2011 Approved Capital Budget

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2011 Approved Capital Budget 2011 Approved Capital Budget City of Windsor Table of Contents Section Page A Summary of 5-Year Capital Budget .............................…………………………………………... 1 B 5-Year Capital Project Listing by Major Category……………………………………………… 5 C 5-Year Summary of Capital Budget by Funding Source………………………………………… 13 D Summary of Growth vs. Maintenance Related Projects (Gross Expenditure Level)………….. 29 E Summary of Growth vs. Maintenance Related Projects (Net Expenditure Level)…………….. 38 F Capital Project Summaries Agencies and Boards ……………………………………………………………………… 47 Office of Community Development and Health ………………………………………… 70 Office of the Chief Administrative Officer ……………………………………………… 91 Office of the Chief Financial Officer …………………………………………………….. 96 Office of the City Clerk ………………………………………………………………….... 121 Office of the City Engineer ……………………………………………………………….. 138 Office of the City Solicitor ………………………………………………………………... 297 2011 Approved Capital Budget Section A: Summary of 5 -Year Capital Budget 1 of 321 Summary of Capital Budget Expenditures and Funding Sources ($ 000's) for Budget Year 2011 (5-Year Capital Plan)*** Internal Pay As You Go Corporate Reserves External Sources Pay As You Go Pay As You Go Capital Development Infrastructure Recreation Pay As You Go Other Provincial Federal Fuel Tax ** Other Third-Party Year Operating Sewer Expenditure Charges Stimulus Funding Infrastructure Total Debt Reduction Reserves Transit Funding Funding One-time Recoveries Budget Surcharge Reserve Reserves (ISF) Funding (RInC) APPROVED 446 31,841 52,000 3,784 1,877 7,422 1,720 20,790 36,036 3,009 35,994 6,418 201,337 Expenditures 2009 Available 10,648 21,600 35,100 3,489 1,877 7,422 1,720 13,537 36,036 3,009 35,994 6,418 176,850 Funding Surplus/(Deficit) 10,202 (10,241) (16,900) (295) - - - (7,253) - - - - (24,487) Carried Forward APPROVED 23,800 38,007 43,100 3,310 4,193 9,638 2,364 21,701 52,917 - 4,000 6,132 209,160 Expenditures 2010 Available 11,823 21,600 32,100 3,250 4,193 9,638 2,364 13,317 52,917 - 4,000 6,132 161,332 Funding Surplus/(Deficit) (11,977) (16,407) (11,000) (60) - - - (8,384) - - - - (47,828) Carried Forward Cumulative total (1,775) (26,648) (27,900) (355) - - - (15,637) - - - - (72,315) APPROVED 29,787 14,600 25,345 3,858 789 7,203 349 11,700 - - 20,367 2,194 116,192 Expenditures 2011 Available 10,721 21,600 32,100 3,000 789 7,203 349 13,317 - - 20,367 2,194 111,641 Funding Surplus/(Deficit) (19,066) 7,000 6, 755 (858) - - - 1,617 - - - - (4,551) Cumulative total (20,841) (19,648) ( 21,145) ( 1,213) - - - ( 14,020) - - - - ( 76,866) APPROVED in 3,392 11,568 33,420 2,184 71 6,842 350 7,915 - - 300 8,985 75,026 Principle Expend. 2012 Available 10,721 21,600 32,100 3,000 71 6,842 350 13,317 - - 300 8,985 97,285 Funding Surplus/(Deficit) 7,329 10,033 ( 1,320) 816 - - - 5,402 - - - - 22,260 Cumulative total (13,512) (9,615) ( 22,465) ( 397) - - - ( 8,617) - - - - ( 54,607) APPROVED in 3,225 10,525 5,400 804 71 7,380 350 4,700 - - 300 6,185 38,939 Principle Expend. 2013 Available 10,721 21,600 32,100 3,000 71 7,380 350 13,317 - - 300 6,185 95,023 Funding Surplus/(Deficit) 7,497 11,075 26, 700 2,196 - - - 8,617 - - - - 56,085 Cumulative total (6,016) 1,460 4, 235 1,799 - - - (0) - - - - 1, 478 APPROVED in 10,719 21,600 32,100 3,000 980 4,194 350 13,317 - - - 210 86,470 Principle Expend. 