DOCSLIB.ORG

National Monument, National Conservation Area and the West Malpais and Cebolla Wilderness Areas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Monument, National Conservation Area and the West Malpais and Cebolla Wilderness Areas University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Books, Reports, and Studies Resources, Energy, and the Environment 2005 El Malpais Area: National Monument, National Conservation Area and the West Malpais and Cebolla Wilderness Areas Kathryn M. Mutz Doug Cannon University of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/books_reports_studies Part of the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Law Commons, and the Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons Citation Information Kathryn Mutz & Doug Cannon, El Malpais Area: National Monument, National Conservation Area and the West Malpais and Cebolla Wilderness Areas (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 2005). Kathryn Mutz & Doug Cannon, EL MALPAIS AREA: NATIONAL MONUMENT, NATIONAL CONSERVATION AREA AND THE WEST MALPAIS AND CEBOLLA WILDERNESS AREAS (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 2005). Reproduced with permission of the Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Resources, Energy, and the Environment (formerly the Natural Resources Law Center) at the University of Colorado Law School. EL MALPAIS AREA: NATIONAL MONUMENT, NATIONAL CONSERVATION AREA AND THE WEST MALPAIS AND CEBOLLA WILDERNESS AREAS Kathryn Mutz and Doug Cannon Natural Resources Law Center February 2005 Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................... 1 II. EARLY HISTORY ....................................................................................................................... 4 III. THE PROCESS OF PROTECTION ............................................................................................... 4 A. The Early Days ..................................................................................................................... 4 B. Legislative History................................................................................................................ 7 1972......................................................................................................................................... 7 1985......................................................................................................................................... 7 1986-1987 ............................................................................................................................. 10 IV. LEGAL FRAMEWORKS........................................................................................................... 13 A. Legislative Provisions......................................................................................................... 13 B. Drawing the Boundaries...................................................................................................... 15 1. National Monument ......................................................................................................... 15 2. National Conservation Area............................................................................................. 18 3. Wilderness Areas ............................................................................................................. 18 a. West Malpais Wilderness Area.................................................................................... 19 b. Cebolla Wilderness Area ............................................................................................. 20 c. Chain of Craters WSA ................................................................................................. 21 d. El Malpais National Monument Roadless Area........................................................... 23 e. Other WSAs Considered for Wilderness Designation................................................. 23 V. MANAGEMENT ........................................................................................................................ 24 A. Management Plans.............................................................................................................. 25 B. Management Issues ............................................................................................................. 27 1. Vehicle Access................................................................................................................. 28 a. Recreation .................................................................................................................... 28 b. Access for Tribes ......................................................................................................... 31 2. Grazing............................................................................................................................. 32 3. Mineral Development ...................................................................................................... 37 4. Water................................................................................................................................ 38 5. Private Lands Acquisition................................................................................................ 40 6. Contrasting Other Management Issues ............................................................................ 43 VI. CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................................... 47 VII. BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................................................................................................... 50 Statutes, Cases, Public Laws, and Federal Regulations............................................................ 50 Committee Reports and Hearings............................................................................................. 50 Agency Documents................................................................................................................... 51 Other Documents ...................................................................................................................... 52 Contacts .................................................................................................................................... 52 i I. INTRODUCTION El malpais (“the badlands”), located about twenty miles south of Grants, New Mexico, is an area of extensive volcanic features including lava flows, cinder cones, lava tubes, calderas, and ice caves. 