Pedro Cambón’s Asian Objects A Transpacific Approach to Eighteenth-Century California

J. M. Mancini On December 9, 1781, a Franciscan mis- voyage: the fact that his companion had sionary named Pedro Benito Cambón not merely left the Californias for San (frontispiece) returned to the Californias Blas but had ultimately traveled across the after a two-year absence. His arrival in Pacific to the Philippine Islands (fig. 2) the harbor of San Diego was noted by and back; and the arrival of a letter from Francisco Palóu, Cambón’s “father com- Cambón saying that he had purchased “a panion” in the mission of San Francisco de great consignment of vestments, wax, and Asís (fig. 1), who waited with keen anticipa- other special things for the and tion for the Galician to complete the final sacristy of this mission.” Coming from leg of his voyage.1 Palóu would have had Cambón, this must have been a tantalizing good reasons to dwell on his colleague’s prospect. For, as Palóu knew, his colleague return. There was the worrying matter of was not the sort to “come with empty Cambón’s ill health. Palóu remarked fre- hands.” Indeed, Cambón had demon- quently on it in his writings, offering it as strated a capacity for procuring “special the reason his companion had left the mis- things.” Even in 1771, when the missions’ sion with the “commander and maritime founding president, Junípero Serra, insisted officers” who had hurriedly shipped down on their aesthetic poverty, Cambón and the Pacific coast to San Blas in October his associate Ángel Somera had man- 1779 upon hearing that was once aged to give him paintings of Our Lady again at war with Great Britain. Since the of Guadalupe and Our Lady of Mount missions were short-handed, the tempo- Carmel from a supply “they had procured rary and perhaps permanent loss of any elsewhere.”3 And even earlier, the pair had colleague was sure to present difficulties. been in possession of “a linen cloth with Moreover, Cambón (1738–1792 or later) the Image of Our Lady of Sorrows,” the was not just any colleague but an especially display of which reputedly defused a poten- versatile one who, over the course of his tially violent conflict with a group of armed career, took an interest in the architecture Indians.4 Palóu might have experienced and engineering of the missions and the anxiety along with his anticipation, how- logistics of furnishing them with images ever, when he read Cambón’s qualification and objects as well as the tasks formally as- that, “as everything came under the regis- Pedro Benito Cambón. Mission sociated with his missionary vocation.2 ter of San Blas, nothing could be unloaded, San Gabriel Arcángel, San Gabriel, California. Photo, Palóu’s anticipation must also have been but he hoped the commissary of San Blas J. M. Mancini piqued by two other aspects of Cambón’s would send it on the first bark that came.”

29 American Art Volume 25, Number 1 © 2011 Smithsonian Institution As is evident from his long and vehement account of Cambón’s earlier effort to trans- port “vestments and ornaments” and other items to the new California missions from some older missions—an episode during which Cambón and his shipment had been stranded below the Franciscan-Dominican border at Mission San Fernando Velicatá for nearly two years—Palóu knew that the logistics of such “consignments” could go terribly awry.5 Palóu need not have worried: the resourceful Cambón returned and was in fact preceded by his cargo. Moreover, as is clear from an inventory made during that brief detour to San Blas, Cambón shipped much more than the “vestments and wax” device that historians claim Franciscans and “ordinary stuffs” in Palóu’s account: deliberately avoided introducing into New twenty-two cases of finished objects from California in order to keep Indian women the Philippine Islands and China in wood, in drudgery. Beyond these two categories, fiber, metal, ceramic, and other media Cambón also shipped a quantity of ob- were listed as well as materials that could jects that were purpose-made for neither be used in the creation of additional im- liturgical use nor the daily work routine, ages, objects, and structures and a variety including a parlor clock, 154 red and 82 of items for consumption or medicinal use blue cups for drinking chocolate, 14 large such as tea and other plant products.6 platters, 12 small plates, and 12 dozen Of the finished objects Cambón sent “ordinary” plates.7 across the Pacific, many were clearly for In addition to finished works, Cambón liturgical use, including new and used vest- shipped paper and ink, unfinished textiles ments made of silk and satin brocade and such as “150 rolls fine denim from Ylocos damask; consecrated and unconsecrated dyed blue,” “leaves used for dy[e]ing altar stones; “one wrought silver chalice, material,” a case of 350 shells “for church made in Canton in South China, with its windows labelled for the Mission of our paten and spoon”; carved, gilt, and painted Father St. Francis,” and paint in four tabernacles; decorated fiber mats for altar colors: blue, red, yellow, and eight pounds covers; painted and lacquered lecterns; of Paris green.8 candles and tapers; and gilt and painted As this suggests, it was Cambón’s processional candleholders. In a single intention not only that Asian objects be instance of a figurative work, these objects introduced to complement an existing also included another image of Our Lady visual and material culture but also that of Sorrows (Nuestra Señora de los Dolores, Asian materials be built into new forms after whom Mission San Francisco de created through the interaction of Indians Asís takes its unofficial name, Mission and Europeans in California. Dolores)—this time a statue. Other objects Although time has dispersed Cambón’s were designed for use by both Indians consignment, it is still possible to identify a and Franciscans as they went about their number of objects that appear to correlate daily work, such as “7 rattan hats, of the to the inventory in locations associated kind worn by the Reverend Fathers of with him, including textiles in San Gabriel the ,” “50 blue kerchiefs from Arcángel and in San Buenaventura. In the China,” and a hand mill—a labor-saving mission to which Cambón had the longest

30 Spring 2011 1 Sites on the eighteenth-century Pacific Coast of North America. Map by Brian F. Gurrin

2 Nicolas de la Cruz Bagay after Pedro Murillo Velarde, Carta hydrographica y chorographica de las yslas Filipinas (Hydrographical and Chorographical Map of the Philippine Islands), 1734 © British Library Board (Maps K.Top.116.37)

attachment, Mission Dolores, the array of of the mission, where they were installed such objects is more diverse: for example, for use as fonts for holy water (see fig. 4). one of six “painted and gilt bouquet-like The plate in the niche in the south wall holders to serve as candlesticks” and an (figs. 6, 7) is badly broken, and it is dif- elaborate gilt and painted tabernacle ficult to make out the decorative scheme, (fig. 3) that employs the lush vegetal reliefs, yet the edges of what appear to be two decorative pilasters, and ornate framing lotuses and two peonies can be discerned. devices typical of Philippine sacred art. The dish in the north font (fig. 8) is in bet- Although now in the mission’s museum, ter condition and also employs decorative at the time of the 1936 Historic American motifs common to Chinese ceramics: two Buildings Survey this tabernacle was in the birds nestled among peonies and branches large niche in the north wall of the church with spring blossoms. In both cases, the (figs. 4, 5). It is also possible that a chalice, plates’ broad brushwork and guileless style stolen from the mission in the 1970s, was suggest they are from the coastal province the Chinese silver chalice obtained by of Fujian, the home province of many Cambón. Mission Dolores still possesses Chinese emigrants and a common source two shallow, rimless porcelain plates, deco- of Chinese ceramics in the Spanish colo- rated in underglaze blue. Now disused and nial Philippines.9 usually covered by cloths, the plates are Remaining evidence of the artistic built into two irregularly shaped, round- materials Cambón shipped is more elusive arched niches in the north and south walls than that of the finished objects. Shells

31 American Art 3 Tabernacle. Philippine Islands, ca. that he acquired for use in the windows hold the porcelain plates—one with a shell 18th century. Carved wood with of Mission Dolores, which were sent design, “richly ornamented with scroll mo- polychrome and gilt decoration. Mission San Francisco de Asís separately, seem never to have reached tifs and flanked on either side with more (Mission Dolores), San Francisco. their destination. Tracing the whereabouts scrolling decorative patterns,” and another Photo, J. M. Mancini of cloth, ink, paper, or paint used in that “is less decorative and painted in red.” 4 Ground Floor Plan, Mission San the eighteenth century presents obvious It is assumed that the paints used to create Francisco de Asís—San Francisco, difficulties. Nonetheless, one intrigu- the mural and other interior works were California. Historic American Buildings Survey, CAL-113, sheet ing possibility is raised by the presence made with local materials—the Historic 2 of 39. Prints and Photographs of a mural in the sanctuary of Mission American Buildings Survey’s color key, Division, Library of Congress, Dolores, painted before the installation of for instance, described the red pigment as Washington, D.C. the monumental reredos in 1796 “Indian Red.” Pigment analysis has never 5 Tabernacle. Niche N.E. Corner (see fig. 4). Covering the entire west wall been conducted on the mural, however, of Nave 103. Historic American of the church, the mural includes two and so it is at least possible that the paints Buildings Survey, CAL-113, sheet 26 of 39. Prints and Photographs statuary niches that are similar in form Cambón brought across the Pacific to Division, Library of Congress to the niches for the holy water fonts that California were also used in its creation.10

