Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018

Request for Qualifications Arizona Department of Solicitation No. Administration ADSPO18‐00007887 State Procurement Office Description: 100 N 15th Ave., Suite 201 2018 Professional Services List Phoenix, AZ 85007

ATTACHMENT 1 ...... OFFER AND ACCEPTANCE FORM ...... 2 ATTACHMENT 2-A .... EXPERIENCE AND CAPACITY ...... 3 1.0 ..... FIVE (5) EXAMPLE PROJECTS ...... 3 ATTACHMENT 2-A .... EXPERIENCE AND CAPACITY ...... 8 2.0 ..... EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE ...... 8 3.0 ..... FIRMS EXPERIENCE AND REVENUE ...... 10 4.0 ..... FIRMS SERVICES ...... 10 5.0 ..... EXPERIENCE REFERENCES: ...... 11 ATTACHMENT 2-B .... ORGANIZATION PROFILE ...... 13 ATTACHMENT 3-A .... METHOD PROPOSAL ...... 15 ATTACHMENT 3-B .... KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSAL ...... 16 ATTACHMENT 3-C ... PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS ...... 23 ATTACHMENT 3-D ... PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE ...... 25 ATTACHMENT 3-E .... ISRAEL BOYCOTT FORM ...... 26 ATTACHMENT 4 ...... PRICING SHEET ...... 27 ATTACHMENT 5-A .... CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION DESIGNATION ...... 28 ATTACHMENT 5-B .... CONFORMANCE STATEMENTS ...... 31 ATTACHMENT 5-C ... INSURANCE EVIDENCE ...... 34 ATTACHMENT 5-D ... OFFER CHECKLIST ...... 35 - -

PART 4 of the Solicitation Documents: Index Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 Page 1 of 35 4 Available online at: Procure.AZ.gov

Attachment 1 Offer and Acceptance Form

SUBMISSION OF OFFER: Undersigned hereby offers and agrees to provide qualifications for 2018 Annual Professional Services List in compliance with the Solicitation indicated above and our Offer indicated by the latest dated version below:

Initial 1. 01/11/2018 DFM Offer: date initial

Wilson & Company, Inc., Engineers & Architects DFM Offeror company name Signature of person authorized to sign Offer Initials

410 N. 44th Street, Suite 460 Daniel F. Marum, AVP, Southwest Transportation Planning Manager

Address Printed name and title

Phoenix, Arizona 85008 Daniel F. Marum, AVP, Southwest Transportation Planning Manager

City | State | ZIP Contact name and title

48-1176300 [email protected] 602-283-2702

CERTIFICATION: By signature in the above, Offeror certifies that it: 1. will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment in violation of Federal Executive Order 11246, [Arizona] State Executive Order 2009-9 or A.R.S. §§ 41−1461 through 1465; 2. has not given, offered to give, nor intends to give at any time hereafter any economic opportunity, future employment, gift, loan, gratuity, special discount, trip, favor, or service to a public servant in connection with the submitted offer. Failure to provide a valid signature affirming the stipulations required by this clause will result in rejection of the Offer. Signing the Offer with a false statement will void the Offer, any resulting contract, and may be subject to legal penalties under law; 3. complies with A.R.S. § 41-3532 when offering electronics or information technology products, services, or maintenance; and 4. is not debarred from, or otherwise prohibited from participating in any contract awarded by federal, state, or local government.

ACCEPTANCE OF OFFER: State hereby accepts the initial Offer, Revised Offer, or Best and Final Offer identified by number ADSPO18- 00007887 at the top of this form, and which was dated______1/11/2018 (the Accepted Offer). Offeror is now bound (as Contractor) to carry out the Work under the attached Contract, of which the Accepted Offer forms a part. Contractor is cautioned not to commence any billable work or to provide any material or perform any service under the Contract until Contractor receives the applicable Order or written notice to proceed from Procurement Officer.

State’s Contract No. is: ADSPO18-00007887 The effective date of the Contract:1/30/18-1/30/19 ______Contract awarded: ______1/30/18

Sean Wulfekuhle Procurement Officer signature Procurement Officer printed name

Contract qualification award can be viewed at https://spo.az.gov/procurement-services/professional-services

PART 4 of the Solicitation Documents: Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 Page 2 of 35 4 Available online at: Procure.AZ.gov

Attachment 2-A Experience and Capacity

STATE MAY DETERMINE YOUR SUBMITTAL IS NON-RESPONSIVE IF YOU DO NOT ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS FULLY.

DEFINITIONS

Branch Office: A geographically distinct place of business or subsidiary office of a firm that has a key role on the team.

Discipline: Primary technical capabilities of key personnel, as evidenced by academic degree, professional registration, certification, and/or extensive experience.

Key Personnel: Individuals who will have major contract responsibilities and/or provide unusual or unique expertise.

Parent Company. Identify controlling company name in this field if the Firm is owned or controlled by another company.

Structure: How a business is organized to accomplish its objectives (ie, Sole Proprietor, Limited Liability Company, Cooperative, Corporation, Partnership, S Corporation). See chart below for example:

Entity Type Structure Corporation S Corporation or C Corporation, or Professional Corporation

Cooperative Cooperative

General Partnership, Limited Partnership, Limited Liability Partnership, Limited Partnership Liability Limited Partnership Sole Proprietor Sole Proprietor

Limited Liability Company Limited Liability Company or Professional Limited Liability Company 1.0 Five (5) Example Projects List no more than five (5) example projects which best illustrate firm’s qualification for this contract in the chart provided below. Select projects where multiple team members worked together, if possible, that demonstrate the team’s capability to perform work similar to that required for this qualifications list contract. (NOTE: The integrity of the chart table columns shall remain unchanged, however the rows for each project may be expanded by the Offeror to accommodate the information).

a. Title and Locations of project or contract. For an indefinite delivery contract, the location is the geographic scope of the contract. b. Enter the year completed of the professional services (such as planning, engineering study, or design), and/or the year completed if construction. If any of the professional services or the construction projects are not complete, leave Year Completed blank and indicate the status in Brief Description of Project and Relevance to This Contract (block f). c. Project Owner or user, such as a government agency or installation, an institution, a corporation or private individual. d. Provide the original budget or not to exceed dollar amount for the project. e. Provide the Total Cost of the Project. If any of the professional services or construction projects is not complete, indicate the percentage compete and whether this project will be on budget, over or under budget. f. Brief Description: Indicate scope, size, and length of project, principle elements and special features of the project. Discuss the relevance of the example project to this contract.

PART 4 of the Solicitation Documents: Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 Page 3 of 35 4 Available online at: Procure.AZ.gov

Title and Design Construction Project Project Total Cost Brief Description of Project Location of Completion Completion Year Owner Original of the Project Year Budget (or Project not to exceed amount) On-Call 2012-Ongoing N/A City of On-call, no max $181,500 Since 2012 Wilson & Company has held an Professional Casa Grande amount on on total on-call contract with the City of Casa Grande Services, budget, per task projects for as needed task orders. Task orders may City of Casa amount thus far, include general civil engineering, structural engineering, electrical and/or mechanical Grande, Arizona that have engineering, survey/right-of-way services, come out and local transit system study services. of this on-call Executed task orders have ranged from warrant studies for traffic signal or all-way stop sign installation to concept design of intersections to assist in preservation of right- of-way.

Project examples included:

 Various intersection signal warrant analysis  Trekell Road, State Route 287Intersection ROW Study  Florence Boulevard Roundabout Conceptual Layout  Access Management Guidelines Update  Topographical survey of future Splash Pad at Peart Park City of Maricopa 2015-Ongoing N/A City of $350,000 Ongoing Wilson & Company assisted the City of Area Maricopa Maricopa with this effort to identify future Transportation roadway, transit, pedestrian, and bicycle Plan facility needs. The study consisted of three separate efforts that guide the development of these future transportation facilities. The first effort was a Transportation Master Plan that focused on needs within the City limits and Municipal Planning Area over the next 25 years. It defines existing and future deficiencies in the transportation network; identifies needed improvements to the roadway, transit, pedestrian, and bicycle network to respond to forecasted growth in population and employment; developed standards to ensure that future transportation infrastructure will support the needs of all modes of travel (car, transit, bicycling, walking); establishes priorities for the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP); provides input to MAG’s NextGen Regional Transportation Plan; and informs the Circulation Element for the City’s next General Plan Update. The second effort is a Regional Connectivity Plan that examines connectivity needs associated with the

PART 4 of the Solicitation Documents: Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 Page 4 of 35 4 Available online at: Procure.AZ.gov

regional roadway network for a long-range growth scenario associated with buildout of the City and surrounding communities. It examined the roadway network to assure functions and capacity matched projected growth if the City and surrounding communities were to develop to the full potential of their General Plan land uses; plans for multimodal connections with other Pinal and Maricopa County communities; and provides Long-Term Guidance, Design Standards, and Right of Way requirements for regional facilities. The third effort, though not currently under contract, is Plan Implementation Support. For this potential future effort, a series of supporting efforts will be conducted to provide support for implementation of the ATP, including research on development funding for transportation projects; more detailed assessment of the potential alignment of identified future high-priority, high-capacity corridors; defining opportunities to bring certain Character Areas into compliance with City standards; and integration of requirements for transportation related drainage infrastructure. In a related effort, Wilson & Company was also contracted to develop signing and striping plans for the Honeycutt Road corridor to reflect potential for implementation of Complete Street principals being developed in conjunction with the ATP.

Casa Grande 2016-Ongoing N/A Sun Corridor $50,000 Ongoing Wilson & Company is currently working on Transit Metropolitan the Casa Grande Transit Development Plan. Development Planning The plan has the following objectives: Plan Organization and City of  Understand existing and future Casa Grande needs and issues  Establish the goals and objectives for transit service  Identify transit needs and services  Develop service alternatives, recommendations and an implementation plan  Identify a financial plan that will make transit affordable  Attract transit users

Wilson & Company reviewed local and regional transit-related planning documents and reviewed socioeconomic data to identify transit needs and the latent transit demand. Employment growth trends and population projections were then identified to define the five- and 10-year travel demands and where the demand for transit would likely occur in

PART 4 of the Solicitation Documents: Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 Page 5 of 35 4 Available online at: Procure.AZ.gov

the future. To conduct this analysis Wilson & Company customized a Transit Demand Model that illustrates existing latent demand for transit and where the demand for transit would expand to in the year 2025 and 2030.

This demand model and the service alternatives were informed by a robust process of public outreach including stakeholder group meetings, stakeholder interviews, public meetings and an online survey. Additional public outreach tasks include press releases, a media campaign, a comment mapping tool, and a project website.

The Casa Grande Transit Development Plan is scheduled to be completed in early 2018.

South 2015-Ongoing N/A Flood Control $325,000 Ongoing Wilson & Company provided ground Phoenix/Laveen District control survey and airborne-GPS base Drainage Maricopa stations, GPS controlled digital aerial Improvement/and County photography, analytical Aerial Mapping aerotriangulation, and high accuracy topographic mapping with pertinent planimetric detail (roads, drains, etc.) meeting Maricopa County and FEMA specifications.

The high accuracy mapping was checked against independent survey data acquired by the County and was well within accuracy specifications. Engineers and Flood Plain Managers are now using timely high accuracy topographic mapping for their updated Drainage Master Plans and to identify flood control problems and plan for the construction of facilities that will eliminate or minimize flooding problems.

In addition, Wilson & Company delivered georeferenced multi-spectral digital imagery including natural color and color infrared. This allows the County to view the imagery in an interactive GIS environment. This is the first time they have received digital imagery for a mapping project. City of Phoenix 2015 N/A City of $33,000 $33,000 The project is located at the intersection Engineering On- Phoenix of 16th Place and Violet Drive, in the Call Storm Drain southern portion of Phoenix. The project Improvements- is within a developed residential area to 16th Place & the east and south, vacant buildings and Violet Drive businesses to the west, and a church to the south. The city of

PART 4 of the Solicitation Documents: Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 Page 6 of 35 4 Available online at: Procure.AZ.gov

Phoenix has received flooding complaints from homeowners at 4602 and 4610 South 16th Place. An engineering study for drainage improvements was completed in July 2010 with an evaluation of the existing conditions and an alternatives analysis.

The Recommended solution from the study is Alternative 2. This scope of work is based on providing final design documents for Alternative 2 of the study prepared by Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, dated July 1, 2010.

PART 4 of the Solicitation Documents: Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 Page 7 of 35 4 Available online at: Procure.AZ.gov

Attachment 2-A Experience and Capacity

STATE MAY DETERMINE YOUR SUBMITTAL IS NON-RESPONSIVE IF YOU DO NOT ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS FULLY.

2.0 EMPLOYEES BY DISCIPLINE

Aeronautical Engineer Electrical Engineer Mechanical Engineer

Agricultural Engineer Environmental Engineer Metallurgical Engineer Archeologist Environmental Scientist Mining Engineer Architect Fire Protection Engineer Nuclear Engineer Architectural Geodetic Surveyor Petroleum Engineer Engineering Geographic Information System Biologist Photogrammetrist Specialist CADD Technician Geological Engineer Project Manager Chemical Engineer Geologist Sanitary Engineer Civil Engineer Hydrographic Surveyor Soils Engineer Construction Manager Hydraulic Engineer Structural Engineer Construction Inspector Hydrologist Technician/Analyst Control Systems Industrial Engineer Transportation Engineer Engineer Cost Engineer/Estimator Landscape Architect Water Resources Engineer

Enter requested information in the chart provided below:

a. Select disciplines from the List of Disciplines. For employees that do not qualify for any of the disciplines, select “Other”.

b. Each person can be counted only twice; once for his/her primary function and once for his/her secondary function. Primary and secondary functions should be indicated by including a “P” or an “S” in column b after the Description Title is given.

c-d. If the form is completed for a firm (including all branch offices), enter the number of employees by disciplines in column c. If the form is completed for a branch office, enter the number of employees by discipline in column d and for the firm in column c. (NOTE: The Offeror may insert or delete rows in the existing Employees by Discipline chart table on page six (6) as necessary to complete the requirements for Question 2).

PART 4 of the Solicitation Documents: Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 Page 8 of 35 4 Available online at: Procure.AZ.gov

EXAMPLE:

b. Function: Primary c. No. of Employees d. No. of a. Discipline Title (P) or Secondary (S) Firm Employees Branch Example: Architect P 138 50-Yuma Branch 50-Tempe Branch 38 – Phoenix Branch

Example: Architect S 20 5-Yuma Branch 5-Tempe Branch 5 – Phoenix Branch 5- Tucson Branch

b. Function: Primary c. No. of Employees d. No. of a. Discipline (P) or Secondary (S) Firm Employees Title Branch Admin/Marketing/Graphics (P) 60 2

Architect (P) 12

CADD Technician (P) 65 2

Civil Engineer (P) 63 3

Construction Inspector (P) 27

Electrical Engineer (P) 7

Environmental Engineer (P) 2

Environmental Scientist (P) 4

GIS Specialist (P) 3 1

Geologist (P) 2

Land Surveyor (P) 34 3

PART 4 of the Solicitation Documents: Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 Page 9 of 35 4

Available online at: Procure.AZ.gov

Mechanical Engineer (P) 7

Photogrammetrist (P) 2

Planner: Urban/Regional (P) 8 3

Project Manager (P) 60 4

Specification Writer (P) 1

Structural Engineer (P) 12

Technician/Analyst (P) 3

Transportation Engineer (P) 37 2

Water Resources Engineer (P) 8

Other Employees (P)

Total* 398* 13* Some of our staff can be identified under multiple categories, thus our total is not a total of all categories.

3.0 FIRMS EXPERIENCE AND REVENUE

a. Firm shall complete the document titled “Project Experience Number of Projects and Revenue”, using same document title and upload in .pdf format only as an “Attachment” with firm’s offer in ProcureAZ. . 4.0 FIRMS SERVICES a. Firm shall complete the Excel spreadsheet titled “2018 Professional Services List of Firms Services” using same document title and uploaded in Excel format only as an “Attachment” with firm’s offer in ProcureAZ. .

PART 4 of the Solicitation Documents: Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 Page 10 of 35 4

Available online at: Procure.AZ.gov

5.0 EXPERIENCE REFERENCES: THE PRIME FIRM SHALL LIST A TOTAL OF THREE (3) CLIENT REFERENCES FOR ANY PROJECTS COMPLETED IN THE LAST YEAR BY THE FIRM (OR A BRANCH LOCATION). REFERENCES MAY BE CONTACTED BY ANY ELIGIBLE AGENCY.

1 Client Company/Address Contact Begin Date End Date City of Maricopa David Maestas 2014 Ongoing Phone Number Email Address 520-316-6948 [email protected]

List project name, project location, original design fee, final design fee, construction costs (if applicable), and program facilities. City of Maricopa Area Transportation Plan, Maricopa, Arizona; Original Fee: $350,000; Date: Ongoing, Construction: N/A; Program Facilities: N/A Services performed similar to those described in Solicitation Transportation Planning and Analysis 2 Client Company/Address Contact Begin Date End Date Maricopa Association of Governments Bob Hazlett 2014 Ongoing Phone Number Email Address 602-254-6300 [email protected]

List project name, project location, original design fee, final design fee, construction costs (if applicable), and program facilities. I-10/I-17 Spine Corridor Master Plan, Maricopa County, Arizona; Original Fee: $475,000; Date: Ongoing; Construction Costs: N/A; Program Facilities: N/A Services performed similar to those described in Solicitation Transportation Planning and Studies 3 Client Company/Address Contact Begin Date End Date Maricopa County Department Flood Joe Wagner 2015 2015 Control District Phone Number Email Address 602-506-2203 [email protected]

List project name, project location, original design fee, final design fee, construction costs (if applicable), and program facilities. South Phoenix/Laveen Drainage Improvement/and Aerial Mapping, Phoenix, Arizona: Original Fee: $241,779; Final Fee: $241,779; Construction Costs: N/A; Program Facilities: N/A Services performed similar to those described in Solicitation Survey and Aerial Mapping

PART 4 of the Solicitation Documents: Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 Page 11 of 35 4

Available online at: Procure.AZ.gov

End of Attachment 2-A

PART 4 of the Solicitation Documents: Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 Page 12 of 35 4

Available online at: Procure.AZ.gov

Attachment 2-B Organization Profile

STATE MAY DETERMINE YOUR PROPOSAL IS NON-RESPONSIVE IF YOU DO NOT ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS FULLY.

ORGANIZATION PROFILE

The firm shall complete a separate Organizational Profile document for each branch office.

2002 as a Firm Name Wilson & Company, Inc., Engineers & Architects Year established corporation; Founded in 1932. Principal address (street, city, 410 N. 44th Street, Suite 460, Phoenix, AZ 85008 (Work will be done out of this office) state) Entity type: Corporation Structure: S-Corporation Branch or Branch Parent Company: x Division: Years the organization has conducted business in Arizona. 16 Contract Representatives to Contact

Name Title Telephone Number E-Mail Address Southwest 1 Daniel Marum Transportation 602-283-2702 [email protected] Planning Manager 2 Nathan Gardner Arizona Survey Manager 602-283-2711 [email protected]

3 x x x x Firm Professional Registration and Certifications (INCLUDE COPY OF DOCUMENT IN OFFER)

Description Issuer Number Expiration

1 Arizona Board of Technical Registration State of Arizona 11137-1 6/29/2018 12-31-2017/renewal applied for in Arizona transaction privilege tax license December. - 2 or (if applicable) Arizona Corporate State of Arizona 20114977 paperwork attached Commission Certificate of Good Standing as Registration and Certificate Information.Pdf

PART 4 of the Solicitation Documents: Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 Page 13 of 35 4

Available online at: Procure.AZ.gov

ATTACHMENT 2-B SUPPLEMENTS: (For submission of additional Organizational Profile qualifications beyond the number of forms provided in the Offer Documents: Offeror shall copy the Organizational Profile form in its entirety and complete in a separate Document for submission with the offer or type “None” on first line if not applicable. Offeror shall title Supplement(s) with the same beginning title as named herein, number sequentially in accordance with the number of Organizational Profile forms submitting and upload with offer.).

Document No. of Title Date pages Purpose in Offer 3. Enter or delete row if not needed x x 4. Enter or delete row if not needed

5. Enter or delete row if not needed 6. Enter or delete row if not needed 7. Enter or delete row if not needed 8. Enter or delete row if not needed 9. Enter or delete row if not needed

(NOTE: The Offeror may insert additional rows as required).

End of Attachment 2-B

PART 4 of the Solicitation Documents: Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 Page 14 of 35 4

Available online at: Procure.AZ.gov

Attachment 3-A Method Proposal (Method of Approach)

RESERVED FOR AWARDED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL UPON SERVICE REQUEST

End of Attachment 3-A

PART 4 of the Solicitation Documents: Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 Page 15 of 35 4

Available online at: Procure.AZ.gov

Attachment 3-B Key Personnel Proposal

Answer all questions thoroughly in the spaces provided. Complete this form in full for each one of the key personnel who will participate in this contract. Insert or attach a separate resume if desired, but any attached resumes are supplemental to this form and do not substitute resumes for this form. Offeror shall list any resume filename within the Key Personnel Form resume section and Attach as titled and submit with firm’s offer in ProcureAZ. Resumes shall not be listed in Attachment 3-B as Supplements.

Daniel Daniel Marum How long with company? 13 years 1 Marum

Current position Associate Vice President, Southwest How long in position? 36 years in company: Transportation Planning Manager

How much of time will be Position for the Services: Principal/QA/QC 25 % dedicated to the Services?

What primary functions Dan will oversee contract administration, staffing, and project QA/QC processes will be assigned? throughout contract.

Dan Marum has spent over 36 years totally dedicated to Arizona transportation planning. Dan serves clients with an extensive background in long-range transportation planning, corridor planning, access management studies, congestion management analysis, traffic impact analysis, parking/circulation Describe person’s evaluations, and national research projects. Dan has been involved in a number of high-profile experience in performing transportation planning efforts, developing a reputation for delivering high quality work products through services like those that effective communication skills designed to foster understanding and implementable solutions. Dan is are to be assigned: Wilson & Company’s Southwest Transportation Planning Manager overseeing projects and studies in Arizona, Southern California, Colorado, New Mexico, and Texas and continues to support his team with a wealth of knowledge concerning Southwest transportation planning.

