Analysis of the Upper Peninsula of Michigan Housing Market (1966)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Analysis of the Upper Peninsula of Michigan Housing Market (1966) 728.r. :308 I"22 Upper Penlnsula, m;"1 ,t966 ' I jI Wtltfrp UPPER PENINSUTA OF MICHIGAN HOUSING MARKET as of Decembcr 1, 1966 A Report by the DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVETOPMENT FEDERAT HOUSING ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D. C. 204t I Scptcmbcr 1967 a ANALYSIS OF TI{E UPPER PENINST]LA OF MICHIGAN HOUSING I',IARKET AS OF DECE},IBER 1. 1966 Field Market Analysis Service Federal Housing Administration Department of Housing and Urban Development a Foresord Ae a publ.lc eervlce to a6si6t local houslng rctivities through clearer understanding of local housing market condlEions, FHA lniEiat.ed publtcatton of tt.s comprehenslve housing markeE analyses early ln 1965. Whlle each reporE 1s deslgned specifically for FtlA use 1n admlnlBterlng itB mortgage lnsurance operations, 1t ls expected that the factual lnformatlon and the flndings and concluslons of t,hese reports wlll be generally useful also Eo bullders, mort,gagees, and othere concerned with Iocal housing probleme and Eo oEhers having an lnterest ln local economic con- dttlonc and trends. Stnce aerket enalysls is not an exacE sclence, the judgmental factor ls lmportant ln the developnenE of flndlngs and conclusions There wtll be dlfferences of opinton, of course, in Ehe lnter- preEetlon of avatlable factuaI lnformation in deEermining the absorptlve capaclEy of Ehe market and Ehe requiremenEs for main- tenance of a reaeonable balence in demand-supply relat.lonships. The factual'framework for each analysis is developed as Ehoroughly as posslble on the basle of lnformaElon avallable from both local and natlonal rources. Unlees apeclflcal[y iCenrifled by source reference, all est.lmateo and judgmenEs ln Ehe analysls are Ehose of the authorlng analyst and the FllA Market Analysls and Research Sec E ton . a Table of Contents Page Summary and Conclusions i a Houstng Market Area 1 Map of Area 2 Economy of the Area Character and History 3 Employnent 4 Unemployment 10 Future EmpLoyment Prospects 11 Income 11 Demographic Factors Population 13 Household s 15 Demographic Trends by Area L6 Housing tlarket Factors Housing Supply 19 Residential Building Activiry 2l Tenure of Occupancy 22 Vacancy 22 Sales Market 24 Rental Market 25 Mortgage Market 25 Urban Renewal 26 Military Housing 26 PubLic Housing 27 Demand for Housing Quantitative Demand 28 Qualltative Demand 30 ANALYSIS OF TTIE UPPER PENINSULA OF MICHIGAN HOUSING MARKET AS OF DECEMBER 1 L966 Summary and Conc Lusions 1 The economy of much of the Upper (U.p. a Peninsula ) of Michigan is based on extractive industries (copper and iron mining) as well as lumbering and wood producE manufacture. Each of these industries has a history of erratic ups and doums, both nationally and in the U.P. Other important sources of employment are government, trade, and services. Ttre latEer two receive support from tourist traffic in the summer months. 2 Employment. in the u.P. dectined for several decades, but the decline appears to have been arrested in recent years. Nonagricultural wage and salary employment has increased each year since 196r, averaging 68,1oo in 1965. During the first nine months of 1966, wage and salary employment averaged 70,7oo, up from 67,8oo during the corresponding perlod in 1955. Based on expansions at copper and iron mining facil- ities, on expected growth in manufacturing employment in the U.p., and on anticipated trends in nonmanufacturing employment, an increment of between 1,2OO and 1,8OO wage and salary jobs appears to be a reasonable expecEation for each of the next thro years. 3. Durlng the first nine monEhs of L966, unemployment averaged 7.3 percent of the civilian work force of the Upper Peninsula. Unemploy- menE has been a long-standing problem in the u.p. The present rate, while hlgh, represents a reduction from the recent peak of 13.g percent in 1961. Because of the effect of seasonal factors on much of the U.P. employment, presenE over-all average annual unemployment may be near Ehe structural minimum. 4 The Upper Peninsula is a low-income area. Ihe current median income of all families in the u.P. is about $5,625, after the deducEion of federal lncome tax, and the median after-tax income of two-or-more Person renter households is $4,775. within Ewo years, median annual after-tax income of all families is expected to be $5,925, and renter households of Ewo or more persons will have a median after-tax income of $5,O25 annually. 