32 Spring 2011 6 Niche for holy water font. South Defamiliarizing “Colonial America” wall, Mission Dolores, San Francisco. Photo, J. M. Mancini Francisco Palóu’s recording of 7 Holy water font (detail). South Pedro Benito Cambón’s voyage, wall, Mission Dolores. Photo, the creation of the inventory, and J. M. Mancini the survival of objects linked to 8 Holy water font. North wall, him all confirm something that is Mission Dolores. Photo, J. M. not well recognized in mainstream Mancini scholarship on American art: the presence of Asian moveable art and potentially of Asian art materials in colonial California. Therefore, understanding this Asian presence presents a formidable challenge. Should Cambón be understood as an idiosyncratic adventurer, and his objects an accidental presence? Or were they part of larger patterns and processes that brought peoples and polities in colonial America into contact with Asia in a long-term, systemic way? Put differently, could eighteenth-century California be understood not as a place whose vi- sual and material culture happened to have Asian elements but as part of an interactive transpacific world? The aim of this essay is to reframe the story of Pedro Benito Cambón. A fuller understanding may be gained of his voyage and of the visual and material culture of eighteenth-century California by placing them within three contexts only infrequently applied to the study of colonial American art and his- tory: the “Pacific world” that joined the to Asia from the fifteenth century until the early nineteenth century; the Franciscan order as a transpacific, global polity; and the turbulent relational context created by rivalry between Spain, the Franciscan order, and other groups in the eighteenth century. It is hoped that this recontextualization will not only illuminate the life of a single person who influenced the visual and material culture of one American re- gion but will also encourage broader

33 American Art 9 Arthur Putnam, Fr. Junípero Saint, [or] Villain.”11 While this essay Serra, early 20th century. Mission does not challenge the importance of such Dolores, San Francisco. Photo, goals, an exclusive focus on “accommoda- J. M. Mancini tions between invaders and indigenes” at the expense of additional contexts risks casting California as an object with only two dimensions instead of one with many sides.12 Specialists in the history of the ar- chitecture, art, and material culture of California also have focused on other questions. George Kubler’s classically structuralist and functionalist effort to characterize the California and New Mexico missions as two distinct “modes of Franciscan architecture” in the border- lands, while groundbreaking for its time, excluded from consideration categories other than “Indian” and “European” and left little room for variation even within those categories. Moreover, neither Kubler’s comparative approach nor his efforts to reconsider the geographic, tem- pursuit of lines of analysis leading back poral, and conceptual frames for the study from the late eighteenth century into the of American art. longer duration have been widely emulated In order to begin such a recontextu- within recent scholarship on California alization, it will be necessary to leave culture. The aim of much recent work behind much that is familiar in the has been to provide new analyses not of prevailing scholarly contexts that have the missions themselves but of the uses to informed the conceptualization of colonial which they have been put: missions as the visual and material culture. Generally source of invented U.S. architectural tradi- speaking, historical interpretations of tions or, more commonly, as the grounds colonial America—and the historical for the creation of powerful myths.13 narratives underpinning analyses of visual Scholars focused on the United States culture that follow from them—are and its colonial antecedents have also heavily tilted toward the Anglo-Atlantic. faced difficulty in conceptualizing and Scholarship on New California also has contextualizing the Franciscan order in a taken little interest in exploring how Asia way that would permit a meaningful in- might figure in the analysis of the region. terpretation of Cambón’s actions. The art If most historical studies note Spain’s and art-world activities of the Catholic re- engagement in the transpacific, they ligious orders have seldom been recognized generally neglect a deeper consideration as pertinent to “American art.” Historians of this dimension in favor of other goals: of New California have studied the reli- “taking us into the missions and reimagin- gious orders more extensively. But even ing them from Indian angles of vision” recent studies tend to see the Franciscans and reflecting on the “unresolved moral as an entity geographically limited to the question[s]” raised by European colonial- California missions or, most extensively, ism, often by raking over the already to the locations in Spain and obsessively documented career of Serra specifically associated with Serra (such as (fig. 9) to determine if he was a “Pioneer, his birthplace, Mallorca), rather than as

34 Spring 2011 a global polity whose representatives had Martín de Mayorga,” and other superior ventured from Europe to East Asia as forces, it is extraordinarily unlikely that early as the thirteenth century. Historians obedience and passivity alone would have describe “the padres” as passive, homo- taken Cambón out of Spain, let alone geneous, and interchangeable, not as across the Pacific.15 individuals who possessed the full range of human motivations. And finally, histo- rians of the Franciscans in California have The Pacific World tended to present them atemporally as an anachronistic “medieval” entity teleported When Pedro Benito Cambón traversed directly to the “Enlightenment,” instead of the Pacific in 1779, it was neither as a the subjects and agents of the tumults of saint nor a villain, nor even as a pioneer. the early modern world.14 In the last third of the eighteenth All of these limitations obscure a figure century, the forbidding frontier of New like Pedro Benito Cambón. During his California was to Spaniards a new place time in California, he seems to have sought whose geography, people, and things roles that differentiated him from those were only just becoming known. But the Franciscans whose sole aim was the conver- corridor between Acapulco and sion of Indians. One was that of chaplain was a familiar space that by the 1770s to and fellow adventurer among seamen had been part of the Spanish Empire for and soldiers, not only on the San Blas and more than two centuries. It connected Manila trips but also during an expedi- Spain’s American possessions to its tion to find the source of San Francisco Asian-Pacific colonies in the Philippine Bay. Others included the constellation and Mariana Islands; it linked the entire 10 Hipolito Ximenez after Antonio Fernandez de Roxas, Topographia of aesthetic roles he pursued—roles that empire of Spain to China and the other de la ciudad de Manila, capital de kept him away from missionary work for states of Asia; and it formed the heart of las yslas Philipinas (Topographical years at a time. Although Palóu strained a Pacific world that, while more loosely Map of the City of Manila, Capital to portray his friend as the hapless pawn joined than the Atlantic, was nonetheless of the Philippine Islands), ca. 1739 © British Library Board (Maps of illness, “God[’s] great wisdom,” “his materially, institutionally, and processu- K.Top.116.40) Excellency, the temporary , Don ally interconnected and interactive. This Pacific world was the first context that shaped Cambón’s adventure. A number of bodies of scholarship out- side the study of colonial America provide insight into the contours of this world. The first is economic history, which has sought to untangle the many forms of transregional interaction in the early modern world and which has paid consid- erable attention to the Pacific as one venue for such interaction. Most notably, Dennis Flynn and Arturo Giráldez (who along with Andre Gunder Frank place Asia, not Europe, at the center of the global economy before 1750) have argued that Spain’s establishment of a Pacific route between Acapulco and the Philippines, and particularly the establishment of Manila (fig. 10) in 1571, was the founding moment of a global economy.16

35 American Art The arguments supporting this view For their part, historians of Chinese are complex and worth outlining in culture and art understand the cre- brief. In the sixteenth century China was ation, distribution, and use of Chinese the world’s largest producer of goods— art objects as a global enterprise that including moveable arts that Europeans encompassed the transpacific from the desired but did not have the technology sixteenth century onward. The scholar- to produce (such as porcelain and lacquer- ship that begins with Asia, rather than ware) or that Europeans could produce the mainstream Anglo-Atlantic context, only to a limited extent (such as silk). is different in several regards: first, in Concurrently, Spain controlled the world’s revealing just how late direct British largest deposits of silver, in mines estab- contact with China was compared with lished at Potosí and later in New Spain. that of other European empires, par- But there were other factors at play, relating ticularly Spain and Portugal; second, in specifically to Chinese policy and sensibil- underscoring the multidirectionality of ity. One, which Kenneth Pomeranz has Chinese exports across the Pacific and emphasized, was the massive remonetiza- Indian Oceans as well as the Atlantic; tion effort still ongoing in China when the and third, in emphasizing how even the Pacific link was established, making silver arrival of Europeans as large-scale trad- the standard for the payment of taxes and ing partners in East Asia in the sixteenth the medium for many commercial transac- century was only one step in the devel- tions. Another was the Ming reluctance to opment of an export-oriented Chinese engage in long-distance trade, requiring moveable art market that preceded Europeans to establish footholds within the early modern European empires the orbit of regional Chinese trade, for by centuries. For example, scholarship example, in Macao, Manila, and Batavia.17 on porcelain indicates that the port of Economic historians attribute pro- received between forty and sixty found, systemic results to this forging thousand pieces of Chinese porcelain of a “Pacific link.” Most obviously, it in the 1530s alone. The first recorded accelerated the trade by Europeans of shipment of porcelain from Manila to American silver for Chinese goods, New Spain took place in 1573, and the but it also set up other global market single largest early modern collection dynamics. For example, the massive new of porcelain outside China was not in supplies of silver from the Americas, the Atlantic at all, but in the Ottoman combined with Chinese demand, Empire. The Anglo-Atlantic powers greatly affected global exchange rates, were virtually the last significant play- particularly between 1540 and 1640 and ers to enter the late medieval and early again between 1700 and 1750. A global modern market for Chinese ceramics: market in currency arbitrage was thus by the eighteenth century, when Britain born, in which Europeans and others and then the United States attained this could become rich simply by taking status, Chinese ceramists had been mak- cheap silver to China and exchanging ing massive quantities of porcelain for it for gold.18 Among the systemic social export for four hundred years.20 transformations effected by the Pacific The growing literature by scholars of link were new migration patterns such as the Spanish Empire, including scholars the large-scale Chinese migration to the of both history and art and material Philippines—as Pomeranz emphasizes, culture, also argues convincingly for the the “city” of Chinese in Manila was existence of an integrated world linking “already larger in 1603 than New York Spain’s Asian and New World colonies. or Philadelphia in 1770, and more than These literatures illuminate the vectors of double the size of Boston in 1770.”19 exchange created and maintained by the

