DOCSLIB.ORG

Pacific Journal of Mathematics Vol. 284 (2016)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Pacific Journal of Mathematics Volume 284 No. 1 September 2016 PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Founded in 1951 by E. F. Beckenbach (1906–1982) and F. Wolf (1904–1989) msp.org/pjm EDITORS Don Blasius (Managing Editor) Department of Mathematics University of California Los Angeles, CA 90095-1555 [email protected] Paul Balmer Vyjayanthi Chari Daryl Cooper Department of Mathematics Department of Mathematics Department of Mathematics University of California University of California University of California Los Angeles, CA 90095-1555 Riverside, CA 92521-0135 Santa Barbara, CA 93106-3080 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Robert Finn Kefeng Liu Jiang-Hua Lu Department of Mathematics Department of Mathematics Department of Mathematics Stanford University University of California The University of Hong Kong Stanford, CA 94305-2125 Los Angeles, CA 90095-1555 Pokfulam Rd., Hong Kong fi[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Sorin Popa Igor Pak Jie Qing Department of Mathematics Department of Mathematics Department of Mathematics University of California University of California University of California Los Angeles, CA 90095-1555 Los Angeles, CA 90095-1555 Santa Cruz, CA 95064 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Paul Yang Department of Mathematics Princeton University Princeton NJ 08544-1000 [email protected] PRODUCTION Silvio Levy, Scientific Editor, [email protected] SUPPORTING INSTITUTIONS ACADEMIA SINICA, TAIPEI STANFORD UNIVERSITY UNIV. OF CALIF., SANTA CRUZ CALIFORNIA INST. OF TECHNOLOGY UNIV. OF BRITISH COLUMBIA UNIV. OF MONTANA INST. DE MATEMÁTICA PURA E APLICADA UNIV. OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY UNIV. OF OREGON KEIO UNIVERSITY UNIV. OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS UNIV. OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA MATH. SCIENCES RESEARCH INSTITUTE UNIV. OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES UNIV. OF UTAH NEW MEXICO STATE UNIV. UNIV. OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE UNIV. OF WASHINGTON OREGON STATE UNIV. UNIV. OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY UNIV. OF CALIF., SANTA BARBARA These supporting institutions contribute to the cost of publication of this Journal, but they are not owners or publishers and have no responsibility for its contents or policies. See inside back cover or msp.org/pjm for submission instructions. The subscription price for 2016 is US $440/year for the electronic version, and $600/year for print and electronic. Subscriptions, requests for back issues and changes of subscriber address should be sent to Pacific Journal of Mathematics, P.O. Box 4163, Berkeley, CA 94704-0163, U.S.A. The Pacific Journal of Mathematics is indexed by Mathematical Reviews, Zentralblatt MATH, PASCAL CNRS Index, Referativnyi Zhurnal, Current Mathematical Publications and Web of Knowledge (Science Citation Index). The Pacific Journal of Mathematics (ISSN 0030-8730) at the University of California, c/o Department of Mathematics, 798 Evans Hall #3840, Berkeley, CA 94720-3840, is published twelve times a year. Periodical rate postage paid at Berkeley, CA 94704, and additional mailing offices. POSTMASTER: send address changes to Pacific Journal of Mathematics, P.O. Box 4163, Berkeley, CA 94704-0163. PJM peer review and production are managed by EditFLOW® from Mathematical Sciences Publishers. PUBLISHED BY mathematical sciences publishers nonprofit scientific publishing http://msp.org/ © 2016 Mathematical Sciences Publishers PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Vol. 284, No. 1, 2016 dx.doi.org/10.2140/pjm.2016.284.1 BITWIST MANIFOLDS AND TWO-BRIDGE KNOTS JAMES W. CANNON, WILLIAM J. FLOYD, LEERLAMBERT, WALTER R. PARRY AND JESSICA S. PURCELL Though LeeR Lambert spent his life as an actuary and a musician and was a loving father of nine girls and one boy, he had always wanted to earn an advanced degree as a math- ematician. With the encouragement of his wife, he earned his Ph.D. in mathematics at the age of 68. Many of the results of this paper appeared in his Ph.D. dissertation at Brigham Young University. At the age of 71, LeeR died of bone cancer. We miss you, LeeR. We give uniform, explicit, and simple face-pairing descriptions of all the branched cyclic covers of the 3-sphere, branched over two-bridge knots. Our method is to use the bitwisted face-pairing constructions of Cannon, Floyd, and Parry; these examples show that the bitwist construction is of- ten efficient and natural. Finally, we give applications to computations of fundamental groups and homology of these branched cyclic covers. 