Military History Anniversaries 1216 Thru 0115
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Free Land Attracted Many Colonists to Texas in 1840S 3-29-92 “No Quitting Sense” We Claim Is Typically Texas
“Between the Creeks” Gwen Pettit This is a compilation of weekly newspaper columns on local history written by Gwen Pettit during 1986-1992 for the Allen Leader and the Allen American in Allen, Texas. Most of these articles were initially written and published, then run again later with changes and additions made. I compiled these articles from the Allen American on microfilm at the Allen Public Library and from the Allen Leader newspapers provided by Mike Williams. Then, I typed them into the computer and indexed them in 2006-07. Lois Curtis and then Rick Mann, Managing Editor of the Allen American gave permission for them to be reprinted on April 30, 2007, [email protected]. Please, contact me to obtain a free copy on a CD. I have given a copy of this to the Allen Public Library, the Harrington Library in Plano, the McKinney Library, the Allen Independent School District and the Lovejoy School District. Tom Keener of the Allen Heritage Guild has better copies of all these photographs and is currently working on an Allen history book. Keener offices at the Allen Public Library. Gwen was a longtime Allen resident with an avid interest in this area’s history. Some of her sources were: Pioneering in North Texas by Capt. Roy and Helen Hall, The History of Collin County by Stambaugh & Stambaugh, The Brown Papers by George Pearis Brown, The Peters Colony of Texas by Seymour V. Conner, Collin County census & tax records and verbal history from local long-time residents of the county. She does not document all of her sources. -
Military History Anniversaries 0101 Thru 0131
Military History Anniversaries 1 thru 31 January Events in History over the next 30 day period that had U.S. military involvement or impacted in some way on U.S military operations or American interests Jan 00 1944 – WW2: USS Scorpion (SS–278). Date of sinking unknown. Most likely a Japanese mine in Yellow or East China Sea. 77 killed. Jan 00 1945 – WW2: USS Swordfish (SS–193) missing. Possibly sunk by Japanese Coast Defense Vessel No. 4 on 5 January or sunk by a mine off Okinawa on 9 January. 89 killed. Jan 01 1942 – WW2: The War Production Board (WPB) ordered the temporary end of all civilian automobile sales leaving dealers with one half million unsold cars. Jan 01 1945 – WW2: In Operation Bodenplatte, German planes attack American forward air bases in Europe. This is the last major offensive of the Luftwaffe. Jan 02 1777 – American Revolution: American forces under the command of George Washington repulsed a British attack at the Battle of the Assunpink Creek near Trenton, New Jersey. Casualties and losses: US 7 to 100 - GB 55 to 365. Jan 02 1791 – Big Bottom massacre (11 killed) in the Ohio Country, marking the beginning of the Northwest Indian War. Jan 02 1904 – Latin America Interventions: U.S. Marines are sent to Santo Domingo to aid the government against rebel forces. Jan 02 1942 – The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) convicts 33 members of a German spy ring headed by Fritz Joubert Duquesne in the largest espionage case in United States history-the Duquesne Spy Ring. Jan 02 1942 – WW2: In the Philippines, the city of Manila and the U.S. -
The Frontiers of American Grand Strategy: Settlers, Elites, and the Standing Army in America’S Indian Wars
THE FRONTIERS OF AMERICAN GRAND STRATEGY: SETTLERS, ELITES, AND THE STANDING ARMY IN AMERICA’S INDIAN WARS A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Government By Andrew Alden Szarejko, M.A. Washington, D.C. August 11, 2020 Copyright 2020 by Andrew Alden Szarejko All Rights Reserved ii THE FRONTIERS OF AMERICAN GRAND STRATEGY: SETTLERS, ELITES, AND THE STANDING ARMY IN AMERICA’S INDIAN WARS Andrew Alden Szarejko, M.A. Thesis Advisor: Andrew O. Bennett, Ph.D. ABSTRACT Much work on U.S. grand strategy focuses on the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. If the United States did have a grand strategy before that, IR scholars often pay little attention to it, and when they do, they rarely agree on how best to characterize it. I show that federal political elites generally wanted to expand the territorial reach of the United States and its relative power, but they sought to expand while avoiding war with European powers and Native nations alike. I focus on U.S. wars with Native nations to show how domestic conditions created a disjuncture between the principles and practice of this grand strategy. Indeed, in many of America’s so- called Indian Wars, U.S. settlers were the ones to initiate conflict, and they eventually brought federal officials into wars that the elites would have preferred to avoid. I develop an explanation for settler success and failure in doing so. I focus on the ways that settlers’ two faits accomplis— the act of settling on disputed territory without authorization and the act of initiating violent conflict with Native nations—affected federal decision-making by putting pressure on speculators and local elites to lobby federal officials for military intervention, by causing federal officials to fear that settlers would create their own states or ally with foreign powers, and by eroding the credibility of U.S. -
