Life in Our Watershed Investigating Vernal Pools
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Appendices I Through VIII
APPENDIX I: Standards for Ecological Classification A given terrestrial ecological system is defined as a group of plant community types that tend to co-occur within landscapes with similar ecological processes, substrates, and/or environmental gradients. A given terrestrial ecological system will typically manifest itself in a landscape at intermediate geographic scales of 10s to 1,000s of hectares and persist for 50 or more years. Ecological processes include natural disturbances such as fire and flooding. Substrates may include a variety of soil surface and bedrock features, such as shallow soils, alkaline parent materials, sandy/gravelling soils, or peatlands. Finally, environmental gradients include hydrologically defined patterns in coastal zones, arid grassland or desert areas, or montane, alpine or subalpine zones defined by climate. By plant community type, we mean a vegetation classification unit at the association or alliance level of the US National Vegetation Classification (US-NVC) (Grossman et al. 1998, Jennings et al. 2003, NatureServe 2004), or, if these are not available, other comparable vegetation units. US-NVC associations are used wherever possible to describe the component biotic communities of each terrestrial system. Ecological systems are defined using both spatial and temporal criteria that influence the grouping of associations. Associations that consistently co-occur on the landscape therefore define biotic components of each ecological system type. Our approach to ecological systems definition using US-NVC associations is similar to the biotope or habitat approach used, for example, by the EUNIS habitat classification, which explicitly links meso-scale habitat units to European Vegetation Survey alliance units (Rodwell et al. 2002). -
South Mather Wetlands Management Plan
South Mather Wetlands Management Plan Prepared by: Sacramento County Department of Economic Development With Assistance from: H. T. Harvey & Associates AECOM Sacramento Valley Conservancy Carol Witham November 2013 SOUTH MATTHER WETLANDS MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared by: Sacramento County Department of Economic Development With Assistance from: H.T. Harvey & Associates AECOM Sacramento Valley Conservancy Carol Witham Report Date: November 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ................................................................................................................................................ i 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Purpose, Organization, and Development of the South Mather Wetlands Management Plan ........... 1-1 1.1.1 Document Approach and Scope ............................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.2 Relationship to Other Documents............................................................................................. 1-2 1.2 Location and Project History .......................................................................................................... 1-3 1.3 Management Areas and Land Uses ................................................................................................. 1-7 1.4 Management Goals and Objectives ............................................................................................... -
Classification of the Vegetation Alliances and Associations of the Northern Sierra Nevada Foothills, California
Classification of the Vegetation Alliances and Associations of the Northern Sierra Nevada Foothills, California Volume 1 of 2 – Introduction, Methods, and Results By Anne Klein Josie Crawford Julie Evens Vegetation Program California Native Plant Society Todd Keeler-Wolf Diana Hickson Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program California Department of Fish and Game For the Resources Management and Policy Division California Department of Fish and Game Contract Number: P0485520 December 2007 This report consists of two volumes. This volume (Volume 1) contains the project introduction, methods, and results, as well as literature cited, and appendices. Volume 2 includes descriptions of the vegetation alliances and associations defined for this project. This classification report covers vegetation associations and alliances attributed to the northern Sierra Nevada Foothills, California. This classification has been developed in consultation with many individuals and agencies and incorporates information from a variety of publications and other classifications. Comments and suggestions regarding the contents of this subset should be directed to: Anne Klein Julie Evens Vegetation Ecologist Senior Vegetation Ecologist California Dept. of Fish and Game California Native Plant Society Sacramento, CA Sacramento, CA <[email protected]> <[email protected]> Todd Keeler-Wolf Senior Vegetation Ecologist California Dept. of Fish and Game Sacramento, CA <[email protected]> Copyright © 2007 California Native Plant Society, 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 95816, U.S.A. All Rights Reserved. Citation: The following citation should be used in any published materials that reference this report: Klein, A., J. Crawford, J. Evens, T. Keeler-Wolf, and D. Hickson. 2007. Classification of the vegetation alliances and associations of the northern Sierra Nevada Foothills, California. -
