DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Draft CEE Rothera Wharf Reconstruction & Coastal Stabilisation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download Draft CEE Rothera Wharf Reconstruction & Coastal Stabilisation Rothera Wharf Reconstruction & Coastal Stabilisation Draft Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation BAS Environment Office January 2018 1 2 Contents NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 11 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 17 1.1. BACKGROUND TO DEVELOPMENT .............................................................................................................. 17 1.2. OVERVIEW OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT .................................................................................................... 17 1.2.1. Rothera Wharf ......................................................................................................................... 17 1.2.2. Coastal Stabilisation ................................................................................................................. 17 1.3. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF DOCUMENT ......................................................................................................... 17 2. APPROACH TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT ................................................................. 19 2.1. STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS ..................................................................................................................... 19 2.2. EIA METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................... 20 2.3. CEEQUAL ............................................................................................................................................ 21 3. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 1 – ROTHERA WHARF ................................................. 22 3.1. PURPOSE AND NEED ............................................................................................................................... 22 3.2. LOCATION ............................................................................................................................................. 22 3.3. DESIGN DETAILS & SCOPE OF PREFERRED OPTION .......................................................................................... 23 3.4. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ..................................................................................................................... 29 3.4.1. Do Nothing ............................................................................................................................... 29 3.4.2. Do Minimum ............................................................................................................................ 29 3.4.3. Alternative Designs .................................................................................................................. 30 3.5. OVERVIEW OF WORKS ............................................................................................................................. 36 3.6. LAYDOWN AREAS ................................................................................................................................... 36 3.7. EXISTING WHARF DISMANTLING METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................... 41 3.7.1. Assembly of Equipment (Construction Season 1) ..................................................................... 41 3.7.2. Dismantling of Existing Wharf ................................................................................................. 41 3.7.3. Assembly of New Wharf Structure ........................................................................................... 42 3.7.4. Preliminary Works for Mid and Rear Walls .............................................................................. 43 3.8. CONSTRUCTION METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................... 44 3.8.1. Rear Wall to Mid Wall Construction ......................................................................................... 44 3.8.2. Back Fill Rear Wall to Mid Wall ................................................................................................ 45 3.8.3. Mid Wall to Front Wall Construction (Construction Season 2) ................................................. 46 3.8.4. Back Fill Mid Wall to Front Wall ............................................................................................... 47 3.8.5. Installation of Bollards and Davit Crane Foundations. ............................................................. 47 3.8.6. Underwater Rock Blasting ........................................................................................................ 47 3.8.7. Construction materials ............................................................................................................. 51 3.8.8. Equipment and vehicles ........................................................................................................... 51 3.9. ANTICIPATED WASTE ............................................................................................................................... 52 3.10. PERSONNEL ........................................................................................................................................... 54 3.11. PREDICTED LIFESPAN ............................................................................................................................... 55 3.12. PLANS FOR DECOMMISSIONING ................................................................................................................. 55 4. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 2 – QUARRYING, DRILLING & BLASTING ..................... 56 4.1. PURPOSE AND NEED ................................................................................................................................ 