2014 Available 10,721 21,600 32,100 3,000 980 4,194 350 13,317 - - - 210 86,472 Funding Surplus/(Deficit) 2 - - - - - - - - - - - 2 Cumulative total (6,014) 1,460 4, 235 1,799 - - - (0) - - - - 1, 480 APPROVED in 10,719 21,600 32,100 2,998 280 4,848 350 13,317 - - - 950 87,161 Principle Expend. 2015 Available 10,721 21,600 32,100 3,000 280 4,848 350 13,317 - - - 950 87,166 Funding Surplus/(Deficit) 2 - - 3 - - - - - - - - 5 Cumulative total (6,012) 1,460 4,235 1,802 - - - (0) - - - - 1,484 * * Use dependent upon constraints associated with funding source. ** Other One-time funding in 2009 consists of Investing in Ontario Grant $20.597m, sale of Brighton Beach lands $9.397m and re-payment of Border Legal Fees $6m. In 2010 ($4m) & 2011 ($2m) amounts to be received are as per Brighton Beach sales agreement. In 2011 additional funding is from MRO Grant ($4m), DRIC ($12m) and ISF surplus of $2.367m. In 2012 and 2013, ISF surplus of $300 respectively. *** 2009 & 2010 are included due to the ISF and acceleration of capital projects. Those years have a cumulative funding shortfall which needs to be funded by 2013 as per the original business case. 2 of 321 Summary and Comparison of Capital Budget Expenditures by Major Categories for Budget Year 2011 (5-Year Capital Plan) 5-Year Capital Plan TOTAL 2011 - 2015 Major Category 2009 % of 2010 % of 2011 % of 2012 % of 2013 % of 2014 % of 2015 % of % of Traditional Capital Budget ($ 000's) Budget ($ 000's) Budget ($ 000's) Budget ($ 000's) Budget ($ 000's) Budget ($ 000's) Budget ($ 000's) Budget ($ 000's) Budget Community & Economic Development 4,980 4% 7,808 5% 3,004 6% 535 2% 1,620 6% 1,775 3% 300 1% 7,234 3% Corporate Technology 2,674 2% 2,565 2% 1,407 3% 915 3% 575 2% 1,240 2% 1,240 2% 5,377 2% Other 12,167 9% 10,183 6% 5,869 11% 5,883 18% 4,040 15% 4,776 9% 4,084 8% 24,652 11% Parks & Recreation 7,879 6% 5,175 3% 3,016 6% 1,540 5% 1,385 5% 2,862 5% 2,355 4% 11,158 5% Roads 42,691 31% 52,429 33% 14,205 28% 5,715 18% 4,629 17% 15,467 29% 16,932 31% 56,947 26% Sewers 58,833 43% 75,608 47% 16,270 32% 12,668 39% 12,925 48% 22,775 42% 22,350 41% 86,988 40% Transportation Infrastructure 7,695 6% 6,161 4% 7,515 15% 5,066 16% 1,880 7% 5,266 10% 6,851 13% 26,576 12% Allocated Traditional Capital Budget Funding 136,918 100% 159,928 100% 51,286 100% 32,321 100% 27,054 100% 54,160 100% 54,111 100% 218,932 100% Third-Party Recoveries 6,418 6,132 2,194 8,985 6,185 210 950 18,524 Traditional Capital Budget Funding 143,336 166,060 53,480 41,306 33,239 54,370 55,061 237,456 Debt Reduction Plan Revenue Allocations: Huron Lodge - 8,900 3,100 - - - - 3,100 WFCU Center 31,600 18,300 - - - - - - Radios Infrastructure - - 2,765 4,500 - - - 7,265 Repayment to 400 CHS Reserve - 700 - - - - - - 400 CHS Post Construction Financing - 600 - - - - - - Repayment to PYG Leasing Reserve for Fire Station #7 - - - 1,920 - - - 1,920 Early Repayment of Richmond Landing Debt - - - 20,600 - - - 20,600 Capital Reserve Enhancements 3,500 3,600 14,480 3,600 3,600 - - 21,680 Unallocated Funds - - - - - 32,100 32,100 64,200 Committed Debt Reduction Levy 35,100 32,100 20,345 30,620 3,600 32,100 32,100 118,765 Other (Accelerated Capital) Expenditures: Brighton Beach Land Sale Repayment of Border Legal Fees 6,000 - - - - - - - Interest Charges (3% Annual Rate) 600 2,600 1,900 1,100 - - - 3,000 Contingency (5% of Gross Capital for