36 Spring 2011 its tendency to exceed the strict official limits imposed by the Spanish state on both the outflow of silver and the importation of manufactured goods, often by substantial degrees. In some cases, such excesses were sanctioned by the crown itself, notably in permitting private trade arrangements mirroring the “Separate Adventures” that the East India Company later allowed on its China routes. But even sanctioned private trade did not satisfy the seem- ingly boundless craving for Asian objects in the Americas. Thus, residents there regularly flouted official limits—and even outright prohibitions on coastal trade, notably the 1631 ban on trade between the viceroyalties of Peru and New Spain enacted to stem the influx of Asian objects and the outflow of silver.22 This culture of transpacific desire and smuggling persisted until the arrival in the 1760s of Visitor General José de Gálvez, who found that even though it was “absolutely prohibited,” whole fleets of boats came to Acapulco from as far away as Peru and Guatemala to obtain 11 Tureen with Cover, 1770–80. initiation of state-sponsored voyages be- as many contraband “efectos de China” Made in China for Mexico. tween Acapulco and Manila, undertaken as they could carry. Fulminating against Hard-paste porcelain, enamel, nearly every year until Mexican indepen- “the common and frequent carrying of gilt, 11 1/16 in. high; 11 13/16 in. diameter. The Metropolitan dence in 1821. Against the backdrop of hidden goods of much value, in boxes Museum of Art, New York, Gift economic historians’ generally large-scale covered with blankets . . . in large jars; of the Winfield Foundation, observations, historians of colonial New in crates with seeds, vegetables, and The Helena Woolworth McCann Collection. Photo © The Spain such as Katharine Bjork, Louisa dried fruits . . . in the chests of soldiers Metropolitan Museum of Art / Schell Hoberman, and Carmen Yuste or sailors, and in the trunks, pouches, Art Resource, New York López demonstrate that silver from the and other quarters of the passengers, of- New World paid for a vast diversity of ficials and merchants,” Gálvez initiated goods from all over East, Southeast, and extreme measures to put a stop to the even South Asia, including aesthetic illegal trade.23 products such as Chinese, Philippine, and Objects did not just move across Indian textiles; Chinese, Vietnamese, and the Pacific; they became part of the Thai ceramics; Philippine jewelry; and fabric of life in New Spain. Gálvez may even gold-capped alligator teeth as well as have clamped down on the smuggling forest, agricultural, and mineral products of Asian objects, but, like other elite such as camphor, spices, tea, and precious peninsulars in the New World, includ- stones. Beyond silver, a small number of ing his brother Matías de Gálvez, who New World products also went to Asia, became viceroy in 1783, he nonetheless such as the red dye cochineal.21 commemorated his acquisition of a new These literatures also shed light on title, marqués de la Sonora, by commis- another typical aspect of that exchange: sioning armorial porcelain (fig. 11). The

37 American Art creole elite, which controlled the Pacific material culture. He was also a consent- trade, also embraced Asian objects, fur- ing member of another global polity: the nishing their great houses with Chinese Franciscan order, whose historical roots gilt and lacquered screens; walnut beds in East Asia actually preceded those of and writing sets; ivory-inlaid writing Spain. Contrary to their representation desks; lacquer tables, lecterns, and by Americanists, medieval Franciscans dressing tables; mahogany and cedar and the world they inhabited were boxes and tabernacles; porcelain plates, anything but insular and unchanging. cups, jars, serving dishes, candlesticks, In the middle of the thirteenth century, and bowls; silk bedspreads, pillows, one of the first Europeans to traverse and hangings; hand-painted wallpaper; the Eurasian landmass was a contem- board games and toys; Philippine ivo- porary and disciple of Francis of Assisi, ries; and Japanese painted, inlaid, and Giovanni di Pian di Carpine (1180– gilt lacquer screens as well as boxes in- 1252), who voyaged to Karakorum, in laid with mother-of-pearl and ebony and Mongolia, as Pope Innocent IV’s repre- ivory side tables.24 Moreover, creoles sentative to the Great Khan, in reciproc- patronized local artists who produced ity to delegations sent by the Mongol new, hybrid, Asian-influenced forms. Empire. Other diplomatic exchanges One important example, biombos, de- followed, and along the way, Franciscans rived from the richly decorated folding and their counterparts participated in an lacquered screens known in Japanese as unprecedented process of material, cul- “wind walls” or byobu, which featured tural, political, and economic exchange in both commercial and diplomatic and integration that joined nearly all exchanges.25 areas of the Old World.26 The Black Death and the collapse of the Pax Mongolica brought the Religious Orders as Transpacific Polities thirteenth-century “world system” to an end, including the Franciscan link to When Pedro Benito Cambón crossed East Asia. Reviving this tie in the early the Pacific, it was not only as a Spanish modern period presented political as subject born into the world’s only trans- well as practical challenges. The found- pacific empire, an empire integrated by ing of the Society of Jesus in 1540 gave institutions and dynamic processes of the mendicant orders a new rival on the exchange and integration in which Asian world stage, and the development of new elements were a part of the visual and arrangements between the Holy See and the European empires interposed those empires into relationships that had pre- viously been conducted directly between the religious orders and Asian states. Nonetheless, in this new environment, Spain’s establishment of a transpacific link facilitated a Franciscan return to 12 Detail showing church and the region. Along with the Augustinians convent of San Francisco and and a number of other religious orders, chapel of the Third Order of San Francisco, Manila. Hipolito they arrived in the Philippine Islands Ximenez after Antonio Fernandez shortly after the founding of Manila, de Roxas, Topographia de la in 1577, and built a substantial com- ciudad de Manila, capital de las yslas Philipinas, ca. 1739 plex (fig. 12) in the walled city. From © British Library Board (Maps Manila, the Franciscans worked to K.Top.116.40) extend their influence to other parts of

38 Spring 2011 new treaty on trade and shipbuilding. But during the voyage Muñoz also con- ducted economic negotiations on behalf of the Franciscans, working to obtain a pact with the consulado, or merchants’ association of New Spain, for the Franciscan missions of Japan. Such interactions meant that large quantities of the objects and materials that left Asia in European hands were destined for religious environments, including, on some occasions, objects with the symbols of mendicant orders (fig. 13).28

Contexts in Change, Contexts in Relation

Whereas the Pacific world and the global Franciscan order provided long-term contexts for a voyager and mover of objects like Pedro Cambón, his entry into the transpacific was also sparked by transformations in a third context: the mutable sphere of interpolity rivalry. In this turbulent arena, single strokes such as the decision of an empire to go to war could cause shock waves throughout that 13 Charger with Symbol of the Asia, including Japan (1592) and China, empire and the polities that interacted Order of St. Augustine, ca. where they were finally able to return with it—as had happened during the 1590–1620. Chinese. Porcelain, 27 3 15/16 in. high; 20 ⅛ in. diameter. in 1633. Seven Years’ War, when Carlos III, Peabody Essex Museum, Salem, Even though the many Franciscans reviving the Family Compact with the Massachusetts, Museum purchase who crossed the Pacific in the early Bourbons of France, joined the war with funds donated anonymously and in memory of Joseph D. modern world did so as religious ac- against England in 1762. This decision Hinkle tors, this did not prevent them from had brought disaster to Spain and to the participating in virtually all of the Catholic Church and orders. The British other political, economic, material, seized Havana and Manila, exacting and human processes that intersected a large cash “gift” from the bishop of with the making of a Pacific world, Havana, D. Pedro Agustín Morell de and from having complex motivations Santa Cruz, and transporting him by for so doing. Consider, for example, force to Florida in a British warship when the career of the Franciscan Alonso he refused to divulge the names of clergy Muñoz, a Galician who went to Japan and religious and an account of their from the Philippines. In 1609 he took goods. In Manila, circumstances were on the role of ambassador—not of even worse, as regular and East India Spain, but to Spain, as the emissary of Company forces destroyed, occupied, and the shogun Tokugawa Ieyasu. In this looted churches, chapels, and properties capacity, Muñoz voyaged to meet “the belonging to the religious orders, includ- Marqués de Salina, Spanish Viceroy in ing one of the oldest churches established New Spain” and “the monarch, Philip by the Franciscans in the Philippines, III,” with the purpose of securing a the sixteenth-century church of San