BS, BA/Urban Geography, University of Arizona, 1981 List person’s job-related Institute of Transportation Engineers training and education: Transportation Planners Council American Planning Association

Resume: Resumes.pdf

PART 4 of the Solicitation Documents: Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 Page 16 of 35 4

Available online at: Procure.AZ.gov

2 Name: Alan Ferreira, PE How long with company? 5 years

Current position Project Manager/Civil Engineer How long in position? 5 years in company:

How much of time will be Position for the Services: Project Manager 40% dedicated to the Services?

What primary functions If assigned a project/task, Alan would be Project Manager and would manage all will be assigned? aspects of the projects/task from scheduling, budgets, and deliverables.

Alan Ferreira has been a transportation engineer since 1997, with a focus on design, safety planning, and management of various transportation infrastructure design projects. His design experience ranges from arterial streets to urban and rural highways with associated facilities including highway design, traffic interchange design, roundabout layout, maintenance of traffic, Describe person’s AASHTO Controlling Design Criteria and Control of Access Reports, right-of-way plans, scoping experience in performing documents and pavement design. His projects range from minor and major arterials to urban and services like those that rural highways and interchanges. Alan manages multidiscipline design teams experienced in are to be assigned: advanced planning; utility and public agency coordination; public meetings; and CADD plan production. Working with both engineers and planners, he has a unique understanding of transportation and safety planning that gives him a unique and valuable perspective as an engineer. Prior to joining Wilson & Company, Alan worked for CalTrans where he developed his vocabulary as a roadway and transportation engineer before moving back to Arizona.

Professional Engineer Arizona #41700 (2004), California #61719 (2001) B.S., Civil Engineering, Arizona State University, 1995 Additional graduate course studies in Transportation Engineering, California State University, Sacramento, CA, 1995-97 List person’s job-related Board Member of American Society of Highway Engineers (ASHE), American Council of Engineering training and education: Companies (ACEC), American Public Works Association (APWA)

Training: Leadership in Engineering Administration Program (LEAP) 2007, ACEC; Road Safety Audits and Road Safety Audits Reviews (NHI Course 380069), FHWA and National Highway Institute; Designing and Implementing Roundabouts, Barry Crown, ADOT Technical Workshop

Resume: Resumes.pdf

PART 4 of the Solicitation Documents: Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 Page 17 of 35 4

Available online at: Procure.AZ.gov

3 Name: Amy Moran How long with company? 13 years

Current position Project Manager/Senior Planner How long in positon? 13 years in company:

How much of time will be Position for the Services: Project Manager/Planner 30 % dedicated to the Services?

What primary functions If assigned a project/task, Amy would be Project Manager and would manage all will be assigned? aspects of the projects/task from scheduling, budgets, and deliverables.

Amy Moran has over 20 years of experience in traffic engineering and transportation planning. She has served as Project Manager, Deputy PM or project planner/engineer in a wide range of studies, including Describe person’s long-range transportation planning, traffic impact analyses, corridor feasibility and design studies, access experience in performing management studies, parking studies, and signal warrant and progression studies. She has gained services like those that expertise in the use of a variety of traffic analysis software, including HCS, CORSIM, Synchro, and are to be assigned: Transyt-7F, as well as several traffic forecasting software models, including TransCAD, EMME2, TModel, and TRANPLAN.

List person’s job-related BS, Civil Engineering, Cornell University, 1993 training and education: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE)

Resume: Resumes.pdf

PART 4 of the Solicitation Documents: Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 Page 18 of 35 4

Available online at: Procure.AZ.gov

4 Name: Nathan Gardner, RLS How long with company? 4 years

Current position Arizona Survey Manager How long in position? 4 in company:

How much of time will be Position for the Services: Survey Manager 45% dedicated to the Services?

What primary functions Nathan will serve as the Survey Manager for any survey or mapping tasks will be assigned? assigned.

Nate joined Wilson & Company after successfully owning and operating his own professional land Describe person’s surveying business. He also managed survey departments at other firms prior to owning his business. experience in performing His skills have been honed in boundary, ALTA, route, construction, and construction surveys; minor land services like those that divisions; and 3-D laser scanning. He is a skilled collaborator and effective communicator who enjoys are to be assigned: fostering strong relationships for successful projects. Nate’s greatest career accomplishments are when his projects have shared ownership between the client, project team, and stakeholders

B.A.S, Technology Management, Northern Arizona University, 2012 Graduated summa cum laude A.A.S., Network Administration, Pima Community College, 2011 A.A.S., Network Security, Pima Community College, 2013 List person’s job-related

training and education: Professional Surveyor Arizona #36786 (2001)

Arizona Professional Land Surveyors Association, National Society of Professional Surveyors, International Right of Way Association

Resume: Resumes.pdf

PART 4 of the Solicitation Documents: Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 Page 19 of 35 4

Available online at: Procure.AZ.gov

5 Name: Jim Townsend, AICP How long with company? 13 years

Current position Transportation Planning Manager How long in position? 13 years in company:

How much of time will be Position for the Services: Project Manager/QA/QC/Planning 40% dedicated to the Services?

What primary functions Transportation planning, multimodal planning, project management, public involvement, quality will be assigned? assurance/quality control

Jim’s broad-based, multimodal background and exposure allows him to provide national experience to his clients. His planning and operations background have provided community direction and proven cost- effective sustainable solutions. His transit and non-motorized experience has allowed him to integrate multimodal elements into communities contemplating initiating or expanding multi-modal services. His Describe person’s diverse experience has also included county and state DOT service providing public sector perspectives experience in performing in his private sector solutions. Above all, Jim’s ability to communicate with several different audiences, services like those that from the technical engineer to the elected official to the lay person at a public meeting, provides clients are to be assigned: with a collaborative process for consensus building with any project Jim leads or directs. Jim has formulated regional plans in cooperation with state, regional, local and MPO organizations; he has developed technical studies for plan and program implementation; as well as facilitated elected official and citizen outreach efforts for committees, studies, and plans.

BS, Urban and Regional Planning, California State Polytechnic University, 1993 Identification and Treatment of High Hazard Locations, Northwestern University, Multimodal Freight Forecasting in Transportation Planning, NHI, Public Involvement in the Transportation Decision Making Process, NHI, Linking Planning and NEPA, NTI, Coordinating Transportation and Land Use, NTI, List person’s job-related Systematic Development of Informed Consent, IPMP, Practical Project Development and Environmental training and education: Documentation, Highway Capacity Analysis, McTrans Center, University of Florida, Advanced ArcInfo GIS, ESRI, Access Management, Location, and Design, NTI American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP), Reg.#091845 American Institute of Certified Planners; American Planning Association, AZ, OK, MO, KS Chapters American Planning Association Transportation Planning Division Missouri Representative

Resume: Resumes.pdf

PART 4 of the Solicitation Documents: Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 Page 20 of 35 4

Available online at: Procure.AZ.gov

6 Name: Mario Juarez-Infante, PE How long with company? 19 years

Current position Vice President How long in position? 3 in company:

Project Manager/Drainage How much of time will be Position for the Services: 30% Lead/Funding dedicated to the Services?

What primary functions Mario will serve as Project Manager or Drainage Lead for assigned tasks. will be assigned?

Mario’s strength lies in the versatility of this civil engineering experience, coupled with his dedication to building successful relationships with clients and stakeholders. He specializes in hydrology/hydraulics, analysis, erosion control, water quality, channel stability, geometric roadway design, and student drop-off/pick-up zone planning and design. He has been Describe person’s responsible for project development, funding assistance, and design over the past 18 years. experience in performing During his career he has enjoyed a record of successfully identifying funding opportunities and services like those that are to be assigned: assisting communities to acquire funding packages required to implement the desired capital projects. In accomplishing these funding tasks he has developed solid relationships with key staff at many of the agencies and programs overseeing funding outcomes. Mario works closely with regulatory and funding agencies to ensure that projects move forward in a timely manner, the funding agencies’ requirements are met, and the owner’s interest is represented.

M.S., Transportation Engineering, University of New Mexico, 2000 B.S., Civil Engineering, New Mexico State University, 1997

Professional Civil Engineer Arizona #48616, New Mexico #15340, Texas #89084 List person’s job-related training and education: American Council of Engineering Companies New Mexico Floodplain Managers Association Border Industrial Association Mesilla Valley Economic Development Alliance

Resume: Resumes.pdf

PART 4 of the Solicitation Documents: Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 Page 21 of 35 4

Available online at: Procure.AZ.gov

ATTACHMENT 3-B SUPPLEMENTS: (For submission of additional Key Personnel qualifications beyond the number of forms provided in the Offer Documents: Offeror shall copy the Key Personnel Form in its entirety and complete in a separate Word Document for submission with the offer, and list file name below or type “None” on first line if not applicable. Offeror shall title Supplement(s) with the same title as named herein and upload with offer.).

Document No. of Title Date pages Purpose in Offer 1. Enter or delete row if not needed x x 2. Enter or delete row if not needed

3. Enter or delete row if not needed 4. Enter or delete row if not needed 5. Enter or delete row if not needed 6. Enter or delete row if not needed 7. Enter or delete row if not needed

(NOTE: The Offeror may insert additional rows as required).

End of Attachment 3-B

PART 4 of the Solicitation Documents: Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 Page 22 of 35 4

Available online at: Procure.AZ.gov

Attachment 3-C Proposed Subcontractors

RESERVED FOR AWARDED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL UPON SERVICE REQUEST

Check “NO” if you WILL NOT subcontract any portion of the Work and will therefore be carrying out all of the Work with your own personnel. NO, the Offeror will not subcontract any portion of the Work.

If you WILL subcontract any portion of the Work, check “YES” below and list name of persons or companies you propose to use as subconsultants. 1. Fill in the information in the chart below for every proposed subcontractor – indicate the role and services work the subconsultant may provide in performing any of the services as outlined in the Requirements Document in the solicitation. 2. Offeror shall complete an Attachment 3-B Key Personnel Form in its entirety for each proposed subcontractor and submit with offer. The term “Subconsultant” shall be annotated in parenthesis after each subcontractor key personnel name typed in the “Name” section of the 3-B form. 3. State may demand additional information about proposed subcontractors as a precondition of award. YES, the Offeror will use the Subcontractors listed below:

Capacity % Dedicated to Perform the Proposed Subcontractor Key Personnel Name; Role/Service For Any Subcontractor Firm Name and Contact List Proposed Subcontractor Project Under This Information Role(s) and Services Contract 1. Name 2. Name 3. Name 4. Name 5. Name 6. Name 7. Name 8. Name 9. Name 10 Name

PART 4 of the Solicitation Documents: Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 Page 23 of 35 4

Available online at: Procure.AZ.gov

ATTACHMENT 3-C SUPPLEMENTS: (Offeror to insert as required and list here or type “None” on first line. Offeror shall title any Supplement(s) with the same title as named herein and upload with offer.)

Document No. of Title Date pages Purpose in Offer 1. Enter or type “None for Sub #1” x x x 2. Enter or type “None for Sub #2” x x x 3. Enter or type “None for Sub #3” x x x 4. Enter or type “None for Sub #4” x x x 5. Enter or type “None for Sub #5” x x x 6. Enter or type “None for Sub #6” x x x 7. Enter or type “None for Sub #7” x x x 8. Enter or type “None for Sub #8” x x x 9. Enter or type “None for Sub #9” x x x 10. Enter or type “None for Sub #10” x x x

End of Attachment 3-C

PART 4 of the Solicitation Documents: Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 Page 24 of 35 4

Available online at: Procure.AZ.gov

Attachment 3-D Performance Guarantee

RESERVED FOR AWARDED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL UPON SERVICE REQUEST End of Attachment 3-D

PART 4 of the Solicitation Documents: Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 Page 25 of 35 4

Available online at: Procure.AZ.gov

Attachment 3-E Israel Boycott Form

All materials submitted as part of a response to a solicitation are subject to Arizona public records law and will be disclosed if there is an appropriate public records request at the time of or after the award of the contract. Recently legislation has been enacted to prohibit the state from contracting with companies currently engaged in a boycott of Israel. To ensure compliance with A.R.S. §35- 393.01. This form must be completed and returned with the response to the solicitation and any supporting information to assist the State in making its determination of compliance.

As defined by A.R.S. §35-393.01: 1."Boycott" means engaging in a refusal to deal, terminating business activities or performing other actions that are intended to limit commercial relations with Israel or with persons or entities doing business in Israel or in territories controlled by Israel, if those actions are taken either: (a) In compliance with or adherence to calls for a boycott of Israel other than those boycotts to which 50 United States Code section 4607(c) applies. (b) In a manner that discriminates on the basis of nationality, national origin or religion and that is not based on a valid business reason. 2. "Company" means a sole proprietorship, organization, association, corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited partnership, limited liability partnership, limited liability company or other entity or business association, and includes a wholly owned subsidiary, majority-owned subsidiary, parent company or affiliate. 3. "Direct holdings" means all publicly traded securities of a company that are held directly by the state treasurer or a retirement system in an actively managed account or fund in which the retirement system owns all shares or interests. 4."Indirect holdings" means all securities of a company that are held in an account or fund, including a mutual fund, that is managed by one or more persons who are not employed by the state treasurer or a retirement system, if the state treasurer or retirement system owns shares or interests either: (a) together with other investors that are not subject to this section. (b) that are held in an index fund. 5.”Public entity" means this State, a political subdivision of this STATE or an agency, board, commission or department of this state or a political subdivision of this state. 6. ”Public fund" means the state treasurer or a retirement system. 7. "Restricted companies" means companies that boycott Israel. 8. "Retirement system" means a retirement plan or system that is established by or pursuant to title 38. All offerors must select one of the following: X My company does not participate in, and agrees not to participate in during the term of the contract a boycott of Israel in accordance with A.R.S. §35-393.01. I understand that my entire response will become public record in accordance with A.A.C. R2-7-C317. My company does participate in a boycott of Israel as defined by A.R.S. §35-393.01. :

By submitting this response, proposer agrees to indemnify and hold the State, its agents and employees, harmless from any claims or causes of action relating to the State’s action based upon reliance on the above representations, including the payment of all costs and attorney fees incurred by the State in defending such an action.

Wilson & Company, Inc., Engineers & Architects Company Name Signature of Person Authorized to Sign

410 N. 44th St., Suite 460 Daniel F. Marum, AVP Address Printed Name

Phoenix Arizona 85003 Southwest Transportation Planning Manager City State Zip Title

End of Attachment 3-E PART 4 of the Solicitation Documents: Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 Page 26 of 35 4

Available online at: Procure.AZ.gov

Attachment 4 Pricing Sheet

RESERVED FOR AWARDED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICE ORDER CONTRACT

End of Attachment 4

PART 4 of the Solicitation Documents: Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 Page 27 of 35 4

Available online at: Procure.AZ.gov

Attachment 5-A Confidential Information Designation

All materials submitted as part of a response to a solicitation are subject to Arizona public records law and will be disclosed if there is an appropriate public records request at the time of or after the award of the contract. Recognizing there may be materials included in a solicitation response that are proprietary or a trade secret, a process is set out in A.A.C. R2-7-103 (copy attached) that will allow qualifying materials to be designated as confidential and excluded from disclosure. For purposes of this process the definition of “trade secret” will be the same as that set out in A.A.C. R2-7-101(52). Complete this form return it with your Offer along with the appropriate supporting information to assist State in making its determination as to whether any of the materials submitted as part of your Offer should be designated confidential because the material is proprietary or a trade secret and therefore not subject to disclosure.

STATE WILL NOT CONSIDER ANY MATERIAL IN YOUR OFFER “CONFIDENTIAL” UNLESS DESIGNATED ON THIS FORM.

Check one of the following – if neither is checked, State will assume that as equivalent to “DOES NOT”:

This response DOES NOT contain proprietary or trade secret information. I understand that my entire response will become public record in accordance with A.A.C. R2-7-C317. This response DOES contain trade secret information because it contains information that: 1. Is a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique or process, AND 2. Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; AND 3. Is the subject of efforts by myself or my organization that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy.

NOTE: Failure to attach an explanation may result in a determination that the information does not meet the statutory trade secret definition. All information that does not meet the definition of trade secret as defined by A.A.C. R2-7- 101(52) will become public in accordance with A.A.C. R2-7-C317. State may make its own determination on materials in accordance with A.A.C. R2-7-103. If State agrees with Offeror’s designation of trade secret or confidentiality and the determination is challenged, the undersigned hereby agrees to cooperate and support the defense of the determination with all interested parties, including legal counsel or other necessary assistance. By submitting this response, Offeror agrees that the entire Offer, including confidential, trade secret and proprietary information may be shared with an evaluation committee and technical advisors during the evaluation process. Offeror agrees to indemnify and hold State, its agents and employees, harmless from any claims or causes of action relating to State’s withholding of information based upon reliance on the above representations, including the payment of all costs and attorney fees incurred by State in defending such an action.

Wilson & Company, Inc., Engineers & Architects

Offeror Company Name Signature of Authorized Person 410 N. 44th St., Suite 460, Phoenix, AZ 85008 Daniel Marum

Address Printed Name

PART 4 of the Solicitation Documents: Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 Page 28 of 35 4

Available online at: Procure.AZ.gov

x x

City State Zip Title

ATTACHMENT 5-A SUPPLEMENTS: (Offeror to insert as required and list here or type “None” on first line. Offeror shall title any Supplement(s) with the same title as named herein and upload with offer.).

Document No. of Title Date pages Purpose in Offer 1. None None x x 2. Enter or delete row if not needed 3. Enter or delete row if not needed

End of Attachment 5-A

PART 4 of the Solicitation Documents: Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 Page 29 of 35 4

Available online at: Procure.AZ.gov

Copy of A.A.C. R2-7-103 [Confidential Information] as was current at time of Solicitation issuance

PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY

A. If a person wants to assert that a person's offer, specification, or protest contains a trade secret or other proprietary information, a person shall include with the submission a statement supporting this assertion. A person shall clearly designate any trade secret and other proprietary information, using the term "confidential". Contract terms and conditions, pricing, and information generally available to the public are not considered confidential information under this Section. B. Until a final determination is made under subsection (C), an agency chief procurement officer shall not disclose information designated as confidential under subsection (A) except to those individuals deemed by an agency chief procurement officer to have a legitimate state interest. C. Upon receipt of a submission, an agency chief procurement officer shall make one of the following written determinations: 1. The designated information is confidential and the agency chief procurement officer shall not disclose the information except to those individuals deemed by the agency chief procurement officer to have a legitimate state interest; 2. The designated information is not confidential; or 3. Additional information is required before a final confidentiality determination can be made. D. If an agency chief procurement officer determines that information submitted is not confidential, a person who made the submission shall be notified in writing. The notice shall include a time period for requesting a review of the determination by the state procurement administrator. E. An agency chief procurement officer may release information designated as confidential under subsection (A) if: 1. A request for review is not received by the state procurement administrator within the time period specified in the notice; or 2. The state procurement administrator, after review, makes a written determination that the designated information is not confidential. - - -

PART 4 of the Solicitation Documents: Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 Page 30 of 35 4

Available online at: Procure.AZ.gov

Attachment 5-B Conformance Statements

STATE WILL NOT CONSIDER ANY EXCEPTIONS UNLESS DESIGNATED ON THIS FORM. READ THE INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS BEFORE TAKING ANY EXCEPTIONS – TAKING EXCEPTIONS CAN BE GROUNDS FOR STATE REJECTING YOUR OFFER IN EVALUATION.

CONFORMANCE TO THE INSTRUCTIONS: (PART 1 OF THE SOLICITATION)

Check one of the following – if neither is checked, State will assume that as equivalent to “YES”:

YES – Offeror acknowledges that it has read and understands the Solicitation Summary in Section 1-A of the Solicitation Documents and the Instructions to Offerors in Section 1-B of the Solicitation Documents and the and attests that its Offer complies with both.

NO – Offeror acknowledges that it has read and understands the Solicitation Summary in Section 1-A of the  Solicitation Documents and the Instructions to Offerors in Section 1-B of the Solicitation Documents, and attests that its Offer complies with both EXCEPT FOR the exceptions listed in Attachment 5-B Supplement 1.

CONFORMANCE TO THE CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS: (PART 2 OF THE SOLICITATION)

Check one of the following – if neither is checked, State will assume that as equivalent to “YES”:

YES – Offeror acknowledges that it has read and understands the Special Terms and Conditions and the Uniform Terms and Conditions, along with their respective Exhibits and Appendices, in Part 2 of the Solicitation Documents and attests that its Offer complies with both.

NO – Offeror acknowledges that it has read and understands the Special Terms and Conditions and the Uniform Terms and Conditions, along with their respective Exhibits and Appendices in Part 2 of the Solicitation Documents and attests that its Offer complies with both EXCEPT FOR the exceptions listed in Attachment 5-B Supplement 2.

CONFORMANCE TO THE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTS: (PART 3 OF THE SOLICITATION)

Check one of the following – if neither is checked, State will assume that as equivalent to “YES”:

YES – Offeror acknowledges that it has read and understands the Requirements Document and the Compensation Document in Part 3 of the Solicitation Documents and attests that its Offer complies with both.

NO – Offeror acknowledges that it has read and understands the Requirements Document and the Compensation Document, in Part 3 of the Solicitation Documents and attests that its Offer complies with both EXCEPT FOR the exceptions listed in Attachment 5-B Supplement 3.