1. Introduction Branched cyclic covers of S3 have played a major role in topology, and continue to appear in a wide variety of contexts. For example, branched cyclic covers of S3 branched over two-bridge knots have recently appeared in combinatorial work bound- ing the Matveev complexity of a 3-manifold[Petronio and Vesnin 2009], in algebraic and topological work determining relations between L-spaces, left-orderability, and taut foliations[Gordon and Lidman 2014; Boyer et al. 2013; Hu 2015], and in geometric work giving information on maps of character varieties[Nagasato and Ya- maguchi 2012]. They provide a wealth of examples, and a useful collection of mani- folds on which to study conjectures. Given their wide applicability, and their con- tinued relevance, it is useful to have many explicit descriptions of these manifolds. We give a new and elegant construction of the branched cyclic covers of two- bridge knots, using the bitwist construction of[Cannon et al. 2009]. While other presentations of these manifolds are known (see, for example,[Minkus 1982; Mulazzani and Vesnin 2001]), we feel our descriptions have several advantages. First, they follow from a recipe involving exactly the parameters necessary to describe a two-bridge knot, namely, continued fraction parameters. Our descriptions MSC2010: 57M12, 57M25. Keywords: bitwist manifolds, two-bridge knots, branched cyclic covers. 1 2 J. W. CANNON, W. J. FLOYD, L. LAMBERT, W. R. PARRY AND J. S. PURCELL apply uniformly to all two-bridge knots, and all branched cyclic covers of S3 branched over two-bridge knots. Second, they are obtained from a description of a two-bridge knot using a very straightforward bitwisted face-pairing construction, as in [Cannon et al. 2000; 2002; 2003; 2009]. Bitwisted face-pairings (read “bi-twisted”, as in twisted two ways) are known to produce all closed orientable 3-manifolds. The examples of this paper show, in addition, that bitwist constructions are often efficient and natural. While a generic face-pairing will yield a pseudomanifold, which, with probability 1, will not be an actual manifold[Dunfield and Thurston 2006], bitwisted face-pairings avoid this problem. (We will review necessary information on bitwisted face-pairings, so no prior specialized knowledge is required to understand our constructions.) Third, our description leads to immediate consequences in geometric group theory. We obtain a simple proof of the fact that the fundamental group of the n-fold branched cyclic covering of S3, branched over a two-bridge knot, has a cyclic presentation. Our description also gives immediate presentations of two well-known families of groups, the Fibonacci and Sieradski groups. These are known to arise as fundamental groups of branched cyclic covers of S3 branched over the figure-eight and trefoil knots, respectively. These groups have received considerable attention from geometric group theorists; see, for example,[Cavicchioli et al. 1998] for further references, and Section 6 for more history. Our methods recover the fact that the first homology groups of Sieradski manifolds are periodic. We also give a proof that their fundamental groups are distinct using Milnor’s characterization of these spaces. We consider orders of abelianizations of Fibonacci groups as well. These orders form an interesting sequence related to the Fibonacci sequence, which we shall see. 1A. Bitwisted face-pairing description. We will see that the bitwist description of any two-bridge knot is encoded as the image of the north–south axis in a ball labeled as in Figure 1, along with an associated vector of integer multipliers. For the branched cyclic cover, the description is encoded by adding additional longitudinal arcs to the sphere. We now describe the construction briefly, in order to state the main results of the paper. A more detailed description of the construction, with examples, is given in Section 2. Begin with a finite graph 0 in the 2-sphere S2 D @B3 that is the union of the equator e, one longitude NS from the north pole N to the south pole S, and 2k ≥ 0 latitudinal circles, such that 0 is invariant under reflection V S2 ! S2 in the equator. Then 0 divides S2 into 2.k C 1/ faces that are paired by . This face-pairing is shown in Figure 1. BITWISTMANIFOLDSANDTWO-BRIDGEKNOTS 3 N e v S Figure 1. The model face-pairing: a faceted 3-ball with dotted central axis and reflection face-pairing V @B3 ! @B3. As with any face-pairing, the edges fall into edge cycles. The equator e forms one edge cycle c0 since the reflection leaves e invariant. Each other edge of the graph is matched with its reflection to form another edge cycle ci . We number these edge cycles from 0 through 2k C 1, with even numbers associated with latitudinal edges, as indicated in Figure 2. Now choose nonzero integer multipliers, denoted m0; m1;:::; m2k; m2kC1, for the edge cycles ci . In the case at hand, restrict the choice of multipliers mi as follows. Each latitudinal edge cycle c2i is assigned either C1 or −1 as multiplier. Each longitudinal edge cycle c2iC1 may be assigned any integer multiplier m2iC1 whatsoever, including 0. The multiplier m2iC1 D 0 is usually forbidden, but in this case indicates that the two edges of edge-class c2iC1 must be collapsed to a point before the bitwist construction is engaged. N 2kC1 2k 2k−1 2k−2 4 3 e 2 1 0 v Figure 2.
Recommended publications
  • Curriculum Vitæ of Peter B. Shalen