39 American Art Fernando de Dilao, which was burned Spain’s aggressive policies in the ensuing and not rebuilt for decades.29 decades, many of the contexts for his ac- This escalation of interimperial war tions likely would not have existed. The into global war initiated a period of New California missions probably would transformation in Spanish policy, dur- not have been established; the naval port ing which Bourbon officials aggressively at San Blas might not have been built; worked to counter not only Britain but and Spain might well not have joined also Spain’s other rivals in the global the American Revolution and thus not borderlands, such as the Apaches and the sent ships across the Pacific to protect newly transpacific Russian Empire. José Manila during that conflict. Historians de Gálvez was perhaps the single most would have had less textual evidence for important figure in this process. He over- Cambón’s voyage even if he had gone, for saw the implementation of administrative without Gálvez’s intensified scrutiny of reforms in the coastal cities of Acapulco transpacific shipping, the inventory prob- and Veracruz and the establishment of the ably would not have been made. base at San Blas (paralleled by adminis- Complex as they are, however, these trative and military reforms in Havana, relations were not the only ones to have New Orleans, and Manila) and developed a direct bearing on Cambón’s world. plans for defending the continental Also of direct relevance were shifts in borderlands. Indeed, Gálvez’s obsessive an additional relational context: that of pursuit of Spanish geopolitical primacy the convoluted relations between the brought him to the edge of madness: individual religious orders and other poli- during an expedition to Sonora, a vision ties, including other religious orders. This of Saint Francis appeared to Gálvez, context is not always rendered legible by promising that he would end Apache prevailing literatures, which in addition belligerence “by bringing six hundred to casting individual Franciscans as ho- apes from Guatemala, which he would mogenous and interchangeable sometimes put into uniforms and send against the imply a sameness and mutuality among fastnesses of the Cerro Prieto.” Yet even the religious orders as corporate entities. temporary insanity did not stop Gálvez Recognizing the complexity of these from carrying through another project for relations can help us better understand which he had campaigned vigorously: the the situation faced by Franciscans on both establishment of new Franciscan missions sides of the Pacific in Cambón’s time, in California beginning in 1769. After beginning with the Americas. Here, as Gálvez returned to Spain, he participated is well known, a seismic shift took place in the culminating event of this epoch in the same decade as Spain’s bruising of Spanish geopolitical consolidation: encounter with Britain, when in February the American Revolution, which Spain 1767 Carlos III issued an order expelling joined against Britain as an ally of France. the Jesuit order from the entire Spanish Gálvez supported not only a network of Empire. Historians of New California spies but also his nephew Bernardo de have tended to see this event as a harbin- Gálvez, governor of , whose ger of Franciscan demise—one among decisive actions affected the course of the many reasons for the order to dwell on conflict between Britain and the insur- the “epic struggle” over “state power” and gency, and gained Spain control of the its “failure to win it.”31 Throughout the entire Gulf of Mexico for the first time.30 Americas, however, Franciscans were not Without a doubt, the intensification of the victims of the Jesuit expulsion but, interpolity rivalry from the Seven Years’ rather, its major beneficiaries. This was War onward directly shaped Cambón’s particularly so in New Spain, where in career. Without that global conflict and all cases in the viceroyalty where Jesuit

40 Spring 2011 missions were not secularized or closed, Augustinians, and Dominicans began to the Franciscans took charge. In the bor- arrive in Japan from Manila, some Jesuits derlands, which across the Americas had responded with intimidation and the been strongholds of the Society of Jesus, keeping of regular reports on mendicant Franciscans also gained. In the instance activities. In turn, almost from the mo- of one Jesuit chapel in Louisiana, im- ment of their arrival in China, rivals to the ages and objects were turned over to the Jesuits attempted to dislodge them from Franciscans before civil authorities razed the prime place that the Jesuits, through the building. And in New California, a strategy of cultural accommodation and where the continental borderlands met the pursuit of elites, had obtained in the the increasingly contested Pacific, the Ming and early Qing dynasties.33 Bourbons allowed the Franciscans to build This rivalry turned to open conflict the only new missions of the period. Thus, when mendicants and members of the while the Bourbon state’s consolidation secular Collège des Missions Étrangères of sovereignty presented Franciscans with took their case to Rome, arguing that long-term challenges, in the immediate Jesuit practices, including the toleration period of the Jesuit expulsion it opened of Chinese ceremonies honoring ances- new possibilities, including the potential tors and Confucius and the apparent for imagining themselves in new ways suppression of the crucifix, contravened and expressing that identity in visual and Church norms. In 1705 Pope Clement XI material forms.32 sent a representative, Charles Maillard de On the other side of the Pacific, an Tournon, to Beijing to convey papal con- 14 Jean-Baptiste Du Halde, Plan de even greater tendency toward competition demnation of Jesuit accommodation of Peking and accompanying key in characterized relations between the orders, the Chinese rites. In response, the Kangxi Description géographique, histo- intensified by the fact that eastward- emperor overturned his own 1692 edict rique, chronologique, politique, et traveling Jesuits, following in the tracks of promising toleration, and in 1721 his son physique de l’empire de la Chine et de la Tartarie chinoise (The Hague: the Portuguese Empire, had been able to banned European Christian missionaries. Henri Scheurleer, 1736), vol. 1. gain a foothold in Japan and China before As was advertised to all of Europe by the Department of Rare Books and transpacific mendicants and by the intense map entitled the Plan de Peking in French Special Collections, Princeton University Library. Photo, desire of all the orders to establish them- Jesuit Jean-Baptiste Du Halde’s 1736 Princeton University Library selves in both places. When Franciscans, book on Chinese geography, history, and culture (fig. 14), however, Jesuits contin- ued to enjoy access to the imperial court well after this point.34 In contrast, the end came quickly for non-Jesuits, who retreated among chaotic scenes that flared immediately after Tournon’s disastrous embassy. As an Augustinian, Ignacio Gregorio de Santa Teresa, wrote in anguish from Guangzhou in 1709, “The affairs of this Mission are in a bad state, and with little hope of remedy. . . . I have remained to guard the walls of this, our house in Canton, and with danger enough of being accused and thrown from China.” By Cambón’s time, this situation had not improved for his order or for the Franciscans: rivalry with the Jesuits had irreparably broken the link to China.35

41 American Art Transpacific Angles of Vision Indians in eighteenth-century California managed to cross the Pacific and return This account began with the proposi- with twenty-two cases of Asian objects, tion that the story of Pedro Benito materials, and products. Cambón went Cambón may only be understood by because he could: both long-term practice contextualizing it within three milieux and immediate circumstances set the stage that are infrequently applied to the art for such a voyage. Indeed, Cambón, from and history of “colonial America”: the the recontextualized perspective of the Pacific world anchored by the Spanish transpacific, was nearly as “ordinary” as Empire; the Franciscan order as a global, his twelve dozen porcelain plates. transpacific polity; and the volatile world But “taking us into the missions and re- of eighteenth-century interpolity relations, imagining them from” transpacific “angles which created and foreclosed opportuni- of vision” ought to include an exploration ties for Spaniards and Franciscans on of more interpretative questions raised both sides of the Pacific. At the very least, by Cambón’s acquisition, transport, and 15 Vestments, Mission San Gabriel. San Gabriel, California. Photo, my purpose in presenting these contexts use of Asian objects and materials. What J. M. Mancini was to help explain how a missionary to were the meanings of his actions? Here recontextualization also provides a pos- sible framework. Once again, the contexts and analysis most frequently applied by scholars—the Franciscan experience in California as exemplified by Serra; the Franciscan-Indigenous relationship in California; and / or “medieval” Catholic doctrine as expressed and reiterated through iconography—only provide partial insight. For example, the floral decoration on the lavishly painted red silk vestments associated with Cambón in Mission San Gabriel (fig. 15) or the lotuses and peonies on the font plates, following existing inter- pretations, could be said loosely to evoke the image Cambón had earlier successfully given to Serra of Our Lady of Guadalupe, which was “decorated profusely with flowers”; their bright colors could be said to have been desirable to Franciscans for their ability to “catch the Indians’ eyes.”36 Yet, if these objects’ obvious material association with Asia is treated as more than incidental, then additional interpreta- tions derived from the other contexts that shaped Cambón’s world may be offered, such as the threatened Pacific link itself. As Cambón embarked on the Princesa for Manila, he must have reflected gravely on what would happen to the Franciscans in the Philippines if the British returned and took the city for good. After he arrived in Manila, he would have seen with his own