PART 4 of the Solicitation Documents: Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 Page 31 of 35 4

Available online at: Procure.AZ.gov

ATTACHMENT 5-B Supplement No. 1: Exceptions to Instructions

Article / Paragraph or Exhibit Reference Proposed Changes / Alternate Language Rationale for Proposed Change Section 1-A: Solicitation Summary N/A None N/A x x x x x x Section 1-B: Instructions to Offerors N/A None N/A x x x x x x

ATTACHMENT 5-B Supplement No. 2: Exceptions to Contract Terms & Conditions

Article/ Paragraph or Exhibit Reference Proposed Changes / Alternate Language Rationale for Proposed Change Section 2-A: Special Terms & Conditions N/A None N/A x x x x x x

Article/ Paragraph or Appendix Reference Proposed Changes / Alternate Language Rationale for Proposed Change Section 2-B: Uniform Terms & Conditions

PART 4 of the Solicitation Documents: Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 Page 32 of 35 4

Available online at: Procure.AZ.gov

N/A None N/A X x x X x x

ATTACHMENT 5-B Supplement No. 3: Exceptions to Technical and Commercial

Article / Paragraph or Exhibit Reference Proposed Changes / Alternate Language Rationale for Proposed Change Section 2-A Scope of Work (Requirements Document) N/A None N/A x x x x x x Section 2-B: Compensation Document N/A None N/A x x x x x x

Wilson & Company, Inc., Engineers & Architects Company Name Signature of Person Authorized to Sign

End of Attachment 5-B

PART 4 of the Solicitation Documents: Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 Page 33 of 35 4

Available online at: Procure.AZ.gov

Attachment 5-C Insurance Evidence

RESERVED FOR AWARDED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL UPON SERVICE REQUEST

End of Attachment 5-C

PART 4 of the Solicitation Documents: Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 Page 34 of 35 4

Available online at: Procure.AZ.gov

Attachment 5-D Offer Checklist

STATE MAY DETERMINE YOUR PROPOSAL IS NON-RESPONSIVE IF YOU DO NOT SUBMIT ALL ATTACHMENTS.

DOCUMENT SUBMITTED

1. Attachment 1: Offer and Acceptance Form - SIGNED YES no

2. Attachment 2-A: Experience and Capacity YES no

3. Attachment 2-A: References YES no

4. Attachment 2-B: Organization Profile YES no

5. Attachment 3-A: Method Proposal – RESERVED FOR AWARD YES no

6. Attachment 3-B: Key Personnel Proposal YES no

7. Attachment 3-C: Proposed Subcontractors – RESERVED FOR AWARD YES no

8. Attachment 3-D: Performance Guarantee – RESERVED FOR AWARD YES no

9. Attachment 3-E: Israel Boycott Form -SIGNED YES no

10. Attachment 4: Pricing Sheet – RESERVED FOR AWARD YES, no

11. Attachment 5-A: Confidential Information Designation - SIGNED YES no

12. Attachment 5-B: Conformance Statements - SIGNED YES no

13. Attachment 5-C: Insurance Evidence – RESERVED FOR AWARD YES no

14. Attachment 5-D: Offer Checklist YES no

15. .pdf File: Number of Projects and Revenue YES no

16. Excel File: 2018 Professional Services List of Firms Services YES no

End of Attachment 5-D End of Part 4 PART 4 of the Solicitation Documents: Offer Forms (Attachments) Date: January 8, 2018 Page 35 of 35 4

Available online at: Procure.AZ.gov

DAN MARUM Vice President/Southwest Transportation Planning Manager

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE TOTAL 36 WITH FIRM 13 EDUCATION BS, BA/Urban Geography, University of Arizona, 1981 Institute of Transportation Engineers ORGANIZATIONS, TRAINING, Transportation Planners Council PUBLICATIONS, AWARDS American Planning Association

Dan Marum has an extensive background in long-range transportation planning, corridor planning, access management studies, congestion management analysis, traffic impact analysis, parking/circulation evaluations, and national research projects. Over more than three decades, he has been involved in a number of high-profile transportation planning efforts, developing a reputation for delivering high quality work products through the use of effective communication skills designed to foster understanding and implementable solutions. Dan is an Arizona native and has spent his entire career working in the Southwest United States. Dan is Wilson & Company’s Southwest Transportation Planning Manager overseeing projects and studies in Arizona, Southern California, Colorado, New Mexico, and Texas. Dan is directly responsible for transportation and comprehensive planning studies, regional modeling, and traffic circulation analyses conducted by our Arizona office. Project Experience Area Transportation Plans/Circulation Element Analysis  Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) Central Phoenix Transportation Framework Study  Navajo Nation Long Range Transportation Plan Update, AZ, NM, UT (Year 2015)  Central Arizona Governments (CAG) Regional Transportation Plan, Pinal and Gila Counties  Yuma Transportation Master Plan, City of Yuma, Arizona  Yuma Foothills/Mesa Del Sol Transportation Plan, Yuma County  Navajo Nation Long Range Transportation Plan Update, Arizona, New Mexico, Utah (Year 2009)  Ak-Chin Long Range Transportation Plan Update, Maricopa, Arizona  Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) Regional Transportation Plan Update  MCDOT On-Call Transportation Planning Consultant Services  City of Scottsdale On-Call Transportation Consultant Services  Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG ) Hassayampa Framework Study for the Wickenburg Area  Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) I-8 and I-10/Hidden Valley Transportation Framework Study, Maricopa and Pinal Counties, Arizona  Central Arizona Governments (CAG) Timing Assumptions: Future Pinal County Transportation Segments, Pinal County, Arizona  City of Maricopa Regional Transportation Plan Update, City of Maricopa, Arizona  Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG ) I-10 Hassayampa Valley Roadway Framework Study, Maricopa County, Arizona  Navajo County Central Area Transportation Study, Navajo County, Arizona  Southern Navajo/Apache County Sub-Regional Transportation Plan, Navajo/Apache Counties, Arizona  City of Glendale Transportation Plan, City of Glendale, Arizona  City of Phoenix Downtown Transportation Study, City of Phoenix, Arizona  City of Casa Grande Small Area Transportation Study (SATS), City of Casa Grande, Arizona  Northwest Valley Transportation Study, Maricopa County, Arizona  Cottonwood Area Transportation Study, Cottonwood, Arizona  City of Peoria CIP Prioritization Review/Analysis Year 2007 Update, City of Peoria, Arizona  City of Peoria Transportation Needs Study Transportation Planning and Public Involvement Support Services, City of Peoria, Arizona  City of Peoria General Plan Circulation Element and Street Classification System Analysis, City of Peoria, Arizona  Kingman Area Transportation Study, City of Kingman, Arizona  Goodyear General Plan Circulation Element, City of Goodyear, Arizona  San Diego Comprehensive Plan Circulation Element, City of San Diego, California  Los Alamos Area Transportation Studies, Los Alamos, New Mexico  North Central Area Traffic Study and Transportation Improvement Program, Gila River Indian Community, Maricopa and Pinal Counties, Arizona Corridor Improvement and Access Management Studies  Bell Road Access Management Plan, City of Surprise, Arizona  Maricopa Department of Transportation (MCDOT) Greenway Parkway Corridor Feasibility Study, Town of Buckeye, Arizona

discip li ne | int ensit y | collaboration I shared ownership | solutions

Dan Marum| pg. 2

 SR-347/UPRR Grade Separation Design Concept and Study Report (DCR) and Environmental Studies Traffic Analysis  Germann Road Access Management and Corridor Improvement Study, Queen Creek, Arizona; Mesa, Arizona  Complete Boulevard Study for El Cajon Boulevard, City of San Diego, California  White & Parker Road/Maricopa-Casa Grande Highway, City of Maricopa, Arizona  Reverse Design Concept Report and Environmental Studies Traffic Analysis: SR-189/Mariposa Road, Nogales, Arizona  US-60/Grand Avenue Access Management Plan – SR-303L/Estrella Freeway to SR-74, Maricopa County, Arizona  El Mirage Road, Northern Avenue to Bell Road Design Concept Report (DCR) and Environmental Assessment (EA) Traffic Analysis, City of El Mirage and City of Surprise, Arizona  Van Buren Street Corridor Study, Avondale, Arizona  City of Avondale Old Town Revitalization Area Network Analysis Project, Avondale, Arizona  MCDOT Turner Parkway Corridor Feasibility Study – Interstate 10 to State Route 74  MCDOT Patton Road/Jomax Road Corridor Improvement and Access Management Study, Maricopa County, Arizona  MCDOT Jackrabbit Trail Access Control and Corridor Improvement Study  MCDOT Meridian Road Access Control and Corridor Improvement Study, Maricopa County, Arizona  SR-74 Access Management Study, I-17 to US-60, Maricopa County, Arizona  US-70 Globe-New Mexico Multimodal Corridor Profile, Central and Eastern Arizona  Phoenix-Flagstaff-Page Multimodal Corridor Profile, Central and Northern Arizona  Central Phoenix/East Valley LRT Project DEIS Transportation Analysis  Central Phoenix/East Valley LRT Project (Preliminary Engineering Phase Traffic Analysis) Traffic Impact Analysis  Biltmore Club Redevelopment Project, Phoenix, Arizona  Wood Corporate Campus Traffic Impact Study, City of Goodyear, Arizona  Desert Ridge Commercial Core Traffic Analysis, Phoenix, Arizona  CityNorth Master Traffic Study, Phoenix, Arizona  Otay Ranch General Plan Amendment Traffic Analysis, Chula Vista, California  4-S Ranch Transportation Analysis, San Diego, California  Estrella Mountain Ranch Transportation Planning Studies, Goodyear, Arizona  Estrella Area Plan Circulation Element  Gila River Crossing Traffic Demand/Capacity Analysis  Estrella Mountain Ranch Regional Transportation Facility Impact Analysis  City of Goodyear Planned Regional Center Circulation System Analysis, Goodyear, Arizona Congestion Management Studies  Congestion Mitigation Strategies (CMS) Research, San Diego, California  Chula Vista Traffic Monitoring and Congestion Analysis, Chula Vista, California  Congestion Management Analysis Studies, Multiple U.S. States  State of Nevada  San Diego Region  San Bernardino Region Focused Freeway/Parkway Interchange Studies  Arizona Parkway Intersection/Interchange Operational Analysis and Design Concepts Study, Maricopa County, Arizona  I-5 Direct Access Ramps Local CirculationSANDAG/Caltrans Interstate 5 North Coast Direct Access Ramp (DAR) Local Circulation System Impact Study; San Diego County, California  I-5/SR-56 North Connectors Traffic Analysis, San Diego, California  SR-56 Westbound Auxiliary Lane Traffic Analysis, San Diego, California  Central I-5 Corridor Study, San Diego, California  I-15 PSR/PR Traffic Analysis, Rancho Bernardo, CA  I-5/Sorrento Valley Road Traffic Forecasting Analysis, San Diego, CA Event Related Traffic Analysis  Phoenix Comprehensive Transportation Study and Event Traffic Control Plan Review, City of Phoenix, Arizona  City of Peoria Sports Complex District Urban Design Study, Peoria, Arizona  Downtown San Diego Ballpark Transportation/Parking Analysis, Center City Development Corporation (CCDC), San Diego, California  Priest/Washington Stadium Site Transportation Planning/Engineering Analysis, Tempe, Arizona  Emerald Center Multipurpose Facility Site Transportation Planning/Engineering Analysis, Tempe, Arizona disci p li ne | int ensit y | collaboration I shared ownership | solutions Dan Marum| pg. 3

 Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Stadium Site - Initial Transportation Planning/Conceptual Engineering Analysis, Maricopa County, Arizona  Los Arcos Development Project Transportation Impact and Mitigation Analysis, Scottsdale, Arizona Downtown Core Parking/Circulation Analysis  Casa Grande Downtown Traffic Circulation Study, City of Casa Grande, Arizona  Traffic Impact & Mitigation Analysis, Indian Plaza Entertainment District: Camelback Road – Buckboard Trail to Civic Center Plaza, City of Scottsdale, Arizona  City of Avondale, Arizona: Downtown Street System Review  City of Oxnard, California: Downtown Revitalization Circulation Study  City of Palmdale, California: Downtown Revitalization Circulation and Parking Study  City of Escondido, California: Downtown Parking and Circulation Analysis  City of Carlsbad, California: Downtown Revitalization Parking and Circulation Study  City of Chula Vista, California: Woodlawn Avenue Alignment Study  City of La Mirada, California: Telegraph Road Traffic Study  City of Scottsdale, Arizona: Downtown Traffic Circulation/Couplet Study  City of Scottsdale, Arizona: Downtown/Civic Center Parking Demand Study National Research Projects Mr. Marum has been involved in a series of national research projects for the Federal Highway Administration, TRB, and NCHRP. These projects included work on the development of the new methodology to determine intersection delay and levels of service at urban signals as detailed in the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). Research conducted by Mr. Marum aided in the creation of new analysis techniques included in Chapters 4 (Weaving Areas) and 9 (Signalized Intersections). Also, Mr. Marum conducted nationwide data collection for developing new methods to analyze the capacity of rural and suburban multilane highways and design guidelines for freeway speed-change lanes.

disci p li ne | int ensit y | collaboration I shared ownership | solutions ALAN FERREIRA, PE Senior Project Manager/Project Engineer YEARS OF EXPERIENCE TOTAL 19 WITH FIRM 4 B.S., Civil Engineering, Arizona State University, 1995 EDUCATION Additional graduate course studies in Transportation Engineering, California State University, Sacramento, CA, 1995-97 LICENSES AND Professional Engineer Arizona #41700 (2004), California #61719 (2001) REGISTRATIONS Board Member of American Society of Highway Engineers (ASHE), American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC), American Public Works Association (APWA) ORGANIZATIONS, TRAINING, Training: Leadership in Engineering Administration Program (LEAP) 2007, ACEC; PUBLICATIONS, AWARDS Road Safety Audits and Road Safety Audits Reviews (NHI Course 380069), FHWA and National Highway Institute; Designing and Implementing Roundabouts, Barry Crown, ADOT Technical Workshop

Alan Ferreira has been a transportation engineer since 1997, with a focus on design, safety planning, and management of various transportation infrastructure design projects. His design experience ranges from arterial streets to urban and rural highways with associated facilities including highway design, traffic interchange design, roundabout layout, maintenance of traffic, AASHTO Controlling Design Criteria and Control of Access Reports, right-of-way plans, scoping documents and pavement design. His projects range from minor and major arterials to urban and rural highways and interchanges. Alan manages multidiscipline design teams experienced in advanced planning; utility and public agency coordination; public meetings; and CADD plan production. Working with both engineers and planners, he has a unique understanding of transportation and safety planning that gives him a unique and valuable perspective as an engineer. Prior to joining Wilson & Company, Alan worked for CalTrans where he developed his vocabulary as a roadway and transportation engineer before moving back to Arizona.

Project Experience  Peart Square 5th Street Construction—City of Casa Grande, AZ | 2016-Ongoing. Project Manager.  On-Call Engineering Services—City of Casa Grande, AZ | 2016-Ongoing. Project Manager. o Florence Boulevard Roundabout Conceptual Layout o Various intersection signal warrant analysis o Trekell Road, State Route 287 Intersection ROW Study o Access Management Guidelines Update o Topographical survey of future Splash Pad at Peart Park

 Deer Valley Trailhead (Final Design)—City of Peoria, AZ | 2016-ongoing. Project Manager.  Deer Valley Trailhead (Scoping)—Maricopa Association of Governments, Peoria, AZ | 2015-2016. Project Manager.  Signal Butte Road, Apache Trail to University--Maricopa County Department of Transportation, City, AZ | 2016. Project Manager.  Honeycutt Signing and Striping—MCDOT, AZ | 2015-2016. Project Manager.  On-Call Traffic Control—San Diego, CA | 2015-Ongoing. Project Manager.  On-Call—City of Phoenix, AZ | 2015-Ongoing. Project Manager.  The Point Design-Build, I-15—Utah Department of Transportation, Salt Lake City, UT | 2015. Project Engineer (Roadway QC & MOT).  Rural Road/Vista Del Cerro Drive Traffic Signal Modification—City of Tempe/Capital Development Partners, Tempe, AZ | 2012-2013. Project Manager.  McCartney Road/Eleven-Mile Corner Road Corridor Studies—ADOT, Coolidge, AZ | 2012-2013. Project Engineer.  Germann Road Corridor Improvements Study—ADOT, Queen Creek, AZ | 2012-2013. Project Engineer.  Central Phoenix Transportation Framework Study—MAG, AZ | 2012-2014. Project Engineer.  Greenway Parkway Feasability Study—MCDOT, AZ | 2013-2014. Project Engineer.  Implementation of the Arizona Strategic Highway Safety Plan—ADOT | 2014-2016. Current Project Manager assisting the ADOT in leading the Implementation Phase of Arizona Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP). Responsibilities include facilitating Emphasis Area teams in developing action plans, tracking progress, and coordinate needed actions through the Arizona SHSP leadership structure. Tasks also include supporting ADOT in the update of Arizona’s Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Manual.

discip li ne | int ensit y | collaboration I shared ownership | solutions

Alan Ferreira, PE | pg. 2

 Updating the Arizona Strategic Highway Safety Plan—ADOT | 2014. Project Manager.  Scoping and Program Management Task Order—Navajo Division of Transportation | 2015. Project Engineer.

Prior Project Experience  On-Call Roadway I-8 Dateland to Aztec—ADOT, AZ | Project Manager.  I-19, Palo Parado – Chavez, Pavement Preservation— ADOT | Project Manager.  On-Call Predesign Engineering, I-40 Coconino National Forest Boundary to Buffalo Range—ADOT, AZ, Project Manager.  On-Call Roadway I-10 San Simon State Line—ADOT, AZ. Project Manager.  I-40 Design Concept Study and Environmental Assessment, Bellemont to Winona—ADOT. Project Engineer.  I-17 DCR and EA, Black Canyon to SR 69—ADOT, project on hold indefinitely. Project Engineer.  I-17 Corridor Study, SR 179 Traffic Interchange to I-40 System Interchange—ADOT.Project Engineer.  SR202L Red Mountain Freeway, Power Road to University Drive—ADOT, Project Engineer.  Red Mountain Power to University-Early Utility Design Services—ADOT, Arizona, Project Engineer.  Charleston Road Improvements, Colombo Drive to Fighting Colt Drive—City of Sierra Vista, AZ, Project Engineer.  Chandler Boulevard and Price 101 Bike Lane—City of Chandler, AZ, Project Engineer.  SR 195 ASH Ext. DCR & Environmental Assessment, I-8, US 95—ADOT, Project cancelled for environmental/public issues, Transportation Engineer.  Low Volume Roads Program, Project Assessments—MCDOT, AZ, Project Engineer.  HES SR 89A Sedona Lighting—ADOT, Sedona, AZ, Transportation.  HES SR 79 Intersection Reconfiguration—ADOT, Florence, AZ, Project Engineer.  HES SR 69, Low Profile Median Barrier—ADOT, Prescott, AZ, Transportation Engineer.  HES SR 177 Curve Realignment—ADOT, Superior, AZ, Transportation Engineer.  SR 89 Center Street to Chino Valley—ADOT, Chino Valley, AZ, Transportation Engineer.  I-17 Dove Valley Traffic Interchange—ADOT, Phoenix, AZ, Transportation Engineer.  I-17 Widening Jomax Road to SR74—ADOT, Phoenix, AZ, Transportation Engineer.  I-17/Jomax Road and Dixileta Drive Traffic Interchange—ADOT, AZ, Transportation Engineer.  SR 51 HOV Shea Boulevard to Junction 101L—ADOT, AZ, Transportation Engineer.  SR 24 Williams Gateway Freeway—ADOT, AZ, Transportation Engineer.  I-90 Master Plan—Illinois State Toll Highway Authority, IL, Transportation Engineer.  I-90 Shoulder Widening—Illinois State Toll Highway Authority, IL, Transportation Engineer.  I-17 Climbing Lane and Auxiliary Lane, ADOT, AZ, Roadway Engineer.  Predesign SR 74 MP13— ADOT, AZ.  Predesign SR 74—ADOT, AZ, Project Engineer.  On Call Assignment J—MCDOT, AZ, Transportation Engineer.  Union Hills/99th Avenue Work Assignment A—MCDOT, AZ, Project Engineer.  Caltrans, Design, and Engineering Services—Caltrans, CA | 1997 to 2004. Directed correspondence to departmental units, other governmental divisions and outside agencies and managed development as a project manager of bidding documents, prepared and reviewed project schedules for delivery of plans, specifications and estimate packages for: o Rural highway rehabilitation and widening for SR 193 in Placer County, CA o An intersection modification with left turn channelization on SR 29 in Lake County, CA o Realignment of 2 miles of existing conventional highway on SR 84 in Alameda County, CA o Production of freeway interchange modification design plans that included a bridge widening, construction of new ramps and existing ramp modification on SR 50 in Yolo County, CA o Developed bidding plans for a park and ride lot project at Mace Blvd interchange on I-80 in Yolo County, CA Managed development of scoping documents for: o Conversion of an at-grade highway intersection to a grade-separated expressway interchange in Lake County, CA o Installation of various ITS Traffic Operations Systems on SR 37 in Marin, Sonoma and Solano Counties, CA o Preliminary design recommendations for a nine-mile highway scoping document that included multiple alternatives, including interchanges for the Willits Bypass on California SR 101, Willits, CA o Developed drainage systems design for SR 193 rehabilitation project Placer County, CA

discip li ne | int ensit y | collaboration I shared ownership | solutions

NATHAN GARDNER, RLS Arizona Survey Manager

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE TOTAL 25 WITH FIRM 3 B.A.S, Technology Management, Northern Arizona University, 2012, Graduated summa cum laude EDUCATION A.A.S., Network Administration, Pima Community College, 2011 A.A.S., Network Security, Pima Community College, 2013 LICENSES AND REGISTRATIONS Professional Surveyor Arizona #36786 (2001), Oregon #89271PLS (2014) ORGANIZATIONS, TRAINING, Arizona Professional Land Surveyors Association, National Society of Professional Surveyors, American PUBLICATIONS, AWARDS Public Works Association

Nate joined Wilson & Company after successfully owning and operating his own professional land surveying business. He also managed survey departments at other firms prior to owning his business. His skills have been honed in boundary, ALTA, route, construction, and construction surveys; minor land divisions; and 3-D laser scanning. He is a skilled collaborator and effective communicator who enjoys fostering strong relationships for successful projects. Nate’s greatest career accomplishments are when his projects have shared ownership between the client, project team, and stakeholders.

