Survey of High-Energy Physics in Latin America
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Los Inicios De La Física Nuclear Y El Fondo Manuel Sandoval Vallarta
LOS INICIOS DE LA FÍSICA NUCLEAR Y EL FONDO MANUEL SANDOVAL VALLARTA. ESTUDIOS DE CASO. Federico Lazarín Miranda y Martha Ortega Soto Coordinadores ÍNDICE Introducción. Federico Lazarín Miranda LA FORMACIÓN DE MANUEL SANDOVAL VALLARTA. Tres precursores de la ciencias exactas en México: Sotero Prieto, Juan Mancilla y José de las Fuentes. Andrea Torres Alejo La formación de un científico. Educación formal de Manuel Sandoval Vallarta, 1899-1929 Federico Lazarín Miranda MULTIPLES ROSTROS DE LA FÍSICA NUCLEAR De cómo los científicos pasaron de sus laboratorios a ser los protagonistas de la historia que cambió al mundo. Claudia Carbajal Segura Las negociaciones internacionales sobre el empleo de la energía nuclear y sus repercusiones en México 1946-1975. La Intervención de Manuel Sandoval Vallarta. Martha Ortega Soto Entre la Atlántida y el Mundo de los Muertos: el imaginario popular sobre la física atómica y nuclear en la ciudad de México. Teresa Pacho Rodríguez SOBRE EL FONDO MANUEL SANDOVAL VALLARTA La sección personal del archivo histórico-científico Manuel Sandoval Vallarte. Una revisión General Blanca García Gutiérrez y Eynar Rivera Valencia La sección institucional del Archivo Histórico Científico Manuel Sandoval Vallarta, un vínculo entre ciencia y cultura: el caso de la International Comission for a History of the Scientific and Cultural Development of Mankind. María Estela Báez –Villaseñor El acervo cartográfico de Manuel Sandoval Vallarta Hugo Pichardo Hernández y Tadeo Liceaga Carrasco Introducción Federico Lazarín Miranda LA FORMACIÓN DE MANUEL SANDOVAL VALLARTA TRES PRECURSORES DE LAS CIENCIAS EXACTAS EN MÉXICO: SOTERO PRIETO, JUAN MANCILLA Y JOSÉ DE LAS FUENTES. Andrea Torres Alejo Estudiante del Doctorado en Historia Posgrado en Humanidades, UAM-I Los ingenieros fueron importantes en la consolidación de los estudios matemáticos en el país, éstos permiten razonar de una forma lógica y ordenada, ayuda a comprender la manera en la cual se llega a la solución del problema planteado. -
Electron-Positron Pairs in Physics and Astrophysics
Electron-positron pairs in physics and astrophysics: from heavy nuclei to black holes Remo Ruffini1,2,3, Gregory Vereshchagin1 and She-Sheng Xue1 1 ICRANet and ICRA, p.le della Repubblica 10, 65100 Pescara, Italy, 2 Dip. di Fisica, Universit`adi Roma “La Sapienza”, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, I-00185 Roma, Italy, 3 ICRANet, Universit´ede Nice Sophia Antipolis, Grand Chˆateau, BP 2135, 28, avenue de Valrose, 06103 NICE CEDEX 2, France. Abstract Due to the interaction of physics and astrophysics we are witnessing in these years a splendid synthesis of theoretical, experimental and observational results originating from three fundamental physical processes. They were originally proposed by Dirac, by Breit and Wheeler and by Sauter, Heisenberg, Euler and Schwinger. For almost seventy years they have all three been followed by a continued effort of experimental verification on Earth-based experiments. The Dirac process, e+e 2γ, has been by − → far the most successful. It has obtained extremely accurate experimental verification and has led as well to an enormous number of new physics in possibly one of the most fruitful experimental avenues by introduction of storage rings in Frascati and followed by the largest accelerators worldwide: DESY, SLAC etc. The Breit–Wheeler process, 2γ e+e , although conceptually simple, being the inverse process of the Dirac one, → − has been by far one of the most difficult to be verified experimentally. Only recently, through the technology based on free electron X-ray laser and its numerous applications in Earth-based experiments, some first indications of its possible verification have been reached. The vacuum polarization process in strong electromagnetic field, pioneered by Sauter, Heisenberg, Euler and Schwinger, introduced the concept of critical electric 2 3 field Ec = mec /(e ). -
Notas De Física