5 The population of the U.p. was 31g,500 persons in Decemb reflecting er !966, an increase of about L2,550 April Lg6o, or an ,r..rg" of 1,875 annua1Ly. The military population"in"" (rrniforrned personnel military and their farnilies) of the U.p. was about 17,500 persons, up about 81950 since April 1960. During the next population tvro years, the total of the U.P. is expected to increase by about 2,g5c annuarly. 1I 6 Households (occupied housing units) in the U.P. number about 91,550, up around 2,675 (4OO annually) since April 1960. AbouE 3,925 of the househoLds are headed by uniformed military personnel, reflecting an increase of 2,525 since April 1960. During the next two years, Ehe total number of households is expected to increase by about 750 t annua 1 ly . 7 There were L22r100 housing units in the U.P. in December l966,reflect- ing a net gain of about 7rlOO since the 196O Census, an average of almost 1,075 a year. Much of Ehe housing built since April 1960 has been under military eontrol (a total of almosL 2,325 units) or is public or student-family housing. Many of the units built were for seasonal use onIy. PrivaEely-financed nonseasonal housing consErucEion has averaged about 42O yearly since April 1960. Judging from the number of building permits issued, the pace of private housing construcEion appears to be accelerating. The number of housing units authorized has increased each year since 1964. Ihe number of units auEhorized during the first eleven months of L966 (38O) is greater than the total for any previous year during the 196O's. Building permits reflect about 8O percent of the total private nonseasonal housing buiLt in the U.p. 8 As of December 1, L966, there were about 2,9OO available vacant nondilapidated nonseasonal housing units in the U.P. About 1r1OO of the available vacancies were for sale only, a homeowner vacancy rate of 1.6 percent, and 1,8OO were available for rent, a renter vacancy rate of 7.1 percent. Both the sales and rental vacancy rates were up somewhat from the 1.4 percent and 6.9 percent, respec- tively, reported in the 1950 Census. The incidence of vacancy varies somewhat in different geographic regions of the U.P., however, and houslng shortages exist in some areas. 9 A total of abouE 78O uniEs of new privately-financed nonseasonal housing units might be absorbed annuatty in certain areas of the U.p. during the next two years. I'tre toEal annual demand includes 630 slngle-family units and 15O units of multifamily housing, exiluding public low-rent housing and rent-supplement accommodations. An additlonal 40 units of housing at Ehe Lower rents achievable with below-market-rate lnterest financing or asslstance in land acquisi- tlon or cost mlght be marketed in Marquette annually. It is unlikely that the building industry of the area can supply this quantity of new housing, however, and part of the demand may be satisfted by the rehabllitation of exlstlng units. Demand for slng[e-family and multifamlLy housing ts distributed by geographic area in the table on page 29. The forecast demand for single-family housing is expected to approximate the price range distribution shown on page 30. ANALYSIS OF TI{E UPPER PE NINSTJLA OF MICHIGAN HOU SING MARIGT AS OF DECEMBER 1. 1966 Hous ins rket Area I The upper Peninsula (u.P.) of llichigan is a projection of land which extends northeastward from northern Wisconsin and is bounded by Wisconsin on the west and Lakes Superior, Huron, and Michigan (see map cn following page). The area of the peninsula is 16,500 square miles, about one-third of all of Michigan; it is divided into fifteen counties. For the purposes of this report, the u.P. is divided into four geographic areas, each consisting of two to six counties. These areas are: The Copper Country area of the western peninsula, defined as Houghton, Keweena\,u, and Ontonogon Counties; the Southr^restern area, defined as Iron and Gogebic counties; the central area, consisting of A1ger, Baraga, De1ta, Dickinson, Marquette, and Menominee counties; and the Eastern area, defined as Chippewa, Luce, Mackinac, and Schoolcraft Counties. rhe u.P. is sparseLy populated; acgording to the census, the total popula- tion of the peninsula was 306,000J/persons in April !960, equal to juit four percenE of the Michigan toEal. The largesE incorporated area is Marquette, in the central area, which had a 1960 population of 19,goo persons. This report will include population estimates for the 13 communities whose current population is 5,ooo persons or more. Ihe topography of the Upper Peninsula is quite fIaE and heavily-forested, for Ehe most part. Much of the interior consists of marshland. Ihere are several areas, however, in which the terrain is hilly enough to make skiing an important winter sport. The most imporEant tourist season is the summerr_when many Persons take advantage of the recreational oppor- tunities of the U.P., including 17 state parks. Ttre primary access route to the U.P.