inflation, staffing, etc.) 7,200 8,400 3,100 1,700 1,800 - - 6,600 Placeholder for Council Priorities 9,100 - - - - - - - Total Other Expenditures 22,900 11,000 5,000 2,800 1,800 - - 9,600 Projects Already Approved by Council MRO Facility (includes $4m Federal Development Grant) - - 22,042 - - - - 22,042 Watermain on County Road #42 4,225 - - - - 4,225 Economic Development / Land Assembly - - 10,800 - - - - 10,800 Children's Games - - 300 300 300 - - 900 Total Projects Already Approved - - 37,367 300 300 - - 37,967 Total Capital Budget Before Placeholders 201,336 209,160 116,192 75,026 38,939 86,470 87,161 403,788 Placeholders Approved in 2011 by Council Roseland Golf Course - Bunker Renovation 1,000 1,000 Wyandotte St. W. - Campbell Ave./Sunset Ave. - Streetscape 1,760 1,760 Wyandotte St. E. - Walker Rd./Lauzon Rd. - Streetscape 2,000 2,000 Ottawa St. BIA - Windermere St./Pierre St. - Streetscape 500 500 6th Concession - Environmental Assessment 200 200 Dominion Blvd. - Sidewalks 275 275 Farmer's Market Improvements 150 150 Children's Safety Village - Support for Crime Prevention 100 100 Sandwich Towne BIA - Initiatives and Furnishings 70 70 Sidewalk Cafes - Fee Reduction 100 100 In Camera - Property Matter 85 85 Minor Alley Maintenance/Rehabilitation 100 100 Ducharme Rd. - Roadwork Extension 250 250 6,590 6,590 Total Capital Budget Funding 201,336 209,160 122,782 75,026 38,939 86,470 87,161 410,378 Note: Expenditure in years 2012 and 2013 are lower than normal due to the acceleration of projects as reflected in 2009 and 2010 totals. 5-Year Plans Comparisons ($ 000's) Total 5-Year Capital Plan (Years 2004 to 2008): $ 397,839 Total 5-Year Capital Plan (Years 2009 to 2013): $ 647,242 Total 5-Year Capital Plan (Years 2011-2015): $ 410,378 3 of 321 City of Windsor Year Over Year Analysis of Traditional Capital Projects Excluding Debt Reduction Plan & Other (Accelerated Capital & Pre-Approved) Expenditures (Net City Cost) 80,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 2009 40,000 2010 2011 000's 2012 2013 30,000 2014 2015 20,000 10,000 - Community & Corporate Other Parks & Roads Sewers Transportation Economic Technology Recreation Infrastructure Development Major Category 4 of 321 2011 Approved Capital Budget Section B: 5 – Year Capital Project Listing by Major Category 5 of 321 City of Windsor Capital Project Listing by Major Category (Net City Cost) for Budget Year 2011 ( 5-Year Capital Plan) Project # Project Name Major Category 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total CAO-002-07 Richmond Landing Community & Economic Development 0 0 0 1,450,000 0 1,450,000 CAO-001-11 Physician Recruitment Office Community & Economic Development 142,000 0 0 0 0 142,000 ECP-009-08 Site Environment Assessment - Various Properties Community & Economic Development 427,337 0 0 0 0 427,337 FIN-002-07 Boundary Adjustment Community & Economic Development 1,500,000 0 1,500,000
Recommended publications
  • Download EAGLE Data Sheet