Settlement's Secret
SETTLEMENT’S SECRET AUDRA SIMPSON CColumbia UniversityA In the spirit of Orin Starn’s piece for Cultural Anthropology “Here Come the Anthros (Again): The Strange Marriage of Anthropology and Native America,” I offer the following response that orients to three periodizations within his review of the literature. These periodizations are marked by an anthropological (1) depen- dence on Native peoples, (2) estrangement from Native peoples, and (3) (tentative) rapprochement with Native peoples. I depart from the premise of settler colonialism to meet Starn in the history he has mapped out for us. Settler colonialism is predicated on a territorial possession by some and, thus, a dispossession of others. In this model of colonialism, “the settler never leaves,” so the possession of territory requires the disappearance of “the native” (Wolfe 1999, 2006). The condition of Indigeneity in North America is to have survived this acquisitive and genocidal process and thus to have called up the failure of the project itself. In my reading of Starn’s piece and my admittedly particular rereading of the anthropological literature offered here, I respond to what I see as his central claims but do so with this reframing of the work of anthropology within the ongoing historical and political process of settlement. I organize my discussion in three parts that respond to the organization of Starn’s article: (1) spectacle, (2) anthropology, and (3) sovereignty. THE SPECTACLE Starn starts with a discussion of James Cameron’s blockbuster film Avatar (2009), a contemporary narrative caught up with desires and discourses that, as he C CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY, Vol. -
Operation Greif and the Trial of the “Most Dangerous Man in Europe.”
Operation Greif and the Trial of the “Most Dangerous Man in Europe.” A disheveled George S. Patton reported to Dwight Eisenhower with unsettling news from the front. “Ike, I’ve never seen such a goddamn foul-up! The Krauts are infiltrating behind our lines, raising hell, cutting wires and turning around road signs!”1 Such was the characteristic response in the aftermath of Operation Greif, orchestrated by Germany’s top commando, Otto Skorzeny. Through his actions during the Ardennes Offensive of 1944, and his acquittal while on trial, Skorzeny effectively utilized disinformation and covert operations to both earn his credibility and infamous reputation. Born in Vienna in 1908, Skorzeny led a mundane life during the years of the First World War. Despite his inability to concentrate on his studies, he managed to graduate in 1931 from the Technischen Hochschule in Wien with an engineering degree.2 His participation in the Schlagende Verbindungen (dueling societies) during his academic career gave Skorzeny the reputation of being a fierce fighter and resulted in his characteristic scars that covered both sides of his face. With the unification of Austria into Germany in 1938, Skorzeny had his first contact with the Nazi party. While visiting Vienna, he came upon Austrian President Miklas in the midst of an attempt on his life by Nazi roughnecks. Skorzeny, always a man of action, blocked the way of the would-be assassins and ended the confrontation. Word spread across the Germany of the bold Austrian who had saved the President’s life on a whim. 1 Glenn B Infield, Skorzeny (New York: St. -
Background of the Battle of the Bulge 16 Dec 44 – 28 Jan 45
First Division Museum Battle of the Bulge Resource Packet Section # 1, Page 1 Background of the Battle of the Bulge 16 Dec 44 – 28 Jan 45 The Situation After the invasion at Normandy on 6 June 1944, the Allied troops were moving quickly towards Germany to win the war on the Western Front. There was a debate over the best method to attack Germany. British Field Mar- shal Bernard Montgomery advocated a single-thrust strategy. Since the Allies had limited supplies coming in from their available ports, Montgomery wanted to concentrate those supplies with his army to allow him to move quickly into Germany and win the war. The danger of the single-thrust plan was that the German’s could get around Mont- gomery’s army. Supreme Allied Commander General Dwight D. Eisenhower favored a broad-front strategy, which was the strategy chosen for the offensive. The broad front strategy spread the Allied troops thin and moved slower than a single-thrust would have, but the advance kept all of the Allied line moving forward together. Obstacles Natural and man-made obstacles stood in the way of the Allied advance towards Germany. Natural obstacles included the Moselle and Meuse Rivers, the Vosges Mountains in Alsace, the wooded hills of the Ardennes, and the dense Hurtgen Forest near Aachen. Man-made obstacles include French defenses such as the old forts around Metz and the Maginot Line in northeastern France. The German Siegfried Line (the Germans called it the West Wall) and the Rhine River were also difficult obstacles for the Allies to get past. -