56 4.2. LOCATION ............................................................................................................................................. 57 4.3. DESIGN DETAILS ..................................................................................................................................... 58 4.4. ALTERNATIVES ....................................................................................................................................... 63 4.4.1. Importing rock fill ..................................................................................................................... 63 4.4.2. Sourcing rock at other local areas ............................................................................................ 63 4.5. METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................................................................... 63 3 4.5.1. Access and Egress to the Drill and Blast Area .......................................................................... 63 4.5.2. Drill and Blasting Methodology................................................................................................ 64 4.5.3. Load Haul & Rock Processing ................................................................................................... 64 4.5.4. Production rates ....................................................................................................................... 65 4.5.5. Equipment and vehicles ........................................................................................................... 66 4.6. ANTICIPATED WASTE ............................................................................................................................... 67 4.7. PERSONNEL ........................................................................................................................................... 67 4.8. PREDICTED LIFESPAN ............................................................................................................................... 68 4.9. PLANS FOR DECOMMISSIONING ................................................................................................................. 68 5. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 3 – COASTAL STABILISATION ...................................... 69 5.1. PURPOSE AND NEED ............................................................................................................................... 69 5.2. LOCATION ............................................................................................................................................. 70 5.3. PROPOSED WORKS ................................................................................................................................. 70 5.4. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ...................................................................................................................... 71 5.4.1. Do Nothing ............................................................................................................................... 71 5.4.2. Do Minimum ............................................................................................................................ 71 5.4.3. Alternative Works .................................................................................................................... 72 5.4.4. Alternative Techniques ............................................................................................................. 72 5.5. LAYDOWN AREAS ..................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 'Landscapes of Exploration' Education Pack
    Landscapes of Exploration February 11 – 31 March 2012 Peninsula Arts Gallery Education Pack Cover image courtesy of British Antarctic Survey Cover image: Launch of a radiosonde meteorological balloon by a scientist/meteorologist at Halley Research Station. Atmospheric scientists at Rothera and Halley Research Stations collect data about the atmosphere above Antarctica this is done by launching radiosonde meteorological balloons which have small sensors and a transmitter attached to them. The balloons are filled with helium and so rise high into the Antarctic atmosphere sampling the air and transmitting the data back to the station far below. A radiosonde meteorological balloon holds an impressive 2,000 litres of helium, giving it enough lift to climb for up to two hours. Helium is lighter than air and so causes the balloon to rise rapidly through the atmosphere, while the instruments beneath it sample all the required data and transmit the information back to the surface. - Permissions for information on radiosonde meteorological balloons kindly provided by British Antarctic Survey. For a full activity sheet on how scientists collect data from the air in Antarctica please visit the Discovering Antarctica website www.discoveringantarctica.org.uk and select resources www.discoveringantarctica.org.uk has been developed jointly by the Royal Geographical Society, with IBG0 and the British Antarctic Survey, with funding from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. The Royal Geographical Society (with IBG) supports geography in universities and schools, through expeditions and fieldwork and with the public and policy makers. Full details about the Society’s work, and how you can become a member, is available on www.rgs.org All activities in this handbook that are from www.discoveringantarctica.org.uk will be clearly identified.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Disc Resources