    600 Full Frames Per Second Motion Analysis System The Eagle is a Complete600 Motion Full FramesAnalysis System Per Secondthat can help Motion solve your Analysis mechanical System issues that happen too fast for the eye to see and be analyzed. Everything is in one precise package in a Storage / Shipping / Carrying Case. Included in this package are the USB 3.0 Camera, Lens, USB 3.0 Cable, Box Computer, Remote Control Tablet, EAGLE Camera Interface USB Software, plus additional Cameras if needed. A separate Accessory Package includes a choice of Box Computer Battery, Battery Powered Lights, Lenses, ImageWarp Motion Analysis Software, Floor Tripods, Bench Tripods and a Handheld Tripod also in a Pelican Storage/Carrying Case. Features – IMI USB 3.0 Camera IMB-3213UP Mono; IMC-3213UP Color • VGA 640 x 480 • Max. 600 fps • CMOS Global/Rolling Shutter • High Bandwidth and Low CPU usage • Power Supply Management Support • Plug and Play Interface • 44(W) x 44 (H) x 22.4 (D) mm. 55g Features – Camera Interface Software Development Kit • Provides easy integration into multiple programming environments (C++, C#, VB, NET, VB6, Delphi, PowerBuilder, Java, Python, QT, and more) • Includes drivers for DirectShow, TWAIN, MATLAB, LabVIEW, InduSoft Studio, WinCC Flexible, GE Fanuc Features – Cable and Lenses • PCIe 2-meter cable DIN to DIN CSP-6 Quad • Ships with three lenses • Ships with Pelican Case Applications • FPD and PCB Inspection • Semiconductor Inspection • Digitizing and Scanning • Research and Scientific Imaging • Bottling, Labeling, and Packaging • Mechanical Product Design • Mechanical Engineering Lab Tool Overview The ImageOps Division of Computer Modules has found that the market needs a Complete Motion Analysis System that can solve mechanical issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Developers Choice
    IDE Scorecard Developers’ Choice IDE Scorecard Definitive Rankings of the Top 11 IDEs by Over 1,200 Developers June 2006 Evans Data Corp, 740 Front St, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 www.evansdata.com (800) 831 3080 IDE Scorecard I NSIDE T HIS R EPORT Overview 1 Overview Abstract and Methodology 3 Overall Usage In Spring 2006, Evans Data Corp conducted primary market research on IDEs, interviewing over 1200 developers worldwide and asking them to rate 4 Feature Rankings the top IDEs. Developers only rated the features of those IDEs that they had 5 Further Information used. They were asked to rank sixteen different features commonly found in IDEs. Each feature could be ranked as “excellent, “very good” “adequate”, “needs improvement” or “NA”. During processing, the first four rankings were assigned a numerical value according to their relative significance. The last value (“N/A”) was discarded. Values were then combined to produce a score for each element for every IDE and also for an overall total score. The top 11 IDEs ranked were: “Eclipse is well on its Adobe/Macromedia Studio 8 way to becoming one Borland Delphi of the most popular Borland JBuilder IDEs for any Eclipse language..” IBM Rational Application Developer IBM WebSphere Studio Microsoft Visual Studio .NET NetBeans Oracle JDeveloper Sun Java Studio Sybase PowerBuilder Features and capabilities rated were: Compiler/Interpreter Debugger Editor Make/Build Functions Documentation Application Modeling Tools Web Design Tools Sample Applications Profiler 1 IDE Scorecard IDE Scorecard Overview Cont’ Compiler Performance Performance of Resulting Applications Ease of Use Ability to Integrate 3rd Party Tools Availability of 3rd Party Tools Quality of Technical Support Options Size and Quality of Developer Community In addition, developers were asked to rate the IDEs based on how well suited they are for creating a particular type of application (server-centric, desktop, thin-client, rich-client, and embedded systems).
