The Birth of Computer Music 1954-70'S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Birth of Computer Music 1954-70'S The Birth of Computer Music 1954-70’s Early Experiments in “Computer-Assisted Composition” 1954 - Yannis Xenakis uses a computer to help compose Metastasis – Work for string orchestra with 61 solo parts – Computer used to calculate intervals and durations of string glissandi – Structure was based on the Fibonnaci series (0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, etc.) "The work introduces a new concept of the melodic line. This line can be explained as the surrounding of tangential glissandi. By fanning the glissandi in a body of strings completely divided into solo parts, the piece exploits the continuity of the sound spectrum and creates areas and fields of sound of varying density. “ -Xenakis Graph of Metastasis m.309-314 1957 - Lejaren Hiller and Leonard Isaacson at the University of Illinois use the Illiac computer to compose The Illiac Suite for string quartet (Hiller was a professor of chemistry and an amateur composer. Isaacson was a graduate student in the Chemistry department.) • Computer was used to generate long strings of random numbers which were used to determine notes in the melody • Some numbers were used and some were skipped, based on certain rules such as: – Melody must begin and end on middle C – Certain leaps were forbidden Early Experiments in Computer- Generated Sound Bell Labs 1957- Max Mathews, scientist at Bell Labs (Murray Hill, NJ) • creates the first converter to put sound into a computer and another converter to get it back out “It was immediately apparent that once we could get sound out of a computer, we could write programs to play music on the computer.” -Mathews • creates Music I, the first sound-generating computer program, written in assembly code for an IBM 704 • one voice (monophonic), one waveform (triangle wave), no envelope controls • pitch, loudness, and duration could be controlled 1958- Mathews creates Music II, an improvement on Music I with four triangle- wave functions 1960 - Mathews creates Music III for an IBM 7094 (one of the computers to use the new transistor technology) – introduced unit generators, which could be used to build modular instruments – Introduced the concept of a “score” - notes could be specified in the order of their starting times and each note was associated with a timbre, loudness, pitch, and duration Musicians join the cause… 1961 - John Pierce (director of the communication sciences at Bell Labs) goes to the University of Illinois to learn more about their experiments – meets Hiller, Isaacson, and James Tenney, a graduate student composer – Hires Tenney allegedly to do psychoacoustics, but really to do computer music 1961 - Tenney composes “Noise Study” 1962 - Mathews and Joan Miller create Music IV for the IBM 7094 • Hubert Howe, Godfrey Winham, and Jim Randall at Princeton University run Music IV on the university’s IBM 7094 • Princeton improves Music IV, creating a more user-friendly version, Music IV-B 1963 - Mathews publishes “The Digital Computer as a Musical Instrument” in Science “At present, the range of computer music is limited principally by cost and by our knowledge of psychoacoustics… the method will become significant only if it is used by serious composers. At present, our goal is to interest and educate such musicians in its use…” Europeans join the cause 1964 - Jean-Claude Risset, a graduate student in Physics studying in Paris inspired by Mathews article aquires a grant to base his thesis on research at Bell Labs • Focuses his research on timbre • Begins by studying trumpet samples, analyzed with sound spectrograph and with the computer “I found that the most salient characteristic of brass tones was the fact that the spectrum varied with loudness, so as to increase the proportion of high-energy when the loudness increases … 1967 - Howe and Winham at Princeton finish a FORTRAN version of Music IV-B called Music IV-BF (1st version written in high-level, non-machine- specific language) 1967 - Richard Moore and Vladimir Ussachevsky join the team at Bell Labs, (Ussachevsky as “visiting composer”) • Moore converted samples into sound using a converter running on an IBM 1620. Composers from Princeton would drop off computer tapes to be converted. 