Municipal Projects  UT SR149, Utility Locates and Final Right of Way Determination – Muller Engineering Company, Vernal, UT | 2016. Survey Task Leader.  Ruth Zenia Van Duzen Roadways Topographic Survey – Muller Engineering Company, Mad River, CA | 2016. Survey Manager.  Sierra Vista Lane Roadway Topographic Survey and Right of Way Determination – Muller Engineering Company, Carson City, NV | 2016. Survey Manager.  Omni Trans16 Stops Bus Stop Design Surveys – STV, Inc., San Bernardino, CA | 2016. Survey Manager.  Navajo County Cross Section Survey – Bridge and Stream Engineering, Inc., Joseph City, AZ | 2016. Survey Manager.  Peart Square Final Design Survey – City of Casa Grande, AZ | 2016. Survey Task Leader.  1st Street Improvements Survey – Town of Florence, AZ | 2016. Survey Task Leader.  Elevation Certificates – Flood Control District of Maricopa County, Rio Verde, AZ | 2016. Survey Manager.  PVR Description – Flood Control District of Maricopa County, Apache Junction AZ | 2016. Survey Manager.  Torres Property Boundary Survey – Flood Control District of Maricopa County, AZ | 2016. Survey Manager.  67th Avenue Topographic Survey for New Municipal Waterline – Burgess & Niple Inc., Peoria, AZ | 2016 Survey Manager.  Elevation Certificates – Flood Control District of Maricopa County, Scottsdale, AZ | 2015. Survey Manager.  Carefree Waterline Staking – Utility West, LLC, Carefree, AZ | 2015. Survey Manager.  Deer Valley Trailhead Survey – City of Peoria, AZ | 2015. Survey Manager.  Topographic Infill and Structure Surveys on Flood Control Structures – Flood Control District Maricopa County, AZ | 2015. Survey Manager.  Aerial Mapping and Waterline Route Legal Descriptions – EPCOR Water Company, Buckeye, AZ | 2014. Survey Manager.  Ground Survey and Aerial Mapping of Neighborhood Streets – City of Tempe, AZ | 2013. Survey Manager.  Carefree Street Surveying – City of Carefree, AZ | 2013. Survey Manager.  * On-Call Surveying Construction Staking and As-Built Survey – Metro Water, Tucson, AZ | 2008-2009. Survey Manager.  *Rancho Sahuarita Master Planned Community Survey – Rancho Sahuarita Development, Tucson, AZ | 2002-2009. Survey Manager.  *Mariposa Port of Entry Survey – GSA, Nogales, AZ | 2008-2009. Survey Manager.  *Light Rail Project Survey – City of Tucson, AZ | 2008-2009. Survey Manager.

discip li ne | int ensit y | collaboration I shared ownership | solutions

Nathan Gardner | pg. 2

 *Sycamore Park Master Planned Community Survey – Lennar Homes, Tucson, AZ | 2007-2008. Survey Manager.  *CAP Pipeline Extension Survey – Town of Sahuarita, AZ | 2008. Survey Manager.  *Freeport McMoRan Waterline Surveys – Green Valley Water Company, Phoenix, AZ | 2008. Survey Manager.  *Pima County Waste Water Survey Services – Pima County, AZ | 2007. Survey Manager.  *Madera Highlands Master Planned Community Survey – Meritage Homes, Sahuarita, AZ | 2006-2007. Survey Manager.  *Continental Ranch Master Planned Community Survey – Fairfield Homes, Tucson, AZ | 2002-2006. Survey Manager.  *Waste Water System As-Built Survey – City of Sommerton, AZ | 2006. Survey Manager.  *LiDAR Mapping – Santa Cruz County Flood Control District, AZ | 2005. Survey Manager.  *Rincon Trails Master Planned Community Survey – Bakus Realty & Development, Vail, AZ | 2002. Survey Manager.

Private Projects  McQueen Park Topographic Survey for New Water Line – Burgess & Niple, Inc., Gilbert, AZ | 2016. Survey Manager.  EPCOR WP15 Descriptions – Burgess & Niple, Inc., Goodyear, AZ | 2016. Survey Manager.  Northsight ALTA Survey – Freight Sales, Inc., Scottsdale, AZ | 2016. Survey Manager.  Pio Pico As-built ALTA Survey – Pio Pico Energy Center, LLC, San Diego, CA | 2016. Survey Manager.  Zayo Section 6 Survey – ZAYO Group, Sonoita, AZ | 2016. Survey Manager.  Remediation Location and Staking, Cathodic Protection Site Staking – Kinder Morgan/El Paso Gas, AZ | Ongoing. Survey Manager.  Multiple Topographic Surveys, Gas Line Detection, Right of Way Boundaries – Kinder Morgan/El Paso Gas, AZ | Ongoing. Survey Manager.  Chino Valley Line & Hydraulic Survey of Bridge – BNSF, Chino Valley, AZ | 2015. Survey Manager.  Topographic Survey for Waterline Design – David Mason Engineers, Eloy, AZ | 2015. Survey Manager.  ALTA Survey of Commercial Property – Pio Pico, LLC, Otay Mesa, CA | 2015. Survey Manager.  Annexation Map – David Mason Engineers, Eloy, AZ | 2014. Survey Manager.

Airport Projects  *Pinal Air Park Survey – Evergreen Air Center, Marana, AZ | 2007. Survey Manager.  *Bisbee Airport Survey – Cochise County, Bisbee, AZ | 2005. Survey Manager.

Federal Projects

 Otay Mesa Boundary Survey for US Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento – IEA, Inc., Otay Mesa, CA | 2016. Survey Manager.  118ac Survey-Dulzura Boundary Survey and Easement Descriptions for US Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento - Continental Mapping Consultants, Inc., Dulzura, CA | 2016. Survey Task Leader.  Canyon Rims – Federal Highway Administration, Moab, UT | 2015. Survey Manager.  SR149 UT FLAP 149(1) – Federal Highway Administration, Jensen, UT | 2015. Survey Manager.  Tohono O’Odham Nation ITF Surveys and Legal Descriptions - US Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Worth District | 2015. Survey Manager.  Sharpe Army Depot Boundary Surveys – US Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District | 2014. Survey Manager.

discip li ne | int ensit y | collaboration I shared ownership | solutions

Nathan Gardner | pg. 3

 Drafting of Right of Way Plans for Highway 89A – Federal Highway Administration, Central Federal Lands Highway Division, Vista Overlook to Flagstaff, AZ | 2014. Survey Manager.  Arizona Border Boundary Surveys and Legal Descriptions – US Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District, Nogales, AZ, | 2014. Survey Manager.  Aerial Mapping Control, Fossil Creek – US Forest Service, Yavapai County, AZ | 2014. Survey Manager.  Tactical Infrastructure Easement Survey – US Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District, Nogales, AZ | 2013. Survey Manager.  Aerial Mapping Control – US Forest Service, Gila County, AZ | 2013. Survey Manager.  *United States White House Survey – GSA, Washington, DC | 2009. Survey Crew Member.  *San Xavier Research Mine Survey – University of Arizona | 2009. Survey Manager.  *On-Call Survey Services - Davis Monthan Air Force Base, Tucson, AZ | 2004. Survey Manager.

*Projects completed prior to joining Wilson & Company

discip li ne | int ensit y | collaboration I shared ownership | solutions

MARIO JUAREZ-INFANTE, PE Vice President

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE TOTAL 19 WITH FIRM 19 M.S., Transportation Engineering, University of New Mexico, 2000 EDUCATION B.S., Civil Engineering, New Mexico State University, 1997 LICENSES AND REGISTRATIONS Professional Civil Engineer, New Mexico #15340, Texas #89084, Arizona #48616 American Council of Engineering Companies New Mexico Floodplain Managers Association ORGANIZATIONS Border Industrial Association Mesilla Valley Economic Development Alliance

Mario’s strength lies in the versatility of this civil engineering experience, coupled with his dedication to building successful relationships with clients and stakeholders. Over the past 19 years Mario has managed many multi-disciplinary teams, and is known for leading teams to produce high-quality, on-time, and on-budget projects. Educational and project experience lie in the Urban Transportation, Urban Hydrology, and Urban Planning. He specializes in hydrology/hydraulics, analysis, erosion control, water quality, channel stability, geometric roadway design, and student drop-off/pick-up zone planning and design. Project experience ranges from recreation and athletic facilities, multi-purpose flood control facilities, urban roadway design, transportation-related drainage designs, large flood control dams, and open channel stability; scour analysis, floodway delineation and Clean Water Act permitting.

He has been responsible for project development, funding assistance, and design over the past 18 years. During his career he has enjoyed a record of successfully identifying funding opportunities and assisting communities to acquire funding packages required to implement the desired capital projects. In accomplishing these funding tasks he has developed solid relationships with key staff at many of the agencies and programs overseeing funding outcomes. Mario works closely with regulatory and funding agencies to ensure that projects move forward in a timely manner, the funding agencies’ requirements are met, and the owner’s interest is represented.

Stormwater Management  Village of Columbus\Port of Entry Master Drainage Plan, Columbus, NM – Luna County, Principal-in-Charge for the funding assistance and Right-of-Way acquision planning for the future LPOE Diversion Berms | Present  Black Mesa Pipeline Phase IA, Albuquerque, NM – AMAFCA, Mr. Juarez-Infante served as Principal-in-Charge for Black Mesa Phase IA, which consists of designing a pressurized pipe network that connects the outlets of McCoy, Don Felipe, and Raymac Dams to an existing 54-inch pressure storm drain located in Raymac Road which was constructed as part of Black Mesa Phase I.  La Presa Detention Facility and West I-40 Diversion Channel, Albuquerque, NM - AMAFCA, Design Engineer for this multipurpose flood control and recreation facility with a storage capacity of 96 acre-feet and peak discharge of approximately 413 cfs.| 2012-2015.  UPRR Strauss Run-through Fueling Facility, Crew Change and Intermodal Block Swap Yard, Santa Teresa, NM - UPRR, A run-through fueling facility, crew change and intermodal block swap yard within approximately 1,000 acres of land located near Santa Teresa, New Mexico for the Union Pacific Rail Road (UPRR) – Drainage Design and Review | 2012- 2015  Village of Columbus\Port of Entry Master Drainage Plan, Columbus, NM – NMDOT – Project Manager for this Binational Master Drainage Plan for USCAE, Luna County, NMDOT District 1, GSA, Village of Columbus, IBWC/CILA, Obras Publicas de Palomas. | 2009 - 2010  Southwest Valley Storm Drain Improvements at Rio Grande High School, Albuquerque, NM – AMAFCA\APS, Project Manager for the Design of a 78”x48” double diversion storm drain pipe, outfall pond and drainage system for Rio Grande High School and the surrounding South Valley Area. | 2010 - 2011  Southeast Valley Water Quality and Drainage Management Plan, Albuquerque, NM – AMAFCA, Study for an approximately 11 square mile mix of industrial, commercial, agricultural and residential areas. | 2011 -2012

discip li ne | int ensit y | collaboration I shared ownership | solutions

Mario Juarez-Infante, PE | pg. 2

Transportation\Highway  Santa Teresa Border Area Transportation Needs Assessment and Strategic Plan – NMDOT, Project Manager for the study to aggregate all previous regional plans, studies and reports and prioritize transportation infrastructure projects for the area. | 2015 - Current  NMDOT Chihuahua/New Mexico Border Master Plan – Dona Ana County, sub-consultant to Stantec supporting TWG/PAC stakeholder meetings, public meeting assitance, and civil infrastructure cost estimating | Present  Airport Road, Las Cruces, NM – Dona Ana County, Principal-in-Charge for the TIGER Grant application and Phase I A/B Report | Present  Nimitz Drive Phase II, Grants, NM – City of Grants, Project Manager for the design of new roadway and waterline improvements including storm drainage and sanitary sewer. | 2012  Nimitz Bridge Replacement, Grants, NM – City of Grants, Principal-in-Charge for design of a single-span prestressed concrete bridge over the Rio San Jose. | 2009 – 2010  Unser Boulevard Cherry Road to King Boulevard, Rio Rancho NM - Design Engineer for widening the roadway from two undivided lanes to four divided lanes with room for expansion to six lanes in the future, requiring extensive right of way acquisition. | 2009.  US 64 Environmental Assessment and Alignment Study, Bloomfield to Farmington NM – Design Engineer for the design of three separate segments of roadway, including the widening of the existing four lane highway to a six lane urban/semi urban arterial. | 2001.  District 4 Right-of-Way Encroachment Drainage Study, MP 330m Serafina, NM – NMDOT, Project Manager for study encompassing I-25 right-of-way encompassing a residential dwelling and public right-of-way. | 2010  District 6 Nizhoni to South and Intersection of Maloney Ave. and Allison Road to North, NM – NMDOT, Project Manager for transportation planning, drainage, exisiting right-of-way mapping and utlity designation and relocation design. | 2009  NM 64 Widening, Farmington to Bloomfield, NM – NMDOT, Drainage Engineer responsible for preliminary recommendations for drainage structures along a six-mile section of NM 64. | 2008 School Facilities Athletic Facilities  Sierra MS/Sunrise ES/Desert Hills ES Basketball Court Upgrade  Cesar Chavez ES/ Jornada ES/ Tombaugh ES Baseketball Court Upgrade  John Adams Middle School Post-Tensioned Basketball Court Facility  La Cueva High School Tennis Courts  Oñate High School Tennis Court Maintenance Contract Specifications  Grant Middle School Track Installation Project  Washington Middle School Track Installation Project  El Dorado Tennis Court Replacement  Cibola High School Track & Field Improvements  Del Norte High School Track & Field Improvements  Manzano High School Track & Field Improvements  Milne Stadium Football Field and Track & Field Improvements  Wilson Stadium Football Field and Track & Field Improvements  Cibola High School Tennis Courts  Sandia High School Tennis Courts  West Mesa High School Baseball Field Synthetic Turf

discip li ne | int ensit y | collaboration I shared ownership | solutions

AMY MORAN Senior Project Manager

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE TOTAL 24 WITH FIRM 13 EDUCATION BS, Civil Engineering, Cornell University, 1993 ORGANIZATIONS, TRAINING, Institute of Transportation Engineers PUBLICATIONS, AWARDS

Amy Moran has nearly 25 years of transportation planning and traffic engineering experience, and has spent the last 20 years assisting federal, state, local, and private clients in the Phoenix area and southwest region. She has served as Project Manager, Deputy PM or project planner/engineer in a wide range of studies, including long-range transportation planning, traffic impact analyses, corridor feasibility and design studies, access management studies, parking studies, and signal warrant and progression studies. Her projects have involved the application of a variety of traffic analysis software, including HCS, Synchro, VISSIM, and TransModeler, as well as traffic forecasting software models, including TransCAD and VISUM.

Project Experience

Area Studies  Transportation Plan Update—City of Avondale, AZ | 2017–Ongoing. Project Manager.  Comprehensive Plan – Sunland Park, NM | 2016-Ongoing. Project Task Manager.  Long Range Transportation Plan Update—ADOT, statewide, AZ | 2015-Ongoing. Project Task Manager.  Area Transportation Plan and Implementation Support Services—City of Maricopa, AZ | 2014-Ongoing. Project Manager.  Regional Transportation Plan—Yuma Metropolitan Planning Organization (YMPO), Yuma, AZ | 2013-2014 and 2016- 2017. Project Task Manager.  Santa Teresa Border Area Transportation Needs Assessment—NMDOT, NM | 2015-2016. Project Task Manager.  Downtown Parking Study—City of Albuquerque, NM | 2015-2016. Project Task Manager.  New Mexico-Chihuahua Border Master Plan—NM | 2014-2015. Project Task Manager.  Regional Transportation Plan—SCMPO, AZ | 2014-2015. Project Task Manager.  Regional Transportation Plan—Central Arizona Governments (CAG), Gila and Pinal Counties, AZ | 2011-2015. Project Manager.  City of Yuma Transportation Master Plan—Yuma, AZ | 2013-2014. Project Manager.  Central Phoenix Transportation Framework Study—MAG, Phoenix, AZ | 2010-2014. Project Manager.  Comprehensive Downtown Transportation Study—City of Phoenix, AZ | 2010-2014. Project Manager.  Transportation Improvement Program Evaluation – MCDOT, AZ | 2013. Project Manager.  Arizona-Sonora Border Master Plan—ADOT, AZ | 2011-2013. Project Task Manager.  Transportation Needs Study for the Foothills and Mesa Del Sol Areas—ADOT, Yuma, AZ | 2011-2012. Project Manager.  Neighborhood Electric Vehicle Research Study—MCDOT, AZ | 2011. Project Manager.  Nob Hill Parking Study—City of Albuquerque, NM | 2010-2011. Project Task Manager.  Hassayampa Framework Study for the Wickenburg Area—MAG, AZ | 2009-2011. Project Manager.  Downtown Traffic Circulation Study—City of Casa Grande, AZ | 2009-2010. Project Manager.  Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) and IRR Inventory Update—Ak-Chin Indian Community, AZ | 2009-2010. Project Manager.  Transportation Improvement Plan Analysis—MCDOT, AZ | 2009. Project Manager.  Transportation Master Plan Assistance—MCDOT, Buckeye, AZ | 2009. Project Task Manager.  Development Impact Fee Program Development—Maricopa County, AZ | 2008-2009. Project Task Manager.  City of Casa Grande Small Area Transportation Study (SATS) —City of Casa Grande, AZ | 2007. Project Planner.  City of Avondale Old Town Revitalization Area Network Analysis Project—City of Avondale, AZ | 2008. Project Planner.  CIP Prioritization—City of Peoria, AZ | 2007-2008. Project Planner.  I-8/I-10 Hidden Valley Transportation Framework Study—MAG, Maricopa and Pinal counties, AZ | 2006-2008. Project Task Manager.

discip li ne | int ensit y | collaboration I shared ownership | solutions Amy Moran | pg. 2

 Arizona Parkway Intersection/Interchange Operational Analysis and Design Concepts Study—MCDOT, Maricopa County, AZ | 2007. Project Task Manager.  Apache County Subregional Transportation Plan—Apache County, AZ | 2006-2007. Project Planner.  I-0/Hassayamapa Valley Framework Study—MAG, AZ | 2006-2007. Project Planner.  Navajo County Subregional Transportation Plan – Navajo County, AZ | 2006-2007. Project Task Manager.

Corridor Studies  University Drive Complete Streets Study—San Diego, CA | 2017-Ongoing. Project Manager  NM-11 Corridor Study—Luna County, NM | 2017-Ongoing. Project Task Manager.  Paseo del Norte Corridor Study – NMDOT, Albuquerque, NM | 2017-Ongoing. Project Task Manager.  Thornton Road Design Concept Road—City of Casa Grande, AZ | 2017-Ongoing. Project Task Manager.  US 191: Chinle to Many Farms Safety Improvement Study—ADOT, Navajo Nation, AZ | 2017–Ongoing. Project Manager.  Kortsen Traffic Interchange Assessment—City of Casa Grande, AZ | 2017. Project Manager.  Camelback Road Signal System Study—City of Phoenix, AZ | 2017-Ongoing. Project Manager.  Columbus LPOE Diversion Berm—Columbus, NM | 2016-Ongoing. Project Task Manager.  US 93/US 60 Corridor Profile Study—ADOT, AZ | 2015-Ongoing. Project Manager.  I-10/I-17 Spine Corridor Master Plan—MAG, AZ | 2014-Ongoing. Project Manager.  Design Concept Report and Environmental Studies: SR 189/Mariposa Road—ADOT, Nogales, AZ | 2011-Ongoing. Project Task Manager.  Airport Road Phase A/B Report – Santa Teresa, NM | 2016. Project Task Manager.  Greenway Thompson Ranch Pedestrian Enhancements —MAG, Surprise, AZ | 2016-2017. Project Manager.  Intersection Signal Warrant Analyses—City of Casa Grande, AZ | 2015-2016. Project Manager.  I-10 and Estrella Parkway—MAG, AZ | 2015. Project Manager.  Honeycutt Road Complete Street Analysis—City of Maricopa, AZ | 2015. Project Manager.  Access Management Guidelines Update (On-Call task) —City of Casa Grande, AZ | 2015. Project Manager.  Ehrenburg Traffic Interchange Assessment—ADOT, AZ | 2014. Project Manager.  Greenway Parkway Corridor Feasibility Study —Maricopa County Department of Transportation MCDOT, AZ | 2013- 2014. Project Manager.  Design Concept Report and Environmental Studies: SR-347—Maricopa, AZ | 2012-2013. Project Task Manager.  Germann Road Corridor Improvement Study— ADOT, Queen Creek, AZ | 2011-2013. Project Manager.  White & Parker Road/MCGH Interchange Design and Major Investment Study— Maricopa, AZ | 2010-2011. Project Task Manager.  Espanola-Main Street Phase A/B Report—Espanola, NM | 2010-2011.  Cottonwood Lane Reconstruction Corridor Analysis—City of Casa Grande, AZ | 2008-2009. Project Task Manager.  Turner Parkway Corridor Feasibility Study – MCDOT, Buckeye, AZ | 2008-2009. Project Task Manager.  El Mirage Design Concept Report & Environmental Assessment—MCDOT, El Mirage, AZ | 2008. Project Task Manager.  City of Maricopa Regional Transportation Plan Update—City of Maricopa, AZ | 2007-2008. Project Planner.  Jackrabbit Trail Access Control and Corridor Improvement Study—Buckeye, AZ | 2007-2008. Project Planner.  US-60/Grand Avenue Access Control Plan—Surprise, AZ | 2007-2009. Project Planner.  NMDOT Engineering On-Call, US-64 TIGER Grant Assistance—New Mexico Department of Transportation, NM | 2009. Planner and Grant Writer.  Maricopa Casa Grande Highway Project Assessment – City of Maricopa, AZ | 2006-2007. Project Planner.  Bell Road Access Control Study – Surprise, AZ | 2006-2007. Project Task Manager.  Patton/Jomax Road Corridor Study – MCDOT, Surprise, AZ | 2005. Project Task Manager.  Meridian Road Corridor Study – Maricopa County, AZ | 2004-2005. Project Planner.  Central I-5 Corridor Study—San Diego, CA | 2004. Project Planner.

discip li ne | int ensit y | collaboration I shared ownership | solutions Mario Juarez-Infante, PE | pg. 3