    [Show full text]
  • The Progress Datadirect for ODBC for SQL Server Wire Protocol User's Guide and Reference
    The Progress DataDirect® for ODBC for SQL Server™ Wire Protocol User©s Guide and Reference Release 8.0.2 Copyright © 2020 Progress Software Corporation and/or one of its subsidiaries or affiliates. All rights reserved. These materials and all Progress® software products are copyrighted and all rights are reserved by Progress Software Corporation. The information in these materials is subject to change without notice, and Progress Software Corporation assumes no responsibility for any errors that may appear therein. The references in these materials to specific platforms supported are subject to change. Corticon, DataDirect (and design), DataDirect Cloud, DataDirect Connect, DataDirect Connect64, DataDirect XML Converters, DataDirect XQuery, DataRPM, Defrag This, Deliver More Than Expected, Icenium, Ipswitch, iMacros, Kendo UI, Kinvey, MessageWay, MOVEit, NativeChat, NativeScript, OpenEdge, Powered by Progress, Progress, Progress Software Developers Network, SequeLink, Sitefinity (and Design), Sitefinity, SpeedScript, Stylus Studio, TeamPulse, Telerik, Telerik (and Design), Test Studio, WebSpeed, WhatsConfigured, WhatsConnected, WhatsUp, and WS_FTP are registered trademarks of Progress Software Corporation or one of its affiliates or subsidiaries in the U.S. and/or other countries. Analytics360, AppServer, BusinessEdge, DataDirect Autonomous REST Connector, DataDirect Spy, SupportLink, DevCraft, Fiddler, iMail, JustAssembly, JustDecompile, JustMock, NativeScript Sidekick, OpenAccess, ProDataSet, Progress Results, Progress Software, ProVision, PSE Pro, SmartBrowser, SmartComponent, SmartDataBrowser, SmartDataObjects, SmartDataView, SmartDialog, SmartFolder, SmartFrame, SmartObjects, SmartPanel, SmartQuery, SmartViewer, SmartWindow, and WebClient are trademarks or service marks of Progress Software Corporation and/or its subsidiaries or affiliates in the U.S. and other countries. Java is a registered trademark of Oracle and/or its affiliates. Any other marks contained herein may be trademarks of their respective owners.
    [Show full text]
  • Kristen Elizabeth Bossio
    Kristen Elizabeth Bossio [email protected] • (413)841-6824 LinkedIn Profile Current Address: Permanent Address: 515 Loudon Road 87 Rockland Drive Loudonville, NY 12211 Pittsfield, MA 01201 Education: Siena College, Loudonville, NY ! Bachelor of Science in Computer Science, Bachelor of Arts in Creative Arts ! Anticipated Graduation: May 2016 ! Current GPA: 3.91 Technical Skills: ! Languages: Java, JavaScript, JQuery, HTML, CSS, SQL ! Tools & Databases: NetBeans, BlueJ, PowerBuilder, Synergy, Oracle, Sybase ! Web application development using a Struts framework, Ajax, Servlets, Java Beans, and Java Factories Work Experience: Software Engineering Intern (May 2015-August 2015) General Dynamics Mission Systems, Pittsfield, MA ! Developed and tested web applications in support of Repair Operations Management System (ROMS) and Engineering Parts List (EPL) ! Worked directly with end users and application experts to define software capabilities and interface design ! Documented software requirements Video Production Intern (January 2015-May 2015) Office of Marketing and Communications, Siena College, Loudonville, NY ! Produced video content for the Siena College website and YouTube channel ! Directed, shot, and edited a promotional video for a fellow student’s Kickstarter page Waitress/Hostess (June 2012-August 2014) Applebee’s, Pittsfield, MA Extracurricular and Leadership Experience: Stage 3 Theatre Club (September 2012 – present) Siena College, Loudonville, NY ! Served on the Executive Board as Vice President (2015-2016), Secretary (2014-2015),
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Left Duff S Mdbg Holt Winters Gai Incl Tax Drupal Fapi Icici
