Parish Profile For
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
North Bucks Rripple (Ramblers Repairing & Improving Public Paths
North Bucks rRIPPLE (ramblers Repairing & Improving Public Paths for Leisure & Exercise) Activity Report 22 September 2016 – 13 November 2016 Before & after photos of all work are available on request. Man hours include some travel time. DaG = Donate a Gate. CAMS is a reference used by BCC/Ringway Jacobs for work requests. All work is requested and authorised by Alastair McVail, Ringway Jacobs, North Bucks RoW Officer, or Jon Clark, BCC Access Officer. 22/9/16 Took delivery of 7 Marlow and 3 Woodstock kissing gates from BCC/TfB at CRFC. Good chat with Greg & Bill of TfB regarding gate installation and their preferred installation method using a timber post attached to either side of a gate. Not so critical with kissing gates. 22/9/16 Stewkley. Emailed Alastair McVail re the replacement by TfB of our gate with a kissing gate at SP842264 to appease Mrs Carter. (See 9/8/16 CAMS 81198). 23/9/16 Eythrop. Emailed Jon Clark reCAMS 81845 at SP768134 completed on 3/2/16 as way marker has been knocked down again. 26/9/16 Eythrop. Received CAMS 83629 at SP768134 to rerect snapped of at ground level way marker post - hit by a vehicle. 27/9/16 Mentmore. CAMS 82567 at SP907186 on MEN/8/1 installed way mark post and bridleway way marker discs. Liaised with golf club groundsman, Adam. Two x 2.5 = 5.0 man hours. B&J. 27/9/16 Mentmore. CAMS 82569 at SP889192 and at SP892194 on MEM/15/2. Checked functioning of two timber kissing gates. First one needed timber attaching to post to prevent gate from swinging right through, second considered to be okay. -
Aylesbury Vale WCS Granborough CP
Aylesbury Vale District Granborough CP Aylesbury Vale District Parish Boundaries Development Sites Winslow Proposed Development Sites Surface Water WFD Surface Water Classifications High Good Moderate Poor Swanbourne CP Bad Groundwater Superficial Aquifers Secondary (undifferentiated) Secondary A Unproductive Granborough CP Bedrock Aquifers Principal Secondary (undifferentiated) Secondary A Secondary B Unproductive Source Protection Zones Zone 1 - Inner Protection Zone Zone 2 - Outer Protection Zone Zone 3 - Total Catchment Aylesbury Vale WCS Water Constraints Oving CP and Opportunities 0 0.2 0.4 0.8 Km Contains Ordnance Survey data (c) Crown copyright and database right 2016 Aylesbury Vale District Great Horwood CP Aylesbury Vale District Nash CP Parish Boundaries Development Sites Whaddon CP Proposed Development Sites Surface Water WFD Surface Water Classifications High Good Moderate Poor Bad Groundwater Superficial Aquifers Secondary (undifferentiated) Great Horwood CP Secondary A Unproductive Adstock CP Bedrock Aquifers Principal Little Horwood CP Secondary (undifferentiated) Secondary A Secondary B Unproductive Source Protection Zones Zone 1 - Inner Protection Zone Zone 2 - Outer Protection Zone Zone 3 - Total Catchment Aylesbury Vale WCS Water Constraints Swanbourne CP and Opportunities Winslow 0 0.3 0.6 1.2 Km Contains Ordnance Survey data (c) Crown copyright and database right 2016 Aylesbury Vale District Grendon Underwood CP Steeple Claydon CP Aylesbury Vale District Parish Boundaries Development Sites Proposed Development Sites -
Church Bells. Part 1. Rev. Robert Eaton Batty