    Curriculum Vitæ of Peter B. Shalen

    Curriculum Vit½ of Peter B. Shalen Address Department of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science (M/C 249) University of Illinois at Chicago 851 South Morgan Street Chicago, IL 60607-7045 312-996-4825 (FAX) 312-996-1491 E-mail: [email protected] Education Ph.D. 1972 Harvard University B.A. 1966 Harvard College Pensionnaire ¶etranger, Ecole Normale Sup¶erieure, Paris, 1966-67 Employment 1985|present Professor University of Illinois at Chicago 1998-99 Long-term visitor, University of Chicago June, 1998 Professeur Invit¶e Universit¶e Paul Sabatier, Toulouse June, 1997 Professeur Invit¶e Universit¶e de Bourgogne June, 1996 Professeur Invit¶e University of Paris June, 1993 Professeur Invit¶e Universit¶e Paul Sabatier, Toulouse Spring 1985 Member Mathematical Sciences Research Institute, Berkeley Fall 1984 Professeur Associ¶e University of Paris (Orsay) Spring 1984 Professeur Associ¶e University of Nantes 1983|85 Professor Rice University 1981|82 Visiting Scholar Columbia University 1979|83 Associate Professor Rice University 1978|79 Visiting Member Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, N.Y.U. 1974|79 Assistant Professor Rice University 1971|74 J.F. Ritt Assistant Professor Columbia University 1 Professional Honors Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Fellowship for Basic Research, 1977|79. Invited one-hour address, A.M.S. Regional Meeting, University of Wisconsin at Parkside, October, 1980. J. Clarence Karcher Lectures in Mathematics, University of Oklahoma, April 1980. Member, Mathematical Sciences Research Institute, Berkeley, Spring 1985, and December 1988. Invited 45-minute address, International Congress of Mathematicians, Berkeley, California, August 1986. Fourth annual Zabrodsky lecture, Hebrew University, Jerusalem. December, 1990. University Scholar award, University of Illinois, 1996 Invited visits, American Institute of Mathematics, May 2000 and May 2002.
  • 3-Manifold Groups

    3-Manifold Groups

    3-Manifold Groups Matthias Aschenbrenner Stefan Friedl Henry Wilton University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA E-mail address: [email protected] Fakultat¨ fur¨ Mathematik, Universitat¨ Regensburg, Germany E-mail address: [email protected] Department of Pure Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics, Cam- bridge University, United Kingdom E-mail address: [email protected] Abstract. We summarize properties of 3-manifold groups, with a particular focus on the consequences of the recent results of Ian Agol, Jeremy Kahn, Vladimir Markovic and Dani Wise. Contents Introduction 1 Chapter 1. Decomposition Theorems 7 1.1. Topological and smooth 3-manifolds 7 1.2. The Prime Decomposition Theorem 8 1.3. The Loop Theorem and the Sphere Theorem 9 1.4. Preliminary observations about 3-manifold groups 10 1.5. Seifert fibered manifolds 11 1.6. The JSJ-Decomposition Theorem 14 1.7. The Geometrization Theorem 16 1.8. Geometric 3-manifolds 20 1.9. The Geometric Decomposition Theorem 21 1.10. The Geometrization Theorem for fibered 3-manifolds 24 1.11. 3-manifolds with (virtually) solvable fundamental group 26 Chapter 2. The Classification of 3-Manifolds by their Fundamental Groups 29 2.1. Closed 3-manifolds and fundamental groups 29 2.2. Peripheral structures and 3-manifolds with boundary 31 2.3. Submanifolds and subgroups 32 2.4. Properties of 3-manifolds and their fundamental groups 32 2.5. Centralizers 35 Chapter 3. 3-manifold groups after Geometrization 41 3.1. Definitions and conventions 42 3.2. Justifications 45 3.3. Additional results and implications 59 Chapter 4. The Work of Agol, Kahn{Markovic, and Wise 63 4.1.
  • Variables Separated Equations: Strikingly Different Roles for the Branch Cycle Lemma and the Finite Simple Group Classification