    jimportneoneo_clienterrorentitynotfoundrelatedtonoeneo_j_sdn neo_j_traversalcyperneo_jclientpy_neo_neo_jneo_jphpgraphesrelsjshelltraverserwritebatchtransactioneventhandlerbatchinsertereverymangraphenedbgraphdatabaseserviceneo_j_communityjconfigurationjserverstartnodenotintransactionexceptionrest_graphdbneographytransactionfailureexceptionrelationshipentityneo_j_ogmsdnwrappingneoserverbootstrappergraphrepositoryneo_j_graphdbnodeentityembeddedgraphdatabaseneo_jtemplate neo_j_spatialcypher_neo_jneo_j_cyphercypher_querynoe_jcypherneo_jrestclientpy_neoallshortestpathscypher_querieslinkuriousneoclipseexecutionresultbatch_importerwebadmingraphdatabasetimetreegraphawarerelatedtoviacypherqueryrecorelationshiptypespringrestgraphdatabaseflockdbneomodelneo_j_rbshortpathpersistable withindistancegraphdbneo_jneo_j_webadminmiddle_ground_betweenanormcypher materialised handaling hinted finds_nothingbulbsbulbflowrexprorexster cayleygremlintitandborient_dbaurelius tinkerpoptitan_cassandratitan_graph_dbtitan_graphorientdbtitan rexter enough_ram arangotinkerpop_gremlinpyorientlinkset arangodb_graphfoxxodocumentarangodborientjssails_orientdborientgraphexectedbaasbox spark_javarddrddsunpersist asigned aql fetchplanoriento bsonobjectpyspark_rddrddmatrixfactorizationmodelresultiterablemlibpushdownlineage transforamtionspark_rddpairrddreducebykeymappartitionstakeorderedrowmatrixpair_rddblockmanagerlinearregressionwithsgddstreamsencouter fieldtypes spark_dataframejavarddgroupbykeyorg_apache_spark_rddlabeledpointdatabricksaggregatebykeyjavasparkcontextsaveastextfilejavapairdstreamcombinebykeysparkcontext_textfilejavadstreammappartitionswithindexupdatestatebykeyreducebykeyandwindowrepartitioning
    [Show full text]
  • Installation Guide Table of Contents
    PUBLIC PowerBuilder 12.6 Document Version: 2.0 - 2014-10-27 Installation Guide Table of Contents 1 Installation Guide............................................................3 2 Installation Workflow.........................................................4 3 Planning Your Installation..................................................... 5 3.1 Installation Media Contents......................................................5 3.2 System Requirements......................................................... 5 3.3 Obtaining a License........................................................... 6 3.3.1 SySAM Troubleshooting.................................................7 3.4 Software Requirements........................................................ 9 4 Preinstallation Tasks........................................................ 12 5 Starting the Common Setup Program............................................13 6 Providing Basic Information...................................................15 7 Installing SQL Anywhere......................................................17 7.1 About SQL Anywhere......................................................... 18 8 Installing InfoMaker.........................................................19 8.1 InfoMaker Components....................................................... 20 9 Installing PowerBuilder ......................................................21 9.1 PowerBuilder Components.....................................................22 10 Completing the Setup Program................................................24
    [Show full text]
  • Create Source Object Repository 168
    US 2013 0080995A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/0080995 A1 RAZA (43) Pub. Date: Mar. 28, 2013 (54) METHOD AND AN APPARATUS FOR (52) U.S. Cl. DEVELOPNG SOFTWARE USPC ........................................... 717/107; 717/120 (57) ABSTRACT (76) Inventor: Ahmad RAZA, Lahore (PK) A Software component, is constructed on the basis of a set of predetermined rules, and by utilizing a source object, a token (21) Appl. No.: 13/242.558 value and a parameter, wherein the Source object is stored in a source object repository, and wherein the source object comprises a component value and/or a token value, wherein (22) Filed: Sep. 23, 2011 the component value may be associated with the token value. For constructing the software component, the token value is processed and a token result, obtained by processing the Publication Classification token value, is utilized for constructing the software compo nent, wherein the parameter may also be utilized for the (51) Int. Cl. processing of the token value and/or constructing the Soft G06F 9/44 (2006.01) ware component. 