetrix Exon-array analysis the events leading to fusion genes. The potential fusion genes (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) of the G089 PCa sample. In were validated and the genes involved were checked for general, we found a low expression pattern of these fusion genes. copy number alteration in other PCa samples. The in-frame The OBP2A–OBP2B fusion, comprising only three mispaired reads, fusion found in PC346C was assessed for possible functional was verified at the RNA level and involved two homologous genes. implications. The AATK–LAMA5 fusion was confirmed at the DNA level, although the number of discordant mate pairs was only five (Table 2). Next, we assessed which fusion events generated an in-frame fusion protein.
Recommended publications
  • Phosphorylation of Synaptojanin Differentially Regulates Endocytosis of Functionally Distinct Synaptic Vesicle Pools
    8882 • The Journal of Neuroscience, August 24, 2016 • 36(34):8882–8894 Cellular/Molecular Phosphorylation of Synaptojanin Differentially Regulates Endocytosis of Functionally Distinct Synaptic Vesicle Pools X Junhua Geng,1* Liping Wang,1,2* Joo Yeun Lee,1,4 XChun-Kan Chen,1 and Karen T. Chang1,3,4 1Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute, 2Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, and 3Department of Cell and Neurobiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, and 4Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089 The rapid replenishment of synaptic vesicles through endocytosis is crucial for sustaining synaptic transmission during intense neuronal activity. Synaptojanin (Synj), a phosphoinositide phosphatase, is known to play an important role in vesicle recycling by promoting the uncoating of clathrin following synaptic vesicle uptake. Synj has been shown to be a substrate of the minibrain (Mnb) kinase, a fly homolog of the dual-specificity tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A (DYRK1A); however, the functional impacts of Synj phosphorylation by Mnb are not well understood. Here we identify that Mnb phosphorylates Synj at S1029 in Drosophila. We find that phosphorylation of Synj at S1029 enhances Synj phosphatase activity, alters interaction between Synj and endophilin, and promotes efficient endocytosis of the active cycling vesicle pool (also referred to as exo-endo cycling pool) at the expense of reserve pool vesicle endocytosis. Dephosphorylated Synj, on the other hand, is deficient in the endocytosis of the active recycling pool vesicles but maintains reserve pool vesicle endocytosis to restore total vesicle pool size and sustain synaptic transmission. Together, our findings reveal a novel role for Synj in modulating reserve pool vesicle endocytosis and further indicate that dynamic phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of Synj differentially maintain endocytosis of distinct functional synaptic vesicle pools.
    [Show full text]
  • Katalog 2015 Cover Paul Lin *Hinweis Förderung.Indd
    Product List 2015 WE LIVE SERVICE Certificates quartett owns two productions sites that are certified according to EN ISO 9001:2008 Quality management systems - Requirements EN ISO 13485:2012 + AC:2012 Medical devices - Quality management systems - Requirements for regulatory purposes GMP Conformity Our quality management guarantees products of highest quality! 2 Foreword to the quartett product list 2015 quartett Immunodiagnostika, Biotechnologie + Kosmetik Vertriebs GmbH welcomes you as one of our new business partners as well as all of our previous loyal clients. You are now member of quartett´s worldwide customers. First of all we would like to introduce ourselves to you. Founded as a family-run company in 1986, quartett ensures for more than a quarter of a century consistent quality of products. Service and support of our valued customers are our daily businesses. And we will continue! In the end 80´s quartett offered radioimmunoassay and enzyme immunoassay kits from different manufacturers in the USA. In the beginning 90´s the company changed its strategy from offering products for routine diagnostic to the increasing field of research and development. Setting up a production plant in 1997 and a second one in 2011 supported this decision. The company specialized its product profile in the field of manufacturing synthetic peptides for antibody production, peptides such as protease inhibitors, biochemical reagents and products for histology, cytology and immunohistology. All products are exclusively manufactured in Germany without outsourcing any production step. Nowadays, we expand into all other diagnostic and research fields and supply our customers in universities, government institutes, pharmaceutical and biotechnological companies, hospitals, and private doctor offices.