42 Spring 2011 16 Saint Francis and the Pheasant, eyes the destruction the previous war had 1263. From Bonaventura de wrought and heard firsthand accounts Bagnoregio, Legenda Major, sec. 1457, miniatura nr. 108. of how the religious had resisted British Museo Francescano dei Cappucini, rule. With this in mind, might Cambón’s Rome, Inv. 1266 outfitting of the California missions 17 Anonymous, Junípero Serra, 1787. with Philippine and Chinese objects and From Francisco Palóu, Relacion materials have been designed to embody— historica de la vida y apostolicas materially and aesthetically—the vital tareas del venerable padre fray transpacific link that had been broken Junípero Serra (Mexico: Don Felipe de Zúñiga y Ontiveros, 1787). during the Seven Years’ War but to whose Department of Rare Books and protection during the War of Independence Special Collections, Princeton he himself had successfully contributed?37 University Library. Photo, Princeton University Library If the application of new contexts allows for current interpretations to be expanded, it also allows them to be challenged in some cases—as with the common assump- tion that Franciscans in California resisted syncretism. Steven Hackel, for example, makes this argument, emphasizing that “the padres saw [as] superstition” the Indian worship of birds and use of feath- ers in the material culture of religion. Yet the central image of one of the Mission Dolores font plates is of a bird, possibly a pheasant, nestled among flora; the San Gabriel vestments are painted with large feather-flowers; and the hidden Mission Dolores mural has a large avian figure, described by Ben Wood as “obviously a rooster, with intricately painted feathers and a heart in the center.” If Cambón sought confluences between Indian and Franciscan iconography, avian motifs would have been an obvious choice. Not only is the rooster a Resurrection symbol, Bohemia in the tumultuous century before but birds also referred to Franciscan images the Reformation.38 such as Saint Francis and the Pheasant in Similarly, it is often suggested that Bonaventura da Bagnoregio’s official life there was a unitary iconographic program history of the saint, the Legenda Major in California, supposedly derived from (fig. 16), and Preaching to the Birds in the “medieval” practice and theology. And yet Saint Francis cycle in the Upper Church in the aesthetic, material, and iconographic Assisi. Such an effort toward material and preferences Cambón exercised appear to symbolic hybridity across the lines of cul- have set him apart from his associates, for ture and orthodoxy, while perhaps atypical example, the maker of the portrait of Serra in eighteenth-century California, would in Palóu’s life history (fig. 17). This widely have linked Cambón to Franciscan practice circulating image casts Serra brandish- in other places and epochs, ranging from ing a crucifix, towering above a crowd of the first generation of Franciscans in New onlookers. Some of these observers cower Spain, to Franciscans in seventeenth- before him, including an Indian with a century Bethlehem, to Franciscans in crown of feathers who averts his eyes,

43 American Art perhaps from the fear of crosses that some of ritual but also of visual representation. scholars attribute to Indians. In contrast, Jesuits were accused of suppressing the the inventory of Cambón’s vast shipment crucifix and thus of converting Chinese to did not include a single crucifix and only something quite other than Christianity. one painted and gilt cross. Moreover, Such an accusation, in turn, had roots Cambón’s objects differed from their me- in the images and objects the Jesuits dieval counterparts in specific ways: unlike circulated in China. As Craig Clunas his vestments, medieval chasubles often argues, Crucifixion prints had been one featured figural images, including narra- of the barriers to effecting conversion that tive sequences depicting scenes from the Jesuits had encountered in the late Ming. lives of the saints such as Francis receiving These turned away potential converts the stigmata.39 whose aesthetic sensibilities made them Here, perhaps, another context shaped unwilling to accept violence and pain in Cambón’s privileging of avian, floral, and religious images, and whose more general Marian imagery over the crucifix, the tools distaste for didactic images made them of penitence, or stigmatization: the broken skeptical of narrative, picture-and-text art. Franciscan link to China (which followed In response, Jesuits “stress[ed] the image a traumatic rupture with Japan in the early of the Virgin and Child, to the extent that seventeenth century that had resulted in well-informed seventeenth-century Chinese the expulsion of all of the religious orders). writers ‘knew’ that the Westerners’ God As noted, a major precipitant to this heavy was a woman shown holding a baby.” This loss for the Franciscans was intolerance strategy allowed Jesuits not only to skirt toward the Jesuits’ strategy of cultural Chinese aversions but also to appeal to the accommodation. This dispute over accom- existing material culture of religion. Images modation turned on questions not only of the Virgin Mary had both an aesthetic

44 Spring 2011 and a religious parallel in China in figures Reimagining Mission Dolores of the bodhisattva Guanyin, in whose guise as a female “giver of sons” Chinese makers In 1785 Francisco Palóu left the Californias modeled ivory figures in direct interplay for good. Cambón remained at Mission with Christian figures of Mary.40 Dolores (fig. 18), on whose design he Understanding this context as poten- and Palóu had worked for many years tially relevant to Cambón’s actions allows and through several iterations. In 1787 us to ask additional questions about them. a furious storm destroyed the temporary Was his choice of open-ended, hybrid church next to the foundations of the iconography and of objects in Chinese permanent structure the two had designed. materials (whose original function, in some Cambón had been Palóu’s subordinate: cases, was not even liturgical) a response to now alone, he redesigned the church, and the calamitous loss of China—a loss that construction began in 1788. He introduced had been triggered by mendicant inflex- paired columns on bulky pediments and ibility toward cultural accommodation and widened the building’s foundations by 2 2/3 jealousy toward the Jesuits? Cambón could varas (about 2 meters). It is not known to not go to China. But he could bring China what extent the rest of the design deviated to California, in the form of beautiful from what he and Palóu had devised, but objects in Chinese materials. From their as Maynard Geiger writes, “The façade . . . place in the visual and material heart of his is Cambón’s contribution to the mission.”42 mission, these objects could also serve as The structure designed by Cambón, 18 Mission San Francisco de Asís bridges to Indians. With the Jesuits gone, built by Ohlone Indians, and dedicated in (Mission Dolores), San Francisco. perhaps Cambón understood his era as 1791 is, after the , the oldest build- Photo, J. M. Mancini another kind of new beginning that might ing in San Francisco. It is rectangular in 19 East Elevation of Church, Mission recover something from the Franciscan plan, with a pitched roof. Its facade, which San Francisco de Asís—San past: not the imagined purity Serra ascribed is roughly equal in height and width, Francisco, California. Historic to converting a “first generation” of Indians, has two tiers, the lower with the paired American Buildings Survey, CAL- but Franciscan habits of aesthetic and cul- columns mentioned above on either side 113, sheet 8 of 39. Prints and Photographs Division, Library of tural accommodation that had been lost in of a round-arched central door, and the Congress, Washington, D.C. the scuffle of interpolity rivalry.41 upper with six stepped columns supporting pyramidal finials. Pierced into the upper tier of the facade are three openings, one rectangular and two topped with round arches, which are the niches for the mis- sion’s bells (fig. 19). Unlike so many of the missions, this building has remained substantially intact. Despite the period of neglect following Mexican independ- ence and secularization, despite the 1906 earthquake, and despite a 1916 renovation by Willis Polk in which it was retrofitted with steel and some of its decorations re- stored, Mission Dolores retains its original foundation, walls, and facade as well as its rawhide-tied timber roof.43 In Lugar: Essays on Philippine Heritage and Architecture, Augusto Villalón writes that most churches built in the Spanish colonial Philippines were designed not by architects working from plans but by

45 American Art and terrifying earthquakes, such as trem- ors that were recorded in July 1769.44 But which memories did Cambón use? In the course of his life and travels, he had the opportunity to observe many dif- ferent options. Was his design, following Kubler’s characterization of Franciscan architecture in California, “essentially European”? Or does Cambón’s Mission Dolores also embody the interactive, interlinked culture of the transpacific world? A better sense of the possibilities open to Cambón may be gauged by look- ing at the Philippine architectural context in comparison with other architectural contexts he knew. Several elements are typical of early modern Philippine church architecture, including Franciscan churches. One is single-nave, rectangular construction. Another is the use of pitched roofs, often in conjunction with pentagonal facades, frequently divided into tiers that were themselves adorned with columns or pilasters, frequently paired. Another is the tendency to avoid belfries in the form of steeples built above the roofline: as Villalón notes, many early modern churches had detached bell tow- ers. Others had bell niches pierced into rectangular or hexagonal pseudobelfries of the same height as, and essentially in- tegrated into, the front elevation. Finally, most early modern churches in the Philippines exhibit a distinctly horizontal orientation. Along with the treatment of bell placement, this characteristic may be specifically understood as a response 20 Obradoiro facade, cathedral of members of the religious orders working to building in a seismically active zone. Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, from memory. This also describes the Taken to a monumental extreme, the style Spain. Photo, J. M. Mancini design of Mission Dolores. Pedro Benito of church architecture in this vein has Cambón was not a trained architect, and been described as “earthquake baroque.”45 his design necessarily emerged from mem- The greater heterogeneity of church ory and on-the-spot experimentation. Like architecture in early modern New Spain his efforts to develop a nexus of images, makes it more difficult to describe a single objects, and materials, this process entailed “typical” approach. Nonetheless, several the making of choices within a framework differences may be noted. In contrast of possibilities and limitations. But in this to the Philippines, the use of cruciform case, those limitations were also physical: plans and/or multiple nave bays was as Cambón knew, structures in California common in New Spain. So too was vault- would have to withstand violent winds ing. Moreover, despite the prevalence of