2O Create Source object repository 168 Create Software component constructor 170 Construct software component 142 Patent Application Publication Mar. 28, 2013 Sheet 1 of 96 US 2013/0080995 A1 Create source object repository 168 Create Software component constructor 170 Construct software component 142 FIG. 1A Patent Application Publication Mar. 28, 2013 Sheet 2 of 96 US 2013/0080995 A1 108 110a 11 O Software Component 142 Select set of predetermined
    [Show full text]
  • Project Summary Major Category Transportation Infrastructure Wards City Wide Version Name Main (Active)
    Table of Contents Page Section A Summary of 5 – Year Capital Budget Summary of Capital Budget Expenditures and Funding Sources 1 Summary and Comparison of Capital Budget Expenditures by Major Categories 3 Section B 5-Year Capital Project Listing by Major Category 4 Section C 5-Year Summary of Capital Budget by Funding Source 12 Section D Summary of Growth vs. Maintenance Related Projects (Gross Expenditure Level) 31 Section E Summary of Growth vs. Maintenance Related Projects (Net Expenditure Level) 38 Section F Capital Project Summaries Agencies and Boards ...........……………...………………………………………… 45 Office of Community Development and Health ..............………………………… 66 Office of the Chief Administrative Officer ..............……………………………… 84 Office of the Chief Financial Officer ...........…………………………………….. 87 Office of the City Clerk ...........………………………………………………….... 113 Office of the City Engineer ...........……………………………………………….. 125 Office of the City Solicitor ............……………………………………………….... 328 2010 Recommended Capital Budget for Administrative Review 2012 Approved Capital Budget Section A: Summary of 5 – Year Capital Budget Summary of Capital Budget Expenditures and Funding Sources ($ 000's) for Budget Year 2012 (5-Year Capital Plan)*** Internal Pay As You Go Corporate Reserves External Sources Pay As You Go Pay As You Go Capital Development Infrastructure Recreation Pay As You Go Other Provincial Federal Fuel Tax ** Other Third-Party Year Operating Sewer Expenditure Charges Stimulus Funding Infrastructure Total Debt Reduction Reserves
    [Show full text]
  • 9397 Microway Update #24 Aprmay08.Indd
    UPDATE April / May 2008 NEW! CONTENTS Functional Index page 22 DEVELOPER 3rdRail . 17 C++Builder 2007 . 16 Visual Studio 2008 Officially Launched! new technology for developing rich interactive Chart FX . 3 As most would already know by now, Microsoft applications for the Web). Take a look at CodeCharge Studio 4.0 . 9 the products under the Developer category CodeGear RAD Studio 2007. 16 “officially” launched Visual Studio 2008 in February. ComponentOne Studio Enterprise 2008 . 4 in this edition. DataWindow. NET 2.5 . 20 What is not so well known is that our MSDN Delphi/400 & Delphi/400 for PHP . 16 InstallShield 2008 Express . 14 customers have enjoyed access to the final release DB2, AS400 and Series-i products InstallShield 2008 . 11 of Visual Studio 2008 since November 2007, and MicroWay has products to assist with data JBuilder 2008. 17 JGear LiveSource. 17 have saved $000’s by ordering under a licensing replication, real-time XML translation and to make Keystone Training - .NET Complete . 2 scheme known as the “Open Business License”. integration and development faster for Windows LEADTOOLS Document Imaging Suite . 3 Nalpeiron Licensing Service . 24 If you don’t have an MSDN subscription, or are based developers & administrators working with NetAdvantage for .NET + WPF . 6 getting close to renewal time, you should check AS400/Series-i based data. See the Hit Ritmo and PrimalScript 2007 . 8 RadControls for ASP.NET . 8 out the benefits and huge savings on VS2008 and DBmoto products, as well as CodeGear’s new Ritmo/DB2 . 24 MSDN presented on page 7. MicroWay is the Delphi 400 in this edition.