    Variables Separated Equations: Strikingly Different Roles for the Branch Cycle Lemma and the Finite Simple Group Classification

    VARIABLES SEPARATED EQUATIONS: STRIKINGLY DIFFERENT ROLES FOR THE BRANCH CYCLE LEMMA AND THE FINITE SIMPLE GROUP CLASSIFICATION MICHAEL D. FRIED∗ Abstract. H. Davenport's Problem asks: What can we expect of two poly- nomials, over Z, with the same ranges on almost all residue class fields? This stood out among many separated variable problems posed by Davenport, D.J. Lewis and A. Schinzel. By bounding the degrees, but expanding the maps and variables in Daven- port's Problem, Galois stratification enhanced the separated variable theme, solving an Ax and Kochen problem from their Artin Conjecture work. J. Denef and F. Loeser applied this to add Chow motive coefficients to previously in- troduced zeta functions on a diophantine statement. By restricting the variables, but leaving the degrees unbounded, we found the striking distinction between Davenport's problem over Q, solved by apply- ing the Branch Cycle Lemma, and its generalization over any number field, solved using the simple group classification. This encouraged J. Thompson to formulate the genus 0 problem on rational function monodromy groups. R. Guralnick and Thompson led its solution in stages. We look at at two developments since the solution of Davenport's problem. • Stemming from C. MacCluer's 1967 thesis, identifying a general class of problems, including Davenport's, as monodromy precise. • R(iemann) E(xistence) T(heorem)'s role as a converse to problems gen- eralizing Davenport's, and Schinzel's (on reducibility). We use these to consider: Going beyond the simple group classification to han- dle imprimitive groups; and what is the role of covers and correspondences in going from algebraic equations to zeta functions with Chow motive coefficients.
  • Leray in Oflag XVIIA: the Origins of Sheaf Theory

    Leray in Oflag XVIIA: the Origins of Sheaf Theory

    Leray in Oflag XVIIA: The origins of sheaf theory, sheaf cohomology, and spectral sequences Haynes Miller∗ February 23, 2000 Jean Leray (November 7, 1906{November 10, 1998) was confined to an officers’ prison camp (“Oflag”) in Austria for the whole of World War II. There he took up algebraic topology, and the result was a spectacular flowering of highly original ideas, ideas which have, through the usual metamorphism of history, shaped the course of mathematics in the sixty years since then. Today we would divide his discoveries into three parts: sheaves, sheaf cohomology, and spectral sequences. For the most part these ideas became known only after the war ended, and fully five more years passed before they became widely understood. They now stand at the very heart of much of modern mathematics. I will try to describe them, how Leray may have come to them, and the reception they received. 1 Prewar work Leray's first published work, in 1931, was in fluid dynamics; he proved the basic existence and uniqueness results for the Navier-Stokes equations. Roger Temam [74] has expressed the view that no further significant rigorous work on Navier-Stokes equations was done until that of E. Hopf in 1951. The use of Picard's method for proving existence of solutions of differential equa- tions led Leray to his work in topology with the Polish mathematician Juliusz Schauder. Schauder had recently proven versions valid in Banach spaces of two theorems proven for finite complexes by L. E. J. Brouwer: the fixed point theorem and the theorem of invariance of domain.
  • On the Classifying Space for Proper Actions of Groups with Cyclic Torsion