1968 - Mathews, Miller, Moore, and Risset complete Music V, a major improvement to the Music-N series written in Fortran - improved modularity with linkable unit generators - improved score functions - was disseminated to studios for installation by punch cards (2 boxes full!) 1969 - Jean-Claude Risset’s Mutations composed at Bell Labs • Sculpts timbre development over time • Not note-oriented 1970 - Charles Dodge, a composer teaching at Princeton composed Earth’s Magnetic Field • Note-oriented composition • Uses graph of average magnetic activity recorded in 1961 to correspond to pitches The cause extends to other institutions… Stanford University • Following a visit to Bell Labs in 1964, John Chowning brings Music IV back to Stanford and installs it with David Poole on the department’s IBM 7094 • Converted samples using a PDP-1 computer in the Artificial Intelligence Lab • In 1966 Chowning and Poole write Music 10, a version of Music IV compatible with the new PDP-10 computer Stanford con’t. • In1966, John Chowning finishes a program which could calculate energy distributions between four loudspeakers (spatialization) • 1967-1971, Chowning experiments with vibrato and discovers the richs of frequency modulation. Among other timbres, he creates very rich brass- like tones and bell-like tones using only two oscillators • 1974 Yamaha licensed Chowning’s FM synthesis technique, patent issued in 1977 “Chowning explains the importance of the technique: “…you can get control over a very large timbral space with a very few knobs.” Stanford con’t. • 1975 - Stanford founds CCRMA (Center for Computer Research in Music and Acoustics) co- directed by Chowning and Leland Smith • 1977 - Stanford acquires grant money to commission The Samson Box, a digital synthesizer utilizing the patented technique of frequency modulation • 1983 John Pierce from Bell Labs joins CCRMA • 1987 Max Mathews from Bell Labs joins CCRMA IRCAM (Institute of Research and Coordination of Acoustics and Music) - Paris • In 1969, Jean-Claude Risset installs Music V on a Hewlett-Packard Computer (1st installation in Europe) at the Institut d’Electronique Fondamental • In 1970, President of France (Georges Pompidou) invites Pierre Boulez to create and direct a music research institute • In 1973 IRCAM was founded with Boulez as artistic director and Risset directing the computer department • Five departments Computer, Instrumental Performance, Electronic Music, Department of Pedagogy, Department of the Diagonal • In 1974 Max Mathews was appointed scientific advisor (spending 3 to 4 months a year in Paris) IRCAM con’t • IRCAM ran Music V, Music 10, and other software developed at Stanford on a PDP-10 and PDP-11 computer • By 1978, the large building for IRCAM was complete, with offices, lab space, recording studios, an anechoic chamber and the Espace de Projection, a black-box concert hall with adjustable acousti • In 1978 Risset left IRCAM because he was dissatisfied with the subordinate role of research (energies were devoted to the creation of music for public concerts).
Recommended publications
  • Weeel for the IBM 704 Data Processing System Reference Manual
    aC sicru titi Wane: T| weeel for the IBM 704 Data Processing System Reference Manual FORTRAN II for the IBM 704 Data Processing System © 1958 by International Business Machines Corporation MINOR REVISION This edition, C28-6000-2, is a minor revision of the previous edition, C28-6000-1, but does not obsolete it or C28-6000. The principal change is the substitution of a new discussion of the COMMONstatement. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page General Introduction... ee 1 Note on Associated Publications Le 6 PART |. THE FORTRAN If LANGUAGE , 7 Chapter 1. General Properties of a FORTRAN II Source Program . 9 Types of Statements. 1... 1. ee ee ee we 9 Types of Source Programs. .......... ~ ee 9 Preparation of Input to FORTRAN I Translatorcee es 9 Classification of the New FORTRAN II Statements. 9 Chapter 2. Arithmetic Statements Involving Functions. ....... 10 Arithmetic Statements. .. 1... 2... ew eee . 10 Types of Functions . il Function Names. ..... 12 Additional Examples . 13 Chapter 3. The New FORTRAN II Statements ......... 2 16 CALL .. 16 SUBROUTINE. 2... 6 ee ee te ew eh ee es 17 FUNCTION. 2... 1 ee ee ww ew ew ww ew ew ee 18 COMMON ...... 2. ee se ee eee wee . 20 RETURN. 2... 1 1 ew ee te ee we wt wt wh wt 22 END... «4... ee we ee ce ew oe te tw . 22 PART Il, PRIMER ON THE NEW FORTRAN II FACILITIES . .....0+2«~W~ 25 Chapter 1. FORTRAN II Function Subprograms. 0... eee 27 Purpose of Function Subprograms. .....445... 27 Example 1: Function of an Array. ....... 2 + 6 27 Dummy Variables.