Site Work “Grading & Drainage Plans”  Sweeny Elementary School Grading & Drainage Plan  Capshaw Middle School Grading & Drainage Plan  Capital High School Grading & Drainage Plan  Long Fellow Elementary School Grading & Drainage Plan  Madison Middle School Grading & Drainage Plan  West Mesa High School Drainage Master Plan  Griegos Elementary School Grading & Drainage  Freedom High School Gymnasium and Parking Lot Grading & Drainage  Head Start Safety Improvements  Hermosa Heights Drainage Improvements  Mark Twain Elementary School Grading & Drainage  Van Buren Middle School Grading & Drainage  Sandia High School Drainage

Parking Lot Design  Del Norte High School Parking Lot and Bus Turnaround Lane  Eisenhower Middle School Bus Lane Addition  Grant Middle School Parking Lot Expansion  Hubert Humphrey Student Drop-off/Pick-Up Lane & Parking Lot Improvements  Sombra Del Monte Elementary School Student Drop-off/Pick-Up Lane & Parking Lot  Van Buren Middle School Parking Lot  Wilson Middle School Student Drop-off/Pick-Up Lane and Parking Lot Addition  Sandia High School Student Drop-off/Pick Up Lane  Agua Fria Elementary School Parking and Drainage  Kearny Elementary School Parking and Drainage

Recreational Facilities \ Athletic Facilities  City Park, Hobbs, NM – This 10-acre park is the old recreational facility in Hobbs, NM. The scope of work included Master Planning, Design and Construction Management for a $4.5M facility that serves multi-generational users. The site is contiguous with Murray Elementary was a cost share facility among the City of Hobbs, Hobbs School District, and the J.F. Maddox Foundation.  Grants Skate Park, Grants, NM – City of Grants, 8750 square foot modular skatepark with parking lot. Worked with local youth to determine features they would prefer in the skatepark and coordinated with manufacturer to stay within the city budget.| 2012- 2013. Project Manager  Tingley Park Flood Control Facility and Park Reconstruction, Albuquerque, NM – City of Albuquerque, 10 acre park with 8.5 acres detention storage. Park renovation included flag football fields, picnic areas, playground, restrooms, fitness equipment, running paths, and baseball fields. | 2009-2010. Lead Design Engineer.  The Taylor Ranch Phase 1, Hobbs, NM – City of Hobbs. 230 acre master planned multi-use park that will include lake for fishing, a stage on the water’s edge, a large grass lawn facing the stage, a family entertainment center, a soccer complex, an discip li ne | int ensit y | collaboration I shared ownership | solutions

Mario Juarez-Infante, PE | pg. 4

all-wheel sports facility, a Skatepark, zip line, batting cages, amphitheater, jogging/walking trails, and playgrounds.| 2015- Ongoing. Project Manager.  Southwest Activity Node Park (SWAN) Phase 1, Santa Fe, NM– City of Santa Fe. 98 acre master planned multi-use park that will include multipurpose fields for both a softball and soccer. Also included is an extensive sidewalk and trail system, a bi-level playground, potable and reuse water systems; and arroyo and drainage improvements. Wilson & Company also provided conceptual design of grading and drainage improvements, utilities, roadway, and parking. | 2013-Ongoing. Principal-in-Charge / QA/QC.  Santa Fe High School Ivanhead Stadium, Santa Fe, NM – Santa Fe Public Schools. The improvements included the conversion of a natural to artificial turf field. Site improvements included removal of top soil and sod, removal of the existing irrigation system, ADA accessibility, and off-site and on-site drainage infrastructure. | 2013. Project Manager  Capital High School Turf Improvements Project, Santa Fe, NM – Santa Fe Public Schools. Project Manager for improvements to the track and field facilities which included the installation of a new ARP-Platinum Synthetic Turf and TuffDrain System along with on-site drainage improvements. | 2009

discip li ne | int ensit y | collaboration I shared ownership | solutions

Amy Moran | pg. 3

Traffic Impact Studies  67th Avenue & McDowell Road Traffic Impact Study – City of Phoenix, AZ | 2017 – Ongoing. Project Manager.  Industrial Site Traffic Assessment – City of Phoenix, AZ | 2017. Project Manager.  Market West Square Traffic Assessment – City of Surprise, AZ | 2016. Project Manager.  Sterling Pines Traffic Impact Analysis – Flagstaff, AZ | 2016. Project Manager.  83rd Avenue & Thunderbird Traffic Impact Analysis – City of Peoria, AZ | 2015. Project Manager.  Park Lake & Family Entertainment Center Traffic Assessment – Hobbs, NM | 2014-2015. Project Task Manager.  Montgomery Complex Master Plan Traffic Assessment – Albuquerque, NM | 2014-2015. Project Task Manager.  Biltmore Club Redevelopment Traffic Assessment – City of Phoenix, AZ | 2014. Project Manager  Solid Waste Transfer Station Traffic Impact Analysis – City of Albuquerque, NM | 2013-2014. Project Task Manager.  3rd & 4th Streets Traffic Impact Analysis, City of Albuquerque, NM | 2012-2013. Project Task Manager.  Business Park Master Plan – City of Casa Grande, AZ | 2012. Project Task Manager.  Taos County Court House Traffic Impact Analysis – Taos, NM | 2011. Project Task Manager.  CMRR/Pajarito Road Study—Los Alamos County, NM | 2010-2011. Transportation Planner.  Los Alamos Fire Station Traffic Impact Analysis – LANL, Los Alamos, NM | 2010. Project Task Manager.  TA-61 Concrete Batch Plant Traffic Assessment – LANL, Los Alamos, NM | 2010. Project Task Manager.  Security Enhancement Traffic Assessment – LANL, Los Alamos, NM | 2010. Project Task Leader  US Foodservice Traffic Impact Analysis – Albuquerque, NM | 2010. Project Task Manager.  Ak-Chin Fire Station Traffic Assessment – Ak-Chin, AZ | 2010. Project Manager.  Jemez Road Safety Enhancement – LANL, Los Alamos, NM | 2010. Project Task Manager.  Santa Fe Schools Traffic Impact Analyses— Santa Fe, NM | 2009-2011. Project Task Manager.  Traffic Impact Analyses—Albuquerque Public Schools, Albuquerque, NM | 2009-2011. Project Task Manager.  Peoria Sports Complex District Urban Design Study—Peoria, AZ | 2008-2010. Project Task Manager.  City North Traffic Impact Analysis – City of Phoenix, AZ | 2008-2009. Deputy Project Manager  Santa Fe Community College Traffic Impact Study— Santa Fe, NM | 2008. Transportation Planner.  CMRR Traffic Impact Analysis – LANL, Los Alamos, NM | 2008. Project Task Maanger.  Indian Plaza Traffic Impact and Mitigation Analysis—City of Scottsdale, AZ | 2007-2008. Deputy Project Manager.  Desert Ridge Traffic Impact Analysis – City of Phoenix, AZ | 2005-2007. Deputy Project Manager.  Wood Corporate Campus Traffic Impact Analysis – Goodyear, AZ | 2005. Project Planner.  San Diego Ballpark Traffic Study—City of San Diego, CA | 2004. Transportation Planner.

discip li ne | int ensit y | collaboration I shared ownership | solutions Jim Townsend | pg. 1

JIM K. TOWNSEND, AICP Midwest Region Transportation Planning Manager Senior Transportation Project Manager YEARS OF EXPERIENCE TOTAL 23 WITH FIRM 11 BS, Urban and Regional Planning, California State Polytechnic University, 1993 Continuing Education: Identification and Treatment of High Hazard Locations, Northwestern University, Multimodal Freight Forecasting in Transportation Planning, NHI, Public Involvement in the Transportation Decision Making EDUCATION Process, NHI, Linking Planning and NEPA, NTI, Coordinating Transportation and Land Use, NTI, Systematic Development of Informed Consent, IPMP, Practical Project Development and Environmental Documentation, Highway Capacity Analysis, McTrans Center, University of Florida, Advanced ArcInfo GIS, ESRI, Access Management, Location, and Design, NTI LICENSES AND REGISTRATIONS American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP), Reg.#091845 American Institute of Certified Planners; American Planning Association, AZ, OK, MO, KS Chapters American Planning Association Transportation Planning Division Missouri Representative

Presentation: “MPO & COG Guidelines and Procedures Manual” – 2013 Rural Transportation Summit, Prescott, Arizona, 2014 Roads & Streets Conference, Tucson, Arizona, 2014 WASHTO Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico; “A Design-Build Approach for Expediting Procurement, Design and Construction of Transportation Maintenance Programs” – 2012 WASHTO Conference, Colorado Springs, Colorado, 2012 Transportation ORGANIZATIONS, TRAINING, Engineers Association of Missouri (TEAM) Conference, Branson, Missouri, 2013 Utah APWA Annual PUBLICATIONS, AWARDS Conference, 2013 Arizona APWA Annual Conference; “City of Coolidge Comprehensive Transportation Feasibility Study” – 2012 Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Roads and Streets Conference, 2012 Missouri/Kansas Joint State APA Conference; “Access Management/Balancing Land Use & Transportation” – 2006 Missouri State APA Conference, Springfield, Missouri Jim Townsend, AICP, “Innovative Design-Build Road Maintenance Strategy: A Proven Direction for Kansas City,” APWA Reporter June 2012. Publications: Jim Townsend, AICP, “Innovative Design-Build Road Maintenance Strategy: A Proven Direction for Kansas City,” Missouri Municipal League’s The Review July 2012. Jim leads our Midwest Region Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering practice, offering experience from both private and public sectors. Jim’s broad-based, multimodal background and exposure allows him to provide national experience to his clients. His planning and operations background have provided community direction and proven cost effective sustainable solutions. His transit and non-motorized experience has allowed him to integrate multimodal elements into communities contemplating initiating or expanding multimodal services. His diverse experience has also included County and State DOT service providing public sector perspectives in his private sector solutions. Above all, Jim’s ability to communicate with several different audiences, from the technical engineer to the elected official to the lay person at a public meeting, provides clients with a collaborative process for consensus building with any project Jim leads or directs. Jim has formulated regional plans in cooperation with state, regional, local and MPO organizations; he has developed technical studies for plan and program implementation; as well as facilitated elected official and citizen outreach efforts for committees, studies, and plans.

Relevant Projects Design Build  Design-Build Alternative Delivery Program Development for Roadway Construction Projects – Kansas City, MO, Program Manager.  Design-Build Program Design-Review Services – Kansas City, MO, Principal. Statewide Planning  Major Projects Prioritization – MO, Planning Task Manager.  Arizona Department of Transportation MPO and COG Procedures and Guidelines Manual – AZ. Project Manager.  Arizona Strategic Highway Safety Plan– AZ. Principal Planner.  Linking NEPA and Planning – MO, MoDOT Team Member.*  Missouri Freight Study – MO, MoDOT Team Member.*

discipline | intensity | collaboration I shared ownership | solutions

Jim Townsend | pg. 2

 Missouri Passenger Study – MO, MoDOT Team Member.*  Reauthorization Team – MO, MoDOT Team Member.*  Planning Framework Implementation Team – MO, MoDOT Team Member.* Regional Planning  Coolidge, Arizona Comprehensive Transportation Feasibility Study – AZ. Project Manager and Transportation Planner.  Southern Navajo County Transportation Plan – Navajo County, AZ. Principal Planner.  Central Navajo County Transportation Plan – Navajo County, AZ. Project Manager.  Central Phoenix Transportation Framework Study – Phoenix, AZ. Quality Control/Quality Assurance Task Manager and the Existing Conditions Assessment Task Manager.  Snowflake-Taylor Multijurisdictional Transportation Plan – AZ. Project Manager and Principle Planner.  Long Range Transportation Plan Update (2009, 2014), Navajo Nation – Arizona, New Mexico, Utah, Project Manager.  Central Arizona Association of Governments Long Range Transportation Plan – AZ. Project Manager.  High Plains Highway Corridor Development Plan – CO, Project Manager  Jefferson County Countywide Transportation Plan Update – Jefferson County, CO, Project Manager  Jefferson County CDOT County Hearing Process – Jefferson County, CO, Project Manager  MPO Transportation Advisory Committee Member (DRCOG)*  MPO TDM Committee Member (Vice-chair)*  MPO Travel Demand Model Technical Committee Member (DRCOG)*  2025 Regional Transportation Plan (DRCOG)*  2030 Regional Transportation Plan (DRCOG)* Community Planning  Multimodal Integration Plan – Flint Hills MPO. Project Manager.  North Central Regional Transit District ADA Transition Plan – New Mexico. Project Manager.  North Central Regional Transit District Taos ADA Transition Plan – Taos, New Mexico. Project Manager.  Santa Teresa Border Area Master Plan – Santa Teresa, NM. Transit Task Manager.  Gladstone Bicycle and Pedestrian Connections Study – Gladstone, MO. Project Manager.  Gladstone Pedestrian Master Plan – Gladstone, MO. Principal / QA/QC.  Linking Historic Old Town Lenexa – City of Lenexa, KS / MARC. Wilson PM / Transportation Planning Lead  Linking Historic Shawnee – City of Shawnee, KS / MARC. Wilson PM / Transportation Planning Lead  Area Transportation Plan – City of Maricopa, AZ. Complete Streets Policy Task Manager.  City of San Diego, Complete Boulevard Concept Design – San Diego, CA. Project Manager/Principal.  Navajo Nation, On-Call – NM, AZ, UT. Transportation Planning Manager.  Navajo Nation 2016 Long Range Transportation Plan – NM, AZ, UT. Project Manager.  Navajo Nation 2009 Long Range Transportation Plan – NM, AZ, UT. Project Manager.  Navaion Nation Tribal Transportation Improvement Program Redefinition – NM, AZ, UT. Project Manager.  Pueblo of Isleta, On-Call – Isleta Pueblo, NM. Transportation Planning Manager.  Pueblo of Isleta Transit Feasibility Study, NM. Project Manager.  City of Hutchinson, Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan – Hutchinson, KS. Project Manger/Principal. discipline | intensity | collaboration I shared ownership | solutions

Jim Townsend | pg. 3

 City of Hutchinson, Main Street (7th to 30th) Concept Plan – Hutchinson, KS. Project Manager/Principal.  63rd Street Assessment and Capital Improvement Program – Kansas City, MO, Project Manager.  Comprehensive Plan – Blue Springs, MO, Project Manager.  Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan – Ottawa, KS, Project Manager.  MAG Designing Transit Accessible Communities – AZ. Project Manager.  Comprehensive Transportation Feasibility Plan – Coolidge, AZ. Project Manager and Transportation Planner.  Multijurisdictional Transportation Plan – Snowflake and Taylor, AZ. Project Manager and Transportation Planner.  General Plan – Duncan, OK. Project Manager and Transportation Planner.  Comprehensive Plan – Holcomb, KS. Project Manager and Transportation Planner.  Conifer/US-285 Corridor Area Community Plan – Jefferson County, CO. Transportation Task Manager.  Evergreen Plan – Evergreen, CO. Transportation Task Manager.  Central Plains Plan – Jefferson County, CO. Transportation Task Manager.  South Plains Plan – Jefferson County, CO. Transportation Task Manager.  Call-N-Ride – Evergreen, CO. Technical Representative. Safety Analysis  Navajo Nation Strategic Transportation Safety Plan – AZ, NM, UT. Project Manager.  Central Arizona Governments (CAG) Strategic Transportation Safety Plan, Arizona. Wilson Project Manager / Analysis Lead.  Arizona Strategic Highway Safety Plan – Arizona. Analysis Lead.  Mary Street Pedestrian Crossing – Lansing, KS. Project Manager.  1995-2002 Jefferson County High Crash Location Studies – Jefferson County, CO. Project Manager.*  1999 Jefferson County Safety Improvement Program – Jefferson County, CO. Project Manager .*  2002 Jefferson County Safety Improvement Program – Jefferson County, CO. Task Manager.*  SH 93 Safety Study, Jefferson County, CO. Project Manager.* Operational/Concept Studies  City of San Diego, Complete Boulevard Study – San Diego, CA. Project Manager.  City of Rio Rancho, Intersection Enhancements: Bicycle & Pedestrian Safety– Rio Rancho, NM. Planning Manager.  City of Albuquerque, Intersection Enhancements: Bicycle & Pedestrian Safety– Albuquerque, NM. Planning Manager.  Magnolia Road Urban Widening Project (Ohio Street to Flood Levee)– Salina, KS. Quality Control Manager.  Magnolia Development Properties– Salina, KS. Project Planner.  K-7/I-70 Lowe’s Traffic Impact Assessment– Bonner Springs, KS. Project Planner.  South 9th Street Corridor Analysis– Salina, KS. Quality Control Manager.  Litchfield Park Condominium Development Traffic Impact Assessment– Phoenix, AZ. Project Planner and Analyst.  Rosewood Plaza Traffic Impact Assessment– Phoenix, AZ. Project Planner.  ICOP Headquarters Traffic Impact Assessment– Lenexa, KS. Project Planner.  31st Street Concept Alignment Study– Lawrence, Douglas County, KS. Traffic, Safety, Environmental and Planning Analyses Lead.  US-169/96th Street Corridor Study– Kansas City, MO. Traffic, Safety, Environmental and Planning Analyses Lead.  US-169/108th Street Corridor Study– Kansas City, MO. Traffic, Safety, Environmental and Planning Analyses Lead. discipline | intensity | collaboration I shared ownership | solutions

Jim Townsend | pg. 4

 US-169/108th Street Interchange Study– Kansas City, MO. Traffic, Safety, Environmental and Planning Analyses Lead.  K-96 Location Study– Nickerson to Sterling, KS. Task Manager.  Parvin Road Alignment Study– Kansas City, MO. Project Manager.  Porter Avenue Corridor Study– Norman, OK. Project Manager.  I-435/Front Street Transportation Demand Management– MO. Principal Transportation Planner and Wilson & Company Project Manager.  Bell Road Access Control Study– Surprise, AZ. Principal Planner.  US-60/Grand Avenue Access Management Plan– Phoenix, AZ. Project Manager and Principal Planner.  US-60/Grand Avenue COMPASS Access Management Plan– Phoenix, AZ. Wilson Project Manager and Principal Planner.  KS Wesleyan University Traffic Study– Salina, KS. Technical Lead.  223rd Street Corridor Study– Spring Hill, KS. Project Manager.  Brenham Frontage Road Access Management Plan and Backage Road Plan– Brenham, TX. Project Manager.  McIntyre Street– Jefferson County, CO. Project Manager.*  52nd Avenue– Jefferson County, CO. Project Manager.*  32nd Avenue– Jefferson County, CO. Project Manager.*  SH-74/JC-73 Intersection– Jefferson County, CO. Task Manager.*  Wide Acres Neighborhood Transportation Study– Jefferson County, CO. Project Manager.* PEL/NEPA Studies  Broadway Bridge PEL – City of Kansas City, MO. PEL Manager.  McCartney Road Planning & Environmental Linkages Studies– Coolidge, AZ. Project Manager.  Eleven Mile Corner Road Planning & Environmental Linkages Studies– Coolidge, AZ. Project Manager.  I-70 PEIS– Denver to Glenwood Springs, CO. Technical Advisory Team Member.*  US-285 EA– Conifer to Bailey, CO. Technical Advisory Team Member.*  Access to Gaming EIS– Golden to Blackhawk/Central City, CO. Technical Advisory Team Member.*  C-470 Value Express Lanes Feasibility Study/EA– Denver, CO. Technical Working Group Member.*  West Corridor EIS– Denver to Golden, CO. Technical Advisory Team Member.* MIS Studies  I-15 North Corridor MIS– Salt Lake City, UT. Traffic Operations and Alternatives Analyst.  Salt Lake Region Long Range Transit Study– Salt Lake, UT. Alternative Analyst.  Gold Line MIS– Denver to Golden, CO. Technical Advisory Team Member.  Tampa MIS– Tampa, FL. Alternative Analyst.  Dallas MIS - Stemmons Corridor– Dallas, TX.  West Corridor MIS– Denver to Golden, CO. Alternative Analyst. Miscellaneous Studies/Plans  Waterfront Red Car Line Streetcar Expansion Feasibility Study– Port of Los Angeles, CA. Project Manager and Principal Planner.  I-435/Front Street Transportation Demand Management– MO. Principal Transportation Planner and Wilson & Company Project Manager.

discipline | intensity | collaboration I shared ownership | solutions

Jim Townsend | pg. 5

 Jefferson County Traffic Impact Fee Program– Jefferson County, CO. Project Manager.  South Jefferson County Road Improvement District– Jefferson County, CO. Task Manager.  US-285/Simms Interchange– Jefferson County, CO. Task Manager.  Clear Creek Master Plan– Jefferson County, CO. Technical Advisory Team Member, Transportation.  Denver Pepsi Center Air Quality Analysis– Denver, CO. Task Manager.  Central Area General Improvement District Parking/Utilization Study– Boulder, CO. Task Manager.  City of Fort Collins Downtown Parking/Utilization Study– Fort Collins, CO. Task Manager.  University of CO Health Sciences Center Parking Analysis– Denver, CO. Data Analyst.  White House Parking/Utilization Study– Washington DC. Task Manager. *Projects/assignment completed prior to joining Wilson & Company.

discipline | intensity | collaboration I shared ownership | solutions

ADSPO18-00007887 Project Experience Number of Projects and Revenue ADSPO18-00007887 2018 Professional Services Qualifications List(save document as a .pdf and submit as an attachment with offer submission). FIRMS NAME: Wilson & Company, Inc., Engineers & Architects