46 Spring 2011 earthquakes in New Spain (which gave of collapse during earthquakes than the rise to modifications toward horizontality buildings to which they are attached.46 in some places, notably Oaxaca), in many A final architectural context Cambón parts of the viceroyalty architects were knew that ought to be compared with much less reluctant than their Philippine Philippine architecture is the Spanish counterparts to construct churches with city where he became a Franciscan, soaring bell towers and an extreme vertical Santiago de Compostela. This city in orientation. One specific example is the Cambón’s home region of Galicia is and Sanctuary of Our Lady of Ocotlán near was a pilgrimage site of significance to Tlaxcala, a site Cambón may have seen all European Catholics (and, before the owing to its importance to Franciscans Reformation, to all Latin Christians). It and proximity to . The is associated with Francis of Assisi, who most common forms for bell placement is known to have embarked on a pilgrim- in New Spain were towers or parapets age toward it in 1214: local tradition with niches known as espadañas—even holds that Saint Francis “was the founder 21 Church of the convent of though, as architectural historian Stephen of the convento that carries his name.” San Francisco, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. Photo, Tobriner argues, both tower belfries and Moreover, the period of Cambón’s youth J. M. Mancini parapets present a significantly higher risk was an especially dynamic one in the history of the city’s sacred architecture, during which it underwent a substantial, durable transformation. In the year of his birth, 1738, work began on Fernando Casas y Novoa’s new facade to the city’s cathedral, the Obradoiro (fig. 20). Erected between two seventeenth-century bell towers that exceed two hundred feet in height, this “remarkably exuberant” addition is notable for its “accentuated verticality.” The Franciscans joined this mid-eighteenth-century building boom, beginning work on a new church on the site of the thirteenth-century convent of San Francisco in 1742 (fig. 21). Although much more austere than the Obradoiro facade, the church’s neoclassical design echoed the changes to the cathedral in its new vertical orientation.47 In various respects, then, Pedro Cambón’s design for Mission Dolores over- lapped with typical elements of Philippine church architecture and apparently with Franciscan buildings Cambón definitely saw in the Philippines, in the walled city of Manila. Evidence of this complex is scarce: it was completely destroyed during World War II, and most of the extant images de- pict a building that had been altered since the eighteenth century. Nonetheless, the 1739 topographical map of Manila repro- duced here in figs. 10 and 12 suggests that

47 American Art in the eighteenth century the Franciscan to argue that he copied forms he remem- church had a rectangular plan, a pitched bered seeing in the Philippines—whether roof with no dome, a pentagonal facade European, Asian, or a combination. with horizontal tiers, a round-arched door, Rather, it is to argue that he participated and integrated facade columns. Mission in the creation and transmission of a Dolores deviates, however, from church transpacific architecture whose practi- architecture in the other contexts Cambón tioners shared membership in common knew. With this in mind, is it possible to institutions and culture; a toleration and imagine Mission Dolores as the product of even enthusiasm for hybridity; and the a deliberately transpacific consciousness? desire to respond actively to the problems To make this argument is not to argue that posed by building in the earthquake-prone Mission Dolores was “not European,” “not Pacific rim. Thus, I would suggest that New Spanish,” or “not Indian.” As Villalón the most unusual feature of Cambón’s emphasizes, Philippine church architecture facade—Mission Dolores’s integrated was itself a fusion of European and Asian bell niches, which directly emulated elements: thus, to bring to California a neither the New Spanish espadaña nor the Philippine model necessarily meant adapt- Philippine pierced pseudobelfry—might ing an approach that was already hybrid. be considered not the straightforward ap- Cambón’s pyramidal finials, which are propriation of a form specific to either side used in Galicia and which also feature in of the Pacific but a transpacific form cre- Manila architecture, might have embodied ated of transpacific practice. As such, it is a such a return. fitting emblem of the complex, interactive To argue that Cambón designed from transpacific world to which Pedro Benito a transpacific consciousness is not merely Cambón’s California belonged.

Notes Versions of this paper were presented at the Scholars frequently call New California Franciscan Missionaries in Hispanic British Group in Early American History, “Alta California,” but that designa- California, 1769–1848: A Biographical Cambridge University, 2005; College Art tion (along with “Baja California”) Dictionary (San Marino, Calif.: Association, Boston; American History did not come into official use until a Huntington Library, 1969), 38–40; Research Seminar, Oxford University; and later period. A border between the two and Frank J. Portman, “Pedro Benito Religion and Ritual Theme Seminar, Getty regions did exist, however, from 1773, Cambón, OFM: Mission Builder Par Research Institute, 2006; and the Philippine when Palóu marked the dividing line Excellence,” Argonaut 5, no. 2 (Fall 1994): Academic Consortium for Latin American between the Franciscan settlements of 8–15. Studies, Manila, 2008. I would like to thank New California and older missions to the Getty Research Institute, the School of the south, which had been turned over 3 For “great consignment” and “empty Social Science of the Institute for Advanced to the Dominicans. hands,” see Palóu, Historical Memoirs, Study, Guire Cleary, and Aaron Olivas. 4:198, 189. “Procured elsewhere”: 2 On Cambón, see Francisco Palóu, Junípero Serra to Rafael Verger, quoted 1 At the time of Cambón’s voyage, the Historical Memoirs of New California, in Kurt Baer, “Spanish Colonial Art in present-day U.S. state of California trans. Herbert Eugene Bolton, 4 vols. the California Missions,” Americas 18, and the present-day Mexican states of (Berkeley: Univ. of California Press, no. 1 (July 1961): 40–41. Baja California and Baja California Sur 1926); Cambón’s departure and arrival were claimed by Spain. Mainland and are in 4:186–87, 197. See also Junípero 4 For “linen cloth,” see Francisco Palóu, peninsular California were adminis- Serra, Writings, ed. Antonine Tibesar, 4 Relación histórica de la vida del Venerable tered together as “the Californias” within vols. (Washington, D.C.: Academy of Padre Fray Junípero Serra (Mexico City, a larger jurisdiction, the Provincias American Franciscan History, 1955–66); 1787), 130: “Overcome with the sight Internas, but were informally known Guire Cleary, “Pedro Benito Cambón,” of such a Beautiful Simulacrum, . . . as “Old California” (the Baja penin- in Encyclopedia of San Francisco, at [they] flung their bows and arrows to sula) and “New California” (the present www.sfhistoryencyclopedia.com/articles the ground, running hastily . . . to put U.S. state, plus further territory inland). /c/cambonPedro.html; Maynard Geiger, at the feet of the Sovereign Queen the