Recommended publications
  • Defense - Military Base Realignments and Closures (1)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 11, folder “Defense - Military Base Realignments and Closures (1)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 11 of The John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON October 31, 197 5 MEMORANDUM TO: JACK MARSH FROM: RUSS ROURKE I discussed the Ft. Dix situation with Rep. Ed Forsythe again. As you may know, I reviewed the matter with Marty Hoffman at noon yesterday, and with Col. Kenneth Bailey several days ago. Actually, I exchanged intelligence information with him. Hoffman and Bailey advised me that no firm decision has as yet been made with regard to the retention of the training function at Dix. On Novem­ ber 5, Marty Hotfman will receive a briefing by Army staff on pos­ sible "back fill'' organizations that may be available to go to Dix in the event the training function moves out.
    [Show full text]
  • Win Awenen Nisitotung Sault Midjim Construction During December During the Month of December, the Midjim in Sault Ste
    Mshka’odin Giizis Win Awenen Frozen Moon NISITOTUNGThe official newspaper of the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians November 16, 2012 • Vol. 33 No. 11 Sault Tribe, Lansing, announce completed land purchase LANSING, Mich. —The Sault possible. We are grateful to have Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa the city and people of Lansing Indians and the City of Lansing as partners in this important completed a critical step in their endeavor. By exercising our sov- effort to win federal approval of a ereign government’s legal right casino in downtown Lansing. On to develop a casino, we will be Nov. 1, the tribe completed the creating a project that will gener- agreement to purchase city-owned ate significant economic benefits land adjacent to the Lansing for Sault Tribe members in addi- Center where the casino will be tion to creating thousands of good built. jobs.” Sault Tribe Chairperson The tribe will file an applica- Aaron Payment, Lansing Mayor tion with the U.S. Department of Virg Bernero, and Bob Liggett the Interior to take the land into — owner of Big Boy restaurants trust as tribal lands under a spe- across Michigan and former cific provision of the federal Land owner of the very success- Claims Act that gives only the ful Lansing-based radio station Sault Tribe the legal right to the WFMK — signed documents process. The tribe intends to open Nov. 1 completing the transfer of the casino after receiving federal the land to the Tribe’s ownership. approval. Liggett is the main investor in The tribe will use casino rev- the project and owns a majority enues to improve programs and Photo courtesy of City of Lansing of Lansing Future Development, services to members, including Lansing Mayor Virg Bernero, Sault Tribe Chair Aaron Payment and developer Bob Liggett following signing LLC, the Sault Tribe’s partner in health care, education, housing, paperwork to transfer land from the city to the tribe for $280,000 plus closing costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Motzer, Lawrence R., Jr. OH1486
    Wisconsin Veterans Museum Research Center Transcript of an Oral History Interview with LAWRENCE R. MOTZER, JR. Security Forces Officer, U.S. Air Force, Vietnam War 2011 OH 1486 OH 1486 Motzer Jr., Lawrence R., (b.1952). Oral History Interview, 2011. Approximate length: 1 hour 40 minutes Contact WVM Research Center for access to original recording. Abstract: Lawrence R. Motzer, Jr. an Eau Claire, Wisconsin native discusses his service during the Vietnam War as a security forces officer in the Air Force as well as his experience returning home, and his career in the military which took him to Germany, Guam and Korea. Motzer enlisted in the Air Force in his senior year of high school and went to basic training in 1971. He comments on his father’s service in World War II and his patriotism