CHURCH BELLS BY THE REV. ROBERT EATON BATTY, M.A. The Church Bell — what a variety of associations does it kindle up — how closely is it connected with the most cherished interests of mankind! And not only have we ourselves an interest in it, but it must have been equally interesting to those who were before us, and will pro- bably be so to those who are yet to come. It is the Churchman's constant companion — at its call he first enters the Church, then goes to the Daily Liturgy, to his Con- firmation, and his first Communion. Is he married? — the Church bells have greeted him with a merry peal — has he passed to his rest? — the Church bells have tolled out their final note. From a very early period there must have been some contrivance, whereby the people might know when to assemble themselves together, but some centuries must have passed before bells were invented for a religious purpose. Trumpets preceded bells. The great Day of Atonement amongst the Jews was ushered in with the sound of the trumpet; and Holy Writ has stamped a solemn and lasting character upon this instrument, when it informs us that "The Trumpet shall sound and the dead shall be raised." The Prophet Hosea was com- manded to "blow the cornet in Gibeah and the trumpet in Ramah;" and Joel was ordered to "blow the trumpet in Zion, and sound an alarm." The cornet and trumpet seem to be identical, as in the Septuagint both places are expressed by σαλπισατε σαλπιγγι. -
Buckinghamshire. [Kelly's
120 HOGGESTON. BUCKINGHAMSHIRE. [KELLY'S Charles Il. and rector of this parish, who died 2oth The land is principally pasture, but wheat, oats and Nov. r68o. and his son and successor, Charles Gataker, beans are grown in small quantities. The area is 1,571 equally celebrated as a critic and divine, who died acres; mteable value, £1,472; the population in 19rr Nov. wtb, 17or, are both buried in the chancel. In was 138. the village i!l a Reading-room, open during the winter Sexton, Henry Baker. evenings. The Earl of Rosebery K.G., K.T., P.C.. Lett~n through Winslow arrive at 7.ro a.m. & 6.30 F.S.A. is lord of the manor and owns all the land with p.m. week days; sundayR, 8.30 a.m. Wall Letter Box the exception of the glebe. The old Manor House, an ( cleared week days at 7.15 a.m. & 6-4o p.m.; sundays interesting building in the Domestic Gothic style and I at 8.40 a.m. Winslow is the nearest money order t dating from about the r6th century, has a good panelled 1 telegraph office, about 3! miles dist-ant room, massive oak stairs and fine chimneys, and is no" Eh"lmentary School (mixed), for so children; Miu occupied by Mr. Blick Morris, in whose family it has re Wilkin&, mi~tress; Miss Alice Margaret Baylis, cor- mained for 200 year!!. The soil is clay; subsoil, clay res.pondent Walpole Rev. Arthur Sumner :M.A.. 1 COMMERCIAL .!\lorris Blick, farmer, Manor honss (rector), The Rectory · Chapman Wm. -
Swanbourne History Trail
Swanbourne History Trail BACKGROUND TO THE VILLAGE The village of Swanbourne can trace its roots back to Anglo- Saxon times. The first mention of ‘Suanaburna’ comes in a document of 792 relating to the granting by King Offa of the parishes of Winslow, Granborough and Little Horwood for the establishment of St. Alban’s Abbey. The name probably means ‘peasant’s brook’, and so originally referred to the stream which flows along the western border of the parish, rather than the village itself. At the time of the Doomsday Book in 1086, the parish was divided between 5 landholders, although one of these was extremely small. One of the major landholders was King William (The Bastard or Conqueror) who took over land belonging to King Harold. William’s half-brother the Count of Mortain also held land, and the other two major landholders were Walter Giffard and William, son of Ansculf. In 1206, much of the village lands were granted to Woburn Abbey, but following Henry VIII’s dissolution of the Abbey in 1538, the land and Overlordship of the Manor of Swanbourne was sold on to the Fortescues, then the Adams, then the Deverells and finally the Fremantles. This trail starts from The Betsey Wynne public house which was opened in July 2006. The pub takes its name from Betsey Fremantle (nee Wynne), wife of Thomas Fremantle, who was a captain in the Royal Navy and a close friend of Admiral Nelson. Thomas and Betsey, together with their new-born son, also called Thomas, moved to Swanbourne in 1798. -