    [Show full text]
  • Leland Smith (1925–2013) of Chicago, Where He Taught from Leland Learned How to Use Music 1952 Until, in 1958, He Was Hired 10 Within a Few Days
    News Leland Smith (1925–2013) of Chicago, where he taught from Leland learned how to use Music 1952 until, in 1958, he was hired 10 within a few days. Chowning Leland Clayton Smith, a pioneer by Stanford University. During his showed him the program and gave of music notation software, died Chicago years, Leland worked with him a FORTRAN manual so that on 17 December 2013 at the age the Chicago Lyric Opera and the he could work on it. Leland mas- of 88. As a child, from the age of Chicago Symphony. tered the principles of programming eleven, he took a serious interest Throughout his tenure at Stanford quickly but found typing lists of data in music. After four years of piano (which continued officially until his cumbersome. In 1966 he devised a and wind lessons, he benefited from retirement in 1992) Smith taught har- music-input language, SCORE, to the proximity of Darius Milhaud, a monic analysis and composition. In take the drudgery out of the process. recent (1940) emigr´ e´ who joined the 1963, he developed his own textbook, It represented “a great advance in music faculty at Mills College (at which was not initially published. ‘computer music,’ which is what we that time an all-female institution) Countless Smith pupils (41 of whom called our medium,” says Chowning. near the Smith family home in received advanced degrees from At that time SCORE ran only on the Oakland, California. Leland studied Stanford) recall their teacher in DEC PDP-10s, but the availability counterpoint, orchestration, and superlatives. In 1979 the printed of an input system attracted both composition privately with Milhaud Handbook of Harmonic Analysis be- composers and students.
    [Show full text]
  • Wendy Reid Composer
    WENDY REID COMPOSER 1326 Shattuck Avenue #2 Berkeley, California 94709 [email protected] treepieces.net EDUCATION 1982 Stanford University, CCRMA, Post-graduate study Workshop in computer-generated music with lectures by John Chowning, Max Mathews, John Pierce and Jean-Claude Risset 1978-80 Mills College, M.A. in Music Composition Composition with Terry Riley, Robert Ashley and Charles Shere Violin and chamber music with the Kronos Quartet 1975-77 Ecoles D’Art Americaines, Palais de Fontainbleau and Paris, France: Composition with Nadia Boulanger; Classes in analysis, harmony, counterpoint, composition; Solfege with assistant Annette Dieudonne 1970-75 University of Southern California, School of Performing Arts, B.M. in Music Composition, minor in Violin Performance Composition with James Hopkins, Halsey Stevens and film composer David Raksin 1 AWARDS, GRANTS, and COMMISSIONS Meet The Composer/California Meet The Composer/New York Subito Composer Grant ASMC Grant Paul Merritt Henry Award Hellman Award The Oakland Museum The Nature Company Sound/Image Unlimited Graduate Assistantship California State Scholarship Honors at Entrance USC National Merit Award Finalist National Educational Development Award Finalist Commission, Brassiosaurus (Tomita/Djil/ Heglin):Tree Piece #52 Commission, Joyce Umamoto: Tree Piece #42 Commission, Abel-Steinberg-Winant Trio: Tree Piece #41 Commission, Tom Dambly: Tree Piece #31 Commission, Mary Oliver: Tree Piece #21 Commission, Don Buchla: Tree Piece #17 Commission, William Winant: Tree Piece #10 DISCOGRAPHY LP/Cassette: TREE PIECES (FROG RECORDS,1988/ FROG PEAK) CD: TREEPIECES(FROG RECORDS, 2002/ FROGPEAK) TREE PIECES volume 2 (NIENTE, 2004 / FROGPEAK) TREE PIECE SINGLE #1: LULU VARIATIONS (NIENTE, 2009) TREE PIECE SINGLE #2: LU-SHOO FRAGMENTS (NIENTE, 2010) 2 PUBLICATIONS Scores: Tree Pieces/Frog On Rock/Game of Tree/Klee Pieces/Glass Walls/Early Works (Frogpeak Music/Sound-Image/W.