as reasons for joining. Motzer describes his first impressions of Vietnam, the living and working conditions on the base at Cam Ranh Bay, and his assignment as base security guard. He discusses substance abuse, particularly heroin, by other service members and the effects that it had on them. Motzer mentions temporary duty assignments at different bases in Vietnam including Tan Son Nhut Airbase in Saigon (Ho Chi Minh City), experiences of going off-base, and seeing exchanges of North and South Vietnamese prisoners. He talks returning to Wisconsin at the end of his tour and from there being assigned to Whiteman Air Force Base. Motzer describes his various tours of duty in Germany, Guam and Korea before being discharged in 1988. He returned to Eau Claire the same year and briefly talks about his life since leaving the military.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Hard 2 Film Tour
    Die Hard 2 Visit northern Michigan where scenes from this iconic film series were filmed. It’s Christmas Eve. John McClane, played by Bruce Willis, is waiting for his wife to land at Washington Dulles International Airport when terrorists take over the air traffic control system. He must stop the terrorists before his wife’s plane, and several other incoming flights that are circling the airport, run out of fuel and crash. Die Hard 2 (sometimes referred to as Die Hard 2: Die Harder), is a 1990 American action film and the second movie in the Die Hard film series. Die Hard 2 had a budget of $70 million and made $239.5 million worldwide, almost doubling that of the first film. problems and cost overruns. Initially, Tarmac scenes were filmed at the Star and distinguished Flying Cross, as director Renny Harlin planned on using airport and featured many locals as well as an flying ace in the Korean War. the normally snowed-in Stapleton extras in shots inside the plane, during Kincheloe Air Force Base served as a International Airport in Denver as the the evacuation scenes, and on the refueling base for aircraft heading to primary location. But the snow melted tarmac. Alaska during WWII, and as an air base early in the season and the crew was for defense of the Soo Locks. Without forced to move farther north, to Moses Meet Odin, the official wildlife control the use of the Soo Locks, America could Lake, Washington. Unseasonably warm dog for Alpena County Regional not effectively operate its war machine.
    [Show full text]
  • 89 STAT. 546 PUBLIC LAW 94-107—OCT. 7, 1975 Public Law 94-107 94Th Congress an Act Uct
    89 STAT. 546 PUBLIC LAW 94-107—OCT. 7, 1975 Public Law 94-107 94th Congress An Act Uct. /, 1975^ rpQ authorize certain construction at military installations, and for other purposes. [S. 1247] Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the Military United States of America in Congress assenibled^ construction and guard and reserve TITLE I—ARMY forces facilities authorization acts, 1976. SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may establish or develop mili­ Military tary installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, converting, Construction rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public works, Authorization including land acquisition, site preparation, appurtenances, utilities, Act, 1976. and equipment for the following acquisition and construction: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES UNITED STATES ARMY FORCES COMMAND Defense Support Activity (Fargo Building), Boston, Massachu­ setts, $8,000,000. Fort Bragg, North Carolina. $13,214,000. Fort Campbell, Kentucky, $13,680,000. Fort Carson, Colorado, $10,732,000. Fort Hood, Texas, $46,281,000. Fort Sam Houston, Texas, $870,000. Fort Lewis, Washington, $31,861,000. Fort George G. Meade, Maryland, $2,892,000. Fort Ord, California, $32,209,000. Fort Polk, Louisiana, $54,361,000. Fort Richardson, Alaska, $1,685,000. Fort Riley, Kansas, $14,879,000. Fort Stewart/Hunter Army Airfield, Georgia, $39,480,000. UNITED STATES ARMY TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND Fort Benning, Georgia, $44,212,000. Fort Eustis, Virginia, $633,000. Fort Gordon, Georgia, $6,945,000. Fort Jackson, South Carolina, $14,546,000. Fort Knox, Kentucky, $42,898,000. Fort Lee, Virginia, $719,000. Fort McClellan, Alabama, $41,090,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Roster of Federal Libraries. INSTITUTION George Washington Univ., Washington, D.C