Steeple Claydon and Verney Junction EWR Phase 2 Newsletter
East West Rail Phase Two Project Newsletter Steeple Claydon & Verney Junction, Autumn 2020 Welcome! Enabling works underway Welcome to the Autumn issue of the East West Rail Alliance project newsletter. I wanted to start by thanking everyone who took the time to read and share the last issue of the newsletter. We have seen an increase in the readership of the newsletter and have received feedback on the format with the level of information in the local update sections we introduced in issue two being positive. As you’ll read below, perhaps the most obvious progress we have made since the last newsletter can be seen in Bletchley, where our team has dismantled sections of the Bletchley Flyover ready for it to be rebuilt to modern standards. The dismantling has demanded a meticulous amount of Since the last issue of our newsletter, the Alliance has planning from our team, Network Rail operations, the been preparing many areas across the project footprint for train operating companies, local authorities and our main construction activities to begin. Highways environment agencies and I’m delighted to report all the improvements have been made, with roads widened, lifts were safely completed in line with our programme. passing bays on narrow roads put in place, and access We are now in the process of removing the final points for our site compounds installed. In addition, we elements of the structure that need to be removed have been constructing ‘haul roads’, which will enable before we can start the rebuild process in construction traffic to travel between certain areas of the November/later this year. -
(Public Pack)Agenda Document for Winslow & Villages Community
Winslow & Villages Community Board agenda Date: Thursday 26 November 2020 Time: 7.00 pm Venue: MS Teams Membership: S Renshell (Chairman), J Chilver, B Everitt, L Monger, S Raven and Sir B Stanier Bt Addington Parish Meeting; Adstock Parish Council; Beachampton Parish Council; Drayton Parslow Parish Council; Dunton Parish Meeting; Granborough Parish Council; Great Brickhill Parish Council; Great Horwood Parish Council; Hoggeston Parish Meeting; Little Horwood Parish Council; Mursley Parish Council; Nash Parish Council; Newton Longville Parish Council; North Marston Parish Council; Oving Parish Council; Padbury Parish Council; Pitchcott Parish Meeting; Soulbury Parish Council; Stewkley Parish Council; Stoke Hammond Parish Council; Swanbourne Parish Council; Thornton Parish Meeting; Whaddon Parish Council; Winslow Parish Council Please note that this meeting will be recorded and will subsequently be available to view via the Buckinghamshire Council website. Agenda Item Time Page No 1 Apologies To note any apologies for absence. 2 Minutes 3 - 8 To approve as a correct record the minutes of the meeting held on 29 September, 2020. 3 Declarations of Interest To note any declarations of interest. 4 Chairman’s Welcome Introduction from Sue Renshell, Chairman of the Winslow and Villages Community Board. 5 Introduction from Martin Dickman Introduction from Martin Dickman, Service Director, Neighbourhood Services. 6 Response to Petition 9 - 12 To note the response to the petition submitted by Great Horwood Parish Council. 7 Funding Update 13 - 30 The Community Board will receive a presentation on funding. 8 Action Group Updates The Action Groups will provide a verbal update to the Community Board. 9 COVID Workshop Presentations and discussions on COVID. -
Election of Parish Councillors for the Parishes Listed Below (Aylesbury Area)