    [Show full text]
  • CCRMA Fall Concert 2013
    Romain Michon is a PhD candidate at CCRMA. After graduating from two bachelors in Musicology and Computer Science in Ireland and in France, he completed a Department of Music Stanford University Masters degree in computer music at the university of Lyon (France). He worked as an engineer in several research center in computer music such as the Institut de Recherche et Coordination Acoustique/Musique (IRCAM), the Groupe de Recherche en Acoustique et en Musique Electronique (GRAME) and the Centre Interdisciplinaire d'Etudes et de Recherches sur l'Expression Contemporaine (CIEREC). Romain’s research interest mainly focuses on digital signal processing, mobile platform and web-technology for music. CCRMA Tim O'Brien is a second year Masters student at CCRMA. His interests include signal processing, progressive rock, and interesting noises. Prior to Stanford, Tim composed and preformed with various bands in New York. He holds a B.S. in physics from the University of Virginia. Fall Concert Rufus Olivier Jr.: a student of David Briedenthal of the Los Angeles Philharmonic. Member, Stanford Woodwind Quintet. Principal bassoonist of the San Francisco Opera Orchestra and S.F. Ballet Orchestra formerly with Los Angeles Philharmonic and San Francisco Symphony. International soloist and recording artist. Teaches at Mills College and Stanford University. Leland C. Smith was born in Oakland, California in 1925. He began composing in 1938 and first studied with Darius Milhaud at age 15. He did some dance band work and then served in a Navy band (and combo) for two and a half years. He studied with Roger Sessions in Berkeley, where he served as his assistant, and received his B.A.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERZITET UMETNOSTI U BEOGRADU FAKULTET MUZIČKE UMETNOSTI Katedra Za Muzikologiju
    UNIVERZITET UMETNOSTI U BEOGRADU FAKULTET MUZIČKE UMETNOSTI Katedra za muzikologiju Milan Milojković DIGITALNA TEHNOLOGIJA U SRPSKOJ UMETNIČKOJ MUZICI Doktorska disertacija Beograd, 2017. Mentor: dr Vesna Mikić, redovni profesor, Univerzitet umetnosti u Beogradu, Fakultet muzičke umetnosti, Katedra za muzikologiju Članovi komisije: 2 Digitalna tehnologija u srpskoj umetničkoj muzici Rezime Od prepravke vojnog digitalnog hardvera entuzijasta i amatera nakon Drugog svetskog rata, preko institucionalnog razvoja šezdesetih i sedamdesetih i globalne ekspanzije osamdesetih i devedesetih godina prošlog veka, računari su prešli dug put od eksperimenta do podrazumevanog sredstva za rad u gotovo svakoj ljudskoj delatnosti. Paralelno sa ovim razvojem, praćena je i nit njegovog „preseka“ sa umetničkim muzičkim poljem, koja se manifestovala formiranjem interdisciplinarne umetničke prakse računarske muzike koju stvaraju muzički inženjeri – kompozitori koji vladaju i veštinama programiranja i digitalne sinteze zvuka. Kako bi se muzički sistemi i teorije preveli u računarske programe, bilo je neophodno sakupiti i obraditi veliku količinu podataka, te je uspostavljena i zajednička humanistička disciplina – computational musicology. Tokom osamdesetih godina na umetničku scenu stupa nova generacija autora koji na računaru postepeno počinju da obavljaju sve više poslova, te se pojava „kućnih“ računara poklapa sa „prelaskom“ iz modernizma u postmodernizam, pa i ideja muzičkog inženjeringa takođe proživljava transformaciju iz objektivističke, sistematske autonomne