    On the Classifying Space for Proper Actions of Groups with Cyclic Torsion

    On the classifying space for proper actions of groups with cyclic torsion Yago Antol´ınand Ram´on Flores September 17, 2018 Abstract In this paper we introduce a common framework for describing the topological part of the Baum-Connes conjecture for a wide class of groups. We compute the Bredon homology for groups with aspherical presentation, one-relator quotients of products of locally indicable groups, extensions of Zn by cyclic groups, and fuchsian groups. We take advantage of the torsion structure of these groups to use appropriate models of the universal space for proper actions which allow us, in turn, to extend some technology defined by Mislin in the case of one-relator groups. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary: 55N91; Secondary: 20F05, 20J05. Key words. Bredon homology, classifying space for proper actions, aspherical presentations, Hempel groups, Baum-Connes conjecture 1 Introduction In [28], Mislin computed the Bredon homology of one-relator groups with coeffi- cients in the complex representation ring. These homology groups were defined arXiv:1107.0566v2 [math.KT] 24 Oct 2011 in the sixties by Bredon in the context of equivariant Homotopy Theory. Since the statement by Baum-Connes of their famous conjecture (see [5] for a thor- ough account and section 5 here for a quick review), there has been a growing interest in the computation of the Bredon homology groups, as they give, via a spectral sequence, a very close approximation to the topological part of the conjecture. Moreover, they are reasonably accessible from the point of view of the computations. Let G be a discrete group.
  • One-Relator Groups

    One-Relator Groups

    One-relator groups Andrew Putman Abstract We give a classically flavored introduction to the theory of one-relator groups. Topics include Magnus’s Freiheitsatz, the solution of the word problem, the classification of torsion, Newman’s Spelling Theorem together with the hyperbolicity (and thus solution to the conjugacy problem) for one-relator groups with torsion, and Lyndon’s Identity Theorem together with the fact that the presentation 2-complex for a torsion-free one- relator group is aspherical. 1 Introduction A one-relator group is a group with a presentation of the form ⟨S ∣ r⟩, where r is a single element in the free group F (S) on the generating set S. One fundamental example is a surface group ⟨a1, b1, . , ag, bg ∣ [a1, b1]⋯[ag, bg]⟩. These groups are basic examples in combinatorial/geometric group theory and possess an extensive literature. In these notes, we will discuss several important classical results about them. The outline is as follows. • We begin in §2 by discussing Magnus’s Freiheitsatz [Ma1], which he proved in his 1931 thesis. This theorem says that certain subgroups of one-relator groups are free. The techniques introduced in its proof ended up playing a decisive role in all subsequent work on the subject. • In §3, we will show how to solve the word problem in one-relator groups. This was proved by Magnus [Ma2] soon after the Freiheitsatz. • In §4, we will prove a theorem of Karrass, Magnus, and Solitar [KMaSo] that says that the only torsion in a one-relator group is the “obvious” torsion.
  • On Mathematical Contributions of Paul E. Schupp

    On Mathematical Contributions of Paul E. Schupp

    Illinois Journal of Mathematics Volume 54, Number 1, Spring 2010, Pages 1–9 S 0019-2082 ON MATHEMATICAL CONTRIBUTIONS OF PAUL E. SCHUPP ILYA KAPOVICH 1. Biographical data Paul Eugene Schupp was born on March 12, 1937 in Cleveland, Ohio. He obtained a Bachelor’s degree at Case Western Reserve University in 1959. During his undergraduate studies there in 1955–1959, Paul became interested in mathematics. In 1959, he became a Ph.D. student in Mathematics at the University of Michigan. He completed his Ph.D. in 1966, under the direction of Roger Lyndon. After graduating from Michigan, Paul was a visiting professor at the Uni- versity of Wisconsin–Madison for the 1966–1967 academic year. He then spent the 1967–1968 academic year at UIUC at the invitation of William Boone, as a visitor for the special year in Combinatorial Group Theory. At the conclu- sion of that special year, Paul became an Assistant Professor at UIUC and he remained a faculty member ever since. Paul was promoted to Associate Professor in 1971 and to Professor in 1975. While a faculty member at UIUC, Paul Schupp has held visiting appoint- ments at the Courant Institute (1969–1970), University of Singapore (January–April 1982), University of London (April–September 1982), USSR National Academy of Sciences in Moscow (September–December 1982), Uni- versity of Bordeaux (1984 and 1996), University of Paris—VII (1984–1992), Universit´e Marne-la-Vall’e, June 1999 and June 1997, and others. He was awarded the John Simon Guggenheim Fellowship for the 1977–1978 academic year.
  • Automorphisms of Free Groups and Outer Space