    [Show full text]
  • SYNJ2 Antibody (Monoclonal) (M02) Mouse Monoclonal Antibody Raised Against a Partial Recombinant SYNJ2
    10320 Camino Santa Fe, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.875.1900 Fax: 858.622.0609 SYNJ2 Antibody (monoclonal) (M02) Mouse monoclonal antibody raised against a partial recombinant SYNJ2. Catalog # AT4124a Specification SYNJ2 Antibody (monoclonal) (M02) - Product Information Application WB Primary Accession O15056 Other Accession NM_003898 Reactivity Human Host mouse Clonality Monoclonal Isotype IgG2a Kappa Calculated MW 165538 SYNJ2 Antibody (monoclonal) (M02) - Additional Information Antibody Reactive Against Recombinant Protein.Western Blot detection against Gene ID 8871 Immunogen (36.74 KDa) . Other Names Synaptojanin-2, Synaptic inositol 1, 5-trisphosphate 5-phosphatase 2, SYNJ2, KIAA0348 Target/Specificity SYNJ2 (NP_003889, 1396 a.a. ~ 1495 a.a) partial recombinant protein with GST tag. MW of the GST tag alone is 26 KDa. Dilution WB~~1:500~1000 Format Clear, colorless solution in phosphate buffered saline, pH 7.2 . Western Blot analysis of SYNJ2 expression in transfected 293T cell line by SYNJ2 Storage monoclonal antibody (M02), clone 2H8. Store at -20°C or lower. Aliquot to avoid repeated freezing and thawing. Lane 1: SYNJ2 transfected lysate(92.2 KDa). Lane 2: Non-transfected lysate. Precautions SYNJ2 Antibody (monoclonal) (M02) is for research use only and not for use in diagnostic or therapeutic procedures. SYNJ2 Antibody (monoclonal) (M02) - Protocols Page 1/3 10320 Camino Santa Fe, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.875.1900 Fax: 858.622.0609 Provided below are standard protocols that you may find useful for product applications. • Western Blot • Blocking Peptides • Dot Blot • Immunohistochemistry • Immunofluorescence • Immunoprecipitation • Flow Cytomety • Cell Culture Western blot analysis of SYNJ2 over-expressed 293 cell line, cotransfected with SYNJ2 Validated Chimera RNAi ( (Cat # AT4124a ) SYNJ2 Antibody (monoclonal) (M02) - Background The gene is a member of the inositol-polyphosphate 5-phosphatase family.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure S1. Representative Report Generated by the Ion Torrent System Server for Each of the KCC71 Panel Analysis and Pcafusion Analysis
    Figure S1. Representative report generated by the Ion Torrent system server for each of the KCC71 panel analysis and PCaFusion analysis. (A) Details of the run summary report followed by the alignment summary report for the KCC71 panel analysis sequencing. (B) Details of the run summary report for the PCaFusion panel analysis. A Figure S1. Continued. Representative report generated by the Ion Torrent system server for each of the KCC71 panel analysis and PCaFusion analysis. (A) Details of the run summary report followed by the alignment summary report for the KCC71 panel analysis sequencing. (B) Details of the run summary report for the PCaFusion panel analysis. B Figure S2. Comparative analysis of the variant frequency found by the KCC71 panel and calculated from publicly available cBioPortal datasets. For each of the 71 genes in the KCC71 panel, the frequency of variants was calculated as the variant number found in the examined cases. Datasets marked with different colors and sample numbers of prostate cancer are presented in the upper right. *Significantly high in the present study. Figure S3. Seven subnetworks extracted from each of seven public prostate cancer gene networks in TCNG (Table SVI). Blue dots represent genes that include initial seed genes (parent nodes), and parent‑child and child‑grandchild genes in the network. Graphical representation of node‑to‑node associations and subnetwork structures that differed among and were unique to each of the seven subnetworks. TCNG, The Cancer Network Galaxy. Figure S4. REVIGO tree map showing the predicted biological processes of prostate cancer in the Japanese. Each rectangle represents a biological function in terms of a Gene Ontology (GO) term, with the size adjusted to represent the P‑value of the GO term in the underlying GO term database.