    [Show full text]
  • The SCORE Music Publishing System
    The SCORE Music Publishing System The SCORE music printing system is intended to facilitate the creation of virtually any page of standard music notation with a final quality equal to that of true engraving. Most of the shapes used in music printing are found in the SCORE drawing library. Any unusual musical symbols may be added to the library. "SCORE has gained wide acceptance in the commercial printing of both classical and popular music on account of four features: Its comprehensive approach to both conventional and unconventional notation. Its extensibility Its precise control of symbol placement on the page The professional appearance of its output" From Beyond MIDI, The Handbook of Musical Codes Eleanor Selfridge-Field et al., MIT Press Distinguished publishers issuing editions created by the SCORE program include: Theodore Presser - Barenreiter - Guitar World Magazine - E.C. Schirmer - Universal Edition (Vienna) - Indiana University Press - Willis Music -Community of Jesus - Hal Leonard - Halstan (London) - Alfred Music - L'Oiseaux Lyre (Monaco) - Schott (Germany) - Harris Music (Toronto) - United Methodist Music - Broude Bros. - Edition Orphee - C.F. Peters - Guitar School Magazine - Breitkopf & Hartel (Germany) - Warner Bros. - Kurt Weil Foundation - C.P.P./Belwin - Durand (Paris) - G. Schirmer - Fujita Music (Japan) - Country Guitar Magazine - Vision One (Australia) - Boosey & Hawkes (London & New York) - Editions du Visage (Paris) - Vivace Press - California Music Teachers Association - Ricordi (Milan) - Peer Music - Chester (London) - Oregon Catholic Press - Cherry Lane - (and more) The SCORE program had its origins in research done by Leland C. Smith, Professor of Music, at the Stanford University Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, starting in 1967. Over about a six year period, most of work was done at the off-campus lab site which was located very near to the famous San Andreas earthquake fault line.
    [Show full text]
  • Editorial: Alternative Histories of Electroacoustic Music
    This is a repository copy of Editorial: Alternative histories of electroacoustic music. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/119074/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Mooney, J orcid.org/0000-0002-7925-9634, Schampaert, D and Boon, T (2017) Editorial: Alternative histories of electroacoustic music. Organised Sound, 22 (02). pp. 143-149. ISSN 1355-7718 https://doi.org/10.1017/S135577181700005X This article has been published in a revised form in Organised Sound http://doi.org/10.1017/S135577181700005X. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution, re-sale or use in derivative works. © Cambridge University Press Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ EDITORIAL: Alternative Histories of Electroacoustic Music In the more than twenty years of its existence, Organised Sound has rarely focussed on issues of history and historiography in electroacoustic music research.