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 044 158 LI 002 215 AUTHOR Benton, Mildred, Comp.; Ottersen, Signe, Comp. TITLE Roster of Federal Libraries. INSTITUTION George Washington Univ., Washington, D.C. Biological Sciences Communication Project. SPONS AGENCY ERIC Clearinghouse on Library and Information Sciences, Minnt.auolis, Minn.; Federal Library Committee, Washington, D.C. PUB DATE Oct 70 NOTE 283p. EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF-$1.25 HC-$14.25 DESCRIPTORS *Directories, *Government Libraries, *Libraries, *National Libraries, School Libraries, Special Libraries ABSTRACT This Roster of Federal Libraries represents an attempt by the Federal Library Committee to identify each of the more than 1,900 individual libraries serving the many departments, committees, agencies, courts, and other formal organizational entities in the Federal Government. They include six types: Presidential, national, general, academic, school, and special or technical. Part I of the three part roster is arranged, alphabetically, within the designated Branches of the Government, then by country, state and city. Part II provides a geographic arrangement, first by country alphabetically, then by state, city, department and bureau. Part III is a listing, alphabetically, by general subject category or type of library. Within the subjects the libraries are arranged by country, state, city, department and bureau. A descriptive explanation and index to contents precedes each of the three parts. A National Plan for Federal Library Statistics has been designed by the Federal Library Committee's Subcommittee on Statistical Programs. It is scheduled for testing in fiscal year 1971 and implementation starting in fiscal year 1972. The Plan will permit accurate, annual identification of Federal libraries. Rosters, based upon information received, will be issued on a regular basis.
    [Show full text]
  • HOUSE of REPRESENTATIVES Annette M
    1964 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD -HOUSE 5529 In removing it, he dramatized, to my mind, can. They fought with an unrelenting cour­ it should also end there. They voted in the the coming of age of both this country and age in the economic, political, and mmtary United States with an eye to the effect on the Irish in it. He was the symbol of the battles of the country. They would not give the freedom of Ireland, and in so doing they immigrant--a symbol not exclusively reserved an inch. They were despised and rejected broadened the scope of American polltical for the Irish. and discriminated against, but they did not thinking. I think that Leonard Patrick O'Connor make this an occasion for wa111ng, but only Wibberley in a summation of his book, "The fought the harder. "The slums did not hold them. The mines Coming of the Green," tells us the Irish con­ "They did not desert their faith, once so did not break them. They were not lost tribution not only to America, but to the unpopular, in order to gain acceptance. Nor building roads and canals in the wilderness. world: did they forget their homeland, for though They were not defeated at the foot of Marye's "The Irish immigrants did what every for­ they believed that freedom began with the Heights. eign group must do to win the name Ameri- American coastline, they saw no reason why "It was a grand battle, indeed." H.R. 8280. An act for the relief of Mrs. jected by the House last week twists HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Annette M.