Spiny-Sepaled Button-Celery)
The comparison of recent versus historical accounts of this species fails to document a decline. Although Stutz and Chu (1993) indicated that they could not find the species at any of the historical sites, it has since been rediscovered in Merced and Tulare Counties. Nevertheless, much suitable habitat of this species throughout the Central Valley has no doubt been lost or degraded, due to the same primary factors that have reduced populations of various other vernal pool-related species addressed earlier in this document. One specific continuing threat is altered hydrology, which threatens the survival of Atriplex persistens in the East Grasslands of Merced County, where vernal pools have been flooded illegally for use as duck ponds (J. Silveira in litt. 2000). e. Conservation Efforts Atriplex persistens has no official Federal or State status. However, the California Native Plant Society has added it to List 1B of the sixth edition of their Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California (California Native Plant Society 2001), indicating that they view the species as endangered throughout its range. Although Atriplex persistens has not been the subject of focused survey efforts, it has been discovered during general surveys for vernal pool plants (Stutz and Chu 1993, Silveira 1996, D. Taylor in litt. 1997). Of the 29 A. persistens populations currently known to be extant, 19 (66 percent) are on public land or in nature preserves. However, no specific measures have been undertaken to conserve or manage for this species on these or other sites. The occurrences in public ownership include 11 on the Sacramento National Wildlife Refuge and 4 in Merced County: 2 in San Joaquin Grasslands State Park, and 1 each on the Arena Plains Unit of the Merced National Wildlife Refuge and the North Grasslands Wildlife Management Area. -
Rare Plant Survey and Mapping, Wra, 2018
APPENDIX D-2 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES RARE PLANT SURVEY AND MAPPING, WRA, 2018 Rare Plant Survey Report Stonegate Subdivision Project CITY OF CHICO, BUTTE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared For: City of Chico 411 Main Street Chico, CA 95928 WRA Contacts: Amanda McCarthy [email protected] Date: February 2017 (Updated March 2018) WRA Project Number 26061 2169-G East Francisco Blvd., San Rafael, CA 94702 (415) 454-8868 tel [email protected] www.wra-ca.com This page intentionally left blank. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY WRA, Inc. (WRA) conducted floristic, protocol-level rare plant surveys within the approximately 317-acre Study Area for the proposed Stonegate Subdivision Project in the City of Chico, California. The surveys were conducted to determine the presence or absence of rare plant species with potential to occur and to document all plant species and plant communities present in the Study Area. Prior to the most recent field survey effort, WRA reviewed the California Native Plant Society (CNPS), the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) lists to determine which species have been documented in the vicinity of the Study Area. Based on a review of occurrence records including previous surveys and a comparison of species habitat requirements with Study Area conditions, it was determined that 12 rare plant species have the potential to occur within the Study Area. Surveys were conducted by trained botanists familiar with California flora. The surveys were conducted by walking transects spaced at approximately 50-foot intervals across the entire Study Area and were floristic in nature (i.e., all plants observed were identified to the lowest level possible, often subspecies or variety). -
Special-Status Plant Report
DRAFT Special-Status Plant Survey Report Mill Creek Placer County, California March 2018 Prepared for: Meritage Homes 1671 E. Monte Vista Avenue, Ste 214 Vacaville, CA 95688 Recommended Citation: Madrone Ecological Consulting, LLC (Madrone). 2018. Draft Special-Status Plant Survey Report for Mill Creek. Prepared for Meritage Homes. Published on 5 March 2018. DRAFT Special-Status Plant Survey Report CONTENTS Mill Creek 1.0 INTRODUCTION ______________________________________________________________________________ 1 2.0 METHODOLOGY _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 3.0 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS ________________________________________________________________ 2 3.1 Terrestrial Vegetation Communities ................................................................................................. 2 3.1.1 Annual Brome Grassland .............................................................................................................................................. 2 3.1.2 Oak Woodland ................................................................................................................................................................. 3 3.1.3 Riparian Woodland ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 3.1.4 Abandoned Almond Orchard ..................................................................................................................................... 3 3.1.5 -