    [Show full text]
  • 62 Years and Counting: MUSIC N and the Modular Revolution
    62 Years and Counting: MUSIC N and the Modular Revolution By Brian Lindgren MUSC 7660X - History of Electronic and Computer Music Fall 2019 24 December 2019 © Copyright 2020 Brian Lindgren Abstract. MUSIC N by Max Mathews had two profound impacts in the world of music ​ synthesis. The first was the implementation of modularity to ensure a flexibility as a tool for the user; with the introduction of the unit generator, the instrument and the compiler, composers had the building blocks to create an unlimited range of sounds. The second was the impact of this implementation in the modular analog synthesizers developed a few years later. While Jean-Claude Risset, a well known Mathews associate, asserts this, Mathews actually denies it. They both are correct in their perspectives. Introduction Over 76 years have passed since the invention of the first electronic general purpose computer,1 the ENIAC. Today, we carry computers in our pockets that can perform millions of times more calculations per second.2 With the amazing rate of change in computer technology, it's hard to imagine that any development of yesteryear could maintain a semblance of relevance today. However, in the world of music synthesis, the foundations that were laid six decades ago not only spawned a breadth of multifaceted innovation but continue to function as the bedrock of important digital applications used around the world today. Not only did a new modular approach implemented by its creator, Max Mathews, ensure that the MUSIC N lineage would continue to be useful in today’s world (in one of its descendents, Csound) but this approach also likely inspired the analog synthesizer engineers of the day, impacting their designs.
    [Show full text]
  • Scholarly Program Notes on the Graduate Vocal Recital of Madalyn Mentor Madalyn W
    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC Research Papers Graduate School Spring 4-12-2013 Scholarly Program Notes on the Graduate Vocal Recital of Madalyn Mentor Madalyn W. Mentor Southern Illinois University Carbondale, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/gs_rp Recommended Citation Mentor, Madalyn W., "Scholarly Program Notes on the Graduate Vocal Recital of Madalyn Mentor" (2013). Research Papers. Paper 393. http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/gs_rp/393 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Research Papers by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SCHOLARLY PROGRAM NOTES ON THE GRADUATE VOCAL RECITAL OF MADALYN MENTOR by Madalyn Mentor B.A., Berea College, 2011 A Research Paper Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master of Music School of Music Southern Illinois University Carbondale May 2013 RESEARCH PAPER APPROVAL SCHOLARLY PROGRAM NOTES ON THE GRADUATE VOCAL RECITAL OF MADALYN MENTOR By Madalyn Mentor A Research Paper Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Music in the field of Vocal Performance Approved by: Dr. Jeanine Wagner, Chair Dr. Susan Davenport Dr. Paul Transue Graduate School Southern Illinois University Carbondale April 12, 2013 AN ABSTRACT OF THE RESEARCH PAPER OF MADALYN MENTOR, for the Master of Music degree in VOCAL PERFORMANCE, presented on April 12, 2013, at Southern Illinois University Carbondale. TITLE: SCHOLARLY PROGRAM NOTES FOR THE GRADUATE VOCAL RECITAL OF MADALYN MENTOR MAJOR PROFESSOR: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • DSP Class III: Digital Electronic Music Concepts Overview (Part III) ADC and DAC Analog-To-Digital Conversion
    TECH 350: DSP Class III: Digital Electronic Music Concepts Overview (Part III) ADC and DAC Analog-to-Digital Conversion Parameters of ADC: • Sampling Rate (fs) = rate at which analog signal is ^ captured (sampling) (in Hertz) Intensity v • Bit Depth = number of values for each digital sample (quantization) (in bits) Time -> Limitations/Issues with Sampling Distortion caused by sampling, AKA ALIASING (or foldover) How can we rectify (or at least describe) this phenomenon? Sampling (Nyquist) Theorem •Can describe the resultant frequency of aliasing via the following (rough) formula, iff input freq. > half the sampling rate && < sampling rate: resultant frequency = sampling frequency (fs) - input frequency For example, if fs = 1000Hz and the frequency of our input is at 800Hz: 1000 - 800 = 200, so resultant frequency is 200Hz (!) •Nyquist theorem = In order to be able to reconstruct a signal, the sampling frequency must be at least twice the frequency of the signal being sampled •If you want to represent frequencies up to X Hz, you need fs = 2X Hz Ideal Sampling Frequency (for audio) •What sampling rate should we use for musical applications? •This is an on-going debate. Benefits of a higher sampling rate? Drawbacks? •AES Standards: •Why 44.1kHz? Why 48kHz? Why higher (we can’t hear up there, can we?) •For 44.1kHz and 48kHz answer lies primarily within video standard considerations, actually… •44.1kHz = 22 · 32 · 52 · 72, meaning it has a ton of integer factors •>2 * 20kHz is great, as it allows us to have frequency headroom to work with, and subharmonics (and interactions of phase, etc.) up in that range are within our audible range Anti-Aliasing Filters + Phase Correction •How to fix aliasing? Add a low-pass filter set at a special cutoff frequency before we digitize the signal.