    [Show full text]
  • Snotarget Shows That Human Orphan Snorna Targets Locate Close to Alternative Splice Junctions
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Gene 408 (2008) 172–179 www.elsevier.com/locate/gene snoTARGET shows that human orphan snoRNA targets locate close to alternative splice junctions Peter S. Bazeley a, Valery Shepelev b, Zohreh Talebizadeh c, Merlin G. Butler c, Larisa Fedorova d, ⁎ Vadim Filatov e, Alexei Fedorov a,d, a Program in Bioinformatics and Proteomics/Genomics, University of Toledo Health Science Campus, Toledo, OH 43614, USA b Department of Bioinformatics, Institute of Molecular Genetics, RAS, Moscow 123182, Russia c Section of Medical Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics and University of Missouri, Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA d Department of Medicine, University of Toledo Health Science Campus, Toledo, OH 43614, USA e Dinom LLC, 8/44 Pedagogicheskaya st., Moscow 115404, Russia Received 31 July 2007; received in revised form 19 October 2007; accepted 24 October 2007 Available online 21 November 2007 Received by Takashi Gojobori Abstract Among thousands of non-protein-coding RNAs which have been found in humans, a significant group represents snoRNA molecules that guide other types of RNAs to specific chemical modifications, cleavages, or proper folding. Yet, hundreds of mammalian snoRNAs have unknown function and are referred to as “orphan” molecules. In 2006, for the first time, it was shown that a particular orphan snoRNA (HBII-52) plays an important role in the regulation of alternative splicing of the serotonin receptor gene in humans and other mammals. In order to facilitate the investigation of possible involvement of snoRNAs in the regulation of pre-mRNA processing, we developed a new computational web resource, snoTARGET, which searches for possible guiding sites for snoRNAs among the entire set of human and rodent exonic and intronic sequences.
    [Show full text]
  • Conserved and Novel Properties of Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis in Dictyostelium Discoideum" (2012)
    Rockefeller University Digital Commons @ RU Student Theses and Dissertations 2012 Conserved and Novel Properties of Clathrin- Mediated Endocytosis in Dictyostelium Discoideum Laura Macro Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.rockefeller.edu/ student_theses_and_dissertations Part of the Life Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Macro, Laura, "Conserved and Novel Properties of Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis in Dictyostelium Discoideum" (2012). Student Theses and Dissertations. Paper 163. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ RU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ RU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CONSERVED AND NOVEL PROPERTIES OF CLATHRIN- MEDIATED ENDOCYTOSIS IN DICTYOSTELIUM DISCOIDEUM A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of The Rockefeller University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Laura Macro June 2012 © Copyright by Laura Macro 2012 CONSERVED AND NOVEL PROPERTIES OF CLATHRIN- MEDIATED ENDOCYTOSIS IN DICTYOSTELIUM DISCOIDEUM Laura Macro, Ph.D. The Rockefeller University 2012 The protein clathrin mediates one of the major pathways of endocytosis from the extracellular milieu and plasma membrane. Clathrin functions with a network of interacting accessory proteins, one of which is the adaptor complex AP-2, to co-ordinate vesicle formation. Disruption of genes involved in clathrin-mediated endocytosis causes embryonic lethality in multicellular animals suggesting that clathrin-mediated endocytosis is a fundamental cellular process. However, loss of clathrin-mediated endocytosis genes in single cell eukaryotes, such as S.cerevisiae (yeast), does not cause lethality, suggesting that clathrin may convey specific advantages for multicellularity.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic and Genomic Analysis of Hyperlipidemia, Obesity and Diabetes Using (C57BL/6J × TALLYHO/Jngj) F2 Mice
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Nutrition Publications and Other Works Nutrition 12-19-2010 Genetic and genomic analysis of hyperlipidemia, obesity and diabetes using (C57BL/6J × TALLYHO/JngJ) F2 mice Taryn P. Stewart Marshall University Hyoung Y. Kim University of Tennessee - Knoxville, [email protected] Arnold M. Saxton University of Tennessee - Knoxville, [email protected] Jung H. Kim Marshall University Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_nutrpubs Part of the Animal Sciences Commons, and the Nutrition Commons Recommended Citation BMC Genomics 2010, 11:713 doi:10.1186/1471-2164-11-713 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Nutrition at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Nutrition Publications and Other Works by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Stewart et al. BMC Genomics 2010, 11:713 