48 Spring 2011 valuables they carried at their necks, as 2005), www.common-place.org/vol-05 17 Kenneth Pomeranz, The Great gifts of their highest appreciation; mani- /no-02/hackel/index.shtml. Divergence: China, Europe, and the festing with this action the peace that Making of the Modern World Economy they wanted with us.” 12 For “invaders and indigenes,” see (Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, Jeremy Adelman and Stephen Aron, 2000), 159–162 and passim. On remon- 5 For “register of San Blas,” see Palóu, “From Borderlands to Borders: Empires, etization, see also Timothy Brook, The Historical Memoirs, 4:198. The complex Nation-States, and the Peoples in Confusions of Pleasure: Commerce and political situation that delayed Cambón’s between in North American History,” Culture in Ming China (Berkeley: Univ. departure is discussed in ibid., 1:296– American Historical Review 104, no. 3 of California Press, 1999). 98, 300–301, 3:319, 370–72. (June 1999): 814–41, quote at 815. 18 Estimates vary on the quantities of 6 John Galvin translated the inventory in 13 George Kubler, “Two Modes of silver and goods. Woodrow Borah esti- “Supplies from Manila for the California Franciscan Architecture: New Mexico mated that 5 million pesos of silver were Missions, 1781–1783,” Philippine and California,” reprinted in Franciscan shipped from Mexico in 1602, and as Studies 12, no. 3 (1964): 494–510. Presence in the Americas, ed. Francisco many as 12 million per year in the 1590s Administrative documents related to Morales (Potomac, Md.: Academy of (before 1593, when restrictions were the shipment are in the Archivo General American Franciscan History, 1983), imposed but never observed); Debin de la Nación, Mexico City, but the 369–75, quote on 371. See also Baer, Ma calculated from Chinese sources inventory itself appears to be missing. “Spanish Colonial Art.” Harold Kirker, that an export value of 3 or 4 million California’s Architectural Frontier: Style pesos’ worth of silk products went to 7 Galvin, “Supplies from Manila.” On and Tradition in the Nineteenth Century the Americas per year in the eighteenth hand mills, see James A. Sandos, (San Marino, Calif.: Huntington century; and Louisa Schell Hoberman Converting California: Indians and Library, 1960); James J. Rawls, “The and Flynn and Giráldez set the sev- Franciscans in the Missions (New Haven: California Mission as Symbol and enteenth-century volume of trade at Yale Univ. Press, 2004), 101. Myth,” California History 71, no. 3 between 1.5 million and 2 million pesos (Fall 1992): 342–61; David Gebhard, per annum. See Borah, Early Colonial 8 Galvin, “Supplies from Manila.” “Architectural Imagery, the Mission Trade and Navigation between Mexico and California,” Harvard Architectural and Peru (Berkeley: Univ. of California 9 Ibid. On Fujian ware in the Philippines, Review 1 (Spring 1980): 137–45; and Press, 1954), 116–27; Ma, “The Great see the display in the Ayala Museum, Weber, “The Spanish Legacy.” Silk Exchange: How the World Was Makati City, Metropolitan Manila; and Connected and Developed,” in Flynn, Rita C. Tan, Zhangzhou Ware Found 14 Two recent, influential examples of his- Frost, and Latham, Pacific Centuries, in the Philippines: “Swatow” Export torical work in this vein are Sandos, 51; Flynn and Giráldez, “Spanish Ceramics from Fujian, 16th–17th Century Converting California; and Steven W. Profitability in the Pacific,” in ibid., ([Manila]: Yuchengco Museum, Oriental Hackel, Children of Coyote, Missionaries 23–37; and Hoberman, “Merchants in Ceramic Society of the Philippines; of Saint Francis: Indian-Spanish Relations Seventeenth-Century Mexico City: A Artpostasia, 2007). in Colonial California, 1769–1850 Preliminary Portrait,” Hispanic American (Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Historical Review 57, no. 3 (August 10 Quotations are from artist Ben Press, 2005). Sandos explicitly employs 1977): 479–503. Wood, “The Hidden Mural at Mission different conceptual frames for Indians Dolores,” at www.foundsf.org/index and Franciscans: ethnohistory and 19 Leslie Bauzon, Deficit Government: .php?title=The_Hidden_Mural_at “theohistory,” respectively, and uses Mexico and the Philippine Situado, 1606– _Mission_Dolores. Along with archae- “medieval” to describe virtually every 1804 (Tokyo: Center for East Asian ologist Eric Blind, Wood conducted the Franciscan practice. Cultural Studies, 1981), 34–37; and most recent investigation of the mural. Pomeranz, The Great Divergence. I am seeking permission to conduct 15 Palóu, Historical Memoirs, 4:189–90, pigment analysis. 128. 20 See Craig Clunas, ed., Chinese Export Art and Design (London: Victoria & 11 “Taking” and “multisided” are from 16 Dennis Flynn and Arturo Giráldez, Albert Museum, 1987); Clunas, Art in David Weber, “The Spanish Legacy “Cycles of Silver: Global Economic China (Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, in North America and the Historical Unity through the Mid-Eighteenth 1997); Robert Finlay, “The Pilgrim Imagination,” Western Historical Century,” Journal of World History 13, Art: The Culture of Porcelain in World Quarterly 23, no. 1 (February 1992): no. 2 (Fall 2002): 391–427; Andre History,” Journal of World History 9, no. 5–24, quotes at 22; see also his inval- Gunder Frank, ReOrient: Global 2 (1998): 141–87; George Kuwayama, uable The Spanish Frontier in North Economy in the Asian Age (Berkeley: Chinese Ceramics in Colonial México (Los America (New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, Univ. of California Press, 1998); Angeles: Los Angeles County Museum 1992). For “unresolved,” see Amy Dennis O. Flynn, Lionel Frost, and of Art, 1997); Linda Rosenfeld Shulsky, Turner Bushnell, “Missions and Moral A. J. H. Latham, eds., Pacific Centuries: “A Chinese Porcelain Bowl Found in Judgement,” OAH Magazine of History Pacific and Pacific Rim History since the Concepción de la Vega,” Oriental Art 47, 14, no. 4 (Summer 2000): 20–23. Sixteenth Century (London: Routledge, no. 2 (2001): 62; Shulsky, “Philip II of “Pioneer”: Steven W. Hackel, “The 1999); and Flynn and Giráldez, “Silk for Spain as Porcelain Collector,” Oriental Competing Legacies of Junípero Silver: Manila–Macao Trade in the 17th Art 44, no. 2 (Summer 1998): 51–54; Serra: Pioneer, Saint, Villain,” Century,” Philippine Studies 44 (First and Richard C. Rudolph, “Chinese Common-place 5, no. 2 (January Quarter 1996): 52–68. Armorial Porcelain in Mexico,” Archives

49 American Art of the Chinese Art Society of America 15 23 Gálvez quotations are from “Instruccion Edward A. Pace, Condé B. Pallen, (1961): 13–20. reserbada que han de observar los dos et al., The Catholic Encyclopedia, 15 ministros de Rl nombrados vols. (New York: Encyclopedia Press, 21 Maria Cristina Barrón and Rafael pr el Exmo Sr Virrey,” December 4, 1909), 6:281–98; Antonio Sisto Rosso, Rodríguez-Ponga, eds., La presen- 1766, GA 217, Huntington Library, San “Caballero, Antonio de,” in Dictionary cia Novohispana en el Pacífico insular Marino, Calif. of Ming Biography, 1368–1644, ed. (México: Universidad Iberoamericana, L. Carrington Goodrich, 2 vols. (New 1990); Katharine Bjork, “The Link 24 A plate with the arms of Matías de York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1976), That Kept the Philippines Spanish: Gálvez is reproduced in Rudolph, 1:24–31; and Donald F. Lach and Mexican Merchant Interests and the “Chinese Armorial Porcelain in Mexico,” Edwin J. Van Kley, Asia in the Making Manila Trade, 1571–1815,” Journal fig. 1. For Asian moveable arts in New of Europe (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago, of World History 9, no. 1 (1998): Spain, see Museo de Monterrey and 1993), 3:208–12. 25–50; Tarsicio García Díaz, “México Museo Franz Mayer, Los palacios de en la expansión Hispánica hacia el la Nueva España: Sus tesoros interio- 28 José M. Pou y Martí, “Letter of Fray Oriente,” in La diversidad del siglo res ([México?]: Ediciones e Impresio- Juan del Hierro, Minister General XVIII Novohispano: Homenaje a Roberto nes Gant, [1990]), 57–59, 121–22, and of the Franciscan Order, to the Moreno de Los Arcos, ed. Carmen Yuste passim. See also Gauvin Alexander Mexican Consulado (Madrid, May (México: UNAM, 2000), 199–228; Bailey, “Asia in the Arts of Colonial 11, 1613), Regarding the Missions of Hoberman, “Merchants in Seventeenth- Latin America,” in Joseph J. Rishel Japan,” Americas 8, no. 3 (January Century Mexico City”; Carmen Yuste with Suzanne Stratton-Pruitt, The 1952): 353–56; Emilio Gónzalez López, El comercio de la Nueva España Arts in Latin America, 1492–1820 López, Siempre de negro: Galicia en con Filipinas, 1590–1785 (México: (Philadelphia: Philadelphia Museum of la Contrarreforma ([Vigo]: Editorial Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Art, 2006), 57–68, which also discusses Galaxia, 1970), 275–76; Lach and Historia, 1984); and Víctor Sánchez and the Portuguese Empire as another vector Van Kley, Asia in the Making of Cayetano S. Fuertes, eds., España en for aesthetic interaction between Asia Europe, 3:211; and Nicholas Cushner, Extremo Oriente: Filipinas, China, Japon and the Americas. Another work, which “Merchants and Missionaries: (Madrid: Publicaciones Archivo Ibero- I was able to obtain only after this article A Theologian’s View of Clerical Involvement in the Galleon Trade,” Americano, 1979). was complete, is Donna Pierce and Ronald Osaka, eds., Asia and Spanish Hispanic American Historical Review 47, America: Trans-Pacific Artistic and Cul- no. 3 (August 1967): 360–69. See also 22 See “Orders and instructions to . . . tural Exchange, 1500–1850 (Denver: the porcelain jar in Kuwayama, Chinese Supercargoes of the Haeslingfield and Denver Art Museum, 2009). Ceramics in Colonial México, 29, with the Harrington, bound for Canton,” Augustinian “eagle with two addorsed February 16, 1742, East India Company 25 For biombos: Dallas Museum of Art: A heads perched on a heart-shaped base Letter Book 25, 654 E/3/108, British Guide to the Collection (Dallas: Dallas with two protruding arrows.” Library, London. Soon after the intro- Museum of Art, 1997), 206; cata- duction of trade quotas, the viceroy of logue entries by Gustavo Curiel and 29 Celia María Parcero Torre, La pérdida New Spain proposed that Sebastian María Concepción García Sáiz, in de la Habana y las reformas Borbónicas Rodriguez Cermeño embark from the Donna Pierce, Rogelio Ruiz Gomar, en Cuba ([Valladolid]: Junta de Castilla Philippines to explore the California and Clara Bargellini, Painting a New y León, Consejería de Educación y coast—and be paid “in the way of taking World: Mexican Art and Life, 1521–1821 Cultura, 1998), 159; Pedro G. Galende, on board merchandise.” Cermeño’s ship (Denver: Frederick & Jan Mayer Center Angels in Stone: Augustinian Churches wrecked near San Francisco, deposit- for Pre-Columbian and Spanish Colonial in the Philippines (Manila: San Agustín ing numerous porcelain sherds; Conde Art, 2004), 226–29, 150–52; and Museum, 1996); and J. M. Mancini, de Santiago to the king of Spain, April Alberto Baena Zapatero, “Nueva España “Siege Mentalities,” in “Objects in 16, 1594, in George Butler Griffin, a través de sus biombos,” in Orbis incog- Motion” special issue, Winterthur trans. and ed., Documents from the Sutro nitus: Avisos y legajos del Nuevo Mundo, Portfolio (forthcoming, Summer– Collection: Publications of the Historical ed. Fernando Navarro Antolín (Huelva: Autumn 2011). Society of Southern California (Los AEA–Servicio de Publicaciones de la Angeles: Franklin Printing Company, Universidad de Huelva, 2007), 441–49. 30 See Weber, The Spanish Frontier, 1891), 19. A royal decree, copied by the 266; Thomas Weaver, ed., Handbook Philippine governor Benito Carrasco in 26 The classic overview is Janet L. Abu- of Hispanic Cultures in the United 1707, required him “to provide . . . good Lughod, Before European Hegemony: The States: Anthropology (Houston: Arte treatment to the sailors who go [in the World System, A.D. 1250–1350 (New Público Press, 2004), 171; Parcero galleons], and not to open the chests York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1989). An Torre, La pérdida de la Habana; and in which they carry their clothing,” account of diplomatic exchanges focus- Willard B. Robinson, “Maritime apparently countenancing smuggling ing on objects is Lauren Arnold, Princely Frontier Engineering: The Defense of to facilitate recruitment of transpacific Gifts and Papal Treasures: The Franciscan New Orleans,” Louisiana History 18, sailors; Philippine Mss, Ms 21534 (2), Mission to China and Its Influence on no. 1 (Winter 1977): 5–62. On the 68–69, Lilly Library, Indiana University. the Art of the West, 1250–1350 (San apes, see Herbert Ingram Priestley, Hoberman, “Merchants in Seventeenth- Francisco: Desiderata Press, 1999). José de Gálvez Visitor General of New Century Mexico City,” 490; and Spain (1765–1771) (1916; Philadelphia: Bjork, “Link That Kept the Philippines 27 See Michael Bihl, “Order of Friars Porcupine Press, 1980), 279. On Spanish,” 43–48. Minor,” in Charles G. Herbermann, Bernardo de Gálvez, see Carmen de