    [Show full text]
  • Delphi Is the Enterprise Solution for Euclid Technology
    Success Story Delphi “Delphi helps Euclid Technology be first to market with Enterprise Solution on Windows Vista. ORGANIZATION ” – Charles Vinal, President and CEO, Euclid Technology Euclid Technology INTRodUCTION such as cross tabs and charting. ClearVantage uses the SQL Server 2005 database, and also ClearVantage from Euclid Technology is runs on SQL Server 2000 and Embarcadero’s an integrated CRM (customer relationship InterBase®. management), ERP (enterprise resource planning), eCommerce and Web Content Euclid has ported the ClearVantage enterprise Management solution built with Delphi. application (more than 480,000 lines of code, AppLICATION ClearVantage is designed for use by trade plus multiple 3rd party components) from Delphi • ClearVantage from Euclid associations and non-profits, and is currently 5 to Delphi 2007. The SOA and web architecture Technology – Integrated used by over 100 organizations ranging in size were ported from Delphi 7 as well, requiring no CRM, ERP, eCommerce and from 15 to 1000 employees. more than a recompile. The application now runs Web Content Management on Vista, has all of the glass features and dialogs, WHAT EUCLID BUILT WITH DELPHI an optional Office 2007 ribbon interface and also runs as it always has on XP. IDE OF CHOIce Features of the ClearVantage solution are • Delphi used by everyone in the organization – from Web Services are primarily wrapped in ISAPI the receptionist to membership management DLLs for ease of integration with other web CHALLENGes to the executive director. What’s more, the development applications. The ISAPI DLLs association or non-profit’s constituents use the connect to the program’s web services to get • Windows Vista enabling of websites that are powered by ClearVantage to data, and then return the data in the selected existing product purchase products, track orders, pay bills and format to the calling application – such as a • Competing against interact with organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Ultimate++ Forum Something with U++
    Subject: Which is the biggest drawback of U++ "unpopuliarity"? Posted by fudadmin on Wed, 07 Dec 2005 20:02:13 GMT View Forum Message <> Reply to Message It would be good to have this poll in "%" but I don't know howto... so, please write your "%"... Are there any other reasons? biggest drawback of U++(total votes: 38) Articles & Reviews3/(8%) Features2/(5%) Lack of documentation33/(87%) Subject: Re: Which is the biggest drawback of U++ "unpopuliarity"? Posted by Garry on Sun, 08 Jan 2006 15:29:55 GMT View Forum Message <> Reply to Message Personally I think the best way to improve "popularity" is what's happening now - this forum. Even without reams of documentation, a good forum is what's needed to help out newbies, like myself. I've followed the progress of UPP for quite some time, but it's only now since the forum got up and running, that I've gotten a bit more confidence in sticking more time and effort into doing something with U++. The original mailing list was far too daunting to try and look for information. Keep up the good work here. Magazine articles would certainly also raise the profile of the project too. It's unusual to see such a powerful and well developed tool have such a low media impact. It's nearly impossible to find any information out there on the web except for download sites which always feature the same description of the project. Anyway, hopefully the download figures are indicating a trend in the right direction.
    [Show full text]
  • Session List Charlotte Powerbuilder Conference 2015
    Session List Charlotte PowerBuilder Conference 2015 Bruce Armstrong New Features in PowerBuilder 12.6 Using PowerBuilder.Net Visual Controls in Visual Studio.Net Using VS.Net Visual Control in PowerBuilder Classic Using .Net Non-Visual Assemblies in PowerBuilder Classic Using PowerBuilder Non-Visual Assemblies in Visual Studio.Net Chris Pollach Getting started with the “Web Service” STD Foundation Classes Workshop Getting started with the “Integrated” STD Foundation Classes Workshop Building Multi-Threaded Windows Service Applications Developing a Modern Web UI that includes Image Management How to implement SSL into your Appeon Mobile/Web applications Cloudifying your Web/Mobile applications Extending your PB/Web/Mobile applications via Web Services How to Webify your existing PB applications (real-world example from Government of Canada) Fully integrating Active Directory into your PB/Web/Mobile applications Webifying and Mobilizing AIRMAN Brian Le Suer The ‘M’ Word in Test Automation Applying Design Patterns to Automated Testing Zeenyx AscentialTest Demonstration Matt Balent Utilizing external technology to extend your PowerBuilder Applications Roll Your Own JSON Parser Datawindow Functionality Enhancement Toolkit Christophe Dufourmantelle Introducing a new BI Query Accelerator Visual Expert 2015 for Oracle and PowerBuilder Visual Expert 2015 Workshop Reporting Studio 2015 Reporting Studio Workshop John Strano HANA and PowerBuilder 12.6-The Solution Mix Heino Hellmers Reporting by using Report Definition Language (RDL) from Microsoft
    [Show full text]