    [Show full text]
  • Computing Science Technical Report No. 99 a History of Computing Research* at Bell Laboratories (1937-1975)
    Computing Science Technical Report No. 99 A History of Computing Research* at Bell Laboratories (1937-1975) Bernard D. Holbrook W. Stanley Brown 1. INTRODUCTION Basically there are two varieties of modern electrical computers, analog and digital, corresponding respectively to the much older slide rule and abacus. Analog computers deal with continuous information, such as real numbers and waveforms, while digital computers handle discrete information, such as letters and digits. An analog computer is limited to the approximate solution of mathematical problems for which a physical analog can be found, while a digital computer can carry out any precisely specified logical proce- dure on any symbolic information, and can, in principle, obtain numerical results to any desired accuracy. For these reasons, digital computers have become the focal point of modern computer science, although analog computing facilities remain of great importance, particularly for specialized applications. It is no accident that Bell Labs was deeply involved with the origins of both analog and digital com- puters, since it was fundamentally concerned with the principles and processes of electrical communication. Electrical analog computation is based on the classic technology of telephone transmission, and digital computation on that of telephone switching. Moreover, Bell Labs found itself, by the early 1930s, with a rapidly growing load of design calculations. These calculations were performed in part with slide rules and, mainly, with desk calculators. The magnitude of this load of very tedious routine computation and the necessity of carefully checking it indicated a need for new methods. The result of this need was a request in 1928 from a design department, heavily burdened with calculations on complex numbers, to the Mathe- matical Research Department for suggestions as to possible improvements in computational methods.
    [Show full text]
  • MTS on Wikipedia Snapshot Taken 9 January 2011
    MTS on Wikipedia Snapshot taken 9 January 2011 PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Sun, 09 Jan 2011 13:08:01 UTC Contents Articles Michigan Terminal System 1 MTS system architecture 17 IBM System/360 Model 67 40 MAD programming language 46 UBC PLUS 55 Micro DBMS 57 Bruce Arden 58 Bernard Galler 59 TSS/360 60 References Article Sources and Contributors 64 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 65 Article Licenses License 66 Michigan Terminal System 1 Michigan Terminal System The MTS welcome screen as seen through a 3270 terminal emulator. Company / developer University of Michigan and 7 other universities in the U.S., Canada, and the UK Programmed in various languages, mostly 360/370 Assembler Working state Historic Initial release 1967 Latest stable release 6.0 / 1988 (final) Available language(s) English Available programming Assembler, FORTRAN, PL/I, PLUS, ALGOL W, Pascal, C, LISP, SNOBOL4, COBOL, PL360, languages(s) MAD/I, GOM (Good Old Mad), APL, and many more Supported platforms IBM S/360-67, IBM S/370 and successors History of IBM mainframe operating systems On early mainframe computers: • GM OS & GM-NAA I/O 1955 • BESYS 1957 • UMES 1958 • SOS 1959 • IBSYS 1960 • CTSS 1961 On S/360 and successors: • BOS/360 1965 • TOS/360 1965 • TSS/360 1967 • MTS 1967 • ORVYL 1967 • MUSIC 1972 • MUSIC/SP 1985 • DOS/360 and successors 1966 • DOS/VS 1972 • DOS/VSE 1980s • VSE/SP late 1980s • VSE/ESA 1991 • z/VSE 2005 Michigan Terminal System 2 • OS/360 and successors
    [Show full text]