50 Spring 2011 Reparaz, Yo solo: Bernardo de Gálvez y la 37 East India Company officials lamented, 42 Maynard Geiger, “New Data on the toma de Panzacola en 1781 (Barcelona: “the Natives of these Islands have been Buildings of Mission San Francisco,” Ediciones del Serbal; Madrid: Instituto alienated from us . . . through the means California Historical Society Quarterly 46, de Cooperación Iberoamericana, 1986). of the Augustine Friars and other disaf- no. 3 (September 1967): 195–205. fected Persons, now in actual Rebelion 31 For “epic struggle” and “failure to win,” [sic].” “Papers concerning the Philippines 43 Ibid.; James Beach Alexander and James see Hackel, Children of Coyote, 130. and Penang 1762–1820,” January 15, Lee Heig, San Francisco: Building the 1763, IOR /H / 77, British Library, Dream City (San Francisco: Scottwall 32 On Franciscan succession, see Olga London. Associates, Publishers, 2002), 17–23; and Merino and Linda A. Newson, “Jesuit Guire Cleary, Mission Dolores: The Gift Missions in Spanish America: The 38 Hackel, Children of Coyote, 132; Wood, of St. Francis (Orange, Calif.: Paragon Aftermath of the Expulsion,” Revista “The Hidden Mural at Mission Dolores.” Agency, 2004). de Historia de América, no. 118 (July– On syncretism in the Franciscan artisan December 1994): 7–32, esp. Table 1, school of San José de los Naturales, 44 Augusto Villalón, Lugar: Essays on 10–11. On Jesuit militarization, see see Claire Farago, entry for Mass of Philippine Heritage and Architecture Alberto Armani, Ciudad de Dios y Saint Gregory, in Pierce, Gomar, and ciudad del sol: El “estado” jesuita de los (Makati City: Bookmark, 2001). Palóu, Bargellini, Painting a New World, 100. Historical Memoirs, 2:129. guaranies (1609–1768) (Mexico: Fondo Franciscans also trained artisans in de Cultura Economica, 1982); and Bethlehem; materially and symbolically 45 Alicia M. L. Coseteng, Spanish Stuart F. Voss, “Societal Competition hybrid works include a painted olive in Northwest New Spain,” Americas 38, Churches in the Philippines (Manila: wood and mother-of-pearl cross with UNESCO National Commission of the no. 2 (October 1981): 185–203. Nuno lotus design (ca. seventeenth century; Senos suggests that Franciscans in Brazil Philippines, 1972); Pedro G. Galende Museo de Terra Santa, Santiago de and Rene B. Javellana, Great Churches of engaged in such a process of reimagi- Compostela); Petr Hlaváček, “Bohemian nation and expression following the the Philippines (Makati, Metro Manila: Franciscans between Orthodoxy Bookmark, 1993), including “typical expulsion of the Jesuits in 1759. Private and Nonconformity at the Turn of conversation, College Art Association, church plan,” 10–11; Villalón, Lugar; the Middle Ages,” in The Bohemian February 2006. and Galende, Angels in Stone. Reformation and Religious Practice, vol. 5 (Prague: Academy of Sciences of the 33 See Lach and Van Kley, Asia in the 46 Robert J. Mullen, Architecture and Its Czech Republic, 2003), 167–89. Making of Europe. James S. Cummins, Sculpture in Viceregal Mexico (Austin: “Two Missionary Methods in China: Univ. of Texas Press, 1997); and John 39 On the Serra image, see Kelly Donahue- Mendicants and Jesuits,” in Sánchez McAndrew, The Open-Air Churches of Wallace, “Picturing Prints in Early and Fuertes, España en Extremo Oriente, Sixteenth-Century Mexico (Cambridge, 33–108. Modern New Spain,” Americas 64, no. 3 (January 2008): 325–49. On figural vest- Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press, 1965). ments, see Nuria Torres Ballesteros, “La Stephen Tobriner, “The Quest for 34 R. Po-Chia Hsia, The World of Earthquake-Resistant Construction Catholic Renewal, 1540–1770, 2nd ed. casulla de Cisneros del Museo Lazaro Galdiano: Aproximación a San Francisco in Europe and the Americas, 1726– (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1908” (lecture, J. Paul Getty Museum, 2005), chap. 13; Benjamin A. Elman, de Asís,” Goya 239 (March–April 1994): 282–88. Los Angeles, September 14, 2006); On Their Own Terms: Science in China, for a figure representing the earth- 1550–1900 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard quake dangers posed by parapets and Univ. Press, 2005), 160–65; Jean- 40 Clunas, Art in China, 120–21; Derek a list of belfries that collapsed in 1906, Paul Desroches, “Beijing–Versailles: Gillman, “Ming and Qing Ivories: Figure see Tobriner, Bracing for Disaster: Relations between Qing Dynasty Carving,” in Chinese Ivories from the Earthquake-Resistant Architecture and China and France,” Oriental Art 43, Shang to the Qing, ed. William Watson no. 2 (Summer 1997): 39; and Marie- (London: Oriental Ceramic Society and Engineering in San Francisco, 1838–1933 Catherine Rey, Peintres à la cour de Chine the British Museum, 1984), 35–52. (Berkeley: Bancroft Library and Heyday (Paris: Gallimard; Réunion des Musées Books, 2006), 64, 163. Nationaux, 2006). 41 Serra’s enthusiasm for encountering Indians who had not previously been 47 Alejandro Lapunzina, Architecture of 35 Gregorio de Santa Teresa to Francisco de evangelized was discussed by Robert M. Spain (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Zamora, February 17, 1709, Philippine Senkewicz and Rose Marie Beebe, “What Press, 2005), 36. Francisco J. Castro Mss, Ms 21524 (2), Lilly Library. They Brought: The Alta California Miramontes, El mensaje de la piedra: Franciscans before 1769” (paper, in “Alta Convento de San Francisco de Santiago de 36 “Profusely” quoted in Baer, “Spanish California: Peoples in Motion, Identities Compostela; Historia, arte y espiritualidad Colonial Art,” 41; “catch” in Hackel, in Formation,” Huntington Library, (Santiago de Compostela: Convento de Children of Coyote, 153. September 29, 2006). San Francisco, n.d.), 8.

51 American Art