1 The elevation of the el malpais region varies from about 6,500 feet to about 8,000 feet above sea level. The vegetation ranges from pinyon-juniper in the lower elevations to ponderosa forests in the highlands. The area provides habitat for numerous amphibians, reptiles, mammals, and bird species. Because of its unique features and long history, the area is also rich in cultural and historical resources. For all of these reasons, Congress has designated most of el malpais for varying degrees of protection. See Maps 1a and 1b. In 1987 Congress passed Public Law 100-225 (the Act), which created three land designations in order to protect and administer the el malpais region. The first is the 114,277-acre El Malpais National Monument, administered by the National Park Service (NPS). Adjacent to and nearly surrounding the National Monument is the El Malpais National Conservation Area (NCA). The approximately 263,000-acre NCA is administered by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). Included within the NCA are the West Malpais and the Cebolla Wilderness Areas that together comprise about 98,000 acres. The Act also called for a wilderness suitability study for part of the NCA (the Chain of Craters Wilderness Study Area (WSA)), as well as the roadless portions of the National Monument. This report describes the legislative history of the area, discussing each legal framework (national monument, NCA, and wilderness areas), how they were chosen, and the controversies and constituencies that influenced the selection. The report also compares management prescriptions specified in the legislation for each framework and how BLM and NPS have translated these prescriptions into management plans. Finally, the report comments on whether or not different land status designations have made any difference in management, with particular emphasis on motorized access, grazing, mineral development, and water rights and water development. 1 “el malpais” (lower case) is used throughout this report to refer to the general badlands area regardless of land status designation. General descriptions of the area were drawn from the following websites unless otherwise cited. http://www.nm.blm.gov/recreation/albuquerque/el_malpais_nca.htm (February 8, 2005); http://www.nps.gov/elma/pphtml/facts.html (February 8, 2005). 1 Map 1a. New Mexico Location 2 Map 1b. Detail of National Monument, NCA, Wilderness Areas, and multiple-use lands. Note: This map is derived from recent BLM and NPS data, but it incorrectly portrays the yellow hatched area (eastern edge) as part of the NCA. This is Acoma Pueblo land excluded from the NCA boundary. Only the hatched orange and green areas area within the NCA. 3 II. EARLY HISTORY The original inhabitants of el malpais were the Acoma and Zuni, dating back to 10,000 –5,000 B.C.E.. Spanish colonization and conquest in the 16th and 17th centuries resulted in dwindling Native populations as well as changes in the Acoma and Zuni agrarian lifestyle. By 1800 the largest industry for the Indian and Spanish in the area was sheepherding. Between
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Travel Summary
    Travel Summary – All Trips and Day Trips Retirement 2016-2020 Trips (28) • Relatives 2016-A (R16A), September 30-October 20, 2016, 21 days, 441 photos • Anza-Borrego Desert 2016-A (A16A), November 13-18, 2016, 6 days, 711 photos • Arizona 2017-A (A17A), March 19-24, 2017, 6 days, 692 photos • Utah 2017-A (U17A), April 8-23, 2017, 16 days, 2214 photos • Tonopah 2017-A (T17A), May 14-19, 2017, 6 days, 820 photos • Nevada 2017-A (N17A), June 25-28, 2017, 4 days, 515 photos • New Mexico 2017-A (M17A), July 13-26, 2017, 14 days, 1834 photos • Great Basin 2017-A (B17A), August 13-21, 2017, 9 days, 974 photos • Kanab 2017-A (K17A), August 27-29, 2017, 3 days, 172 photos • Fort Worth 2017-A (F17A), September 16-29, 2017, 14 days, 977 photos • Relatives 2017-A (R17A), October 7-27, 2017, 21 days, 861 photos • Arizona 2018-A (A18A), February 12-17, 2018, 6 days, 403 photos • Mojave Desert 2018-A (M18A), March 14-19, 2018, 6 days, 682 photos • Utah 2018-A (U18A), April 11-27, 2018, 17 days, 1684 photos • Europe 2018-A (E18A), June 27-July 25, 2018, 29 days, 3800 photos • Kanab 2018-A (K18A), August 6-8, 2018, 3 days, 28 photos • California 2018-A (C18A), September 5-15, 2018, 11 days, 913 photos • Relatives 2018-A (R18A), October 1-19, 2018, 19 days, 698 photos • Arizona 2019-A (A19A), February 18-20, 2019, 3 days, 127 photos • Texas 2019-A (T19A), March 18-April 1, 2019, 15 days, 973 photos • Death Valley 2019-A (D19A), April 4-5, 2019, 2 days, 177 photos • Utah 2019-A (U19A), April 19-May 3, 2019, 15 days, 1482 photos • Europe 2019-A (E19A), July
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Manager's Report Fiscal Year 2015
    Summary Manager’s Report Fiscal Year 2015 National Monuments, National Conservation Areas, and Similar Designations Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Utah Page 2 Summary of Manager’s Reports for Fiscal Year 2015 - National Monuments and National Conservation Areas Highlights of Fiscal Year 2015 The Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM’s) National Landscape Conservation System (National Conservation Lands) manages 873 units, including 46 National Monuments, National Conservation Areas (NCAs), and similar designations. The National Conservation Lands are uniquely diverse. They encompass red-rock deserts and rugged ocean coastlines, deep river canyons and broad Alaskan tundra. Many areas are remote and wild, but others are surprisingly accessible. The National Conservation Lands also protect our cultural legacy. They safeguard American Indian cliff dwellings and cultural sites and preserve the remaining traces of our nation’s historic trails. These units are the most well-known and well-visited of the National Conservation Lands. The management of these special units supports the BLM’s mission of sustaining the health, diversity, and productivity of public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. This report summarizes the successes and challenges from each unit as reported through the annual “Manager’s Reports” for fiscal year 2015. McInnis Canyons National Conservation Area, Colorado Page 3 Summary of Manager’s Reports for Fiscal Year 2015 - National Monuments and National Conservation Areas Highlights of Fiscal Year 2015 Recreation Mapping In 2015, the National Conservation Lands office achieved its goal of developing standardized recreation maps for every National Monument and National Conservation Area and posting those maps on recreation-focused web pages.