    Automorphisms of Free Groups and Outer Space

    AUTOMORPHISMS OF FREE GROUPS AND OUTER SPACE Karen Vogtmann * Department of Mathematics, Cornell University [email protected] ABSTRACT: This is a survey of recent results in the theory of automorphism groups of nitely-generated free groups, concentrating on results obtained by studying actions of these groups on Outer space and its variations. CONTENTS Introduction 1. History and motivation 2. Where to get basic results 3. What’s in this paper 4. What’s not in this paper Part I: Spaces and complexes 1. Outer space 2. The spine of outer space 3. Alternate descriptions and variations 4. The boundary and closure of outer space 5. Some other complexes Part II: Algebraic results 1. Finiteness properties 1.1 Finite presentations 1.2 Virtual niteness properties 1.3 Residual niteness 2. Homology and Euler characteristic 2.1 Low-dimensional calculations 2.2 Homology stability 2.3 Cerf theory, rational homology and improved homology stability 2.4 Kontsevich’s Theorem 2.5 Torsion 2.6 Euler characteristic 3. Ends and Virtual duality 4. Fixed subgroup of an automorphism * Supported in part by NSF grant DMS-9971607. AMS Subject classication 20F65 1 5. The conjugacy problem 6. Subgroups 6.1 Finite subgroups and their centralizers 6.2 Stabilizers, mapping class groups and braid groups 6.3 Abelian subgroups, solvable subgroups and the Tits alternative 7. Rigidity properties 8. Relation to other classes of groups 8.1 Arithmetic and linear groups 8.2 Automatic and hyperbolic groups 9. Actions on trees and Property T Part III: Questions Part IV: References §0. Introduction 1. History and motivation This paper is a survey of recent results in the theory of automorphism groups of nitely-generated free groups, concentrating mainly on results which have been obtained by studying actions on a certain geometric object known as Outer space and its variations.
  • Continuum Newsletter of the Department of Mathematics at the University of Michigan 2007 Bass Wins National View from the Medal of Science Chair's Offi Ce

    Continuum Newsletter of the Department of Mathematics at the University of Michigan 2007 Bass Wins National View from the Medal of Science Chair's Offi Ce

    ContinuUM Newsletter of the Department of Mathematics at the University of Michigan 2007 Bass Wins National View from the Medal of Science Chair's Offi ce University of Michigan Tony Bloch Mathematics and Educa- tion Professor Hyman Bass The 2006-2007 academic year was an received the nation’s highest eventful and exciting one for the Depart- science honor from President ment of Mathematics. The current quality George Bush during a July of the Department is refl ected in the range 27 ceremony at the White and scope of our activities: numerous House. A video of the cere- seminars, exciting colloquia, and interest- mony is available on the U-M ing conferences. During this past aca- website http://ummedia04. demic year we had 21 long-term visiting rs.itd.umich.edu/~nis/Bass. scholars, and more than 160 short-term mov. visitors. In addition our faculty members presented numerous lectures at exciting Bass was one of eight venues all over the U.S. and the world. National Medal of Science laureates honored. He is the Department members organized nu- Roger Lyndon Collegiate merous conferences on various subjects: Professor of Mathematics Algebraic Geometry, Financial Engineer- in the College of Literature, ing, Teichmueller Theory, and Scientifi c Science, and the Arts, and Computing. There was also the Canary Professor of Mathematics Fest, a series of workshops on Geometry Education in U-M's School of and Topology in celebration of Dick Ca- Education. and researcher in the College of Litera- nary’s 45th birthday. ture, Science, and the Arts working col- Bass is the fi rst U-M researcher to Our weekly colloquium series was laboratively with his colleagues in the very successful, featuring several distin- win the honor in 21 years.
  • Gender Issues in Science/Math Education (GISME): Over 700 Annotated References & 1000 URL’S – Part 1: All References in Alphabetical Order * † § 

    Gender Issues in Science/Math Education (GISME): Over 700 Annotated References & 1000 URL’S – Part 1: All References in Alphabetical Order * † § 