Vegetation Alliances and Associations of the Great Valley Ecoregion, California
Vegetation Alliances and Associations of the Great Valley Ecoregion, California By Jennifer Buck-Diaz, Scott Batiuk and Julie M. Evens California Native Plant Society, Vegetation Program 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 95816 April 2012 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Funding and In-kind Contributions California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) – In-kind staff time for field crew training, land owner access and logistics; reconnaissance and accuracy assessment field survey work in the Great Valley Ecoregion; contributed and compiled field survey data for classification analysis; review and advisement on a floristic and mapping classification California Department of Water Resources – Regional funding and assistance with land access California Native Plant Society – Contributed and compiled field survey data for classification analysis and report Geographical Information Center, Chico State University – Collaborating partner as mapping contractor Strategic Growth Council – Regional funding Field and Office Staff CDFG staff included Rachelle Boul, Mary Jo Colletti, Michael Gordon, Diana Hickson, Anne Klein, Todd Keeler-Wolf, Aicha Ougzin, Cynthia Roye, Joseph Stewart, and Rosie Yacoub CNPS staff included Scott Batiuk, Jennifer Buck-Diaz, Rebecca Crowe, Julie Evens, and Deborah Stout Collaborators Contributing Additional Vegetation Data in this Project Area California Department of Fish and Game, Region 4 Private Consultant, Carol Witham Solano Land Trust (Rush Ranch), Jessie Olson The Nature Conservancy, Sasha Gennet University of California, Berkeley -
Vernal Pool Restoration and Management Issues for Yolo County’S Grasslands Regional Park
Vernal pool restoration and management issues for Yolo County’s Grasslands Regional Park Report by: Students of UC Davis’ Restoration Ecology Class (ENH 160), Spring 2010, compiled by Sarah Hoskinson and Valerie Eviner Professor: Valerie Eviner, [email protected] TA: Sarah Hoskinson 1 Notes This document is a product from UC Davis’ Restoration Ecology class (ENH 160) in the spring of 2010, and is a result of the hard work of the students. Each topic was written by an individual student, as noted at the start of each report. Some of these reports have been modified in an effort to synthesize and streamline this report. Due to logistical issues (inability to import parts) some figures are missing. Synthesis sections derive from class discussion. Acknowledgements We thank Kent Reeves and Scott Lines from the Yolo County Parks and Resources Department for guidance on key topics that they needed addressed, lecturing to the lab section, giving tours and background information on the site, and allowing us access to the study site. We also thank Carol Whitham for sharing her knowledge of vernal pools with the lab section during field trips to the study site. This project was made possible through the University of California, Davis and the USDA NRI CSREES Managed Ecosystem Program through a grant to Valerie Eviner. 2 Contents Introduction 4 Site overview 5 Vernal pool complex characterization 8 Project synthesis- management/ restoration plan 11 Regional vernal pools overview Distribution of vernal pools in the Central Valley 14 Vernal pool hydrology 35 Vegetation characterization 52 Special status invertebrates Conservancy fairy shrimp (Branchinecta conservation) 83 Vernal pool fairy shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi) 101 Vernal pool snail (Fossaria sonomensis) 112 Other animals Native solitary bees (Andenidae family) 126 Western spadefoot toad (Spea hammondii) 143 Dabbling ducks (Anas spp.) 158 Special status native plants Crampton’s tuctoria (Tuctoria mucronata) 173 Colusa grass (Neostapfia colusana) 188 Alkali milk vetch (Astragalus tener var. -
Appendix 2A Consequence of No Action Final Technical