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/11/713 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Genetic and genomic analysis of hyperlipidemia, obesity and diabetes using (C57BL/6J × TALLYHO/JngJ) F2 mice Taryn P Stewart1, Hyoung Yon Kim2, Arnold M Saxton3, Jung Han Kim1* Abstract Background: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is the most common form of diabetes in humans and is closely associated with dyslipidemia and obesity that magnifies the mortality and morbidity related to T2D. The genetic contribution to human T2D and related metabolic disorders is evident, and mostly follows polygenic inheritance. The TALLYHO/ JngJ (TH) mice are a polygenic model for T2D characterized by obesity, hyperinsulinemia, impaired glucose uptake and tolerance, hyperlipidemia, and hyperglycemia.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table 1: Adhesion Genes Data Set
    Supplementary Table 1: Adhesion genes data set PROBE Entrez Gene ID Celera Gene ID Gene_Symbol Gene_Name 160832 1 hCG201364.3 A1BG alpha-1-B glycoprotein 223658 1 hCG201364.3 A1BG alpha-1-B glycoprotein 212988 102 hCG40040.3 ADAM10 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 10 133411 4185 hCG28232.2 ADAM11 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 11 110695 8038 hCG40937.4 ADAM12 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 12 (meltrin alpha) 195222 8038 hCG40937.4 ADAM12 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 12 (meltrin alpha) 165344 8751 hCG20021.3 ADAM15 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 15 (metargidin) 189065 6868 null ADAM17 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 17 (tumor necrosis factor, alpha, converting enzyme) 108119 8728 hCG15398.4 ADAM19 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 19 (meltrin beta) 117763 8748 hCG20675.3 ADAM20 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 20 126448 8747 hCG1785634.2 ADAM21 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 21 208981 8747 hCG1785634.2|hCG2042897 ADAM21 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 21 180903 53616 hCG17212.4 ADAM22 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 22 177272 8745 hCG1811623.1 ADAM23 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 23 102384 10863 hCG1818505.1 ADAM28 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 28 119968 11086 hCG1786734.2 ADAM29 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 29 205542 11085 hCG1997196.1 ADAM30 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 30 148417 80332 hCG39255.4 ADAM33 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 33 140492 8756 hCG1789002.2 ADAM7 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 7 122603 101 hCG1816947.1 ADAM8 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 8 183965 8754 hCG1996391 ADAM9 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 9 (meltrin gamma) 129974 27299 hCG15447.3 ADAMDEC1 ADAM-like,
    [Show full text]
  • Cellular and Molecular Signatures in the Disease Tissue of Early
    Cellular and Molecular Signatures in the Disease Tissue of Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Stratify Clinical Response to csDMARD-Therapy and Predict Radiographic Progression Frances Humby1,* Myles Lewis1,* Nandhini Ramamoorthi2, Jason Hackney3, Michael Barnes1, Michele Bombardieri1, Francesca Setiadi2, Stephen Kelly1, Fabiola Bene1, Maria di Cicco1, Sudeh Riahi1, Vidalba Rocher-Ros1, Nora Ng1, Ilias Lazorou1, Rebecca E. Hands1, Desiree van der Heijde4, Robert Landewé5, Annette van der Helm-van Mil4, Alberto Cauli6, Iain B. McInnes7, Christopher D. Buckley8, Ernest Choy9, Peter Taylor10, Michael J. Townsend2 & Costantino Pitzalis1 1Centre for Experimental Medicine and Rheumatology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK. Departments of 2Biomarker Discovery OMNI, 3Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Genentech Research and Early Development, South San Francisco, California 94080 USA 4Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands 5Department of Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology & Immunology Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 6Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, Policlinico of the University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy 7Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8TA, UK 8Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing (IIA), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2WB, UK 9Institute of
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery of Driver Non-Coding Splice-Site-Creating Mutations in Cancer