TYPE OF PROJECT TOTAL NUMBER OF FIRM Using the Revenue Using the Revenue TYPE OF PROJECT TOTAL NUMBER OF Using the Revenue Using the Revenue PROJECTS (ALL FIRM Index (Enter 1‐10) Index (Enter 1‐10) FIRM PROJECTS (ALL Index (Enter 1‐10) Index (Enter 1‐10) Professional Services Revenue LOCATIONS) COMPLETED indicate the indicate the FIRM LOCATIONS) indicate the indicate the Index Number IN LAST THREE YEARS approximate revenue approximate revenue COMPLETED IN LAST approximate revenue approximate the firm has earned the firm has earned THREE YEARS the firm has earned revenue the firm 1. Less than $100,000 over the last three over the last three over the last three has earned over the 2. $100,000 to less than $250,000 years from ARIZONA years from ARIZONA years from ARIZONA last three years 3. $250,000 to less than $500,00 ONLY state, ONLY non‐ ONLY state, municipal, from ARIZONA 4. $500,000 to less than $1 Million municipal, federal etc. government projects federal etc. ONLY non‐ government projects only government projects government 5. $1 Million to less than $2 Million only only projects only 6. $2 Million to less than $5 Million 7. $5 Million to less than $10 Million 8. $10 Million to less than $25 Million 9. $25 Million to less than $50 Million 10. $50 Million or greater Acoustics, Noise Abatement Land Surveying 829 4 4 Activity Centers Landscape Architecture 1 Aerial Photography; Airborne Data and Imagery LEED Accredited A/E Collection and Analysis 480 3 Agricultural Development; Grain Storage; Farm LEED Independent 3rd Party Building Mechanization Commissioning Air Pollution Control Libraries; Museums; Galleries 3 Lighting (Exteriors; Streets; Airports; Navaids; Airport Lighting; Aircraft Fueling Memorials; Athletic Fields, Etc.) Lighting (Interior; Display; Theater, Airports; Terminals and Hangars; Freight Handling Etc.) Animal Facilities Lighting (Cave; Cavern) Mapping Location/Addressing Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection 7 Systems Materials Handling Systems; Area Master Planning 200 6 2 Conveyors; Sorters Auditoriums and Theaters Materials Testing Measurement / Verification / Automation; Controls; Instrumentation Conservation Water Consumption Barracks; Dormitories Medical Related Bridge Design: Bridges 104 Metallurgy 4 Cartography Mining and Mineralogy Modular Systems Design; Pre- Cemeteries (Planning and Relocation) Fabricated Structures or Components Chemical Processing and Storage Mold Investigation Child Care/Development Facilities Museums Codes; Standards; Ordinances Nuclear Facilities; Nuclear Shielding Cold Storage; Refrigeration and Fast Freeze Office Buildings; Industrial Parks 75 Commercial Building (Low Rise) ; Shopping Centers 1 Outdoor Recreation Petroleum and Fuel (Storage and Communications Systems; TV; Microwave Distribution) 68 Community Facilities 2 Phase I Environmental Computer Facilities Photogrammetry 4 Pipelines (Cross-Country - Liquid and Conservation and Resource Management Gas) 23 Construction Management 117 Plumbing and Piping Design Pneumatic Structures, Air-Support Construction Materials Testing Buildings Power Generation, Transmission, Construction Surveying 27 Distribution 5 Controls and Electronics Engineer Prisons and Correctional Facilities Corrosion Control; Cathodic Protection Electrolysis Product, Machine Equipment Design Cost Estimating; Cost Engineering and Analysis; Public Safety Facilities Parametric Costing; Forecasting 5 Radar; Sonar; Radio and Radar Cryogenic Facilities Telescopes Radio Frequency Systems and Dams (Concrete; Arch) 2 Shieldings

Dams (Earth; Rock) ; Dikes; Levees Railroad; Rapid Transit 65 1808 4 Recreation Facilities (Parks, Marinas, Desalinization (Process and Facilities) 20 Etc ) Design & Planning Structured Parking Facilities Refrigeration Plants/Systems Rehabilitation (Buildings; Structures; Design-Build - Preparation of Requests for Proposals 31 1 Facilities) 6 Detention Security Systems Research Facilities Digital Elevation and Terrain Model Development Resources Recovery; Recycling Rivers; Canals; Waterways; Flood Digital Orthophotography 16 Control Dining Halls; Clubs; Restaurants Roof Infrared Imaging to Identify Water Leaks Disability / Special Needs Roofing 4 Safety Engineering; Accident Studies; Dredging Studies and Design OSHA Studies Security Systems; Intruder and Ecological and Archeological Investigations Smoke Detection Educational Facilities; Classrooms 424 1 Seismic Designs and Studies Sewage Collection, Treatment and Electrical Studies and Design 44 Disposal 96 Electronics Soils and Geologic Studies; Elevators; Escalators; People-Movers Solar Energy Utilization Energy / Water Auditing Savings Solid Wastes; Incineration; Landfill Energy Conservation; New Energy Sources 7 Special Environments; Clean Rooms, Environmental Impact Studies, Assessments or Statements 46 Specifications Writing Fallout Shelters; Blast-Resistant Design Storm Water Handling and Facilities Fire Protection Structural Design; Special Structures 349 1 Surveying; Platting; Mapping; Flood Fisheries; Fish Ladders Plain Studies 42 1 Forensic Engineering Sustainable Design Garages; Vehicles Maintenance Facilities; Parking 4 Swimming Pools 6 Gas Systems (Propane; Natural, Etc.) 21 Testing and Inspection Services Geodetic Surveying: Ground and Airborne 10 Topographic Surveying and Mapping 152 1 1 Towers (Self‐Supporting and Guyed Heating; Ventilating; Air Conditioning 34 1 Systems) Highways; Streets; Airfield Paving; Parking Lots 113 5 1 Toxicology Historical Preservation 3 Traffic and Transportation 1023 4 1 Hospital and Medical Facilities 47 Traffic Studies Hotels; Motels Transportation Housing (Residential, Multi-Family; Apartments; Condominiums) 53 Tunnels and Subways Urban Renewals; Community Hydraulics and Pneumatics 5 Development Hydrographic Surveying 2 Utilities (Gas and Steam) Industrial Buildings; Manufacturing Plants 24 1 Value Analysis; Life‐Cycle Costing Industrial Processes; Quality Control 12 Warehouse and Depots 1 Industrial Waste Treatment 12 1 Waste Water Treatment Facility Water Resources; Hydrology; Intelligent Transportation Systems 21 Ground Water 48 Water Supply; Treatment and Infrastructure Distribution 376 Water Well Rehabilitation; Water Irrigation; Drainage 63 Well Work 1 Wind Tunnels; Research/Testing Judicial and Courtroom Facilities 6 Facilities Design Laboratories; Medical Research Facilities 3 Zoning; Land Use Studies Labs - General Labs – Research – Dry Labs – Research – Wet SAM Search Results List of records matching your search for :

Search Term : "wilson & company inc. engineers & architects* Record Status: Active

ENTITY Wilson & Company, Inc., Engineers & Architects Status:Active

DUNS: 007448715 +4: CAGE Code: 0EDE9 DoDAAC:

Expiration Date: Dec 20, 2018 Has Active Exclusion?: No Debt Subject to Offset?: No

Address: 4401 Masthead Street NE, Ste 150 City: Albuquerque State/Province: NEW MEXICO ZIP Code: 87109-4497 Country: UNITED STATES

ENTITY WILSON & COMPANY, INC., ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS Status:Active

DUNS: 047142989 +4: CAGE Code: 3DAW9 DoDAAC:

Expiration Date: Mar 14, 2018 Has Active Exclusion?: No Debt Subject to Offset?: No

Address: 4900 LANG AVE NE STE 200 City: ALBUQUERQUE State/Province: NEW MEXICO ZIP Code: 87109-4304 Country: UNITED STATES

ENTITY WILSON & COMPANY, INC., ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS Status:Active

DUNS: 844868620 +4: CAGE Code: 3C934 DoDAAC:

Expiration Date: Mar 15, 2018 Has Active Exclusion?: No Debt Subject to Offset?: No

Address: 1675 BROADWAY STE 200 City: DENVER State/Province: COLORADO ZIP Code: 80202-4629 Country: UNITED STATES

ENTITY Wilson & Company, Inc., Engineers & Architects Status:Active

DUNS: 127218647 +4: CAGE Code: 7CDM6 DoDAAC:

Expiration Date: Mar 13, 2018 Has Active Exclusion?: No Debt Subject to Offset?: No

Address: 414 N Main St Ste A City: Las Cruces State/Province: NEW MEXICO ZIP Code: 88001-1281 Country: UNITED STATES

February 12, 2018 1:39 PM https://www.sam.gov/ Page 1 of 3 ENTITY WILSON & COMPANY, INC., ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS Status:Active

DUNS: 117775044 +4: CAGE Code: 3C990 DoDAAC:

Expiration Date: Mar 13, 2018 Has Active Exclusion?: No Debt Subject to Offset?: No

Address: 4500 MERCANTILE PLAZA DR STE 234 City: FORT WORTH State/Province: TEXAS ZIP Code: 76137-2746 Country: UNITED STATES

ENTITY WILSON & COMPANY, INC., ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS Status:Active

DUNS: 127218704 +4: CAGE Code: 3TYE7 DoDAAC:

Expiration Date: Mar 13, 2018 Has Active Exclusion?: No Debt Subject to Offset?: No

Address: 2600 American Rd. Se, Suite 100 City: RIO RANCHO State/Province: NEW MEXICO ZIP Code: 87124-1858 Country: UNITED STATES

ENTITY WILSON & COMPANY, INC., ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS Status:Active

DUNS: 042646328 +4: CAGE Code: 3C9Z0 DoDAAC:

Expiration Date: Mar 13, 2018 Has Active Exclusion?: No Debt Subject to Offset?: No

Address: 800 E 101st Ter Ste 200 City: Kansas City State/Province: MISSOURI ZIP Code: 64131-3355 Country: UNITED STATES

ENTITY WILSON & COMPANY, INC., ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS Status:Active

DUNS: 043920982 +4: CAGE Code: 1QBN9 DoDAAC:

Expiration Date: Mar 14, 2018 Has Active Exclusion?: No Debt Subject to Offset?: No

Address: 5755 MARK DABLING BLVD STE 220 City: COLORADO SPRINGS State/Province: COLORADO ZIP Code: 80919-2200 Country: UNITED STATES

ENTITY WILSON & COMPANY, INC., ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS Status:Active

DUNS: 829447049 +4: CAGE Code: 5WK52 DoDAAC:

Expiration Date: Mar 16, 2018 Has Active Exclusion?: No Debt Subject to Offset?: No

Address: 10913 S RIVER FRONT PKWY STE 125 City: SOUTH JORDAN State/Province: UTAH ZIP Code: 84095-3513 Country: UNITED STATES

February 12, 2018 1:39 PM https://www.sam.gov/ Page 2 of 3 ENTITY WILSON & COMPANY, INC., ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS Status:Active

DUNS: 131777141 +4: CAGE Code: 327P4 DoDAAC:

Expiration Date: Mar 13, 2018 Has Active Exclusion?: No Debt Subject to Offset?: No

Address: 11516 MIRACLE HILLS DR STE 102 City: OMAHA State/Province: NEBRASKA ZIP Code: 68154-4473 Country: UNITED STATES

ENTITY WILSON & COMPANY, INC., ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS Status:Active

DUNS: 840705078 +4: CAGE Code: 3C975 DoDAAC:

Expiration Date: Mar 14, 2018 Has Active Exclusion?: No Debt Subject to Offset?: No

Address: 13105 NW Freeway, Suite 710 City: HOUSTON State/Province: TEXAS ZIP Code: 77040-6312 Country: UNITED STATES

ENTITY WILSON & COMPANY, INC., ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS Status:Active

DUNS: 124216065 +4: CAGE Code: 3C9V5 DoDAAC:

Expiration Date: Mar 13, 2018 Has Active Exclusion?: No Debt Subject to Offset?: No

Address: 625 E Carnegie Dr Ste 100 City: San Bernardino State/Province: CALIFORNIA ZIP Code: 92408-3576 Country: UNITED STATES

ENTITY WILSON & COMPANY, INC., ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS Status:Active

DUNS: 848836300 +4: CAGE Code: 3DAD9 DoDAAC:

Expiration Date: Mar 10, 2018 Has Active Exclusion?: No Debt Subject to Offset?: No

Address: 1700 E IRON AVE City: SALINA State/Province: KANSAS ZIP Code: 67401-3403 Country: UNITED STATES

ENTITY WILSON & COMPANY, INC., ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS Status:Active

DUNS: 063534028 +4: CAGE Code: 3C2D3 DoDAAC:

Expiration Date: Mar 10, 2018 Has Active Exclusion?: No Debt Subject to Offset?: No

Address: 410 N 44TH ST STE 460 City: PHOENIX State/Province: ARIZONA ZIP Code: 85008-7617 Country: UNITED STATES

February 12, 2018 1:39 PM https://www.sam.gov/ Page 3 of 3

ÿ !!"#ÿ$% #

0( 83680'( 9ÿqrGCWGÿRQGRØÿUSDGWÿBSÿIPcIRCBGÿBQGÿRQCPTGÿFSVÿ ÀÁÂÿÃÄÅÿÅÁÆÿÇÄÈÉÿ ÿÿ¡ÿ' CHGÿHGhVGWBIPTÿCPcÿRSbErGBGÿBQGÿWGRBISPfÿÿ@WBGHIWØÿipÿRQCPTGWÿBSÿ ÂÊËÄÌÉÍÎÉËÏÌÍÿÌÁÿÐÁÂÑÿ 30´'(ÿ)43874(8ÿ'ÿ34µ4(64 aHCPWCRBISPÿqHIIrGTGÿaCDÿsIRGPWGWÿCHGÿWVUÙGRBÿBSÿCÿdGGÿSdÿÚ¾eÿEGHÿ ÂÍÏÅÉÍÍÿ ÃÃÁÂÅÌÿÄÌÿ qÿw¶ÿe·¸¹e rSRCBISPÿdSHÿBQGÿWBCBGÿdGGÿCPcÿCPFÿCEErIRCUrGÿRIBFÿdGGWÿiWGGÿECTGÿ¹pfÿ qQSGPIDtÿ@ÿÿº»¸¹º¼·¸¹e ÆÆÆÒ Ó#ÄÔÉÍÒÕÁÖÒÿÌÿÏÍÿ ÿ 8ÿÿÿÿÿ£ÿÿ ÿ¢ÿ6ÿ8¥ÿ i½¸epÿe»»¼¹¹º¾ÿ ×ÄÍÌÿÄÅËÿÍÉÃÂÑÉÒ ÿ¾ÿiº¸¸pÿ¹»e¼¿¸·¸ ÿ¤¡£ÿ3£x &'()0(1ÿ345603474(89ÿ@ÿBCDECFGHÿIPÿBQGÿRSPBHCRBIPTÿUVWIPGWWÿXY`aÿbCIPBCIPÿCÿUSPcÿdSHÿCÿbIPIbVbÿSdÿeÿFGCHWfÿgQGPÿHGhVGWBIPTÿRQCPTGiWpÿBSÿBQGÿqQFWIRCrÿsSRCBISPtÿ sGTCrÿuCbGÿCPcvSHÿwVWIPGWWÿuCbGtÿxySIPTÿwVWIPGWWÿ@WtÿÿIBQIPÿBQGÿdIHWBÿeÿFGCHWtÿCÿwSPcÿIcGHÿBSÿbCBRQÿBQGÿRQCPTGiWpÿHGhVGWBGcÿXY`aÿUGÿSUBCIPGcÿEHISHÿBSÿBQGÿHGhVGWBÿCPcÿ WVUbIBBGcÿIBQÿBQIWÿwVWIPGWWÿ@RRSVPBÿYEcCBGÿSHbf 480'(ÿ9ÿÿ&ÿ0 sGTCrÿwVWIPGWWÿuCbG ÛÜÝÞßàÿâÿãßäåæàçèÿéàêëèÿìàíÜàîîïÞÿâÿðïêñÜòîêòÞ sIRGPWGÿuVbUGHGcGHCrÿbErSFGHÿdcGPBIdIRCBISPÿuVbUGHÿSHÿ`SRICrÿ`GRVHIBFÿuVbUGHtÿefghiefjÿilÿmnofÿpenpeifqneÿriqsÿtnÿfuponvffm óôõõö÷øø öùúõõøûüôô wxÿy(14z {ÿ8'ÿ|04( 4 ÿÿsSRÿ}ScG~ÿ ÿGEHIPBÿsIRGPWG ÿGIPWBCBGÿddGRBIGÿyCBG~ÿÿÿXXyyÿÿ}CPRGrÿGddGRBIGÿcCBG~ÿÿXXyy ÿ i qfÿefghiefjÿlneÿiqssnojitÿtovp xÿ|04( 4ÿ84ÿÿsfÿ ooÿqs qÿ ppov ÿaHCPWCRBISPÿqHIIrGTGÿaCDÿsIRGPWGÿiaqapÿ ÿYWGÿaCDÿGTIWBHCBISP ÿgIBQQSrcIPTvYPGbErSFbGPBÿaCDÿGTIWBHCBISPÿilÿsieitÿfuponvffm ÿaqaÿdSHÿ}IBIGWÿusÿ xÿy(14ÿ 46308ÿ)70(0 838'3ÿ0('3780'( `SRICrÿ`GRVHIBFÿuSfÿaIBrGsCWBÿuCbGÿÿIHWBÿuCbGÿ XIccrGÿdPBrf ýõóúùöúüüõõãßàòïßÝÝîïãÿßêñïæàîãÿ æòñîïÜàî ì bCIr qQSPGÿuVbUGHÿiriqsÿ ef ÿnjfp êæòñîïÜàîëêßêñïæàîþÿÜÝÞßàêßëêßä ýôýÿüöùúöõ÷ö xÿ'|)ÿwVWIPGWWÿuCbGtÿxySIPTÿwVWIPGWWÿ@WÿSHÿaHCcGÿuCbGÿCBÿBQIW (4ÿwVWIPGWWÿuCbGtÿxySIPTÿwVWIPGWWÿ@WÿSHÿaHCcGÿuCbGÿCBÿBQIWÿqQFWIRCrÿ ÿÿ qQFWIRCrÿsSRCBISP ÿ sSRCBISP

xÿ(4ÿXCIrIPTÿ@ccHGWWÿÿPVbUGHÿCPcÿWBHGGBÿ }IBF`BCBGdqÿ}ScGÿ ööôõÿæÞòñîæÿòïîîòÿìèÿìÿõýô ðÝ îï î ùøõô÷ }SVPBFvGTISP}SVPBHF îïàæÝÜÝÝß ð wVWIPGWWÿqQSPGÿuVbUGHÿiriqsÿ ef ÿnjfpbCIrÿ@ccHGWWCDÿuVbUGHÿiriqsÿ ef ÿnjfp ýôýÿüöùúöôôô êæòñîïÜàîëêßêñïæàîþÿÜÝÞßàêßëêßä ýôýÿüöùúöõýý x|'80'( ÿ6ÿÿÿÿ ¡¢ÿ£¢ÿ¤ÿÿ¡¡ÿÿ¤ÿÿÿ¥£ÿ¤x qQFWIRCrÿsSRCBISPÿSdÿwVWIPGWWÿSHÿ}SbbGHRICrvGWIcGPBICrÿGPBCrÿ }IBF`BCBGdqÿ}ScG uVbUGHÿCPcÿWBHGGBÿnÿtnqÿhmfÿ¦ÿ§n¨©ÿ¦ª§ÿneÿenhqfÿthu«fem

IHWBÿyCFÿSdÿwVWIPGWW }SVPBFvGTISP}SVPBHFqQSPGÿuVbUGH XXyy GWIcGPBICrÿGPBCrÿPrFÿÿuVbUGHÿSdÿYPIBWGESHBIPTÿ}IBFÿilÿjillfeftqÿqs tÿpsvmi oÿon qintÿiqv

@ccIBISPCrÿ}SVPBFvGTISPÿdPcICPÿGWGHCBISPv}IBF~ÿÿ}SVPBFvGTISPÿdPcICPÿGWGHCBISPÿCPcÿ}IBFÿ}ScGWÿCCIrCUrGÿCBÿfC¬cSHfTS }SVPBFÿv }IBF GTISP (0 ÿ¡9ÿÿ@CIrCUrGÿCBÿfC¬cSHfTS &ÿ¡ÿidPRrVcGÿCrrÿ`BCBGÿCPcÿ}IBFÿwVWIPGWWÿ}ScGWÿBQCBÿCEErFp9ÿÿ@CIrCUrGÿCBÿfC¬cSHfTS

yGWRHIEBISPÿSdÿwVWIPGWW~ÿfmei«fÿufes tjimfÿmnojÿneÿq ¨ «ofÿ qiiqv

|'80'(ÿ|' 0(1 ÿÿsSRÿ}ScG~ÿ ÿÿ qQFWIRCrÿsSRCBISPÿSdÿwVWIPGWW}IBF`BCBGdqÿ}ScG

sCWBÿyCFÿSdÿwVWIPGWW }SVPBFvGTISP}SVPBHF XXyy GWIcGPBICrÿGPBCrÿPrFÿÿuVbUGHÿSdÿYPIBWGESHBIPTÿ}IBFÿilÿjillfeftqÿqs tÿpsvmi oÿon qintÿiqv

®xÿ&6 0(4 ÿ')49ÿÿtovÿhmfÿilÿvnhÿ efÿ jjit¯jfofqit¯s titÿqvpfÿnlÿ«hmitfmmÿ qiiqv°ÿÿ± io «ofÿ qÿrrr° ²jne°n `BCBGÿwVWIPGWWÿ}rCWWÿ}ScG~ÿÿ@cc~ÿ ÿÿyGrGBG~ÿ ÿÿ}QCPTG~ÿ sSRÿ}ScG~ÿ ÿ }IBFÿwVWIPGWWÿ}rCWWÿ}ScG~ÿÿÿÿ@cc~ÿ ÿÿyGrGBG~ÿ ÿÿ}QCPTG~ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ }SPBIPVGcÿSPÿECTGÿeÿÿ³ 4567ÿÿ95@ÿ@ABCDÿBDÿE5F7ÿGH IPQ7D@7RÿST4ÿBUÿVV4ÿ95@ÿ@ABCDÿBDÿE5F7ÿGH ÷øùúúûüýþþ WXYÿ` abcÿbdefgÿÿhipqÿstuÿvwÿqxsÿyuÿyviupuvi yiviÿÿxutÿÿyvpypuÿyÿyxx deÿdfg1hÿÿgghÿ ÿÿi1j1k1hÿ ÿÿdl)m01hÿ WnYÿbo `pfÿqara`pÿqsft$f`bugÿvÿwfxyÿ)mmx)jÿky)mz){k|fmÿ}y|~|j101ÿk)ÿj|)|j|kwÿ|zhÿ ÿ1zzÿkl)mÿ3 ÿwfxÿ)wÿv|j1ÿ)mgÿ})wÿ'' ÿ1k11mÿ3 ÿ)mgÿ ÿwfxÿ)wÿv|j1ÿ)mgÿ})wÿ'# ÿkl1y|z1ÿwfxyÿky)mz){k|fmÿ}y|~|j101ÿk)1zÿ)y1ÿgx1ÿ"# ÿfmkljwÿÿÿÿx)yk1yjwÿÿÿÿmmx)jÿÿÿÿÿÿe1)zfm)jÿe1j1{kÿmfÿfy1ÿkl)mÿÿfmklzÿ1jf

ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ( ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿe( ÿd ÿ ÿid W ¡Yÿ£ ¤ÿsfbdsecÿ¥oucab rÿrdb £ad`ÿ¦ÿmx1yÿ)mgÿzky11k d|kwek)k1°(ÿdfg1 ÿ §¨xÿixÿstuÿ©hÿªx«¬ÿ©ªÿxÿxsuÿis®ut¯

dfxmkw dfxmkyw

)1ÿfvÿdfmk){k(lfm1ÿx1yÿ|klÿ)y1)ÿ{fg1k1mz|fm

q"ÿ£''!#"ÿ¥±²ÿ£'³ÿr!ÿ'&ÿ´#"&²ÿs²#'#"gÿÿaµÿ#ÿ"¶%ÿ!'²ÿÿ'ÿ¶ÿf%"ÿa&#µ!'#"ÿ `·ÿ¸fa`¹ºÿ'ÿ»"#ÿ£'³ÿ %%!'#"ÿÿ&Yÿÿedÿ`d£ÿ$cfÿ£oacÿqds¼ÿ£dÿbo `pfÿ£ofÿfa`Y Wcfb£ad`ÿgÿa&#µ!'#"ÿ"µÿd¶ÿb'²ºÿ¥'#ºÿb"%"'#ÿdµµ!ºÿ¼·½¼''²²ÿ ÿ¼·ÿ"ÿdµµ!'ÿ"µÿ#ÿf%"²ÿ$# wÿqxsÿiuuÿ®xuÿt¾y u¬ÿyy ÿvvxiypÿhiu¬ÿ©yiu¬ÿx¾xyuÿhwwv u§t¯ÿwx®ÿyyvpypuÿyÿyxxÿÿvÿkl1ÿfm1yÿ})ykm1yzÿ{fy}fy)k1ÿfvv|{1yzÿfyÿ{f|m)k|fmÿfvÿ })ykm1yzÿfyÿ{fy}fy)k1ÿfvv|{1yzÿ11yzÿ)mg¿fyÿ)m)0|m0ÿ11yzÿfmÿfy1ÿkl)mÿÀ Áÿfvÿfyÿ{fmkyfjÿ)mfkl1yÿxz|m1zzÿ|mÿy|Âfm)ÿ)kk){lÿ)ÿj|zkÿfvÿkl1ÿxz|m1zz1zÿ}1y{1mk)01zÿ fm1gÿ)mgÿxm1}jfw1mkÿ|mzxy)m{1ÿ){{fxmkÿÄÅÆÇÈÉÊÿËÉÿÌÉËÍÎÏÈÿÐÿÑËÒÈÉÿËÓÿÔÕÕËÉÄÈÖÿ×ØËÉÆÿÙÚÛÜÿÒÝÎÞÝÿÆÅÊÕÿÇÈÿßààÈÏÿËÅÕÿÐÄÏÿÊÎáÄÈÏÿÇÖÿÐÄÿÐÅÕÝËÉÎâÈÏÿÞËÉÌËÉÐÕÈÿËÓßÞÈÉã ef{|)jÿe1{xy|kwÿfÿ|kj1)zkÿ)1ÿÿ|yzkÿ)1ÿ |ggj1ÿmkj ÿêÿ ê äåæçèÿé eky11kÿggy1zzÿd|kwek)k1Áÿm1g 1 i1j1k1 °(ÿdfg1dfxmkw(lfm1ÿx1yÿvÿyuyÿ xu dfxmkyw

ef{|)jÿe1{xy|kwÿf|kj1)zkÿ)1ÿÿ|yzkÿ)1ÿ |ggj1ÿmkj ÿêÿ ê äåæçèÿë eky11kÿggy1zzÿd|kwek)k1Áÿm1g 1 i1j1k1 °(ÿdfg1dfxmkw(lfm1ÿx1yÿvÿyuyÿ xu dfxmkyw

ef{|)jÿe1{xy|kwÿf|kj1)zkÿ)1ÿÿ|yzkÿ)1ÿ |ggj1ÿmkj ÿêÿ ê äåæçèÿì eky11kÿggy1zzÿd|kwek)k1Áÿm1g 1 i1j1k1 °(ÿdfg1dfxmkw(lfm1ÿx1yÿvÿyuyÿ xu dfxmkyw

cfb£ad`ÿbgÿÿs&ÿc²'# £ÿ&"!#ÿ#ÿ·ÿ²&ÿ·ÿ'ÿ"µµ!ÿ²'ÿ%"·ÿµ"ÿ#ÿ·Yÿÿaÿ'ÿ'#"í&ÿ#"ÿ!"%#ÿ#ÿ%&'#ÿ#Yÿÿ$&ÿ %'#ÿ"µÿ%îÿaÿ&!'ÿ#'#ÿ#ÿµ"'#"ÿ%"±&&ÿ"ÿ#ÿ&"!#ÿÿ#ÿ'&ÿ!"!#Yÿ ÿ(y|mkÿfyÿw}1ÿ)1 ïÿ(y|mkÿfyÿw}1ÿ)1 ÿÿÿ |kj1 |kj1 ÿÿÿÿ ! i)k1 i)k1 þú"þ#"#þúø e|0m)kxy1 e|0m)kxy1ÿ

£ÿ'%%!'#"ÿ#ÿ·ÿ!"%#&ºÿ²&ºÿ'&ÿ#&ÿ'ÿ%"±&&ÿ·ÿ YsYcYÿðÿïñòóïïY ôx)jÿ}}fykxm|kwÿ}jfw1y¿(yf0y) l|zÿ)}}j|{)k|fmÿ|zÿ)~)|j)j1ÿ|mÿ)jk1ym)k|~1ÿvfy)kzÿ)kÿm1}jfw1mkÿmzxy)m{1ÿ)ÿvv|{1

¥rf cfÿbd¼¥rf£fÿcfb£ad`ÿegÿc£ £f½bd$`£uÿõÿba£uÿrabf`cfÿqffÿ´dsöcoff£ÿÿ £dÿb rb$r £fÿ `eÿsf¼a£ÿ£d£ rÿ ¼d$`£ÿe$fÿ´a£oÿ£oacÿ ¥¥rab £ad`Y

ÿÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ !!"#ÿ$%&'#ÿ()01ÿ3 4567ÿÿ95@ÿ@ABCDÿBDÿE5F7ÿGH IPQ7D@7RÿST4ÿBUÿVV4ÿ95@ÿ@ABCDÿBDÿE5F7ÿGH ¿ÀÁÂÂÃÄÅÆÆ WXY`abcÿdeÿÿW#'#fY"#gÿhÿY#gÿi!ÿpÿq"rst#

uvvÿwxxyÿuxÿyx ÿ ÿuxÿÿ1ÿÿ)d1eÿ)dÿfff)g0h

ÿ)ii)d1ÿYa`jÿpXXeÿkidlimÿnopÿorÿsotuvwoxyÿzmÿd1ÿswt{xy{ÿ|{{ÿ)}ÿ1}d1ÿe~ÿl}ÿswt{xy{ÿvovu nopÿorÿswt{xy{ÿswt{xy{ÿ nopÿorÿswt{xy{ÿswt{xy{ÿ nopÿorÿswt{xy{ÿswt{xy{ÿ wv oxo{soty |{{ vovuwv ox o{soty |{{ vovuwv ox o{soty |{{ vovu u)1ÿ}dl}uÂÇÆÆÈÇÆÆ m1)y))ld)yu uh})i1 u))i1y)}ÿvley 1}e} y)m1}ydde)i1y lez11 izy1})yx 1m1 x))ÿldmyfÿvfyv ii1)ÿldm1~1 yl1)ÿled)y )~ÿ11 x1)}my}fi)1y )111 ul}0~)}ky~1d}y )e)ÿ)}1v)1ÿ)h)evydÿ e}y )h1ÿ11 vldl1iÿ()v(yl}01hlii1y )}i1 k)~~dkydÿ}ey l}ÿ)ii1m k))})kuyd)ÿ)ii1my i))i1 k)l)k(y1ly ild} wk1e)kxyle1y( i)ÿldmkl)~l kk )mi v il01 v0)i1e 1~1 x dd}f ÿ)ii1m )d1 1f1m~zid()01( ii1e} 0i)e v())le1ÿ)ii1m( ~zed}1 y })} ()1( e} x)0) x()d)0}l)(u e)m)} xiÿkl)01 xk()me}(y1iid} xim xv(1l)(xl1}z0 wi)0ed) wy(1}l(ÂÉlÆÇÆÆ ii wi1}1 wv(l~) (kliil)~e v w}d)l}ÿliiew(l}1dv)1el1((l}1i~)}k w1}l) w(1edd(l}eify li)ÿ1} (1eddÿ)ii1m(v}0df} liz1d )dgeld1~) k i1})i1 x 311}ÿ11 iz1 v y)yw yzdd)iÿldmÿvl1}e1ÿw11eÿ yzdd)iÿldmÿvl1}e1ÿw11eÿ yzdd)iÿldmÿvl1}e1ÿw11eÿ i~}ÿ ÈÇÆÆÉi~}ÿ ÆÇÆÆ i~}ÿ3 ÆÇÆÆ

¬¬`b` iÿW#'#ÿi!ÿp ¡eÿÿ)ii)d1ÿzmÿ~idliml}0ÿ}~z1ÿÿzel}1eeÿi)dl}eÿzmÿ È ®¯p°° È¿ÇÆÆ ±{yw{xvwuÿ±{xvuÿswt{xy{ÿ|{{yÿ²ÿªxÿ³ux{©´ÿµ³o{xw¶´ÿuxÿtovvyu{ÿ kidlimÿd1ÿ}~z1ÿÿ}ldeÿ1ÿi)dl}eÿzmÿÿÿu}})iÿ)ÿ1ÿil1}e1ÿÿnopÿorÿ·xwvynopÿorÿsoty wvÿ|{{

bcijÿuvx¹ÿ(x¹ÿ)}ÿy yuvxÿ 1el1}dl)iÿ1}d)iÿvl1}e1¸)}i1 eiÿe1ÿdleÿe1dl}ÿ 1el1}dl)iÿ1}d)iÿvl1}e1¸(1}l dbÿcb`ÿe1ÿd1ÿ11ÿ)dÿ)zh1ÿdÿ)ii)d1ÿil1}e1ÿ11e 1ÿ)~}dÿÿ1)ÿldmÿu ÿxxxÿ 1el1}dl)iÿ1}d)iÿvl1}e1¸ydde)i1

YY`b` iÿY#gÿº&#'¢ÿº#'¢ÿi!ÿpÿ &&ÿYt'&¢r»ÿ¼t"½»ÿhÿW!"##&'¢¡ÿ ÆÇÆÆ

dd`b` iÿd$Xÿ &&ÿ¢ÿ ÿ¥ÿÿ¥ÿYY¡ÿ ÃÄÇÆÆ ¾ÿk)1ÿ1ÿ)m)zi1ÿdÿulg})ÿ1)d~1}dÿÿ ¾ÿÿ}dÿe1}ÿ)e 1h1}1 ¾ÿvl1}e1ÿfliiÿ}dÿz1ÿlee1ÿflddÿiiÿ)m~1}dÿÿ ¾ÿ}i1ÿwxÿÿyyÿ}ÿ)m~1}d 11e ÿmÿ}imÿzel}1eeÿleÿ}1ÿi)eeÿ3¹ÿ~~1l)iÿv1)e1¹ÿd11ÿleÿ}ÿil1}e1ÿ11ÿ1ÿ

ÿÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ !!"#ÿ$%&'#ÿ()01ÿ3 ÿ !"#$!#ÿ%ÿ!&!'! (!!)ÿ0#'1#0ÿ%ÿÿ2'0!00ÿ'" #!ÿ"")1#

34536ÿ774589@5A3 '0!ÿ# 0ÿ"")1#ÿ#ÿ ÿ67Av@ÿAvÿw536wwÿ8d93t6wÿGXCGÿCqqEWGÿSTUVÿ BCDEÿGHIEÿCPQÿICREÿSTUVÿWXCPYE`ÿ fVCP`CWGHTPÿVHDHaEYEÿfCgÿaHWEPÈÿTVÿiHGXXTaQHPYÿfCgÿ TPaHPEÿCGÿbbbcdefCgE`cYTDcÿ VEYH`GVCGHTPcÿ ÿ1d93t6wÿ53ÿ4A89@5A3ÿAvÿw536wwÿ4A89@5A3ÿQTÿPTGÿ hÿiCPWEaÿSTUVÿaHWEPÈ VEUHVEÿCÿPEbÿGVCP`CWGHTPÿVHDHaEYEÿaHWEPÈÿPUIEVcÿ hÿiXCPYEÿSTUVÿICHaHPYÿCQQVE`` iXEPÿaTWCGHTP`ÿCVEÿCQQEQÿTVÿGXEVEÿCVEÿWXCPYE`ÿHPÿGXEÿ hÿpQHGÿaTWCGHTPÿHPqTVICGHTPÿrÿCQQsÿ U`HPE``ÿPCIEÿTVÿydÿGXEÿaHWEPÈÿPUIEVÿQTE`ÿPTGÿ WaTÈÿTVÿWXCPYEÿSTUVÿHPqTVICGHTP WXCPYEÿXTbEDEVsÿCÿPEbÿaHWEPÈÿH`ÿVHPGEQÿ`XTbHPYÿ GXEÿUQCGEQÿHPqTVICGHTPcÿHWEPÈÿqEE`ÿCVEÿVEUHVEQÿ bXEPEDEVÿGXEÈÿWXCPYE`ÿCVEÿICQEÿCPQÿGXEÿU`HPE``ÿ $95453tÿuuv6ww VEWEHDE`ÿCÿPEbÿVHPGÿTqÿGXEÿaHWEPÈc dVHxTPCÿyECVGIEPGÿTqÿEDEPUE ÿ@d6vÿw536wwÿ8d93t6wÿGXCGÿ`XTUaQÿEÿVETVGEQÿGTÿGXEÿ ÿTgÿ yECVGIEPGÿTqÿEDEPUEÿHPWaUQEÿWXCPYE`ÿHPÿGXEÿICHaHPYÿ XTEPHgsÿdeÿÿ CQQVE``ÿTVÿaTWCGHTPÿTqÿCUQHGÿVEWTVQ`sÿCQQHGHTPÿTVÿVEITDCaÿ TqÿTbPEVTqqHWEVÿHPqTVICGHTPsÿVEUE`G`ÿGTÿWCPWEaÿSTUVÿ 1w@A6vÿ06v586ÿ aHWEPÈÿbXEPÿGXEÿU`HPE``ÿaCP`ÿGTÿWECÈÿTEVCGHTP`sÿ 163@6vÿ)A89@5A3w CPQÿVEUE`G`ÿGTÿWXCPYEÿqHaHPYÿqVEUEPWScÿfXEÈÿWXCPYE`ÿ ÿCcIcÿrÿÿcIc QTÿPTGÿVEUHVEÿCÿaHWEPÈÿqEEc TPQCSÿGXVTUYXÿVHQCS pgWEGÿaEYCaÿdVHxTPCÿ`GCGEÿXTaHQCS` A@6ÿ1d93t6wÿ53ÿA36vwd57ÿVEUHVEÿCÿPEbÿaHWEPÈÿ EWCUÈÿaHWEPÈ`ÿCVEÿPTGÿGVCP`qEVCaEcÿÈÿGXEÿdVHxTPCÿTHPGÿ "dA635eÿff586 fCgÿdaHWCGHTPÿGTÿCaSÿqTVÿCÿPEbÿaHWEPÈÿHqÿSTUVÿU`HPE``ÿ ghÿiE`GÿTPVTE WXCPYE`ÿqVTIÿCÿ`TaEÿVTVHEGTV`XHÿGTÿCÿCVGPEV`XHÿTVÿ XTEPHgsÿdeÿÿj WTVTVCGHTPsÿTVÿUPQEVYTE`ÿCÿ`HIHaCVÿWXCPYEÿHPÿTVYCPHxCGHTPcÿ $6w9ÿff586 da`TsÿHqÿGXEÿU`HPE``ÿH`ÿCÿCVGPEV`XHÿCPQÿCVGPEV`ÿCVEÿCQQEQÿ TVÿVEITDEQsÿCÿPEbÿaHWEPÈÿH`ÿVEUHVEQc gkÿBTUGXÿE`CÿyVHDE UHaQHPYÿlg $"##ÿÿfTÿCDTHQÿQEaCS`ÿHPÿVTWE``HPYÿTqÿSTUVÿ E`Csÿdeÿÿ g mnopqÿstuvwÿxswqÿyszÿo{yx|wÿ}p||py~ÿsÿ{vvsyzÿ CaHWCGHTPsÿbEÿVEWTIIEPQÿSTUÿVECQÿGXEÈÿHP`GVUWGHTP`ÿ QHÙGE` CPQÿVEqEVÿGTÿGXEIÿC`ÿPEEQEQÿGTÿEPÙVEÿSTUÿXCDEÿCWWUVCGEaSÿ EPGEVEQÿCaaÿGXEÿVEUHVEQÿHPqTVICGHTPcÿÿ#d5wÿ9774589@5A3ÿ #8wA3ÿff586 w@ÿ6ÿ8A746@6uÿw5t36uÿ93uÿv6@v36uÿ9wÿ7vA5u6uÿ kÿiE`GÿiTPYVE`` ÿ0ÿÿ fUW`TPsÿdeÿÿjg ÿaECÈÿVECQÿqTVIÿHP`GVUWGHTP`ÿbXHaEÿWTIaEGHPYÿGXEÿ 1w@A6vÿ06v586ÿ CaHWCGHTPcÿÿdQQHGHTPCaÿHPqTVICGHTPÿCPQÿqTVI`ÿCVEÿ #6467dA36ÿ6vw CDCHaCaEÿCGÿbbbcCxQTVcYTDc HWEP`HPYÿUE`GHTP`ÿTPÿfVCP`CWGHTPÿ ÿEUHVEQÿHPqTVICGHTPÿH`ÿQE`HYPCGEQÿbHGXÿCPÿC`GEVH`Rÿc VHDHaEYEsÿiHGXXTaQHPYÿTVÿÈÿfCgÿ ÿaECÈÿWTIaEGEÿBEWGHTPÿyÿÿBGCGEiTUPGSÿÿiHGSÿ dVHxTPCÿyECVGIEPGÿTqÿEDEPUEÿ HWEPÈÿEEÿiTVR`XEEGÿGTÿWCaWUaCGEÿCPQÿVEIHGÿ#A@94ÿ h ÿ g A3@ÿ 6ÿbHGXÿGXH`ÿCaHWCGHTPc gÿÿ k iXEPÿWTIaEGHPYÿGXH`ÿqTVIsÿaECÈÿ7v53@ÿAvÿ@76ÿ53ÿ498ÿ53cÿ EYHaEÿCaHWCGHTP`ÿCVEÿVEUHVEQÿqTVÿCWWUVCGEÿVTWE``HPYcÿ fXEÿqTaaTbHPYÿPUIEVEQÿHP`GVUWGHTP`ÿWTVVE`TPQÿGTÿGXEÿ PUIEV`ÿTPÿGXEÿU`HPE``ÿQCGEÿdWWTUPGcÿÿ

ÿ ÿ P`GVUWGHTP`ÿCYEÿg ÿÿ !ÿ "#!ÿ!#!