    [Show full text]
  • BLM Manual 6100-National Landscape Conservation System
    Form 1221-2 (June 1969) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Release BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 6-131 Date MANUAL TRANSMITTAL SHEET 07/13/2012 Subject 6100 – National Landscape Conservation System Management Manual (Public) 1. Explanation of Material Transmitted: This release is the foundation Manual Section for the program-specific Manuals in the 6100 National Landscape Conservation System series. This manual provides general policy for all units of the BLM’s National Landscape Conservation System. 2. Reports Required: none 3. Material Superseded: none 4. Filing Instructions: File as directed below. REMOVE INSERT All of 6100 (Total 19 sheets) /s/ Mike Pool Acting Director, Bureau of Land Management BLM Manual 6100-National Landscape Conservation System Table of Contents 1.1 Purpose. ......................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Objectives. ..................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Authority. ....................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.4 Responsibility. ............................................................................................................................... 1-2 1. 5 References. .................................................................................................................................... 1-4 1.6 Policy.
    [Show full text]
  • National Conservation Lands
    ^ BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT National Conservation Lands The Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) system of National Conservation Lands includes approximately 36 million acres of nationally significant landscapes with outstanding historic, cultural, ecological, and The Upper Missouri River Breaks National Monument in central scientific values. Congress and presidents have Montana protects a historic landscape that is tremendously popular for outdoor recreation. The monument includes key provided specific designations to these lands segments of the Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail and the to conserve, protect, and restore them for the Nez Perce National Historic Trail, as well as the Fort Benton National Historic Landmark. benefit of current and future generations. PHOTO BY BOB WICK/BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT National Conservation Lands The National Conservation Lands FY 2021 Appropriations Request system include BLM lands with the following congressional and presidential Please support $49.5 million for the Bureau of Land designations: Management’s National Conservation Lands in the FY 2021 • National Monuments Interior Appropriations bill. • National Historic Trails • National Scenic Trails • Wild and Scenic Rivers APPROPRIATIONS BILL: Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies • Wilderness Areas AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management • Wilderness Study Areas ACCOUNT: Management of Lands and Resources • National Conservation Areas ACTIVITY: National Landscape Conservation System (National • Additional areas designated by Conservation Lands)
    [Show full text]
  • Definitions of Special Management Areas for Federal Public Lands
    Definitions of Special Management Areas for federal public lands Many different types of land management are applied to federal lands under as variety of regulations and prescriptions. By Gary Sprung Communications Director, International Mountain Bicycling Association, Nov. 18, 1997 The following areas or categories of areas, sites, and potential systems are regional, national, and international in scope and are managed totally or in conjunction with another agency, locale, or entity by the Bureau of Land Management. Most of these categories also apply to U. S. Forest Service areas. They are not listed in any particular order or sequence. The term "special" is limited to those areas and programs identified therein and may be expanded depending upon subsequent program and organizational capabilities at the Headquarters Office. Definitions are subject to refinement and currently form their basis from a variety of sources, i.e., statutory, policy, and program guidance. Comments to improve the definitions are encouraged. NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM: An area designated by Congress to assure that increasing population, expanding settlement, and growing mechanization does not occupy and modify all areas of the United States. Designation ensures that certain lands are preserved and protected in their natural condition. A wilderness in contrast with those areas where man and his works dominate the landscape, is recognized where the earth and its community of life are untrammeled by man, where man himself is a visitor who does not
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Impact Reports (Firs) Are Prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for Standing Finance Committees of the NM Legislature
    Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they are used for other purposes. Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the NM Legislative Website (www.nmlegis.gov). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North. F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T ORIGINAL DATE 02/07/13 SPONSOR Herrell/Martinez LAST UPDATED 02/18/13 HB 292 SHORT TITLE Transfer of Public Land Act SB ANALYST Weber REVENUE (dollars in thousands) Recurring Estimated Revenue Fund or Affected FY13 FY14 FY15 Nonrecurring (See Narrative) There (See Narrative) There may be additional may be additional Recurring General Fund revenue in future years. revenue in future years. (Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decrease ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (dollars in thousands) 3 Year Recurring or Fund FY13 FY14 FY15 Total Cost Nonrecurring Affected General Total $100.0 $100.0 $200.0 Recurring Fund (Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases) Duplicate to SB 404 SOURCES OF INFORMATION LFC Files Responses Received From Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) General Services Department (GSD) Economic Development Department (EDD) Department of Cultural Affairs (DCA) Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department (EMNRD) State Land Office (SLO) Department of Transportation (DOT) Department of Finance and Administration (DFA) House Bill 292 – Page 2 SUMMARY Synopsis of Bill House Bill 292 (HB 292) is the Transfer of Public Lands Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 111-11