NOTICE OF ELECTION Buckinghamshire Council Election of Parish Councillors for the Parishes listed below (Aylesbury Area) Number of Parish Parishes Councillors to be elected Adstock Parish Council 7 Akeley Parish Council 7 Ashendon Parish Council 5 Aston Abbotts Parish Council 7 Aston Clinton Parish Council 11 Aylesbury Town Council for Bedgrove ward 3 Aylesbury Town Council for Central ward 2 Aylesbury Town Council for Coppice Way ward 1 Aylesbury Town Council for Elmhurst ward 2 Aylesbury Town Council for Gatehouse ward 3 Aylesbury Town Council for Hawkslade ward 1 Aylesbury Town Council for Mandeville & Elm Farm ward 3 Aylesbury Town Council for Oakfield ward 2 Aylesbury Town Council for Oxford Road ward 2 Aylesbury Town Council for Quarrendon ward 2 Aylesbury Town Council for Southcourt ward 2 Aylesbury Town Council for Walton Court ward 1 Aylesbury Town Council for Walton ward 1 Beachampton Parish Council 5 Berryfields Parish Council 10 Bierton Parish Council for Bierton ward 8 Bierton Parish Council for Oldhams Meadow ward 1 Brill Parish Council 7 Buckingham Park Parish Council 8 Buckingham Town Council for Highlands & Watchcroft ward 1 Buckingham Town Council for North ward 7 Buckingham Town Council for South ward 8 Buckingham Town Council form Fishers Field ward 1 Buckland Parish Council 7 Calvert Green Parish Council 7 Charndon Parish Council 5 Chearsley Parish Council 7 Cheddington Parish Council 8 Chilton Parish Council 5 Coldharbour Parish Council 11 Cublington Parish Council 5 Cuddington Parish Council 7 Dinton with Ford & -
Buckingham Share As at 16 July 2021
Deanery Share Statement : 2021 allocation 3AM AMERSHAM 2021 Cash Recd Bal as at % Paid Share To Date 16-Jul-21 To Date A/C No Parish £ £ £ % S4642 AMERSHAM ON THE HILL 75,869 44,973 30,896 59.3 DD S4645 AMERSHAM w COLESHILL 93,366 55,344 38,022 59.3 DD S4735 BEACONSFIELD ST MARY, MICHAEL & THOMAS 244,244 144,755 99,489 59.3 DD S4936 CHALFONT ST GILES 82,674 48,998 33,676 59.3 DD S4939 CHALFONT ST PETER 88,520 52,472 36,048 59.3 DD S4971 CHENIES & LITTLE CHALFONT 73,471 43,544 29,927 59.3 DD S4974 CHESHAM BOIS 87,147 51,654 35,493 59.3 DD S5134 DENHAM 70,048 41,515 28,533 59.3 DD S5288 FLAUNDEN 20,011 11,809 8,202 59.0 DD S5324 GERRARDS CROSS & FULMER 224,363 132,995 91,368 59.3 DD S5351 GREAT CHESHAM 239,795 142,118 97,677 59.3 DD S5629 LATIMER 17,972 7,218 10,754 40.2 DD S5970 PENN 46,370 27,487 18,883 59.3 DD S5971 PENN STREET w HOLMER GREEN 70,729 41,919 28,810 59.3 DD S6086 SEER GREEN 75,518 42,680 32,838 56.5 DD S6391 TYLERS GREEN 41,428 24,561 16,867 59.3 DD S6694 AMERSHAM DEANERY 5,976 5,976 0 0.0 Deanery Totals 1,557,501 920,018 637,483 59.1 R:\Store\Finance\FINANCE\2021\Share 2021\Share 2021Bucks Share20/07/202112:20 Deanery Share Statement : 2021 allocation 3AY AYLESBURY 2021 Cash Recd Bal as at % Paid Share To Date 16-Jul-21 To Date A/C No Parish £ £ £ % S4675 ASHENDON 5,108 2,975 2,133 58.2 DD S4693 ASTON SANDFORD 6,305 6,305 0 100.0 S4698 AYLESBURY ST MARY 49,527 23,000 26,527 46.4 S4699 AYLESBURY QUARRENDON ST PETER 7,711 4,492 3,219 58.3 DD S4700 AYLESBURY BIERTON 23,305 13,575 9,730 58.2 DD S4701 AYLESBURY HULCOTT ALL SAINTS -
Oxfordshire Archdeacon's Marriage Bonds
Oxfordshire Archdeacon’s Marriage Bond Index - 1634 - 1849 Sorted by Bride’s Parish Year Groom Parish Bride Parish 1635 Gerrard, Ralph --- Eustace, Bridget --- 1635 Saunders, William Caversham Payne, Judith --- 1635 Lydeat, Christopher Alkerton Micolls, Elizabeth --- 1636 Hilton, Robert Bloxham Cook, Mabell --- 1665 Styles, William Whatley Small, Simmelline --- 1674 Fletcher, Theodore Goddington Merry, Alice --- 1680 Jemmett, John Rotherfield Pepper Todmartin, Anne --- 1682 Foster, Daniel --- Anstey, Frances --- 1682 (Blank), Abraham --- Devinton, Mary --- 1683 Hatherill, Anthony --- Matthews, Jane --- 1684 Davis, Henry --- Gomme, Grace --- 1684 Turtle, John --- Gorroway, Joice --- 1688 Yates, Thos Stokenchurch White, Bridgett --- 1688 Tripp, Thos Chinnor Deane, Alice --- 1688 Putress, Ricd Stokenchurch Smith, Dennis --- 1692 Tanner, Wm Kettilton Hand, Alice --- 1692 Whadcocke, Deverey [?] Burrough, War Carter, Elizth --- 1692 Brotherton, Wm