    An early map of the world Resource D1 A map of the world drawn in 1570 shows ‘Terra Australis Nondum Cognita’ (the unknown south land). National Library of Australia Expeditions to Antarctica 1770 –1830 and 1910 –1913 Resource D2 Voyages to Antarctica 1770–1830 1772–75 1819–20 1820–21 Cook (Britain) Bransfield (Britain) Palmer (United States) ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ Resolution and Adventure Williams Hero 1819 1819–21 1820–21 Smith (Britain) ▼ Bellingshausen (Russia) Davis (United States) ▼ ▼ ▼ Williams Vostok and Mirnyi Cecilia 1822–24 Weddell (Britain) ▼ Jane and Beaufoy 1830–32 Biscoe (Britain) ★ ▼ Tula and Lively South Pole expeditions 1910–13 1910–12 1910–13 Amundsen (Norway) Scott (Britain) sledge ▼ ▼ ship ▼ Source: Both maps American Geographical Society Source: Major voyages to Antarctica during the 19th century Resource D3 Voyage leader Date Nationality Ships Most southerly Achievements latitude reached Bellingshausen 1819–21 Russian Vostok and Mirnyi 69˚53’S Circumnavigated Antarctica. Discovered Peter Iøy and Alexander Island. Charted the coast round South Georgia, the South Shetland Islands and the South Sandwich Islands. Made the earliest sighting of the Antarctic continent. Dumont d’Urville 1837–40 French Astrolabe and Zeelée 66°S Discovered Terre Adélie in 1840. The expedition made extensive natural history collections. Wilkes 1838–42 United States Vincennes and Followed the edge of the East Antarctic pack ice for 2400 km, 6 other vessels confirming the existence of the Antarctic continent. Ross 1839–43 British Erebus and Terror 78°17’S Discovered the Transantarctic Mountains, Ross Ice Shelf, Ross Island and the volcanoes Erebus and Terror. The expedition made comprehensive magnetic measurements and natural history collections.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Funding and National Facilities (Research Vessel Facilities and Equipment)
    UK Funding and National Facilities (Research Vessel Facilities and Equipment) Lisa McNeill and the UK community National Oceanography Centre Southampton University of Southampton Research Council Funding • Natural Environment Research Council primary funding source – Part of Research Councils UK (RCUK) – Potential to apply to other RC programmes e.g., EPSRC (e.g. for engineering related technology development) • A: Responsive mode (blue skies). Includes Urgency Funds • B: Research Themes (part of current focus – increasingly strategic, applied and impact focused). Relevant themes: – Forecasting and mitigation of natural hazards (includes “Building resilience in earthquake-prone and volcanic regions”) – Earth System Science – Sustainable Use of Natural Resources • Increasing cross Research Council themes and programmes, e.g.: – Living With Environmental Change • Impact of current economy: – Reduction of overall NERC budget in real terms – Focused on significant capital budget reduction – “Protecting front line science” through various measures including efficiency savings – External funds to support major capital investments, e.g., RRS Discovery replacement – Maintaining share of the budget for responsive mode research funding, although implementing “demand management” IODP-UKIODP • UKIODP also funded through NERC, with associated research funding • This includes funds for site survey, post-cruise and other related research International Collaboration • Many examples of co-funded research • Usage of barter/joint agreements for research
    [Show full text]
  • Written Evidence Submitted by the British Antarctic Survey and NERC Arctic Office (CLI0009)
    Written evidence submitted by the British Antarctic Survey and NERC Arctic Office (CLI0009) Summary The Polar Regions are the regions on Earth most sensitive to climate change. What happens in the remote Polar Regions affects every person on this planet through the inter-related complexities of our global Earth system. International collaboration and environmental diplomacy enable UK polar scientists to undertake world-class research in remote and challenging polar environments on topics such as climate change, environmental management, non-native species, biosecurity, sustainable fishing and tourism. The British Antarctic Survey and the NERC Arctic Office work closely with the FCO to deliver highly significant IPCC reports on climate change in the Polar Regions, and to enable participation in the Arctic Council’s Working Groups, Expert Groups and Taskforces. The FCO Polar Regions Department works with the UK and international science community on award-winning education programmes for schools, public and international audiences. Submitted by: Professor Dame Jane Francis, Director British Antarctic Survey Henry Burgess, Head of NERC Arctic Office Linda Capper, Head of Communications, British Antarctic Survey 1. The British Antarctic Survey (BAS) is a Research Centre of the Natural Environment Research Council (UKRI-NERC) based in Cambridge, whose focus is science in the Polar Regions. In this role BAS works closely with the Polar Regions Department of the FCO. 2. The mission of BAS is to undertake world class science in the Polar Regions and to be the UK permanent presence in Antarctica and in South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands (SGSSI). This is outlined in a formal MoU between BAS, UKRI-NERC, FCO, and BEIS.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Report for the First Stage of the Diversity in Polar Science Initiative
    2021 REPORT FOR THE FIRST STAGE OF THE DIVERSITY IN POLAR SCIENCE INITIATIVE Written by Donna Frater 2021 Report for the first stage of the Diversity in Polar Science Initiative Contents PURPOSE................................................................................................................................................. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ 2 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Steering Committee ........................................................................................................................... 3 British Antarctic Survey participants .................................................................................................. 4 Wider UK Polar community ............................................................................................................... 4 PROJECT OUTCOMES .............................................................................................................................. 4 KEY OUTCOMES EVALUATION ................................................................................................................ 5 PROGRESS OF THE INITIATIVE – ENGAGEMENT, AWARENESS AND IMPACT ....................................... 17 Engagement with key stakeholder groups and organisations ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Centenary of the Scott Expedition to Antarctica and of the United Kingdom’S Enduring Scientific Legacy and Ongoing Presence There”