    PUBLIC LAW 111–11—MAR. 30, 2009 123 STAT. 991 Public Law 111–11 111th Congress An Act To designate certain land as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System, to authorize certain programs and activities in the Department of the Mar. 30, 2009 Interior and the Department of Agriculture, and for other purposes. [H.R. 146] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, Omnibus Public Land SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. Management Act (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Omnibus of 2009. Public Land Management Act of 2009’’. 16 USC 1 note. (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents of this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. TITLE I—ADDITIONS TO THE NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM Subtitle A—Wild Monongahela Wilderness Sec. 1001. Designation of wilderness, Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia. Sec. 1002. Boundary adjustment, Laurel Fork South Wilderness, Monongahela Na­ tional Forest. Sec. 1003. Monongahela National Forest boundary confirmation. Sec. 1004. Enhanced Trail Opportunities. Subtitle B—Virginia Ridge and Valley Wilderness Sec. 1101. Definitions. Sec. 1102. Designation of additional National Forest System land in Jefferson Na­ tional Forest as wilderness or a wilderness study area. Sec. 1103. Designation of Kimberling Creek Potential Wilderness Area, Jefferson National Forest, Virginia. Sec. 1104. Seng Mountain and Bear Creek Scenic Areas, Jefferson National Forest, Virginia. Sec. 1105. Trail plan and development. Sec. 1106. Maps and boundary descriptions. Sec. 1107. Effective date. Subtitle C—Mt. Hood Wilderness, Oregon Sec.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1464 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1132
    § 1132 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1464 Department and agency having jurisdiction of, and reports submitted to Congress regard- thereover immediately before its inclusion in ing pending additions, eliminations, or modi- the National Wilderness Preservation System fications. Maps, legal descriptions, and regula- unless otherwise provided by Act of Congress. tions pertaining to wilderness areas within No appropriation shall be available for the pay- their respective jurisdictions also shall be ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- available to the public in the offices of re- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation gional foresters, national forest supervisors, System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- priations be available for additional personnel and forest rangers. stated as being required solely for the purpose of managing or administering areas solely because (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classi- they are included within the National Wilder- fications as primitive areas; Presidential rec- ness Preservation System. ommendations to Congress; approval of Con- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined gress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Ea- A wilderness, in contrast with those areas gles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado where man and his own works dominate the The Secretary of Agriculture shall, within ten landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where years after September 3, 1964, review, as to its the earth and its community of life are un- suitability or nonsuitability for preservation as trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- wilderness, each area in the national forests tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness classified on September 3, 1964 by the Secretary is further defined to mean in this chapter an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its of Agriculture or the Chief of the Forest Service primeval character and influence, without per- as ‘‘primitive’’ and report his findings to the manent improvements or human habitation, President.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L
    Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L. 88–363, § 10, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) Sec. 1132. Extent of System. § 1110. Liability 1133. Use of wilderness areas. 1134. State and private lands within wilderness (a) United States areas. The United States Government shall not be 1135. Gifts, bequests, and contributions. liable for any act or omission of the Commission 1136. Annual reports to Congress. or of any person employed by, or assigned or de- § 1131. National Wilderness Preservation System tailed to, the Commission. (a) Establishment; Congressional declaration of (b) Payment; exemption of property from attach- policy; wilderness areas; administration for ment, execution, etc. public use and enjoyment, protection, preser- Any liability of the Commission shall be met vation, and gathering and dissemination of from funds of the Commission to the extent that information; provisions for designation as it is not covered by insurance, or otherwise. wilderness areas Property belonging to the Commission shall be In order to assure that an increasing popu- exempt from attachment, execution, or other lation, accompanied by expanding settlement process for satisfaction of claims, debts, or judg- and growing mechanization, does not occupy ments. and modify all areas within the United States (c) Individual members of Commission and its possessions, leaving no lands designated No liability of the Commission shall be im- for preservation and protection in their natural puted to any member of the Commission solely condition, it is hereby declared to be the policy on the basis that he occupies the position of of the Congress to secure for the American peo- member of the Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to Senate Appropriations Interior Subcommittee FY22 BLM