1 638 Homicides Occurring in Buffalo: 1902-1936
1 638 Homicides Occurring in Buffalo: 1902-1936 Current Chart: 5/28/2013 The following table includes all of the homicides reported by the Buffalo Police from 1902 to 1936. An exact transcription is replicated from the yearly Annual Report Board of Police. These reports were submitted after the year had ended which allowed the police to often include information generated after the arrest. In 1927, there were two additional categories, “officers shot by crooks” and “persons shot by police.” Two of the latter resulted in fatalities. These have been included in the table. Additional information, found from other sources, follows the information supplied by the police. That information is in italics. The homicides are listed in the following manner. Before the date, a number from 1 to 638 has been placed in bold type. The date listed is when the incident that caused the homicide occurred. In a small number of incidents the death occurred on a later date. If more than one homicide occurred during the same incident, each is counted. After some of the numbers, letters appear, capitalized in bold type. If there is nothing in bold after the number, then none of the conditions mentioned below occurred. The following abbreviations have been included: HS-Homicide Suicide: The perpetrator committed suicide after killing one or more people. AS-Attempted Suicide: The perpetrator attempted to commit suicide. LEO-Law Enforcement Officer related: Either an officer was murdered or one or more citizens was killed by the police. E-Executed: The convicted murderer was put to death for the listed murder. -
Clemency in a Nazi War Crimes Trial By: Allison Ernest
Evading the Hangman’s Noose: Clemency in a Nazi War Crimes Trial By: Allison Ernest Ernest 2 Contents Introduction: The Foundations for a War Crimes Trial Program 3 Background and Historiography 10 Chapter 1: Investigations into Other Trials Erode the United States’ Resolve 17 Chapter 2: The Onset of Trial Fatigue Due to Public Outcry 25 Chapter 3: High Commissioner McCloy Authorizes Sentence Reviews 38 Chapter 4: McCloy and the United States Set the War Criminals Free 45 Conclusion: A Lesson to be Learned 52 Chart: A Complicated Timeline Simplified 57 Bibliography 58 Ernest 3 Introduction: The Foundations for a War Crimes Trial Program “There is a supervening affirmative duty to prosecute the doers of serious offenses that falls on those who are empowered to do so on behalf of a civilized community. This duty corresponds to our fundamental rights as citizens and as persons to receive and give respect to each other in view of our possession of such rights.” Such duty, outlined by contemporary philosopher Alan S. Rosenbaum, was no better exemplified than in the case of Nazi war criminals in the aftermath of World War II. Even before the floundering Axis powers of Germany and Japan declared their respective official surrenders in 1945, the leaders of the Allies prepared possible courses of action for the surviving criminals in the inevitable collapse of the Nazi regime. Since the beginning of the war in 1939, the Nazi regime in Germany implemented a policy of waging a war so barbaric in its execution that the total numbers of casualties rivaled whole populations of countries. -
Joe Padgett – U.S
Joe Padgett – U.S. Army (WW II) A year or so before Joe died he and I were sitting around the kitchen table and I asked him about World War II and his experiences. This is what we talked about: Joe joined the service and was trained and assigned to the 965th Infantry Regiment, Battery 'A' - Artillery, as a forward observer. His S/N was 36725152. He went into Europe 14 days after D-Day and fought in 5 Campaigns including: - Rhineland - Battle of the Bulge - Ardennes - Normandy - Northern France - Europe During his time in Europe Joe's travels included the following locations (spelling is probably off) Harstorf, Gramnitz (where he crossed the Elbe River), Hoort-Morass, Else-Allendorf, and Schoustadt. Joe supported not only the American armies but also the British Army in which he was not too happy about dealing with British officers. Joe said he was wounded once during an artillery barrage by the Germans while he was fixing a broken communication wire near his forward observation point ... he was hit with a phosphorus shell fragment and suffered a painful wound and burn. Joe said he patched it up himself, hopped into the jeep with his men because of an advancing German force and headed back to the U.S. front lines leaving all his equipment behind. During the retreat the Germans were so close that the jeep was under constant small arms fire. One of the men with Joe manned a 50 caliber machine gun mounted on the jeep and was firing constantly during their escape. -