    Debate on 18 October: Scott Expedition to Antarctica and Scientific Legacy This Library Note provides background reading for the debate to be held on Thursday, 18 October: “the centenary of the Scott Expedition to Antarctica and of the United Kingdom’s enduring scientific legacy and ongoing presence there” The Note provides information on Antarctica’s geography and environment; provides a history of its exploration; outlines the international agreements that govern the territory; and summarises international scientific cooperation and the UK’s continuing role and presence. Ian Cruse 15 October 2012 LLN 2012/034 House of Lords Library Notes are compiled for the benefit of Members of the House of Lords and their personal staff, to provide impartial, politically balanced briefing on subjects likely to be of interest to Members of the Lords. Authors are available to discuss the contents of the Notes with the Members and their staff but cannot advise members of the general public. Any comments on Library Notes should be sent to the Head of Research Services, House of Lords Library, London SW1A 0PW or emailed to [email protected]. Table of Contents 1.1 Geophysics of Antarctica ....................................................................................... 1 1.2 Environmental Concerns about the Antarctic ......................................................... 2 2.1 Britain’s Early Interest in the Antarctic .................................................................... 4 2.2 Heroic Age of Antarctic Exploration .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Inhomogeneity of the Surface Air Temperature Record from Halley, Antarctica
    15 JUNE 2021 K I N G E T A L . 4771 Inhomogeneity of the Surface Air Temperature Record from Halley, Antarctica a a a a a a JOHN C. KING, JOHN TURNER, STEVE COLWELL, HUA LU, ANDREW ORR, TONY PHILLIPS, a a J. SCOTT HOSKING, AND GARETH J. MARSHALL a British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, United Kingdom (Manuscript received 25 September 2020, in final form 10 March 2021) ABSTRACT: Commencing in 1956, observations made at Halley Research Station in Antarctica provide one of the longest continuous series of near-surface temperature observations from the Antarctic continent. Since few other records of comparable length are available, the Halley record has been used extensively in studies of long-term Antarctic climate variability and change. The record does not, however, come from a single location but is a composite of observations from a sequence of seven stations, all situated on the Brunt Ice Shelf, that range from around 10 to 50 km in distance from the coast. Until now, it has generally been assumed that temperature data from all of these stations could be combined into a single composite record with no adjustment. Here, we examine this assumption of homogeneity. Application of a statistical changepoint algorithm to the composite record detects a sudden cooling associated with the move from Halley IV to Halley V station in 1992. We show that this temperature step is consistent with local temperature gradients measured by a network of automatic weather stations and with those simulated by a high-resolution atmospheric model. These temperature gradients are strongest in the coastal region and result from the onshore advection of maritime air.
    [Show full text]
  • Travel to and from Antarctica: 2019/20
    Travel To and From Antarctica: 2019/20 Coronavirus and travel to Antarctica All individuals who have recently visited China should be in quarantine/self-isolation and symptom free for 2 weeks before traveling to Antarctica or joining a BAS ship. Any recent travel to China should be identified to the BAS Polar Operations Support Team. Any deploying personnel should not travel with any flu-like illness. If you later develop any symptoms please contact the ship/station Doctor or contact BASMU. General advice can be found at: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019 1. General: a. Travel by the most direct and convenient route at the start of your tour to Antarctica will be arranged for you by British Antarctic Survey (BAS). You will not normally have the option to make your own arrangements for travelling south. If this is likely to cause you significant inconvenience, please contact the Polar Operations Support Team as soon as possible, contact details at the end of this notice. b. You will be able to view your planned travel via the SOUTH database. For those external to BAS, a password and link to view your travel remotely will be provided by early September 2019. c. It is an individual’s responsibility to obtain any required visas. All non-UK citizens are advised to check whether they need visas for entry (even in transit) for Chile, South Africa and Falkland Islands. d. Approximately 2 weeks before your planned departure date, the Support Team will contact you by e-mail with travel details for the southbound journey.
    [Show full text]
  • BAS Science Summaries 2018-2019 Antarctic Field Season