    March 17, 2021 The Honorable Jeff Merkley The Honorable Lisa Murkowski Chair Ranking Member Subcommittee on Interior, Subcommittee on Interior, Environment and Related Agencies Environment and Related Agencies Committee on Appropriations Committee on Appropriations United States Senate United States Senate Washington, D.C. 20515 Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Chairman Merkley and Ranking Member Murkowski: Thank you for increasing funding for key Bureau of Land Management (BLM) accounts in the FY2021 Interior, Environment and Related Agencies Appropriations bill. As you prepare the FY2022 Interior Appropriations bill, we encourage you to build on that important work by including at least $21.131 million for BLM’s cultural resources account and at least $65.131 million for the National Conservation Lands. The BLM manages the largest, most diverse, and most scientifically important body of cultural, historical, and paleontological resources of any federal land management agency. Yet only about 10 percent of BLM lands have been surveyed for cultural resources. We urge the Committee to provide at least $21.131 million—an increase from FY2021 of $1.5 million—for the BLM’s cultural resources management account to help BLM fulfill its statutory requirements to inventory and protect cultural resources, manage paleontological resources, and improve government-to-government consultation with Indian tribes. This modest increase in funding would also support ongoing collaboration with state historic preservation officers in the West to standardize and integrate cultural resources data for BLM lands through the National Cultural Resources Information Management System (NCRIMS). This effort is a significant and often overlooked preservation success story. It funds predictive modeling and data analysis, in partnership with state historic preservation offices, to support planning for large scale cross-jurisdictional and other projects.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 El Malpais National Conservation Area Business Plan 508 Compliant
    Draft El Malpais National Conservation Area Business Plan U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Rio Puerco Field Office August 2021 1 RECOMMENDATIONS, REVIEWS, and APPROVALS Prepared by: Jennifer Merino, Outdoor Recreation Planner, Date Rio Puerco Field Office Reviewed by: Elaine Lopez, Assistant Field Manager, Date Rio Puerco Field Office Approved By: Kymm Gresset, Field Manager, Date Rio Puerco Field Office This business plan was prepared by the Bureau of Land Management’s Rio Puerco Field Office pursuant to the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act of 2004 (16 U.S.C. 6801- 6814) and BLM recreation fee program policies. It establishes future management goals and priorities for the El Malpais National Conservation Area in the Rio Puerco Field Office. 2 Table of Contents Letter to the Reader………………………………………………………………………………………………………...5 1. Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 6 2. Background ..................................................................................................................................... 7 3. Authorities ................................................................................................................................... 9 Land Use Plan Guidance ............................................................................................................................ 9 4. Description of the Rio Puerco Field Office Recreation Program ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Can We Save the Wolf?
    www.nmwild.org By Stephen Capra It was 1998. After two decades of planning, environmental assessment, threats of litigation, and sometimes ran- corous public debate, something special was happening. Mexican wolves were once again free in the wilds of the Blue Range of Arizona and poised to return to the Gila country of New Mexico. It was a hopeful moment for the most imper- iled subspecies of gray wolf in North America—the Mexican gray wolf (Canis lupus baileyi.) Much like recovery efforts in the northern Rocky Mountains, where wolves had been released into Yellow- stone National Park and central Idaho, TRAGIC CONSEQUENCES: CAN WE SAVE THE WOLF? it seemed we had learned in the South- west to share our lands with native wild- life. Working with ranchers and rural communities, conservationists sensed a new respect for nature and a desire for ecological balance taking root after generations of abuse and slaughter. But unlike Yellowstone’s success, the fate of the Mexican lobo is far from certain. The story of Canis lupus baileyi is a complex and mostly frustrating tale of good intentions, an old West mentality, politics, and unsatisfactory results. Origi- nally, the Mexican wolf ranged from central Mexico to today’s U.S. Interstate 10 in Arizona and New Mexico. It was exterminated from the southwestern United States by the U.S. Bureau of Biological Survey. In 1950, the Bureau’s successor agency, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, launched a program in Mexico that eliminated almost all of its wolves by the mid-1970s. Such see CAN WE SAVE , pg.
    [Show full text]