ISSN OO29-3865 MINISTÉRIO DA CIÊNCIA E TECNOLOGIA CNPo| CBPF CENTRO BRASILEIRO DE PESQUISAS FÍSICAS Notas de Física CBPF-NF-027/88 ARE CENTAURO EVENTS A MANIFESTATION OF AN UNUSUAL TYPE OF PHASE TRANSITION? by I. BEDIAGA, E.N.F. CURADO and E. PREDAZZI RIO DE JANEIRO NOTAS DE FÍSICA é uma pré-publicação de trabalho original em Física NOTAS DE FÍSICA is a preprint of original works un published in Physics Pedidos de cópias «lesta publicação devem ser envia dos aos autores ou ã: Requests for copies of these reports should be addressed to: Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas Area de Publicações Rua Dr. Xavier Sigaud, 150 - 49 andar 22.290 - Rio de Janeiro, RJ BRASIL ISSN 0029 - 3865 CBPF-NF-027/88 ARE CENTAURO EVENTS A MANIFESTATION OF AN UNUSUAL TYPE OF PHASE TRANSITION?* by I.BEDIAGA, E.M.F. CURADO and E. PREDAZZI > Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas - CBPF/CNPq Rua Dr. Xavier Sigaud, 1bO 22290 - Rio de Janeiro, RJ - Trasil 'Dipartimento di Física Teórica Universita di Torino, Italy and 1st. Naz. Física Nucleare, Sezionc di Torino. •Contribution to the homage to Professor J. Leite Lopes on his seventieth birthday. CBPF-NF-027/88 SUMMARY We argue that the Centauro events found in cosmic rays by the brazilian-Japanese collaboration could be the manifesta- tion of an unusual phase transition in which a new ordered phase of quarks separated from antiquarkc takes place at ex- tremely high densities. This new phase should then be fol- lowed by yet another disordered phase which might correspond to freeing the quark components. -
Table of Contents (Print)
PERIODICALS PHYSICAL REVIEW D Postmaster send address changes to: For editorial and subscription correspondence, PHYSICAL REVIEW D please see inside front cover APS Subscription Services (ISSN: 1550-7998) Suite 1NO1 2 Huntington Quadrangle Melville, NY 11747-4502 THIRD SERIES, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 7 CONTENTS D1 OCTOBER 2004 RAPID COMMUNICATIONS Measurement of the eeÿ ! D D cross sections (6 pages) . 071101 T. Uglov et al. (Belle Collaboration) p Study of double charmonium production in eeÿ annihilation at s 10:6 GeV (6 pages) . 071102 K. Abe et al. (Belle Collaboration) Testing soft electroweak supersymmetry breaking from neutralino, chargino, and charged Higgs boson pair production at linear colliders (5 pages) .......................................................... 071301 M. Beccaria, H. Eberl, F. M. Renard, and C. Verzegnassi Universal neutrino mass hierarchy and cosmological baryon number asymmetry (4 pages) . 071302 Zhi-zhong Xing ARTICLES New measurements of 1S decays to charmonium final states (18 pages) . 072001 R. A. Briere et al. (CLEO Collaboration) Underlying event in hard interactions at the Fermilab Tevatron pp collider (10 pages) . 072002 D. Acosta et al. (CDF Collaboration) Measurement of 3 with Dalitz plot analysis of B ! D K decay (14 pages) . 072003 A. Poluektov et al. (Belle Collaboration) Study of the eeÿ ! ÿ0 process using initial state radiation with BABAR (22 pages) . 072004 B. Aubert et al. Nucleon contribution to the induced charge of neutrinos in a matter background and a magnetic field (10 pages) 073001 Jose´ F. Nieves Large logarithms in the beam normal spin asymmetry of elastic electron-proton scattering (10 pages) . 073002 Andrei V. Afanasev and N. P. Merenkov Improving extractions of jVcbj and mb from the hadronic invariant mass moments of semileptonic inclusive B decay (17 pages) ........................................................................... -
New Results from Cosmic Rays
0 NEW RESULTS FROM COSMIC RATS S.C. Tonwar Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Hoasi BhaSsha RoasS, Bombay-400 005 I wish to discerns here some of the interesting results that have become available In last few years fro m experiments carried out using cosmic ray beam. These results provide information about particle physics at energies well above these available at particle accelerators. I have also included in this discussion some experimental results which were obtained many years back but have been reinterpreted recently in the light of our present knowledge of high energy processes v . , and cosmic ray composition. I must emphasize right in the beginning that most of the interesting results obtained in cosmic ray experiments suffer from poor statistics due to very low luminosity of the cosmic ray beam at high energies. Further the interpretations of observed phenomena, in some cases, are not unique due to our lack of precise knowledge of the composition of primary cosmic rays at these'energies. Therefore, the cosmic ray experiments, by their very nature, can provide in some cases only a glimpse of the interesting phenomenon which may be occurring at very high energies. An idea of the statistical problems faced by a cosmic ^ray^physicist may be given by a comparison of the cosmic ray particle flux with the beam luminosity obtained, say, at ISR machine. For - 262 - - 263 - energies above 2000 GeV (2 TeV) the proton flux at the top of atmosphere is about 70 m"^sr"*hr“l and only about 0.5 m '^sr^day*1 at mountain altitude (730 g. -