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19307-6 OPEN Discovery of driver non-coding splice-site-creating mutations in cancer Song Cao1,2, Daniel Cui Zhou 1,2, Clara Oh1,2, Reyka G. Jayasinghe1,2, Yanyan Zhao1, Christopher J. Yoon1,2, Matthew A. Wyczalkowski 1,2, Matthew H. Bailey 1,2, Terrence Tsou 1,2, Qingsong Gao1,2, ✉ ✉ Andrew Malone 1, Sheila Reynolds3, Ilya Shmulevich3, Michael C. Wendl2,4,5, Feng Chen1,6 & Li Ding1,2,4,6 Non-coding mutations can create splice sites, however the true extent of how such somatic 1234567890():,; non-coding mutations affect RNA splicing are largely unexplored. Here we use the MiSplice pipeline to analyze 783 cancer cases with WGS data and 9494 cases with WES data, discovering 562 non-coding mutations that lead to splicing alterations. Notably, most of these mutations create new exons. Introns associated with new exon creation are significantly larger than the genome-wide average intron size. We find that some mutation-induced splicing alterations are located in genes important in tumorigenesis (ATRX, BCOR, CDKN2B, MAP3K1, MAP3K4, MDM2, SMAD4, STK11, TP53 etc.), often leading to truncated proteins and affecting gene expression. The pattern emerging from these exon-creating mutations sug- gests that splice sites created by non-coding mutations interact with pre-existing potential splice sites that originally lacked a suitable splicing pair to induce new exon formation. Our study suggests the importance of investigating biological and clinical consequences of noncoding splice-inducing mutations that were previously neglected by conventional anno- tation pipelines. MiSplice will be useful for automatically annotating the splicing impact of coding and non-coding mutations in future large-scale analyses.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Six Autophagy-Related-Lncrna Prognostic Biomarkers in Uveal Melanoma
    Hindawi Disease Markers Volume 2021, Article ID 2401617, 12 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2401617 Research Article Identification of Six Autophagy-Related-lncRNA Prognostic Biomarkers in Uveal Melanoma Yao Chen , Lu Chen , Jinwei Wang , Jia Tan, and Sha Wang Hunan Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Eye Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, China Correspondence should be addressed to Sha Wang; [email protected] Received 7 June 2021; Revised 16 July 2021; Accepted 23 July 2021; Published 13 August 2021 Academic Editor: Ting Su Copyright © 2021 Yao Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Currently, no autophagy-related long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) has been reported to predict the prognosis of uveal melanoma patients. Our study screened for autophagy-related lncRNAs in 80 samples downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database through lncRNA-mRNA coexpression. We used univariate Cox to further filter the lncRNAs. Multivariate Cox regression and LASSO regression were applied to construct an autophagy-associated lncRNA predictive model and calculate the risk score. Clinical risk factors were validated using Cox regression to determine whether they were independent prognostic indicators. Functional enrichment was performed using Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. The model was built with six predictive autophagy-associated lncRNAs and clustered uveal melanoma patients into high- and low-risk groups. The risk score of our model was a significant independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio = 1:0; p <0:001).
    [Show full text]
  • Association of Gene Ontology Categories with Decay Rate for Hepg2 Experiments These Tables Show Details for All Gene Ontology Categories
    Supplementary Table 1: Association of Gene Ontology Categories with Decay Rate for HepG2 Experiments These tables show details for all Gene Ontology categories. Inferences for manual classification scheme shown at the bottom. Those categories used in Figure 1A are highlighted in bold. Standard Deviations are shown in parentheses. P-values less than 1E-20 are indicated with a "0". Rate r (hour^-1) Half-life < 2hr. Decay % GO Number Category Name Probe Sets Group Non-Group Distribution p-value In-Group Non-Group Representation p-value GO:0006350 transcription 1523 0.221 (0.009) 0.127 (0.002) FASTER 0 13.1 (0.4) 4.5 (0.1) OVER 0 GO:0006351 transcription, DNA-dependent 1498 0.220 (0.009) 0.127 (0.002) FASTER 0 13.0 (0.4) 4.5 (0.1) OVER 0 GO:0006355 regulation of transcription, DNA-dependent 1163 0.230 (0.011) 0.128 (0.002) FASTER 5.00E-21 14.2 (0.5) 4.6 (0.1) OVER 0 GO:0006366 transcription from Pol II promoter 845 0.225 (0.012) 0.130 (0.002) FASTER 1.88E-14 13.0 (0.5) 4.8 (0.1) OVER 0 GO:0006139 nucleobase, nucleoside, nucleotide and nucleic acid metabolism3004 0.173 (0.006) 0.127 (0.002) FASTER 1.28E-12 8.4 (0.2) 4.5 (0.1) OVER 0 GO:0006357 regulation of transcription from Pol II promoter 487 0.231 (0.016) 0.132 (0.002) FASTER 6.05E-10 13.5 (0.6) 4.9 (0.1) OVER 0 GO:0008283 cell proliferation 625 0.189 (0.014) 0.132 (0.002) FASTER 1.95E-05 10.1 (0.6) 5.0 (0.1) OVER 1.50E-20 GO:0006513 monoubiquitination 36 0.305 (0.049) 0.134 (0.002) FASTER 2.69E-04 25.4 (4.4) 5.1 (0.1) OVER 2.04E-06 GO:0007050 cell cycle arrest 57 0.311 (0.054) 0.133 (0.002)
    [Show full text]