    [Show full text]
  • Office of Archives and History
    NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES OFFICE OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY Military Collection State Archives of North Carolina Wilton W. Strickland Interview Summary MilColl OH 833 Interviewee: Wilton W. Strickland Interviewer: Sion Harrington III Interview Date: February 11, 2003 Interview Location: Tarboro, N.C. Interview Runtime: 1:28:07 Biographical Sketch Wilton Wayne Strickland was born on June 10, 1934, in Nashville, N.C., to William Berry and Tempe Vada Lewis Strickland. He was the youngest of eight siblings, and was raised on a farm in Nash County, N.C. He attended North Carolina State College (present-day North Carolina State University) from 1952 to 1956, where he participated in the Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC). Strickland entered active duty in the U.S. Air Force in February 1957. Initially an Aviation Cadet recruit, Strickland was unable to continue with the program because he had married shortly before he went on active duty, which went against the Aviation Cadet Training program rules. He reverted to enlisted status, and attended basic training at Lackland Air Force Base in San Antonio, Texas. Strickland then attended mechanics training at Sheppard Air Force Base in Wichita County, Texas. He served as an air craft mechanic in the 98th Bombardment Wing at Lincoln Air Force Base, Nebraska. In 1959, Strickland entered Officers Candidate School at Lackland AFB, and would receive his commission on February 15, 1960. He then attended navigator pre-flight training at Harlingen Air Force Base, Texas; bombing navigation training at Mather Air Force Base in Sacramento County, California; and aircrew survival training at Stead Air Force Base in Washoe County, Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • LCD-77-321 Proposed Closure of Kincheloe Air Force Base, Michigan
    DCCIMENT ESUME 02042 - A1252232] ( / Proposed Closure of Kincheloe ir force Base, Michigan. LCD-77-321; B-168700. April 29, 1977. 15 pp. Report to Rep. Philip E. Ruppe; y Robert P. Keller, Deputy Comptroller General. Issue Area: Facilities and Material Management (700). Contact: Logistics ard Communications Div. Budget Function: National Defense: Defense-related Activities (054). Organizaticn Concerned: Department of the Air Force; Department of the Air orce: Kincheloe AFE, I. Congressional Relevance: Pep. Philip E. Ruppe. The proposed closure of Kincheloe Air orce Base is part of a continuing effort by the Air orce to reduce support and overhead costs and to reallocate additional resources for force modernization and increased combat capability. Findings/Conclusions: Numerous errors were found in the Air Force's estimate of costs and savings if Kincheloe were closed. The current proposed cloture could result in aual recurring savings of about $2e millicn; one-time costs of about $27.9 million; and one-time cost avoidances of about $9 million. The closure would further depress the economy in the eastern part of Michigan's Upper Peninsula, and undoubtedly would result in increased Federal expenditures to assist affected communities and individuals. The total estimated one-time costs include estimates for impact aid to school districts and for unemployment compensation and food stamps for affected Kinocheloe employees. Closure of tbe base would also drastically affect the local eccncmy by causing an increased housing vacancy rate, depressing real estate values, and causing a substantial business loss in the area. Federal response to the closing might also include establishing a local development organization, developing a regional plan to attract private investment, training unemployed persons to fill existing or new jobs, converting Department of Defense facilities for civilian use, and providing loans to build and equip plants for nes industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Generations of Chevrons a History of the Enlisted Force
    Generations of Chevrons A History of the Enlisted Force ★ Edited by Janet R. Bednarek Generations of Chevrons A History of the Enlisted Force ★ Edited by Janet R. Bednarek AIR FORCE HISTORY AND MUSEUMS PROGRAM UNITED STATES AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, D.C. 2004 Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the au- thor(s), and do not necessarily represent the views of the Air Force History and Museums Program, the U.S. Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other U.S. Government agency. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Generations of chevrons : a history of the enlisted force / edited by Janet R. Bednarek. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. United States. Air Force—Non-commissioned officers—Biography. 2. United States—Biogra- phy. I. Bednarek, Janet R. Daly (Janet Rose Daly), 1959- 9- UG626.G44 2004 358.4’0092’2—dc222 2004026962 ★ This book is dedicated to the memory of four great chief master sergeants of the Air Force: CMSAF DONALD L. HARLOW 1920–1997 CMSAF RICHARD D. KISLING 1923–1985 CMSAF ARTHUR L. “BUD” ANDREWS 1934–1996 CMSAF THOMAS N. BARNES 1930–2003 CONTENTS Preface . ix Foreword . xi Introduction . 1 CHIEF MASTER SERGEANTS OF THE AIR FORCE Paul W. Airey. 45 Donald L. Harlow . 57 Richard D. Kisling. 69 Thomas N. Barnes. 81 Robert D. Gaylor . 93 James M. McCoy. 105 Arthur L. “Bud” Andrews. 117 Sam E. Parish . 129 James C. Binnicker . 141 Gary R. Pfingston . 153 David J. Campanale. 167 Eric W. Benken . 179 Frederick J. Finch . 191 Gerald R.