The Creation of the International Centre for Theoretical Physics in Trieste
Alexis De Greiff The tale of two peripheries The Tale of Two Peripheries: The Creation of the International Centre for Theoretical Physics in Trieste Publicado con cambios menores en Historical Studies of Physical and Biological Sciences (Special Issue, Alexis De Greiff y David Kaiser, eds.) Vol. 33, Part 1 (2002), pp. 33-60. Alexis De Greiff* Abstract: This paper can be seen in the intersection between history of 20th-century physics, diplomatic history and international relations of science. In this work I analyze the dynamics of the negotiations to create the International Centre for Theoretical Physics, which took place between 1960 and 1963 at the International Atomic Energy Agency. In contrast to previous studies on the creation of international scientific institutions, I pay special attention to the active role played by scientists, politicians and intellectuals from the host-city, Trieste (Italy). Further, I spell out the historical circumstances that allowed this group of local actors to become key figures in the establishment of the Centre. I discuss in detail their interests as well as the political and scientific environment that eventually catalysed the diplomatic efforts of the Trieste elite. The present paper is also concerned with the strategies adopted by the advocates of the idea to confront the hostility of delegations from several industrialized countries, the Soviet Union and India. A frontier is a strip which divides and links, a sour gash like a wound which heals with difficulty, a no-man’s land, a mixed territory, whose inhabitants often feel that they do not belong to any clearly-defined country, or at least they do not belong to any country with that obvious certainty with which one usually identifies with ones native land. -
Theory and Experiment in the Quantum-Relativity Revolution
Theory and Experiment in the Quantum-Relativity Revolution expanded version of lecture presented at American Physical Society meeting, 2/14/10 (Abraham Pais History of Physics Prize for 2009) by Stephen G. Brush* Abstract Does new scientific knowledge come from theory (whose predictions are confirmed by experiment) or from experiment (whose results are explained by theory)? Either can happen, depending on whether theory is ahead of experiment or experiment is ahead of theory at a particular time. In the first case, new theoretical hypotheses are made and their predictions are tested by experiments. But even when the predictions are successful, we can’t be sure that some other hypothesis might not have produced the same prediction. In the second case, as in a detective story, there are already enough facts, but several theories have failed to explain them. When a new hypothesis plausibly explains all of the facts, it may be quickly accepted before any further experiments are done. In the quantum-relativity revolution there are examples of both situations. Because of the two-stage development of both relativity (“special,” then “general”) and quantum theory (“old,” then “quantum mechanics”) in the period 1905-1930, we can make a double comparison of acceptance by prediction and by explanation. A curious anti- symmetry is revealed and discussed. _____________ *Distinguished University Professor (Emeritus) of the History of Science, University of Maryland. Home address: 108 Meadowlark Terrace, Glen Mills, PA 19342. Comments welcome. 1 “Science walks forward on two feet, namely theory and experiment. ... Sometimes it is only one foot which is put forward first, sometimes the other, but continuous progress is only made by the use of both – by theorizing and then testing, or by finding new relations in the process of experimenting and then bringing the theoretical foot up and pushing it on beyond, and so on in unending alterations.” Robert A. -
Lhcb Prepares for RICH Physics