International Law on Use of Enemy Uniforms As a Stratagem and the Acquittal in the Skorzeny Case
Missouri Law Review Volume 24 Issue 1 January 1959 Article 7 1959 International Law on Use of Enemy Uniforms As a Stratagem and the Acquittal in the Skorzeny Case Maximilian Koessler Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Maximilian Koessler, International Law on Use of Enemy Uniforms As a Stratagem and the Acquittal in the Skorzeny Case, 24 MO. L. REV. (1959) Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr/vol24/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Missouri Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Koessler: Koessler: International Law on Use of Enemy Uniforms As a Stratagem INTERNATIONAL LAW ON USE OF ENEMY UNIFORMS AS A STRATAGEM AND THE ACQUITTAL IN THE SKORZENY CASE MlAxnaLmiA KoEssLER* I. INTRODUCTION Prior to the trial, by an American military commission entitled "Military Government Court,"' of Otto Skorzeny and his codefendants,2 which trial took place in Dachau between August 18 and September 8, 1947, and ended with an acquittal of all the defendants, the international law on legitimacy or illegitimacy of the use of enemy uniforms as a stratagem was not settled in so far as use outside open combat was con- cerned, as will be later on discussed at some length. One writer has expressed the view that the outcome of that trial supports the view "that such deception is permissible if not done in battle."8 However, this is not necessarily so. -
Read Genealogies, of the Brothers and Sisters and Families And
NYPL RESEARCH LIBRARIES 3 3433 08071712 :\ i„i.v j W «! i iSJwHM ffi£$ffl 14tM»BW ni'-W l •;<>:' i- ifffitju i :.! • (>il#!i ilrtr i.'ltii A READ GENEALOGIES Of the Brothers and Sisters AND Families and Descendants OF ISRAEL READ ABNER READ JOHN READ POLLY READ (Hetherington) WILLIAM READ WOLCOTT READ LEWIS READ NATHANIEL READ Compiled by Rev. Henry Martyn Dodd, A. B., A. M. Clinton, New York - . " " I I -> L » t .. "»• Your fatheis where are they? — Zech. i : J EDITION FIRST Copyright 1912 Henry Martyn Dodd Clinton, N. Y. PREFACE N compiling this Read Genealogy, I have been in actuated part by. my . enjoyment of such work, and in part by a desire to -do something of value for the Read family to which my mother belonged, I realize, however, that it is a very incomplete book, for much that whs important has passed beyond recovery with the passing away of the older generations and their neglect of family records. If I had had larger means I might, perhaps, by expensive researches have discovered more facts and made a more perfect record. I have found the written records few and scattered, and not always correct. It has been necessary to depend much on Tradition ; but knowing the uncertainty of such evidence, I have been careful about accepting it unless well verified. I feel sure that the statements of this book can be depended on with reasonable confidence. Some of the kin- dred have helped cordially, for which I return most hearty thanks. Others have seemed indifferent and unresponsive, and if any such do not find much about their own families, they certainly will not blame me. -
[Pennsylvania County Histories]
'ioK.Z. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2018 with funding from This project is made possible by a grant from the Institute of Museum and Library Services as administered by the Pennsylvania Department of Education through the Office of Commonwealth Libraries https://archive.org/details/pennsylvaniacoun02unse MARK TWAIN’S senai® mok. E A TENTS: UNITED STATES. GREAT BRITAIN. FRANCE. Juse 24TH, 1873. May i6th, 1877. May i8th, 1877. TRADE MARKS: UNITED states. GREAT BRITAIN. \ Registered No. 5,896.- Registered No. 15,979. DIRECTION^. Use but little moisture, and only on the gummed lines. Press the scrap on without wetting it. *. * _ • DANIEL SLOPE & COMPANY, NEW YORK. % $ t IND EX, IK DBX. D • I . 1 F' INDEX. »■ enrolled. Out of this material our im- ! mediate and complete organization of the j Reserve Corps was effected, i One of the first orders issued by the Com- mauding General enjoined on examining surgeons the rejection of all recruits who i did not fully meet the physical requirements of the regular army. This, together with the fact/that the standard of moral courage ! and the spirit of intelligent patriotism were i on a par with the physical excellence of the !men, accounts for the efficiency of the division in the discharge of every soldierly I duty. ®3,OOO,OOO for Military Purposes. The organization was effected in compli¬ Gallant Sons of the Keystone ance with Governor Curtin’s recommenda¬ tion to the Legislature, convened in extra State Who Were the session April 30, 1861, to “recruit and equip 1.5 l egiments exclusive of those called iuto First to March the service of the United States.” ---- May 15 a bill was passed authorizing a loan of 83,000,000, and empowering the Gov¬ ernor to carry out his recommendation.