$%&'()0ÿ23ÿÿ45$678$$ÿ679@AB2C6@7 ÿEFGHIPQÿQÿuswÿSIeQÿudQaÿ)(0Uÿ4XY(0%YYÿ ÿEFGHIPQÿRGSFÿT%UVWÿ4XY(0%YYÿ7V`%aÿT(&%0Y%ÿ 2Yÿi42lpÿÿtÿIÿIÿQÿdQÿdÿQÿT%UVWÿ4XY(0%YYÿ 7X`b%cÿdePÿ9%f%cVWÿ8`gW)h%cÿ6f%0'(i(&V'()0ÿ7)pÿ 7V`%ÿQeQFÿdQÿ qrstuvÿGFÿwGxIdyÿwQxSFIRÿuGÿqwwuvÿIÿRGSÿdFQÿdÿGyQÿ pÿEFGHIPQÿQÿuswÿBV(W(0Uÿ2ffc%YYÿqeSQFÿdePÿ FGFIQGFÿ IGSÿQyGRQQÿÿddRQFÿdFQÿFQSIFQPÿ FQQvÿ QFQÿdyyÿxGFFQGePQexQÿIÿGÿQÿQeÿGSÿ GÿFGHIPQÿQIFÿddRQFÿIPQeIIxdIGeÿeSQFÿqtuvÿ dRÿSQÿRGSFÿGQÿdPPFQaÿxGFGFdQÿQdPSdFQFaÿ GeÿdyyÿFQSFeÿdePÿPGxSQeÿÿÿtuÿIÿPQIeQPÿdÿQÿ GFÿdxxGSeIeÿIF ÿdPPFQaÿQxÿÿtÿdIyIeÿdPPFQÿ QPQFdyÿQyGRQFÿIPQeIIxdIGeÿeSQFÿqstuvÿGFÿGxIdyÿ PIQFÿGFÿyIxQeQÿqGFÿIedexQÿ IGyPIeÿdePÿ QxSFIRÿeSQFÿqwwuvaÿPQQePIeÿSGeÿG ÿIexGQÿ SeQyGRQeÿIeSFdexQvaÿyQdQÿQePÿdÿxGHQFÿyQQFÿ dÿIÿFQGFQPÿÿQÿstuÿIÿFQSIFQPÿGFÿdyyÿQyGRQFÿ IÿxGyQQPÿdyIxdIGeÿGÿQydIe ÿQedyRÿGÿÿ IyyÿQÿdQQPÿRÿQÿQdFQeÿGÿ ÿEFGHIPQÿQÿ4XY(0%YYÿmj)0%ÿ7X`b%cÿIexySPIeÿQÿ QHQeSQÿGFÿQdxÿPGxSQeÿIyQPÿ IGSÿdÿtu dFQdÿxGPQ pÿEFGHIPQÿRGSFÿT)&V'()0ÿ)f%ÿdePÿxQxdÿ dÿxdeQÿ ÿEFGHIPQÿQÿ8`V(Wÿ2ffc%YYÿGFÿQÿSIeQÿGFÿxGedxÿ RGSÿdFQÿddIeÿGÿRGSFÿyIxQeQÿQFIeIeÿGFÿFQIedIeÿ QFGe RGSFÿyIxQeQÿIÿSeQxÿGÿdÿQQÿGÿfgÿQFÿyGxdIGeÿGFÿ QÿdQÿdePÿdeRÿdyIxdyQÿxIRÿQQ ÿEFGHIPQÿQÿ4XY(0%YYÿ9Voÿ7X`b%cÿIexySPIeÿQÿdFQdÿ xGPQ hpÿT(&%0Y%ÿChg%ÿij%&kÿVWWÿ'jV'ÿVggWhl3ÿ pÿ6iÿh)XÿVc%ÿVff(0UÿVÿT)&V'()0ÿi5Y%ÿ'j(YÿY%&'()0ÿ CcV0YV&'()0ÿmc(n(W%U%ÿCVoÿiCmCl3ÿÿeRGeQÿQedQPÿIeÿ ')ÿXgfV'%ÿ&jV0U%ÿ&W)Y%ÿ)cÿVffÿVÿW)&V'()0ÿ')ÿV0ÿ dÿSIeQÿddyQÿSePQFÿQÿEÿdSQÿSÿdyRÿ %o(Y'(0UÿW(&%0Y%pl GFÿdÿEÿpIxQeQÿQGFQÿQedIeÿIeÿSIeQÿÿrGFÿ EaÿRGSÿdFQÿFQSIFQPÿGÿGdIeÿdePÿPIydRÿdÿQdFdQÿ ÿEFGHIPQÿQÿuswÿmjhY(&VWÿT)&V'()0ÿGÿQÿSIeQÿ yIxQeQÿxQFIIxdQÿGFÿQdxÿSIeQÿGFÿFQedyÿyGxdIGeÿ IÿdPPFQÿxdeeGÿQÿdÿEzÿGÿGFÿGSQÿuSQFÿ IÿdRÿQÿdxxGyIQPÿIeÿGeQÿGÿQÿGyyG Ieÿ dRq EFGHIPQÿuswq rÿsdxÿyGxdIGeÿdRÿQÿyIxQeQPÿdÿdÿQdFdQÿSIeQÿ rÿrIFÿdQÿGÿSIeQÿIeÿFI|Gedÿ IÿdÿQdFdQÿyIxQeQÿeSQFÿGFÿSFGQÿGÿFQGFIeÿ rÿ}GSeRQIGe FdedxIGeÿFIHIyQQÿdePÿSQÿdQÿIePIHIPSdyyRÿ rÿ}GSeFR QFQGFQaÿdÿQdFdQÿdyIxdIGeÿIÿeQQPQPÿGFÿQdxÿ rÿEGeQÿuSQF yGxdIGe rÿQIPQeIdyÿQedyÿzupÿÿ{ÿuSQFÿGÿyeI rÿtSyIyQÿyGxdIGeÿdRÿQÿyIxQeQPÿSePQFÿdÿxGeGyIPdQPÿ rÿQGFIeÿ}IRaÿIÿPIQFQeÿFGÿQÿmjhY(&VWÿT)&V'()0ÿ yIxQeQÿeSQFaÿFGHIPQPÿQÿG eQFIÿIÿQÿdQaÿGÿ xIRÿÿrGFÿQdyQaÿIÿQÿyGxdIGeÿGFÿQÿyIQPÿdPPFQÿ IÿyIQPÿIeÿdeÿdPedxQeÿxIRaÿSxÿdÿwxGPdyQaÿ dyyG ÿIyIeÿGÿdÿIeyQÿdÿFQSFeÿÿtÿdyRIeÿGFÿdÿeQ ÿ SÿQÿyGxdIGeÿGÿQÿSIeQÿIÿdxSdyyRÿ IIeÿ yIxQeQaÿyIÿQÿHdFIGSÿSIeQÿyGxdIGeÿdÿIeFSxQPÿ QÿxIRÿGÿEGQeIÿÿwQQÿEÿdQÿpGGdÿyÿGeÿ QyG ÿ dQGHÿ u('jj)Wf(0Uÿvÿ50%`gW)h`%0'ÿCVo%Y3ÿÿsyGRQFÿ dRIeÿ dQÿGFÿdydFIQÿGÿQyGRQQÿGFÿQFHIxQÿ ÿ EFGHIPQÿQÿ2ff('()0VWÿ)X0'hA%U()0ÿ60f(V0ÿ QFGFQPÿIeÿQÿwdQÿSÿdyRÿGFÿdÿwIGyPIeÿ A%Y%cnV'()0ÿ)f%iYlpÿÿÿxSFFQeÿyIIeÿIÿdHdIydyQÿdÿ eSQFÿxÿyeQyGRQeÿeSQF d|PGFGHÿ 5Y%ÿCVo3ÿzS{G{dQÿHQePGFÿqdÿIaÿHQePGFÿ Iÿ ÿEFGHIPQÿdyyÿ7)c'jÿ2`%c(&V0ÿ60fXY'c(%YÿWVYY(i(&V'()0ÿ eGÿFI|GedÿyGxdIGevÿddIeÿPIFQxÿdyQÿIeGÿFI|Gedÿ $hY'%`ÿi726$lÿ)f%iYlÿdÿdyRÿÿQÿut}wÿIÿ SÿGdIeÿdÿyQÿdÿQIFdIGeÿ}QFIIxdQÿÿte{dQÿ IPQeIIQPÿGFÿRGSFÿSIeQaÿdQPÿGeÿRGSFÿdeGFÿ SIeQÿeGÿFQSIFQPÿGÿQÿyIxQeQPÿIeÿFI|GedÿGFÿEÿ SIeQÿdxIHIRaÿFIexIyQÿFGPSxÿRGSÿdeSdxSFQaÿ SFGQaÿddIeÿGS{GÿdQÿSFxdQÿGFÿQIFÿG eÿ xGGPIRÿGyPaÿGFÿQFHIxQÿQFGFQPÿÿGSÿSÿ SQÿqdePÿeGÿGFÿFQdyQvÿSÿdyGÿGdIeÿQÿyQÿdÿ IePIxdQÿdÿyQdÿGeQÿut}wÿxGPQÿÿÿxSFFQeÿyIIeÿIÿ FQIFdIGe dHdIydyQÿdÿ d|PGFGH CmCÿi)cÿ&('(%Yÿ)0Wh3ÿÿIÿRQÿGÿyIxQeQÿIÿeQQPQPÿIÿ ÿEFGHIPQÿQÿ4XY(0%YYÿ)f%iYlÿIexySPIeÿdyyÿwdQÿdePÿ RGSFÿSIeQÿdxIHIRÿIÿSeQxÿGÿxIRÿEÿ IxÿIÿ }IRÿSIeQÿ}GPQqvÿdÿdyRÿdQPÿGeÿRGSFÿdeGFÿ xGyyQxQPÿRÿQÿdQaÿSÿQÿdxIHIRÿIÿeGÿdQPÿdÿQÿ SIeQÿdxIHIRaÿFIexIyQÿFGPSxÿRGSÿdeSdxSFQaÿ dQÿyQHQyÿ xGGPIRÿGyPaÿGFÿQFHIxQÿQFGFQPÿÿGSÿSÿ ~pÿEFGHIPQÿQÿ$$7ÿC('W%ÿTVY'ÿ7V`%ÿ9(cY'ÿ7V`%ÿ IePIxdQÿdÿyQdÿGeQÿSIeQÿxGPQÿÿÿxSFFQeÿyIIeÿIÿ B(ffW%ÿ60('(VWÿ8`V(WÿdePÿmj)0%ÿ7X`b%cÿGÿQÿ dHdIydyQÿdÿ d|PGFGH QxSFIRÿdPIeIFdGFÿRGSÿdFQÿxdeIeÿ ÿEFGHIPQÿQÿ%Y&c(g'()0ÿ)iÿ4XY(0%YYÿRÿPQxFIIeÿQÿ pÿEFGHIPQÿQÿzpÿSIeQÿudQaÿ)(0Uÿ4XY(0%YYÿ deGFÿddyQÿSIeQÿdxIHIRaÿFIexIyQÿFGPSxÿRGSÿ 2Yÿi42lpÿÿÿIÿQÿedQÿGÿdÿSIeQÿGQFÿdeÿ deSdxSFQaÿxGGPIRÿGyPaÿGFÿQFHIxQÿQFGFQPÿ QÿG eQF ÿedQÿGFaÿIeÿQÿxdQÿGÿdÿxGFGFdIGeaÿdÿ GSFÿPQxFIIGeÿGÿSIeQÿIÿHQFRÿIGFdeÿdePÿtywÿ edQÿdÿIÿPIQFQeÿFGÿQÿyQdyÿGFÿFSQÿxGFGFdQÿ yIedÿGÿQÿdFGFIdQÿ726$ÿ)f%ÿdePÿ4XY(0%YYÿ edQ )f%

ÿ ÿ teFSxIGeÿEdQÿg ÿÿ !ÿ "#!ÿ!#!

ÿ%&ÿ'()ÿ012ÿ3456%78ÿ0ÿ4(90@A(Bÿ 629@A(Bÿ3{ÿÿx} %x}|ÿ6%87gv x}6 ÿDEFGHIPÿQRPÿST'UA90Vÿ4(90@A(BÿFWÿQRPÿXY`HaP``ÿQRbQÿH`ÿ qRH`ÿbHrbQHFaÿvY`QÿXPÿ`H aPIÿFaÿXÿPHQRPEÿbÿ`FPÿFaPEÿ cdefghipÿqRH`ÿbIIEP``ÿrbaaFQÿXPÿbÿDeÿsFtÿFEÿuFYQPÿ bQÿPb`QÿQFÿbEQaPE`ÿvbab Ha ÿvPvXPEÿFEÿrFEFEbQPÿ hYvXPEpÿDEFGHIPÿcdefghiw FWWHrPEÿP bÿEP`Fa`HXPÿWFEÿQRPÿXY`HaP``pÿÿqRH`ÿbHrbQHFaÿ xÿdb`QÿbÿFWÿsY`HaP``ÿHaÿEHFabÿ chheqÿXPÿ`H aPIÿXÿb PaQ`ÿFEÿEPEP`PaQbQHGP`pÿ xÿcFYaQuP HFa 629@A(Bÿ|{ÿÿ6vgv}35 7vÿÿ3%vÿ4%3}76}ÿ~}}ÿÿ xÿcFYaQE ÿ5x6}}v xÿuP`HIPaQHbÿuPaQb`ÿehdÿÿÿhYvXPEÿFWÿaHQ` qRPEPÿbEPÿaFÿWPP`ÿWFEÿHQRRFIHa aPvFvPaQÿ xÿuPFEQHa ÿcHQÿHWÿIHWWPEPaQÿWEFvÿQRPÿST'UA90Vÿ4(90@A(Bÿ rHQpÿÿFEÿPtbvPÿHWÿQRPÿFrbQHFaÿWFEÿQRPÿH`QPIÿbIIEP``ÿ ga`YEbarPÿFEÿ`PÿqbtÿEP H`QEbQHFa`pÿÿfQbQPÿHrPa`PÿWPP`ÿ H`ÿH`QPIÿHaÿbaÿbIbrPaQÿrHQÿ`YrRÿb`ÿfrFQQ`IbPÿ bEPÿrbrYbQPIÿPEÿXY`HaP``ÿFrbQHFapÿÿqFÿrbrYbQPÿQRPÿrHQÿ XYQÿQRPÿFrbQHFaÿFWÿQRPÿXY`HaP``ÿH`ÿbrQYbÿHQRHaÿ HrPa`PÿWPP`ÿY`PÿQRPÿH`QHa ÿFWÿrHQHP`ÿFaÿb PÿÿfPrQHFaÿÿFWÿ QRPÿrHQÿFWÿDRFPaHtpÿÿfPPÿqDqÿubQPÿdFFÿÿFaÿ QRH`ÿbHrbQHFapÿÿcHQÿWPP`ÿbEPÿ`YXPrQÿQFÿrRba PpÿÿcRPrÿWFEÿ pqbtP`p FGÿp YIbQP`ÿbQÿpbIFEp FGp dÿDEFGHIPÿFYEÿ4(90@A(Bÿ3(e2ÿbaIÿRbQÿfQbQPÿbaIÿcHQÿ sY`HaP``ÿcb``ÿcFIP`ÿFYÿbEPÿbIIHa ÿIPPQHa ÿFEÿ xÿwÿÿqeqdÿcHQÿdHrPa`PÿPP`ÿÿqFÿrbrYbQPÿQRPÿrHQÿ rRba Ha p WPP`ÿvYQHÿhFpÿFWÿdFrbQHFa`ÿHaÿQRPÿrHQÿXÿQRPÿHrPa`Pÿ WPPÿbaIÿPaQPEÿ`YvÿHaÿfYXQFQbÿcHQÿdHrPa`PÿPP`pÿÿqRPaÿ fdÿDEFGHIPÿQRPÿ7g%36ÿ3(e2UÿFYÿbEPÿbIIHa ÿIPPQHa ÿFEÿ rbrYbQPÿbaIÿPaQPEÿQRPÿ`YvÿFWÿrFYva`ÿÿÿlÿÿpÿgWÿ rRba Ha p FYÿRbGPÿbÿFrbQHFaÿHaÿDRFPaHtÿbaIÿQRPÿXY`HaP``ÿH`ÿ hdÿDEFGHIPÿQRPÿWHHa ÿWEPiYParÿQRbQÿFYÿbEPÿrRba Ha ÿQFpÿ FaÿYaIPEÿcb``ÿlÿcFvvPErHbÿdPb`PÿQRPEPÿH`ÿaFÿ gWÿFYEÿQFQbÿP`QHvbQPIÿbaaYbÿrFvXHaPIÿEHFabÿrFYaQÿ HrPa`PÿWPPÿIYPp baIÿvYaHrHbÿqDqÿHbXHHQÿH`wÿ jÿdP``ÿQRbaÿklmmmÿFYÿvbÿWHPÿbaIÿbÿ0BB)0VV'd xÿsswÿÿqeqdÿfQbQPÿdHrPa`PÿPP`ÿÿqFÿrbrYbQPÿQRPÿ`QbQPÿ jÿsPQPPaÿklmmmÿbaIÿknmmmÿFYÿvbÿWHPÿbaIÿbÿ WPP`ÿvYQHÿQRPÿhFpÿFWÿFrbQHFa`ÿHaÿQRPÿ`QbQPÿXÿklp o)01@21V'p jÿeQRPEH`PÿFYEÿQEba`brQHFaÿEHGHP PÿQbtP`ÿbEPÿIYPÿ xÿccwÿÿqeqdÿcHQÿuP`HIPaQHbÿuPaQbÿdHrPa`PÿPPÿÿfÿ p(B@TV'p qgfÿfcqgehÿeuÿchduÿDehgÿhÿ ÿgWÿFYEÿXY`HaP``ÿH`ÿ620U(B0VÿFEÿFYÿbEPÿbÿQEba`HPaQÿ fceqqfdÿehdpÿqRP`PÿrHQHP`ÿgddÿheqÿY`PÿQRPÿ q2Be(1ÿHaIHrbQPÿQRPÿvFaQR`ÿHaÿRHrRÿFYÿHaQPaIÿQFÿIFÿ bE PEÿWPPÿrRbEQpÿqFÿrbrYbQPÿuP`HIPaQHbÿuPaQbÿHrPa`Pÿ XY`HaP``ÿHaÿEHFabpÿrfPPrQÿaFÿvFEPÿQRbaÿnÿvFaQR`ÿ WPPÿvYQHPÿQRPÿhFpÿFWÿYaHQ`ÿXÿQRPÿhFpÿFWÿFrbQHFa`ÿXÿ XPFsp klpmmÿrkmpmmÿaaYbÿcbÿPEÿHrPa`PspÿÿqRPÿbvFYaQÿWFEÿ tudÿv0wÿx29(1eUÿST'UA90Vÿ4(90@A(BÿHaIHrbQPÿQRPÿR`Hrbÿ PbrRÿrHQÿchheqÿcÿkmpmmpÿ bIIEP``ÿRPEPÿFYEÿQbtÿEPrFEI`ÿbEPÿFrbQPIpÿgarYIPÿQRPÿ rFaQbrQÿPE`Fay`ÿabvPÿbaIÿRFaPÿaYvXPEpÿ xÿwÿÿqeqdÿÿÿIIÿHaP`ÿÿÿssÿÿccpÿ

DPb`Pÿ`PaIÿFYEÿbvPaQÿWFEÿQRH`ÿbvFYaQpÿÿbHYEPÿQFÿ 629@A(Bÿz{ÿÿ%|}7v%~%3gv%57ÿ5~ÿ5 7}x6ÿ HarYIPÿFYEÿbvPaQÿHQRÿQRH`ÿbHrbQHFaÿHÿEP`YQÿHaÿbÿ ÿSgxv7}x6ÿ35xS5xgv}ÿ5~~%3}x6ÿ IPbÿHaÿEFrP``Ha ÿFYEÿHrPa`PpÿÿdHrPa`P`ÿbEPÿaFQÿH``YPIÿ ÿ}z}x6ÿg7g8%78ÿ}z}x6ÿ5xÿ YaQHÿbÿWPP`ÿRbGPÿXPPaÿbHIpÿ ÿ5~~%3%g46ÿ5~ÿv%6ÿ}S45%78ÿ 7%v ÿDEFGHIPÿQRPÿWYÿabvPÿ`FrHbÿ`PrYEHQÿaYvXPEÿbaIÿQHQPÿ 02ÿ9T29Uÿ0'0V2ÿ@(ÿ@T2ÿg1A(B0ÿ|201@p2B@ÿ(&ÿ FWÿbÿeaPE`ÿDbEQaPE`ÿcFEFEbQPÿeWWHrPE`ÿPvXPE` x2q2B)2dÿÿsPÿ`YEPÿQFÿEPQYEaÿbÿb P`ÿFWÿQRPÿbHrbQHFaÿ bab Ha ÿPvXPE`ÿFEÿeWWHrHb`ÿFWÿQRPÿvFHa ÿaHQpÿ HQRÿFYEÿbvPaQpÿÿuPQbHaÿbÿrFÿFWÿQRPÿbHrbQHFaÿWFEÿ gWÿFYÿaPPIÿbIIHQHFabÿ`brPÿbQQbrRÿIIHQHFabÿeaPE`ÿ FYEÿEPrFEI`pÿ DbEQaPE`ÿcFEFEbQPÿeWWHrPEr`sÿIIPaIYvÿbGbHbXPÿbQÿ xÿeÿheqÿfhÿcf pbIFEp FGpÿÿgWÿQRPÿFaPEÿbEQaPE`ÿrFEFEbQPÿ FWWHrPE`ÿFEÿrFvXHabQHFaÿFWÿbEQaPE`ÿFEÿrFEFEbQPÿFWWHrPE`ÿ xÿgarYIPÿFYEÿghÿFEÿffhÿFaÿbvPaQÿ vPvXPE`ÿbaIFEÿvbab Ha ÿvPvXPE`ÿFaÿvFEPÿQRbaÿ mÿFWÿFEÿrFaQEFÿbaFQRPEÿXY`HaP``ÿHaÿEHFabÿbQQbrRÿ bÿH`QÿFWÿQRPÿXY`HaP``P`ÿPErPaQb P`ÿFaPIÿbaIÿ YaPvFvPaQÿHa`YEbarPÿbrrFYaQÿaYvXPE`ÿFEÿEFGHIPÿ bÿiPaPEbÿH`rF`YEPÿDFPEÿFWÿQQFEaPÿrFEvÿlnsÿ RHrRÿvY`QÿXPÿWHPIÿFYQÿbaIÿ`H aPIÿXÿbaÿbYQRFEHPIÿ rFEFEbQPÿFWWHrPEp

ÿ ÿ ga`QEYrQHFa`ÿDb Pÿ

Office of the CORPORATION COMMISSION

CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING

To all to whom these presents shall come, greeting:

I, Ted Vogt, Executive Director of the Arizona Corporation Commission, do hereby certify that

***WILSON & COMPANY, INC., ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS*** a foreign corporation organized under the laws of Kansas did obtain authority to transact business in the State of Arizona on the 3rd day of January 2003.

I further certify that according to the records of the Arizona Corporation Commission, as of the date set forth hereunder, the said corporation has not had its authority revoked for failure to comply with the provisions of the Arizona Business Corporation Act; and that its most recent Annual Report, subject to the provisions of A.R.S. sections 10-122, 10-123, 10- 125 & 10-1622, has been delivered to the Arizona Corporation Commission for filing; and that the said corporation has not filed an Application for Withdrawal as of the date of this certificate.

This certificate relates only to the legal authority of the above named entity as of the date issued. This certificate is not to be construed as an endorsement, recommendation, or notice of approval of the entity's condition or business activities and practices.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the Arizona Corporation Commission. Done at Phoenix, the Capital, this 11th day of January, 2018, A. D.

______Ted Vogt, Executive Director

1806178 By: ______