I n t e r n at I o n a l J o u r n a l o f H I g H - e n e r g y P H y s I c s CERN COURIERV o l u m e 47 n u m b e r 6 J u ly/a u g u s t 2 0 07 LHCb prepares for RICH physics NEUTRINOS LHC FOCUS InSIDE STORY Borexino starts On the trail of At the far side to take data p8 heavy flavour p30 of the world p58 CCJulAugCover1.indd 1 11/7/07 13:50:51 Project1 10/7/07 13:56 Page 1 CONTENTS Covering current developments in high- energy physics and related fields worldwide CERN Courier is distributed to member-state governments, institutes and laboratories affiliated with CERN, and to their personnel. It is published monthly, except for January and August. The views expressed are not necessarily those of the CERN management. Editor Christine Sutton CERN CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland E-mail [email protected] Fax +41 (0) 22 785 0247 Web cerncourier.com Advisory board James Gillies, Rolf Landua and Maximilian Metzger Laboratory correspondents: COURIERo l u m e u m b e r u ly u g u s t V 47 N 6 J /A 20 07 Argonne National Laboratory (US) Cosmas Zachos Brookhaven National Laboratory (US) P Yamin Cornell University (US) D G Cassel DESY Laboratory (Germany) Ilka Flegel, Ute Wilhelmsen EMFCSC (Italy) Anna Cavallini Enrico Fermi Centre (Italy) Guido Piragino Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (US) Judy Jackson Forschungszentrum Jülich (Germany) Markus Buescher GSI Darmstadt (Germany) I Peter IHEP, Beijing (China) Tongzhou Xu IHEP, Serpukhov (Russia) Yu Ryabov INFN (Italy) Barbara Gallavotti Jefferson Laboratory (US) Steven Corneliussen JINR -
Centauro and Strange Object Research in Nucleus
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE CASTOR: Centauro And Strange Object Research in provided by CERN Document Server nucleus-nucleus collisions at LHC Ewa G ladysz-Dziadu´s for the CASTOR group A L S Angelis1, X Aslanoglou2,JBartke3, K Chileev4, 3 4 4 4 EG ladysz-Dziadu´s ∗,MGolubeva,FGuber,TKaravitcheva, YVKharlov5,ABKurepin4, G Mavromanolakis1, A D Panagiotou1, S A Sadovsky5 VVTiflov4, and Z Wlodarczyk 6 1 Nuclear and Particle Physics Division, University of Athens, Athens, Greece. 2 Department of Physics, the University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece. 3 Institute of Nuclear Physics, Cracow, Poland. 4 Institute for Nuclear Research, Moscow, Russia. 5 Institute for High Energy Physics, Protvino, Russia. 6 Institute of Physics, Pedagogical University, Kielce, Poland. Abstract. We describe the CASTOR detector designed to probe the very forward, baryon-rich rapidity region in nucleus-nucleus collisions at the LHC. We present a phenomenological model describing the formation of a QGP fireball in high baryochemical potential environment, and its subsequent decay into baryons and possibly strangelets. The model explains the Centauro events observed in cosmic rays and the long-penetrating component frequently accompanying them, and makes predictions for the LHC. Simulations of Centauro-type events by means of our Monte-Carlo event generator CNGEN were done. To study the response of the apparatus to new effects, different exotic species (DCC clusters, Centauros, strangelets and so{called mixed events produced by baryons and strangelets being the remnants of the Centauro fireball explosion) were passed through the deep calorimeter. The energy deposition pattern in the calorimeter appears to be a new clear signature of the QGP state. -
On the Occasion of the 14Th Marcel Grossmann Meeting
ICRANet on the occasion of the 14 th Marcel Grossmann Meeting – MGXIV in celebration of the International Year of Light 2015 the 100 th anniversary of the Einstein’s equations the golden jubilee of Relativistic Astrophysics The ICRANet Seats The University of Rome “La Sapienza” where the Physics Department hosts the ICRANet ICRANet Headquarters in Pescara (Italy). seat in Rome (Italy). ICRANet seat in Nice (France). National Academy of Sciences of Armenia, which hosts the ICRANet seat in Yerevan (Armenia). (Above:) CBPF, which hosts the ICRANet seat in Rio de Janeiro. (Below:) The planned seat at Cassino da Urca (Brazil). II This brochure reviews some background facts concerning the founding of ICRANet and its current structures and then turns to the 2015 celebrations of the Year of Light and the ICRANet initiated International Relativistic Astrophysics Ph.D. program (the IRAP-PhD). It then addresses the birth of relativistic astrophysics following the first fifty years of the existence of general relativity plagued mainly by the absence of observational or experimental activity. Four events marked the onset of relativistic astrophysics: the discovery by Schmidt of the first quasar in 1962, of Scorpius X1 by