Oxford Hicks, Elizth --- 1694 Harwell, Isaac Islip Dagley, Mary --- 1694 Dutton, John Ibston, Bucks White, Elizth --- 1695 Wilkins, Wm Dadington Whetton, Ann --- 1695 Hanwell, Wm Clifton Hawten, Sarah --- 1696 Stilgoe, James Dadington Lane, Frances --- 1696 Crosse, Ralph Dadington Makepeace, Hannah --- 1696 Coleman, Thos Little Barford Clifford, Denis --- 1696 Colly, Robt Fritwell Kilby, Elizth --- 1696 Jordan, Thos Hayford Merry, Mary --- 1696 Barret, Chas Dadington Hestler, Cathe --- 1696 French, Nathl Dadington Byshop, Mary --- Oxfordshire Archdeacon’s Marriage Bond Index - 1634 - 1849 Sorted by -
Bucks Historic Churches Trust Sponsored Ride
BUCKS HISTORIC CHURCHES TRUST SPONSORED RIDE & STRIDE 2015 RESULTS Deanery 2015 Donations G/Aid Total 2014 Donations G/Aid Total Variation Amersham 3972.25 640.50 4612.75 3043.00 533.25 3576.25 1036.50 Aylesbury 4966.10 942.30 5908.40 5939.50 1171.75 7111.25 -1202.85 Buckingham 1645.00 259.25 1904.25 3167.50 614.00 3781.50 -1877.25 Burnham & Slough 2992.80 562.50 3555.30 3029.40 577.00 3606.40 -51.10 Claydon 3183.38 550.13 3733.51 2242.50 376.50 2619.00 1114.51 Milton Keynes 2191.00 391.75 2582.75 2487.40 388.85 2876.25 -293.50 Mursley 3082.49 609.00 3691.49 1818.00 210.88 2028.88 1662.62 Newport 2223.50 361.88 2585.38 2093.00 251.50 2344.50 240.88 Wendover 3244.28 639.38 3883.66 3808.40 677.85 4486.25 -602.60 Wycombe 3361.58 606.75 3968.33 2332.00 443.25 2775.25 1193.08 Donations Not Linked to a Deanery 165.00 41.25 206.25 4835.28 604.25 5439.53 -5233.28 Totals 31027.38 5604.68 36632.06 34795.98 5849.08 40645.06 -4013.00 Gift Aid % 18.06 16.81 Visitors Riders/Welcomers Amount AMERSHAM DEANERY Amersham on the Hill St Michael & All Angels 21 1 90.00 Amersham on the Hill Free (Baptist) 12 Amersham St Mary 4 7 462.00 Amersham on the Hill St John's, Methodist 7 Beaconsfield St Michael & All Angels 3 1 270.00 Beaconsfield St Mary & All Saints 4 Beaconsfield R C St Teresa, Warwick Rd 2 Beaconsfield U R C Aylesbury End 3 Beaconsfield Free Methodist,Shepherds Lane 3 Chalfont St Peter 9 2 170.00 Chalfont Goldhill Baptist 8 Hornhill St Pauls 2 Oval Way All Saints 2 Chenies St Michael 4 1 inc LC St George 583.00 Little Chalfont Methodist 3 199.00 -
ED113 Housing Land Supply Soundness Document (June 2018)
1 VALP Housing Land Supply Soundness document June 2018 Introduction 1.1 This document accompanies the Submission Vale of Aylesbury Local Plan (VALP). It sets out the housing trajectory and housing land supply position based on the housing requirement and allocations within the Pre Submission VALP. It shows that a 5 year housing land supply can be demonstrated at the point of adoption. 1.2 This housing trajectory and housing land supply calculation is different to that in the latest published Housing Land Supply Position Statement (currently June 2018). It takes into account the redistribution of unmet need to Aylesbury Vale which is a ‘policy on’ matter. It is not appropriate to use ‘policy on’ figures for the purposes of calculating a 5 year housing land supply in the context of determining individual planning applications because they have not been tested through examination and found sound. 1.3 The ‘policy off’ approach to calculating the five year supply for application decisions has been endorsed by recent inspectors.1 In the Waddesdon appeal (July 2017) the inspector concluded at paragraph 81 that: “Although there may be some distribution from other districts to Aylesbury Vale, and although what this figure is might be emerging, at this stage in the local plan process any redistribution would represent the application of policy and thus represent a ‘policy on’ figure. As the Courts have made clear this is not appropriate for consideration in a Section 78 appeal and I am therefore satisfied that for this appeal the OAN figure for Aylesbury Vale should be 965 dwellings per annum”.