    [Show full text]
  • Part I Highlights of This Issue
    MONDAY, JULY 1 WASHINGTON, D.C. Volume 40 ■ Numb Pages 29531-29700 PART I HIGHLIGHTS OF THIS ISSUE This listing does not affect the legal status of any document published in this issue. Detailed table of contents appears inside. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION—ARBA prohibits on basis of religion, sex, age or handicap in federally assisted programs.......................................................... 29536 AMERICAN REVOLUTION BICENTENNIAL—ARBA de­ scribes Bicentennial logo and prescribes regulations July 14, 1975— Pages 29531-29700 for use.............. .................. ...... .............. *...... ......... ..........i 29539 FOOD STAMPS— USDA/FNS requires States to monitor and improve administration of their programs; effec­ tive 7-1-75........................ 29531 INCOME TAX— 1RS proposes regulations to determine qualification of certain retirement plans; comments by 8-14-75...... 29553 1RS temporary regulations to determine qualification of certain retirement plans............................................... 29535 CORRECTED MEETING— DOD/AIR: Scientific Advisory Board, 7-30 and 7-31-75.. 29558 (Continued inside) PART II: r j NURSING STUDENT LOANS— HEW/HRA list of hospitals qualifying for loan cancellation............. 29631 rem inders (The items in this list were editorially compiled as an aid to F ederal R eg ister users. Inclusion or exclusion from this list has no legal significance. Since this list is intended as a reminder, it does not include effective dates that occur within 14 days of publication.) Rules Going Into Effect Today This list includes only rules that were published in the F ederal R e g ister after October 1, 1972. DOT/CG— W. Palm Beach Canal, Fla., drawbridge operations.. 25004; 6—12—75 List of Public Laws This is a listing of public bills enacted by Congress and approved by the President, together with the law number, the date of approval, and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 166 Public Law 86-500-.June 8, 1960 [74 Stat
    166 PUBLIC LAW 86-500-.JUNE 8, 1960 [74 STAT. Public Law 86-500 June 8. 1960 AN ACT [H» R. 10777] To authorize certain construction at military installation!^, and for other pnriwses. He it enacted hy the Hemite and House of Representatives of the 8tfiction^'Acf°^ I'raited States of America in Congress assemoJed, I960. TITLE I ''^^^* SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may establish or develop military installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, con- \'erting, rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public works, including site preparation, appurtenances, utilities, and equip­ ment, for the following projects: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES I'ECHNICAL SERVICES FACILITIES (Ordnance Corps) Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: Training facilities, medical facilities, and utilities, $6,221,000. Benicia Arsenal, California: Utilities, $337,000. Blue Grass Ordnance Depot, Kentucky: Utilities and ground improvements, $353,000. Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey: Research, development, and test facilities, $850,000. Pueblo Ordnance Depot, Colorado: Operational facilities, $369,000. Redstone Arsenal, Alabama: Community facilities and utilities, $1,000,000. Umatilla Ordnance Depot, Oregon: Utilities and ground improve­ ments, $319,000. Watertow^n Arsenal, Massachusetts: Research, development, and test facilities, $1,849,000. White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico: Operational facilities and utilities, $1,2'33,000. (Quartermaster Corps) Fort Lee, Virginia: Administrative facilities and utilities, $577,000. Atlanta General Depot, Georgia: Maintenance facilities, $365,000. New Cumberland General Depot, Pennsylvania: Operational facili­ ties, $89,000. Richmond Quartermaster Depot, Virginia: Administrative facili­ ties, $478,000. Sharpe General Depot, California: Maintenance facilities, $218,000. (Chemical Corps) Army Chemical Center, Maryland: Operational facilities and com­ munity facilities, $843,000.
    [Show full text]