    Gender Issues in Science/Math Education (GISME): Over 700 Annotated References & 1000 URL’s – Part 1: All References in Alphabetical Order * † § Richard R. Hake, Physics Department (Emeritus), Indiana University, 24245 Hatteras Street, Woodland Hills, CA 91367 Jeffry V. Mallow, Physics Department (Emeritus), Loyola University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60626 Abstract This 12.8 MB compilation of over 700 annotated references and 1000 hot-linked URL’s provides a window into the vast literature on Gender Issues in Science/Math Education (GISME). The present listing is an update, expansion, and generalization of the earlier 0.23 MB Gender Issues in Physics/Science Education (GIPSE) by Mallow & Hake (2002). Included in references on general gender issues in science and math, are sub-topics that include: (a) Affirmative Action; (b) Constructivism: Educational and Social; (c) Drivers of Education Reform and Gender Equity: Economic Competitiveness and Preservation of Life on Planet Earth; (d) Education and the Brain; (e) Gender & Spatial Visualization; (f) Harvard President Summers’ Speculation on Innate Gender Differences in Science and Math Ability; (g) Hollywood Actress Danica McKellar’s book Math Doesn’t Suck; (h) Interactive Engagement; (i) International Comparisons; (j) Introductory Physics Curriculum S (for Synthesis); (k) Is There a Female Science? – Pro & Con; (l) Schools Shortchange Girls (or is it Boys)?; (m) Sex Differences in Mathematical Ability: Fact or Artifact?; (n) Status of Women Faculty at MIT. In this Part 1 (8.2 MB), all references are in listed in alphabetical order on pages 3-178. In Part 2 (4.6 MB) references related to sub-topics “a” through “n” are listed in subject order as indicated above.
  • Certain One-Relator Products of Groups: Freiheitssatz and Non-Triviality

    Certain One-Relator Products of Groups: Freiheitssatz and Non-Triviality

    Certain one-relator products of groups: Freiheitssatz and non-triviality Ihechukwu Chinyere Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Heriot-Watt University Department of Mathematics, School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences. November 6, 2015 The copyright in this thesis is owned by the author. Any quotation from the thesis or use of any of the information contained in it must acknowledge this thesis as the source of the quotation or information. Abstract Combinatorial group theory is an aspect of group theory that deals with groups given by presentations. Many techniques both geometric and algebraic are used in tackling problems in this area. In this work, we mostly adopt the geometric approach. In particular we use pictures and clique-pictures to describe various properties of certain one-relator product of groups. These groups are our object of study and they have presentations of the form G G = Λ ; N(w) where GΛ is a free product of groups Gλ2Λ and w is a (cyclically reduced) word in the free product GΛ with length at least two. It is known that most results about G are obtained by putting some conditions on the Gλ's, on w, or both. In the case where Λ = 2, say Λ = f1; 2g, there are two forms of conditions we put on w. The first condition is that w = rn, where r is cyclically reduced word of length at most eight and n > 0. More precisely suppose A and B non-trivial groups and G = (A ∗ B)=N(rn): Suppose that any of the following conditions holds: 1.
  • Association for Women in Mathematics President's Report

    Association for Women in Mathematics President's Report

    AW-MI ASSOCIATION FOR WOMEN IN MATHEMATICS PRESIDENT'S REPORT It's been four months now since Jill handed me the AWM bowl, and I haven't been this busy since I had two toddler daughters! Certainly the AWM work presents challenges more pleasant and interesting than my other duties. I do hope that all that I'm learning will be digested in time to be put to good use for AWM. (Taped on my wail for years is a "Peanuts" cartoon in which Snoopy is writing his memoirs: "Things I Learned After It Was Too Late"!) If not, the Nominating Committee has come up with a great list of women who will be able to do what I cannot; the slate appears on page 7. It looks as if Jenny Baglivo will be paroled soon from her life sentence as Treasurer. Thanks, Jenny! One thing I have learned is that the President of AWM goes to Washington often. The CBMS Workshop on Graduate Education IN THIS ISSUE took place there May 4-6, 1991, with keynote speakers Luther Williams (from NSF's Education and Human Resources) and Calvin Moore (Chair of MSEB's Committee on Collegiate and University 3 Alice T. Schafer Prize Relations). The focus of the discussions was on how doctoral, masters, and non-degree graduate programs in the mathematical sciences could better serve national needs. Much concern was 9 Tribute to Wilhelm Magnus expressed about the failure of the profession to renew itself adequately, and also for the need for improved interaction between 15 Book Review the educational and research communities.