Appendix 2A Consequence of No Action Final Technical Memorandum 2485 Natomas Park Drive, Ste. 600 Sacramento, CA 95833 United States T +1.916.920.3033 F +1.916.920.0212 www.jacobs.com Subject Consequence of No Action Project Name Renewable Placer: Waste Action Plan Attention Western Placer Waste Management Authority From Janet Goodrich/CH2M Lyndsey Lopez/CH2M Date February 6, 2019 Copies to Project File This technical memorandum summarizes the materials that were prepared to document the potential consequence of “No Action.” The majority of this information was developed in April 2018. As Western Placer Waste Management Authority (WPWMA) staff continued to engage key stakeholders, it became increasingly clear that ongoing dialog of the WPWMA’s master planning effort needed to include a discussion of the consequences of delaying or foregoing modifications to the WPWMA’s facilities. Staff and the CH2M Team identified several possible operating scenarios assuming the master planning and subsequent California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) efforts were not successful and that future operations were limited to the currently permitted facilities. The table in Attachment 1 summarizes the various scenarios. These scenarios acknowledge that the WPWMA will not be able to fully meet the needs of the Member Agencies in the long term. Providing ongoing services constrained to only the existing site would necessitate either modifying and expanding materials recovery facility (MRF) and composting operations at the expense of landfill capacity or phasing out MRF and composting operations to maximize landfill capacity. In the former scenario, an alternative, existing, non-WPWMA disposal location would need to be identified that could accept the WPWMA’s waste in the future. -
Biology of Covered Species
II. BIOLOGY OF COVERED SPECIES A. Federally Listed Plant Species 1. CASTILLEJA CAMPESTRIS SSP. SUCCULENTA (FLESHY OWL’S-CLOVER) a. Description and Taxonomy Taxonomy.—Owl’s-clovers are members of the figwort or snapdragon family (Scrophulariaceae). Hoover (1936a) first named fleshy owl’s-clover, giving it the scientific name Orthocarpus campestris var. succulentus. The type specimen had been collected at Ryer, in Merced County. Hoover (1968) raised fleshy owl’s-clover to the rank of species and assigned it the name Orthocarpus succulentus. Chuang and Heckard (1991) reconsidered the taxonomy of Orthocarpus and related genera. Based on floral morphology, seed morphology, and chromosome number, they transferred many species into the genus Castilleja. Furthermore, they determined that the appropriate rank for fleshy owl’s-clover was as a subspecies of field owl’s-clover (Castilleja campestris). Thus, the scientific name currently assigned to fleshy owl’s-clover is Castilleja campestris ssp. succulenta, whereas field owl’s-clover is Castilleja campestris ssp. campestris (Chuang and Heckard 1991). Another common name for fleshy owl’s-clover is succulent owl’s-clover (Skinner and Pavlik 1994). Description and Identification.— Castilleja campestris ssp. succulenta (Figure II-1) has rather intricate flowers, with the corolla consisting of two lips. The flower has four sepals that are fused at the base, creating the calyx tube. Together, all the flowers plus the bracts comprise the inflorescence. The plant has erect or decumbent stems up to 30 centimeters (11.8 inches) long. The stems are usually unbranched and without hairs. The leaves at the base of the stem are small and scale-like, whereas those on the upper stem are 1.5 to 4 centimeters (0.6 to 1.6 inches) long, lance-shaped, not lobed, thick, fleshy, and easily broken. -
Classification of the Vegetation Alliances and Associations of the Northern Sierra Nevada Foothills, California
Classification of the Vegetation Alliances and Associations of the Northern Sierra Nevada Foothills, California Volume 1 of 2 – Introduction, Methods, and Results By Anne Klein Josie Crawford Julie Evens Vegetation Program California Native Plant Society Todd Keeler-Wolf Diana Hickson Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program California Department of Fish and Game For the Resources Management and Policy Division California Department of Fish and Game Contract Number: P0485520 December 2007 This report consists of two volumes. This volume (Volume 1) contains the project introduction, methods, and results, as well as literature cited, and appendices. Volume 2 includes descriptions of the vegetation alliances and associations defined for this project. This classification report covers vegetation associations and alliances attributed to the northern Sierra Nevada Foothills, California. This classification has been developed in consultation with many individuals and agencies and incorporates information from a variety of publications and other classifications. Comments and suggestions regarding the contents of this subset should be directed to: Anne Klein Julie Evens Vegetation Ecologist Senior Vegetation Ecologist California Dept. of Fish and Game California Native Plant Society Sacramento, CA Sacramento, CA <[email protected]> <[email protected]> Todd Keeler-Wolf Senior Vegetation Ecologist California Dept. of Fish and Game Sacramento, CA <[email protected]> Copyright © 2007 California Native Plant Society, 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 95816, U.S.A. All Rights Reserved. Citation: The following citation should be used in any published materials that reference this report: Klein, A., J. Crawford, J. Evens, T. Keeler-Wolf, and D. Hickson. 2007. Classification of the vegetation alliances and associations of the northern Sierra Nevada Foothills, California.