    BAS Science Summaries 2018-2019 Antarctic field season BAS Science Summaries 2018-2019 Antarctic field season Introduction This booklet contains the project summaries of field, station and ship-based science that the British Antarctic Survey (BAS) is supporting during the forthcoming 2018/19 Antarctic field season. I think it demonstrates once again the breadth and scale of the science that BAS undertakes and supports. For more detailed information about individual projects please contact the Principal Investigators. There is no doubt that 2018/19 is another challenging field season, and it’s one in which the key focus is on the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) and how this has changed in the past, and may change in the future. Three projects, all logistically big in their scale, are BEAMISH, Thwaites and WACSWAIN. They will advance our understanding of the fragility and complexity of the WAIS and how the ice sheets are responding to environmental change, and contributing to global sea-level rise. Please note that only the PIs and field personnel have been listed in this document. PIs appear in capitals and in brackets if they are not present on site, and Field Guides are indicated with an asterisk. Non-BAS personnel are shown in blue. A full list of non-BAS personnel and their affiliated organisations is shown in the Appendix. My thanks to the authors for their contributions, to MAGIC for the field sites map, and to Elaine Fitzcharles and Ali Massey for collating all the material together. Thanks also to members of the Communications Team for the editing and production of this handy summary.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Factsheet
    Antarctic Factsheet Geographical Statistics May 2005 AREA % of total Antarctica - including ice shelves and islands 13,829,430km2 100.00% (Around 58 times the size of the UK, or 1.4 times the size of the USA) Antarctica - excluding ice shelves and islands 12,272,800km2 88.74% Area ice free 44,890km2 0.32% Ross Ice Shelf 510,680km2 3.69% Ronne-Filchner Ice Shelf 439,920km2 3.18% LENGTH Antarctic Peninsula 1,339km Transantarctic Mountains 3,300km Coastline* TOTAL 45,317km 100.00% * Note: coastlines are fractal in nature, so any Ice shelves 18,877km 42.00% measurement of them is dependant upon the scale at which the data is collected. Coastline Rock 5,468km 12.00% lengths here are calculated from the most Ice coastline 20,972km 46.00% detailed information available. HEIGHT Mean height of Antarctica - including ice shelves 1,958m Mean height of Antarctica - excluding ice shelves 2,194m Modal height excluding ice shelves 3,090m Highest Mountains 1. Mt Vinson (Ellsworth Mts.) 4,892m 2. Mt Tyree (Ellsworth Mts.) 4,852m 3. Mt Shinn (Ellsworth Mts.) 4,661m 4. Mt Craddock (Ellsworth Mts.) 4,650m 5. Mt Gardner (Ellsworth Mts.) 4,587m 6. Mt Kirkpatrick (Queen Alexandra Range) 4,528m 7. Mt Elizabeth (Queen Alexandra Range) 4,480m 8. Mt Epperly (Ellsworth Mts) 4,359m 9. Mt Markham (Queen Elizabeth Range) 4,350m 10. Mt Bell (Queen Alexandra Range) 4,303m (In many case these heights are based on survey of variable accuracy) Nunatak on the Antarctic Peninsula 1/4 www.antarctica.ac.uk Antarctic Factsheet Geographical Statistics May 2005 Other Notable Mountains 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Archives of Natural History, 47, 147-165. Accepted Version. Robert
    Archives of Natural History, 47, 147-165. Accepted version. Robert McCormick’s geological collections from Antarctica and the Southern Ocean, 1839–1843 PHILIP STONE British Geological Survey, The Lyell Centre, Research Avenue South, Edinburgh EH14 4AP, Scotland, UK (e-mail: [email protected]) ABSTRACT: Robert McCormick (1800–1890) took part in three mid-nineteenth- century British Polar expeditions, two to the Arctic and one to the Antarctic. The latter, from 1839 to 1843 and led by James Clark Ross, is the best known. McCormick served as senior surgeon on HMS Erebus and was responsible for the collection of zoological and geological specimens. Despite the novelty and potential scientific importance of these early geological collections from Antarctica and remote islands in the Southern Ocean, they received surprisingly little attention at the time. Ross deposited an official collection with the British Museum in 1844, soon after the expedition’s return, and this was supplemented by McCormick’s personal collection, bequeathed in 1890. McCormick had contributed brief and idiosyncratic geological notes to the expedition report published by Ross in 1847, but it was not until 1899 that an informed description of the Antarctic rocks was published, and only in 1921 were McCormick’s palaeobotanical specimens from Kerguelen examined. His material from other Southern Ocean islands received even less attention; had it been utilized at the time it would have supplemented the better-known collections made by the likes of Charles Darwin. In later life, McCormick became increasingly embittered over the lack of recognition afforded to him for his work in the Polar regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Rothera Modernisation ‐ Phase 1
    Rothera Modernisation ‐ Phase 1 Initial Environmental Evaluation BAS Antarctic Infrastructure Modernisation Programme BAS Environment Office September 2019 0 This page has been intentionally left blank. 1 Contents Non‐Technical Summary ....................................................................................................................... 10 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 16 1.1 Background to AIMP ............................................................................................................. 16 1.2 Overview of proposed development .................................................................................... 16 1.3 Purpose and scope of document .......................................................................................... 17 2 APPROACH TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT ............................................................. 18 2.1 Statutory requirements ........................................................................................................ 18 2.2 EIA methodology ................................................................................................................... 18 2.3 BREEAM ................................................................................................................................. 19 2.4 Sustainability Plan ................................................................................................................. 20
    [Show full text]