Riccardo Giacconi in 1963, of the cosmic background radiation by Penzias and Wilson in 1964, and of pulsars by Jocelyn-Bell and Antony Hewish in 1967. These events led to a systematic development of the understanding of the four pillars of relativistic astrophysics: supernovae where observations of the CRAB Nebula are still relevant today, white dwarfs and neutron stars, black holes and their first identification in Nature in Cygnus X1 found by Riccardo Giacconi with the UHURU satellite based on the conceptual background developed by our group in Princeton, and finally the discovery of gamma ray bursts as the largest energy source delivered in the shortest time of any astrophysical phenomenon. -
Via Issuelab
ROCKEFELLER ARCHIVE CENTER RESEARCH REPO RTS The Rockefeller Foundation (Non) Policy Toward Physics Research and Education in Latin America by Adriana Minor García Centro de Estudios Históricos, El Colegio de México © 2019 by Adriana Minor García Abstract This report provides an overview of the history of physics in Latin America through the intervention of the Rockefeller Foundation. It is mainly based on reports and correspondence located at the Rockefeller Archive Center, documenting the interaction of Rockefeller Foundation officers with Latin American physicists, providing insight into how these scientists represented themselves. It focuses on the policies of the Rockefeller Foundation behind its support for physics communities and institutions in Latin America from the 1940s to the 1960s. It provides a panoramic – but not exhaustive – view about how these orientations changed according to the group, the topic, and the geopolitical context. 2 RAC RESEARCH REPORTS Introduction An inspiring corpus of works about the role of the Rockefeller Foundation (RF) in Latin America exists nowadays. Among such works, the book edited by Marcos Cueto in the 1990s, Missionaries of Science, is still one of the most representative, with a remarkable focus on medicine and agriculture. These areas were in fact the priority of the RF for decades in Latin America. However, other scientific disciplines were also supported by the foundation, such as physics and mathematics. For sure, the funds provided and the consistency of the institutional agenda for these areas were not as impressive as in the case of medicine and agriculture, but as this report demonstrates, they had, nonetheless, important impacts for this region. -
Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project, 1939-1945: a Study in German Culture
Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project http://content.cdlib.org/xtf/view?docId=ft838nb56t&chunk.id=0&doc.v... Preferred Citation: Rose, Paul Lawrence. Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project, 1939-1945: A Study in German Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press, c1998 1998. http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft838nb56t/ Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project A Study in German Culture Paul Lawrence Rose UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS Berkeley · Los Angeles · Oxford © 1998 The Regents of the University of California In affectionate memory of Brian Dalton (1924–1996), Scholar, gentleman, leader, friend And in honor of my father's 80th birthday Preferred Citation: Rose, Paul Lawrence. Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project, 1939-1945: A Study in German Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press, c1998 1998. http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft838nb56t/ In affectionate memory of Brian Dalton (1924–1996), Scholar, gentleman, leader, friend And in honor of my father's 80th birthday ― ix ― ACKNOWLEDGMENTS For hospitality during various phases of work on this book I am grateful to Aryeh Dvoretzky, Director of the Institute of Advanced Studies of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, whose invitation there allowed me to begin work on the book while on sabbatical leave from James Cook University of North Queensland, Australia, in 1983; and to those colleagues whose good offices made it possible for me to resume research on the subject while a visiting professor at York University and the University of Toronto, Canada, in 1990–92. Grants from the College of the Liberal Arts and the Institute for the Arts and Humanistic Studies of The Pennsylvania State University enabled me to complete the research and writing of the book.